DOCSLIB.ORG

Differences in Renal Diet and Medical Symptom Knowledge in Diet Adherent and Diet Nonadherent Adult Hemodialysis Patients

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIFFERENCES IN RENAL DIET AND MEDICAL SYMPTOM KNOWLEDGE IN DIET ADHERENT AND DIET NONADHERENT ADULT HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS A thesis submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health and Human Service in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Nutrition and Dietetics By Kelsey Lynn Hagens May 2019 © Copyright, 2019 by Kelsey L. Hagens All Rights Reserved ii A thesis written by Kelsey Lynn Hagens B.S., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2017 M.S., Kent State University, 2019 Approved by ________________________, Director, Master’s Thesis Committee Natalie Caine-Bish ________________________, Member, Master’s Thesis Committee Eun-Jeong (Angie) Ha ________________________, Member, Master’s Thesis Committee Tanya Falcone Accepted by ________________________, Director, School of Health Sciences Ellen Glickman ________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health, and Human Services James C. Hannon iii HAGENS, KELSEY LYNN, M.S., May 2019 Nutrition and Dietetics THE EFFECT OF RENAL DIET AND RENAL SYMPTOM KNOWLEDGE ON DIETARY ADHERENCE IN ADULT HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS Director of Thesis: Natalie Caine-Bish, Ph.D, R.D., L.D. pp 111 Most end stage renal disease patients utilize hemodialysis as a treatment to sustain kidney function. Hemodialysis requires adherence to a complex diet that restricts nutrients in order to reduce complications and improve quality of life. However, dietary nonadherence is extremely prevalent in this population with many etiologies considered. The purpose of this study was to determine if renal nutrition knowledge differed between patients who are adherent and nonadherent to a renal diet. Participants were adult hemodialysis patients with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease who completed a questionnaire that tested their knowledge of renal diet components and the medical complications associated with nonadherence. A series of laboratory results consisting of serum phosphorus, serum potassium, and interdialytic weight gain divided the population as adherent or nonadherent. Data analysis showed no significant difference in renal knowledge scores between adherent and nonadherent participants (p<0.05). This indicates that education is not a significant factor in dietary nonadherence. Methods of behavior change should be explored to improve adherence. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to express my appreciation to Dr. Natalie Caine-Bish for advising me through this process that initially seemed so intimidating and unattainable. Her persistent help and support kept me motivated through all of the bumps in the road. I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Eun-Jeong Ha and Tanya Falcone, who took time to provide crucial advice and knowledge that improved my research drastically. Additionally, I would like to thank Judy Nagy for her passion to the field of renal nutrition that inspired this study. I truly appreciate the time and effort you put into helping me throughout this process. I would also like to thank the entire staff at CDC that allowed this research to happen and the patients who participated. You made my first research experience more enjoyable than I ever could have imagined. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………iv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………….…...….……………….......1 Statement of the Problem…………………………………………………….….....3 Purpose Statement………………………………………………………...............4 Hypothesis………………………………………………………………………...4 Operational Definitions…………………………………………………………....5 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE……………………………………………....…….7 The Kidney………………...................................................................................7 Physiology…………………….……………………………………..…...7 Glomerular Filtration Rate..………..……………………….…..8 Chronic Kidney Disease...…….……………...…………………………….…..9 Etiology..…………….…………………………………………….......10 Glomerulonephritis.….……………………………………...…10 Diabetes Mellitus….……………………………………..……11 Hypertension…………….......……………………………..…12 Polycystic Kidney Disease……….……………………...…....12 Acute Kidney Injury..………….………………………...…....14 Stages of CKD…..…………..……..………………………….…..…15 Stage 1..…..…………………………….…………….……....15 Stage 2……………….……………………..……..…....…….16 Stage 3……………....…….………………………………….17 Stage 4………….………………………….…………….…...18 Stage 5…………………....…………………………….….…18 End Stage Renal Disease……….……….....……………………………....….19 Epidemiology…….……………..………………………………...…19 Dietary Assessment…...………...……...……………….…………...19 v Laboratory Assessment.…..…..…..……...……………………..…..21 Treatment……………........…...……………………………………24 Medications…….….…………………….........………..….24 Phosphorus binders..……………………………....24 Erythropoietin...……………………….…………..25 Active vitamin D………………..………..………..25 Dialysis…….………….….……………..…………..……26 Kt/V.........…...……………………………………26 Hemodialysis..………………….........………..….27 Peritoneal dialysis…..…………………………....28 Kidney Transplantation..…………………….…………..29 Medical Nutrition Therapy..…………..………..………..30 Energy.……….….……………..…………..……30 Protein....…...……………………………………31 Phosphorus…………………….........………..….31 Potassium………..……………………………....32 Sodium……...……………………….…………..32 Fluid…………………………..………..………..33 Vitamin D…....….……………..…………..……33 Calcium…....……………………………………33 Comorbidities of ESRD patients…...…………….........………..….34 Diabetes………………..…..…………………………....35 Cardiovascular Disease..…………………….…………..35 Malnutrition……………....…………..………..………..36 Infection Concerns of ESRD Patients..…………..…………..……36 Factors Affecting Nonadherence in Hemodialysis Patients…….…………….…..38 Psychological Factors.…………………………………………......39 Social Factors…………….……………………………………......40 Education Factors…..….……………………………………..……42 Self-efficacy………………….......………………………………44 III. METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………………....47 Overview….……………………………………………………………………..47 Participants.……………………………………………………………………...47 Laboratory Results………..……………………………………………………...48 Instrumentation…….………………………………………………………….…48 Questionnaire Development……………………………………………...48 Questionnaire Components……………..………………………………..49 Part I: Nutrition Knowledge and Medical Symptom Quiz………49 Part II: Demographics and Health Information.…..……….…….50 vi Data Collection Procedures….………………………………………………….50 Data Analysis Procedures…….…………………………………………………51 IV. JOURNAL ARTICLE…………………………………………………………....53 Introduction…….………………………………………………………………..53 Methodology...…………………………………………………………………..55 Participants………………………………………………………………...55 Review of Laboratory Results……………………………………………..56 Instrumentation…..………………………………………………………...56 Data Collection Procedures…...…………………………………………...58 Data Analysis Procedures...………………………………………………..58 Results…....……………………………………………………………………….59 Demographics……..………….…………………………………………...59 Laboratory Results…………….…………………………………………..60 Knowledge Questionnaire…….…………………………………………...60 Discussion………..………..……………………………………………………...64 Characteristics of Study Population..……………………………………..64 Laboratory Results...……………………………………………………...65 Renal Nutrition and Medical Symptom Knowledge……………………...66 Limitations………………………………………………………………………..68 Applications.……………………………………………………………………...69 Conclusion………..……….……………………………………………………...70 APPENDICES………………………..………………………………………………………….71 APPENDIX A. LABORATORY STANDARDS…………………………………………72 APPENDIX B. RENAL NUTIRITION KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE……..….....74 Part I: Renal Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire……...….……..… …………..75 Part II: Demographics……….….……..……..…………..………...………….....78 APPENDIX C. QUESTIONNAIRE BY DUROSE ET AL………………………………80 APPENDIX D. STUDY CONSENT FORM….…………………………………………..88 APPENDIX E. HIPAA FORM………………..…………………………………………..91 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………..……94 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a steady decline in renal function (Mahan, Escott-Stump, & Raymond, 2012). This decline can be stable and last many months or can rapidly progress to kidney failure. CKD is categorized into stages that are determined by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and other factors that show evidence of kidney disease (Mahan, Escott-Stump, & Raymond, 2012). CKD affects nearly 1 in 8 adults globally, with approximately 2% of these individuals progressing to stage 5, also known as end stage renal disease (ESRD) (Lambert, Mullan, & Mansfield, 2017). Renal replacement therapy, or dialysis, is required to sustain life once a patient reaches ESRD (Barnett, Li Yoong, Pinikahana, & Si-Yen, 2008). Hemodialysis is the most common treatment for ESRD patients and requires attendance three times a week to remove uremic toxins and excess water that the kidneys no longer can. Although hemodialysis is performing the main function of the kidneys, a proper diet is necessary to minimize the accumulation of toxins, electrolytes, and fluid in the body between treatments (Barnett, Li Yoong, Pinikahana, & Si-Yen, 2008). The renal diet is extremely complex and involves potential restrictions of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, and fluid (Durose, Holdsworth, Watson, and Przygrodzka, 2004). Phosphorus is crucial for the formation of bone and other tissues (Nutrition and Hemodialysis, 2013). Phosphorus is a mineral that is abundant in dairy products, beans, nuts, colas, and processed foods, and often needs to be limited by dietary 1 2 restriction and/or phosphorus binders. Potassium helps the muscles and heart work properly and is found in certain fruits and vegetables, milk, and meats. Sodium, found in many snack foods, canned and frozen foods, sauces, and soups, can cause our body to hold on to extra fluid when consumed in excess amounts. Fluid is considered anything that is liquid at room temperature. Excess
Recommended publications
  • 1.11 Diet Reference Guide

    1.11 Diet Reference Guide

    RENAL DIET The guidelines below have been developed as a quick reference to help you guide your patients in regards to any queries regarding their renal diet. Goals of the Renal Diet Help prevent nutritional deficiencies Help prevent fluid retention Keep blood level within normal limits, by controlling potassium, phosphorous and sodium intake Maintain and protect bone strength Maintain a healthy body weight 1) Protein Intake: An adequate protein intake is important for growth and repair of body tissues. It helps fight infections and prevents muscle loss. The amount of protein required depends on individual requirements and form of renal replacement therapy. Most protein foods are high in phosphate. During dialysis patients lose some of their good protein, Albumin. Here are some ideas to help boost protein intake while maintaining a normal phosphate level. Protein is found in plant and animal foods. The protein from animal origin is more readily absorbed by the body. The plant sources tend to be high in phosphate or potassium so the animal sources are better for the body. ANIMAL SOURCES PLANT SOURCES (limit) Red meat (lamb/beef) Lentils Chicken Beans Fish Dried peas Cottage Cheese Soya Egg white Peanuts Fish paste Peanut butter Tuna Try to include a low phosphate protein with 2 meals every day. Although dairy products like milk and cheese are good sources of protein, they are high in phosphate. One can include a ½ cup of milk or yoghurt + either 1 egg or a small amount of cheese in the diet daily. HIGH PROTEIN BOOSTERS Try and include 1 – 2 of these high protein boosters in the diet every week to help boost your Albumin level.
  • A Taxonomy of Behavior Change Methods; an Intervention Mapping Approach

    A Taxonomy of Behavior Change Methods; an Intervention Mapping Approach

    Tables and Figure for A Taxonomy of Behavior Change Methods; an Intervention Mapping Approach This document contains the Tables and Figure that accompany the publication “A Taxonomy of Behavior Change Methods; an Intervention Mapping Approach” that was accepted for publication (and published online) in Health Psychology Review in 2015: Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernández, M. E., Markham, C., & Bartholomew, L. K. (2015). A Taxonomy of Behavior Change Methods; an Intervention Mapping Approach. Health Psychology Review. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155 Note that the final citation will likely be different (e.g. the article may be published in 2016 or later), but the DOI will remain the same. This document is available as supplemental material accompanying the publication in Health Psychology Review (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155), and in the Open Science Framework repository at http://osf.io/sqtuz. Note that introductory material to this publication and these tables with behavior change methods is available at http://effectivebehaviorchange.com. If you wish to cite these supplemental materials, instead please cite the original paper to which they belong (see http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155). This document contains four sections: first, the abstract of the original Health Psychology Review publication; second, an excerpt from that publication where use of the tables is explained; third, Tables 1-15 and Figure 1 from the publication; and fourth, the references cited in Tables 1-15. The next page first starts with a Table of Contents.
  • Diet and Lifestyle for Healthy Kidneys

    Diet and Lifestyle for Healthy Kidneys

    Diet and Lifestyle for Healthy Kidneys Meyeon Park, MD MAS FASN UCSF PKD Center of Excellence Special thanks to Mary Ellen di Paola UCSF Registered Dietitian Osher Mini Med School October 16, 2019 Disclosures • Site PI for Kadmon, Reata, Sanofi‐Genzyme trials in PKD • Advisory board Otsuka Pharmaceuticals • Consultant for Abalone Bio • Spouse works for Merck Outline • What are the health outcomes we are trying to prevent with a healthy diet and lifestyle? • Brief overview of some common diets • General guidelines • Discussion Disclaimer • These are general recommendations that integrate data with common sense and should NOT take the place of a formal registered dietitian / medical evaluation • Nutrition science is an evolving field and I am a nephrologist – not a dietitian • Patients with clinical chronic kidney disease may have different requirements depending on disease severity Case 1 • 52 year old gentleman with high blood pressure, kidney stones, obesity (BMI 34), knee pain • This patient does NOT currently have kidney disease as assessed by blood or urine tests • He could be at risk for kidney disease due to high blood pressure, kidney stones, obesity, and risk of diabetes Case 1 diet • Coffee, bagel in the morning • Instant ramen noodles for lunch • Steak and potatoes for dinner • Eats out at restaurants frequently • Not sure how much water he drinks What are the health outcomes we’re trying to accomplish? • Prevent – Heart disease – Stroke – Kidney disease – Diabetes – High blood pressure – Obesity – All of these are intertwined
  • Beyond Engagement: Strategies for Persuasion and Influence

    Beyond Engagement: Strategies for Persuasion and Influence

    Beyond Engagement: Strategies for Persuasion and Influence Jennie Echols, PhD, MSN, RN Director of Clinical Solution Development Carenet Healthcare Services Engagement has been a focus in healthcare for the last decade and continues to be a major strategy asserted to improve health outcomes. The idea is that if healthcare consumers (e.g., health plan members, patients, employees, etc.) are more actively involved in their healthcare, better health outcomes will result along with reduced costs. As a result, healthcare organizations (i.e., payers and providers) have optimistically sought strategies to engage healthcare consumers. However, a critical question still needs to be addressed: What needs to happen within the engagement journey to maximize success? When talking about healthcare consumer engagement, most resources talk about multi-channel communication strategies including the use of digital technology. Although engagement has been increasingly associated with technology, there is some debate regarding its role. “…you can’t just throw technology at the problem and expect to solve patient engagement…patient engagement is a far more nuanced challenge, one that’s directly tied to adherence and outcomes. The answer, therefore, cannot merely be to ‘go digital.’”1 There is less discussion regarding the art of dialogue and nuance that must accompany the communication, regardless of the communication avenue. While engagement is a necessity, there is a need to explore how tools such as influence and persuasion fit into the model to achieve activation whereby a person implements a behavior change or action to achieve a health goal. INFLUWP_JUL2017 To dr iv e e n gage me n t, “persuasion it is important to inform works by appealing healthcare consumers about what they stand to gain by to a limited set proactively participating in of deeply rooted their healthcare, and even more importantly, what human drives and they’re likely to lose if needs” they fail to act.
  • Effects of Self-Focused Augmented Reality on Health Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Web-Based Between-Subject Experiment

    Effects of Self-Focused Augmented Reality on Health Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Web-Based Between-Subject Experiment

    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH Seals et al Original Paper Effects of Self-focused Augmented Reality on Health Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Between-Subject Experiment Ayanna Seals1, MSc; Monsurat Olaosebikan2, MSc; Jennifer Otiono3, BA; Orit Shaer3, PhD; Oded Nov4, PhD 1New York University, Brooklyn, NY, United States 2Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States 3Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, United States 4Department of Technology Management and Innovation, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY, United States Corresponding Author: Ayanna Seals, MSc New York University 5 Metrotech Center, 4th Fl Brooklyn, NY, 11201 United States Phone: 1 646 997 3760 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: Self-focused augmented reality (AR) technologies are growing in popularity and present an opportunity to address health communication and behavior change challenges. Objective: We aimed to examine the impact of self-focused AR and vicarious reinforcement on psychological predictors of behavior change during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, our study included measures of fear and message minimization to assess potential adverse reactions to the design interventions. Methods: A between-subjects web-based experiment was conducted to compare the health perceptions of participants in self-focused AR and vicarious reinforcement design conditions to those in a control condition. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group or to an intervention condition (ie, self-focused AR, reinforcement, self-focus AR × reinforcement, and avatar). Results: A total of 335 participants were included in the analysis. We found that participants who experienced self-focused AR and vicarious reinforcement scored higher in perceived threat severity (P=.03) and susceptibility (P=.01) when compared to the control.
  • Acute Malnutrition

    Acute Malnutrition

    Jordan Guidelines for Management of Acute Malnutrition 2013 These Guidelines are based on international standards. However, some changes have been introduced to adapt them to Jordanian specific working conditions and environment. Protocols for the management of acute malnutrition followed in these guidelines have been endorsed by the Jordanian Ministry of Health in 2013. 1 Contents Jordan Guidelines for Management of Acute Malnutrition ................................................................. 1 List of Field Cards................................................................................................................................ 3 Using these guidelines ......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1 – Malnutrition: an overview. ............................................................................................................. 7 Components of Nutrition ................................................................................................................. 7 Causes of Malnutrition ..................................................................................................................... 8 Types of Malnutrition: Definitions ................................................................................................ 10 Acute malnutrition: types and classification
  • Food and Nutrition: What Should You Eat If You Have Kidney Disease?

    Food and Nutrition: What Should You Eat If You Have Kidney Disease?

    Food and Nutrition: What should you eat if you have kidney disease? Haewook Han, PHD, RD, CSR, LDN Harvard Vanguard Medical Associate Department of Nephrology Content Basics of Kidney What Should You Eat for Your Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)? Is Herbal Supplement Beneficial or Harmful for CKD? Aristolochic acid Echinacea Basics of Kidney Maintain homeostatic balance Fluid Electrolytes Excretion of metabolic waste Urine Produce hormones Renin Erythropoietin Vitamin D Basics of Kidney Measurement of Kidney Function Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): GFR is measure of how well your kidneys filter blood Use estimated GFR called” eGFR”. Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) 5 stages (1-5) Stage 3- 5 CKD Stages Stage Description eGFR 1 Kidney damage but normal 90 or more eGFR 2 Kidney damage with mild 60 - 89 decrease of eGFR 3 Kidney damage with 30 - 59 moderate decrease of eGFR 4 Kidney damage with severe 15 - 29 decrease of eGFR 5 Kidney failure: need renal Less than 15 replacement therapy CKD Risk Factors Diabetes Hypertension Family history of kidney failure Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) Cardiovascular disease Prolonged consumption of over the counter medication (i.e. ibuprofen) or herbal supplements (Aristolochic acid, Echinacea, Creatine, Chromium, Cat’s claw) What Should You Eat for Your CKD? Purpose To maintain good nutritional status Slow progression of CKD To treat complications Key Diet Components Controlling blood pressure: Low sodium intake Reducing protein intake if EXCESS Managing diabetes There
  • FDA's Comprehensive, Multi-Year Nutrition Innovation Strategy 7/26/18

    FDA's Comprehensive, Multi-Year Nutrition Innovation Strategy 7/26/18

    FDA’s Comprehensive, Multi-Year Nutrition Innovation Strategy 7/26/18 Page 1 FDA’s COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-YEAR NUTRITION INNOVATION STRATEGY Docket No. FDA-2018-N 2381 Thursday, July 26, 2018 Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel 1750 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Reported by: Natalia Thomas FDA’s Comprehensive, Multi-Year Nutrition Innovation Strategy 7/26/18 Page 2 A P P E A R A N C E S Kari Barrett Advisor for Strategic Communications and Public Engagement, Office of Foods and Veterinary Medicine, FDA Scott Gottlieb Commissioner, FDA Susan Mayne Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA David Portalatin Vice President and Food Industry Advisor, The NPD Group Christopher Waldrop Senior Public Health Educator, Office of Analytics and Outreach, CFSAN, FDA Neal Hooker Professor of Food Policy, John Glenn College of public Affairs, Ohio State University Rob Post Senior Director, Health and Wellness/Corporate Affairs, Chobani Laura MacCleery Policy Director, Center for Science in the Public Interest Robin McKinnon Senior Advisor for Nutrition Policy, CFSAN, FDA Douglas Balentine Director, Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling, CFSAN, FDA Felicia Billingslea Director, Food Labeling and Standards Staff, Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling, CFSAN, FDA Steve Bradbard Director, Consumer Studies Branch, Office of Analytics and Outreach, CFSAN, FDA Blakeley Fitzpatrick Interdisciplinary Nutrition Scientist, Nutrition Assessment and Evaluation Team, Nutrition Programs Staff, Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling, CFSAN, FDA FDA’s Comprehensive, Multi-Year Nutrition Innovation Strategy 7/26/18 Page 3 C O N T E N T S SPEAKER PAGE Opening remarks 4 Scott Gottlieb 5 Susan Mayne 10 David Portalatin 13 Christopher Waldrop 35 Neal Hooker 35 Rob Post 41 Laura MacCleery 46 Open Public Comments 63 Robin McKinnon 121 FDA’s Comprehensive, Multi-Year Nutrition Innovation Strategy 7/26/18 Page 4 P R O C E E D I N G S MS.
  • A Practical Guide to Effective Behavior Change

    A Practical Guide to Effective Behavior Change

    Peters A practical guide to effective behavior change original article A practical guide to effective behavior change: How to identify what to change in the first place Gjalt-Jorn Y. Peters In 1947, mathematician even thinking about how to change a given behavior. Open University of The John von Neuman In the second part, practical pointers will be given as Netherlands remarked that to how to actually do this – map beliefs and mathematics is simple, determinants. In other words, first I’ll explain what to supporting this claim with a comparison with change; and then, how to identify what to change. something infinitely more complicated: "If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is" Starting from scratch (Alt, 1972). Behavior change scientists who study behavior change or who develop behavior change Although the approach outlined in these interventions operate in between these two extremes guidelines is not based on any particular single of overwhelming complexity and, well, at least theory, it does make a number of basic assumptions. relative simplicity. Effective behavior change methods To make sure that everybody is on the same page, and (Peters, de Bruin, & Crutzen, 2014) employ theory- to make this text as widely accessible as possible, I based1 processes of change to influence psychological will start with outlining these assumptions, so feel variables that are postulated to determine behavior. free to skip the next paragraphs if you already know Because, bar physical coercion, no behavior change all this (this bit is where the pretty pictures are method operates directly on behavior, this means though).
  • Running Head: ACT INTERVENTIONS for PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 1

    Running Head: ACT INTERVENTIONS for PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 1

    Running head: ACT INTERVENTIONS FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 1 Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions for promoting physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sally Pears* University of Cambridge Stephen Sutton University of Cambridge * Corresponding author Authors’ Note Sally Pears, Behavioural Science Group, University of Cambridge Email: [email protected] Address: Behavioural Science Group, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR. Telephone: +44 1223 746552 Stephen Sutton, Behavioural Science Group, University of Cambridge Email: [email protected] Address: Behavioural Science Group, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR. Telephone: +44 1223 330594 ACT INTERVENTIONS FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 2 1 Physical inactivity is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide and is a key risk 2 factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, some cancers 3 and type 2 diabetes (Lee et al. 2012). Worldwide, inactivity is estimated to cause 9% of 4 premature mortality, and if inactivity were decreased by 10%, more than 533,000 deaths 5 could be averted every year (Lee et al. 2012). The World Health Organisation (WHO) 6 recommendations for adults aged 18–64 are for at least 150 minutes of at least moderate- 7 intensity aerobic physical activity (such as brisk walking or cycling) per week (WHO, 2019). 8 However, the majority of the world’s population does not meet these recommendations (Ding 9 et al. 2016; Rhodes, Janssen, Bredin, Warburton, & Bauman, 2017), and globally physical 10 inactivity is on the rise (Lee et al.
  • A Plant-Based Diet Prevents and Treats Chronic Kidney Disease

    A Plant-Based Diet Prevents and Treats Chronic Kidney Disease

    Review Article JOJ uro & nephron Volume 6 Issue 3 - January 2019 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Stewart D Rose DOI: 10.19080/JOJUN.2019.06.555687 A Plant-Based Diet Prevents and Treats Chronic Kidney Disease Stewart D Rose* and Amanda J Strombom Plant-based diets in Medicine, USA Submission: January 03, 2019; Published: January 23, 2019 *Corresponding author: Stewart D Rose , Plant-Based Diets in Medicine, 12819 SE 38th St, #427, Bellevue, WA 98006, Washington, USA. Abstract (CKD) is now the 8th leading cause of death in the United States and its treatment consumes substantial amounts of medical resources and money. Interest in the dietary treatment of chronic kidney disease has been growing as its incidence has been increasing. Chronic Kidney Disease increased risk among omnivores, especially those who eat red and processed meats. Although the practice started long ago, research on the use Several lines of epidemiological research have shown a lower risk of chronic kidney disease among vegetarians. It also shows a substantially vegetarianof a low-protein diet, oftenplant-based supplemented diet to treat with chronic keto analogues, kidney disease has been diet shownhas intensified to reduce in acidosis,recent years. phosphotemia, This research uremia, has shown proteinuria that a andlow-protein to slow progression.vegetarian diet Research is safe showsand efficacious that this treatmentat both treating does not and result slowing in malnutrition. the progression Research of chronic has also kidney shown disease. that larger Treatment amounts with of aplant low-protein protein preventing and treating common comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.
  • Renal Diet Menu

    Renal Diet Menu

    Renal Diet Dining On Call Menu (All items in Bold Print require a choice.) Breakfast Lunch and Dinner Entrées (1 dairy/day: Yogurt, Cheese or Milk) Build Your Own Omelet Entrée Salads Regular Egg whites Low Cholesterol Chicken Caesar Salad(no tomatoes) (1 dairy/day: Yogurt, Cheese or Milk) Chef Salad (no tomatoes) Cheese: Swiss Cheddar Pepper Jack Dressings: Balsamic French Italian Onions Ranch Raspberry Vinaigrette Green Peppers Chef Selections Pancake (1): Buttermilk Blueberry Baked Fish Cinnamon French Toast (White Bread) Seasoned Chicken Breast Roast Turkey Breast with Gravy Sides Asian Stir-Fry Vegetables: Chicken Tofu Scrambled Eggs: Grill Regular Egg Whites Low Cholesterol Grilled sandwich: Cheese Chicken Breast on Hard Boiled Egg White Bun Turkey Bacon – slice (Limit 1) or Burger: Beef Turkey Turkey Sausage link (Limit 1) Toppings: Lettuce Red Onion Bakery Build Your Own Sandwich Blueberry Muffin Bread: White English Muffin Protein: Turkey Tuna Salad Chicken Salad Bagel (1/2): Plain Cinnamon Raisin Egg Salad Peanut Butter (limit 1 per day) & Jelly White Toast Cheese: Swiss Cheddar Pepper Jack Hot and Cold Cereals Toppings: Lettuce Red Onion Cream of Wheat® Side Dishes Oatmeal (4oz) Side Salads: Garden (no tomatoes) Caesar (no tomatoes) Grits Dressings: French Italian Oil and Vinegar Cheerios® Ranch Raspberry Vinaigrette Corn Flakes® Vegetable: ♦Braised Cabbage Special K® Rice Krispies® ♦Mexican Corn Broccoli Green Beans Orange Glazed Carrots Fruit and Yogurt White Rice (1 dairy/day: Yogurt, Cheese or Milk) Bread: Cornbread Dinner Roll Macaroni & Cheese Fresh Fruit: Grapes Apple Pasta: Alfredo Sauce Soft Fruit: Peaches Pears Applesauce Carrots & Celery Sticks Yogurt Vanilla Strawberry Greek Plain Soups and Broths Soup: Chicken Noodle Chicken Broth Items with a ♦ are not available at our Stafford location.