Yan Yean Water Supply System Conservation Management Plan Volume 6: Appendices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thismia Americana : a Chicago Endemic Or an Elaborate Hoax?
150 THE GREAT LAKES BOTANIST Vol. 57 THISMIA AMERICANA : A CHICAGO ENDEMIC OR AN ELABORATE HOAX? Gerould Wilhelm and Laura Rericha Conservation Research Institute W59 N412 Hilgen Avenue Cedarburg, Wisconsin 53012 [email protected] ABSTRACT Named in 1912, Thismia americana Pfeiff. was reportedly collected in a wet prairie in Chicago, Illinois, by Norma Pfeiffer, a student at the University of Chicago. For decades, few botanists ques - tioned the authenticity of the find. With advances in biogeography over the last few decades and with rare but significant experience with fraudulent science, some scientists have raised questions about the veracity of Pfeiffer’s work. While some have speculated on biogeographic mechanisms that ac - count for a species to have spread from the Asian-Pacific region to a north-temperate one, such as the southwestern Great Lakes, some have toyed with the idea that Pfeiffer’s work represents an outright hoax. This article describes an example of botanical fraud, specifically the Rum affair. Pfeiffer’s work is recounted, compared with those in science who have masterminded hoaxes, and analyzed with re - gard to the question whether her work was fraudulent. KEYWORDS: Biogeography, fraud, hoax, Pfeiffer, Thismia INTRODUCTION According to her own account, Norma Pfeiffer, a 23-year-old student at the University of Chicago, set out to gather liverworts in a prairie on the south side of Chicago, specifically at 119th Street and Torrence Avenue (Pfeiffer 1914a). During this foray, she encountered a tiny, nearly subterranean, flowering plant, the identity of which was a mystery to her and her advisors. Upon concluding that it was a species of the burmanniaceous genus Thismia , the congeners of which are both cryptic and in widely dispersed populations (Merckx & Smets 2014), she gave up a teaching job she had secured out west and remained at the University of Chicago, where she pursued doctoral research on the anatomy, morphology, and taxonomy of the Chicago Thismia population. -
Neue Litteratur. *⁾ Anonymous
:: © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Neue Litteratur. 137 sowie schliesslich über den Uebergang von den ersten Primär- blättchen zu den späteren typischen Laubblättern bei den Coniferen. Für den oben angegebenen Zweck ist das Büchlein sehr em- pfehlenswerth. Brick (Hamburg). Neue Litteratur. Geschichte der Botanik: Yauianioto, Y., Biography of Japanese botanists. Part IL (The Botanical Magazine. Tokyo. Vol. V. 1891. p. 57.) Zinimeter, A., Hans Stein inger. Nachruf. (Oesterreichische botanische Zeitschrift. 1891. p. 135.) Bibliographie: J u s t 's botanischer Jahresbericht. Systematisch geordnetes Repertorium der botanischen Litteratur aller Länder. Herausgeg von E. Koohno. Jahrg. XVI. 1888. Abth. II. Heft 2. 8°. VIII, p. 385—627. [Schluss.] Berlin (Gebr. Bornträger) 1891. M. 8.— Allgemeines, Lehr- und Handbücher, Atlanten etc.: "Cogniaux , Alfred . Elements des sciences naturelles ä l'usage des ecoles moyennes — . IL Botanique. 4e edit. 8°. 154 pp. Bruxelles (Parent & Co.) 1891. Fr. 1.85. Johnstone, A., Botany, a concise manual for students of medicine and science. 8°. 244 pp. 164 ill. and floral diagrams. London (Pentland) 1891. Sh. 6.— Krause, H., Schulbotanik. Nach methodischen Grundsätzen bearbeitet. 3. Aufl. 8°. VII, 231 pp. mit 397 Holzschn. Hannover (Helwing) 1891. M. 2.20. Algen Wildeiuan, Les Trentepohlia des Indes Neerlandaises. (Annales du Jardin bo- tanique de Buitenzorg. Tome IX. Partie II. 1891.) Pilze Costautin, J.. Revue des travaux sur les Champignons publies eu 1889 et 1890. (Revue generale de botanique. 1891. 15. Mars.) Hariot, P,, Une nouvelle espece d'Uromyces. (Journal de botanique. Tome V. 1891. p. 99.) Kramer, E., Ueber einen rotligefärbten, bei der Vergährung von Most mit- wirkenden Sprosspilz. -
Regional Bird Monitoring Annual Report 2018-2019
BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact BirdLife Australia 60 Leicester Street, Suite 2-05 Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: (Australia): (03) 9347 0757 Fax: (03) 9347 9323 (Overseas): +613 9347 0757 Fax: +613 9347 9323 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended citation: BirdLife Australia (2020). Melbourne Water Regional Bird Monitoring Project. Annual Report 2018-19. Unpublished report prepared by D.G. Quin, B. Clarke-Wood, C. Purnell, A. Silcocks and K. Herman for Melbourne Water by (BirdLife Australia, Carlton) This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia under contract to Melbourne Water. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been undertaken to ensure that the information presented within is accurate. BirdLife Australia does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. -
A Review of Natural Values Within the 2013 Extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area
A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Nature Conservation Report 2017/6 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Hobart A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Jayne Balmer, Jason Bradbury, Karen Richards, Tim Rudman, Micah Visoiu, Shannon Troy and Naomi Lawrence. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, September 2017 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (World Heritage Program). Australian Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Tasmanian or Australian Governments. ISSN 1441-0680 Copyright 2017 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Published by Natural Values Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph of Eucalyptus regnans tall forest in the Styx Valley: Rob Blakers Cite as: Balmer, J., Bradbury, J., Richards, K., Rudman, T., Visoiu, M., Troy, S. and Lawrence, N. 2017. A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. -
Conservation Assessment of Future Potential Production Forest Land (FPPF Land)
Conservation Assessment of Future Potential Production Forest land (FPPF land) A REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE GROWTH Natural and Cultural Heritage Division DPIPWE 2 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT OF FPPF LAND Contents Executive summary ................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................. 4 Method .................................................................................................... 5 Natural Values (Flora and Fauna) ....................................................................... 6 Heritage Tasmania .............................................................................................. 7 Aboriginal Heritage .............................................................................................. 7 Constraints and Potential Causes of Error .......................................................... 7 Results and Discussion ............................................................................. 8 Natural Values (Flora and Fauna) ....................................................................... 8 Threatened Flora ................................................................................................. 8 Threatened Fauna ............................................................................................... 9 Heritage Tasmania ............................................................................................ 10 Aboriginal Heritage ........................................................................................... -
The Economic Value of Water in Storage
Melbourne School of Engineering Department of Infrastructure Engineering The economic value of water in storage 11th February 2018 Citation Western, Andrew W., Taylor, Nathan, Langford, John K., and Azmi, Mo, 2017. The economic value of water in storage. The University of Melbourne, Australia. Copyright © The University of Melbourne, 2017. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of The University of Melbourne. Contact Professor Andrew Western, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010, Australia [email protected] Project Team The University of Melbourne Project team consisted of: • Professor Andrew Western, Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne; • Professor John Langford, Steering Committee Chair, University of Melbourne; and • Research Fellow, Nathan Taylor, University of Melbourne. Steering Committee The project was informed by the members of the Steering Committee consisting of: • Richard Smith; Business Planning and Regulation Manager; City West Water; • Udaya Kularathna; Team Leader Water Resource Assessment, Integrated Planning; Melbourne Water; • Bruce Rhodes, Manager Water Resources Management, Melbourne Water; • Ian Johnson; Manager Urban Water Policy; South East Water; • Dominic Keary; ESC Project Manager; Yarra Valley Water; and • Stephen, Sonnenberg, Manager Urban Water Security Policy, Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning. The Steering Committee was Chaired by Professor John Langford, University of Melbourne. While this report was informed by the Steering Committee, the findings contained in the report are the responsibility of the Project Team and not the Steering Committee or the organisations they represent. -
Thismia Rodwayi
Threatened Species Link www.tas.gov.au SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROFILE Thismia rodwayi fairy lanterns Group: Magnoliophyta (flowering plants), Liliopsida (monocots), Orchidales, Burmanniaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: Not listed Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Not listed Endemic Found in Tasmania and elsewhere Status: Thismia rodwayi (fairy lanterns) is seldom seen because it flowers virtually beneath the soil surface. Fairy lanterns are often mistaken for fungi, but are true flowering plants. This delicate fleshy plant (not more than 2 cm tall) is aptly named ‘fairly lanterns’ with its bright orange lantern-like flowers that poke out of the soil. The species flowers from October to December. It lacks chlorophyll and is therefore incapable of photosynthesis, relying instead on fungi associated with the roots to provide food from rotting plant matter. Fairy lanterns grow in damp or wet forests. The species needs deep well-developed soils with a thick cover of leaf litter. The main threat to the species is clearing of habitat, which mainly occurs through forestry activities but also more locally from trackworks and residential subdivisions. Key Points Important: Is this species in your area? Do you need a permit? Ensure you’ve covered all the issues by checking the Planning Ahead page. Important: Different threatened species may have different requirements. For any activity you are considering, read the Activity Advice pages for background information and important advice about managing around the needs of multiple threatened species. Habitat 'Habitat’ refers to both known habitat for the species (i.e. in or near habitat where the species has been recorded) and potential habitat (i.e. -
APC 21(4) March – May 2013
AUSTRALASIAN PLANT CONSERVATION Vegetation monitoring and management at Kinglake National Park following the 2009 Black Saturday Bushfires Karl Just1 and Cam Beardsell2 1Consultant ecologist; 2Parks Victoria. Email: [email protected] Introduction The 2009 Black Saturday bushfires affected up to 95% of Kinglake National Park (KNP), situated in the western section of the Victorian highlands. The fire burnt across much of the park in several hours and in places reached intensities never before recorded in Victoria’s history. In the aftermath of the fire event, the sheer scale and intensity of the bushfire raised some important and concerning questions for the local land managers, Parks Victoria: • How had the fire affected populations of threatened plant taxa and vegetation communities? • Were these populations and communities at immediate risk from other processes in the post-fire period? The nationally threatened Swamp Bush-pea • If they were at risk, what could be done to prevent (Pultenaea glabra). Photo: Carl Just further decline? In an effort to respond to these questions, Parks Victoria Management initiated a vegetation monitoring and recovery program Despite the high density of seedling recruitment, Parks which began several months after the fire event and has Victoria was concerned that browsing pressure from continued until the present. This article discusses some native and feral herbivores such as Goats (Capra aegagrus of the challenges and responses encountered during the hircus), Sambar Deer (Rusa unicolor) and Black Wallaby program and uses individual plant taxa and communities (Wallabia bicolor) would eliminate plants. If the adult as case studies. population were killed, this could be detrimental if the fire had exhausted the soil seed-bank. -
The Alg of the Yan Yean Reservoir, Victoria
THE JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, (B0 T ANY.) The Algte of the Yan Yean Rrser+oir, Victoria : LL Biological and CEcological Study. By G. S. WEST,M.A., D.Sc., F.L.S., Lecturer on Botany in the University of' Birminghain. (PLATES1-6 and 10 Text-figures.) [Read 18th June, 1908.1 Page Introduction .................................................. 1 I. The Phytoplankton ........................................ G General Notice .......................................... 6 AIonthly Stateinelit of Plankton froni Feb. 190.5 to Feb. 1906 . 11 Tahle of Phytoplmkton .................................. 14 Dominant Forms nud their Periodicity ..................... 18 11. The Littoral Alga-flora (or Microphytic Benthos). ............... 22 General Notice .......................................... 22 Monthly Statement of the Jlicrophytic Benthos from Feb. 1905 to Jan.1906 .......................................... 23 Table of Littoral Alga-flora ................................ 26 Dominant Forms and their Periodicity ...................... 33 111. The Algae of the Yan Pean Drainage Area.. .................... 35 IV. The Relations between the Plankton, Benthos, and Ales of the Drainage Area. ........................................... 40 V. Systematic Account of the niore Noteworthy Species ............ 43 VI. The Peculiarities of the Australasian Alga-flora ................ 82 VII. General Summary ....... ................................... 84 INTRODUCTION. ABOUTthe middle of October, 1'304,T received from Mr. A. D. Hardy, F.L.S., of the Lands Department, Melbourne, two slides of Alge from the Yan Yenn Reservoir, and their inspection revealed such a number of interesting species LIZ". J0URN.-BOTANY, VOL. XXSIX. R 2 DR. a. s. WEST ON THE ALGB OF that I asked permission to examine more of the material. The sample had been obtained in February, 1904, about two hrindred yards from the shore, and froin the nature of the species observed I felt certain that the A1g-i~of the Yan Yean Reservoir would be well worth investigation. -
March 2021 NL
President www.apstasnorth.org Peter Dowde 6331 7761 Email: [email protected] Business Secretary Post: 45 Osborne Avenue, Anna McGrane 0419 347 743 Trevallyn. Tas. 7250 Minutes Secretary Noel Manning 6344 2277 Northern Group Newsle<er February - March 2021 This superb photo from Rosemary Verbeeten encapsulates the season beau6fully - the seeds falling lazily, the bu<erfly harves6ng nectar or perhaps just res6ng momentarily. These late summer flowers s6ll provide splashes of gold. The seeds are beginning the journey to become neXt year’s seedlings. To complete the picture look closely at the intricate markings on the bu<erfly, Australian painted lady, posing centre stage. At Propaga6on - the first Saturday in February with members enjoying a much earned a\ernoon tea. A good day and an eXcellent turnout as 23 members arrived at the nursery on February 6 to work on the many tasks in prepara6on for the looming plant sale on April 17th. Photo by Janet Hallam Tuesday 16 AGM 7.30 pm The AGM followed by the first General mee6ng in February had a very good a<endance. The organisa6on for the night was eXcellent: members were emailed and able to read relevant documents, think about new appointee and office bearer roles so that the agenda items progressed efficiently. Peter Dowde’s president’s report was detailed and showed a surprisingly busy year despite the months when events were cancelled. Appointees’ reports were also informa6ve reads, providing evidence of a very busy and hard working Group. Most office bearers retained their present responsibili6es but pleasingly a few new members were willing to add their names helping to spread the workload. -
Recovery of Victorian Rare Or Threatened Plant Species After the 2009 Bushfires
Recovery of Victorian rare or threatened plant species after the 2009 bushfires Black Saturday Victoria 2009 – Natural values fire recovery program Arn Tolsma, Geoff Sutter, Fiona Coates Recovery of Victorian rare or threatened plant species after the 2009 bushfires Arn Tolsma, Geoff Sutter and Fiona Coates Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment PO Box 137, Heidelberg VIC 3084 This project is No. 9 of the program ‘Rebuilding Together’ funded by the Victorian and Commonwealth governments’ Statewide Bushfire Recovery Plan, launched October 2009. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, February 2012 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2012 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. Print managed by Finsbury Green Printed on recycled paper ISBN 978-1-74287-436-4 (print) ISBN 978-1-74287-437-1 (online) For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186. Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility: If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, such as large print or audio, please telephone 136 186, 1800 122 969 (TTY), or email customer. -
Water Quality Annual Report
Water Quality Annual Report 2016-17 Melbourne Water Doc ID. 39900111 Melbourne Water is owned by the Victorian Government. We manage Melbourne’s water supply catchments, remove and treat most of Melbourne’s sewage, and manage rivers and creeks and major drainage systems throughout the Port Phillip and Westernport region. Table of contents Water supply system .................................................................................................. 3 Source water .............................................................................................................. 4 Improvement initiatives ............................................................................................. 7 Drinking water treatment processes .......................................................................... 8 Issues ...................................................................................................................... 16 Emergency, incident and event management ........................................................... 16 Risk management plan audit results ........................................................................ 17 Exemptions under Section 8 of the Act ..................................................................... 17 Undertakings under Section 30 of the Act ................................................................ 17 Further information .................................................................................................. 17 2 Water Quality Annual Report | 2016-17 This report is