DOCSLIB.ORG

If You Have Problems Reading This Document, Please Contact the Uscis History Library at [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
If You Have Problems Reading This Document, Please Contact the Uscis History Library at Cishistory.Library@Dhs.Gov IF YOU HAVE PROBLEMS READING THIS DOCUMENT, PLEASE CONTACT THE USCIS HISTORY LIBRARY AT [email protected]. IMMIGRATION SERVICE. ANNUAL REPORT OF T)1J SUPEIJNTENDENT OF J{J1IGRATION• TO THE SEJRETARY OF THE TREASURY FOR TilE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 7 1892. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, 18.92. TimA SURY DEPART1ENT, Dooiirneiit No. 1569, Office of Superintendent of Immigration. ANNUAL REPORT or THE SUPERINTENDENT OF IMMIGRATION. TREASURY Dnp.&mmiwr, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, * WashiHgton, D. U., Hovember 30, 1892. Sin: I have the honor to submit herewith, for your information the following report: ThIMIGIIAIcTS ARRiVED. 0 i TABLE No. 1.—SHOWING THE NUMBER OE IMMIGRANTS INSPFCTFD AND ADMITTED INTO THE UNITED STATES AT TilE PORTS BELOW, AND THE NUMBER or THE PR0HXIIImD CLASSES DiscoVVRED AND RETURNED TO THE COUNTRIES WHENCE THEY CAME, AS WELL AS THE NurI13ER ADMITTED ON BOND, DURING TEE FiSCAL YEAR ENDING JuNE 30, 1892. Number admitted. Number returned. Portof entry. ..* QC fl.. e 0 0 0o o H O P.ii H Baltimore ............. .30, 877 24, 933 55, 870 ............. 30 3 ................ 22 I t 60 2 Boston ................ .17,346 15,006 32,352 3 145 3 21 ..............89 261 108 iarnstable ............ .... 28 9 37 ............................................................ Brunswick ............ ..... 2 .............. 2 ............................................................ alvestou. ............. ....16 10 26 ............................................................ Gloucester. ................15 9 24 ............................................................ lacksonvillo...............3 3 6 ............................................................ Key West .............3, 322 1, 238 4, 560 4 .................................... 4 1 Slobile .....................5 .............5 ........................................................... New Orleans .......... 2,594 1,717 3,711 .......... 2 ......................... 1 3 13 New York ............ 283,905 162,082 445,987 4 13 780 72 20 .... 832 508 2, 235 2, 011 New Bedford ..........200 171 671 ............ Norfolk................1 ... 1 ........... Newport News ........ 3 ... 3 ............I 7 ...... Philadelphia........... 18,752 11,951 30,703 ........... 28 ............ I 2 21 51 ....... Providence ................ 38 10 48 ............ Portland, Me ..........1, 013 447 1,460 ........... 6 ........ 50 13 69 ....... Portland, Oregon ...... 312 8 320 . .......... 26 . ..........20 ....... Port Townsend ....... .164 1 165 ........... Pensacola ............. II 6 17 ........... San Francisco ......... 2,922 723 3,645 ... I .. 2 '... 2 80 ................ 85 ....... San Diego ........... 18 7 25 ...... Cavannah .............5 2 7 ...... Wilmington ...........11 7 18 ...... 80j20 23 80932 Total .... LI686321800576634Hl,002 iis Non..—Th additiri to the above number returned 831 in contract laborers were returned to eda. REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF IMMIGRATION. TABLE No, 2.-SHOWING TBE NATIVITY OF IMMIGRANTS ADMITTED AT THE SEVERA PORTS OF THE UNITED STATES, AS WELL AS THOSE BARRED ARD RETURNR DURiNG THE Fxsc. YEAH ENDING JUNE 30, 1892. Port. es. ce.1iaand Baltimore .................... 119 338 - 4 5 29,956 14 8,370 8,532 28 Boston ...................... 11,731 7,317 25 1,713 320 13 4,107, 014 7 Barnstable ............................ Brunswick .............................. Galveston ................. .............2 ......... Gloucester ............................. 1 ......... Jacksonville ............................. Roy West...........................602 ...1 31 13 ..................... Mobile .............................. 3 ..... New Orleans .................... 3 131 26 83 314 11 6 New York ---- .----------- .. 34,825 21,682 602 4,716 81, 502 4,127 59,205 28, 003 6.763 New Bedford........................2 ..... Norfolk .............................1....... Newport News......................3 ..... Pl,i1ade1pbi ................. 4,533 3,500 97 613 6,872 165 4,412 3,042 63 Providence. ............................... Portlancl,Me. ............. .. 80 302 1 13 116 1 106 43 6 Portland, Oregon ..................... 6 ....... Port Townsend ............................ 4 ....................... Pensacola ...................1 ......1 ............ San Francisco..............112 303 89 186 27 26 2 13 SanDego .................. 2 ....1 8 ............ Savanntsb ................... 2 .......... Wilmington..................... Total ....... .......... 51, 383 34,309 729 7; 177 110, 168 4,678 76, 417 40, 536 6,886 buinberr barred and re- turned .................... 52 233 4 36 260 22 477 39 11 Swe. Nor. lIe!- Hol- . Portu- Den flun- ort. ta • pam. den. way. gium. land. gal, mark. gary. Baltimore ..................... 276 55 2 89 22 ....................... 271 810 Boston ................. --- ...3,813 911 18 9 27 9 545 165 30 Ba-rentable ........................... Brunswick ........................... Galveston ......................... I..................3 ....... Gloucester ............................ ....... Tacksonville ....................... 3 . .........1 3,796 ..2 Rev West.......................... 1 ............ Mdbiie .......................... 17 7 43 10 2, 720 82 1 6 2 New OrleanO ................ 35, 440 12,195 3,340 5,775 58, 687 165 2,221 9,380 33, 280 New York ................. ..............I ...8 ........... New Bedford............................. Norfolk .................................. Newport. News ............ .. 1,838 990 618 251 115 14 5 355- 1, 58 PhiladelphFc ..................... 48 ........... Providence .................. 433 130 5 .................... 1 110 1 Portland,Me .................... 1 ............ Portland, Oregon .................. Port Townsend ..... L .............. 7 ... Pensacola ................... 25 33 1 6 50 10 572 19 San Francisco............... 1 .......1 1 ..1 .. San Diego .................. .. 2 ........ Savannah ........................... Wilmington ............... ............ Total ................ .. 41,845 14,325 4,026 6,141 61,631 4,078, 3,400 10,128 35, 624 Number barred and an- . - turned ................... 51 19 15 20 616 2 3 15 155 REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF IMMIGRATION. 5 P .1ILE No. 2.-SroowiNG THE NATIVITY OF IMMIGRANTS ADMITTED AT THE SEVERAL PORTS OF TIlE 1JNJTED STATES, ETc.-Contirnlecl. I - All Aus- ]3ohe- Fin- Arme- Aus- Nor- other oat. reeco. T o a i tria. into-, laud. nm. tralia. key. 001111- trios. Baltimore ------------------ -- 4,924 1,901 16 - ----------------- - 17 - ......... - 112 55,870 Boston --------------------- ---- 140 22 -........ --------- - 7 7 404 32,352 Barnstablo .......................................... 37 37 Brunswick ............. -- ........ -........ ---- -- -- 2 2 Galveston .............................................26 Gloucester ............................................ 19 24 lacksonville .......................................... 6 6 Key West ----------------- .-------- ................... 21 4,500 Mobile .................... ............................ ' 1 5 New Orleans .................... 12 ..............1 15 4 219 3,711 New York .................. 26, 953 6,365 4,917 1,157 18 89 531 4,133 445,987 New Bedford .............. ............................. 600 671 Norfolk .................................................. 1 Newport News ............ .............................. 3 Philadelphia ................... 890 4 88 7 36 11 616 30,703 Providence ................ ................................48 Portland,Mo .............................. 1 8 1 . ..... 3 1,460 Portland, Oregon .......... .............................. 315 320 Port Townsend ......................................... 161 165 Pensacola ............................................... 8 17 San Francisco ............. ..10 7 13 . ... 247 3 106 1,775 3,645 San Diego ............................... 1 9 25 Savannah ................................. 3 7 Wilmington ............... ................ 18 34 Total ................ .. 32, 935 8,278 5,094 1,164 207 . 167 660 8,520 579,663 Number barred and re- turned ................... 344 15 , 24 8 2 4 164 2,801 TAISLE No. 3.-SHOWING TIlE NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS DESTINED TO EACH STATE, TEIUUTOiIY, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DURING. THE FISCAL YEAR ENDJN JUNE 30,189 States au erritories. Number. II Stahas and Territories. I Number. Alabama ............................... 409 Now Hampshire ...................... 1,215 Alask-a ................................. 4 North Carolina ....................... 331. Arizona ................................. 225 North Dakota ......................... 2,525 Arkansas............................... 442 Nebraska ............................ 5,768 Connecticut ............................ 8, 642 Nevada............................... 626 Colorado................................. 2, 018 New Jersey ........................... 16,665 California .............................. 10,936 New Mexico .......................... 340 Delaware .............................. 754 Now York ............................. 242, 668 - District of Columbia.................... 861 Ohio................................... 15,040 Florida ................................. 4,829' Oregon..... T ......................... 1,192 Georgia --------- ........................ 390 Oklahoma .......................... 6 Indiana................................. 3,407 Pennsylvania.......................... 83,414 Indian Territory ....................... 314 Rhode Island ......................... 4,385 minois................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Establishment of the Head Port of Gloucester, 1565-1584 (Mphil
    The Establishment of the Head Port of Gloucester, 1565-1584 Alexander Higgins A thesis submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, Department of Historical Studies, November 2012. 24,884 words. Abstract After a fifteen-year campaign, Gloucester became an independent head port in 1580. This effectively ended Bristol’s long-standing jurisdiction over the Gloucestershire reaches of the River Severn and resulted in the loss of the greater part of Bristol’s historic port. This dissertation explores Bristol’s objections to this change and examines the prosecution of their complaints through the equity side of the Exchequer court. Primarily, this study focuses upon two commissions created by the Crown to review the case. The interrogatories and depositions produced by these commissions are used to explore the nature of this dispute, the motivation behind Bristol’s objections and why Gloucester ultimately retained its head port status. The first chapter focuses upon the practical implementation of the commissions. Rather than relying upon the legal records alone, this study uses letters, accounts and reports produced by the two parties to explore the workings of a commission. This approach reveals the extent of Bristol and Gloucester’s attempts to manipulate proceedings to their own advantage. These findings have significant implications on the impartiality of Tudor legal process and the reliability of the Exchequer records. The second chapter examines the findings of the two commissions to assess the nature and strength of Bristol’s arguments. It is shown that many of these arguments were unsubstantiated.
    [Show full text]
  • Centerboard Classes NAPY D-PN Wind HC
    Centerboard Classes NAPY D-PN Wind HC For Handicap Range Code 0-1 2-3 4 5-9 14 (Int.) 14 85.3 86.9 85.4 84.2 84.1 29er 29 84.5 (85.8) 84.7 83.9 (78.9) 405 (Int.) 405 89.9 (89.2) 420 (Int. or Club) 420 97.6 103.4 100.0 95.0 90.8 470 (Int.) 470 86.3 91.4 88.4 85.0 82.1 49er (Int.) 49 68.2 69.6 505 (Int.) 505 79.8 82.1 80.9 79.6 78.0 A Scow A-SC 61.3 [63.2] 62.0 [56.0] Akroyd AKR 99.3 (97.7) 99.4 [102.8] Albacore (15') ALBA 90.3 94.5 92.5 88.7 85.8 Alpha ALPH 110.4 (105.5) 110.3 110.3 Alpha One ALPHO 89.5 90.3 90.0 [90.5] Alpha Pro ALPRO (97.3) (98.3) American 14.6 AM-146 96.1 96.5 American 16 AM-16 103.6 (110.2) 105.0 American 18 AM-18 [102.0] Apollo C/B (15'9") APOL 92.4 96.6 94.4 (90.0) (89.1) Aqua Finn AQFN 106.3 106.4 Arrow 15 ARO15 (96.7) (96.4) B14 B14 (81.0) (83.9) Bandit (Canadian) BNDT 98.2 (100.2) Bandit 15 BND15 97.9 100.7 98.8 96.7 [96.7] Bandit 17 BND17 (97.0) [101.6] (99.5) Banshee BNSH 93.7 95.9 94.5 92.5 [90.6] Barnegat 17 BG-17 100.3 100.9 Barnegat Bay Sneakbox B16F 110.6 110.5 [107.4] Barracuda BAR (102.0) (100.0) Beetle Cat (12'4", Cat Rig) BEE-C 120.6 (121.7) 119.5 118.8 Blue Jay BJ 108.6 110.1 109.5 107.2 (106.7) Bombardier 4.8 BOM4.8 94.9 [97.1] 96.1 Bonito BNTO 122.3 (128.5) (122.5) Boss w/spi BOS 74.5 75.1 Buccaneer 18' spi (SWN18) BCN 86.9 89.2 87.0 86.3 85.4 Butterfly BUT 108.3 110.1 109.4 106.9 106.7 Buzz BUZ 80.5 81.4 Byte BYTE 97.4 97.7 97.4 96.3 [95.3] Byte CII BYTE2 (91.4) [91.7] [91.6] [90.4] [89.6] C Scow C-SC 79.1 81.4 80.1 78.1 77.6 Canoe (Int.) I-CAN 79.1 [81.6] 79.4 (79.0) Canoe 4 Mtr 4-CAN 121.0 121.6
    [Show full text]
  • Grfc Season Record 1920-21
    GRFC Season Record 2011-12 Season Played 32, Won 13, Lost 18 Drawn 1 Record Points For 694, Against 722 This is the lowest percentage of wins in a season since 1960- 61. Most R.Harden 29 (25 starts + 4 replacements), F.Burns 29 (24+5), appearances P.Buxton 28 (18+10), C.Sharples 27 (26+1), J.May 27 (22+5), D.Dawidiuk 25 (14+11), N.Wood 24 (22+2), A.Qera 24 (19+5) Leading Most tries: C.Sharples, J.May 10, J.Simpson-Daniel 6, scorers O.Morgan, A.Qera 5 Most conversions: F.Burns 36, T.Taylor 8 Most penalties: F.Burns 63, T.Taylor 17 Captain L. Narraway Sep 4 Northampton 26 Gloucester 24 Tries: J.May, C.Sharples (League) Conversion: T.Taylor Penalties: T.Taylor (2), F.Burns Drop goal: F.Burns Sep 10 Gloucester 29 Worcester 8 Tries: J.May, T.Voyce, (League) Conversions: T.Taylor, F.Burns Penalties: T.Taylor (4), F.Burns Sep 17 Harlequins 42 Gloucester 6 Penalties: F.Burns (2) (League) Sep 24 Gloucester 23 Bath 6 Tries: D.Dawidiuk, (League) C.Sharples Conversions: T.Taylor, F.Burns Penalties: T.Taylor (3) Oct 1 Gloucester 33 London Irish 30 Tries: T.Voyce, D.Dawidiuk + (League) penalty try Conversions: T.Taylor (3) Penalties: T.Taylor (3), F.Burns Oct 8 Sale 13 Gloucester 11 Try: H.Trinder (League) Penalties: T.Taylor (2) Oct 15 Gloucester 58 Sale 27 Tries: L.Vainikolo, J.May, (LV Cup) L.Narraway, R.Lawson, C.Sharples, F.Burns, S.Lawson Conversions: F.Burns (6), T.Taylor Penalties: F.Burns (3) Oct 21 Leicester 40 Gloucester 14 Tries: D.Murphy, L.Vainikolo (LV Cup) Conversions: F.Burns (2) Oct 29 Gloucester 17 Saracens 19 Try: O.Morgan (League)
    [Show full text]
  • Porthole Put on the Back Burner
    THURSDAY, JANUARY 16, 2020 Porthole put on the back burner By Gayla Cawley The issue, McGrath said, is that boats ITEM STAFF from the adjacent Lynn Yacht Club are resting next to the building and imped- LYNN — Developer Patrick McGrath is ing demolition. planning to break ground on a $23 mil- “(With the way the building was) con- lion, 80-unit condominium project on a structed, it was too dangerous to tear the Blossom Street site shortly, but his plans building down,” said McGrath. “They’re for the former Porthole Restaurant have going to move the boats in the spring and hit a snag. then we can take the building down safely.” A groundbreaking for the $35 million In addition, McGrath said he’s still go- redevelopment of the Porthole site into 74 ing through the permitting process, which luxury condominiums was initially slated should take another four to six months. ITEM PHOTO | SPENSER HASAK for this past fall. But McGrath said the Because the site is located on the water- remainder of demolition at 98 Lynnway, front, he needs to go through Chapter Demolition of the former Porthole Restaurant has been placed on hold which started in late November, has been due to its close proximity to the Lynn Yacht Club and the boats that are pushed back until the spring. PORTHOLE, A3 housed on its property over the winter. Somber salute in Peabody Saugus sets its priorities for 2020 By Elyse Carmosino ITEM STAFF SAUGUS — At the top of the list for Saugus’ Board of Select- men’s issues to tackle in the com- ing months is updating the town’s master plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Social and Cultural Impact Assessment of the Highly Migratory
    Social and Cultural Impact Assessment of the Highly Migratory Species Fisheries Management Plan and the Amendment to the Atlantic Billfish Fisheries Management Plan performed by The Ecopolicy Center for Agriculture, Environmental, and Resource Issues New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Cook College Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey for the National Marine Fisheries Service A Social and Cultural Impact Assessment of the Highly Migratory Species Fisheries Management Plan and the Amendment to the Atlantic Billfish Fisheries Management Plan performed by The Ecopolicy Center for Agriculture, Environmental, and Resource Issues, Rutgers University. Completed under contract with the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Highly Migratory Species Office. New Brunswick NJ, July 1998 Contributing authors: Doug Wilson, principal investigator and corresponding author; Bonnie J. McCay, co-principal investigator; Danielle Estler; Marla Perez-Lugo; Johnelle LaMarque; Sheri Seminski; and Agnes Tomczuk. Please direct any comments or questions to: Doug Wilson Institute for Fisheries Management and Coastal Community Development North Sea Centre, Willemoesvej 2 P.O.Box 104, DK-9850 Hirtshals, Denmark phone : +45 98 94 28 55, fax : +45 98 94 42 68 e-mail : [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document is a social and cultural impact assessment of the Fisheries Management Plan (FMP) for Highly Migratory Species and the current amendment to the FMP for Atlantic Billfish. It focuses on such impacts in the five states of Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, Florida, Louisiana, and in Puerto Rico. These places were chosen for study because they each had important affected fisheries and because they are fairly evenly spread around the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Daily Press: July 15,1963
    PORTLAND DAILY PRESS. VOLUME II. WEDNESDAY JULY 1803. PORTLAND, ME., MORNING, 15, ίWHOLE NO. 328 .»iuuwv.v<t »»'· Hic rUitlJLiAWLF JJ AiJu 1 rituioo, I ens ιι»··<·γ. pi CSV IIL Ciuur- MI NULL 1J Λ Λ1<AJ υ rs. gency ami gone to the front. It is a pity the CARDS. FOR SALE & TO LET. JOHN T. OILMAN, I LEGAL & Editor, lii-tory and glory of a regiment should be so BUSINESS OFFICIAL. Is at No. divided, and it will be a published 82J EXCHANGE STREET, source of regret to J L. the J. R. COAL «fc WILLOW, Agent, C'oinitiiiif Kooni to L«*t. cm of IN FOX BLOCK, by returning portion that they cannot share (;»LI)FJt, Λ\ΓOOD, iiifum. what was no within CHEAP It MANUFACTURER OF KOOM over No. 90 N. A. FOSTER & CO. easily their grasn. The KO CASH, Commercial 8t. COUNTINGThomas Block, to let. to In reception of the regiment will not oecur un- Apply the Year (Me Thousand DELIVERED TO ANY PART OF THE CITY S J. MILLER, Eight Ihindrtd and til the whole when a warm and enthu- Furniture and Steam .Sixty-three. ΤenriH : returns, Crockery Engines, Steam Boilers, mch'il dtf Over 92 Commercial Street. siastic will be them all. Thk PoRTLATfD Daily Pbmh if published every reception given The In second ORDINANCE concerning morning excepted), at year colored rezlment—the Mass. 55th— s η am ο mountain AM IVEKY DESCRIPTION «F lACHlSERÏ, Hoard of Meeting* of the (.Sundays #6.00per WAREROOMS, i.ehig.h, AN Mayor a».d Aldermen, and advance, to which will be added twenty-five cent* for will leave next week with full ranks.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 10/07/2019 18:00
    Cabinet Meeting: Wednesday, 10th July 2019 at 6.00 pm in Civic Suite - North Warehouse, The Docks, Gloucester, GL1 2EP Membership: Cllrs. James (Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Regeneration and Economy) (Chair), Watkins (Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Communities and Neighbourhoods), Cook (Cabinet Member for Environment), Gravells (Cabinet Member for Planning and Housing Strategy), Morgan (Cabinet Member for Culture and Leisure) and H. Norman (Cabinet Member for Performance and Resources) Contact: Democratic and Electoral Services 01452 396126 [email protected] AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To receive from Members, declarations of the existence of any disclosable pecuniary, or non- pecuniary, interests and the nature of those interests in relation to any agenda item. Please see Agenda Notes. 3. MINUTES (Pages 7 - 12) To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 12th June 2019. 4. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME (15 MINUTES) The opportunity is given to members of the public to put questions to Cabinet Members or Committee Chairs provided that a question does not relate to: Matters which are the subject of current or pending legal proceedings, or Matters relating to employees or former employees of the Council or comments in respect of individual Council Officers 1 5. PETITIONS AND DEPUTATIONS (15 MINUTES) To receive any petitions or deputations provided that no such petition or deputation is in relation to: Matters relating to individual Council Officers, or Matters relating to current or pending legal proceedings 6. LEADER AND CABINET MEMBERS' QUESTION TIME (15 MINUTES) Any Member of the Council may ask the Leader of the Council or any Cabinet Member any question without prior notice, upon: Any matter relating to the Council’s administration Any matter relating to any report of the Cabinet appearing on the summons A matter coming within their portfolio of responsibilities Only one supplementary question is allowed per question.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Observer
    Bird Observer VOLUME 41, NUMBER 5 OCTOBER 2013 HOT BIRDS What is it with Lazuli Buntings? Up until this fall there were only three records of this species in the state, but on September 15 Ian, Ben Lagasse, and Keenan Yakola spotted a possible Lazuli Bunting on Cuttyhunk Island. Then, on November 2, the same threesome discovered what was clearly a Lazuli Bunting at the Honey Pot in Hadley (above). Blair Nikula was seawatching on October 12 at Race Point when he spotted this immature Brown Booby (left). He got some distant photographs with Northern Gannets for comparison. Nick Ernst and Brian Harris found a Black-throated Gray Warbler (right) on Nantucket on October 14. Brian recorded this western warbler in a few photographs. CONTENTS BIRDING THE WENHAM CANAL AND TOPSFIELD FAIRGROUNDS, WITH A SIDE TRIP ON THE WENHAM RAIL TRAIL Jim Berry 265 CHESTER ALBERT REED: AUTHOR OF THE FIRST FIELD GUIDE TO BIRDS IN 1905 Michel Chevalier 272 THE BIRDING JOHN NELSONS John Nelson 277 ONE NIGHT ONLY: A SPECIAL VIEWING OF FUERTES’S PAINTINGS, BIRDS OF MASSACHUSETTS Nancy Walker 281 TWENTY YEARS AGO IN BIRD OBSERVER The Wild Turkey: An Update James E. Cardoza 283 FIELD NOTES Play Behavior by Black Vultures? William E. Davis, Jr. 290 Immature Double-crested Cormorant Fails to Ingest Fish William E. Davis, Jr. 292 ABOUT BOOKS Going, Going . Gone! And Really Long Gone Mark Lynch 295 BIRD SIGHTINGS May/June 2013 303 ABOUT THE COVER: Northern Harrier William E. Davis, Jr. 318 ABOUT THE COVER ARTIST: Barry Van Dusen 320 AT A GLANCE Wayne R.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Gloucestershire Police and Crime Panel, 13/09
    Gloucestershire Police and Crime Panel Friday 13 September 2019 at 10.00 am Cabinet Suite - Shire Hall, Gloucester AGENDA 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Andrea Clarke 2 MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING (Pages 1 - 4) Andrea Clarke 3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Andrea Clarke Please see note (a) at the end of the agenda. 4 OPCC - INTERIM APPOINTMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PCC Martin Surl The Police and Crime Commissioner to give the context to his decision to appoint an Interim Chief Executive Officer. 5 HOW THE POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER HOLDS THE CHIEF Richard Bradley CONSTABLE TO ACCOUNT (Pages 5 - 8) The Panel to be informed on the process to be followed going forward; and how Panel Members can track this process through the OPCC website. 6 GLOUCESTERSHIRE CONSTABULARY CRIME DATA INTEGRITY PCC Martin Surl INSPECTION 2019 (Pages 9 - 22) The Crime Data Integrity Inspection Report is available here https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/publications/gloucestershi re-crime-data-integrity-inspection-2019/. Panel members may also find it helpful to review the Constabulary’s PEEL Report 2018/19 which sets out the wider performance framework. The report is available here https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/publications/peel- assessment-2018-19-gloucestershire/ 7 POLICE AND CRIME PLAN REFRESH (Pages 23 - 34) PCC Martin Surl 8 POLICE AND CRIME PLAN HIGHLIGHT REPORT (Pages 35 - 94) Richard Bradley Date Published:5 September 2019 9 OFFICE OF THE POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER - CHIEF Richard Bradley EXECUTIVE REPORT (Pages 95 - 102) FUTURE MEETINGS 12 November 2019 3 February 2020 27 March 2020 17 July 2020 18 September 2020 6 November 2020 All meetings start at 10.00am and are held in Shire Hall, Gloucester.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rutland Record Index for Records 11
    rutland record index COVER:Layout 1 13/10/2011 14:27 Page 1 Rutland Record Journal of the Rutland Local History & Record Society Index of numbers 11-20 Compiled by Robert Ovens rutland record index COVER:Layout 1 13/10/2011 14:27 Page 2 RutlandRutland Local Local History History & & Record Record Society Society The Society is formed from the union in June 1991 of the Rutland Local History Society, founded in the 1930s, and the Rutland Record Society, founded in 1979. In May 1993, the Rutland Field Research Group for Archaeology & History, founded in 1971, also amalgamated with the Society. The Society is a Registered Charity, and its aim is the advancement of the education of the public in all aspects of the history of the ancient County of Rutland and its immediate area. Registered Charity No. 700723 These are the main contents of Rutland Record 11-20. Each issue also contains annual reports from local societies, museums, record offices and archaeological organisations. For details of the Society’s other publications and how to order, please see inside the back cover. Rutland Record 11 (OP) ISBN 978 0 907464 16 7 Rutland, Russia and Shakespeare; A medieval bishop in Rutland; Industrial archaeology in Rutland; The fifth Earl of Lonsdale in the Arctic; The survival of elms in Rutland Rutland Record 12 (£2.00, members £1.50) ISBN 978 0 907464 17 4 Flitteris and Cold Overton: two medieval deer parks; A village archive: Preston parish records; The great educational experiment: Edward Thring at Uppingham School; Jeremiah Whittaker: a turbulent
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation and Closure in Renaissance Lyric Poetry
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Dissertations Department of English 5-9-2016 Transformation and Closure in Renaissance Lyric Poetry Lisa Ulevich Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss Recommended Citation Ulevich, Lisa, "Transformation and Closure in Renaissance Lyric Poetry." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss/164 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRANSFORMATION AND CLOSURE IN RENAISSANCE LYRIC POETRY by LISA MICHELLE ULEVICH Under the Direction of Stephen B. Dobranski, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Closure is one of the most important putative goals for highly structured Renaissance verse. Elements of structure—for example, sophisticated prosody or the embedding of a poem within a web of intertextual relationships—determine how poets work toward closure. This project explores how verse forms and genre manifest poets’ attempts to create resolution, and, significantly, how often the challenges of the process instead become the object of focus. Developing a New Formalist approach that focuses on how literary forms are inherently responsive (both to the social conventions that inform various genres and to the expressive goals of individual authors), I examine texts in four important Renaissance poetic genres: epyllion (William Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis [1593]), satire (Joseph Hall’s Virgidemiae [1598, 1599]), religious lyric (George Herbert’s The Temple [1633]), and pastoral elegy (John Milton’s Epitaphium Damonis [1639] and Lycidas [1637, 1645]).
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Birds Regions Cities/Towns Numbered on Map 1
    A quarterlyIRGINIA journal of ornithological sightings in theIRDS Commonwealth V published by the Virginia B Society of Ornithology Volume 13 Number 1 Summer Records June–July 2016 Virginia Birds Regions Cities/towns numbered on map 1. Abingdon 18. Fredericksburg 31. Petersburg 42. Virginia Beach 2. Alexandria 19. Galax 32. Poquoson 43. Waynesboro 3. Bedford 20. Hampton 33. Portsmouth 44. Williamsburg 45 Frederick 4. Bristol 21. Harrisonburg 34. Radford 45. Winchester Clarke Loudoun 5. Buena Vista 22. Hopewell 35. Richmond North Fairfax Arlington 6. Cape Charles 23. Lexington 36. Roanoke Warren Fauquier 15,16 Shenandoah 25, 26 7. Charlottesville 24. Lynchburg 37. Salem Rappahannock Prince 2 Page William 8. Chesapeake 25. Manassas 38. South Boston Madison Culpeper Rockingham21 Stafford 9. Chincoteague 26. Manassas Park 39. Staunton King Highland Greene George 10. Clifton Forge 27. Martinsville 40. Suffolk Augusta Orange 18 39 Westmoreland 11. Colonial Heights 28. Newport News 41. Tazewell Spotsylvania Bath 43 7 Louisa Caroline Richmond West Essex East 9 12. Covington 29. Norfolk Albemarle King and Queen Northumberland 12 Rockbridge Central King William 13. Danville 30. Norton 10 Lancaster Alleghany Nelson FluvannaGoochland Hanover 23 Middlesex 14. Emporia 5 Amherst Henrico Accomack Botetourt Buckingham Powhatan 15. Fairfax New Gloucester Craig Appomattox 35 Kent Mathews 16. Falls Church Bedford Chesterfield Charles James Giles Roanoke 24 CumberlandAmelia 22 City City 44 17. Franklin Buchanan 3 Prince York 6 Montgomery37 36 Campbell Edward
    [Show full text]