June 2021 Board Meeting Materials

Home , Templeton Gap

PPRTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA* Wednesday June 9, 2021 – 1:30 p.m. PPACG Lower Level Conference Room or Zoom Meeting https://ppacg.zoom.us/j/99674910105?pwd=ZHRXdjZSaHFyTDJrenJ5WEtkYlV6Zz09 Meeting ID: 996 7491 0105 Passcode: 916630 One tap mobile: +12532158782,,99674910105# Dial In: +1 253 215 8782 US AGENDA ITEM ACTION 1 Call to Order / Establish a Quorum 2 Approval of the Agenda Approve 3 Public Comment Period for Items Not on the Agenda Public Comment The public can email general comments or comments regarding the agenda in advance of a meeting to PPACG Office Administrator at [email protected] 4 Resolutions of Appreciation for City of Colorado Springs Director David Geislinger, Approve Town of Green Mountain Falls Director Tyler Stevens, and Town of Ramah Director Turner Smith  5 Approval of the Minutes from May 12, 2021 Special Meeting  Approve 6 Presentation of the FY2020 Audit  Accept 7 Citizen Advisory Committee Monthly Report  Accept 8 Financial Reports Information 9 2021 Capital, Maintenance and Public Transportation Contracts A. City of Colorado Springs  A. Approve B. El Paso County  B. Approve 10 Other Reports A. City of Colorado Springs Transit Services Monthly Update  A. Information B. PPRTA-3 Matrix  B. Approve C. City of Colorado Springs Monthly Change Order and Property Acquisition Report  C. Information D. RAISE Grant Application for UPRR Bridge Replacement over Fontanero  D. Approve E. Quarterly Reports from Member Governments  E. Information 11 Administrative Actions and Reports A. Legislative Reports A. Approve B. Discuss Proposed Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) rule(s) and Potential B. Approve Impact on Operations and Project Delivery, and Consider Requesting Party Status 12 PPRTA Member Announcements Information Adjournment Approve  Indicates Attachment

El Paso County Directors City of Colorado Springs Directors Commissioner Carrie Geitner Councilmember Yolanda Avila Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez, Jr. Councilmember Randy Helms, Chair Commissioner Holly Williams, Vice Chair Councilmember Wayne Williams Commissioner Cami Bremer (Alternate) Councilmember Bill Murray (Alternate) Commissioner Stan VanderWerf (Alternate) Councilmember Mike O'Malley (Alternate) Council President Pro Tem Richard Skorman City of Manitou Springs Directors (Alternate) Mayor John Graham Council President Tom Strand (Alternate) Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Fortuin (Alternate) Town of Green Mountain Falls Directors Town of Ramah Directors Mayor Jane Newberry Mayor Dennis Carpenter Trustee Katharine Guthrie (Alternate) Trustee William Schaal (Alternate)

Respectfully Submitted, Rick Sonnenburg, PPRTA Board Secretary

*Meetings will be held in a hybrid format to allow in-person attendance as well as a Zoom option. Vaccines are highly encouraged for those attending in person. An RSVP must be sent to [email protected] as PPACG continues to operate under a lower maximum capacity in the conference room. Masks are still required at PPACG if unvaccinated. For details on the CDC guidance regarding continued mask use go to https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated-guidance.html PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 4

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

RESOLUTION BY THE PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACKNOWLEDGING APPRECIATION TO CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS DIRECTOR DAVID GEISLINGER

June 9, 2021

WHEREAS, the City of Colorado Springs is a member government of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority, and

WHEREAS, David Geislinger served as a Councilmember of the City of Colorado Springs from April 2017 until April 2021, and served on the Pikes Peak RTA Board from June 2017 until April 2021, including as the Vice-Chair of the Pikes Peak RTA Board in 2018 and 2020, as well as the Pikes Peak RTA Board Chair in 2019, and

WHEREAS, City of Colorado Springs Director David Geislinger has served the citizens of the City of Colorado Springs and the Pikes Peak Region with distinction.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors wishes to acknowledge their deepest gratitude to City of Colorado Springs Director David Geislinger for his commitment to regional transportation planning and projects, for his wise counsel, and for his dedication to the advancement of the transportation projects of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority.

RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority this ninth day of June 2021 at Colorado Springs, Colorado.

______Randy Helms, Chair Board of Directors

ATTEST:

______Rick Sonnenburg Board Secretary

2 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 4

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

RESOLUTION BY THE PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACKNOWLEDGING APPRECIATION TO TOWN OF GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS DIRECTOR TYLER STEVENS

June 9, 2021

WHEREAS, the Town of Green Mountain Falls is a member government of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority, and

WHEREAS, Tyler Stevens served as the Mayor or a Trustee of the Town of Green Mountain Falls from January 2005 until April 7, 2020, and

WHEREAS, Town of Green Mountain Falls Director Tyler Stevens has served the citizens of the Town of Green Mountain Falls and the Pikes Peak Region with distinction.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors wishes to acknowledge their deepest gratitude to Town of Green Mountain Falls Director Tyler Stevens for his commitment to regional transportation planning and projects, for his wise counsel, and for his dedication to the advancement of the transportation projects of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority.

RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority this ninth day of June 2021 at Colorado Springs, Colorado.

______Randy Helms, Chair Board of Directors

ATTEST:

______Rick Sonnenburg Board Secretary

3 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 4

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

RESOLUTION BY THE PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACKNOWLEDGING APPRECIATION TO TOWN OF RAMAH DIRECTOR TURNER SMITH

June 9, 2021

WHEREAS, the Town of Ramah is a member government of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority, and

WHEREAS, Town of Ramah Director Turner Smith served as Town of Ramah Trustee from 2016 until April 7, 2020, when he served as Alternate Board Director from 2016 until April 7, 2020, and

WHEREAS, Town of Ramah Director Turner Smith has served the citizens of the Town of Ramah and the Pikes Peak Region with distinction.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors wishes to acknowledge their deepest gratitude to Town of Ramah Director Turner Smith for his commitment to regional transportation planning and projects, for his wise counsel, and for his dedication to the advancement of the transportation projects of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority.

RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority this ninth day of June 2021 at Colorado Springs, Colorado.

______Randy Helms, Chair Board of Directors

ATTEST:

______Rick Sonnenburg Board Secretary

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

PPRTA Board Meeting Minutes Wednesday May 12, 2021 - 1:30 p.m. Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments – Zoom Virtual Meeting

1. Call to Order/Establish a Quorum Director Holly Williams called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. A role call was performed, and a quorum was established. 2. Approval of the Agenda Director Wayne Williams moved to approve the agenda, seconded by Director Helms. 3. Public Comment Period for Items Not on the Agenda There were none. 4. Selection of Board Chair Director Wayne Williams nominated Director Helms as chair, seconded by Director Geitner. Director Avila nominated herself, seconded by Director Graham. Director Wayne Williams moved to close the floor to other nominations, seconded by Director Newberry. The motion passed unanimously. The Board decided to have the vote for the Chair by secret ballot with the Directors providing their votes to Board Attorney Jennifer Ivey. Board Attorney Jennifer Ivey tallied the votes and announced that Director Randy Helms was elected as the Chair for the balance of calendar year 2021. 5. Approval of the Minutes from April 14, 2021 Director Wayne Williams moved to approve the minutes for the April 14, 2021 meeting, seconded by Director Gonzalez. The motion carried unanimously. 6. Citizen Advisory Committee Monthly Report CAC Chair Mr. Jim Godfrey gave the report of the May 2021 CAC meeting. Director Wayne Williams moved to accept the CAC Report, seconded by Director Newberry. The motion carried unanimously.

7. Financial Reports A. Monthly Financial Reports Ms. Beverly Majewski, Pikes Peak RTA Finance Manager, shared the financial reports noting that the March actuals totaled $12,084,324; $4,055,645 or 50.5% over the monthly budget. The Year-to-Date total is $6,668,690 or 26.7% over prior year-to-date actual.

B. FY 2021 Budget Amendment – Conduct Public Hearing and Approve

Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Minutes of May 12, 20215 Meeting

Ms. Beverly Majewski requested that the Chair open the Public Hearing portion of the meeting to receive public comments. The Chair opened the Public Hearing, received comments, and closed the Public Hearing. Director Wayne Williams moved to approve the two resolutions approving the 2021 budget amendment and appropriating the funds, seconded by Director Graham. The motion carried unanimously.

8. 2021 Capital, Maintenance and Public Transportation Contracts A. City of Colorado Springs Ms. Gayle Sturdivant, City of Colorado Springs, requested a positive recommendation for the contract as presented: 1) SEMA Construction, Centennial Blvd. Extension: Fillmore to Fontanero, Build 8500 lineal feet of a 4-lane minor arterial, Capital-PPRTA II: CAC- Information/PPRTA Board- Approval: $14,723,636.30 Director Wayne Williams moved to approve the contract, seconded by Director Holly Williams. The motion carried unanimously.

B. El Paso County Ms. Jennifer Irvine, El Paso County, requests a positive recommendation for the following contracts: 1) Olgoonik Enterprises, 2021 Concrete Contract, Purchase Order, Maintenance: $1,500,000.00 2) Martin Marietta Materials, 2021 Overlay Contract, Purchase Order, Maintenance: $5,000,000.00 3) Intermountain Rural Electric Association, Beacon Lite Road Improvements, Reimbursement Agreement and Purchase Order, Capital: $114,615.00 4) Michael Baker International, Inc., Beacon Lite Road Improvements, Contract Amendment and Purchase Order, Capital: $474,828.00 5) AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Monument Hill road Safety Improvements, Contract Amendment and Purchase Order, Capital: $30,880.00 Director Gonzalez moved to approve the 5 contracts, seconded by Director Holly Williams. The motion carried unanimously.

C. City of Manitou Springs The City of Manitou Springs requests PPRTA concurrence to use up to $172,650 from the Transit shuttle and surface or structure parking fund for selective demolition at the Hiawatha Gardens shuttle hub. Director Avila moved to approve the request, seconded by Director Graham. The motion carried unanimously. 9. Other Reports A. City of Colorado Springs Transit Services Monthly Update This was an information item provided by Mr. Craig Blewitt, Mountain Metro Transit. B. City of Colorado Springs Request to Revise Board Policy #12 for Centennial Extension Ms. Gayle Sturdivant, City of Colorado Springs, requests that the Centennial Blvd Extension: Fillmore to Fontanero Project be added to PPRTA Policy #12 to increase the change order limit.

Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Minutes of May 12, 20216 Meeting

Director Wayne Williams moved to approve the request, seconded by Director Graham. The motion carried unanimously. C. City of Colorado Springs Monthly Change Order & Property Acquisition Report This was an information item provided by Ms. Gayle Sturdivant. D. El paso County monthly Change Order & Property Acquisition Report This was an information item provided by Ms. Jennifer Irvine.

10. Administrative Actions and Reports A. Resolution Designating an Official Custodian for the Colorado Open Records Act Director Holly Williams moved to adopt the Resolution Designating an Official Custodian for the Colorado Open Records Act, seconded by Director Graham. The motion carried unanimously. B. Legislative Reports – this item was discussed out of sequence Director Holly Williams moved approval to direct Lobbyist Mr. Dan Jablan to take an AMEND position of SB21-260 by the PPRTA, seconded by Director Wayne Williams. Director Wayne Williams offered a friendly amendment to Director Holly Williams’ motion to include: The PPRTA to take an AMEND position and seek amendments to the bill to 1) have the Air Quality Control Commission’s (AQCC) rule-making authority not apply to voter-approved projects, such as PPRTA projects, or 2) to transfer the AQCC’s rule-making authority to the State’s Transportation Commission. If not successful in getting the desired amendments, the Chair and Vice Chair can instruct the lobbyist to take an OPPOSED position. Should a member of the Board want a special meeting to override the Chair and Vice Chair’s decision to oppose, the Chair will call the meeting on behalf of the Board. The motion carried with 8 in favor and 1 in opposition.

The Board discussed the possibility El Paso County being divided when new congressional district boundaries were drawn. The Board agreed to approve a letter urging the Colorado Independent Redistricting Commission to keep El Paso County whole within one single Congressional district to the greatest extent possible when drawing new congressional districts. Director Wayne Williams moved to approve that PPRTA draft and sign a letter in support of keeping El Paso county whole within one congressional district, seconded by Director Geitner. The motion carried with 1 opposition.

11. PPRTA Member Announcements There were none.

12. Adjournment Director Helms adjourned the meeting at 3:14 p.m. Attendees Present Name Agency/Affiliation x Director Holly Williams El Paso County x Director Longinos Gonzalez El Paso County x Director Carrie Geitner El Paso County Director Stan VanderWerf El Paso County (Alternate) Director Cami Bremer El Paso County (Alternate) Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Minutes of May 12, 20217 Meeting x Director John Graham City of Manitou Springs Director Nancy Fortuin City of Manitou Springs (Alternate) x Director Randy Helms City of Colorado Springs x Director Wayne Williams City of Colorado Springs x Director Yolanda Avila City of Colorado Springs Director Mike O’Malley City of Colorado Springs (Alternate) Director Richard Skorman City of Colorado Springs (Alternate) Director Bill Murray City of Colorado Springs (Alternate) Director Tom Strand City of Colorado Springs (Alternate) x Director Jane Newberry Town of Green Mountain Falls Director Katharine Guthrie Town of Green Mountain Falls (Alternate) x Director Dennis Carpenter Town of Ramah Director William Schaal Town of Ramah (Alternate) x Mr. Rick Sonnenburg PPRTA Program/Contracts Manager x Ms. Beverly Majewski PPRTA Financial Manager x Mr. Dan Jablan PPRTA Legislative Lobbyist x Ms. Jennifer Ivey PPRTA General Counsel x Mr. Andrew Gunning PPACG Executive Director x Staff of Member Governments and Citizens

Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Minutes of May 12, 20218 Meeting PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

May 28, 2021

Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Colorado Springs, Colorado

We have audited the financial statements of Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (the “Authority”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, and have issued our report thereon dated May 28, 2021. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit.

Our Responsibility under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to express opinions about whether the financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities.

Our responsibility is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that a material misstatement or noncompliance may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial misstatements or violations of laws or regulations that do not have a direct and material effect on the financial statements.

Our responsibility for the supplementary information accompanying the financial statements, as described by professional standards, is to evaluate the presentation of the supplementary information in relation to the financial statements as a whole and to report on whether the supplementary information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements as a whole.

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Authority’s internal control as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the effectiveness of the Authority’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Authority’s internal control.

9 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

Accounting Estimates

Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the significant estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

Significant Accounting Policies

Management has the responsibility for selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the Authority are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. We noted no transactions entered into by the Authority during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Significant Audit Adjustments

For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a significant audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the financial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. We proposed no audit adjustments to the financial statements as a result of our auditing procedures.

Consultations with Other Independent Accountants

In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves the application of an accounting principle to the Authority’s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.

Disagreements with Management

For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit.

Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors

We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management prior to retention as the Authority’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and the responses were not a condition to our retention.

2 10 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit

We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management during the audit process.

Conclusion

We would like to thank Rick Sonnenburg and Beverly Majewski for their assistance during the audit process.

This purpose of this report is solely to inform the Board of Directors and management of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority about the results of our audit of the financial statements. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

Sincerely yours,

Logan and Associates, LLC

3 11 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

12 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Independent Auditors’ Report a - b

Management’s Discussion and Analysis i - iv

Basic Financial Statements

Statement of Net Position 1

Statement of Activities 2

Balance Sheet – Governmental Fund 3

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Governmental Fund 4

Notes to Financial Statements 5 - 11

Required Supplementary Information

Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 12

Notes to Required Supplementary Information 13

13 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Colorado Springs, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and the major fund of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (the “Authority”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Authority’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Authority’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Authority’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our audit opinions.

a 14 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

Opinions

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and the major fund of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority as of December 31, 2020, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Other Matters

Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, and budgetary comparison schedule on pages i – iv and 12 – 13 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the GASB who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

Aurora, Colorado May 28, 2021

b 15 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

As management of the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority, we offer readers of the Authority’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the Authority for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Financial Highlights

 The assets of the Authority exceeded its liabilities at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $199,926,675 (total net position). Of this amount, $199,428,706 is restricted to meet the Authority’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors for Transit, Capital and Maintenance projects.  Total net position increased by $27,168,195 in 2020 compared to a net increase of $22,421,954 in 2019.  In 2012 a second ballot measure was passed with a list of new Capital projects to start design in 2015. From 2015 through 2020 the Authority was primarily in the design phase of many of the major projects of the second ballot measure for capital funding with some projects being completed. The construction phase for the first major projects on the renewal capital list was under way in 2017. During periods of planning and design the Sales and Use tax revenue for capital projects exceeds the expenditures; therefore, increasing the Authority’s net position as in 2015 through 2020. During the heavy construction phases of capital projects, the net position will decrease as it did in 2017. In 2020 the Authority was in the design phase of many projects and therefore the Authority’s net position increased again. The Authority will experience future reductions in fund balance due to the anticipated increase of construction activity.  At the end of the current fiscal year, restricted fund balance for the general fund was $199,428,706, or 99.8% of total fund balance. The amount of $3,780,496 or 3% is the TABOR reserve, restricted for emergencies.  The Authority does not have any debt.

Overview of the Financial Statements

This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the Authority’s basic financial statements. The Authority’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to financial statements. This report also contains required supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements.

Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the Authority’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business.

i 16 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

The statement of net position presents information on all of the Authority’s assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the Authority is improving or deteriorating.

The statement of activities presents information showing how the Authority’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and obligations to vendors).

The government-wide financial statements of the Authority contain the functions that are supported by the collection of 1% sales and use tax. The governmental activities of the Authority include Capital Improvements, Transportation, Maintenance and Operational funding and expenses.

Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The Authority, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. The Authority presents the fund financial statements following the government-wide financial statements.

Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financing requirements.

The Authority has one governmental fund; the General Fund.

The Authority adopts an annual appropriated budget for its General Fund. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for the General Fund to demonstrate compliance with this budget.

Notes to financial statements provide additional information that is essential for a full understanding of the data provided in the financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found immediately following the basic financial statements.

Government-wide and Governmental Funds financial analysis Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority’s Net Position

2020 2019 Cash $193,989,910 $166,022,405 Accounts Receivable 21,956,641 20,639,533 Total assets 215,946,551 186,661,938

ii 17 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

Accounts Payable 16,019,876 13,903,458 Total liabilities 16,019,876 13,903,458

2020 2019 Assigned for Administration 497,969 0 Restricted For Emergencies 3,780,496 3,578,623 Restricted 195,648,210 169,179,857 Total net position $199,926,675 $172,758,480

By far the largest portion of the Authority’s net position (98 percent) reflects cash funds that are earmarked for the construction of capital improvements, maintenance and transit activities. Accounts receivable are primarily sales and use taxes earned within the budget year and received within sixty days of year end.

Most of the restricted net position ($195,648,210) will be used to meet the Authority’s future obligations to creditors.

Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority’s Changes in Net Position 2020 2019 General Revenues Sales and Use Taxes $120,954,436 $111,579,298 Investment Income 1,523,941 3,767,422 Transit Revenue 2,516,149 3,725,481 Cost Sharing Reimbursements 828,437 733,181 Total revenues 125,822,963 119,805,382

Expenses: General government Capital Improvements $45,880,674 $50,507,234 Transportation 4,141,537 12,846,889 Maintenance Activities 48,117,897 33,535,935 Administration 514,660 493,370 Total expenses 98,654,768 97,383,428

Net Change in Net Position 27,168,195 22,421,954 Net Position – Beginning 172,758,480 150,336,526 Net Position – Ending $199,926,675 $172,758,480

The Authority’s net position and fund balance increased $27,168,195 during the current fiscal year.

The Authority’s major source of revenue is 1% sales and use tax.

General Fund Budgetary Highlights

Net Sales and Use tax revenues of $120,954,436 were greater than the final budget by $19,224,436 or 18.9 percent. Interest income of $1,523,941 was less than the budget by $476,059 due to falling interest rates. Other Income which includes Cost Sharing, Bus fare and Transit advertising revenue exceeded budget by $327,274.

iii 18 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

Total Capital Improvement expenditures were $123,131,796 less than the final budget due to the up-front time needed to design and bid out large projects before construction can begin. The budget includes funds carried over for construction projects from prior years. In 2020 the fund balance increased due to the lower costs associated with the design phase of several large projects as compared to the more costly construction phase. Unused funds are carried over to the next year to be used during the design and construction phases of large capital projects. When the Authority is in the construction phase of several large- scale capital improvement projects the actual expenditures exceed the current year capital revenue and utilize prior year carryover funds. In 2019 the Authority carried over $112,536,270 funds for capital improvements to be constructed in future years.

The Authority’s final 2020 budget showed a decrease of $673,643 for Transit revenue reduction. The fund balance increased due to the timing of construction versus design of major capital projects. Many of the major capital projects were in the design phase which requires less cash outflow than the construction phase. We anticipate many of the major capital projects to be in the more costly construction phase in 2021 and 2022 at which time carryover funds will be utilized. The final total budgeted expenditures compared to the original budget expenditures decreased by $33,267,533 in 2020 due to an increase in the carryover of unspent expenditure funds from the prior year budget. Unspent funds roll over from year-to-year which is reflected in the final budget as compared to the original budget.

Capital Assets The Authority owns no capital assets. Roadway, capital improvements and transit services equipment acquired with Authority resources are capital assets of the member governments who purchased them.

2021 Budget Highlights For the year ending December 31, 2021 the Authority’s original budgeted revenue is estimated to increase from 2020 budget by 1,561,143 or 1.5% due to an increase in estimated sales and use tax revenue. The Authority’s actual net Sales and Use tax revenue increased from 2019 to 2020 by $9,375,138 or 8.4%. The Authority anticipates adding additional estimated Sales and Use tax collections during their 2021 budget amendment process.

Request for information This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Authority’s finances for all those with an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Finance Director at (719)471-7080, Extension 136.

iv 19 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION December 31, 2020

GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES ASSETS Cash and Investments $ 193,989,910 Accounts Receivable 21,956,641

TOTAL ASSETS 215,946,551

LIABILITIES Accounts Payable 16,019,876

TOTAL LIABILITIES 16,019,876

NET POSITION Restricted for Emergencies 3,780,496 Restricted for Priority Capital Projects 137,727,317 Restricted for Roadway Maintenance and Repairs 23,586,658 Restricted for Transit Services 34,334,235 Unrestricted 497,969

TOTAL NET POSITION $ 199,926,675

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 1 21 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year Ended December 31, 2020

GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES EXPENSES General Government Capital Improvements $ 39,494,815 Transportation 4,141,537 I-25 Gap Project Contribution 6,385,859 Maintenance Activities 48,117,897 Administration 514,660

Total Expenses 98,654,768

GENERAL REVENUES Sales and Use Taxes 120,954,436 Investment Income 1,523,941 Transit Revenue 2,516,149 Cost Sharing Reimbursements 828,437

Total General Revenues 125,822,963

CHANGE IN NET POSITION 27,168,195

NET POSITION, Beginning 172,758,480

NET POSITION, Ending $ 199,926,675

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 2 22 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUND December 31, 2020

GENERAL FUND ASSETS Cash and Investments $ 193,989,910 Accounts Receivable 21,956,641

TOTAL ASSETS $ 215,946,551

LIABILITIES Accounts Payable 16,019,876

TOTAL LIABILITIES 16,019,876

FUND BALANCE Restricted for Emergencies 3,780,496 Restricted for Priority Capital Projects 137,727,317 Restricted for Roadway Maintenance and Repairs 23,586,658 Restricted for Transit Services 34,334,235 Assigned for Administration 497,969

TOTAL FUND BALANCE 199,926,675

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 215,946,551

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 3 23 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE GOVERNMENTAL FUND Year Ended December 31, 2020

GENERAL FUND REVENUES Sales and Use Taxes $ 120,954,436 Investment Income 1,523,941 Transit Revenue 2,516,149 Cost Sharing Reimbursements 828,437

TOTAL REVENUES 125,822,963

EXPENDITURES Capital Improvements Renewal Capital "A" List Projects 35,120,230 Initial Capital "A" List Projects 4,374,585

Total Capital Improvements 39,494,815

Transportation 4,141,537 I-25 Gap Project Contribution 6,385,859 Maintenance Activities 48,117,897 Administration 514,660

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 98,654,768

NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 27,168,195

FUND BALANCE, Beginning 172,758,480

FUND BALANCE, Ending $ 199,926,675

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 4 24 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (the “Authority”) was formed as a separate legal entity authorized by Section 43-4-601 of the Colorado Revised Statutes through an intergovernmental agreement between the Authority and El Paso County, City of Colorado Springs, Town of Manitou Springs and Town of Green Mountain Falls (collectively, the “Parties”). The Authority was formed to provide funding for roadway capital improvements, maintenance and operations, and transportation service within the Authority boundaries. On November 2, 2004, El Paso County voters approved a total 1% sales and use tax, split .55% to fund the priority capital projects listed on the election ballot, and .35% to fund maintenance, and .10% to fund transportation activities beginning January 1, 2005. The .55% priority capital projects funding expired on December 31, 2014. On November 6, 2012, El Paso County voters approved to extend the Authority’s capital projects funding through December 31, 2024.

The Authority has no employees and is governed by a nine-member Board of Directors appointed by the governing bodies of the Parties. Only directors appointed by El Paso County and the City of Colorado Springs may serve as Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors.

In November 2008, the voters in the Town of Ramah approved inclusion in the Authority for maintenance and operations funding beginning January 1, 2009. In December 2008, the Authority Board of Directors approved the inclusion of the Town of Ramah, and subsequently amended the Authority bylaws to increase the Board of Directors from eight to nine members.

The accounting policies of the Authority conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to government entities. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. A summary of the Authority’s more significant accounting policies follows.

Reporting Entity

The definition of the reporting entity is based primarily on financial accountability. The Authority is financially accountable for organizations that make up its legal entity. It is also financially accountable for legally separate organizations if Authority officials appoint a voting majority of the organization’s governing body and either it is able to impose its will on that organization or there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits to, or to impose specific financial burdens on, the Authority. The Authority may also be financially accountable for organizations that are fiscally dependent upon it.

Based on the application of the above criteria, the Authority does not include additional organizations in its reporting entity.

5 25

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements

The Authority is a single-purpose government as defined by governmental accounting standards. The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all activities of the Authority. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported in a single column.

The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of the given function or segment are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues.

Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation

The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when the liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows.

Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collected within the current year or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current year. For this purpose, the Authority considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current year. Sales and use taxes and investment income associated with the current year are considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current year. All other revenues are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the Authority. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting.

When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the Authority’s practice to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed.

6 26

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued)

In the fund financial statements, the Authority reports the following major governmental fund:

General Fund - The General Fund is the only fund maintained by the Authority. It is used to account for all financial activities.

Assets, Liabilities and Net Position/Fund Balance

Receivables - Accounts receivable consists primarily of sales and use taxes earned at year end but collected in the subsequent year.

Capital Assets - The Authority has no capital assets. Roadways, capital improvements, and transit services equipment purchased with Authority resources become capital assets of the Parties.

Net Position - In the government-wide financial statements, net position is restricted when constraints placed on the net assets are externally imposed.

Fund Balance Classification – The governmental fund financial statements present fund balances based on classifications that comprise a hierarchy that is based primarily on the extent to which the Authority is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts in the respective governmental funds can be spent. The classifications used in the governmental fund financial statements are as follows:

 Nonspendable – This classification includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are either (a) not in spendable form (such as prepaid items) or (b) are legally or contractually required to be maintained intact.

 Restricted – This classification includes amounts for which constraints have been placed on the use of the resources either (a) externally imposed by creditors (such as through a debt covenant), grantors, contributors or laws or regulations of other governments, or (b) imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

The Authority has classified fund balance for priority capital projects, maintenance and transit amounts as restricted at December 31, 2020

7 27

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Assets, Liabilities and Net Position/Fund Balance (Continued)

 Committed – This classification includes amounts that can be used only for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal action of the Authority’s highest level of decision-making authority, the Board of Directors. The constraint may be removed or changed only through formal action of the Board of Directors.

 Assigned – This classification includes amounts that are constrained by the Authority’s intent to be used for specific purposes, but is neither restricted nor committed. Intent is expressed by the Board of Directors to be used for a specific purpose. Constraints imposed on the use of assigned amounts are more easily removed or changed than those imposed on committed amounts.

 Unassigned – This classification includes the residual fund balance for the General Fund. The unassigned classification also includes negative residual fund balance of any other governmental fund that cannot be eliminated by offsetting of assigned fund balance amounts.

The Authority has a fund balance reserve policy, which the objective is to provide working capital to the Authority. The policy establishes a minimum unallocated fund balance of 10% to be used for cash flow purposes, revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures, which includes the 3% TABOR reserve (NOTE 10). In addition, the policy establishes restricted fund balance guidelines and uses for capital projects, maintenance and transit services.

Subsequent Events

The Authority has evaluated events subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2020 through May 11, 2021, the date of these financial statements were issued, and has incorporated any required recognition into these financial statements

Risk Management

The Authority is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to, or destruction of assets; errors or omissions; and natural disasters. The Authority maintains public officials’ liability insurance through a commercial carrier for these risks of loss. The Parties, individually, maintain liability, property and workers’ compensation coverages. Therefore, the Authority has no exposure for these risks of loss.

8 28

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Assets, Liabilities and Net Position/Fund Balance (Continued)

Subsequent Events

The Authority has evaluated events subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2020 through May 28, 2021, the date of these financial statements were issued, and has incorporated any required recognition into these financial statements

Risk Management

8 29

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 3: CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)

Investments (Continued)

 Obligations of the United States and certain U.S. Agency securities  Certain international agency securities  General obligation and revenue bonds of U.S. local government entities  Bankers’ acceptances of certain banks  Commercial paper  Local government investment pools  Written repurchase agreements collateralized by certain authorized securities  Certain money market funds  Guaranteed investment contracts

At December 31, 2020, the Authority had the following investment:

Maturity 2020

Colorado Liquid Asset Weighted Average Asset Trust (COLOTRUST) under 60 days $ 193,803,265

The Authority invested in the Colorado Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST) (the “Trust”), an investment vehicle established for local government entities in Colorado to pool surplus funds. The State Securities Commissioner administers and enforces all State statutes governing the Trust. The Trust operates similarly to a money market fund and each share is equal in value to $1.00. The Trust offers share in two portfolios, COLOTRUST PRIME and COLOTRUST PLUS+. Both portfolios may invest in U.S. Treasury and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. COLOTRUST PLUS+ may also invest in certain obligations of U.S. government agencies, highest rated commercial paper and any security allowed under CRS 24-75-601. A designated custodial bank serves as custodian for the Trust’s portfolios pursuant to a custodian agreement. The custodian acts as the safekeeping agent for the Trust’s investment portfolios and provides services as the depository in connection with direct investments and withdrawals. The custodian’s internal records segregate investments owned by the Trust. COLOTRUST is rated AAA by Standard and Poor’s. COLOTRUST records its investments at fair value and the Authority records its investments in COLOTRUST using the net asset value method. There are no unfunded commitments, the redemption frequency is daily and there is no redemption notice period.

10 30

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020

NOTE 3: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Tabor Amendment

Colorado voters passed an amendment to the State Constitution, Article X, Section 20, which has several limitations, including revenue raising, spending abilities, and other specific requirements of state and local government. The Amendment is complex and subject to judicial interpretation.

In November 2004, and again in November 2012, the Authority’s voters authorized the Authority to collect and expend all taxes and other revenues of the Authority without any limitation contained in the Amendment. The Authority’s management believes it is in compliance with the provisions of the Amendment.

The Authority has established an emergency reserve, representing 3% of qualifying expenditures, as required by the Amendment. At December 31, 2020, the emergency reserve of $3,780,496 was reported as a restriction of fund balance in the General Fund and as restricted net assets in the government-wide financial statements.

Administrative Services Agreement

The Authority has contracted with the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG) to provide administrative services identified in the Authority’s administrative budget. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Authority paid $424,282 to PPACG for these administrative services.

Uncertainty – Coronavirus Pandemic

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus outbreak a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” and on March 10, 2020, declared it to be a pandemic. The coronavirus and actions taken by government and public health officials to mitigate it have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets in many countries, including the geographical area in which the Authority is located. It is unknown how long these conditions will last and what the complete financial impact will be to the Authority.

11 31

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

32 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6 PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE GENERAL FUND Year Ended December 31, 2020

VARIANCE ORIGINAL FINAL Positive BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL (Negative) REVENUES Sales and Use Taxes$ 101,730,000 $ 101,730,000 $ 120,954,436 $ 19,224,436 Investment Income 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,523,941 (476,059) Transit Revenue 3,690,955 3,017,312 2,516,149 (501,163) Cost Sharing Reimbursements - - 828,437 828,437

TOTAL REVENUES 107,420,955 106,747,312 125,822,963 19,075,651 EXPENDITURES Capital Improvements Renewal Capital "A" List Projects 153,598,144 157,293,705 35,120,230 122,173,475 Initial Capital "A" List Projects 5,240,031 5,332,906 4,374,585 958,321 Total Capital Improvement 158,838,175 162,626,611 39,494,815 123,131,796

Transportation 35,543,222 36,442,849 4,141,537 32,301,312 I-25 Gap Project Contribution - 6,385,859 6,385,859 - Maintenance Activities 40,717,861 62,664,845 48,117,897 14,546,948 Administration 766,000 1,012,627 514,660 497,967

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 236,145,258 269,412,791 98,654,768 170,758,023

NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (128,724,303) (162,665,479) 27,168,195 189,833,674

FUND BALANCE, Beginning 128,724,303 162,665,479 172,758,480 10,093,001

FUND BALANCE, Ending $ - $ - $ 199,926,675 $ 199,926,675

See the accompanying Independent Auditors' Report. 12 33 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 6

PIKES PEAK RURAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2020

NOTE 1: STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Budgets

The Authority follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements:

· In October, management submits to the Board of Directors a proposed operating budget for the General Fund for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them.

· Public hearings are conducted to obtain public comments.

· Prior to December 31, the budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution.

· Any revisions that alter the total expenditures must be approved by the Board of Directors.

· A budget for the General Fund is legally adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

· All appropriations lapse at year end. Colorado governments may not exceed budgeted appropriations at the fund level.

13 34 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 7

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: June 9, 2021 TO: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors FROM: Jim Godfrey, Chair of the Citizen Advisory Committee Rick Sonnenburg, Program/Contracts Manager SUBJECT: Citizen Advisory Committee Monthly Report

ACTION REQUESTED: Accept

The following is an overview of the actions taken at the June 2, 2021, Citizen Advisory Committee meeting:

1. Public Comments—there were none. 2. Monthly Financial Reports—information only. 3. City of Colorado Springs Contracts—approved a positive recommendation for the 7 contracts as presented to the CAC. 4. El Paso County Contracts—approved a positive recommendation for the 1 contract as presented to the CAC. 5. City of Colorado Springs Transit Services Monthly Update—information only. 6. PPRTA-3 Matrix—approved a set of recommendations for the 16-item list. 7. City of Colorado Springs Monthly Change Order and Property Acquisition Report— information only. 8. RAISE Grant Application for UPRR Bridge Replacement over Fontanero—approved a positive recommendation to the Board to send a letter of support for this application. 9. Quarterly Reports from Member Governments—information. 10. Report of Recent Board Actions—information only. 11. Agenda Topics for the Next Meeting—there were none. 12. Communications—there were none.

35 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

CONTRACT LIST To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority - Citizen Advisory Committee for meeting on June 2, 2021 Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority - Board of Directors for meeting on June 9, 2021

Contract / Change Order Maintenance, Capital, Project Name Project Description Vendor Contract No. Division Amount or Transit

Replace bridge on Cascade Ave Cascade Ave over Cheyenne PPRTA -$160,000.00 Capital-PPRTA II/City 1. over Cheyenne Run in the Native Sun Construction T009794 City Engineering Run Bridge Replacement Other -$85,155.92 General Fund Ivywild neighborhood.

Extend Tutt Boulevard north Classic Consulting 2. Tutt Blvd. Extension from Dublin Boulevard $57,400.00 TBD City Engineering Capital-PPRTA II Engineers & Surveyors approximately 1,500 feet.

Operations and 3. Maintenance Crack Seal $0.00 Seal Coat T010362 Maintenance Maintenance

Operations and 4. Maintenance Crack Seal $0.00 Elite Surface T010363 Maintenance Maintenance

Capital-PPRTA II / 5. Traffic System Signal Upgrades Supply Signal Equipment $500,000.00 AM Signal LLC T010343 Traffic Engineering Maintenance

Academy Blvd Reconstruction- 6. Reconstruct Road $278,310.00 AECOM T009337 City Engineering Capital-PPRTA II Bijou to Airport

Pikes Peak Greenway Southwest Downtown Capital-PPRTA II/ SW 7. Other -$15,000.00 Kiewit Infrastructure Co. T009368 City Engineering Improvements Pedestrian Bridge Construction Downtown BID

36 1 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Ryan Phipps, PE, Project Manager

CC: City of Colorado Springs Gayle Sturdivant, PE, PMP, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director

Date: June 2, 2021

CONTRACT

Project: Cascade Ave over Cheyenne Run Bridge Replacement

Contract Amount: PPRTA: -$160,000.00 Other: -$85,155.92 (City General Fund)

Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description: This project replaced a 95 year old bridge on Cascade Ave over Cheyenne Run in the Ivywild neighborhood. The existing bridge was functionally deficient, the vehicular travel lanes were too narrow, and there were no shoulders and no sidewalk on the existing bridge. The proposed bridge will be much wider to accommodate all modes of travel. The opening of the bridge increased nominally, and the channel was graded and stabilized to protect the bridge structure.

This project was completed in coordination with the roundabout recently construction at the Tejon/Cheyenne/Cascade/Ramona intersection, as well as the 2020 2C overlay work on Cascade Ave between Brookside and the new roundabout.

This Change Order 3 decreased the contract value by a total of $245,155.92 as a result of reconciling the actual quantities used on the project to those anticipated under the contract. The project is now complete.

37 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: Native Sun Construction

Contract No.: T009794

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: February 2020 to April 2021

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Category Project Contract Funds 2020 Budget Category Amount Available Budget Code Amount Emergency Capital -$160,000.00 $ 4.85 M $ 1.00 M 03-20-5030018 Bridge Funds Maint. Transit Cascade Ave Capital -$85,155.92 $ 85,000 $ 0 3100-202- over Cheyenne Maint. 9310247 (City Run Bridge Transit General Fund) Replacement Comments:

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

B19-T2119AM Comments:

Attachments: Contract Award Process Document (Bid Tab) Location Map

38 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Mike Chaves, PE

CC: City of Colorado Springs Gayle Sturdivant, PE, PMP, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director

Date: June 2, 2021

CONTRACT

Project: Tutt Blvd. Extension (PPRTA Capital Project No. 03-20-5030030)03

Contract Amount: PPRTA $57,400.00

Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description: The Tutt Boulevard extension is a joint Colorado Springs/El Paso County project. Tutt Boulevard will extend north from Dublin Boulevard and connect with the existing Tutt Boulevard, a distance of approximately 1,500 feet. Phase 1, from Dublin Boulevard to Vickie Lane, was completed in March 2016. Phase 2 will extend Tutt Boulevard from Vickie Lane to the existing 4-lane section south of the roundabout at Wolf Ridge Road. Traffic currently operates on an old 2-lane section of Templeton Gap Road in proximity to this location, and the project will eliminate the bottleneck in the roadway with the completion of the new 4-lane section.

Classic Engineering previously completed the design of Phase 1 and preliminary engineering of Phase 2. The remaining project halted until the development, and possible annexation, status of a key parcel of land was determined. Development of this key parcel is not proceeding and, upon further analysis, the City has determined the most advantageous and cost effective solution to complete the project is to purchase the necessary right-of-way this parcel. The City will commence final engineering of Phase 2 and land acquisition upon approval of this contract. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2022.

As Classic Engineering has already completed much of the Phase 2 engineering, it would not be efficient or cost effective to start the design over with a different consultant. Classic Engineering does not have a current on-call engineering contract; however, City Engineering documented, requested,

39 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A and received permission through the City’s Procurement team to hire them under a sole source project specific contract.

Classic’s work includes final engineering and construction phase design services. The City requests the PPRTA Board approve this consultant contract with Classic Engineering for $57,400.

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: Classic Consulting Engineers & Surveyors

Contract No. TBD

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: June 2021 to July 2022

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Category Project Contract Funds 2021 Budget Category Amount Available Budget Code Amount Tutt Blvd. Capital $57,400.00 $2,615,151 $1,791,611 03-20-5030030- Extension Maint. 20-5030007 Transit 0000 Comments:

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

Comments: The consultant completed Phase 2 through 60% engineering in 2017, but the project was then put on hold due to land acquisition issues. Sole source justification provided to the City’s procurement office for the new contract to complete the design.

Attachments: Contract Location Map

40 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Location Map

41 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Jason Hanson, Project Manager

Date: June 2, 2021

CONTRACT

Project: Crack Seal

Contract Amount:

Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description: Scope of work includes all materials, equipment, labor, cleaning and clean up, traffic control and incidental items necessary for sealing or filling cracks of asphalt pavements.

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: Seal Coat Contract No.: T010362

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: January 2021 to December 2021 with four optional renewal years. The initial contract value is zero; however, tasks orders will be issued as needed and are subject to approved budget allocations. The cumulative tasks orders will not exceed the budget allocation.

42 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Category Project Contract Funds 2021 Budget Category Amount Available Budget Code Amount Maintenance Capital $0.00 $750,000 $750,000 03-30-5231000 Maint. Transit Comments:

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

Comments:

Attachments: Contract Award Process Document (Bid Tab) Location Map

43 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Jason Hanson, Project Manager

Date: June 2, 2021

CONTRACT

Project: Crack Seal

Contract Amount:

Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description: Scope of work includes all materials, equipment, labor, cleaning and clean up, traffic control and incidental items necessary for sealing or filling cracks of asphalt pavements.

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: Elite Surface Contract No.: T010363

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: January 2021 to December 2021 with four optional renewal years. The initial contract value is zero; however, tasks orders will be issued as needed and are subject to approved budget allocations. The tasks orders will not exceed the budget allocation.

44 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Category Project Contract Funds 2021 Budget Category Amount Available Budget Code Amount Maintenance Capital $0.00 $750,000 $750,000 03-30-5231000 Maint. Transit Comments:

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

Comments:

Attachments: Contract Award Process Document (Bid Tab) Location Map

45 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Todd Frisbie, Traffic Engineer

Date: June 2, 2021 CONTRACT

Project: Traffic Signal System Upgrades and Traffic Signal System Maintenance

Contract Amt.: PPRTA $500,000 Other $ Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description: The City intends to leverage bulk pricing on a CDOT contract for traffic signal parts and supplies in order to complete signal work under both the Traffic Signal System Upgrades and Traffic Signal System Maintenance programs.

CDOT awarded a contract to AM Signal LLC, pursuant to CDOT IFB HAA IFB 20-034 JR on the September 1, 2019, with option years, for traffic signal parts and supplies (CDOT Award 31102056 – Traffic Signal Parts & Supplies).

Significant City staff time and resources will be saved by using this existing contract, alleviating the need to undertake the City’s process to procure traffic equipment. The City will realize additional savings by piggybacking on the CDOT contract as the vendor will provide a 21% discount off catalog prices.

The City is requesting that the PPRTA Board of Directors approve use of this CDOT contract for PPRTA related projects.

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: AM Signal LLC Contract No.: TBD

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: NTP – August 31, 2021. Three optional years available.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Project Task Order Funds 2021 Budget Budget Category Category Amount Available Amount Code Traffic Signal Capital $250,000 $1,754,486 $1,000,000 03-20-5030050 System Maint. $250,000 $ 884,033 $2,000,000 03-30-5208300 Upgrades and Transit Maintenance Comments: Piggyback CDOT Contract with AM Signal LLC.

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

Comments: Contractor will be selected from proposals submitted by vendors to CDOT.

Attachments Task Order Award Process Document Final Design Scope and Fee

47 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Mike Chaves, PE

CC: City of Colorado Springs Gayle Sturdivant, PE, PMP, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director

Date: June 2, 2021 CONTRACT

Project: Academy Boulevard Reconstruction: Bijou Street to Airport Road (PPRTA 03-20-5030002)

Contract Amt.: PPRTA $278,310.00 Other $ Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description:

Academy Boulevard Reconstruction from Bijou Street to Airport Road (North segment) and from Fountain Boulevard to Milton Proby Parkway (South segment) are PPRTA ‘A’ list projects. Academy Boulevard is a 6-lane road with poor pavement quality and with deteriorated curb, gutter and medians requiring replacement. Poor drainage is contributing to pavement decline, so a new storm water system is being designed to alleviate ponding issues. Planned improvements incorporate recommendations from the Great Streets Corridor Study including a 10-foot wide multi-use path.

AECOM Engineering was selected in May 2019 to complete the design of both roadway sections. AECOM is currently working on final design for Academy Boulevard from Bijou Street to Airport Road. This new scope of work includes acquisition of 20 easements to accommodate a new 10-ft wide concrete sidewalk and additional bridge design work needed to widen the sidewalk across the bridge over Sand Creek. Contract items include the following:

Preliminary Design $ 1,429,187.00 Final Design $ 2,045,237.00 Right-of-Way Acquisition Services and Bridge Design $ 278,310.00 Total $ 3,752,734.00

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

The City is requesting that the PPRTA Board approve this change to the consultant contract with AECOM for $278,310.00.

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: AECOM Engineering Contract No.: T009337

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: September 2020 through December 2022

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Project Task Order Funds 2021 Budget Budget Category Category Amount Available Amount Code Academy-Bijou Capital $ 278,310.00 $ 8,310,093 $ 5,100,000 03-20-5030002 to Airport Maint. Transit

Comments:

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

Comments:

Attachments Task Order Award Process Document Final Design Scope and Fee

49 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)

From: City of Colorado Springs Mike Chaves, PE

CC: City of Colorado Springs Gayle Sturdivant, PE, PMP, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director

Date: June 2, 2021 CONTRACT

Project: Southwest Downtown Pedestrian Bridge Construction

Contract Amt.: PPRTA Other -$15,000.00 (SW Downtown BID) Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Transit Personnel Other (description)

Project Description:

The Pikes Peak Greenway SW Downtown Pedestrian Bridge is a partially PPRTA-funded pedestrian bridge project. Once completed, the bridge will connect America the Beautiful Park and the Pikes Peak Greenway Trail with southwest downtown near the intersection of Vermijo Ave and Sierra Madre St. Additional funds for construction will come from non-PPRTA sources.

Change Order History

The initial contract amount was used to begin procuring structural steel while the final value engineering drawings were in the process of finalization. Steel procurement and fabrication were critical to move the project forward.

Change Order 1 incorporated the necessary construction services to complete the bridge project. Value engineered drawings were completed in late January 2019. The value engineering modifications made to the design were incorporated into this change order. Contract time extended through 2020 to complete the work.

Change Order 2 incorporated the balance of Item 10 (Bridge Installation) and incorporated Minor Contract Revision items for this contract. Item 3 (Temporary Leveling) was incorporated at a later date once the City and Contractor finalized negotiation with the railroads regarding requirements to protect the railroad facilities while erecting the bridge.

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A

Change Order 3 incorporated funding for the scope of Item 3 (Temporary Leveling). The City and contractor finalized negotiations with the railroads regarding requirements to protect the railroad facilities while erecting the bridge.

Change Order 4 incorporated funding for the actual drilled pier lengths and Minor Contract Revision line items. PPRTA funds were reduced once additional funding sources became available for this contract.

Change Order 5 incorporated PPRTA funding back into the contract after a reduction in funding because of Change Order 4. A correction to the remaining funds in the URA SW Downtown Infrastructure Bond account was made after Change Order 4 was executed. This change order added $51,248.72 of PPRTA funds back to the Kiewit construction contract. There was no scope change associated with this change order.

Current Change Order Change order 6 will decrease the SW Downtown Business Improvement District funding available for this contract by $15,000. Funds will be intended for other non-PPRTA project-related costs. The contract end date will also extend to December 31, 2021. This time extension is needed due to weather delays in construction and for project closeout. Construction is expected to be completed by July 1, 2021.

Summary of Change Order Costs

Original Contract $1,244,478.06 Change Order 1 $9,437,272.84 Change Order 2 $1,539,427.10 Change Order 3 $1,518,331.46 Change Order 4 $127,874.28 Change Order 5 $0.00 Change Order 6 -$15,000.00 Total Contract Value $13,852,383.74

The City is requesting the PPRTA Board approve this change order to the construction contract with Kiewit by -$15,000.

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: Kiewit Infrastructure Co Contract No.: T009368

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: June 2021 through December 2021

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Project Change Order Funds 2020 Budget Category Category Amount Available Budget Code Amount URA SW Downtown -$15,000 -$15,000 $0 Infrastructure Bond Comments: Contractor invoices will be split and billed to separate accounts.

PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9A The following is a summary of funds, without Change Order 6, associated with Kiewit’s contract:

Source Contract Amount PPRTA $1,347,432.46 SW BID $5,400,029.34 URA Bond $6,919,721.94 Gift $200,000.00 Total Contract Value $13,867,183.74

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFP Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Proposal)

Comments:

Attachments Task Order Award Process Document Final Design Scope and Fee

52 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9B

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee

From: Jennifer E. Irvine P.E., MPA, County Engineer El Paso County Department of Public Works

Date: 9 June 2021

Project name Project Description Contract or Vendor Maintenance or Purchase Order Capital amount Mesa Ridge Contract and Wilson & Capital $799,160 Parkway Purchase Order Company (2015-2024)

53 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9B

Department of Public Works

Kevin Mastin, Deputy Director Board of County Commissioners 719-520-6900 Holly Williams, District 1 Chuck Brown Transportation Complex Carrie Geitner, District 2 3275 Akers Drive Stan VanderWerf, District 3 Colorado Springs, CO 80922 Longinos Gonzalez, Jr., District 4 www.ElPasoCo.com Cami Bremer, District 5

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee

From: Jennifer E. Irvine P.E., MPA, County Engineer

Date: June 9, 2021

Re: Mesa Ridge Parkway Improvements Project (2015-2024 Capital Program) Preliminary and Final Civil Engineering Design Services

The El Paso County Department of Public Works requests to award a contract and purchase order with Wilson & Company in the amount of $799,160 for Civil Engineering Design services for the Mesa Ridge Parkway Project. The contract amount is to cover engineering design and plan preparation for construction of two additional traffic lanes for this corridor.

The existing portion of Mesa Ridge Parkway from SH21 to Marksheffel Road was constructed by the developer of the adjacent land north of the roadway. The roadway was designed by the developer for a future 4-lane cross-section to operate as a Principal Arterial, but only the westbound lanes have been constructed to date. The Project shall consist of design of the eastbound lanes of Mesa Ridge Parkway in general conformance with the future 4-lane configuration shown in the El Paso County Major Transportation Corridor Plan. Also included will be the design to widen the existing bridge or to design a second bridge over Jimmy Camp Creek to accommodate the new eastbound lanes.

Funds for this project will come from the PPRTA Capital Funds Account 06.20.5060009 for El Paso County.

54 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9B

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

To: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen Advisory Committee

From: Jennifer E. Irvine P.E., MPA, County Engineer

Date: June 9, 2021 CONTRACT

Project: Mesa Ridge Parkway Improvements Project (2015-2024 Capital Program) Civil Engineering Design Services

Contract Amt.: PPRTA $ 799,160 Other $ 0

Type: Capital Consultant Equipment Maintenance Construction Materials Other - Transit Personnel

Project Description: Preliminary and Final Civil Engineering Design Services for Mesa Ridge Parkway.

55 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9B

VENDOR INFORMATION

Vendor: Wilson & Company

Contract No.: 17-067; RFQ #17-067-78

Contract Term (start/end dates) / Duration: Date approved by PPRTA Board and El Paso County Board of County Commissioners until completion of project

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Budget Project Contract Funds 2021 Budget Budget Category Category Amount Available Amount Code Capital Maint. $799,160 $9,975,000 $9,975,000 06.20.5060009 Transit Comments:

AWARD PROCESS

IFB RFQ Sole Source Other (Invitation for Bid) (Request for Quote)

Comments: Through a competitive RFP on-call process and subsequent RFQ, two (2) quotes were received from: Michael Baker International and Wilson & Company. Wilson & Company was determined to be the best value.

Attachments Supporting Documentation Award Process Document Location Map

56 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 9B Fontaine Blvd Powers Blvd Powers

WXYZ[21

Fountain Mesa Road WXYZÆ Mesa Ridge Parkway Mesa Ridge Parkway

I-25 ± Project Area

Marksheffel Road Ix C and S Road

El Paso County Department of Public Works Feet El Paso County Department of Public Works 425 0 425 850 1,275 1,700 2,125 Mesa Ridge Parkway Improvements

Project Vicinity Map COPYRIGHT 2017 by the Board of County Commissioners, El Paso County, Colorado. All rights reserved. No part of this document or data contained hereon may be reproduced; used to prepare derivative products; or distributed without the specific Scale 1:20,000 written approval of the Board of County Commissioners, El Paso County, Colorado. This document was prepared from the best data available at the time of printing. El Paso57 InfrastructureInfrastructure ManagementManagement SystemSystem GISGIS DataData ViewerViewer County, Colorado, makes no claim as to the completeness or accuracy of the data contained hereon. PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10A

DATE: May 14, 2021

TO: City of Colorado Springs Citizens' Transportation Advisory Board Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizens’ Advisory Committee Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board City of Colorado Springs Transit Passenger Advisory Committee

FROM: Erin McCauley, Sr. Program Compliance Analyst

SUBJECT: March 2021 Monthly Mountain Metropolitan Transit (MMT) Update

Local Bus Routes Mountain Metropolitan Transit (MMT) local routes provided 151,667 one-way trips during April of 2021. Service ran 30 out of 30 days in March (22 weekdays, 4 Saturdays, and 4 Sundays). Though many of the routes suspended during 2020 have been reinstated, ridership remains much lower than it has been in past years. Ridership in April 2021 shows an increase of 13.03% as compared April 2020, which was the first full month of service decreases due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Total ridership for April 2020 was 134,178.

April 2020 April 2021 Weekday Service – Ridership 113,198 126,230 Weekday Average Daily Ridership 5,145 5,737 Saturday Service – Ridership 13,891 16,252 Sunday Service – Ridership 7,089 9,185 Revenue Service Hours 14,768 15,216 Boardings per Revenue Service Hour 9.1 10.0 Cumulative Annual Change -34.16%

Boardings per revenue service hour in April of 2021 are 9.9% higher than April of 2020.

Local Fixed-Route Ridership by Month 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 -

2019 2020 2021

58 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10A

Fixed Route Average Weekday Ridership 6,000 14.00% 13.20% 5,738 5,800 12.00% 5,600 5,443 10.00% 5,400 8.00% 5,200 6.00% 5,000 4.00% 4,808 5.41% 4,800 2.00% 4,600 0.00% -2.47% 4,400 -2.00% 4,200 -4.00% February March April

Average Ridership Month-to-Month - % Change

Average weekday fixed-route ridership increased between February and March by over 13% and between March and April by almost 5.5%. Total ridership has also increased since February 2021 – by 25.44% between February and March and by 4.6% between March and April.

ADA Service: Metro Mobility MMT’s Metro Mobility complementary ADA paratransit service transported 7,687 passengers in April 2021, which amounts to an increase of 289.02% compared to ridership in April 2020. Like fixed route, there were 30 days of operation (22 weekdays, 4 Saturdays, and 4 Sundays).

April 2020 April 2021 Weekday Service – Ridership 1,819 7,178 Weekday Average Daily Ridership 83 326 Saturday Service – Ridership 137 351 Sunday Service – Ridership 20 158 Revenue Service Hours 1,950 4,550 Boardings per Revenue Service Hour 1.0 1.7 Cumulative Annual Change -20.97%

Metro Mobility Ridership by Month 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 -

2019 2020 2021

59 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10A

Metro Mobility Average Weekday Ridership 330 326 12.00% 320 9.87% 10.00% 310 297 8.00% 300 6.29% 290 6.00% 279 6.51% 280 4.00% 270 2.00% 260 250 0.00% February March April

Average Ridership Month-to-Month - % Change

Average weekday ridership has steadily increased between January and April of 2021.

Specialized Paratransit: Taxi Choice Option The Taxi Choice Option is a premium passenger service available to Mountain Metro Mobility passengers whose rides are seven miles or less from origin to destination. The service is considered non-ADA specialized paratransit, as it is not required under the ADA.

Taxi Choice returned to service in March 2021, but has been slow throughout April.

April 2020 April 2021 Weekday Service – Ridership 17 2 Weekday Average Daily Ridership 5.7 1 Saturday Service – Ridership -- -- Sunday Service – Ridership -- -- Revenue Service Hours 31 1 Boardings per Revenue Service Hour 0.5 2.0 Cumulative Annual Change -22.95%

Taxi Ridership by Month 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 -

2019 2020 2021

60 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10A

Vanpool The Metro Rides vanpool program operated seven vans during April. There were 41 active riders who made 884 reported one-way trips, which amounted to an increase of 149.72% compared to ridership in April 2020.

April 2020 April 2021 Weekday Service – Ridership 354 866 Weekday Average Daily Ridership 20 41 Saturday Service – Ridership -- 12 Sunday Service – Ridership -- 6 Revenue Service Hours 194 308 Boardings per Revenue Service Hour 1.8 2.9 Cumulative Annual Change -64.93%

Metro Rides Vanpool Ridership by Month 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 -

2019 2020 2021

Metro Rides Average Weekday Ridership 50 35.00% 44 30.06% 45 41 30.00% 40 34 25.00% 35 20.00% 30 15.00% 25 10.00% 20 15 0.14% 5.00% 10 0.00% 5 -5.00% 0 -5.66% -10.00% February March April

Average Ridership Month-to-Month - % Change

61 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10A PROJECT UPDATE

Fall 2021 Service Changes The approval by the PPRTA Board of the 2021 budget amendment enables the Transit Services Division (MMT) to propose various service improvements for consideration during our fall 2021 service change. We will conduct a virtual public process later in June to present and gather feedback on the proposal. The proposal will likely feature several improvements scheduled for implementation later in September and a service expansion scheduled for next spring. A preliminary sample of improvements is shown below:

1. Route 11 (World Arena-PPCC) Weekend On-Time Performance Improvements 2. Route 22 (Southborough via Murray Blvd) Add Sunday Service 3. Route 23 (Galley Rd-Tutt Blvd) Add Sunday Service 4. Route 37 (Hancock Plaza-Amazon-COS Airport) Conversion from Express to Full Service with ADA Proposed Implementation – Sunday, September 26, 2021

5. Downtown Shuttle (New Service) Proposed Implementation – Sunday, April 24, 2022 (at the earliest)

Details on the virtual public meeting will be distributed as soon as they are finalized.

62 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: June 9, 2021 TO: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors FROM: Rick Sonnenburg, Program/Contracts Manager SUBJECT: PPRTA-3 Matrix

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve

With the PPRTA-2 Capital program (2015-2024) being over the halfway mark in time (year 6.5 of 10), the Board has started the process to review the topics, issues, and rules for the planned PPRTA-3 Capital program (2025-2034). The Board held its first PPRTA-3 Workshop at its July 2020 meeting with a referral of the Workshop list to the CAC at its August 2020 meeting. After several CAC and Board meetings, the Board decided to refer the Matrix to the member government staffs to discuss and develop a set of recommendations to the CAC and Board. We are now at that stage in this process.

The CAC reviewed the Matrix at its May 5, 2021 and June 2, 2021 meetings and has developed a set of recommendations on the 16-item list in the Matrix. The full Matrix, with its member government staff recommendations and CAC recommendations, is attached. However, I have prepared what I am calling an Executive Summary list in outline form for quicker reading. It is shown below using the 16-item titles and numbering sequence (the CAC’s recommendations concur with the member government staff recommendation, unless stated otherwise):

1. Program Funds a. Allow each member government to decide if they want to request Program Funds b. List projects alphabetically, as was done with PPRTA-2 c. Add a new Program Fund called “State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund,” which would be a placeholder project with no funds unless a member government moved funds into it from one or more of their other projects via a line-item transfer to apply for a grant. If the grant was awarded, the funds would be used. If the grant was not awarded, the member would move the funds back out via line-item transfer. This program fund could also be used for projects NOT on either the “A” or “B” lists IF the Board approved via a super-majority vote. The CAC agrees with the super- 63 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

majority vote concept, but leaves it to the Board to select the percentage, such as 2/3 or ¾. d. Not establish a CDOT Companion Project Program Fund 2. A/B List—yes, with both being alphabetized 3. Moving a “B” List Project to the “A” List—yes, if a “B” List project receives a state or federal grant, it can be “moved” or funded out of the proposed “State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund Program.” Moving to an “A” List for other circumstances is not recommended. 4. Moving from the “A” List to the “B” List a. Member government staffs recommended keeping the ballot language the same as PPRTA-2 (all “A” projects must be completely funded before any member entity could move to its “B” List), but the CAC recommended differently—in favor of changing the ballot language to allow each member to move to its “B” List independent of the other member entities. b. The CAC recommended against establishing an “A” List program fund called “Engineering Advancement Program Fund” to be available starting in year 6 for any member government to use to begin the design of “B” List projects. 5. Adding Project(s) Without Additional Elections—not recommended. 6. Eligibility for “Mid-Stream” Capital Projects for New Members Joining “Mid-Stream”— the CAC had some positive interest in the concept, but if the Board wished to pursue this concept in more detail, the CAC recommends that there be a 1 or 2-year delay in the new member receiving Capital funds. 7. Which Year to go to the Ballot—November 2022. 8. When Could Prospective New Member Entities Join the PPRTA—November 2021 and April 2022. 9. Should a Capital Project for the portion of the Front Range Rail that would be in the PPRTA boundary be added to the PPRTA Capital list—No. 10. Weighted Voting—No. 11. Is there a contiguity requirement for new member entities to join—(information item from the PPRTA attorney stating “No”) 12. Prospective New Member Entities—this is a Board-approved process which is underway 13. Board and CAC Membership Changes if More Entities Join—no recommendation. 14. Improved Cost Estimates for Capital Projects—this is an existing Board-approved line item in the PPRTA Administration budget ($446,627) for use now by member governments through a contract(s) by the PPRTA staff and Board for planning and estimating the costs of proposed PPRTA-3 Capital projects. The CAC approves. 15. Revenue Estimates for the Entire 10-Year Capital Program—revisit in early or mid-2022 in order to develop a figure which the Board would give to the member governments so they can decide how to spend their Capital funds and where the dividing line would be between their “A” and “B” Lists. 16. Maintenance of Effort Provision—recommend that the base year be updated from 2004 to a year more current, such as 2019, but only after additional input from member government finance staffs.

RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD: The CAC recommends that the Board approve the attached PPRTA-3 Matrix.

Attachment: 1. PPRTA-3 Matrix Document

64 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

65 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

PPRTA-3 Topic List for Decisions

1. Program Funds a. Leave to Each Entity to Request b. Give Priority to Named Projects—what would be the standard and process? Would this wording be in the ballot, the IGA, or a Board Policy? c. Regional Grant Match Program Fund—no initial funding, but funding could be added if an opportunity arises using the funding contributions from each entity per population. d. Regional Federal/State Companion Project Fund—no initial funding, but funding could be added if an opportunity arises using the funding contributions from each entity per population. e. CAC Recommendation: On May 5, 2021, the CAC supported staff’s recommendation for item a 13-2, item b 15-0, item c 13-2 and item d 14-1. A few CAC members are not in favor of program funds and are concerned they could be perceived as slush funds. Several CAC members supported program funds and asked that controls either remain in place and that controls be put in place for new programs. Programs should not detract from funding A-list projects. f. BOARD Decision: ______Staff Recommendation:

a. Leave opportunity for each entity to request A-list program funds. Similar to A-list projects, entities should present an initial budget for the program funds to the CAC and Board. These programs will be allocated annually through the budget cycle. Changes to these budgets should be justified by the requesting entity.

b. Capital programs should be included in the ballot in alphabetical order with the projects. By default, capital programs and projects are prioritized through the annual budget process. Entities requesting capital program funds must demonstrate a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to complete A-list projects in addition to their capital programs.

c. Include a “State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund Program” on the A-list. This program could be available for all member governments and could be used for local matching funds for projects. Consider either nominal or no initial budgeted funds. Board can approve budget or budget amendment to provide match funding. Establish policy for obtaining State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund Program consideration when applying for grant funds (commitment of local funds typically needed in grant applications). The grant funded project would be “child” project under the Grant Match Fund Program (therefore incorporated into the A-list by way of the Program).

The State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund Program could be used to fulfill local match requirements for discretionary grants awarded by the State of Colorado (programs pending development) or the Federal government (e.g., INFRA, RAISE grants) or future grant opportunities resulting from a federally declared disaster. The program is not intended to provide local match for revenue allocations administered by PPACG.

If the proposed grant project is not on the A-list, but is included on the B-list than a majority vote is necessary to plan for matching funds for the state or federal awarded grants. If the

66 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

proposed grant project is not on either the A-list or B-list, then a super majority vote (2/3 or ¾ of full board membership) is necessary to plan for matching funds for the state or federal awarded grants.

When the State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund Program is included on the A-list on the ballot, language may be added that eligibility for this program will be set forth in either the Establishing IGA or by Board Resolution to provide transparency for the electorate.

d. A separate CDOT Companion Project Program is not recommended; however, member governments could use other programs, if available and relevant, to partner with CDOT or other entities to incorporate betterments deemed appropriate for the jurisdiction with the project led by CDOT or other entity.

2. “A/B” List a. One List b. “A” Priority List, with a “B” List if there is additional funding—both being alphabetized. c. Should the “A” List be designed to be completed by a year prior to year #10? If so, what year? d. CAC Recommendation: On May 5, 2021, the CAC supported staff’s recommendations 15-0. e. BOARD Decision: ______Staff Recommendation: a & b. Have both alphabetized A and B lists. Allow each entity to determine their approach to completing their A-list. Staff will develop and provide project candidates for consideration.

c. Do not identify a completion date for the A-list. Revenue will come in after the authorization has ended and construction should linger into subsequent year(s).

3. Moving a “B” List Project to the “A” List Ballot Language a. When a “B” List Project receives other funding, such as a grant or developer contribution b. When other circumstances arise (this needs some definition such as only after X% of the “A” List is completed) ? c. Do #3a or #3b need a supermajority vote of the Board? If so, what percentage? d. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, 2021, the CAC supported staff’s recommendations 13-0. e. BOARD Decision; ______Staff Recommendation: Revision to ballot language not recommended. a. If grant funding is received, then the Board can budget the matching funds through the State or Federal Discretionary Grant Match Fund Program. b. Not recommended. c. See response to item 1c above.

4. Moving from the “A” List to the “B” List a. All entities must completely fund their “A” List projects before any entity can move to their “B” List projects, as is the wording in the PPRTA-2 ballot

67 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

b. Revise this ballot wording to allow each entity to move to its “B” List projects after they completely fund their “A” List projects, independent of the other entities? If so, would the Capital projects in the “A” list need to be identified by member entity so the public could see how this would work? c. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, CAC considered including an A-list “Engineering Advancement Program” with funding anticipated to start no earlier than year 6 of the authorization. The vote failed 5-8. CAC voted 9-4 to allow member entities to move independently to their B-list project. This vote is not consistent with staff’s recommendation and would require ballot language changes and potentially an amendment to the IGA. d. BOARD Decision: ______Staff Recommendation: a. Revision to ballot language not recommended. If the ballot language is changed to remove or modify the A-list projects “completely funded prior to use of funding” for B-list projects language, then an “Engineering Advancement Program” could be added to the A-list. This program could be available for all member governments. The program could be used to advance engineering for B-list projects as the budget is allocated and B-list projects are prioritized by the Board. If the program is included on the A-list, there would be no initial budget and future budget consideration would be anticipated in the last 5-years of the PPRTA authorization as B-list projects are prioritized and funding (received revenue and projected (80% of planned budget allocation)) indicates A-list projects can be completed. This program should not impact the timing or ability to complete A-list projects.

b. Member governments independently moving to B-list projects is not recommended. Advancement to the B-list based on prioritization by the Board.

5. Adding Project(s) Without Additional Elections? a. Legally ballot language could be added that would allow the Board to add Capital projects during the 10-year cycle without a vote of the public, but should such language be added in light of the success of having defined projects in past ballots? b. Would these projects be added to the “A” list or the “B” list? Or would it be left to the discretion of the Board? c. Would adding these projects need a supermajority of the Board? If so, what percentage? d. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, 2021, the CAC supported staff’s recommendations 13-0. e. BOARD Decision: ______f. Staff Recommendation: a, b & c. Revision to ballot language not recommended. If new capital projects, not on the A-list or B-list, are proposed, a new ballot measure must be presented to the electorate. Note some smaller projects, such as intersection safety improvements, may occur as part of the defined, A-list programs. Programs must be included on the A-list.

6. Eligibility for “Mid-Stream” Capital Projects for New Members Joining “Mid-Stream”. a. The current the ballot language and the Establishing IGA (which currently says that new members joining “mid-stream” only get Maintenance funding) do not legally allow for a new entity joining “mid-stream” to receive Capital projects as well as Maintenance and in order

68 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

to do so a “mid-stream” amendment to the Establishing IGA and an election would need to be held. (For reference, the cost of the ballot measure in 2017 for the I-25 Gap project was $210,000. With inflation, a similar “mid-stream” ballot measure in 2026 or beyond would probably cost the PPRTA and/or the prospect entity $250,000.) However, during the PPRTA- 3 election and Establishing IGA revision, language could be added to the ballot (see #5 above) and the Establishing IGA to allow the Board to add the Capital projects of any newly- joining entity “mid-stream.” Should such language be added? b. Would these projects be added to the “A” list or the “B” list? Or would this be left to the discretion of the Board? c. Would these projects need a supermajority vote of the Board? If so, what percentage? d. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, the CAC discussed the concept of allowing mid-stream members and allowing funding for A-list capital projects. The capital funding could be delayed by 1 or 2 years after joining the PPRTA. No formal recommendation provided. e. BOARD Decision: ______Staff Recommendation: Hesitant to change ballot language; however, ask legal to provide potential ballot language for consideration. Recommend deferring decision on including new capital projects until mid-stream, new member is identified. Revenue impacts need to be considered with the addition of potential new projects.

7. Which Year to go to the Ballot? a. 2022 b. 2023 c. 2024 d. CAC Recommendation: November 2022. e. BOARD Decision: November 2022. 8. When could prospective new member entities join the PPRTA? a. Prospective new member entities could hold elections to join the PPRTA depending on the entity, in local biennial elections (April 5, 2022 for the entities that have been reviewed), November 2, 2021, or November 8, 2022. However, while legally possible, having the prospective new members hold joining elections at the same time as the PPRTA-3 election raises several legal and practical considerations that could make it more risky for the potential new member, result in either multiple ballot questions or a more complicated ballot question submitted by the PPRTA, and would likely result in greater election expenses for the PPRTA. Should the PPRTA require that potential new members hold their “joining” election on one of the TABOR dates that may be available to them prior to November 2022? b. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, 2021, the CAC supported staff’s recommendations 13-0. c. BOARD Decision: ______d. Staff Recommendation: Consider elections in only November 2021 and April 2022. 9. Should a Capital project for the portion of the Front Range Rail that would be within PPRTA boundaries be added to the PPRTA Capital List. If so, should this be an “A” list or “B” list project. a. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, 2021, the CAC supported staff’s recommendations 13-0. b. BOARD Decision: ______Staff Recommendation: Do not include a Front Range Passenger Rail (FFPR) project at this time. More details and project understanding would be needed for further consideration.

69 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

10. Weighted Voting a. A review of the statutes and case law does not state that weighted voting is allowed or disallowed. Is this something that the PPRTA should consider as a possible addition to the Establishing IGA? b. CAC Recommendation: On June 2, the CAC voted on not including weighted 13-0. c. BOARD Decision: ______11. Is there a contiguity requirement for new entities to join? PPRTA Attorney Jennifer Ivey says “No.” 12. Prospective New Member Entities to Approach. Develop a process and proceed to contact them. a. Palmer Lake b. Monument c. Calhan d. Fountain e. Woodland Park f. CAC Recommendation: Defers to the Board. g. BOARD: On September 9, 2020, the Board directed staff to proceed with a process to contact the five prospective member entities listed above. 13. Board and CAC Membership Changes if More Entities Join a. The current ratio on the Board is 3/3/1/1/1. Since all the prospective entities are small in population, should the two larger entities get one more seat on the Board of Directors, such as one more seat on the Board of Directors when one or two new entities join, then another seat if a third or fourth new entity joins? If so, the Establishing IGA would have to be revised. b. The current ratio on the CAC is 3/3/2/2/2/5+4, with the 5 and 4 being At Large and At Large Alternates. Should this be changed to 4 each for the City and County if one or two new entities join, then 5 each for the City and County if a third or fourth new entity joins? The CAC Bylaws would have to be revised by the Board. c. Composition of the CAC as it Relates to Each Member Entity’s Capital Projects d. CAC Recommendation: Defers to the Board. CAC deemed this a political decision and the response would vary based on the number of new member governments. e. BOARD Decision: ______14. Improved Cost Estimates for Capital Projects On June 2, the CAC accepted staff’s response 13-0. Staff Response: Member governments will implement procedures to provide the best possible cost estimate given the available data at the time. Project costs will be continually assessed as projects develop to better achieve cost certainty. Fully understanding the intended scope of work, needed risk mitigation and regulatory requirements assists with project cost development.

Administrative funds are available for planning and estimating for PPRTA 3 projects. Use of these administrative funds are subject to Board approval. PPRTA would contract for services and member entities would manage the consultant(s) to develop parametric cost estimates.

70 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

Regardless of the approach or methodology used to develop cost estimates, it is important to note the lack of maturity of projects (0% to 2%) staff is estimating up to 14 years in advance of construction activities. Even with due diligence, developing the estimate and as documented by AACE (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering) International or other accepted methodologies, the expected accuracy range with an 80% confidence level is highly variable and could span from -50% to +100% when project assumptions are static. These estimates are appropriate for strategic business planning purposes, project screening and long-range CIP planning. As projects mature and advance through the life-cycle, a greater level of anticipated cost accuracy is attainable.

15. Revenue Estimate for the Entire 10-Year Program a. Use the 2022 Budgeted Revenue and leave it “flat” for the entire ten years. b. Use the 2022 Budgeted Revenue but add an annual inflation factor for all or most of the ten years. c. CAC Recommendation: PPRTA and member government staff will revisit the revenue projections and provide projected revenue amount for use in PPRTA 3 planning. d. BOARD Decision: ______Staff Recommendation: Staff has developed four models to establish the PPRTA 3 budgeted revenue. The models initially assumed no new member governments join prior to establishing PPRTA 3. We understand Calhan is interested in inclusion as a member government, but adjustments were not made to the revenue projections. The scenarios are summarized below:

Scenario 1. Starting with the 2021 budget, add 3% growth per year and apply a 78% reduction to the anticipated total revenue anticipated from 2025 through 2034. Use the resulting value divided by 10 to set base year (2025) budgeted revenue. For Scenario 1, the base year revenue is applied flat (zero growth) for the 10-year authorization. Total projected revenue under this scenario is approximately $1.056B.

Scenario 2. Start with the base year revenue established in Scenario 1 for 2025 and apply 1% growth/inflation factor per year. Total projected revenue under this scenario is approximately $1.106B.

Scenario 3. Starting with the 2021 budget, add 1 % growth/inflation factor per year. Total projected revenue under this scenario is approximately $1.143B.

Scenario 4. Start with the 2019 actual revenue received and add 1 % growth/inflation factor per year. Total projected revenue under this scenario is approximately $1.242B

The combination of growth/inflation factors and reduction application consider both strong and weak economic conditions that could occur during the 10-year authorization. They prepare for economic downturn or recession conditions, construction industry inflation and market demand, regulatory changes, and unforeseen site conditions. The reduction also

71 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10B

provides a potential opportunity to leverage PPRTA funds to obtain other funding sources and it provides an opportunity to fund B-list projects.

Staff recommends presenting all four revenue scenarios and deferring a final recommendation until mid-2022. Planning thresholds should be considered when developing the A-list and B-list projects, and the cut-off between the two lists. One example is to use 75% of projected revenue available for capital project for the two large entities and to work with the other member governments to fund their proposed A-list projects. The revenue “buffer” provides an opportunity to respond to unforeseen circumstance, higher than anticipated inflation, regulatory changes, local match for grant opportunities, and to potentially start delivering B-list projects once A-list projects are fully funded.

16. Maintenance of effort discussion. CAC recommends resetting the base year with each authorization. The CAC suggested the base year be updated to at least the 2019 maintenance of effort levels with additional review by member government’s financial staff. 9-4. Staff does not recommend changes to the current maintenance of effort language or Policy #11.

72 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10C June 2021 City of Colorado Springs Capital Change Order Log Current Total Change Orig Contract New Contract Percent Contract # Contractor Project Title PPRTA Program CO # Description of CO Amt of CO Month Note PPRTA Account Contract Total Orders Amount Amount Increase

Move $214.287 from Move money ext period of performance now to T008564 FHU 30th St Improvements 8 $0.00 $2,924,128.50 $224,128.50 $700,000.00 $2,924,128.50 0.00% May 70930-3100-202-931026, October 31, 2021 add to 03-20-5130900

Pedestrian Bridge from Olympic T008140 Anderson Mason Dale 9 Extend contract through December 31, 2021 $0.00 $2,013,642.75 $1,631,886.75 $381,756.00 $2,013,642.75 0.00% May 03-20-5030038 Museum to ATBP over Railroad

Vermijo Avenue and Sierra Incorporate $410,699 of funding from Colorado Springs T009439 Wildcat Construction Madre Street: Reconstruction 6 $410,699.00 $13,089,301.00 $5,084,356.00 $8,004,945.00 $13,500,000.00 3.14% May N/A Utilities and the City of Colorado Springs and Streetscape

June 2021 City of Colorado Springs Maintanence Change Order Log Current Total Change Orig Contract New Contract Percent Contract # Contractor Project Title PPRTA Program CO # Description of CO Amt of CO Month Note PPRTA Account Contract Total Orders Amount Amount Increase

T008182 TP Enterprises PPRTA Landscape Maintenance 10 Add funds for 2021 program $14,820.15 $1,511,850.00 $1,376,670.15 $150,000.00 $1,526,670.15 0.97% May 03-30-5209000

T009765 A-1 Chipseal PPRTA Chip Seal Program 3 Add funds for 2021 program $1,600,000.00 $2,427,400.02 $1,178,459.50 $2,848,940.52 $4,027,400.02 39.73% May 03-30-5231000

increase funds & extend date through December 31, T009766 A-1 Chipseal Co PPRTA Crack Seal Program 3 $300,000.00 $1,813,218.50 $813,218.50 $1,300,000.00 $2,113,218.50 14.20% May 03-30-5231000 2021

T008634 Precision Concrete Cutting SVDM - PPRTA Funded 11 increase funds for 2021 program $174,937.93 $379,784.75 $504,722.68 $50,000.00 $554,722.68 31.54% May 03-30-5233000

Install Truncated Domes T008584 Ozarks Vanguardonline 13 Install Truncated Domes Detectable Warning $124,735.78 $299,792.16 $241,220.16 $58,572.00 $424,527.94 29.38% May 03-30-5233000 Detectable Warning

June 2021 City of Colorado Springs Task Order Log Contract PPRTA Account Task Order Number Mod Number Total Price Vendor Description Month Capital Maint Number Number T009334 2021-003 Schanel W Colorado Bearing Plate Holders May Maint 03-30-5205000 $43,850.00 T009734 2021-010 Adarand Galley over Sand Creek May Maint 03-30-5205000 $3,635.00 T009734 2021-011 Adarand Paseo @ Constitution May Maint 03-30-5205000 $1,087.50

73 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10D

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

DATE: May 25, 2021

TO: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) Board of Directors Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Citizen’s Advisory Committee (CAC)

FROM: City of Colorado Springs Gayle Sturdivant, PE, PMP, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director

SUBJECT: RAISE Grant Application UPRR Over Fontanero Bridge Replacements

The City of Colorado Springs intends to apply for a discretionary federal grant, Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE), to assist with funding PPRTA A-list and B-list projects. The UPRR Mainline over Fontanero Bridge (A-list project) and UPRR Siding over Fontanero (B-list project), collectively referred to as the UPRR Over Fontanero Bridge Replacements project, is a strong candidate for grant selection based on the current level of project development and cost certainty, in addition to the criterion outlined in the notice of funding opportunity for the grant. Additional RAISE grant details are available online: https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants

As an A-list project, funding for the UPRR Mainline over Fontanero Bridge derives from PPRTA. Although the UPRR Siding over Fontanero is a B-list project, it warrants simultaneous reconstruction with the A-list project for continuing railroad operations during construction, thus increasing need for PPRTA funding for the dual project. This grant could provide necessary funding for the B-list project and potentially cover some of the cost for the A-list project, relieving PPRTA funding. The City anticipates requesting between $15-19M in grant funds to cover a majority of the construction and construction management services costs. PPRTA funds would cover engineering, environmental clearance, and right-of-way acquisition costs, along with the grant match requirement for the RAISE grant.

The RAISE grant application is due July 12, 2021. Grant award notices are anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2021. While waiting for the grant award notice, the City will continue with its current schedule to complete the engineering plans and start construction of both projects in late 2023. If the grant is received, we expect little to no delay in the project construction start. With the PPRTA capital project programming and the project schedule, time (schedule float) is available to complete the grant agreement and environmental clearances, and to incorporate federal requirements into the project.

If selected for the RAISE grant, the grant award amount would be additional discretionary federal funding and would benefit both PPRTA and the Pikes Peak region. The PPRTA funding replaced with the grant can be used to support other A-list projects and opens further opportunity to support B-list efforts.

The City requests a letter of support from the PPRTA Board of Directors for inclusion with the grant application.

74 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Colorado Springs El Paso County Manitou Springs Green Mountain Falls Ramah

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: June 9, 2021 TO: Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Board of Directors FROM: Rick Sonnenburg, Program/Contracts Manager SUBJECT: Quarterly Project and Program Status Reports

ACTION REQUESTED: Information

The Comprehensive IGAs between the Pikes Peak RTA and each of the member governments state that each of the five entities…” shall provide to the Board, within fifty (50) calendar days after the close of each calendar quarter, a status report on capital projects and maintenance programs.” A copy of each of the status reports received for the 1st quarter of 2021 is attached.

Attachments: 1. Status Report from the Town of Ramah 2. Status Report from the Town of Green Mountain Falls 3. Status Report from the City of Manitou Springs 4. Status Report from El Paso County 5. Status Report from the City of Colorado Springs

75 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

TOWN OF RAMAH P.O. BOX 129 113 S. COMMERCIAL RAMAH, CO 80832 719-541-2163 FAX 719-541-3978 Email: [email protected]

May 24, 2021

To Whom It May Concern:

The Town of Ramah had no capital expenses in the 1st quarter. No maintenance funds were spent in the first quarter. The Town of Ramah is planning a grant funded project in 2021 for drainage and anticipate using our PPRTA maintenance funds for this project. No sales have taken place for PPRTA-funded assets.

Cordially,

Cindy M. Tompkins Town Clerk

76 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Town of Green Mountain Falls PO Box 524, 10615 Green Mountain Falls Rd., Green Mountain Falls, CO 80819 Phone 719.684.9414 Website: www.gmfco.us

May 26, 2021

To the PPRTA Board of Directors and CAC members:

PPRTA First Quarter Progress Report 2021

Please find the following progress summary for January, February, & March 2021.

The Town of Green Mountain Falls continued to undertake all regular road maintenance practices including the filling of priority potholes on the Town’s limited paved roads. With respect to the remainder of the municipal street system that remains unpaved, Town staff subjected all roads to routine grading, compaction, and drainage support operations. In addition, all such roads are treated bi-annually with a comprehensive application of magnesium chloride, both to mitigate dust impacts and preserve surface conditions.

Town Staff coordinated with PPRTA and Wilson & Company, Engineer, Andre Bracken, who began work on the Stilling Basins Project. The first phase of that project is now complete, which involved a stormwater drainage study. The second phase has been approved by the Board of Trustees, and Mr. Bracken and his team have started working on the construction documents.

With respect to the Town’s first quarter maintenance allocation, Town staff worked and continues working to build up road base, grade, apply mag chloride, replace under road and in right-of-way culverts, compact its gravel roads as well as use the services of a third party to patch asphalt.

Respectfully submitted,

Angie Sprang, Town Manager [email protected] 719-684-9414 ext. 5

77 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

18, May 2021

David Geislinger, Chairman Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority 15 South 7th Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905

RE: 2021 1st Quarter Report, City of Manitou Springs

Dear Chairman Geislinger:

In the first quarter of 2021, the City of Manitou Springs utilized Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA) funding as follows:

Maintenance Funds: Construction was just completed on the Public Works transportation and maintenance building where $350,000 of approved Maintenance fund were used for the entire project.

Manitou Springs Priority “A” Projects: West Colorado/Manitou Avenue East (WAAP) Total project cost to COMS: $150,000 Additional committed $146,576 Status: This multi-jurisdictional project continues east of Manitou. The Manitou Springs portion of the project, and sidewalk work have been completed.

Manitou Avenue West End Drainage Improvements Project Total project cost: $4,250,000 PPRTA Match funding: $1,221,000 2019 amended budget $434,600 Expended: $71,202, PPRTA $14,342, TIP $59,020 Status: Engineering Consultant has submitted 90% percent plans for review Project is well underway as Wildcat Construction continues to work their way up Manitou Avenue building the new storm drain system.

78 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Transit Shuttle and Surface or Structure Parking Total project cost: $650,000 Expended: $307,009 (property purchase) + 14,309.99 (lot reseal and stripe 2017)+$6,500 (Ruxton stop Q1 2018)+$172,650 (Demolition contract 2021) Status: Demolition to be underway in the next 3 weeks

This property is adjacent to the pick-up/drop off location for the City's free shuttle program located on Old Man's Trail. PPRTA funding in the amount of $303,209 was utilized for lease-purchase down payment and closing costs on this property.

Citizen participation has determined that the existing structure will be retained for a transit center. During the first quarter of 2021 a demolition contractor was selected to demolish part of the structure leaving the center portion of the building to build-out into a transportation hub.

Downtown Sidewalk, Drainage and Utilities Improvements Total project budget: $768,000 Expended/encumbered: $323,859.26 This capital allocation is slated for a variety of needs in the downtown district of Manitou Springs. Remaining funds in this account and additional City funds will be combined in 2021 to bring all downtown public bathrooms up to ADA standards and place pedestrian ramps at critical locations such as the post office

With Regards,

Jeffery A. Jones Public Works Director City of Manitou Springs 719-492-2359 [email protected]

79 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

PPRTA QUARTERLY REPORT El Paso County Department of Public Works

1st Quarter 2021 March 2021

McLaughlin Road Roundabout

Engineering Division 3275 Akers Drive Colorado Springs, Colorado 80922 (719) 520-6460 www.elpasoco.com

80 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E PROJECTS AND PROGRAM UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS

First Quarter Executive Summary 3

2005-2014 Capital Programs PPRTA Budget Summary 4 2015-2024 Capital Programs PPRTA Budget Summary 4

Project Status Reports

Capital Projects South Academy Boulevard Project 5 Highway 105 Project 6 McLaughlin Road / Old Meridian Road Roundabout Project 7 Meridian Road Extension / US Highway 24 Intersection Improvements 8 Security Boulevard & Main Street Intersection Improvements 9 Security/Widefield Boulevard & Fontaine Avenue Intersection Improvements 10 Mesa Ridge Parkway Improvement Project 11 Beacon Lite Road Improvement Project 12 Eastonville Road Improvement Project 13 Briargate Parkway/Stapleton Road Corridor Study 14-15

Maintenance Program Maintenance Program 16-18

PPRTA Extension A-List Projects Schedule Projections 17 Budget Projections 18

81 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Executive Summary

During the first quarter of 2021, the County’s PPRTA capital and maintenance projects continued to advance.

Design for the South Academy Boulevard project is progressing. This project is a collaborative project with CDOT under the Military Access Mobility and Safety Improvement Project which falls under a BUILD Grant.

Final design and property acquisition for the Highway 105 Segment A continues and design for the remainder is in progress. Construction of segment A is anticipated to begin in 2022.

Construction for the Old Meridian Road/McLaughlin Road Roundabout project continues. Approximately 95 percent of the project was completed through the 4th quarter of 2020. The remaining items will be completed in the second quarter of 2021.

Construction of the Meridian Road Extension/US Highway 24 Intersection Project is ongoing. This project is being constructed in conjunction with the federally funded Falcon Park & Ride project. This project was originally awarded in the first quarter of 2020 and approximately 46% has been completed through the first quarter of 2021.

Design continues for two intersection improvement projects located at Security Boulevard & Main Street and Security/Widefield Boulevard & Fontaine Avenue by El Paso County Engineering staff, with both nearing final design. These two projects are currently scheduled to be advertised for construction in late Spring of 2021.

Consultant procurement for design of the Mesa Ridge Parkway project is in progress. After reconsideration of the use of a design/build approach, the project will proceed using a conventional design-bid-build delivery. The Project consists of design and construction of the eastbound lanes of Mesa Ridge Parkway between SH 21 (Powers Boulevard) and Marksheffel Road.

Design for the Beacon Lite Road Project (County Line Phase) and the Corridor Study for Briargate/Stapleton continued into the 1st quarter of 2021. Additionally, the Transportation Impact Study for Eastonville Road was completed and accepted at the end of the 1st quarter.

The 2021 maintenance program work progressed during the first quarter. El Paso County completed a total of 3,681 square yards of sidewalk, 7,187 linear feet of curb and gutter, 299 square yards of cross pan, 620 square yards of fillet and 1,046 square yards of pedestrian ramps. El Paso County also completed 4.5 centerline miles of gravel roads.

82 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Capital Programs PPRTA Budget Summary

The following tables summarize the cumulative program budget for each project and identifies the current status of the project.

2005-2014 Capital Projects 2015-2024 Capital Projects

Cumulative Cumulative Project Name Budget Status Project Name Budget Thru Status Thru 2014 2020 Baptist-Hodgen Connection $ 2,062,003 Completed Beacon Lite Road $ 4,361,000 Design – 60% Black Forest Road (joint w/ City City Led Akers Drive $ 1,714,614 Completed $ 0 South Metro Accessibility $ 25,017,190 - of Colorado Springs) Project Deer Creek, Base Camp, Design $ 200,000 Phase I- Westmeadow Br. Completed Microscope Way (aka Emigrant) Evaluation Phase II- SH 115 to B St. Completed Eastonville Road $ 8,525,000 TIS Complete Phase III- PPCC to I-25 Completed Fontaine Blvd/Security Phase IV- B St to PPCC Completed Blvd/Widefield Blvd $ 1,250,000 Design - 90% County Line Road Upgrade Intersection $ 7,400,000 Completed I-25 to Furrow Road Highway 105 $ 13,728,850 Meridian Road Widening Phase A – Jackson Creek $ 7,520,632 Completed Design – 85% Woodmen Road to Rex Road Pkwy to Lake Woodmoor Dr Hodgen Road Upgrade Phases B- Lake $ 19,059,935 - Design – 35% SH83 to Eastonville Road Woodmoor Dr to SH83 Phase I – SH-83 to Black Completed Main St/Security Blvd $ 750,000 Design – 100% Forest Road Old Meridian/McLaughlin Construction – Phase II – Bar X to $ 5,226,000 Completed Roundabout 95% Goshawk & at Meridian Mesa Ridge Parkway $ 10,014,997 Design Baptist Road Widening $ 8,568,100 Completed I-25 to Tari Drive Monument Hill Road $ 5,183,852 Closeout Construction Struthers Extension/Jackson New Meridian/US 24 Int. $ 4,608,000 Creek $ 3,714,500 Completed 46% Falcon Nest to Baptist Road South Academy Blvd $ 7,023,305 Design - 65% Marksheffel Road Widening & Stapleton Drive/Briargate Blvd Extension $ 19,100,209 Completed Corridor Study (joint w/ City of $ 410,000 Study – 95% PAFB to Black Forest Road Colorado Springs) Baptist Road Widening Tutt Blvd Extension (joint w/ City Led $ 544,729 Completed $ 555,000 Mitchell Avenue to I-25 City of Colorado Springs) Project Baptist Road RR Xing EPC $ 10,274,196 West Colorado Avenue (joint w/ COS $25,774,910 EPC Led Overpass at BNSF/UP / $ 10,861,241 Completed MS $ 448,925 Monument Creek City of Manitou Springs/City of Midland Trail - Project Construction 46% Colorado Springs) $450,000 Closeout $ 513,411 Meridian Road Extension (Combined with TOT $36,498,032 Thru 2020 - Falcon Hwy to US-24 2015-2014 -New $5,121,411 Meridian/US 24) Stapleton Drive (West)- $ 2,343,267 Completed Eastonville Road to US-24 Marksheffel Road Widening $ 32,231,078 Completed Mesa Ridge Parkway to US-24 Stapleton Drive (East)- $ 5,250,000 Completed US-24 to Curtis Road

83 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E South Academy Boulevard Project

Project Description: The project consists of widening South Academy Boulevard (SAB) from west of I-25 to the El Paso County/City of Colorado Springs border from a 4 lane to 6 lane rural expressway section. The SAB bridges over Fountain Creek are considered scour critical and the project includes analysis and design for scour countermeasures to prevent future scour. This project is a collaboration project with CDOT under the Military Access Mobility and Safety Improvement Project which falls under a CDOT BUILD Grant.

The approximate 2-mile-long project includes widening of SAB to 6 lanes, improvements to multiple intersections/interchanges, widening of bridges and culverts, installation of sound walls, signalization, pedestrian and ADA improvements, adding accessible bus stops, drainage, lighting, signage and striping improvements, etc. The Project also includes evaluation and widening of the existing bridges and box culverts, scour countermeasures within Fountain Creek, and addresses stormwater quantity and quality.

Project Team: • Design: AECOM • Construction: SEMA

Cost Summary: • PPRTA Total Budget – $21,000,000 • Design Contract Authorized – $3,891,314.00

Schedule Summary: • Final design: Winter of 2021 • Construction: Spring of 2022

Project Status: • Preliminary design for the entire corridor is complete • Project is now in final design • Conceptual railroad package has been submitted and approved by railroad owners. Railroad coordination is ongoing. • Environment & right-of-way clearances are underway

South Academy Project Limits 84 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Highway 105 Project

Project Description: The Highway 105 project will evaluate, design and construct capacity and safety improvements between the I-25 off ramps and SH 83. The corridor is approximately five miles in length and improvements will be phased as required. A corridor study outlining the proposed conceptual improvements, funded by El Paso County was completed in 2012. For conceptual planning purposes, the corridor was broken into 5 segments:

. Project A: I-25 off Ramp to Lake Woodmoor Drive . Project B-E: Lake Woodmoor Drive to SH 83

Project Segment A has also been approved for federal funds and will be the first segment constructed.

Project Team: • Designer: HDR

Cost Summary: • PPRTA Total Budget – $18,000,000 • Design Contracts Authorized – $3,207,945 • Federal Funds for Project A (Construction) – $5,115,944 ($4,235,490 federal / $880,454 local match)

Schedule Summary: • Conceptual design completed – 2012 (funded by El Paso County Road & Bridge) • Preliminary design for entire corridor – 2015 to 2018 • Project A - Design 2016 to 2022 / Construction is anticipated to begin in 2022 • Project Segments B-E – Final design 2019 to 2022 & Phased Construction TBD

Project Status: • Preliminary design for the entire corridor is complete. • Final Design and property acquisition for Project A continues • El Paso County is relooking at all alternatives within Project A for access and an updated Traffic Analysis is underway which will require additional design prior to finalizing property acquisitions. • Information on the corridor Plan / Conceptual Design is available at www.105corridor.com

Highway 105 Corridor Vicinity Map

85 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E McLaughlin Road / Old Meridian Road Roundabout Project

Project Description: This project involves reconstructing the McLaughlin Road / Old Meridian Road intersection as a modern single-lane roundabout and upgrading the Old Meridian Road cross-section toward US-24. The current intersection consists of three approaches with poor alignment resulting in driver confusion and traffic conflicts. The project is a safety improvement that will include pedestrian facilities at the intersection and along Old Meridian Road to the southeast and McLaughlin Road to the northeast. The project will also necessitate drainage improvements to accommodate runoff from the contributing areas, involving a new storm drain system in Old Meridian Road to US-24.

Project Team: • Designer: El Paso County Engineering Division • Property Acquisition: TRS Corp. • Construction Management: Alfred Benesch & Co • Contractor: Kiewit Infrastructure, Co.

Cost Summary: • PPRTA budget: $ 5,226,000 • Encumbered: $ 4,509,000

Schedule Summary: • Construction: 2020 – Spring 2021

Progress/Status: Vicinity Map • Construction and Construction Management services are in progress and completion is expected by Spring of 2021.

Roundabout McLaughlin/Old Meridian Previous Condition

86 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Meridian Road Extension/US Highway 24 Intersection Improvements

Project Description: Intersection improvements at Old Meridian/US-24, New Meridian/US-24 (2014 PPRTA “A” list project); New Meridian Extension from US-24 to Falcon Highway (2004 PPRTA “A” list project), and the Falcon Park & Ride (federal funds project). These projects will be designed and constructed concurrently for cost and time efficiencies. Inadequate auxiliary lanes on Old Meridian Road currently cause delays; skewed intersection limits driver sight distance, increases pedestrian exposure and reduces capacity at US-24. Improvements include removing the traffic signal at Old Meridian/US-24 and converting access control at this location to a right-in/right-out; and completing New Meridian/US-24 as a signalized intersection with adequate turn lanes at all approaches. Improvements will maximize intersection operational efficiency, increase motorist and pedestrian safety and provide appropriate auxiliary lanes and drainage improvements.

Project Team: • Design: HDR • CM: Alfred Benesch & Company • Construction: HEI Civil

Cost Summary (not including Park & Ride): • PPRTA budget: $ 4,608,000 Intersection $ 513,411 Meridian Road. Extension

Schedule Summary: • Construction: 2020 to 2021 Vicinity Map Progress/Status: • Construction in progress, currently transitioning to second phase, ~46% complete • Currently scheduled to open New Meridian Road by May of 2021. • Scheduled for completion Fall of 2021.

Northbound New Meridian Approach US Highway 24

87 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Security Boulevard & Main Street Intersection Improvements

Project Description: Intersection improvements at the intersection of Security Boulevard & Main Street. The intersections are currently equipped with traffic control devices that are more than three decades old with leaning traffic poles, inadequate signal head clearance, and exposed cabling. Improvements will include installation of new traffic signals and accompanying equipment, as well as new signage, striping, and pedestrian improvements. Improvements will update intersection operational efficiency, increase pedestrian and ADA access, and increase overall public safety.

Team: • Designer: El Paso County Engineering • CM and Contractor: TBD Cost Summary: • PPRTA Budget: $750,000 Schedule Summary: • Design: 2019 to 2020 • Construction: 2021 Progress/Status: • Final Design complete • Utility agreement finalized • Construction advertisement Spring of Vicinity Map 2021

Existing Conditions at Main and Security Intersection

88 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Security/Widefield Boulevard & Fontaine Avenue Intersection Improvements

Project Description: Intersection improvements at the intersection of Security/Widefield Boulevard and Fontaine Avenue. Presently the infrastructure at the intersection is over three decades old and has exceeded its service life. Improvements will include the installation of new traffic control devices, creation of ADA compliant curb ramps and sidewalk, and minor drainage improvements to the area. These improvements will increase the operational efficiency of the intersection, provide ADA compliant access, and increase pedestrian and vehicular safety.

Team: • Designer: El Paso County Engineering • CM/Contractor: TBD • Property Acquisition: TRS Cost Summary: • PPRTA Budget: $1,250,000 Schedule Summary: • Design: 2019 to 2021 • Property Acquisition: 2020 to 2021 • Construction: 2021 Progress/Status: • Final Design in progress. Vicinity Map • Property acquisition underway – finalized by Summer of 2021 • Construction advertisement Spring of 2021

Existing Conditions at Security Intersection at Fontaine and Security/Widefield Intersection

89 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Mesa Ridge Parkway Improvements

Project Description: The existing portion of Mesa Ridge Parkway from SH 21 (Powers Boulevard) to Marksheffel Road was constructed by the developer of the adjacent land north of the roadway. It is planned for an ultimate 4-lane cross-section to operate as a Principal Arterial, but only the westbound lanes have been constructed to date. The ground where the eastbound lanes are to be located was graded for those improvements at the time the westbound lanes were constructed. The preliminary plans for the second phase construction included information for the ultimate four lane cross-section, but only the grading has been completed for the eastbound lanes. The project also includes a bridge over Jimmy Camp Creek and intersection improvements at SH21 and Marksheffel Road.

The Project consists of design and construction of the eastbound lanes of Mesa Ridge Parkway in general conformance with the ultimate configuration shown in the original roadway concept plans. After reconsideration of the use of a design/build approach, the project will proceed using a conventional design-bid-build approach. Procurement is underway for the selection of the design consultant. Also included in the project will be the design and construction to widen or design and construct a second bridge over Jimmy Camp Creek.

Project Team: • TBD Cost Summary: • PPRTA budget: $ 9,975,000 Schedule Summary: • Design – 2021; Construction – 2022 Progress/Status: • Contract for Design Services to be awarded in the second quarter of 2021

Existing Mesa Ridge Parkway

90 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Beacon Lite Road Project

Project Description: Beacon Lite Road is a 1 mile, 2-lane gravel road operating as a rural collector in northern El Paso County, Colorado with Douglas County to the north and Town of Monument to the south. The Project extends from Wakonda Way to County Line Road providing access for local residents. The project is being split in two phases. The first phase will be the County Line phase which will consist of improving the Beacon Lite road and County Line road intersection and will extend from Indi Dr. on the east to Interstate 25 interchange on the west. The Second phase will provide improvements to Beacon Lite road from Wakonda way on the south to County Line road on the north.

The project will consist of designing and constructing safety enhancements and improving the road to current County standards. The anticipated enhancements along Beacon Lite Road include asphalt paving, horizontal and vertical improvement, intersection improvements, drainage improvements, and water quality.

Project Team: • Design: Michael Baker International • Construction: TBD

Cost Summary: • PPRTA Total Budget – $4,300,000 • Phase 1 Design Contract – $558,142

Schedule Summary: • Phase 1 design package: Spring of 2021 / Phase 1 Construction start: Summer of 2021 • Phase 2 design package: Spring of 2022 / Phase 2 Construction start: Winter of 2022

Project Status: • Phase 1 final design is 90% complete • Right-of-way clearances are underway

91 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Eastonville Road Improvement Project

Project Description: The project focuses on implementation of linear and intersection specific improvements within the corridor between McLaughlin Road and Latigo Boulevard. A Transportation Impact Study commenced in December of 2019 with final draft complete November of 2020. The study investigated traffic growth and required improvements along the Eastonville Road corridor. The County is now developing a strategy for furthering the design for the entire corridor, including a coordinated design with ongoing development for a portion along Phase I (Budget - $8,525,000). Recently it was approved by Department of Public Works with corridor design to follow.

Project Team: • Traffic Impact Study: Wilson & Company • Design: TBD Cost Summary: • PPRTA budget: $ 8,525,000 (Total Project) Schedule Summary: • Traffic Impact Study: Final Draft November of 2020/EPC-Approved March of 2021 • Design: 2021 Progress/Status: • Design phasing strategy for corridor under development

Vicinity/Phase Map

92 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Briargate Parkway / Stapleton Road Corridor Study

Project Description: The Briargate Parkway / Stapleton Road Corridor study is a joint project between El Paso County and the City of Colorado Springs. The Briargate Parkway / Stapleton Road corridor is an integral part of a larger transportation corridor system providing connectivity with I-25 to the north and south of the greater Colorado Springs area. The corridor section under consideration with this project is mostly undeveloped at this time with some portions containing existing roadways of various types and phases of construction associated with adjacent developments that have occurred over time. The project area begins at Black Forest Road, which is the eastern boundary of the Wolf Ranch subdivision currently under development and is also currently the eastern boundary of the City of Colorado Springs. The terminus of the project area is along the Stapleton Road right-of- way at Meridian Road. This is a rapidly developing area of the City and the County. While a majority of the project area is currently within the jurisdiction of the County, it is likely that a significant portion of the currently developing areas within the corridor may be incorporated into the City as development progresses.

Early objectives of this project are to verify and develop the master plan requirements for the roadway. The County’s 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan (MTCP) includes specific recommendations regarding functional classification, transportation modes, and other uses for the Briargate/Stapleton corridor. It is anticipated that this project will plan for the ultimate improvements, but that interim phases of capacity and safety improvements may be warranted based upon the findings of early studies and funding limitations. The corridor will also be evaluated to determine if additional mobility provisions such as bike routes, pedestrian accommodations, and public transit will be appropriate additions to this corridor.

Vicinity Map

93 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Project Team: • Corridor Study: Wilson and Company Cost Summary: • PPRTA budget: $ 1,100,000 (EPC - $ 314,000, City of Colorado Springs - $ 786,000) Schedule Summary: • Corridor Study: 2020 to 2021 Progress/Status: • Study to be completed 2nd Quarter 2021 • Virtual Public Meeting Scheduled April 16th to April 30th • Website designed and provided for Public Outreach • Access Control Coordination with City of Colorado Springs

Briargate Parkway looking East

Stapleton Road looking West

94 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Program Status Reports: 2021 Maintenance Programs

2021 Concrete Drainage Program 1st Quarter Report

During the first quarter, work commenced on the 2021 Concrete Drainage Program. A total of 3,681 Square Yards of sidewalk, 7,187 linear feet of curb and gutter, 299 Square Yards of cross pan, 620 Square Yards of Fillet and 1,046 Square Yards of pedestrian ramps were completed. Work was completed at the following locations:

McLaughlin Meridian Ranch

Meridian Ranch Road - Sunset Crater Drive to Eastonville Road McLaughlin Road – Flowers Road to Tompkins Road Rainbow Bridge Drive - Londonderry Drive to Mount Harvard Drive

2021 1st Quarter Gravel

El Paso County crews completed 4.5 centerline miles of gravel on Meridian Road South and Jones Road in the first quarter.

Jones Road Meridian Road South

95 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

PPRTA Extension A‐List Projects Schedule Projections (Quarterly Update ‐ March 2021)

2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Name

Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Design 1 BEACON LITE RD.: HWY 105 TO - COUNTY LINE Construction AD BLACK FOREST RD. ROADWAY Design 2 IMPROVEMENTS: WOODMEN TO RESEARCH Construction City of Colorado DEER CREEK, BASE CAMP, Design 3 EMIGRANT: MONUMENT HILL TO WOODMOOR Construction AD Design 4 EASTONVILLE RD.: MCLAUGHLIN TO LATIGO Construction AD Design 5 FONTAINE BLVD. AT SECURITY BLVD. AND WIDEFIELD BLVD. Construction AD

6 HIGHWAY 105: I25 TO LAKE Design WOODMOOR Construction AD

6 HIGHWAY 105: LAKE WOODMOOR Design TO HW Y 83 Construction AD Design 7 MAIN ST. AT SECURITY BLVD. Construction AD Design 8 MERIDIAN / MCLAUGHLIN ROUNDABOUT Construction Design 9 MESA RIDGE PKWY. IMPS.: POWERS TO MARKSHEFFEL Construction AD

MONUMENT HILL RD.: COUNTY LINE SUBSTANTIALLY 10 RD. TO WOODMOOR DR. COMPLETE

Design 11 NEW MERIDIAN AT US-24 Construction Design 12 S. ACADEMY BLVD.: I25 TO BRADLEY RD. RAMPS Construction AD

STAPLETON DR. /BRIARGATE 13 BLVD. CORRIDOR STUDY (JOINT Corridor Study PROJ) TUTT BLVD. EXTENSION: DUBLIN Design 14 TO TEMPLETON GAP RD. (JOINT PROJ) Construction

W. COLORADO AVE. SUBSTANTIALLY RECONSTRUCTION: 31ST ST. TO US 15 COMPLETE 24 (JOINT PROJ)

96 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

PPRTA Extension A‐List Projects BUDGET PROJECTIONS (Quarterly Update April 2021)

A-List Projects Funding to 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Original Increase / Date Budget Decrease Estimate

1 BEACON LITE ROAD.: HWY 105 TO 4,361,000 7,000,000 3,500,000 14,861,000 4,361,000 10,500,000 COUNTY LINE

BLACK FOREST ROAD. 2 - 3,534,000 3,534,000 3,534,000 - ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: WOODMEN TO

3 DEER CREEK, BASE CAMP, EMIGRANT: 200,000 200,000 200,000 - MONUMENT HILL TO WOODMOOR

4 EASTONVILLE ROAD.: MCLAUGHLIN 8,525,000 2,590,087 4,500,000 4,500,000 15,265,087 8,525,000 6,740,087 TO LATIGO

5 FONTAINE BLVD. AT SECURITY BLVD. 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 - AND WIDEFIELD BLVD.

6 HIGHWAY 105: I25 TO SH83 10,613,857 5,770,783 7,500,000 12,500,000 39,499,633 18,314,000 21,185,633

7 MAIN ST. AT SECURITY BLVD. 750,000 750,000 750,000 -

8 MERIDIAN / MCLAUGHLIN ROUNDABOUT 2,376,000 5,226,000 2,376,000 2,850,000

9 MESA RIDGE PKWY. IMPS.: POWERS TO 9,975,000 9,975,000 9,975,000 - MARKSHEFFEL

10 MONUMENT HILL ROAD.: COUNTY LINE 5,183,852 1,500,000 5,000,000 11,683,852 3,965,000 7,718,852 ROAD. TO WOODMOOR DRIVE

11 NEW MERIDIAN AT US-24 4,608,000 5,608,000 4,608,000 1,000,000

12 S. ACADEMY BLVD.: I25 TO BRADLEY 7,023,305 1,000,000 22,023,305 18,000,000 4,023,305 ROAD. RAMPS

STAPLETON DRIVE /BRIARGATE 13 BLVD. CORRIDOR STUDY (JOINT 314,000 314,000 314,000 - PROJ)

TUTT BLVD. EXTENSION: DUBLIN TO 14 555,000 555,000 555,000 - TEMPLETON GAP ROAD. (JOINT PROJ) W. COLORADO AVENUE. 15 RECONSTRUCTION: 31ST ST. TO US 24 16,454,321 17,454,321 3,428,000 14,026,321 (JOINT PROJ)

TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $72,189,335 $10,596,640 $17,000,000 $17,000,000 $8,534,000 $148,199,198 $80,155,000 $68,044,19

Revenue Projection 10,596,640 17,000,000 17,000,000 17,000,000 Contingency -'B' List - - - 8,566,000 8,466,000

97 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Platte Ave. Eastbound Bridge Girder Placement PPRTA Projects and Programs Quarterly Update 1st Quarter 2021

City of Colorado Springs

98 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

City of Colorado Springs PPRTA Program and Project Quarterly Update 1st Quarter 2021

Table of Contents Capital Program Overview ...... 4 Completeness...... 4 B-list Update ...... 8 PPRTA 2005-2014 Authorization Update ...... 10 CDOT and PPRTA Impacts and Joint Participation ...... 11 Budget ...... 12 Drawdown ...... 17 Schedule ...... 17 A-list Capital Project Highlights ...... 20 Academy Boulevard Pavement Reconstruction - Bijou to Airport ...... 21 Academy Boulevard Pavement Reconstruction - Fountain to Milton Proby Parkway ...... 22 Airport Road Over Spring Creek Bridge Replacement ...... 23 Barnes Roadway Improvements – Solar Ridge Drive to Powers Boulevard ...... 24 Black Forest Road Roadway Improvements – Woodmen to Research ...... 25 Centennial Boulevard Extension – Fillmore to Fontanero ...... 26 Circle Drive Bridges Over Hancock and Fountain Creek Rehabilitation ...... 27 Galley Road Over Sand Creek Bridge Replacement ...... 28 Las Vegas Street and Royer Railroad Crossing Relocation ...... 29 Marksheffel Road Bridge over Sand Creek ...... 30 Platte Avenue Corridor Improvement Study including Connection to I-25 ...... 31 Platte Avenue Over Sand Creek Bridge Replacement ...... 32 South Cheyenne Canyon Road 1 Over Cheyenne Creek Bridge Replacement ...... 33 Tutt Boulevard Extension - Dublin to Templeton Gap Road ...... 34 UPRR Mainline Over Fontanero Bridge Replacement ...... 35 UPRR Nevada & Tejon Street Crossing Reconstruction ...... 37 West Fillmore Over Unnamed Channel Bridge Replacement ...... 38

99 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

A-list Capital Programs ...... 39 Companion Drainage Improvements for Roadways Project ...... 40 Citywide Intersection Improvements Phase I ...... 41 Citywide On-street Bikeway Improvements Phase I ...... 42 Citywide Pedestrian Transportation Improvements Phase I ...... 43 Citywide School and Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements Phase I ...... 43 Citywide Roadway Safety, Traffic Operations, and Maintenance Phase 1 ...... 44 Citywide Congestion and Incident Management Signal Improvements Phase I ...... 45 Citywide Traffic Signal System Upgrade ...... 46 Emergency Bridge Fund ...... 47 Transit Programs ...... 48 Trail Program ...... 49 Maintenance Programs ...... 51 Roadway Maintenance, Roadway Drainage Pipe, Guardrail and Concrete Repair Programs ...... 51 Drawdown ...... 53 Asset Totals and Materials Quantities ...... 54 Citywide Traffic Signal System Maintenance ...... 55 Bridge Maintenance ...... 56 Capital Project Maintenance ...... 58 Appendix A – Additional Transit Data for PPRTA Staff ...... 59 Summary of Transit Contracts ...... 59 Appendix B – Additional Operations and Maintenance Data for PPRTA Staff ...... 60 PPRTA On-call/ADA Detail ...... 60 Summary of O&M Maintenance Contracts ...... 65 Appendix C – Capital Project Completeness Graphics ...... 66 2021 ...... 66 2022 ...... 67 2023 ...... 68 2024 ...... 69

100 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Capital Program Overview Following is the PPRTA Quarterly report prepared by the City of Colorado Springs for the 1st quarter of 2021. The report presents information on projects and programs in order to inform citizens, staff, and the board on the status, progress, and projections for PPRTA-funded activities. Completeness There are 34 A-list PPRTA capital improvement projects. At the end of the first quarter of 2021, 10 of these 34 projects, or 29 %, are complete. The remaining projects are in various phases of delivery as outlined in Figure 1. Figures 2- 5 represent the projected statuses of the remaining 24 A-list capital projects at the end of the next four years. Enlarged versions of these Figures are provided in Appendix C. Barnes Road, from Solar Ridge Drive to Powers Boulevard, was under construction during most of 2020, and will reach completion in the spring of 2021. Construction of the Platte Avenue bridge replacement and utility relocations for the Airport Road bridge replacement projects are both ongoing. Several other projects, including the Centennial Extension project, are anticipated to start construction in 2021. Please note the engineering phase on these projects can range from planning studies through final design and concludes with construction bidding. Each capital project includes a graphic to indicate the project status within the project lifecycle. The locations of the 34 projects, along with the current phase, are shown on the map of Figure 6. Following the map, the next several pages elaborate upon the budget and schedule for each project.

101 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Figure 1. Remaining Projects by Phase at end of 2020

102 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Larger versions of these graphics provided in Appendix C.

Figure 2. Status at the end of 2021 Figure 3. Status at the end of 2022

Figure 4. Status at the end of 2023 Figure 5. Status at the end of 2024

103 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Figure 6. Project Location with Current Phase

104 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

In addition to the A-list capital improvement projects, there are 10 A-list Capital Programs (Capital Programs) to complete distinct groups of smaller transportation infrastructure projects and a Trail Program. Each program provides unique focus and benefit to the community. Project summary reports for active capital projects and the Capital Programs are provided within the report. Summaries of the City’s PPRTA funded Maintenance Programs are also provided. B-list Update Fifty-one (51) of the City’s B-list projects were identified in the PPRTA authorization. Of these projects, 11 are complete, one is in construction, and two are currently in engineering. The B-list projects were advanced through one of the following means: the use of non-PPRTA funding; leveraging PPRTA funds to obtain non-PPRTA funding; capitalizing on an opportunity to cost effectively deliver both an A-list and B-list project together; or, in response to an emergency repair or replacement need. Table 1 outlines the completed, or in-progress, projects and how they are funded. Projects requiring the use of PPRTA A-list funds were presented and approved by the Board of Directors. Table 1. B-list Project Update Project Name Funding Source/Comment Status Paseo Bridge Replacement Grant funded with Final engineering and ROW over Shooks Run Tributary Emergency Bridge Funds for acquisition (south) match Rockrimmon II Bridge Grant funded Complete Reconstruction Verde over Spring Creek City’s General Fund Complete Bridge Replacement Academy Blvd. – Palmer Park City’s General Fund Complete to Bijou St. Pavement Reconstruction Cascade Ave. over Cheyenne City’s General Fund Complete Run Bridge Replacement Cimarron over Fountain CDOT funded – completed Complete Creek Bridge Replacement with interchange 21st St. Over Fountain Creek PPRTA Bridge and Traffic Temporary completion Bridge Replacement programs, 2C, Water Resources Engineering – rehabilitated to extend bridge service life until replacement funds are available Mark Dabling 1 over PPRTA – Emergency Bridge Complete Unnamed Channel Fund Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Replacement

105 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Project Name Funding Source/Comment Status Mark Dabling 2 over PPRTA – Emergency Bridge Complete Unnamed Channel CMP Fund Replacement Rockrimmon Blvd – PPRTA – Maintenance Funds Complete Woodmen to Pro Rodeo Pavement Reconstruction Marksheffel Road over Jimmy PPRTA – completed with El Complete Camp Creek Bridge Paso County’s A-list project Replacement Fascination over Sand Creek PPRTA – completed with A- Complete Tributary Bridge list Enchanted Circle over Replacement Sand Creek Tributary Bridge Replacement project Platte Ave. EB over Sand PPRTA – with A-list Platte Under construction Creek Bridge Replacement Ave. WB over Sand Creek Bridge Replacement project. Both bridges replace with one structure. EB bridge cost covered with grant funds UPRR Siding over Fontanero PPRTA – Emergency Bridge Final Engineering Bridge Replacement Fund (engineering); Construction needed with PPRTA A-list UPRR Mainline over Fontanero Bridge Replacement project to serve as a bypass during construction

106 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

PPRTA 2005-2014 Authorization Update The following projects and activities are underway to use remaining funds from the 2005-2014 PPRTA authorization. Expenditure of these funds is anticipated to be complete by the end of 2021. Table 2. 2005-2014 Authorization Update Project Name Comment Funds Roadway Safety and Traffic Funds spent on 30th Street $0 (previously $214,287) Operations Improvement project to pay for design services. Pikes Peak Greenway Funds obligated in $41,105 Improvements from construction contract with Rockrimmon at I-25 to Olgoonik General Contractor Cottonwood Creek in April 2021. Construction anticipated to start in October 2021 and PPRTA funds spent by December 2021. Marksheffel Road (PAFB to Marksheffel Road over Sand $28,924 Black Forest) Creek Bridge. Remaining work consists of landscaping, willow planting, and painting to be completed when proper temperatures are reached. $420,070 is obligated for the remaining construction contact and construction management services. Approximately $28,924 remains, which will likely be used for design of Marksheffel between N. Carefree and Dublin.

107 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

CDOT and PPRTA Impacts and Joint Participation The City has completed a review of the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) projects identified in the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The following table identifies the currently programmed CDOT projects and potential PPRTA project or program impacts, along with the anticipated construction year. Please note these projects are thoroughly coordinated with CDOT and are typically considered joint efforts or opportunities for future improvements. Table 3. CDOT and PPRTA Impacts and Joint Participation Projects CDOT Project Name (CDOT PPRTA Project/Program Impact Schedule Programmed Cost) (PPRTA Cost) (Construction Year) US24 at 31st Street Intersection Relocate crosswalk and pedestrian 2022 Improvements ($341k) ramps (potential future cost) I-25 Fillmore to Garden of the Trail improvements on Sinton Trail 2023/2024 Gods Bridge Repair ($6.2M) (potential future cost) US24 Bypass EB Off Ramp and Participation in project and 2021 Union Signal Repairs ($245k) signalization at Union Blvd and Monterey Road ($600k) SH115 at St. Elmo Ave., Ramona Incorporate with the PPRTA A-list I- 2023/2024 Ave. and Brookside Signal 25 ramps improvements at Tejon Replacements ($1.8M) and Nevada project ($8.7M) SH21 and Airport Road Potential signal at Troy Hill Only engineering programmed Interchange Design ($2M) (potential future cost) in TIP (2024) SH21 (Powers) and Research Signal timing (future effort) 2022 Interchange ($44M) SH115 and Lake Avenue Safety Direct participation not 2024/2025 Improvements (emerging anticipated; however, City received project) (~$2.5M) grant for the intersection safety improvements at Lake Avenue and Southgate Road (directly east of the CDOT project). Both projects are currently in development and they could potentially be completed together.

108 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Budget The next several pages present the current and projected financial status of the PPRTA A-list projects. Table 4 provides an update on the City’s active A-list project contracts and presents the current budget, remaining contract values, amount paid to date, and the percentage of funds used on the projects. The City continually analyzes the remaining A-list projects, including projected revenue and current project cost estimates. The City further analyzes the anticipated additional allocation needed to complete the A-list projects and updates the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) included in Table 5 with the budget outlook. The CIP distributes anticipated funding needs from 2021 through 2024 to complete the projects and demonstrates the ability to complete A-list projects, thus fulfilling the commitment to voters. Project costs are continually monitored and adjusted as projects evolve and cost certainty is refined. Budget updates also occur following receipt of construction bids and after project closeout. The City received proposals for construction of the Centennial Boulevard Extension project this past quarter. Seven proposals were received and five of the seven costs presented were lower than the engineer’s estimated construction cost. The selected contractor was 16.8% below the engineer’s estimate. In comparison, CDOT recently received bids for the SH21 (Powers Boulevard) and Research Parkway interchange and all the bids were over the engineer’s estimate with the apparent low bid 5.25% over, and the high bid 32.65% over, the construction cost estimate. These results indicate the current nature of the local civil construction community. The City is closely monitoring construction commodities, bid trends, and schedule adjustments to evaluate and plan for potential construction cost changes on individual projects, and to evaluate revenue projections at the end of the current PPRTA authorization. There is concern the City will start to see increased construction costs starting in the near future and lasting for six to 18 months as work forces expand and supply chain issues are resolved. As the result of the Centennial Boulevard Extension bid, the estimated total project cost was revised to capture Colorado Springs Utilities work that will be reimbursed to PPRTA and expenditures from previous project phases. The estimate project cost for Black Forest Road was also updated to reflect the revised construction estimate and El Paso County’s portion of the costs. The City currently has an outstanding balance on the El Paso County-led West Colorado Avenue Reconstruction project. The joint jurisdiction costs for these two projects are anticipated to be fairly equal and will balance out during the budget process over the next few years. The first step to balance these costs will occur during the upcoming mid-year budget amendment. Table 5 reflects the current total anticipated project cost for the Black Forest Road project and the initial reduction to the City’s costs on the West Colorado Avenue Reconstruction project. Although the mid-year amendment is not approved yet, these changes and inclusion of the

109 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

budget amendment revenue are necessary to fully present the revenue picture to complete the A-list projects. Costs presented in Table 5 were also updated for the Las Vegas Street/Royer Street UPRR Crossing Relocation and Tutt Boulevard Extension projects, and the Citywide Intersection Improvements and Roadway Safety Improvements capital programs. Both the conservative and optimistic revenue projections were updated with information provided by PPRTA for the upcoming mid-year budget amendment and are presented in Table 5. The conservative projection reflects the anticipated 2021 budget, including the mid-year budget amendment. The projections for 2022 through 2024 are based on the 2021 budget, without 2020 carryover, with 3% growth per year. The conservative revenue projection and the current projected project costs result in nearly a $2.4M contingency and possible B-list project funds. The optimistic revenue projections start with the 2021 budget following the anticipated mid-year amendment. Revenue projections are adjusted for 3% growth in subsequent years. This optimistic revenue trend and the projected project costs result in approximately $25.7M in contingency and possible B-list project funds. The conservative revenue estimate is used for the remainder of this report. The band of revenue projections demonstrates the ability to deliver the A-list projects and exhibits contingency to move into the B-list projects. This band considers the known construction cost increases as mentioned above; however, the City is closely monitoring the construction industry and will make other cost adjustments as necessary. PPRTA revenues remain strong as evident in the March 2021 sales and use tax collection report. If economic circumstance change and revenue is either reduced or construction costs outpace revenue, then mitigation measures can be put in place to deliver the A-list projects.

110 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Table 4 – Active Project Financial Status Report AMOUNT REMAINING INVOICE PAID % OF FUNDS PROJECT NAME PPRTA # BUDGET ON CONTRACTS/POs TO DATE ALLOCATED 8th ST: Motor City Way to Fountain Creek 5030001 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Academy Blvd - Bijou to Airport 5030002 $ 9,517,000.00 $ 502,219.38 $ 704,687.42 12.68% Academy Blvd - Fountain to Milton Pkwy 5030003 $ 5,773,199.00 $ 1,291,582.11 $ 1,236,892.92 43.80% Academy Over Cottonwood Creek 5030004 $ 9,134,564.00 $ - $ 9,130,413.19 99.95% Airport Road over Spring Creek 5030005 $ 7,159,595.00 $ 3,449,609.61 $ 1,449,194.02 68.42% Barnes Rd Impr Solar Rdg-Powers 5030006 $ 4,050,000.00 $ 286,567.77 $ 2,802,616.80 76.28% Black Forest Rdwy Imps to Woodmen 5030007 $ 9,998,202.00 $ 888,260.79 $ 3,892,817.22 47.82% Centennial Blvd Fillmore to Fontanero 5030008$ 18,737,941.00 $ 1,129,198.05 $ 6,476,883.45 40.59% Chestnut over South Douglas 5030010 $ 4,185,460.00 $ 0.00 $ 4,162,926.79 99.46% Circle Dr EB over Fountain Crk Bridge Reh 5030011 $ 6,800,000.00 $ 344,268.28 $ 1,414,981.26 25.87% Circle Dr EB over Hancock Bridge Reh 5030012 $ 6,000,000.00 $ - $ 1,994,143.40 33.24% Circle Dr WB over Fountain Crk Reh 5030013 $ 2,327,864.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Circle Dr WB over Hancock Bridge Reh 5030014 $ 300,000.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Dublin Blvd Widening 5030016 $ 1,937,872.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 1,867,872.48 99.74% El Paso Bridge over Fountain Creek Trib. Repl. 5030017 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Galley over Sand Creek Bridge Replacement 5030020 $ 792,218.00 $ 248,416.00 $ 471,438.91 90.87% I-25 Ramps: S Nevada/Tejon Street Corridor Imp 5030021 $ 600,000.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Las Vegas & Royer UPRR 5030022 $ 8,426,952.00 $ 75,238.77 $ 782,626.38 10.18% Platte Ave Bridge WB 5030026 $ 8,874,000.00 $ 2,568,231.25 $ 858,203.07 38.61% S Cheynenne Canyon Rd 1 Bridge 5030027 $ 860,000.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Shooks Run Bridge Study 5030028 $ 2,750,000.00 $ 10,010.00 $ 2,704,635.88 98.71% Stapleton Dr Briagate Corridor Study 5030029 $ 786,000.00 $ - $ - 0.00% Tutt Blvd Extension 5030030 $ 1,533,000.00 $ 1,903.00 $ 706,351.97 46.20% UPRR Mainline over Fontanero Bridge Repl 5030031 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 96,527.83 $ 319,662.39 37.84% UPRR Nevada to Tejon Crossing 5030032 $ 3,550,000.00 $ 10,196.85 $ 2,563,780.81 72.51% W CO Ave Reconstruction 5030033$ 25,820,027.00 $ - $ 23,761,550.30 92.03% W Fillmore over Unnamed Channel Bridge Repl 5030034 $ 697,448.00 $ 190,487.50 $ 310,539.28 71.84% Woodmen Road Improvements 5030035 $ 8,700,000.00 $ 23,580.00 $ 8,355,951.15 96.32% Pikes Peak Greenway 5030038 $ 7,700,000.00 $ 475,230.20 4,928,153.91 70.17% Platte Avenue Corridor and Connect Imp Study-25 5030039 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 363,238.13 $ 174,773.41 26.90% Marksheffel Rd over Sand Creek Bridge (RTA 1) 5160600 $ 4,812,501.00 $ 419,029.28 $ 4,364,547.59 99.40% $ 165,423,843.00 $ 12,438,794.80 $ 85,435,644.00 59.17%

111 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Table 5. PPRTA A-list Budget Outlook 2021 Budget & Projected Future Allocation Previous Estimated Project Original Increase/ Project Name Complete Funding to Date 2021 2022 2023 2024 Cost1 Allocation Decreases A-List Engineering Projects 8TH ST. IMPS.: MOTOR CITY WAY TO FOUNTAIN 1 CREEK 250,000 625,119 1,000,000 1,875,119 1,500,000 375,119 ACADEMY BLVD.: BIJOU ST. TO AIRPORT RD. 2 PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION 4,417,000 5,100,000 2,468,734 11,985,734 3,817,000 8,168,734 ACADEMY BLVD.: FOUNTAIN TO MILTON PROBY 3 PKWY. PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION 5,773,199 5,000,000 25,856,132 36,629,331 15,200,000 21,429,331 ACADEMY OVER COTTONWOOD CREEK BRIDGE 4 REHABILITATION  9,134,563 9,134,563 1,280,000 7,854,563 AIRPORT RD. OVER SPRING CREEK BRIDGE 5 REPLACEMENT3 4,431,732 2,727,863 7,159,595 1,584,000 5,575,595 BARNES RD. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, 6 SOLAR RIDGE DR. TO POWERS BLVD. 4,050,000 4,050,000 2,420,000 1,630,000 BLACK FOREST RD. ROADWAY 7 IMPROVEMENTS: WOODMEN TO RESEARCH (JOINT PROJ)3,4, 8 4,333,902 5,664,300 9,216,303 8,308,235 35,546,915 8,866,000 26,680,915 CENTENNIAL BLVD. EXTENSION: FILLMORE TO 8 FONTANERO3 11,860,665 6,877,276 24,056,802 10,450,000 13,606,802 CENTENNIAL ST.: GARDEN OF THE GODS TO 9 FILLMORE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION  11,820,028 11,820,028 8,065,000 3,755,028 CHESTNUT ST. OVER S. DOUGLAS CREEK 10 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT  4,185,460 4,185,460 1,800,000 2,385,460 CIRCLE DR. EB OVER FOUNTAIN CREEK 11 2 BRIDGE REHABILITATION 2,000,000 4,800,000 3,251,000 10,051,000 3,300,000 6,751,000 CIRCLE DR. EB OVER HANCOCK BRIDGE 11 2 REHABILITATION 2,000,000 4,000,000 4,051,000 10,051,000 3,300,000 6,751,000 CIRCLE DR. WB OVER FOUNTAIN CREEK 11 2 BRIDGE REHABILITATION - 2,327,864 7,723,136 10,051,000 3,300,000 6,751,000 CIRCLE DR. WB OVER HANCOCK BRIDGE 11 2 REHABILITATION - 300,000 9,751,000 10,051,000 3,300,000 6,751,000 DUBLIN RD. IMPROVEMENTS: BRIDLE PASS 12 WAY TO POWERS BLVD.  1,937,872 1,937,872 1,540,000 397,872 EL PASO BRIDGE OVER FOUNTAIN CREEK 13 TRIBUTARY REPLACEMENT 250,000 457,600 611,078 457,000 154,078 ENCHANTED CIRCLE OVER SAND CREEK 14 TRIBUTARY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT  373,218 373,218 300,000 73,218 GALLEY RD. OVER SAND CREEK BRIDGE 15 REPLACEMENT 792,218 4,914,160 5,706,378 1,936,000 3,770,378 I-25 RAMPS: SOUTH NEVADA/ TEJON ST. 16 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 250,000 350,000 8,061,497 8,661,497 5,500,000 3,161,497 LAS VEGAS ST./ROYER UPRR CROSSING 17 RELOCATION 8,426,952 9,186,076 3,850,000 5,336,076 OLD RANCH RD. IMPROVEMENTS AND BRIDGE 18 CONSTRUCTION  8,599,002 8,599,002 8,000,000 599,002 PIKES PEAK AVE. : COLORADO TO PRINTERS 19 PKWY. PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION  16,129,048 16,129,048 8,663,000 7,466,048 PLATTE AVE. WB OVER SAND CREEK BRIDGE 20 REPLACEMENT5 8,874,000 6,633,798 5,874,000 759,798 PLATTE AVE. CONNECTION TO I-25 STUDY6 21 - - 550,000 (550,000) PLATTE AVE. CORRIDOR IMP. STUDY6 22 1,950,000 50,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 (200,000) S. CHEYENNE CANYON RD. 1 OVER CHEYENNE 23 CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 250,000 610,000 992,256 1,852,256 410,000 1,442,256 SHOOK'S RUN BRIDGE CORRIDOR STUDY 24  2,750,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 - STAPLETON DR. /BRIARGATE BLVD. CORRIDOR 25 STUDY (JOINT PROJ) 786,000 786,000 786,000 - TUTT BLVD. EXTENSION: DUBLIN TO 26 TEMPLETON GAP RD. (JOINT PROJ)4 1,533,000 1,854,907 5,179,518 1,393,000 3,786,518 UPRR MAINLINE OVER FONTANERO BRIDGE 27 REPLACEMENT7 550,000 550,000 2,000,000 15,982,817 19,082,817 2,750,000 16,332,817 UPRR NEVADA & TEJON ST. CROSSING 28 RECONSTRUCTION (DESIGN ONLY) 3,550,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 - W. COLORADO AVE. RECONSTRUCTION: 31ST 29 ST. TO US 24 (JOINT PROJ) 9  18,049,000 1,178,564 2,100,000 21,327,564 8,600,000 12,727,564 W. FILLMORE OVER UNNAMED CHANNEL 30 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 697,449 300,000 1,997,521 2,994,970 1,000,000 1,994,970 WOODMEN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: UNION 31 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTION  8,700,000 8,700,000 7,500,000 1,200,000

SUBTOTAL A-LIST PROJECTS $148,704,308 $33,357,303 $42,911,029 $40,122,957 $34,055,995 $312,458,639 $135,541,000 $176,917,639 1 Total Project Cost less other funding sources

2 Project 11 counts as 4 projects combined giving a total of 34 projects.

3Adjusted to reflect the total project cost; Colorado Springs Utilities to provide cost reimbursement for their work

4PPRTA El Paso County Allocation in 2023 of $3.534M for BFR and $550k for Tutt

5Addition funding from STP Metro grant - Anticipated total is $13.2M.

6Projects/studies being completed together

7Siding bridge needs to be replaced at the same time, along with associated roadway improvements to meet clearance requirements

8 Cost increase potential due to project risk 9Reduced City contribution to offset El Paso County costs anticipated on Black Forest Road ($4,492,666)

112 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Table 5. PPRTA A-list Budget Outlook (cont’d.) 2021 Budget & Projected Future Allocation Previous Estimated Project Original Increase/ Project Name Complete Funding to Date 2021 2022 2023 2024 Cost1 Allocation Decreases PROGRAMS COMPANION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ROADWAY PROJECTS 2,471,970 412,000 412,000 412,030 412,030 4,120,030 2,690,000 1,430,030 CITYWIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PH I 6,944,697 824,000 824,000 824,000 824,000 10,490,697 6,171,000 4,319,697 CITYWIDE ON-STREET BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS PH I 3,072,727 412,000 412,000 412,000 412,000 4,720,727 3,027,000 1,693,727 CITYWIDE PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PH I 4,398,635 687,000 687,000 687,000 687,000 7,146,635 5,153,000 1,993,635 CITYWIDE ROADWAY SAFETY, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE PH I 13,700,423 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 18,450,423 8,108,000 10,342,423 CITYWIDE SCHOOL AND NEIGHBORHOOD PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS PH I 2,471,970 412,000 412,000 412,000 412,000 4,119,970 3,027,000 1,092,970 CITYWIDE CONGESTION AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PH I 2,471,970 412,000 412,000 412,000 412,000 4,119,970 3,027,000 1,092,970 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM UPGRADE (60 LOCATIONS) 11,626,103 1,000,000 12,626,103 14,983,000 (2,356,897) EMERGENCY BRIDGE FUND 10,240,638 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 14,240,638 5,381,000 8,859,638 TRAIL PROJECTS COTTONWOOD TRAIL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS  600,000 600,000 600,000 - MIDLAND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS: RIDGE RD. TO COLUMBIA ST.  450,000 450,000 450,000 - PIKES PEAK GREENWAY CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 7,700,000 7,700,000 2,121,000 5,579,000 ROCK ISLAND TRAIL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - SHOOK'S RUN TRAIL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 800,000 800,000 800,000 - SINTON TRAIL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 600,000 600,000 600,000 - TEMPLETON GAP TRAIL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 600,000 600,000 600,000 - TRANSIT ADA-PARATRANSIT BUS SYSTEM VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 1,119,789 187,000 187,000 187,000 187,000 1,867,789 1,400,000 467,789 FIXED-ROUTE BUS SYSTEM VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 4,786,782 627,000 627,000 627,000 627,000 7,294,782 4,700,000 2,594,782 SIDEWALK/BUS STOP PROG. EXISTING ROUTES 390,430 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,190,430 1,500,000 (309,570) VANPOOL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 427,999 107,000 107,000 107,000 107,000 855,999 800,000 55,999

TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $224,578,441 $40,637,303 $49,191,029 $46,402,987 $40,336,025 $415,452,832 $201,679,000 $213,773,832

Conservative Revenue Projection 51,759,565 45,786,343 47,159,933 48,574,731 Total Revenue 417,859,013

Potential Shortfall/Contingency/'B" List Funds by Year 11,122,262 (3,404,686) 756,946 8,238,706 Contingency/'B' List 2,406,180

Optimistic Revenue Projection 51,759,565 53,312,352 54,911,723 56,559,074 Total Revenue 441,121,154

Potential Shortfall/Contingency/'B" List Funds by Year 11,122,262 4,121,323 8,508,736 16,223,049 Contingency/'B' List 25,668,322

113 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Drawdown Table 7 presents the quarterly financial picture of the PPRTA extension from 2015 to 2024. Data presented prior to the first quarter of 2021 is actual, and after is projected. The blue bar represents the cumulative budgeted allocation. The solid red bar represents the cumulative expenditures to date, with the yellow extension representing the cumulative amount obligated via contract. These bars represent the City’s financial commitment to projects. The faded red bar distinguishes between the cumulative previous and projected future expenditure. As you can see, the current costs exceed the current revenue projection. Capital projects and programs will be monitored closely and measures will be put in place to complete the A-list projects. Schedule Table 8 represents the schedule for engineering and construction of the capital A-list projects. You can also see the completion month of 10 projects.

114 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Table 7. Cumulative Expenditure for A-list Capital Projects/Programs

115 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Table 8. Capital Project Schedule Legend: Engineering/Right-of-way Construction

2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Name

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 8TH ST. IMPS.: MOTOR CITY WAY TO FOUNTAIN CREEK - ACADEMY BLVD.: BIJOU ST. TO AIRPORT RD. PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION ACADEMY BLVD.: FOUNTAIN TO MILTON PROBY PKWY. PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION ACADEMY OVER COTTONWOOD CREEK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Complete May 2019 AIRPORT RD. OVER SPRING CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BARNES RD. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, SOLAR RIDGE DR. TO POWERS BLVD. BLACK FOREST RD. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: WOODMEN TO RESEARCH (JOINT PROJ) CENTENNIAL BLVD. EXTENSION: FILLMORE TO FONTANERO CENTENNIAL ST.: GARDEN OF THE GODS TO FILLMORE PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION Complete October 2017 CHESTNUT ST. OVER S. DOUGLAS CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Complete April 2017

CIRCLE DR. BRIDGES

COMPANION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ROADWAY PROJECTS DUBLIN RD. IMPROVEMENTS: BRIDLE PASS WAY TO POWERS BLVD. Complete June 2019 EL PASO BRIDGE OVER FOUNTAIN CREEK TRIBUTARY REPLACEMENT

EMERGENCY BRIDGE FUND

ENCHANTED CIRCLE OVER SAND CREEK TRIBUTARY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Complete June 2019 GALLEY RD. OVER SAND CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT I-25 RAMPS: SOUTH NEVADA/ TEJON ST. CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS LAS VEGAS ST./ROYER UPRR CROSSING RELOCATION OLD RANCH RD. IMPROVEMENTS AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION Complete November 2015 PIKES PEAK AVE. : COLORADO TO PRINTERS PKWY. PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION Complete November 2019

PLATTE AVE. CONNECTION TO I-25 STUDY

PLATTE AVE. CORRIDOR IMP. STUDY

PLATTE AVE. WB OVER SAND CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT S. CHEYENNE CANYON RD. 1 OVER CHEYENNE CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT SHOOK'S RUN BRIDGE CORRIDOR STUDY Complete February 2017 STAPLETON DR. /BRIARGATE BLVD. CORRIDOR STUDY (JOINT PROJ) TUTT BLVD. EXTENSION: DUBLIN TO TEMPLETON GAP RD. (JOINT PROJ) UPRR MAINLINE OVER FONTANERO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT UPRR NEVADA & TEJON ST. CROSSING RECONSTRUCTION (DESIGN ONLY) W. COLORADO AVE. RECONSTRUCTION: 31ST ST. TO US 24 (JOINT PROJ) Complete November 2019 W. FILLMORE OVER UNNAMED CHANNEL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WOODMEN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: UNION Complete June 2018 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTION

116 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

A-list Capital Project Highlights Highlights of active capital projects are provided. Each project has a graphical representation of the project lifecycle with an arrow indicating the current phase or overall completion to date. Some projects are only through the study or design phase, and this information in included in the project description.

Photographs, exhibits or a site map are provided with most projects. A budget summary is provided for each project including the following information:

• Funding sources – Projects included in this report have current, future, or both current and future PPRTA allocation as indicated in the CIP presented in Table 5 above. Other funding sources may be identified. • Estimated Project Cost – Column represents total anticipated project cost throughout the project lifecycle and is broken down by funding source. • Obligated – Represents current contractual obligation by funding source. • Spent to Date – Actual dollar amount expended on the project to date. • Percent Spent to Date – Percentage represents actual amount spent to date of the current contractual obligation. This typically does not represent the project completeness to date, as the contractual obligation evolves throughout the project life cycle. Other highlights are featured at the end of each project update.

117 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Academy Boulevard Pavement Reconstruction - Bijou to Airport

Current Phase: Design – Engineering and ROW Engineering Percent Complete: 60% Anticipated Completion Date: August 2021 Anticipated Construction Date: October 2021

Project Description: Academy Boulevard between Bijou Street and Airport Road is a 6-lane road with poor pavement, and with curb, gutter and medians conditions requiring replacement. Poor drainage is contributing to pavement decline, so a new storm water system is being designed to alleviate ponding issues. Planned improvements incorporate recommendations from the Great Streets Corridor Study including a 10-foot wide multi-use path.

Figure 7. Vicinity Map Academy Boulevard - Bijou to Airport Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $11,985,734 $1,206,907 $704,687 58% Total $11,985,734 $1,206,907 $704,687 58% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Engineering Design began on April 30, 2019 and is anticipated to finish in August 2021. • Anticipated Construction start will be October 2021.

118 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Academy Boulevard Pavement Reconstruction - Fountain to Milton Proby Parkway

Current Phase: Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 60% Anticipated Completion Date: January 2022 Anticipated Construction Date: March 2022

Project Description: Academy Boulevard between Fountain Boulevard and Milton Proby Parkway is a 6-lane road with poor pavement, and with curb, gutter and medians conditions requiring replacement. The project length of 10,800 feet includes remediation of the pavement area that experiences subsidence due to an abandoned landfill. Poor drainage is contributing to pavement decline, so a new storm water system is being designed to alleviate ponding issues. Planned improvements incorporate recommendations from the Great Streets Corridor Study including a 10-foot wide multi-use path.

Figure 8. Vicinity Map Academy Boulevard - Fountain to Airport

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $36,629,331 $2,528,475 $1,236,893 49% Total $36,820,331 $2,528,475 $1,236,893 49% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Engineering design began on April 30, 2019 and is anticipated to finish in January 2022. Anticipated Construction start date will be March 2022. • Repair subsidence for settlement of abandoned landfill under pavement.

119 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Airport Road Over Spring Creek Bridge Replacement

Current Phase: Construction Engineering Percent Complete: 100% Construction Start Date: September 2020 Anticipated Completion Date: May 2022

Project Description: Airport Road is an east west, principal arterial, that carries traffic over Spring Creek on a 47-year-old bridge that is deteriorating, is too narrow to accommodate sidewalks, and has less than half the capacity needed to pass the 100-year flood under the roadway. While the roadway section is adequate, there is inadequate pedestrian access across the bridge. The project involves two major utility relocations for a 20” high-pressure gas main and an 18” sanitary sewer main. The project will deepen the channel below the bridge to reduce flood risk and include new sidewalks on both sides of the roadway.

Figure 9. Overall Project Map Airport Road Over Spring Creek Figure 10. Relocating Sanitary sewer line – new foundation at Spring Creek crossing

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $7,159,595 $4,898,804 $1,449,194 30% Utility Cost Shares $5,170,470 $5,015,907 $3,392,650 68% Total $12,330,065 $9,914,711 $4,841,844 49% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount. Highlights: • Construction started in mid-September on the sanitary sewer main and gas mains relocations. Bridge replacement work is projected to start fall 2021. • Construction being completed with separate contracts for the sanitary sewer, gas and bridge work. Gas work completed.

120 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Barnes Roadway Improvements – Solar Ridge Drive to Powers Boulevard

Current Phase: Construction Construction Percent Complete: 90% Anticipated Completion Date: June 2021; top pavement mat and colored concrete to be installed in spring of 2021

Project Description: The street cross section for the Barnes Road widening between Solar Ridge Drive and Powers Boulevard will be compatible with the existing roadway sections at either end of the project limits. The project will provide curb and gutter, turn lanes, drainage infrastructure, and pedestrian improvements along both sides of the roadway. Safety improvements and future signalization of Barnes Road at Rio Vista/Chaparral Drive intersection are also included.

Figure 11. Traffic control signal being installed by City Traffic Eng. Figure 12. Barnes Road Project Area. Image taken from Integrity Center Point looking west.

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $4,050,000 $3,089,185 $2,802,617 91% Total $4,050,000 $3,089,185 $2,802,617 91% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Coordinated with adjacent property owners and developers to reconstruct a portion of Chaparral Road and restore the intersection to Barnes Road. • Planned for signal at the intersection of Barnes Road and Chaparral Road / Rio Vista Drive. • Paving of top asphalt mat anticipated in the 2nd quarter.

121 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Black Forest Road Roadway Improvements – Woodmen to Research

Current Phase: Final Engineering Phase Completion Date: June 2021 Anticipated Construction Date: August 2021

Project Description: Widen Black Forest Road to a four lane Principal Arterial cross-section from Woodmen Road to Research Parkway, including a new bridge over Cottonwood Creek. The existing and proposed development in the City and the County require more capacity on Black Forest Road than the current two-lane section provides. Figure 13. Project Newsletter was distributed February 2021

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1, 3 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $35,546,915 $4,781,078 $3,892,817 81% Total $35,546,915 $4,781,078 $3,892,817 81% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2 Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount. 3 Updated to include El Paso County’s PPRTA funding allocation.

Highlights:

• Phasing of construction improvements will keep the current number of lanes open for the majority of the time (except special cases such as bridge girder erection). • The project will accommodate multi-modal travel. • Right-of-way from Woodmen Road to Research Parkway will be purchased now and annexed into the City after purchases are completed. This land acquisition process is underway. • Coordination with utilities is ongoing to determine relocations needed for the corridor. • Final engineering in underway with a submittal expected in May 2021.

122 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Centennial Boulevard Extension – Fillmore to Fontanero

Current Phase: Final Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 85% Anticipated Completion Date: March 2021 Anticipated Construction Date: May 2021

Project Description The extension of Centennial Boulevard from Fillmore Street to Fontanero Street will construct a 4 lane median divided roadway with curb and gutter, storm water drainage, water quality facilities and street lighting.

Figure 14. Vicinity Map and future road alignment Figure 15. Landfill Cleanup of Centennial ROW

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $24,056,802 $7,606,082 $6,476,883 85% Total $24,056,802 $7,606,082 $6,476,883 85% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• All right-of-way has been acquired and structures demolished. • Phase 1, from Fillmore to Van Buren, was completed in May 2018. Phase 2, from Van Buren to Fontanero, is scheduled to start construction in spring 2021. • MVS cleaning up landfill with completion anticipated by May 2021. MVS to rough grade the roadway from the MVS boundary to 7th Street. • The road section south of Van Buren is preloaded and being monitored to minimize future settlement. • Received and began review of proposals for the construction contract.

123 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Circle Drive Bridges Over Hancock and Fountain Creek Rehabilitation

Current Phase: Final Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 95% Anticipated Construction Start Date: Summer 2021 Anticipated Completion Date: Spring 2024

Project Description: Constructed by the Colorado Department of Highways in 1963, the Circle Drive Bridges carry eastbound and westbound lanes of Circle Drive on separate structures. The western pair of bridges cross Fountain Creek. The eastern pair of bridges cross the BNSF Railroad, a Fountain Mutual Irrigation Company conveyance facility, Hancock Expressway, and East Las Vegas Street. This project will replace the structures with four new bridges. The new bridges will have wider cross sections to allow for better pedestrian movement.

Figure 16. View from existing Eastbound Circle Drive Bridge Figure 17. Bridges over Fountain Creek

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $40,204,000 $3,753.393 $3,409,125 91% Total $40,204,000 $3,753,393 $3,409,125 91% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount. Highlights:

• 95% engineering completed in fall 2020. Waiting on variance request approval from railroads to complete engineering. • Coordination on-going with the BNSF and UP railroads. • Beginning contractor pre-qualification process in spring 2021. Planning adaptive procurement process to mitigate schedule and cost risks.

124 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Galley Road Over Sand Creek Bridge Replacement

Current Phase: Final Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 65% Anticipated Completion Date: July 2021 Anticipated Construction Date: January 2024

Project Description: Galley Road Bridge was built in 1965 and replacement is needed since this bridge is too narrow for the roadway and is hydraulically inadequate. FEMA floodplain mapping shows the road overtops and there have been reports of overtopping by 3-4 feet in recent years. The recommendations from the alternatives analysis is to widen the road and build a new, deeper concrete box culvert with drop structures to provide adequate capacity in the channel.

Figure 18. Vicinity Map Galley Road Bridge Figure 19. Narrow Roadway over Existing Galley Road Bridge

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $5,706,378 $719,855 $471,439 65% Total $5,706,378 $719,855 $471,439 65% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Creek invert below Galley Road to be lowered to provide adequate capacity. • Bridge widened to match road section on either side of the bridge. • At-grade, pedestrian actuated traffic signal will be provided for the trail crossing at Galley Road.

125 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Las Vegas Street and Royer Railroad Crossing Relocation

Current Phase: Final Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 95% Anticipated Bid Date: Late 2021

Project Description: The intersection of Royer Street and the railroad tracks is a non-standard crossing and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has recorded 25 non-fatal, “train vs. vehicle” accidents at this crossing since 1975. A new road will be constructed called Twin Bridges Road (formerly Spring Creek Road), beginning at the existing traffic signal on Hancock Expressway, which is currently an access to a Colorado Springs Utilities facility. The new road would run south under the Martin Luther King Bypass (US24) and connect to Las Vegas Street just east of the bypass. The opening of the new roadway and railroad crossing would coincide with the closing of the existing crossing at Royer Street.

Figure 20. Las Vegas & Royer UPRR Crossing Relocation Figure 21. Semi-Truck Stuck at Crossing Budget:

Funding Source Estimated Project Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $9,186,076 $857,865 $782,626 91% Total $9,186,076 $857,865 $782,626 91% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights: Completed the 95% submittal and held design review meeting in November 2020. Currently developing Construction Advertisement package.

• Agreement development with Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroads has been completed and agreement with UPRR is currently underway. • PUC application prepared and will need to be updated prior to submittal. • Completed agreement with Rocky Top Resources for the construction of a left turn lane on Las Vegas Street. • Development of the Executive Agreement with CSU for Twin Bridges Road and changes to storage yard continues to be underway. • Completed Fountain Mutual Irrigation Company agreement. • Coordination underway with El Paso County concerning work within their right-of-way.

126 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Marksheffel Road Bridge over Sand Creek

Current Phase: Construction Percent Complete: 95% Anticipated Completion Date: May 2021

Project Description: Install a new bridge on the future alignment of Marksheffel Road north of Woodmen Road over Sand Creek. The bridge will be a concrete arch, 100 feet wide and have a span over the creek of 55 feet. A future extension of the Sand Creek Trail has been considered and can be accommodated under the structure. Approximately 800 feet of Sand Creek will be realigned and stabilized to protect the bridge structure from future scour. The roadway on top of the bridge will not be connected to the roadway north or south of the project location, as adjacent private developments are responsible for extending Marksheffel Road to the bridge.

Figure 22. Aerial view of project looking southeast Figure 23. Future Sand Creek Trail complete under bridge

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Project Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $4,812,501 $4,783,577 $4,363,507 91% Parks $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 100% CSU $89,171 $89,171 $89,171 100% Other $132,050 $132,050 $132,050 100% Total $5,433,722 $5,404,798 $4,984,728 91% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Roadway work completed in fall 2020. • Channel stabilization completed in winter 2020/ 2021. • Weather dependent work activities to be completed in spring 2021 as needed.

127 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Platte Avenue Corridor Improvement Study including Connection to I-25

Current Phase: Study Study Percent Complete: 15% Anticipated Completion Date: July 2022 (Study Only)

Project Description: The study is a 15 month long effort that will evaluate existing conditions, analyze roadway and multimodal transportation needs, identify community desires, and define improvements for this 6-mile corridor between I-25 and Powers Boulevard. Two projects for the corridor were included in the PPRTA II Ballot Initiative. One of the projects, Platte Avenue Connection to I-25 Study, is focused on the transportation improvement needs for the connection between I-25 and Platte Avenue. The Platte Avenue Corridor Improvement Study, will focus on the remainder of the corridor. Both projects have been combined into one study effort.

Figure 24. Platte Avenue looking west at Nevada Avenue Figure 25. Vicinity Map Platte Avenue

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent Project Cost1 (Actual) to Date2 PPRTA $2,000,000 $538,012 $174,773 32% Total $2,000,000 $538,012 $174,773 32% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights: • Project Kick-Off meeting held with several City Departments in early January. • Began significant community involvement effort which is a major focus early in the project. • Continued data and information collection efforts for project. • Began corridor needs assessment efforts. • Develop list of recommended projects by fall 2021 for future implementation.

128 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Platte Avenue Over Sand Creek Bridge Replacement

Current Phase: Construction Percent Complete: 12% Anticipated Completion Date: December 2022

Project Description: Two parallel Platte Avenue bridges cross Sand Creek and are located approximately ¼ mile west of Powers Boulevard. The Platte Avenue westbound replacement bridge was designed and coordinated in conjunction with the eastbound replacement bridge that is funded primarily by a federal-aid grant. The combined project will remove both structures and replace them with a single structure wide enough to accommodate six through lanes, auxiliary lanes and pedestrian facilities. The project will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Space Center Drive and install a trail crossing beneath the bridge in anticipation of the Sand Creek Regional Trail extension.

Figure 26. Scheduled night work to set Phase 1 girders. Figure 27. Phase 1 girder set complete. Budget: Funding Source Estimated Project Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $6,633,798 $4,935,635 $858,203 17% Federal Grant $7,812,379 $7,812,379 $2,044,566 26% City General $349,565 $349,565 $349,565 100% Total $14,795,742 $13,097,579 $3,252,334 25% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount. Highlights:

• Completed eastbound bridge foundation piles and caissons, and set girders during an overnight shutdown of Platte Avenue. • Installed drain system and settlement monitoring plates for soils consolidation of embankment behind the west abutment. • Began channel armoring with grouted riprap.

129 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

South Cheyenne Canyon Road 1 Over Cheyenne Creek Bridge Replacement

Current Phase: Concept Design Percent Complete: 1% Anticipated Construction Start: 2022

Project Description: Believed to be built in the 1957, the South Cheyenne Canon Road Bridge is a multi-type structure located just north of the Seven Falls entrance. The bridge is load posted and has reached the end of its service life, thus requiring replacement. A previously completed study recommends constructing a new bridge east of the existing structure to improve intersection with Mesa Avenue.

Figure 28. Vicinity Map S. Cheyenne Canyon Road Figure 29. Cheyenne Creek Bridge

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA $1,852,256 $0 $0 0% Total $1,852,256 $0 $0 0% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Design scheduled to start in mid-2021. Development of scope of work is underway with consultant. • Considering alternative delivery methods for project construction effort.

130 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Tutt Boulevard Extension - Dublin to Templeton Gap Road

Current Phase: Engineering for Phase 2 Percent Complete: 50% (Phase 1 of 2, built); 60% for Phase 2

Project Description: The Tutt Boulevard extension is a joint Colorado Springs/El Paso County project. Tutt Boulevard will be extended north from Dublin Boulevard and connect with the existing Tutt Boulevard, a distance of approximately 1,500 feet. Phase 1 (from Dublin Boulevard to Vickie Lane) was completed in March 2016. Final engineering of Phase 2 will commence in spring of 2021 followed by land acquisition. Construction is anticipated to begin in early 2022.

Budget: Figure 30. Vicinity Map of Tutt Boulevard Extension

Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent Project Cost1 (Actual) to Date2 PPRTA $5,179,518 $708,255 $706,352 99% Developer $281,000 $281,000 $281,000 100% Total $5,460,518 $989,255 $987,352 99% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Phase 1 completed in 2016. • Phase 2 final design to begin spring 2021.

131 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

UPRR Mainline Over Fontanero Bridge Replacement

Current Phase: Final Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 40% Anticipated Construction Date: Late 2023 or early 2024

Project Description: The goal of this project is to replace the mainline track railroad bridge over Fontanero Street just east of I-25. The UPRR Mainline over Fontanero Bridge was built in 1963. The driving need for this project is the inadequate strength of the existing mainline railroad bridge. In addition, the clearance under the bridge is inadequate since it is 1’-6” less than current standards which is a safety issue proven by the truck impacts on the bridges. Temporary supports were constructed under the end spans, as a PPRTA Bridge Maintenance effort in 2012, to partially address the strength issue. Since the supports were not able to increase the strength fully, the intent was to only address the bridge strength issue as an interim solution. The agreement with the railroad to construct the temporary supports requires the City to replace the bridge.

As shown Figure 32, there is a second railroad bridge, which carries a railroad siding track immediately to the east of the mainline track railroad bridge. The siding bridge was also built in 1963 and has the same issues with strength and clearances, along with the same commitments to the railroad. The City recognizes and respects the fact that the siding bridge is a B-list project. The design effort for the siding bridge is being advanced through the use of the Emergency Bridge Fund, at the same time as the mainline railroad bridge design.

Preliminary engineering identified the necessity to reconstruct both the mainline and siding bridges as one construction project. The design also shows that the road will need to be lowered approximately 4 feet at the existing bridges, which impacts the existing bridge foundations. The first reason for the lowering is to address to the low clearance issues at the bridges. The second is the need to lengthen the railroad bridges to accommodate the future road section below the bridges and address future roadway improvements under the I-25 bridges, resulting in deeper girders. Additionally, railroad operations are required to continue during construction and both the mainline and siding bridges are needed for rail detours, thus requiring the City to advance the UPRR Siding over Fontanero project with the mainline A- list project.

FONTANERO SERVICE CENTER

FONTANERO ST.

Figure 31. Vicinity Map UPRR over Fontanero Figure 32. Existing Fontanero Bridges

132 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

UPRR Mainline Over Fontanero Bridge Replacement (cont.)

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent to Project Cost1 (Actual) Date2 PPRTA 19,082,8173 $1,107,590 $325,501 29% PPRTA Emergency Bridge $715,979 $715,979 $161,253 23% Total $19,798,796 $1,823,569 $486,754 27% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount. 3Project costs anticipated to be PPRTA A-list project costs as siding bridge needed for bypass.

Highlights:

• Preliminary engineering of roadway has been completed and final design is currently underway. Railroad design has advanced to 15% and has been submitted to BNSF railroad for review. Final engineering will occur throughout 2021 and into early 2022. • Construction phasing for the railroad is expected to be a significant design element and will require coordination and acceptance of the approach by both railroads. It is anticipated that Fontanero, between I-25 and Recreation Way, may need to be closed for a period of time during construction. • The Preliminary Engineering Agreements with BNSF has been completed and the agreement with UPRR is currently underway. Coordinating agreement language changes requested by City. • Utility relocation is anticipated to be an important part of the project. Coordination efforts are well underway with CSU and private utility companies. • No private land acquisition required; however, Executive Agreements will be needed with CSU, CDOT and City Parks and Recreation.

133 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

UPRR Nevada & Tejon Street Crossing Reconstruction

Current Phase: Design (only phase) Percent Complete: 30% Anticipated Completion Date: TBD

Project Description: This is a design project to determine the best approach to replace two railroad bridges at the south end of downtown Colorado Springs in the future. The aging railroad bridges over South Nevada Avenue (70 years old) and the South Tejon Street (115 years old) are in poor condition. The project will prepare an engineering package ready for final design and future construction funding.

Figure 33. View of RR Bridge from SB Nevada Avenue Figure 34. View of RR Bridge from SB Tejon Street

Budget: Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent Project Cost1 (Actual) to Date2 PPRTA $3,300,000 $2,573,978 $2,563,781 99% Total $3,300,000 $2,573,978 $2,563,781 99% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Preferred alignment is proceeding to 30% design. • Drafting preliminary engineering agreements with UPRR and BNSF railroads. • Ongoing meetings with affected property owners and businesses. • Working on funding strategies for construction.

134 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

West Fillmore Over Unnamed Channel Bridge Replacement

Current Phase: Preliminary Engineering Engineering Percent Complete: 40% Anticipated Construction Date: Late 2023

Project Description: Believed to be built in the 1970s, the West Fillmore Bridge is a 48” diameter Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) located just west of Coronado High School (25’ below roadway). Replacement is needed as the structure is at the end of its service life.

Figure 35. Vicinity Map W. Fillmore Figure 36. Existing Fillmore Street over Culvert

Budget:

Funding Source Estimated Obligated Spent to Date Percent Spent Project Cost1 (Actual) to Date PPRTA $2,994,970 $501,027 $310,539 62% Total $2,994,970 $501,027 $310,539 62% 1 Estimated project cost includes future anticipated funding authorization. Total project cost includes known work for project life-cycle phases from planning to construction completion. 2Actual funds spent of the current obligated amount.

Highlights:

• Due to the depth of the culvert under the roadway (25’), jacking and boring options are being proposed. • Proposed crossing planned to accommodate future widening of Fillmore Street by designing culvert ends to be easily extended.

135 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

A-list Capital Programs Capital improvement programs exist to complete smaller transportation infrastructure projects in distinct groups outlined over the next several pages. The capital programs are as follows:

• Companion Drainage Improvements for Roadways Project • Citywide Intersection Improvements Phase I • Citywide On-street Bikeway Improvements Phase I • Citywide Pedestrian Transportation Improvements Phase I • Citywide School and Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements Phase I • Citywide Roadway Safety, Traffic Operations, and Maintenance Phase 1 • Citywide Congestion and Incident Management Signal Improvements Phase I • Citywide Traffic Signal System Upgrade • Emergency Bridge Fund • Transit Programs

Program spend and completion data from the previous three years and the current year-to-date are provided. Activities completed during the first quarter and upcoming activities are highlighted.

136 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Companion Drainage Improvements for Roadways Project This program constructs drainage improvements needed in advance of roadway rehabilitation or reconstruction efforts.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Drainage Improvements $ 412,000 $ 413,178 $ 412,000 $ - $ 1,237,178 Total Spent/Encumbered $ 412,000 $ 413,178 $ 412,000 $ - $ 1,237,178 Budget1 $ 412,000 % Spent/Encumbered 100% 100% 100% 0% Percent of Program Drainage Improvements % of Program 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 1 2021 Budget includes $412,000 budget allocation and $0 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid- year adjustment.

Narrative: Companion Drainage funds are exhausted prior to using funds from O&M Maintenance Funds on pipe projects. The following list summarizes all (both companion drainage and maintenance pipe lining) storm pipe lining projects to be completed in 2021:

Flintridge Pipe Project

137 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide Intersection Improvements Phase I Construct improvements at intersections that will reduce delay, improve air quality, and enhance safety for both motorized and non-motorized traffic.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Transportation Studies $ 588 $ - $ 46,151 $ 8,865 $ 55,604 Engineering $ 106,866 $ - $ 111,758 $ 18,456 $ 237,080 Safety Projects $ 34,308 $ 9,490 $ 10,014 $ - $ 53,812 Intersection Improvements $ 410,286 $ 752,165 $ 1,055,088 $ 118,650 $ 2,336,189 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 552,048 $ 761,654 $ 1,223,011 $ 145,971 $ 2,682,684 Budget1 $ 3,297,843 % Spent/Encumbered 26% 18% 30% 4% Percent of Program % of Transportation Studies 0% 0% 4% 6% 2% % of Design 19% 0% 9% 13% 9% % of Safety Projects 6% 1% 1% 0% 2% % of Intersection Improvements 74% 99% 86% 81% 87% 1 2021 Budget includes $824,000 budget allocation and $2,473,843 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Final plans and advertisement for construction of the Dublin/Peterson intersection. Construction is is anticipated to start spring 2021. Construction of signal improvements at the Cheyenne Road intersections at Roanoke and Cascade intersections. Engineering design of improvements to the Dublin/Marksheffel intersection. Engineering design of improvements at the Milam/Union/Old Ranch intersection.

138 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide On-street Bikeway Improvements Phase I The City's Comprehensive Plan, Intermodal Transportation Plan (ITP), and the Complete Streets ordinance strongly recommend streets be designed to accommodate safe and efficient bicycle travel/access. There are many locations in the city where safe and adequate bicycle travel and access are not provided or need enhancement. Proposed bikeway improvements will continue to: improve and construct bike lanes in accordance with the ITP and the City’s Bicycle Plan; install bicycle lanes (where feasible) to close gaps on the existing on-street bike lane network; improve connections from on-street bike lanes to the Colorado Springs trail system and residential/commercial centers; and, develop/implement improved signage to provide better wayfinding for bicyclists.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2017 2018 2019 2021 Totals On-Street Bike Facilities $ 581,455 $ 136,176 $ 157,313 $ 3,544 $ 878,488 Trail Crossings $ 111,968 $ 11,300 $ 371,074 $ 242,547 $ 736,889 Total Spend $ 693,423 $ 147,476 $ 528,387 $ 246,090 $ 1,615,377 Budget $ 1,021,738 % Spent 52% 12% 31% 24% Percent of Program % of On-Street Bike Facilities 84% 92% 30% 1% 54% % of Trail Crossings 16% 8% 70% 99% 46% 1 2021 Budget includes $412,000 budget allocation and $609,738 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Project Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Completed mid-block trail crossings across Rangewood and across Briargate Boulevard. Continued design efforts for the Pikes Peak / 31st Street pedestrian crossing signal. Continued design efforts for the Homestead trail crossing of Dublin Road.

Figure 37. New bike and pedestrian crossing of Rangewood Figure 38. Family using the new crossing

139 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide Pedestrian Transportation Improvements Phase I Citywide School and Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements Phase I These programs are collectively referred to as the Citywide Sidewalk Infill Program. The City's Comprehensive Plan, Intermodal Transportation Plan (ITP), and the Complete Streets Policy strongly recommend streets be designed to accommodate safe and efficient pedestrian access. There are many locations in the city where safe and adequate pedestrian travel and access are not provided. Proposed pedestrian improvements will continue to construct missing pedestrian connections along transportation facilities, schools and neighborhoods; follow the Operation and Maintenance Division quadrant approach; improve safety; and develop/implement improved pedestrian connectivity.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Pedestrian Transportation Imp. Ph. I $ 941,843 $ 524,493 $ 954,441 $ 371,737 $ 2,792,515 School & Neighborhood Pedestrian Imp. Ph. I $ 470,708 $ 362,037 $ 484,956 $ 230,500 $ 1,548,201 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 1,412,551 $ 886,531 $ 1,439,397 $ 602,237 $ 4,340,716 Budget1 $ 1,138,583 % Spent/Encumbered 129% 81% 131% 53% Percent of Program Ped. Improvements % of Program 67% 59% 66% 62% 64% School & Neighborhood % of Program 33% 41% 34% 38% 36% 1 2021 Budget includes $1,099,000 budget allocation and $39,583 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid- year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Sidewalk Infill Program is constructing new sidewalk in the central quadrant of the City in 2021 Notable sidewalks planned in 2021: N Carefree Cir & Peterson Rd (intersection) - 740 LF Constitution Ave (west of Tutt Blvd) – 1,900 LF Paseo Rd (Patty Jewett vicinity) – 640 LF Northview Dr (adjacent to Jefferson Elementary School & Park) – 650 LF Uintah St (various locations between Union and Circle) – 815 LF Willamette Ave (west of Platte) – 1,100 LF

140 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide Roadway Safety, Traffic Operations, and Maintenance Phase 1 This capital program includes intersection and corridor “spot” improvements to mitigate existing safety and traffic flow deficiencies. Proposed projects of this type will include the construction of traffic signals, roundabouts, auxiliary traffic lanes, traffic calming features, and other lower-cost geometric improvements. These projects may also install infrastructure such as guard rail; construct/ reconstruct medians and intersection to improve capacity; and install traffic control devices where warranted to improve traffic operations and safety.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Intersection Improvements $ - $ 1,914,058 $ 112,155 $ 11,725 $ 2,037,938 Safety Projects $ - $ 16,915 $ 58,899 $ 13,449 $ 89,262 Transportation Studies $ 55,019 $ 181,562 $ 707,456 $ 82,989 $ 1,027,026 I-25/Cimarron RAMP Match $ 1,686,334 $ - $ - $ 1,686,334 Sierra / Vermijo $ - $ - $ 2,217,670 $ 238,677 $ 2,456,347 Total Spend $ 1,741,353 $ 2,112,535 $ 3,096,179 $ 346,840 $ 7,296,907 Budget 1 $ 2,390,457 % Spent 61% 32% 58% 15% Percent of Program % of Intersection Improvements 0% 91% 4% 3% 28% % of Safety Projects 0% 1% 2% 4% 1% % of Transportation Studies 3% 9% 23% 24% 14% % of I-25/Cimarron Ramp Match 97% 0% 0% 0% 23% % of Sierra / Vermijo 0% 0% 72% 69% 34% 1 2021 Budget includes $1,000,000 budget allocation and $1,390,437 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Continuing efforts on Intermodal Transportation Study aka ConnectCOS. Continuing analysis of traffic conditions in the Colorado Avenue corridor. Continuing signal design and intersection improvements at the 30th Street / Mesa intersection . Continuing analysis of Cascade Avenue lane geometry changes. Signal construction at the Voyager / Spectrum Loop / Copper Center intersection. Safety study of Cheyenne Boulevard and Cheyenne Road.

141 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide Congestion and Incident Management Signal Improvements Phase I Implement Citywide/Region wide Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to improve traffic operations, coordinate systems and improve safety. Improvements may include monitoring systems; hardware and software; message systems; metering; communication infrastructure, and specialized equipment and staff.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Traffic ITS Equipment $ 18,514 $ 363 $ 328,680 $ 17,237 $ 364,796 Traffic Signal Equipment $ - $ 333,756 $ 117,625 $ - $ 451,381 Software $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 18,514 $ 334,119 $ 471,305 $ 17,237 $ 841,176 Budget1 $ 1,489,180 % Spent/Encumbered 1% 18% 24% 1% Percent of Program % of Traffic ITS Equipment 100% 0% 70% 100% 43% % of Traffic Signal Equipment 0% 100% 25% 0% 54% % of Software 0% 0% 5% 0% 3% 1 2021 Budget includes $412,000 budget allocation and $1,077,180 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Determination of locations and technology for permanent vehicle count locations. Upcoming advance detection purchases. Upcoming purchases of Audible Push Buttons. Upcoming upgrades to the City's school flasher system.

142 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide Traffic Signal System Upgrade Design and reconstruct dilapidated traffic signal systems across the City. Currently responsible for operation and maintenance of 612 signalized intersections around the City.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Traffic Signal Equipment $ 1,816,618 $ 1,670,032 $ 722,029 $ 896 $ 4,209,575 Design $ 251,848 $ 37,132 $ 123,708 $ - $ 412,688 Traffic Signal Upgrades $ 983,093 $ 2,633,934 $ 803,337 $ 211,069 $ 4,631,433 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 3,051,559 $ 4,341,098 $ 1,649,075 $ 211,964 $ 9,253,695 Budget1 $ 1,846,613 % Spent/Encumbered 73% 116% 73% 11% Percent of Program % of Traffic Signal Equipment 60% 38% 44% 0% 45% % of Design 8% 1% 8% 0% 4% % of Traffic Signal Upgrades 32% 61% 49% 100% 50% 1 2021 Budget includes $1,000,000 budget allocation and $846,613 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Completed signal rebuild at the Colorado / Wahsatch intersection. Continuing rebuild of the existing signal at Voyager and Federal intersection. Continuing rebuild of the existing signal at the Voyager and Old Ranch intersection. Started signal rebuild at North Carefree and Academy intersection.

143 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Emergency Bridge Fund The Emergency Bridge Fund was created to address unfunded bridge needs and provides the City the ability to repair, replace or rehabilitate a bridge that has a serious deterioration issue or safety concerns to the travelling public. In particular, Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) structures are creating massive issues throughout the City. CMP structures were installed in the 1970’s and 1980’s and are nearing the end of their service life. The highest profile corrugated metal pipe failure in Colorado Springs was at the Chestnut Street Bridge. These funds are also used to leverage other funding sources for design or construction of bridge infrastructure citywide.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Engineering/ROW $ 146,398 $ 135,009 $ 903,301 $ 349,721 $ 1,534,428 Construction $ 435,861 $ 9,751 $ 993,382 $ 48,502 $ 1,487,495 Program Support $ 1,674 $ 4,684 $ 3,047 $ 233 $ 9,637 Total % Spent/Encumbered $ 583,932 $ 149,444 $ 1,899,729 $ 398,456 $ 3,031,561 Budget1 $ 4,903,101 % Spent/Encumbered 38% 5% 33% 8% Percent of Program % of Engineering/ROW 25.1% 90.3% 47.5% 87.8% 50.6% % of Construction 74.6% 6.5% 52.3% 12.2% 49.1% % of Program Support 0.3% 3.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 1 2021 Budget includes $1,000,000 budget allocation and $3,903,101 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts -Local match funding for grant to replace Cheyenne Run concrete box culverts under Cascade Avenue. -Engineering advanced for Hunter's Lane over Spring Run bridge. Supplementing HUTF funding with construction planned in 2021. -Engineering advanced for Wooten Road bridge replacement. Supplementing HUTF funding with construction planned in 2021. -Engineering complete and bridge advertised for construction for Paseo Road (north) bridge over Van Buren ditch. Supplementing HUTF funding with construction started in 2021. - Engineering complete for Paseo Road (south) bridge over Shooks Run. Local match for STP Metro grant funding with construction planned in 2021. -Advanced preliminary engineering for UPRR over Fontanero Street siding bridge with the A-list UPRR over Fontanero Street mainline bridge replacement project. Construction is planned in 2023 and 2024. -Engineering complete for 3 Cheyenne Canyon bridge structures. Supplementing state grant funding for the replacement of three bridges with construction planned in 2021.

144 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Transit Programs Capital improvements for Mountain Metro focus on vehicle replacements and improvements to sidewalks and bus stops to support transit activities. The transit capital improvements focus on the following areas:

• ADA-paratransit bus system vehicle replacement • Fixed-route bus system vehicle replacement • Sidewalk and bus stop improvements along existing routes • Vanpool vehicle replacement Additional transit related data is provided in Appendix A. The list of contracts is for both the transit capital program and for dedicated transit funding.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals ADA-Paratransit Bus System Vehicle Replacement $ 234,668 $ 247,996 $ 173,318 $ - $ 655,982 Fixed-Route Bus System Vehicle Replacement $ 233,746 $ 1,898,500 $ - $ - $ 2,132,246 Sidewalk/Bus Stop Program, Existing Routes $ 41,120 $ 60,616 $ 3,879 $ - $ 105,615 Vanpool Vehicle Replacement $ 58,601 $ 21,310 $ - $ - $ 79,911 % Spent/Encumbered $ 568,135 $ 2,228,422 $ 177,197 $ - $ 2,973,754 Budget1 $ 3,529,551 % Spent/Encumbered 18% 60% 5% 0% Percent of Program % ADA-Para Bus Replacement 41% 11% 98% 0% 22% % Fixed-route Bus System Replacement 41% 85% 0% 0% 72% % Sidewalk/Bus Stop Program 7% 3% 2% 0% 4% % Vanpool Vehicle Replacement 10% 1% 0% 0% 3% 1 2021 Budget includes $1,121,000 budget allocation and $2,408,551 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts -MMT will move funds from Vanpool Vehicle Replacement to Fixed Route Vehicle Replacement annually, because MMT is not replacing Vanpool vehicles because demand has declined. -MMT will move funds from Sidewalk/Bus Stop Program to Fixed Route Vehicle Replacement to increase the match split and become more competitive in discretionary grant applications; other funding sources are being utilized to address Sidewalk/Bus Stop Program needs. -MMT will move funds from ADA-Paratransit Vehicle Replacement to Fixed Route Vehicle Replacement to increase the match split and become more competitive in discretionary grant applications.

145 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Trail Program The City’s Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services (Parks) Department oversees trail improvement projects to include trail paving, capital corridor reconstruction, crossing improvements (at-grade and grade separated), drainage improvements, connectivity enhancements, and signage and related amenities. PPRTA provides funding for A-list Trail projects as outlined in Table 8. The Pikes Peak Greenway Corridor (PPG) Corridor Improvements consist of several projects.

Parks looks for opportunities to leverage PPRTA funding to obtain grants to assist with overall projects costs. The PPG project from Rockrimmon at I-25 to Cottonwood Creek is grant funded and PPRTA funds will be used for the local match and construction management.

Table 8. Trail Projects Project Name Description Status Cottonwood Trail Corridor Trail constructed as part of the Completed Improvements Academy at Cottonwood Creek Bridge replacement project Midland Trail Improvements – Trail constructed with El Paso Completed; invoices pending Ridge Rd to Columbia St. County’s A-list W. Colorado Avenue Reconstruction project Pikes Peak Greenway (PPG) Corridor Improvements: Mesa Creek to Uintah Install new concrete trail and Engineering underway – Street Mesa Road underpass Working with CSU to move the existing electrical lines underground. Southwest Downtown Bridge installed; overall project Pedestrian Bridge underway Uintah St. Underpass Underpass at Uintah St. to allow Completed PPG trail users grade separated crossing of street Mesa Creek Crossing Bridge over Mesa Creek Plans submitted to City Engineering for review; construction anticipated in 2021. Rockrimmon at I-25 to Trail reconstruction with grant CDOT has approved the Cottonwood Creek funding contract with Olgoonik for construction of the trail. Construction anticipated to start in October 2021. Rock Island Trail Corridor Trail reconstruction from Van Design complete; construction Improvements Buren to Templeton Gap anticipated in 2021; waiting on SHPO to approve grant funding necessary to construct project Shook’s Runs Trail Corridor Trail reconstruction; preliminary Easement acquisition Improvements design complete from E. Las underway; additional design Vegas to PPG work needed

146 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Project Name Description Status Sinton Trail Corridor Concrete paving and associated Construction anticipated to Improvements improvements start in 2021 Templeton Gap Trail Corridor Concrete paving and associated Not started Improvements improvements

Figure 39. Uintah Street Underpass Figure 40. Pikes Peak Greenway Trail

147 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Maintenance Programs Roadway Maintenance, Roadway Drainage Pipe, Guardrail and Concrete Repair Programs The City has maintenance programs to preserve the service life of infrastructure assets. The largest program is Roadway Maintenance, Roadway Drainage Pipe, Guardrail and Concrete Repair Programs. Other maintenance programs are Citywide Traffic Signal System Maintenance, Bridge Maintenance and Capital Project Maintenance.

The road maintenance costs per major work items are summarized below. For each work item, the total expenditure for the past three years and the first quarter of 2021 is provided. A drawdown chart is also presented for these road maintenance activities. The chart shows the annual allocation in blue, and the actual and projected monthly expenditures in red and cumulative balance for the program in green. As the year progresses, the program balance decreases as activities are completed, representing the drawdown. The program plans work and associated expenditures annually to maximize use of available funds.

Detailed reports of asset and material quantities are also provided. Appendix B contains the completed on-call ADA replacement items and a summary of contracts active in the 1st quarter of 2021.

Costs per major work items for the Citywide Traffic Signal System Maintenance, Bridge Maintenance and Capital Project Maintenance programs are also summarized.

Material Placed in 2021 for Roadway and Sidewalk Maintenance

Crack Seal – 1/5th times as heavy as the Space Shuttle or 24,278 pounds

Sidewalk – 2/3rd times as big as a football field or 39,004sf

Curb & Gutter – as long as the National Mall or 10,219 linear feet

148 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Chipseal $ 2,116,317 $ - $ 2,427,400 $ - $ 4,543,717 Crackseal $ 1,601,078 $ - $ 1,363,219 $ 32,521 $ 2,996,818 Digout/Patching $ 337,028 $ - $ 691,443 $ - $ 1,028,471 Overlay $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Pavement Assessment $ 353,109 $ - $ 205,944 $ - $ 559,053 Pre-overlay Pipe $ 1,679,987 $ 909,340 $ 2,496,723 $ 111,476 $ 5,197,526 Guardrail $ 83,804 $ 115,470 $ 57,399 $ 9,902 $ 266,575 Pre-overlay Concrete $ 91,043 $ - $ 30,737 $ - $ 121,780 ADA/On-call $ 1,158,829 $ 3,475,771 $ 5,937,683 $ 1,341,202 $ 11,913,485 Independent ADA Ramp Assessment $ - $ 44,493 $ 45,547 $ - $ 90,040 Cost Share Program $ 96,318 $ 83,519 $ 91,773 $ 13,802 $ 285,412 Sidewalk Vertical Displacement Mitigation Program $ 49,863 $ 74,990 $ 149,938 $ - $ 274,791 Truncated Domes Program $ 49,918 $ 74,800 $ 74,736 $ - $ 199,454 Program Support $ 783,178 $ 791,769 $ 1,349,556 $ 263,730 $ 3,188,233 Other $ 65,044 $ 4,485,495 $ 3,181,941 $ - $ 7,732,480 In-House Maintenance Program $ 6,397,463 $ 4,964,729 $ 4,081,605 $ 226,928 $ 15,670,725 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 14,862,978 $ 15,020,376 $ 22,185,643 $ 1,999,561 $ 54,068,558 Budget1 $ 18,154,510 $ 18,312,212 $ 18,892,171 $ 25,240,858 % Spent/Encumbered 66% 73% 95% 8% Percent of Program Chipseal % of Program 14% 0% 11% 0% 8% Crackseal % of Program 11% 0% 6% 2% 6% Digout/Patching % of Program 2% 0% 3% 0% 2% Overlay % of Program 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Pavement Assessment % of Program 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% Pre-overlay Pipe % of Program 11% 6% 11% 6% 10% Guardrail % of Program 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Pre-overlay Concrete % of Program 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% ADA/On-call % of Program 8% 23% 27% 67% 22% Independent ADA Ramp Assessment % of Program 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Cost Share Program % of Program 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% Sidewalk Vertical Displacement Mitigation % of Program 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% Truncated Domes Program % of Program 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Program Support % of Program 5% 5% 6% 13% 6% Other % of Program 0% 30% 14% 0% 14% In-House Maintenance Program % of Program 43% 33% 18% 11% 29% 1 2021 Budget includes $18,963,225 budget allocation and $6,277,633 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid- year adjustment. Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Other Line Item Breakdown: No projects to report at this time In-House program supports: Potholes Minor Paving In-house crackseal program In-House concrete work Upcoming projects/activities: Chip Seal to begin in Q2 Digout and Wide Crack Mitigation are on-going SVDM and Truncated Domes will kick off in Q2 Flintridge Pipe Project is projected to finish end of Q2 or beginning of Q3

149 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Drawdown The chart shows the annual allocation in blue and the actual and projected monthly expenditures in red and cumulative balance for the program in green. As the year progresses, the program balance decreases as activities are completed, representing the drawdown. The program plans work and associated expenditures annually to maximize use of available funds; however, a small percentage of the annual allocation is typically carried into the next year and applied to on-going maintenance activities.

150 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Asset Totals and Materials Quantities

Roadway Maintenance Program Unit of Measure Q1 Quantities Q2 Quantities Q3 Quantities Q4 Quantities Total Quantities Chip Seal Area (Square yards) - - Lane Miles - - Crack Seal Material (Pounds) 24,278 24,278 Digout and Wide Crack Mitigation Asphalt material (Tons) - -

Concrete Maintenance Program Unit of Measure Q1 Q2 Quantities Q3 Quantities Q4 Quantities Total Quantities On Call and ADA Curb and Gutter (Linear feet) 10,219 10,219 Installed Sidewalk (Square feet) 39,004 39,004 New Pedestrian Ramps (Each) 22 22 Retrofitted Pedestrian Ramps (Each) 34 34 Cross pans (Each) 7 7 Cost Share Curb and Gutter (Linear feet) 190 190 Installed Sidewalk (Square feet) 1,272 1,272 Sidewalk Vertical Displacement Mitigation Cuts - -

Additional Maintenance Programs Unit of Measure Q1 Q2 Quantities Q3 Quantities Q4 Quantities Total Quantities Pipe Pipe lined (Linear feet) - - Guardrail Projects completed 2 2

151 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Citywide Traffic Signal System Maintenance This program includes corridor and intersection improvements to mitigate existing safety and traffic flow deficiencies, and improve traffic signals, signs, school/pedestrian improvements, pavement markings, and other traffic control devices.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Citywide Safety and Traffic Operations $ 758,765 $ 2,466,388 $ 2,431,264 $ 69,135 $ 5,725,552 Traffic Signal Maintenance $ 800,700 $ 341,065 $ 513,211 $ 1,654,976 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 1,559,465 $ 2,807,453 $ 2,944,475 $ 69,135 $ 7,380,528 Budget1 $ 2,106,906 % Spent/Encumbered 73% 116% 73% 3% Safety Operations % of Program 49% 88% 83% 100% 78% Signal Maintenance % of Program 51% 12% 17% 0% 22% 1 2021 Budget includes $1,500,000 budget allocation and $606,906 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Continuing design efforts for the Union intersections with Monterey and with US 24 EB off-ramp. Continuing engineering design efforts of Marksheffel/Space Village safety improvements. Continuing efforts on city wide safety study. Traffic counts and data analysis. Traffic signal maintenance.

152 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Bridge Maintenance PPRTA funding is used by the City of Colorado Springs to plan and perform bridge maintenance activities to the City’s 217 major bridge structures (greater than 20 feet in length) and 211 minor bridge structures (between 4’ and 20’ in length). Since the beginning of PPRTA in 2005, the funding provided by PPRTA for bridge maintenance has been invested to address several types of maintenance efforts as described below. This investment has enabled the City to move its efforts from mostly emergency response to a deliberate and planned bridge maintenance effort. The benefit to the community includes improvements in safety and a reduction in the loss of the use of bridges.

The City has categorized investments made for bridge maintenance to plan and implement efforts in a balanced manner with the intention of funding all categories each year. Each category addresses different types of bridge needs and have different values to the community.

Category Description Community Value Repairs Addressing bridge issues related to age, Maintains bridges damage, and others condition Safety Focused on improving public safety and Addresses safety issues reduction of risk and risks Rehabilitation Major improvements and repairs required to Extends bridge service obtain or extend the service life of bridges. life and addresses major Examples include deck replacement, bridge rail condition and safety replacement, and others. issues Programmed & Maintenance activities that can be scheduled or Extends bridge service Preventative are routine life Opportunity As City maintenance and capital efforts are Leverages bridge performed by others, there is opportunity to maintenance funding by perform bridge maintenance activities either as lowering costs part of or during those efforts. Emergency Response to bridge emergencies such as Necessary for public accidents, storm damage, and others safety Engineering Evaluation of bridge issues, repair options, and Provides information for design better planning and implementation Program This includes staff to manage, inspect, and Forecasting, planning, Management administer bridge maintenance and planning monitoring, and activities reporting The following table outlines the financial status of the Bridge Maintenance program, and highlights achievements from the past quarter and upcoming activities.

153 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Engineering $ 749,833 $ 549,623 $ 1,312,560 $ 950,620 $ 3,600,905 Construction $ 4,284,008 $ 4,629,303 $ 6,081,364 $ 3,400,731 $ 19,516,290 Reimbursements1 $ (15,454) $ (67,850) $ (75,235) $ - $ (158,538) Program Support $ 5,769 $ 15,411 $ 10,401 $ 1,560 $ 48,601 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 5,024,155 $ 5,126,488 $ 7,329,090 $ 4,352,912 $ 23,007,259 Budget2 $ 5,332,108 %Spent/Encumbered 88% 105% 100% 82% Percent of Program Engineering % of Program 15% 11% 18% 22% 16% Construction % of Program 85% 90% 83% 78% 85% Reimbursements % of Program 0% -1% -1% 0% -1% Program Support % of Program 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1These are reimbursements for damages. 2 2021 Budget includes $4,896,380 budget allocation and $435,128 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Performed or contracted maintenance activities on 8 bridges and completed bridge maintenance activities started Performed or contracted engineering activities on 6 bridges. Completed 5-Year Bridge Maintenance Plan. Colorado Avenue Bridge over Monument Creek and Railroad Bridge - Deck rehabilitation construction continues. Performed Enhanced Inspections at 16 structures. Began bridge rehabilitation project at Peterson Road over Peterson trib. Completed bypass road at Cheyenne Canyon bridge. Completed 5 bridge rehab projects at the SE side of Colorado Springs. Completed bridge rehab project at Balsam Road over Cottonwood Creek Trib. Continued Development of Bridge Capital Improvement Plan. Continued Development of Preferred Bridge Maintenance Material Specifications. Emergency repair construction for Uintah over Monument Creek still underway. Completed handrail remediation at 31st street over Camp Creek Performed guardrail repair at 6 locations.

Upcoming projects/activities: Bridge replacement project at West Bijou Street. 4 Bridge rehab projects at the SE side of Colorado Springs. Completion of Peterson road rehab project. Diaphragm removal and replacement at Palmer Park over Sand Creek. Removal of the existing BNSF over Costilla Bridge. Removal is anticipated in 2021. Improve Bridge Maintenance Systems using CarteGraph. Additional bridge maintenance construction tasks. Continue Development of Bridge Capital Improvement Plan.

154 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E

Capital Project Maintenance The Capital Project Maintenance program is designed to provide support after the City takes beneficial use of projects constructed with PPRTA funds. The support typically focuses on landscaping and irrigation within the project limits to establish and maintain slope stabilizing vegetation, native plantings and other landscaping features, along with wall repair and graffiti removal. The following table outlines the financial status of the Capital Project Maintenance program.

Program Spend and Completion Status Program 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals Landscape Maintenance $ 298,268 $ 361,321 $ 418,122 $ 81,623 $ 1,159,334 Irrigation Systems $ 73,682 $ 67,636 $ 74,421 $ 3,978 $ 219,718 Program Management $ 157 $ 176 $ 187 $ 51 $ 570 Total Spend/Encumbered $ 372,107 $ 429,134 $ 492,729 $ 85,652 $ 1,379,622 Budget1 $ 533,169 % Spent/Encumbered 16% Percent of Program Landscape Maintenance % of Program 80% 84% 85% 95% 84% Irrigation Systems % of Program 20% 16% 15% 5% 16% Program Management % of Program 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2021 Budget includes $500,000 budget allocation and $33,169 2020 carryover. Note, the 2021 budget may change with a mid-year adjustment.

Projects Completed in Q1 and Continuing Efforts Annual maintenance needs for completed PPRTA A-listed projects

155 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Appendix A – Additional Transit Data for PPRTA Staff Summary of Transit Contracts Transit 1st Quarter 2021 PPRTA Contract Report - PPRTA amount ≥ $25,000 1st Quarter 1st Quarter YTD 2021 Contract / PO Total Contract PPRTA Contract YTD 2021 Vendor Name Description PPRTA Funds No. Amount Amount Local Match PPRTA PPRTA Funds PeopleSoft GL 1190 TRANSIT CAMPUS EXPANSION PROJECT C009451 * LOLLAR ENGINEERING $599,677.74 $119,935.55 $0.00 1,639.05 MANAGEMENT MCDONALD TRANSIT ASSOC INC (05/01/20 - C008103 FIXED-ROUTE SERVICE $10,499,199.85 $5,954,242.82 $0.00 $0.00 04/30/21) PIKES PEAK AREA COUNCIL OF C009935 SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM $124,968.00 $124,968.00 $124,968.00 $0.00 GOVERNMENTS (PPACG) 1190 TRANSIT CAMPUS EXPANSION DESIGN C009418 * SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC $836,623.98 $167,324.80 $0.00 $948.48 ENGINEERING

C009519 TRANSDEV ADA (01/01/21 - 06/30/21) ADA PARATRANSIT SERVICE $2,324,033.95 $1,430,707.95 $0.00 $0.00

TRANSDEV MAINTENANCE (04/01/20 - C008080 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE $3,857,780.04 $747,009.81 $0.00 $0.00 03/31/21) PO 65528 *TRAPEZE SOFTWARE GROUP PARATRANSIT EZ WALLET AND PASS-WEB $164,792.00 $32,958.40 $0.00 $0.00

PO 65627 * TRAPEZE SOFTWARE GROUP SMART INFO SIGNS $173,379.00 $34,675.80 $0.00 $0.00

* The referenced contracts or purchase orders are on an ongoing basis. The "Total Contract Amount" and "PPRTA Contract PPRTA FUNDED ASSET SALES >$1,000 Amount" are total contract value since contract inception. The final two columns are YTD expenditures in 2021. $2,840.00 K187 $2,839.20 K156 **Disposal funds received in Jan 2021 & accrued back to 2020. $3,480.00 ** K175 $3,600.00 ** K178 $3,600.00 ** K181 $3,640.00 ** K153

$19,999.20 1ST QTR TOTAL VEHICLE SALES

$19,999.20 2021 YTD TOTAL

156 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Appendix B – Additional Operations and Maintenance Data for PPRTA Staff PPRTA On-call/ADA Detail 2021 PPRTA COST SHARE 1st Quarter 2105 ACADEMY CIR Corner - Ped-Ramp 2105 ACADEMY CIR Entrance - Ped-Ramp 2105 ACADEMY CIR Entrance - Ped-Ramp 2120 ACADEMY CIR 2121 ACADEMY CIR 2130 ACADEMY CIR 2140 ACADEMY CIR 2141 ACADEMY CIR 2145 ACADEMY CIR 2175 ACADEMY CIR 2233 ACADEMY CIR ACADEMY CIR 2139-2169 Academy Circle 2222 ACADEMY PL 2378 ACADEMY PL 4690 ACKLEY CT Ped-Ramp 4695 ACKLEY CT Ped-Ramp ACKLEY CT X-Pan 2115 AFTON WAY 7757 AMBERLY DR Ped-Ramp ANTELOPE RIDGE DR ANTELOPE RIDGE DR 1065 APPLEWOOD DR 1070 APPLEWOOD DR 1075 APPLEWOOD DR 1079 APPLEWOOD DR 1081 APPLEWOOD DR 1085 APPLEWOOD DR 1090 APPLEWOOD DR 1107 APPLEWOOD DR 1119 APPLEWOOD DR 1122 APPLEWOOD DR 1131 APPLEWOOD DR 1131 APPLEWOOD DR Ped-Ramp 1138 APPLEWOOD DR 1155 APPLEWOOD DR Ped-Ramp 1155 APPLEWOOD DR 1162 APPLEWOOD DR 1167 APPLEWOOD DR 3903 APPLEWOOD DR 3910 APPLEWOOD DR 3922 APPLEWOOD DR 3923 APPLEWOOD DR 3928 APPLEWOOD DR 3931 APPLEWOOD DR 3937 APPLEWOOD DR 3940 APPLEWOOD DR 3945 APPLEWOOD DR 3946 APPLEWOOD DR Side yard of vacant lot 3946 APPLEWOOD DR 3238 BRECKENRIDGE DR E 3245 BRECKENRIDGE DR E 3246 BRECKENRIDGE DR E 3252 BRECKENRIDGE DR E 3253 BRECKENRIDGE DR E 5601 BRENNAN AVE Ped-Ramp 5938 BRENNAN AVE Ped-Ramp 5938 BRENNAN AVE Intersection of Issaquah Dr and Sonesta Dr. (Backyard of 5938 Brennan Ave) - Ped-Ramp 5938 BRENNAN AVE Ped-Ramp 5938 BRENNAN AVE Intersection of Issaquah Dr and Sonesta Dr. (Backyard of 5938 Brennan Ave) Ped-Ramp 7595 BUCKEYE TREE LN Midblock - Ped-Ramp CALYPSO DR Intersection of Calypso Dr and Antelope Ridge Dr. - Ped-Ramp 2790 CONSTITUTION AVE Intersection at entrance from Constitution Ave. Ped-Ramp 7654 CORDELLE LN Intersection of Calypso Dr and Antelope Ridge Dr. (7654 Cordelle Ln Backyard) Ped-Ramp 7379 CORSICANA DR Midblock - Ped-Ramp

157 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2021 PPRTA COST SHARE 1st Quarter CRAGMOR RD Alley entrance next to vacant lot between Stanton St and Applewood Dr 4645 DESERT VARNISH DR 1502 DIANA LN Ped-Ramp 1502 DIANA LN 1503 DIANA LN 1503 DIANA LN Ped-Ramp 1506 DIANA LN 1512 DIANA LN 1518 DIANA LN 1520 DIANA LN 1521 DIANA LN 1523 DIANA LN 1528 DIANA LN 1529 DIANA LN 1530 DIANA LN 1531 DIANA LN 1537 DIANA LN 4410 E FOUNTAIN BLVD Passthrough - Ped-Ramp 4410 E FOUNTAIN BLVD Passthrough - Ped-Ramp 4410 E FOUNTAIN BLVD Entrance 4410 E Fountain Blvd. Outbound to E Fountain Blvd. - Ped-Ramp 4450 E FOUNTAIN BLVD Ped-Ramp 6983 EDINBOROUGH DR Ped-Ramp 6984 EDINBOROUGH DR Ped-Ramp 1501 EDITH LN 1501 EDITH LN Ped-Ramp 1502 EDITH LN Ped-Ramp 1505 EDITH LN 1508 EDITH LN 1509 EDITH LN 1513 EDITH LN 1514 EDITH LN 1517 EDITH LN 1518 EDITH LN 1522 EDITH LN 1604 EDITH LN 1606 EDITH LN 1609 EDITH LN 1613 EDITH LN 1614 EDITH LN 1619 EDITH LN EDITH LN West side of Alley between Happiness Dr and Merry Ln EDITH LN East side of Alley between Happiness Dr and Merry Ln 3022 ESCAPARDO CIR Side Yard 3022 ESCAPARDO CIR Ped-Ramp 2913 ESCAPARDO PL Ped-Ramp 2913 ESCAPARDO PL Side Yard 2918 ESCAPARDO PL Side Yard 2918 ESCAPARDO PL Ped-Ramp 5208 ESCAPARDO WAY 5211 ESCAPARDO WAY 5212 ESCAPARDO WAY 5215 ESCAPARDO WAY 5216 ESCAPARDO WAY 5219 ESCAPARDO WAY 5220 ESCAPARDO WAY 5223 ESCAPARDO WAY 5224 ESCAPARDO WAY 5227 ESCAPARDO WAY 5228 ESCAPARDO WAY 5232 ESCAPARDO WAY 5236 ESCAPARDO WAY 5240 ESCAPARDO WAY 5244 ESCAPARDO WAY

158 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2021 PPRTA COST SHARE 1st Quarter 5248 ESCAPARDO WAY 5252 ESCAPARDO WAY 5256 ESCAPARDO WAY 5306 ESCAPARDO WAY 5310 ESCAPARDO WAY 5314 ESCAPARDO WAY 5318 ESCAPARDO WAY 5322 ESCAPARDO WAY 5326 ESCAPARDO WAY 5402 ESCAPARDO WAY 5406 ESCAPARDO WAY 5409 ESCAPARDO WAY Ped-Ramp 5409 ESCAPARDO WAY 5410 ESCAPARDO WAY 5413 ESCAPARDO WAY 5414 ESCAPARDO WAY 5417 ESCAPARDO WAY 5418 ESCAPARDO WAY 5422 ESCAPARDO WAY 5426 ESCAPARDO WAY 5430 ESCAPARDO WAY ESCAPARDO WAY X-Pan ESCAPARDO WAY X-Pan ESCAPARDO WAY X-Pan ESCAPARDO WAY X-Pan 6195 FABRAY LN Ped-Ramp FABRAY LN X-Pan 7712 FIREHAWK LN Side Yard 1570 HAPPINESS DR 1602 HAPPINESS DR Side Yard 2893 INSPIRATION DR Side Yard 2905 INSPIRATION DR Side Yard 4910 JEDEDIAH SMITH RD North Entrance - Ped-Ramp 4910 JEDEDIAH SMITH RD North Entrance - Ped-Ramp 4910 JEDEDIAH SMITH RD North entrance - X-Pan 6180 KATY CT Ped-Ramp 2904 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2907 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2911 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2915 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2916 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2920 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2923 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2924 LA ESTRELLA CIR 2927 LA ESTRELLA CIR Side Yard 2927 LA ESTRELLA CIR Ped-Ramp 2928 LA ESTRELLA CIR Ped-Ramp 2928 LA ESTRELLA CIR Side Yard 2902 LA ESTRELLA CT 2906 LA ESTRELLA CT 2909 LA ESTRELLA CT 2910 LA ESTRELLA CT 2917 LA ESTRELLA CT 2918 LA ESTRELLA CT 2921 LA ESTRELLA CT Ped-Ramp 2921 LA ESTRELLA CT Side Yard 2921 LA ESTRELLA CT 2922 LA ESTRELLA CT 2922 LA ESTRELLA CT Side Yard 2922 LA ESTRELLA CT Ped-Ramp 3825 MAIZELAND RD Side Yard 2804 MERRY LN 2809 MERRY LN

159 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2021 PPRTA COST SHARE 1st Quarter 2811 MERRY LN 2821 MERRY LN 2822 MERRY LN 2825 MERRY LN 2826 MERRY LN 2829 MERRY LN 2830 MERRY LN 2838 MERRY LN 2839 MERRY LN 2843 MERRY LN 2847 MERRY LN 2847 MERRY LN Ped-Ramp 2850 MERRY LN 2855 MERRY LN 2855 MERRY LN Ped-Ramp 2858 MERRY LN 2859 MERRY LN 2862 MERRY LN 2863 MERRY LN 2866 MERRY LN 2867 MERRY LN 2870 MERRY LN 2874 MERRY LN 2875 MERRY LN 2879 MERRY LN 2886 MERRY LN 2887 MERRY LN 2891 MERRY LN 2894 MERRY LN 2895 MERRY LN 2898 MERRY LN 2899 MERRY LN 5675 MIRABEL LN Ped-Ramp 6510 MUSTANG PONY WAY Ped-Ramp 2123 N ACADEMY BLVD Ped-Ramp 2123 N ACADEMY BLVD 2133 N ACADEMY BLVD 2345 N ACADEMY BLVD Backyard 2385 N ACADEMY BLVD Backyard on Academy Pl 1623 N CIRCLE DR Side Yard 1370 N NEWPORT RD Entrance of 1370 N Newport Rd. 475 RED CLIFF TER 5984 SONESTA DR Ped-Ramp 3957 STANTON ST Side Yard 7517 LEGEND HILL DR Intersection on backyard - Ped-Ramp ISSAQUAH DR Intersection behind 7958 Manistique Dr (backyard) - Ped-Ramp ISSAQUAH DR Intersection behind 7958 Manistique Dr (backyard) - Ped-Ramp 7517 LEGEND HILL DR Intersection on backyard - Ped-Ramp 6620 TURKEY TRACKS RD Ped-Ramp TURKEY TRACKS RD X-Pan 6310 WICKLOW CIR E 6332 WICKLOW CIR E 6354 WICKLOW CIR E 6388 WICKLOW CIR E 6404 WICKLOW CIR E 6418 WICKLOW CIR E 6424 WICKLOW CIR E 6448 WICKLOW CIR E 6464 WICKLOW CIR E 6317 WICKLOW CIR W

160 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2021 PPRTA COST SHARE 1st Quarter 2021 Cost Share 1st Quarter 1307 DOYLE PL 3955 LARDNER LN 3056 MEANDER CIR 1526 ROBIDOUX CIR 3610 TRAILHILL PL

161 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Summary of O&M Maintenance Contracts

Program Activity Contractor

Roadway Maintenance Program Chip Seal A-1 Chipseal Roadway Maintenance Program Crack Seal A-1 Chipseal Concrete Maintenance Program On Call and ADA Lucky Dog Concrete Maintenance Program On Call and ADA QHI Concrete Maintenance Program On Call and ADA Soji Concrete Maintenance Program On Call and ADA HCD Concrete Maintenance Program On Call and ADA ICS Concrete Maintenance Program On Call and ADA Trax Concrete Maintenance Program Cost Share HCD Right-of-Way Maintenance Program Structures Vivid Engineering Right-of-Way Maintenance Program Structures Granite Right-of-Way Maintenance Program Structures Adarand Additional Maintenance Programs Pipe Insituform Technologies Additional Maintenance Programs Pipe Utility Maintenance & Inspection Additional Maintenance Programs Pipe Lucky Dog Additional Maintenance Programs Guardrail Adarand Program Support and Indirect Expenses Independent ADA Ramp Assessment HDR Program Support and Indirect Expenses Contracted Inspection Staffing Express Professionals Program Support and Indirect Expenses Contracted Inspection Staffing Action Staffing Program Support and Indirect Expenses Contracted Administrative Staffing Express Professionals Program Support and Indirect Expenses Contracted Administrative Staffing Action Staffing Program Support and Indirect Expenses Contracted Administrative Staffing Add Staff Program Support and Indirect Expenses Materials Testing Granite Engineering Program Support and Indirect Expenses Materials Testing CTL Thompson Program Support and Indirect Expenses Materials Testing Yeh & Associates Program Support and Indirect Expenses Monumented Land and Survey Plats Rampart Surveys Program Support and Indirect Expenses Arborist Tall Timbers Program Support and Indirect Expenses Asset Management Software Cartegraph Program Support and Indirect Expenses Pavement & Alleyway Assessment Marker Geospatial Program Support and Indirect Expenses Indirect Expenses AT&T Program Support and Indirect Expenses Indirect Expenses Axelliant Program Support and Indirect Expenses Indirect Expenses Bill's Equipment & Tool Rental Program Support and Indirect Expenses Indirect Expenses Staples Program Support and Indirect Expenses Indirect Expenses City of Colorado Springs

162 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E Appendix C – Capital Project Completeness Graphics 2021

163 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2022

164 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2023

165 PPRTA BOD Agenda Item 10E 2024

166