DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydro-Pneumothorax of Long-Standing Which Came Under Ing from A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydro-Pneumothorax of Long-Standing Which Came Under Ing from A 1652 Dr. BUSHBY read some short notes on five cases of the internal to the external. A few strards of silkworm git Pneumothorax which had come under his notice during the were left in one corner of the wound, the rest being drawa bst twelve months. The first case was one of tuberculous into perfect apposition and the whole covered with sulpho- disease of the lung in which the pneumothorax was recovered cyanide gauze and wool. At the end of twenty-four hours from without effusion of fluid. The second was a case of the wound was dressed and at no time did the temperature hydro-pneumothorax of long-standing which came under rise above 1011 F. The limb was placed in plaster-of.PaIis> notice a few weeks before death. The third was a case of at the end of four weeks and a week later the patient was pneumothorax ariirg in a strong, healtby man without evi- discharged. The plaster was removed in nine weeks from dence or history of tuberculous disease. The condition in the date of the operation ard he was now able to go about this case was completely recovered from without effusion of without support and with a limb practically no shorter than fluid. The fourth case originated in a left-sided pneumonia its fellow, for on very careful measurement one-eighth of an passing into gangrene WhICh broke down into the pleural inch could scarcely be detected. Mr. Butcher was of opinion cavity. At the necropsy the husk of a grain of wheat was that the result was far preferable to any that could have found in the gangrenous patch. In this case the patient been attained by the ordinary method of excision, where the himself bad ascribed his illness to the inhalation of dust patient would have had a couple of inches shortening and from grain. The fifth cafe was in a man whose left lung would have been obliged to wear a special boot. It is not was almost destroyed by tuberculous disease. Death resulted often that one is called upon to operate on a perfectly from the rupture of a vessel in a small cavity in the apex of healthy joint in order to procure fixation, but for diseased the right lung which was otherwise not diseased. joints the matter is different, for there are then removed not Mr. SHEARS showed a man, aged thirty-five years, suffer- only cartilage and synovial membrane but almost invariably ing from a Traumatic Implantation Cyst of the Iris. certain portions of diseased bore. Dr. W. FLOYD read notes (1) of a case of Death after Parturition from Ursemic Convulsions ; and (2) Post-partum Peritonitis arrd Septicasmia in which the Anti-streptococcic. BIRKENHEAD MEDICAL SOCIETY. Serum had been used. Mr. WILKINSON read notes (1) of a case of Bicornate Uterus; and (2) a case of Rigid Os where the vertex of the Subl1u)’Jation the - I)path Opel)’ation for of Xnee-júint. fl)’om fcetus was bound down by adhesions to the lower zone of the Ul)’ae1nio Convulsions following Partur7,tian -A1.ti.f;Þrepto. uterus. coccie Sel)’111n in Post partrcnz Peritonitis arid Septicamla - In tte discussions which ensued on the various cases Bi,eornate Os with Ute’f1Is.-.H.igid Co22iplicatto,)bg.-Exki- Fhown: the PRESIDENT, Dr. F. JoHiSTON, Mr. WILKINSON, bition of Cases and Specimens. Dr. GIBSON, Dr. BRIEN, and Dr. W. FLOYD took part. A MEETING of this society was held on Dec. 10th, Dr. STANSFiELD exhibited (1) a case of Hemiannaesthesia Dr. R. S. MARSDEN, President, being in the chair. affectirg: the right side of the body ; and (2) a man suffeiirg Mr. A. H. BUTCHER showed a man and read the following from a Tumour of the Ethmoid Bone most probably of a. notes of an operation he had performed in order to fix themrcom3tcus nature. knee-joint in a case of Subluxation. He said that there were i Dr. W. FLOYD showed an Acepbalic Foetus. ’ certain cafes not very frequent which come before surgeons Dr. STAKSMBLD showed a large Meningocele. for alleviation and which were not referred to in the ordinary Dr. CARDEN PEARSON showed (1) a pair of Contracted works on surgery and this was his excuse for making a few Kidneys ; and (2) a Perforated Ulcer of the Colon. remarks on the cause and result of an operation he bad per- formed at the man’s express desire so that he might be able to his follow employment with greater confidence and safety. ROYAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE IN The case was one of constantly recurring sublvxatien due to Extreme laxity of the joint structures, so much so that the man IRELAND. could subluxate his joint at will.’The result of this laxity was so that the of his as a instability, followirg employment SECTION OF SURGERY. dock labourer was attended with considerab’e risk, for when any extra strain was put upon the joint it gave way and the Suppurative Middle-ear Disease. man would fall. He was under treatment at the Borough A MEETING of this section was held on Nov. 12th, Sir- Hcspital and various methods were tried in the hope of WILLIAM THOMSON, the President, being in the chair. cauiDg some contraction of the surrounding structures of Mr. ROBERT H. WOODS read a paper on a case of Suppu- the joint ; knee-caps, caustics, &c., were used, but without rativeI Middle-ear Disease complicated by lateral sinus success. An operation was performed in the hope ofthrombosis, extra-dural cerebellar abscess, and temporo.- anchoring the patella in position, but this a1:;o failed ; thesphenoidal abscess. The patient, a man, aged twenty-seven patient then migrated elsewhere where exchion was sug-years, was admitted to the Hardwicke Hospital suffering gested, but to this he would not agree on account of thefrom symptoms of typhoid fever. He had had chronic inevitable shoitening. The man returned to him (Mr.otorrhcea for seven years, the discharge ceasing seven days Butcher) in the hope that he might be able to give him a before admission. Lateral sinus thrcmbosis was diagnosed stiff knee, as he declared that a stiff knee would beand an operation performed. The mastoid antrum was more useful to him than the knee in its then lax con- opened and cleared out and the bony meatus extended bach dition. This Mr. Butcher agreed to do and operated to the groove from the lateral sinus, in which a septic in the following manner. A slightly incurved incision thrombus was found. An extra-dural abscess on the pos- was made across the front cf the joint from the back terior aspect of the temporal bone was evacuated. Two days portion of the internal to the back portion of the ex- later, symptoms of brain abscess persisting, a second opera- ternal condyle of the femur, dividing all the structures tion was undertaken with the result that a temporo- down to the bone and cutting through the ligamentum sphenoidal abscess was tapped and four drachms of pus were patel]a3, which was turned up, the joint was forcibly nexed, removed. The patient made an uninterrupted recovery. the lateral ligaments were divided together with the crucial The PRESIDENT congratulated Mr. Woods on the result ligaments, which were quite healthy, and the joint was which had attended his operation. Such cases, so far, hsd brought well into view. With a sharp gouge the semilunar not always been so satisfactory. cartilages were removed and the condyles of the femur were Mr. M’ARDLE said that he had seen Mr. Wocds me the thoroughly denuded of all the articular cartilage, taking care mallet and gouge and he himself preferred the gouge. There to remove the portions well back and also the patellar portion was a great difficulty in guiding the electric bmr. in front; then the tibia was treated in the same manner with Mr. FITZGIBBON said that the question as to the use of the the exception that the tuberosities were slightly gouged out gouge or the use of a burr or the use of a trephine must so as to make a cup-shaped surface into which to place the depend to a great extent on what is found after the- convex femur. The cartilage surface of the patella was incision. next removed and the ligamentum patellae sutured. The Several other members having spoken Mr. WOODS said, in. femur was now placed into the hollowed out tibia and the reply, that in these cases there was the greatest difficulty in- whole limb placed on a McIntyre splint. The bones were now getting through the bone because there was a sclerosing secured in position by two ivory pegs about four inches long, osteitis set up which eburnated the mastoid process and one b3ing driven through the external condyle of the femur made it exceedingly difficult to get through and it was in into the internal tuberosity of the tibia and the other from these cases that the burr was so useful. It was not at al) 1653 probable that concussion of the brain could be caused byanatomical lectures. In 1748 John Hunter, then twenty jalows of the mallet on a chisel. years of age, joined his brother in London. His early life is brought before the reader in this exquisite passage: his he was at such as the SECTION OF PATHOLOGY. ’’ Throughout boyhood good games village afforded to boys and observant of nature, but deficient Exhibition of Specimens. in self-control, idle, and ignorant, a great disgrace for a A MEETING of this section was held on Dac.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JOHN HUNTER: SURGEON and NATURALIST* by DOUGLAS GUTHRIE, M.D., F.R.C.S.Ed
    JOHN HUNTER: SURGEON AND NATURALIST* By DOUGLAS GUTHRIE, M.D., F.R.C.S.Ed. " " Why Think ? Why not try the Experiment ? Professor John Chiene,*^ whose apt maxims of surgical practice still ring in the ears of those of us who were fortunate to be his pupils, was wont to advise us to avoid becoming mere " hewers of wood and drawers of water." Such counsel would have delighted John Hunter who, with a vision far ahead of his time, laboured to prevent surgery from becoming an affair of carpentry and plumbing. In the present era of specialism and super-specialism it is indeed salutary to recall this great figure of medical history, and although the work of John Hunter has been the theme of a dozen biographers and nearly a hundred Hunterian Orators, the remarkable story remains of perennial interest. Parentage and Youth John Hunter, the youngest of a family of ten children, was born on 14th February 1728, at the farm of Long Calderwood, some seven miles south-east of Glasgow. His father, already an old man, died when John was ten years old, and he remained in the care of an indulgent mother and appears to have been a " spoiled child." It is indeed remarkable that such a genius, at the age of seventeen, could neither read nor write. But, as is well known, the brilliant schoolboy does not always fulfil the promise of early years, and, conversely, the boy who has no inclination for scholarship may grow to be a clever man. John Hunter was one who blossomed late ; nevertheless his education did progress, although along unusual lines, for in " his own words he wanted to know all about the clouds and the grasses, and why the leaves changed colour in autumn : I watched the ants, bees, birds, tadpoles and caddisworms ; I pestered people with questions about what nobody knew or cared anything about." His sister Janet, eldest of the surviving children, had married a Mr Buchanan, a Glasgow cabinet- maker.
    [Show full text]
  • John Hunter's Letters by WILLIAM RICHARD LEFANU, Librarian, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London W.C.2
    John Hunter's Letters By WILLIAM RICHARD LEFANU, Librarian, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London W.C.2 N EVER ask me what I have said or what I have written, but if you will ask me what my present opinions are, I will tell you," John Hunter once said to a pupil. Some of Hunter's 'present opinions,' the current thoughts which he wrote down with no inten- tion of publishing, can still be read in his letters. But his letters have to be looked for in a number of biographies and other books. When Hunter died in October 1793 he had published only a frac- tion of his work. One book which was ready for publication, A Treatise on the Blood, Inflammation, and Gun-sbot Wounds, was edited the next year by Everard Home, the brother-in-law who for nine years had been his private assistant. It is well-known that Home kept Hunter's other manuscripts for thirty years and then burnt them in 1823. The little that Home allowed to survive was garnered by William Clift and Rich- ard Owen and published piecemeal between 1830 and 1861, chiefly in the Catalogues of the Hunterian Museum at the Royal College of Surgeons. Besides these papers of his own, many of Hunter's pupils had kept notes of his lectures, from which two versions of the Lec- tures on Surgery were published in 1833 and 1835. About the same time Hunter's letters began to be generally known. For the last twenty years of his life Hunter corresponded regularly with Edward Jenner, his favourite pupil, who had gone back to a country practice in Gloucestershire, and was not brought to London again by his discovery of vaccination till several years after Hunter's death.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 Chapter II. Public and Private
    Chapter II. Public and Private “Moral Sentiment” and “Physical Truth”: the Upstairs and Downstairs of Anne and John Hunter What, besides a couple of inches of newsprint, might have connected the worlds of Anne and John Hunter? Anne Hunter’s poems, set by Haydn as canzonets, and John Hunter’s work and reputation do not immediately suggest themselves to be kindred. Admittedly, Hunterian biographies, which are considerably unified in their treatment of the couple, strongly tend to suggest that neither spouse was influential in the pursuits of the other. The British Critic set the tone in 1802: “Such a union of science and genius has seldom been contemplated by the world, as in the persons of John Hunter and his lady,” wrote an anonymous reviewer. “The former, investigating physical truth with a zeal and acuteness not often equaled; the latter, adorning moral sentiment with the finest graces of language.”1 Throughout the Hunterian biographical literature of the next two centuries, husband and wife are made to represent an ideal juxtaposition, playing opposite, though complementary, roles.2 John Hunter, who held the title Surgeon Extraordinary to George III, earned distinction for his significant contributions to medical knowledge, especially in the areas of gunshot wounds, venereal disease, and aneurysm. In order to investigate “physical truth” he assembled an extensive collection of 1 Robert Nares, “Art. 12. Poems. By Mrs. John Hunter,” The British Critic 20 (1802). 2 The earliest book-length biography, written by Jessé Foot just one year after Hunter’s death, provides the main exception. Foot’s dislike for the surgeon appears to have strongly influenced his retelling of his subject’s life; however, the document is nevertheless valuable as an antidote to the Hunterian mythologizing that gathered enormous momentum in subsequent decades.
    [Show full text]
  • John Hunter and Experimental Surgery
    JOHN HUNTER AND EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY Hunterian Oration delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 14th February 1955 by Sir Cecil Wakeley, Bt., K.B.E., C.B., LL.D., M.Ch., D.Sc., F.R.C.S., F.R.S.E. Senior Surgeon and Director of Surgical Studies, King's College Hospital. Consulting Surgeon to the Royal Navy. An engraving by C. Josi from William Sharpe's print of Sir Joshua Reynolds's portrait of John Hunter. 1782. 69 SIR CECIL WAKELEY MR. PRESIDENT, MEMBERS of Council, Ladies and Gentlemen: I have been collecting data bearing on John Hunter as a pioneer in Experimental Surgery and if any of my gleanings are of interest to you I shall be very gratified. So far as I can find out, John Hunter was the first surgeon to establish an experimental research station, buying in 1765 the leasehold of three pieces of land for this purpose at Earl's Court where he had previously rented a house. As you know well, it was Hunter's example that influenced the late Sir Buckston Browne in 1931 to make it possible for our College to build and endow a modern " Earl's Court" at Downe in Kent, next door to Darwin's old home. Thanks to the laborious enquiries of the late Mr. George Peachey (1862-1935) we know that Hunter made this bold purchase at Earl's Court in 1765 when his worldly prospects were at their very bleakest, and it is perhaps not without interest to treat of the events that led to this enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Diathesis, and Germs in 19Th-Century Britain
    Darwin and the Doctors: Evolution, Diathesis, and Germs in 19th-century Britain By W. F. Bynum /. /nîrodiirfï'orc: Darwin and Medicine Charles Darwin, it might he said, had medicine in his blood. His grandfather and father were successful physicians, and he himself seemed at one time destined to follow in their footsteps. 'My father', wrote Darwin, 'who was by far the best judge of character whom I ever knew, declared that I should make a successful physician, -meaning by this one who would get many patients. He maintained that the chief element of success was exciting confidence; but what he saw in me which convinced him lhaL I should create confidence I know not'D Dr Darwin's judgement was never put to the professional test, for Charles disliked his medical studies in Edinburgh and had to leave the operating theatre before the two operations he ventured to witness could be completed. Medicine's loss was science's gain. Darwin abandoned his medical career without reluctance or regrets and, despite the subsequent award of the Baly Medal by the Boyal College of Physicians, honorary medical degrees from three Continental universities, and honorary membership in the Medieo-Chirurgical and the Physiological Societies, it can hardly be said that he maintained more than an ordinary interest in the vast changes in medical science or medical practice which occurred during his lifetime. His friends and correspondents included, of course, many doctors, such as Henry Holland, John Scott Burdon-Sander- son, his personal physicians Henry Bence-Jones and Andrew Clark, the pharmacologist Thomas Lauder Brunton, and the surgeons William Bow- man and James Paget, at whose house Darwin was briefly in 1881 to meet Louis Pasteur.- Despite Darwin's early squeamishness at the sight of human suffering, he valued medical research and was a firm friend of the physiolo- gists in the 1870s when antivivisection groups were agitating for controls which would have stymied a vigorous young experimental discipline then emerging in Britain®.
    [Show full text]
  • William Hunter, Anatomist
    Mil. Teacher?William Hunter, Anatomist. 15 WILLIAM HUNTER, ANATOMIST: A LECTURE WITH DEMONSTRATION OF PREPARATIONS FROM THE OBSTETRICAL SERIES OF THE HUNTERIAN MUSEUM.1 By JOHN H. TEACHER, M.A., M.B., C.M., Underkeeper in the Hunterian Museum, and Assistant in the Physiological Department, Glasgow University. The billet for this afternoon's the " proceedings designates subject of the lecture William Hunter, Anatomist." When I was asked to give this lecture and demonstration to the Society, the idea was that it should deal with William Hunter as an obstetrician ; but it gives an opportunity, which I trust you will excuse me for regarding as too good to be omitted* of entering a protest against the commonly accepted view of what William Hunter was, and why he is entitled to a prominent place in the history of medicine. To quote the words of the late Dr. Matthews Duncan,2 who " was a most enthusiastic admirer of the accurate William Hunter," "he is known as a fashionable practitioner and a " great author in obstetrics," yet he did not give his great and sustained powers to midwifery, but to anatomy. His abilities, his zeal, his great fortune were devoted to this. To use his own phrase, he made a great figure in anatomy. We know from his own mouth that it was as an anatomist that he claimed eminence and expected fame; and although his repu- tation has latterly become too exclusively obstetrical, it has not even in this respect been too highly exalted. Yet it is necessary, with a view to justice, to point out that his obstet- rical fame is chiefly anatomical, and that his greatest claim on our admiration and gratitude arises from his anatomical work and influence." If we judge William Hunter from his writings we might allow that the common estimate of him is the correct one, for the great work which has conferred immortality on his name (as Waldeyer3 describes it, "dieses 1 Head at a meeting of the Glasgow Obstetrical and Gyntecoloical ?Society held on 26th April, 1899, in the University.
    [Show full text]