DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan TRAVERSE County, Minnesota, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan TRAVERSE County, Minnesota, 2015 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan TRAVERSE County, Minnesota, 2015 Traverse County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015 This page is intentionally left blank Page | 2 Traverse County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan TRAVERSE County, Minnesota 2015 Contact: Traverse County Lynn Siegel, Emergency Management Director 708 3rd Avenue North Wheaton, MN 56296 [email protected] (320) 563-0872 www.co.traverse.mn.us Prepared By: Geospatial Analysis Center College of Liberal Arts University of Minnesota Duluth 329 Cina Hall Duluth, MN 55812 Stacey Stark, Director [email protected] (218) 726-7438 Page | 3 Traverse County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015 This page is intentionally left blank Page | 4 Traverse County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. 5 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Section 1 – Introduction............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.2 Hazard Mitigation Definition........................................................................................... 10 1.1.3 Benefits of Mitigation Planning ...................................................................................... 11 1.2 State Mitigation Plan Overview .............................................................................................. 11 Section 2 – Public Planning Process ........................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Planning Team Information .................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Review of Existing Plans .......................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Planning Process Timeline and Steps ...................................................................................... 14 Section 3 – Traverse County Profile ........................................................................................................ 17 3.1 General County Description .................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Environmental Characteristics ................................................................................................ 17 3.3 Hydrography ........................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.1 Groundwater ................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.2 Lakes ................................................................................................................................ 19 3.3.3 Rivers ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Wetlands ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Climate .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.5 Demographics ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.6 Economy .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.7 Traverse County Community Services & Infrastructure ......................................................... 24 3.7.1 Health Care Providers ..................................................................................................... 26 3.7.2 Public Safety Providers/Government Services................................................................ 26 3.7.3 Utilities/Communications ............................................................................................... 28 3.7.4 Transportation ................................................................................................................ 28 3.8 Land Use and Ownership ........................................................................................................ 28 Section 4 – Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................... 31 Page | 5 Traverse County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015 4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile................................................................................................... 31 4.1.1 Hazard Identification ....................................................................................................... 31 4.1.2 Vulnerability Assessment by Jurisdiction ........................................................................ 32 4.1.3 Calculated Priority Risk Index .......................................................................................... 34 4.1.4 Hazard Profiling Concept of Planning ............................................................................. 36 4.1.5 GIS and Hazus-MH........................................................................................................... 36 4.1.6 National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Records .............................................................. 37 4.1.7 FEMA Declared Disasters ................................................................................................ 37 4.2 Vulnerability Assessment ........................................................................................................ 41 4.2.1 Asset Inventory ............................................................................................................... 41 4.2.2 Facility Replacement Costs ............................................................................................. 44 4.3 Future Development ............................................................................................................... 44 4.4 Hazard Profiles ........................................................................................................................ 45 4.4.1 Flash Flood and Riverine Flood ....................................................................................... 45 4.4.2 Wildfire ............................................................................................................................ 61 4.4.3 Severe Winter Storms – Blizzards, Ice Storms ................................................................ 63 4.4.4 Severe Summer Storms (Lightning, Hail, Windstorms, Tornadoes) ................................ 68 4.4.5 Extreme Cold ................................................................................................................... 77 4.4.6 Extreme Heat .................................................................................................................. 79 4.4.7 Drought ........................................................................................................................... 81 4.4.8 Dam Failure ..................................................................................................................... 82 4.4.9 Structure Fires ................................................................................................................. 86 4.4.10 Ground and Surface Water Supply Contamination ........................................................ 87 4.4.11 Infectious Diseases .......................................................................................................... 90 4.4.12 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................... 94 4.4.13 Terrorism ......................................................................................................................... 98 Section 5 – Mitigation Strategy ............................................................................................................. 100 5.1 Community Capability Assessment ....................................................................................... 100 5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) .................................................................... 100 5.1.2 Plans and Ordinances .................................................................................................... 100 5.2 Mitigation Goals .................................................................................................................... 101 5.3 Mitigation Actions and Projects ............................................................................................ 104 Page | 6 Traverse County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015 5.3.1 Hazard Mitigation Actions ............................................................................................. 107 5.3.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BIG STONE LAKE State Park Management Plan April 1984
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) BIG STONE LAKE State Park Management Plan April 1984 d STATE OF ~~~~©u~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAl RESOURCES BOX , CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 DNR INFORMATION (612} 296-6157 FILE NO. _____ April 13, 1984 Dear Concerned Citizens: A draft management plan for Big Stone Lake State Park has been completed by the Department of Natural Resources, Park Planning Section. This plan was prepared under the authority of the Outdoor Recreation Act of 1975. Copies of this draft management plan are available for review at the Ortonville Public Library, Graceville Public Library, Big Stone State Park Office, and the DNR Regional Office in New Ulm. Any comments you have on the plan should be made in writing and addressed to: Dennis Thompson or Carol Braun Park Planning Section Box lOE, Centennial Building .St. Paul, MN 55155 t e 1 e : ( 61 2) 2 9 6-0 5 01 The Outdoor Reacreation Act of 1975 provides for a 30 day review period in which comments may be made by the public. A public open house will be held at the Ortonville National Guard Armory on Thursday, May 3, 1984, come anytime between 1:00-4:30 and 6:00-9:00 p.m. During this open house the park planning staff will be available to answer questions and discuss the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • By Stephen J. Lawrence Water-Resources Investigations
    WATER-RESOURCES APPRAISAL OP THE LAKE TRAVERSE INDIAN RESERVATION IN SOUTH DAKOTA By Stephen J. Lawrence U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4031 Huron, South Dakota 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Rm. 408, Federal Bldg. Federal Center, Bldg. 810 200 4th St. SW Box 25425 Huron, SD 57350 Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................ 1 Introduction .............................. 1 Physiography ........................... 2 Climate .............................. 2 Geology .............................. 6 Surface water .............................. 6 Surface-water quantity ....................... 15 Streams ............................ 15 Lakes ............................. 21 Surface-water quality ....................... 21 Streams ............................ 21 Lakes ............................. 27 Ground water .............................. 31 Hydrogeology ............................ 32 Ground-water quality ........................ 35 Needed additional studies ........................ 38 Summary ................................. 40 Selected references ........................... 41 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing the location of the Lake Traverse Indian Reservation in South Dakota ................. 3 2. Map showing physiographic
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Wadsworth Agency and Scout Headquarters Building And/Or Common Joseph R
    NPS Form 10-900 (7-81) United States Department off the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______ ______ 1. Name historic Fort Wadsworth Agency and Scout Headquarters Building and/or common Joseph R. Brown/Samuel J. Brown House 2. Location street & number Broadway Avenue and Dakota Avenue not for publication city, town Browns Valley N/A vicinity of state Minnesota code 22 county Traverse code 155 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district x public occupied agriculture x museum x building(s) private X unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A— in process X yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military Other! 4. Owner off Property name State of Minnesota: Department of Administration / Department of Natural Resources street & number 20° Administration Building / 500 Lafayette Road St ' Paul 55155 / St ' Paul city, town state Minnesota 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Register of Deeds street & number Traverse County Courthouse city, town Wheaton state Minnesota 56296 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title See continuation sheet - page 1 has this property been determined eligible? yes Y date N/A federal state county local depository for survey records N/A city, town N/A state N/A 7. Description Condition Check one Check one —— excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered __ original site JLjjtedi i __ruins JL altered JL_ moved date 1866 / 1871_________ __ fair __ unexposed Describe the present and original (Iff known) physical appearance The Fort Wadsworth Agency and Scout Headquarters Building was built in 1864 one mile east of Fort Wadsworth (now Fort Sisseton) in Dakota territory near Kettle Lake in what is today Marshall County, South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 - Segment 1 Browns Valley to Ortonville Implementation Program
    Chapter 10 - Segment 1 Browns Valley to Ortonville Implementation Program Communities: Browns Valley, Beardsley, Ortonville Counties: Traverse, Big Stone I. The Segment’s Character and Resources Character of the area • Big Stone Lake is the dominant physical feature and defining quality of this area. Historically and today, the primary reason to come to this area is the lake and its surrounding landscape. • The wide open prairies, grasses, wetlands and the fields and farmlands provide a vast and beautifil backdrop for the lake and river. • Geologic action exposed large deposits of beautiful red granite. The prehistoric landscape edges of the Ancient River Warren Valley is clearly identifiable. • The headwaters of the Minnesota River are located in this segment. View of Big Stone Lake at wayside • The historic town of Browns Valley and Ortonville’s historic rest between Browns Valley commercial district contribute to the historic character of the and Ortonville region. This is reinforced by the history of the Brown Family and its role in establishing the EuroAmerican settlement of the area. Intrinsic qualities present • Archeological: Browns Valley Man (10,000 year old skeleton found) represents a significant archeological find and topic for interpretation. • Cultural: This area has been a regional tourism destination since the early 1900’s, drawing annual visitors from throughout the Midwest to recreate at the lake. • Historic: Big Stone Lake has a rich history as an early 1900’s tourism destination, with lakeside and island hotels, and steam boat transportation up and down the lake. The Brown family’s role in early frontier settlement of this region is Chapter 10 - Implementation - Browns Valley to Ortonville 10-12 significant, including Samuel Brown’s Ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarrernary GEOLOGY of MINNESOTA and PARTS of ADJACENT STATES
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman ,Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director P~ofessional Paper 161 . QUArrERNARY GEOLOGY OF MINNESOTA AND PARTS OF ADJACENT STATES BY FRANK LEVERETT WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY FREDERICK w. SARDE;30N Investigations made in cooperation with the MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1932 ·For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ________________________________________ _ 1 Wisconsin red drift-Continued. Introduction _____________________________________ _ 1 Weak moraines, etc.-Continued. Scope of field work ____________________________ _ 1 Beroun moraine _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 47 Earlier reports ________________________________ _ .2 Location__________ _ __ ____ _ _ __ ___ ______ 47 Glacial gathering grounds and ice lobes _________ _ 3 Topography___________________________ 47 Outline of the Pleistocene series of glacial deposits_ 3 Constitution of the drift in relation to rock The oldest or Nebraskan drift ______________ _ 5 outcrops____________________________ 48 Aftonian soil and Nebraskan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Striae _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 Kansan drift _____________________________ _ 5 Ground moraine inside of Beroun moraine_ 48 Yarmouth beds and Kansan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Mille Lacs morainic system_____________________ 48 Pre-Illinoian loess (Loveland loess) __________ _ 6 Location__________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota Arw of 1862
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History Fall 12-14-2011 Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota arW of 1862 Julie A. Anderson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Julie A., "Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/28 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECONCILING MEMORY: LANDSCAPES, COMMEMORATIONS, AND ENDURING CONFLICTS OF THE U.S.-DAKOTA WAR OF 1862 by JULIE HUMANN ANDERSON Under the Direction of Clifford M. Kuhn ABSTRACT The U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 resulted in the deaths of more than 500 Minnesota settlers, the expulsion of the Dakota people from their homeland, and the largest mass execution in U.S. history. For more than a century, white Minnesotans declared themselves innocent victims of Indian brutality and actively remembered this war by erecting monuments, preserving historic landscapes, publishing first-person narratives, and hosting anniversary celebrations. However, as the centennial anniversary approached, new awareness for the sufferings of the Dakota both before and after the war prompted retellings of the traditional story that gave the status of victimhood to the Dakota as well as the white settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic History of Minnesota Rivers
    GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF MINNESOTA RIVERS Minnesota Geological Survey Ed ucational Series - 7 Minnesota Geological Survey Priscilla C. Grew, Director Educational Series 7 GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF MINNESOTA RIVERS by H.E. Wright, Jr. Regents' Professor of Geology, Ecology, and Botany (Emeritus), University of Minnesota 'r J: \ I' , U " 1. L I!"> t) J' T II I ~ !oo J', t ' I' " I \ . University of Minnesota St. Paul, 1990 Cover: An early ponrayal of St. Anthony Falls on the Mississippi River In Minneapolis. The engraving of a drawing by Captain E. Eastman of Fan Snelling was first published In 1853; It Is here reproduced from the Second Final Report of the Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota, 1888. Several other early views of Minnesota rivers reproduced In this volume are from David Dale Owen's Report of a Geological Survey of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota; and Incidentally of a portion of Nebraska Territory, which was published In 1852 by Lippincott, Grambo & Company of Philadelphia. ISSN 0544-3083 1 The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, religion, color, sex, national origin, handicap, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation. 1-' \ J. I,."l n 1 ~ r 1'11.1: I: I \ 1"" CONTENTS 1 .... INTRODUCTION 1. PREGLACIAL RIVERS 5 .... GLACIAL RIVERS 17 ... POSTGLACIAL RIVERS 19 . RIVER HISTORY AND FUTURE 20 . ... REFERENCES CITED iii GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF MINNESOTA RIVERS H.E. Wright, Jr. A GLANCE at a glacial map of the Great Lakes region (Fig. 1) reveals that all of Minnesota was glaciated at some time, and all but the southeastern and southwestern corners were covered by the last ice sheet, which culminated about 20,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads and the Settlement of Minnesota
    MINNESOTA HISTORY VOLUME 21 SEPTEMBER, 1940 NUMBER 3 ROADS A N D THE SETTLEMENT OF MINNESOTA IN THE STORY of settlement in America, the difficulty of travel in newly opened areas is a constantly recurring theme. As soon as the settlers of America moved inland from the coastal waters, their troubles began, for there were few roads, and it was no easy task to build them. Yet, the growth of the American nation hinged upon roads, for, un- til they were built and communication was improved, settle- ment was retarded. The problem of road building had to be faced anew by each generation of pioneers on the west- ward march, and by the time Minnesota was reached, the nation had almost a hundred and fifty years of experience in pioneering and road making. At the time of the organization of Minnesota Territory in 1849, there were fewer than five thousand white persons living in the whole area. Less than a decade later — in 1858 — the territory became a state with an estimated popu- lation of more than a hundred and fifty thousand. Each decade thereafter showed an astounding increase in popula- tion until, at the close of the nineteenth century, when the frontier had all but vanished, the state had a population of more than a million and three-quarters. In 1849, the popu- lation centers of Minnesota were at St. Paul, St. Anthony, and Stillwater. Together they had fewer than two thousand inhabitants, but that was more than forty per cent of the people then living in Minnesota. In 1860 the same com- munities had a combined population of well over eighteen thousand — only about ten per cent of the total state popu- 225 226 ARTHUR J.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5.0 Detailed Analysis of Little Minnesota River Floodway and Toelle Coulee Flood Mitigation Alternatives
    SECTION 5.0 DETAILED ANALYSIS OF LITTLE MINNESOTA RIVER FLOODWAY AND TOELLE COULEE FLOOD MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES 5.1 LITTLE MINNESOTA AND TOELLE COULEE ALTERNATIVES Based upon the information presented within Section 4.0, Range of Flood Mitigation Alternatives Considered, discussions with the BVFMTF, and consultation with the UMRWD, the range of Little Minnesota River flood mitigation alternatives became reduced to: 1) a Little Minnesota River floodway; and, 2) storage, a floodway, a levee or some combination thereof for Toelle Coulee. This section provides descriptions, detailed information on the engineering design, and an assessment of hydraulic performance for each of the flood mitigation alternatives selected for evaluation. Section 7 provides the rationale for selection of the preferred floodway alternatives for the Little Minnesota River and the design for Toelle Coulee. 5.1.1 Little Minnesota River Floodway Alternatives Six different alignments and two inlet types (i.e., gate-controlled or “active” and fixed crest or “passive”) for a total of twelve different floodway alternatives were considered for the Little Minnesota River to provide flood protection for the City of Browns Valley. Floodway Option 3 was added by Houston Engineering, Inc. subsequent to the November 1, 2007 BVFMTF meeting. Option 3 is intended to better address potential concerns relative to maintaining the historic proportion of flow to Lake Traverse and concerns about modifying low flows through the City of Browns Valley. All floodway designs focused on containing the design discharge (plus 1-foot of freeboard) within the floodway channel, rather than using levees to provide additional capacity. Material from floodway construction will be placed in spoil banks adjacent to the floodway and used to reconstruct Roberts CR 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Indian Accounts of the Uprising
    A portrait of Chief Big Eagle, taken before tlie Sioux Uprising AS RED MEN V/IEWED IT Three Indian Accounts of the Uprising Edited by KENNETH CARLEY IN THE abundant source material on the Eagle by Return I. Holcombe, then a repre­ Sioux Uprising of 1862 there is depressingly sentative of the St. Paul Pioneer Press. Hol­ httle testimony from the Indian side. While combe's interest in the Sioux Uprising white participants and their mixed-blood apparently had been stimulated by his ex­ friends told their versions of the conflict in amination of the Henry H. Sibley Papers in numerous contemporary narratives, long- 1893 for the Minnesota Historical Society. after reminiscences, soldiers' reports, dia­ (See above, p. 100.) ries, letters, official documents, and the like, In the late spring of 1894 Holcombe the Indians were silent except for brief and visited scenes of the outbreak in the Minne­ sometimes ludicrous statements attributed sota River Valley and searched out Sioux to them at the time of capture or during Indians still living there. Then he went on trials in the field. to Flandreau, South Dakota, to talk with It was not until 1894 that an important Mrs. Nancy Huggan.i While there he met Indian story of the war came out in the form Chief Big Eagle, who had left his home near of an extensive interview with Chief Big Granite Falls for a visit to Flandreau. The 126 MINNESOTA History reporter seized this opportunity to get, first­ same subject gave certain information, but hand, the story of the uprising from a promi­ requested that their names be not printed.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Minnesota River State Water Trail from Ortonville to Highway 40
    Route Description, Minnesota River - RM 318 to 278 Route Description, Pomme de Terre River R and L represent sides of the river facing downstream. R and L represent sides of the river facing downstream 30.0 County Road 7 bridge. 318-304 Numerous log jams and snags exist in this 27.5 (L) Koosman carry-in launch. County Road 20 bridge. 24.6 185th Avenue bridge. area. 23.0 County Road 56 bridge. 317.9 Minnesota River enters from Big Stone 19.7 190th Avenue bridge. Lake. City of Ortonville. 19.1 (L) Pomme de Terre #1 carry-in access. Rest area and watercraft campsite. US Highway 12 bridge. 317.9 (L) Big Stone #8 trailer access and fishing pier. 16.6 (R) Confluence with Long Lake Creek. 317.7 Dam and railroad bridge. No portage. 14.8 (L) Larson carry-in access. County Road 36 bridge. 317.6 Ortonville Dam. No portage. Shorefishing 13.5 US Highway 59 bridge. site. 9.1 Hening Street bridge. City of Appleton. 8.9 (L) Veum Avenue bridge. 317.5 US Highway 12 bridge. Powerline crossing. 8.8 Appleton carry-in access and shorefishing. Munsterman Street/Highway 119 bridge. 316.8 Pedestrian bridge. 8.7 Railroad bridge. 316.8-303.4 Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge. 8.0 Railroad bridge. 5.0 County Road 51 bridge. 316.0 Powerline crossing. 2.3 County Road 51 bridge. 312.5 Bridge. 0.1 (R) Marsh Lake carry-in access. 307.9 (L) Confluence with Stony Run. 0-4 Lac qui Parle Wildlife Management Area. 0 to 10 CAUTION - numerous rapids an log jams in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Minnesota River Watershed Five Year Strategic Plan
    UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN In Cooperation With: East Dakota Water Development District South Dakota Conservation Districts South Dakota Association of Conservation Districts South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Date: August 2012 Prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................6 Introduction ........................................................................................................................8 1.1 Project Background and Scope ........................................................................8 1.2 Upper Minnesota River Watershed History ...................................................10 1.3 Upper Minnesota River Watershed Water Quality Studies ..........................13 1.4 Goals of the Upper Minnesota River Basin Project .......................................15 2.0 Causes and Sources of Impairment .......................................................................15 2.0.1 Geography, Soils, and Land Use....................................................................15 2.0.2 Water Bodies Studies and Current Status .....................................................24 2.1.0 Description of the Impairments for 303(d) Water Body Listings in the Upper Minnesota River Basin ............................................................29 2.1.1 Temperature ...................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]