World Journal of Urology

Challenges in Paediatric Urologic Practice: a Lifelong View --Manuscript Draft--

Manuscript Number: WJUR-D-19-01106R1 Full Title: Challenges in Paediatric Urologic Practice: a Lifelong View Article Type: SIU-ICUD Congenital Lifelong Urology (Dr. Wood) Keywords: diseases, urologic; abnormalities, congenital; abnormalities, genitourinary; obstructive uropathy; bladder; exstrophy, bladder; urethral valves; cloaca; ; bladder, neurogenic Corresponding Author: John Wiener Duke University School of Medicine Durham, NC UNITED STATES Corresponding Author Secondary Information: Corresponding Author's Institution: Duke University School of Medicine Corresponding Author's Secondary Institution: First Author: John Wiener First Author Secondary Information: Order of Authors: John Wiener Nina Huck, MD Anne-Sophie Blais, MD Mandy Rickard, MN, NP Armando Lorenzo, MD, MSc Heather N. McCaffrey Di Carlo, MD Margaret G. Mueller, MD Raimund Stein, MD Order of Authors Secondary Information: Funding Information: Abstract: The role of the pediatric urologic surgeon does not end with initial reconstructive surgery. Many of the congenital anomalies encountered require multiple staged operations while others may not involve further surgery but require a life-long follow-up to avoid complications. Management of most of these disorders must extend into and through adolescence before transitioning these patients to adult colleagues. The primary goal of management of all congenital uropathies is protection and/or reversal of renal insult. For posterior urethral valves, in particular, avoidance of end stage renal failure may not be possible in severe cases due to the congenital nephropathy but usually can be prolonged. Likewise, prevention or minimization of urinary tract infections is important for overall health and eventual renal function. Attainment of urinary continence is an important goal for most with a proven positive impact on quality of life; however, measures to achieve that goal can require significant efforts for those with neuropathic bladder dysfunction, obstructive uropathies, and . A particular challenge is maximizing future self-esteem, sexual function, and reproductive potential for those with genital anomalies such as hypospadias, the bladder exstrophy complex, prune belly syndrome, and Mullerian anomalies. Few endeavors are as rewarding as working with children and their families throughout childhood and adolescence to help them attain these goals, and modern advances have enhanced our ability to get them to adulthood in better physical and mental health than ever before.

Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Response to Reviewers: Reviewer #3: Fantastic article that definitely should be published as soon as possible.

Congratulations to the authors.

One small remark about PUV and some remarks about late hypospadias complications that should be addressed. As an adolescent and urethral reconstructive surgeon, also performing hypospadias in children, I find the outcomes about paediatric hypospadias repair a bit to much on the positive side.

P 12 : nadir creatinine in the first year of life: value?

From reference 78, the value of nadir serum creatinine < 0.7 mg/dL was added to page 18.

P 21 I don t agree that the outcomes after hypospadias surgery are typically good. Long term outcomes speak about a 20 % complication rate in distal hypospadias. In that sense, ok if you don t follow up during childhood if ok, but follow up should include a review during adolescence or young adulthood. Especially because curvature recurrence is high.

More long term series speak about 52% of complications appearing after the first year of surgery

because flow rates usually improve at puberty, watchful watching is encouraged for most boys with obstructive symptoms.[146, 147] : for obstructive flow rates I agree to wait , because they usually get better: but a boy with obstructive symptoms should be treated

On page 27, we modified, “70-90% of cases are distal,[141] and surgical outcomes are typically good for distal cases.”

We concur with the review that outcomes after proximal hypospadias are different and poorer. Complications are much more common, and long term follow up is warranted. An earlier version of this manuscript went into much greater detail about this, but much of this discussion had to be omitted due to the long nature of this review and the word limits of the journal.

In the same paragraph on p 28, we amended:

“More complicated distal cases and most proximal cases have much higher risks of complications in both short term and long term. Long and Canning [144] noted an overall complication of 17% in a ten year series of hypospadias repairs, but the rate was 45% for the proximal cases. [144] Therefore, re-evaluation in adolescence is recommended due to the relatively higher risks of functional and psychological suboptimal results.[145]”

Reviewer #4: This is a very good review of the content. Thank you for submitting. A few recommended revisions herein.

Abstract Change the sentence starting "Many of the congenital anomalies encountered require multiple staged operations while others may not involve further surgery but require life- long follow-up to avoid complications" to "Many of the congenital anomalies encountered require multiple staged operations while others may not involve further planned surgery, but require life-long follow-up and often revisions."

Change made on page 8.

Bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex Please change all references to CBE to just BE to be consistent with other submissions. (FIND AND REPLACE FUNCTION)

Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Done.

Urethral anomalies Following the sentence ending "decreased anterior corporal length." add "Unlike hypospadias, this condition is associated with deficient bladder neck development and impaired continence."

Unlike hypospadias, isolated epispadias without BE is often associated with deficient bladder neck development and impaired continence. Added to page 12.

Neuropathic bladder remove capital "U" from "Urinary tract infections"

Change made on page 13.

Posterior urethral valves Change "Risk of development of ESRD remains throughout life" to "Risk of development of ESRD is well described in periadolescence and adulthood"

Change made on page 14.

Bladder physiology PUV "bladder sensation, and high PVR can result in chronic bladder overdistention" add "with and secondary urinary tract infections."

Added to page 15.

Treatment and outcome NPB "Use of tissue-engineered aultologous bladder tissue to avoid the potential complications of enterocystoplasty remain experimental" Change to "Use of tissue- engineered autologous bladder tissue to avoid complications associated with bowel interposition in enterocystoplasty remains experimental."

Change made on p. 16

Following "Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) may obtain superior continence rates...", pls provide a comment about the longterm durability of this treatment being poor, and attendant risk of cuff erosion and device infection.

This was added to page 17 along with new reference 75. “However, these devices have the risk of cuff erosion or device infection as well as the mechanical failure/fluid leak; in a series of 32 children with mean follow up of 15 years, 41% had the device removed, and the remaining 19 patients underwent 34 revision surgeries”

Evaluation and followup BEEC "For some, continence may only be achieved by bladder neck transection" change to "For some, continence may only be achieved by bladder neck closure."

Change made on page 22.

In the para discussing cancer risk for BEEC, add a comment related to difficult surveillance of some BEEC patients for bladder tumors given their reconstructed , which are often small caliber and preclude good quality or biopsy in adult life.

Added to page 22 “Surveillance for bladder tumors is complicated in this population given their reconstructed urethras are often of small caliber and make cystoscopy +/- biopsy difficult in adult life.”

Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation In the para about cosmesis of genitalia in BEEC, add a comment about penile lengthening surgeries and neophallus being options in adult life for males with penile insufficiency. (ref Messanyi and Hanna)

We are unable to find the reference with both Messangyi and Hanna, but the following sentence was added to page 23 with references to papers by each individually. “Some males will require secondary genitoplasty for penile lengthening;[125] whereas, neophallus creation may be necessary in the most severe cases.[126]”

GU anomalies affecting the female repro system Please add a statement acknowledging that reconstruction has previously been done in infancy and childhood, but changing social paradigms related to gender assignment and surgery in more recent years has resulted in characterization of these anomalies in childhood, but often deferred surgical reconstruction until the patient is able to participate in decision-making. The impact of this change on cosmetic and functional outcomes for patients effected by conditions that result in ambiguous genitalia will not be borne out for decades.

The following paragraph was added to page 26-27. “It should be noted that reconstructive surgery was previously performed in infancy and childhood, but changing social paradigms related to gender assignment and surgery in more recent years has resulted in characterization of these anomalies in childhood, but often deferred surgical reconstruction until the patient is able to participate in surgical decision-making. The impact of this paradigm shift on cosmetic, functional, and psychologic outcomes for patients affected by conditions that result in ambiguous genitalia will not be borne out for decades.

In the summary recs, I would broaden to need for a multidisciplinary team (not just gyn and uro) for management, incl psych, endo, etc.

The following sentence was added to page 27. “A multidisciplinary team, including psychologists and endocrinologists, contribute to improved physical and mental health outcomes. “

Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Manuscript Click here to access/download;Manuscript;Revised WJUR-D-19- 01106 with comments 4-6-20.docx Click here to view linked References

RESPONSE TO REVIEWERS CHALLENGES IN PAEDIATRIC UROLOGY PRACTICE: A LIFELONG VIEW WJUR-D-19-01106

Reviewer #3:

Fantastic article that definitely should be published as soon as possible.

Congratulations to the authors.

One small remark about PUV and some remarks about late hypospadias complications that should be addressed. As an adolescent and urethral reconstructive surgeon, also performing hypospadias in children, I find the outcomes about paediatric hypospadias repair a bit to much on the positive side.

P 12 : nadir creatinine in the first year of life: value?

From reference 78, the value of nadir serum creatinine < 0.7 mg/dL was added to page 18.

P 21 I don t agree that the outcomes after hypospadias surgery are typically good. Long term outcomes speak about a 20 % complication rate in distal hypospadias.

In that sense, ok if you don t follow up during childhood if ok, but follow up should include a review during adolescence or young adulthood. Especially because curvature recurrence is high.

More long term series speak about 52% of complications appearing after the first year of surgery

because flow rates usually improve at puberty, watchful watching is encouraged for most boys with obstructive symptoms.[146, 147] : for obstructive flow rates I agree to wait , because they usually get better: but a boy with obstructive symptoms should be treated

1 On page 27, we modified, “70-90% of cases are distal,[141] and surgical outcomes are typically good for distal cases.”

We concur with the review that outcomes after proximal hypospadias are different and poorer. Complications are much more common, and long term follow up is warranted. An earlier version of this manuscript went into much greater detail about this, but much of this discussion had to be omitted due to the long nature of this review and the word limits of the journal.

In the same paragraph on p 28, we amended:

“More complicated distal cases and most proximal cases have much higher risks of complications in both short term and long term. Long and Canning [144] noted an overall complication of 17% in a ten year series of hypospadias repairs, but the rate was 45% for the proximal cases. [144] Therefore, re- evaluation in adolescence is recommended due to the relatively higher risks of functional and psychological suboptimal results.[145]”

Reviewer #4: This is a very good review of the content. Thank you for submitting. A few recommended revisions herein.

Abstract

Change the sentence starting "Many of the congenital anomalies encountered require multiple staged operations while others may not involve further surgery but require life-long follow-up to avoid complications" to "Many of the congenital anomalies encountered require multiple staged operations while others may not involve further planned surgery, but require life-long follow-up and often revisions."

Change made on page 8.

Bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex

Please change all references to CBE to just BE to be consistent with other submissions. (FIND AND REPLACE FUNCTION)

Done.

2 Urethral anomalies

Following the sentence ending "decreased anterior corporal length." add "Unlike hypospadias, this condition is associated with deficient bladder neck development and impaired continence."

Unlike hypospadias, isolated epispadias without BE is often associated with deficient bladder neck development and impaired continence. Added to page 12.

Neuropathic bladder remove capital "U" from "Urinary tract infections"

Change made on page 13.

Posterior urethral valves

Change "Risk of development of ESRD remains throughout life" to "Risk of development of ESRD is well described in periadolescence and adulthood"

Change made on page 14.

Bladder physiology

PUV

"bladder sensation, and high PVR can result in chronic bladder overdistention" add "with urinary retention and secondary urinary tract infections."

Added to page 15.

Treatment and outcome

NPB

"Use of tissue-engineered aultologous bladder tissue to avoid the potential complications of enterocystoplasty remain experimental" Change to "Use of tissue-engineered autologous bladder tissue to avoid complications associated with bowel interposition in enterocystoplasty remains experimental."

3 Change made on p. 16

Following "Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) may obtain superior continence rates...", pls provide a comment about the longterm durability of this treatment being poor, and attendant risk of cuff erosion and device infection.

This was added to page 17 along with new reference 75.

“However, these devices have the risk of cuff erosion or device infection as well as the mechanical failure/fluid leak; in a series of 32 children with mean follow up of 15 years, 41% had the device removed, and the remaining 19 patients underwent 34 revision surgeries”

Evaluation and followup

BEEC

"For some, continence may only be achieved by bladder neck transection" change to "For some, continence may only be achieved by bladder neck closure."

Change made on page 22.

In the para discussing cancer risk for BEEC, add a comment related to difficult surveillance of some BEEC patients for bladder tumors given their reconstructed urethras, which are often small caliber and preclude good quality cystoscopy or biopsy in adult life.

Added to page 22

“Surveillance for bladder tumors is complicated in this population given their reconstructed urethras are often of small caliber and make cystoscopy +/- biopsy difficult in adult life.”

In the para about cosmesis of genitalia in BEEC, add a comment about penile lengthening surgeries and neophallus being options in adult life for males with penile insufficiency. (ref Messanyi and Hanna)

We are unable to find the reference with both Messangyi and Hanna, but the following sentence was added to page 23 with references to papers by each individually.

“Some males will require secondary genitoplasty for penile lengthening;[125] whereas, neophallus creation may be necessary in the most severe cases.[126]”

4

GU anomalies affecting the female repro system

Please add a statement acknowledging that reconstruction has previously been done in infancy and childhood, but changing social paradigms related to gender assignment and surgery in more recent years has resulted in characterization of these anomalies in childhood, but often deferred surgical reconstruction until the patient is able to participate in decision-making. The impact of this change on cosmetic and functional outcomes for patients effected by conditions that result in ambiguous genitalia will not be borne out for decades.

The following paragraph was added to page 26-27.

“It should be noted that reconstructive surgery was previously performed in infancy and childhood, but changing social paradigms related to gender assignment and surgery in more recent years has resulted in characterization of these anomalies in childhood, but often deferred surgical reconstruction until the patient is able to participate in surgical decision-making. The impact of this paradigm shift on cosmetic, functional, and psychologic outcomes for patients affected by conditions that result in ambiguous genitalia will not be borne out for decades.

In the summary recs, I would broaden to need for a multidisciplinary team (not just gyn and uro) for management, incl psych, endo, etc.

The following sentence was added to page 27.

“A multidisciplinary team, including psychologists and endocrinologists, contribute to improved physical and mental health outcomes. “

5

CHALLENGES IN PAEDIATRIC UROLOGIC PRACTICE: A

LIFELONG VIEW

Authors:

John S. Wiener, MD1,9

Nina Huck, MD2

Anne-Sophie Blais MD3

Mandy Rickard MN, NP4

Armando Lorenzo MD, MSc5

Heather N. McCaffrey Di Carlo, MD6

Margaret G. Mueller, MD7

Raimund Stein, MD8

1Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics Division of Urologic Surgery Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC, USA

2 Fellow, Department of Pediatric, Adolescent and Reconstructive Urology University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University Mannheim, Germany

3Fellow, Division of Pediatric Urology, Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON, Canada

4Division of Pediatric Urology, Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON, Canada

5Division of Pediatric Urology, Hospital for Sick Children Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Toronto ON, Canada

6

6Spigel/Nichols Assistant Professor of Pediatric Urology The James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD, USA

7Assistant Professor, Departments of OB/GYN and Urology Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA

8Department of Pediatric, Adolescent and Reconstructive Urology University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University Mannheim, Germany

9 Corresponding author [email protected]

Word Count: 4432 References: 150 Figures/Tables: 0 Abstract: 234 words

7 ABSTRACT

The role of the pediatric urologic surgeon does not end with initial reconstructive surgery. Many of the congenital anomalies encountered require multiple staged operations while others may not involve further surgery but require a life-long follow-up and often revisions. Management of most of these disorders must extend into and through adolescence before transitioning these patients to adult colleagues. The primary goal of management of all congenital uropathies is protection and/or reversal of renal insult. For posterior urethral valves, in particular, avoidance of end stage renal failure may not be possible in severe cases due to the congenital nephropathy but usually can be prolonged. Likewise, prevention or minimization of urinary tract infections is important for overall health and eventual renal function. Attainment of urinary continence is an important goal for most with a proven positive impact on quality of life; however, measures to achieve that goal can require significant efforts for those with neuropathic bladder dysfunction, obstructive uropathies, and bladder exstrophy. A particular challenge is maximizing future self- esteem, sexual function, and reproductive potential for those with genital anomalies such as hypospadias, the bladder exstrophy epispadias complex, prune belly syndrome, and Mullerian anomalies. Few endeavors are as rewarding as working with children and their families throughout childhood and adolescence to help them attain these goals, and modern advances have enhanced our ability to get them to adulthood in better physical and mental health than ever before.

STANDARDISATION OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION

Standardised classification of congenital urologic conditions can improve management by creating consistent patient care and simplifying communication between care providers.

8

Neuropathic bladder dysfunction (NBD)

Neuromuscular dysfunction of the lower urinary tract can be congenital or acquired. The most common cause is neural tube defect of the spinal cord (spina bifida [SB]). SB is typically subclassified by anatomic type and level of the vertebral defect. Congenital NBD can also be due to sacral agenesis and anorectal malformations. Acquired aetiologies include pelvic surgery or radiation, central nervous system disease, and spinal cord insults.

NBD can affect storage and/or elimination of urine. Bladder storage may be altered by decreased detrusor compliance, reduced bladder capacity, detrusor overactivity or weak outlet. Emptying may be impaired by detrusor underactivity or detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). Urodynamic evaluation of the LUT can be non-invasive (bladder diaries, voiding observations and uroflowmetry) or invasive (urodynamic studies (UDS) with cystometry).[1] UDS should be performed when symptoms and/or non-invasive studies raise suspicion for NBD, obstruction, genitourinary anomalies, or significant (VUR) of unknown cause. In congenital NBD, UDS are recommended early in life to provide baseline assessment to identify those with a “hostile” bladder. Regular follow-up UDS can detect deterioration in bladder function.

Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction

The most common cause of pediatric bladder outlet obstruction in males is posterior urethral valves

(PUV). Young[2] first classified PUV by anatomic type: type 1 (most common [>90%] with two leaflets descending from the verumontanum), type 2 (a normal anatomic variant no longer

9 considered pathologic), and type 3 (an obstructing ring with a small central opening). Dewan et al. hypothesized that most congenital posterior urethral obstructions were anatomically similar and should be called congenital obstructing posterior urethral membrane (COPUM).[3]

Prune-belly syndrome (PBS) consists of a triad of deficient abdominal wall musculature, bilateral intra-abdominal testicles and urinary tract dilation.[4] Woodard developed three categories of neonatal presentation:[5] Category I involves severe obstructive uropathy with renal dysplasia and , resulting in , Potter features, and usually neonatal demise.

Category II has all features of the triad with less severe renal dysplasia. Category III is associated with incomplete or mild features of the triad without pulmonary hypoplasia or renal dysplasia.

Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex (BEEC)

BEEC presents along a spectrum from primary epispadias through classic bladder exstrophy (BE) to cloacal exstrophy (CE). BE involves malformations of the anterior abdominal wall, bladder, , genitalia, and pelvic bones, believed to result from premature rupture of the cloacal membrane. Genital anomalies in BE can present with marked deficiency of penile corporal tissue, creating a short penis or shortened/stenotic vagina. The upper urinary tract is usually normal at birth, but incompetent ureteral orifices may result in VUR after bladder closure.

CE, also known as OEIS (omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus and spinal defects), typically includes neurospinal defects, hindgut deficiency, and omphalocele.[6] CE patients have complete phallic/clitoral separation, an even wider pubic diastasis, and gastrointestinal tract anomalies, typically with imperforate anus and shortened hindgut with caecum located between the

10 exstrophied hemi-bladders. In females, the Mullerian ductal structures are completely separated.

Renal anomalies, such as and ectopia, are also more common.

BEEC may also be divided into typical (epispadias, BE and CE) and atypical (duplicated exstrophy, covered exstrophy and pseudoexstrophy) forms. Pseudoexstrophy describes the musculoskeletal defect associated with BE without urinary tract anomalies.[7] Superior vesical fissure presents with the same musculoskeletal defects but with a congenital vesicocutaneous fistula. Covered exstrophy is similar to BE, but the cloacal membrane persists.[8]

Cloaca/anorectal malformations

Persistent cloacal and anorectal malformations (ARM) range from mild anal anomalies to complex cloacal malformations. Many classification systems for ARM exist. The Wingspread classification was used to distinguish low, intermediate, and high ARM based on the levator ani muscle.[9] As surgeons embraced the posterior sagittal surgical approach to ARM, it was recognized that the fistula location had significant impact on long term outcomes, leading to the Pena classification.[10] The Krickenbeck classification was introduced to allow better comparison of follow-up with 3 categories: diagnostic (fistula site and degree of rectal/anal stenosis), surgical procedure performed, and functional outcome (degrees of incontinence and constipation).[11]

Differences in sexual development

Differences in sexual development (DSD) include a broad spectrum of endocrinopathies and structural anomalies that may lead to ambiguous genitalia. Multiple classification schema have

11 been used, but the 2008 Chicago Consensus introduced terminology to overcome dissatisfaction with older nomenclature.[12] Primary classification involves sex chromosome anomalies, XX, and

XY disorders with the latter two subdivided into disorders of gonadal development, disorders of sex steroidogenesis, or other.

Urethral anomalies

The most common congenital anomaly of the penis is hypospadias. Duckett classified hypospadias by meatal position after correction of chordee: anterior (glanular, sub-coronal, distal penile), middle (midshaft) or posterior (proximal penile, penoscrotal, scrotal or perineal).[13] However, due to the variability of penile malformation in hypospadias, other parameters (chordee, penoscrotal transposition, urethral dysplasia, and preputial anomalies) impact surgical outcomes.[14, 15] Other hypospadias classifications (GMS and GUMS) have been proposed to include characteristics of the glans, urethral plate, meatal position, and penile shaft.[16] The

HOPE, PPPS, HOSE and Hadidi scores additionally include assessment of postoperative outcomes and cosmetic appearance.[17]

Epispadias may present in isolation or, more commonly, as part of the BEEC complex. The urethra is found on the dorsum of the penis and is often associated with dorsal chordee and decreased anterior corporal length. Unlike hypospadias, isolated epispadias without BE is often associated with deficient bladder neck development and impaired continence. Classification in males is typically based on meatal location (glanular, penile, and penopubic).[6] Davis described

3 degrees of female epispadias: mild (patulous meatus), intermediate (urethra open dorsally along most of its length), and severe (involving the entire urethra and sphincter.)[18]

12

Summary recommendation

Classification schema of congenital urological anomalies have been standardized based on anatomy, surgical considerations, and functional outcomes. It is recommended that best efforts be made to classify and document patient characteristics at birth and at routine follow-up. Ideally, classification systems should be highly reproducible and have low inter-user variability. (Level C)

NEUROPATHIC BLADDER AND LOWER URINARY TRACT

OBSTRUCTION

Neuropathic bladder

Urinary sequeala of NBD include incontinence, urinary tract infections (UTI), urolithiasis, VUR, and renal deterioration.[19] Renal damage may occur in up to 60-80% of children in a few years without proper treatment, resulting in scarring and renal failure. The primary role of the urologist is to closely surveille bladder function in order to prevent upper tract damage.[20-22]

Routine follow-up is critical as bladder dysfunction can change during rapid growth in the first years of life and later during puberty. A large series found that 95% of myelomeningocele patients over age 4 years had NBD versus 65.1% of those with non-myelomeningocele forms of SB.[23]

One analysis found that 37% (8-85%) of young adult meningomyelocele patients reported continence, 25% had some degree of chronic (CKD), and 1.3% had end-stage renal disease (ESRD).[24]

Posterior urethral valves

13 The impact of the PUV on bladder and renal function is variable.[3, 25, 26] Poor urine concentrating ability is common and results in higher urine output which can negatively influence bladder physiology. Renal function must be closely monitored as up to 32% and 20% will develop

CKD and ESRD, respectively.[27] Risk of development of ESRD is well described in periadolescence and adulthood.

Prune-belly Syndrome (PBS)

Similarly, patients with PBS have varying degrees of bladder and renal dysfunction and must be regularly assessed.

BLADDER PHYSIOLOGY

Neuropathic bladder

The degree and type of resulting LUT dysfunction cannot be accurately predicted by the level of the neuropathic lesion and may evolve with growth.[19] The largest known SB registry found only 45.8% of adults were continent with most (76.8%) performing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC).[28]

Posterior urethral valves

Bladder dysfunction often results from obstructive uropathy during fetal development despite early postnatal PUV ablation.[29] Boys with PUV may experience progressive storage and voiding symptoms as they age.[30-33] Up to 80% of affected infants have a small thick-walled and/or overactive bladder. Detrusor overactivity often resolves as bladder capacity increases.[30, 33, 34]

Elevated postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume is common and often increases during puberty

14 with increased outlet resistance secondary to prostatic development.[34] The detrusor can become underactive and occurs in approximately 1/3 of patients aged 4-7 years, 2/3 at puberty, and 83% after puberty.[30, 35, 36] A cycle of polyuria due to reduced renal urinary concentration, impaired bladder sensation, and high PVR can result in chronic bladder overdistension with urinary retention and secondary UTI.[37] Reflux into dilated upper tracts may also contribute to the elevated PVR as a result of secondary bladder filling.[38, 39] Not surprisingly, boys with a history of PUV often experience delayed achievement of urinary continence.

Prune Belly Syndrome

Unlike patients with PUV or NBD, the dilated urinary tract in PBS is usually a low-pressure system with favorable detrusor compliance and rare overactivity. PVR are typically high secondary to detrusor underactivity and VUR (found in up to 75%) into dilated upper tracts.[40, 41]

Lifelong follow-up is mandatory for all with congenital bladder dysfunction, as detrusor and the sphincter function can change over time, often with silent and potentially preventable renal insult.

(Grade C)

TREATMENT AND OUTCOME

The primary goals of management are preservation of renal function and prevention of UTIs with later attainment of urinary continence in most.

Neuropathic bladder

15 With the vast majority of adolescent and adult SB patients performing CIC,[28] institution of CIC early in childhood may be prudent. There is controversy whether early initiation of CIC soon after birth results in better renal outcomes and a decreased need for bladder augmentation.[38, 39, 42]

Anticholinergic medications are frequently used to treat detrusor overactivity and reduced detrusor compliance [43, 44] with approximately half of adults with SB taking them.[28] Mirabegron, a ß3 agonist, may be used, but experience in NBD is limited.[45, 46]

For bladders refractory to anticholinergics, intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A is a non-surgical option.[47, 48] The effectiveness is better in bladders with detrusor overactivity compared to those with poor compliance.[49, 50] Neuromodulation, including intravesical electrical stimulation of the bladder,[51] sacral nerve stimulation,[52] transcutaneous neuromodulation,[53] and intradural somatic-to-autonomic nerve anastomosis[54, 55] have been reported in patients with SB but has to be considered experimental at this time. There are limited reports of urethral dilatation to improve bladder characteristics in highly selected patients.[56]

Vesicostomy can be useful in medically-refractory infants and young children, if the parents will not or cannot perform CIC.[57] In older patients who fail the above therapies, bladder augmentation or urinary diversion is an option.[58, 59] Augmentation cystoplasty is effective in increasing bladder capacity and lowering storage pressure as well as improving urinary continence.[60, 61] In rare situations with a unilateral non-functioning kidney with a dilated , ureterocystoplasty can be performed.[62, 63] Use of tissue-engineered autologous bladder tissue to avoid the complications associated with bowel interposition in enterocystoplasty remain experimental.[64, 65]

16 Continent cutaneous catheterizable channels (Mitrofanoff or Yang-Monti) are commonly created for patients who are unable to perform CIC per urethra. Though highly effective, the revision rate in long-term studies can be as high as 50-60%.[66, 67]

In patients with sphincter incompetence, pharmacologic therapy with α-adrenergic receptor agonists is rarely effective.[68] Surgical intervention is typically the only solution.[69-71]

Synthetic slings in girls with NBD have had poor track record and should not be used.[72]

Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) may obtain superior continence rates in up to 85% in well- selected patients and is the only surgical option that can preserve the ability to void spontaneously.[73] Due to its size, AUS is typically reserved for post-pubertal patients with good manual dexterity. CIC through a urethra with an AUS is possible with proper patient selection.[74]

However, these devices have the risk of cuff erosion or device infection as well as the mechanical failure/fluid leak; in a series of 32 children with mean follow up of 15 years, 41% had the device removed, and the remaining 19 patients underwent 34 revision surgeries.[75]

Bladder neck reconstruction in NBD is less successful than in bladder exstrophy.[76] After a failed bladder outlet procedure, bladder neck closure with a continent catheterizable stoma may be considered but should be considered as the option of last resort. Complications occur in one-third and include fistulae in up to 15% and an increased risk of bladder stones, bladder perforation and upper tract deterioration.[77, 78] In those who will not or cannot perform CIC, an incontinent urinary diversion (cutaneous vesicostomy or intestinal conduit) may be required.

Posterior urethral valves

17 Renal function often improves slightly in the first three years of life and is typically stable from age 3 to puberty. Following the onset of puberty, up to 50 % will develop renal failure. Nadir serum creatinine <0.7 mg/dL in the first year of life and increasing proteinuria can be predictive of later need for renal replacement therapy. [79]

Valve bladder (voiding dysfunction commonly encountered in PUV) has been well-described.[80,

81] Bladder functional outcomes in adult life have not been addressed well.[81-84] In boys with detrusor overactivity, anticholinergic medications may be beneficial,[83, 85] but with a low risk of reversible myogenic failure and worsening retention.[85, 86] Bladder emptying can be improved by timed and double voiding.[36, 87] α-blockers, such as terazosin and tamsulosin, may be helpful in boys with elevated PVR or straining to void.[88, 89] CIC may be necessary in those with high daytime PVR;[82, 90, 91] however, unlike NBD, boys with PUV typically have normal urethral sensation. In such cases, adequate bladder emptying may only be possible with a continent catheterizable channel.[82, 92] Some may require overnight catheter drainage in the setting of obligatory nocturnal polyuria.[37, 93]

Rarely, bladder augmentation may be required to manage valve bladders with reduced capacity and/or compliance.[94, 95] The need for augmentation prior to renal transplantation is controversial as the new kidney will often end the polyuria caused by the poor concentrating ability of the native kidneys, and bladder dynamics will subsequently improve.[96] Following transplantation, graft function needs to be closely monitored to be sure that the valve bladder dysfunction and compliance issues do not harm the kidney.[97]

18 Prune Belly Syndrome

Prior management with near universal surgical reconstruction to attempt to normalize urinary tract anatomy has evolved to one that is much less surgical. Double and timed voiding after toilet training has fewer complications than early total urinary reconstruction.[98, 99] CIC is an option in those with poor emptying – either per urethra or surgically created channel.[41, 100]. If the upper urinary tract deteriorates, surgical correction of VUR or massive ureteral dilation may be considered; however, complication rates are significant with post-operative ureteral obstruction in up to 40% and persistent VUR in 30% [101]

Abdominal wall reconstruction is also controversial.[101] Arguments for reconstruction include improvement of the abdominal muscular tone, improved bladder sensation, better efficiency of bladder emptying, and improved cosmesis.[102-104] Conversely, some boys do well with a non- surgical approach with a corset.[105, 106]

FOLLOW-UP SCHEDULE

Neuropathic bladder

EAU/ESPU guidelines recommend proactive treatment with CIC +/- anticholinergic medication starting in the first months of life.[107]

Lifelong follow-up is required with regular examination, renal bladder ultrasound, renal function monitoring by serum creatinine and/or cystatin C, blood pressure and urinalysis for proteinuria.

The need for regular urodynamic assessment in patients without changes in upper tracts, continence or UTI frequency is not well-delineated.[107] Following augmentation cystoplasty,

19 monitoring for metabolic acidosis and serum vitamin B12 deficiency and imaging to detect urolithiasis are also recommended. Routine cystoscopy for malignancy screening after augmentation is not effective,[108, 109] but cystoscopy should be performed in the setting of gross hematuria or recurrent UTI. (Grade C)

Posterior urethral valves and prune belly syndrome

Annual urologic follow-up is required for these boys through puberty with longer follow-up dependent on urinary symptoms and the degree of CKD. Evaluation should include examination, serum creatinine, determination of bladder function (by sonography or uroflow studies), and upper tract imaging. Urodynamics should be reserved for worsening incontinence, increasing frequency of UTIs, new , or worsening GFR. In cases with bladder augmentation or continent catheterizable channel, the follow-up is similar to those with NBD. (Grade C)

BLADDER EXSTROPHY-EPISPADIAS COMPLEX The techniques for management of BE have evolved tremendously since the first described neonatal bladder closure in 1885. The three primary approaches employed in the 21st century are: the modern staged repair,[110] the complete primary repair,[111] and the Kelly repair.[112]

Undoubtedly, children with BEEC undergo a number of subsequent reconstructive operations and often require further reconstruction in adulthood.[113]

The modern staged repair of BE begins with neonatal closure of the bladder, posterior urethra, abdominal wall and bony pelvis.[114] Closure may be delayed if the bladder template is too small or rigid to allow spherical closure.[115] The second stage in boys to correct the epispadias usually

20 occurs at 6-12 months of age. The next step to correct VUR and attain continence by bladder neck reconstruction is typically performed usually at least 5 years of age.

Complete primary repair of exstrophy combines bladder closure with epispadias repair and bladder neck reconstruction in a single procedure.[111, 116] Over the past few years, some are moving to delaying primary repair when the child beyond the newborn period.

The Kelly technique is a staged approach with neonatal closure of the bladder dome and inguinal hernia repair without osteotomies.[112, 117] The second stage at 3-6 months of age involves radical mobilization of soft tissue, including the pelvic floor muscles, to create the sphincteric complex with simultaneous proximal urethra closure. In males, penile lengthening occurs at this stage, and the urethra is left at the penoscrotal junction. Advancement of the urethral meatus to the glans is performed around three years of age.

Evaluation and Follow-up

Long term BEEC management focuses on preservation of renal function, attainment of urinary continence, and genital reconstruction for satisfactory sexual function. Renal function is paramount but can be compromised by urinary tract reconstruction; fortunately, the rates of CKD have decreased with refinements in surgical techniques.[118] A full understanding of the closure technique utilized are important, and surgical records should be obtained if not known. No set guidelines exist, but most recommend annual renal/bladder ultrasound and serum creatinine.

21 Worsening renal function may result from recurrent UTI, ureteral or urethral obstruction, VUR

(primary or secondary) or high bladder storage pressures.[118]

Urinary continence has a substantial impact upon quality of life and should be regularly assessed.

Social continence is typically defined as the ability to stay dry for 3 hours.[110, 113, 119] Most patients require some type of bladder neck procedure to create adequate outlet resistance while allowing voiding per urethra. Those that are unable to adequately empty their bladders by voiding may require CIC to achieve dryness. Catheterization through the reconstructed urethra may not be possible for all, and a continent catheterizable channel may be required. For some, continence may only be achieved by bladder neck closure.

Surveillance for tumor formation later in life is particularly an issue for BEEC patients.[120] In the adult exstrophy population alone, it has been demonstrated that the risk of malignancy is

17.5%, 700 times greater than the healthy population, independent of the bladder reconstruction status.[121, 122] Transitional cell, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell bladder cancers have all occurred in exstrophy bladders. Evolving reconstructive techniques and better counseling for carcinogen avoidance (e.g., tobacco) may reduce risk in the future. [120] Surveillance for bladder tumors is complicated in this population given their reconstructed urethras are often of small caliber and make cystoscopy +/- biopsy difficult in adult life.

Genital issues in both males and females with BEEC arise in adolescence. The penis is shorter and wider in BEEC often requiring lengthening procedures to allow intercourse.[123, 124] Some

22 males will require secondary genitoplasty for penile lengthening;[125] whereas, neophallus creation may be necessary in the most severe cases.[126] Vaginal stenosis is common with many females needing surgery to allow tampon use and to engage in intercourse.[127]

Incontinence and concerns about genital appearance and function can amplify the pre-existing anxiety problems common to many children with chronic medical problems, and counselling by sexual therapists and mental health professionals should be encouraged.[128]

Complications and issues into adulthood

Stones are common in patients with bowel used in urinary reconstruction as mucus can be a nidus for mineral precipitation.[129] Retained sutures in the urinary tract can be another nidus for stone formation in this population and must be addressed surgically. Patients should be counseled to stay well-hydrated and perform regular generous bladder irrigation to remove mucus. Regular monitoring with renal bladder ultrasound is recommended for stone detection. If stones do occur, access to the bladder and may be compromised by prior surgical reconstruction, and percutaneous approaches may be required.

Evaluation of incontinence can be complicated in BEEC patients. Typically, the patient must be compliant with a strict bladder emptying regimen, as well as additional measures such as double voiding or CIC. Imaging may help demonstrate adequate emptying after bladder neck reconstruction. Patients reporting changes in continence or shortening of their dry intervals could also be experiencing worsening detrusor compliance. Urodynamic evaluation must be available, and those with poor capacity and/or detrusor compliance may need anticholinergic medication,

23 intradetrusor botulinumtoxin injection, or bladder augmentation. Rather unique to BEEC patients, incontinence can also result from vesicocutaneous or urethrocutaneous fistulae which require closure and coverage with a muscle flap.[130, 131]

Sexual function and fertility are complex in the BE population. Vaginal stenosis may complicate intercourse, conception and delivery.[132, 133] Males usually have normal spermatogenesis but may require assisted reproductive technology, due to retrograde ejaculation or iatrogenic ejaculatory duct obstruction.[132, 134, 135] CE patients present even greater challenges. Males may be have neurogenic erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction,[136] and females typically have a high incidence of Müllerian anomalies with duplicated vagina and as well as separated mons, labia, and clitoris.[137]

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of children and adolescents with BEEC is critical as they move towards adulthood to ensure the preservation of renal function and to optimize quality of life. As adults, these patients require care by urologists with sub-specialty experience.

For females, conception and delivery may require genetic specialists, reconstructive gynecologists/urologists, infertility specialists, and high-risk obstetricians, along with shared urologic care during pregnancy and delivery. (Level C)

24 GENITOURINARY ANOMALIES AFFECTING THE FEMALE

REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM

In the absence of Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS), the Müllerian ducts fuse and develop into the uterus, fallopian tube, and upper vagina. Their proximity to the Wolffian ducts are believed to be responsible for the common association of Müllerian duct anomalies with ureteral/renal anomalies.[138] The vaginal plate is formed as the caudal end of the ducts contact the urogenital sinus and promote proliferation of the sinovaginal bulbs. Without androgens, the external genitalia become distinctly female as the genital tubercle elongates into the clitoris, the urogenital folds develop into the labia minora, and the labioscrotal swellings become the labia majora.

Müllerian anomalies are relatively common, affecting approximately 5.5% of females. [139]

They can result from abnormalities of Müllerian duct development (vaginal atresia, absence of uterus), fusion (didelphys, septate) or migration (persistent urogenital sinus.) Transverse vaginal septum results from failure of vertical vaginal fusion and can be occur at any level, but most commonly in the upper 1/3 of the vagina. Classification is by distance from the hymen: low (<

3 cm), mid (3-6 cm), and high (> 6 cm). Septa typically present during adolescence with progressive episodic abdomino-pelvic pain and primary amenorrhea due to obstructed menstruation.[140] Obstructed Hemi-vagina Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis (OHVIRA) is defined by uterine didelphys, obstructed hemi-vagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (from failed ipsilateral

Wolffian duct development.) With this anomaly, adolescents can present with regular or irregular periods as well as episodic abdomino-pelvic pain.[141] Mayer Rokitansky Kuster

Hauser Syndrome (MRKH) is defined by the absence of a normal uterus and vagina in a 46,XX

25 female and is caused by inadequate Müllerian development. Affected girls typically present with primary amenorrhea; examination reveals a shallow vaginal pouch with normal secondary sex characteristics. Associated urinary tract anomalies occur in 30-40% of cases.[142]

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) results from autosomal recessive endocrinopathies of adrenal cortisol synthesis. 21-hydroxylase deficiency is the most common, accounting for up to

90% of cases.[143] The classic form is simply virilizing with normal aldosterone biosynthesis; whereas, the salt-wasting form involves impaired aldosterone production. Virilzation can begin in the seven week of gestation as the 46,XX fetus from exposure to systemic adrenal androgens and can result in “ambiguous genitalia” with an enlarged clitoris, rugated and fused labia majora, and common urogenital sinus. The Prader scale classifies the variable presentation from stage 1

(phenotypic female with mild clitoromegaly) to stage 5 (phenotypic male). The length of the common urogenital sinus from the vagina-urethral junction to the external meatus is also dependent on the degree of virilization. Without testicular MIS, the uterus, upper vagina, and fallopian tubes form normally, so fertility is usually preserved. This differentiates CAH from other types of DSD, many of which have no reproductive potential.

It should be noted that reconstructive surgery was previously performed in infancy and childhood, but changing social paradigms related to gender assignment and surgery in more recent years has resulted in characterization of these anomalies in childhood, but often deferred surgical reconstruction until the patient is able to participate in surgical decision-making. The impact of this paradigm shift on cosmetic, functional, and

26 psychologic outcomes for patients affected by conditions that result in ambiguous genitalia will not be borne out for decades.[144]

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

Mullerian anomalies may be noted at birth or can present at puberty or early adult life.

Experienced gynecological management is critical to achieving successful cosmetic and functional outcomes. Co-management with urologists is required when the urinary tract is also involved. A multidisciplinary team, including psychologists and endocrinologists, contribute to improved physical and mental health outcomes. (Grade C)

FOLLOW-UP OF HYPOSPADIAS IN CHILDHOOD AND

ADOLESCENCE

The goals of hypospadias management remain constant with age: 1) satisfactory urinary stream;

2) a sufficient straight penis with a distal meatus to allow satisfactory sexual function and fertility, and 3) satisfactory penile appearance.

No guidelines exist regarding optimal follow-up following hypospadias repair. 70-90% of cases are distal,[145] and surgical outcomes are typically good for distal cases. Thus, universal prolonged follow-up throughout childhood may be unnecessary after repair of uncomplicated distal hypospadias. Self-esteem may be affected by repeated urologist visits with little chance of

27 detecting complications affecting urinary or sexual function. At least 80% of complications occur in the first year following hypospadias repair, and it has been estimated that prolonged follow-up would needed in 14 boys to detect each complication.[146] Over 70% of urethrocutaneous fistulae, the most common complication, are diagnosed within the first year after surgery.[147] Delayed fistulas are typically small and have obvious symptoms, further limiting the utility of universal prolonged follow-up. More complicated distal cases and most proximal cases have much higher risks of complications in both short term and long term. Long and Canning [144] noted an overall complication of 17% in a ten year series of hypospadias repairs, but the rate was 45% for the proximal cases.[148] Therefore, re-evaluation in adolescence is recommended due to the relatively higher risks of functional and psychological suboptimal results.[149]

Urethral obstruction is a more worrisome complication. Calibration of the neo-urethra in the clinic should be reserved for infants with obstructive voiding symptoms and/or small meatus, and it should be performed under sedation or anesthesia in older boys.[150] Uroflowmetry can be useful in symptomatic toilet trained boys but is likely not routinely indicated. Because flow rates usually improve at puberty, watchful watching is encouraged for most boys with obstructive symptoms.[151, 152]

In terms of sexual function, adolescent boys with history of proximal hypospadias repair have similar age for sexual debut and rates of sexual activity as normal controls and those with history of distal hypospadias repair, with few reporting erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction.[153]

Proximal hypospadias is associated with greater concerns about penile length as well as lower

28 scores for orgasmic and ejaculatory function, but not erectile function.[154] Penile perception scores also show decreased satisfaction among those with more proximal hypospadias..[155]

Recommendation:

Following successful distal hypospadias repair, routine follow-up can likely be stopped 6-12 months post-operatively, but parents should be counselled regarding obstructive voiding symptoms or a second or abnormal stream. There is a greater risk of complications and associated psychologic concern after proximal hypospadias repair, so continued follow up during childhood and through puberty is reasonable. (Grade B)

29 Authors’ Contributions

Wiener – Project development; manuscript writing

Huck - manuscript writing

Blais - manuscript writing

Rickard - manuscript writing

Lorenzo - manuscript writing

Di Carlo - manuscript writing

Mueller - manuscript writing

Stein - manuscript writing

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights This is a review that contains no original research. We assume that the referenced studies were approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and were performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent: This is a review that contains no original research. We assume that the referenced studies were performed with informed consent obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

30 References:

1. Austin, P.F., et al., The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: Update report from the standardization committee of the International Children's Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn, 2016. 35(4): p. 471-81. 2. Young, H.H., W.A. Frontz, and J.C. Baldwin, Congenital obstruction of the posterior urethra. J Urol, 1919. 3: p. 289-365. 3. Dewan, P.A., et al., Endoscopic reappraisal of the morphology of congenital obstruction of the posterior urethra. Br J Urol, 1992. 70(4): p. 439-44. 4. Routh, J.C., et al., Contemporary epidemiology and characterization of newborn males with prune belly syndrome. Urology, 2010. 76(1): p. 44-8. 5. Woodard, J.R., Prune-belly Syndrome, in Clinical Pediatric Urology, K.L. Kelalis PP, Belman AB, Editor. 1985, W. B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia. p. 805-824. 6. Eeg, K.R. and A.E. Khoury, The exstrophy-epispadias complex. Curr Urol Rep, 2008. 9(2): p. 158- 64. 7. Marshall, V.F., Meucke EC, Congenital Abnormalities of the Bladder, in Hanbuch der Urologie, D.V. Alken CE, Goodwin WE, Weyrauch HM, Wildbolz E, Editor. 1968, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. p. 165-223. 8. Cerniglia, F.R., Jr., D.R. Roth, and E.T. Gonzales, Jr., Covered exstrophy and visceral sequestration in a male newborn: case report. J Urol, 1989. 141(4): p. 903-4. 9. Bhatnagar, S., Anorectal malformations (part 1). J Neonatal Surg, 2015. 4(1): p. 7. 10. Gangopadhyay, A.N. and V. Pandey, Anorectal malformations. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, 2015. 20(1): p. 10-5. 11. Holschneider, A., et al., Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg, 2005. 40(10): p. 1521-6. 12. Hughes, I.A., Disorders of sex development: a new definition and classification. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2008. 22(1): p. 119-34. 13. T, H.A., Hypospadias Surgery. 2004, Berlin: Springer Verlag. 14. Keays, M.A. and S. Dave, Current hypospadias management: Diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patient-centred outcomes. Can Urol Assoc J, 2017. 11(1-2Suppl1): p. S48-s53. 15. Orkiszewski, M., A standardized classification of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol, 2012. 8(4): p. 410- 4. 16. Merriman, L.S., et al., The GMS hypospadias score: assessment of inter-observer reliability and correlation with post-operative complications. J Pediatr Urol, 2013. 9(6 Pt A): p. 707-12. 17. Springer, A., Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery - a review. Front Pediatr, 2014. 2: p. 2. 18. Davis, D., Epispadias in females and its surgical treatment. . Surgery Gynecology Obstetrics, 1928. 47: p. 680-696. 19. Bauer, S.B., Neurogenic bladder: Etiology and assessment. Pediatric Nephrology, 2008. 23(4): p. 541-551. 20. McGuire, E.J., J.R. Woodside, and T.A. Borden, Upper urinary tract deterioration in patients with myelodysplasia and detrusor hypertonia: a followup study. J Urol, 1983. 129(4): p. 823-6. 21. Sillen, U., et al., Development of the urodynamic pattern in infants with myelomeningocele. Br J Urol, 1996. 78(4): p. 596-601. 22. Hopps, C.V. and K.A. Kropp, Preservation of renal function in children with myelomeningocele managed with basic newborn evaluation and close followup. J Urol, 2003. 169(1): p. 305-8.

31 23. Sawin KJ, L.T., Ward E, Thibadeau J, Schechter MS, Soe MM, Walker W, The National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: profile of a large cohort of participants from the first 10 clinics. J Pediatr 2015. 166(2): p. 444-450. 24. Veenboer, P.W., et al., Upper and Lower Urinary Tract Outcomes in Adult Myelomeningocele Patients: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 2012. 7 (10) (no pagination)(e48399). 25. Okafor, H.U., S.O. Ekenze, and S.N. Uwaezuoke, Posterior urethral valves: Determinants of outcome in a developing country. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2013. 49(2): p. 115- 119. 26. Woodhouse, C.R., Posterior urethral valves, in Adolescent Urology, C.R. Woodhouse, Editor. 2015, Wiley Blackwell: UK. p. 167-176. 27. Hennus, P.M.L., et al., A systematic review on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures for infravesical obstruction in boys. PLoS ONE, 2014. 9(2): p. e85474. 28. Wiener, J.S., et al., Bladder Management and Continence Outcomes in Adults with Spina Bifida: Results from the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry, 2009 to 2015. J Urol, 2018. 200(1): p. 187-194. 29. Peters, C.A., et al., The urodynamic consequences of posterior urethral valves. J Urol, 1990. 144(1): p. 122-6. 30. De Gennaro, M., et al., The changing urodynamic pattern from infancy to adolescence in boys with posterior urethral valves. BJU Int, 2000. 85(9): p. 1104-8. 31. Ghanem, M.A., et al., Long-term bladder dysfunction and renal function in boys with posterior urethral valves based on urodynamic findings. J Urol, 2004. 171(6 Pt 1): p. 2409-12. 32. Glassberg, K.I., The valve bladder syndrome: 20 years later. J Urol, 2001. 166(4): p. 1406-14. 33. Holmdahl, G., et al., The changing urodynamic pattern in valve bladders during infancy. J Urol, 1995. 153(2): p. 463-7. 34. Holmdahl, G., et al., Bladder dysfunction in boys with posterior urethral valves before and after puberty. J Urol, 1996. 155(2): p. 694-8. 35. De Gennaro, M., et al., Detrusor hypocontractility in children with posterior urethral valves arises before puberty. Br J Urol, 1998. 81 Suppl 3: p. 81-5. 36. De Gennaro, M., et al., Detrusor hypocontractility evolution in boys with posterior urethral valves detected by pressure flow analysis. J Urol, 2001. 165(6 Pt 2): p. 2248-52. 37. Koff, S.A., K.H. Mutabagani, and V.R. Jayanthi, The valve bladder syndrome: pathophysiology and treatment with nocturnal bladder emptying. J Urol, 2002. 167(1): p. 291-7. 38. Kaefer, M., et al., Improved bladder function after prophylactic treatment of the high risk neurogenic bladder in newborns with myelomentingocele. J Urol, 1999. 162(3 Pt 2): p. 1068-71. 39. Dik, P., et al., Early start to therapy preserves kidney function in spina bifida patients. Eur Urol, 2006. 49(5): p. 908-13. 40. Bellah, R.D., L.J. States, and J.W. Duckett, Pseudoprune-Belly syndrome: imaging findings and clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996. 167(6): p. 1389-93. 41. Kinahan, T.J., et al., The efficiency of bladder emptying in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol, 1992. 148(2 Pt 2): p. 600-3. 42. Park, J.M., Early reduction of mechanical load of the bladder improves compliance: experimental and clinical observations. . Dialogues in Pediatric Urology 2000. 23: p. 6-7. 43. Andersson, K.E., Pharmacotherapy of the overactive bladder. Discov Med, 2009. 8(42): p. 118- 24. 44. Rawashdeh, Y.F., et al., International children's continence society's recommendations for therapeutic intervention in congenital neuropathic bladder and bowel dysfunction in children. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2012. 31(5): p. 615-620.

32 45. Krhut, J., et al., Efficacy and safety of mirabegron for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity-Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurourol Urodyn, 2018. 37(7): p. 2226-2233. 46. Welk, B., et al., A pilot randomized-controlled trial of the urodynamic efficacy of mirabegron for patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn, 2018. 47. Hascoet, J., et al., Outcomes of intra-detrusor injections of botulinum toxin in patients with spina bifida: A systematic review. Neurourology and Urodynamics., 2016. 48. Sager, C., et al., Pharmacotherapy in pediatric neurogenic bladder intravesical botulinum toxin type a. Isrn Urology Print, 2012. 2012: p. 763159. 49. Tiryaki, S., et al., Botulinum injection is useless on fibrotic neuropathic bladders. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2015. 11(1): p. 27.e1-27.e4. 50. Horst, M., et al., Repeated Botulinum-A toxin injection in the treatment of neuropathic bladder dysfunction and poor bladder compliance in children with myelomeningocele. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2011. 30(8): p. 1546-1549. 51. Hagerty, J.A., I. Richards, and W.E. Kaplan, Intravesical Electrotherapy for Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction: A 22-Year Experience. Journal of Urology, 2007. 178(4 SUPPLEMENT): p. 1680-1683. 52. Lansen-Koch, S.M.P., et al., Sacral nerve modulation for defaecation and micturition disorders in patients with spina bifida. Colorectal Disease, 2012. 14(4): p. 508-514. 53. Capitanucci, M.L., et al., Long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for different types of lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. The Journal of urology, 2009. 182(4 Suppl): p. 2056-2061. 54. Xiao, C.G., et al., An artificial somatic-central nervous system-autonomic reflex pathway for controllable micturition after spinal cord injury: preliminary results in 15 patients. J Urol, 2003. 170(4 Pt 1): p. 1237-41. 55. Tuite, G.F., et al., Urological Outcome of the Xiao Procedure in Children with Myelomeningocele and Lipomyelomeningocele Undergoing Spinal Cord Detethering. Journal of Urology, 2016. 196(6): p. 1735-1740. 56. Wan, J., The role of urethral dilation in managing pediatric neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Current Urology Reports, 2009. 10(2): p. 153-158. 57. Lee, M.W. and S.P. Greenfield, Intractable high-pressure bladder in female infants with spina bifida: clinical characteristics and use of vesicostomy. Urology, 2005. 65(3): p. 568-71. 58. Stein, R., A. Schroder, and J.W. Thuroff, Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in patients with neurogenic bladder: Surgical considerations. J Pediatr Urol, 2012. 8(2): p. 153-61. 59. Stein, R., L. Wessel, and M.S. Michel, [Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in children and adolescents]. Urologe A, 2016. 55(1): p. 44-52. 60. Herschorn, S. and R.J. Hewitt, Patient perspective of long-term outcome of augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder. Urology, 1998. 52(4): p. 672-8. 61. Medel, R., et al., Urinary continence outcome after augmentation ileocystoplasty as a single surgical procedure in patients with myelodysplasia. J Urol, 2002. 168(4 Pt 2): p. 1849-52. 62. Youssif, M., et al., Augmentation ureterocystoplasty in boys with valve bladder syndrome. J Pediatr Urol, 2007. 3(6): p. 433-7. 63. Husmann, D.A., et al., Ureterocystoplasty: indications for a successful augmentation. J Urol, 2004. 171(1): p. 376-80. 64. Joseph, D.B., et al., Autologous cell seeded biodegradable scaffold for augmentation cystoplasty: Phase II study in children and adolescents with spina bifida. Journal of Urology, 2014. 191(5): p. 1389-1394. 65. Atala, A., et al., Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet, 2006. 367(9518): p. 1241-6.

33 66. Deuker, M., et al., Long-term outcome after urinary diversion using the ileocecal segment in children and adolescents: Complications of the efferent segment. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2016. 12(4): p. 247.e1-247.e7. 67. Faure, A., et al., Bladder continent catheterizable conduit (the Mitrofanoff procedure): Long-term issues that should not be underestimated. Journal of Pediatric Surgery., 2016. 11. 68. MacLellan DL, B.S., Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Lower Urinary Tract in Children, in Campbell-Walsh Urology, K.L. Wein AJ, Partin AW, Peters CA, Editor. 2016, Elsevier: Philadelphia. p. 3272-3296. 69. Kryger, J.V., R. Gonzalez, and J.S. Barthold, Surgical management of in children with neurogenic sphincteric incompetence. J Urol, 2000. 163(1): p. 256-63. 70. Castellan, M., et al., Bladder neck sling for treatment of neurogenic incontinence in children with augmentation cystoplasty: long-term followup. J Urol, 2005. 173(6): p. 2128-31; discussion 2131. 71. Chrzan, R., et al., Sling suspension of the bladder neck for pediatric urinary incontinence. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2009. 5(2): p. 82-86. 72. Pannek, J., P. Bartel, and K. Gocking, Clinical usefulness of the transobturator sub-urethral tape in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in female patients with spinal cord lesion. J Spinal Cord Med, 2012. 35(2): p. 102-6. 73. Kryger, J.V., et al., The outcome of artificial urinary sphincter placement after a mean 15-year follow-up in a paediatric population. BJU Int, 1999. 83(9): p. 1026-31. 74. Simeoni, J., et al., Artificial urinary sphincter implantation for neurogenic bladder: a multi- institutional study in 107 children. Br J Urol, 1996. 78(2): p. 287-93. 75. Kryger, J.V., G. Leverson, and R. Gonzalez, Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincters in children are independent of age at implantation. J Urol, 2001. 165(6 Pt 2): p. 2377-9. 76. Szymanski, K.M., et al., Long-term outcomes of the Kropp and Salle urethral lengthening bladder neck reconstruction procedures. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2016. 12(6): p. 403.e1-403.e7. 77. Shpall, A.I. and D.A. Ginsberg, Bladder neck closure with lower urinary tract reconstruction: technique and long-term followup. J Urol, 2004. 172(6 Pt 1): p. 2296-9. 78. Landau, E.H., et al., Bladder neck closure in children: a decade of followup. The Journal of urology, 2009. 182(4 Suppl): p. 1797-1801. 79. McLeod, D.J., et al., Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Catheterization Risk in Posterior Urethral Valves. Pediatrics, 2019. 143(3). 80. Jalkanen, J., et al., Controlled Outcomes for Achievement of Urinary Continence among Boys Treated for Posterior Urethral Valves. Journal of Urology, 2016. 196(1): p. 213-218. 81. Smith, G.H., et al., The long-term outcome of posterior urethral valves treated with primary valve ablation and observation. J Urol, 1996. 155(5): p. 1730-4. 82. Holmdahl, G., et al., Does treatment with clean intermittent catheterization in boys with posterior urethral valves affect bladder and renal function? J Urol, 2003. 170(4 Pt 2): p. 1681-5; discussion 1685. 83. Puri, A., et al., Initial surgical treatment as a determinant of bladder dysfunction in posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Surg Int, 2002. 18(5-6): p. 438-43. 84. Lopez Pereira, P., et al., Long-term bladder function, fertility and sexual function in patients with posterior urethral valves treated in infancy. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2013. 9(1): p. 38-41. 85. Kim, Y.H., et al., Management of posterior urethral valves on the basis of urodynamic findings. J Urol, 1997. 158(3 Pt 2): p. 1011-6. 86. Misseri, R., et al., Myogenic failure in posterior urethral valve disease: real or imagined? J Urol, 2002. 168(4 Pt 2): p. 1844-8; discussion 1848. 87. Duckett, J.W., Are 'valve bladders' congenital or iatrogenic? Br J Urol, 1997. 79(2): p. 271-5.

34 88. Abraham, M.K., et al., Role of alpha adrenergic blocker in the management of posterior urethral valves. Pediatric Surgery International, 2009. 25(12): p. 1113-1115. 89. Skenazy, J. and M. Horowitz, Alpha adrenergic blockade in neonates with posterior urethral valves. Journal of Urology, 2012. 187(4): p. e654. 90. Holmdahl, G., Bladder dysfunction in boys with posterior urethral valves. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, 1997. 188: p. 1-36. 91. Neel, K.F., Feasibility and outcome of clean intermittent catheterization for children with sensate urethra. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2010. 4(6): p. 403-5. 92. King, T., R. Coleman, and K. Parashar, Mitrofanoff for valve bladder syndrome: Effect on urinary tract and renal function. Journal of Urology, 2014. 191(5 SUPPL): p. 1517-1522. 93. Nguyen, M.T., et al., Overnight catheter drainage in children with poorly compliant bladders improves post-obstructive diuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol, 2005. 174(4 Pt 2): p. 1633-6; discussion 1636. 94. Baka-Ostrowska, M., Bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion in boys with posterior urethral valves. Central European journal of urology, 2011. 64(4): p. 237-9. 95. Youssif, M., et al., Augmentation ureterocystoplasty in boys with valve bladder syndrome. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2007. 3(6): p. 433-437. 96. Jesus, L.E. and J.L. Pippi Salle, Pre-transplant management of valve bladder: a critical literature review. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11(1): p. 5-11. 97. Fine, M.S., et al., Posterior urethral valve treatments and outcomes in children receiving kidney transplants. J Urol, 2011. 185(6 Suppl): p. 2507-11. 98. Bukowski, T.P. and A.D. Perlmutter, Reduction cystoplasty in the prune belly syndrome: a long- term followup. J Urol, 1994. 152(6 Pt 1): p. 2113-6. 99. Woodhouse, C.R., M.J. Kellett, and D.I. Williams, Minimal surgical interference in the prune belly syndrome. Br J Urol, 1979. 51(6): p. 475-80. 100. Lopes, R.I., et al., 27 years of experience with the comprehensive surgical treatment of prune belly syndrome. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11(5): p. 276 e1-7. 101. Hassett, S., G.H. Smith, and A.J. Holland, Prune belly syndrome. Pediatr Surg Int, 2012. 28(3): p. 219-28. 102. Smith, C.A., et al., Voiding function in patients with the prune-belly syndrome after Monfort abdominoplasty. J Urol, 1998. 159(5): p. 1675-9. 103. Furness, P.D., 3rd, et al., The prune-belly syndrome: a new and simplified technique of abdominal wall reconstruction. J Urol, 1998. 160(3 Pt 2): p. 1195-7; discussion 1216. 104. Monfort, G., et al., A novel technique for reconstruction of the abdominal wall in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol, 1991. 146(2 ( Pt 2)): p. 639-40. 105. Satar, M., et al., Corset Usage for Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Problems in a Newborn with Prune Belly Syndrome. Indian J Pediatr, 2016. 83(7): p. 717-9. 106. Woodhouse, C.R., P.G. Ransley, and D. Innes-Williams, Prune belly syndrome--report of 47 cases. Arch Dis Child, 1982. 57(11): p. 856-9. 107. Radmayr, C., et al. EAU/ESPU Paeditric Urology Guidelines. http://uroweb.org/guideline/paediatric-urology/ 2018. 108. Higuchi, T.T., et al., Augmentation cystoplasty and risk of neoplasia: fact, fiction and controversy. The Journal of urology, 2010. 184(6): p. 2492-6. 109. Kokorowski, P.J., et al., Screening for malignancy after augmentation cystoplasty in children with spina bifida: A decision analysis. Journal of Urology, 2011. 186(4): p. 1437-1443. 110. Gearhart, J.P. and R.D. Jeffs, State-of-the-art reconstructive surgery for bladder exstrophy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Am J Dis Child, 1989. 143(12): p. 1475-8.

35 111. Grady, R.W., M.C. Carr, and M.E. Mitchell, Complete primary closure of bladder exstrophy. Epispadias and bladder exstrophy repair. Urol Clin North Am, 1999. 26(1): p. 95-109, viii. 112. Jarzebowski, A.C., et al., The Kelly technique of bladder exstrophy repair: continence, cosmesis and pelvic organ prolapse outcomes. J Urol, 2009. 182(4 Suppl): p. 1802-6. 113. Baird, A.D., D. Frimberger, and J.P. Gearhart, Reconstructive lower urinary tract surgery in incontinent adolescents with exstrophy/epispadias complex. Urology, 2005. 66(3): p. 636-40. 114. Baird, A.D., C.P. Nelson, and J.P. Gearhart, Modern staged repair of bladder exstrophy: a contemporary series. J Pediatr Urol, 2007. 3(4): p. 311-5. 115. Di Carlo, H.N., et al., The inadequate bladder template: Its effect on outcomes in classic bladder exstrophy. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 116. Grady, R.W. and M.E. Mitchell, Complete primary repair of exstrophy. J Urol, 1999. 162(4): p. 1415-20. 117. Leclair, M.D., et al., One-stage combined delayed bladder closure with Kelly radical soft-tissue mobilization in bladder exstrophy: preliminary results. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 118. Schaeffer, A.J., et al., Preservation of renal function in the modern staged repair of classic bladder exstrophy. J Pediatr Urol, 2013. 9(2): p. 169-73. 119. Gargollo, P., et al., Bladder neck reconstruction is often necessary after complete primary repair of exstrophy. J Urol, 2011. 185(6 Suppl): p. 2563-71. 120. Husmann, D.A. and S.R. Rathbun, Long-term follow up of enteric bladder augmentations: the risk for malignancy. J Pediatr Urol, 2008. 4(5): p. 381-5; discussion 386. 121. Gearhart, J.P., Neoplasia in adult exstrophy patients. BJU Int, 2001. 88(6): p. 647-8. 122. Smeulders, N. and C.R. Woodhouse, Neoplasia in adult exstrophy patients. BJU Int, 2001. 87(7): p. 623-8. 123. Silver, R.I., et al., Penile length in adulthood after exstrophy reconstruction. J Urol, 1997. 157(3): p. 999-1003. 124. Woodhouse, C.R. and M.J. Kellett, Anatomy of the penis and its deformities in exstrophy and epispadias. J Urol, 1984. 132(6): p. 1122-4. 125. VanderBrink, B.A., J.A. Stock, and M.K. Hanna, Esthetic outcomes of genitoplasty in males born with bladder exstrophy and epispadias. J Urol, 2007. 178(4 Pt 2): p. 1606-10; discussion 1610. 126. Massanyi, E.Z., et al., Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty for penile inadequacy in patients with exstrophy. J Urol, 2013. 190(4 Suppl): p. 1577-82. 127. Cervellione, R.M., et al., Vaginoplasty in the female exstrophy population: Outcomes and complications. J Pediatr Urol, 2010. 6(6): p. 595-9. 128. Reiner, W.G. and J.P. Gearhart, Anxiety disorders in children with epispadias-exstrophy. Urology, 2006. 68(1): p. 172-4. 129. Kisku, S., et al., Bladder calculi in the augmented bladder: a follow-up study of 160 children and adolescents. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11(2): p. 66 e1-6. 130. Friedlander, D.A., et al., Repair of Vesicocutaneous and Urethrocutaneous Fistulae with Rectus Muscle Flap in a Bladder Exstrophy Patient. Urol Case Rep, 2017. 13: p. 42-44. 131. McDonald, M.W., et al., Repair of vesicocutaneous fistula by rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Br J Urol, 1991. 67(4): p. 445. 132. Reynaud, N., et al., Male Sexuality, Fertility, and Urinary Continence in Bladder Exstrophy- Epispadias Complex. J Sex Med, 2018. 15(3): p. 314-323. 133. Rubenwolf, P., et al., Sexual Function and Fertility of Women with Classic Bladder Exstrophy and Continent Urinary Diversion. J Urol, 2016. 196(1): p. 140-5. 134. D'Hauwers, K.W., W.F. Feitz, and J.A. Kremer, Bladder exstrophy and male fertility: pregnancies after ICSI with ejaculated or epididymal sperm. Fertil Steril, 2008. 89(2): p. 387-9.

36 135. Salem, H.K. and M. Eisa, Long-term follow-up (18-35 years) of male patients with history of bladder exstrophy (BE) repair in childhood: erectile function and fertility potential outcome. J Sex Med, 2012. 9(5): p. 1466-72. 136. Schober, J.M., et al., The ultimate challenge of cloacal exstrophy. J Urol, 2002. 167(1): p. 300-4. 137. Suson, K.D., et al., Complexities of Mullerian Anatomy in 46XX Cloacal Exstrophy Patients. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2016. 29(5): p. 424-428. 138. Marshall, F.F. and D.S. Beisel, The association of uterine and renal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol, 1978. 51(5): p. 559-62. 139. Chan, Y.Y., et al., The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update, 2011. 17(6): p. 761-71. 140. Williams, C.E., et al., Transverse vaginal septae: management and long-term outcomes. BJOG, 2014. 121(13): p. 1653-8. 141. Fedele, L., et al., Double uterus with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis: pelvic anatomic variants in 87 cases. Hum Reprod, 2013. 28(6): p. 1580-3. 142. Oppelt, P., et al., Female genital malformations and their associated abnormalities. Fertil Steril, 2007. 87(2): p. 335-42. 143. Speiser, P.W. and P.C. White, Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. N Engl J Med, 2003. 349(8): p. 776-88. 144. Anderson, S., Disorders of Sexual Differentiation: Ethical Considerations Surrounding Early Cosmetic Genital Surgery. Pediatr Nurs, 2015. 41(4): p. 176-86. 145. van der Horst, H.J. and L.L. de Wall, Hypospadias, all there is to know. Eur J Pediatr, 2017. 176(4): p. 435-441. 146. Snodgrass, W., C. Villanueva, and N.C. Bush, Duration of follow-up to diagnose hypospadias urethroplasty complications. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10(2): p. 208-11. 147. Wood, H.M., et al., Timing of the Presentation of Urethrocutaneous Fistulas After Hypospadias Repair in Pediatric Patients. The Journal of Urology, 2008. 180(4, Supplement): p. 1753-1756. 148. Long, C.J. and D.A. Canning, Hypospadias: Are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias? J Pediatr Urol, 2016. 12(4): p. 196.e1-5. 149. Wood, D., et al., Lifelong Congenital Urology: The Challenges for Patients and Surgeons. Eur Urol, 2019. 75(6): p. 1001-1007. 150. Snodgrass, W., Bush NC, Hypospadias, in Campbell-Walsh Urology, K.L. Wein AJ, Partin AW, Peters CA, Editor. 2016, Elsevier: Philadelphia. p. 3399-3429. 151. Hueber, P.-A., et al., Long-term functional outcomes of distal hypospadias repair: A single center retrospective comparative study of TIPs, Mathieu and MAGPI. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2015. 11(2): p. 68.e1-68.e7. 152. Hueber, P.-A., et al., Long-term functional outcomes after penoscrotal hypospadias repair: A retrospective comparative study of proximal TIP, Onlay, and Duckett. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2016. 12(4): p. 198.e1-198.e6. 153. Andersson, M., et al., Psychosocial and Sexual Outcomes in Adolescents following Surgery for Proximal Hypospadias in Childhood. The Journal of Urology, 2018. 154. Rynja, S.P., et al., Proximal hypospadias treated with a transverse preputial island tube: long‐ term functional, sexual, and cosmetic outcomes. BJU International, 2018. 122(3): p. 463-471. 155. Ortqvist, L., et al., Long-term followup of men born with hypospadias: urological and cosmetic results. J Urol, 2015. 193(3): p. 975-81.

37