Tenebrionoidea: Zopheridae: Colydiinae) from Eocene Baltic Amber
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Succession of Coleoptera on Freshly Killed
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana Stephanie Gil Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gil, Stephanie, "Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 1067. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1067 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUCCESSIO OF COLEOPTERA O FRESHLY KILLED LOBLOLLY PIE (PIUS TAEDA L.) AD SOUTHER RED OAK ( QUERCUS FALCATA MICHAUX) I LOUISIAA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Entomology by Stephanie Gil B. S. University of New Orleans, 2002 B. A. University of New Orleans, 2002 May 2008 DEDICATIO This thesis is dedicated to my parents who have sacrificed all to give me and my siblings a proper education. I am indebted to my entire family for the moral support and prayers throughout my years of education. My mother and Aunt Gloria will have several extra free hours a week now that I am graduating. -
The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State -
Your Name Here
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DEAD WOOD AND ARTHROPODS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by MICHAEL DARRAGH ULYSHEN (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT The importance of dead wood to maintaining forest diversity is now widely recognized. However, the habitat associations and sensitivities of many species associated with dead wood remain unknown, making it difficult to develop conservation plans for managed forests. The purpose of this research, conducted on the upper coastal plain of South Carolina, was to better understand the relationships between dead wood and arthropods in the southeastern United States. In a comparison of forest types, more beetle species emerged from logs collected in upland pine-dominated stands than in bottomland hardwood forests. This difference was most pronounced for Quercus nigra L., a species of tree uncommon in upland forests. In a comparison of wood postures, more beetle species emerged from logs than from snags, but a number of species appear to be dependent on snags including several canopy specialists. In a study of saproxylic beetle succession, species richness peaked within the first year of death and declined steadily thereafter. However, a number of species appear to be dependent on highly decayed logs, underscoring the importance of protecting wood at all stages of decay. In a study comparing litter-dwelling arthropod abundance at different distances from dead wood, arthropods were more abundant near dead wood than away from it. In another study, ground- dwelling arthropods and saproxylic beetles were little affected by large-scale manipulations of dead wood in upland pine-dominated forests, possibly due to the suitability of the forests surrounding the plots. -
The Cylindrical Bark Beetles of Malta (Insecta: Coleoptera: Zopheridae, Colydiinae)
Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 102B 259 - 267 Wien, Dezember 2000 The cylindrical bark beetles of Malta (Insecta: Coleoptera: Zopheridae, Colydiinae) R. Schuh* & D. Mifsud** Abstract Four species of Colydiinae (Zopheridae) are recorded from Malta of which Langelandia niticosta sp.n. is described as new. Bitoma rufula MOTSCHULSKY, 1863 is transferred to Microprius FAIR MAIRE, 1868. Microprius linearis (WOLLASTON, 1867), Synchitodes rufa REITTER, 1877 and Synchitodes j;'ivaldszkyi REITTER, 1881 are synonymized with Microprius rufulus (MOTSCHULSKY, 1863). Microprius rufulus is recorded from Europe (Germany and Malta) for the first time. Key words: Insecta, Coleoptera, Zopheridae, Colydiinae, Langelandia, Microprius, new species, new com bination, new synonymies, taxonomy, first record, Europe (Germany, Malta). Zusammenfassung Vier Arten der Unterfamilie Colydiinae (Zopheridae) werden von Malta gemeldet. Langelandia niticosta sp.n. wird beschrieben. Bitoma rufula MOTSCHULSKY, 1863 wird in die Gattung Microprius FAIRMAIRE, 1868 gestellt. Microprius linearis (WOLLASTON, 1867), Synchitodes rufa REITTER, 1877 und Synchitodes frivaldszkyi REITTER, 1881 werden mit Microprius rufulus (MOTSCHULSKY, 1863) synonymisiert. Micro prius rufulus (MOTSCHULSKY, 1863) wird erstmals fUr Europa (Deutschland und Malta) gemeldet. Introduction The only comprehensive list of Coleoptera occuring in the Maltese Islands is that of CAMERON & CARUANA GATTO (1907). In this list two species were included under "Colydiidae", Bitoma crenata (FABRICIUS, 1775) [as Ditoma crenata (F.)] and Aglenus brunneus (GYLLENHAL, 1813). The latter appears to be closely related to prostominiines (Salpingidae: Prostominiinae and Agleninae) where it is currently included (LAWRENCE 1980; LAWRENCE & NEWTON 1995). For this reason, Aglenus brunneus will not be con sidered further in this work. The record of Bitoma crenata by CAMERON & CARUANA GATTO (1907) was especially noted as "ColI. -
Colydiine Genera (Coleoptera: Zopheridae: Colydiinae) of the New World: a Key and Nomenclatural Acts 30 Years in the Making
Colydiine genera (Coleoptera: Zopheridae: Colydiinae) of the new World: A Key and Nomenclatural Acts 30 Years in the Making Authors: Michael A. Ivie, Nathan P. Lord, Ian A. Foley, and S. Adam Slipinski This is a postprint of an article that originally appeared in Coleopterists Bulletin on December 18, 2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-70.4.755 Ivie, Michael A. , , Ian A. Foley, and S. Adam Slipinski. "Colydiine genera (Coleoptera: Zopheridae: Colydiinae) of the new World: A Key and Nomenclatural Acts 30 Years in the Making." Coleopterists Bulletin 70, no. 4 (April 2017): 755-788. DOI: 10.1649/0010-065X-70.4.755. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu COLYDIINE GENERA (COLEOPTERA:ZOPHERIDAE:COLYDIINAE) OF THE NEW WORLD:AKEY AND NOMENCLATURAL ACTS 30 YEARS IN THE MAKING MICHAEL A. IVIE Montana Entomology Collection, Marsh Labs, Room 50 Montana State University Bozeman, MT 59717, U.S.A. [email protected] NATHAN P. LORD Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences Georgia College and State University Milledgeville, GA 31061, U.S.A. IAN A. FOLEY Montana Department of Agriculture Helena, MT 59601, U.S.A. AND S. ADAM ŚLIPIŃSKI CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences Australian National Insect Collection GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT A brief review of the classification history of the subfamily Colydiinae is provided, followed by a provisional diag- nosis for the group. The 47 genera of New World Colydiinae (Colydiidae auctorum) are reviewed, with an illustrated key to genera, a representative habitus of each genus, a list of all 305 described species currently considered valid, each placed into the appropriate recognized genus, with full citations for each. -
Catalog of the Genera of World Colydiidae
POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT ZOOLOGII Michael A. I v i e , Stanisław A. Ś l i p i ń s k i Catalog of the genera of worldColydiidae (Coleoptera) Tom 43 Suplement 1 ™ ARSZAWA http://rcin.org.pl REDAKCJA Barbara Bierzyńska (sekretarz),Wojciech Czechowski, Stanisław Głogowski, Eugeniusz Kierych (zastępca redaktora),Janusz Nast, Beata Pokryszko, Adolf Riedel (redaktor naczelny),Stanisław A. Slipiński Biblioteka Muzeum i Insi Zoologii PAN P.255 Vol.43, sup 1.1 1000000000548 1000000000548 Adres Redakcji: Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk ul. Wilcza 64, 00-950 Warszawa, skr. 1007 © Copyright by Instytut Zoologii PAN Warszawa 1990 ISBN 83-85192-00-X ISSN 0003-4541 Nakład 910 + 90. Ark. wyd. 3 , Ark. druk. 2. Papier druk. sat. kl. III, 80 g 70x 100. Oddano do składania w lipcu 1990 r. Podpisano do druku w październiku 1990 r. Druk ukończono w listopadzie 1990 r. Drukarnia Nr 1, Warszawa. Zam. 88/90 — 1000 http://rcin.org.pl POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT ZOOLOGII ANNALES ZOOLOGICI Tom 43 Warszawa, 15X1 1990 Supl. 1 Michael A. IviE, Stanisław A. Ś lip iŃ S K I Catalog of the genera of worldColydiidae (Coleoptera) A bstract. A catalog of all generic and suprageneric names used in theColydiidae, their current placement, status and typification is given. Notes on nomenclatural problems, and location of types of type species are given where needed. Names and current placement of taxa removed from the family since theH e t s c h k o ’s 1930 Catalog are given. The following genera are removed from synonymy and recognized as valid:Endeitoma S h a r p ; Eulachus E r i c h s o n ; Eudesma L e C o n t e ; Holopleuridia R e i t t e r ; Pristoderus H o p e ; Nosodomodes R e i t t e r . -
East Devon Pebblebed Heaths Providing Space for Nature Biodiversity Audit 2016 Space for Nature Report: East Devon Pebblebed Heaths
East Devon Pebblebed Heaths East Devon Pebblebed Providing Space for East Devon Nature Pebblebed Heaths Providing Space for Nature Dr. Samuel G. M. Bridgewater and Lesley M. Kerry Biodiversity Audit 2016 Site of Special Scientific Interest Special Area of Conservation Special Protection Area Biodiversity Audit 2016 Space for Nature Report: East Devon Pebblebed Heaths Contents Introduction by 22nd Baron Clinton . 4 Methodology . 23 Designations . 24 Acknowledgements . 6 European Legislation and European Protected Species and Habitats. 25 Summary . 7 Species of Principal Importance and Introduction . 11 Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Species . 25 Geology . 13 Birds of Conservation Concern . 26 Biodiversity studies . 13 Endangered, Nationally Notable and Nationally Scarce Species . 26 Vegetation . 13 The Nature of Devon: A Biodiversity Birds . 13 and Geodiversity Action Plan . 26 Mammals . 14 Reptiles . 14 Results and Discussion . 27 Butterflies. 14 Species diversity . 28 Odonata . 14 Heathland versus non-heathland specialists . 30 Other Invertebrates . 15 Conservation Designations . 31 Conservation Status . 15 Ecosystem Services . 31 Ownership of ‘the Commons’ and management . 16 Future Priorities . 32 Cultural Significance . 16 Vegetation and Plant Life . 33 Recreation . 16 Existing Condition of the SSSI . 35 Military training . 17 Brief characterisation of the vegetation Archaeology . 17 communities . 37 Threats . 18 The flora of the Pebblebed Heaths . 38 Military and recreational pressure . 18 Plants of conservation significance . 38 Climate Change . 18 Invasive Plants . 41 Acid and nitrogen deposition. 18 Funding and Management Change . 19 Appendix 1. List of Vascular Plant Species . 42 Management . 19 Appendix 2. List of Ferns, Horsetails and Clubmosses . 58 Scrub Clearance . 20 Grazing . 20 Appendix 3. List of Bryophytes . 58 Mowing and Flailing . -
Systematics Within the Zopheridae Complex (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea)
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Biology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2013 Systematics within the Zopheridae Complex (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea). Nathan Lord Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds Recommended Citation Lord, Nathan. "Systematics within the Zopheridae Complex (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea).." (2013). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds/71 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nathan Patrick Lord Candidate Biology Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Kelly B. Miller, Chairperson Dr. Christopher C. Witt Dr. Timothy K. Lowrey Dr. Joseph V. McHugh i SYSTEMATICS WITHIN THE ZOPHERID COMPLEX (COLEOPTERA: TENEBRIONOIDEA) by NATHAN PATRICK LORD B.S.E.S., Entomology, University of Georgia, 2006 M.S., Entomology, University of Georgia, 2008 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2013 ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my grandmother, Marjorie Heidt, who always encouraged me to follow my passions. Thank you, Grandma. You were the best. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my graduate advisor and dissertation committee chair, Dr. Kelly Miller, for his continual support and encouragement throughout my academic career. I would also like to thank my Master’s advisor and committee member, Dr. -
Succession of Coleoptera on Freshly Killed Loblolly Pine And
Succession of Coleoptera on Freshly Killed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) and Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata Michx.) in Louisiana Stephanie A. Gil ([email protected]) and Christopher E. Carlton ([email protected]), Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA ABSTRACT Species of Interest Overlapping complexes of insects invade dead wood according to the species of tree, Carabidae: Mochtherus tetraspilotus (MacLeay) (Fig. 9) stage of decomposition, and ambient conditions. We studied beetle succession in felled loblolly pines and southern red oaks by documenting beetle arrival and residency in Many carabids are known to be predators and this species is no exception. It freshly killed standing tree trunks. Six trees of each species at Feliciana Preserve in can be distinguished by the setulose pronotum that is wider than the head, the West Feliciana Parish, LA were felled during October 2004 and April 2005 for a total of Table 1. Species Checklist elytra each with two pale orange spots, and with elytral interval 3 with two 24 trees sampled from October 2004 – September 2005. Four 48‐inch bolts were cut punctures (Choate 2001). Mochtherus, ~7mm, has been seen scurrying around Indigo = Loblolly pine species; Red = Southern red oak species; Black = shared species from each felled tree. Each bolt was further cut into eight six‐inch sections, on recently felled logs (Darlington 1968, Choate 2001). The single specimen reassembled in proper order, and positioned standing upright. Insects were aspirated Anthribidae Euparius marmoreus (Olivier) Colopterus niger (Say) obtained in this study was collected on loblolly pine two weeks after felling. Biphyllidae Diplocoelus rudis (Le Conte) Colopterus semitectus (Say) from the interfaces of sections once a week for the first month and then monthly for Cymindis sp. -
INSECTA MUNDI a Journal of World Insect Systematics
INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0144 The beetles of the island of St. Vincent, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera); diversity and distributions Stewart B. Peck Department Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, CANADA Date of Issue: October 15, 2010 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Stewart B. Peck The beetles of the island of St. Vincent, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera); diversity and distributions Insecta Mundi 0144: 1-77 Published in 2010 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod taxon. Manuscripts considered for publication include, but are not limited to, systematic or taxonomic studies, revisions, nomenclatural changes, faunal studies, phylogenetic analy- ses, biological or behavioral studies, etc. Insecta Mundi is widely distributed, and referenced or ab- stracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Abstracts, etc. As of 2007, Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, not as quarterly issues. As manuscripts are completed they are published and given an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are again reviewed by the editorial board to insure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for System- atic Entomology. Managing editor: Paul E. Skelley, e-mail: [email protected] Production editor: Michael C. Thomas, e-mail: [email protected] Editorial board: J. H. Frank, M. -
Biodiversity Studies of Six Traditional Orchards in England
Natural England Research Report NERR025 Biodiversity studies of six traditional orchards in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR025 Biodiversity studies of six traditional orchards in England M. Lush1, H. J. Robertson, K. N. A. Alexander, V. Giavarini, E. Hewins1, J. Mellings1, C. R. Stevenson, M. Storey & P.F. Whitehead 1Just Ecology Environmental Consultency Limited Published on 23 April 2009 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2009 Project details This report results from research commissioned by English Nature and completed after the successor organisation, Natural England, was set up in October 2006. The work was undertaken under English Nature contract CPAU03/02/189 by the following team: Mike Lush, Eleanor Hewins and Jon Mellings of Just Ecology, Heather Robertson, of Natural England during the project, now retired, and individual consultants Keith Alexander, Vince Giavarini, Robin Stevenson and Malcolm Storey. Results from the report were used from 2005 to 2007 to support the proposal to list traditional orchards as a national priority habitat in the Biodiversity Action Plan. Since 2007, the report has been expanded to incorporate previous work by Paul Whitehead on one study site. The study site results are now being made more widely available, in the form of a permanent record, in this Natural England Research Report. -
Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 December 2020 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack USDA Forest Service, [email protected] Bill Ruesink [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Haack, Robert A. and Ruesink, Bill 2020. "Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Haack and Ruesink: Coleoptera Collected at Grass River Natural Area 138 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 53, Nos. 3–4 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack1, * and William G. Ruesink2 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite F, Lansing, MI 48910 (emeritus) 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820 (emeritus) * Corresponding author: (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Overall, 409 Coleoptera species (369 identified to species, 24 to genus only, and 16 to subfamily only), representing 275 genera and 58 beetle families, were collected from late May through late September 2017 at the Grass River Natural Area (GRNA), Antrim Coun- ty, Michigan, using baited multi-funnel traps (210 species), pitfall traps (104 species), and sweep nets (168 species).