A Beautiful Instance of Stellar Ornamentation 18 May 2016
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Synchrotron Superbubble in the IC 10 Galaxy: a Hypernova Remnant?
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–?? (2007) Printed 28 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) A synchrotron superbubble in the IC 10 Galaxy: a hypernova remnant? T. A. Lozinskaya1⋆ and A. V. Moiseev2 1Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universitetskii pr. 13, Moscow, 119991 Russia 2Special Astrophysical Observatory, Nizhnii Arkhyz, Karachaevo-Cherkesia, 369167 Russia Accepted 2007 June 29. Received 2007 June; in original form 2007 June 4 ABSTRACT The nature of the synchrotron superbubble in the IC 10 galaxy is discussed using the results of our investigation of its ionized gas structure, kinematics, and emission spectrum from observations made with the 6-m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and based on our analysis of the radio emission of the region. The hypernova explosion is shown to be a more plausi- ble mechanism of the formation of the synchrotron superbubble compared with the earlier proposed model of multiple supernova explosions. A compact remnant of this hypernova may be identified with the well known X-ray binary X-1 – an accreting black hole. Key words: ISM: bubbles – ISM: kinematics and dynamics – supernova remnants galaxies: individual: IC 10. 1 INTRODUCTION. and observations with a scanning Fabry–Perot interferom- eter (FPI) in the Hα line. We report the detailed results The synchrotron superbubble in the IC 10 galaxy was discov- of our observations in a separate paper (Lozinskaya et al. ered by Yang & Skillman (1993). They associated it with the 2007). In this Letter we summarize the main results of these explosion of about ten supernovae. The synchrotron nature observations and the ensuing conclusions. -
Breaching the Eddington Limit in the Most Massive, Most Luminous Stars
Mass Loss from (Hot) Massive Luminous Stars Stan Owocki Bartol Research Institute Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Delaware Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Massive Stars in the Whirlpool Galaxy Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Henize 70: LMC SuperBubble Wind-Blown Bubbles in ISM Some key scalings: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Henize 70: LMC SuperBubble Wind-Blown Bubbles in ISM Some key scalings: WR wind bubble NGC 2359 Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Henize 70: LMC SuperBubble Wind-Blown Bubbles in ISM Some key scalings: WR wind bubble NGC 2359 Superbubble in the Large Magellanic Cloud Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Pistol Nebula Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Eta Carinae Wednesday, January 12, 2011 P-Cygni Line Profile Line-scattering in massive winds Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Observed wind line profiles Resonance line-scattering Recombination line O-star P-Cygni profile WR-star emission profile −v∞ +v −v∞ ∞ Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Basic Mass Loss Properties i 2 Mass Loss rate M = 4πρvr Terminal speed Velocity law v(r) v∞ 8 Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Massive-Star Mass Loss i M 1. OB Winds M ~ 10−9 − 10−6 yr v∞ 1000 − 3000 km / s – opt. thin τ c < 1 2. Wolf-Rayet Winds i M M ~ 10−6 − 10−5 yr – opt. thick τ c > 1 v∞ 1000 − 3000 km / s 3. Luminous Blue Variable (LBV) Eruptions i 1 −5 M -very opt. thick τ c M ~ 10 − 1 !! yr v∞ 50 − 1000 km / s Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Q: What can drive such extreme mass loss?? Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Q: What can drive such extreme mass loss?? A: The force of light! Wednesday, January 12, 2011 -
Modelling Supernova Remnant Kinematics and X-Ray Emission: Some Examples
Modelling Supernova Remnant kinematics and X-ray emission: Some Examples. Margarita Rosado Instituto de Astronomía UNAM Collaborators: • Pablo Velázquez, Ary Rodríguez González (ICN-UNAM) • Jorge Reyes Iturbide (IT Santiago Tianguistengo) • Patricia Ambrocio-Cruz (UAEH) • Mónica Sánchez-Cruces (ESFM-IPN) I. The Kinematics: By means of a FP Interferometer (i.e. the PUMA) One gets millions of Halpha or [SII] profiles over the field. From Valdez- Gutiérrez et al. 2001 OAN: San Pedro Mártir, B.C. Mexico PUMA INTERFEROMETER PUMA parameters - Detector CCD 1024x1024 – FP scanning steps 48 – Finesse 24 – Spectral resolution 47.3 km s-1 – Plate scale 0.59 arcsec pix -1 – Filters Hα [SII] – Central lambda a 6570 6720 – Interference order 330 332 – Free spectral range b 847 931 – Sampling step c 17.6 19.4 – Calibration line a Hα (6562.7) Ne (6717.04) a) in units of angstroms, b) in km s -1, c) in km s -1 channel -1 Doppler Effect Iso-velocity contours in our Galaxy Rotation curve of our Galaxy (also from Bland & Blitz ) The kinematics of SNRs is a powerful tool that we can use to estimate the DISTANCE, and other important parameters of those objects. The Galactic SNR CTB 109 and the quest for its distance: Radio Einstein X-rays continuum, and CO CO and HI From Gregory & Falman (1980), Tatematsu et al. (1987), Kothes et al. (2002, 2006) While in the optical: Hurford & Fesen (1995) Sánchez -Cruces et al. (2017) 2D [SII]/Hα line-ratios of the optical filaments è a radiative shock Typical [SII] velocity profiles of two regions: è SNR CTB 109 IS IN THE PERSEUS ARM è THIS SNR HOSTING A MAGNETAR HAS RATHER TYPICAL INITIAL ENERGY II. -
Feedback by Massive Stars and the Emergence of Superbubbles
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. krause+2013_ESB_II_v10 c ESO 2018 January 3, 2018 Feedback by massive stars and the emergence of superbubbles II. X-ray properties Martin Krause1, 2,⋆, Roland Diehl1, 2, Hans Böhringer1, 2, Michael Freyberg1, and Daniel Lubos1 1 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85741 Garching, Germany 2 Excellence Cluster Universe, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstrasse 2, 85748 Garching, Germany Received March 24, 2014; accepted ? ABSTRACT Context. In a previous paper we investigated the energy transfer of massive stars to the interstellar medium as a function of time and the geometrical configuration of three massive stars via 3D-mesh-refining hydrodynamics simulations, following the complete evolution of the massive stars and their supernovae except non-thermal processes . Aims. In order to compare our results against observations we derive thermal X-ray properties of the interstellar medium from our simulations and compare them to observations of superbubbles in general, to the well-studied nearby Orion-Eridanus superbubble and to the diffuse soft X-ray emission of nearby galaxies. Methods. We analysed our ISM simulation results with the help of spectra for plasma temperatures between 0.1 and 10 keV and computed the spectral evolution and the spatio-temporal distribution of the hot gas. Results. Despite significant input of high temperature gas from supernovae and fast stellar winds, the resulting thermal X-ray spectra are generally very soft, with most of the emission well below 1 keV. We show that this is due to mixing triggered by resolved hydrodynamic instabilities. Supernovae enhance the X-ray luminosity of a superbubble by 1-2 orders of magnitude for a time span of about 0.1 Myr; longer if a supernova occurs in a larger superbubble and shorter in higher energy bands. -
The Interstellar Medium
The Interstellar Medium http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM • Total mass ~ 5 to 10 x 109 solar masses of about 5 – 10% of the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy interior to the suns orbit • Average density overall about 0.5 atoms/cm3 or ~10-24 g cm-3, but large variations are seen • Composition - essentially the same as the surfaces of Population I stars, but the gas may be ionized, neutral, or in molecules (or dust) H I – neutral atomic hydrogen H2 - molecular hydrogen H II – ionized hydrogen He I – neutral helium Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, dust, molecules, etc. THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM • Energy input – starlight (especially O and B), supernovae, cosmic rays • Cooling – line radiation and infrared radiation from dust • Largely concentrated (in our Galaxy) in the disk Evolution in the ISM of the Galaxy Stellar winds Planetary Nebulae Supernovae + Circulation Stellar burial ground The The Stars Interstellar Big Medium Galaxy Bang Formation White Dwarfs Neutron stars Black holes Star Formation As a result the ISM is continually stirred, heated, and cooled – a dynamic environment And its composition evolves: 0.02 Total fraction of heavy elements Total 10 billion Time years THE LOCAL BUBBLE http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/L/Local_Bubble.html The “Local Bubble” is a region of low density (~0.05 cm-3 and Loop I bubble high temperature (~106 K) 600 ly has been inflated by numerous supernova explosions. It is Galactic Center about 300 light years long and 300 ly peanut-shaped. Its smallest dimension is in the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy. -
Forming a Constant Density Medium Close to Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
A&A 460, 105–116 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065709 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics Forming a constant density medium close to long gamma-ray bursts A. J. van Marle1,N.Langer1, A. Achterberg1, and G. García-Segura2 1 Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, PO Box 80000, 3508 TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands e-mail: [A.vanMarle;N.Langer;A.Achterberg]@astro.uu.nl 2 Instituto de Astronomía-UNAM, APDO Postal 877, Ensenada, 22800 Baja California, Mexico e-mail: [email protected] Received 29 May 2006 / Accepted 21 July 2006 ABSTRACT Aims. The progenitor stars of long Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are thought to be Wolf-Rayet stars, which generate a massive and energetic wind. Nevertheless, about 25 percent of all GRB afterglows light curves indicate a constant density medium close to the exploding star. We explore various ways to produce this, by creating situations where the wind termination shock arrives very close to the star, as the shocked wind material has a nearly constant density. Methods. Typically, the distance between a Wolf-Rayet star and the wind termination shock is too large to allow afterglow formation in the shocked wind material. Here, we investigate possible causes allowing for a smaller distance: A high density or a high pressure in the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM), a weak Wolf-Rayet star wind, the presence of a binary companion, and fast motion of the Wolf-Rayet star relative to the ISM. Results. We find that all four scenarios are possible in a limited parameter space, but that none of them is by itself likely to explain the large fraction of constant density afterglows. -