Arxiv:1911.12155V13 [Math.CA] 1 Jul 2020 2.7 Double Integration

On logarithmic integrals, harmonic sums and variations

Ming Hao Zhao

Abstract Based on various non-MZV approaches we evaluate certain logarithmic integrals and harmonic sums. More speciﬁcally, 85 LIs, 89 ESs, 263 PLIs, 28 non-alt QESs, 39 GESs, 26 BESs, 14 IBESs with weight ≤ 5, 193 QLIs, 172 QPLIs, 83 QESs, 7 QBESs, 3 IQBESs with weight ≤ 4. With help of MZV theory we evaluate other 10 QESs with weight ≤ 4. High weight hypergeometric series, nonhomogeneous integrals and other results are also established.

Contents

1 Preliminaries 5 1.1 Special functions ...... 5 1.2 Deﬁnition of subjects ...... 6 1.2.1 LI and PLI ...... 6 1.2.2 QLI and QPLI ...... 7 1.2.3 ES and QES ...... 8 1.2.4 Fibonacci basis ...... 9 1.3 Main results ...... 11

2 LI 11 2.1 Brute force ...... 11 2.2 General formulas ...... 12 2.3 Integration by parts ...... 14 2.4 Fractional transformation ...... 14 2.5 Beta derivatives ...... 15 2.6 Contour integration ...... 16 arXiv:1911.12155v13 [math.CA] 1 Jul 2020 2.7 Double integration ...... 16 2.8 Hypergeometric identities ...... 16 2.9 Solution ...... 17

1 3 ES 17 3.1 General formulas ...... 17 3.2 Symmetric relations ...... 18 3.3 Partial fractions ...... 18 3.4 Contour integration ...... 18 3.5 Solution ...... 18 3.5.1 Preparation ...... 18 3.5.2 Confrontation ...... 24

4 PLI 27 4.1 Brute force ...... 27 4.2 General formulas ...... 27 4.3 Integration by parts ...... 28 4.4 Fractional transformation ...... 28 4.5 Complementary integrals ...... 28 4.6 Polylog identities ...... 28 4.7 Series expansion ...... 30 4.8 Solution ...... 32

5 QLI 33 5.1 Logsine integrals and contour deformation ...... 33 5.1.1 LSI, PLSI, ITF ...... 33 5.1.2 QLSI and QLI ...... 35 5.2 Inverse tangent family ...... 35 5.3 Polylog special values ...... 35 5.4 Brute force ...... 37 5.4.1 Class 1 ...... 37 5.4.2 Class 2 ...... 37 5.5 General formulas ...... 37 5.6 Feynman’s trick on Mellin transform ...... 38 5.7 Integration by parts ...... 39 5.8 Fractional transformation ...... 39 5.9 Power substitution ...... 39 5.10 Weierstrass substitution ...... 39 5.11 Parametric integration ...... 39 5.12 Fourier expansion ...... 40 5.13 Beta derivatives ...... 40 5.13.1 Class 1 ...... 40 5.13.2 Class 2 ...... 40

2 5.14 Contour integration ...... 40 5.14.1 Class 1 ...... 40 5.14.2 Class 2 ...... 41 5.15 Series expansion ...... 41 5.16 Solution ...... 42

6 QPLI 42 6.1 Brute force ...... 42 6.2 General formulas ...... 42 6.3 Integration by parts ...... 43 6.4 Fractional transformation ...... 43 6.5 Polylog identities ...... 43 6.6 Power substitution ...... 43 6.7 Valean’s master formula ...... 43 6.7.1 Class 1 ...... 43 6.7.2 Class 2 ...... 44 6.8 Contour integration ...... 44 6.8.1 Class 1 ...... 44 6.8.2 Class 2 ...... 44 6.9 Series expansion ...... 45 6.9.1 Class 1 ...... 45 6.9.2 Class 2 ...... 46 6.10 Double integration ...... 46 6.10.1 Class 1 ...... 46 6.10.2 Class 2 ...... 47 6.10.3 Class 3 ...... 48 6.10.4 Class 4 ...... 48 6.10.5 Class 5 ...... 49 6.11 Solution ...... 50

7 QES 52 7.1 Non-alternating case ...... 52 7.2 Generating functions ...... 52 7.3 QLI/QPLI expansion ...... 53 7.4 Integral representation ...... 53 7.5 Contour integration ...... 54 7.6 Partial fractions ...... 54 7.7 Symmetric relations ...... 54 7.8 Solution ...... 54

3 8 Applications 55 8.1 Nonhomogeneous integrals ...... 55 8.1.1 NLI ...... 55 8.1.2 NPLI, NQLI, NQPLI ...... 55 8.2 Nested sums and multiple log integrals ...... 56 8.2.1 NS manipulation ...... 56 8.2.2 MLI representation ...... 57 8.3 Geometric and binomial Euler sums ...... 57 8.3.1 GES ...... 57 8.3.2 BES ...... 58 8.3.3 IBES ...... 61

8.3.4 QBES, IQBES (pFq part 1) ...... 62 8.4 Related problems ...... 68 8.4.1 Symmetric PLI ...... 68 8.4.2 MT of PLI ...... 69 8.4.3 Inverse ES ...... 69 8.4.4 High weight ES ...... 70 8.4.5 High weight PLI ...... 71 8.4.6 Parseval LSI ...... 71 8.4.7 Convolutional LI ...... 72 8.4.8 Valean’s hexagram ...... 73

8.4.9 Hypergeometric rhapsody (pFq part 2) ...... 75

8.4.10 FL fantasia (pFq part 3) ...... 77 8.5 Two conjectures solved ...... 80

8.5.1 Borwein’s conjecture on binomial sum (pFq part 4) ...... 80 8.5.2 Au’s conjecture on general LI ...... 82

9 Table of subjects 84 9.1 LI ...... 84 9.2 ES...... 87 9.3 PLI ...... 90 9.4 QLI ...... 99 9.5 QPLI ...... 106 9.6 QES...... 111 9.7 GES...... 115 9.8 BES ...... 117 9.9 IBES ...... 118 9.10 QBES, IQBES ...... 118

4 10 Miscellaneous 119 10.1 LSI ...... 119 10.2 PLSI ...... 120 10.3 ITF ...... 120 10.4 QLI (W =5) ...... 121 10.5 QLSI ...... 121 10.6 NLI ...... 122 10.7 NPLI ...... 122 10.8 NQLI ...... 123 10.9 NQPLI ...... 124 10.10NS, MLI ...... 124 10.11Miscellaneous ...... 125

11 Comments 126

1 Preliminaries

1.1 Special functions

Below are special functions used. We assume readers are aware of their basic properties [13, 14].

R ∞ s−1 −t Gamma function: The analytic continuation of Γ(s) = 0 t e dt

R 1 a−1 b−1 Γ(a)Γ(b) Euler Beta function: The analytic continuation of B(a, b) = 0 t (1 − t) dt = Γ(a+b)

n+1 (n) ∂ log(Γ(x)) Polygamma function: The analytic continuation of ψ (x) = ∂xn+1

P∞ zk Polylogarithm: The analytic continuation of Lin(z) = k=1 kn

P∞ 1 Riemann Zeta function: The analytic continuation of ζ(s) = k=1 ks

k−1 1−s P∞ (−1) Dirichlet Eta function: The analytic continuation of η(s) = (1 − 2 )ζ(s) = k=1 ks

P∞ (−1)k Dirichlet Beta function: The analytic continuation of β(s) = k=0 (2k+1)s

(3) 1 (3) 3 ψ ( 4 )−ψ ( 4 ) Catalan constant and generalization: C = β(2), 1536 = β(4)

(0) Γ(a+n) Euler-Mascheroni constant: γ = −ψ (1) Pochhammer symbol: (a)n = Γ(a)

5 Generalized hypergeometric function: The analytic continuation of

∞ n X (a1)n ··· (ap)nz F (a , ··· , a ; b , ··· , b ; z) = p q 1 p 1 q (b ) ··· (b ) n! n=0 1 n q n

P∞ sin(nx) P∞ cos(nx) Clausen function: Cl2k(x) = n=1 n2k , Cl2k+1(x) = n=1 n2k+1

R x Tik−1(t) −1 Inverse tangent integral: Tik(x) = 0 t dt, Ti1(x) = tan (x)

π π q Elliptic K/E integral: K(x) = R 2 √ 1 dt, E(x) = R 2 1 − x sin2(t) dt 0 1−x sin2(t) 0

n 2 n 1 ∂ (x −1) Legendre P polynomial: Pn(x) = (2n)!! ∂xn

1.2 Deﬁnition of subjects

Clariﬁcation: Throughout this paper, LI will be the abbreviation of log integral, PLI polylog integral, QLI quadratic log integral, QPLI quadratic polylog integral, ES Euler sum, QES quadratic Euler sum, MZV multiple Zeta value. Minor abbreviations will be mentioned later.

1.2.1 LI and PLI

Notations:

f(0; x) = 1 − x, f(1; x) = x, f(2; x) = 1 + x

l(0; x) = log(1 − x), l(1; x) = log(x), l(2; x) = log(1 + x), l(3; x) = log(1 + x2), l(4; x) = tan−1(x)

1 − x L(n, 1; x) = Li (x),L(n, 2; x) = Li (−x),L(n, 3; x) = Li ( ), n ≥ 2 n n n 2

1 + x 1 − x x − 1 L(n, 4; x) = Li ( ),L(n, 5; x) = Li ( ),L(n, 6; x) = Li ( ), n ≥ 2 n 2 n 1 + x n 1 + x

Deﬁnition:

Z 1 Q2 l(m; x)a(m) LI(a(0), a(1), a(2); p) = m=0 dx 0 f(p; x)

6 P LI(a(0), a(1), a(2); b(2, 1), ··· , b(2, 6); ··· ; b(N, 1), ··· , b(N, 6); p) Z 1 Q2 l(m; x)a(m) Q6 QN L(n, k; x)b(n,k) = m=0 k=1 n=2 dx 0 f(p; x)

Abbreviation: In later discussion of PLIs, N and b(n, k) will be small and many of them equal to 0. In this case, we omit those zero parameters and simply repeat the word ’nk’ b(n, k) times for abbreviation. For instance we have

Z 1 log(1 − x) log2(x) log3(x + 1) LI(1, 2, 3; 0) = dx 0 1 − x 2 Z 1 Li x+1 Li (−x) log(x + 1) P LI(0, 0, 1; 24, 24; 32; 2) = 2 2 3 dx 0 x + 1

Weight: We deﬁne the weight W of LI, PLI as

2 6 N 2 X X X X 1 + a(m), 1 + nb(n, k) + a(m) m=0 k=1 n=2 m=0 respectively, so LI(1, 2, 3; 0) is of weight 7 and P LI(0, 0, 1; 24, 24; 32; 2) weight 9.

For W ≤ 5 there are 85 convergent LIs, since a simple counting shows the total number of 1 2 weight W convergent LIs is 2 3W + W − 2 . For W ≤ 5, after excluding those already contained in LIs, there are 263 convergent PLIs.

1.2.2 QLI and QPLI

Notations: 1 + x2 g(1; x) = 1 − x, g(2; x) = x, g(3; x) = 1 + x, g(4; x) = 1 + x2, g(5; x) = x

k(1; x) = log(1 − x), k(2; x) = log(x), k(3; x) = log(1 + x), k(4; x) = log(1 + x2), k(5; x) = tan−1(x)

2 L(n, 7; x) = Lin(−x ),L(n, 8; x) = Tin(x)

7 Deﬁnition:

Z 1 Q5 k(m; x)A(m) QLI(A(1),A(2),A(3),A(4),A(5); p) = m=1 dx 0 g(p; x)

Z 1 L(2, a; x) Z 1 L(3, a; x) Z 1 L(2, a; x)k(b; x) QP LI3(a; p) = dx, QP LI4(a; p) = dx, QP LI4(a; b; p) = dx 0 g(p; x) 0 g(p; x) 0 g(p; x)

Abbreviation: In later discussion of QLIs, A(m) will be small and many of them equal to 0. In this case, we omit those zero parameters and simply repeat the word ’m’ A(m) times for abbreviation. For instance we have

Z 1 x log(x + 1) tan−1(x)2 Z 1 log(1 − x) log x2 + 1 tan−1(x) QLI(355; 5) = 2 dx, QLI(145; 4) = 2 dx 0 x + 1 0 x + 1

Z 1 Li (−x2) Z 1 Ti (x) log(x) QP LI4(7; 3) = 3 dx, QP LI4(8; 2; 1) = 2 dx 0 x + 1 0 1 − x

P5 Weight: We deﬁne the weight W of QLI as 1 + m=1 A(m). QP LI3(··· ), QP LI4(··· ) are of weight 3, 4 respectively. All 4 examples above are of weight 4.

For W ≤ 4, after excluding those already contained in LIs, there are 193 convergent QLIs. For W ≤ 4, after excluding those already contained in LI/PLI/QLIs, there are 172 convergent QPLIs.

1.2.3 ES and QES

Notations:

n n j−1 (k) X 1 ](k) X (−1) (1) (1) H = , Hn = ,Hn = H , Hfn = Hgn n jk jk n j=1 j=1

(k) ](k) (k) f1k(n) = Hn , f2k(n) = Hn , f3k(n) = H2n

](k) (k) 1 (k) Note that H2n won’t appear since it equals H2n − 2k−1 Hn .

Deﬁnition:

8 ∞ n−1 M N X (±1) Y Y (b(j)) ES(a(1), ··· , a(M), −b(1), ··· , −b(N); ±p) = H(a(k)) H^ np n n n=1 k=1 j=1 ∞ s X (±1)n−1 Y QES1(m k , ··· , m k ; ±p) = f (n) 1 1 s s np mr kr n=1 r=1 ∞ s X (±1)n−1 Y QES2(m k , ··· , m k ; ±p) = f (n) 1 1 s s (2n + 1)p mr kr n=1 r=1 (k) We may assume a(i), b(j), mrkr are non-decreasing. If there exists no Hn (resp. f2kr (n)) and the outer index +p, we call an ES (resp. QES) non-alternating, otherwise alternating.

PM PN Ps Weight: We deﬁne the weight W of ES as k=1 a(k) + j=1 b(j) + p and QES r=1 kr + p. For instance 2 n−1 (2) g(3) (2) (2) ∞ (−1) Hn Hn ∞ H H 2H X X n n 2n ES(2, −3, −3; −4) = , QES(11, 12, 12, 32; 3) = n4 n3 n=1 n=1 are weight 12 alternating ES and weight 10 non-alternating QES, respectively.

For W ≤ 5 there are 89 convergent ESs. For W ≤ 4, after excluding those already contained in ESs, there are 93 convergent QESs. For W = 5, after excluding those already contained in ESs, there are 28 convergent non-alternating QESs.

1.2.4 Fibonacci basis

This part is about the structure of closed-forms.

Weight of constants: We assign weight 0 to rational numbers, 1 to π, log(2), 2 to Catalan C, 4 to (3) 1 (3) 3 1 ψ ( 4 ) − ψ ( 4 ), n to ζ(n), Lin( 2 ),

Linear relations: A linear relation is an equality of form

’rational combination of LI/PLI/QLI/QPLI/ES=certain constants’

If all items in LHS have the same weight, we call it a homogeneous relation; otherwise we call it non-homogeneous.

9 Fibonacci basis: According to [1], all 85 LIs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by certain t(W ) weight W constants over Q, here t(1) = 1, t(2) = 2, t(3) = 3, t(4) = 5, t(5) = 8. We deﬁne the sets of these homogeneous constants generating LIs as Fibonacci bases due to consistency between t(n) and

Fibonacci numbers Fn. This term arises from [6] but diﬀers a little. See also [1] for higher weight LIs.

We denote AW the weight W Fibonacci basis containing t(W ) full-simplified polylog constants. 1 By full-simplified we mean ζ(2n), n > 0 and Lin 2 , n < 4 won’t appear, due to simplification formulas [13, 14] 1 π2 log2(2) 1 7ζ(3) log3(2) 1 22n−1π2n |B | Li = − , Li = + − π2 log(2), ζ(2n) = 2n 2 2 12 2 3 2 8 6 12 (2n)! where Bn are Bernoulli numbers. These simplifications keeps the weight unchanged. We have [1]

2 2 2 3 A1 = {log(2)} ,A2 = π , log (2) ,A3 = π log(2), log (2), ζ(3) 1 A = π4, π2 log2(2), log4(2), ζ(3) log(2), Li 4 4 2 1 1 A = π4 log(2), π2 log3(2), log5(2), π2ζ(3), ζ(3) log2(2), ζ(5), Li log(2), Li 5 4 2 5 2

And that all LIs with W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q. A possible weight 6 representation is:

6 4 2 2 4 6 2 3 A6 = π , π log (2), π log (2), log (2), π ζ(3) log(2), ζ(3) log (2), ζ(5) log(2), 1 1 1 1 ζ(3)2, Li log2(2), π2Li , Li log(2), Li ,S 4 2 4 2 5 2 6 2

P∞ (−1)k−1 Where the constant S = ES(1; −5) = k=1 k5 Hk is very likely to be irreducible. Higher weights’ representations are omitted.

Extended basis: We deﬁne extended Fibonacci bases for W ≤ 4 as

B2 = A2 ∪ {C, π log(2)}

2 3 B3 = A3 ∪ C log(2), πC, π log (2), π , =(Li3(1 + i))

2 2 2 3 3 B4 = A4 ∪ C , πC log(2),C log (2), π C, π log (2), π log(2), log(2)=(Li3(1 + i)), 1 3 πζ(3), π=(Li (1 + i)), =(Li (1 + i)), ψ(3) − ψ(3) 3 4 4 4

W Note that in these 3 cases each BW contains 2 constants.

10 1.3 Main results

In section 3 ∼ 6 the following will be proved:

Theorem 1. All 89 ESs and 263 PLIs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q.

Theorem 2. All 193 QLIs and 172 QPLIs with weight W ≤ 4 are generated by BW over Q.

Theorem 1, a natural consequence of MZV theory (see for instance [18]), will be proved by a systematic non-MZV approach. Theorem 2, intimately connected with level 4 MZVs, will be established by generalizing the approach above.

See tables of section 9 for all their closed-forms and 8, 10 for applications.

2 LI

LIs with weight W ≤ 5 are completely and explicitly solved in [1]. We summarize and add some new results, generating linear relations between LIs.

2.1 Brute force R log(a+x) log(b+x) R log2(a+x) log(b+x) R log(a+x) log2(b+x) R logn(a+x) It is known that c+x dx, a+x dx, a+x dx, b+x have polylog primitives. By Mathematica we have:

Z log3(a + x) a + x a + x F1: dx = 6Li + 3 log2(a + x)Li b + x 4 a − b 2 a − b a + x b + x −6 log(a + x)Li + log3(a + x) log − 3 a − b a − b

Z 3 log2(a + x) log(b + x) a + x a + x F2: dx = −6Li − 3 log2(a + x)Li a + x 4 a − b 2 a − b a + x b + x +6 log(a + x)Li − log3(a + x) log − + log3(a + x) log(b + x) 3 a − b a − b

Z log(a + x) log(b + x) (a − c)(b + x) b + x (a − c)(b + x) (a − c)(b + x) F3: dx = Li3 + Li2 − Li2 log c + x (b − c)(a + x) a + x (b − c)(a + x) (a + x)(b − c)

11 a + x (a − c)(b + x) b + x (a − c)(b + x) +Li2 log(b + x) − log + Li2 log + log(a + x) a − c (a + x)(b − c) b − c (a + x)(b − c) 1 (a − b)(c + x) a − b c + x 2 (a − c)(b + x) b + x + − log + log + log log − Li3 2 (a + x)(c − b) a + x c − a (a + x)(b − c) a + x

a + x b + x b + x c + x c + x (a − c)(b + x) −Li3 − Li3 + log log − − log log a − c b − c b − c b − c c − a (a + x)(b − c) 1 b + x b + x c + x c + x c + x + log log − 2 log(a + x) log − log − + log(a + x) log(b + x) log 2 b − c b − c c − a b − c c − a

2 ! ! !! ! ! Z 12 log (a + x) log(b + x) a + x b + x b + x b + x 2 b + x F4: dx = −24 −Li4 + Li4 − + Li4 − 12Li2 log − b + x a − b a − b a + x a + x a + x

a + x ! b + x ! b + x !!2 a + x ! a + x ! b + x !! +12Li2 log − − log − + 24Li2 log log(b + x) − log − a − b a − b a + x a − b a − b a − b

b + x ! a + x ! b + x !! b + x ! b + x ! b + x !! ! +12Li2 − 2 log log(b + x) − log − + log − log − − 2 log − − 2 log(a + x) log(b + x) a − b a − b a − b a − b a − b a + x

a + x ! b + x ! ! b + x ! b + x ! ! b + x ! b + x ! +24Li3 log − − log(b + x) + 24Li3 − log − + log(a + x) + 24Li3 log − a − b a + x a − b a + x a + x a + x

! ! ! !! ! ! ! 4 b + x 4 b + x b + x a − b 3 b + x 2 b + x 2 b + x + log − + log − − 4 log − + log log − + 6 log − log − a − b a + x a − b a + x a + x a + x a − b

! !! ! ! a + x b + x b + x 2 b + x 2 2 −4 3 log + log − log − log − + 6 log (a + x) log (b + x) a − b a − b a + x a − b

! !! ! ! ! !! 2 a + x b + x b + x a + x 2 3 b + x +6 log log(b + x) − log − 3 log − + log(b + x) − 4 log 3 log(a + x) log (b + x) − 2 log − a − b a − b a − b a − b a − b

Here logs and polylogs are principal, following the convention of Mathematica. Based on this, for each LI we may check by Mathematica whether its primitive is computable. If it is, we get the closed-form directly via Newton-Leibniz formula.

2.2 General formulas

Proposition 1. The following formulas hold:

Z 1 (−1)nn! m n (1) x log (x) dx = n+1 0 (m + 1)

logn+1(2) LI(0, 0, n; 2) = (2) n + 1

LI(0, n, 0; 0) = LI(n, 0, 0; 1) = (−1)nn!ζ(n + 1) (3)

LI(0, n, 0; 2) = 1 − 2−n (−1)nn!ζ(n + 1) (4)

12 1 LI(n, 0, 0; 2) = (−1)nn!Li (5) n+1 2

LI(1, n, 0; 1) = LI(n, 1, 0, 0) = (−1)n−1n!ζ(n + 2) (6)

LI(0, n, 1; 1) = 1 − 2−(n+1) (−1)nn!ζ(n + 2) (7)

n−1 k 1 n+1 X log (2)Li−k+n+1 n log (2) LI(0, 0, n; 1) = −n! 2 + n!ζ(n + 1) − (8) k! n + 1 k=0

n k 1 n+2 X log (2)Li−k+n+2 log (2) LI(0, 1, n; 2) = n! 2 − n!ζ(n + 2) + (9) k! n + 2 k=0

n+2 X (−1)k−1ζ(k) log−k+n+2(2) 1 logn+2(2) LI(1, 0, n; 2) = n! + (−1)nn!Li + (10) (−k + n + 2)! n+2 2 n + 1 k=2

n ! 1 X LI(1, n, 0; 0) = LI(n, 1, 0; 1) = (−1)n−1n! (n + 1)ζ(n + 2) − ζ(k)ζ(−k + n + 2) (11) 2 k=2

n 1 X LI(0, n, 1; 0) = (−1)nn! 1 − 21−k 1 − 2k−n−1 ζ(k)ζ(−k + n + 2) 2 k=2 (12) 1 −(−1)nn! (n + 1)ζ(n + 2) − 2 1 − 2−(n+1) log(2)ζ(n + 1) 2

n−1 X LI(0, 2n − 1, 1; 2) = −(2n − 1)! 1 − 21−2k ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n + 1) k=1 (13) −(2n − 1)! 2−(2n+1)ζ(2n + 1) − (n − 1) 1 − 2−2n ζ(2n + 1)

n−1 X LI(1, 2n − 1, 0; 2) = −(2n − 1)! 1 − 22k−2n ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n + 1) k=1 (14) +(2n − 1)! (n + 1) 1 − 2−2n + 2−(2n+1) ζ(2n + 1) − 2 1 − 2−2n log(2)ζ(2n)

n+1 ! X LI(2, n, 0; 1) = (−1)nn! (n + 2)ζ(n + 3) − ζ(k)ζ(−k + n + 3) (15) k=2

13 n X LI(0, 2n, 2; 1) = 2(2n)! 1 − 21−2k ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n + 3) k=1 (16) −2(2n)! 1 − 2−(2n+2) nζ(2n + 3) − 2−(2n+3)ζ(2n + 3)

n X LI(1, 2n, 1; 1) = −(2n)!2−(2n+1) 1 − 2−2k+2n+2 ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n + 3) k=1 (17) +(2n)! (2n + 3)2−(2n+3) − 1 ζ(2n + 3)

−t 1 Proof. (1): x → e , Γ. (2): Trivial. (3)-(5): Series expansion of 1−ax , then use (1). (6)- 1 (7): Series expansion of log(1 − ax). (8): Nielsen-Ramanujan integral. t → 1+x , then use R 1 m n ∂n 1−2−(m+1) 1 x log (x) dx = n . (9)-(10): Use (8), integrate by parts. (11)-(12): Series ex- 2 ∂m m+1 log(1−x) pansion of 1−x , use (1) then ES results in [11]. (13)-(17) Series expansion and [11].

For each LI, check whether they are directly solved using general formulas above.

Clariﬁcation: Throughout this paper, legitimacy of all operations of exchanging orders of multiple summation and integration can be justiﬁed by convergence theorems.

2.3 Integration by parts

Q2 a(m) R 1 0 Take F (x) = m=0 l(m; x) in N-L formula 0 F (x) dx = F (1) − F (0) to obtain linear a linear relation between LIs. Now consider all possible F . As one can see, this is essentially the process of partial integration.

Clariﬁcation: Though we don’t carry out partial integration from the view of manipulating single LIs here, this will be used frequently later. Throughout this paper, by ’integration by parts lifting (up) u0 in integral R u0v, we mean transforming it into uv − R uv0.

2.4 Fractional transformation Q2 a(m) 2F 1−x m=0 l(m;x) R 1 R 1 ( x+1 ) Take F (x) = f(p;x) (p 6= 1) in the identity 0 F (x) dx = 0 (x+1)2 dx. Since log(x) → log(1−x)−log(x+1), log(1−x) → log(x)−log(x+1)+log(2), log(x+1) → log(2)−log(x+1)

1−x under the substitution x → x+1 , we may obtain a linear relation after expansion and possible 1 partial fraction decomposition on x(x+1) for p = 0. Now consider all possible F .

14 2.5 Beta derivatives

Proposition 2. The following formulas hold:

∂m+nB(a, b) LI(n, m, 0; 1) = LI(m, n, 0; 0) = lim (1) {a,b}→{0,1} ∂am ∂bn

n X n ∂m+nB(a, b) LI(k, m, n − k; 1) = 2−(m+1) lim (2) k {a,b}→{0,1} ∂am ∂bn k=0

n m+n m+n ! X n −(m+1) ∂ B(a, b) ∂ B(a, b) LI(k, m, n − k; 0) = 2 lim m n + lim m n (3) k {a,b}→{1,0} ∂a ∂b {a,b}→ 1 ,0 ∂a ∂b k=0 { 2 }

n m+n m+n ! X n −(m+1) ∂ B(a, b) ∂ B(a, b) LI(k, m, n − k; 2) = 2 lim m n − lim m n (4) k {a,b}→{ 1 ,0} ∂a ∂b {a,b}→{1,0} ∂a ∂b k=0 2

∂m+1B(a, b) ∂m+1B(a, b) LI(0, m, 1; 0) = 2−(m+1) − 1 lim + 2−(m+1) lim (5) {a,b}→{1,0} ∂am ∂b1 1 ∂am ∂b1 {a,b}→{ 2 ,0}

n 1−s X n ∂n 2 − 1 π (−1)k LI(k, n − k, 0; 2) = lim (6) k s→1 ∂sn sin(πs) k=0

n n+1 X X nn + 1 1 ∂2n+1B(a, b) log2n+2(2) (− log(2))j+kLI(−k + n + 1, 0, n − j; 2) = lim − (7) j k 2 {x,y}→{0,1} ∂an ∂bn+1 2n + 2 j=0 k=0

n n X n X n 1 (−1)k LI(0, n − k, k; 2) = (−1)n l! Li logn−l(2) (8) k l l+1 2 k=0 l=0

m n X m X n (−1)k (−1)j LI(0, j + k, −j + m + n; 1) + (−1)j LI(0, j + k, −j + m + n; 1) j j j=0 j=0 (9) k X k ∂k+m+nB(a, b) ∂k+m+nB(a, b) = (−1)m+n (−1)k lim + lim j {x,y}→{0,1} ∂aj+m ∂b−j+k+n {x,y}→{1,0} ∂aj+m ∂b−j+k+n j=0

m n 2 R 1 log (x) log (1−x ) 1 x+1 1 Proof. (1): Diﬀerentiate B(a, b). (2)-(4): consider 0 f(p;x) dx. Using 1−x = 1−x2 , x+1 = 1−x 2 2 1−x2 and that x → t give RHS. Alternatively log(1−x ) = log(1−x)+log(1+x) and binomial the- 2 2 log(x+1) x log(1−x ) log(1−x ) log(1−x) orem for expansion give LHS. (5): Multiply both sides of 1−x = 1−x2 + 1−x2 − 1−x

15 n x m 2 log ( 1−x ) x with log (x) then integrate, t → x . (6): Consider F (x) = x+1 , substituting t → 1−x and 1−s R ∞ xs−1 π(2 −1) diﬀerentiating 0 (x+1)(2x+1) dx = sin(πs) yield RHS, and binomial theorem yields LHS. (7): 1 n n+1 R 2 log (1−x) log (x) 1−u 0 1−x dx is evaluated in [15]. Let x → 2 , use binomial theorem twice. (8): Sim- n x x log ( x+1 ) ilar to (6), subsitute t → x+1 in integral of F1(x) = x+1 , series expansion. (9): Consider k m n 1 R ∞ log (x) log (x+1) log ( x +1) 1 0 x dx, m, n > 0. Substitution x → t for (1, ∞) part and binomial theo- 1−t rem yields LHS, while x → t for the whole integral and partial fractions give RHS.

Partial derivatives in above expressions can be evaluated by Mathematica (or manually by com- puting Laurent series of polygamma and plugging in their special values). Now consider all possible relations generated from these formulas.

2.6 Contour integration

Integrate logk(1 − z) logm(z) logn(z + 1) F (z) = z(1 − z) (with all logs principal) along the large upper semicircular contour, by Cauchy theorem we have R ∞+0i 1 −∞+0i F (z)dz = 0. Split the integral into 4 parts by branch points 0, ±1, use x → ±t, x → ± t to map them to (0, 1), after expansion we obtain a linear relation (see [1] and sections below for details and examples). Now consider all possible F .

Clariﬁcation: Here and below, by ’principal’ we follow the convention of Mathematica, that is, the argument of log/polylogs vary in (−π, π).

2.7 Double integration

In [1] a symmetric double log integral is investigated, which essentially yields:

n−1 2 ! X 1 1 1 1 1 LI(2n, 0, 1; 1) = (2n)! (−1)kLi Li + (−1)nLi + Li k+1 2 −k+2n+1 2 2 n+1 2 2n+2 2 k=0

2.8 Hypergeometric identities

Diﬀerentiating hypergeometric identities can be used to generate the most nontrivial high weight relations, see [1].

16 2.9 Solution

All linear relations involving LIs with W ≤ 5 generated by subsection 2-1∼2-6 already yields:

Lemma 1. All LIs with weight W ≤ 5 can be generated by AW over Q.

In fact W = 6 case is also solvable using 2-1∼2-6 only, but we won’t record their closed-forms below due to great complexity (for their values we refer readers to [1]). W = 6 results will be frequently used later so it’s better to be aware of the general structure.

Clariﬁcation: In section N, all subjects computed in section 1, ··· ,N − 1 are supposed to be known. As an example, LI values are frequently used below with the statement ’··· modulo LIs’.

3 ES

Since the theory of Euler sums is well developed already, this section won’t be a thorough summary, but a simple review of ES evaluation and solution of several ESs.

P∞ (±1)n−1 Excluding the trivial n=1 np , there lefts 89 ESs with weight W ≤ 5 (2, 9, 24, 54 for weight 2, 3, 4, 5 respectively) .

3.1 General formulas

According to [11], we have

Lemma 2. ES(±1; p),ES(±1; −p)(p even), ES(p; p),ES(p; q)(p + q odd or smaller than 7), ES(1, 1; p)(p odd or smaller than 5) are reducible to Zeta values.

See [2, 7] for alternative proofs.

17 3.2 Symmetric relations

By inclusion-exclusion (abbr. I-E) principle we have:

X X X X X X X X = + + − − − + 0

(±1)j−1(±1)k−1(±1)l−1 Apply this identity as an operator on all triple summands jakblc to obtain linear relations. For instance, if we choose 3 ’±’s to be ’+’ and assuming convergence one obtain

ζ(a)ζ(b)ζ(c) = ES(a, b; c)+ES(a, c; b)+ES(b, c; a)−ES(a; b+c)−ES(b; a+c)−ES(c; a+b)+ES(a+b+c)

Consider all other choices and n-ple generalizations to obtain relations, see for instance [21, 22]. See also [9] for similar contents on MZVs.

3.3 Partial fractions

P∞ P∞ 1 Consider Cauchy product of the double sum j=1 k=1 jakb . By partial fraction decomposition Pn−1 1 we know that all sums of the form k=1 ka(n−k)b are expressible in a combination of homogeneous (k) Hn na+b−k , k = 1, ··· , a + b − 1, we found that ζ(a)ζ(b) is expressed in a corresponding combination of (±1)j−1(±1)k−1 ESs, which is a linear relation. We may also consider jakb and generalizations to triple sums. See [9] for more.

3.4 Contour integration

See [11] again for generating ES relations using contour integration and polygamma kernels.

3.5 Solution

3.5.1 Preparation

In [11, 19, 21, 22] all but 1 weight 3 ES, 2 weight 4 ESs and 7 weight 5 ESs are solved. 3 weight < 5 ESs are evaluated trivially. Now we will sketch a proof for the remaining 7, that is

ES(−1, −1, −1; −2),ES(−1, −1, −1, −1; −1),ES(1, 1, −2; −1),ES(1, 1, −1, −1; −1) ES(1, −1, −1; −2),ES(1, −1, −2; −1),ES(1, −1, −1, −1; −1)

18 All LIs, low weight ESs and other 47 weight 5 ESs are supposed to be known. Also, several GES 1 P∞ Hn (Geometric Euler Sums, i.e. sums involving 2n like n=1 n32n ) computed in [19] will be applied too.

Proposition 3. (1)-(15) hold where |x| < 1 and naturally extends to |z| ≤ 1 assuming convergence:

∞ ∞ n 1 X n X (±x) = (±x) , − log(1 ∓ x) = (1) 1 ∓ x n n=0 n=1

∞ ∞ log(1 ∓ x) X n log(1 ± x) X n − = Hn (±x) , = Hf (±x) (2) 1 ∓ x 1 ∓ x n n=1 n=1 ∞ X 1 Hn n log2(1 ± x) = 2(−1)n−1 − (±x) (3) n2 n n=1

∞ ! X Hg 1 log(1 − x) log(x + 1) = − 2n + x2n (4) n 2n2 n=1

∞ n ∞ ∞ X (±x) X n Lik(±x) X (k) n Lik(∓x) = Li (±x), H(k) (±x) = , H] (±x) = − (5) nk k n 1 ∓ x n 1 ∓ x n=1 n=1 n=1

∞ n X Hnx 1 = Li (x) + log2(1 − x) (6) n 2 2 n=1

∞ X Hf xn 1 − x 1 n = Li − Li (−x) − Li − log(2) log(1 − x) (7) n 2 2 2 2 2 n=1

∞ 2 X Li2(x) log (1 − x) (H ) 2xn = + (8) n 1 − x 1 − x n=1

∞ 1−x 1 x+1 X 2 2 Li2 − Li2 + log log(1 − x) + Li2(x) Hf xn = 2 2 2 (9) n 1 − x n=1

∞ 1−x 1 1 2 X n Li2 2 − Li2(−x) − Li2 2 − 2 log (x + 1) − log(2) log(1 − x) HnHf x = (10) n 1 − x n=1

∞ 1 2 1 2 X Li3(1 − x) + Li3(x) + log(x) log (1 − x) − π log(1 − x) − ζ(3) H H(2)xn = 2 6 (11) n n 1 − x n=1

∞ 3 3 2 1 2 X 3 n 3Li3(1 − x) + Li3(x) − log (1 − x) + 2 log(x) log (1 − x) − 2 π log(1 − x) − 3ζ(3) (Hn) x = (12) 1 − x n=1

19 ∞ 2 n X (Hn) x 1 = Li (x) − Li (x) log(1 − x) − log3(1 − x) (13) n 3 2 3 n=1

∞ (2) n X Hn x 2 = 2Li3(1 − x) + Li3(x) − 2Li2(1 − x) log(1 − x) − Li2(x) log(1 − x) − log(x) log (1 − x) − 2ζ(3) (14) n n=1

∞ n X Hnx 1 = −Li (1 − x) + Li (x) + Li (1 − x) log(1 − x) + log(x) log2(1 − x) + ζ(3) (15) n2 3 3 2 2 n=1

R x f(t) Proof. (1): Trivial. (2)-(5): Cauchy product, use (1). (6)-(7): Applying L(f) = 0 t dt on G(x) certain f in (5). (8): Denote LHS as F (x), suppose it is of form F (x) = 1−x , then by Cauchy we P∞ 2 2 n 1 have G(x) = n=1 (Hn) − (Hn−1) x . Using Hn−1 = Hn − n and (5), (6) to arrive at RHS. (9)-(12): Calculating diﬀerences like (8). (13)-(15): Make use of L(f) on (5), (6), (8). Mathematica is used to calculate primitives.

Proposition 4. (1)-(10) hold where |x| < 1 and naturally extends to |z| ≤ 1 assuming convergence:

∞ 2 n 2 X (Hn) x Li2(x) (1) = − 2Li (1 − x) + Li (x) n2 2 4 4 n=1 1 π4 −Li (1 − x) log2(1 − x) + 2Li (1 − x) log(1 − x) − log(x) log3(1 − x) + 2 3 3 45

∞ (2) n X H x 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 (2) n = − log − 1 + log(1 − x) log − 1 + log log − 1 n2 6 x 3 x 3 x x n=1 2 2 1 x − 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 − log (1 − x) log − 1 + 2Li2 log − 1 − 2Li2(x) log − 1 + log (1 − x) log − 1 x x x x 3 x 2 1 1 1 +2 log (1 − x) log(x) log − 1 + 4 log(1 − x)Li2(1 − x) log − 1 + 4 log(1 − x)Li2(x) log − 1 x x x 4 1 x − 1 1 1 π 1 4 x −4Li3(1 − x) log − 1 − 4Li3 log − 1 − 4Li3(x) log − 1 + − log x x x x 18 12 1 − x 1 1 1 x 1 x 2 1 x − log4(1 − x) + log log3 + log log3(x) − log(1 − x) log3(x) − log2(x) log2 6 3 1 − x 1 − x 3 1 − x 3 2 1 − x

2 3 x Li2(x) 1 x 4 + log2(1 − x) log2(x) + log log(1 − x) log2(x) + + log3 log(x) − log3(1 − x) log(x) 2 1 − x 2 3 1 − x 3 2 x x 2 x 2 2 + log Li2 − − log Li2(1 − x) − 2 log (1 − x)Li2(1 − x) − log (x)Li2(1 − x) 1 − x 1 − x 1 − x x 2 2 +2 log log(x)Li2(1 − x) + 2 log(1 − x) log(x)Li2(1 − x) − 2 log (1 − x)Li2(x) − log (x)Li2(x) 1 − x

20 x x x x +2 log log(x)Li2(x) + 2 log(1 − x) log(x)Li2(x) − 2 log Li3 − − 2 log Li3(1 − x) 1 − x 1 − x 1 − x 1 − x

x x x − 1 log4(x) −2 log Li3(x) + 2 log(1 − x)Li3(x) + 2Li4 − + 2Li4(1 − x) + 4Li4 − Li4(x) − 2 log(x)ζ(3) − 1 − x 1 − x x 12

∞ n X Hnx 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 (3) = log − 1 − log(1 − x) log − 1 − log log − 1 n3 12 x 3 x 3 x x n=1 1 2 2 1 x − 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 + log (1 − x) log − 1 − Li2 log − 1 + Li2(x) log − 1 − log (1 − x) log − 1 2 x x x x 3 x 2 1 1 1 − log (1 − x) log(x) log − 1 − 2 log(1 − x)Li2(1 − x) log − 1 − 2 log(1 − x)Li2(x) log − 1 x x x 1 x − 1 1 1 1 4 x 1 4 +2Li3(1 − x) log − 1 + 2Li3 log − 1 + 2Li3(x) log − 1 + log + log (1 − x) x x x x 24 1 − x 12

log4(x) 1 1 x 1 x 1 1 x + − log log3 − log(x) log3 + log(1 − x) log3(x) + log2 log2(x) 24 6 1 − x 1 − x 6 1 − x 3 4 1 − x 3 1 x 1 x 2 − log2(1 − x) log2(x) − log3(x) log − log(1 − x) log2(x) log + log3(1 − x) log(x) 4 6 1 − x 2 1 − x 3 1 2 x 2 1 2 x + log Li2(1 − x) + log (1 − x)Li2(1 − x) + log (x)Li2(1 − x) − log(x) log Li2(1 − x) 2 1 − x 2 1 − x 1 2 x x 2 1 2 − log(1 − x) log(x)Li2(1 − x) − log Li2 + log (1 − x)Li2(x) + log (x)Li2(x) 2 1 − x x − 1 2 x x x x − log(x) log Li2(x) − log(1 − x) log(x)Li2(x) + log Li3(1 − x) + log Li3 1 − x 1 − x 1 − x x − 1

x x x − 1 π4 + log Li3(x) − log(1 − x)Li3(x) − Li4(1 − x) − Li4 − 2Li4 + 2Li4(x) + log(x)ζ(3) − 1 − x x − 1 x 36

∞ (2) n 2 2 2 X HnHn x Li2(1 − x) Li2(x) π Li2(x) x (4) = − + + Li4(1 − x) − Li4 n 2 2 6 x − 1 n=1 1 2 x 1 x 2 x 1 2 1 2 + Li2(1 − x) log − Li2 log + Li2(1 − x) log (1 − x) + Li2(1 − x) log (x) 2 1 − x 2 x − 1 1 − x 2 2 1 2 x x x + Li2(x) log (x) − Li2(1 − x) log(x) log − Li2(x) log(x) log + Li3(1 − x) log 2 1 − x 1 − x 1 − x x x x +Li3 log + Li3(x) log − Li2(x) log(1 − x) log(x) − Li3(1 − x) log(1 − x) + ζ(3) log(1 − x) x − 1 1 − x 1 − x

1 x log4(x) 1 1 x 1 x 1 x −ζ(3) log(x) + log4 + − log log3 − log(x) log3 − log3(x) log 24 1 − x 24 6 1 − x 1 − x 6 1 − x 6 1 − x

1 1 x 1 x 1 1 π4 + log(1−x) log3(x)+ log2(x) log2 − log(1−x) log2(x) log + π2 log2(1−x)− log2(1−x) log2(x)− 3 4 1 − x 2 1 − x 12 4 40

∞ (3) n 2 X Hn x Li2(x) (5) = − + Li (x) − Li (x) log(1 − x) n 2 4 3 n=1

21 ∞ 3 n 2 2 2 ! ! X (Hn) x 3Li2(1 − x) Li2(x) π Li2(x) x 3 2 x (6) = − + − 3Li4(1 − x) − 3Li4 − 2Li4(x) + Li2(1 − x) log n=1 n 2 2 2 x − 1 2 1 − x

! ! ! 3 x 2 x 3 2 3 2 3 2 x − Li2 log − Li2(1 − x) log (1 − x) + Li2(1 − x) log (x) + Li2(x) log (x) − 3Li2(1 − x) log(x) log 2 x − 1 1 − x 2 2 2 1 − x

x ! x ! x ! x ! x ! −3Li2(x) log(x) log + 3Li3(1 − x) log + 3Li3 log + 3Li3(x) log − 3Li2(x) log(1 − x) log(x) 1 − x 1 − x x − 1 1 − x 1 − x

! 4 1 4 x 1 4 log (x) +3Li3(1 − x) log(1 − x) + 2Li3(x) log(1 − x) + 3ζ(3) log(1 − x) − 3ζ(3) log(x) + log + log (1 − x) + 8 1 − x 4 8

! ! ! ! 1 1 3 x 1 3 x 1 3 x 3 3 − log log − log(x) log − log (x) log + log(1 − x) log (x) − log (1 − x) log(x) 2 1 − x 1 − x 2 1 − x 2 1 − x

! ! 4 3 2 2 x 3 2 x 1 2 2 3 2 2 π + log (x) log − log(1 − x) log (x) log + π log (1 − x) − log (1 − x) log (x) − 4 1 − x 2 1 − x 4 4 120

∞ n ! ! ! ! !! X Hgnx x + 1 x 2x x + 1 2x (7) = −Li − Li (−x) − Li (x) − Li + Li + log(2)Li (x) + Li log(x) − log 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 n=1 n 2 x + 1 x + 1 2 x + 1

1 x x ! ! x ! 2x !! 2x ! +Li2 − log(x) + Li2(x) log + log(x + 1) + Li2 − Li2 log 2 2 x + 1 x + 1 x + 1 x + 1

! ! ! !! ! 1 2 1 2 2x 1 − x 1 x − 1 2x + log (2) log(x) + log log + log − log − + log(2) log(x) log 2 2 x + 1 2 x + 1 x + 1 x + 1

! ! 3 1 1 2 1 − x x + 1 7ζ(3) log (2) − log(2) log(x)(log(x) − 2 log(x + 1) + log(4)) − π log(x) + log log log(x) + + 2 12 2 2 8 6

∞ n ! ! ! ! ! X HnHgnx 1 − x x + 1 x + 1 x + 1 x (8) = −Li3 − 2Li3 + Li3 − Li3(1 − x) − Li3 − Li3(−x) − Li3(x) − Li3 n=1 n 2 2 1 − x x − 1 x + 1

! ! ! 2x 1 2 1 − x 1 − x +Li3 + log(2) 2Li2(x) + log (1 − x) + Li2 log(1 − x) − Li2 (log(1 − x) − log(x)) x + 1 2 2 2

x + 1 ! 2x !! x + 1 ! x + 1 !! +Li2 log(x) − log + Li2 log(x + 1) + Li2(1 − x) log(x + 1) − log 2 x + 1 2 1 − x

x + 1 ! x + 1 !! x + 1 ! x ! ! + Li2 − Li2 log + Li2(−x)(log(1 − x) − log(x)) + Li2(−x) log(x) + Li2(x) log + log(x + 1) x − 1 1 − x 1 − x x + 1

x ! 2x !! 2x ! x + 1 ! ! + Li2 − Li2 log + Li2(x + 1) log + log(1 − x) − Li2(x + 1) log(x + 1) x + 1 x + 1 x + 1 1 − x

! ! ! ! ! 1 1 − x 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 x + 1 2x 2 + log log (x+1)− log(−x) log (x+1)+ π − 6 log (2) log(1−x)+ log − log + log − + log(x) 2 2 2 12 2 1 − x x − 1 x − 1

! ! ! !! ! 1 2 2 1 2 2x 1 − x 1 x − 1 2x − π − 6 log (2) log(x) + log log + log − log − + log(2) log(x) log 12 2 x + 1 2 x + 1 x + 1 x + 1

1 1 − x ! x + 1 ! x + 1 ! − log(2) log(x)(log(x) − 2 log(x + 1) + log(4)) + log log log(x) + log (log(−x) − log(x)) log(x + 1) 2 2 2 1 − x

3 1 15ζ(3) log (2) 1 2 + log(1 − x) log(x) log(x + 1) + (log(x) − log(−x)) log(x + 1)(log(x + 1) − 2 log(1 − x)) + + − π log(2) 2 8 2 6

2 ∞ H xn ! ! ! ! ! ! X gn 1 − x x + 1 x + 1 x + 1 x 2x (9) = −4Li3 − 2Li3 + 2Li3 − 2Li3 − Li3(x) − 2Li3 + 2Li3 n=1 n 2 2 1 − x x − 1 x + 1 x + 1

! ! ! !! 2 1 − x 1 − x x + 1 2x −2Li3(x+1)+log(2) 2Li2(x) + log (1 − x) +4Li2 log(1−x)−2Li2 (log(1−x)−log(x))+2Li2 log(x) − log 2 2 2 x + 1

x + 1 !! x + 1 ! x + 1 !! x + 1 ! +2Li2(1 − x) log(x + 1) − log − 2Li2(1 − x) log(1 − x) + 2 Li2 − Li2 log − Li2(x)(log(1 − x) − log(x)) 1 − x x − 1 1 − x 1 − x

22 x ! ! x ! 2x !! 2x ! x + 1 ! ! −Li2(x) log(x)+2Li2(x) log + log(x + 1) +2 Li2 − Li2 log +2Li2(x+1) log + log(1 − x) x + 1 x + 1 x + 1 x + 1 1 − x ! ! ! ! 2 1 2 2 2 x + 1 2x 2 2 − log(2) log (1 − x) + π − 6 log (2) log(1 − x) + log − log + log − + log(x) − log (1 − x) log(x) 6 1 − x x − 1 x − 1 ! ! ! !! ! 1 2 2 2 2x 1 − x 1 x − 1 2x − π − 6 log (2) log(x) + log log + log − log − + 2 log(2) log(x) log 6 x + 1 2 x + 1 x + 1 x + 1

1 − x ! x + 1 ! x + 1 ! − log(2) log(x)(log(x) − 2 log(x + 1) + log(4)) + 2 log log log(x) + 2 log (log(−x) − log(x)) log(x + 1) 2 2 1 − x

15ζ(3) 3 1 2 +2 log(1 − x) log(x) log(x + 1) + (log(x) − log(−x)) log(x + 1)(log(x + 1) − 2 log(1 − x)) + + log (2) − π log(2) 4 3

(10) The following four generating functions are polylog expressible, using formula (1)-(6):

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ X 4 n X 2 (2) n X (2) 2 n X (3) n (Hn) x , (Hn) Hn x , Hn x , HnHn x n=1 n=1 n=1 n=1

Proof. (1)-(9): Again, make use of L(f) in appropriate functions in Proposition 3, then Math- ematica. They are verified via differentiation. (10): Calculate differences. The results will be combinations of (1)-(6) thus extremely lengthy, so we omit them.

Proposition 5. The following formulas hold:

Z 1 (−1)kk! n−1 k (1) x log (x) dx = k+1 0 n

Z 1 ∞ X 1 Hn xn−1 log(1 − x) dx = − = − (2) j(j + n) n 0 j=1

Z 1 ∞ 2 (2) X 1 (Hn) + Hn xn−1 log2(1 − x) dx = = (3) j(j + n)2 n 0 j=1

Z 1 H H(2) π2 n−1 n n (4) x log(x) log(1 − x) dx = 2 + − 0 n n 6n

Z 1 3H H(2) + (H ) 3 + 2H(3) xn−1 log3(1 − x) dx = − n n n n (5) 0 n ∞ Z 1 X (−1)j (−1)n−1Hf − (−1)n−1 log(2) − log(2) − xn−1 log(x + 1) dx = = n (6) j(j + n) n 0 j=1

∞ j n−1 (2) n−1 n−1 2 n−1 X (−1) (−1) Hgn (−1) Hf (−1) log(2) log(2) π (−1) = + n − − − (7) j(j + n)2 n n2 n2 n2 12n j=1

23 Proof. (1): Trivial. (2)-(5): Diﬀerentiate Beta functions, then transform polygamma constants into (2) (3) (3) π4 (4) harmonic ones (for instance ψ (n + 1) = 2Hn − 2ζ(3), ψ (n + 1) = 15 − 6Hn , etc). (6)-(7): π2 Invoke partial fractions and that η(1) = log(2), η(2) = 12 .

3.5.2 Confrontation

Now we compute 7 remaining weight 5 Euler sums:

Proposition 6. The following formulas hold:

(1) ES(−1, −1, −1; −2) 1 π2ζ(3) 1229ζ(5) 21 3 log5(2) 3 29 = −18Li − + + ζ(3) log2(2) + + π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 5 2 8 64 8 20 4 160

(2) ES(−1, −1, −1, −1; −1) 1 1 5π2ζ(3) 733ζ(5) 13 log5(2) 3 71 = −48Li − 4Li log(2) + + + + π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 5 2 4 2 48 16 30 2 180

(3) ES(1, 1, −2; −1) 1 π2ζ(3) 93ζ(5) 1 1 13π4 log(2) = 6Li − − − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) − 5 2 48 64 20 36 1440

(4) ES(1, 1, −1, −1; −1) 1 π2ζ(3) 201ζ(5) 3 log5(2) 1 97 = 12Li + − − ζ(3) log2(2) + + π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 16 16 8 10 12 720

(5) ES(1, −1, −1; −2) 1 1 π2ζ(3) 7 1 2 1 = 10Li −2Li log(2)+ −10ζ(5)− ζ(3) log2(2)− log5(2)+ π2 log3(2)+ π4 log(2) 5 2 4 2 96 8 6 9 10

(6) ES(1, −1, −2; −1) 1 7 log5(2) 5 1 = 4Li log(2) + ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2 4 2 16 6 72 480

(7) ES(1, −1, −1, −1; −1)

24 1 13π2ζ(3) 83ζ(5) 9 13 41 1 = 2Li + − + ζ(3) log2(2) − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 5 2 96 32 16 60 72 180

Proof. (1)-(2): Exploit symmetry. Take (2) as an example, we have

X (−1)j−1(−1)k−1(−1)l−1(−1)m−1(−1)n−1 ES(−1, −1, −1, −1; −1) = jklmn 0

Consider the analogous sum without restrictions, by I-E principle log5(2) = 5ES(−1, −1, −1, −1; −1)−10ES(−1, −1, −1; 2)+10ES(−1, −1; −3)−5ES(−1; 4)+η(5)

Since all ESs but the desired one are known, (2) is established. (1) is similar.

2 (3): Multiply both sides of Prop. 5(7) with (Hn) then sum w.r.t n, we have:

π2 − ES(1, 1; −1) − log(2)ES(1, 1; 2) − log(2)ES(1, 1; −2) 12 ∞ ∞ j 2 X X (−1) (Hn) +ES(1, 1, −1; −2) + ES(1, 1, −2; −1) = j(j + n)2 n=1 j=1

Using formulas above we have:   ∞ ∞ j 2 Z 1 ∞ j−1 j ∞ ! X X (−1) (Hn) log(x) X (−1) x X = (H ) 2xn dx j(j + n)2 x  j  n n=1 j=1 0 j=1 n=1 Z 1 1 1 2 = + log(x) log(x + 1) Li2(x) + log (1 − x) dx 0 x 1 − x

Therefore we only need to evaluate P LI(0, 1, 1; 21; 0), P LI(0, 1, 1; 21; 1). Indeed:

∞ ∞ j−1 R 1 j+n−1 ∞ ∞ X X (−1) log(x)x dx X X (−1)j P LI(0, 1, 1; 21; 1) = 0 = jn2 jn2(j + n)2 n=1 j=1 n=1 j=1 ∞ ∞ X X Hfj P LI(0, 1, 1; 21; 0) = ··· = − n2(j + n + 1)2 n=1 j=1

For the ﬁrst one, sum w.r.t either n or j ﬁrst and the PLI reduces to known ESs. For the second, sum w.r.t n yields

∞ ∞ ∞ j−1 (2) 2 ! X X Hfj X (−1) 2Hj Hj π − = − Hfj − − − + n2(j + n + 1)2 j j3 j2 3j2 n=1 j=1 j=1

25 All ES components on RHS are also known so (3) is proved.

n−1 2 (4): Multiply both sides of Prop. 5(3) with (−1) Hfn and sum n, the ES boils down to P LI(2, 0, 0; 22; 1/2), P LI(2, 0, 0; 24; 1/2) via Prop. 3(9). For P LI(2, 0, 0; 22; 1/2), use Prop. 3(5) for expansion to reduce them to known ESs. For P LI(2, 0, 0; 24; 1/2), use that:

1 − x x + 1 π2 Li +Li = log(2) log(1−x)+log(2) log(x+1)−log(1−x) log(x+1)+ −log2(2) 2 2 2 2 6 to reduce them to P LI(2, 0, 0; 23; 1/2) modulo LIs. For the ﬁnal 2 PLIs, by substitution t → 1 − x, x x Li2( 2 ) Li2( 2 ) single/double expansion for x / respectively and ES/GES results [19] they are solved 1− 2 1−x either so (4) is proved.

(5): Same as (4), except that we start from Prop. 5(4). One may verify that all ESs appeared during reduction are known and all PLIs can be reduced to known ESs.

(6): Multiply both sides of Prop. 5(7) with HnHfn, remaining steps are alike to (3)-(5), in which the value of (5) is used.

P∞ 3 n (7): Denote f(x) = n=1 Hfn x , by calculating diﬀerences of the generating function we H 2xn n n −3P (x)−3Q(x)−Li3(x) P∞ (gn) P∞ (−1) Hgnx have f(−x) = x+1 , where P (x) = n=1 n ,Q(x) = n=1 n2 . Thus

Z 1 f(−x) log(1 − x) Z 1 log(1 − x)(−3P (x) − Li (x) − 3Q(x)) ES(1, −1, −1, −1; −1) = dx = 3 dx 0 x 0 x(x + 1)

Integrate by parts using

Z log(1 − x) π2 1 − x x + 1 dx = u(x) = − Li − Li (x) − log(1 − x) log x(x + 1) 6 2 2 2 2

We only have to compute

Z 1 ∞ n ∞ ! u(x) X (−1) n X 2 n 3 Hfnx + 3 Hfn x + Li2(x) dx x n 0 n=1 n=1

Which, by Proposition 3, equals to

Z 1 u(x) 1 − x 1 x + 1 3 2Li2 + Li2(x) − 2Li2 + 2 log log(1 − x) dx 0 x(1 − x) 2 2 2

26 Z 1 Z 1 u(x) x + 1 1 Li2(x)u(x) +3 Li2 − Li2(x) − Li2 − log(2) log(x + 1) dx + dx 0 x 2 2 0 x

Expand all these expressions. Some parts of the integrand are divergent so we put them together x+1 1 R 1 Li2(x)(Li2( 2 )−Li2( 2 )) again, for instance 0 x dx. Apply integration by parts on all these composite integrals (in the example lift up a Li3(x)) to convert them into convergent PLIs. After this we reduce it to plenty of LIs and PLIs. For each of them, integrate by parts and use techniques in (3)-(6) over and over again (or more generally, use the expansion algorithm in section 4), all PLIs can be reduced to lower weight ESs and 53 weight 5 ESs already known, hence (7) is proved.

Thus all 89 ESs with W ≤ 5 are evaluated.

4 PLI

Due to existence of a polylog term, a PLI’s weight W ≥ 3. There are 11, 55, 197 PLIs for weight 3, 4, 5 respectively.

4.1 Brute force

x+1 Li2( 2 ) log(1−x) Some of the PLIs can be calculated by brute force, for instance x+1 has primitive x+1 1 x+1 2 log(2)Li3 2 − 2 Li2 2 . For each PLI, check by Mathematica whether the primitive is solvable and evaluate it if so.

4.2 General formulas

See [12, 15] for proofs of the following:

m n R 1 Lim(x)Lin(x) R 1 log (x)Lin(x) R 1 Lin+1(x) log (x) Lemma 3. 0 x dx, 0 1−x dx (m + n even) and 0 x+1 dx are reducible to Zeta values.

Thus PLIs of these types are solved directly.

27 4.3 Integration by parts

Q2 a(m) Q6 QN b(n,k) In spirit of subsection 2-3, generalize F to m=0 l(m; x) k=1 n=2 L(n, k; x) . For those involving L(n, k; x), k ∈ {3, 5, 6}, after partial fractions another integration by parts lifting log(1−x) is needed to obtain a regular relation modulo LIs. Now consider all possible F .

4.4 Fractional transformation

Q2 a(m) Q6 QN b(n,k) 1−x m=0 l(m;x) k=1 n=2 L(n,k;x) Similar to subsection 2-4, apply x → x+1 in integral of F = f(p;x) , where b(n, 3) = b(n, 4) = 0. For p = 1, after partial fractions another integration by parts lifting log(1 − x) is needed to obtain a regular relation modulo LIs. Now consider all possible F .

4.5 Complementary integrals

QN a(n) 1±x Denote P (x) = n=2 Lin(x) , by equally splitting (0, 1) and substituting t = 2 we have:

1−x m 1−x n x+1 x+1 m x+1 n 1−x m n Z 1 P 2 log 2 log 2 P 2 log 2 log 2 Z 1 P (x) log (x) log (1 − x) + dx = dx 0 1 ∓ x 1 ± x 0 f±(x)

Here f+(x) = x, f−(x) = 1 − x. Expand LHS to get a linear relation. Now consider all possible P .

4.6 Polylog identities

Proposition 7. The following formulas hold on (0, 1) and naturally extend to the plane, where all logs/polylogs are principal:

Li x2 Li (−x) + Li (x) = n (1) n n 2n−1

π2 Li (1 − x) + Li (x) = − log(x) log(1 − x) (2) 2 2 6

x 1 Li + Li (x) = − log2(1 − x) (3) 2 x − 1 2 2

1 π2 1 Li − + Li (−x) = − − log2(x) (4) 2 x 2 6 2

2 1 − x x + 1 π 2 Li2 + Li2 = log(2) log(x + 1) + log(2) log(1 − x) − log(1 − x) log(x + 1) + − log (2) (5) 2 2 6

28 1 − x x − 1 1 1 Li + Li = − log2(x + 1) + log(2) log(x + 1) − log2(2) (6) 2 2 2 x + 1 2 2

1 1 1 Li (−x) − Li − = − log3(x) − π2 log(x) (7) 3 3 x 6 6

x 1 1 1 Li + Li (1 − x) + Li (x) = log3(1 − x) − log(x) log2(1 − x) + π2 log(1 − x) + ζ(3) (8) 3 x − 1 3 3 6 2 6

1 − x x + 1 x − 1 1 1 Li + Li + Li = log3(x + 1) − log2(2) log(1 − x) 3 2 3 2 3 x + 1 6 2 1 π2 log2(2) − log2(x + 1) log(1 − x) + − log(x + 1) (9) 2 6 2 log3(2) 1 + log(2) log(1 − x) log(x + 1) + ζ(3) + − π2 log(2) 3 6

1−x Proof. (1)-(4), (7)-(8): Classical formulas, see [14]. (5), (6), (9): Substitute t → 2 in (2), (3), (8) respectively.

logm(1−x2) logk(x) Now, multiply both sides of (1) with F (x) = x , integrate on (0, 1). Substitute t → x2 on RHS, expand (log(1 − x) + log(x + 1))m on LHS, we obtain a relation. Another choice x logm(1−x2) logk(x) is F (x) = 1−x2 , where we also use partial fractions to decompose LHS. Now consider all possible F .

Q2 a(m) m=0 l(m;x) Moreover, multiply both sides of (9) with F (x) = f(p;x) , it generates a relation between 3 PLIs since all LIs on RHS are known. For (5), (6) the process is similar, except that we may Q2 a(m) m=0 l(m;x) L(2,k;x) broaden the range of F to f(p;x) and f(p;x) . Now consider all possible F for 3 formulas to engender linear relations.

Clariﬁcation: If we derive all closed-forms of PLIs involving L(2, 2; x) hence L(2, 6; x) (via fractional transformation), those involving L(2, 3/4; x) will be natural corollaries thus redundant in the systematic solution. However, as we will see in the next subsection, solving all L(2, 2; x) type PLIs directly is unachievable. As a matter of fact, some of the independent relations only generate from 1−x manipulating L(2, 3/4; x) type, say subsection 4-7 (reﬂection of Lin 2 ), 6-10-4, hence this part is necessary.

29 4.7 Series expansion

Weight 5 PLIs are sorted into 4 classes, that is, (2,1,1), (3,1), (4), (2,2). The index indicates the quantity as well as order of polylog terms, for instance, P LI(1, 1, 0; 22; 2) belongs to (2,1,1) class for it contains one Li2 term and two log terms in numerator. Note that class (1,1,1,1,1) is excluded for they are simply LIs.

From now on we only discuss about weight 5 PLIs for lower weights are relevantly trivial. More- over, we restrict the use of this method to (2,1,1), (3,1) and (4) class PLIs. Furthermore, we require the only polylog term L(n, k; x)(n = 2, 3, 4) contained in the PLI to satisfy 1 ≤ k ≤ 3. Denote the set of these PLIs as Q.

We only present the general procedure of converting the PLI into combination of ESs. In this subsection ’ES’ represents all ordinary ESs and all GESs.

1−x Step 1. Reﬂection. If the only polylog term involved is Lin 2 , substitute t = 1 − x in the integral. If the only polylog term involved is Lin(−x), keep it unchanged. If the only polylog term involved is Lin(x), keep it unchanged, or reduce the integral to the corresponding one involving

Lin(1 − x) via (3.4.2) modulo known LIs, then substitute t = 1 − x. After this operation, the x argument in polylog term is either x or 2 . In this step we have 2 choices for case Lin(x) and 1 choice for other 2 cases.

Step 2. Determine the invariant part of integrand. Since we will use (2.5.16)-(2.5.19) to convert the integral to ESs, we choose a part of the integrand to be invariant. This part should be of form m n F1(x) = log (x) log (1 − x), with m equals to the degree of log(x) in the original integrand, n do not exceed the degree of log(1 − x) in the original integrand. In this step we have at most 3 choices on determining n, namely n = 0, 1, 2.

Step 3. Multiple expansion. Denote F = F1F2, where F is the whole integrand after possible manipulations in step 1, F1 the invariant part determined in step 2. We have F2 a combination of products of terms belong to the set:

1 1 1 1 x x , , , x , log(1 − x), log(x + 1), log 1 − , Lin(x), Lin x 1 − x x + 1 1 − 2 2 2 Where by combination we mean the integral is composed of several integrals with diﬀerent weights 1 (see examples below). Separate F2, expand each term other than x into elementary power series, exchange the order of evaluation, we get a at most quadruple sum with the summand an integral consistent with Prop. 5. In this step we have only 1 choice for the process of integration is deﬁnite.

30 Step 4. Converting into multiple harmonic series. This is straightforward if we use Prov. 5 to evaluate the integral in rational/harmonic terms. In this step we have only 1 choice for the process of integration is deﬁnite.

Step 5. Cauchy simpliﬁcation. After step 4 we arrive at a multiple sum w.r.t at most 4 summation indexes. If there’s only 1 index, it’s already a combination of ESs hence the procedure is ﬁnished. If there are 2 indexes, go to the next step. If there are more than 2 indexes, consider 2 manipulations: (1) Sum w.r.t all indexes with rational summands to reduce the weight. (2) Con- sider all index pairs (j, k), check whether their Cauchy product is expressible in harmonic terms with a new index m, if so, replace (j, k) with m in the summation to reduce the weight. Carry out (1)(2) until it’s not reducible any more. If the resulting sum is double, go to the next step, otherwise discard this sum and stop the procedure. In this step we have a great deal of choices to simplify the sum, but much of them will be discarded.

Step 6. Reduction to ESs. If we go through step 5, we will have a double series in hand. Denote the index of summation as (j, k). If the summand is rational functions of j, k, sum w.r.t either of the indexes first to finish the procedure. If the summand is rational to j but harmonic to k, sum w.r.t j also finishes. If we have all harmonic terms with index j + k and other parts rational, invoke

Cauchy product again to ﬁnish the procedure. For other cases (e.g. the sum involves HkHj+k), discard it. In this step we have 1 or 2 choices for using iterated summation or Cauchy simpliﬁcation.

Fix a weight 5 PLI that belongs to Q, consider the tree of choices that we would make through step 1∼6 of the procedure above. If there exist a branch of this tree that is not ended with ’discarded’ in step 5∼6, we have reduced the PLI to ESs successfully. Since all weight 5 ESs are already evaluated, we readily obtained the closed-form of this PLI. If all branches are discarded, we get nothing new. Now carry out the procedure for every PLI in Q to obtain independent relations giving PLI closed-forms directly. We show some typical examples:

R 1 Li2(x) log(1−x) log(x+1) A successful example: Consider P LI(1, 0, 1; 21; 2) = 0 x+1 dx.

R 1 Li2(1−x) log(1−x) log(x+1) Step 1: Modulo known LIs, we only need to evaluate 0 x+1 , so let t → 1−x.

Li (x) log(x) log 1− x R 1 Li2(x) log(x) R 1 2 ( 2 ) Step 2: The problem boils down to evaluating log(2) x dx and x dx. 0 1− 2 0 1− 2 Set log(x) to be invariant in both 2 integrals. Making use of double expansion the weight 4 integral is easily solved. Now we deal with the latter one.

x 1 Step 3: Expand Li2(x), log 1 − , x with 3 independent index j, k, l. 2 1− 2

31 Step 4: Make use of Prop. 5(1).

Step 5: Consider Cauchy product of the summation w.r.t k, l. The convolutional term is har- x log(1− 2 ) monic hence the triple sum is reduced to double (or we may expand x directly in step 3 to 1− 2 obtain the double sum).

Step 6: Denote the Cauchy index replacing k, l as m. The double sum we have in hand is P∞ P∞ Hm j=1 m=1 j22m(j+m+1)2 . Sum w.r.t j ﬁrst (this is nothing but the elementary sum occurred in proof of Prop. 6(3)), we reduced this sum to a combination of three GESs already known. Hence

1 1 23π2ζ(3) 15ζ(5) P LI(1, 0, 1; 21; 2) = −2Li − Li log(2) + − 5 2 4 2 96 64 21 1 5 11 − ζ(3) log2(2) − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 16 40 72 720

Unsuccessful examples: Readers may verify that P LI(1, 0, 1; 22; 2), P LI(2, 0, 0; 22; 2) are un- solvable using this procedure. More speciﬁcally, it is impossible to make choices in the procedure above, to avoid the multiple sum containing summand of form HkHj+k or its alternating analogue, hence in step 6 they must be discarded. In fact these two integrals are evaluated nontrivially as we put all relations generated by this section together. This reveals the necessity of a systematic approach providing linear relations.

4.8 Solution

All linear relations generated by section 3 and 4 forms a equation system, from which all ESs and PLIs with weight ≤ 5 are explicitly solved thus Theorem 1 is proved.

Note: Based on Prop. 7(1)(2)(3) and all LI/PLIs computed, we may add the following

x x Li x2 , Li (1 − x), Li , Li 2 2 2 x − 1 2 x + 1

to the set of 6 polylog terms with new PLIs remain in AW for corresponding W . As an example, x x R 1 Li2( x−1 )Li2( x+1 ) see [15] for evaluation of 0 x dx. These new PLIs will be of great use in section of QPLI below.

In fact, there exists a more essential way of proving Theorem 1 using MZV decomposition, which is implicitly outlined in [4, 5, 6, 18]. It is of great complexity compared to our methods

32 above. Since we focus on elementary proofs, its explanation will be omitted. Moreover, we establish all QLI/QPLI results, and all but 10 QES results using MZV-free methods below. Only in the last part of solution, 10 QESs will be solved by applying MZV theory.

5 QLI

There are 14, 50, 129 QLIs for weight 2, 3, 4 respectively.

5.1 Logsine integrals and contour deformation

5.1.1 LSI, PLSI, ITF

We introduce logsine integrals (abbr. LSIs) as follow:

π Z 2 LSI(a, b, c; d) = xa logb(2 sin(x)) logc(2 cos(x)) cotd(x) dx 0

Here a, b, c ≥ 0, d = 0, ±1. The weight of an LSI is deﬁned as W = a + b + c + 1.

Proposition 8. All convergent LSIs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW ∪ πAW −1 over Q. Here πS = {πs|s ∈ S},A0 = {1}.

l(0;x)kl(1;x)ml(2;x)n Proof. Consider F0(x) = f(p;x) with all logs principal, integrate along the contour encircling the upper unit disc. Map the (−1, 0) part back to (0, 1) via t → −x, parametrize the semicircular part by t → e2ix. Since log(−x) = log(x) + iπ on upper (−1, 0) and log(1 + e2ix) = 2ix π π log(2 cos(x)) + ix, log(1 − e ) = log(2 sin(x)) + i x − 2 on (0, 2 ), we have that:

π m Z 2 X m F (x)G (x) dx = LI(k, m, n; l) − (iπ)jLI(n, m − j, k; 2 − l) l j 0 j=0

m π k n Where F (x) = (2ix) log(2 sin(x)) + i x − 2 (log(2 cos(x))+ix) ,G0(x) = cot(x)+i, G1(x) = −2i and G2(x) = tan(x) − i. Taking

Clariﬁcation: There’s no complete table for LSIs in this article. Readers may compute them by using Prop. 8 themselves. Several of LSIs will be used later in section 8. Also note that this solution naturally extends to higher weights.

33 Though Prop. 8 is already a complete solution, we may also apply Fourier expansion. Since

∞ ∞ X (−1)k−1 cos(2kx) X cos(2kx) = log(2 cos(x)), − = log(2 sin(x)) k k k=1 k=1

π π hold on (0, π ) [13], we see immediately that R 2 xn log(2 sin(x)) dx or R 2 xn log(2 cos(x)) dx are 2 0π 0 R 2 m inx given closed-forms using elementary results of 0 x e dx and Fubini theorem. This is naturally π extended to the integral on (0, 4 ), see subsection 5-12 for applications.

Another way of solving LSIs is to diﬀerentiate the following formula [13] w.r.t v, a:

π Z 2 π cos(ax) cosv−1(x) dx = v a+v+1 −a+v+1 0 2 vB 2 , 2

π π R 2 2n m R 2 2n+1 m By which all LSIs of form 0 x log (2 cos(x)) dx, 0 x tan(x) log (2 cos(x)) dx are solved. Similarly, diﬀerentiate the following formula w.r.t p (for its proof, substitute tan(x) → t then refer to Mellin transform subsection below):

π Z 2 1 πp p x tanp(x) dx = π csc ψ(0) 1 − − 2ψ(0)(1 − p) − γ 0 4 2 2

π π R 2 n R 2 n We obtain closed-forms of 0 x log (tan(x)) dx and 0 x cot(x) log (tan(x)) dx, which yield LSI relations after expansion.

π We deﬁne poly-logsine integrals (abbr. PLSIs) as an integral on (0, 2 ), with its integrand FG with F = xa logb(2 sin(x)) logc(2 cos(x)) cotd(x), G a product whose terms belong to the set

2 Cl2(2x), Cl2(4x), Li2 − tan (x) , Ti2(tan(x))

They arise in parametrizations of L(2, k; x), k = 1, 2, 5, 6 via substitution x → e2it in PLIs [14]:

π2 Li (x) = Li e2it = iCl (2t) + t2 − πt + 2 2 2 6

1 π2 Li (−x) = Li −e2it = i Cl (4t) − Cl (2t) + t2 − 2 2 2 2 2 12

1 − x 1 Li ± = Li (∓i tan(t)) = Li − tan2(t) ∓ iTi (tan(t)) 2 x + 1 2 4 2 2

Deforming contours like before, PLSIs can be evaluated.

34 Furthermore, by x → tan(t) and repeated integration by parts, it’s possible to convert the inverse tangent family (abbr. ITF)

Z ∞ tan−1(x)k logm x2 + 1 l 2 n dx 0 x (x + 1)

R ∞ xa−1 to combination of LSIs hence obtain their closed-forms. Diﬀerentiating 0 (x+1)a+b dx = B(a, b) logm(1+iz) or integrating zn along the upper plane also generate relations between them.

5.1.2 QLSI and QLI

Quadratic logsine integrals (abbr. QLSIs) are deﬁned as:

π Z 4 QLSI(a, b, c) = xa logb(2 sin(x)) logc(2 cos(x))dx 0

The name ’logsine’ originate from [10]. QLSIs are involved in solution of certain QLIs. For instance, by x → tan(t) we have

m n π Z 1 2 Z 4 log (x) log x + 1 n m n 2 dx = (−2) log (tan(t)) log (cos(t)) dt 0 x + 1 0

In our case m + n ≤ 3 so that brute force may be used. Expand RHS using log(tan(t)) = log(sin(t)) − log(cos(t)), deform contour via z → e2it like before, QLSIs are converted into complex R i log integrals 1 ··· dz, which are completely solvable by Mathematica (using F 1 ∼ F 4 in subsection R 1 logm(x) tan−1(x)n 2-1). This method is also applicable for another type of QLI: 0 x2+1 dx. There’s also no complete table for QLSIs in this article.

5.2 Inverse tangent family

1 Start from a integral in ITF, map (1, ∞) part to (0,1) via t → x , after simpliﬁcation on logs and −1 −1 1 −1 π tan (x) (note tan x +tan (x) = 2 ) we obtain a QLI relation. Now consider all ITF integrals.

5.3 Polylog special values

(n) Apparently Lin(±1), Lin(±i) can be represented by ζ, η, β, ψ . Moreover we have (proved by plugging in special values in formulas of Prop. 7 and [14]):

35 π2 1 1 i 1 5π2 1 Li (1 + i) = + i C + π log(2) , Li + = i C − π log(2) + − log2(2) 2 16 4 2 2 2 8 96 8

35ζ(3) 1 1 + i 35ζ(3) log3(2) 5 <(Li (1 + i)) = + π2 log(2), < Li = + − π2 log(2) 3 64 32 3 2 64 48 192

1 + i 7π3 3 = Li + =(Li (1 + i)) = + π log2(2) 3 2 3 128 32

1 + i 1 7 =(Li (1 + i)) − = Li = π log3(2) + π3 log(2) 4 4 2 64 256

Below is the only nontrivial pair of special values.

Proposition 9. The following formulas hold:

5Li 1 97π4 5 log4(2) 1 <(Li (1 + i)) = − 4 2 + − + π2 log2(2) 4 16 9216 384 48

k ∞ P[ 2 ] l k 1 4 4 1 i X (−1) 5Li4 343π log (2) 5 < Li + = l=0 2l = 2 + + − π2 log2(2) 4 2 2 k42k 16 92160 96 768 k=1

In which [a] denotes the integer part of a.

Proof: Two formulas are equivalent due to inversion formula of Li4(z). Consider evaluating QLI(225; 4) in 2 ways:

π Z 4 (1) QLI(225; 4) → t log2(tan(t)) dt → QLSIs 0

Where QLSIs are evaluated by brute force in the subsection 5-1-2.

∞ n ∞ n ! X (−1) H2n X i Hn (2) QLI(225; 4) → · · · + → · · · < n3 n3 n=1 n=1

Where we have used double expansion like in subsection 4-7, then a simpliﬁed version of Prop. 4(3). Equating 2 forms generated by 2 methods (use Mathematica for simplicity) gives the closed-from of <(Li4(1 + i)) and completes the proof.

36 5.4 Brute force

5.4.1 Class 1

By writing log x2 + 1 , 2i tan−1(x) as log(1+ix)±log(1−ix), all QLIs with W ≤ 3 are decomposed R 1 log(a+x) log(b+x) into several integrals of form 0 c+x dx, which are trivial due F 3, subsection 2-1.

5.4.2 Class 2

Moreover, due to F 1,F 2,F 4, subsection 2-1, all integrals of form

Z log2(A(x)) log(B(x)) Z log2(A(x)) log(B(x)) Z logn(C(x)) dx, dx, dx A(x) B(x) g(p; x)

P (x) (here A(x),B(x) ∈ Z = {1, x, 1 ± x, 1 ± ix}, C(x) = Q(x) with P (x),Q(x) ∈ Z, p 6= 1) can be calculated by brute force as well. For former two we simply use F 2,F 4, while the latter boils down to transformation z → C(x), partial fraction decomposition outside the log (since the inverse 0 −1 D (z) D = C is also a fractional transformation, the outside R(z) = g(p;D(z)) is rational), and usage of F 1. Consider all possible A, B, C, p, expand the expression, take

Z 1 log(1 − ix) log2(x + 1) Z 1 log2(1 + ix) log(1 − x) dx, dx 0 1 − ix 0 1 + ix

3 3 3 1 1−x 1 x 1 1+ix Z log 1+ix Z x log 1+ix Z log 1−ix dx, 2 dx, dx 0 x 0 x + 1 0 x + 1

All can be done without much eﬀort with the help of Mathematica and subsection 5-3.

5.5 General formulas

Evidently the following are expressible in terms of ζ, η, β, Lik for arbitrary n:

Z 1 logn(x) Z 1 x logn(x) Z 1 x logn x2 + 1 Z 1 tan−1(x)n 2 dx, 2 dx, 2 dx, 2 dx 0 x + 1 0 x + 1 0 x + 1 0 x + 1

By series expansion and calculating primitives. Based on subsection 2-2 and these four, we may also evaluate the following in a general sense, using x → x2 and integration by parts:

Z 1 logn x2 + 1 Z 1 x log(x) logn x2 + 1 Z 1 log x2 + 1 logn(x) dx, 2 dx, dx 0 x 0 x + 1 0 x

37 Z 1 tan−1(x) logn(x) Z 1 log2 x2 + 1 log2n(x) Z 1 x log x2 + 1 log2n−1(x) dx, dx, 2 dx 0 x 0 x 0 x + 1

One may write down exact formulas themselves. Now use them to solve QLIs directly.

5.6 Feynman’s trick on Mellin transform

Proposition 10. Denote

1 πs s 1 f(s) = π sec ψ(0) 1 − − ψ(0) 4 2 2 2

1 − s πs 2 − s πs g(s) = 2β csc + 2β sec − 2π csc(πs) 2 2 2 2 Then we have

Z 1 tan−1(x) log2n+1(x) 1 ∂2n+1f(s) 1 2 dx = lim 2n+1 − π(2n + 1)!β(2n + 2) 0 x + 1 2 s→0 ∂s 4

Z 1 x tan−1(x) log2n(x) 1 π 1 − 2−2n (2n)!ζ(2n + 1) 1 ∂2nf(s) 2 dx = (2n)!β(2n + 2) + 2n+3 − lim 2n 0 x + 1 2 2 2 s→0 ∂s

Z 1 −1 2n 2n tan (x) log (x) 1 1 −2n 1 ∂ g(s) dx = (2n)!β(2n + 2) + π 1 − 2 (2n)!ζ(2n + 1) − πlim 2n 0 x + 1 2 4 16 s→0 ∂s

tan−1(x) tan−1(x) Proof. Consider Mellin transform of x+1 , x2+1 . Take the latter as the example: let

Z ∞ xs−1 tan−1(x) Z ∞ xs−1 tan−1(ax) M(s) = 2 dx, J(a, s) = 2 dx 0 x + 1 0 x + 1 then by Feynman’s trick and proof of Prop. 2(6) we get

Z ∞ s 1−s πs ∂J x π 1 − a sec 2 = 2 2 2 dx = 2 ∂a 0 (x + 1) (a x + 1) 2 (1 − a )

Integrate w.r.t a using the following (see [13])

Z 1 xu − xv dx = ψ(0)(v + 1) − ψ(0)(u + 1) 0 1 − x

38 1 we get J. Diﬀerentiate w.r.t s, substitute t → x for (1, ∞) part on RHS and assign appropriate values of s gives the ﬁrst two formulas. The last one is similar, see [15].

Now use them to solve QLIs directly, in our case QLI(225; 5), QLI(225; 3).

5.7 Integration by parts

Q5 A(m) In spirit of subsection 2-3, generalize F to m=1 k(m; x) . Now consider all possible F .

5.8 Fractional transformation

Q5 A(m) 1−x m=1 k(m;x) Similar to subsection 2-4, substitute x → x+1 in integral of F = g(p;x) , where p 6= 2. Using ! ! 1 − x π 1 − x2 2 x2 + 1 tan−1(x) + tan−1 = , log + 1 = log x + 1 4 x + 1 (x + 1)2

1−x we may split the integrand to obtain QLI relations (after possible decomposition (1+x)(1+x2) → 1 x 1+x − 1+x2 ). Now consider all possible F .

5.9 Power substitution

For each LI, substitute x → t2, then expand logn(1 − t2) via binomial formula (and possibly de- t compose 1−t2 ) to get QLI relation. Now consider all LIs.

5.10 Weierstrass substitution

−1 2t 1−t2 dt For each LSI, substitute x → 2 tan (t). Since (sin(x), cos(x)) → 1+t2 , 1+t2 , dx → 2 1+t2 , we get a QLI relation after simpliﬁcation. Now consider all LSIs.

5.11 Parametric integration

This method only generates one relation. By (keyhole) contour integration we may show

Z ∞ log2(x) π2a log3(a) π2 log(a) 2 dx = 2 − 2 − 2 (a > 0) 0 (x + 1) (a + x) 8 (a + 1) 3 (a + 1) 3 (a + 1)

R ∞ log(x+1) log2(x) Integrate a on (0,1), expand the RHS integrals, 0 x2+1 dx is computed. Now map the

39 (1, ∞) part to (0, 1).

5.12 Fourier expansion R 1 tan−1(x)n R 1 x tan−1(x)n We may solve 0 x dx and 0 x2+1 dx by Fourier expansion after x → tan(t). The π π π R 4 n R 4 n−1 R 4 n−1 former becomes 0 t (tan(t) + cot(t)) dt, then 0 t log(sin(t)) dt, 0 t log(cos(t)) dt after integration by parts, which are completely solved using Fourier series in subsection 5-1-1. The latter π log 1−x2 tan−1(x)2 R 4 n R 1 ( ) boils down to 0 t tan(t) dt either. See also [15] for evaluation of 0 x2+1 dx using Fourier expansion twice.

5.13 Beta derivatives

5.13.1 Class 1 R 1 logm(x) logn(1−x4) Similar to subsection 2-5, all integrals of form 0 g(p;x) dx (p = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) are solv- 1 −x3+x2−x+1 4 able. For instance, when p = 3 we write x+1 = 1−x4 , substitute x → t then split it into 4 integrals expressible via Beta derivatives. On the other hand, we may expand logn(1 − x4) = (log(1 − x) + log(x + 1) + log(x2 + 1))n to obtain a QLI relation. Now consider all m, n, p.

5.13.2 Class 2

Another variation is to multiply both sides of the equality

log x2 + 1 x3 ± x2 ± x + 1 log 1 − x4 (±x + 1) log 1 − x2 = − 1 ∓ x 1 − x4 1 − x2

2 m m R 1 log(x +1) log (x) with log (x) and integrate. Therefore 0 1∓x dx, in our case QLI(224; 1), QLI(224; 3), are evaluated by Beta derivatives using x2 → t, x4 → t on RHS.

5.14 Contour integration

5.14.1 Class 1

Similar to subsection 2-6, consider integrating

logk(1 − z) logm(z) logn(z + 1) logk(1 − z) logm(z) logn(z + 1) F (z) = or F (z) = 1 1 + z2 2 z(1 + z2)

40 along large upper semicircular contour with all logs principal. Residue theorem yields

Z ∞+0i Fk(z)dz = 2πiRes(Fk, i) −∞+0i

1 Split LHS into 4 parts by branch points 0, ±1, use x → ±t, x → ± t to map them to (0, 1), after expansion and taking

5.14.2 Class 2

Alternatively, consider integrating

logk(1 − z) logm(z) logn(1 + z) logs(1 + iz) logt(1 − iz) F (z) = z(1 + z) along large quartercircular contour encircling the ﬁrst quadrant, with all logs principal. Cauchy R ∞ R i∞ theorem yields 0 F (z)dz − 0 F (z)dz = 0. Split the integral into 4 parts by 0, 1, i, use x → 1 i t, x → t , x → it, x → t to map them to (0, 1), after expansion and taking

log(1−z) log(1+z) log(1+iz) Take F (z) = z(1+z) as an example, after routine simpliﬁcation we have

! Z 1 x i 1 π2 −( − )(log(1−x)−log(x)+iπ) log2 x2 + 1 − log(x) log x2 + 1 + log2(x) + tan−1(x)2 − π tan−1(x) + 2 2 0 x + 1 x + 1 4 4

1 i x 1 1 1 1 −( − − ) log(1−x) log2 x2 + 1 + tan−1(x)2 + − log(1−x) log(x+1) log x2 + 1 + i tan−1(x) x x2 + 1 x2 + 1 4 x x + 1 2 1 1 πi + (log(1 − x) − log(x) − iπ)(log(x + 1) − log(x)) log x2 + 1 − log(x) − i tan−1(x) + dx = 0 x + 1 2 2

Now expand this expression and take

logm(z) logn(1−z) Note: In fact we have a ‘Beta’ use of contour integration, that is, integrate z(1−z) along (0, ∞) → (0, 0) → (1, 0) → (1, ∞). Since it only generates superﬂuous relations, we won’t elaborate more here.

5.15 Series expansion

The procedure of multiple expansion in subsection 4-7 can be naturally extended to QLIs, since −1 2 −1 1 x 2 −1 −1 2 tan (x) log x + 1 , tan (x), x2+1 , x2+1 , and products like log x + 1 tan (x), tan (x) , x2+1 have

41 elementary or (quadratic) harmonic power series. Finally, if not discarded, set x → i in all generating functions in Prop. 4, take

(−1)kH(2) P∞ 2k+1 Take QLI(115; 2) for an example. After the procedure we get quadratic sums k=0 (2k+1)2 , k 2 P∞ (−1) (H2k+1) k=0 (2k+1)2 , which are directly solved by setting x → i in Prop. 4(1)(2), taking imaginary parts and using Prop. 9 for simpliﬁcation. Moreover, using Prop 4. and Prop. 5(3)(4), QLI(125; 2), QLI(114; 2), QLI(124; 2) can be evaluated similarly.

5.16 Solution

Solving the equation system of QLI relations generated by this section, all 193 QLIs with weight ≤ 4 are given closed-forms. Moreover, one may observe there are essentially two types of closed-forms in QLIs with ﬁxed weight. Take W = 4, then 68 QLIs lie in the subspace spanned by 8 constants in the extended basis B4 over Q, in which those ﬁve in A4 are included. The remaining 61 QLIs are completely expressible by other 8 constants in B4. This phenomenon of separation will extend to QPLIs.

6 QPLI

There are 20, 152 QPLIs with weight 3, 4 respectively.

6.1 Brute force

−1 R 1 Ti2(x) tan (x) Some QPLIs can be calculated by brute force, for instance 0 x dx. For each QPLI, check by Mathematica whether the premitive is solvable and evaluate it if so.

6.2 General formulas

See [15] for proof of the following:

2n−1 n n R 1 Ti2(x) log (x) R 1 Lin+1(−x) log (x) R 1 x log (x)Lin+1(±x) Lemma 4. 0 x+1 dx, 0 x2+1 dx and 0 x2+1 dx are reducible to ζ, β values.

Thus QPLIs of these types are solved directly.

42 6.3 Integration by parts

Lifting up the denominator, all QPLIs with W = 3 are trivial. Generally, in spirit of subsec- Q5 A(m) Q8 QN b(n,k) tion 2-3, generalize F to m=1 k(m; x) k=1 n=2 L(n, k; x) (in W = 4 case it is of form L(4, a; x),L(3, a; x)k(b; x),L(2, a; x)k(b; x)k(c; x) or L(2, a; x)L(2, b; x)). For those involving L(n, a; x), a ∈ {3, 5, 6}, after partial fractions another integration by parts lifting log(1 − x) is needed to obtain a regular relation modulo QLIs. Now consider all possible F .

1−x Take F = Li2 2 Ti2(x) as an example, after the extra procedure we obtain a relation between QP LI4(8; 1; 3), QP LI4(3; 5; 2).

6.4 Fractional transformation

Q5 A(m) Q8 QN b(n,k) 1−x m=1 k(m;x) k=1 n=2 L(n,k;x) Similar to subsection 2-4, apply x → x+1 in integral of F = g(p;x) L(2,a;x)k(b;x) L(3,a;x) (in W = 4 case it is of form g(p;x) or g(p;x) , a ∈ {1, 2, 5, 6}). For p = 2, after partial fractions, possibly another integration by parts lifting log(1 − x) is needed to obtain a regular relation. Now consider all possible F .

6.5 Polylog identities

logm(1−x2) logn(1+x2) logk(x) Like in subsection 4-6, multiply both sides of Prop. 7(1) with F = x or x logm(1−x2) logn(1+x2) logk(x) 1 x k(m;x) 1±x2 , Prop. 7(9) with F = x2+1 or x2+1 , Prop. 7(5)(6) with F = g(p;x) , integrate on (0,1) to obtain relations modulo known QLIs. Now consider all 4 formulas (1)(5)(6)(9) and all corresponding possible F .

6.6 Power substitution

2 Similar to subsection 5-9, for each PLI containing only Lin(±x) and log terms, substitute x → t then use Prop. 7(1) for decomposition, we obtain a QPLI relation (for instance taking F = Li2(x) log(1−x) x+1 yields a relation between QP LI4(1/2; 1/3; 5)). Now consider all suitable PLIs.

6.7 Valean’s master formula

6.7.1 Class 1

In [16], by calculating Cauchy products of polylogarithms based on subsection 3-3, the following is proved whenever |a| ≤ 1:

43 Z 1 ln(t)Li (t) Li2(a) Li (a) Li (a) 2 dt = 2 + 3 4 − 2ζ(2) 2 0 1 − at 2a a a

It naturally extends to the plane. Letting a → i and taking

6.7.2 Class 2

i R 1 Li2(1−x) log(1−x) 1 R 1 Li2(x) log(x) Moreover, by using a → i−1 , 0 1−ix dx = 1−i 0 i dx is computable due to 1− i−1 x R 1 Li2(x) log(1−x) subsection 5-3. By Prop. 7(2) the corresponding 0 1−ix dx is also evaluated modulo QLIs, thus giving closed-forms of QP LI4(1; 1; 4/5).

6.8 Contour integration

6.8.1 Class 1

Since we only discuss the weight 4 case, integrands will be restricted. Similar to subsection 5-14, consider integrating

Li (±z) log(1 + az) Li (±z) log(1 + az) F (z) = 2 or F (z) = 2 1 1 + z2 2 z(1 + z2) along large upper semicircular contour (here logs and polylogs are principal, a ∈ {±1, −i}), apply residue theorem, map each part to (0,1), take

F1,F2.

Li2(z) log(1−z) For instance, take F2(z) = z(z2+1) , after routine simpliﬁcation we have that:

 2   2  Z 1 z 1 2 π z 1 2 π − (log(z + 1) − log(z)) −Li2(−z) − log (z) −  + (log(1 − z) − log(z) − iπ) −Li2(z) − log (z) − iπ log(z) +  0 z2 + 1 2 6 z2 + 1 2 3

! ! 4 1 z 1 z 1 2 1 π 1 3 − − Li2(−z) log(z + 1) + − Li2(z) log(1 − z) dz = 2πiRes (F2(z), i) = − iπ C + πC log(2) + + iπ log(2) z z2 + 1 z z2 + 1 4 2 192 96

6.8.2 Class 2

Alternatively, consider integrating

Li (az) log(1 + bz) F (z) = 2 z(1 + z)

44 along large quartercircular contour encircling the ﬁrst quadrant (here logs, polylogs are principal, a, b ∈ {±1, ±i} ), apply Cauchy theorem, map each part to (0,1), take

Li2(z) log(1−z) For instance, take F (z) = z(z+1) , after routine simpliﬁcation we have that:

1 2 2 ! Z z i 1 iπ Li2 −z 1 1 π − − log z2 + 1 − log(z) + i tan−1(z) − − + iTi (z) − log2(z) − πi log(z) − 2 2 2 0 z + 1 z + 1 2 2 4 2 2 24

2 ! z i 1 Li2 −z 1 2 −1 − − − + + iTi2(z) log z + 1 − i tan (z) z2 + 1 z2 + 1 z 4 2

2 ! 1 1 2 π 1 1 + (log(1 − z) − log(z) − iπ) −Li2(z) − log (z) − iπ log(z) + + − Li2(z) log(1 − z) dz = 0 z + 1 2 3 z z + 1

1 2 −1 Note: In simipliﬁcations of relations above log(1 + iz) = 2 log z + 1 + i tan (z), Li2(iz) = 1 2 4 Li2 −z + iTi2(z) are frequently used. Moreover, due to Prop. 7(4) and deﬁnition of principle 1 1 2 π2 branches, we have Li2(z) = −Li2 z − 2 log (z) + iπ log(z) + 3 on upper side of (1, ∞), here 1 P∞ 1 1 1 Li2 z = k=1 k2zk . Also reminds that Ti2(z) − Ti2 z = 2 π log(z) for z > 0.

6.9 Series expansion

6.9.1 Class 1

By Prop. 3(5), 5(2) we have

Z 1 ∞ n (2) Li2(ix) log(1 − x) X i HnHn dx = − x(1 − ix) n 0 n=1

The sum is solved by Prop. 4(4) and 9. Thus, after partial fraction decomposition, expanding

Li2(ix) and taking real, imaginary parts on LHS, relations between (QP LI4(7; 1; 4), QP LI4(8; 1; 5)), (QP LI4(7; 1; 5), QP LI4(8; 1; 4)) are deduced, modulo known QP LI4(7/8; 1; 2) (since by lifting up

Li2(x) then log(x) they boils down to QP LI4(1; 4/5; 2) then QP LI4(1; 2; 4/5) modulo QLIs, which are solved in subsection 6-7).

45 6.9.2 Class 2

Moreover, using Prop. 3(5) again gives

Z 1 2 ∞ k−1 (2) Li2 −x log(1 − x) X (−1) H2k+1H dx = k x2 + 1 2k + 1 0 k=0

k (2) R 1 (1−x ) log(x) Substitute Hk = − 0 1−x dx in the sum, by Fubini we have it equals to √ = f i x ( ( )) =(f(ix)) 1 log(x) =(f(i)) − √ 1 Z x Z 4x log(x) =(f(i)) − x dx = 2 dx 0 1 − x 0 1 − x

k P∞ Hkx 1 2 Where f(x) = k=1 k = Li2(x) + 2 log (1 − x) by Prop. 3(6). Extracting imaginary parts using formulas in subsection above, it is furtherly transformed into

Z 1 2 −1 ! 4Cx log(x) 4Ti2(x) log(x) πx log(2) log(x) 2 log x + 1 log(x) tan (x) 2 − 2 − 2 + 2 dx 0 1 − x 1 − x 2 (1 − x ) 1 − x Modulo LI/QLIs and partial fractions it boils down to QP LI4(8; 2; 1/3), then QP LI4(1/2; 5; 2) and QP LI4(1/2; 2; 4) by lifting up Li2(±x) then log(x). Since QP LI4(1/2; 2; 4) are evaluated in subsection 6-2, 6-7, the original QP LI4(7; 1; 4) is solved directly.

By taking real parts, QP LI4(7; 1; 5) is dealt in a similar way.

6.10 Double integration

6.10.1 Class 1

The elementary identity

Z 1 x log(y) − dy = Li2(x)(|x| < 1) 0 1 − xy produces several linear relations. For instance, apply this to rewrite the expression of QP LI4(1; 1; 5), R 1 x2 log(1−x) after Fubini and calculating 0 (x2+1)(1−xy) dx by brute force (here and below, indefinite integration w.r.t x are carried out by Mathematica, easily verified by differentiation), we have:

Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 2 xLi2(x) log(1 − x) x log(1 − x) 2 dx = − log(y) 2 dx dy 0 x + 1 0 0 (x + 1)(1 − xy)

 y  1 2 Z C Li2 y−1 5π2y y log (2) π log(2) = − log(y)  2 + 2 + 2 − 2 − 2  dy 0 y + 1 y (y + 1) 96 (y + 1) 8 (y + 1) 8 (y + 1)

46 y Modulo PLI/QLIs, partial fractions and Prop. 7(3) Li2 y−1 → Li2(y) , the only one remains R 1 yLi2(y) log(y) is 0 y2+1 dy, thus we get a relation between QP LI4(1; 1; 5), QP LI4(1; 2; 5).

3 more relations between (QP LI4(2; 1; 5), QP LI4(2; 2; 5)), (QP LI4(1; 1; 4), QP LI4(1; 2; 4)) and (QP LI4(2; 1; 4), QP LI4(2; 2; 4)) can be obtained by double integration similarly, possibly with a substitution x → −x in the identity above and Prop. 7(3).

6.10.2 Class 2

Alternatively, apply this method to QP LI4(1; 3; 5) yields:

 y 2y  Z 1 Z 1 Li2 Li2 xLi2(x) log(1 + x) 1+y 1+y 2 dx = − log(y) log terms + 2 − 2  dy 0 1 + x 0 y(1 + y ) y(1 + y )

With the part involving log terms trivially evaluated via LIs. Modulo PLI/QLIs, partial frac- y tions and Prop. 7(3) Li2 y+1 → Li2(−y) and QP LI4(2; 2; 5) (evaluated in subsection 6-2), Li y Li 2y 2 R 1 2( 1+y ) R 1 2( 1+y ) log (y) the 0 log(y) y(1+y2) dy part is solved. 0 log(y) y dy is also solved by lifting up 2 so Li 2y R 1 2( 1+y ) 1 2 only J = 0 y log(y) 1+y2 dy remains. For J, integrate by parts twice (lifting ﬁrstly 2 log(1 + y ) 1 2 2y then 2 Li2(−y )) to eliminate Li2 1+y term, modulo QLIs it boils down to evaluation of

Z 1 1 − y Li (−y2) Z 1 1 − y Li (−y2) log 2 dy, log 2 dy 0 1 + y y 0 1 + y 1 + y

2 R 1 Li2(−y ) The former two 0 log (1 ± y) y dy are also reduced to subsection 6-2 after integrating by 2 R 1 Li2(−y ) parts twice (lifting ﬁrstly −Li2(∓y) then log(y)), moreover 0 log (1 + y) 1+y dy reduces to 1 2 QLIs by lifting up 2 log (1 + y). Thus the ﬁnal relation is between the original integral and 2 R 1 Li2(−y ) 0 log (1 − y) 1+y dy, i.e. QP LI4(1; 3; 5) and QP LI4(7; 1; 3).

2 analogous relations between (QP LI4(1; 3; 4), QP LI4(8; 1; 3)), (QP LI4(2; 3; 4), QP LI4(8; 1; 3)) can be obtained by double integration and repeated integration by parts similarly.

47 6.10.3 Class 3

Furthermore, apply this method to one involving imaginary arguments yields:

Z 1 Z 1 Li2(x) log(1 + ix) log(y) y (1 + i)y 2 dx = − 2 quadratic log terms + Li2 − Li2 dy 0 x + 1 0 y + 1 i + y i + y

With the quadratic log terms of form log(1 ± y), log(1 ± iy), all logs and polylogs are principal. y (1+i)y 0 i y 1 Denote f(y) = Li2 i+y −Li2 i+y , then f (y) = y2+1 − y2+1 + y log(1−y) is of good form. R 1 f(y) log(y) Modulo known LI/QLIs, our only interest is 0 y2+1 dy. Apply partial integration twice (lift- −1 R 1 0 ing tan (y) then Ti2(y)), modulo QLIs again the integral is reduced to 0 Ti2(y)f (y) dy, which is a combination of QP LI4(8; 1; 2/4/5). Now, modulo QLIs again QP LI4(8; 1; 2) is equivalent to

QP LI4(1; 2; 4) (solved in subsection 6-7) by partial integration lifting −Li2(y) then log(y), while QP LI4(8; 1; 4/5) are deduced by combining relations in subsection 6-9 (in which the original integral is not used so it’s not a circular argument). Thus we’ve evaluated the original integral i.e. QP LI4(1; 4/5; 4) directly.

2 relations between (QP LI4(2; 4; 4), QP LI4(8; 3; 2/5)), (QP LI4(2; 5; 4), QP LI4(8; 3; 4)) can be R 1 Li2(−x) log(1+ix) obtained similarly if we start from 0 x2+1 dx instead.

6.10.4 Class 4

Now we make use of the generalized

Z 1 x log2(y) Li3(x) = dy (|x| < 1) 0 2(1 − xy)

Consider QP LI4(3; 4), by Fubini theorem, rational integration w.r.t x and reﬂection y → 1 − y:

Z 1 1−x Z 1 Z 1 2 Li3 2 (1 − x) log (y) 2 dx = 2 dydx 0 x + 1 0 0 2 (x + 1) (2 − (1 − x)y)

Z 1 (−πy − 4 log(2 − y) + π + log(4)) log2(y) Z 1 log2(1 − y)(πy − 4 log(y + 1) + log(4)) = 2 dy = 2 dy 0 8 (y − 2y + 2) 0 8 (y + 1)

Plug in QLI values, the desired QP LI4(3; 4) is solved directly.

Note that QP LI4(4; 4) can be computed in the same way.

48 6.10.5 Class 5

Now we make use of a new kernel:

Z 1 2 2 4x y log(y) Li2 −x = 2 2 dy (|x| < 1) 0 x y + 1

Apply this to another involving imaginary arguments yields:

1 2 1 1 2 Z Li2 −x log(1 + ix) Z Z 4x y log(1 + ix) log(y) 2 dx = 2 2 2 dydx 0 x + 1 0 0 (x + 1) (x y + 1)

Z 1 2i log(y) y (1 + i)y y (1 + i)y = 2 quadratic log terms + Li2 − Li2 − Li2 + Li2 dy 0 1 − y y − 1 y − 1 y + 1 y + 1

y By Prop. 7(3) and known LI/PLI/QLIs, the part involving quadratic log and Li2 y±1 are directly R 1 2h(y) log(y) evaluated. Thus, up to a constant factor −i, the only one remains is 0 1−y2 dy, where

1−iy 1+iy (1 + i)y (1 + i)y log y+1 log 1−y h(y) = Li − Li , h0(y) = − 2 y − 1 2 y + 1 y(y + 1) (1 − y)y

Apply partial integration using:

Z 2 log(y) π2 K(y) = dy = Li (−y) − Li (y) − log(1 − y) log(y) + log(y + 1) log(y) + 1 − y2 2 2 4

R 1 2h(y) log(y) R 1 0 We have 0 1−y2 dy boils down to 0 K(y)h (y) dy, which is decomposed into combination of QP LI4(1/2; ·; 1/2/3) after separation, appropriate partial integration lifting − log(1 − y), modulo LI/PLI/QLIs. Thus, we obtain 2 independent relations between the original QP LI4(7; 4/5; 4) and these QP LI4(1/2; ·; 1/2/3). In fact, by combining all relations generated by subsection 6-1∼6-10-4, all QPLIs of form QP LI4(1/2; ·; 1/2/3) are solved so QP LI4(7; 4/5; 4) is evaluated.

Another relation between QP LI4(7; 3; 4), QP LI4(2; 5; 5) and QP LI4(2; 4; 4) can be obtained 2 R 1 Li2(−x ) log(1+x) similarly if we consider applying this kernel on 0 x2+1 dx instead. Indeed, in this case R 1 0 R 1 0 the remaining 0 K(y)h (y) dy will be replaced by 0 K(y)l (y) dy, where:

y 2y y 2y l(y) = Li − Li − Li + Li 2 −i + y 2 −i + y 2 i + y 2 i + y

i log y2 + 1 2iy tan−1(y) 2i tan−1(y) l0(y) = − + − y2 + 1 y2 + 1 y

49 From which the mentioned relation is extracted.

6.11 Solution

One may verify that subsection 6-1∼6-10 readily oﬀers 171 independent relations, from which 160 QPLIs (W ≤ 4) out of the total 172 are solved, while the remaining 12 QPLIs are connected by 11 relations (generated by subsection 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, 6-10-3, 6-10-5). In other words, only one needs to be solved explicitly to complete the system. The 12 (up till now) unsolved are:

QP LI4(2/3/4/6; 4; 4), QP LI4(2/3/4/6; 5; 5)

QP LI4(8; 3; 5), QP LI4(8; 4; 3), QP LI4(7; 3; 4), QP LI4(7; 5; 3)

R 1 Li2(−y) log(1−iy) Apparently, 0 1−iy dy is evaluable, since by partial integration it boils down to integral R 1 log2(1−iy) log(y+1) 0 y dy then QLIs. On the other hand, taking its real part gives a relation between QP LI4(2; 4; 4), QP LI4(2; 5; 5) (essentially this is subsection 6-3).

R 1 Li2(−y) log(1+iy) Now we evaluate 0 1−iy dy directly to obtain the last nontrivial relation. Apply double expansion using Prop. 3(2)(5), sum w.r.t j in spirit of Prop. 5, after an index change we arrive at:

Z 1 ∞ ∞ j k Li2(−x) log(1 + ix) X X (−1) i Hfk dx = 1 − ix j2(j + k + 1) 0 j=1 k=1

∞ k 2 ! X k (−1) (log(2) − H^k+1) π log(2) = i Hfk − + (k + 1)2 12(k + 1) (k + 1)2 k=1

∞ k−1 k−1 2 ! X k−1 (−1) (−1) (log(2) − Hfk) log(2) π = i Hfk − + − k k2 k2 12k k=1

Modulo ζ, η values and up to constant factors, we have to deal with 5 sums:

2 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ n n n n i Hn X i Hfn X (±i) Hfn X i Hfn X f S = ,S = ,S = ,S = 1 n 2/3 n2 4 n3 5 n2 n=1 n=1 n=1 n=1

Using Prop. 3(7), 4(7) and all closed-forms in subsection 5-3, plug in x → ±i, S1,S2,S3 are solved.

50 R 1 1−(−x)n For S4, by using Hfn = 0 x+1 dx and partial integration we have

∞ n Z 1 Z 1 2 ! X i Hfn Li3(i) − Li3(−ix) log(x + 1) Li2 −x 1 = dx = + iTi (x) dx + iπ3 log(2) n3 x + 1 x 4 2 16 n=1 0 0

Since QP LI4(7/8; 3; 2) belong to 160 QPLIs already solved, S4 is ﬁnished. To conquer S5, recall Prop. 5(1), 3(9), exchange the order:

2 ∞ n ∞ i Hfn Z 1 2 X log(x) X n = − Hfn (−ix) dx n2 x n=1 0 n=1 Z 1 1 i ix + 1 1 = − + log(x) Li2(−ix) + 2Li2 − 2Li2 + A(x) dx 0 x 1 + ix 2 2

R 1 1 i Here A(x) = 2 log(1−ix) log(1+ix)−2 log(2) log(1+ix). Apparently 0 − x + 1+ix log(x)A(x)dx 1 2 trivially reduces to LI/QLIs. Moreover, by using partial integration lifting 2 log (x), polylogs in ix+1 1 R 1 (Li2(−ix)+2Li2( 2 )−2Li2( 2 )) log(x) 0 x dx part are eliminated hence also solved via QLIs. Further- Li 1 log(x) R 1 2( 2 ) R 1 Li2(−ix) log(x) more, 0 1+ix dx, 0 1+ix dx are trivial since QP LI4(7/8; 2; 4/5) also belong to 160 ix+1 R 1 Li2( 2 ) log(x) known QPLIs. Therefore, up to constants the only one left is 0 1+ix dx. Like in subsection 6-10-1, with the aid of

Li 1 (ix + 1) Z 1 log(y) 2 2 = − dy (|x| < 1) 1 + ix 0 2 − (1 + ix)y

We apply double integration

iy 1 ix+1 1 1 1 Z Li log(x) Z Z log(x) log(y) Z Li2 2−y log(y) 2 2 dx = − dydx = −i dy 0 1 + ix 0 0 2 − (1 + ix)y 0 y

1 2 Lift up 2 log (y) again, let y → 1 − y and simplify, we have it equals to

2 (1−i)(1+iy) 2 (1−i)(1+iy) 1 1 i Z log (1 − y) log y+1 i Z log (1 − y) log y+1 − dy − dy 2 0 1 − y 2 0 y + 1

Obviously they reduce to LI/QLIs after separation and a possible partial integration lifting up 1 3 − 3 log (1 − y) for the former, so S5 is computed.

51 R 1 Li2(−x) log(1+ix) R 1 Li2(−x) log(1−ix) Combining S1 ∼ S5, desired 0 1−ix dx is solved. Add it up to 0 1−ix dx above then take real part, QP LI4(2; 4; 4) hence other 11 unknowns are calculated, ﬁnishing evaluation of all 172 QPLIs with weight ≤ 4. Thus, Theorem 2 is proved.

7 QES

We solve 83 QESs with W ≤ 4 (out of 93) and 28 non-alt QESs with W = 5 using non-MZV approach. 10 tough alternating weight 4 QESs remain are deduced with help of MZV theory [24].

7.1 Non-alternating case

1 2p For each non-alternating QES, write Hn = H2n − He2n, np = (2n)p , use

∞ ∞ ∞ ! X 1 X X f(2n) = f(n) − (−1)n−1f(n) 2 n=1 n=1 n=1 and possible index change to decompose it into alternating ESs. For instance we have

∞ 2 ∞ n−1 2 X (H2n − He2n)(H2n) X 1 − (−1) (Hn − Hen)(Hn) QES(11, 31, 31; 22) = = (2n + 1)2 2 (n + 1)2 n=1 n=0

n (−1) 1 1 2 ∞ n−1 H − H + − H − X 1 − (−1) n+1 en+1 n+1 n+1 n+1 n+1 = 2 (n + 1)2 n=0

n−1 (−1) 1 1 2 ∞ n−1 H − H + − H − X 1 + (−1) n en n n n n = 2 n2 n=1

Expand this expression. Since all ESs of weight 5 are recorded/computed in section 3, the QES is solved directly. Now do the same to all non-alt QESs.

7.2 Generating functions

For each formula in Prop. 3 or 4, let z → i, take

52 7.3 QLI/QPLI expansion

For each QLI/QPLI, carry out the procedure of subsection 4-7 to obtain QES relations. For in- log(x2+1) stance, double expansion on Li2(x), x2+1 gives

∞ 2 X H2n π 1 QP LI4(1, 4; 4) = (−1)n−1H − + − n (2n + 1)2 6(2n + 1) (2n + 1)3 n=1

Which directly leads to QES(11, 31; −22) modulo trivial terms. As another example, one may verify QP LI4(7, 4; 4), QES(11, 12; −12) are connected by double expansion too. Now it’s natural to consider all QLI/QPLIs and all possible choices in the expansion procedure.

7.4 Integral representation

For each formula in Prop. 5 (and other integral representations), multiply both sides by appropriate harmonic factor, sum up w.r.t n, use Prop. 3 (or other generating functions) to simplify LHS, reduce them to known LI/PLI/QLI/QPLIs via various manipulations (sub, IBP, etc).

Other integral representations are those featuring single harmonic terms, for instance

Z 1 n Z 1 n Z 1 1 − x2n log2(x) 1 − x g(2) (1 − (−x) ) log(x) (3) Hn = dx, Hn = − dx, H2n = dx 0 1 − x 0 x + 1 0 2(1 − x) or those composite ones like (readers may complete them)

Z 1 2n Z 1 n x x n−1 dx = Hn − H2n + log(2), dx = (−1) Hfn − log(2) 0 x + 1 0 x + 1

Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 xn−1 log(x) log(x + 1) dx, xn−1 log(1 − x) log(x + 1) dx, xn−1 log2(x + 1) dx 0 0 0

Other generating functions are derived from Prop. 3, i.e. consider f(±za), f(za) ± f(−za) or a 1

∞ √ √ ∞ X (−1)nxn tan−1 ( x) − x X x2n+1 1 = √ , = (Li (x) − Li (−x)) 2n + 1 x (2n + 1)2 2 2 2 n=1 n=0

∞ ∞ 2 X 1 log(1 − x) log(x + 1) X (2) Li2 −x xTi2(x) H x2n = − + , (−1)nH x2n = − 2n 2 1 − x x + 1 2n 4 (x2 + 1) x2 + 1 n=1 n=1

53 The general process is rather tricky and complicated so we only show one example. Consider P∞ H2n+1Hgn QES(21, 31; 22). Modulo trivial QES(21; 32) we only need to calculate n=0 (2n+1)2 . By manipulating Prop. 3(15) one have (all polylogs principal)

∞ n 2n X (−1) H2n+1x i F (x) = = − (−Li (−ix) + Li (ix) + Li (ix + 1) − Li (1 − ix) (2n + 1)2 2x 3 3 3 3 n=0 1 1 −Li (ix + 1) log(1 + ix) + Li (1 − ix) log(1 − ix) − log(−ix) log2(1 + ix) + log(ix) log2(1 − ix) 2 2 2 2

n 2x 1− −x2 R 1 ( ( ) ) P∞ H2n+1Hgn R 1 2x(−F (x)+F (i)) Hence, recall Hfn = 0 x2+1 dx, it is direct that n=0 (2n+1)2 = 0 x2+1 dx. Li3(··· ) Li2(··· ) log(··· ) Expand the integrand, apply partial integration to x2+1 terms then Prop. 7(2) for x2+1 , −1 Li2(··· ) tan (··· ) x2+1 terms, simplify and plug in QLI/QPLI values, the original sum is evaluated.

7.5 Contour integration

Identical to subsection 3-4, see [11] for examples and general process.

7.6 Partial fractions

(±1)j−1(±1)k−1 Generalize subsection 3-3 to consideration of f(j)ag(k)b where f, g ∈ {2t, 2t + 1}. For those (k) Pn (−1)j−1 relations involving summand Jn = j=1 (2j+1)k , try subsection 7-4, i.e. use generating func- (k) tions/integral representations of Jn to solve it by QLI/QPLI.

7.7 Symmetric relations

(k) Generalize 3-2→7-7 like 3-3→7-6. Do the same as 7-6 for Jn involved sums.

7.8 Solution

By combining methods listed above, all but 10 weight 4 alternating QESs are solved. As one may notice, all integrals and sums in sections above are given closed-forms by combining MZV-free methods, but it simply terminates here, suggesting us getting help from more powerful tools. Indeed, based on closed-forms of weight 4 level 4 MZVs [24] and QES-MZV reduction, the remaining 10

54 sums are evaluated immediately. They will be dyed blue in tables of section 9.

8 Applications

8.1 Nonhomogeneous integrals

8.1.1 NLI

Deﬁne nonhomogeneous log integrals (abbr. NLIs) as

2 Z 1 Y NLI(a(0), a(1), a(2); k) = xk l(m; x)a(m)dx 0 m=0

Whenever the order k ∈ Z − {−1}.

Proposition 11. All convergent NLIs with weight W = a(0) + a(1) + a(2) ≤ 5 are generated by W ∪w=0Aw over Q.

k xk+1 xk+1−1 Proof. Integrate by parts repeatedly. Suppose k is nonnegative, lift up x to k+1 (or k+1 some- times for convergence issues) and diﬀerentiate the log terms, after splitting and partial fraction xk+1 decomposition on 1±x , it boils down to several weight W LIs and weight W − 1 NLIs. Hence an induction on NLIs’ weight completes the proof. For negative k the technique is similar.

In fact, by partial fraction decomposition and method above, all convergent integrals of form Q2 a(m) R 1 m=0 l(m;x) 0 (1−x)pxq (x+1)r dx are evaluable.

8.1.2 NPLI, NQLI, NQPLI

Similarly we deﬁne nonhomogeneous polylog integrals, nonhomogeneous quadratic log integrals and nonhomogeneous quadratic polylog integrals (abbr. NPLIs, NQLIs, NQPLIs) by replacing PLI/QLI/QPLI denominators by xk, k 6= −1. They share similar structure with NLIs, that is, com- W W pletely generated by ∪w=0Aw(W ≤ 5) or ∪w=0Bw(W ≤ 4) for ﬁxed weight W . The proof, using partial integration, is identical to NLI case. Generalizations with denominator (1−x)pxq(x+1)r(x2+1)s is also available for NQLI/NQPLIs. Also by manipulating these integrals some logsine variations can be deduced, for instance

π Z 2 x cos(x) log(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x))dx 0

55 π2 π3 3 3 = 2C − 4C log(2) + 4=(Li (1 + i)) + − + π − 6 + π log2(2) − 2 log2(2) − π log(2) + 6 log(2) 3 8 8 4 2

One may deﬁne NES, NQES similarly by changing denominators of the summands. Their nonhomogeneous structures will be fully established by partial fractions and reindexing. Notwithstanding, they won’t be discussed later.

8.2 Nested sums and multiple log integrals

8.2.1 NS manipulation

Some PLIs not evaluable directly in subsection 4-7 can be used to evaluate some nested harmonic sums (i.e. NSs). For instance, by double expansion and Cauchy summation

Z 1 2 ∞ ∞ j+k−1 ∞ m−1 m−1 Li2(−x) log (1 − x) X X (−1) HfjHj+k X (−1) Hm X H^m−k dx = = x(x + 1) k2(j + k) m k2 0 k=1 j=1 m=1 k=1

Pm−1 (−1)m−k LHS is known. Since k=1 k2(m−k) is elementary and that:   m g(2) X n−1 Hfn Hn (2) (3) (−1) + = HfnHgn + H  n2 n  n n=1 we know

m−1 m X H^m−k X Hfn (2) (3) (3) = − HgmHgm − Hgm + H k2 n2 m k=1 n=1

Using it to simplify the ﬁrst identity and plugging in ES values, we obtain the closed-form of the following:

∞ m−1 m 2 X (−1) Hm X Hfn 1 π ζ(3) 277ζ(5) = −10Li + + m n2 5 2 96 32 m=1 n=1 9 log5(2) 1 1 + ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 16 12 72 18

Another way of solving NSs is to exploit symmetry. We have outer and inner symmetric formula:

∞ m ∞ m ∞ ∞ ∞ X X X X X X X (O) g(m) f(n) + f(m) g(n) = f(m) g(m) + f(m)g(m) m=1 n=1 m=1 n=1 m=1 m=1 m=1

56 ∞ m n ∞ m n ∞ m m m ! X X X X X X X X X X (I) f(m) g(n) h(k)+ f(m) h(n) g(k) = f(m) g(n) h(n) + g(n)h(n) m=1 n=1 k=1 m=1 n=1 k=1 m=1 n=1 n=1 n=1

Apply these and n-ple generalizations repeatedly with all f, g, h, ··· arbitrary harmonic terms, we obtain some relations between NSs. For example, all weight 5 RSs of form

∞ m ∞ m X X Hn X X Hfn f(m) , f(m) (−1)n−1 n n m=1 n=1 m=1 n=1 Pm Hn 1 2 (2) with f harmonic term can be reduced to ESs directly using inner n=1 n = 2 (Hm) + Hm

P∞ Hgm Pm n−1 Hn and its alternating analogue, while m=1 m2 n=1(−1) n is evaluated by outer symmetry, known ESs and the NS computed above.

8.2.2 MLI representation

Plenty of multiple log integrals (i.e. MLIs) are evaluable by using ES/NSs. For instance, using n n H(2)−Pm (−x) R 1 1−(−x) Pm Hgn R 1 m n=1 n2 Hfn = 0 x+1 dx thus n=1 n2 = 0 x+1 dx, Proposition 5 and Fubini we have

m n ∞ m P∞ (2) m P∞ Pm (−y) (−x) m−1 Z 1 Z 1 log(1 − y) Hm (−y) − 2 X (−1) Hm X Hfn m=1 m=1 n=1 n = dxdy m n2 (x + 1)y m=1 n=1 0 0

Z 1 Z 1 log(1 − y)(Li (−y) − Li (−xy)) = 2 2 dxdy 0 0 (x + 1)y(y + 1)

In general, we use Proposition 5 (and its alternating analogue) then exchange order repeatedly to obtain the integral representation for certain sums.

8.3 Geometric and binomial Euler sums

8.3.1 GES

In section 3 we have made use of GES results i.e. geometric Euler sums of form:

∞ M X 1 Y GES(a(1), ··· , a(M); p) = H(a(k)) np2n n n=1 k=1

PM According to Xu [19], all GESs with weight W = k=1 a(k) + p ≤ 5 and p > 0 are generated by

57 AW over Q. In fact this trivially extends to the case p = 0 by the reindex trick, for instance

(2) ∞ (2) ∞ 1 3 1 3 Hn − Hn − 2 1 X (Hn) Hn X n n = 2 2n 2n n=1 n=1

From which we may extract the value of LHS since all GESs on RHS with p > 0 are known. Thus all 39 GESs with W ≤ 5 and p ≥ 0 are computed (we exclude the trivial polylog case where no a(k) exists).

8.3.2 BES

Another generalization is binomial Euler sum (abbr, BES):

∞ 2n M X Y BES(a(1), ··· , a(M); p) = n H(a(k)) np4n n n=1 k=1

PM The weight is naturally deﬁned as W = k=1 a(k) + p and p > 0 ensuring convergence. Diﬀerent from GES, we take the case where no a(k) exists into account.

Proposition 12. All 26 BESs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q.

Proof. All can be done by a single method. Denote the set of harmonic integral representations as A, which contains 3 classes of formulas:

Z 1 Z 1 (1 − xn) logk(x) xn−1 logk(x) dx (k ≤ 3), dx (k ≤ 3) 0 0 1 − x

1 (k+1) featuring nk+1 and Hn , and

Z 1 xn−1 logk(x) logm−k(1 − x) dx (m ≤ 4, 0 ≤ k < m) 0 featuring composite harmonic terms. Part of them are recorded in Prop. 5 (see also subsection 7-4) and we tabulate the rest here.

Z 1 (2) (3) 2 n−1 2 2Hn 2Hn 2Hn π 2ζ(3) x log (x) log(1 − x) dx = − 3 − 2 − + 2 + 0 n n n 3n n

Z 1 (2) 2 2 (2) (3) n−1 2 2HnHn (Hn) π Hn Hn 2Hn 2ζ(3) x log(x) log (1 − x) dx = − − 2 + − 2 − + 0 n n 3n n n n

58 (2) 2 Z 1 6 (H ) 2H(2) 8H H(3) (H ) 4 3 Hn 6H(4) xn−1 log4(1 − x) dx = n n + n n + n + + n 0 n n n n n

Z 1 (2) 2 (2) (3) 3 n−1 3 3HnHn 3 (Hn) Hn 6HnHn (Hn) x log(x) log (1 − x) dx = 2 + + + 2 0 n n n n

(2) 2 6ζ(3)H π2 (H ) 2 2H(3) 3 Hn 6H(4) π2H(2) π4 − n − n + n + + n − n − n 2n n2 n n 2n 15n

Z 1 (2) (3) 2 2 n−1 2 2 4HnHn 4HnHn 2 (Hn) 2π Hn x log (x) log (1 − x) dx = 2 + + 3 − 2 0 n n n 3n

(2) 2 4ζ(3)H 2H(2) 4H(3) 2 Hn 6H(4) 2π2H(2) 4ζ(3) π4 − n + n + n + + n − n − − n n3 n2 n n 3n n2 90n

Z 1 (2) (3) (4) 2 4 n−1 3 6Hn 6Hn 6Hn 6Hn π 6ζ(3) π x log (x) log(1 − x) dx = 4 + 3 + 2 + − 3 − 2 − 0 n n n n n n 15n

These can be proved by using Beta derivatives like in Prop. 5. Now, denote

∞ 2n n ∞ 2n n X x X Hnx f (x) = n , fh (x) = n k 4nnk j 4nnk n=1 n=1 binomial generating functions (k = 0, 1, 2, 3; j = 0, 1) and the set of these 6 functions as B, then we have closed-form expressions: √ √ 2 log 1√−x+1 1 − 1 − x √ 2 1−x (1)(2)(3) f0(x) = √ , f1(x) = 2 log(2) − 2 log 1 − x + 1 , fh0(x) = √ 1 − x 1 − x

√ √ 1 √ (4) fh (x) = 2Li 1 − 1 − x + 2Li − 1 − x + 2Li 1 − x + 1 1 2 2 2 2 √ √ √ + log2 1 − x + 1 − log(4) log 1 − 1 − x + log(1 − x) log 1 − 1 − x 1 √ 1 √ π2 +2 log √ + 1 log 1 − 1 − x − 2 log √ + 1 log 1 − x + 1 − + log2(2) 1 − x 1 − x 6

1 √ √ (5) f (x) = −2Li 1 − x + 1 − log2 1 − x + 1 2 2 2

59 1 √ √ π2 +2 log(2) log(x) − 2 log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1 + − 3 log2(2) 2 3 1 √ 1 √ 1 √ (6) f3(x) = 2Li3 1 − 1 − x − 2Li3 1 − x + 1 − 2Li2 1 − 1 − x log(x) 2 2 2 1 √ √ 1 √ 1 √ √ +2Li2 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1 − 2Li2 1 − x + 1 log(x) + 2Li2 1 − x + 1 log 1 − x + 1 2 2 2 1 √ √ √ − log3 1 − x + 1 − 3 log2(2) log(x) − 2 log2(2) log 1 − x − 1 + log2(2) log 1 − x + 1 + log(4) log2(x) 3 √ √ √ √ − log(4) log2 1 − x − 1 + log 1 − 1 − x log2 1 − x + 1 + log(4) log(2) log(x) − log(8) log(2) log 1 − x + 1 √ √ 1 √ √ √ + log(2) log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1+ π2 log(x)−log(4) log 1 − 1 − x log(x)−2 log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1 log(x) 3 √ √ √ √ √ + log(4) log(x) log 1 − x − 1 + log(4) log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x − 1 − log(4) log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1

√ √ √ √ 4 log3(2) 7 + log(8) log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1−log(4) log 1 − x − 1 log 1 − x + 1+2ζ(3)+ +2iπ log2(2)− π2 log(2) 3 3

R 1 f0(x)−f0(tx) In which we applied binomial expansion for f0, the identity fh0(x) = 0 1−t dt, brute force and repeated use of L(f) in Prop 3.

2n 2n ( n ) ( n )Hn Fix a formula in A and a (harmonic-)binomial term belongs to { 4nnk , 4nnj }, (k = 0, 1, 2, 3; j = 0, 1). Muptiply both sides of the chosen formula with this term, sum w.r.t n, use the corresponding generating functions in B to convert LHS into an integral and RHS a combination of BESs. Sub- stitute x → 1 − x2 in LHS, the integral can be decomposed into PLIs (in all cases here, with weight 1±x ≤ 5), since the integrand only contains logs and polylogs of form Li2(−x), Li2(1 − x), Li2 2 or 1±x Li3 2 which are main focuses of section 4 (with a possible reﬂection on the second). Since LHS is known now, we obtain a relation of BESs on RHS. Consideration of all possible choices in A, B completes the evaluation.

Here are two examples of the procedure above. Composite relations generated by, say the kernel R 1 n−1 2 2 0 x log (x) log (1 − x) dx, are cumbersome thus omitted here.

1 Z 1 f (1) − f 1 − x2 log3 1 − x2 BES(4; 1) = − 1 1 dx, 3 0 x 2 f1(1) − f1 1 − x = 2 log(x + 1)

Z 1 fh (1) − fh 1 − x2 log2 1 − x2 BES(13; 1) = 1 1 dx, 0 x x + 1 fh (1) − fh 1 − x2 = −2Li − 2Li (1 − x) − 2Li (−x) − log2(x + 1) + log(4) log(1 − x) 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 π2 −2 log + 1 log(1 − x) − 2 log(1 − x) log(x) + 2 log + 1 log(x + 1) + − log2(2) x x 2

60 Evidently they are evaluable via weight 5 LI/PLIs.

8.3.3 IBES

Now we deal with inverse binomial Euler sum (abbr, IBES):

∞ M X 4n Y IBES(a(1), ··· , a(M); p) = H(a(k)) np2n n n=1 n k=1 PM The weight is deﬁned as W = k=1 a(k) + p as usual and p > 1 ensuring convergence. We also take the case where no a(k) exists into account.

Proposition 13. All 14 IBESs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q.

Proof. Instead of PLI usage in Prop. 12, LSI/PLSI (subsection 5-1) will play an important role here. First of all, recall generating functions of inverse sine power from [8]:

∞ n n √ −1 √ ∞ n n X 4 x 2 x sin ( x) X 4 x √ 2 (T 1)(T 2) d(x) = = √ , f(x) = = 2 sin−1 x 2n 1 − x 22n n=1 n n n=1 n n

∞ n (2) n ∞ n n X 4 Hn x X 4 x 2 √ 4 (T 3) g(x) = − = sin−1 x 22n 42n 3 n=1 n n n=1 n n

logk(x) IBES(0; 2) = f(1) is trivial. Multiply both sides of (T2) with x and integrate on (0,1). Let x → sin2(u), plug in LSI values, we get closed-forms of IBES(0; p) for 3 ≤ p ≤ 5.

R 1 1−xn By using Hn = 0 1−x dx for IBES(1; 2), Prop. 5(2) for IBES(1; 3) it is clear that

Z 1 f(1) − f(x) Z 1 f(x) log(1 − x) IBES(1; 2) = dx, IBES(1; 3) = − dx 0 1 − x 0 x

Substitute x → sin2(u) in both identities, plug in LSI values, IBES(1; 2/3) are readily solved. R 1 (f(1)−f(x)) log2(x) Similar to IBES(1; 2) we have IBES(3; 2) = 0 2(1−x) dx, which is computed via LSI under the same substitution.

Moreover, by manipulating (T3) we have

Z 1 2g(x) IBES(2; 2) = g(1) + IBES(0; 4),IBES(2; 3) = dx + IBES(0; 5) 0 3x

61 IBES(2; 2) is solved directly. For the latter, let x → sin2(u) then plug in LSI value.

Furthermore, similar to solution of IBES(1; 3), multiply Prop. 5(3)(4)(5) by appropriate factors, sum w.r.t n gives

Z 1 d(x) log2(1 − x) Z 1 f(x) log2(1 − x) dx = IBES(11; 2) + IBES(2; 2), dx = IBES(11; 3) + IBES(2; 3) 0 x 0 x

Z 1 f(x) log(x) log(1 − x) π2 dx = IBES(1; 4) + IBES(2; 3) − IBES(0; 3) 0 x 6

Z 1 d(x) log3(1 − x) − dx = 3IBES(12; 2) + IBES(111; 2) + 2IBES(3; 2) 0 x

While another use of (T3) gives

Z 1 g(1) − g(x) dx = IBES(12; 2) − IBES(1; 4) 0 1 − x

All 5 integrals on LHS boils down to known LSIs using x → sin2(u). Solving this system yields closed-forms of last 5 IBESs, i.e. IBES(11; 2/3),IBES(1; 4),IBES(12; 2),IBES(111; 2), complet- ing the proof.

8.3.4 QBES, IQBES (pFq part 1) We have quadratic binomial Euler sum and its inverse (abbr. QBESs, IQBESs):

∞ 2n!2 M X 1 Y QBES(a(1), ··· , a(M); p) = n H(a(k)) 4n np n n=1 k=1

∞ !2 M X 4n 1 Y IQBES(a(1), ··· , a(M); p) = H(a(k)) 2n np n n=1 n k=1

Here p > 0 for QBES and p > 2 for IQBES, ensuring convergence. Deﬁning weight W = PM k=1 a(k) + p as usual, there are 7 QBESs and 3 IQBESs for W ≤ 4, with 3 and 2 harmonic- free sums respectively.

Part 1: First of all we compute 5 harmonic-free sums.

62 Proposition 14. The following formulas hold:

3 3 (1) IQBES(0; 3) = 4 F 1, 1, 1, 1; , , 2; 1 = 8πC − 14ζ(3) 4 3 2 2

3 3 (2) IQBES(0; 4) = 4 F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , , 2, 2; 1 5 4 2 2 1 233π4 8 log4(2) 20 = 64π=(Li (1 + i)) + 64Li − + − π2 log2(2) 3 4 2 90 3 3

1 3 3 (3) πQBES(0; 1) = π F 1, 1, , ; 2, 2, 2; 1 = 4π log(2) − 8C 4 4 3 2 2

1 3 3 (4) πQBES(0; 2) = π F 1, 1, 1, , ; 2, 2, 2, 2; 1 = 64=(Li (1 + i)) − 2π3 − 12π log2(2) 4 5 4 2 2 3

1 3 3 (5) πQBES(0; 3) = π F 1, 1, 1, 1, , ; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; 1 4 6 5 2 2 ψ(3) 1 ψ(3) 3 = −512=(Li (1 + i)) + 4πζ(3) + 16π log3(2) + 8π3 log(2) + 4 − 4 4 4 4

−1 √ 2 3 sin ( x) Proof. (1): By Clausen formula or manipulating (T1) above we have 3F2 1, 1, 1; 2 , 2; x = x . Multiply both sides by √1 , integrate on (0,1). Now expand F for LHS (see [13] for general 2 1−x 3 2 2 Euler integral of pFq) and let x → sin (t) for RHS.

(2): Use the same technique in (1), integrate by parts (lifting up √1 ), one have 2x 1−x Z 1 3 3 3 x 4F3 1, 1, 1, 1; 2 , 2, 2; x 5F4 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , , 2, 2; 1 = √ dx 2 2 0 2x 1 − x √ √ √ Z 1 log 1 − 1 − x − log 1 − x + 1 sin−1 ( x)2 = − dx 0 2x

Now substitute x → sin2(t), t → 2 tan−1(u), apply partial fractions and plug in QLI values.

√ 4 log( 1 ( 1−x+1)) (3): By repeated integration we obtain F 1, 1, 3 ; 2, 2; x = − 2 . Multiply both √ 3 2 2 x sides by √2 x , integrate on (0,1). Now expand F for LHS and let x → sin2(t) for RHS. π 1−x 3 2

63 R x ∗ 0 f(t) dt (4)(5): Using L (f) = x on (3) it’s clear that √ 3 4Li 1 1 − x + 1 2π2 F 1, 1, 1, ; 2, 2, 2; x = − 2 2 + 4 3 2 x 3x √ √ √ √ 4 log 1 − 1 − x log 1 1 − x + 1 2 log 1 1 − x + 1 log 1 1 − x + 1 − 2 − 8 2 x x √ √ 1 1 3 4Li3 1 − 1 − x 4Li3 1 − x + 1 F 1, 1, 1, 1, ; 2, 2, 2, 2; x = 2 − 2 5 4 2 x x √ √ √ √ 1 1 4Li2 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1 4Li2 1 − x + 1 log 1 − x + 1 + 2 + 2 x x √ √ 1 1 3 3 4Li2 1 − 1 − x log(−x) 4Li2 1 − x + 1 log(−x) 4ζ(3) 2iπ 2 log (2) − 2 − 2 + + + x x x 3x 3x √ √ √ 3 2 2 2 log 1 − x + 1 log(4) log2(2) 2 log (2) log 1 − 1 − x 4 log (2) log 1 − x − 1 − + − − 3x x x x √ √ √ √ 2 log2(2) log 1 − x + 1 2 log 1 − 1 − x log2 1 − x + 1 log(16) log2 1 − x − 1 − + − x x x √ √ √ 2 2 log (4) log 1 − 1 − x log (4) log 1 − x + 1 log(16) log(2) log 1 − 1 − x 2π2 log(2) − − + − x x x 3x √ √ √ 2π2 log(x) log(16) log(−x) log 1 − x − 1 log(16) log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x − 1 + + + 3x x x √ √ √ log(16) log(−x) log 1 − x + 1 log(16) log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1 + + x x √ √ √ √ 4 log 1 − 1 − x log 1 − x + 1 log(−x) log(16) log 1 − x − 1 log 1 − x + 1 − − x x

√ We only establish (5), (4) is relevantly trivial. Multiply both sides of the F formula by √2 x , 5 4 π 1−x 2 −1 integrate on (0,1). Expand 5F4 for LHS, let x → sin (t), t → 2 tan (u) for RHS. After simpliﬁca- tions and modulo QLIs, there only left several nontrivial ones of form

Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 −1 Li2 (p(x)) log(q(x)) Li3(p(x)) tan (x)Li2(p(x)) 2 dx, 2 dx → dx 0 x + 1 0 x + 1 0 r(x)

1 x2 2 x2+1 Where p ∈ { x2+1 , x2+1 }, q ∈ {x, x + 1}, r ∈ {x, x }, and the ‘→’ denotes IBP for 2 Li3 terms and partial fractions. Now, use Prop. 7(2), 7(4) and 7(2) again, take care of complex arguments, 2 modulo trivial QLI terms we reduce Li2(p(x)) to ordinary Li2 −x :

x2 1 Li → Li → Li x2 + 1 → Li −x2 2 x2 + 1 2 x2 + 1 2 2

Finally plug in QPLI to complete the proof.

64 Part 2: Now there left only one IQBES. We will establish that

1 413π4 8 log4(2) 32 IQBES(1; 3) = 32C2−32πC log(2)+128π=(Li (1+i))+64Li − + − π2 log2(2) 3 4 2 90 3 3

2 P∞ 4n xn 3 3 Indeed, by using Prop. 5(2), n=1 2n n2 = 4x 3F2 1, 1, 1; 2 , 2 ; x then a shifted representa- ( n ) 2 P∞ 4n xn 3 3 tion n=0 2n (2n+1)2 = 3F2 1, 1, 1; 2 , 2 ; x and Prop. 5(2) again, one have ( n ) Z 1 3 3 IQBES(1; 3) = −4 log(1 − x) 3F2 1, 1, 1; , ; x dx, 0 2 2 2 2 Z 1 ∞ Z 1 n ! n ∞ n ! 3 3 X 4 x log(1 − x) X 4 Hn+1 log(1−x) F 1, 1, 1; , ; x dx = dx = − 3 2 2 2 2n (2n + 1)2 2n n + 1 0 n=0 0 n n=0 (2n + 1) n √ n −1 P∞ (4x) sin√ ( x) Due to another shifted sum n=0 2n = , Prop. 5(2) again and xz → u, we have (2n+1)( n ) x(1−x) √ n Z z X 4 Hn+1 arcsin u u du zn = − log(1 − ) (n + 1)(2n + 1)2n p z z n≥0 n 0 u(1 − u)

1 Therefore, by using 2n = B(n + 1, n + 1), the generating function above and Fubini: (2n+1)( n ) 2 ∞ n ! Z 1 n X 4 Hn+1 X 4 Hn+1 − = − (4x(1 − x))n dx (2n + 1)2n n + 1 (n + 1)(2n + 1)2n n=0 n 0 n≥0 n √ Z 1 Z 4x(1−x) arcsin u u du = dx p log(1 − ) 0 0 u(1 − u) 4x(1 − x) 4x(1 − x) √ 1 √ 1 1−u+1 ! Z arcsin u Z 2 ( ) u dx = du √ log(1 − ) p 1 4x(1 − x) 4x(1 − x) 0 u(1 − u) 2 (− 1−u+1)

According to subsection 2-1, by brute force we have 8 times of the inner x integral equals to

√ √ √ 1 √ 2 1 − u 1 − 1 − u 2 1 − u r(u) = −8Li2 1 − 1 − u + 2Li2 √ + 4Li2 √ − 2Li2 √ 2 1 − u − 1 1 − u + 1 1 − u + 1 √ √ √ + log2 1 − 1 − u + log2 1 − u + 1 − 2 log 1 − 1 − u log(1 − u) + log(16) log(u) √ √ √ − log(4) − log 1 − u + 1 u + log 1 − 1 − u + log(8) − log(16) log 1 − u + 1 √ √ √ +2 log(1 − u) log 1 − u + 1 − 6 log 1 − 1 − u log 1 − u + 1 − 2 log2(2) + log2(4)

65 √ To calculate the resulting R 1 r(u√) arcsin u du, apply u → sin2(t), t → 2 tan−1(v). After simpliﬁca- 0 8 u(1−u) −1 R 1 Li2(p(x)) tan (x) tions and modulo QLIs, there only left several nontrivial ones of form 0 x2+1 dx where 2 2 1 x2 p ∈ {x , 1−x , 1− x2 , x2+1 }. By using Prop. 7 (1)(2)(4) ﬂexibly and take care of branches, modulo trivial QLI terms we reduce Li2 to ordinary arguments:

1 1 Li 1 − x2 → Li x2 → Li (±x) , Li 1 − → Li → Li x2 → Li (±x) 2 2 2 2 x2 2 x2 2 2

x2 1 Li → Li → Li x2 + 1 → Li −x2 2 x2 + 1 2 x2 + 1 2 2

Finally plug in QPLI to complete evaluation of IQBES(1; 3).

Part 3: Now we compute the rest 4 QBESs. Firstly, in [23] it is proved that

11π3 πQBES(1; 1) = 32C log(2) − 64=(Li (1 + i)) + + 4π log2(2) 3 6

So we only need to focus on evaluation of πQBES(11; 1), πQBES(2; 1), πQBES(1; 2).

Proposition 15. The following formulas hold:

(1) πQBES(1; 2) = 1024=(Li4(1 + i)) − 256 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i)) 16 2 25ψ(3) 1 25ψ(3) 3 +πζ(3) + π log3(2) − 8π3 log(2) + π3 log(2) − 4 + 4 3 3 48 48

20π2C (2) πQBES(2; 1) = − 128C log2(2) − 1024=(Li (1 + i)) 3 4 64 25ψ(3) 1 25ψ(3) 3 +512 log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) − 14πζ(3) − π log3(2) + 4 − 4 3 3 48 48

4π2C ψ(3) 1 ψ(3) 3 (3) πQBES(11; 1) = − + 12πζ(3) − 4 + 4 3 48 48

P∞ Proof. In spirit of [23], if f(x) = n=0 cnPn(2x − 1), then by Bonnet recursion formula [13] and solving diﬀrence equation, one may prove

∞ n ∞ ! f(x) X Z 1 f(x) X 1 X = (−1)n(2n + 1) dx + 2 (−1)kc P (2x − 1) x x m k n n=0 0 m=1 k=m

66 2 Therefore, recall FL expansions of Li2(x), log(x) log(1 − x), log (1 − x) in literature above, after simpliﬁcation using subsection 8-2 we have

∞ ∞ 2 ∞ Li2(x) X log(x) log(1 − x) X log (1 − x) X = A P (2x − 1), = B P (2x − 1), = C P (2x − 1) x n n x n n x n n n=0 n=0 n=0

2 n m−1 ! π (3) (2) X (−1) A = (−1)n(2n + 1) ζ(3) − H + 2Hg + 4H Hg − 4 H n 3 n n n n m2 m m=1

2 n m−1 ! π (3) (2) X (−1) B = (−1)n(2n + 1) ζ(3) + H − 2Hg − 4H Hg − 2H(3) + 4 H n 3 n n n n n m2 m m=1

n m−1 ! (3) X (−1) C = (−1)n(2n + 1) 2ζ(3) + 4Hg − 8 H n n m2 m m=1

2n 2 P∞ ( n ) n Now, by using Prop. 5(2)(3)(4) and that π n=1 4n x = 2K(x) − π, the following three equations are established:

2 Z 1 ∞ 2n ! n Z 1 π log(1 − x) X x (2K(x) − π)Li2(x) πQBES(1; 2) = − n dx = πQBES(0; 1)Li (1) − dx x 4n n 2 x 0 n=1 0

Z 1 (2K(x) − π) log(1 − x) log(x) π3 dx = πQBES(1; 2) + πQBES(2; 1) − QBES(0; 1) 0 x 6

Z 1 (2K(x) − π) log2(1 − x) dx = πQBES(11; 1) + πQBES(2; 1) 0 x

From which we observe that it suﬃces to compute

Z 1 K(x)Li (x) Z 1 K(x) log(1 − x) log(x) Z 1 K(x) log2(1 − x) 2 dx, dx, dx 0 x 0 x 0 x

(modulo known QBESs and trivial integrals) to complete evaluation of 3 QBESs. Using the classical P∞ 2Pn(2x−1) R 1 K(x) = n=0 2n+1 , 3 expansions above and orthogonal identity 0 Pp(2x − 1)Pq(2x − 1) dx = δp,q 2p+1 , they boils down to

∞ ∞ ∞ X 2An X 2Bn X 2Cn , , (2n + 1)2 (2n + 1)2 (2n + 1)2 n=0 n=0 n=0

67 Modulo weight 4 QESs and up to constant factors, the only notrivial sum in all three series above is a quadratic NS (i.e. QNS):

∞ n ∞ n ∞ n X (−1)n−1 X (−1)m−1 X (−1)n−1 X (−1)m−1 X (−1)n−1 X (−1)m−1 H → H → H 2n + 1 m2 m n2 n 2m + 1 n2 n 2m − 1 n=1 m=1 n=1 m=1 n=1 m=1

Where we have used outer symmetry (subsection 8-2) and reindexing for two ‘→’ repsectively, transforming the QNS into a extended QES modulo trivial sums, i.e.

∞ n−1 ∞ n−1 ∞ X (−1) 4 − π X (−1) Hn 5ζ(3) X Hn = , = , = −2ζ(3) − 4 log2(2) 2n + 1 4 n2 8 n2(2n + 1) n=1 n=1 n=1 2 n Pn (−1)m−1 R 1 1−(−x ) Since m=1 2m−1 = 0 x2+1 dx, plug in Prop. 4(15) and simplify by Prop. 7, the extended QES is equal to

Z 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8Li3 x − 8Li3 1 − x + 8Li2 1 − x log 1 − x + 4 log x log 1 − x + 13ζ(3) dx 0 8 (x + 1)

2 −1 R 1 Li3(1−x ) 2 Lift up tan (x) for 0 x2+1 dx to reduce Li3 to Li2, use Prop. 7(2) to have Li2(1 − x ) → 2 Li2(x ), IBP again, plug in QPLI values, 3 QBESs are solved.

P∞ 2An Thus we have ﬁnished evaluation of 10 desired sums. Note that as solving n=0 (2n+1)2 , ··· , 3 weight 4 QES values we invoke i.e. QES(11, 22; −12), QES(13; −12), QES(23; −12) are not among 10 MZV-dependent ones, that is, these QBESs are established without MZV usage.

8.4 Related problems

We present several minor problems with basically increasing complexity.

8.4.1 Symmetric PLI

1−x Denote D = {(x, y) : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < x+1 } a region symmetric about y = x. Let D1 = D ∩ {(x, y): y > x}, we have

1−x 1 Li log(1 − x) Z 2 x+1 Z log(1 − x) log(1 − y) − dx = dxdy 0 x D xy

√ 1−x 2−1 Li (x) − Li log(1 − x) Z log(1 − x) log(1 − y) Z 2 2 x+1 = 2 dxdy = 2 dx xy x D1 0

68 2 R Li2(x) log(1−x) Li2(x) Hence by using x dx = − 2 and value of P LI(1, 0, 0; 25; 1):

√ 1−x Z 2−1 Li2 log(1 − x) √ 1 4 x+1 1 2 Li4 2 7 7π 1 4 1 2 2 dx = − Li2 2 − 1 − − ζ(3) log(2)+ − log (2)+ π log (2) 0 x 2 2 16 2880 48 48

Lin(x)Lin(y) A similar consideration for integrand xy yields the general formula:

√ 1−x √ 1−x Z 2−1 Z 1 ! Lin(x)Lin+1 Z 2−1 Z 1 ! Lin(x)Lin+1 x+1 x+1 √ 2 − √ dx = 2 − √ 2 dx = Lin+1 2 − 1 0 2−1 x 0 2−1 x − 1

8.4.2 MT of PLI

We present a master formula of PLI:

√ √ 2 1 1 2 1− 1−x 1−x Z x − 1 1 − x Z 1 − 1 − x F x Li2 x+1 F (x) Li2 + Li2 dx = √ dx 2 2 0 x + 1 x + 1 0 2x 1 − x

1 R 1 x2−2x+1 1 x2+1 For the proof, rewrite LHS as 2 0 F (x)Li2 x2+2x+1 dx then let t → 2x . For instance, take 1−x Li2( x+1 ) F = x+1 and plug in P LI(0, 0, 0; 25, 25/26; 2) gives: √ √ 2 1 2 1−x x+√1−x −1 Z 1 − 1 − x Li2 x+1 Li2 2 √ √ x− 1−x +1 dx 2 2 0 x 1 − x x − 1 − x + 1 1 1 13π2ζ(3) ζ(5) 7 4 log5(2) 2 1 = 8Li +8Li log(2)− − + ζ(3) log2(2)+ − π2 log3(2)+ π4 log(2) 5 2 4 2 16 4 2 15 9 36

8.4.3 Inverse ES

(k) Some inverse sums are computed below, where by inverse we mean the summand contains ζ(k)−Hn ](k) or η(k) − Hn , that is, the tail of generalized harmonic sums.

5 P∞ n n Consider n=1(−1) log(2) − Hfn . By Abel’s summation (lift up (−1) by partial summation and take diﬀerence of the other part) we have it equals to:

∞ n−1 X 1 n−1 (−1) 5 5 (−1) − 1 + log(2) − Hfn − log(2) − Hfn 2 n n=1

69 4 P∞ (log(2)−Hgn) Expand the RHS, all terms are weight 5 ESs except another inverse sum n=1 n . Apply Abel summation again and split the summand, the new sum can be reduced to ESs either. Therefore we have:

∞ 5 X n 5 1 1 157ζ(5) 35 2 2 log (2) 5 2 3 (−1) log(2) − Hfn = 10Li5 +10Li4 log(2)− + ζ(3) log (2)− − π log (2) 2 2 16 8 3 18 n=1

Using the same method we are able to deduce that:

∞ 4 4 X 5 1 45 259π 5 log (2) 5 2 2 log(2) − Hfn = −20Li4 − ζ(3) log(2) + + + π log (2) 2 4 1440 3 12 n=0

Here the reason why a ’quintic’ sum yields a ’quartic’ value is the existence of n after summation R 1 xn n by parts once. Combining 2 results and make use of 0 x+1 dx = (−1) log(2) − Hfn , we conclude:

∞ Z X 5 dV log(2) − Hg2n = 2 5 (u + 1)(v + 1)(x + 1)(y + 1)(z + 1)(1 − (uvxyz) ) n=0 (0,1) 1 1 1 157ζ(5) 35 = −10Li + 5Li + 5Li log(2) − + ζ(3) log2(2) 4 2 5 2 4 2 32 16 45 259π4 log5(2) 5 log4(2) 5 5 − ζ(3) log(2) + + + − π2 log3(2) + π2 log2(2) 8 2880 6 6 36 24

8.4.4 High weight ES

2 −1 4 (2) 2n 1 log(x) log(1−x ) sin (x) ∞ H (2x) R √ −1 4 3 P n−1 Consider the integral 0 2 dx. Using sin (x) = 2 n=1 2 2n [8], t → 1−x n ( n ) x2, Beta derivatives and that

1 ψ(0)(n + 1) = H − γ, ψ(0) n + = 2 (H − H − log(2)) n 2 2n n

The integral is converted to harmonic sum. On the other hand, by x → sin(t) and expanding π R 2 4 2 0 t (log(2 sin(t)) − log(2))(log(2 cos(t)) − log(2)) dt, the integral is also reduced to several LSIs with weight at most 6. Evaluate them using weight 6 LI [1] and contour deformation (subsection 5-1) gives:

2 ∞ H(2) 2 (H − H + log(2)) (H + 2 log(2)) + H(2) − π X n−1 n 2n n n 6 n2 n=1

70 4 1 15ζ(3)2 1 281π6 1 4 = −4ES(1; −5)− π2Li − −π2ζ(3) log(2)− ζ(5) log(2)+ − π2 log4(2)+ π4 log2(2) 3 4 2 8 4 15120 18 45

8.4.5 High weight PLI Using multiple expansion the following 4 integrals are reducible to Zeta values:

Z 1 Li (x) log(x) log(1 − x) Z 1 Li (x) log(x) log(1 − x) Z 1 Li (x) log2(x) Z 1 Li (x) log2(1 − x) 3 dx, 3 dx, 3 dx, 3 dx 0 x 0 1 − x 0 1 − x 0 x

1 By Prop. 7(7)(8) Li3 1 − x is expressible in Li3(x), Li3(1 − x) and log terms, so 4 corresponding 1 R 1 Li3(1− x ) log(x) log(1−x) 1 integrals 0 x dx, ··· also Zeta expressible. Let −t → 1 − x , we arrive at 4 integrals on (0, ∞) with integrands composed of Li3(−x) and logs. Combining 2 of them gives

Z ∞ Li (−x) log(x + 1) log 1 + 1 31π6 3 x dx = −2ζ(3)2 − 0 x 5670

Split the integral, map back to (0,1), using Prop. 7(7) and weight 6 LI values [1] we readily arrive at:

Z 1 Li (−x) log(x + 1) log 1 + 1 3 x dx 0 x 1 1 7 137π6 1 1 = −ES(1; −5) + π2Li + π2ζ(3) log(2) − + π2 log4(2) − π4 log2(2) − ζ(3)2 3 4 2 24 90720 72 72

8.4.6 Parseval LSI

We have an expanded logsine integral:

Z 2π 1 1 1 2 (π − x) π2(π − x) 2 979π7 π2f(x) − f(x)3 + (x − π)g(x) + h(x) + f(x)2 − f(x)g(x) + dx = 6πζ(3)2+ 0 12 3 2 2 24 11340

x Where f(x) = log 2 sin 2 , g(x) = Cl2(x), h(x) = Cl3(x). And a compact one:

Z 2π 2 3 2 9 1 ix 2 ix ix ix 4π ζ(3) 677π − Li2 e − log 1 − e Li3 e + Li4 e dx = 15πES(2; 6) + − 70πζ(5)ζ(3) + 0 2 3 113400

71 P∞ 1 2 inx The ﬁrst one is a direct consequence of Parseval identity applied to f(x) = n=1 n Hne on (0, 2π), Prop. 3(13), closed-form of ES(1, 1, 1, 1; 2) and elementary expansions, while the latter makes use of Prop. 4(5) and weight 8 non-alternating ES(3, 3; 2). See [15, 20] for evaluation of 2 ESs respectively.

8.4.7 Convolutional LI R 1 R 1 logn((1−x)(1−y)) Consider 0 0 (x+1)(y+1) dxdy. By binomial theorem and Prop. 1(5) we may express this integral in terms of polylogs. On the other hand, let u → (1 − x)(1 − y), x → x, integrate R 1 (2 log(2−u)−log(u)) logn(u) w.r.t x, we ﬁnd it equals to 0 4−u du. Using substitution u → 1 − x and n+1 R 1 log (u) n−1 1 0 4−u du = (−1) (n + 1)!Lin+2 4 we have

n ! Z 1 log(x + 1) logn(1 − x) (−1)n(n + 1)! 1 X 1 1 1 dx = Li Li − Li x + 3 2 n + 1 k+1 2 −k+n+1 2 n+2 4 0 k=0

R 1 R 1 log(x+1) log(y+1)(log(x+1)+log(y+1))n Similarly, consider evaluating 0 0 xy dxdy by Prop. 1(8) and substitution yields:

m Z 2 Z 4 X f(x) logm(x) dx + g(x) logm(x) dx = m! (k + 1)(−k + m + 1)J(k)J(m − k) 1 2 k=0

Where J, f, g are

k j 1 k+2 X log (2)Li−j+k+2 log (2) J(k) = − 2 − + ζ(k + 2) j! (k + 2)k! j=0 1 1 1 f(x) = 12Li + 12Li (x) − 6Li (1 − x) log(x) + 6Li log(x) 6(x − 1) 3 x 3 2 2 x 2 2 2 −12Li2(x) log(x) − 6 log(x − 1) log (x) − 6iπ log (x) + π log(x) − 24ζ(3)

1 x 2 x x x g(x) = 24Li + 24Li − 24Li log − 12Li 1 − log(x) 12(x − 1) 3 2 3 x 2 2 2 2 2 2 x x +12Li log − 24Li (2) + 12Li (2) log(4) + 6 log2(2) log + 12iπ log2(2) 2 x 4 3 2 2 x x x x − 2 −12 log 1 − log2 + 12 log(2) log log − 21ζ(3) + 2 log3(2) 2 2 2 x

72 One may furtherly simplify Mathematica-generated F,G. Note that both integrals share the structure of ’convolution’.

8.4.8 Valean’s hexagram

We generalize Valean’s results [17]. Denote

−k+2n−1 π 2n−k X (−1)j−1ζ(j + 2)(iπ)−j−k+2n−1 X log(2) X = (−1)k 1 − 2k−2n ζ(−k+2n+1)+ ,Y = < − 2 (−j − k + 2n − 1)! (2i)2n−k (2n − k)! j=0

n−1 ! 1−4n 2n+1 X 1−2k 2n 2n+1 A = 2 (2n − 2)! 2 1 − 2 ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n + 1) − 2n 2 − 1 − 2 + 1 ζ(2n + 1) k=1

−2n −2(2n−2)−3 2n C1 = (2n − 2)!ζ(2n + 1),C2 = 2 − 1 (2n − 2)!ζ(2n + 1),U = 2 1 − 2 (2n − 2)!ζ(2n + 1)

2n−1 X P = (2n − 2)! −2−2n 1 − 21−2n log(2)ζ(2n) − β(k + 1)β(2n − k) k=0 2n−2 ! X − 1 − 2−k 2−2n−1 1 − 2k−2n+1 ζ(k + 1)ζ(2n − k) + 2nζ(2n + 1) k=1

 2(n−1) −4n 2n X Q = −2 (2n − 2)! − 2 − 2 ζ(k + 1)ζ(−k + 2n) k=1 n−1 ! X +22n+1 1 − 21−2k ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n + 1) + −2n + 22n+1 − 1 ζ(2n + 1) k=1

Then we have six general formulas (Bn denotes Bernoulli numbers [13]): 2x 2n−2 2n−1 Z 1 Li2 2 log (x) k x +1 X Bk(2π) Y (1) V = dx = (−1)n−1(2n − 2)! 1 x k! 0 k=0

2x 2n−2 2n−1 Z 1 Li2 − 2 log (x) k 1−k x +1 X Bk(2π) (1 − 2 )Y (2) V = dx = (−1)n(2n − 2)! 2 x k! 0 k=0

Z 1 2n−1 x log(1 − x) log (x) A C1 U V1 (3) W1 = 2 dx = −(2n − 1) − + + 0 x + 1 8 2 8 4

73 Z 1 2n−1 x log(x + 1) log (x) A C2 U V2 (4) W2 = 2 dx = −(2n − 1) − + + 0 x + 1 8 2 8 4

Z 1 2 2n−2 log(1 − x) log x + 1 log (x) 2W1 (5) T1 = dx = − log(2)(2n − 2)!ζ(2n) − + P 0 x 2n − 1

Z 1 log(1 + x) log x2 + 1 log2n−2(x) (6) T2 = dx = Q − T1 0 x

We establish V1 below. Following [17], by applying double integration, Fourier expansion of Poisson kernel and logsine functions, we have the formula:

2n−2 1 Li 2x log (x) π ∞ ! Z 2 x2+1 Z 2 X sin(kt) dx = 2(−1)2n−1(2n − 1)! log(cos(t)) dt x k2n−1 0 0 k=1

Now, [13] oﬀers the Fourier expansion

∞ 2n−1 n t X sin(kt) (2π) (−1) B2n−1 = 2π k2n−1 2(2n − 1)! k=1

Pn n n−k where Bn(x) = k=0 Bk k x are Bernoulli polynomials. Plugging in these results we ﬁnd that:

π 2n−1 n−1 2n−1 2n−1 R 2 −k+2n−1 (2π) (−1) X Bk t log(cos(t)) dt ··· = k 0 2n − 1 (2π)−k+2n−1 k=0

Finally, by simple induction we have

Z n n k−1 n−k log(z + 1) log (z) X (−1) n!Lik+2(−z) log (z) dz = z (n − k)! k=0

n log(z+1) log (z) 2ix Integrate z along the upper unit circle (counter clockwise), parametrize z = e , it is π R 2 n Z direct that 0 x log(2 cos(x)) dx = < (2i)n+1 , where

n X (−1)j−1n!(iπ)n−jζ(j + 2) Z = (−1)n−1 1 − 2−n−1 n!ζ(n + 2) + (n − j)! j=0

Making use of this result completes the evaluation of V1. V2 is established similarly. W1,W2,T1,T2 are relevantly easy (using Prop. 1, ES/PLI/QLI general formulas and hints in [17]) so we omit the details. These six formulas hold to arbitrary order.

74 8.4.9 Hypergeometric rhapsody (pFq part 2) √ Li x π R 1 3( ) R 1 Li3(x) R 2 First of all, take a look at radical polylog ntegral √ dx i.e. √ dx, Li3(sin(t)) dt. 0 x(1−x) 0 1−x2 0 Expanding Li3 and taking care of parity, we obtain a hypergeometric form. Alternatively, following √ log2(y) −π 1−y2+2 sin−1(y)+π R 1 Li3(x) R 1 subsection 6-10-4, by double integration one have √ dx = √ dy. 0 1−x2 0 2 2y 1−y2 −1 Now let y → sin(t), t → 2 tan (u) then plug in QLI values to express it by extended basis B4. Equating 2 forms yields

1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 3 (1) F , , , 1, 1; , , , ; 1 = 8=(Li (1+i))− π log3(2)− π3 log(2)− ψ(3) − ψ(3) 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 12 16 384 4 4

3 1 log3(x) π log(2) Now we focuse on QLSIs. Consider R √ dx = R 4 log(2 sin(t)) − dt. The RHS 0 2−x2 0 2 reduces to QLSIs solved in subsection 5-1, while LHS is transformed into hypergeometric sum by expanding √ 1 into power series. After simpliﬁcation one have 2−x2 √ √ √ √ (3) 1 (3) 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 2 ψ 4 − ψ 4 (2) 5F4 , , , , ; , , , ; = 2=(Li4(1+i))+ π 2ζ(3)+ π 2 log(2)− 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 768 12288

2 −1 x 2 1 log (x) sin √ π log(2) Similar consideration for R √ 2 dx = R 4 t log(2 sin(t)) − dt yields (we may 0 2−x2 0 2 sin−1(x) ∞ (2x)2n √ −1 2 1 P obtain the expansion for 2 by diﬀerentiating sin (x) = 2 n=1 2 2n ): 1−x n ( n ) 3 1 5Li 1 11π4 5 log4(2) 1 (3) F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , 2, 2, 2; = 2π=(Li (1 + i)) + 4 2 − + − π2 log2(2) 5 4 2 2 3 2 144 48 6

For higher weights not all QLI/QLSIs can be computed analytically. Nevertheless, the method of expansion above can be naturally generalized here, yielding connection formulas between pFq and Borwein LSIs (for notations of Ls see [10], which is a bit diﬀerent from our QLSIs). Either of these constants can be added to B5 representing irreducible constants:

1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 (4) F , , , , , ; , , , , ; 6 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 √ 1 √ 1√ 1 √ π = 2C log3(2) − 2 log2(2)=(Li (1 + i)) + 2 log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) − 2Ls 96 16 3 4 4 48 5 2 √ √ 1 √ 1 √ π3 2 log2(2) 2 log(2) ψ(3) 1 − ψ(3) 3 + π 2ζ(3) log(2) + π 2 log4(2) + − 4 4 32 512 3072 24576

3 1 1 (5) F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , 2, 2, 2, 2; = − πC log2(2) + 2π log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) 6 5 2 2 2 3 4 π 5 1 35 5 log5(2) 5 11 + Ls(1) + Li log(2) + ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 3 5 2 2 4 2 32 48 24 144

75 −1 p x 2 1 P∞ (−1)n−1xn log2(x) Moreover, multiply both sides of sinh 8 = 2 n=1 2 n 2n by x then integrate n 2 ( n ) −1 p x P∞ (−1)k−1 on (0, 1). Let t → sinh 8 for LHS, use Prop. 1(1) for RHS, we deduce k=1 5 k 2k = k 2 ( k ) log(2) log(2) R 2 2 2 2 R 2 2 k 2 0 x coth(x) log 8 sinh (x) dx. Clearly it boils down to 0 x coth(x) log (sinh(x)) dx 1 for k = 0, 1, 2, all of which are directly solved under substitution x → 2 log(y + 1) and several LI(0, a, b; 1/2) values. After simpliﬁcation we arrive at

3 1 (6) F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , 2, 2, 2, 2; − 6 5 2 8 1 1 19 log5(2) 4 7 = 40Li + 24Li log(2) − 38ζ(5) + 4ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 4 2 30 9 45

2n P∞ ( n ) Furtherly, consider calculating n=1 n64n via Beta derivatives like in section of BES, and eval- 1 log5(x) 1 log4(x) sin−1(x) ∞ n ∞ (−1)n−1 R √ R √ P 4 P uating 0 2 dx, 0 2 dx (essentially IBES n=1 6 2n ) and n=1 6 n 2n in 2 1−x 1−x n ( n ) n 2 ( n ) ways using methods above, with the help of [1] one may deduce:

3 (7) F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, ; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; 1 8 7 2 16 4 79π6 8 2 1 = −4ζ(3)2 − ζ(3) log3(2)+ π2ζ(3) log(2)−24ζ(5) log(2)+ − log6(2)+ π2 log4(2)+ π4 log2(2) 3 3 7560 45 9 10

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 (8) F , , , , , , ; , , , , , ; 1 7 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 π3ζ(3) 3πζ(5) 1 1 1 19π5 log(2) = + + πζ(3) log2(2) + π log5(2) + π3 log3(2) + 192 32 16 240 288 11520

3 (9) F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; 1 7 6 2 1 31 19π6 log6(2) 1 19 = 2ES(1; −5)+16Li −ζ(3)2+π2ζ(3) log(2)+ ζ(5) log(2)− + + π2 log4(2)− π4 log2(2) 6 2 8 1120 45 9 360

3 1 1 1 (10) F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1; , 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; − = 8ES(1; −5) + 64Li + 24Li log(2) 7 6 2 8 6 2 5 2 4 43π6 19 1 7 +4ζ(3)2 − ζ(3) log3(2) + 38ζ(5) log(2) − − log6(2) + π2 log4(2) − π4 log2(2) 3 540 180 9 90

All 4 general hypergeometric sums are generated by A6, in which methods for non-alternating (7)(8) 3 1 3 can be generalized to n+1Fn {1}n, 2 ; {2}n; 1 , n+1Fn { 2 }n+1; { 2 }n; 1 . As a corollary, all radical

76 Li x2 π R 1 Lin−1(x) R 1 n−1( ) R 2 2 polylog integrals of form √ dx i.e. √ dx, Lin−1 sin (t) dt are trivial since up 0 x(1−x) 0 1−x2 0 3 to a constant factor it’s equivalent to n+1Fn {1}n, 2 ; {2}n; 1 by expanding numerators. Moreover, 1 Li (x) the shifted R √n−1 dx can be reduced to generalization of (9) i.e. F {1} ; 3 , {2} ; 1 0 x 1−x2 n+1 n n+1 2 n−1 modulo trivial pFq values, which means these integrals are also solved if we plug in high weight LI [1] then LSI values. For further examples, see (4)(5) of next subsection.

8.4.10 FL fantasia (pFq part 3) Apart from solving QBESs, we present some other use of FL theory (all FL expansions below are recorded in/deducible from [23]). Firstly, in literature above 2 connection formulas between a (−1)n H − Hn 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 P∞ ( 2n 2 ) R 2 Li3(z) QBES i.e. 5F4 , , , , ; 1, , , ; 1 , and √ dz are proved, in 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n=1 2n+1 0 z(1−z) which the middle sum is made up of QES({11}k, {31}3−k; −12) (0 ≤ k ≤ 3) hence trivial. Therefore

1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 (1) π F , , , , ; 1, , , ; 1 = 64=(Li (1+i))− π log3(2)−π3 log(2)− ψ(3) − ψ(3) 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 32 4 4 is conﬁrmed true. Making use of another relation and value of R 1 √Li3(x) dx above yields a pair 0 x(1−x) of by-products:

1 Z 2 2 Li3(1 − z) π C 2 (2) p dz = − C log (2) + 56=(Li4(1 + i)) − 4 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i)) 0 z(1 − z) 6 1 25 7ψ(3) 1 7ψ(3) 3 +πζ(3) + π log3(2) − π3 log(2) − 4 + 4 3 24 256 256

1 Z 2 2 0 Li3(z) π C 2 (2 ) p dz = − + C log (2) − 56=(Li4(1 + i)) + 4 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i)) 0 z(1 − z) 6

17 7ψ(3) 1 7ψ(3) 3 +πζ(3) + π log3(2) + π3 log(2) + 4 − 4 24 256 256

R 1 δp,q Secondly, by orthogonal identity 0 Pp(2x − 1)Pq(2x − 1) dx = 2p+1 and following FL series

∞ ∞ ∞ X 2Pn(2x − 1) X 4Pn(2x − 1) X K(x) = ,E(x) = − , Li (x) = A P (2n − 1) 2n + 1 (2n − 1)(2n + 1)(2n + 3) 3 n n n=0 n=0 n=0 π2 π2 15 A = ζ(3) − + 1,A = − 0 6 1 4 8

77 ∞ (−1)k n P 4 3 2 2(−1) (2n + 1) k=n+3 k2 n + n + 3n + 8n + 4 (2n + 1) A (n ≥ 2) = + n n(n + 1) n3(n + 1)3(n + 2)2

R 1 R 1 We may compute polylog elliptic pair 0 Li3(x)K(x) dx, 0 Li3(x)E(x) dx in closed-forms. The literature already computes the former so we only deal with the latter here. Modulo trivial rational P∞ (−1)k R 1 (−x)n+2 log(x) sums, the representation k=n+3 k2 = 0 x+1 dx and constant factors, the problem boils down to evaluation of

∞ Z 1 2 ∞ n X An x log(x) X x then dx (2n − 1)(2n + 1)2(2n + 3) x + 1 n(n + 1)(2n − 1)(2n + 1)(2n + 3) n=2 0 n=2

Let x → x2 and do partial fractions, the latter integral is decomposed into several NQLIs of form R 1 xk log(x) log(1±x) 0 x2+1 dx, all of which are trivially evaluated due to subsection 8-1-2 and QLI (W ≤ 3) results. Therefore we readily deduce:

Z 1 3 2 64 128 4ζ(3) 4π 16π 2336 8 2 1120 log(2) (3) Li3(x)E(x) dx = C log(2)− =(Li3(1+i))+ + − + + π log (2)− 0 3 3 3 3 27 81 3 27

Moreover we have nonhomegeneous hypergeometric results. Indeed, by Li3(x) expansion above and that

∞ 2n 1 3 3 X P2n(2x − 1) = B , n p4 4 4 4n x(1 − x) n=0

The quartic-radical polylog integral R 1 √Li3(x) dx is evaluable. Indeed, modulo trivial rational 0 4 x(1−x) P∞ 4(−1)k (2) (2) sums, the identity − k=2n+3 k2 = Hn+1 −H 1 and constant factors, the problem boils down n+ 2 to evaluation of

(2) (2) ∞ 2n ∞ 1 − 1 2n H − H X A2n X 2n 2n+1 n n+1 n+ 1 n then 2 2n(4n + 1) 4n n=1 n=1

√ n (2) (2) R 1 (x− x)x log(x) Substituting Hn+1 − H 1 = 0 1−x dx and sum w.r.t n in latter sum yields an elemen- n+ 2 tary intrgral, which reduces to QLI/NQLIs (W ≤ 3) after x → sin2(t), t → 2 tan−1(u) and partial fractions. By subsection 8-1-2 again we obtain

Z 1 3 2 Li3(x) Γ 4 7 5 (4) dx = √ 5F4 1, 1, 1, 1, ; 2, 2, 2, ; 1 p4 0 x(1 − x) π 4 2

78 2 2Γ 3 21ζ(3) 5π2 3π3 = √ 4 2πC − 4C log(2) + 8=(Li (1 + i)) − − − − 2π π 3 8 12 16 log3(2) 3 5 +8 + − π log2(2) + log2(2) − π2 log(2) − π log(2) + 4 log(2) 6 4 24

In which the 5F4 form comes from Taylor expansion of Li3(x) and Beta integrals. Now consider √ R 1 Li3( x) √ √ dx: Expand Li3 ( x) as above, taking care of parity yields a Gamma combination 0 4 x(1−x) 7 5 1 1 1 5 3 3 3 of known 5F4 1, 1, 1, 1, 4 ; 2, 2, 2, 2 ; 1 and 5F4 2 , 2 , 2 , 4 , 1; 2, 2 , 2 , 2 ; 1 . According to parameter 1 3 pairs (1; 2), 2 ; 2 in latter 5F4, via partial fractions it’s furtherly decomposed into

1 5 3 1 1 5 3 3 1 1 1 5 3 3 3 F , , 1; 2, ; 1 , F , , ; , ; 1 , F , , , ; , , ; 1 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 2 2 2 4 2 2 2

Using limiting argument for the ﬁrst and Beta derivative for latter two, all three sums hence 1 1 1 5 3 3 3 5F4 2 , 2 , 2 , 4 , 1; 2, 2 , 2 , 2 ; 1 is evaluated. Thus plugging back the 5F4 in (4) gives

√ 2 Z 1 √ 3 3 Li3 ( x) Γ 4 π (5) dx = π 2 + √ 48πC − 32C log(2) + 64=(Li3(1 + i)) − 21ζ(3) − p4 0 x(1 − x) 32 π 2 34π2 4 log3(2) 17 − − 48π + 64 + − 10π log2(2) + 8 log2(2) − π2 log(2) − 24π log(2) + 32 log(2) 3 3 3

Here, by limiting argument we mean to apply following asymptotics:

1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 4 3F2 , , 1; 2, ; 1 = lim z 3F2 , 1, ; 2, ; z = lim 2z 2F1 , ; ; z − √ + 4 2 4 2 z→1− 2 4 2 z→1− 2 4 2 4 1 − z

3/2 1 5 3 2 π 3 − 2F1 , ; ; z = √ − √ + O((1 − z) 4 )(z → 1 ) 2 4 2 4 1 5 1 − z 2Γ 4 Γ 4

And by Beta derivative we mean to choose appropriate r, p, a in:

r r+1 Z 1 p−1 n + 1 1 − p n + 3 (−1) (n + 1) n 2 2 r r+2Fr+1 { }r+1, ; { }r+1; a = t 1 − at log (t) dt 2 2 2 r! 0

Similarly, with the help of

∞ 2n 1 1 1 X (4n + 1)P2n(2x − 1) = B , n (x(1 − x))3/4 4 4 4n n=0 One may deduce a pair of dual result:

1 1 2 Z Li (x) Γ 5 3 0 3 √4 (4 ) 3/4 dx = 5F4 1, 1, 1, 1, ; , 2, 2, 2; 1 0 (x(1 − x)) 2 π 4 2

79 1 2 Γ 21ζ(3) 3π3 log3(2) 3 5 = √4 2πC + 4C log(2) − 8=(Li (1 + i)) − + + + π log2(2) − π2 log(2) π 3 8 16 6 4 24

Z 1 √ 0 Li3 ( x) (5 ) 3/4 dx 0 (x(1 − x)) 1 2 Γ 3πC 1 21ζ(3) π3 log3(2) 5 17 = √4 + C log(2) − =(Li (1 + i)) − + + + π log2(2) − π2 log(2) π 4 2 3 64 128 48 32 192

√ 0 Using exactly the same method in (4)(5). Note that while expanding Li3 ( x) in (5 ) we have a 5 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 Gamma conbination of known 5F4 1, 1, 1, 1, 4 ; 2 , 2, 2, 2; 1 and 4F3 2 , 2 , 2 , 4 ; 2 , 2 , 2 ; 1 , in which the latter, again, is trivially evaluated by Beta derivative.

Finally we have another application of (4). Let x → 1 − x in Prop. 7(8), multiple both sides by k m √ 1 , integrate on (0,1). Since R 1 log (√x) log (1−x) dx, R 1 √Li3(x) dx, R 1 √Li3(1−x) dx are trivial 4 x(1−x) 0 4 x(1−x) 0 4 x(1−x) 0 4 x(1−x) 1 1 Li3(1− ) due to Beta derivatives, formula (4) and reﬂection, we extract the value of R √ x dx. Now a 0 4 x(1−x) substitution x → cos2(t) yields

Z π r 2 2 p 2 2 3 31ζ(3) 3 2 (6) sin(2t)Li3 − tan (t) dt = Γ −4πC + 8C log(2) − 16=(Li3(1 + i)) − + π + π log (2) 0 π 4 4

Note the corresponding derivation of (4’) is:

π 2 1 2 Z 2 3 0 Li3 − tan (t) Γ 4 31ζ(3) π 1 2 (6 ) p dt = √ −2πC − 4C log(2) + 8=(Li3(1 + i)) − − − π log (2) 0 sin(2t) 2π 8 2 2

Other nonhomegeneous radical polylog integrals (i.e. hypergeometric series), including the dou- 1 1 1 R m− 2 n− 2 ble parametric class 0 x (1 − x) Li3(x) dx where m, n ∈ N, are also solvable using FL expansion and results of NPLI/NQLIs. Since they are relevantly trivial, we simply pause here.

8.5 Two conjectures solved

We prove two related conjectures in [1, 3].

8.5.1 Borwein’s conjecture on binomial sum (pFq part 4)

P∞ 1 In [3] Borwein conjectured that n=1 4 n 3n is expressible via single and multiple polylogarithms n 2 ( n ) n P∞ Hnz Li4, Li3,1. Based on Li4(z) + Li3,1(z) = n=1 n3 , Prop. 4(3) and subsection 5-3, his statement

80 is equivalent to:

∞ 1 4 X 1 21Li4 57 83π 23 7 (∗) = −2π=(Li (1+i))− 2 − ζ(3) log(2)+ − log4(2)+ π2 log2(2) 4 n3n 3 2 8 480 48 12 n=1 n 2 n Now we prove this identity. We have

2 n 2 1 2(x (1−x)) x (1−x) ∞ ∞ R Z 1 2Li3 Z 1 2 X 1 X 0 x dx 2 x (1 − x) 2 log(x) 4 log(x) = = dx = Li2 − dx 4 n3n n32n x 2 1 − x x n=1 n 2 n n=1 0 0

Where we’ve used Beta integral, Fubini, deﬁnition of polylog and integration by parts, lifting up log(x). Now the original problem is reduced to the evaluation of 2 integrals:

Z 1 1 2 Z 1 1 2 4 Li2 2 x (1 − x) log(x) 4 Li2 2 x (1 − x) log(x) J1 = dx, J2 = dx 0 x 0 1 − x Indeed, we will establish that:

1 4 1 1 15Li4 83 31π 13 1 J = −C2 + πC log(2) − π=(Li (1 + i)) − 2 − ζ(3) log(2) + − log4(2) + π2 log2(2) 1 4 2 3 8 64 768 192 12

1 1 197 107π4 3 11 J = −2C2 + πC log(2) − 2π=(Li (1 + i)) − 9Li − ζ(3) log(2) + − log4(2) + π2 log2(2) 2 2 3 4 2 32 640 8 24

1 2 For J1, lift up 2 log (x), simplify then factorize the log:

Z 1 2 1 2 1 2 (1 − x) + 1 J1 = − log (x) log + log(x + 1) dx 0 2 x 1 − x 2

Via possible reﬂection x → 1 − x, this expression is decomposed into several LIs and QLIs, that is:

1 log(2) 1 Z 1 log2(1 − x) log 1 x2 + 1 LI(0, 2, 1; 1)− LI(0, 2, 1; 0)+ LI(2, 0, 0; 1)− QLI(114; 2)+ 2 dx 2 2 2 0 1 − x 1 3 2 Lifting up − 3 log (1 − x), the last one equals to 3 QLI(111; 5) so J1 is solved. For J2, ﬁrstly we lift R log(x) up Li2(1 − x)(= 1−x dx) to arrive at:

Z 1 2 1 (1 − x)2 + 1 J2 = − Li2(1 − x) log + log(x + 1) dx 0 x 1 − x 2

2 π R 1 Li2(1−x) log(x+1) Replacing Li2(1 − x) by 6 − Li2(x) − log(1 − x) log(x), two parts of J2 i.e. 0 x dx, R 1 Li2(1−x) log(x+1) 0 1−x dx are evaluated by using integration by parts and LI, PLI results. For the other (1−x)2+1 two parts involving log 2 , use x → 1 − x again. Modulo known LI/PLI/QLIs, the only

81 two remains are:

Z 1 Li (x) log x2 + 1 Z 1 Li (x) log 1 x2 + 1 2 dx, 2 2 dx 0 x 0 1 − x

The former is simply QP LI4(1; 4; 2) and the latter boils down to QP LI4(1; 1; 5) after lifting up

− log(1 − x) (modulo QLI values), thus J2 is solved and Borwein’s conjecture is conﬁrmed true.

Note that the equivalent hypergeometric form is:

3 4 5 2 F 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, ; , , 2, 2, 2; 6 5 2 3 3 27 1 171 83π4 23 7 = −12π=(Li (1 + i)) − 63Li − ζ(3) log(2) + − log4(2) + π2 log2(2) 3 4 2 4 80 8 2

8.5.2 Au’s conjecture on general LI

n n−1 R 1 log (1−x) log (1+x) 2 In [1] Au conjectured that In = 0 1+x dx lies in the algebra generated by log(2), π , ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), ··· over Q and veriﬁed the case n ≤ 10. Now we prove the general statement by generalizing method of Prop. 2(7). Denote

1 j k Z 2 log (1 − y) log (y) f(k, j) = dy 0 1 − y

Consider the integral jf(j, k −1). By partial integration, separation, Beta derivatives and reﬂection y → 1 − y, we have

1 j k−1 Z 2 log (1 − y) log (y) jf(k, j − 1) = −(− log(2))j+k + k dy 0 y ! Z 1 Z 1 logj(1 − y) logk−1(y) = −(− log(2))j+k + k − dy = U(j, k) − kf(j, k − 1) 1 y 0 2

Where

∂k+j−1B(a, b) U(k, j) = jf(k, j − 1) + kf(j, k − 1) = −(− log(2))j+k + k lim lim a→0b→1 ∂ak−1 ∂bj

n−1 n (j−1)(k) j Noticing n n−1 = k , we have a crucial identity (j )(k−1)

82 n n−1 n n − 1 n n − 1 f(k, m − k) + f(m + 1 − k, k − 1) = k m−k U(k, m + 1 − k) k m − k m + 1 − k k − 1 −k + m + 1

1−x Now, using substitution y → 2 and Binomial theorem twice on In:

1 n n−1 n n−1 Z 2 log (2y) log (2(1 − y)) X X nn − 1 I = dy = f(k, j) log2n−j−k−1(2) n 1 − y k j 0 k=0 j=0

Extract k = 0

n n−1 1 n n−1 X X nn − 1 Z 2 log (2) log (2(1 − y)) I = f(k, j) log2n−j−k−1(2) + dy n k j 1 − y k=1 j=0 0

Take Cauchy product and simplify:

2n−1 X X nn − 1 log2n(2) I = f(k, j) log2n−m−1(2) + n k j n m=1 k+j=m

n m 2n−1 n ! X X X X n n − 1 log2n(2) = + f(k, m − k) log2n−m−1(2) + k m − k n m=1 k=1 m=n+1 k=m−n+1

Let k → m + 1 − k then take averages:

n m 2n−1 n ! log2n(2) 1 X X X X I = + + n n 2 m=1 k=1 m=n+1 k=m−n+1 n n − 1 n n − 1 f(k, m − k) + f(m + 1 − k, k − 1) log2n−m−1(2) k m − k m + 1 − k k − 1

Plug in the crucial identity

n m 2n−1 n ! n n−1 −m+2n−1 log2n(2) 1 X X X X log (2) (∗)I = + + k m−k U(k, m + 1 − k) n n 2 −k + m + 1 m=1 k=1 m=n+1 k=m−n+1

According to [1], Lemma 2.3, all Beta derivatives in U(k, m + 1 − k) above lies in the algebra generated by π2, ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), ··· over Q. Adding up log(2) factors in U concludes the proof.

83 9 Table of subjects

9.1 LI

Table of 85 LIs with weight ≤ 5. For instance:

Weight 3 LI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) 1 1 1 (1,0,1;2) − 12 3 8

3 R 1 log(1−x) log(x+1) ζ(3) log (2) 1 2 Implies that LI(1, 0, 1; 2) = 0 x+1 dx = 8 + 3 − 12 π log(2).

Weight 1 LI: LI(0, 0, 0; 1) = log(2)

Weight 2 LI π2 log2(2) 1 (0,1,0;0) − 6 0 1 (1,0,0;1) − 6 0 1 (0,0,1;1) 12 0 1 1 (1,0,0;2) − 12 2 1 (0,1,0;2) − 12 0 1 (0,0,1;2) 0 2

Weight 3 LI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) (0,2,0;0) 0 0 2 (1,1,0;0) 0 0 1 1 (0,1,1;0) − 4 0 1 (2,0,0;1) 0 0 2 1 (0,0,2;1) 0 0 4 (1,1,0;1) 0 0 1 3 (0,1,1;1) 0 0 − 4 5 (1,0,1;1) 0 0 − 8 1 1 7 (2,0,0;2) − 6 3 4 3 (0,2,0;2) 0 0 2 1 (0,0,2;2) 0 3 0 1 13 (1,1,0;2) − 4 0 8 1 (0,1,1;2) 0 0 − 8 1 1 1 (1,0,1;2) − 12 3 8

84 4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 LI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) 1 (0,3,0;0) − 15 0 0 0 0 1 (2,1,0;0) − 45 0 0 0 0 1 (1,2,0;0) − 180 0 0 0 0 19 7 (0,2,1;0) − 720 0 0 2 0 7 5 1 21 (0,1,2;0) − 144 − 12 6 4 4 17 1 1 7 (1,1,1;0) 1440 − 24 − 12 8 −2 1 (3,0,0;1) − 15 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 21 (0,0,3;1) 15 4 − 4 − 4 −6 1 (2,1,0;1) − 180 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 (2,0,1;1) − 144 − 12 12 4 2 1 (1,2,0;1) − 45 0 0 0 0 7 (0,2,1;1) 360 0 0 0 0 1 (1,0,2;1) − 240 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 (0,1,2;1) 24 6 − 6 − 2 −4 3 1 1 7 (1,1,1;1) − 160 − 12 12 4 2 (3,0,0;2) 0 0 0 0 −6 7 (0,3,0;2) − 120 0 0 0 0 1 (0,0,3;2) 0 0 4 0 0 11 1 (2,1,0;2) 360 0 − 4 0 −6 1 1 1 (2,0,1;2) − 360 − 6 4 2 0 1 1 1 (1,2,0;2) 90 6 − 6 0 −4 1 1 1 7 (0,2,1;2) − 24 − 6 6 2 4 1 1 1 (1,0,2;2) − 45 − 6 3 2 2 1 1 1 7 (0,1,2;2) − 45 − 12 12 4 2 1 5 1 21 (1,1,1;2) − 45 − 24 12 8 2

85 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 LI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) (0,4,0;0) 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 (3,1,0;0) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 (1,3,0;0) 0 0 0 −1 0 12 0 0 1 3 (0,3,1;0) − 8 0 0 − 8 0 12 0 0 17 1 1 7 63 117 (0,1,3;0) − 80 − 3 − 20 − 16 8 4 −6 −24 2 (2,2,0;0) 0 0 0 − 3 0 8 0 0 49 1 1 13 7 47 (0,2,2;0) − 360 9 − 5 − 24 2 2 −8 −16 1 1 1 7 7 7 (2,1,1;0) 120 − 18 60 − 16 8 − 4 2 8 1 1 1 29 7 1 (1,2,1;0) 180 − 18 10 − 48 4 4 4 8 1 1 1 7 (1,1,2;0) − 48 − 6 0 − 2 2 6 0 0 (4,0,0;1) 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 2 4 21 (0,0,4;1) 0 3 − 5 0 − 2 24 −24 −24 (3,1,0;1) 0 0 0 −1 0 12 0 0 1 1 7 21 81 (3,0,1;1) 0 − 6 5 − 16 8 − 16 6 6 (1,3,0;1) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 45 (0,3,1;1) 0 0 0 0 0 − 8 0 0 1 1 7 21 3 (1,0,3;1) 0 6 − 5 16 − 8 4 −6 −6 1 2 1 21 99 (0,1,3;1) 0 3 − 5 2 − 4 16 −12 −12 2 (2,2,0;1) 0 0 0 − 3 0 8 0 0 1 2 7 25 (2,0,2;1) 0 − 9 15 0 4 − 8 4 4 1 29 (0,2,2;1) 0 0 0 3 0 − 8 0 0 1 2 1 7 7 (2,1,1;1) 0 − 9 15 − 16 4 − 2 4 4 1 27 (1,2,1;1) 0 0 0 8 0 − 16 0 0 7 25 (1,1,2;1) 0 0 0 48 0 − 16 0 0 (4,0,0;2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 45 (0,4,0;2) 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 (0,0,4;2) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 3 (3,1,0;2) 40 0 − 20 − 8 0 − 16 0 18 1 1 3 1 3 (3,0,1;2) − 120 − 6 20 − 2 3 16 0 6 1 3 273 (1,3,0;2) − 8 0 0 − 4 0 16 0 0 1 87 (0,3,1;2) 0 0 0 − 2 0 16 0 0 1 1 1 (1,0,3;2) − 15 − 6 4 0 3 6 0 −6 1 1 21 (0,1,3;2) 0 − 6 5 0 8 −6 6 6 1 1 1 13 15 (2,2,0;2) 90 9 − 15 − 12 0 2 0 8 1 2 7 1 63 (2,0,2;2) − 20 − 9 30 − 3 4 8 0 −4 2 4 1 7 33 (0,2,2;2) 0 − 9 15 − 3 2 − 8 8 8 1 1 1 1 21 121 (2,1,1;2) − 48 − 9 − 15 − 2 8 16 −2 −2 49 1 1 5 7 213 (1,2,1;2) − 720 18 − 10 − 12 4 16 −4 −8 17 1 1 7 7 19 (1,1,2;2) − 240 − 6 20 − 24 2 2 0 −6

86 9.2 ES

Table of 89 ESs with weight ≤ 5.

π2 log2(2) π2 log2(2) Weight 2 ESs: ES(1; −1) = − ,ES(−1; −1) = + 12 2 12 2

Weight 3 ES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) (1; 2) 0 0 2 1 1 (−1; 2) 4 0 − 4 5 (1; −2) 0 0 8 1 5 (−1; −2) 4 0 − 8 1 (2; −1) − 12 0 1 1 13 (−2; −1) − 6 0 8 1 1 3 (1, 1; −1) − 12 3 4 1 1 1 (1, −1; −1) 6 − 3 4 1 1 1 (−1, −1; −1) 4 3 − 2

87 4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 ES π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) 1 (1; 3) 72 0 0 0 0 1 7 (−1; 3) − 288 0 0 4 0 11 1 1 7 (1; −3) 360 12 − 12 − 4 −2 1 1 1 (−1; −3) 60 12 − 12 0 −2 7 (2; 2) 360 0 0 0 0 17 1 1 7 (−2; 2) 288 6 − 6 − 2 −4 17 1 1 7 (2; −2) − 480 − 6 6 2 4 13 (−2; −2) 1440 0 0 0 0 17 (1, 1; 2) 360 0 0 0 0 43 1 1 (1, −1; 2) 1440 8 − 8 0 −3 13 5 1 (−1, −1; 2) − 720 12 12 0 2 41 1 1 7 (1, 1; −2) 1440 12 − 12 − 4 −2 29 1 1 (1, −1; −2) 1440 8 − 8 0 −3 61 1 1 7 (−1, −1; −2) − 1440 3 6 4 4 19 3 (3; −1) 1440 0 0 − 4 0 1 1 1 3 (−3; −1) − 180 − 12 12 4 2 1 1 1 7 (1, 2; −1) − 90 − 24 12 8 2 43 1 1 (−1, 2; −1) 1440 − 24 − 8 0 −3 1 1 1 (1, −2; −1) − 160 − 24 8 0 3 61 1 1 7 (−1, −2; −1) 1440 − 24 − 6 − 8 −4 1 1 1 9 (1, 1, 1; −1) 144 8 − 4 − 8 0 53 1 1 (1, 1, −1; −1) 1440 24 8 0 −3 7 1 3 (1, −1, −1; −1) 0 24 − 4 8 0 59 13 11 (−1, −1, −1; −1) − 1440 24 24 0 5

88 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 ES π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 (1; 4) 0 0 0 − 6 0 3 0 0 1 1 17 (−1; 4) 48 0 0 16 0 − 16 0 0 1 59 (1; −4) 0 0 0 − 12 0 32 0 0 1 1 59 (−1; −4) 48 0 0 8 0 − 32 0 0 1 9 (2; 3) 0 0 0 2 0 − 2 0 0 1 51 (−2; 3) 0 0 0 − 24 0 32 0 0 5 11 (2; −3) 0 0 0 48 0 − 32 0 0 3 83 (−2; −3) 0 0 0 − 8 0 16 0 0 1 7 (1, 1; 3) 0 0 0 − 6 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 7 193 (1, −1; 3) 45 36 − 60 16 − 8 − 64 0 2 19 1 1 1 7 167 (−1, −1; 3) 720 18 − 30 8 4 − 32 0 4 1 2 11 7 19 (1, 1; −3) 0 − 9 15 − 48 4 − 32 4 4 2 1 1 1 7 37 (1, −1; −3) 45 36 − 60 − 48 − 8 − 16 0 2 19 1 1 1 19 (−1, −1; −3) 720 6 − 6 16 0 − 32 −4 0 1 11 (3; 2) 0 0 0 − 3 0 2 0 0 1 41 (−3; 2) 0 0 0 48 0 32 0 0 1 21 (3; −2) 0 0 0 8 0 − 32 0 0 7 67 (−3; −2) 0 0 0 16 0 − 16 0 0 1 (1, 2; 2) 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 23 1 1 1 27 (−1, 2; 2) − 1440 18 − 10 12 0 4 −4 −8 1 2 5 7 29 (1, −2; 2) 0 − 9 15 − 24 4 64 4 4 49 1 1 1 7 23 (−1, −2; 2) 720 18 − 30 − 8 − 4 − 8 0 4 1 2 5 7 23 (1, 2; −2) 0 9 − 15 32 − 4 8 −4 −4 23 1 1 5 7 29 (−1, 2; −2) − 1440 − 18 30 16 4 − 64 0 −4 13 125 (1, −2; −2) 0 0 0 − 48 0 32 0 0 49 1 1 1 35 (−1, −2; −2) 720 − 18 10 96 0 − 4 4 8 1 (1, 1, 1; 2) 0 0 0 6 0 10 0 0 109 1 1 1 165 (1, 1, −1; 2) 1440 − 36 20 12 0 − 32 2 4 1 1 1 1 53 (1, −1, −1; 2) 10 6 − 10 6 0 − 4 0 12 29 11 1 1 367 (−1, −1, −1; 2) − 160 12 − 20 12 0 16 −6 −24 1 1 9 21 9 (1, 1, 1; −2) 0 − 6 5 − 32 8 − 4 6 6 109 1 1 1 7 197 (1, 1, −1; −2) 1440 36 − 60 − 8 − 8 − 64 0 2 1 2 1 1 7 (1, −1, −1; −2) 10 9 − 6 96 − 8 −10 −2 10 29 3 3 1 21 1229 (−1, −1, −1; −2) − 160 4 20 − 8 8 64 0 −18 7 1 (4; −1) − 720 0 0 − 16 0 2 0 0 1 1 91 (−4; −1) − 90 0 0 − 8 0 32 0 0 49 1 1 1 3 167 (1, 3; −1) − 1440 36 − 20 − 96 8 32 −2 −4 11 1 1 5 3 193 (−1, 3; −1) 1440 − 36 60 − 48 − 8 − 64 0 −2 1 1 1 1 3 37 (1, −3; −1) 360 36 − 60 6 − 8 − 16 0 2 11 1 1 1 3 19 (−1, −3; −1) 1440 − 12 12 24 8 − 32 2 0 29 1 1 5 259 (2, 2; −1) 360 − 9 5 48 0 − 16 8 16 5 1 75 (2, −2; −1) − 288 0 0 16 0 64 0 0 13 1 1 1 299 (−2, −2; −1) − 120 9 − 5 − 24 0 16 −8 −16 7 1 1 1 7 (1, 1, 2; −1) 720 18 − 12 16 − 8 0 −2 0 1 1 1 7 7 155 (1, −1, 2; −1) − 45 − 72 20 96 16 32 0 −6 1 1 1 1 (−1, −1, 2; −1) 20 − 36 − 4 48 0 0 −6 0 13 1 1 1 93 (1, 1, −2; −1) − 1440 36 − 20 − 48 0 − 64 0 6 1 5 1 7 (1, −1, −2; −1) − 480 − 72 6 0 16 0 4 0 193 1 7 1 7 899 (−1, −1, −2; −1) 1440 − 9 − 60 24 − 8 − 64 0 14 11 2 3 11 9 83 (1, 1, 1, 1; −1) 360 − 9 10 − 48 4 − 16 4 8 37 7 11 1 9 55 (1, 1, 1, −1; −1) 720 72 − 60 − 96 − 16 16 0 −2 97 1 1 1 3 201 (1, 1, −1, −1; −1) 720 12 10 16 − 8 − 16 0 12 1 41 13 13 9 83 (1, −1, −1, −1; −1) − 180 72 − 60 96 16 − 32 0 2 71 3 13 5 733 (−1, −1, −1, −1; −1) − 180 2 30 48 0 16 −4 −48

89 9.3 PLI

Table of 263 PLIs with weight ≤ 5. For sake of simplicity, we abbreviate P LI(a, b, c; ··· ) as P LI(abc; ··· ).

Weight 3 PLI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) (000; 21; 1) 0 0 1 1 5 (000; 21; 2) 6 0 − 8 3 (000; 22; 1) 0 0 − 4 1 1 (000; 22; 2) − 12 0 4 1 1 7 (000; 23; 0) − 12 6 8 1 1 1 (000; 23; 2) 12 − 6 − 4 1 1 1 (000; 24; 2) 12 − 6 8 1 13 (000; 25; 0) − 6 0 8 1 5 (000; 25; 2) 6 0 − 8 1 (000; 26; 0) 12 0 −1 1 1 (000; 26; 2) − 12 0 4

90 4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 PLI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) 1 (010; 21; 0) − 120 0 0 0 0 1 (010; 21; 1) − 90 0 0 0 0 1 (010; 21; 2) − 480 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 (001; 21; 1) − 60 − 12 12 4 2 1 1 (001; 21; 2) − 480 12 0 0 0 1 (100; 21; 1) − 72 0 0 0 0 29 1 1 (100; 21; 2) − 1440 − 24 8 0 3 71 1 1 7 (010; 22; 0) 1440 6 − 6 − 2 −4 7 (010; 22; 1) 720 0 0 0 0 13 1 1 7 (010; 22; 2) 288 6 − 6 − 2 −4 1 (001; 22; 1) − 288 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 21 (001; 22; 2) 30 12 − 8 − 8 −3 11 1 1 7 (100; 22; 1) 360 12 − 12 − 4 −2 1 1 1 21 (100; 22; 2) 24 8 − 6 − 8 −4 1 1 1 (010; 23; 0) − 720 0 − 24 8 −1 1 1 (010; 23; 2) 360 24 0 −1 0 1 1 1 7 (001; 23; 0) − 288 − 24 24 8 0 11 1 1 13 (001; 23; 1) 240 8 − 6 − 4 −4 1 1 1 23 (001; 23; 2) 30 6 − 6 − 8 −3

91 4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 PLI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) (100; 23; 0) 0 0 0 0 −1 19 1 1 1 (100; 23; 1) − 1440 24 24 4 1 1 1 1 1 (100; 23; 2) − 1440 24 − 24 − 4 0 11 1 1 (010; 24; 0) − 288 − 24 8 1 3 1 1 1 (010; 24; 2) 180 0 − 12 − 8 −2 1 5 1 23 (001; 24; 1) − 36 − 24 6 8 4 1 (001; 24; 2) − 90 0 0 1 1 11 5 1 5 (100; 24; 1) − 1440 24 − 8 − 8 −3 1 1 1 1 (100; 24; 2) − 96 24 − 24 8 0 1 5 5 7 (010; 25; 0) 48 24 − 24 − 4 −5 13 1 1 (010; 25; 2) − 720 − 8 8 0 3 7 1 1 (001; 25; 0) 480 0 − 12 − 8 −2 11 1 1 7 (001; 25; 1) 720 24 − 24 − 8 −1 1 1 5 (001; 25; 2) 480 12 0 − 8 0 1 1 1 (100; 25; 0) 180 0 − 12 − 8 −2 7 1 1 7 (100; 25; 1) 1440 24 − 24 − 8 −1 1 5 (100; 25; 2) 0 12 0 − 8 0 37 1 1 7 (010; 26; 0) 1440 24 − 24 − 4 −1 1 1 1 (010; 26; 2) 120 24 − 24 0 −1 53 1 1 29 (001; 26; 0) 1440 6 − 8 − 8 −3 19 7 7 49 (001; 26; 1) − 240 − 24 24 8 7 1 1 1 23 (001; 26; 2) − 30 − 6 8 8 3 1 1 1 (100; 26; 0) 720 0 24 − 8 1 11 1 1 7 (100; 26; 1) 720 24 − 24 − 8 −1 17 1 5 (100; 26; 2) 1440 0 − 24 − 8 −1 1 (000; 31; 1) 90 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 (000; 31; 2) 60 12 − 12 − 4 −2 7 (000; 32; 1) − 720 0 0 0 0 1 3 (000; 32; 2) 288 0 0 − 4 0 (000; 33; 0) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7 (000; 33; 2) − 288 − 24 24 8 0 1 (000; 34; 2) 90 0 0 0 −1 1 1 1 3 (000; 35; 0) − 180 − 12 12 4 2 1 1 1 3 (000; 35; 2) 60 12 − 12 − 4 −2 19 3 (000; 36; 0) − 1440 0 0 4 0 1 3 (000; 36; 2) 288 0 0 − 4 0

92 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 PLI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) (020; 21; 0) 0 0 0 1 0 −11 0 0 (020; 21; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 67 (020; 21; 2) 0 0 0 4 0 − 8 0 0 2 4 1 7 39 (002; 21; 1) 0 − 9 15 − 4 2 − 8 8 8 1 1 7 7 1 (002; 21; 2) 0 9 − 15 48 − 8 4 −2 −2 1 (200; 21; 1) 0 0 0 3 0 −1 0 0 19 1 1 7 23 (200; 21; 2) 720 − 36 20 24 0 − 32 0 −6 2 13 (110; 21; 0) 0 0 0 3 0 − 2 0 0 1 3 (110; 21; 1) 0 0 0 6 0 − 2 0 0 1 31 421 (100; 21; 2) − 96 0 0 48 0 − 64 0 0 1 1 2 29 7 21 (011; 21; 0) − 96 9 − 15 48 − 4 − 8 −4 −4 5 107 (011; 21; 1) 0 0 0 − 16 0 32 0 0 1 2 19 7 53 (011; 21; 2) 0 9 − 15 96 − 4 32 −4 −4 5 29 (101; 21; 1) 0 0 0 − 48 0 64 0 0 11 5 1 23 21 15 (101; 21; 2) − 720 72 − 40 96 − 16 − 64 −1 −2 1 21 (020; 22; 0) 0 0 0 12 0 − 16 0 0 15 (020; 22; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 − 8 0 0 5 41 (020; 22; 2) 0 0 0 24 0 − 16 0 0 1 2 1 7 125 (002; 22; 1) 0 − 9 15 − 48 4 − 32 4 4 7 4 7 (002; 22; 2) 0 36 − 15 0 − 2 8 −8 −8 1 2 1 7 15 (200; 22; 1) 0 9 − 15 8 − 4 16 −4 −4 13 1 1 7 21 61 (200; 22; 2) 144 18 − 60 24 − 8 − 4 2 12 1 2 3 7 71 (110; 22; 0) 0 9 − 15 32 − 4 32 −4 −4 5 3 (110; 22; 1) 0 0 0 48 0 − 2 0 0 17 1 19 7 237 (110; 22; 2) 180 0 15 96 − 4 − 16 4 12 17 1 1 5 7 301 (011; 22; 0) 180 9 − 15 48 − 2 − 32 0 8 1 17 (011; 22; 1) 0 0 0 16 0 − 32 0 0 2 4 25 7 323 (011; 22; 2) 0 9 − 15 96 − 2 64 −8 −8 1 2 5 7 123 (101; 22; 1) 0 9 − 15 96 − 4 32 −4 −4 19 11 19 5 63 209 (101; 22; 2) 240 72 − 120 24 − 16 − 32 −3 4 19 1 2 7 151 (020; 23; 0) − 720 9 − 15 48 −1 32 −4 −4 19 7 3 15 (020; 23; 2) 720 0 0 24 − 4 − 4 0 0 1 1 1 1 7 3 (002; 23; 0) − 144 − 36 60 48 8 − 32 0 0 1 1 1 1 11 99 (002; 23; 1) 15 12 − 20 48 − 4 − 16 0 6 1 1 (002; 23; 2) 15 18 0 0 −2 −8 2 8 (200; 23; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

93 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 PLI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 5 11 11 11 81 (200; 23; 1) − 144 36 − 60 24 − 4 32 −6 −8 1 7 13 23 23 23 (200; 23; 2) − 720 36 − 60 48 − 8 32 −6 −6 17 1 1 1 15 25 (110; 23; 0) 1440 24 − 12 96 − 16 64 −2 0 3 1 7 3 11 143 (110; 23; 1) − 160 12 − 60 8 − 8 64 −4 −6 1 5 1 5 17 37 (110; 23; 2) − 96 36 − 8 12 − 8 64 −4 −5 17 7 17 1 1 245 (011; 23; 0) − 360 72 − 120 12 − 2 32 −5 −8 1 1 1 1 3 79 (011; 23; 1) 24 − 18 10 8 8 − 8 4 8 7 1 2 5 1 369 (011; 23; 2) 144 − 12 15 24 16 − 32 5 9 1 1 7 7 7 27 (101; 23; 0) − 288 24 − 120 96 − 16 64 −2 −1 1 1 1 1 69 (101; 23; 1) − 240 12 − 10 6 −1 64 −3 −3 47 5 1 25 25 381 (101; 23; 2) 1440 72 − 24 96 − 16 − 64 0 3 1 1 1 19 3 159 (020; 24; 0) − 90 − 18 30 24 4 − 32 0 −4 1 1 1 3 153 (020; 24; 2) 90 − 18 10 8 1 − 16 4 8 1 5 1 87 (022; 24; 1) − 240 0 0 − 12 − 8 16 0 0 1 (022; 24; 2) − 45 0 0 0 1 2 0 −2 1 1 1 5 1 81 (200; 24; 1) − 15 − 18 15 16 − 8 32 2 2 1 1 1 5 1 29 (200; 24; 2) − 48 36 − 60 16 8 − 32 0 0 11 1 1 19 1 87 (110; 24; 0) − 360 − 36 − 60 32 − 16 64 −2 −8 1 1 1 7 3 81 (110; 24; 1) − 180 − 18 15 − 48 8 64 2 2 1 1 1 17 1 521 (110; 24; 2) − 480 72 40 48 2 − 64 2 7 1 5 9 7 17 437 (011; 24; 0) − 96 − 36 40 12 8 − 32 7 8 3 5 11 19 11 183 (011; 24; 1) − 160 36 − 60 − 48 − 8 16 −6 −8 1 1 1 1 15 65 (011; 24; 2) − 45 − 24 − 60 16 16 32 −1 −3 1 1 1 13 13 131 (101; 24; 1) − 144 − 18 20 − 48 8 64 1 −1 31 1 7 3 23 123 (101; 24; 2) − 1440 − 24 120 32 16 − 64 2 1 41 1 7 1 7 217 (020; 25; 0) − 720 − 6 30 3 4 − 32 8 12 41 1 1 1 7 (020; 25; 2) 720 − 18 30 − 24 4 0 0 −4 7 1 1 19 5 41 (002; 25; 0) 240 − 6 6 − 48 2 − 8 6 10 5 1 5 35 93 (002; 25; 1) 0 18 − 3 8 − 8 32 −10 −10 1 1 1 7 3 1 (002; 25; 2) 240 9 − 15 48 − 2 4 −2 −2 1 1 1 1 15 (200; 25; 0) 90 18 − 10 − 8 −1 8 −2 2 1 1 37 21 465 (200; 25; 1) 0 − 6 5 48 8 − 32 6 6 1 1 1 183 (200; 25; 2) 0 − 9 5 2 2 − 16 6 6 23 1 1 1 7 155 (110; 25; 0) 1440 18 − 30 − 48 − 16 − 64 0 4 1 1 17 21 713 (110; 25; 1) 0 − 6 5 32 8 − 64 6 6 19 7 13 17 35 31 (110; 25; 2) − 1440 − 36 60 48 16 − 4 6 4

94 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 PLI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 1 1 5 21 93 (011; 25; 0) 180 − 18 10 − 96 16 − 16 4 8 1 1 1 7 31 (011; 25; 1) 0 18 − 15 48 − 8 32 −2 −2 1 1 1 3 7 31 (011; 25; 2) − 360 − 12 12 − 32 16 64 2 0 29 1 1 11 3 109 (101; 25; 0) 1440 − 18 30 96 4 − 16 2 6 1 1 17 7 31 (101; 25; 1) 0 18 − 15 − 96 − 8 8 −2 −2 1 1 5 1 45 (101; 25; 2) 480 0 15 − 96 4 − 32 2 2 49 1 7 1 7 527 (020; 26; 0) 720 − 6 30 8 4 − 32 8 12 49 1 1 1 7 93 (020; 26; 2) − 720 − 18 30 − 8 4 16 0 −4 53 1 3 1 381 (002; 26; 0) 720 − 18 20 − 48 −1 − 32 6 12 1 1 1 21 93 (002; 26; 1) 0 − 6 5 − 48 8 − 16 6 6 1 1 1 (002; 26; 2) − 15 − 18 − 60 0 2 8 −2 −8 1 1 1 1 1 (200; 26; 0) 360 18 − 20 6 −1 − 16 −2 −4 1 1 11 21 31 (200; 26; 1) 0 − 6 5 − 24 8 − 32 6 6 17 1 11 5 149 (200; 26; 2) 720 − 6 60 − 16 2 − 32 6 8 1 23 7 217 (110; 26; 0) 96 0 0 96 − 16 − 64 0 0 1 1 43 21 93 (110; 26; 1) 0 − 6 5 − 96 8 − 64 6 6 17 5 11 13 35 341 (110; 26; 2) 720 − 36 60 − 48 16 − 64 6 8 151 2 1 13 21 713 (011; 26; 0) 1440 − 9 3 96 16 − 32 12 20 1 1 3 7 217 (011; 26; 1) 0 18 − 15 − 8 − 8 32 −2 −2 17 1 3 5 7 465 (011; 26; 2) − 240 12 − 20 − 24 16 32 −6 −12 11 1 17 405 (101; 26; 0) 288 0 20 96 −1 − 64 2 4 1 1 37 21 93 (101; 26; 1) 0 − 6 5 − 96 8 − 64 6 6 31 1 1 25 189 (101; 26; 2) − 1440 − 9 12 − 96 2 64 2 0 1 9 (010; 31; 0) 0 0 0 3 0 − 2 0 0 (010; 31; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0 7 83 (010; 31; 2) 0 0 0 16 0 − 16 0 0 1 (100; 31; 1) 0 0 0 6 0 −3 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 85 (100; 31; 2) 360 36 − 60 3 − 8 − 16 0 2 1 59 (001; 31; 1) 0 0 0 − 8 0 32 0 0 1 2 1 5 39 (001; 31; 2) 0 9 − 15 8 − 4 16 −4 −4 1 11 (010; 32; 0) 0 0 0 48 0 32 0 0 15 (010; 32; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 51 (010; 32; 2) 0 0 0 − 8 0 32 0 0 1 59 (100; 32; 1) 0 0 0 − 12 0 32 0 0 49 1 1 7 3 27 (100; 32; 2) 1440 − 36 20 − 96 − 8 − 8 2 4 1 17 (001; 32; 1) 0 0 0 16 0 − 16 0 0

95 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 PLI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 1 1 5 125 (001; 32; 2) 0 18 − 15 96 − 4 64 −2 −2 1 1 1 1 1 1 (010; 33; 0) 720 36 − 40 12 − 2 − 32 −1 −2 1 1 3 1 13 33 (010; 33; 2) − 720 18 − 40 16 − 16 64 −2 −1 (100; 33; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 19 5 13 3 23 23 (100; 33; 1) 1440 72 − 120 32 − 16 64 −3 −2 1 5 11 7 7 81 (100; 33; 2) − 288 72 − 120 48 − 8 64 −3 −3 1 1 7 7 27 (001; 33; 0) 0 36 − 30 96 − 16 32 −1 −2 11 1 1 1 5 457 (001; 33; 1) − 240 24 − 15 48 16 64 −3 −7 1 1 1 1 7 3 (001; 33; 2) − 288 − 72 120 96 16 − 64 0 0 1 1 1 5 13 405 (010; 34; 0) 180 − 18 20 32 16 − 64 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 15 (010; 34; 2) − 180 − 36 20 16 2 − 16 1 −1 11 5 1 19 5 29 (100; 34; 1) 1440 − 72 40 − 96 16 16 0 −3 1 1 1 3 7 123 (100; 34; 2) 90 − 36 30 32 16 − 32 1 2 1 5 1 1 23 35 (001; 34; 1) 36 72 − 30 − 8 − 16 − 32 0 4 1 (001; 34; 2) 90 0 0 0 0 −1 0 1 1 1 7 1 7 93 (010; 35; 0) − 360 12 − 60 12 − 8 32 −4 −6 1 1 7 5 7 31 (010; 35; 2) 360 − 12 60 24 8 − 4 4 6 1 1 1 3 1 153 (100; 35; 0) − 180 36 − 20 − 16 − 2 32 −2 −4 1 1 5 7 465 (100; 35; 1) 0 − 18 15 12 8 − 64 2 2 1 1 1 5 1 61 (100; 35; 2) 60 − 36 20 16 2 − 8 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 19 (001; 35; 0) − 180 36 − 20 4 − 2 32 −2 −4 1 1 17 7 155 (001; 35; 1) 0 − 18 15 − 48 8 64 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 39 (001; 35; 2) 60 − 36 20 − 8 2 − 16 2 4 49 1 7 1 7 527 (010; 36; 0) − 1440 12 − 60 − 16 − 8 64 −4 −6 49 1 7 1 7 341 (010; 36; 2) 1440 − 12 60 − 12 8 − 64 4 6 19 1 1 7 1 151 (100; 36; 0) − 1440 18 − 15 96 − 2 64 −2 −2 1 1 3 7 31 (100; 36; 1) 0 − 18 15 − 32 8 − 64 2 2 1 1 1 13 1 23 (100; 36; 2) 288 − 18 15 − 96 2 − 64 2 2 19 1 1 5 1 193 (001; 36; 0) − 1440 18 − 15 − 96 − 2 64 −2 −2 1 1 1 7 155 (001; 36; 1) 0 − 18 15 96 8 − 64 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 125 (001; 36; 2) 288 − 18 15 − 96 2 − 64 2 2 (000; 41; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 59 (000; 41; 2) 90 0 0 8 0 − 32 0 0 15 (000; 42; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 − 16 0 0 7 1 17 (000; 42; 2) − 720 0 0 − 16 0 16 0 0 (000; 43; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

96 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 PLI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 1 7 7 27 (000; 43; 2) 0 36 − 30 96 − 16 32 −1 −2 (000; 44; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 −1 1 1 91 (000; 45; 0) − 90 0 0 − 8 0 32 0 0 1 1 59 (000; 45; 2) 90 0 0 8 0 − 32 0 0 7 1 (000; 46; 0) 720 0 0 16 0 −2 0 0 7 1 17 (000; 46; 2) − 720 0 0 − 16 0 16 0 0 1 (000; 21, 21; 1) 0 0 0 3 0 −3 0 0 1 5 29 (000; 21, 21; 2) 36 0 0 − 24 0 32 0 0 1 17 (000; 22, 22; 1) 0 0 0 8 0 − 16 0 0 1 2 4 1 7 125 (000; 22, 22; 2) 144 − 9 15 − 24 2 − 16 8 8 1 1 7 7 7 27 (000; 23, 23; 0) − 144 12 − 60 48 − 8 32 −2 −2 1 1 1 1 3 (000; 23, 23; 2) 144 − 36 20 − 24 0 16 0 0 1 1 7 3 7 123 (000; 24, 24; 2) 144 − 12 60 16 8 − 32 2 2 1 5 29 (000; 25, 25; 2) 36 0 0 − 24 0 32 0 0 1 13 125 (000; 25, 25; 0) − 36 0 0 24 0 − 32 0 0 1 2 4 1 7 125 (000; 26, 26; 2) 144 − 9 15 − 24 2 − 16 8 8 1 2 4 1 7 27 (000; 26, 26; 0) − 144 9 − 15 6 − 2 4 −8 −8 5 59 (000; 21, 22; 1) 0 0 0 − 24 0 32 0 0 1 1 2 19 7 33 (000; 21, 22; 2) − 72 − 9 15 − 96 4 − 32 4 4 19 5 13 3 23 23 (000; 21, 23; 0) − 1440 − 72 120 − 32 16 − 64 3 2 1 1 1 11 3 311 (000; 21, 23; 1) − 60 − 36 60 − 48 8 64 0 −2 19 1 1 5 13 101 (000; 21, 23; 2) 1440 − 8 8 − 16 8 − 64 4 5 1 1 1 1 3 85 (000; 21, 24; 1) − 72 − 18 15 2 8 − 16 2 2 11 5 1 1 5 29 (000; 21, 24; 2) 1440 − 72 40 − 32 16 16 0 −3 1 1 5 7 465 (000; 21, 25; 1) 0 18 − 15 − 12 − 8 64 −2 −2 7 5 11 17 7 31 (000; 21, 25; 2) − 1440 72 − 120 − 48 − 8 4 −3 −4 7 1 1 1 31 (000; 21, 25; 0) 1440 − 72 40 − 16 0 − 64 1 2 1 1 17 7 155 (000; 21, 26; 1) 0 18 − 15 48 − 8 − 64 −2 −2 11 5 11 23 7 93 (000; 21, 26; 2) − 720 72 − 120 96 − 8 64 −3 −4 11 1 1 7 31 (000; 21, 26; 0) 720 − 72 40 − 48 0 − 32 1 2 11 1 1 1 5 457 (000; 22, 23; 0) 240 − 24 15 − 48 − 16 − 64 3 7 1 1 3 15 (000; 22, 23; 1) − 288 0 0 48 8 − 32 0 0 11 5 1 1 1 61 (000; 22, 23; 2) − 240 72 − 10 24 − 8 8 −4 −8 11 1 1 19 3 27 (000; 22, 24; 1) 360 − 36 20 − 96 8 − 8 2 4 1 5 1 5 23 35 (000; 22, 24; 2) 36 72 − 30 − 24 − 16 − 32 0 4 11 1 1 11 31 (000; 22, 25; 0) 720 − 72 40 96 0 − 8 1 2

97 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 PLI π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 1 3 7 31 (000; 22, 25; 1) 0 18 − 15 32 − 8 64 −2 −2 11 5 11 23 7 93 (000; 22, 25; 2) − 720 72 − 120 96 − 8 64 −3 −4 19 7 7 1 899 (000; 22, 26; 0) − 240 72 − 40 32 0 64 −7 −14 1 1 1 7 155 (000; 22, 26; 1) 0 18 − 15 − 96 − 8 64 −2 −2 19 1 13 1 7 93 (000; 22, 26; 2) 240 − 24 120 − 24 − 8 − 8 5 12 1 1 1 7 21 81 (000; 23, 24; 0) − 144 − 18 20 − 96 16 − 64 3 3 1 1 1 25 21 369 (000; 23, 24; 2) 144 18 − 20 − 96 − 16 64 −3 −3 1 1 1 5 7 5 (000; 23, 25; 0) − 72 18 − 30 24 − 16 − 16 −1 −1 1 1 1 1 21 29 (000; 23, 25; 2) 72 18 − 10 8 − 16 32 −3 −3 1 5 1 5 7 51 (000; 23, 26; 0) 144 − 72 15 − 32 8 − 64 2 2 1 1 2 1 7 61 (000; 23, 26; 2) − 144 8 − 15 24 − 4 16 −4 −4 1 1 1 5 35 57 (000; 24, 25; 0) − 72 6 − 6 − 96 − 16 8 −5 −5 1 1 1 17 7 1 (000; 24, 25; 2) 72 − 18 30 − 96 16 2 1 1 1 11 1 3 21 57 (000; 24, 26; 0) 144 72 − 5 − 16 − 8 8 −6 −6 1 7 2 25 7 433 (000; 24, 26; 2) − 144 − 72 15 96 4 − 64 4 4 1 1 2 1 7 23 (000; 25, 26; 0) 72 9 − 15 − 96 − 4 8 −4 −4 1 1 2 19 7 33 (000; 25, 26; 2) − 72 − 9 15 − 96 4 − 32 4 4

98 9.4 QLI

Table of 193 QLIs with weight ≤ 4.

Weight 2 QLI π2 log2(2) 1 (4; 2) 24 0 1 3 (4; 3) − 48 4 1 (5; 4) 32 0 5 1 (1; 5) − 96 8 1 (2; 5) − 48 0 1 1 (3; 5) 96 8 1 (4; 5) 0 4

Weight 2 QLI π log(2) C (5; 2) 0 1 1 (5; 3) 8 0 1 (1; 4) 8 −1 (2; 4) 0 −1 1 (3; 4) 8 0 1 (4; 4) 2 −1 1 1 (5; 5) − 8 2

99 Weight 3 QLI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) πC 3 1 (24; 1) − 16 0 2 − 2 23 1 (14; 2) 0 0 32 − 2 3 (24; 2) 0 0 − 16 0 33 1 (34; 2) 0 0 − 32 2 1 (44; 2) 0 0 8 0 7 1 (55; 2) 0 0 − 8 2 5 11 7 1 (14; 3) − 32 24 4 − 2 1 3 1 (24; 3) − 16 0 2 − 2 1 11 (34; 3) − 96 24 0 0 1 2 5 (44; 3) − 24 3 2 −1 1 21 1 (55; 3) 32 0 − 32 4 1 7 1 (15; 4) 64 0 − 64 − 8 7 1 (25; 4) 0 0 16 − 4 1 21 1 (35; 4) 64 0 64 − 8 1 21 1 (45; 4) 16 0 64 − 4 5 1 35 (11; 5) − 96 24 32 0 3 41 (12; 5) − 32 0 64 0 1 1 7 (13; 5) − 48 24 − 64 0 5 1 11 1 (14; 5) − 96 12 16 − 4 3 (22; 5) 0 0 16 0 1 15 (23; 5) 32 0 − 64 0 1 (24; 5) 0 0 − 32 0 1 1 (33; 5) 96 24 0 0 1 1 5 1 (34; 5) 96 12 − 8 4 1 (44; 5) 0 6 0 0 1 21 1 (55; 5) − 32 0 − 64 4

100 3 2 Weight 3 QLI π π log (2) C log(2) P3 3 1 1 (25; 1) 64 8 2 −2 1 1 (15; 2) 0 16 2 −1 1 (25; 2) − 32 0 0 0 3 3 3 (35; 2) 32 16 2 −3 1 1 (45; 2) 16 8 1 −2 19 7 1 (15; 3) 384 32 2 −2 1 1 (25; 3) − 64 0 2 0 7 7 (35; 3) 128 32 1 −2 5 1 (45; 3) 96 4 1 −2 7 3 (11; 4) 64 16 0 −2 3 1 (12; 4) 64 16 0 −1 1 (13; 4) − 32 0 −1 1 9 1 1 (14; 4) 64 2 − 2 −4 1 (22; 4) 16 0 0 0 5 3 (23; 4) − 64 − 16 −2 3 3 1 (24; 4) 32 8 −1 −2 7 3 (33; 4) − 64 − 16 -2 4 7 5 (34; 4) − 64 0 − 2 4 7 5 (44; 4) 48 4 −2 −4 1 (55; 4) 192 0 0 0 19 1 1 (15; 5) − 384 − 8 4 1 5 1 (25; 5) − 64 − 8 0 2 11 3 (35; 5) 384 0 4 −1 7 1 1 (45; 5) − 192 − 4 2 1

101 4 2 2 4 1 2 Weight 4 QLI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) πP3 πC log(2) C 59 5 5 35 5 1 1 (124; 1) − 3840 − 192 − 96 64 − 4 2 − 4 1 199 35 (224; 1) − 5760 0 0 16 0 0 0 2 211 11 1 315 3 3 1 (234; 1) 11520 − 64 32 64 4 − 2 − 4 1 61 17 1 77 (244; 1) − 576 − 48 24 16 1 2 −2 4 53 1 1 7 1 (255; 1) 5760 24 − 24 − 16 −1 0 − 4 0 521 11 5 35 5 1 (114; 2) − 11520 − 96 96 32 4 1 − 2 2 119 5 5 35 5 (124; 2) − 5760 − 96 96 32 4 0 0 1 37 3 3 63 9 (134; 2) − 1920 − 32 32 32 4 0 0 −1 877 1 1 7 (144; 2) − 5760 − 3 12 4 2 4 −2 2 151 1 1 7 1 1 (155; 2) − 23040 − 48 48 16 2 0 0 − 2 7 (224; 2) 2880 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1 1 21 3 (234; 2) 1440 32 − 32 − 32 − 4 0 0 −1 1 1 1 7 (244; 2) 96 24 − 24 − 8 −1 0 0 0 151 1 1 7 (255; 2) − 11520 − 24 24 8 1 0 0 0 185 25 19 133 19 1 (334; 2) 2304 96 − 96 − 32 − 4 −1 2 0 173 1 1 7 (344; 2) 1152 3 − 12 − 4 −2 −4 2 −2 1289 5 1 7 1 1 (355; 2) 23040 48 48 16 2 −2 1 − 2 1 1 1 21 (444; 2) 30 8 − 8 − 8 −3 0 0 0 209 1 1 7 1 (455; 2) 11520 48 24 8 1 −1 2 0 277 3 7 35 1 (114; 3) 4608 64 96 32 −6 −1 − 2 2 331 3 5 77 15 3 1 (124; 3) 5760 64 − 32 64 − 4 − 2 − 4 2 259 19 5 239 9 1 1 (134; 3) − 23040 − 96 12 64 4 − 2 − 4 0 193 1 11 5 (144; 3) 11520 − 48 48 3 −5 0 − 2 4 557 19 1 7 1 1 (155; 3) − 23040 − 384 24 64 1 2 − 8 0 161 21 (224; 3) − 5760 0 0 16 0 0 0 2 29 43 17 245 17 1 1 (234; 3) − 480 − 192 96 64 4 2 − 4 0 47 7 1 35 (244; 3) − 576 − 48 − 24 16 −1 2 −2 4 233 5 1 7 1 (255; 3) − 5760 − 48 24 16 1 1 − 4 0 209 7 41 35 5 (334; 3) − 7680 − 64 96 16 2 0 0 0 209 11 31 45 1 (344; 3) − 3840 − 48 48 8 5 0 − 2 0 7 7 21 1 3 (355; 3) 512 128 0 − 64 0 − 2 8 0 89 5 1 39 (444; 3) − 480 − 16 2 8 −3 6 −6 6 677 1 1 7 1 1 (455; 3) − 23040 − 24 24 32 1 2 0 2

102 4 2 2 4 1 2 Weight 4 QLI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) πP3 πC log(2) C 143 11 1 35 1 1 1 (115; 4) 11520 384 − 48 − 64 − 2 0 − 8 2 121 1 1 7 3 1 1 (125; 4) 15360 32 − 32 − 16 − 4 0 − 8 4 29 3 1 35 3 1 1 1 (135; 4) − 15360 128 − 32 − 64 − 4 4 − 4 4 97 1 7 105 7 1 1 1 (145; 4) 5760 12 − 192 − 128 − 8 − 4 − 4 2 151 1 1 7 (225; 4) 11520 24 − 24 − 8 −1 0 0 0 119 1 7 3 1 3 1 (235; 4) − 15360 0 − 32 − 16 − 4 2 − 8 4 437 11 1 7 1 1 (245; 4) 11520 96 − 12 − 8 −2 − 2 − 4 0 7 3 21 1 3 (335; 4) − 512 − 128 0 64 0 2 − 8 0 179 7 11 49 11 1 1 (345; 4) 23040 96 − 192 − 128 − 8 4 − 2 0 11 29 11 35 11 1 (445; 4) 180 96 − 96 − 32 − 4 −1 − 2 0 1 (555; 4) 1024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 5 1 15 (111; 5) − 15360 128 − 16 0 − 8 0 0 0 167 1 5 15 (112; 5) 23040 32 − 64 0 − 8 0 0 0 23 7 3 35 3 (113; 5) − 5120 − 128 64 32 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 29 1 (114; 5) 2560 − 96 − 96 32 −1 0 − 4 1 13 5 5 5 (122; 5) 3840 96 − 96 0 − 4 0 0 0 229 1 3 7 9 (123; 5) − 23040 − 16 64 8 8 0 0 0 89 1 1 49 1 1 1 (124; 5) 7680 − 192 − 96 64 − 4 − 2 0 2 77 5 1 1 (133; 5) − 46080 − 384 48 0 8 0 0 0 167 3 5 93 7 1 (134; 5) − 11520 − 32 48 64 4 0 0 − 2 121 13 1 29 1 (144; 5) − 2880 − 96 12 16 2 1 −1 1 111 1 1 35 3 1 1 (155; 5) − 5120 − 16 64 128 8 2 0 − 4 7 (222; 5) − 1920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1 1 3 (223; 5) − 11520 − 32 32 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 1 (224; 5) − 192 − 48 48 16 2 0 0 0 467 3 5 7 15 (233; 5) 23040 32 − 64 − 4 − 8 0 0 0 79 3 1 7 3 1 1 (234; 5) − 4608 − 64 32 − 64 4 2 0 − 2 1 1 1 7 1 (244; 5) − 180 − 48 48 16 2 0 0 0 361 1 1 7 3 (255; 5) − 7680 − 8 16 16 2 1 0 0 209 21 9 105 15 (333; 5) 5120 128 − 64 − 32 − 4 0 0 0 209 11 7 45 5 1 (334; 5) 7680 96 − 96 − 16 − 2 0 4 0 89 5 1 13 1 (344; 5) 2880 96 12 − 16 2 −1 1 −1 319 1 7 35 7 1 1 1 (355; 5) 46080 − 48 192 128 8 − 2 2 − 4 1 (444; 5) 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 11 35 11 1 1 (455; 5) − 360 − 96 192 64 8 2 4 0

103 3 3 2 2 Weight 4 QLI π log(2) π log (2) π C C log (2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3 3 1 11 1 35 1 1 (125; 1) 128 32 96 8 256 − 2 0 − 1536 1 1 35 1 (225; 1) 32 0 − 24 0 64 0 0 − 768 1 1 1 1 91 1 1 (235; 1) − 128 32 − 96 8 256 − 2 0 − 1536 1 1 5 1 105 1 (245; 1) 64 16 − 48 4 128 −1 0 − 768 1 5 1 35 (115; 2) 0 24 − 48 4 128 −1 2 0 3 35 1 (125; 2) 0 0 − 16 0 128 0 0 1536 1 5 7 1 (135; 2) 0 6 − 48 1 128 −4 8 − 256 1 1 1 1 (145; 2) 0 12 − 6 2 0 −2 4 − 768 1 (225; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 768 1 21 1 (235; 2) 0 0 − 16 0 − 128 0 0 1536 35 1 (245; 2) 0 0 0 0 − 64 0 0 768 7 1 7 21 5 (335; 2) 0 24 − 48 4 − 128 −7 14 − 768 1 1 3 7 1 (345; 2) 0 4 24 2 − 16 −6 12 − 192 1 35 1 (445; 2) 0 6 0 1 − 32 −4 8 − 768 3 1 (555; 2) 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 − 1024 59 13 5 1 35 5 (115; 3) 384 96 − 48 4 128 1 −12 768 1 1 7 1 77 3 5 (125; 3) 128 − 32 − 96 8 256 2 −6 1536 17 1 7 5 29 1 5 (135; 3) 192 6 − 96 8 256 − 2 −6 1536 47 5 1 1 41 5 (145; 3) 384 32 − 6 2 128 1 −12 768 1 1 21 (225; 3) − 32 0 − 24 0 64 0 0 0 5 1 7 1 21 3 5 (235; 3) 128 − 32 − 96 8 256 2 −6 1536 1 1 5 1 7 1 (245; 3) 64 − 48 − 48 4 128 1 −4 384 7 19 (335; 3) 128 96 0 1 0 −2 0 0 31 19 29 1 (345; 3) 384 96 0 1 − 128 −1 −4 384 5 5 1 9 1 (445; 3) 48 24 − 8 1 − 64 0 −8 192 1 3 63 (555; 3) 128 0 32 0 − 256 0 0 0

104 3 3 2 2 Weight 4 QLI π log(2) π log (2) π C C log (2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3 21 3 (111; 4) 128 32 0 0 0 0 −6 0 3 1 1 1 (112; 4) 64 48 3 0 0 0 −2 − 768 3 5 1 1 (113; 4) 128 − 96 6 −1 0 2 −4 768 23 7 5 1 35 1 (114; 4) 64 24 48 − 4 64 0 −16 192 1 1 1 (122; 4) 32 0 3 0 0 0 0 − 384 1 5 1 (123; 4) − 64 − 48 6 −1 0 2 −2 0 9 1 1 1 7 (124; 4) 64 16 4 − 4 16 0 −6 0 11 19 1 (133; 4) − 128 − 96 6 −2 0 4 −2 0 3 1 11 7 1 (134; 4) − 64 24 48 −2 64 1 2 − 384 61 23 5 35 3 (144; 4) 96 24 24 −1 32 −2 −32 256 1 1 35 1 (155; 4) 384 0 − 32 0 − 256 0 0 3072 1 (222; 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 256 1 1 1 (223; 4) 32 0 6 0 0 0 0 − 768 1 7 1 (224; 4) 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 − 256 5 11 1 (233; 4) − 64 − 48 6 −2 0 4 −2 0 7 1 1 7 7 7 (234; 4) − 64 − 48 8 − 4 16 −2 14 − 768 3 1 7 1 (244; 4) 8 3 0 −1 4 −4 −8 − 768 1 1 (255; 4) 0 0 − 16 0 0 0 0 3072 21 11 (333; 4) − 128 − 32 0 −3 0 6 0 0 21 5 1 15 35 3 (334; 4) − 64 − 24 48 − 4 64 2 20 − 256 35 11 1 35 3 (344; 4) − 96 24 24 −4 32 −6 40 − 128 1 1 21 (355; 4) 384 0 − 32 0 256 0 0 0 7 1 (444; 4) 8 3 0 −3 3 −12 −24 256 1 1 3 1 (455; 4) 96 0 − 16 0 − 128 0 0 3072 5 7 5 1 29 1 (115; 5) − 48 − 96 − 96 8 128 0 4 − 768 1 1 3 49 1 (125; 5) − 16 − 24 − 32 0 256 2 1 0 1 1 5 1 9 1 (135; 5) 192 − 48 − 96 2 256 0 −1 1536 53 3 1 1 23 1 1 (145; 5) − 384 − 16 − 12 4 256 2 6 − 384 1 7 1 (225; 5) − 16 0 0 0 64 0 0 1536 3 5 1 7 7 3 (235; 5) 64 − 48 − 32 0 − 256 2 −11 512 3 1 21 1 (245; 5) − 32 − 8 0 0 − 128 2 0 1536 1 1 1 7 3 5 (335; 5) 12 32 − 96 8 − 64 0 −6 1536 25 5 1 3 61 3 7 (345; 5) 384 − 48 48 4 − 256 2 −8 1536 7 11 1 1 1 (445; 5) − 48 − 24 0 2 − 2 2 4 − 1536 1 3 9 1 (555; 5) − 128 0 32 0 256 0 0 − 2048

105 9.5 QPLI

Table of 172 QPLIs with weight ≤ 4.

3 2 Weight 3 QPLI π π log (2) C log(2) P3 1 1 1 (1; 4) 24 16 2 −1 7 3 3 (2; 4) 96 16 2 −3 7 3 1 (3; 4) − 384 − 32 − 2 1 35 3 1 (4; 4) 384 32 2 −2 1 1 1 (5; 4) 24 16 2 −1 7 3 3 (6; 4) 96 16 2 −3 5 1 (7; 4) 48 4 2 −4 1 (8; 2) 32 0 0 0 3 3 1 (8; 3) − 32 − 16 − 2 3 1 1 (8; 5) − 32 − 16 0 1

Weight 3 QPLI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) πC 1 23 1 (1; 5) 12 0 64 − 4 1 33 1 (2; 5) − 24 0 − 64 4 3 7 49 1 (3; 5) 64 − 48 − 64 4 1 7 7 1 (4; 5) 64 − 48 8 − 4 1 63 1 (5; 5) 12 0 − 64 4 1 49 1 (6; 5) − 24 0 64 − 4 3 (7; 2) 0 0 − 8 0 1 33 (7; 3) − 12 0 − 16 1 1 1 (7; 5) − 24 0 8 0 7 1 (8; 4) 0 0 8 − 4

106 4 2 2 4 1 2 Weight 4 QPLI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) πP3 πC log(2) C 511 7 5 15 1 1 (1; 1; 5) − 46080 − 384 128 0 16 0 − 8 2 41 1 (1; 2; 5) − 7680 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 269 1 7 7 7 1 (1; 3; 5) − 46080 384 384 8 16 0 − 8 0 23 5 5 35 5 (1; 4; 2) − 2304 − 96 96 32 4 0 0 0 35 13 11 7 11 1 (1; 4; 3) − 4608 192 192 32 8 0 4 −1 877 1 1 7 1 1 1 (1; 4; 5) − 23040 − 24 48 16 2 1 − 2 2 89 1 1 7 1 1 (1; 5; 4) 46080 − 96 96 32 4 0 0 − 4 23 5 5 3 5 (1; 5) 4608 192 − 192 − 64 − 8 0 0 0 757 13 17 7 17 1 1 (2; 1; 5) 46080 384 − 384 − 8 − 16 0 8 − 2 13 1 (2; 2; 5) 2560 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 2 209 11 7 7 1 (2; 3; 5) − 46080 − 384 384 0 16 0 8 0 67 1 1 21 3 (2; 4; 2) 11520 32 − 32 − 32 − 4 0 0 0 2059 15 15 133 45 1 (2; 4; 3) 23040 64 − 64 − 32 − 8 −1 4 0 173 1 1 7 1 1 1 (2; 4; 5) 4608 16 − 48 − 16 − 2 −1 2 − 2 1169 5 1 7 1 1 1 (2; 5; 4) 46080 96 96 32 4 −1 2 − 4 67 1 1 3 3 (2; 5) − 23040 − 64 64 − 64 8 0 0 0 25 1 1 1 1 1 (3; 1; 5) − 18432 − 768 − 128 0 2 0 8 − 2 23 1 7 15 7 1 (3; 2; 5) 9216 64 384 − 64 16 0 0 − 2 1609 59 3 7 25 1 (3; 3; 5) 92160 768 − 32 − 4 − 16 0 8 0 117 7 5 35 5 1 (3; 4; 1) 5120 384 192 64 − 4 − 2 0 0 179 3 13 157 13 3 1 (3; 4; 2) − 7680 − 64 − 192 − 64 − 8 2 − 4 0 419 9 7 39 13 1 (3; 4; 3) − 46080 128 − 48 − 16 − 8 1 − 4 0 95 3 5 97 1 3 1 (3; 4; 5) 9216 64 − 64 − 64 − 2 0 8 − 2 161 13 1 49 1 1 3 1 (3; 5; 4) 11520 768 96 128 4 − 2 16 − 4 117 7 5 35 5 1 (3; 5) 10240 768 384 128 − 8 − 4 0 0 29 43 31 7 5 1 1 (4; 1; 5) − 10240 768 − 384 − 64 − 4 0 − 8 2 61 1 25 15 25 1 (4; 2; 5) 15360 192 − 384 − 64 − 16 0 0 2 259 49 1 105 23 1 (4; 3; 5) − 18432 − 768 32 64 16 0 − 8 0 1141 19 5 11 5 3 1 (4; 4; 2) 23040 192 − 192 64 − 8 − 2 4 1 259 41 5 29 5 1 (4; 4; 3) 15360 384 − 48 64 − 8 − 2 0 0 193 3 7 1 5 3 (4; 4; 5) 46080 64 − 64 8 − 4 0 − 8 1 317 31 1 49 1 1 3 (4; 5; 4) − 46080 − 768 48 128 2 4 − 16 0 259 41 5 35 5 1 (4; 5) − 30720 − 768 96 128 16 4 0 0 23 1 7 7 7 1 1 (5; 1; 5) − 46080 384 384 − 64 16 0 8 − 2 59 5 5 7 5 1 (5; 2; 5) − 4608 − 48 48 8 2 0 0 − 2 173 1 7 7 7 1 (5; 3; 5) − 46080 384 384 − 64 16 0 8 0 617 3 11 33 1 (5; 4; 1) 23040 64 − 64 −1 − 8 0 − 4 1 53 1 1 (5; 4; 2) 1152 16 0 0 0 −1 2 −2

107 4 2 2 4 1 2 Weight 4 QPLI π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) πP3 πC log(2) C 79 13 11 13 11 1 (5; 4; 3) − 23040 192 192 − 32 8 0 4 −1 529 1 7 35 7 3 3 (5; 4; 5) 23040 32 96 64 4 −1 4 − 2 391 5 1 7 1 1 1 1 (5; 5; 4) 46080 192 − 96 − 32 − 4 − 4 8 4 269 11 11 45 11 (5; 5) 23040 192 − 192 − 64 − 8 0 0 0 101 5 3 7 9 1 1 (6; 1; 5) 46080 384 − 128 − 64 − 16 0 − 8 2 97 1 1 7 1 1 (6; 2; 5) − 7680 − 48 48 8 2 0 0 2 349 59 55 217 55 1 (6; 3; 5) − 9216 − 384 384 64 16 0 − 8 0 229 3 3 11 9 1 (6; 4; 1) − 23040 64 − 64 − 4 − 8 1 − 4 0 97 5 1 7 1 (6; 4; 2) − 5760 − 48 6 2 4 −1 2 0 523 1 1 43 3 1 (6; 4; 3) 23040 − 64 64 32 8 −1 4 0 551 3 7 147 7 1 1 (6; 4; 5) − 23040 − 32 96 64 4 0 − 4 2 329 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 (6; 5; 4) − 46080 − 192 − 96 − 32 − 4 4 − 8 4 49 1 1 45 3 (6; 5) 7680 64 − 64 − 64 − 8 0 0 0 13 5 5 35 5 (7; 1; 2) 384 48 − 48 − 16 − 2 0 0 0 109 9 5 77 5 1 (7; 1; 3) − 1280 − 32 96 − 32 4 3 2 −2 7 1 1 49 (7; 1; 5) − 384 − 32 − 24 − 32 −1 1 0 0 433 5 5 35 (7; 2; 1) 5760 24 − 24 − 8 −5 0 0 −2 7 (7; 2; 2) 2880 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 1 1 21 (7; 2; 3) 1920 8 − 8 − 8 −3 0 0 −2 13 1 1 7 (7; 2; 5) 1152 24 − 24 − 8 −1 0 0 0 107 1 1 21 3 (7; 3; 2) − 5760 − 16 16 16 2 0 0 0 185 7 19 133 19 1 (7; 3; 3) 2304 32 − 96 − 32 − 4 −1 2 0 5 3 1 7 (7; 3; 5) 128 32 − 24 32 −1 −1 0 0 1 (7; 4; 2) − 576 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 1 63 (7; 4; 3) 9 48 − 12 − 16 −2 −6 4 −4 1 1 1 21 3 (7; 4; 5) 60 24 − 16 − 16 − 2 0 0 0 179 1 1 7 1 (7; 5; 4) 11520 48 24 8 1 −1 2 0 7 (7; 2) − 1440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 1 1 27 (7; 3) 2880 8 − 8 − 8 −3 0 0 0 1 3 (7; 5) 576 0 0 − 8 0 0 0 0 61 1 1 7 1 (8; 1; 4) 11520 24 − 24 − 16 −1 0 − 8 0 151 1 1 7 1 (8; 2; 4) 11520 24 − 24 − 8 −1 0 0 − 2 29 1 1 7 1 3 (8; 3; 4) − 11520 96 − 24 − 16 −1 2 − 8 0 181 5 1 7 1 1 1 (8; 4; 4) 3840 32 − 8 − 8 −3 − 2 − 4 − 2 1 (8; 5; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1231 11 1 1 3 3 1 (8; 5; 3) − 23040 − 96 48 0 2 2 − 8 2 47 17 1 3 1 (8; 5; 5) − 1440 − 192 24 0 1 4 0 4 1 1 (8; 4) 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 2

108 3 3 2 2 Weight 4 QPLI π log(2) π log (2) π C C log (2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3 1 1 7 1 1 (1; 1; 4) 48 96 − 32 8 0 0 −1 768 17 1 (1; 2; 4) 0 0 − 48 0 0 0 0 512 1 17 5 9 1 (1; 3; 4) 48 96 − 32 8 0 −4 7 − 384 1 1 13 1 7 1 (1; 4; 4) 12 24 − 48 2 − 32 0 −4 256 1 35 1 (1; 5; 2) 0 0 6 0 128 0 0 − 768 1 1 5 1 7 1 (1; 5; 3) 48 − 96 96 − 8 128 0 1 − 768 1 1 5 7 1 (1; 5; 5) − 48 48 96 0 64 −1 4 − 384 1 3 1 (1; 4) 0 0 − 6 0 − 128 0 0 768 7 11 1 7 (2; 1; 4) 192 96 − 32 8 0 −2 1 0 1 (2; 2; 4) 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 1 15 7 (2; 3; 4) 192 32 − 96 8 0 −6 9 − 1536 7 1 1 3 7 5 (2; 4; 4) 48 8 16 2 − 32 0 −12 768 1 21 1 (2; 5; 2) 0 0 − 12 0 − 128 0 0 1536 11 1 1 1 21 1 (2; 5; 3) − 192 96 − 96 − 8 − 128 −1 5 − 512 1 1 1 7 3 (2; 5; 5) − 12 16 − 96 0 − 64 −3 12 − 512 1 3 1 (2; 4) 0 0 12 0 − 128 0 0 − 1536 19 25 11 7 7 (3; 1; 4) − 768 192 − 96 8 0 −4 10 − 1536 5 3 1 1 7 (3; 2; 4) − 128 32 − 16 2 0 −3 9 − 1536 49 1 1 1 7 (3; 3; 4) − 768 64 − 96 − 8 0 −2 9 − 1536 35 5 3 5 7 5 (3; 4; 4) − 384 48 − 32 8 − 128 −6 20 − 512 7 5 1 1 35 3 1 (3; 5; 1) 768 64 − 12 2 256 − 2 2 − 1536 3 7 1 91 3 1 (3; 5; 2) 32 0 96 − 8 − 256 2 −9 192 7 13 1 3 29 1 (3; 5; 3) − 768 192 − 96 8 − 128 −2 5 − 512 3 1 13 1 57 7 (3; 5; 5) 128 − 192 192 − 16 − 256 1 −4 3072 7 5 1 1 35 3 1 (3; 4) 768 64 − 12 2 256 − 2 2 − 1536 77 1 7 1 5 (4; 1; 4) 768 − 64 − 32 8 0 1 −6 1536 3 11 13 1 7 (4; 2; 4) 128 − 96 − 48 − 2 0 3 −7 1536 23 25 5 7 7 (4; 3; 4) 768 − 192 − 32 − 8 0 3 −7 1536 97 7 29 5 7 19 (4; 4; 4) 384 − 48 − 96 − 8 − 128 5 −22 1536 1 19 1 77 3 1 (4; 5; 2) 0 12 96 8 256 − 2 1 − 768 35 5 1 1 29 3 1 (4; 5; 3) 768 64 12 2 256 − 2 1 − 768 9 5 13 1 3 3 (4; 5; 5) − 128 192 192 16 16 −1 5 − 1024 35 5 1 1 35 3 1 (4; 4) − 768 − 64 − 12 − 2 256 2 −1 768 1 11 19 5 7 (5; 1; 4) 48 − 96 − 96 − 8 0 3 −7 1536 1 1 1 (5; 2; 4) 0 − 6 − 16 −1 0 4 −8 256 1 11 5 5 1 (5; 3; 4) 48 − 96 32 − 8 0 3 −7 384 1 1 1 5 7 7 (5; 4; 4) 12 − 4 24 − 4 − 32 7 −18 768 1 1 11 1 3 (5; 5; 1) − 48 − 96 − 96 − 8 16 0 1 0

109 3 3 2 2 Weight 4 QPLI π log(2) π log (2) π C C log (2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3 1 1 1 7 (5; 5; 2) 0 24 16 4 − 16 −1 2 0 1 1 5 1 27 1 (5; 5; 3) 48 96 − 96 8 − 128 0 −1 768 1 1 1 1 49 1 (5; 5; 5) − 48 32 16 8 − 256 −1 3 − 768 1 3 1 (5; 4) 0 0 − 6 0 − 128 0 0 768 7 3 1 3 7 (6; 1; 4) 192 − 32 32 − 8 0 3 −9 1536 1 1 7 (6; 2; 4) 0 − 6 − 48 −1 0 4 −8 1536 7 3 1 3 7 (6; 3; 4) 192 − 32 96 − 8 0 3 −9 1536 7 1 1 3 7 1 (6; 4; 4) 48 − 4 12 − 4 − 32 9 −30 64 7 1 7 1 1 1 (6; 5; 1) − 192 96 96 − 8 − 4 −1 5 − 384 1 1 1 7 1 (6; 5; 2) 0 24 − 16 4 16 −1 2 − 512 7 1 1 1 29 1 (6; 5; 3) 192 − 96 96 8 128 1 −5 512 7 5 1 1 63 1 (6; 5; 5) − 192 96 − 16 8 256 −2 7 − 256 1 3 1 (6; 4) 0 0 12 0 − 128 0 0 − 1536 5 1 1 1 7 1 (7; 1; 4) 96 24 − 8 2 − 8 0 −4 192 1 7 1 (7; 2; 4) 0 0 12 0 − 4 0 0 256 5 13 1 7 7 1 (7; 3; 4) 96 24 − 24 2 − 8 −12 20 − 128 5 1 1 21 11 (7; 4; 4) 24 6 12 2 − 8 0 −16 768 1 21 1 (7; 5; 2) 0 0 − 12 0 32 0 0 − 768 7 1 1 1 1 (7; 5; 3) − 96 − 24 8 − 2 0 0 4 − 384 11 1 1 7 13 (7; 5; 5) − 96 12 − 24 0 32 −4 16 − 1536 1 3 1 (7; 4) 0 0 6 0 − 2 0 0 384 35 1 (8; 1; 2) 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 − 768 3 5 1 3 77 3 1 (8; 1; 3) − 32 − 48 32 − 8 256 2 1 − 768 1 1 49 1 (8; 1; 5) − 64 − 48 0 0 256 2 −1 0 3 35 1 (8; 2; 1) 0 0 − 16 0 64 0 0 − 1536 1 (8; 2; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 1536 1 21 1 (8; 2; 3) 0 0 16 0 64 0 0 − 768 7 1 (8; 2; 5) 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 − 3072 21 1 (8; 3; 2) 0 0 0 0 − 128 0 0 1536 7 1 3 21 7 5 (8; 3; 3) 0 − 48 96 − 8 256 2 −7 1536 1 1 7 3 1 (8; 3; 5) 32 − 24 0 0 − 256 2 −5 384 21 1 (8; 4; 2) 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 − 1536 1 1 1 1 63 (8; 4; 3) − 16 − 6 − 24 − 2 128 3 −2 0 1 35 1 (8; 4; 5) 0 − 24 0 0 128 1 −2 3072 1 1 (8; 5; 4) 0 0 − 16 0 0 0 0 2048 1 (8; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1536 1 21 1 (8; 3) 32 0 0 0 128 0 0 − 1536 1 21 1 (8; 5) 64 0 0 0 − 128 0 0 3072

110 9.6 QES

Table of 93 QESs with weight ≤ 4, 28 non-alternating QESs with weight 5. 10 results established only by using level 4 MZVs [24] are dyed blue.

5 1 Weight 2 QES : QES(31; −11) = π2 − log2(2) 48 4 Weight 2 QES π log(2) C 1 (11; −12) 2 −1 1 (21; −12) − 4 1 1 (31; −12) 8 0

Weight 3 QES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) πC 5 1 1 1 (11, 31; −11) − 48 6 − 16 2 7 1 25 (21, 31; −11) 48 − 6 32 0 1 1 3 1 (31, 31; −11) − 12 12 16 2 1 1 (32; −11) − 48 0 2 − 2 11 (31; 21) 0 0 4 0 23 (31; −21) 0 0 − 16 1 1 7 (11; 22) − 4 0 4 0 1 7 1 (21; 22) 8 0 − 4 2 7 (31; 22) 0 0 16 0

3 2 Weight 3 QES π π log (2) C log(2) P3 1 3 (11, 11; −12) − 4 − 2 0 8 7 7 (11, 21; −12) 32 8 0 −6 3 3 1 (11, 31; −12) − 64 − 8 − 2 2 5 1 (12; −12) − 48 − 4 −2 4 1 1 (21, 21; −12) − 8 − 2 0 4 7 5 (21, 31; −12) 64 16 1 −3 11 1 (22; −12) 48 2 4 −8 5 3 1 (31, 31; −12) − 96 − 16 − 2 2 11 1 1 (32; −12) − 192 − 8 − 2 2 3 1 (11; −22) − 32 − 8 1 2 1 1 (21; −22) − 32 − 8 −2 2 1 1 1 (31; −22) 32 16 2 −1

111 4 2 2 4 1 2 Weight 4 QES π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) πP3 πC log(2) C 67 1 1 23 (11, 11, 31; −11) − 576 − 8 − 8 − 16 0 4 −2 2 29 7 3 21 3 1 (11, 21, 31; −11) 1152 − 96 32 16 − 4 0 2 −1 191 3 1 51 3 (11, 31, 31; −11) − 2304 − 32 − 16 − 32 0 3 − 2 2 1 11 3 63 9 (11, 32; −11) − 120 − 96 16 32 2 −1 1 0 5 13 1 21 (12, 31; −11) 48 48 − 8 − 16 −3 −2 0 0 23 1 1 1 (21, 21, 31; −11) − 384 12 − 8 − 4 0 2 0 0 133 5 1 35 1 1 (21, 31, 31; −11) 5760 − 48 12 16 2 0 2 −1 203 23 9 7 27 1 (21, 32; −11) 2880 96 − 32 − 2 − 4 0 − 2 1 29 13 5 7 15 (22, 31; −11) − 640 − 48 16 2 2 0 0 0 167 1 1 93 3 3 (31, 31, 31; −11) − 4608 − 32 − 32 − 64 0 2 − 4 2 89 1 5 35 5 1 1 (31, 32; −11) 5760 − 64 96 64 4 − 2 4 0 199 3 (33; −11) 11520 0 0 − 32 0 0 0 −1 13 1 1 7 (11, 31; 21) 720 − 6 6 2 4 0 0 0 41 1 7 7 7 (21, 31; 21) − 1920 48 − 48 − 4 − 2 2 0 0 3 1 1 7 (31, 31; 21) 80 − 6 6 2 4 0 0 0 79 1 1 (32; 21) 720 3 − 3 −7 −8 0 0 0 487 1 1 21 (11, 31; −21) − 5760 − 8 − 8 − 8 −3 4 −2 2 77 5 5 7 5 (21, 31; −21) − 2880 − 48 48 2 2 0 1 −2 7 1 5 35 5 (31, 31; −21) − 240 − 48 − 48 − 16 − 2 2 −1 2 353 5 5 35 (32; −21) − 5760 − 24 24 8 5 0 0 0 61 1 1 (11, 11; 22) − 1440 6 3 0 8 0 0 0 91 1 (11, 21; 22) 1920 0 − 4 0 −6 0 −1 1 1 1 1 7 (11, 31; 22) − 360 − 12 12 8 2 0 0 0 121 1 1 (12; 22) − 1440 − 3 3 7 8 0 0 0 61 1 1 (21, 21; 22) − 2880 − 24 6 0 4 0 1 −2 29 1 1 7 1 1 (21, 31; 22) − 11520 96 − 24 − 16 −1 2 − 4 0 181 1 1 7 (22; 22) 2880 6 − 6 − 2 −4 0 0 −2 11 1 1 7 (31, 31; 22) 2880 − 24 24 8 1 0 0 0 53 1 1 7 (32; 22) − 2880 − 12 12 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 (31; 31) − 15 − 3 3 7 8 0 0 0 13 5 5 35 (31; −31) 192 24 − 24 − 8 −5 0 0 0 1 7 (11; 32) 64 0 0 − 4 0 0 0 0 1 7 (21; 32) − 64 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 17 1 1 7 (31; 32) 1440 24 − 24 − 8 −1 0 0 0

112 3 3 2 2 Weight 4 QES π log(2) π log (2) π C C log (2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3 3 1 37 (11, 11, 11; −12) 2 3 12 0 0 0 −96 768 9 5 1 1 (11, 11, 21; −12) − 8 − 3 6 0 0 0 64 − 32 5 2 1 7 11 (11, 11, 31; −12) 16 3 0 2 32 2 −28 768 5 1 5 (11, 12; −12) 24 0 − 12 1 0 4 −24 384 11 11 1 5 (11, 21, 21; −12) 16 12 12 0 0 0 −40 256 3 23 1 5 1 (11, 21, 31; −12) − 8 − 48 8 − 4 0 0 22 − 96 11 1 1 13 (11, 22; −12) − 24 − 3 6 −4 0 0 32 − 768 19 13 1 1 21 11 (11, 31, 31; −12) 96 48 − 12 2 64 0 −14 1536 31 5 1 1 7 3 (11, 32; −12) 192 48 − 48 4 − 32 0 −10 512 5 1 1 (12, 21; −12) − 48 − 12 0 −1 0 0 8 − 256 5 1 5 1 7 1 (12, 31; −12) 96 24 − 24 2 8 0 −4 768 1 3 1 (13; −12) 0 0 − 6 0 2 0 0 − 384 3 1 1 5 (21, 21, 21; −12) − 8 − 2 6 0 0 0 24 − 384 9 3 1 3 7 1 (21, 21, 31; −12) 32 8 − 24 2 16 −2 −12 192 11 1 1 1 (21, 22; −12) 48 3 − 6 3 0 −4 −8 192 7 5 1 5 1 (21, 31, 31; −12) − 48 − 16 8 − 4 0 4 0 1536 1 5 1 1 1 (21, 32; −12) − 24 − 48 8 − 4 0 2 −2 1536 11 1 1 1 (22, 31; −12) − 96 − 4 − 6 −2 0 4 0 768 1 3 1 (23; −12) 0 0 − 3 0 − 16 0 0 384 3 1 11 3 93 3 (31, 31, 31; −12) 64 8 − 96 8 256 − 2 0 0 11 1 5 1 35 1 (31, 32; −12) 384 32 − 96 8 256 − 2 0 0 1 1 3 (33; −12) 64 0 − 48 0 128 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 (11, 11; −22) 8 3 12 −1 0 −4 −8 384 1 1 1 5 5 (11, 21; −22) − 32 24 − 12 2 0 0 −4 1536 1 1 5 1 7 1 (11, 31; −22) − 16 − 24 48 − 2 − 32 0 4 − 512 1 7 1 (12; −22) 0 0 12 0 − 4 0 0 256 1 1 1 1 (21, 21; −22) − 16 − 4 6 −3 0 4 0 − 768 1 3 1 5 5 (21, 31; −22) 32 16 24 4 0 −4 6 − 1536 2 1 (22; −22) 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 − 256 1 1 1 35 1 (31, 31; −22) 0 − 24 12 − 4 − 128 1 −2 768 1 35 1 (32; −22) 0 0 48 0 − 64 0 0 768 1 7 1 (11; −32) 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 − 512 1 1 1 (21; −32) − 32 0 − 4 0 0 0 0 512 35 1 (31; −32) 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 − 1536

113 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 QES π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 2 37 (31; 41) 0 0 0 − 3 0 4 0 0 1 7 31 (11; 42) − 48 0 0 − 32 0 8 0 0 1 93 (31; 42) 0 0 0 − 8 0 64 0 0 4 8 1 307 (11, 31; 31) 0 9 − 15 − 12 −7 16 −16 −16 4 8 1 131 (31, 31; 31) 0 9 − 15 4 −7 8 −16 −16 19 133 (32; 31) 0 0 0 12 0 − 8 0 0 1 7 7 31 (11, 11; 32) − 16 0 0 − 48 2 8 0 0 49 93 (12; 32) 0 0 0 48 0 − 8 0 0 17 1 1 7 13 (11, 31; 32) − 720 − 12 12 0 4 128 2 0 29 217 (32; 32) 0 0 0 96 0 − 64 0 0 1 1 5 7 155 (31, 31; 32) 0 − 18 15 96 8 − 64 2 2 4 8 3 421 (11, 11, 31; 21) 0 9 − 15 8 −7 16 −16 −16 4 8 23 917 (11, 31, 31; 21) 0 9 − 15 48 −7 32 −16 −16 4 8 23 581 (11, 32; 21) 0 − 9 15 48 7 − 32 16 16 5 101 (12, 31; 21) 0 0 0 − 24 0 16 0 0 1 2 43 21 49 (31, 31, 31; 21) 0 3 − 5 48 − 4 2 −12 −12 2 4 1 7 15 (31, 32; 21) 9 − 9 15 48 2 − 4 8 8 11 197 (33; 21) 0 0 0 − 12 0 16 0 0 61 1 2 7 1271 (11, 11, 11; 22) 240 − 3 − 5 24 0 − 32 0 48 1 1 1 7 7 217 (11, 11, 31; 22) 90 9 − 15 32 − 4 − 64 0 8 121 2 2 7 589 (11, 12; 22) 720 9 − 15 24 −7 − 32 0 16 11 1 1 35 7 465 (11, 31, 31; 22) − 1440 12 − 12 192 − 4 128 −2 0 53 1 1 35 7 651 (11, 32; 22) 1440 18 − 30 192 − 4 − 128 0 4 2 4 7 7 713 (12, 31; 22) 0 9 − 15 − 32 − 2 64 −8 −8 4 31 (13; 22) 0 0 0 − 3 0 2 0 0 1 1 31 21 93 (31, 31, 31; 22) 0 12 − 10 192 − 16 16 −3 −3 1 1 1 7 93 (31, 32; 22) 0 18 − 15 − 64 − 8 32 −2 −2 5 93 (33; 22) 0 0 0 − 48 0 64 0 0

114 9.7 GES

Table of 39 GESs with weight ≤ 5. We abbreviate GES(a, b, c; d) as GES(abc; d) and so on.

Weight 1 GES : GES(1; 0) = 2 log(2)

Weight 2 GES π2 log2(2) 1 (2; 0) 6 −1 1 (11; 0) 6 1 1 (1; 1) 12 0

Weight 3 GES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) 1 1 7 (3; 0) − 6 3 4 1 3 (12; 0) 0 − 3 2 1 1 (111; 0) 3 3 1 5 (2; 1) 0 0 8 7 (11; 1) 0 0 8 1 (1; 2) − 12 0 1

4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 GES π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) (4; 0) 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 3 (13; 0) − 240 − 12 6 2 2 1 1 1 (22; 0) 360 − 6 6 1 2 7 1 (112; 0) 180 0 − 6 0 −2 31 7 5 (1111; 0) 120 6 − 6 −15 −22 1 1 1 7 (3; 1) − 288 − 24 24 8 1 1 1 1 7 (12; 1) − 720 − 24 24 8 1 5 5 5 35 (111; 1) 72 24 − 24 − 8 −5 1 1 1 1 (2; 2) 1440 − 24 24 4 1 37 1 1 7 (11; 2) 1440 24 − 24 − 4 −1 1 1 1 (1; 3) 720 0 24 − 8 1

115 4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 GES π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) (5; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 7 (14; 0) − 360 0 − 60 − 48 8 4 0 0 1 1 1 3 9 29 (23; 0) 180 18 − 30 16 − 8 − 16 0 2 19 1 1 7 19 147 (113; 0) − 360 − 18 15 − 48 8 16 0 −6 1 1 5 11 3 (122; 0) 90 0 60 16 − 8 − 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 15 77 (1112; 0) − 360 − 9 60 − 16 8 8 0 −4 8 10 7 85 215 195 (11111; 0) 9 9 − 12 − 48 − 8 − 4 0 72 1 1 7 7 27 (4; 1) 0 36 − 30 96 − 16 32 −1 −1 1 1 7 21 31 (13; 1) 0 − 12 10 − 48 16 − 64 3 3 7 7 49 49 31 (22; 1) 0 36 − 30 96 − 16 16 −7 −7 1 1 7 21 31 (112; 1) 0 − 12 10 − 96 16 − 32 3 3 5 1 35 105 341 (1111; 1) 0 12 − 2 − 96 − 16 16 −15 −15 1 5 11 7 7 81 (3; 2) 288 − 72 120 − 48 8 − 64 3 4 1 1 1 1 31 (12; 2) 720 − 72 40 48 0 − 32 1 2 5 13 31 7 7 279 (111; 2) − 72 72 − 120 − 48 − 4 16 −9 −14 1 7 13 23 23 23 (2; 3) − 1440 72 − 120 96 − 16 64 −3 −2 37 1 1 3 7 279 (11; 3) − 1440 72 − 40 − 32 16 64 −1 −2 1 1 1 1 1 1 (1; 4) − 720 − 36 40 − 12 2 32 1 2

116 9.8 BES

Table of 26 BESs with weight ≤ 5. We abbreviate BES(a, b, c; d) as BES(abc; d) and so on. Also 2n P∞ ( n ) we write BES(0; k) = n=1 4nnk .

Weight 1 BES : BES(0; 1) = 2 log(2)

π2 π2 Weight 2 BES : BES(0; 2) = − 2 log2(2),BES(1; 1) = 6 3

Weight 3 BES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) 1 4 (0; 3) − 3 3 2 2 9 (1; 2) − 3 0 2 3 (2; 1) 0 0 2 21 (11; 1) 0 0 2

4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 BES π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) 1 1 2 (0; 4) 40 3 − 3 −4 0 13 1 1 (1; 3) − 360 3 3 −2 8 1 (2; 2) 30 0 0 −3 0 7 4 4 (11; 2) − 45 − 3 3 7 32 37 1 1 (3; 1) 360 3 − 3 −7 −8 49 1 1 (12; 1) 360 3 − 3 −7 −8 23 5 5 (111; 1) 72 − 3 3 35 40

4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 BES π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 1 2 4 1 (0; 5) − 20 − 9 15 − 3 4 6 0 0 13 2 2 5 23 (1; 4) 180 − 9 − 15 − 6 2 − 8 0 16 1 4 8 1 123 (2; 3) − 15 9 − 15 3 −4 8 −16 −16 14 4 2 465 (11; 3) 45 9 0 − 3 0 − 8 16 80 37 2 2 7 203 (3; 2) − 180 − 9 15 − 12 7 8 0 −16 49 2 14 1 217 (12; 2) − 180 3 − 15 12 −7 4 −32 −48 23 14 38 35 217 (111; 2) − 36 − 9 15 12 7 − 2 96 176 4 8 7 63 (4; 1) 0 − 9 15 − 12 7 − 8 16 16 4 8 7 31 (13; 1) 0 − 9 15 − 4 7 4 16 16 4 8 7 93 (22; 1) 0 9 − 15 12 −7 8 −16 −16 4 8 7 589 (112; 1) 0 3 − 5 − 12 −21 8 −48 −48 28 56 77 1829 (1111; 1) 0 − 9 15 4 49 8 112 112

117 9.9 IBES

Table of 14 IBESs with weight ≤ 5. We abbreviate IBES(a, b, c; d) as IBES(abc; d) and so on. P∞ 4n Also we write IBES(0; k) = n=1 k 2n . n ( n )

π2 Weight 2 IBES : IBES(0; 2) = 2

7ζ(3) 7ζ(3) Weight 3 IBES : IBES(0; 3) = π2 log(2) − ,IBES(1; 2) = + π2 log(2) 2 2

4 2 2 4 1 Weight 4 IBES π π log (2) log (2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 2 ) 19 2 1 (0; 4) − 360 3 3 0 8 1 4 1 (1; 3) 90 3 − 3 0 −8 1 2 1 (2; 2) − 90 3 3 0 8 9 (11; 2) 20 2 −1 0 −24

4 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 Weight 5 IBES π log(2) π log (2) log (2) π ζ(3) ζ(3) log (2) ζ(5) Li4( 2 ) log(2) Li5( 2 ) 19 4 2 31 (0; 5) − 180 9 15 1 0 8 0 −16 1 8 2 1 31 (1; 4) 45 9 − 15 2 0 − 2 0 16 1 4 2 1 31 (2; 3) − 45 9 15 4 0 4 0 −16 9 4 2 7 (11; 3) 10 3 − 5 − 4 0 −62 0 48 19 4 2 3 217 (3; 2) − 180 9 15 − 4 0 8 0 −16 19 8 2 3 155 (12; 2) 180 9 − 15 2 0 − 8 0 16 91 16 2 155 (111; 2) 36 9 − 3 3 0 − 8 0 80

9.10 QBES, IQBES

Tabulated in subsection 8-3-4 already.

118 10 Miscellaneous

We tabulate some typical results without proof. All can be derived using methods above.

10.1 LSI π Z 2 x2 cot(x) log(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx 0 π2ζ(3) 31ζ(5) 7 1 1 = − − ζ(3) log2(2) + π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 12 64 8 12 192

π Z 2 x log2(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx 0 1 1 155ζ(5) π2ζ(3) 7 log5(2) 1 = Li + Li log(2) − − + ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) 5 2 4 2 128 192 16 30 36

π Z 2 x2 log(2 sin(x)) log2(2 cos(x)) dx 0 1 1 3π3ζ(3) 121πζ(5) 7 1 1 = −πLi −πLi log(2)+ + − πζ(3) log2(2)− π log5(2)+ π3 log3(2) 5 2 4 2 64 128 16 30 36

π Z 2 x log3(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx 0 9 1 1 1 1 1 3ζ(3)2 = ES(1; −5) − π2Li + 6Li + 3Li log2(2) + 6Li log(2) + 4 8 4 2 6 2 4 2 5 2 2 1579π6 7 log6(2) 7 13 1 − + ζ(3) log3(2) + − π2ζ(3) log(2) − π2 log4(2) + π4 log2(2) 161280 8 12 64 192 192

π Z 2 x4 log2(2 sin(x)) dx 0 3 1 1 7 269π7 1 1 = πES(1; −5) + π3Li + π3ζ(3) log(2) − + π3 log4(2) − π5 log2(2) 2 2 4 2 16 40320 48 48

119 10.2 PLSI π Z 2 xTi2(tan(x)) log(2 sin(x)) dx 0 7 1 49 163π5 7 7 = πLi + πζ(3) log(2) − + π log4(2) − π3 log2(2) 4 4 2 32 11520 96 96

π Z 2 Cl2(2x) log(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx 0 1 1 279ζ(5) 7 log5(2) 1 = 2Li + 2Li log(2) − + ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) 5 2 4 2 128 8 15 18

π Z 2 2 Cl2(4x) log (2 cos(x)) dx 0 1 1 465ζ(5) 7π2ζ(3) 8 log5(2) 4 = 16Li + 16Li log(2) − − + 7ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) 5 2 4 2 32 48 15 9

π Z 2 xCl2(4x) cot(x) log(2 sin(2x)) dx 0 1 23π2ζ(3) 31ζ(5) 2 log5(2) 2 151 = 16Li log(2) − + + 14ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 4 2 48 4 3 3 720

10.3 ITF Z ∞ log2 x2 + 1 tan−1(x)2 4 dx 0 x πζ(3) π3 4 4 2 4 = − + − π log3(2) + π log2(2) − π3 log(2) + π log(2) 6 18 9 3 9 3

Z ∞ log2 x2 + 1 tan−1(x)3 2 dx 0 x 1 3π2ζ(3) 93ζ(5) 1 4 47 = 24Li + − − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 8 2 5 3 60

Z ∞ log2 x2 + 1 tan−1(x)2 2 dx 0 x(x + 1) 1 3π2ζ(3) 217ζ(5) 1 4 79 = 8Li − − − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 8 16 15 9 360

120 10.4 QLI (W = 5) Z 1 x log2 x2 + 1 tan−1(x)2 2 dx 0 x + 1 1 1 i 1 5 1 = πC log2(2)+2π=(Li (1+i))+π log(2)=(Li (1+i))+8< Li + −8Li − Li log(2) 4 4 3 5 2 2 5 2 4 4 2

(3) 1 (3) 3 2 5 4 π ψ − ψ π ζ(3) 465ζ(5) 35 log (2) 119 2473π log(2) 4 4 − + + ζ(3) log2(2) + − π2 log3(2)− − 8 512 64 80 576 23040 3072

Z 1 log2 x2 + 1 tan−1(x)2 2 dx 0 x + 1 √ 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 i = −8 2 F , , , , , ; , , , , ; − π2C log(2) − π2=(Li (1 + i)) − 8= Li + 6 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 4 3 5 2 2

(3) 1 (3) 3 5 log(2) ψ − ψ 5 1 61 709π 1 9 4 4 + πLi + πζ(3) log(2) + + π log4(2) + π3 log2(2) + 8 4 2 64 15360 24 128 1536

10.5 QLSI

π Z 4 x log2(sin(x)) dx 0 1 1 5Li 1 35 11π4 5 log4(2) 1 = πC log(2) + π=(Li (1 + i)) + 4 2 − ζ(3) log(2) − + + π2 log2(2) 8 4 3 16 128 1152 384 384

π Z 4 log3(2 cos(x)) dx 0 3 3 3πζ(3) 1 ψ(3) 1 − ψ(3) 3 = 3=(Li (1 + i)) − log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) + C log2(2) − + π log3(2) − 4 4 4 2 3 8 8 16 2048

π Z 4 log(2 sin(x)) log2(2 cos(x)) dx 0 1 πζ(3) 1 1 5 ψ(3) 1 − ψ(3) 3 = C log2(2)+=(Li (1+i))+ − log(2)=(Li (1+i))+ π log3(2)− 4 4 8 4 16 2 3 48 6144

121 10.6 NLI Z 1 log3(1 − x) log2(x + 1) dx 0 1 1 3ζ(5) π4 = 24Li + 24Li − 2π2ζ(3) + 45ζ(3) + + 12ζ(3) log2(2) − 24ζ(3) log(2) + + 6π2 − 120 4 2 5 2 4 30 3 log5(2) 2 1 + −3 log4(2)− π2 log3(2)+16 log3(2)+2π2 log2(2)−48 log2(2)− π4 log(2)−6π2 log(2)+96 log(2) 5 3 30

Z 1 log2(1 − x) log2(x) log2(x + 1) 2 dx 0 x 8 1 1 1 1 1 = −8ES(1; −5) − π2Li + 8Li + 24Li + 16Li + 8Li log2(2) 3 4 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 4 2 1 1 19π2ζ(3) 227ζ(3)2 +24Li log(2) + 16Li log(2) + − − 62ζ(5) − 7ζ(3) log3(2) 4 2 5 2 6 8 35 217 35 π4 25π6 2 log6(2) − ζ(3) log2(2) − 9ζ(3) log(2) − ζ(5) log(2) + π2ζ(3) log(2) + + + 2 2 6 90 378 9 4 log5(2) 5 log4(2) 5 2 13 1 + − − π2 log4(2) + π2 log3(2) + π2 log2(2) + π4 log2(2) + π4 log(2) 5 3 18 3 36 6

Z 1 log2(1 − x) log2(x) log2(x + 1) dx 0 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 = −4ES(1; −5)− π2Li −32Li +24Li −16Li −8Li log2(2)+24Li log(2) 3 4 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 4 2 4 2 1 275ζ(3)2 34π2ζ(3) 341ζ(5) 91 77 −16Li log(2)+ + −237ζ(3)− +7ζ(3) log3(2)− ζ(3) log2(2)− π2ζ(3) log(2) 5 2 8 3 2 2 6 217 73π6 29π4 2 4 log5(2) 1 2 log4(2) +156ζ(3) log(2)+ ζ(5) log(2)+ −40π2 − +720− log6(2)+ − π2 log4(2)+ 2 3024 45 9 5 18 3 2 1 2 + π2 log3(2) − 24 log3(2) − π4 log2(2) − 8π2 log2(2) + 144 log2(2) + π4 log(2) + 32π2 log(2) − 480 log(2) 3 36 3

10.7 NPLI Z 1 1 − x x − 1 Li2 Li2 log(x + 1) dx 0 2 x + 1 2 1 1 1 π ζ(3) 3ζ(3) 189ζ(5) 21 2 23 = 6Li4 − 24Li5 − 18Li4 log(2) + − + − ζ(3) log (2) + ζ(3) log(2) 2 2 2 12 2 8 4 4 43π4 π2 3 log5(2) log4(2) 17 3 1 29 − − − + + log3(2) + π2 log3(2) + 3 log2(2) − π2 log2(2) + π2 log(2) − π4 log(2) 720 4 5 3 36 8 3 360 Z 1 x + 1 Li3 log(x) log(1 − x) dx 0 2 2 4 1 1 1 49π ζ(3) 463ζ(5) 21 2 11 121π = −7Li4 +11Li5 +4Li4 log(2)+ −10ζ(3)− + ζ(3) log (2)− ζ(3) log(2)+ 2 2 2 96 32 16 4 1440 13π2 3 log5(2) 5 log4(2) 1 log3(2) 5 1 2 − +20+ − − π2 log3(2)+ + π2 log2(2)−3 log2(2)+ π4 log(2)+ π2 log(2)+12 log(2) 6 40 24 24 3 24 288 3

122 10.8 NQLI Z 1 log(1 − x) log(x + 1) log x2 + 1 tan−1(x) dx 0 5π2C πC 1 1 = C2 − + − 4C − πC log(2) − C log(2) + π=(Li (1 + i)) + 10=(Li (1 + i)) 24 2 2 2 3 3 13Li 1 105πζ(3) 19ζ(3) 163 −24=(Li (1 + i)) + 3 log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) − 4 2 + − − ζ(3) log(2) 4 3 4 128 32 64 247π4 7π2 11π3 1 log3(2) 5 9 3 log2(2) + + − − 3π − log4(2) + + π log3(2) + π2 log2(2) − 23040 24 48 6 4 16 64 2 13 5 7 5 3 1 3 − π log2(2) + π3 log(2) − π2 log(2) + π log(2) + 6 log(2) + ψ(3) − ψ(3) 8 24 48 2 256 4 4

R 1 R 1 f(x)−f(y) R 1 Using 0 0 x−y dxdy = 2 0 f(t)(log(t) − log(1 − t)) dt for certain continuous f:

Z 1 Z 1 log(x + 1) log x2 + 1 tan−1(x) − log(y + 1) log y2 + 1 tan−1(y) dxdy 0 0 x − y 5π2C 1 1 = +πC+8C+ C log2(2)− πC log(2)−2C log(2)−16=(Li (1+i))+40=(Li (1+i))−4 log(2)=(Li (1+i)) 24 2 2 3 4 3 1 49πζ(3) 33ζ(3) 57 5π3 π2 209π4 7 log4(2) log3(2) 2 +2Li − − + ζ(3) log(2) + − − + − − π log3(2) 4 2 32 8 16 12 4 11520 48 3 3 3 9 37 3 7 1 3 − π2 log2(2) + π log2(2) + log2(2) − π3 log(2) + π2 log(2) − π log(2) − ψ(3) − ψ(3) 16 4 96 8 384 4 4

Now recall subsection 8-1-2 and 8-4-9 for higher weight:

Z 1 log5 x2 + 1 dx 0 √ 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 = −1920 2 F , , , , , ; , , , , ; + 1920C − 40C log3(2) + 240C log2(2) 6 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 −960C log(2)−1920=(Li3(1+i))+1920=(Li4(1+i))−240 log (2)=(Li3(1+i))+960 log(2)=(Li3(1+i)) 19π5 135 −960 log(2)=(Li (1+i))−240πζ(3)+360πζ(3) log(2)+ +70π3+960π−3840+log5(2)+ π log4(2) 4 3 2 145 −10 log4(2) − 240π log3(2) + 80 log3(2) + π3 log2(2) + 600π log2(2) − 480 log2(2) − 70π3 log(2) 4 5ψ(3) 1 5ψ(3) 3 5 1 5 3 −960π log(2) + 1920 log(2) − 4 + 4 + log(2)ψ(3) − log(2)ψ(3) 16 16 32 4 32 4

123 10.9 NQPLI Z 1 2 Ti2(x) log(x + 1) log x + 1 dx 0 π2C 1 3 = − + πC + 4C + C log2(2) − πC log(2) − 3C log(2) + π=(Li (1 + i)) 24 2 4 3 1 63πζ(3) −4=(Li (1 + i)) − 2=(Li (1 + i)) + 3 log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) − 2Li + 3 4 3 4 2 128 97ζ(3) 7 13π3 π2 29π4 1 log3(2) 1 − − ζ(3) log(2) + + − − 3π − log4(2) + − π log3(2) 32 8 96 12 5760 12 12 6 1 1 1 1 + π2 log2(2) − π log2(2) − log2(2) − π3 log(2) − π2 log(2) + 2π log(2) + 6 log(2) 48 8 16 48

Z 1 2 2 Li2 −x log(x + 1) log x + 1 dx 0 π2C = −4C2 − − 4πC + 16C + 7C log2(2) + 4πC log(2) − 24C log(2) − 6π=(Li (1 + i)) 12 3 1 73ζ(3) 7πζ(3) +40=(Li (1 + i)) + 40=(Li (1 + i)) − 24 log(2)=(Li (1 + i)) − 2Li + − 3 4 3 4 2 8 4 63 2π4 13π3 π2 1 10 log3(2) 13 5 − ζ(3) log(2) + − − + 18π − 96 − log4(2) + + π log3(2) + π2 log2(2) 16 9 12 12 12 3 12 16 1 5 1 1 1 3 − π log2(2) − 25 log2(2) + π3 log(2) + π2 log(2) − 11π log(2) + 84 log(2) − ψ(3) − ψ(3) 2 48 3 64 4 4

10.10 NS, MLI

1−xy ∞ m−1 m n−1 (2) Z 1 Z 1 log(x) log(1 − y) log X (−1) Hm X (−1) Hn 1−y = dxdy m n (1 − x)y(y + 1) m=1 n=1 0 0 1 11π2ζ(3) 49ζ(5) 1 1 1 13 = 6Li + − − ζ(3) log2(2) − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 48 8 2 20 36 360

∞ m−1 2 m (1−x)(1−y)(1−z)(1−xyz) (−1) Hm n−1 Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 X g X (−1) Hn log(1 − z) log( 2(xy+1)(xz+1)(yz+1) ) = dxdydz m n (x + 1)(y + 1)(z + 1) m=1 n=1 0 0 0

1 π2ζ(3) 349ζ(5) 5 17 log5(2) 7 43 = 22Li + − − ζ(3) log2(2) − − π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 8 16 8 60 72 240

∞ m−1 m n−1 X (−1) Hgm X (−1) HnHfn m n m=1 n=1

124 (1−y)(1−z) (1−z)(xy+1) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Z Z Z log(1 − y) log 2(yz+1) Z Z Z x log(1 − y) log 2(1−xyz) = dxdydz − dxdydz 0 0 0 (x + 1)(y + 1)(z + 1) 0 0 0 (x + 1)(z + 1)(1 − xy) 1 π2ζ(3) 115ζ(5) 3 11 log5(2) 1 23 = 14Li + − − ζ(3) log2(2) − − π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) 5 2 12 8 8 60 18 180

t Denote f(t) = 1+t , then by symmetry: Z (f(−wxyz) − 3f(xyz) + 3f(−xy) − f(x)) log(1 − x) ES(1, −1, −1, −1; −1) = dxdydzdw (0,1)4 x(y + 1)(z + 1)(w + 1)

1 13π2ζ(3) 83ζ(5) 9 13 41 1 = 2Li + − + ζ(3) log2(2) − log5(2) + π2 log3(2) − π4 log(2) 5 2 96 32 16 60 72 180

x 1 x2y y Let dµ = dxdydzdw, p1 = (z+1)(1−xy) + (y+1)(z+1) , p2 = (1−xy)(xyz+1) , p3 = (y+1)(1−yz) , q1 = log(2)−log(1−t) f(w) + zf(−zw), q2 = f(w) + xyzf(−xyzw), q3 = f(w) − yzf(yzw), f(t) = 1+t , then:

X (−1)j−1(−1)k−1(−1)l−1(−1)m−1(−1)n−1 jklmn 1≤j≤k≤l≤m≤n

Z p q − p q + p q π2ζ(3) 3ζ(5) 1 log5(2) 1 1 = 1 1 2 2 3 3 dµ = + + ζ(3) log2(2) + + π2 log3(2) + π4 log(2) (0,1)4 x + 1 48 16 8 120 72 160

10.11 Miscellaneous By x → tan(u), IBP twice, contour deformation and brute force:

Z tan(a) tan−1(x)n dx = nan−1 log(2 cos(a)) + an tan(a) − n(n − 1)<(X), 0 n−2 k−1 −k+n−2 2ia n−1 1−n n−2 2ia X (−1) (n − 2)!(2ia) Lik+2 −e X = (−1) 1 − 2 (n−2)!ζ(n)−(2ia) Li −e + 2 (2i)n−1(−k + n − 2)! k=1

By repeated IBP and deﬁnition of Ls [10] :

Z 1 n k −k+n−1 ! ! n 2 X (−2) n! n−k n−k X j −k + n − 1 log x + 1 dx = log (2) − (n − k)(−2) (− log(2)) A(j, k, n) , (n − k)! j 0 k=0 j=0 −j−k+n−1 ∂ a+b−1 a + 1 b + 1 1 π A(j, k, n) = lim 2 B , + Lsn−k−j {a,b}→{0,0} ∂a−j−k+n−1 2 2 2 2

125 11 Comments

LI/PLI/QLI/QPLI/ES/QESs evaluation are superﬁcies. MZV theory is the essence.

Superﬁcies: This paper summarizes nearly all known methods of generating LI/PLI/QLI/QPLI relations without using MZVs, resulting in closed-forms of LI/PLI with W ≤ 5, QLI/QPLI with W ≤ 4. Since for higher weights irreducible constants are inevitable in both cases, in the sense of ‘expressing these integrals in polylog closed-forms’ nothing more can be done. Nevertheless, while ESs are evaluated by totally MZV-free methods, we seek for help from level 4 MZV due to huge diﬃculties on solving the last 10 QESs. This shows the boundary of elementary methods and reveals the necessity of establishing a deeper theory.

Essence: MZV theory oﬀers a more essential way of establishing relations between higher weight LI/ES/PLIs [6, 18]. For QLI/QES/QPLIs, though not fully developed, it is clear that QMZV theory (focusing on quadratic MZVs i.e. multiple polylogarithms of level 4) is their essence. [24] provides good example for W ≤ 5, which is suﬃcient for problems discussed here. Furthermore, a successful investigation on poly-MZVs (level 2n) will be producing much more seemingly incomprehensible but π profound results. For instance, the theory of logsine integrals with argument 3 and corresponding Apery-binomial series [10], should be natural consequences of solving level 6 MZV system.

126 Acknowledgements

1. Special thanks to following contributors for crucial improvements of corresponding sections:

K. C. Au: For introducing me this general topic through establishment of section 2 and level 4 MZV through that of subsection 7-8, as well as oﬀering important techniques that I used to complete subsection 5-1, 8-4-7.

Chen: For introducing me the basic FL theory, oﬀering problems of subsection 8-3-2, 8-4-10(4) and the latter’s solution.

J. D’Aurizio: For further explanation on FL theory, suggestions on hypergeometric represen- f(x) tation in subsection 8-3-4 part 2, and derivation of FL expansion of x in part 3, given that of f(x).

A. Shather: For suggestions on double integration in subsection 6-10-1, 8-5-1, oﬀering problem of 8-4-9(6) and its solution.

C. I. Valean: For his challenging problem book [15], oﬀering insights on QLI/QPLI evaluation from which I developed section 5, 6 later.

2. I also appreciate following Math. SE users for presenting interesting problems, solutions on related topics, or minor suggestions on this article:

Cody, FDP, M.N.C.E., Renascence 5, Tunk-Fey, user 178256, user 1591719, user 97357329, xuce1234, Zacky. Please forgive if I’ve forgotten someone.

3. Last but not least, I am grateful to my family and friends for always supporting me during this paper’s reformulation.

Thank you all.

127 References

[1] Au, K. C. (2019). Linear relations between logarithmic integrals of high weight and some closed-form evaluations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12113. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.12113

[2] Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (1994). Experimental Evaluation of Euler Sums. Experimental Mathematics, 3(1), 17-30.

[3] Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (2004). Experiments in Mathematics: Computational Paths to Discovery. DBLP.

[4] Blumlein, J. (2009). Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms at Weight w = 6. arXiv preprint arXiv: 0901.0837. https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0837

[5] Blumlein, J. (2009). Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to Weight w = 5. arXiv preprint arXiv: 0901.3106. https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3106

[6] Blumlein, J., Broadhurst, D. J., Vermaseren, J. A. M. (2009). The Multiple Zeta Value Data Mine. Computer Physics Communications, 2009, 181(3):582-625.

[7] Borwein, D., Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (1995). Explicit Evaluation of Euler Sums. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 38(02), 277.

[8] Borwein, J. M., Chamberland, M. (2007). Integer Powers of Arcsin. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Volume 2007, Article ID: 19381.

[9] Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (1996). Evaluation of Triple Euler Sums. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 3, #R23.

[10] Borwein, J. M., Straub, A. (2011). Special values of generalized log-sine integrals.

[11] Flajolet, P., Salvy, B. (1998). Euler Sums and Contour Integral Representations. Experimental Mathematics, 7(1), 15-35.

[12] Freitas, P. (2005). Integrals of polylogarithmic functions, recurrence relations, and associated euler sums. Mathematics of Computation, 74(251), 1425-1440.

128 [13] Gradshteyn, I. S., Ryzhik, I. M. (2015). Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic Press, New York, 8th edition.

[14] Lewin, L. (1981). Polylogarithms and Associated Functions. New York, North-Holland.

[15] Valean, C. I. (2019). (Almost) Impossible Integrals, Sums, and Series. Springer, New York.

[16] Valean, C. I. (2019). A simple idea to calculate a class of polylogarithmic integrals by using the Cauchy product of squared Polylogarithm function. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337739055

[17] Valean, C. I. (2019). The derivation of eighteen special challenging logarithmic integrals. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334598773

[18] Vermaseren, J. A. M. (1998). Harmonic sums, mellin transforms and integrals. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 14(13), 2037-2076.

[19] Xu, C. (2017). Evaluations of Euler-Type Sums of Weight ≤ 5. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, 1-31.

[20] Xu, C. (2017). Multiple zeta values and Euler sums. Journal of Number Theory, 177(Complete):443- 478.

[21] Xu, C., Cai, Y. L. (2016). On Harmonic Numbers and Nonlinear Euler Sums. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04924. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04924

[22] Xu, C., Cheng, J. F. (2016). Some Results on Euler Sums. Functiones et Approximatio, 54(1), 25-37.

[23] Cantarini. M., D’ Aurizio. J. (2018). On the interplay between hypergeometric series, Fourier-Legendre expansions and Euler sums. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08411. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08411.

[24] Au, K. C. (2020). Mathematica package MultipleZetaValues. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342344452

129