Mclaren Report #2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mclaren Report #2 RICHARD H. MCLAREN, O.C. INDEPENDENT PERSON WADA INVESTIGATION OF SOCHI ALLEGATIONS 9 December 2016 Via Email: [email protected] to be forwarded President Sir Craig Reedie World Anti-Doping Agency Stock Exchange Tower 800 Place Victoria (Suite 1700) Montréal, QC H4Z 1B7 Re: Report to the President of WADA by the Independent Person Dear President Reedie: I, as the Independent Person, have completed the enclosed Report, dated 9 December 2016, which is submitted to you pursuant to the Terms of Reference that established the Independent Investigation. This Report fulfills the mandate of the Independent Person. I appreciate having had the opportunity to be of service. Yours truly, Richard H. McLaren IP in Sochi Investigation [email protected] THE INDEPENDENT PERSON 2nd REPORT Professor Richard H. McLaren, O.C. 9 December 2016 Table of Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1: Executive Summary of 2nd IP Report ....................................................... 1 Key Highlights of 2nd Report ................................................................................................. 1 Institutionalised Doping Conspiracy and Cover Up ....................................................... 1 The Athlete Part of Conspiracy and Cover Up ................................................................. 2 London Summer Olympic Games ...................................................................................... 2 IAAF Moscow World Championships .............................................................................. 3 Sochi Winter Olympic Games ............................................................................................. 3 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Appointment of the IP ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3 1st Report Key Findings ..................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Constraints of the 1st Report ............................................................................................. 7 1.4.1 Response to 1st Report Findings ................................................................................. 7 1.5 Completion of the IP’s Mandate ..................................................................................... 9 1.6 IP Investigative Method .................................................................................................. 10 1.7 Chronology of Events ...................................................................................................... 16 1.8 Highlights .......................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: Athletes Benefiting from Manipulations and Concealment of Positive Tests ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3: The Moscow Laboratory and the Disappearing Positive Methodology (“DPM”) ............................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 4: The Olympic Games Year and London 2012 ............................................... 23 Chapter 5: IAAF Moscow World Championships and Events of 2013 ....................... 25 Chapter 6: Sochi 2014 The XXII Olympic Winter Games .............................................. 27 Chapter 7: Samples Swapping After Sochi ..................................................................... 29 1.9 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 30 Chapter 2: Athletes Benefiting from Manipulations Concealing Positive Doping Tests .................................................................................................................. 32 Chapter 2 Highlights ............................................................................................................. 32 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 35 2.2 Individual Russian Athletes .......................................................................................... 35 2.3 Potential Violations of Code Article 2.2 ...................................................................... 36 2.3.1 Contextual Evidence .................................................................................................. 37 2.3.2 ITP Screen of the Moscow Laboratory Indicating Possible Prohibited Substances (DPM) ............................................................................................................... 41 2.3.3 Forensic Evidence ...................................................................................................... 44 2.3.4 Additional Evidence of Doping and Doping Cover-Up Related to Individual Athletes Provided by Dr. Rodchenkov. ........................................................................... 45 2.4 Potential Violations of Code Article 2.5. ..................................................................... 46 2.5 Potential Violations of Code Article 2.8/2.9 ................................................................ 46 2.6 Potential Violations of Code Article 2.1 ...................................................................... 47 i Chapter 3: The Moscow Laboratory & the Disappearing Positive Methodology (“DPM”) .......................................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 3 Highlights ............................................................................................................. 49 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 49 3.2 The IP’s Findings on the Moscow Laboratory and the DPM .................................. 52 3.3 DPM Communication Methods .................................................................................... 53 3.4 DPM Investigative Results ............................................................................................. 57 3.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 59 Chapter 4: The Olympic Games Year and London 2012 ........................................ 60 Chapter 4 Highlights ............................................................................................................. 60 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 61 4.2 The Lay of the Land in Russia 2012 .............................................................................. 63 4.3 Incident: WADA Directed Testing of “67 Samples” ................................................. 65 4.4 Reaction: Russian Response as a result of WADA Testing Incident ..................... 70 4.5 The Bereg Kit Washout Technique: London 2012 .................................................... 71 4.5.1 Weakness of Bereg kit Washout Testing ................................................................ 72 4.6 The XXX Olympiad: London 2012 ................................................................................. 73 4.6.1 London 2012 Retesting Results and IP Intelligence given to the IOC ................ 74 4.7 Athlete Case Study ........................................................................................................... 77 4.8 Summary of Findings ...................................................................................................... 77 Chapter 5: Moscow Championships and Events of 2013 ....................................... 79 Chapter 5 Highlights ............................................................................................................. 79 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 80 5.2 Eliminating the Identified Vulnerabilities in the Doping Cover up and Manipulation Conspiracy ..................................................................................................... 82 5.2.1. Sample Swapping ..................................................................................................... 82 5.2.2 “Under the Table” Washout Testing ....................................................................... 84 5.3 Universiade Games: Trial Run on Sample Swapping .............................................. 85 5.4 2013 Moscow IAAF World Championships (“Moscow Championships”) ........... 88 5.5 Corruption Related to Positive Doping Results ......................................................... 89 5.6 Washout Prior to Moscow Championships ................................................................ 91 5.7 Sample Swapping at the Moscow Championships ................................................... 92 Chapter 6: Sochi 2014 The XXII Olympic Winter Games ...................................... 93 Chapter 6 Highlights ............................................................................................................. 93 6.1
Recommended publications
  • Lausanne 2016: Long Jump W
    Women's Long Jump Diamond Race 25.08.2016 Start list Long Jump Time: 21:00 Records Order Athlete Nat NR PB SB 1 Blessing OKAGBARE-IGHOTEGUONOR NGR 7.12 7.00 6.73 WR 7.52 Galina CHISTYAKOVA URS Leningrad 11.06.88 2 Christabel NETTEY CAN 6.99 6.99 6.75 AR 7.52 Galina CHISTYAKOVA URS Leningrad 11.06.88 NR 6.84 Irene PUSTERLA SUI Chiasso 20.08.11 3 Akela JONES BAR 6.75 6.75 6.75 WJR 7.14 Heike DRECHSLER GDR Bratislava 04.06.83 4 Lorraine UGEN GBR 7.07 6.92 6.76 MR 7.48 Heike DRECHSLER GER 08.07.92 5 Shara PROCTOR GBR 7.07 7.07 6.80 DLR 7.25 Brittney REESE USA Doha 10.05.13 6 Darya KLISHINA RUS 7.52 7.05 6.84 SB 7.31 Brittney REESE USA Eugene 02.07.16 7 Ivana SPANOVIĆ SRB 7.08 7.08 7.08 8 Tianna BARTOLETTA USA 7.49 7.17 7.17 2016 World Outdoor list 7.31 +1.7 Brittney REESE USA Eugene 02.07.16 7.17 +0.6 Tianna BARTOLETTA USA Rio de Janeiro 17.08.16 Medal Winners Diamond Race 7.16 +1.6 Sosthene MOGUENARA GER Weinheim 29.05.16 1 Ivana SPANOVIĆ (SRB) 36 7.08 +0.6 Ivana SPANOVIĆ SRB Rio de Janeiro 17.08.16 2016 - Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games 2 Brittney REESE (USA) 16 7.05 +2.0 Brooke STRATTON AUS Perth 12.03.16 1. Tianna BARTOLETTA (USA) 7.17 3 Christabel NETTEY (CAN) 15 6.95 +0.6 Malaika MIHAMBO GER Rio de Janeiro 17.08.16 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 World Championships Statistics
    2019 World Championships Statistics – Women’s DT by K Ken Nakamura The records to look for in Doha: 1) Perkovic can complete medal set by winning a bronze 2) Can Cuban (Perez and Caballero) win gold and silver, joining GDR as second to do so? 3) Can Caballero become 5th WDT to win gold for the second time at WC? Summary: All time Performance List at the World Championships Performance Performer Dist Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 71.62 Martina Hellmann GDR 1 Roma 1987 2 2 71.02 Tsvetanka Khristova BUL 1 To kyo 1991 3 3 70.31 Sandra Perkovic CRO 1 London 2017 4 4 70.12 Diana Gansky GDR 2 Roma 1987 5 69.67 Sandra Perkovic 1qA London 2017 6 5 69.64 Dani Stevens AUS 2 London 2017 7 6 69.28 Denia Caballero CUB 1 Beijing 2015 8 7 69.12 Ilke Wylud da GER 2 Tokyo 1991 9 68.94 Martina Optiz 1 Helsinki 1983 10 68.82 Tsvetanka Khristova 3 Roma 1987 Margin of Victory Difference Distance Name Nat Venue Year Max 2.23m 66.56 Franka Dietzsch GER Helsinki 2005 2.09m 68.14 Franka Dietzsch GER Sevilla 1999 Min 13cm 65.44 Dani Samuels AUS Berlin 2009 18cm 67.32 Irina Yatchenko BLR Paris 2003 Best Marks for Places in the World Championships Pos Distance Name Nat Venue Year 1 71.62 Martina Hellmann GDR Roma 1987 2 70.12 Diana Gansky GDR Roma 1987 69.64 Dani Stevens AUS London 2017 69.12 Ilke Wyludda GER Tokyo 1991 3 68.82 Tsvetanka Khristova BUL Roma 1987 4 68.20 Ilke Wyludda GDR Roma 1987 Multiple Medalists: Sandra Perkovic (CRO): 2013 Gold; 2015 Silver, 2017 Gold Yarelis Barrios (CUB): 2007 Silver, 2009 Silver, 2011 Bronze Franka Dietzsch (GER): 1999 Gold, 2005
    [Show full text]
  • Women's 3000M Steeplechase
    Games of the XXXII Olympiad • Biographical Entry List • Women Women’s 3000m Steeplechase Entrants: 47 Event starts: August 1 Age (Days) Born SB PB 1003 GEGA Luiza ALB 32y 266d 1988 9:29.93 9:19.93 -19 NR Holder of all Albanian records from 800m to Marathon, plus the Steeplechase 5000 pb: 15:36.62 -19 (15:54.24 -21). 800 pb: 2:01.31 -14. 1500 pb: 4:02.63 -15. 3000 pb: 8:52.53i -17, 8:53.78 -16. 10,000 pb: 32:16.25 -21. Half Mar pb: 73:11 -17; Marathon pb: 2:35:34 -20 ht EIC 800 2011/2013; 1 Balkan 1500 2011/1500; 1 Balkan indoor 1500 2012/2013/2014/2016 & 3000 2018/2020; ht ECH 800/1500 2012; 2 WSG 1500 2013; sf WCH 1500 2013 (2015-ht); 6 WIC 1500 2014 (2016/2018-ht); 2 ECH 3000SC 2016 (2018-4); ht OLY 3000SC 2016; 5 EIC 1500 2017; 9 WCH 3000SC 2019. Coach-Taulant Stermasi Marathon (1): 1 Skopje 2020 In 2021: 1 Albanian winter 3000; 1 Albanian Cup 3000SC; 1 Albanian 3000/5000; 11 Doha Diamond 3000SC; 6 ECP 10,000; 1 ETCh 3rd League 3000SC; She was the Albanian flagbearer at the opening ceremony in Tokyo (along with weightlifter Briken Calja) 1025 CASETTA Belén ARG 26y 307d 1994 9:45.79 9:25.99 -17 Full name-Belén Adaluz Casetta South American record holder. 2017 World Championship finalist 5000 pb: 16:23.61 -16. 1500 pb: 4:19.21 -17. 10 World Youth 2011; ht WJC 2012; 1 Ibero-American 2016; ht OLY 2016; 1 South American 2017 (2013-6, 2015-3, 2019-2, 2021-3); 2 South American 5000 2017; 11 WCH 2017 (2019-ht); 3 WSG 2019 (2017-6); 3 Pan-Am Games 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 5427 Ilvir Khuzin V
    Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2017/A/5427 Ilvir Khuzin v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 23 July 2018 (operative part of 1 February 2018) Panel: Prof. Christoph Vedder (Germany), President; Mr Hamid Gharavi (France); Mr Dirk-Reiner Martens (Germany) Bobsleigh Doping (use of a prohibited substance or method; tampering with doping control; cover-up of and complicity in the commission of an ADRV) Standard of proof in general Standard of proof with regard to the alleged doping scheme Means of proof Liability of the athlete in case of substitution of the content of his/her sample Elevated urinary sodium concentrations Use of a prohibited method Use of a prohibited substance Tampering with any part of doping control Administration of a prohibited method or substance to an athlete Cover-up of or complicity in the commission of an ADRV Consequences to the team of the disqualification of a team member’s individual results Appropriate length of the Olympic ineligibility 1. The comfortable satisfaction standard is well-known in CAS practice, as it has been the normal CAS standard in many anti-doping cases even prior to the World Anti- Doping Code (WADC). The test of comfortable satisfaction must take into account the circumstances of the case. Those circumstances include the paramount importance of fighting corruption of any kind in sport and also considering the nature and restricted powers of the investigation authorities of the governing bodies of sport as compared to national formal interrogation authorities. The gravity of the particular alleged wrongdoing is relevant to the application of the comfortable satisfaction standard in any given case.
    [Show full text]
  • AT-HT-W-F--A--.RS1.Pdf
    Daegu (KOR) World Championships 27 August - 4 September 2011 RESULTS Hammer Throw Women - Final 04 SEP 2011 - 18:15 RESULT NAME AGE VENUE DATE World Record 79.42 Betty HEIDLER (GER) 28 Halle 21 May 11 Championships Record 77.96 Anita WLODARCZYK (POL) 24 Berlin 22 Aug 09 World Leading 79.42 Betty HEIDLER (GER) 28 Halle 21 May 11 START TIME 18:10 TEMPERATURE 28°C HUMIDITY 54% END TIME 19:37 TEMPERATURE 27°C HUMIDITY 54% PLACE BIB NAME COUNTRY DATE OF BIRTH ORDER RESULT 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 772 Tatyana LYSENKO RUS 9 OCT 83 6 77.13 SB 76.80 77.09 77.13 74.51 75.05 X 타티아나 리센코 1983년 10월 9일 2 420 Betty HEIDLER GER 14 OCT 83 3 76.06 X 73.96 74.70 X 76.06 X 베티 하이들러 1983년 10월 14일 3 246 ZHANG Wenxiu CHN 22 MAR 86 4 75.03 75.03 74.31 X 73.17 71.86 74.79 장 웬시우 1986년 3월 22일 4 285 Yipsi MORENO CUB 19 NOV 80 12 74.48 SB 73.29 X 74.48 X X X 입시 모레노 1980년 11월 19일 5 715 Anita WLODARCZYK POL 8 AUG 85 8 73.56 SB 73.56 X 72.61 X X 72.65 아니타 볼다르치크 1985년 8월 8일 6 733 Bianca PERIE ROU 1 JUN 90 10 72.04 SB 67.73 70.40 67.75 70.24 70.91 72.04 비앙카 페리 1990년 6월 1일 7 424 Kathrin KLAAS GER 8 FEB 84 1 71.89 67.02 70.18 70.67 71.89 70.44 X 카트린 클라스 1984년 2월 8일 8 650 Zalina MARGHIEVA MDA 5 FEB 88 5 70.27 69.99 X 68.13 70.24 70.27 68.76 잘리나 마르기에바 1988년 2월 5일 9 506 Silvia SALIS ITA 17 SEP 85 11 69.88 68.61 69.88 X 실비아 살리스 1985년 9월 17일 10 105 Jennifer DAHLGREN ARG 21 APR 84 7 69.72 68.27 X 69.72 헤니퍼 달그렌 1984년 4월 21일 11 928 Jessica COSBY USA 31 MAY 82 9 68.91 X 68.91 68.15 제시카 코스비 1982년 5월 31일 12 364 Stéphanie FALZON FRA 7 JAN 83 2 66.57 66.57 X X 스테파니 팔존 1983년 1월 7일 ALL-TIME TOP LIST
    [Show full text]
  • El Periódico
    EL PERIÓDICO Lydia Valentín: "Sabía que competía con rivales que no iban limpias" La bronce olímpica de halterofilia en Rio 2016 recuperará también medallas de Pekín 2008 y Londres 2012 JORDI COTRINA Lydia Valentín posa este viernes en Barcelona. JOAN CARLES ARMENGOL / BARCELONA VIERNES, 21 DE OCTUBRE DEL 2016 - 18:01 CEST Lydia Valentín está en Barcelona. Esta sábado se pone delante de 300 personas en una clase magistral de fitness, patrocinada porBridgestone, bajo el lema 'Persigue tu sueño, supera los obstáculos', que viene como anillo al dedo a una deportista que ha llegado a lo más alto en su modalidad, la halterofilia, tras superar multitud de piedras en el camino y vicisitudes de lo más pintorescas. La leonesa de Camponaraya, pequeño pueblo cercano aPonferrada (León) donde nació hace 31 años, es la única deportista que en un mes ha sido medallista olímpica tres veces… en tres Juegos distintos. A principios de agosto se enteró de que el podio de su categoría (75 kilos) de Londres 2012 se había caído entero al reanalizarse las muestras antidopaje, lo que le daba la victoria; el día 12 se colgó el bronce en Río 2016, y pocos días después de regresar a casa otra revisión de Pekín 2008 la llevó del quinto al segundo puesto. Oro, bronce y plata en un mes. "Voy a reclamar las medallas y los premios del 2008 y el 2012 porque es justo y estoy en mi derecho" -¡Qué montón de sensaciones debió sentir durante ese mes, ¿no?!Muchísimas. Fue la mezcla de muchos sentimientos. Primero sentí una alegría inmensa, pero después piensas: ¡Cómo me han podido fastidiar tanto! ¡Cómo es posible que se permita esto! Estamos hablando de deporte.
    [Show full text]
  • The Negative Implications of Russia's Doping Scandal on The
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1427-9657.08.07 EASTERN REVIEW 2019, T. 8 Anna Kobierecka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-6452 University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland Faculty of International Relations and Political Science e-mail: [email protected] Michał Marcin Kobierecki https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-5710 University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland Faculty of International Relations and Political Science e-mail: [email protected] The negative implications of Russia’s doping scandal on the country’s international image* Abstract. In December 2014, Russia was accused of developing a state-organized doping system in the second decade of the twenty-first century. The scandal resulted in many Russian athletes being banned from competing in the Olympics in Rio in 2016 and the IOC’s suspension of the Russian National Olympic Committee prior to the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang. The research presented in this article aims to answer the research question of whether the doping scandal actually affected the international image of Russia. The research was conducted with the use of frame analysis of public discourse. The hypothesis to be tested states that the Russian doping scandal contributed to the intensification of a negative external image of this state. Keywords: Russia, doping, sports diplomacy, nation branding, image of a country. * This work was supported by National Science Centre, Poland grant number 2015/19/D/ HS5/00513, grant holder: Michał Marcin Kobierecki). © by the author, licensee Łódź University – Łódź University Press, Łódź, Poland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 162 Anna Kobierecka, Michał Marcin Kobierecki Introduction Sports are believed to play various political roles, both in states’ internal policies and in international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY 3000 Metres Steeplechase Women - Round 1
    Daegu (KOR) World Championships 27 August - 4 September 2011 SUMMARY 3000 Metres Steeplechase Women - Round 1 27 AUG 2011 First 4 in each heat (Q) and the next 3 fastest (q) advance to the Final RESULT NAME AGE VENUE DATE World Record 8:58.81 Gulnara GALKINA (RUS) 30 Beijing (National Stadium) 17 Aug 08 Championships Record 9:06.57 Ekaterina VOLKOVA (RUS) 29 Osaka 27 Aug 07 World Leading 9:12.89 Milcah Chemos CHEYWA (KEN) 25 Roma 26 May 11 RANK BIB NAME COUNTRY DATE OF BIRTH HEAT PLACE RESULT 1 867 Binnaz USLU TUR 12 MAR 85 1 1 9:24.06 NR Q 비나스 우스루 1985년 3월 12일 2 853 Habiba GHRIBI TUN 9 APR 84 1 2 9:24.56 Q 하비바 그리비 1984년 4월 9일 3 584 Mercy Wanjiku NJOROGE KEN 10 JUN 86 1 3 9:24.95 Q 멜시 완지쿠 조지 1986년 6월 10일 4 646 Hanane OUHADDOU MAR 82 1 4 9:25.96 SB Q 하나네 우하도우 1982년 1월 1일 5 346 Birtukan FENTE ETH 18 JUN 89 1 5 9:28.82 q 비르투칸 펜테 1989년 6월 18일 6 337 Sofia ASSEFA ETH 14 NOV 87 2 1 9:32.48 Q 소피아 아세파 1987년 11월 14일 7 574 Milcah Chemos CHEYWA KEN 24 FEB 86 3 1 9:35.61 Q 밀카 체모스 체이와 1986년 2월 24일 8 791 Yuliya ZARIPOVA RUS 26 APR 86 3 2 9:35.80 Q 울리아 자루드네바 자리포바 1986년 4월 26일 9 427 Gesa Felicitas KRAUSE GER 3 AUG 92 3 3 9:35.83 PB Q 게사 펠리시타스 크라우스 1992년 8월 3일 10 588 Lydia Chebet ROTICH KEN 8 AUG 88 2 2 9:36.70 Q 리디아 제벳 로티시 1988년 8월 8일 11 725 Sara MOREIRA POR 17 OCT 85 2 3 9:36.97 Q 사라 모레이라 1985년 10월 17일 12 334 Birtukan ADAMU ETH 29 APR 92 3 4 9:37.31 Q 비르투칸 아다무 1992년 4월 29일 13 402 Barbara PARKER GBR 8 NOV 82 3 5 9:38.21 q 바바라 파커 1982년 11월 8일 14 927 Emma COBURN USA 19 OCT 90 2 4 9:38.42 Q 엠마 코번 1990년 10월 19일 15 762 Lyubov KHARLAMOVA RUS 2 MAR 81 2 5 9:40.04
    [Show full text]
  • Report on World Anti-Doping Agency Governance As Required by House Report 116-456 May 17, 2021
    EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY Washington, DC 20503 Report on World Anti-Doping Agency Governance as required by House Report 116-456 May 17, 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) is pleased to have this opportunity to update Members of Congress on the fight against doping and the ongoing efforts at governance reform within the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). As the sole international regulatory body against doping in sport, WADA has a unique responsibility to ensure that international competitions, especially the Olympic and Paralympic Games, are fairly conducted with the highest possible standards of integrity. Significant additional reforms to the way WADA is structured and operates are required to ensure that the organization is able operate with “independence and transparency of its operations, enhancing the role of athletes in WADA decision-making, and restoring confidence in clean competition.”1 ONDCP recognizes that this degree of change is challenging to accomplish and will require dialogue and cooperation among all key stakeholders. This Report provides an overview of the threat of doping and related corruption to sport (Section 1); then describes the progress of reform at WADA to date (Section 2); and follows with a discussion of the top ten reform challenges faced by WADA and its stakeholders, accompanied by a roadmap on how to begin addressing them (Section 3). It is WADA’s job to monitor anti-doping programs including drug testing, not just during the Olympics, but year-round. Elite athletes who participate in doping often do so with the assistance of highly skilled scientists who carefully develop protocols to reduce or eliminate the chances they will be caught.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hundred Russian Whistleblowers the Subject Referring to Protection Of
    Report of the International Human Rights Group Agora The hundred Russian whistleblowers The subject referring to protection of individuals who reveal information about violations to the public gets more and more topical not only in Russia, where the whistleblowers are regularly subjected to retaliation, including murders, violence, prosecution and imposing of disciplinary measures, but also in the rest of the world. The questions relevant to protection of whistleblowers have become subject to discussions in the UN, OSCE, Council of Europe, OECD, the bodies of the European Union and the G20. Up to date the national legislations of more than 60 countries envisage various measures aimed at guaranteeing of security and protection from retaliation of individuals who objectively act in favor of society by revealing of inaccessible information. The review of the subject relevant to protection of whistleblowers shall include the existing materials in the field. Mainly the Project on basic principles of laws on reporting of facts about corruption and illegal activities1 realized by Transparency International and the report of experts of this organization published in 2012 on ‘Corruption Reporting and Whistleblower Protection’2 describing in details the existing international and foreign approaches that may be used at elaboration of mechanisms for protection of individuals who report violations of greater size. The assurance of access to information is one of the problems closely related to the protection of whistleblowers. According to a report of Team 29 ‘The right to know’ the practice in Russia when it comes to assurance of access to information is not always in conformity to the international requirements and often contradicts to these requirements3.
    [Show full text]
  • HEEL and TOE ONLINE the Official Organ of The
    Bahrain HEEL AND TOE ONLINE The official organ of the Victorian Race Walking Club 2020/2021 Number 01 Monday 5 October 2020 VRWC Preferred Supplier of Shoes, clothes and sporting accessories. Address: RUNNERS WORLD, 598 High Street, East Kew, Victoria (Melways 45 G4) Telephone: 03 9817 3503 Hours: Monday to Friday: 9:30am to 5:30pm Saturday: 9:00am to 3:00pm Website: http://www.runnersworld.com.au Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Runners-World/235649459888840 PAUL F DEMEESTER TALKS MATTERS IAAF AND IOC Thanks to US Attorney at Law Paul F. DeMeester for another insightful analysis. That is the 29 th in a row and it’s a beauty. You can see links to all Paul’s articles at the bottom of webpage http://www.vrwc.org.au/save-the-50km.shtml. MALE WALKERS SUPPORTING WOMEN’S 50K: A QUENTIN-SSENTIAL DUTY By Paul F. DeMeester I know. I misspelled the word “quintessential.” On purpose. The “Quentin-ssential” in the headline is a reference to New Zealand 50K specialist Quentin Rew, a veteran of two Olympics (27th at London 2012 in 3:55:03; 12th at Rio 2016 in 3:49:32) and five World Championships (23rd at Daegu 2011 in 4:08:46; 16th at Moscow 2013 in 3:50:27; 10th at Beijing 2015 in 3:48:48; 11th in London 2017 in 3:46:29; and 11th at Doha 2019 in 4:15:54). Rew has already qualified for Tokyo 2020, having bested the time limit of 3:50:00 by 12 seconds at the Japanese National Championship last year in Wajima.
    [Show full text]
  • Resultados Oficiais
    Resultados Oficiais Shot Put - M QUALIFICATION Qual. rule: qualification standard 20.20m or at least best 8 qualified. Group A 07 March 2008 - 10:00 Position Bib Athlete Country Mark . 1 346 Reese Hoffa USA 21.49 Q(SB) 2 341 Christian Cantwell USA 20.91 Q. 3 13 Scott Martin AUS 20.83 Q (AR) 4 192 Dorian Scott JAM 20.62 Q (NR) 5 31 Andrei Mikhnevich BLR 20.58 Q . 6 239 Rutger Smith NED 20.30 Q . 7 154 Peter Sack GER 20.27 Q . 8 251 Tomasz Majewski POL 20.23 Q . 9 28 Hamza Alic BIH 20.00 . 10 294 Pavel Sofin RUS 19.95 . 11 304 Miran Vodovnik SLO 19.94 . 12 139 Carl Myerscough GBR 19.86 (SB) 13 310 Milan Haborák SVK 19.80 . 14 93 Manuel Martínez ESP 19.75 (SB) 15 49 Dylan Armstrong CAN 19.56 . 16 111 Robert Häggblom FIN 19.42 . 17 328 Yuriy Bilonoh UKR 19.02 . 18 78 Kim Christensen DEN 18.26 . 19 226 Ivan Emilianov MDA 18.16 . 20 261 Marco Fortes POR 17.96 . 21 324 Ming Huang Chang TPE 17.73 . Athlete 1st 2nd 3rd Reese Hoffa 21.49 Christian Cantwell 19.25 20.91 Scott Martin 20.12 19.85 20.83 Dorian Scott 19.56 20.62 Andrei Mikhnevich 20.58 Rutger Smith 19.96 19.60 20.30 Peter Sack 20.27 Tomasz Majewski 19.89 20.23 Hamza Alic 19.36 20.00 19.96 Pavel Sofin 19.71 19.95 19.95 Miran Vodovnik 19.26 18.94 19.94 Carl Myerscough X X 19.86 Milan Haborák 19.80 X X Manuel Martínez 19.56 19.64 19.75 Dylan Armstrong 19.56 X 19.03 Robert Häggblom 19.41 X 19.42 Yuriy Bilonoh 19.02 X - Kim Christensen 17.95 17.87 18.26 Ivan Emilianov 18.16 18.07 X Marco Fortes X 17.96 X Ming Huang Chang 17.73 X X High Jump - M QUALIFICATION Qual.
    [Show full text]