Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Colombia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae)
Molecular Ecology (2004) 13, 2405–2420 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02213.x ReproductiveBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. effects and geographical distributions of two Wolbachia strains infecting the Neotropical beetle, Chelymorpha alternans Boh. (Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) G. P. KELLER,*†‡ D. M. WINDSOR,* J. M. SAUCEDO* and J. H. WERREN§ *Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 2072, Balboa, Rep. of Panama †University of Georgia, Entomology Department, Athens, GA 80602, §Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627–0211 Abstract Wolbachia are maternally inherited endocellular bacteria known to alter insect host repro- duction to facilitate their own transmission. Multiple Wolbachia infections are more com- mon in tropical than temperate insects but few studies have investigated their dynamics in field populations. The beetle, Chelymorpha alternans, found throughout the Isthmus of Panama, is infected with two strains of Wolbachia, wCalt1 (99.2% of beetles) and wCalt2 (53%). Populations infected solely by the wCalt1 strain were limited to western Pacific Panama, whereas populations outside this region were either polymorphic for single (wCalt1) and double infections (wCalt1 + wCalt2) or consisted entirely of double infec- tions. The wCalt2 strain was not found as a single infection in the wild. Both strains caused cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). The wCalt1 strain caused weak CI (∼20%) and the double infection induced moderate CI (∼70–90%) in crosses with uninfected beetles. The wCalt1 strain rescued about 75% of eggs fertilized by sperm from wCalt2 males. Based on the relation- ships of beetle mtDNA and infection status, maternal transmission, and repeated popula- tion sampling we determined that the double infection invaded C. alternans populations about 100 000 years ago and that the wCalt2 strain appears to be declining in some popula- tions, possibly due to environmental factors. -
Invasive Insects (Adventive Pest Insects) in Florida1
Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. ENY-827 Invasive Insects (Adventive Pest Insects) in Florida1 J. H. Frank and M. C. Thomas2 What is an Invasive Insect? include some of the more obscure native species, which still are unrecorded; they do not include some The term 'invasive species' is defined as of the adventive species that have not yet been 'non-native species which threaten ecosystems, detected and/or identified; and they do not specify the habitats, or species' by the European Environment origin (native or adventive) of many species. Agency (2004). It is widely used by the news media and it has become a bureaucratese expression. This is How to Recognize a Pest the definition we accept here, except that for several reasons we prefer the word adventive (meaning they A value judgment must be made: among all arrived) to non-native. So, 'invasive insects' in adventive species in a defined area (Florida, for Florida are by definition a subset (those that are example), which ones are pests? We can classify the pests) of the species that have arrived from abroad more prominent examples, but cannot easily decide (adventive species = non-native species = whether the vast bulk of them are 'invasive' (= pests) nonindigenous species). We need to know which or not, for lack of evidence. To classify them all into insect species are adventive and, of those, which are pests and non-pests we must draw a line somewhere pests. in a continuum ranging from important pests through those that are uncommon and feed on nothing of How to Know That a Species is consequence to humans, to those that are beneficial. -
Maternal Care in Omaspides Bistriata Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Mesomphaliini)
www.biotaxa.org/rce. ISSN 0718-8994 (online) Revista Chilena de Entomología (2020) 46 (4): 613-622. Research Article Maternal care in Omaspides bistriata Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Mesomphaliini) Cuidado maternal en Omaspides bistriata Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Mesomphaliini) Rolando Ramírez C.1 and Marcela Sánchez-Ocampo2 1Natural and Exact Sciences School (ECEN), Natural resource management (MARENA), Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED), San José, Costa Rica. [email protected] 2 National Museum, Natural History Department, San José, Costa Rica. [email protected] ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: EEA83797-4FCE-4A94-BB6F-CDE31400A1DC https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.46.4.20.07 Abstract. Maternal care (subsociality): characterization of the different stages of maternal care and its efficiency as a strategy. Maternal care and larval development of Omaspides bistriata Boheman, 1862 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Mesomphaliini) are described; including characteristics and manner in which maternal care is given across the different stages of development of the specie (eggs, larvae, pupae and teneral adults). We report the oviposition of eggs, the duration to hatch the eggs, and the duration of larval period, pupal stage, and emergence. A life table and survival curve is presented covering all life stages. Changes in the behavior and feeding habits are also noted for the immatures and the attending mother. Key words: Beetle, behavior, hostplants, parental care. Resumen. Cuidado maternal (subsocialidad): caracterización de las diferentes etapas del cuidado materno y su eficiencia como estrategia. Se describen el cuidado maternal y el desarrollo larvario de Omaspides bistriata Boheman, 1862 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Mesomphaliini); incluyendo características y forma en que se brinda el cuidado materno en las diferentes etapas de desarrollo de la especie (huevos, larvas, pupas y adultos tenerales). -
Chrysomela 43.10-8-04
CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 43.2 July 2004 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Fabreries in Fabreland 2- Editor’s Page St. Leon, France 2- In Memoriam—RP 3- In Memoriam—JAW 5- Remembering John Wilcox Statue of 6- Defensive Strategies of two J. H. Fabre Cassidine Larvae. in the garden 7- New Zealand Chrysomelidae of the Fabre 9- Collecting in Sholas Forests Museum, St. 10- Fun With Flea Beetle Feces Leons, France 11- Whither South African Cassidinae Research? 12- Indian Cassidinae Revisited 14- Neochlamisus—Cryptic Speciation? 16- In Memoriam—JGE 16- 17- Fabreries in Fabreland 18- The Duckett Update 18- Chrysomelidists at ESA: 2003 & 2004 Meetings 19- Recent Chrysomelid Literature 21- Email Address List 23- ICE—Phytophaga Symposium 23- Chrysomela Questionnaire See Story page 17 Research Activities and Interests Johan Stenberg (Umeå Univer- Duane McKenna (Harvard Univer- Eduard Petitpierre (Palma de sity, Sweden) Currently working on sity, USA) Currently studying phyloge- Mallorca, Spain) Interested in the cy- coevolutionary interactions between ny, ecological specialization, population togenetics, cytotaxonomy and chromo- the monophagous leaf beetles, Altica structure, and speciation in the genus somal evolution of Palearctic leaf beetles engstroemi and Galerucella tenella, and Cephaloleia. Needs Arescini and especially of chrysomelines. Would like their common host plant Filipendula Cephaloleini in ethanol, especially from to borrow or exchange specimens from ulmaria (meadow sweet) in a Swedish N. Central America and S. America. Western Palearctic areas. Archipelago. Amanda Evans (Harvard University, Maria Lourdes Chamorro-Lacayo Stefano Zoia (Milan, Italy) Inter- USA) Currently working on a phylogeny (University of Minnesota, USA) Cur- ested in Old World Eumolpinae and of Leptinotarsa to study host use evolu- rently a graduate student working on Mediterranean Chrysomelidae (except tion. -
Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Cassidini)
Genus Vol. 18(3): 487-492 Wrocław, 30 IX 2007 A new species of Microctenochira SPAETH from Belize (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Cassidini) LECH BOROWIEC Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Taxonomy, Zoological Institute, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego 63/77, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] AbsTRACT. Microctenochira belizensis, species new to science, is described from Belize. It belongs to the group of species with elytral pattern forming a regular black ring. Key words: entomology, taxonomy, new species, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae, Cassidini, Microctenochira, Belize. CHAPUIS (1875) proposed the genus Ctenochira for small Cassidinae with pectinate claws. WEISE (1896) designated Coptocycla aciculata Boheman, 1855 as type species of Ctenochira CHAPUIS. SPAETH (1926) in his monograph of the genera from the New World with pectinate claws described within Ctenochira a new subgenus Microcte- nochira with Coptocycla jousselini BOHEMAN, 1855 as type species. HINCKS (1950) noticed that the name Ctenochira CHAPUIS was preoccupied by Ctenochira FOERSTER, 1855 and he proposed a new name Euctenochira for cassidine genus. He overlooked that the name Microctenochira has priority and recently Euctenochira has usually been treated as subgenus of Microctenochira (SEENO and WILCOX 1982, RILEY 1986). In my world catalogue of Cassidinae I noted (BOROWIEC 1999) Euctenochira under synonyms of Microctenochira but without formal synonymization. In my opinion division of the genus into two subgenera is untimely and some species have characters crossed between both proposed subgenera. The genus Microctenochira is well characterized by structure of claws, appendiculate on fore legs and pectinate on mid and hind legs. SPAETH (1926) published a perfect key to the genus, but eight species were described after the date of publication of the key (SPAETH 1932; Świętojańska and BOROWIEC 1995, 1999; BOROWIEC 2002). -
Newsletter Dedicated to Information About the Chrysomelidae Report No
CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 55 March 2017 ICE LEAF BEETLE SYMPOSIUM, 2016 Fig. 1. Chrysomelid colleagues at meeting, from left: Vivian Flinte, Adelita Linzmeier, Caroline Chaboo, Margarete Macedo and Vivian Sandoval (Story, page 15). LIFE WITH PACHYBRACHIS Inside This Issue 2- Editor’s page, submissions 3- 2nd European Leaf Beetle Meeting 4- Intromittant organ &spermathecal duct in Cassidinae 6- In Memoriam: Krishna K. Verma 7- Horst Kippenberg 14- Central European Leaf Beetle Meeting 11- Life with Pachybrachis 13- Ophraella communa in Italy 16- 2014 European leaf beetle symposium 17- 2016 ICE Leaf beetle symposium 18- In Memoriam: Manfred Doberl 19- In Memoriam: Walter Steinhausen 22- 2015 European leaf beetle symposium 23- E-mail list Fig. 1. Edward Riley (left), Robert Barney (center) and Shawn Clark 25- Questionnaire (right) in Dunbar Barrens, Wisconsin, USA. Story, page 11 International Date Book The Editor’s Page Chrysomela is back! 2017 Entomological Society of America Dear Chrysomelid Colleagues: November annual meeting, Denver, Colorado The absence pf Chrysomela was the usual combina- tion of too few submissions, then a flood of articles in fall 2018 European Congress of Entomology, 2016, but my mix of personal and professional changes at July, Naples, Italy the moment distracted my attention. As usual, please consider writing about your research, updates, and other 2020 International Congress of Entomology topics in leaf beetles. I encourage new members to July, Helsinki, Finland participate in the newsletter. A major development in our community was the initiation of a Facebook group, Chrysomelidae Forum, by Michael Geiser. It is popular and connections grow daily. -
Wolbachia Infection Among Coleoptera: a Systematic Review
A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 9 March 2018. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/4471), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Kajtoch Ł, Kotásková N. 2018. Current state of knowledge on Wolbachia infection among Coleoptera: a systematic review. PeerJ 6:e4471 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4471 Current state of knowledge on Wolbachia infection among Coleoptera: a systematic review Lukasz Kajtoch Corresp., 1 , Nela Kotásková 2 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland 2 Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic Corresponding Author: Lukasz Kajtoch Email address: [email protected] Background. Despite great progress in studies on Wolbachia infection in insects, the knowledge about its relations with beetle species, populations and individuals, and the effects of bacteria on these hosts is still unsatisfactory. In this review we summarize the current state of knowledge about Wolbachia occurrence and interactions with Coleopteran hosts. Methods. An intensive search of the available literature resulted in the selection of 81 publications that describe the relevant details about Wolbachia presence among beetles. These publications were then examined with respect to the distribution and taxonomy of infected hosts and diversity of Wolbachia found in beetles. Sequences of Wolbachia genes (16S rDNA, wsp and ftsZ) were used for the phylogenetic analyses. Results. The collected publications revealed that Wolbachia has been confirmed in 197 beetle species and that the estimated average prevalence of this bacteria across beetle species is 38.3% and varies greatly across families and genera (0-88% infected members) and is much lower (c. -
Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Mesomphalia Hope, 1839 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)
Zootaxa 3835 (2): 151–197 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3835.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:007CBD0C-3259-4AFD-9ABB-0E9FE9B3A4C3 Taxonomic Revision of the genus Mesomphalia Hope, 1839 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) MARIANNA V. P. SIMÕES1,3 & MARCELA L. MONNÉ 2,3 ¹Division of Entomology, Biodiversity Research Institute & Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U. S. A. E-mail: [email protected] ²Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940-040, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 3Fellow of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Table of contents Abstract . 151 Resumo . 152 Introduction . 152 Materials and methods. 153 Taxonomy . 153 Mesomphalia Hope, 1839 . 153 Key to species of Mesomphalia Hope . 155 Mesomphalia gibbosa (Fabricius, 1781) . 156 Mesomphalia sublaevis Boheman, 1850. 165 Mesomphalia spaethi Simões & Monné, sp. nov. 167 Mesomphalia turrita (Illiger, 1801) . 168 Mesomphalia subnitens Spaeth, 1917 . 171 Mesomphalia sexmaculosa Boheman, 1856 . 172 Mesomphalia tumidula Boheman, 1850 . 173 Mesomphalia variolaris Boheman, 1850 . 174 Mesomphalia denudata Boheman, 1850 . 176 Mesomphalia retipennis Boheman, 1850 . 177 Mesomphalia latipennis Boheman, 1856 . 178 Mesomphalia nudoplagiata Spaeth, 1901. 179 Mesomphalia albofasciculata Boheman, 1856 . 181 Mesomphalia ampliata Boheman, 1850 . 183 Species excluded from the genus Mesomphalia . 195 Cyrtonota pyramidata (Boheman, 1850), comb. nov. 195 Stolas scrobiculata (Boheman, 1850), comb. nov. 195 Acknowledgments . 195 References . 196 Abstract A revision of the genus Mesomphalia Hope, 1839, is presented based on a detailed morphological study of all species, except M. -
Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) from Brazil
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 113: 352–363, 2016 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2016.046 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparative cytogenetic analysis in 13 tortoise beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) from Brazil AMÁLIA T. LOPES 1, FLÁVIA R. FERNANDES 2 and MARIELLE C. SCHNEIDER 3 1 Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Departamento de Biologia, Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela Vista, 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, MPEG, Departamento de Entomologia, Avenida Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, 66077-830, Belém, Pará, Brasil; e-mail: fl [email protected] 3 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Professor Artur Riedel, 275, 09972-270, Diadema, São Paulo, Brasil; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, C-band, chromosome, karyotype, meiosis, sex chromosome system, constitutive heterochromatin Abstract. In the present work, we have characterized the chromosomes of 13 Cassidinae beetles, belonging to four tribes, the broad aim being to increase the cytogenetic data and establish the mechanisms involved in chromosome evolution of this sub- family, which appear to be conserved karyotypically, i.e. 2n = 16 + Xyp. The analysis of mitotic and meiotic cells revealed a high diversity of diploid numbers (2n = 18, 2n = 22, 2n = 26, 2n = 32, 2n = 36, 2n = 40, 2n = 42), and the presence of sex chromosome system of the Xyp type in most species, with the exception of two representatives that exhibited Xyr and XY systems. C-banding showed constitutive heterochromatin predominantly localized in the pericentromeric region of the chromosomes, but differences regarding the number of chromosomes with positive C-bands, intensity of the blocks, and presence of additional bands in auto- somes and/or sex chromosomes were observed among the species investigated. -
ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 60(2): 667–707 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.37520/Aemnp.2020.048
2020 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 60(2): 667–707 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.37520/aemnp.2020.048 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Commented catalogue of Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, with remarks on the collection of Jaro Mráz in the National Museum in Prague Lukáš SEKERKA Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00, Praha – Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: Abstract. Commented catalogue of Cassidinae species reported from the state of São Paulo, 14th December 2020 Brazil is given. Altogether, 343 species are presently registered from the state representing the Published online: following tribes: Alurnini (5 spp.), Cassidini (84 spp.), Chalepini (85 spp.), Dorynotini (9 spp.), 26th December 2020 Goniocheniini (8 spp.), Hemisphaerotini (2 spp.), Imatidiini (25 spp.), Ischyrosonychini (6 spp.), Mesomphaliini (83 spp.), Omocerini (14 spp.), Sceloenoplini (9 spp.), and Spilophorini (13 spp.). Fifty-two species are recorded for the fi rst time and 19 are removed from the fauna of São Paulo. Each species is provided with a summary of published faunistic records for São Paulo and its general distribution. Dubious or insuffi cient records are critically commented. A list of Cassidi- nae species collected in São Paulo by Jaro Mráz (altogether 145 identifi ed species) is included and supplemented with general information on this material. In addition, two new synonymies are established: Cephaloleia caeruleata Baly, 1875 = C. dilatata Uhmann, 1948, syn. nov.; Stolas lineaticollis (Boheman, 1850) = S. silaceipennis (Boheman, 1862), syn. nov.; and the publication year of the genus Heptatomispa Uhmann, 1940 is corrected to 1932. -
Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4. -
The Evolution of Animal Weapons
The Evolution of Animal Weapons Douglas J. Emlen Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008. 39:387-413 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on animal diversity, sexual selection, male competition, horns, antlers, tusks September 2, 2008 The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Abstract Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org Males in many species invest substantially in structures that are used in com- This article's doi: bat with rivals over access to females. These weapons can attain extreme 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173 502 proportions and have diversified in form repeatedly. I review empirical lit- Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. erature on the function and evolution of sexually selected weapons to clarify All rights reserved important unanswered questions for future research. Despite their many 1543-592X/08/1201-0387$20.00 shapes and sizes, and the multitude of habitats within which they function, animal weapons share many properties: They evolve when males are able to defend spatially restricted critical resources, they are typically the most variable morphological structures of these species, and this variation hon- estly reflects among-individual differences in body size or quality. What is not clear is how, or why, these weapons diverge in form. The potential for male competition to drive rapid divergence in weapon morphology remains one of the most exciting and understudied topics in sexual selection research today. 3*7 INTRODUCTION Sexual selection is credited with the evolution of nature's most extravagant structures, and these include showy male adornments that are attractive to females (ornaments) and an arsenal of outgrowths that function in male-male combat (weapons) (Darwin 1871).