Printmgr File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Printmgr File Subject to Completion, dated July 30, 2018 OFFERING CIRCULAR 6,718,729 Shares ese securities and is not Amalgamated Bank Class A Common Stock This is an initial public offering of shares of Class A common stock of Amalgamated Bank, a New York non-member commercial bank and a chartered trust company (the “Bank”). The selling stockholders identified in this offering circular are offering 6,718,729 shares of Class A common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares in this offering. Prior to this offering, there has been no established public market for our Class A common stock. We currently estimate that the public offering price per share of our Class A common stock will be between $15.00 and $17.00 per share. We have applied to list our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “AMAL.” Investing in our Class A common stock involves risks that are described in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 26 of this document. SHARES OF OUR CLASS A COMMON STOCK ARE NOT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, DEPOSITS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF ANY BANK, ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, AND ARE SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING THE POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE ENTIRE AMOUNT YOU INVEST. THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES AN OFFERING CIRCULAR COVERING SECURITIES THAT ARE EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE ‘SECURITIES ACT”) PURSUANT TO SECTION 3(A)(2) THEREOF. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY BODY, NOR HAS THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY BODY PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS OFFERING CIRCULAR. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 and, as a result, have elected to take advantage of certain reduced public company reporting and disclosure requirements in this offering circular. The distribution of this offering circular and the offering of the shares in certain jurisdictions outside the United States may be restricted by law. Persons who receive this offering circular in such jurisdictions should see “Notice to Investors” on page 174 for more information regarding these restrictions. Per Share Total Initial public offering price ............................................................. $ $ Underwriting discounts................................................................ $ $ Proceeds to the selling stockholders, before expenses.................................. $ $ The underwriters may also exercise their option to purchase up to an additional 1,007,809 shares of our Class A common stock from the selling stockholders at the public offering price less the underwriting discount, for days after the date of this offering circular. The shares of Class A common stock in this offering will be ready for delivery on or about , 2018. Joint Bookrunners Barclays J.P. Morgan Keefe, Bruyette & Woods A Stifel Company Co-Managers Piper Jaffray Raymond James Sandler O’Neill + Partners, L.P. soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information in this preliminary offering circular is not complete and may be changed. This preliminary offering circular is not an offer to sell th Offering Circular dated , 2018. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA ................................. 20 RISK FACTORS ............................................................................... 26 CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS....................... 58 USE OF PROCEEDS ........................................................................... 60 DIVIDEND POLICY............................................................................ 60 CAPITALIZATION............................................................................. 61 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............................................................................ 62 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK .................. 95 BUSINESS .................................................................................... 97 SUPERVISION AND REGULATION ............................................................ 120 MANAGEMENT ............................................................................... 132 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION................................................................. 147 PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS .................................................. 157 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS .......................... 161 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK ........................................................... 167 UNDERWRITING.............................................................................. 171 SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE........................................................ 177 CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK........................................................................... 178 ERISA CONSIDERATIONS..................................................................... 182 LEGAL MATTERS............................................................................. 184 EXPERTS ..................................................................................... 184 WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION................................................ 184 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ......................................................... F-1 You should rely only on the information contained in this offering circular and any supplement or addendum that may be provided to you. None of the Bank, the selling stockholders or the underwriters have authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We, the selling stockholders, and the underwriters are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information contained in this offering circular and any supplement or addendum is accurate only as of the date thereof, regardless of the time of delivery of this offering circular or any sale of our Class A common stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. (i) ABOUT THIS OFFERING CIRCULAR Unless we state otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references in this offering circular to “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Bank” and “Amalgamated” refer to Amalgamated Bank and its consolidated subsidiaries as a combined bank following the acquisition of New Resource Bank completed on May 18, 2018 (the “New Resource Bank Acquisition”). We use the term Combined Bank to refer to any financial information presented on a pro forma basis to give effect to the New Resource Bank Acquisition as if the transaction had occurred on March 31, 2018, but not give effect to the purchase method of accounting. Financial information with respect to New Resource Bank has been derived from New Resource Bank’s historical Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with Domestic Offices Only and Total Assets Less than $1 Billion - FFIEC 051 (the “NRB Call Report”) for March 31, 2018. The NRB Call Report was prepared by New Resource Bank’s management team prior to the completion of the New Resource Bank Acquisition and may not reflect similar assumptions or accounting standards used in Amalgamated Bank’s financial statements. The New Resource Bank financial information included in this offering circular has not been reviewed or audited by our independent registered public accounting firm and may not be directly comparable to Amalgamated Bank’s financial results for corresponding periods. References to our “Class A common stock” and “common stock” refer to our Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Unless otherwise indicated, the dollar amounts in this offering circular are presented rounded to the nearest thousand and fractional shares have been rounded down to the nearest whole number. Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, all information in this offering circular assumes that the underwriters will not exercise their option to purchase additional shares of common stock from the selling stockholders. European Economic Area This offering circular (and any supplement or addendum) have been prepared on the basis that any offer of common stock in any Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant Member State) will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Prospectus Directive, as implemented in that Relevant Member State, from the requirement to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive. Accordingly, any person making or intending to make an offer in that Relevant Member State of common stock which is the subject of the offering contemplated in this offering circular (and any supplement or addendum thereto) should only do so in circumstances in which no obligation arises for Amalgamated
Recommended publications
  • Yucaipa Companies
    YUCAIPA COMPANIES: “POSTER CHILD FOR THE ILLS OF POLITICAL DONATIONS AND BUSINESS” Yucaipa is a holding company that invests across a wide range of industries—from groceries to logistics to magazine distribution. Ronald Burkle, chairman of Yucaipa, has been a multi-million fundraiser and donor for Bill and Hillary Clinton and in Bill Clinton’s post-presidency, Burkle has emerged as a close friend and rain- maker for the Clintons – and the friendship has been prosperous for both. “The mainstream business press beats up on [Burkle], essentially for buying access and influence among politicians and leaders of the pension funds that invest with him (FORBES included). ‘I basically became the poster child for the ills of political donations and business. It’s preposterous!’ Burkle protests.” [Forbes, 12/11/06] BILL CLINTON AND YUCAIPA 2006: Bill Clinton Has Guaranteed Payments “Over $1,000” From Yucaipa And Has Invested In Several Yucaipa Funds. Hillary’s financial disclosure report indicates that Bill Clinton has “over $1,000” in guaranteed payments from Yucaipa Global Holdings. Because the Clintons are not required to report the actual amount or any range of income that is more specific than “over $1,000” we do not know how much Bill has been compen- sated. Through WJC International Investments GP, Bill Clinton invests in Yucaipa Global Holdings and Yu- caipa Global Partnership. The Yucaipa Global Partnership Fund “invests in securities of corporations that con- duct significant operations in foreign countries.” Clinton reported interest income between $201-$1,000 from Yucaipa Global Holdings and between $1,001-$2,500 from Yucaipa Global Partnership Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Morgans Hotel Group Co. Form 10-K/A Annual Report Filed 2013-10
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K/A Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) [amend] Filing Date: 2013-10-02 | Period of Report: 2012-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-13-387531 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Morgans Hotel Group Co. Mailing Address Business Address 475 TENTH AVENUE 475 TENTH AVENUE CIK:1342126| IRS No.: 161736884 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 NEW YORK NY 10018 NEW YORK NY 10018 Type: 10-K/A | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-33738 | Film No.: 131128139 212-277-4100 SIC: 7011 Hotels & motels Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 001-33738 Morgans Hotel Group Co. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 16-1736884 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 475 Tenth Avenue New York, New York 10018 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (212) 277-4100 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Formatted Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY CHAIN AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS THE RISE AND FALL OF TESCO IN THE UNITED STATES ERIKA VEISZLEMLEIN FALL 2018 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Supply Chain and Information Systems with honors in Supply Chain and Information Systems Reviewed and approved* by the following: Dr. Robert Novack Associate Professor of Supply Chain and Information Systems Thesis Supervisor Dr. John C. Spychalski Professor Emeritus of Supply Chain Management Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Tesco—an uncommon name in North America, yet one of the largest retailers of our time. With nearly 7000 stores worldwide and 460,000 employees, it is no surprise that Tesco currently holds the title of ninth largest retailer in the world. Founded in 1919 by Jack Cohen, a former member of the Royal Flying Force, Tesco began as nothing more than a small grocery stall run by a twenty-one year old boy. After thirteen years of expansion, Tesco became a private limited company in 1932, followed by the construction of its first headquarters and warehouse, the most modern of its kind in England. The next major milestone materialized following the Second World War, when it became a publically traded company in 1947. By the time Cohen died in 1979, the company’s total sales had reached £1 billion and were to double in the following three years. In 1995 it claimed the title of the UK’s top grocer, a title it continues to hold today.
    [Show full text]
  • John Laco Partner
    John Laco Partner Los Angeles D: +1-213-430-6544 [email protected] John Laco is a seasoned corporate lawyer with 30 years of Admissions experience advising public and private companies and financial investors. Bar Admissions California He works with some of the best-known Southern California companies global private equity and institutional investors along the full investment cycle, from negotiating initial investments and Education acquisitions to subsequent tack-on acquisitions, financings, and Loyola Marymount University, J.D., portfolio company growth counseling. 1992: Loyola Law Review, Editor and John is also a boardroom level counselor who provides C-level Staff Member; Order of the Coif; American Jurisprudence Award, executives, in-house counsel, and boards of directors with Torts/Legal Writing experienced corporate advice on fiduciary duties, corporate University of Notre Dame, B.S.E.E., structuring, stockholder agreements, complex commercial 1987 arrangements and transformative strategic undertakings. Lead Engineer/Manager, Northrop, He offers deep knowledge of business and legal issues in the Reliability Engineering Group, 1987- manufacturing, retail, infrastructure, agriculture, aerospace, and 1989 technology sectors, and is a founding member of O’Melveny’s Water Industry Practice. John leads O’Melveny’s Equity Investment Committee, an internal group managing the investment of more than US$180 million of the firm’s retirement funds. He is the Chair of the O’Melveny Scholarship Program, which provides college scholarships and mentors to fifth graders at LAUSD’s O’Melveny Elementary School, with the goal of encouraging each “O’Melveny Scholar” to succeed academically and pursue a college education. O’Melveny & Myers LLP 1 Experience • Representing Guess?, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven L. Lichtenfeld
    Contact Steven L. Lichtenfeld Partner New York +1.212.969.3735 [email protected] Steven L. Lichtenfeld is co-head of our market-leading Real Estate Capital Markets and Real Estate Finance Groups and a founding member of our Private Equity Real Estate Group. He regularly advises real estate funds, REITs, sovereign wealth funds, institutional lenders, specialty lenders, hedge funds, and pension advisors regarding public offerings and private placements of real estate-related debt and equity securities, real estate-related mergers and acquisitions, real estate preferred equity investments and joint ventures, real estate-related senior and mezzanine financings and other corporate, partnership and limited liability company matters. Steven has been widely recognized as a driving force in the real estate capital markets and finance space during his more than thirty-five year career. He has garnered several prestigious accolades in this area, including receiving a coveted ranking from Chambers USA, which has described him as “a brilliant real estate attorney with experience in many asset classes.” Chambers has also described Steven as “highly analytical and highly strategic” and “encyclopedic in terms of his knowledge” in handling a broad spectrum of public and private debt offerings, M&A, joint venture and other corporate real estate matters. Steven is also recommended for Real Estate and REITs by Legal 500 United States and is consistently recognized as a leading real estate lawyer in Best Lawyers in America and Super Lawyers. Proskauer.com Steven has a unique skill set that allows him to quarterback a broad spectrum of transactions including public REIT offerings (both traded and non-traded), real estate mergers and acquisitions, real estate preferred equity investments and joint ventures and real estate recapitalizations and reorganizations.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Employees' Retirement System
    THE CITY OF NEW YORK TELEPHONE: (212) 669-8318 OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER FAX NUMBER: (212) 815-8503 BUREAU OF ASSET MANAGEMENT WWW.COMPTROLLER.NYC.GOV 1 CENTRE STREET ROOM 736 EMAIL: [email protected] NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007-2341 Scott C. Evans ───────────── Chief Investment Officer SCOTT M. STRINGER COMPTROLLER MEMORANDUM TO: Trustees New York City Police Pension Fund FROM: Scott C. Evans DATE: February 24, 2015 RE: New York City Police Pension Fund Investment Meeting – March 3, 2015 Enclosed is a copy of the public agenda for the March 3, 2015 Investment Meeting. The meeting will be held at the Police Pension Fund, 233 Broadway – 25th Floor; beginning at 10:00am. Please remember to bring your Quarterly Performance Overview book with you to the meeting, it will be mailed to you. If you have questions about any agenda item, please give me a call at 212-669-8318. I:\Investment Strategy\Agendas\AGENDAS -POLICE\03 - March 3, 2015\Memo (Public).doc 1 THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER 1 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007-2341 ───────────── Scott M. Stringer COMPTROLLER NEW YORK CITY POLICE PENSION FUND INVESTMENT MEETING MARCH 3, 2015 2 NEW YORK CITY POLICE PENSION FUND INVESTMENT MEETING MARCH 3, 2015 PUBLIC AGENDA Page I. Performance Reviews: (30 Minutes) • Quarterly Review/Annual Review – December 31, 2014 (To be distributed) 6 • ETI Quarterly Report – December 31, 2014 • Private Equity Quarterly Report – September 30, 2014 12 • Real Assets Quarterly Report – September 30, 2014 43 II. January Monthly Performance Review: (30 Minutes) (Material to be sent under separate cover) --- APPENDICES: • Basket Clause 74 • Liquidity Analysis 76 3 PUBLIC AGENDA 4 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review
    The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review www.preqin.com/PEFOF Dear Spotlight Reader, This month’s edition of Spotlight includes extensive analysis on the private equity fund of funds market. We have seen funds of funds accounting for a higher percentage of investors in closed funds in comparison with previous years, and are also seeing an increasing number of investors turning to funds of funds in 2009 compared with 2008. All analysis is taken from our newly released publication, The 2010 Preqin Private Equity Fund of Funds Review. Also in this month’s edition, we examine the use of investment consultants by institutional investors, reveal the latest changes in the returns and NAV of private equity funds, and uncover all the latest investor news. We hope you enjoy this month’s edition, and as ever we welcome any feedback, questions and suggestions for any research that you would like to see in Spotlight in the future. Kindest Regards, Tim Friedman Head of Communications Preqin Private Equity Spotlight www.preqin.com December 2009 / Volume 5 - Issue 12 Welcome to the latest edition of Private Equity Spotlight, the monthly newsletter from Preqin providing insights into private equity performance, investors and fundraising. Private Equity Spotlight combines information from our online products Performance Analyst, Investor Intelligence, Fund Manager Profi les & Funds in Market. PE Fund of Funds Special Feature Article Secondaries Spotlight page 3 page 16 The Growing Importance of Funds of Funds We look at statistics from Preqin’s industry-leading product, Secondaries Market Monitor, and uncover the latest secondaries With other institutional backers of private equity funds having news.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Wayne BURKLE Dossier 2 Jul 2021
    Ronald Wayne BURKLE Dossier 2 Jul 2021 The materials herein are solely for member's internal business purposes to assist in the acquisition and retention of member's clients (i.e. permitted purpose). Except as required by the law, member will not reveal these materials to any person or entity whose data is contained herein or to persons acting on their behalf. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Wealth-X excludes and disclaims all conditions, terms, representations and warranties relating to the subject matter hereof, whether express or implied, including the implied warranties of satisfactory quality and fitness for a particular purpose. While every attempt is taken to ensure that these materials are kept up to date, Wealth-X cannot guarantee that information contained in them in relation to any person or entity will not have changed or be correct. Ronald Wayne BURKLE Primary Position Managing Partner Source Self-Made Primary Company The Yucaipa Companies Age 68 Estimated Net Worth At least $2.1 billion Birthday 12 Nov 1952 Estimated Liquid Assets At least $1.7 billion Marital Status Divorced Estimated Household Wealth - Religion Unknown Estimated Household Liquid Alternate Names Ron Burkle Assets Estimated Family's Net Worth Estimated Family's Liquid Assets Wealth Trend Majority of fortune fluctuates with the broad equity and bond markets; remainder fluctuates with the performance of Pittsburgh Penguins and The Yucaipa Companies. Residences London, Greater London, United Kingdom Beverly Hills, California, United States Oak Glen, California, United States Yucaipa, California, United States Los Olivos, California, United States Hometown Pomona, California, United States Biography American businessman; studied dentistry at California State Polytechnic University, a Pomona, California-based public polytechnic university, but never graduated.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Development Investment Review, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2007
    Volume 3, Issue 1, 2007 Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW www.frbsf.org/cdinvestments Articles A History of Emerging Domestic Markets Glenn Yago, Betsy Zeidman, Alethea Abuyuan Who’s Counting? Measuring Social Outcomes from Targeted Private Equity Janneke Ratcliffe Panning for Gold in Inner City Markets Prabal Chakrabarti Investment Intermediaries in Economic Development: Linking Public Pension Funds to Urban Revitalization Lisa A. Hagerman, Gordon L. Clark, and Tessa Hebb The Brookings Urban Markets Initiative: Using Information to Drive Change Alyssa Stewart Lee Commentary Gregory B. Fairchild University of Virginia Phil Angelides NTER FO CE R C O Riverview Capital Investments and S M T N former California State Treasurer M E U M N T I T S FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO Michael A. Stegman Y E V MacArthur Foundation D N E I VE T LOPMEN Table of Contents ARTICLES A History of Emerging Domestic Markets ................................................................................................1 Glenn Yago, Betsy Zeidman, Alethea Abuyuan The Milken Institute’s Center for Emerging Domestic Markets has been a leader in researching and writing about the issue of expanding investment in traditionally undervalued and undercapitalized entrepreneurs, enterprises and communities, including women and ethnic business owners, urban cores, rural areas and low- income populations. This article traces the evolution of the emerging domestic market concept and provides a guide to the existing literature. Who’s Counting? Measuring Social Outcomes from Targeted Private Equity ...........................................23 Janneke Ratcliffe The potential of private equity investment in emerging domestic markets to deliver strong financial returns while also giving rise to public benefits has drawn the attention of both venture and economic development capital, as well as policymakers and researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Eimskipafélag Íslands Hf
    Eimskipafélag Íslands hf. Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended 31 December 2012 EUR Eimskipafélag Íslands hf. Korngardar 2 104 Reykjavík Iceland Reg. no. 690409-0460 Contents Endorsement by the Board of Directors and the CEO ........................................................................................... 3 Independent Auditor's Report ................................................................................................................................ 5 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income ............................................................................................. 6 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ....................................................................................................... 8 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ..................................................................................................... 9 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ................................................................................................................. 10 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements ................................................................................................... 11 Quarterly Statements ............................................................................................................................................. 35 Corporate Governance Statement ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Food Distribution Research Volume 30 Part 01 Page 0005
    Food Retailing Consolidation: Implications for Supply Chain Management Practices Phil R. Kaufman In recent years, the food retailing industry has of the top four and eight retailers remained fairly undergone unprecedented reorganization through stable through 1996. There was little change in the mergers and acquisitions among its largest firms. top four, eight, and 20 firms' share of sales, which These actions have raised concerns about the de- averaged 17.4, 27.3, and 41.8 percent, respectively, gree of competition and the ability of large retail- over the three years. Between 1996 and 1997, the ers to gain market power. Merging retailers often leading 20 retailers' share rose four percentage cite potential cost savings through consolidation points, reaching 47 percent of grocery store sales of purchases from food and non-food suppliers. while the top four and eight firm shares rose Because supply chain management practices en- somewhat less. Aggregate concentration is esti- compass these objectives, it is likely that retailers mated to reach new heights in 1998, with the top will employ such methods to successfully achieve four shares jumping nine percentage points to 29 stated efficiency and cost reduction goals. percent, and the top eight firms' share rising by I first present three measures of consolida- eight percentage points to 39 percent. The top 20 tion, then discuss major mergers and acquisitions firms' share increased less dramatically, reaching in recent years. I next identify the likely driving an estimated 51.5 percent (Figure 2). forces of retailer consolidation, after which fol- Aggregate concentration measures in food re- lows specific supply chain management objectives tailing are less comparable with other industries- and the practices that retailers are likely to adopt such as food manufacturing, for example, whose larg- under each objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Uneven Resistance to Inequality in the Spaces of Food Labor and Urban Land Use Politics
    MAPPING POWER RELATIONS IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOOD MOVEMENT: UNEVEN RESISTANCE TO INEQUALITY IN THE SPACES OF FOOD LABOR AND URBAN LAND USE POLITICS By JOSHUA SBICCA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2014 1 © 2014 Joshua Sbicca 2 For Jennifer and human flourishing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is a collective product. While there were times when I felt like a lone wolf in the desert support in the form of critical feedback, encouragement, a hug, or a hot meal were readily and often supplied. In the first semester of graduate school, I took a seminar in Environmental Justice from Brian Mayer. Wanting to understand how people were fighting for environmental goods, I became enamored with the topic of food. No one in the department is a food scholar, but I received nothing but support from all those I encountered. Beginning with my master’s degree, Brian and Christine Overdevest were strong supporters of my work, and endorsed my qualitative project in the hopes this would feed into a dissertation. In addition, Stephen Perz always allowed my intellectual curiosities to guide me, partially because we share a wide view of environmentally related social science. Moreover, he offered regular constructive criticism and editing advice for my first two publications. I especially want to thank Whitney Sanford for requiring that we read Marx’s Ecology by John Bellamy Foster. This work proved to be a deep source of inspiration at a critical time in my graduate training.
    [Show full text]