DOCSLIB.ORG

Law Society Launches Solicitors' Well-Being Supports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Law Society Launches Solicitors' Well-Being Supports Future shock Cherry bomb Moore’s treat ‘Predictive analytics’ and ‘Second chance’ insolvency The Gazette speaks to the the further commodification solutions for businesses incoming managing partner of the business of law and individuals of top firm Arthur Cox gaLAW SOCIETY ette€4.00 OCTOBER 2019 SHINING A MAGAZINE OF THE YEAR 10 LIGHT Law Society launches 9 771393 695029 ISSN 1393−6956 solicitors’ well-being supports gaLAW SOCIETY ette IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR ONLINE READERS In order to enhance your enjoyment of the online, interactive version of the Gazette, readers are strongly advised to download the magazine first to their computer or device. Prior to downloading the Gazette, make sure that you are using the most up-to-date versions of your favourite browser, for example, Internet Explorer, Safari, Firefox or Chrome. IMPORTANT NOTE ON PAGE VIEW If you are reading the downloaded PDF in two-page view, ensure that you uncheck the ‘Show cover in two page view’ option. This can be found in the ‘Page display’ option under the ‘View’ tab. You should be seeing this page right beside the cover in the correct two-page view. Does your client have a claim eligible for ASR Hip ADR? The ADR Process gives claimants a neutral non-binding evaluation of eligible claims How it works To apply, submit a completed Form B to McCann FitzGerald solicitors. Form Bs are available from McCann FitzGerald and from www.hipadr.ie. On receipt of Form B McCann FitzGerald may ask for additional information or documents, such as necessary medical records or details of any special damages claimed. If the claimant’s case is eligible, Form B will be endorsed and returned to the claimant’s solicitor. Both parties prepare written submissions which are submitted to an independent Evaluator who issues a written evaluation stating the amount of any damages assessed. The parties have 45 days to accept or reject the evaluation. • Claimants in the ADR Process do not have to • Evaluators are senior counsel or retired prove liability; only causation and quantum are Superior Court judges relevant • A €25,000 payment in respect of the claimant’s • There is no fee to submit a claim to the ADR legal costs, outlay and VAT will be paid within Process 28 days of settlement of claims within the ADR Process. This is without prejudice to a claimant’s • If necessary, McCann FitzGerald will collect right in the circumstances of a case to seek the claimant’s medical records where written higher costs and outlay through negotiation or authorisation has been provided taxation Eligible claims Claimants may avail of the ADR Process if: • Proceedings have issued • Injuries Board authorisation has been obtained • The index surgery of the ASR product took place • The claim is not statute barred in Ireland • Revision surgery was not exclusively due to • Revision surgery took place in Ireland not earlier dislocation; trauma; infection; fracture of the than 180 days and not later than 10 years after the femoral head; or any issue related to the femoral index surgery stem For further information, or to discuss settlement of any eligible claim, please contact McCann FitzGerald (DFH/RJB) on 01 829 0000 or email [email protected] Law Society Gazette | gazette.ie PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE October 2019 1 STEPS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION here is much emphasis this month, countries having big friends. I am glad to say that and much of interest to read, in the Irish legal profession is held in high regard the pages that follow in relation to internationally, with many chairs and speakers the subject of mental health and contributing to various sessions. well-being. You will see the various support programmes that are being Crowdfunding challenges rolled out by the Law Society, continuing the work One of these dealt with the ethics and issues of begun and fostered by my predecessor Michael crowdfunded litigation. The President of the TQuinlan. Please take time to read these articles – High Court commented recently that only the they contain valuable insights, advice and signposts. very rich or the very poor can afford to litigate By the time you read this, various parts of – there is very much more than a grain of truth the Legal Services Regulation Act will have been in this. Crowdfunding and, indeed, commercial commenced. A huge positive is the introduction of funders, as well as more exotic products like LLPs, which will enable partnerships to limit their blockchain-based, security-token offerings are personal liability. becoming more prevalent internationally as a This brings the business of the provision of legal means of financing litigation, particularly of the services into line with all other businesses, which public-interest type. have had the ability to limit their liability for nearly Whether these innovations breach the old two centuries, and also into line with international rules of maintenance and champerty have not norms. Guidance is being issued in relation to yet been tested in Ireland, but as those rules are registration processes, which we are promised will based on a perception of public policy, there may be straightforward and inexpensive. well be rapid development of the law in this area. It’s hard to argue that public-interest litigation Common sense could be against public policy. We must not forget, however, that this legislation We had a striking example of this in Britain covers only partnerships, and not sole practitioners recently, with the successful outcome of the or principals. There is no justification for this Miller/Cherry litigation, ending with the distinction, but we cannot overemphasise the Supreme Court holding that parliament had difficulty and, indeed, political resistance in some been suspended illegally by the prime minister. quarters, even to what has been achieved to date. We will return to this unfairness with the Legal Services Regulatory Authority and, hopefully, when it is seen that the world hasn’t stopped THIS WAS A STRIKING VINDICATION turning because of LLPs, common sense will prevail and the legislation will be extended to sole OF THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN practitioners. CURBING EXECUTIVE EXCESS Likewise, the new rules in relation to section 150 notices, at time of writing, are due to come into effect. The Society is promulgating guidance and precedents in relation to the new obligations, so do Whatever your views on Brexit, this was a take note. No doubt, most bar associations will be striking vindication of the role of the courts running CPD sessions on the new regulations, so in curbing executive excess. In a world where please sign up and improve your CPD points’ score institutions, conventions, and the rule of law before the current CPD cycle closes. itself are increasingly under threat, it was a very A large number of Irish solicitors and barristers welcome outcome. This case was crowdfunded, represented their firms and professions at the as were a number of other Brexit-related cases. recent IBA conference in South Korea. I have As ever, if you have any comments or queries, PATRICK DORGAN, commented before on the importance of small please contact me at [email protected]. PRESIDENT 2 October 2019 CONTENTS Law Society Gazette | gazette.ie gaLAW SOCIETY ette PIC: SHUTTERSTOCK LAW SOCIETY GAZETTE LAW Future shock Cherry bomb Moore’s treat Volume 113, ‘Predictive analytics’ and ‘Second chance’ insolvency The Gazette speaks to the the further commodification solutions for businesses incoming managing partner of the business of law and individuals of top firm Arthur Cox number 8 • Vol 113 No 8 • Vol gaLAW SOCIETY ette€4.00 OCTOBER 2019 48 14 OCTOBER 2019 Subscriptions: €65 (€95 overseas) SHINING A MAGAZINE OF THE YEAR Blackhall Place, Dublin 7 10 Law Society of Ireland LIGHT tel: 01 672 4828 Law Society launches fax: 01 672 4801 9 771393 695029 ISSN 1393−6956 solicitors’ well-being supports email: [email protected] PROFESSIONAL NOTICES: see the ‘Rates’ panel in the professional notices section of this Gazette COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING: contact Seán Ó hOisín, 10 Arran Road, Dublin 9; mobile: 086 811 7116, tel: 01 834 6891, email: sean@ lawsociety.ie. See the Gazette rate card online at www.lawsociety.ie/ gazette-rates HAVE YOU MOVED? Members of the profession should send change- of-address details to: IT Section, Blackhall Place, Dublin 7, or to: [email protected] Editor: Mark McDermott FIIC 40 Deputy editor: Dr Garrett O’Boyle Art director: Nuala Redmond Editorial secretary: Catherine Kearney Printing: Turner’s Printing Company Ltd, Longford Editorial board: Michael Kealey (chairman), Mark McDermott (secretary), Aoife Byrne, Ken Casey, Mairéad Cashman, Tracy Cruikshank, Caroline Dee-Brown, Hilary Forde, Richard Hammond, Teri Kelly, Patrick J McGonagle, Aisling Meehan, Heather Murphy, Ken Murphy, Andrew Sheridan No material from the Gazette may be published or used without the permission of the copyright holder. The Law Society of Ireland can accept no responsibility for the accuracy of contributed articles or statements appearing in this magazine, and any views or opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Law Society’s Council, save where otherwise indicated. No responsibility for loss or distress occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from acting, as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by the authors, contributors, editor or publishers. The editor reserves the right to make publishing decisions on any advertisement or article submitted to this magazine, and to refuse publication or to edit any editorial material as seems appropriate to him. Professional legal advice should always be sought in relation to any specific matter. FSC independently certified wood and paper products used by the Law Society Gazette are sourced from sustainable, ecologically managed forests. Visit www.fsc.org This publication supports the work of the Press Council of Ireland and the Office of the Press Ombudsman, and our staff operate within the Code of Practice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issue Jan/Feb 04
    Contents GazetteLawSociety Regulars Cover Story Guests of the nation News 2 20 Automatic residency rights for non-national parents of Irish-citizen children have been limited by the Supreme Court. But what about the Viewpoint 8 applications that were outstanding when the ruling was delivered? Letters 16 Book review 47 CPD: a review Continuing professional development was introduced to the profession Tech trends 48 25 last year. Alison Egan answers some of the most common queries Briefing 51 raised by practitioners Council reports 51 Committee Labouring the point reports 53 27 The de Rossa libel case is still in the Practice notes 54 courts and the ECHR’s verdict is likely to be delivered soon. Simon Legislation McAleese examines the case’s progress update 56 Solicitors Disciplinary Slow motion Tribunal 59 30 The courts are taking a harder line with late applications. Master of the Personal injury High Court Edmond Honohan discusses the rationale behind the judgment 60 courts’ insistence that motions delayed may lead to motions denied FirstLaw update 64 Eurlegal 67 Break for the border People and 34 The law on recognition of foreign divorces has places 72 always been complex. Now, it is also in a state of confusion. Eugene Davy explains Professional information 74 Caught in the web COVER PHOTO: PHOTOCALL IRELAND 38 Who polices the net, and what redress is there for consumers who have been misled by on-line advertising? Sinead Morgan reports Long arm of the law 42 Two new directives adopted last year will make it easier for the Revenue to find out about cross-border bank accounts, writes Max Barrett Editor: Conal O’Boyle MA.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Annual Report 2020
    2020Annual Report Report published by the Supreme Court of Ireland with the support of the Courts Service An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Courts Service Editors: Sarahrose Murphy, Senior Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Patrick Conboy, Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Case summaries prepared by the following Judicial Assistants: Aislinn McCann Seán Beatty Iseult Browne Senan Crawford Orlaith Cross Katie Cundelan Shane Finn Matthew Hanrahan Cormac Hickey Caoimhe Hunter-Blair Ciara McCarthy Rachael O’Byrne Mary O’Rourke Karl O’Reilly © Supreme Court of Ireland 2020 2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Foreword by the Chief Justice 6 Introduction by the Registrar of the Supreme Court 9 2020 at a glance 11 Part 1 About the Supreme Court of Ireland 15 Branches of Government in Ireland 16 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 17 Structure of the Courts of Ireland 19 Timeline of key events in the Supreme Court’s history 20 Seat of the Supreme Court 22 The Supreme Court Courtroom 24 Journey of a typical appeal 26 Members of the Supreme Court 30 The Role of the Chief Justice 35 Retirement and Appointments 39 The Constitution of Ireland 41 Depositary for Acts of the Oireachtas 45 Part 2 The Supreme Court in 2020 46 COVID-19 and the response of the Court 47 Remote hearings 47 Practice Direction SC21 48 Application for Leave panels 48 Statement of Case 48 Clarification request 48 Electronic delivery of judgments 49 Sitting in King’s Inns 49 Statistics 50 Applications for Leave to Appeal 50 Categorisation of Applications for Leave to Appeal
    [Show full text]
  • Information Law 2019 Friday 22 March 2019 Venue: Hilton Hotel, Charlemont Place, Dublin 2
    Information Law 2019 Friday 22 March 2019 Venue: Hilton Hotel, Charlemont Place, Dublin 2 Conference Programme Time Topic Speaker 8.30am Registration 9.00am - 9.10am Introduction from the Chair Mr Justice Max Barrett 9.10am – 9.40am GDPR and consumer IoT devices Deirdre Kilroy 9.40am – 10.10am The Public Services Card: What's the Problem? Elizabeth Farries 10.10am – 10.40am The DPO journey: Insights from Industry Rachael Gallagher 10.40am – 11.00am Coffee Break 11.00am – 11.30am Being DPO in the Parliament, how is it different? Jennifer McGrath 11.30am – 12.00pm Data Protection Litigation: An update. David Fennelly 12.00pm – 12.30pm Question and Answer Session 12.30pm Close from the Chair Mr Justice Max Barrett GDPR and consumer IoT devices Deirdre Kilroy, Solicitor Partner, Matheson Data Protection Litigation: An update David Fennelly BL Law Library and Assistant Professor, Trinity College Dublin The DPO journey: Insights from Industry Rachael Gallagher Manager, Data Privacy Services, Deloitte Being DPO in the Parliament, how is it different? Jennifer McGrath DPO, Houses of the Oireachtas Service The Public Services Card: What's the Problem? Elizabeth Farries Information Rights Program Manager, Irish Council for Civil Liberties Speaker Biographies Mr Justice Max Barrett was appointed a judge of the High Court in December 2013. He was enrolled as a solicitor in 2001.Educated at Trinity College Dublin, University College Dublin and the University of Salford in the UK, he has worked in the legal field at Danske Bank Ireland, Rabobank Ireland, Bank of Ireland and, most recently, at SEB International Assurance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the HIGH COURT (1) Record No. 2015/696/JR Between COLM
    THE HIGH COURT (1) Record No. 2015/696/JR Between COLM MOORE Applicant – and – THE MINISTER FOR ARTS, HERITAGE AND THE GAELTEACHT Respondent – and – CHARTERED LAND LIMITED Notice Party 1 (2) Record No. 2016/51/MCA Between COLM MOORE Applicant – and – THE MINISTER FOR ARTS, HERITAGE AND THE GAELTEACHT First Named Respondent – and – CHARTERED LAND LIMITED Second Named Respondent 2 (3) Record No. 2015/387/MCA Between COLM MOORE Applicant – and – THE MINISTER FOR ARTS, HERITAGE AND THE GAELTEACHT Respondent 3 JUDGMENT of Mr Justice Max Barrett delivered on 18th March, 2016. TABLE OF CONTENTS (Numbers in square brackets are paragraph numbers) PART 1 1916 Chapter 1 Nurse O’Farrell [1] A. 27th April, 1916. [1] B. 28th April, 1916. [2] C. 29th April, 1916. [8] D. 30th April, 1916. [27] Chapter 2 The Wider Picture [28] A. The GPO Garrison. [28] B. Evacuation of the GPO. [30] C. The O’Rahilly’s Attack. [31] D. The Main Evacuation. [41] 4 E. Crossing Moore Lane. [46] F. ‘Holed Up’ in Moore Street. [51] Chapter 3 The Civilian Experience [64] A. Overview. [64] B. Civilian Deaths in Moore Street. [66] C. The Deaths of Two Children. [71] D. Conclusion. [74] Chapter 4 The British Perspective [75] Notes to Part 1 [after 82] PART 2 TIMELINE Chapter 5 A Useful Summary Timeline [83] A. Overview. [83] B. Summary Timeline. [83] 5 PART 3 SOME PRELIMINARY MATTERS Chapter 6 The Parties Involved [84] Chapter 7 Alleged Abuse of Process Arising [87] PART 4 THE JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Chapter 8 Netting the Issues Arising [90] Chapter 9 The Reliefs Sought by Mr Moore [95] Chapter 10 Some Unique Features Presenting [96] A.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Chilling Effects' of Costs for Public Interest Litigation
    Jim’ll f ix it! Working abroad Winning ways James MacGuill wins The latest information Gazette team scoops the day in the European on international job top gong at national Court of Human Rights possibilities for lawyers magazine awards LAW SOCIETY LAW GAZETTEGAZETTE€3.75 Jan/Feb 2011 THE BIG CHILL The ‘chilling effects’ of costs for public interest litigation 2010-11 BUSINESS TO BUSINESS MAGAZINE OF THE YEAR LegaL RequiRements The European Arrest Money Laundering and Warrant in Ireland Terrorist Financing Act Remy Farrell BL and 2010: Annotated Anthony Hanrahan BL Dr Max Barrett (Solicitor) Price: €140 Price: €80 Irish Criminal Justice: Principles of Irish Theory Process and Employment Law Procedure Dr Brenda Daly, Dr Vicky Conway, Dr Yvonne Daly, Dr Michael Doherty Jennifer Schweppe Price: €60 Price: €80 Cassidy on the EU Law in Ireland Licensing Acts Dr Elaine Fahey Third Edition Constance Cassidy SC Price: €60 Price: €325 COming sOOn The Probate Handbook Housing Law, Tim Bracken BL and Rights and Policy Margaret Campbell (Solicitor) Dr Padraic Kenna Price: Price: Aprrox €35 Approx €220 (HB) | €170 (PB) To order email: [email protected] Telephone: 01 415 0439 Fax: 01 454 9265 For more information on these and other titles please visit our website: www.claruspress.ie Law Society Gazette www.gazette.ie Jan/Feb 2011 PreSident’S meSSaGe 1 InSuRAnCe CRISIS IS MAjOR COnCeRn t is with profound gratitude and great respect for you, The second report, reference my colleagues, that I write my first president’s message. 98-2010, entitled Alternative IThe economic tsunami and the horrendously stressful and Dispute Resolution – Mediation expensive insurance renewal process, for many colleagues, has and Conciliation, sets out a caused enormous levels of anxiety, upset and anger, together statutory framework for with huge financial pressure – which I readily acknowledge ADR applying to individuals, and with which I empathise.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Appointments Advisory Board Annual Report 2014
    Judicial Appointments Advisory Board Annual Report 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Applications & Appointments 6 2.1 Special Board Meeting 2.2 Supreme Court 2.3 Court of Appeal 2.4 High Court 2.5 Circuit Court 2.6 District Court 2.7 Summary 3 Statistics 15 4 Conclusions & Recommendations 17 5 Appendices 18 (i) Rules / Procedures of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board (ii) Numbers of valid applications considered at meetings of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board 1996 - 2014 Members of the Board The Hon. Mrs. Justice The Hon. Mr. Justice The Hon. Mr. Justice Susan Denham Sean Ryan Nicholas Kearns Chairperson, Chief Justice President of the Court of Appeal President of the High Court The Hon. Mr. Justice Her Honour Judge Ms. Máire Whelan SC Raymond Groarke Rosemary Horgan Attorney General President of the Circuit Court President of the District Court Mr. David Barniville SC Mr. John Shaw, Solicitor Dr. Simon Boucher Chairperson of the Bar Council Law Society of Ireland nominee Nominee of the Minister for of Ireland Justice & Equality Dr. Valerie Bresnihan Ms. Karen Dent Mr. Brendan Ryan BL Nominee of the Minister for Nominee of the Minister for Secretary Justice & Equality Justice & Equality Judicial Appointments Advisory Board Annual Report 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction The Judicial Appointments Advisory Board (hereafter “the Board”) was established pursuant to the Courts and Court Officers Act, 1995, (hereafter “the Act”). The purpose of the Board is to identify persons and inform the Government of the suitability of those persons
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Mar 2001 Font Change
    Contents GazetteLawSociety Regulars Cover Story Hold the front page! News 2 8 There’s been considerable speculation about the potential impact of the European Viewpoint 6 convention on human rights on family law and criminal law – but how will it affect the Tech trends 30 media and the issue of free speech? Michael Briefing 34 Kealey discusses the articles most likely to keep editors up at night Practice notes 34 Legislation update 36 Till deceit do us part? Personal injury The Supreme Court recently reassessed Irish judgments 38 12 nullity law in the context of one party’s FirstLaw update 40 infidelity and adultery. John Healy examines Eurlegal 45 fresh attempts to widen the basis of nullity law as it applies to marriages People and based on deception places 49 Obituary: Ernest Margetson 51 A healthy alternative As in so many other countries, Apprentices’ page 53 16 medical malpractice cases are on the rise Professional here. Kieran Doran looks across the Atlantic to US efforts to information 54 stem the tide there by using non-binding mediation to resolve disputes and restore confidence in the doctor/patient COVER PHOTO: [email protected] relationship Arbitration and public policy 20 A recent case decided by the Pakistani Supreme Court involved major issues in commercial arbitration. Max Barrett considers the lessons that may be important to practitioners in other jurisdictions, including Ireland The dangers in paying the piper 27 Joint lodgments are a viable way for defendants to handle liabilities in court cases. But, as Dessie Shiels and Karl Henson argue, they’re not always appropriate Editor: Conal O’Boyle MA.
    [Show full text]
  • White V. Bar Council
    THE HIGH COURT [2015 No. 582JR] BETWEEN: BARRY WHITE APPLICANT – AND – THE BAR COUNCIL OF IRELAND – AND – THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY – AND – 1 IRELAND – AND – THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT of Mr Justice Max Barrett delivered on 22nd July, 2016. Part 1 Tradition 1. Mr White is a retired High Court judge. He wants to return to practice as a barrister. He anticipates that this will lead to him acting as an advocate, principally in the Circuit Court, and also in onward appeals. He therefore looks set to breach a tradition that retired barristers- turned-judges who return to practice as barrister-advocates do not appear before a court of equal or lower jurisdiction than that in which they used formerly to sit as a judge. This tradition has been represented in the within proceedings, at least by the parties opposed to Mr 2 White, as a rule of law. However, for the reasons identified by the court hereafter, it is in truth but a tradition, and so not legally binding upon Mr White. 2. The principal decision regarding this tradition is that of Kennedy C.J. in In the Matter of the Solicitors (Ireland) Act, 1898 and in the Matter of an Application by Sir James O’Connor [1930] I.R. 623. The Chief Justice’s decision in that matter concerned an application by a onetime judge who wanted to return to practice as a solicitor. Having posited, at 630-31, that there was a common “understanding” that upon such an individual being appointed a judge, the practice of law by him (or, of course, her) is abandoned forever, Kennedy C.J.
    [Show full text]
  • In-House Counsel Masterclass
    In-House Counsel Masterclass Business Disputes: Managing the Ref? Friday 13 October 2017 DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Welcome Declan Black, Managing Partner DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Recent Developments in Irish Contract Law Maurice Phelan, Head of Dispute Resolution DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco “Good lawyers know the law; great lawyers know the judge” - H.L. Mencken DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Supreme Court Mr. Justice Frank Clarke, Chief Justice Mr. Justice Donal O'Donnell Mr. Justice Liam McKechnie Mr. Justice John Mac Menamin Ms. Justice Elizabeth Dunne Mr. Justice Peter Charleton Ms. Justice Iseult O'Malley DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Court of Appeal Mr. Justice Sean Ryan, President Ms. Justice Mary Finlay Geoghegan Mr. Justice Michael Peart Mr. Justice George Birmingham Ms. Justice Mary C. Irvine Mr. Justice Gerard Hogan Mr. Justice Alan Mahon Mr. Justice John A. Edwards Mr. Justice John Hedigan Ms. Justice Máire Whelan DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco High Court Mr. Justice Peter Kelly, President Ms. Justice Deirdre Murphy Mr. Justice Michael Moriarty Ms. Justice Aileen Donnelly Mr. Justice Paul Butler Mr. Justice Seamus Noonan Mr. Justice Henry Abbott Ms. Justice Mary Faherty Mr. Justice Paul Gilligan Mr. Justice Tony Hunt Mr. Justice Michael Hanna Mr. Justice Robert Eagar Mr. Justice Patrick J. McCarthy Mr. Justice Robert Haughton Mr. Justice Michael White Mr. Justice Charles Meenan Ms. Justice Isobel Kennedy Mr. Justice Kevin Cross Ms. Justice Mary Ellen Ring Mr. Justice Paul McDermott Mr. Justice Tony O'Connor Mr. Justice Anthony Barr Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Submission
    • To the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee • • Secretary to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe • Environment Division • Palais des Nations • CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland • E-mail: [email protected] Subject: Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee regarding the Laois- Kilkenny Reinforcement Project. Case Number ACCC/C/2015/132 • • I. Information on correspondent submitting the communication • • This submission is made both on behalf of the RTS Substation Action Group and in a personal capacity as a member of the public directly affected by the issues outlined within this submission. • • Name: RTS Substation Action Group Contact person: Fand Cooney Member of the RTS Action Group and resident in the area of concern. Permanent address: Powelstown, Ratheniska, Stradbally, Co. Laois, Ireland. Telephone: +353 87 2888 661 E-mail: [email protected] • • II. Party concerned • • Ireland 1 of 31 ACCC/C/2015/132 IV. Project update The following is a short and partial update on this project since we submitted our original complaint to the Aarhus Compliance Committee. As you can see, the issues are ongoing. • In early 2017, the developer commenced development on the project in breach of their planning permission. The RTS Group submitted a complaint to the Local Authority and eventually enforcement action was taken requiring the works to be removed. 1 Part of the works undertaken were not even part of the original planning permission. • While we were awaiting enforcement action by the Local Planning Authority, the Developer, EirGrid, applied to An Board Pleanala (ABP) for an amendment to their planning permission. Our legal advice was that such an amendment was not possible due to the nature of the project and the nature of the planning breach.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Disputes in Aircraft Leasing - the Irish Litigation Perspective Thursday 23 November 2017
    Managing Disputes in Aircraft Leasing - The Irish Litigation Perspective Thursday 23 November 2017 DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Welcome Christine O’Donovan, Head of Aviation DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco The Irish Litigation Perspective Gareth Steen, Partner DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Process and positioning in the Irish Courts Declan Black, Managing Partner DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Supreme Court Mr. Justice Frank Clarke, Chief Justice Mr. Justice Donal O'Donnell Mr. Justice Liam McKechnie Mr. Justice John Mac Menamin Ms. Justice Elizabeth Dunne Mr. Justice Peter Charleton Ms. Justice Iseult O'Malley DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco Court of Appeal Mr. Justice Sean Ryan, President Ms. Justice Mary Finlay Geoghegan Mr. Justice Michael Peart Mr. Justice George Birmingham Ms. Justice Mary C. Irvine Mr. Justice Gerard Hogan Mr. Justice Alan Mahon Mr. Justice John A. Edwards Mr. Justice John Hedigan Ms. Justice Máire Whelan DublinDublin LondonLondon NewNew YorkYork San SanFranscisco Francisco High Court Mr. Justice Peter Kelly, President Ms. Justice Deirdre Murphy Mr.Mr. JusticeJustice MichaelMichael MoriartyMoriarty Ms. Justice Aileen Donnelly Mr.Mr. JusticeJustice PaulPaul ButlerButler Mr. Justice Seamus Noonan Ms. Justice Mary Faherty Mr.Mr. JusticeJustice HenryHenry AbbottAbbott Mr. Justice Tony Hunt Mr.Mr. JusticeJustice PaulPaul GilliganGilligan Mr. Justice Robert Eagar Mr. Justice Michael Hanna Mr. Justice Robert Haughton Mr. Justice Patrick J. McCarthy Mr. Justice Charles Meenan Mr. Justice Michael White Ms. Justice Isobel Kennedy Mr. Justice Kevin Cross Ms. Justice Mary Ellen Ring Mr. Justice Paul McDermott Mr. Justice Tony O'Connor Mr. Justice Anthony Barr Mr.
    [Show full text]