State Higher Education Perspective Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Government of Madhya Pradesh Department of Higher Education Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan State Higher Education Perspective Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS DCF-1: Adherence to Pre-Requisites DCF-2: Fund Equalization Formula DCF–3: State Plan at a Glance PART-A:STATE PLAN AT A GLANCE 01-36 1 INTRODUCTION 01 VISION 01 MISSION 02 GOALS 03 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 04-05 BASIC INFORMATION 04 DEMOGRAPHICS 04 ENROLMENTS 05 SCHOOL PASS OUTS 05 DISTRICT-WISE PROFILE: 2013-14 (BASE LINE DATA) 06-07 DISTRICT-WISE PROFILE: 2013-14 (INSTITUTIONAL DENSITY) 08-09 DISTRICT WISE PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2014-15 (NEWLY PROPOSED) 10 DISTRICT WISE PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2015-16 (NEWLY PROPOSED) 10 DISTRICT WISE PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2016-17 (NEWLY PROPOSED) 10 QUALITATIVE PROFILE 11 INSTITUTIONAL DATA 12-14 NUMBER OF INSTITUTIONS COVERING THE STATE (UNIVERSITIES) 12 LIST OF UNIVERSITIES & INSTITUTES 12-13 NUMBER OF INSTITUTIONS COVERING THE STATE (COLLEGES) 14 UNIVERSITY WISE INSTITUTIONS 15 LIST OF ACCREDITED COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITY 16-25 AUTONOMOUS COLLEGE 26 PROPOSED NAAC ACCREDITATION OF COLLEGES- IN 2014-15 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 27 PROPOSED NAAC ACCREDITATION OF COLLEGES- IN 2015-16 (P ERSPECTIVE PLAN) 27 PROPOSED NAAC ACCREDITATION OF COLLEGES- IN 2016-17 (P ERSPECTIVE PLAN) 28 COLLEGE WITH POTENTIAL FOR EXCELLENCE STATUS: 28 PROPOSED COLLEGE WITH POTENTIAL FOR EXCELLENCE: AS IN 2014-15 (P ERSPECTIVE PLAN) 29 PROPOSED COLLEGE WITH POTENTIAL FOR EXCELLENCE: AS IN 2015-16 (P ERSPECTIVE PLAN) 29 PROPOSED COLLEGE WITH POTENTIAL FOR EXCELLENCE: AS IN 2016-17 (P ERSPECTIVE PLAN) 30 FACULTY: 2013-14 BASELINE DATA 31-33 BASE LINE DATA 2013-14 FOR GOVERNMENT COLLEGES 31 BASE LINE DATA 2013-14 FOR UNIVERSITIES 31 PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2014-15 FOR UNIVERSITIES 32 PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2014-15 FOR GOVERNMENT COLLEGES 32 PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2015-16 FOR GOVERNMENT COLLEGES 33 PERSPECTIVE PLAN 2016-17 FOR GOVERNMENT COLLEGES 33 PART-B:STATE HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN 34-35 1 BASIC PROFILE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS 34 2(a) UNIVERSITY WISE STUDENTS AND TEACHERS 35 2(b) STATE DATA ACROSS THE STATE 35 (1) STATE DATA FOR COLLEGES ACROSS THE STATE ……………………… Annexure-1 (2) STATE DATA FOR UNIVERSITIES ACROSS THE STATE ………………………. Annexure-1 (3) STATE DATA FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ACROSS THE STATE ………….. Annexure-2 2 (c) FACULTY-WISE ENROLMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION 36-41 (i) UNDER GRADUATE STUDIES 2013-14 (BASELINE DATA) 36 (ii) UNDER GRADUATE STUDIES 2014-15 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 36 (iii) UNDER GRADUATE STUDIES 2015-16 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 37 (iv) UNDER GRADUATE STUDIES 2016-17 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 37 (v) POST GRADUATE STUDIES 2013-14 (BASELINE DATA) 38 (vi) POST GRADUATE STUDIES 2014-15 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 38 (vii) POST GRADUATE STUDIES 2015-16 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 39 (viii) POST GRADUATE STUDIES 2016-17 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 39 (ix) RESEARCH STUDIES (M.PHIL./PH.D.) 2013-14 (BASELINE DATA) 40 (x) RESEARCH STUDIES (M.PHIL./PH.D.) 2014-15 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 40 (xi) RESEARCH STUDIES (M.PHIL./PH.D.) 2015-16 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 41 (xii) RESEARCH STUDIES (M.PHIL./PH.D.) 2016-17 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 41 3(a) ANALYSIS OF PAST PERFORMANCE 42 3(b) SWOT ANALYSIS 43 4 FINANCIAL DETAILS 44-45 (i) 2012-13 (BASE LINE DATA) 44 (ii) 2013-14 (BASE LINE DATA) 44 (iii) 2014-15 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 44 (iv) 2015-16 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 45 (v) 2016-17 (PERSPECTIVE PLAN) 45 STATE EXPENDITURE ON HIGHER EDUCATION IN LAKH RS (PLAN/NON-PLAN): 2013-14 (BASELINE DATA) 45 5PREPARATION OF STATE PLAN 46-47 6EIGHT YEAR PERSPECTIVE PLAN 48-50 7 SOURCES OF FUNDS 51 8 MAJOR TARGETS &FINANCIAL OUTLAYS (FOR PLAN PERIOD) 52-53 9 COMPONENT WISE TARGET AND PROPOSED FINANCIAL OUTLAYS 54-56 9 OUTCOME& OUTPUT TARGETS 57-58 10 STATE DATA – (BASELINE & PERSPECTIVE) 59 DCF–4: Component-wise Proposal 1 COMPONET-1 : PROPOSAL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOR COMPONENT-1: 61-73 UP-GRADATION OF EXISTING AUTONOMOUS COLLEGES TO UNIVERSITIES 2COMPONET-2 : PROPOSAL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOR COMPONENT-1: CONVERSION OF COLLEGES TO CLUSTER UNIVERSITIES 74-76 3COMPONET-3 : INFRASTRUCTURE GRANTS TO UNIVERSITIES 77-80 4COMPONET-4 : NEW MODEL COLLEGES 81-84 5COMPONET-5 : UP-GRADATION OF EXISTING DEGREE COLLEGES TO MODEL DEGREE COLLEGES 85-88 6COMPONET-6 : PROPOSAL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOR NEW COLLEGES (PROFESSIONAL) 89-94 7COMPONET-7 : INFRASTRUCTURE GRANTS TO COLLEGES 95-102 8COMPONET-8 : RESEARCH, INNOVATION & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 103-108 9COMPONET-9 : EQUITY INITIATIVES 109-114 10COMPONET-10 : FACULTY RECRUITMENT SUPPORTS 115-116 11COMPONET-11 : FACULTY IMPROVEMENT 117-120 12COMPONET-12 : VOCATIONALIZATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION 121-127 LIST OF ANNEXURES Annexure-1: State Data for colleges and universities across the state Annexure-2: State Data for technical education across the state Annexure-3: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-1: Up-gradation of existing autonomous colleges to universities Annexure-4: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-6: New professional College Annexure-5: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-8: Research, Innovation & Quality Improvement for College & Universities Annexure-6: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-9: Equity Initiatives Annexure-7: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-11: Faculty Improvement Annexure-8: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-12:Vocationalization of Higher Education Annexure-9: Proposal of Technical Education for Component-17:Support to Polytechnics LIST OF ENCLOSURES Enclosure-1: Copy of Notification of SHEC & RUSA Directorate Enclosure-2: Copy of Advertisement for filling vacant positions DCF - 1 Adherence to Prerequisites Please specify what has been done by the state with respect to each of the prerequisites as shown in the following table. (Please go through Pages. 107-129 of RUSA Document) State's response (YES/NO)/ S.N. Prerequisite Key Questionnaire Commitment as per a set timeline 1 State Higher Does the State agree to Create the Yes Education Council State Higher Education Council Notification issued according to the suggestion made under (refer to enclosure-1) RUSA 2 State Perspective Does the state agree to create and Yes Plan submit the State Higher Education Plan according to prescribed guidelines 3 Financial Does the state agree to scale up to and Yes Contribution to maintain prescribed levels of funding to Between 0.5 – 1.0 % Higher Education higher education as a percentage of as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) GSDP 4 Adherence to Does the State agree to share the Yes timelines for fund project cost of the Government funded release and aided institutions with MHRD in the applicable ration (10:90, 35:65) 5 Agreement to Does the state agree to create separate Yes, Account has been opened create separate fund for RUSA A/c No. - 2073101018868 fund for RUSA IFSC – CNRB0002073 MP Nagar, Bhopal 6 Filling Faculty Does the state agree to fill up vacant YES Vacancies faculty positions Vacant Posts have been advertised and recruitment process is in progress. (refer to enclosure-2) 7 Accreditation Does the state commit for all state HEIs Yes reforms to apply for accreditation 8 Affiliation and Does the state agree to implement all Yes. Proposal for upgrading examination affiliation reforms mentioned under 01 Autonomous college at reforms RUSA Shahdol in a University under Component -01. Colleges at Dewas & Satna to be converted into cluster Universities in the academic year 2015-16. 9 Governance and Does the state agree to implement all Yes Administrative the sectoral governance reforms The state would implement reforms at State mentioned under RUSA governance reforms in the Level coming three academic years. 10 Institutional Does the state agree to implement all Yes governance the Institutional (Administrative) governance/Administrative reforms reforms mentioned under RUSA Enclosure-1: copy of the notification of the SHEC (Annexure -9) Enclosure-2: Copy of the advertisement to fill up vacant posts (Annexure -10) DCF - 2 Fund Equalization Formula SN Criteria Value 1 Population (Age Group: 18-23) 8548106 (As per Census 2011) 2 Per Capita Income Rs 37979 (Curr. Price) (As per 2011-12) Rs 23447 (Cons. Price) 3 Gross Enrolment Ratio (As per 2011-12) 14.0 As on 2013-14 19.5 4 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- Performances 08 09 10 11 2011-12 Improvement in GER GER- All categories 10.61 11.39 11.13 13.89 14.02 GER- SCs 5.68 7.14 10.4 GER- STs 2.32 3.1 4.9 Gender Parity Index GPI- All Categories 0.49 0.79 0.85 0.79 0.79 GPI- SCs 0.89 0.68 0.77 0.75 0.67 GPI- STs 0.70 0.50 0.57 0.57 0.58 As per census data 2011 Expenditure on Higher Education Per Capita Expenditure (2011-12) Rs – 133.97 per Capita Rs – 1148.44 per Capita (Age group 18-23 Yrs) Expenditure as % of NSDP (2011-12) 0.29% (HE) + 0.05 (TE) = 0.34% College - Population Index* 2.45 Institutional Density 5.70 Teacher - Student Ratio UTD 01:46 Colleges 01:134 Research Output Approx. 2000 research publications No. of Ph.D's Produced Approx. 2000 per annum No. of Citations Approx. 300 5 Special Problems 1. Special Problems may be highlighted 1. 39 EBDs in state out of 379 districts (India) by the states that they face according to 2. Large no of colleges terrain or problems of very special 3. Colleges in remote areas, spread over 50 districts nature, if they exist in their state. 4. Low GER of SC/ST/Female Students 5. Low Institutional density Some suggestive problems could be: a) Very difficult terrain as in Ladhak, J&K b) Naxalite effected area c) Remote Tribal /Hilly Areas, etc. d) Areas which are prone to Vagaries of nature, Andaman & Nicobar island, Lakshadweep Note: 1. * Population should be taken as per 2011 Census data 2. Gender Parity Index= No. of females enrolled/no. of males enrolled 3.