DOCSLIB.ORG

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 2 [email protected] DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 3 [email protected] MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 4 [email protected] THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 5 [email protected] DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433 6 [email protected] BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 7 [email protected] 333 South GraNd AveNue 8 Los ANgeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 9 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 10 JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 [email protected] 11 KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 [email protected] 12 555 MissioN Street, Suite 3000 SaN FraNcisco, CA 94105-0921 13 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and Case No. CV 13-03826-EMC 20 ELIE GURFINKEL, iNdividually aNd oN behalf of all others similarly situated, DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ 21 MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 22 Plaintiffs, v. Hearing Date: August 6, 2015 23 Time: 1:30 p.m. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Place: Courtroom 5 24 Judge: HoN. Edward M. CheN Defendant. 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION CV 13-03826-EMC 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 3 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 3 4 A. Uber’s Business Model .................................................................................................... 3 5 B. Drivers’ Onboarding Experiences .................................................................................... 5 6 C. Licensing Agreements ...................................................................................................... 6 D. Drivers’ Star RatiNgs/Pro Tips/Suggestions .................................................................... 6 7 E. Third Party EmploymeNt ANd Drivers’ Use Of Other Lead GeNeratioN 8 Applications ..................................................................................................................... 7 9 F. Expenses And Reimbursement ........................................................................................ 7 G. Gratuities .......................................................................................................................... 8 10 H. Proposed Class Representatives ....................................................................................... 9 11 1. Plaintiff Thomas Colopy ...................................................................................... 9 12 2. Plaintiff Elie Gurfinkel ......................................................................................... 9 13 3. Plaintiff Matthew Manahan ............................................................................... 10 14 III. LEGAL STANDARD ............................................................................................................. 10 IV. ARGUMENT .......................................................................................................................... 11 15 A. Plaintiffs Have Failed To Prove That They Satisfy Rule 23(a)(2)’s Commonality 16 Requirement Or Rule 23(b)(3)’s More Demanding Predominance Requirement ......... 11 17 1. Plaintiffs’ Misclassification Claims Require Individualized Inquiries Into Each Transportation Provider’s Relationship With Uber .................................. 11 18 a. Right To CoNtrol The MaNNer ANd MeaNs Of PerformaNce .............. 13 19 (i) Right To Terminate ................................................................. 16 (ii) Control Over Schedules And Routes ...................................... 19 20 (iii) Use Of Third-Party Apps ........................................................ 20 21 b. Secondary Indicia ................................................................................ 20 22 (i) Whether Drivers Believe They Are Employees ...................... 22 (ii) Length Of Time Worked And Method Of Payment ............... 22 23 (iii) Opportunity For Profit Or Loss ............................................... 23 24 (iv) Negotiation Of Rates ............................................................... 24 25 (v) Engagement In A Distinct Occupation Or Business And “Employment Of Helpers” ...................................................... 24 26 (vi) Provision Of The Instrumentalities And Tools Of Work ........ 25 27 2. Plaintiffs’ Tipping Claims Turn On INdividualized INquiries ............................ 25 28 3. Plaintiffs’ Claim For Expense Reimbursement Under Labor Code Section 2802 Depends On A Host Of Individualized Inquiries ...................................... 27 Gibson, Dunn & i Crutcher LLP DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION CV 13-03826-EMC 1 B. PlaiNtiffs Have Failed To Satisfy The Typicality RequiremeNt Of Rule 23(a)(3) Or The Adequacy Requirement Of Rule 23(a)(4) .......................................................... 30 2 1. The Named Plaintiffs Are Not Adequate Class RepreseNtatives UNder 3 Rule 23(a)(4) Because They Seek A Remedy That MaNy Class Members Oppose And That Could Subject Class Members To Legal Liability ............... 30 4 2. The Claims Of The Named Plaintiffs Are Atypical Under Rule 23(a)(3) 5 And The Named Plaintiffs Are Inadequate Class Representatives Under Rule 23(a)(4) Because They Are Subject To Unique Defenses ......................... 32 6 3. The Named PlaiNtiffs Are Not Typical Of The Putative Class Because 7 There Is No Typical Uber Driver ....................................................................... 35 8 C. That Some Members Are Subject To AN Arbitration Clause Raises Individual Issues That Preclude Certification Under Rule 23(b)(3) ................................................ 38 9 D. PlaiNtiffs’ Proposed PAGA Claim Fails To Satisfy The Requirements Of Rule 23 ...... 39 10 V. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 40 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & ii Crutcher LLP DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION CV 13-03826-EMC 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Page(s) 3 Cases 4 Adashunas v. Negley, 626 F.2d 600 (7th Cir. 1980) .................................................................................................... 26 5 Air Couriers Int’l v. Emp’t Dev. Dep’t, 6 150 Cal. App. 4th 923 (2007) .............................................................................................. 1, 20 7 Alatraqchi v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 11-42020 CT (Cal. Labor Comm. Aug. 1, 2012) .............................................................. 12 8 Alberghetti v. Corbis Corp., 9 263 F.R.D. 571 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2010) ................................................................................ 31 Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., 10 765 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2014) .................................................................................................... 19 11 Ali v. U.S.A. Cab Ltd., 176 Cal. App. 4th 1333 (2009) .............................................................................. 13, 16, 20, 24 12 Allied Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, L.P., 13 247 F.R.D. 156 (C.D. Cal. 2007) ............................................................................................. 31 14 Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest., 133 S. Ct. 2304 (2013) ............................................................................................................. 10 15 Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. Superior Court, 16 46 Cal. 4th 993 (Cal. 2009) ...................................................................................................... 40 Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, 17 521 U.S. 591 (1997) ................................................................................................................. 11 18 Arias v. Superior Court, 46 Cal. 4th 969 (2009) ............................................................................................................. 40 19 Arnold v. Mut. of Omaha Ins. Co., 20 202 Cal. App. 4th 580 (2011) ................................................................................ 16, 19, 24, 37 21 Avilez v. Pinkerton Govt. Serv. Master Global Holding, Inc., 596 F. App’x 579 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2015) .............................................................................. 38 22 Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc., 23 59 Cal. 4th 522 (2014) ....................................................................................................... 15, 16 Beaumont-Jacques v. Farmers Grp., Inc., 24 217 Cal. App. 4th 1138 (2013) .......................................................................................... 13, 16 25 Beauperthuy v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., 772 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2011) ................................................................................... 30 26 Bemis v. People, 27 109 Cal. App. 2d 253 (1952) .............................................................................................. 15, 19 28 Berger v. Home Depot
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8177Fd55310a99e80798a055bc
    KIRKLAND KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Diversity News for the Los Angeles Office Summer/Fall 2006 CONGRATULATIONS TO THE 2006 MINORITY FELLOWSHIP RECIPIENTS DIVERSITY CELEBRATED DURING 2006 SUMMER SEASON: Rebecca Olson (Tulane ‘07) •The annual summer associate diversity dinner was held at Spago on May 25th. K&E San Francisco •Corporate partner Eva Davis and the WLI sponsored a much-needed zen moment for the summer associate women with a yoga class at Gold’s Gym on June 19th. Darah Smith (Chicago ‘07) •Litigation associate Felix Lebron was the host of a dinner celebrating attorneys and summer associates of color at Bistro 45 in Pasadena on July 6th. The dinner was K&E Chicago preceded by an attorney of color panel discussion led by Jane Park, Felix Lebron, Luke Guerra and Bettina Clark, allowing summer associates the opportunity to Jessica Kiser (Columbia ‘07) address specific issues faced by students and attorneys of color. K&E New York •Litigation partner Melissa Ingalls hosted a Women’s Happy Hour at her home on July 13th. Tarica Chambliss (Howard ‘07) •The African American Attorneys for Downtown Law Firms held their Summer K&E Washington Associate Dinner on July 20th at the Omni Los Angeles hotel. Litigation attorneys Tony Richardson and Bettina Clark and summer associate Shani Moore were among the attendees at this annual event. Kelly Guzman (Michigan ‘07) •Restructuring partner Robbin Itkin hosted a Women’s Summer Associate Tea at the K&E Chicago Peninsula Hotel on July 21st. Manoj Viswanathan (NYU ‘07) WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE EXPLORES CAREER PATHS K&E New York & San Francisco On June 21, the LA Women's Leadership Committee hosted a roundtable discussion Ketan Shah (Northwestern ‘07) of women attorneys from several areas of the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayorkas DOJ Letter
    January 14, 2021 Senator Gary Peters Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Senator Rob Portman Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Peters and Senator Portman, We are a group of eighty-five former senior officials of the United States Department of Justice who have served in administrations of both political parties. We all personally know and/or have worked with Alejandro Mayorkas, President-elect Joe Biden’s nominee to serve as Secretary of Homeland Security, during his many years of public service – as a federal prosecutor, as United States Attorney in Los Angeles and as a leader in the Department of Homeland Security during the Obama Administration. We have had ample opportunity to assess Ali’s character as he has handled the myriad challenges of government service, and have seen in Ali the unimpeachable integrity, the sound judgment and the commitment to public service that make him an ideal choice to serve in this critical position. For that reason, we wholeheartedly and unequivocally support Ali’s nomination, and we urge your Committee and the United States Senate to quickly confirm him as Secretary of Homeland Security so that DHS can have confirmed leadership in place on the first day of the new administration. Ali has a wealth of experience that uniquely equips him to serve effectively as the DHS Secretary. First he draws on his experience in the Justice Department, and specifically on his role and duty as a federal prosecutor to defend the Constitution and protect individual liberties in the federal criminal justice system.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney 2 THOM..L\S P. 0' BRIEN Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division MARK A
    1 DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney 2 THOM..l\S P. 0' BRIEN Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division MARK A. YOUNG (State Bar No. 179376) 4 PETER HERNANDEZ (State Bar No. 178104) DAVID P. KOWAL (State Bar No. 188651) 5 Assistant United States Attorneys Narcotics Section 6 14CO United States Courthouse 312 North Spring Street 7 Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-6527/6681/5136 8 Fa c s imi Ie : (213 ) 894 - 0 14 2 .9 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CR 05-578(A)-JFW 14 Plaintiff, GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE OF INTEN~ ( TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY 15 v. AGAINST DEFEND.Zl.NT JAVIER COVARRU3IUS 16 J}WI ER COVp.RRUB HJ S, 17 Defendant. 18 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY 19 The United States of p.~erica, pursuant to 18 O.S.C. 20 § 3593(a), notifies the Court and defendant JAVIER COVARRUBIOS 21 ("defendantN), that the Government believes the circumstances of 22 the offense charged in Counts Six and Fi~ty-Four of the First 23 Superseding Indictment are such that, in ~he event of a 24 conviction, a sentence of death is justified under Chapter 228 25 (Sections 3591 through 3S98) of Title 18 of the United States 26 Code, and that the Government will seek the sentence of death for 27 the offense of violent crime (murder) in aid of racketeering, in 28 1 violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1959 (a) (1) I 2 which carries a possible sentence of death.
    [Show full text]
  • Mujica V. Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Airscan
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUIS ALBERTO GALVIS MUJICA, on behalf of himself and as representative of the Estates of Tereza Mujica Hernan, Edilma Leal Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra; MARIO GALVIS GELVEZ, on behalf of himself, individually, and as heir of the decedents Tereza Mujica No. 05-56056 Hernandez, Edilma Leal Pacheco D.C. No. and Johanny Hernandez Becerra; CV-03-02860-WJR JOHN MARIO GALVIS MUJICA, Central District of through his guardian ad litum and California, on behalf of himself, individually, Los Angeles and as heir of the decedents Terza Mujica Hernandez, Edilma Leal Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION; AIRSCAN INC., Defendants-Appellees. 5423 5424 MUJICA v. OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LUIS ALBERTO GALVIS MUJICA, on behalf of himself and as representative of the Estates of Tereza Mujica Hernan, Edilma Leal Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra; MARIO GALVIS GELVEZ, on behalf of himself, individually, and as heir of the decedents Tereza Mujica Hernandez, Edilma Leal Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra; No. 05-56175 JOHN MARIO GALVIS MUJICA, D.C. No. through his guardian ad litum and CV-03-02860-WJR on behalf of himself, individually, Central District of and as heir of the decedents Terza California, Mujica Hernandez, Edilma Leal Los Angeles Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AIRSCAN INC., Defendant. MUJICA v. OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM 5425 LUIS ALBERTO GALVIS MUJICA, on behalf of himself and as representative of the Estates of Tereza Mujica Hernan, Edilma Leal Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra; MARIO GALVIS GELVEZ, on behalf of himself, individually, and as heir of the decedents Tereza Mujica Hernandez, Edilma Leal Pacheco and Johanny Hernandez Becerra; No.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Copyright and Innovation in a Post-Grokster World
    S. HRG. 109–1041 PROTECTING COPYRIGHT AND INNOVATION IN A POST-GROKSTER WORLD HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 Serial No. J–109–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 34–113 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:03 Mar 04, 2009 Jkt 047297 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\34113.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma DAVID BROG, Staff Director MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:03 Mar 04, 2009 Jkt 047297 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\34113.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure 2007 605.Pmd
    34th Annual Seminar October 5-7, 2007 Silverado Resort & Meritage Resort Napa, California SECURITY & PRIVACY ACTIONS: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE FOR BUSINESS LITIGATORS 8 hrs. MCLE (1 hr. MCLE Ethics Credit) Approved by the State Bar of California Keynote Speaker HONORABLE SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (RETIRED) Special Address KATHLEEN SULLIVAN, STANLEY MORRISON PROFESSOR OF LAW AND FORMER DEAN OF STANFORD LAW SCHOOL General Seminar Schedule of Events All education sessions to take place at Silverado Resort Transportation between locations provided Friday, October 5, 2007 3:00 - 5:00 p.m. Joint Board Meeting 6:00 - 9:30 p.m. Children’s Activities and Dinner (ages 4-12) 6:00 - 10:00 p.m. Opening Reception & Keynote Address from Hon. Sandra Day O’Connor, U.S. Supreme Court (Ret.) (keynote address to start promptly at 6:45 p.m.) Saturday, October 6, 2007 7:00 - 9:30 a.m. Buffet Breakfast (registered family and guests welcome) 8:30 - 8:45 a.m. Welcome 8:45 - 9:40 a.m. Private Investigators: How Much Information Can a Lawyer Ask to Find? Technical Advances in Snooping and Security 9:50 - 10:45 a.m. Director and Officer Liability for Security and Privacy Violations: Indemnification and Criminal Investigation Issues 11:00 - 12:00 p.m. Open Forum with Members of the Judiciary 1:30 - 5:00 p.m. Wine tasting at the home and private vineyard of Mary Jo and Art Shartsis (transportation provided) Featuring wines from Secret Napa Valley Wines (a unique private wine society) and Amica Cellars 3:00 - 10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • National Association of Former United States Attorneys
    National Association of Former United States Attorneys March 2010 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Officers 2009 ANNUAL CONFERENCE President Richard A. Rossman ED Michigan President Elect William L. Lutz New Mexico Vice President Richard H. Deane, Jr. ND Georgia Secretary Jay B. Stephens District of Columbia Treasurer Don Stern Massachusetts Past President Michael D. McKay WD Washington History Committee Chairman John Clark WD Texas Membership Committee Chairman Jack Selden ND Alabama Directors Class of 2010 Wayne Budd Massachusetts J. A. “Tony “ Canales SD Texas Douglas Jones ND Alabama Andrea Ordin MD California Matthew Orwig ED Texas Former Deputy AG William Class of 2011 Ruckelshaus Gives Riveting Margaret Currin ED North Carolina Walter Holton MD North Carolina Speech Concerning Saturday John McKay WD Washington Debra Wong Yang CD California Night Massacre Class of 2012 Jim Brady WD Michigan The 2009 NAFUSA Annual Conference Dinner Speaker, William Ruckel- Terry Flynn WD New York Rick Hess SD Illinois shaus, who served as Acting Director of the FBI and as Deputy Attorney Gen- Jose Rivera Arizona Chuck Stevens ED California eral in the Nixon Administration, gave his first speech recounting the events when he and Attorney General Elliott Richardson resigned on Saturday, Octo- Executive Director ber 20, 1973, rather than follow a direct order from the president to fire Water- Ronald G. Woods SD Texas 5300 Memorial - Suite 1000 gate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox. Houston, TX 77007 Ruckelshaus, now 77 and living in Seattle, agreed to the request of his Phone: 713-862-9600 Fax: 713-864-8738 Email: [email protected] friend, NAFUSA President Mike McKay, to speak on the subject at the NA- FUSA Annual Conference Dinner on Saturday, October 3, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Project Safe Childhood Debra Wong Yang
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 34 Issue 2 A Tribute to Judge Byrne & Symposium: Article 15 Balancing Career & Family: A Work/Life Symposium 1-20-2007 Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: An Overview of Project Safe Childhood Debra Wong Yang Patricia A. Donahue Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Computer Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Debra Wong Yang and Patricia A. Donahue Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: An Overview of Project Safe Childhood, 34 Pepp. L. Rev. 2 (2007) Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol34/iss2/15 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: An Overview of Project Safe Childhood* Debra Wong Yang** and Patricia A. Donahue*** 1. INTRODUCTION II. VALIDATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT III. MORE SHOCKING, GRAPHIC IMAGES IV. INCREASED COMPULSION/PROPENSITY TO MOLEST CHILDREN V. AFFIRMATIVE TOOLS OF MOLESTERS VI. A CALL TO ARMS I. INTRODUCTION On May 17, 2006, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales announced the beginning of the nationwide implementation of Project Safe Childhood, a Department of Justice initiative designed to enhance the national response to the growing threat to America's children from online exploitation and abuse.' "We are in the midst of an epidemic of sexual abuse and exploitation of our children," said Attorney General Gonzales.2 "Project Safe Childhood will help law enforcement and community leaders prevent, investigate, and prosecute sexual predators and pornographers who target 3 our children and grandchildren." * Portions of this article have been reprinted with permission of the Department of Justice from the Project Safe Childhood Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Y?Amji ~ MARIA SILVA Commission Executive Assistant I
    LO. ANGELES POLICE COMM~ JION BOARD OF RICHARD M. TEFANK POLICE COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NICOLE C. BERSHON JOHNW. MACK INSPECTOR GENERAL PRESIDENT ALAN J. SKOBIN EXECUTIVE OFFICE VICE PRES IDENT PoliCE ADMINISTRATION B UILDING ANTON IO R VI LLARA IGOSA 100WEST F IRST STREET, S UITE 134 RICHARD OROOYAN MAYOR L osANGELEs, CA90012-4 1 12 ROBERT M. SALTZMAN DEBRA WONG YANG (213) 236-1400 PHONE (213)236-1410FAX MARIA SILVA (213) 236-1440 TOO COMM ISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I September 27, 2010 BPC #10-0367 The Honorable Public Safety Committee City of Los Angeles c/o City Clerk's Office City Hall, Room 395 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention John White: RE: REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF IDSTICE At the regular meeting ofthe Board ofPolice Commissioners held Tuesday, September 14, 2010, the Board APPROVED the Department's report relative to the above matter. This matter is being forwarded to you for approval. Respectfully, BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS 7Y?aMJi ~ MARIA SILVA Commission Executive Assistant I Attachment c: Chief of Police AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER www.LAPDOnline.org www.joinLAPD.com INTR )EPARTMENTAL CORRESPOND 'CE September 7, 20 I 0 (;['0 0 9 2010 1.14 '-' · --~ CF # 08-1943 POLICE CO!v1f\IIISSION CB # 10-0009 TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. That the Board APPROVE this report on the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, and TRANSMIT this report to the City Council' s Public Safety Committee in response to a motion introduced by Councilman Bernard Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Common Ground WASHINGTON, D.C.! (Updated May 15, 2017) !
    MEDIA SCHEDULE! C100 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2017 MAY 18-20, 2017! Seeking Common Ground WASHINGTON, D.C.! (updated May 15, 2017) ! ! THURS. MAY 18 - GALA DINNER (BUSINESS ATTIRE FOR MEDIA)! (summit schedule cont’d)! VENUE: Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Washington, D.C. ! 12:10-2:00pm Summit Luncheon Keynote Remarks: U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross! 6:00-7:00pm Media Registration and Camera Pre-set ! Senator Dan Sullivan, Co-Chair, Senate U.S.-China Working Group! (venue: Main entrance on Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.)! Chinese Americans in Public Service: Congressman Ted Lieu! 7:00-9:00pm Awards Gala Dinner (venue: Atrium)! Musical Performance: Abigail Washburn and Wu Fei! Gala Emcee: Betty Liu, Bloomberg TV Anchor, C100 member! 2:10-2:30pm Chinese American Journeys (TED-style talk)! Welcome: Congresswoman Judy Chu! Ginger Lew, Former Senior Counsel to White House on Economic Policy; C100 Member! Welcome: Congressman Ed Royce! 2:40-3:55pm Panel 3: The Role of Media in U.S.-China Relations Honoree: Ambassador Cui Tiankai, Chinese Ambassador to the United States! Panel Chair: George Koo, C100 member; Regular Contributor, Asia Times! Honoree: Terry Branstad, Governor, Iowa (invited)! David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, Washington Post! Featuring a musical performance by: Abigail Washburn and Wu Fei Kaiser Kuo, Founder of award-winning podcast Sinica; Editor-at-large SupChina! Yan Mei, Senior Partner, Brunswick Group! ! Victor Yuan, Founder, Dataway Horizon; TV Host, Brainstorm! FRI. MAY 19 – “Seeking Common Ground”ALL-DAY SUMMIT 4:00-4:05pm Coffee Break! (ATTIRE: BUSINESS FORMAL)! 4:05-5:20pm Panel 4: U.S.-China Soft Power Dynamics VENUE: JW Marriott – 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C.! Panel Chair: Shirley Young, C100 co-founder, U.S.-China Cultural Institute! Robert Daly, Director, Kissinger Institute on China and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AGREEMENT the United States Attorney's Offices for the Central
    AGREEMENT The United States Attorney's Offices for the Central District of California ("CDCA") and the Eastern District of Virginia ("EDVA") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the USAOs"), and The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), by its Senior Vice President - Law, pursuant to authority granted by its Board of Directors, hereby enter into this Agreement (the "Agreement"). This Agreement is part of a comprehensive resolution of civil and criminal matters relating to the subject matters defined in paragraphs I and 2 of this Agreement. This Agreement shall have force and effect only upon the occurrence of both: (a) execution of this Agreement by the USAOs and Boeing; and (b) execution of a Civil Settlement Agreement and Release, in the form attached hereto as Appendix C, by the Department of Justice and Boeing. Definitions The "EELV Matter" is defined to include all matters relating to the alleged - possession, transfer, use, and concealment of, and other conduct with respect to, another company's documents and information, whether or not proprietary or trade secret and whether or not in written form, and whether or not constituting "competition sensitive" or "source selection" information as defined in 41 U.S.C. § 423, and the disclosure or nondisclosure of such conduct, in connection with Boeing's participation: (a) from 1992 through 2003 in the United States Air Force ("USAF") MLV III program; (b) from 1995 through 2003 in the USAF EELV procurement process, awards and restructurings; (c) from 1999 through 2003 in the National Aeronautic and Space Administration ("NASA") Launch Services ("NLS") procurement process, including the NLS 19-pack procurement; and (d) from 1995 through 2003 in the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle procurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: an Overview of Project Safe Childhood
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 34 Issue 2 A Tribute to Judge Byrne & Symposium: Balancing Career & Family: A Work/Life Article 15 Symposium 1-20-2007 Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: An Overview of Project Safe Childhood Debra Wong Yang Patricia A. Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Computer Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Debra Wong Yang and Patricia A. Donahue Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: An Overview of Project Safe Childhood, 34 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 2 (2007) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol34/iss2/15 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Protecting Children from Online Exploitation and Abuse: An Overview of Project Safe Childhood* Debra Wong Yang** and Patricia A. Donahue*** 1. INTRODUCTION II. VALIDATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT III. MORE SHOCKING, GRAPHIC IMAGES IV. INCREASED COMPULSION/PROPENSITY TO MOLEST CHILDREN V. AFFIRMATIVE TOOLS OF MOLESTERS VI. A CALL TO ARMS I. INTRODUCTION On May 17, 2006, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales announced the beginning of the nationwide implementation of Project Safe Childhood, a Department of Justice initiative
    [Show full text]