DOCSLIB.ORG

Finished File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finished File FINISHED FILE SRI - SEXUAL RIGHTS INITIATIVE - ACTION CANADA FOR SEXUAL HEALTH AND RIGHTS SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 1300 CET Services provided by: Caption First, Inc. P.O. Box 3066 Monument, CO 80132 800-825-5234 www.captionfirst.com *** This text, document, or file is based on live transcription. Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART), captioning, and/or live transcription are provided in order to facilitate communication accessibility and may not be a totally verbatim record of the proceedings. This text, document, or file is not to be distributed or used in any way that may violate copyright law. *** >> VARYANNE SIKA: Hello, everyone. Hello. Shall we please take our seats. Thank you. So first of all, welcome, and thank you for joining us in this side event, for making the time to join us at this hour. We would like to just give you a few pointers before we start. The event is going to be livestreamed on Facebook. It's going to be captioned -- there's going to be live captions, and we're going to have translation services in Spanish and in French and Spanish to English and French to English, and we're going to have CAP services provided also. The event is organized by the Sexual Rights Initiative, SRI, which is a coalition of partners working in various regions, particularly with Global South. SRI works on issues related to gender, sexuality, and reproduction (Inaudible) Global South to these issues. We thank co-sponsors for working on this event with us and hope that we can work on more of all these kinds of events going forward. I forgot to introduce myself. My name is Varyanne Sika. I come from Nairobi, Kenya. I work with The Coalition of African Lesbians based in Johannesburg in South Africa, and The Coalition of African Lesbians is one of the members of the (Inaudible). So before we continue, I'd like to give an opportunity to the speakers to introduce themselves. We'll start from the right. >> RAKSHYA PAUDYAL: Good afternoon, everyone. This is Rakshya Paudyal, and I'm representing Beyond Beijing Committee, an organization based in Nepal. >> VICTORIA PEDRIDO: (Speaking non-English language) -- work at the regional level in Argentina. >> KRYSTYNA KACPURA: My name is Krystyna Kacpura. I represent the Federation for Women and Family Planning based in (Inaudible). >> MAEVE TAYLOR: Hello. My name is Maeve Taylor, and I'm the director of advocacy and communications with the Irish Family Planning Association, which is the Irish member of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. >> VARYANNE SIKA: Thank you. So just a very quick brief framing for this event. We organized this event in order to commemorate the outcoming international (Inaudible) September 28th, which is around the corner, and the purpose of the event is also to reflect on laws and policies related to abortions in different regions and to share with each other some lessons that we can learn from each other as well. We have the SRI, Sexual Rights Initiative, has a joint statement on abortion that we welcome you to support. Please sign or please see Danielle, who's the person on the right in the green if you wish to support this statement. So I just would like us to get very quickly into the presentations, and we will start also in the same order that we introduced ourselves. Rakshya will begin and then Victoria and Krystyna and me. >> RAKSHYA PAUDYAL: Thank you, Varyanne. I'd like to present my findings on progress and ensuring rights to safe abortion, and I'll be presenting from the Asian region. (Inaudible) it offers a response to unintended pregnancy and globally (Inaudible) pregnancies occur each year, and 56% of them end in abortion, and among 1,000 women, age 15-44, each year 62 pregnancies are unintended, and abortion offers due to ineffective use or nonuse of contraceptives, for nonintended pregnancies (Inaudible) due to changes in life circumstances are affecting women's help, and this is very important and it needs to be considered. Talking about the unsafe abortion (Inaudible), 42% of all safe abortions in Asia are among women aged 30-44 years, and it is slightly low, but it is still important and significant for (Inaudible) ignored, and for a developing reason as a whole, unsafe abortion is peak in the women age 20-29 years, and in Asia, the average abortion rate is 56 per 1,000 women. Talking about the South and Central Asian region, it is estimated that 57 abortions per 1,000 women is 15-44 years takes place. And abortion -- unsafe abortion is estimated to account for 30% of all maternal dates worldwide and a higher abortion rate in Asia which is 19%. (Inaudible) which is much more common and also the modality, and all the complications includes hemorrhages (Inaudible) cervix, and abdominal organs. Well, about abortion in South Asia, it is very clear that Nepal, Cambodia, is very (Inaudible) legalized abortion (Inaudible) preserve women's health for economic, social reasons, et cetera; however, in these regions, as well, despite the progressive stigma and other various (Inaudible) Mike creates (Inaudible). Abortion is legal only to save women's life; however, they've been using measured regulation as an entry point to ensure women have access to safe abortion, while in Philippines, the post-abortion care is used as an entry point. Coming down to the safe abortion in the case of Nepal, it is legal -- it is conditionally legal in Nepal, and it was legal in 2002, but before that, women used to be jailed for having abortion, and with the consent of women, safe abortion can be done for pregnancy up to 12 weeks, up to 18 weeks for rape and incest, and (Inaudible) if the mother's health is at risk or the fetal health is (Inaudible). It's very important to mention that Nepal says that every women (Inaudible) re-ensuring reproductive health rights of women in Nepal. Talking about legally policy framework, abortion is conditionally legalized. We have safe abortion policy, we have safe abortion program guidelines, which was formed in 2011, and the Reproductive Rights Bill is in the process of passing, and safe abortion is one of the key components in under the reproductive health rights. It's important to mention that the bill is mentioned as Reproductive Health Rights Bill, which I think is a very progressive step, and the service provision, more than 3,000 health professionals are trained, more than 1100 (Inaudible) 51 districts and second-trimester services are provided in 29 hospitals in Nepal, and most importantly, safe abortion is provided free of cost in all public health institutions of Nepal. Coming to the abortion incidents and unintended pregnancy in Nepal, 19% of pregnancies are unplanned and 50% of pregnancies are unintended, but the recent research, which was conducted by one of the research organizations (Inaudible), mentions that every year (Inaudible) abortion takes place out of reach, 58% are done under the (Inaudible) conditions, and 7% of maternal (Inaudible) is due to maternal abortion; however, (Inaudible) maternal mortality, which was 580 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 1995 to 109 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 2030. And talked about awareness, still the latest data shows that only 41% of women know that abortion is legal, and 48% of women know the place for obtaining safe abortion. When it comes to abortion, (Inaudible) for young women is even more important, and only 42% of young women think abortion is legal, and 3.5% of women below 20 years have had an abortion, but young women, especially fail to talk about abortion because stigma of being ostracized and (Inaudible), which is a major barrier for young women to access safe abortion in Nepal. (Inaudible) access service in an illegal secret setting due to the stigma of abortion and (Inaudible) and young women prefer to go to pharmacy and get the medicines over the counter so that people don't really recognize them for having an abortion. So there are different practices which are unsafe abortion practices, and it is one of the major factors is lack of information about the legalization, but because still -- like it was 38% in 2011, Demographic Health Survey, and it has increased to just 45% in 2016, so the lack of information is a major barrier -- major factor. And also the lack of availability of services, especially in the rural areas of Nepal, and the fear of being (Inaudible) while obtaining safe abortion service by health services, so women often go to health procedures which is far from their village, or they often go across the border to seek abortion services, and there is a belief in community that abortion is still a not correct choice, and -- despite women having unwanted pregnancy, and it is, as always, a taboo and stigmatized to (Inaudible) patriarchal mind-set and (Inaudible). So coming to the key recommendations, it is very important to make safe, legal abortion accessible as part of comprehensive sexual -- sexual and productive health services to all women, comprehensive sexual education over rights to our body, and rights of access to services is mandatory to adults and young people, which is very important for them to know about the changes and know about ways to access safe services. And safe abortion is entirely a women's right issue, and so specific laws and policies needs to be formulated or amended to ensure the rights of women (Inaudible). It's to ensure every women who choose abortion for unintended pregnancy is able to access safe and nonstigmatized level of care, and once again, expansion of services to the corners of villages is crucial so that every woman who wants the service is able to access it and, thus, being prevented from other unsafe practices and its consequences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TA(2020)0336 Abortion Rights in Poland European Parliament Resolution of 26 November 2020 on the De Facto Ban on the Right to Abortion in Poland (2020/2876(RSP))
    European Parliament 2019-2024 TEXTS ADOPTED P9_TA(2020)0336 Abortion rights in Poland European Parliament resolution of 26 November 2020 on the de facto ban on the right to abortion in Poland (2020/2876(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), and in particular Articles 2 and 7(1) thereof, – having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) of 4 November 1950 and the related case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), – having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), – having regard to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, – having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948, – having regard to the UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) of 16 December 1966 and the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) of 16 December 1966, – having regard to the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women of 18 December 1979, – having regard to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984, – having regard to the UN Human Rights Committee’s concluding observations of 23 November 2016 on the seventh periodic report of Poland, – having regard to UNESCO’s International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education of 10 January 2018, – having regard to the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held in Cairo in 1994, its programme of
    [Show full text]
  • Summaries of Jurisprudence Health and Reproductive
    SUMMARIES OF JURISPRUDENCE Health and Reproductive Rights Centro por la Justicia y el Derecho Internacional Center for Justice and International Law Centro pela Justiça e o Direito Internacional Pemonton Kowantok Wacüpe Yuwanin Pataset Summaries of Jurisprudence / Health and Reproductive Rights Compiled by Liliana Tojo Center for Justice and International Law - CEJIL, 2012. 216 p.; 24 x 17 cm. The commercialization of this publication is prohibited. Reproduction of the contents is authorized, provided that the source is quoted. Compilation: Liliana Tojo Compilation Assistant: Pilar Elizalde Federico Taboada Translation Team (spanish edition): Ludmila Novotny (intern) María Pía Rebussone (intern) Edition, editorial and cover design: Folio Uno S.A. CEJIL´s Board of Directors: José Miguel Vivanco (President) Alejandro Garro (Vice-president) Helen Mack (Secretary) Mariclaire Acosta Urquidi Gastón Chillier Benjamín Cuellar Gustavo Gallón Sofía Macher Julieta Montaño SUMMARIES OF JURISPRUDENCE Health and Reproductive Rights CEJIL´S WORK IS POSSIBLE THANKS TO THE GENEROUS CONTRIBUTION OF THE FOLLOWING SUPPORTERS: Dan Church Aid Diakonia/European Union EED Embassy of Canada in Argentina Foundation to Promote Open Society (FOSI) HIVOS Loyola University MISEREOR National Endowment for Democracy Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Royal Embassy of Norway in Argentina The Ford Foundation The John D. and Catherine MacArthur Foundation The Netherlands Embassy in Costa Rica The Oak Foundation The Sigrid Rausing Trust UNHCR United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture (UNVFVT) And individual and private donors who wish to remain anonymous. We are especially grateful to the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Argentina for the support they provided in the production of this book. IV PRESENTATION CEJIL is proud to present a new addition to the series: Tools for the Protection of Human Rights: Summaries of Jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]
  • Federation for Women and Family Planning Ul. Nowolipie 13/15 00-150, Warsaw, Poland [email protected]
    Federation for Women and Family Planning Ul. Nowolipie 13/15 00-150, Warsaw, Poland [email protected] Warsaw, 16 June 2021 Submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on Health - The right to sexual and reproductive health – Challenges and Possibilities during COVID-19 1. About the Federation The Federation for Women and Family Planning is a non-governmental organization based in Poland that works locally, regionally and internationally on advancement of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) through monitoring, advocacy and educational activities as well as strategic litigation before domestic and international courts. In 1999 the Federation was awarded the Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC) and conducts SRHR advocacy at the United Nations, Council of Europe and European Union. 2. Introduction This submission illustrates how Polish state instrumentalised Covid-19 measures to restrict access to SRHR with the particular focus on access to abortion. It outlines main events in the field of SRHR that has happened during Covid-19, and challenges faced especially by women in Poland who are making or living their reproductive choices. Unfortunately, for the scarcity thereof, only small part of the submission is dedicated to the opportunities created by the pandemic crisis. Poland was the only country at the EU where access to abortion have been drastically restricted and the conditions created by the Covid-19 crisis have facilitated for the Polish authorities the processes leading to the change in laws. It needs to be noted that even before the pandemic, pursuant to the Family Planning Act of 1993, access to abortion was limited to the grounds of severe and irreversible fetal defect or incurable illness of the fetus, rape, incest, and danger to mother’s health.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly in Its Consideration of Article 40.3.3° of the Irish Constitution
    Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly in its consideration of Article 40.3.3° of the Irish Constitution 16 December 2016 1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Purpose and Outline of the Submission ................................................................................................. 4 Domestic Legal Framework ..................................................................................................................... 6 Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights & Revised European Social Charter . 10 Obligations under United Nations Human Rights Treaties ................................................................... 16 Summary of Gaps in Protection as identified by International Bodies ................................................. 27 Recommendations of the Commission ................................................................................................. 30 2 Introduction The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (‘the Commission’) is both the national human rights institution and the national equality body for Ireland, established under the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission Act 2014 (‘2014 Act’). The 2014 Act provided for the merging of the former Irish Human Rights Commission and the former Equality Authority into an enhanced body. The new Commission enjoys increased institutional accountability to the
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting and Implementing Existing Abortion Laws in Africa 2013
    Interpreting and Implementing Existing Abortion Laws in Africa 2013 Content INTRODUCTION 8 SUMMARY OF LAWS REGULATING ABORTION IN AFRICA 11 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GUIDANCE ON SAFE ABORTION 13 CARE . TRANSLATING HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS INTO ACTION: BRIEF CASE STUDIES FROM THREE COUNTRIES (GHANA, ETHIOPIA, 17 Zambia) CONCLUSION 21 ANNEX I: SOURCES TO CONSIDER WHEN INTERPRETING AND IMPLEMENTING 23 ABORTION LAWS ANNEX II: FURTHER INFORMATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS 33 3 Foreword The promotion of maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) across the African continent is a priority of the African Union Commission. The continent has, no doubt, recorded significant improvement with regard to MNCH status. The economic growth being experienced across the continent provides a further window of opportunity to consolidate on those gains and cover more ground. Maternal, Newborn and Child Health status is a very critical indicator that provides an insight into the quality of life of any nation’s citizens. Women account for about fifty percent of the continent’s population. Therefore sustainable economic growth cannot be engendered unless they are empowered and their overall quality of life is improved. Unsafe abortion unfortunately continues to contribute to morbidity and mortality in Africa. Each AU member state has laws in place to regulate the practice within its sovereign responsibility to promote community wellbeing. Evidence has shown that if these laws, irrespective of their apparently liberal or restrictive nature, are implemented with a view to saving women’s lives and improving their health, the contribution of unsafe abortion to maternal mortality will be significantly contained. Evidence further shows that restrictive laws result in higher levels of unsafe abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Dishonourable Disobedience’’ — Why
    +Model WOMAN-2; No. of Pages 12 ARTICLE IN PRESS Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2014) xxx, xxx—xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/woman ‘‘Dishonourable disobedience’’ — Why refusal to treat in reproductive healthcare is not conscientious objection a,∗ b Christian Fiala , Joyce H. Arthur a Gynmed Ambulatorium, Mariahilferguertel 37, 1150 Vienna, Austria b Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, POB 2663, Station Main, Vancouver, Canada V6B 3W3 Received 30 January 2014; accepted 16 March 2014 KEYWORDS Summary In medicine, the vast majority of conscientious objection (CO) is exercised within Abortion; the reproductive healthcare field — particularly for abortion and contraception. Current laws Contraception; and practices in various countries around CO in reproductive healthcare show that it is unwork- Conscientious able and frequently abused, with harmful impacts on women’s healthcare and rights. CO in objection; medicine is supposedly analogous to CO in the military, but in fact the two have little in common. Dishonourable This paper argues that CO in reproductive health is not actually Conscientious Objection, disobedience; but Dishonourable Disobedience (DD) to laws and ethical codes. Healthcare professionals who exercise CO are using their position of trust and authority to impose their personal beliefs Reproductive health; on patients, who are completely dependent on them for essential healthcare. Health systems Refusal to treat and institutions that prohibit staff from providing abortion or contraception services are being discriminatory by systematically denying healthcare services to a vulnerable population and disregarding conscience rights for abortion providers. CO in reproductive healthcare should be dealt with like any other failure to perform one’s professional duty, through enforcement and disciplinary measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Rights in Ireland 297 Appendix 2- History of Reproductive Rights in Quebec 300
    Abortion Rights in Quebec and Ireland: Divergent Paths Laura Harris A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO November, 2013 ©Laura Harris, 2015 Abstract The ability to control one’s personal reproduction should be experienced by all women, regardless of citizenship. For Irish women, however, this does not exist. Ireland’s constitutional protection of a fetal right to life exists in direct conflict with a woman’s right to control her body. At first glance, one might point toward Ireland’s Catholicism, or perhaps its strong sense of nationalism, as likely reasons. When we consider Quebec, a jurisdiction with a historically strong sense of both Catholicism and nationalism, the answer as to why Ireland has one of the most conservative policies against abortion in the western world becomes more complex. By considering competing institutional strategies, the role of nationalism, the role of Catholicism, elites, and other interest groups, and the impact of multi-level governance, this dissertation seeks to uncover how Ireland and Quebec have such different policies regulating abortion rights. With regard to institutions and opportunities for the success of social movements, I consider which factors have been both present and absent from the reproductive rights movement in Ireland, ultimately leading to an incredibly slow progression of the liberalization of abortion access. I emphasize the ways that authoritative agents such as Dr. Henry Morgentaler, political institutions such as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and an effective women’s movement came together to foster the necessary climate for change.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments to Polish Parliamentary Committee
    Polish Federation for Women and Family Planning Memorandum for the Members of the Polish Parliament with Respect to the Bill “On the Protection of Human Life from the Moment of Conception” August 2011 The Federation for Women and Family Planning (Warsaw) and the Center for Reproductive Rights (New York) respectfully submit this memorandum to the esteemed Members of the Polish Parliament that will review the draft bill “On the protection of human life from the moment of conception” [Print No. 4222] (the “Bill”).1 The Bill aims to protect human life from the moment of conception and would impose an absolute ban on abortion in Poland. The Federation for Women and Family Planning is a Polish nongovernmental organization acting for gender equality by defending women‟s and girls‟ reproductive rights, including the right to legal and safe abortion, both at the national and international level.2 The Center for Reproductive Rights is an international human rights nongovernmental legal advocacy organization that provides international and comparative legal analysis on reproductive health–related issues to governments, inter-governmental bodies, including the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the European Union, and to non- governmental organizations around the world.3 This memorandum demonstrates that the Bill is inconsistent with the jurisprudence of national-level European courts on the right to life in the context of abortion and with the vast majority of the European countries‟ laws. Moreover, it violates international and regional human rights standards and has the potential to jeopardize women‟s health and lives. We urge the Parliamentary Health Committee and the Social Policy and Family Committee to recommend rejection of the Bill to the Parliament and we urge the Parliament to reject the Bill in the first reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Teenage Girl Who Was Raped Should Have Been Given Unhindered Access to Abortion
    issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 398 (2012) 30.10.2012 Teenage girl who was raped should have been given unhindered access to abortion In today’s Chamber judgment in the case of P. and S. v. Poland (application no. 57375/08), which is not final1, the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been: Two violations of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, as regards the determination of access to lawful abortion in respect of both applicants (by six votes to one) and as regards the disclosure of the applicants’ personal data (unanimously). It further held, unanimously, that there had been: A violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) in respect of P., and a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) in respect of P. The case concerned the difficulties encountered by a teenage girl, who had become pregnant as a result of rape, in obtaining access to an abortion, in particular due to the lack of a clear legal framework, procrastination of medical staff and also as a result of harassment. The Court held in particular that: the applicants had been given misleading and contradictory information and had not received objective medical counselling; and, the fact that access to abortion was a subject of heated debate in Poland did not absolve the medical staff from their professional obligations regarding medical secrecy. Principal facts The applicants, P. and S., daughter and mother, are Polish nationals who were born in 1993 and 1974 respectively and live in Lublin (Poland).
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilisation, Protest, and Resistance Against Reproductive Rights Restrictions in Poland
    Mobilisation, Protest, and Resistance Against Reproductive Rights Restrictions in Poland JOANNA MISHTAL* Abstract This paper1 examines Polish women’s use of the clandestine abortion under- ground and online networking as a form of resistance developed in response to severe reproductive rights restrictions in Poland since 1993. Rather than complying with the abortion ban, imposed unilaterally by postsocialist state and the Catholic church, Polish women’s response has been to develop their own coping strategies to control fertility, including circumventing the leg- islation by pursuing illegal abortions and sharing this knowledge on the In- ternet. Based on long-term ethnographic research in Poland and an analysis of online discussion forums, I argue that this individualised and privatised form of resistance is a limited stopgap strategy for dealing with larger social and collective concerns about reproductive rights, health, as well as gender equality that should be addressed with collective policy solutions. More- over, I consider these “anti-political” strategies in the context of the 2016 and 2018 mass protests to halt proposals for total abortion bans, and raise questions about the impact of different forms of mobilisation and resistance on reproductive rights and policies. Keywords: Gender; Reproductive governance; Abortion politics; Individu- alised resistance; Poland Introduction: postsocialist politics and the turn to the right in Poland When the state socialist regime collapsed across the Eastern European re- gion in 1989, and the advent of democracy was on the horizon, paradoxi- cally, women’s rights have not gained in this transition. Specifically, women’s reproductive rights, as well as employment rights, in particular protection of women against discrimination in the labour market, have suffered.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocating Access for Abortion Access
    Advocating for Abortion Access: Eleven Country Studies Copyright: Women’s Health Project 2001. The publication may be reviewed, abstracted or reproduced in part when fully referenced, but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. Published by: The Women’s Health Project School of Public Health University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa P O Box 1038 Johannesburg 2000 South Africa Fax: 27 11 489 9922 Telephone: 27 11 489 9917 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.sn.apc.org/whp/ Project managed by Zanele Hlatshwayo Publication edited by Barbara Klugman and Debbie Budlender Copy edited and proof-read by Cheryl Hunter Layout by ITL Communication and Design Cover photograph taken by Daniela Colombo during a rally in Rome in 1977. The women carry placards with names of women who had died after undergoing clandestine abortions. Printed by Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg ISBN No 1-86383-283-4 Also available in Spanish Acknowledgements The Johannesburg Initiative is funded by the Government of the Netherlands and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The South African case study was supported by the Health Systems Trust. We thank them all for their willingness to support a ‘south- based’ initiative and one which seeks to explore this contro- versial yet critical issue for women’s rights and health. We would like to thank all the participants in this Initiative for their commitment to this endeavour. We would like to thank our colleagues at Women’s Health Project (WHP) including our financial officer, Lynn Reynolds, operations manager Jennifer Harris and administrator Thandi Mosiane, for man- aging the logistics of the Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid- 19 Pandemic and the Protection of the Right to Abortion
    UDK 34-055.2: 616-036.21 Original scientific article COVID- 19 PANDEMIC AND THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO ABORTION Ivana Tucak, PhD, Associate Professor Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Stjepana Radića 13, Osijek, Croatia [email protected] Anita Blagojević, PhD, Associate Professor Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Stjepana Radića 13, Osijek, Croatia [email protected] ABSTRACT The COVID - 19 pandemic that swept the world in 2020 and the reactions of state authorities to it are unparalleled events in modern history. In order to protect public health, states have limited a number of fundamental human rights that individuals have in accordance with national constitutions and international conventions. The focus of this paper is the right of access to abortion in the Member States of the European Union. In Europe, the situation with regard to the recognition of women’s right to abortion is quite clear. All member states of the European Union, with the exception of Poland and Malta, recognize the rather liberal right of a woman to have an abortion in a certain period of time after conception. However, Malta and Poland, as members of the European Union, since abortion is seen as a service, must not hinder the travel of women abroad to have an abortion, nor restrict information on the provi- sion of abortion services in other countries. In 2020, a pandemic highlighted all the weaknesses of this regime by preventing women from traveling to more liberal countries to perform abortions, thus calling into question their right to choose and protect their sexual and reproductive rights.
    [Show full text]