International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2019, Vol 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 Original Research Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2019.201 COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY Pitta Venkata Chandrika *1, Athota Vijayalaxmi Devi 2, R.Chitra 3. *1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Siddhartha Medical College (Govt.), , , . 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Siddhartha Medical College (Govt.), Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3 Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Siddhartha Medical College (Govt.), Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. ABSTRACT

Introduction: The communication between musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve is an important anatomical variation to occur having serious implications during surgical procedures on arm if unnoticed and without prior knowledge. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted in 80 upper limbs of 40 adult human cadavers (Female: 10 and Male: 30) in the Department of Anatomy, Siddhartha Medical College (Government), Vijayawada and the Department of Anatomy, N.R.I. Medical College, over a period of 4 years (2014 to 2018) during educational dissections. Results: The communication between musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve was observed in present study, which is classified in accordance with previous classifications described in the literature. In present study the incidence of communication between musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve is 25%. Conclusion: Prior knowledge of this communication between musculocutaneous and median nerves in the arm is important to avoid the surgical damage to the nerves and also explain unusual clinical presentation in shoulder injuries. KEY WORDS: Musculocutaneous nerve, Median nerve, Communication. Address for Correspondence: Dr P.V.Chandrika, M.D.(Anatomy), Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Siddhartha Medical College (Govt.), Near Dr N.T.R.U.H.S., Gunadala, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, PIN -.520 008, India Mobile no. – 99494 98970. E-Mail: [email protected] Access this Article online Journal Information Quick Response code International Journal of Anatomy and Research ICV for 2016 ISSN (E) 2321-4287 | ISSN (P) 2321-8967 90.30 https://www.ijmhr.org/ijar.htm DOI-Prefix: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar Article Information Received: 15 Apr 2019 Accepted: 20 May 2019 Peer Review: 16 Apr 2019 Published (O): 05 Jun 2019 DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2019.201 Revised: None Published (P): 05 Jun 2019

INTRODUCTION important clinical entity and have been reported The brachial plexus is a network of nerves by several investigators. The musculocutaneous located in the lower neck and axilla which is nerve is the terminal branch of lateral cord of formed by anterior primary rami of C5 to C8 and brachial plexus and it pierces the coracobrachia- T1 and supplies the chest, shoulder and upper lis muscle, supplies it before piercing. Then it limb. Variations in the formation and branching descends in between the biceps brachii and pattern of the brachial plexus constitute an brachialis muscles supplying them and descends

Int J Anat Res 2019, 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 6674 Pitta Venkata Chandrika, et al., COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY. as lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm. two nerves was observed in 20 upper extremi- The median nerve is formed by the contribution ties. 4 cadavers show bilateral communications. from medial and lateral cords; one root from each Absence of musculocutaneous nerve was of them. It descends crossing the brachial observed in 7 upper extremities. artery from lateral to medial side without giving Table 1: Observations in the present study. any branches in the arm. Length of the Number of the Formation Musculocutaneous nerve has frequent varia- S.No Sex Communicating communicating of nerves tions associated with its connection to median nerve branches nerve. The knowledge of anatomical variations 1 M Normal 3.6cm Single of the peripheral nerves in the upper extremity 2 M Normal 4.1cm Single is extremely important as these could be inad- 3 M Normal 4.8cm Double vertently injured during surgical procedures, 4 M Normal 3.9cm Single administration of nerve blocks in axillary region 5 F Normal 3.3cm Double and also it explains the unusual clinical 6 M Normal 2.9cm Single symptoms. The present study is aimed at assessing the variations in the communications DISCUSSION between median nerve and musculocutaneous Absence of musculocutaneous nerve: Absence nerve which are of anatomical and clinical of musculocutaneous nerve was noted in seven significance. upper limbs in present study (0.88%). MATERIALS AND METHODS In the case of absence of musculocutaneous nerve all the three muscles viz; coracobrachia- The present study was conducted in 80 upper lis, biceps brachii and brachialis are supplied limbs of 40 adult human cadavers (Female: 10 by median nerve. This similarity also noted by and Male: 30) in the Department of Anatomy, Broca (1888) [1], Kerr (1918) [2], Le Minor (1992) Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada and the [3], Rao and Chaudhary (2000) [4], Sud and Department of Anatomy, N.R.I. Medical College, Sharma (2000) [5], Rajashree et al (2003) [6] and Chinakakani, Guntur (Dt) over a period of 4 years Saritha (2004) [7] in their studies. Incidence of (2014 to 2018) during educational dissections. this finding is 0.3 to 2.0% according to Broca All the cadavers were properly embalmed and [1], 5.14% by Kerr [2] and 3.33% according to fixed in formalin. The brachial plexus of both Priti Chaudary et al (2013) [8]. Rest of above sides were dissected carefully following described studies reported only single cases. standard procedure with particular importance to the communications between the musculo- No case of absence musculocutaneous nerve cutaneous and median nerves and the variations with innervations of coracobrachialis from observed were noted. Required ethical clearance branches of lateral cord and of Biceps brachii for the present study obtained from the Ethical by median nerve as described by Priti Chaudary committee of this institution. et al (2013) [8]. RESULTS Communications between musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve: Communications The results were categorized under the multiple between the musculocutaneous and median variables and compared with Le Minor’s obser- nerves is by far the most common and frequent vations. The variables considered in the present of all variations that are observed among the study are branches of brachial plexus. It varies between a 1. Whether the formation of two nerves were wide range of 1.4% to 63.5% (Sachdeva and normal. Singla 2011 [9]). Although the communications between the different nerves in the arm are rare, 2. Length of communicating branch. those between the musculocutaneous nerve and 3. Number of communicating branches. median nerve have been described from 19th In the present study, out of 80 dissected upper century [10]. The communication between extremities, the communication between the muscul ocutaneous nerve and median nerve

Int J Anat Res 2019, 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 6675 Pitta Venkata Chandrika, et al., COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY. have been classified into five different types by Fig. 1a: Le Minor - Type 1 communication Le Minor (in 1992) [3], three different types by Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou (in 1998) [11] and Choi et al (in 2002) [12]. Le Minor [3] classified these communications into following five types. Type I: There are no connecting fibers between the musculocutaneous and median nerve as described in classic textbooks. The musculocu- taneous nerve pierces the coracobrachialis MN – Median nerve, MCN –Musculocutaneous nerve, muscle and innervates the coracobrachialis, the LR- Lateral root, MR- Medial root. biceps brachii and brachialis muscle. Fig. 2: Le Minor - Type 2 communication Type II: Although some fibers of the medial root of the median nerve unite with the lateral root of the median nerve and form the main trunk of median nerve, remaining medial root fibers run in the musculocutaneous nerve leaving it after a distance to join the main trunk of median nerve. Type III: The lateral root of the median nerve from the lateral cord runs in the musculocuta- neous nerve and leaves it after a distance to join the main trunk of median nerve. Type IV: The fibers of the musculocutaneous MN – Median nerve, MCN –Musculocutaneous nerve, LR- Lateral root, MR- Medial root, CB – Communicating nerve unite with the lateral root of the median branch, CBr – Coracobrachialis muscle, BB- Biceps nerve. After some distance, the musculocuta- Brachii muscle. neous nerve arises from the median nerve. Fig. 3: Le Minor - Type 4 communication Type V: The musculocutaneous nerve is absent. The fibers of the musculocutaneous nerve runs within the median nerve along its course. In this type the musculocutaneous nerve does not pierce the coracobrachialis muscle. Fig. 1: Le Minor classification of communication between musculocutaneous and median nerve (Type I to V). LF: Lateral cord; MF: Medial cord; MC: Musculocutaneous nerve; M: Median nerve; U: Ulnar nerve; CB: Coracobrachialis muscle; BB: Biceps brachii muscle; B: MN – Median nerve, MCN –Musculocutaneous nerve, Brachialis muscle. LR- Lateral root, MR- Medial root. Fig. 4A: Le Minor - Type 5 communication

MN – Median nerve, LR- Lateral root, MR- Medial root, CBr – Coracobrachialis muscle, Br – Brachialis muscle.

Int J Anat Res 2019, 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 6676 Pitta Venkata Chandrika, et al., COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY. Fig. 4B: Le Minor - Type 5 communication comprising 138 cadavers. Pattern I: Fusion of both nerves (19.2%). Pattern II: Presence of one supplementary branch between both nerves (72.6%). Pattern IIa): Single root from musculocutane- ous nerve, contributes to the connection (69.9%). Pattern IIb): There are two roots from musculo- cutaneous nerve (2.7%). Pattern III: Presence of two branches between both nerves (6.8%). MN – Median nerve, BB- Biceps Brachii muscle, In present study, the communication between Br – Brachialis muscle, LCNF- Lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm. musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve according Choi et al [12], are of Type II and III. In present study, the communication between Anastomosis between musculocutaneous nerve musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve were and median nerve is the most common and classified according to Le Minor classification. frequent anomaly of brachial plexus. This is Table 2: Comparison of results of the present study under Le Minor classification. noted between a wide range of 1.4% to 63.5% according to Sahdeva and Singhla (2011) [9]. Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type V Guerri-Guttenberg and Ingolotti (2009) [13] 60 11 - 2 7 observed communication between median nerve Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou (2000) [11] and musculocutaneous nerve in 53.6%. classified this nerve communication into three types, depends upon its relation with coraco- Loukas and Aqueelah (2008) [14] observed brachialis muscle. communication between median nerve and musculocutaneous nerve in 63.5%. Type I: The communication is proximal to en- trance of the musculocutaneous nerve into co- If communicating branch between median nerve racobrachialis. and musculocutaneous nerve is given off in upper third of arm, it is generally considered as Type II: The communicating branch arises dis- third (Double lateral) root of the median nerve tal to coracobrachialis muscle from musculocu- [15]. taneous nerve. Lang and Spinner [16] reported a complete Type III: The musculocutaneous nerve and the fusion of the musculocutaneous and median communicating branch do not pierce the cora- nerve in a case report. Wantanabe [17] et al cobrachialis muscle. found two cases (1.4%) of fusion of median and Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou [11] found 22 musculocutaneous nerves among 140 upper communications between the musculocutane- limbs. ous and median nerves in 16 out of 79 cadav- Nakatani et al [18] observed absence of muscu- ers. In six subjects they were present bilater- locutaneous nerve with innervations of coraco- ally. Nine of these 22 communications were brachialis, biceps brachii and brachialis muscles proximal to the entrance of the musculocutane- and the lateral border of forearm by branches ous nerve into the coracobrachialis. from lateral cord of brachial plexus. In present study, the communication between Prasada and Chaudhary [19] reported two cases musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve of absence of musculocutaneous nerve out of 11 according to Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou 24 upper limbs dissected. The median nerve took classification, are of Type II (Communication over the area of supply of musculocutaneous was distal to Musculocutaneous nerve exit from nerve by giving off both muscular and sensory Coracobrachialis muscle) branches. Sud and Sharma [5] reported a case Choi et al (2002) [12] later classified the of absence of musculocutaneous nerve with in- communications into three types in a study nervations of coracobrachialis and biceps brachii Int J Anat Res 2019, 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 6677 Pitta Venkata Chandrika, et al., COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY. via the median nerve. The lateral cutaneous CONCLUSION nerve of forearm originated from the median The knowledge of communication between nerve and gave off a muscular branch to the musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve in brachialis muscle. the arm is of significant clinical importance Choi et al (2002) [12] reported the incidence of especially in post traumatic surgical repair of communication as 26.4% in 138 upper limbs. peripheral nerves and also in the anterior Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou (in 1998) [11] approach to fracture of Humerus. It also helps reported the incidence of communication as us explain the unexpected paralysis or paresis 13.9% in 158 upper limbs. of flexor muscles of elbow and hypoesthesia of Ontogeny: Many factors influencing the forma- lateral surface of forearm, in addition to tion of limb muscles and peripheral nerves classical signs due to high median nerve paraly- during embryonic life are attributed to abnor- sis occurring in axilla. It can also explain mal communication between musculocutaneous unexpected entrapment syndromes which is nerve and median nerve. This may be result of necessary to avoid unnecessary surgeries over signal alterations between mesenchymal cells carpal tunnel, as lesions of the communicating and neuronal growth cones according to Abhaya, branch may give rise to symptoms similar to Bharadwaj and Prakash (2003) [20] or the fac- carpal tunnel syndrome. tors affecting circulation at the time of forma- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS tion of Brachial plexus cords according to Kosugi, Mortia and Yamashita (1986) [21]. I offer my sincere gratitude to Dr Radhika, Professor, Dr Syamala, Associate professor and According to Iwata (1960) [22], human brachial Dr Laxmi Durga, Assistant professor for their plexus appears as single radicular cone in guidance in preparing the manuscript. upper limb bud, which then divides longitudi- nally into ventral and dorsal segments. Possible Conflicts of Interests: None failure of differentiation may be the cause of REFERENCES such abnormal communication and aberrant [1]. Broca (1888) cited by Gumusburun E, Adiguzel E. course. According to Chiarapattan et al (1998), Variation of brachial plexus characterized by lack of coordination between limb muscles absence of the musculocutaneous nerve: a case formation and their innervations during embry- report. Surg. Radiol.Anat., 2000;22:63-65. onic development as cause of formation of [2]. Kerr A T. The brachial plexus of nerves in man, abnormal communicating branch. variations in its formation and branches. Am J Anat, 1918;23(2):285-395. Phylogeny: Chauhan and Roy (2002) [23] [3]. Le Minor J M. A rare variation of the median and postulated phylogeny and development of musculocutaneous nerves in man. Arch Anat Histol nerves of upper limb for interpretation of nerve Embryol 1990;73:33-42. anomalies of upper arm. This abnormal commu- [4]. Chaudhary P, Singla R, Kalsey G, Arora K. Branching pattern of posterior cord of the brachial plexus: A nication between nerves could be remnant of cadaveric study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic phylogenetic or comparative anatomical point research, 2011;5:787-790. of view and the ontogeny recapitulates the [5]. Sud M, Sharma A. Absence of musculocutaneous phylogeny. nerve and inrrervations of coracobrachialis, biceps brachii and brachialis from median nerve. J Anat Table 3: Comparative incidence of communication Soc India 2000;49(2):176-177. between musculocutaneous and median nerves. [6]. Rajashree B, Arati D, Mamata S, Chinmayi M, Charulata S. Absence of musculocutaneous nerve- Study Incidence (%) a case report. J Anat Soc India 2003;52(1):94. [7]. Saritha S. Variations in the median nerve and mus- Guerri – Guttenberg and Ingolotti [13] 53.60% culocutaneous nerve –a surgical perspective. J Anat Kerr [2] 24% Soc Ind 2004;53(1):31-66. [8]. Priti Chaudary, Gurdeep Kalraj et al, Communica- Choi et al [12] 26.40% tion between musculocutaneous nerve and median Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou [11] 13.90% nerve – Different types and their incidence in North India population. Indian journal of clinical prac- Present study 25% tice. 2003;24:364-371.

Int J Anat Res 2019, 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 6678 Pitta Venkata Chandrika, et al., COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY. [9]. Sachdeva K, Singhla R K. Communication between [17]. Watanabe M, Takatsuji K, Sakamoto N, Morit Y, Ito median and musculocutaneous nerves. Journal of H. Two cases of fusion of musculocutaneous and Morphological sciences 2011;28:246-249. median nerves. Kalbo gaki Zasshi 1985;60:1-7. [10]. Harris W. The true form of Brachial plexus. J Anat [18]. Nakatani T, Mizukami S, Tanaka S. Absence of mus- Physiol, 1904;38:399-422. culocutaneous nerve with innervation of the cora- [11]. Venieratos D, Anagnostopoulou S. Classification of cobrachialis, the biceps brachii, the brachialis and communications between musculocutaneous and the lateral border of the fore arm by the branches median nerves. Clinical Anat J 1998;11(5):327-331. from lateral cord of the brachial plexus. J Anat [12]. Choi D, Rodriguez M, Vazquez T, Parkin I, Sanudo J R. 1997;191:459-460. Patterns of connections between the musculocuta- [19]. Prasada Rao P V, Chaudhary S C. Communication of neous nerve and median nerve in axilla and arm. musculocutaneous nerve with the median nerve. Clinical Anatomy, 2002;15:11-17. East Afr. Med. 2000;77:498-503. [13]. Guerri-Guttenberg, Ingolotti. Clinical anatomy, [20]. Abhaya A, Bharadwaj R, Prakash R. Dual origin of 2009;22 – 671-6983. Musculocutaneous nerve. Journal of Anatomical [14]. Loukas and Aqueelah. Musculocutaneous and me- society of India, 2003;52:56-59. dian nerves connections within proximal and dis- [21]. Kosugi K, Mortia T, Yamashita H. Branching pattern tal to coracobrachialis muscle. Folio Morphologica of musculocutaneous nerve. Jikeakai Med J, 2005;64(2):101-105. 1986;33:63-71. [15]. Bergman R A, Afifi A K, Miyauchi R. Illustrated ency- [22]. Iwata H. Studies on the development of the brachial clopedia of human anatomic variation. 1998, In: plexus in Japanese embryo. Rep Dept Anat Mie Pre- Nervous system – plexuses. Web: fect Univ Sch Med 1960;13:129-144. virtualhospital.com.university of iowa care. [23]. Chauhan R, Roy T S. Communication between me- [16]. Lang J, Spinner M. An important variation of bra- dian nerve and musculocutaneous nerve – A case chial plexus – complete fusion of median and mus- report. Journal of Anatomical Society of India, culocutaneous nerves. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 2002;51:72-75. 1970;31(1):7-13.

How to cite this article: Pitta Venkata Chandrika, Athota Vijayalaxmi Devi, R.Chitra. COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MUSCULOCUTANEOUS AND MEDIAN NERVES: A CADAVERIC STUDY. Int J Anat Res 2019;7(2.3):6674-6679. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2019.201

Int J Anat Res 2019, 7(2.3):6674-79. ISSN 2321-4287 6679