The Fall of Jamal Mohamed College Under the Premiership of Sheik Mohamed
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The fall of Jamal The fall of Jamal Mohamed College under the premiership of Sheik Mohamed Edited by Mary Sheryl De © 2011, Rightleft foundation No right is reserved Published by Rightleft foundation New York Author address The Principal Jamal Mohamed College Tiruchirappalli- 620020 - India Dedicated to The victims of Jamal Mohamed College Since 2003 Preface Thousands of pages are required to record the atrocities, victimizations, scandals, and other malpractices committed by the principal Sheik Mohamed. However, this small document represents the views of few victims of the principal of Jamal Mohamed College. Anyone who is interested in further investigation may look into the records of University Grants Commission of India, office of the Prime minister of India, office of the HRD ministry of India and the High court of Madras. I quote these offices because they have been bribed by Sheik Mohamed. Anyway the following pages are not my writings. They have been taken from the grievances and from the questions raised by the proud Jamalians. This can be kept as a small document for future reference. Enjoy reading the other side of the Indian Administrators. New York Mary Sheryl De 31st January, 2011 Why shouldn't the Ph.D awarded to Principal of Jamal Mohamed College be withdrawn? Look at the academic progress record of the Principal of Jamal Mohamed College, Tiruchirappalli. M.Com. (1974), M.Phil. (1984), Ph.D. (1994), PGDCA.(1996), FMSPI(2000), PGDFM (2001), FICWA (2001), Dip.MA (2006), MBA (2008), M.Phil.(Mgmt.) (2010) In 2003, this man becomes the principal of college, and awards the the following degrees to himself! Dip.MA (2006), MBA (2008), M.Phil.(Mgmt.) (2010) Everyone knows that 'degree' means 'level' and in this context 'level of education.' In the normal course, one goes through bachelor, masters, then the master of philosophy and the doctorate in philosophy. It is academically incorrect go for a master degree or anyother lower degree after the award of doctorate in philosophy. It is something like doing Ph. D in Chemistry, then coming back to school and writing an examination in physical chemistry and declaring that I have got first mark in physical chemistry. It is something like doing Ph. D in Computer science, then coming back to college, joining an M. Sc information Technology course and writing an examination and declaring that I have got first mark in Information technology. It is logically, socially, academically, philosophically incorrect to do so. No sane mind will do that. If Dr. X is doing a bachelor degree after the award of Ph.D, then his level of education is just a bachelor degree holder. Dr. X may hold a Ph.D, but his qualification would be just B.Sc., if the final degree recived by him is B.Sc. What is your present level (of education) is your qualification. What you had done in the past is the path, not your present qualification. In general the commerce guys used to buy several degrees in order to make a claim that I am opt for this job, for that job. But, here the case is principal of a big college. He advices his staff and students that everyone has to be like him. Everyone should buy degrees like him (after all, he is a man who gives certificates to himself, I know that commerce guys would say that is self appreciation). If everyone follows the path of the principal of Jamal Mohamed College, it would be academic disaster. Every teacher will appear for every examination in order to get a M. Sc in chemistry, the redo another Masters in Physics, Another masters in Botany, Another masters in Zoology... Is it the way science progresses? Is it the way academics progress? Is it not the promotion of idiocy in the name of education? I would say that the Ph. D awarded to these kind of 'academicians' should be withdrawn, because such person will become a wrong role model for the younger generation. Therefore, I feel that the society is having a watch on the academic affairs of all colleges. It is where our sons and daughters are getting educated. In order to teach a lesson to these kind of academic mockeries - the University Grants Commission of India and other academic regulatory bodies must first order for the withdrawal of the the Ph.D awarded to Principal of Jamal Mohamed College. It will become a good lesson for the all the academicians who have the intent of cheating. Sheik Mohamed Cannot make a claim that I am innocent because first the he is th principal and secondly he is doctorate degree holder. He must know meaning of the word 'degree'. No excuse! Don't the University Grants Commission of India consider this as academic mockery? What is the stand of Government of India on this issue? Is it academically correct to award degree to himself? If the same trend continues, everyone will start a college to award a degree to himself! The Principal of Jamal Mohamed College Awarding degree (M. Phil in Management) to himself! Date: 19. 12. 2010 Venue: Jamal Mohamed College Auditorium I don't see any problem. His masters was in commerce. I do not know in what subject the Principal got his initial Ph.D. but his subsequent qualifications were in diverse subjects like computers, finance, accounts and management. What is wrong? There are instances in which people with higher qualification acquire degree/ diploma in other subjects. Are you not aware of post graduates becoming graduates in law or education? I know at least one specialist doctor with MD (Urology) who studied DGO (diploma in gynecology). He was not disqualified as urologist. Many engineers (incl PG) acquire AMIE qualification in related branches, like a ME (Electrical) pass AMIE (Electronics). … It is academically incorrect to do so. So, you will join higher secondary school after your Ph. D and sit with school students and declare that you are the first rank holder. No one expected that this kind of tragedy will happen with Indian Academics. I hope you are not understanding the basis of classification of degrees and diplomas. It is a hierarchal order, not the parallel order. So, in the days to come, one has to go through MD (urology), MD (gynocology), MD(x-ology), MD (y-ology), MD(n-ology). Hello man, you are lost.....Finally no one will know what this MD means? You will always read books and declare that you are the most intelligent person in the world. Let me tell you, the right course - after Ph.d go for Post doctoral fellowship, publish more research papers, and shine in the field which you have chosen. That is what academic progress means. Not in this way - doing B.Sc physics, B. Sc - chemistry, B. Sc - zoology, B. Sc - Botany. Finally declare that what you are master of everything. The hard core fact - all these subjects share - the same more than 90 %) of papers. If what you say is correct and encouraged - then the spirit of conducting examinations and awarding degrees is lost. For example - in the beginning of your B. Sc and BA degree - you have the same set of papers for first four semesters in all departments. Only in the third year, the papers differ. So, any guy - who has already completed B. Sc in chemistry and if he goes for a B.Sc in physics, definitely he will get the first mark. All the others will be running behind him. It is a clear act of academic mockery. You can kill the foundations of academic institutions by showing examples - that man has done this, this man has done so. What is the academic spirit has to looked from that way. I know my university does not allow people to go for lower degrees after the award of Ph. D. Ph. D is not a course work. You synthesis a new thesis on the basis of all that you have learned before, and you make a generalization, the thesis statement on the basis of years of your observation. I say that his Ph. D must be withdrawn because he wrote a thesis without acquiring essential knowledge to write a thesis. If you say that you are writing a thesis in chemistry, it means that you have verified the physical, chemical, biological, synthetic, thermodynamic, ... mathematical, logical viewpoints. It implies that your thesis is invalid if ff you go for Ph. D in physics after a Ph.d in chemistry because your thesis has not looked in to all the aspects of the given problem. If the conclusion is that a PhD should never diversify into other fields, then I cannot comment on it. I just do not agree. Similarly****o not know if a doctoral thesis approved by different experts in the field should be invalidated later on the grounds that the scholar did research on a different problem in the same or allied or different field. It is reasonable to cancel the earlier doctorate if it gets known tha**** was incorrect on facts or logic not because a PhD (Chemistry) did a PhD (Chemistry, Physics or E****mics). I am not aware of any such rule, precedent or code of conduct. But I know PhDs who got MBA later and continue to be PhD. Regarding B.Sc. in multiple fields, it may look odd. But how can we object? In some universities, candidates who go for second graduation, the common subjects like English, are exempted. The Principal of Jamal Mohamed College shows this way to the republic of India: 1. Do a Ph.