Ed Pressman Dialogue with Julie Solomon, 1991

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ed Pressman Dialogue with Julie Solomon, 1991 Ed Pressman Dialogue with Julie Solomon, 1991 Bruce Jenkins: We've decided to end this season. This is our first year of such dialogues with a visit not by another director or actor/director, but by a producer and not just any producer. Management hailed in a recent issue of American Film as ​ a producer of the decade and I believe the single most interesting producer in the US, someone who has a sense of what is possible and a sense of how to make visions of filmmakers actually happen on celluloid. It's Edward R. Pressman who is very, very kindly agreed to come and talk about the work he's done for the past 20 years. I had an opportunity to see him in action a year ago at Berlin where he was doing a premiere of a new film. Bruce Jenkins: He has continued to work at an extraordinary pace making two, three, sometimes four films in a year. He is as we know right now beginning work with a native son, someone whose career we followed here at the Walker, Mark Frost who will in about a week's time be making his feature film directing debut under the production of Ed Pressman, a new film called Storyville. We're very, very pleased to highlight not only another aspect of what makes interesting, ​ ​ engaging, lively cinema possible, but a particular figure who's been a catalyst for filmmakers like Brian De Palma, Oliver Stone, Charles Burnett, Barbet Schroeder, and hopefully Mark Frost. Bruce Jenkins: With Ed tonight is a critical... I know many people who have read but have never seen or have not widely known about her other work. We have Julie Solomon from Wall Street Journal whose career dates back to writing fiction of ​ first novel who has been writing for the journal since the late 1970s, who has a degree in law, has a broad range of interests. Her work at the journal though I think is of singular importance. The general began covering film in 1983 and she was allowed to begin working on the film beat and has in that time a master or rather astonishing array of film reviews of feature coverage on a whole range of issues, of aesthetic and cultural importance in film. Bruce Jenkins: She has been working for the past two years on a book documenting the production of a major film of the past year. Major film that regrettably didn't make very much money in the past year, Bonfire of the Vanities and will in about six ​ months time have her first major nonfiction book, this case study of Bonfire of the Vanities published. We're very ​ pleased that she's taken time out from her reviewing duties at Wall Street Journal and finishing up work on this ​ actually major, major book study to be with us and to spend some time really over the last two months looking at work that has been done under the auspices of Ed Pressman, making their final dialogue visit or making our final dialogue visit possible tonight. Bruce Jenkins: It is a great deal of pleasure to welcome here to the Walker, Ed Pressman and Julie Solomon. Julie Solomon: Hello. Is this okay? Good. Well, before we came out here, I decided I should do a little research about Ed Pressman outside of what I knew about his film career, so I called his mother up. I said to her that we were going to be here in Minneapolis and I wanted her to know when she first thought that Ed was going to go into the movie business and Apr 20, 1991 1 she said she never thought he was going to go into the movie business when he was a kid, but she had a couple of good stories that she thought I should tell you about them. She thought it gave them insight into his future as a somewhat eclectic film producer, and she said that when he was a kid, he went to the Ethical Culture School in New York City, and he used to go off to school every day and everything didn't match all the time. Julie Solomon: Like when she would be from one pair of shoes and the other shoe would be from the other pair of shoes, and she was quite concerned about this. She went to talk to one of Ed's teachers and the teacher said, "Don't worry about it. Just means he's very interested in everything. He'll be like Benjamin Franklin." Mrs. Pressman thought, "Well, okay, we'll see about that." Then she sent Eddie off to camp. Eddie, she called and she said he came home from camp that summer and her little quiet boy comes home and he's mister all around camper. She says, "I always wondered how they knew that because he's such a quiet person. How did they know that he was so great?" Julie Solomon: She said I should tell you that her all around camper may not look like what your stereotype of a film, but you're expecting some guy with a ponytail and all of that and then in comes Ed, but he is the mister all around camper. I think as you look at some of the films and listened to his career, you'll see that he has really been all over the map. Guess I wanted to start a little bit about how you ended up getting into the film business. Ed's family is in the toy business, was in the toy business, and one could say that might be fun enough, and yet you chose to go into film. You certainly don't fit the stereotype and what was it that first attracted you to movie making? Ed Pressman: Well, I think it was a similar process to what I guess brought me to major in Philosophy in college. It was a process of elimination. Philosophy seemed to be the most encompassing subject and film brought together very diverse aspects of my interest. I was brought up to go into the toy business and film is a business, and I think that strain was very much a part of me, but I didn't want to go into the toy business. Julie Solomon: Why was that? Ed Pressman: I used to try it out in the summer times. I don't know, I just never was excited by it. I can't give a reason, but just, it didn't fulfill me and I also didn't want to just pursue, I shouldn't say just, but I didn't want to pursue an academic career in philosophy, but film seemed somehow to subsumed the whole and encompassed all those aspects of our culture. I couldn't think of anything else I ever wanted to do and that film itself seemed totally remote and impossible to pursue I guess. When I was at Fieldston High School, I had a teacher that taught modern European history through German films, Dr. Caligari and Mädchen in Uniform and Der letzte Mann, and I guess that impressed me on ​ ​ ​ ​ the power of film. Ed Pressman: I had an uncle when I was growing up in New York. I guess that's first thing. When I was maybe eight years old, he owned two movie theaters up in Washington Heights. I used to sell popcorn and see four movies a day and loved the movies, but again, it seemed totally remote. When I was at Stanford, I had a roommate whose father was a director Apr 20, 1991 2 and we talked about making films endlessly but again, it seemed impossible. When I went to graduate school in England at LSE, while I was going to school, I got a non-paying job, an attache with an executive at Columbia Pictures and I met a filmmaker who was American studying at Cambridge named Paul Williams, and he had done a short film at Harvard the year before. Ed Pressman: The two of us started talking about film and he thought I was a great movie mogul because I had a job on Orr Street. I thought he was a, yeah, D.W. Griffith. We were totally absorbed with each other's dreams and we spent the whole night talking about... We formed a partnership that day and we were together for seven years, and Paul really was the way I got into film because Paul had great confidence. He was the outside man, I was the inside man. It was through Paul I guess ultimately that the possibilities seemed real. Julie Solomon: Well, that's great, and so then you went from that to becoming a producer, and I think one of the things that has always somewhat mystified me, even though I've been writing about film for a long time, you always hear about producer and I think they're all different kinds of producers who really run the gamut from having a very minimal effect on what the actual film is. They just pick a project and then leave to producers who are very much hands on all the way through what we think of as a David Selznick type. I guess what I want to ask you is, what does a producer do generally, and I guess more specifically, what is it that you do and how does that differ from somebody who's working within the studio system? Ed Pressman: That's a lot of questions.
Recommended publications
  • The Life Artistic: July / August 2016 Wes Anderson + Mark Mothersbaugh
    11610 EUCLID AEUE, CLEELAD, 44106 THE LIFE ARTISTIC: JULY / AUGUST 2016 WES ANDERSON + MARK MOTHERSBAUGH July and August 2016 programming has been generously sponsored by TE LIFE AUATIC ... AUATIC TE LIFE 4 FILMS! ALL 35MM PRINTS! JULY 7-29, 2016 THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART CINEMATHEQUE 11610 EUCLID AVENUE, UNIVERSITY CIRCLE, CLEVELAND OHIO 44106 The Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque is Cleveland’s alternative film theater. Founded in 1986, the Cinematheque presents movies in CIA’s Peter B. Lewis Theater at 11610 Euclid Avenue in the Uptown district of University Circle. This new, 300-seat theater is equipped with a 4K digital cinema projector, two 35mm film projectors, and 7.1 Dolby Digital sound. Free, lighted parking for filmgoers is currently available in two CIA lots located off E. 117th Street: Lot 73 and the Annex Lot. (Those requiring disability park- ing should use Lot 73.) Enter the building through Entrance C (which faces E. 117th) or Entrance E (which faces E. 115th). Unless noted, admission to each screening is $10; Cinematheque members, CIA and Cleveland State University I.D. holders, and those age 25 & under $7. A second film on LOCATION OF THE the same day generally costs $7. For further information, visit PETER B. LEWIS THEATER (PBL) cia.edu/cinematheque, call (216) 421-7450, or send an email BLACK IL to [email protected]. Smoking is not permitted in the Institute. TH EACH FILM $10 • MEMBERS, CIA, AGE 25 & UNDER $7 • ADDITIONAL FILM ON SAME DAY $7 OUR 30 ANNIVERSARY! FREE LIGHTED PARKING • TEL 216.421.7450 • CIA.EDU/CINEMATHEQUE BLOOD SIMPLE TIKKU INGTON TE LIFE ATISTIC: C I N E M A T A L K ES ADES AK TESBAU ul 72 (4 lms) obody creates cinematic universes like es Anderson.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Percy Editor
    LEE PERCY EDITOR FEATURES CHARMING THE HEARTS OF MEN High Hopes Productions Prod: Brian David Cange, Richard T. Lewis Dir: S.E. DeRose (Editor) THE HALF OF IT (Editor) Netflix Prod: Blair Breard, Anthony Bregman Dir: Alice Wu SKIN (Editor) A24 Prod: Oren Moverman, Dillon D. Jordan Dir: Guy Nattiv Jamie Ray Newman THE KINDERGARTEN TEACHER Netflix Prod: Maggie Gyllenhaal, Ged Dickersin Dir: Sara Colangelo (Editor) MAPPLETHORPE (Editor) Samuel Goldwyn Films Prod: Richard Bosner, Eliza Dushku Dir: Ondi Timoner THE MOUNTAIN BETWEEN US (Editor) 20th Century Fox Prod: Peter Chernin, Dylan Clark Dir: Hany Abu-Assad SNOWDEN (Editor) Open Road Films Prod: Moritz Borman, Eric Kopeloff Dir: Oliver Stone ANGELICA (Editor) Pierpoline Films Prod: Mitchell Lichtenstein, Joyce Pierpoline Dir: Mitchell Lichtenstein TOUCHED WITH FIRE (Editor) Roadside Attractions Prod: Jeremy Alter, Kristina Nikolova, Dir: Paul Dalio Jason Sokoloff CARRIE (2013) (Editor) MGM / Screen Gems Prod: Kevin Misher Dir: Kimberly Peirce DISCONNECT (Editor) LD Entertainment Prod: William Horberg, Mickey Liddell Dir: Henry Alex Rubin Jennifer Monroe WHAT MAISIE KNEW Millennium Entertainment Prod: Daniel Crown, Daniela Taplin, Lundberg, Dir: Scott McGehee, David Siegel (Additional Editor) William Teitler, Charles Weinstock THIN ICE (Editor) ATO Pictures Prod: Mary Frances Budig, Elizabeth Redleaf, Dir: Jill Sprecher Christine K. Walker AS GOOD AS DEAD (Editor) First Look International Prod: Jordan Gertner, Ali Abouomar Dir: Jonathan Mossek SALT (Additional Editor) Sony Prod: Lorenzo
    [Show full text]
  • Phantom of the Paradise De Brian De Palma (1974)
    Thème de la musique avant toute chose. Fiche cinéma 1 Phantom of the Paradise de Brian de Palma (1974) Synopsis : Un compositeur talentueux, Wislow Leach, inconnu et pauvre, vient d’écrire l’œuvre de sa vie : Faust,l’opéra rock, il vient proposer sa musique à une Major ; celle de Swan. Il sera dépouillé de son œuvre, emprisonné à Sing Sing sans raison et, dans un acte de folie, voulant récupérer son bien, va être victime d’un accident terrible dans les presses de la maison de disque. Devenant le « phantom » de lui-même, et du théâtre « Paradise » où doit se jouer son œuvre, il signera finalement un contrat avec Swan qui sera aussi celui de sa mort et dans lequel, sans s’en rendre compte, il se dépouille de son œuvre et de son âme. Dans ce film Brian de Palma fait le portrait d’une industrie liée au monde de la musique peu glorieuse, il nous en montre tous les travers. Il est une évidence, ce film colle au thème de la musique avant toute chose. Nous sommes dans l’univers musical de la production : maison de disque « Death Records », interprétation de Juicy Fruits « juteux pour le producteur ». Le producteur Swan, pour lui la musique n’est qu’une question d’argent. I/Les thèmes évoqués : -La drogue : Être sous stupéfiants pour se dépasser et aussi pour profiter de l’autre. -Le sexe : Il n’est pas tant libéré que cela, on comprend rapidement que le sexe n’existe que pour le bénéfice que l’on peut en retirer «de la musique avant toute chose » mis en place d’une certaine ironie.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW from “Barbet Schroeder Has Made Yet Another Compelling Documentary That Demands to Be Seen.”
    NEW FROM “Barbet Schroeder has made yet another compelling documentary that demands to be seen.” “GENUINELY HORRIFYING!” – Film Comment “There’s an ever-present sense of rage and despair burbling beneath the placid surface of Barbet Schroeder’s film.” – Slant Magazine WINNER! OFFICIAL SELECTION FREEDOM AWARD CANNES, CPH:DOX BEST DOCUMENTARY LOCARNO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL, JERUSALEM FILM FESTIVAL TELLURIDE FILM FESTIVAL Barbet Schroeder is one of the world’s most accomplished and prolific directors of our time. Some of his most popular films includeSingle White Female, Kiss of Death, and Murder by Numbers. He has been nominated for the Academy Award for Best Director, and for the Palme d’Or for his 1987 film Barfly starring Mickey Rourke and Faye Dunaway “This is an important documentary that Evil comes in many forms. In Myanmar, it manifests in the casual racism and Islamophobia of influential, charismatic Burmese Buddhist monk not only illuminates the rank underbelly Ashin Wirathu. Through interviews with international journalists and of Theravada Buddhism in Myanmar, but community leaders who protest against Wirathu’s views, activist footage also captures one of the first major tests of Rohingya persecutions, and through powerful storytelling, acclaimed faced by the new political order.” director Barbet Schroeder (Reversal of Fortune, Koko: A Talking Gorilla, and Barfly) slowly, but inexorably, builds his case. Perhaps most damning – The New York Review of Books of all are the interviews with the man himself; couching his rhetoric in nationalist fervor. THE VENERABLE W. A film by Barbet Schroeder • From Distrib Films • An Icarus Films Release Established in 2013, Distrib Films brings the latest 2017 • 100 min • Color • in English, French, Spanish, Burmese (with English subtitles) • Not Rated SRP: $26.98 • UPC # 8-545-6500316-3 French and European movies to the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Screams on Screens: Paradigms of Horror
    Screams on Screens: Paradigms of Horror Barry Keith Grant Brock University [email protected] Abstract This paper offers a broad historical overview of the ideology and cultural roots of horror films. The genre of horror has been an important part of film history from the beginning and has never fallen from public popularity. It has also been a staple category of multiple national cinemas, and benefits from a most extensive network of extra-cinematic institutions. Horror movies aim to rudely move us out of our complacency in the quotidian world, by way of negative emotions such as horror, fear, suspense, terror, and disgust. To do so, horror addresses fears that are both universally taboo and that also respond to historically and culturally specific anxieties. The ideology of horror has shifted historically according to contemporaneous cultural anxieties, including the fear of repressed animal desires, sexual difference, nuclear warfare and mass annihilation, lurking madness and violence hiding underneath the quotidian, and bodily decay. But whatever the particular fears exploited by particular horror films, they provide viewers with vicarious but controlled thrills, and thus offer a release, a catharsis, of our collective and individual fears. Author Keywords Genre; taboo; ideology; mythology. Introduction Insofar as both film and videogames are visual forms that unfold in time, there is no question that the latter take their primary inspiration from the former. In what follows, I will focus on horror films rather than games, with the aim of introducing video game scholars and gamers to the rich history of the genre in the cinema. I will touch on several issues central to horror and, I hope, will suggest some connections to videogames as well as hints for further reflection on some of their points of convergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Reviews
    Page 104 FILM REVIEWS “Is this another attack?”: Imagining Disaster in C loverfield, Diary of the Dead and [ Rec] Cloverfield (Dir. Matt Reeves) USA 2007 Paramount Home Entertainment Diary of the Dead (Dir. George A. Romero) USA 2007 Optimum Home Entertainment [Rec] (Dir. Jaume Balagueró & Paco Plaza) S pain 2007 Odeon Sky Filmworks In 1965, at the height of the Cold War, Susan Sontag declared in her famous essay ‘The Imagination of Disaster’ that the world had entered an “age of extremity” in which it had become clear that from now until the end of human history, every person on earth would “spend his individual life under the threat not only of individual death, which is certain, but of something almost insupportable psychologically – collective incineration which could come at any time”. Sontag went on to claim that narratives in which this fate was dramatised for the mass audience in fantastical form – like the monster movies of the 1950s – helped society deal with this stress by distracting people from their fate and normalising what was psychologically unbearable: a kind of vaccination of the imagination, if you will. If this is the case, then Cloverfield, in which Manhattan is destroyed by an immensely powerful sea monster, George A. Romero’s latest zombie movie, Diary of the Dead, and claustrophobic Spanish hit [Rec] are not so much pre­emptive vaccinations against probable catastrophe, but intermittently powerful, if flawed, reminders of actual calamity. In all three films some of the most destabilising events and anxieties of the past decade – including 9/11 (and the fear of terrorist attacks striking at the heart of American and European cities), Hurricane Katrina, the 2004 Tsunami, and the SARS virus– are reconfigured as genre­based mass market entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • BARBET SCHROEDER VEGA FILM and LES FILMS DU LOSANGE Present
    A film by BARBET SCHROEDER VEGA FILM and LES FILMS DU LOSANGE present MARTHE KELLER MAX RIEMELT amnesia A FILM BY BARBET SCHROEDER With the participation of BRUNO GANZ INTERNATIONAL SALES LES FILMS DU LOSANGE ► AGATHE VALENTIN – HEAD OF SALES + 33 6 89 85 96 95 / [email protected] ► LISE ZIPCI – TV & LIBRARY SALES + 33 6 75 13 05 75 / [email protected] ► MARINE GOULOIS – FESTIVALS & SALES + 33 6 84 21 74 53 / [email protected] Photos and press pack can be downloaded at www.filmsdulosange.fr SWISS - FRANCE • 2015 • 1H30 • 1.85 - 2K • COLOR • SOUND 5.1 Ibiza, the early nineties, Jo is a twenty-five-year-old music composer. He has come over from Berlin and wants to be part of the nascent electronic music revolution, ideally by getting a job first as a DJ in the new nightclub on the island, Amnesia. Martha has been living alone in her house facing the sea for forty years. One night Jo knocks on her door. Her solitude intrigues him. They become friends even as the mysteries around her accumulate: that cello in the corner she refuses to play, the German language she refuses to speak… As Jo draws her into his world of techno music, Martha puts everything she had previously lived by into question. amnesia - 3 - (The following are extracts from a conversation with Emilie Bickerton) martha’s choice ow is it that a woman who never saw or we did not want to become moralizing or righteous. Hexperienced anything particularly terrible To try to avoid this with Martha we showed how could take such a radical position against her she made exceptions to her rule for art and philo- country, and stick to it all her life? sophy : Beethoven’s chamber music, the German Martha is not Jewish, nor is she a victim of Nazi poets and philosophers.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian De Palma Brian De Programmation
    BRIAN DE PALMA BRIAN DE PROGRAMMATION BRIAN DE PALMA RÉTROSPECTIVE 31 MAI – 4 JUILLET EN PARTENARIAT AVEC LES ÉDITIONS RIVAGES Phantom of the Paradise 28 29 MÉCANIQUES FATALES Brian De Palma est l’auteur d’un cinéma politique et critique au cœur même de Hollywood et de l’Amérique de l’après-Vietnam (Phantom of the Paradise, Blow Out, Scarface, Outrages…). C’est une œuvre tout à la fois sombre et spec- taculaire, référentielle et constamment inventive : comme si De Palma n’avait jamais cessé de reprendre des images venant du cinéma, celles de Hitchcock en particulier, et de leur redonner vie dans un véritable feu d’artifice formel BRIAN DE PALMA BRIAN DE (Obsession, Pulsions, Body Double…). Rétrospective intégrale des films de ce cinéaste-inventeur à l’occasion de sa venue en France pour la sortie de son pre- mier roman, co-écrit avec Susan Lehman : Les serpents sont-ils nécessaires ? (éditions Rivages). Scarface LA CHAMBRE NOIRE Adolescent, découvrir les films de Brian De Palma c’était rencontrer le cinéma lui- Au cours d’une carrière qui épousa parfois celle de ses compagnons de route : même. Lorsque Carrie embrasait le bal de l’école, il n’y avait pas seulement une Scorsese, Coppola ou Spielberg, il a connu le succès avec des épopées mafieuses image sur l’écran mais deux et même trois. Dans Pulsions, pendant dix minutes (Scarface, Les Incorruptibles), joué les artificiers pour Tom Cruise (Mission : muettes, la caméra en apesanteur suivait Angie Dickinson dans les allées d’un Impossible), adapté des best-sellers (Le Bucher des vanités) ou abordé les « grands musée, en une sidérante anamorphose de la mort et du désir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phantom on Film: Guest Editor’S Introduction
    The Phantom on Film: Guest Editor’s Introduction [accepted for publication in The Opera Quarterly, Oxford University Press] © Cormac Newark 2018 What has the Phantom got to do with opera? Music(al) theater sectarians of all denominations might dismiss the very question, but for the opera studies community, at least, it is possible to imagine interesting potential answers. Some are historical, some technical, and some to do with medium and genre. Others are economic, invoking different commercial models and even (in Europe at least) complex arguments surrounding public subsidy. Still others raise, in their turn, further questions about the historical and contemporary identities of theatrical institutions and the productions they mount, even the extent to which particular works and productions may become institutions themselves. All, I suggest, are in one way or another related to opera reception at a particular time in the late nineteenth century: of one work in particular, Gounod’s Faust, but even more to the development of a set of popular ideas about opera and opera-going. Gaston Leroux’s serialized novel Le Fantôme de l’Opéra, set in and around the Palais Garnier, apparently in 1881, certainly explores those ideas in a uniquely productive way.1 As many (but perhaps not all) readers will recall, it tells the story of the debut in a principal role of Christine Daaé, a young Swedish soprano who is promoted when the Spanish prima donna, Carlotta, is indisposed.2 In the course of a gala performance in honor of the outgoing Directors of the Opéra, she is a great success in extracts of works 1 The novel was serialized in Le Gaulois (23 September 1909–8 January 1910) and then published in volume-form: Le Fantôme de l’Opéra (Paris: Lafitte, 1910).
    [Show full text]
  • DE PALMA, Brían (Newark, New Jersey, 1940). Menos Respetado
    DE PALMA, Brían (Newark, New Jersey, 1940). Menos respetado por la critica que Scorsese, de carrera menos comercial que Spielberg, De Palma ocupa una posición relativamente frágil e inestable (si bien nunca marginal) dentro del panteón de los movie brats. Pero sus películas, quizá más que las de ninguno, revelan un genuino plaisir du cinéma, una dionisiaca utilización del tren eléctrico más caro del mundo; una notable perversidad, siempre a un paso de entrar de lleno en la estética trash (es famosa su réplica a la feminista Marcia Pally de que nada es comparable al impacto plástico de asesinar a una chica sexy; y en alguna ocasión ha tenido la idea de hacer cine porno); y una residual pero notable voluntad modernista, procedente de su etapa underground, que se traduce en su perceptible desinterés por la dramaturgia y la narrativa convencionales y, desde luego, por la verosimilitud: rueda con desgana las escenas transicionales o explicativas que en su cine, y sobre todo en el menos conseguido; son casi todas menos aquellas escenas fuertes en las que concentra todo su aparato formal, sus famosas set- pieces: un virtuoso ejercicio de estilo o de lucimiento cinemático traducido en la condensación/dilatación de la acción en una coreografía plástica de la violencia. Su actitud posclásica se revela también en su gusto por la repetición (el último y brillante ejemplo: Femme Fatale, [2002]), la split-screen (desde Dyonisos in '69 [1970]) Y el falso final (que patentó en Carrie [1976]); las secuencias oníricas (a menudo su cine parece una ilustración del traumwerk freudiano) y las metáforas sobre la visión (tecnológicas: el video; y narrativas: el voyeurismo); y por supuesto en su posmoderna afición a la cita y el pastiche, de Hitchcock principalmente, De Palma empieza a hacer sus primeras películas amateur cuando todavía se encuentra cursando estudios en la Columbia University, en donde conoce el cine de Hitchcock y descubre que la esencia del cine radica en la manipulación del punto de vista.
    [Show full text]
  • Horror, Crime, and War: Some Comment on the Films of Brian De Palma, 1980-1989
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 31, núm. 1 (2021) · ISSN: 2014-668X Horror, Crime, and War: Some Comment on the Films of Brian De Palma, 1980-1989 ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract This review-essay revisits four films by Brian De Palma made between 1980 and 1989—Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables, and Casualties of War—in an attempt to reconsider the most successful decade of De Palma’s career and at the same time to counter the received wisdom that he is somehow a “great” or “visionary” director. In fact, De Palma has built his career largely on the imitation of old movies, usually by Alfred Hitchcock, beginning with his very first film, Murder à la Mod (1968), and extending all the way through to Passion (2012). Keywords: Brian De Palma, Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables, Casualties of War, American cinema. Resumen Este ensayo-retrospectiva revisita cuatro películas de Brian De Palma realizadas entre 1980 y 1989 —Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables y Casualties of War— en un intento de valorar la década más exitosa de la carrera de De Palma en la que se deposita toda la sabiduría recibida del de alguna manera, uno de los grandes directores y un "visionario". De hecho, De Palma ha construido su carrera en gran parte sobre la imitación de películas clásicas, generalmente de Alfred Hitchcock, comenzando con su primera película, Murder à la Mod (1968), y extendiéndose hasta Passion (2012). Palabras clave: Brian De Palma, Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables, Casualties of War, Cine norteamericano. Introduction I’d like to begin this review-essay with what, by now, sadly, is the received wisdom on Brian De Palma, from none other than Robin Wood: The conventional dismissal of Brian De Palma—that he is a mere “Hitchcock imitator”—[is] certainly unjust .
    [Show full text]
  • February 2015 at BFI Southbank Katharine Hepburn, Eric Rohmer, BFI Future Film Festival
    February 2015 at BFI Southbank Katharine Hepburn, Eric Rohmer, BFI Future Film Festival Helen de Witt, Head of Cinemas, BFI said: “Style, sophistication and amusement characterise February at BFI Southbank, topped off with some romantic favourites for Valentine’s Day. The exquisite Katherine Hepburn graces our screens in an extended season; Eric Rohmer continues to educate and charm with his Four Seasons, and Comedies and Proverbs series. Shaun the Sheep previews a family celebration of Aardman animation for half term.” From 1 February – 19 March 2015 BFI Southbank will dedicate a season to one of Hollywood’s most iconic actresses, Katharine Hepburn. The season will feature 24 of her most famous films, including Bringing Up Baby (1938), The African Queen (1951), The Lion in Winter (1968), On Golden Pond (1981) and an extended run of The Philadelphia Story (1940), re-released by the BFI in selected cinemas across the UK from February 13. BFI Southbank continues to reassess one of film’s most consistently rewarding artists, Eric Rohmer. Running until mid-March, part two of this comprehensive season includes Rhomer’s Tales of The Four Seasons quartet of films, and his six Comedies and Proverbs, as well as well as further short films and rare examples of his television documentary work. If audiences are feeling romantic this Valentine’s Day there are plenty of films to pluck at the heart strings, including BFI Flare screenings of Cloudburst (2011) and Plan B (2009), Hepburn classics The Philadelphia Story (1940) and Bringing up Baby (1938) and Eric Rohmer favourite My Girlfriend’s Boyfriend (1987).
    [Show full text]