DOCSLIB.ORG

Refgov Refgov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Refgov Refgov REFGOV Project no CIT3-CT-2005-513420 REFGOV Reflexive Governance in the Public Interest Integrated Project Priority 7 – Citizens and Governance in a knowledge-based society PART I PERIODIC ACTIVITY REPORT 3 June 2007 – May 2008 Period covered from 1/06/2007 to 31/05/2008 Date of preparation Start date of project 1/06/2005 Duration 5 years Project coordinator J. Lenoble name Project coordinator CPDR (Centre de Philosophie du Droit) Revision Organisation name Université catholique de Louvain REFGOV Reflexive Governance in the Public interest Periodic activity report 3 June 2007-May 2008 Contents Section 1 – Project objectives and major achievements during the reporting period.................................................................................................................... 4 Part 1 The REFGOV Research Project: Its General Framework, Hypotheses, Methodology, and Development. 4 1. The specific nature of the REFGOV research project and the hypothesis of reflexive governance 5 2. Review of the methodological organisation and planning of the research project: the scope of the studies conducted between June 2007 and May 2008 18 Part 2 Subnetworks’ objectives and major achievements during the reporting period 22 1. Global Public Services and Common Goods 22 2. Fundamental Rights 25 3. Services of general interest 29 4. Corporate governance 39 5. Institutional Frames for Markets 41 6. Theory of the Norm Unit 47 Section 2 – Workpackages - progress of the period.......................................49 2.1. Workpackages - Services of General Interest 49 Work package 1 description – SGI ...................................................................................... 49 Work package 2 description – SGI ...................................................................................... 51 Work package 3 description – SGI ...................................................................................... 52 Work package 4 description – SGI ...................................................................................... 53 Work package 5 description – SGI ...................................................................................... 55 2.2 Workpackages Global and Public Services 58 Work package 26 description – GPS.................................................................................... 58 Work package 27 description – GPS.................................................................................... 59 2.3 Workpackages Institutional Frames for Markets 62 Work package 11 description – IFM.................................................................................... 62 Work package 12 description – IFM.................................................................................... 63 Work package 13 description – IFM.................................................................................... 64 Work package 14 description – IFM.................................................................................... 65 Work package 15 description – IFM.................................................................................... 67 Work package 16 description – IFM.................................................................................... 69 2.4 Workpackages Corporate Governance 70 Work package 17 description – CG ..................................................................................... 70 Work package 18 description – CG ..................................................................................... 72 Work package 19 description – CG ..................................................................................... 74 Work package 20 description – CG ..................................................................................... 76 2.5 Workpackages Fundamental Rights 78 Work package 28 description – FR...................................................................................... 78 Work package 29 description – FR...................................................................................... 81 Work package 30 description – FR...................................................................................... 84 Work package 31 description – FR...................................................................................... 87 Work package 33 description – FR...................................................................................... 90 2.5 Workpackages Theory of the Norm Unit 94 Coordinated by the Centre for Philosophy of Law – Université catholique de Louvain 2 http://refgov.cpdr.ucl.ac.be/ REFGOV Reflexive Governance in the Public interest Periodic activity report 3 June 2007- May 2008 Work package 24 description – TNU................................................................................... 94 Work package 25 description – TNU................................................................................... 97 Work package 35 description – CTS.................................................................................... 99 Section 3 – Tables ............................................................................................101 3.1 Workpackages Table 102 3.2 Deliverables Table 105 Annexes.............................................................................................................110 Annexe 1 : Global Public Services : Overview of the proposed edited volume in the “Politics, Science, and the Environment” series, MIT Press 110 Annexe 2 : Global Public Services : Outline of a collective volume, based on the Cargese workshop 112 Annexe 3 : Global Public Services : Workshop 7th of May 2008, Fondation Universitaire, Bruxelles 114 Annexe 4 : Corporate Governance : list of outputs 116 3 Coordinated by the Centre for Philosophy of Law – Université catholique de Louvain http://refgov.cpdr.ucl.ac.be/ REFGOV Reflexive Governance in the Public interest Periodic activity report 3 June 2007- May 2008 Section 1 – Project objectives and major achievements during the reporting period Part 1 The REFGOV Research Project: Its General Framework, Hypotheses, Methodology, and Development. If the scope of the studies conducted in REFGOV during its third year (June 2007 – May 2008) is to be grasped, those studies must be situated within the research project’s general framework. To this end, two points must be recalled: 1. To build on the initial results of the REFGOV research project, it is necessary to specify the broad hypothesis governing the research project and the meaning we ascribe to the expression “reflexive governance”, thereby defining the conditions a collective action must fulfil in order to ensure, to the extent possible, that its members’ normative expectations are “maximised” (that is, in order to ensure what is generally called “governance in the public interest”). 2. Then we should remind the method used to organise the broad investigation being conducted within REFGOV, guaranteeing consistency among the various subnetworks. This will enable us to give an account of the basic unity underlying all the studies being conducted within the various subnetworks, across differing disciplinary approaches and the various empirical fields dealt with in the case studies. Clarifying our methodological procedure will also enable us to recall the way we have organised the research project’s “temporal dynamics”. With this basis, we will give an account of the stages to which the studies conducted between June 2007 and May 2008 correspond and the stages that remain to be completed for the objectives we set for REFGOV to be fulfilled. *** 4 Coordinated by the Centre for Philosophy of Law – Université catholique de Louvain http://refgov.cpdr.ucl.ac.be/ REFGOV Reflexive Governance in the Public interest Periodic activity report 3 June 2007- May 2008 1. The specific nature of the REFGOV research project and the hypothesis of reflexive governance The meaning we assign to the expression “reflexive governance” can only be understood if we first recall the project that underpins REFGOV. This project emerged out of an option and an insight. The option consists of how “governance of a collective action” is broached. The insight was that by reconstructing the different current investigations into theory of governance from the angle of their theoretical assumptions about the theory of collective action, we would arrive at an important theoretical result. First, the option. No one doubts the issue designated by the term “governance” is currently dealt with in differing ways depending on the disciplinary instrument used (economic, legal, political-science, and so on) and the level at which a specific issue addressed is situated. Indeed, one is often struck by how difficult it is to integrate all this work into a cohesive inquiry, the issues under study being so diverse and situated at such divergent levels. (For instance, how are we to integrate economic analyses of reform in the management of common goods with political-scientific or legal analyses about multilevel governance or with analyses of new modes of governance inspired by the theories of deliberative democracy?) Thus under the umbrella of a single term – one that designates a common investigation into the question of governance – can be found an aggregation of studies that diverge significantly as regards the issues examined and the methodological approaches used. Besides this, however, even when the studies deal with similar issues, dialogue appears to be impossible. Often discipline-based approaches are developed in one sphere
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acquis + Glossary
    Acquis + Glossary THE ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE FOR SERVICES OF GENERAL ECONOMIC INTEREST ––– December 2020 General Remark: This Glossary is a general and non-exhaustive description of the EU primary and secondary law, case law and soft law impacting the provision of SGIs in the European Union, from a transversal point of view. It does not aim at presenting all the EU legislation impacting each and every sector and service concerned as this would require a specific project. This transversal work enlightens how complex the issue of services of general interest in the European Union is, as it is always difficult to find the right balance between the European cohesion and the respect of subsidiarity. Based on this compendium, SGI Europe has therefore formulated proposals in a Manifesto to achieve this equilibrium with the objective of giving the best answer possible to citizen’s expectations regarding their public services. In order to facilitate the comprehension of the concept of SGIs in Europe at national and local level, these two documents are accompanied by a leaflet “Services of General Interest for Everyone”. All this Acquis+ Package is available on SGI Europe website www.SGIeurope.org For more information, please contact SGI Europe General Secretariat ([email protected] - +32 2 219 27 98) Content Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Primary law ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TESTING the EUROPEAN UNION SKILLS PROFILE TOOL for Tcns
    TESTING THE EUROPEAN UNION SKILLS PROFILE TOOL FOR TCNs AN EVALUATION REPORT BASED ON PILOT TESTING EXERCISES CONDUCTED IN AUSTRIA AND GREECE IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EXPERT GROUP OF SKILLS AND MIGRATION OF THE LABOUR INT 2 PROJECT Gaia Testore FIERI WITH THE SUPPORT OF: IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Co-funded by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund of the European Union. 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 6 Box 1: Explaining the Refugee Gap 7 1. THE ISSUE AND THE EU TOOL 8 1.1. The issue: increasing asylum seekers and refugees’ employability through the assessment of formal/informal skills 8 1.2. The EU tool and its goals 11 Box 2: Recent Updates to the EU Tool 12 2. THE EVALUATION STRATEGY 13 3. THE ANALYSIS OF THE LOGIC BEHIND THE ADOPTION OF THE EU TOOL 15 4. THE TWO NATIONAL PILOT ACTIONS 18 4.1. The asylum/migration legislation and the labour market context in Athens (Greece) 18 4.2. The testing of the EU skills profile tool in Athens (Greece) 20 4.3. The asylum/migration legislation and the labour market context in Tyrol (Austria) 22 4.4. The testing of the EU skills profile tool in Tyrol (Austria) 24 5. MAIN FEATURES AND CHALLENGES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU TOOL 28 5.1. Improving user-friendliness and making the tool even more responsive to counsellors’ needs 29 5.2. The contextual elements and their impact on the EU tool 31 6. FINAL REMARKS 33 ANNEX 35 Annex I: the evaluation strategy flyer 36 Annex II: the questionnaire for the counsellors- the Greece example 37 REFERENCES 41 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Labour market integration is a key facet of the broader issue of social inclusion of asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Reshaping the Future
    WHY EUROPE NEEDS PUBLIC SERVICES RESHAPING THE FUTURE ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT EDITORIAL - A SHIFT OF PARADIGM FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 3 WHAT IS CEEP? 4 A YEAR IN REVIEW 5 The Public Procurement Package 5 The Local Public Services Entreprises Conference 7 The Framework of Actions for Youth Employment 8 The Symposium on Acquis + 8 CEEP’s Projects 9 The Public Services Summit, in pictures 11 PUBLIC SERVICES BOARD 13 Entreprises, Internal Market & Competition 15 Local Entreprises 16 Services of General Interests & Statistics 18 SOCIAL AFFAIRS BOARD 20 Macro-Economics 22 Social Protection 23 Health & Safety 24 Education & Training 25 SUSTAINABILITY BOARD 26 Communications 28 Energy 29 Environment 30 Transport 32 Water 33 ANNEXES 35 CEEP Executive level 35 President & Correspondents 35 Members of CEEP National Sections 39 Opinions 44 CEEP Responses to Consultation 45 Press Releases 45 CEEP General Secretariat 47 2 CEEP - ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 EDITORIAL A SHIFT OF PARADIGM FOR PUBLIC SERVICES Dear colleagues, Dear friends, Hans-Joachim RECK, Valeria RONZITTI, President General Secretary In 2013, public services in Europe were questioned, with One of the key conclusions of this PSS was that a shift in financial cuts being operated in a difficult financial, eco- paradigm is needed to achieve inclusive and sustainable nomic and social context. growth. The economic and social upheavals taking place over these past few years are the focus of ongoing dis- In order to find innovative solutions, CEEP organised in cussions among EU and national leaders. June the first ever Public Services Summit (PSS). It was But those discussions are not reaching any results: there more than necessary to hold that Summit in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU)
    European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) Press Release, 2 September 2021 Damaging ruling on how the Commission should handle EU social partner agreements 10 million workers in central governments remain deprived of EU legal protection of information and consultation rights on restructuring (Brussels, 2 September 2021) Today, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its verdict on the case EPSU (the European Federation of Public Service Unions) brought against the European Commission (case C-928/19P). The case concerned the Commission’s unprecedented refusal to bring forward a social partner agreement to the Council for decision based on the interpretation of Article 155.2 TFEU. EPSU argued that when the social partners are representative, when they jointly request so and when the content of their agreement is legal, the Commission must transform the agreement into a directive for Council to decide upon. This is based upon 25 years of practice and several Commission communications on the subject. Pending a full analysis of the verdict, the Court’s press release indicates the Advocate- General’s public opinion has been upheld. It states that the Commission has full discretion to do what it wants with social partner agreements. This means the Commission can make a political judgement as to whether a social partner agreement fits in its agenda or to give in to pressure from some governments to not bring an agreement to the Council for a majority decision. The ultimate result is twofold: Firstly, it denies nearly ten million civil servants and workers in public administrations the same EU legal protection of information and consultation rights as other workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Activities
    EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE UNIONS REPORT OF ACTIVITIES JANUARY - DECEMBER 2006 EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE UNIONS • FEDERACIÓN SINDICAL EUROPEA DE SERVICIOS PÚBLICOS • FEDERATION SYNDICALE EUROPEENNE DES SERVICES PUBLICS • EUROPEISKA FEDERATIONEN FÖR OFFENTLIG ANSTÄLLDAS FÖRBUND • EUROPÄISCHER GEWERKSCHAFTS- VERBAND FÜR DEN ÖFFENTLICHEN DIENST TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EPSU GOVERNING BODIES...............................................................................................3 STEERING AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ........................................................................................................ 3 FINANCES, MEMBERSHIP & PERSONNEL........................................................................................................ 6 II. GENDER EQUALITY COMMITTEE.....................................................................................7 III. EPSU STANDING COMMITTEES....................................................................................9 1. HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES ........................................................................................................... 9 2. NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................... 15 3. LOCAL AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT................................................................................................. 18 4. PUBLIC UTILITIES...............................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Public Services Supporting the Very Fabric of European Society
    Public Services Supporting the Very Fabric of European Society ACTIVITY REPORT | 2010 Editorial Dear colleagues, dear Friends, You are receiving this activity report during the celebrations of CEEP 50th anniversary. We have therefore decided, through this editorial, to pay tribute to all those who helped to make what CEEP is today: THE representative of public services providers and public employers in Europe. The road that brought us here was sometimes made out of successes, sometimes of failures, but always characterised by the strong will of CEEP members and leaders to keep the organisation at the centre of European policies. All started in 1961, when a group of large public enterprises joined forces to ensure that the voice of public services providers would be heard by European policy makers. At that time, the Treaty of Rome was signed only four years before, the accession of different Member States was something difficult to imagine, and the number of policies to be addressed by European institutions was still limited. Nobody could fully imagine what the future of Europe would be, nor what role CEEP would play in such a future. In reality, this was for the organisation only the beginning of a long and successful story. Since then, we have grown quite a lot. From its first conference in 1961 CEEP has expanded its membership to many new sections, often anticipating the entering of the respective Member State into the European Union. While we were growing in numbers, the available resources for public services were declining. The waves of liberalisation of Services of General Interest throughout Europe made CEEP members work under the mantra of “doing more with less”.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2019 Ceep Activity Report 2019 3 What Is Ceep? Editorial
    CROSS-INDUSTRY SOCIAL PARTNER FOR PUBLIC SERVICES EMPLOYERS REPRESENTING PROVIDERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND SERVICES OF GENERAL INTEREST ACTIVITY www.ceep.eu REPORT 2019 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 5 2019 IN REVIEW 6 Public Services Summit 2019 6 CEEP and the EU elections 8 Activities across Europe 30thAnniversary of Employers of Poland 10 Congress of the Fédérations des EPL 10 Contributing to a social Europe The 6th Social Partners’ Work Programme 11 Negotiation of the Autonomous Framework Agreement on Digitalisation 11 CEEP Opinion on climate change 12 Digitalisation of public services and SGIs 12 Contribution to sectoral policies Drinking Water Directive and Water Framework Directive Consultation 13 Revision of the Clean Vehicle Directive 13 Regulatory Challenges for a Sustainable Gas Sectoir 13 Startegic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment 13 A Fair Level Playing Field for SGIs Supporting a Stong Cohesion Policy, and Highlighting the Role of SGIs in its Implementation 14 Review of the SME Definition 14 Projects Social Services in EU Cross-Industry Social Dialogue 15 Labour INT 2 15 SOCIAL AFFAIRS BOARD 16 Macroeconomics Task Force 18 Social Protection Task Force 18 PUBLIC SERVICES BOARD 20 SGI Task Force 22 Internal Market Task Force 22 SUSTAINABILITY BOARD 24 Communications Task Foce 26 Energy Task Force 26 Environment Task Force 27 Transport Task Force 27 Water Task Force 28 ANNEXES Presidential Team 29 National sections, sectoral members and associated members 30 Members of CEEP sections 34 Opinions, responses to consultations and other papers 36 Press releases 37 General Secretariat (as of May 2020) 38 2 CEEP ACTIVITY REPORT 2019 CEEP ACTIVITY REPORT 2019 3 WHAT IS CEEP? EDITORIAL CEEP, the European Centre of Employers and Enterprises PRESENT AT THE HEART OF THE EU providing Public Services and Services of general Along with BusinessEurope and ETUC, CEEP is one of the interest (SGIs), represents employers and enterprises three European general cross-industry social partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Programme 2021
    Work Programme 2021 CORPORATE PRIORITIES Work for an SGI friendly recovery post COVID-19: Building up on the contacts established with the European Commission’s RECOVER, SGI Europe will continue to plead for making the post-COVID-19 recovery SGI-centred. Actions will focus on the following priorities: • Support our members in lobbying their national government for SGI-friendly National Recovery and Resilience Plans • Lobby for a strong place for SGIs in the implementation of the MFF • Relaunch the work for the setting up of an EP interest group on SGIs • Build and promote a new paradigm for SGIs, based on the “day after the recovery” Put SGIs at the centre of sustainable finance: With its seat in the Platform on sustainable finance, SGI Europe will reinforce its involvement in the debates on the promotion of sustainable finances in the EU. As the issue will remain at the top of the agenda with the implementation of the NGEU and the MFF, targeted actions will aim at: • Lobbying for an SGIs friendly completion of taxonomy regulations • Modernising our CSR Label with a reinforced focus on the financing of the sustainable transition Maximise the potential of SGI Europe seats in transversal platforms and organisations: In 2020, in the shaping of the new EU institutional landscape following the EU elections, SGI Europe ensured its presence in several transversal expert groups and platforms. On top of our representatives in technical expert groups, SGI Europe will particularly focus on: • Using the seat in the Expert group on Sustainable Finance
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2015 Contents
    ACTIVITY REPORT 2015 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 3 WHAT IS CEEP? 4 2015 IN REVIEW 5 PUBLIC SERVICES SUMMIT 5 MAJOR TRANSVERSAL PRIORITIES 8 BETTER REGULATION DIGITALISATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES A RELIABLE PARTNER FOR EUROPEAN DECISION-MAKERS 9 RELAUNCH OF SOCIAL DIALOGUE 10 THE EU SEMESTER SOCIAL PARTNERS’ WORK PROGRAMME AND IN-DEPTH EMPLOYMENT ANALYSIS REPRESENTING EMPLOYERS AND PROVIDERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES AT EU LEVEL 12 CONSOLIDATING THE PUBLIC SERVICES’ EMPLOYERS FORUM IMPROVING THE PULSE OF PUBLIC SERVICES CONTRIBUTION TO THE COP21 13 CEEP OPINION ON THE COP21 CONFERENCE AT THE EXPO IN MILAN EXCHANGE OF PRACTICES BETWEEN LEADERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: FINAL REPORT 14 SOCIAL AFFAIRS BOARD 16 PUBLIC SERVICES BOARD 20 SUSTAINABILITY BOARD 24 ANNEXES 29 CEEP - EXECUTIVE LEVEL 29 NATIONAL & SECTORAL SECTIONS 30 MEMBERS OF CEEP SECTIONS 32 PAPERS, OPINIONS AND REspONSES TO CONSULTATIONS 36 PREss RELEASES 37 GENERAL SECRETARIAT (AS OF MAY 2016) 38 2 CEEP ACTIVITY REPORT 2015 EDITORIAL DEAR MEMBERS, DEAR FRIENds, In 2015, CEEP continued to promote at European level some citizens might be left on the sidelines of the ‘digital and, thanks to its members, at national and local level, the revolution’. However, connecting rural areas does not key contribution of efficient and effective public services provide a high return on investment, and is not an attractive to the development of the European project. CEEP also economic prospect for services’ providers. In this context, positioned itself as a reliable and pragmatic partner for there is a need to set up incentives to encourage such EU policy-makers: public services are pivotal in the EU investments, for instance through more flexible state aid social model; their modernisation must be at the heart of rules.
    [Show full text]
  • European Economic Area Forum of Local and Regional Authorities of the Eea Efta States
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA FORUM OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES OF THE EEA EFTA STATES Ref. 21-151 Draft background paper and draft key messages on the Proposal for a Directive on adequate minimum wages in the European Union Meeting of the EEA EFTA Forum of elected representatives Local and Regional Authorities, 28 – 29 January 2021 I Key messages The EEA EFTA Forum of elected representatives Local and Regional Authorities could: A) Agree with the overall objective of paying European workers adequate wages, making work pay, fighting poverty and strengthening the role of the social partners and social dialogue while respecting national labour market models; B) Point to the fact that autonomous negotiations between social partners have proven to be successful in ensuring the priorities and security of both employers and workers and in contributing to a flexible working market; C) Disagree on the choice of a directive as instrument to obtain adequate minimum wages and strongly believe a Council Recommendation with systematic follow-up would be a better instrument to reach the objectives; D) Stress the need for the European Commission to identify measures that do not influence the autonomy of social partners in countries with well-functioning collective bargaining systems; E) Strongly support that countries where wages are currently determined mainly through negotiations between the social partners, should be exempted to introduce statutory minimum wages or mandatory extension of collective agreements; F) Be of the opinion that the EU should
    [Show full text]
  • CEEP Activity Report 2009 Increased Action in Times of Change
    CEEP Activity Report 2009 INCREASED ACTION IN TIMES OF CHANGE Editorial CEEP is on the eve of celebrating its 50 year anniversary in Brussels. As an organisation which initially came into existence shortly after the signing of the treaty of Rome establishing the European Economic Community, it has participated in the development and establishment of the European Union. CEEP has evolved in tandem with Europe, reflecting the needs of a changing society, gaining increasing recognition for Public Services who make up and contribute to the fabric of our society as we know it. We will all remember 2009 for different reasons –o bama’s inauguration in the US, world recession, financial crisis, a botched Copenhagen Climate Summit etc. For CEEP, 2009 was significant as it became increasingly clear that the importance of Public Services and their contribution to the European economy on a number of levels, from employment to GdP, particularly in times of economic instability, was still not fully recognised. Public Services, also known as Services of General interest (SGis), are services whose provider is entrusted by a public authority (national, regional or local) with specific missions by virtue of general interest. These services can either be of economic or non-economic nature and their missions can include Public Service obligations or universal service obligations. Public Services include energy, water, public transport, postal services, telecommunications as well as healthcare and social work, public administration, defence, education, etc. in response to a question from Nicolaos Vakalis (former MEP) to Commissioner Špidla on the significance of Public Services in Europe, CEEP, with the financial support of the European Commission, embarked on a comprehensive, Europe-wide measurement and analysis of Public Services.
    [Show full text]
  • CEEP ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 a WAY FORWARD for PUBLIC SERVICES and Sgis
    CEEP ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 A WAY FORWARD FOR PUBLIC SERVICES AND SGIs THE LOBBY FOR PUBLIC SERVICES AND SERVICES OF GENERAL INTEREST CEEP represents around 500.000 pro- THE GENERAL viders of public services and services of general interest throughout Europe. CROSS-INDUSTRY Contributing to more than 26% of the SOCIAL PARTNER EU GDP and employing more than 60 million people, our members are the FOR PUBLIC backbone of the EU economy, pro- viding citizens and enterprises with SERVICES essential services such as central and local administration, healthcare, edu- EMPLOYERS cation, energy, transport, water, envi- ronment, waste management, housing, CEEP is one of the three European tourism, communications general cross-industry social partners, and postal services. representing employers of public ser- vices and services of general interest. As a recognised actor in the EU social dialogue, CEEP has a say in the bipar- tite and tripartite social dialogue at the highest level. www.ceep.eu 2 CEEP ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 CONTENTS WHAT IS CEEP? 4 EDITORIAL, by President Katherina Reiche and General Secretary Valeria Ronzitti 5 2018 IN REVIEW 6 Putting SGIs at the Centre Stage High-level Seminar in Sofia (Bulgaria) – 1 June 2018 6 CEEP CSR Label awarding ceremony in Stockholm (Sweden) – 11 December 2018 7 Pushing Forward the Future of Europe Impacting the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-27 8 A social partners’ work programme for 2019-2021 9 Finalisation of the social dialogue integrated projects 10 Shaping a Social Europe Transparent and predictable
    [Show full text]