DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Based Strategic Rail Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Based Strategic Rail Study CITY OF WINDSOR COMMUNITY BASED STRATEGIC RAIL STUDY Final Report McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION in association with Canarail Consultants Inc. April 2008 (Updated August 2008) City of Windsor Final Report Community Based Strategic Rail Study PREFACE The City of Windsor and Transport Canada are undertaking a strategic planning study to assess the opportunities for rail rationalization and modal integration in the City of Windsor. The intent of the study is to produce a strategic plan that is technically feasible and addresses the City’s transportation needs, while being responsive to the local community through consultation with key stakeholders. This Report is based on the various technical reports completed during the study. The technical reports completed are listed below: TR1 Rail Operations – Issues and Opportunities February 2006 TR2 Rail Rationalization Opportunities April 2007 TR3 Modal Integration Opportunities July 2007 TR4 Associated Community Opportunities and Benefits November 2007 TR5 Implementation Strategy January 2008 MRC April 2008 i City of Windsor Final Report Community Based Strategic Rail Study CONTENTS Page PREFACE.....................................................................................................................................................I E1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................IV 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. RAIL OPERATIONS – ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES....................................................... 2 2.1 Existing Rail Operations.....................................................................................................2 2.2 Rail Corridors & Rail Yards ...............................................................................................3 2.3 Road Crossings ...................................................................................................................8 2.4 Land Use Adjacent to Rail Corridors................................................................................10 2.5 Issues and Opportunities...................................................................................................13 2.5.1 Issues ..........................................................................................................................13 2.5.2 Opportunities..............................................................................................................19 3. RAIL RATIONALIZATION OPPORTUNITIES.................................................................... 21 3.1 Development of Rail Rationalization Alternatives ...........................................................21 3.1.1 Passenger Rail ............................................................................................................21 3.1.2 Freight Rail.................................................................................................................22 3.1.3 Rail Yards...................................................................................................................22 3.2 Rail Line Rationalization Alternatives..............................................................................23 3.3 Rail Yard Relocation Alternatives....................................................................................23 3.4 Consultation......................................................................................................................24 3.4.1 Partner Agencies Group Meetings .............................................................................24 3.4.2 Stakeholders Group Meeting......................................................................................24 3.5 Analysis and Evaluation of Alternatives...........................................................................25 3.5.1 Analysis......................................................................................................................25 3.5.2 Evaluation...................................................................................................................25 3.6 Technically Preferred Alternative.....................................................................................26 3.6.1 ‘Ultimate’ Scenario ....................................................................................................26 3.6.2 ‘Interim’ Scenario ......................................................................................................28 3.6.3 Opportunities..............................................................................................................28 3.6.4 Impacts .......................................................................................................................30 3.6.5 Outstanding Issues......................................................................................................31 3.6.6 Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates...................................................................31 4. MODAL INTEGRATION OPPORTUNITIES ........................................................................ 35 4.1 Windsor Airport Lands .....................................................................................................35 4.2 Rail Companies’ Views on Intermodal in Windsor..........................................................36 4.3 Modal Integration Opportunities.......................................................................................36 5. ASSOCIATED COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES AND BENEFITS OF RAIL RATIONALIZATION.............................................................................................................................. 45 5.1 Land Use Redevelopment Opportunities..........................................................................45 5.1.1 Current Uses...............................................................................................................45 5.1.2 City of Windsor Land Use and Rail Use Strategies ...................................................46 5.1.3 Brownfield Development Policies..............................................................................48 5.1.4 Residential and Commercial Developments ..............................................................48 5.1.5 High-Speed Transit ....................................................................................................49 5.1.6 Parks, Bicycle Paths, and Pedestrian Walkways........................................................50 5.1.7 Modal Integration.......................................................................................................50 MRC April 2008 ii City of Windsor Final Report Community Based Strategic Rail Study 5.2 Traffic Impacts..................................................................................................................50 5.2.1 Improvements on Existing Traffic Deficiencies.........................................................50 5.2.2 Road User Delays.......................................................................................................52 5.3 Environmental Impacts .....................................................................................................53 5.3.1 Noise and Vibration....................................................................................................53 5.3.2 Air Quality..................................................................................................................54 5.3.3 Conservation Areas ....................................................................................................54 6. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY .......................................................................................... 55 6.1 Implementation Time Frame and Costs............................................................................55 6.2 Implementation Strategy...................................................................................................57 6.2.1 Business Case and Multimodal Committee................................................................57 6.2.2 Partnerships ................................................................................................................59 6.2.3 Government Approvals and Commitment..................................................................59 6.2.4 Rail Operations and Contractual Agreements ............................................................60 6.2.5 Preliminary Design.....................................................................................................60 7. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 62 APPENDIX A Rail Line Rationalization and Rail Yard Relocation Alternatives B Summary of Key Comments from Partner Agencies C Analysis and Evaluation of Alternatives D Key Benefits and Impacts on the Windsor Community LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 - Existing Rail Infrastructure.....................................................................................................................2 Table 2.2 - Summary of Key Railway Crossings.......................................................................................................9 Table 3.1 - Interim Scenario Preliminary Cost Estimate.......................................................................................32 Table 3.2 - Preliminary Estimated Additional Costs Associated with the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official Road Map of Ontario
    4 Ipperwash 5 r Corbett e Corners 27 v Kettle Pt. Beach 21 i dc 18 19 20 hg 22 139 123 P R Harrin Northville a Grantonji24ji 28 83° 82° 10 rk 24 hi hg Ravenswood 18 ll C 24 hg 47 Uniondale 79 r. hg 59 hghg Clandeboye hgLucan 7 27 Medina Lakeside Thedford 21 hg hg 7 dc C.N.R. 25 Sylvan Parkhill hg R hg 9 6 6 20 Elginfield hg O 7 Ailsa Craig 119 hg hg 7 hg 7 M hg e ji N Lambton Shores Denfieldhg 23 16 E hg 4 d 31 12 9 17 w hg hg 27 16 Kintore 25 Forest dca hg Hi hg Bryanston cko hg Birr y hg hg hgr 6 28 R mn MICHIGAN U.S.A. y Nairn 20 hg 81 C hg ONTARIO CANADA hg Arkona A ble r Thorndale 7 30 hgusa Ilderton . X 21 Cr. 19 16 E hg 14 Brights hg hg Ballymote Fanshawe Point 11dc 12 hg 17 S 43°43° Grove Camlachie hgKeyser L. 2 hg . 28 Edward 13 9 79 hger 16 Cr Arva 27 Thamesford hg Port 7 Plympton-Wyoming iv E 20 hg hg Ing hghg R hg Huron 6 hg 30 Hickory hg 69 3 9 14 15 Warwick Coldstream O 9hg 9 34 22 Adelaide Corner LONDON 73 45 1 O O O 22 L rq O hg 22 Lobo Melrose hg hg O 22 25 10 hg 32 k . 11 Poplar 44 r 9 hg C.N.R. hgPu SarniahgMandauminOReece's 22 e 56 4 69 w hgDorchester43° e C 65 o Cors.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Council Members 2018 – 2022
    Municipal Council Members 2018 – 2022 Town of Amherstburg 271 Sandwich Street South, Amherstburg, Ontario N9V 2A5 Phone: 519-736-0012 FAX: 519-736-5403 Website: www.amherstburg.ca Title and Address Phone Number Email Address (P) Primary (A) Alternate Mayor Aldo DiCarlo (P) 519-981- [email protected] 642 Richmond Street 2605 Amherstburg, Ontario (A) 519-736- N9V 3Y5 8509 Deputy Mayor Leo Meloche (P) 226-346- [email protected] 9602 Walker Road 0621 McGregor, Ontario NOR 1J0 Councillor Peter Courtney (P) 226-348- [email protected] 155 Lakewood Drive 6521 Amherstburg, Ontario N9V 2Y8 Councillor Donald McArthur (P) 519-981- [email protected] 7018 Eagle Crescent 4875 (A) 519- McGregor, Ontario 965-0781 N0R 1J0 Councillor Michael Prue (P) 519-992- [email protected] 386 Crystal Bay Drive 5075 (A) 519- Amherstburg, Ontario 736-7586 N9V 4A7 Councillor Marc Renaud (P) 226-345- [email protected] 48 Balaclava St. South 7636 Amherstburg, Ontario N9V 2G6 Councillor Patricia Simone (P)519-566- [email protected] 188 Alma Street 1771 Amherstburg, Ontario N9V 1A7 Municipal Council Members 2018 – 2022 (continued…) Town of Essex 33 Talbot Street South, Essex, Ontario N8M 1A8 Phone: 519-776-7336 FAX: 519-776-8811 Website: www.essex.ca Title and Address Phone Number Email Address (P) Primary (A) Alternate Mayor Larry Snively (P) 519-890- [email protected] 29 County Road 50 West, 2381 RR#1 (A) 519-738- 4739 4th Concession 2082 Harrow, Ontario N0R 1G0 Deputy Mayor (P) 519-982- [email protected] Richard Meloche 2776 12066 County Road 15 (A) 519-776- Essex, Ontario N8M 2X6 5726 Councillor - Ward 1 (P) 519-890- [email protected] Morley Bowman 4273 173 Brien Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018-2019
    Annual Report 2018‐2019 Science Education Partnership A better world through hands‐on, minds‐on science education 2018‐2019: KEY ACHIEVEMENTS classrooms were visited by volunteer farmers for Canada Agriculture Day science kits were revamped science kit bookings were made by different of schools within the teachers at schools Lambton Kent and St. Clair Catholic Districts accessed SEP programs this year, volunteers were active in the impacting an estimated newly students reorganized Science Discovery Squad volunteer 30 classrooms participated in the program unveiled National Engineering Month in February Challenge. A new Virtual Volunteer activity format was piloted with great success Page 1 NEW IN 2019: INTRODUCING THE SCIENCE DISCOVERY SQUAD The 2018‐2019 school year brought about exciting changes to SEP volunteer initiatives. The very first SEP volunteer program, “Adopt‐a‐ Scientist”, began in 1995 when Imperial Oil retirees were asked if they would like to help in the classroom. Initially, volunteers could be “adopted” by teachers who would have them in on a regular basis, but it soon became evident that educators were asking for help repeatedly in the same subject areas. In response, volunteers created interactive, hands‐on presentations that could travel to from Superintendents Laura Callaghan and Ben Hazzard, along with SEP Technician Wendy Hooghiem, watch pie plates fly from a classroom to classroom. Van der Graaf machine generator with SDS volunteer Peter Smith. In 2004, volunteer activities expanded to include bridge‐building sessions that celebrated National Engineering Month and fit with the Structures and Mechanisms strand of the Ontario Curriculum. Between 25 and 40 classes have participated each year since.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Shafted and Shaftless Screw Conveyors for Handling Residuals at Amherstburg WWTP in Ontario, Canada
    Shafted and Shaftless Screw Conveyors for Handling Residuals at Amherstburg WWTP in Ontario, Canada General Description of the Application The Amherstburg Public Works Department in Ontario, Canada is responsible for the maintenance of the Town’s sewage collection systems working in cooperation with the Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA). OCWA operates the sewage treatment facilities. There are six treatment facilities within the Amherstburg town limits. They are the Amherstburg Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Big Creek Treatment Plant, the McLeod Sewage Treatment Plant, the Boblo RBC, Edgewater Lagoons and McGregor Lagoons. End User or Owner Town of Amherstburg A 2005 study showed the Amherstburg WWTP was reaching capacity and when there were combined Amherstburg, Ontario sewers and storms, Amherstburg was sometimes sending sewage to the Detroit River. The plant took more than three years to improve and can now serve Amherstburg for the next 25 to 30 years. Consulting Engineer CH2M Hill Canada Ltd KWS Environmental was involved with a project that included modications and additions to the Toronto, Ontario existing water reclamation facility's primary and secondary treatment facilities including grit, screen- Contractor ings and biosolids residuals processing improvements. Residuals from grit classiers, screens and FACCA Inc. centrifuges were transferred to disposal using KWS Environmental shaftless and shafted screw Ruscom, Ontario conveyors. Plant Name and Location Amherstburg WWTP Design Parameters of Application Amherstburg, Ontario Type of Residual: Dewatered Sludge/Biosolids Material Density: 63 to 70 Lbs. per Cubic Foot Solids, percent by weight: 25-percent Capacity (max): 3.5 Tons per Hour Capacity: 120 Cubic Feet per Hour Duty: 24 Hours per Day, 7 Days per Week Type of Residual: Grit and Screenings Material Density: 50 to 110 Lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Border Crossings
    Canadian Border Crossings Port Canadian City/Town Province Highway Crossing U.S. City/Town Code 709 Chief Mountain Alberta Chief Mountain via Babb, MT 705 Coutts Alberta Hwy 4 Coutts Sweetgrass, MT 708 Del Bonita Alberta Del Bonita (via Cut Bank), MT 706 Aden Alberta Hwy 880 Whitlash, MT 711 Wild Horse Alberta Hwy 41 Simpson, MT 711 Wildhorse Alta. Hwy 41 Havre, MT 832 Paterson B. C. Northport, WA 841 Aldergrove British Columbia BC 13 Lynden, WA Boundary Bay British Columbia Boundary Bay Point Roberts, WA 840 Douglas British Columbia Peace Arch Blaine, WA 829 Flathead British Columbia Trail Creek, 817 Huntingdon British Columbia BC11 Huntingdon Sumas, WA 813 Pacific Highway British Columbia BC 15 Pacific Highway Blaine, WA 824 Roosville British Columbia Roosville Eureka, MT 822 Rykerts British Columbia Porthill, ID 816 Cascade British Columbia Hwy 3 Laurier, WA Grand Forks British Columbia Hwy 3 Danville, WA 818 Kingsgate British Columbia Hwy 3 Eastport, ID 835 Midway British Columbia Hwy 3 Ferry, WA 828 Nelway British Columbia Hwy 6 Metaline Falls, WA 819 Osoyoos British Columbia Hwy 97 Oroville, WA 507 Boissevain Manitoba Dunseith, ND Middleboro Manitoba Warroad, MN 506 South Junction Manitoba Roseau, MN 521 Cartwright Manitoba Hwy 5 Hansboro, ND 524 Coulter Manitoba Hwy 83 Westhope, ND 520 Crystal City Manitoba Hwy 34 Sarles, ND Hwy 75 / Manitoba 502 Emerson Highway 29 Emerson Pembina, ND Gainsborough Manitoba Hwy 256 Antler, ND Goodlands Manitoba Hwy 21 Carbury, ND 503 Gretna Manitoba Hwy 30 Neche, ND Haskett Manitoba Hwy 32 Walhalla, ND 522 Lena Manitoba Hwy 18 St.
    [Show full text]
  • ST. CLAIR TUNNEL HAER No. MI-67 (St
    ST. CLAIR TUNNEL HAER No. MI-67 (St. Clair River Tunnel) Under the St. Clair River, between Port Huron, HA^l: f> . Michigan, and Sarnia, Canada ih \ .~~; (~ ; Port Huron ' '*■ • ''-•■- H ■ St. Clair County *7U^--fQH\jt Michigan ''/[ • PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Northeast Region U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 # HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ST. CLAIR TUNNEL (St. Clair River Tunnel) HAER No. MI-67 Location: Under the St. Clair River, between Port Huron, Michigan, and Sarnia, Canada TJTM: A: 17.382520.4757260 C: 17.385690.4756920 B: 17.382470.47 57150 D: 17.385650.4756S20 Quad: Port Huron, MI, 1; 2 4,0 0 0 Dates of Construction: 1888-1891; 1907-1908; 1958 Engineer: Joseph Hobson and others Present Owner: St Clair Tunnel Company, 1333 Brewery Park Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan 48207-9998 Present Use; Railroad tunnel Significance: The St. Clair Tunnel was the first full- sized subaqueous tunnel built in North America. Joseph Hobson, the Chief Engineer, successfully combined three significant new technologies—a tunnel shield driven by hydraulic rams; a cast iron tunnel lining; and the use of a compressed air environment. This tunnel eliminated a major bottleneck in the rail transportation system linking the American midwest with its eastern markets. Project Information; This documentation is the result of a Memorandum of Agreement, among the Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Detroit District and the Canadian National North America Railroad as a mitigative measure before the closing of the tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and Members of Council From
    Municipality Of Chatham-Kent Infrastructure and Engineering Services Public Works To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Ryan Brown, P.Eng. Director of Public Works Gabriel Clarke, MES, BA Environmental Planner I Date: April 28, 2021 Subject: Amendments to Long Grass and Weeds By-Law 56-2020 Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. The attached by-law to regulate and prohibit long grasses and weeds be approved. 2. By-Law Number 56-2020, the former bylaw to regulate and prohibit long grasses and weeds be repealed. Background At the September 14, 2020 meeting, Council approved the following Motion: “Chatham-Kent’s Long Grass and Weed By-law (By-law # 56-2020) was introduced to implement a minimum outdoor landscaping maintenance standard that prohibits overgrown grasses and weeds on private properties. Similar to long grass by-laws in other communities, Chatham-Kent’s By-law maintains community aesthetics and prevents landscape abandonment. The by-law applies to all grass and weed species listed in the Government of Ontario’s Publication 505 ‘Ontario Weeds’ and requires that they be kept under 20cm in height through regular mowing, or be subject to enforcement. However, it is also a community strategic objective to enhance natural areas in the Municipality and there is a conflict that exists with the long grass by-law in meeting these objectives. Specifically, there are challenges that the current grass cutting by- law poses with respect to legitimate tall grass prairie environmental naturalization activities on private lands and despite the positive intent of the by-law, the way it is currently written can be used to reverse these environmental stewardship activities that the Municipality has otherwise identified as desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Care Sites Information.Pdf
    SCHOOLS WITH LICENSED CHILD CARE ON SITE AND/OR WITHIN A SCHOOL’S ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY 2018/2019 A. V. Graham Public School Child Care Centre On Site Phone # Latchkey Day Care & Learning Centre Yes 519.979.4977 http://www.latchkey.ca 519.979.4309 First Steps Child Care No 519.739.0811 13291 Tecumseh Road East, Windsor http://childcareessex.ca Amherstburg Public School - English Child Care Centre On Site Phone # YMCA of Windsor and Essex County – Amherstburg Yes 519.984.1137 Public School www.ymcawo.ca Bright Child Montessori, Inc. No 519.736.4022 236 Cherrylawn Crescent, Amherstburg http://www.brightchild.ca Little Buddies Preschool Centre No 519.800.5371 193 Simcoe St, Amherstburg http://littlebuddiespreschoolcentre.weebly.com Amherstburg Public School - French Immersion Only Child Care Centre On Site Phone # YMCA of Windsor and Essex County – Amherstburg Yes 519.984.1137 Public School www.ymcawo.ca No 519.736.0100 Anderdon Child Care, Inc. at Anderdon Public School 226.773.5864 No 519.562.0611 The Toy Box - Malden Central Public School http://thetoyboxece.com Anderdon Public School Child Care Centre On Site Phone # Anderdon Child Care, Inc. Yes 519.736.0100 226.773.5864 Good Shepherd Lutheran Christian Day Care No 519.736.5909 11 Concession 3, Amherstburg http://www.gslchristiandaycare.com Belle River Public School Child Care Centre On Site Phone # YMCA of Windsor and Essex County – Belle River Public Yes 519.903.2711 School www.ymcawo.ca Latchkey Day Care & Learning Centre - St. John the No 519.728.1447 Baptist School No bussing available
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Essex County Municipal Directory
    2021 MUNICIPAL DIRECTORY ESSEXCOUNTY County of Essex 360 Fairview Avenue West Essex, Ontario N8M 1Y6 Phone: 519-776-6441 FAX: 519-776-4455 TTY Telephone Toll-Free Number: 1-877-624-4832 Emergency after Hours: 519-776-6444 County of Essex Website: www.countyofessex.ca Essex County Department Contact Information Warden’s Office Essex County Civic Centre, Suite 314 Phone: 519-776-6441 FAX No. 519-776-4455 Warden Deputy Warden Gary McNamara Nelson Santos 1562 Carmelita Court 1308 Wigle Grove Road Tecumseh, ON N8N 0E3 Kingsville, ON N9Y 3S1 Phone: 519-735-2184 x 115 Phone: 519-796-5259 County Office: 519-776-6441, x1327 Alt. Phone: 519-733-2305 x 313 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] & [email protected] Phone / Last, First Position Email Ext. Director of Council & Birch, Mary Community 1335 [email protected] Services/Clerk Hebert, Katherine Deputy Clerk 1353 [email protected] Council & Community Sylvestre, Crystal Services Administrative 1323 [email protected] Assistant Essex County Department Contact Information Senior Leadership Team Essex County Civic Centre, Suite 202 Phone: 519-776-6441 FAX No. 519-776-4455 Phone / Last, First Position Email Extension Director of Council Birch, Mary Services & Community 1335 [email protected] Services/Clerk Brooks Keller, Administrator 3202 [email protected] Jayne Director of Human Cronin, Kristie 1322 [email protected] Resources Chief Administrative Galloway, Mike 1328 [email protected] Officer Greenall, Robin CEO/Chief Librarian 122 [email protected] Chief, Essex-Windsor Krauter, Bruce 2654 [email protected] EMS Director of Infrastructure Mustac, Jane 1397 [email protected] Services/County Engineer Director of Financial Zwiers, Sandra 1312 [email protected] Services/Treasurer Administration Essex County Civic Centre Phone: 519-776-6441 FAX No.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 85 Port Huron-Sarnia Detroit
    I. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE WASH I N GTO N The International Joint Commission, United States and Canada, Washington, D .C. , U.S .A., and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. I .. .d Sirs: As a result of expand.ing industrial and other activities along the international boundary of the United States and Canada, the Governments of both countries have been increasingly aware of the problem of air pollution affecting citizens and property interests on either side of the boundary. In particular, Governments have received representations that citizens and property in the vicinities of Detroit-Windsor and Port Huron-Sarnia are being subjected to detrimental quantities of air pollutants crossing the boundary. The problem of air pollution in the vicinity of the cities of Windsor and Detroit was the subject of a Joint Reference to the Commission dated January 12, 1949. The Commission was requested to report whether the air over, or in the vicinity of, Detroit and Windsor was being polluted by smoke, soot, fly ash or other impurities in quantities detrimental to the ..i public health, safety or general welfare of citizens 1 or property on either side of the boundary. In the event of an affirmative answer, the Commission was ..., i asked to indicate the extent to which vessels plying '1 I the waters of the Detroit River were contributing to this pollution and what other major factors were responsible and to what extent. m-F?. The Commission, in its final report to Governments RCi;ilpn,. 0-f May 1960.,,.repliedin the affirmative to the first question and listed various industrial, domestic and 1 'I 4.
    [Show full text]