Board Briefing Paper July 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Putting the Water Into Waterways, September 2014 Also Available At
Putting the water into waterways Water Resources Strategy 2015–2020 October 2015 Contents Executive summary 3 Appendices Strategic actions 4 Appendix 1 – Hydrological units, including phase 1 modelling cycle 28 01 – Introduction – why do we need a Water Resources Strategy? 6 Appendix 2 – Organisations that helped us to shape this Strategy 32 02 – Key concepts and definitions 8 Appendix 3 – Glossary 33 03 – Why do we need a level of service? 11 Appendix 4 – References 34 04 – What is our agreed level of service? 11 05 – Impacts of restorations and new canals on level of service 12 North West Waterway North East Waterway 06 – Measuring level of service Manchester & Pennine Waterway North Wales & Borders Waterway and baseline data Central Shires13 Waterway East Midlands Waterway West Midlands Waterway 07 – Future pressures South East 14Waterway South Wales & Severn Waterway Kennet & Avon Waterway Stockton London Waterway on Tees 08 – How will we decide on waternon-Trust waterways coastal gateways resource improvement schemes?non-navigable 19 waterways are Kendal indicated by a dashed line 09 – Phasing of water resources Ripon Lancaster schemes 22 Skipton Bingley 10 – Other issues 23 Preston Burnley York Ribble for 3 & 5 rise Blackburn Link Leeds Sowerby Selby 11 – Cycle of the strategy 27 Bridge Goole Rochdale Castleford Burscough Wakefield Wigan Bolton Bury Huddersfield Keadby Standedge Salford Tunnel Doncaster Liverpool Quays Rotherham Manchester Sheffield Runcorn Chesterfield Worksop Gainsborough Marple Anderton Bugsworth Boat Lift Basin -
Response to the Consultation on the Route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and Beyond
Canal & River Trust response to the Consultation on the route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and beyond. Response to the Consultation on the route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and beyond Please find below the response of the Canal & River Trust. The Trust is the guardian of 2,000 miles of historic waterways across England and Wales. We are among the largest charities in the UK, maintaining the nation’s third largest collection of listed structures, as well as museums, archives, navigations and hundreds of important wildlife sites. The Trust has a range of charitable objects: to preserve, protect, operate and manage Inland Waterways for public benefit: for navigation; for walking on towpaths; and for recreation or other leisure-time pursuits of the public in the interest of their health and social welfare; to protect and conserve for public benefit sites, objects and buildings of archaeological, architectural, engineering or historic interest on, in the vicinity of, or otherwise associated with Inland Waterways; to further for the public benefit the conservation protection and improvement of the natural environment and landscape of Inland Waterways; to promote, facilitate, undertake and assist in, for public benefit, the restoration and improvement of Inland Waterways; to promote and facilitate for public benefit awareness, learning and education about Inland Waterways, their history, development, use, operation and cultural heritage by all appropriate means including the provision of museums; to promote sustainable development in the vicinity of any Inland Waterway for the benefit of the public, in particular by: the improvement of the conditions of life in socially and economically disadvantaged communities in such vicinity; and the promotion of sustainable means of achieving economic growth and regeneration and the prudent use of natural resources; and Canal & River Trust response to the Consultation on the route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and beyond. -
The International Canal Monuments List
International Canal Monuments List 1 The International Canal Monuments List Preface This list has been prepared under the auspices of TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage) as one of a series of industry-by-industry lists for use by ICOMOS (the International Council on Monuments and Sites) in providing the World Heritage Committee with a list of "waterways" sites recommended as being of international significance. This is not a sum of proposals from each individual country, nor does it make any formal proposals for inscription on the World Heritage List. It merely attempts to assist the Committee by trying to arrive at a consensus of "expert" opinion on what significant sites, monuments, landscapes, and transport lines and corridors exist. This is part of the Global Strategy designed to identify monuments and sites in categories that are under-represented on the World Heritage List. This list is mainly concerned with waterways whose primary aim was navigation and with the monuments that formed each line of waterway. 2 International Canal Monuments List Introduction Internationally significant waterways might be considered for World Heritage listing by conforming with one of four monument types: 1 Individually significant structures or monuments along the line of a canal or waterway; 2 Integrated industrial areas, either manufacturing or extractive, which contain canals as an essential part of the industrial landscape; 3 Heritage transportation canal corridors, where significant lengths of individual waterways and their infrastructure are considered of importance as a particular type of cultural landscape. 4 Historic canal lines (largely confined to the line of the waterway itself) where the surrounding cultural landscape is not necessarily largely, or wholly, a creation of canal transport. -
Project Title
Lichfield Canal Restoration Feasibility Study Final Report - July 2009 Acknowledgements The Lichfield and Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust Limited would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following in preparing this report: British Waterways West Midlands has contributed considerable staff time as an in kind donation to the feasibility study. BW has inspected works constructed to date, advised as to the design criteria required and provided assistance with budget estimates for specialist elements of the scheme. Lichfield District Council has provided Ordnance Survey Mapping and other assistance, including identifying local nature sites and consultation over environmental issues, to the feasibility study. Thanks are due to Staffordshire Highways for its ongoing co-operation with the Trust, particularly with regard to the Lichfield Southern Bypass proposals and its prompt provision of design details for use in the study. The Inland Waterways Association (IWA) have provided a grant of £5,000 to part fund the feasibility study, and this support is gratefully acknowledged. IWA’s Consultant Engineers have reviewed the engineering proposals and their suggestions have been taken into account and incorporated where appropriate. The Environment Agency have indicated their support in principle for the restoration of the Lichfield Canal The invaluable work of the Trust itself, and all its members and officers is also acknowledged. In particular, John Horton and Mike Smith have undertaken much early work developing solutions which this study validates and on which, in part, it is based. John produced the first analysis of a potential alignment for the restored canal, and Mike has developed options to demonstrate that a restored canal would be able to use the Lichfield Southern Bypass corridor.