Contemporary Adaptations of Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet Aurelie Bourg Universite De Nantes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
QUEERING CANONICAL SHAKESPEARE: CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS OF HAMLET AND ROMEO AND JULIET AURELIE BOURG UNIVERSITE DE NANTES QUEERING CANONICAL SHAKESPEARE: CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS OF HAMLET AND ROMEO AND JULIET Aurélie Bourg Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment for the Degree of Master in English Literary Studies – Year 2 Master Cultures, Langues et Littératures Etrangères, 2ème année Department of English Studies Faculty of Languages and Cultures Université de Nantes Supervisors: Pr. Georges Letissier & Valérie Bénéjam. July 2018 N°10, 2018 1 Éditions du CRINI © e-crini, 2018 ISSN 1760-4753 QUEERING CANONICAL SHAKESPEARE: CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS OF HAMLET AND ROMEO AND JULIET AURELIE BOURG UNIVERSITE DE NANTES TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF IMAGES .......................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: SAME SEX ADAPTATIONS OF ROMEO AND JULIET ........................................... 17 1.1 : GROUNDINGS OF QUEER ADAPTATIONS IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT ................. 17 1.1.1 LOVE, HIDDEN RELATIONSHIPS AND FAMILY CONFLICTS ........................ 18 1.1.2 MERCUTIO, THE PLAY’S QUEER CHARACTER ............................................... 26 1.1.2.1 MERCUTIO IN THE ORIGINAL PLAY .......................................................... 26 1.1.2.2 USE OF MERCUTIO IN ADAPTATIONS ....................................................... 31 Fig. 1: Harold Perrineau as Mercutio in 1.5 of Romeo + Juliet (1995), dir. Baz Luhrmann. .................................................................................................................. 31 1.1.2.3 MERCUTIO IN SHAKESPEARE’S R&J ........................................................... 33 1.2 : QUEERING STRATEGIES ............................................................................................. 35 1.2.1 ALL-MALE CASTS................................................................................................... 35 1.2.1.1 THE EARLY MODERN TRADITION ............................................................. 35 1.2.1.2 SUBVERTING THE TRADITION IN MODERN ADAPTATIONS ............... 38 1.2.2 QUEERING THE MEDIUM AND METATHEATRE ............................................. 41 1.2.2.1 PRIVATE ROMEO .............................................................................................. 41 Fig. 2 and 3: examples of warmer colours and oversaturation in the duel scene (00:51:05) and the final scene (1:27:12). ................................................................... 45 Fig.4 and 5: grayertones in military school scenes: the privates being reprimanded for hazing (00:36:25), and a classroom moment (00:49:01). ........................................... 46 1.2.2.2 SHAKESPEARE’S R&J ..................................................................................... 47 1.2.2.3 STILL A ROSE .................................................................................................... 50 1.3 : THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF QUEERING A TRAGEDY ...................................... 51 1.3.1 A SHORT HISTORY OF THE “BURY YOUR GAYS” TROPE IN ENTERTAINMENT ............................................................................................................ 51 1.3.2 HOW CREATORS CONFRONT THE ISSUE .......................................................... 54 1.3.3 PORTRAYING MINORITIES WITHIN THE MINORITY ..................................... 59 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 62 PART 2: TRANSGENDER NARRATIVES OF HAMLET ......................................................... 64 2.1 ELEMENTS OF HAMLET THAT INCITE QUEER ADAPTATIONS............................ 65 2.1.1 HAMLET AND HORATIO ....................................................................................... 65 Fig. 6: David Tennant and Peter de Jersey as Hamlet and Horatio in 5.2 of Hamlet (2009), dir. Gregory Doran. ........................................................................................ 68 2.1.2 SUICIDE IN HAMLET LINKED TO QUEERNESS ................................................. 69 2.1.2 EDWARD VINING: THE THEORY OF A FEMALE HAMLET ............................ 70 Fig. 7: Hamlet (1921), 00:00:38 and 00:00:52. The intertitles read: “The film confirms the view—of American Shakespearean scholar Dr. Edward P. Vining—that Hamlet was a woman who for reasons of State had to disguise herself as a man”. ... 71 2.2 TRANSGENDER TEXT AND SUBTEXTS IN INTERPRETATIONS .......................... 76 2.2.1 ASTA NIELSEN’S HAMLET: A WOMAN IN DISGUISE ..................................... 76 N°10, 2018 2 Éditions du CRINI © e-crini, 2018 ISSN 1760-4753 QUEERING CANONICAL SHAKESPEARE: CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS OF HAMLET AND ROMEO AND JULIET AURELIE BOURG UNIVERSITE DE NANTES 2.2.1.1 THE QUESTION OF HAMLET’S GENDER ................................................... 76 2.2.1.2 NUANCES IN HAMLET’S GENDER EXPRESSION ..................................... 81 2.2.2 MAXINE PEAKE’S HAMLET: A NONBINARY APPROACH? ........................... 85 2.2.2.1 A PARTIALLY EXPLICIT APPROACH TO HAMLET’S GENDER ............. 85 2.2.2.2 A GENDERBENT CASTING ............................................................................ 88 2.2.2.3 PERFORMING THE PLAY’S GENDERED INTERACTIONS ...................... 90 2.2.3 LAERTES AND FORTINBRAS IN QUEER ADAPTATIONS ............................... 97 2.3 ISSUES OF CASTING AND QUEER ERASURE ........................................................... 99 2.3.2 CIS ACTRESSES, TRANS ROLES ........................................................................ 102 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................... 104 GENERAL CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 105 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 112 PRIMARY SOURCES ........................................................................................................... 112 WORKS BY SHAKESPEARE ......................................................................................... 112 THEATRE ADAPTATIONS ............................................................................................ 112 MOVIE ADAPTATIONS ................................................................................................. 112 SECONDARY SOURCES ..................................................................................................... 114 FEMINIST AND QUEER STUDIES ................................................................................ 114 PERFORMANCE STUDIES ............................................................................................ 118 INTERTEXTUALITY AND ADAPTATION STUDIES ................................................. 118 GENERAL SHAKESPEAREAN STUDIES .................................................................... 118 GENERAL SHAKESPEAREAN STUDIES: HAMLET .............................................. 118 GENERAL SHAKESPEAREAN STUDIES: ROMEO AND JULIET ......................... 119 SHAKESPEARE: FEMINIST AND QUEER STUDIES ................................................. 119 FEMINIST AND QUEER STUDIES: HAMLET ......................................................... 121 FEMINIST AND QUEER STUDIES: ROMEO AND JULIET .................................... 121 SHAKESPEARE ON FILM .............................................................................................. 122 APPENDIX 1 STRUCTURE AND INTERTEXTUALITY IN CALARCO'S SHAKESPEARE'S R&J .......................................................................................................... 123 APPENDIX 2 THE GENDERBREAD PERSON.................................................................. 126 N°10, 2018 3 Éditions du CRINI © e-crini, 2018 ISSN 1760-4753 QUEERING CANONICAL SHAKESPEARE: CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS OF HAMLET AND ROMEO AND JULIET AURELIE BOURG UNIVERSITE DE NANTES LIST OF IMAGES Fig. 1: Harold Perrineau as Mercutio in 1.5 of Romeo + Juliet (1995), dir. Baz Luhrmann. 31 Fig. 2 and 3: examples of warmer colours and oversaturation in the duel scene (00:51:05) and the final scene (1:27:12). 45 Fig.4 and 5: grayertones in military school scenes: the privates being reprimanded for hazing (00:36:25), and a classroom moment (00:49:01). 46 Fig. 6: David Tennant and Peter de Jersey as Hamlet and Horatio in 5.2 of Hamlet (2009), dir. Gregory Doran. 68 Fig. 7: Hamlet (1921), 00:00:38 and 00:00:52. The intertitles read: “The film confirms the view—of American Shakespearean scholar Dr. Edward P. Vining—that Hamlet was a woman who for reasons of State had to disguise herself as a man”. 71 N°10, 2018 4 Éditions du CRINI © e-crini, 2018 ISSN 1760-4753 QUEERING CANONICAL SHAKESPEARE: CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS OF HAMLET AND ROMEO AND JULIET AURELIE BOURG UNIVERSITE DE NANTES INTRODUCTION The 16th century favored cross-dressed men in women’s roles, forging a bond between our culture and theater that endures today. That era’s greatest dramatist, in sonnets to his benefactor, Mr. W. H., proclaimed his love more ringingly than he portrayed the ruin of dynasties. — Alan Moore, The Mirror of Love. As reflected in Alan Moore’s poem, Renaissance theatre, and in particular