DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex X the Vistula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

12th July 2018 Annex X Application of the bottom- up multicriteria methodology in eight European River Basin District The Vistula RBD Task A3 of the BLUE 2 project “Study on EU integrated policy assessment for the freshwater and marine environment, on the economic benefits of EU water policy and on the costs of its non- implementation” By: Magdalena Trybuch Agnieszka Rogowiec Krzysztof Kochanek In collaboration with Disclaimer: The arguments expressed in this report are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinion of any other party. The report should be cited as follows: Trybuch, Rogowiec, Kochanek (2018). Annex X. Application of the bottom-up multicriteria methodology in eight European River Basin Districts – The Vistula RBD. Deliverable to Task A3 of the BLUE 2 project “Study on EU integrated policy assessment for the freshwater and marine environment, on the economic benefits of EU water policy and on the costs of its non- implementation”. Report to DG ENV. Client: Directorate-General for the Environment of the European Commission. Ramboll Group A/S Hannemanns Allé 53 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark Tel: +45 5161 1000 Fax: +45 5161 1001 Institute for European Environmental Policy London Office 11 Belgrave Road IEEP Offices, Floor 3 London, SW1V 1RB Tel: +44 (0) 20 7799 2244 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7799 2600 Brussels Office Rue Joseph II 36-38, 1000 Bruxelles Tel: +32 (0) 2738 7482 Fax: +32 (0) 2732 4004 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. 3 Preface ............................................................................................................................. 5 1 Description of the River Basin District Wisła (Vistula) ................................................ 6 2 The Second River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) and the related Programme of Measure (PoM) .............................................................................................................. 10 3 The measures included in the BAU level of effort .................................................... 13 4 The measures included in the HI level of effort ........................................................ 21 5 Costs of the measures included in the BAU level of effort ........................................ 24 6 Costs of the measures included in the HI level of effort ........................................... 27 7 Outcomes of the measures included in the BAU and HI level of effort ...................... 29 8 Benefits of the measures included in the BAU and HI level of effort (a quarter of a page per measure) .................................................................................................................. 31 9 Biodiversity improvements of the measures included in the BAU and HI level of effort 33 10 Comparison of the costs and benefits in the two levels of effort .............................. 34 11 Challenges and recommendations to improve the methodology .............................. 45 12 References .............................................................................................................. 48 13 Annex. Detailed information on costs ...................................................................... 50 List of Tables Table 1 Characterisation of the River Basin District of the River Vistula. ................................. 9 Table 2 Measures in the BAU level of effort ............................................................................ 14 Table 3 Measures in the HI level of effort ............................................................................... 22 Table 4 Costs of the measures included in the BAU level of effort – total funding ................ 26 Table 5 Costs of the measures included in the HI level of effort – total funding .................... 28 Table 6 Summary of the costs in the two levels of effort ........................................................ 35 Table 7 Summary of the outcomes in the two levels of effort ................................................ 37 Table 8 Summary of the benefits in the two levels of effort ................................................... 41 Table 9 Summary of the biodiversity improvements in the two levels of effort .................... 44 Table 10 Costs of the measures included in the BAU level of effort – public funding ............ 50 Table 11 Costs of the measures included in the BAU level of effort – private funding .......... 51 Table 12 Costs of the measures included in the BAU level of effort – other funding ............. 52 List of Figures Figure 1 Overview of the BLUE2 study ...................................................................................... 5 Figure 2 The River Vistula Basin District .................................................................................... 6 Preface This annex report is one product of the “Study on European Union (EU) integrated policy assessment for the freshwater and marine environment, on the economic benefits of EU water policy and on the costs of its non-implementation” (BLUE2) commissioned by the European Commission (EC). The overall aim of the BLUE2 study is to support the Commission in building up its analytical capacity and understanding of the economics and effectiveness of the EU water acquis. BLUE2 is comprised of two parts, as shown in Figure 1: Figure 1 Overview of the BLUE2 study The overall objective of Part A of BLUE2 is to increase the understanding of the full (economic) value that water, and water services generate and how water resources contribute to economic development and citizens' well-being. The findings of BLUE2 will further assist in quantifying how the EU water acquis contributes to this value generation, using the most appropriate valuation techniques. The overall objective of Part B of BLUE2 is to develop a method for the integrated socio- economic assessment of policies affecting the quality of the freshwater and marine environment, to be applied in connection with the water and marine modelling framework held by the Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC). The method and accompanying tools will be used to support policy development. In particular, Part B aims to establish an EU pressures inventory and measures database. Additionally, Part B will increase the understanding of the cost-effectiveness of measures and the benefits arising from a reduction of pressures on the freshwater and marine environment through the application of two online modelling tools. A Scenario Generation Tool for defining and generating policy scenarios for JRC modelling and an Evaluation Tool for cost-benefit assessment of the created scenarios. Task A3 of BLUE2 developed a bottom-up multicriteria methodology to compare costs and benefits of water policy at the River Basin District level. This annex summarises the results of the application of the methodology developed in Task A3 to the Vistula RBD. 1 Description of the River Basin District Wisła (Vistula) Figure 2 The River Vistula Basin District Overall description of the RBD The River Vistula (Pol. Wisła) basin district (RVBD) is the largest catchment in Poland with an area of 183,176 km2 (whose 87.5% in Poland). It covers nearly 60% of the whole area of the country. The sources of the main River Vistula are located on the slope of the Barania Góra mountain in Beskid Śląski and the mouth of the river is in the Zatoka Gdańska (Baltic Sea). Due to its large area, the RVBD covers several administrative units in Eastern Poland, these are Voivodships (from south to north – along the River Vistula course): śląskie, małopolskie, podkarpackie, lubelskie, świętokrzyskie, łódzkie, mazowieckie, podlaskie, warmińsko-mazurskie, kujawsko- pomorskie, pomorskie, i.e. 11 out of all 16 Voivodships in Poland. It terms of geographical variability, the RVBD covers three physio-geographical units: Subcarpatian Region, Eastern Europe without Alpian regions and Eastern European lowlands. It means that the RVBD is of mountainous character in its southern part (approximately up to Dunajec tributary), which later changes into highland character (approximately up to the River San tributary) and finally lowland rivers catchment up to the River Vistula mouth. The most important left tributaries of the River Vistula are: Przemsza, Nida, Czarna, Kamienna, Iłżanka, Radomka, Pilica, Bzura, Brda, Wda, and Wierzyca, whereas the right tributaries are: Soła, Skawa, Raba, Dunajec, Wisłoka, San, Wieprz, Świder, Narew, Skrwa, Drwęca, Osa and Liwa. The significant discharges of the River Vistula and frequent inundations lead to the building of several artificial reservoirs that mostly play flow-regulating, fresh-water supplying and power- generating roles; the biggest artificial reservoirs are Wisła-Czarne, Goczałkowice and Włocławek. Within the RVBD there are: 2,660 rivers, 6 near-sea rivers, 5 channels, 484 lakes and 94 groundwater water reservoirs. The population in the RVBD reaches 24.5 million inhabitants. The most important Polish cities with regards to their cultural heritage and economic significance are located in the area of the River Vistula Catchment, including: Kraków (population: 766,739 in 2017), Katowice (population: 297,177 in 2017), Lublin (population: 340,230 in 2017), Warszawa (population: 1,758,143 in 2017), Białystok (population: 296,628 in 2017), Toruń (population: 202,591 in 2017), Bydgoszcz (population: 353,215 in 2017) and Gdańsk (population: 464,293 in 2017). It is estimated that 64% of the RVBD area
Recommended publications
  • Raport Z Wykonania Map Zagrożenia Powodziowego I Map Ryzyka

    Raport Z Wykonania Map Zagrożenia Powodziowego I Map Ryzyka

    Projekt: Informatyczny system osłony kraju przed nadzwyczajnymi zagrożeniami Nr Projektu: POIG.07.01.00–00–025/09 RAPORT Z WYKONANIA MAP ZAGROZ ENIA POWODZIOWEGO I MAP RYZYKA POWODZIOWEGO Projekt: Informatyczny system osłony kraju przed nadzwyczajnymi zagrożeniami Nr Projektu: POIG.07.01.00–00–025/09 SPIS TREŚCI: WYKAZ SKRÓTÓW STOSOWANYCH W DOKUMENCIE 4 DEFINICJE 5 I. WPROWADZENIE 7 II. PODSTAWA OPRACOWANIA MZP I MRP 9 III. ZAKRES OPRACOWANIA MZP I MRP 13 IV. DANE WYKORZYSTANE DO MZP I MRP 37 IV.1. NUMERYCZNY MODEL TERENU 41 IV.2. PRZEKROJE KORYTOWE RZEK 41 V. OPIS METODYKI OPRACOWANIA MZP 43 V.1. MODELOWANIE HYDRAULICZNE 43 V.2. SCENARIUSZE POWODZIOWE 70 V.3. WYZNACZANIE OBSZARÓW ZAGROŻENIA POWODZIOWEGO 73 VI. OPIS METODYKI OPRACOWANIA MRP 83 VI.1. NEGATYWNE KONSEKWENCJE DLA LUDNOŚCI 83 VI.2. RODZAJ DZIAŁALNOŚCI GOSPODARCZEJ 84 VI.3. OBIEKTY ZAGRAŻAJĄCE ŚRODOWISKU W PRZYPADKU WYSTĄPIENIA POWODZI 86 VI.4. OBSZARY CHRONIONE 87 VI.5. OBSZARY I OBIEKTY DZIEDZICTWA KULTUROWEGO 87 VI.6. OBLICZENIE WARTOŚCI POTENCJALNYCH STRAT POWODZIOWYCH 88 VII. FORMA SPORZĄDZENIA MZP i MRP 91 VII.1. BAZA DANYCH PRZESTRZENNYCH MZP I MRP 91 VII.2. WIZUALIZACJA KARTOGRAFICZNA MZP i MRP 92 VIII. PUBLIKACJA I PRZEKAZANIE ORGANOM ADMINISTRACJI MZP I MRP 101 VIII.1. PRZEKAZANIE MZP i MRP ORGANOM ADMINISTRACJI 101 VIII.2. PUBLIKACJA MZP i MRP 101 VIII.3. ZASADY UDOSTĘPNIANIA MZP i MRP 105 2 Projekt: Informatyczny system osłony kraju przed nadzwyczajnymi zagrożeniami Nr Projektu: POIG.07.01.00–00–025/09 IX. MZP i MRP W PLANOWANIU I ZAGOSPODAROWANIU PRZESTRZENNYM 107 X. PRZEGLĄD I AKTUALIZACJA MZP I MRP 114 XI.
  • Arts in Wild Felid Conservation Programmes in Poland and in the World

    Arts in Wild Felid Conservation Programmes in Poland and in the World

    J Vet Res 63, 457-464, 2019 DOI:10.2478/jvetres-2019-0043 REVIEW ARTICLE ARTs in wild felid conservation programmes in Poland and in the world Joanna Kochan1, Wojciech Niżański2, Nei Moreira3, Zalmir Silvino Cubas4, Agnieszka Nowak1, Sylwia Prochowska2, Agnieszka Partyka2, Wiesława Młodawska1, Józef Skotnicki5 1Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 30-059 Kraków, Poland 2Department of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-366 Wrocław, Poland 3Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, PR 85950-000, Brazil 4ITAIPU Binacional, Refúgio Biológico Bela Vista, Foz do Iguaçu, PR 85856-970, Brazil 5City Zoological Park and Garden in Kraków Charitable Foundation, 30-232 Kraków, Poland [email protected] Received: January 11, 2019 Accepted: July 2, 2019 Abstract With the exception of the domestic cat, all felid species (Felidae) are currently threatened with extinction in their natural habitat. To develop effective and optimal wild cat conservation programmes with assisted reproductive technology (ART) it is necessary to combine advances from different disciplines of science, starting from the biology of the species, through research into the population and habitat, assisted reproductive technologies, establishment of gene banks, developing bioinformatic systems, and ending with biodiversity and endangered species management. In the last few years knowledge of felid reproduction has expanded considerably thanks to comparative studies utilising the domestic cat as a research model for endangered wild cats. Basic reproductive techniques utilised in both domestic cat breeding and rescuing wild felid populations that are threatened with extinction include semen collection and cryopreservation, artificial insemination, oocyte collection, in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilisation, somatic cloning, and embryo transfer.
  • Modeling and Monitoring of Hydrodynamics and Surface Water Quality in the Sulejów Dam Reservoir, Poland

    Modeling and Monitoring of Hydrodynamics and Surface Water Quality in the Sulejów Dam Reservoir, Poland

    water Article Modeling and Monitoring of Hydrodynamics and Surface Water Quality in the Sulejów Dam Reservoir, Poland Aleksandra Ziemi ´nska-Stolarska 1,* and Magdalena Kempa 2 1 Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Wólcza´nska213 Str., 90-924 Lodz, Poland 2 Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Gaustadalléen 21 Str., 0349 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this work is to evaluate core variables of the ecological potential of the Sulejów Reservoir (temperature distribution, flow velocities, and concentrations of selected indicators, e.g., phosphates, nitrates, the abundance of phytoplankton) using a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, GEMSS-HDM (generalized environmental modeling system for surface waters), coupled with a water quality model, WASP EUTRO (GEMSS-WQM). The monitoring data necessary to build the model were obtained from two multiparameter probes that were submerged in two locations in the Sulejów Reservoir. An ADCP current profiler was used to collect data for hydrodynamic model calibration and verification. Total error between computed and measured velocity was estimated at 10–15%. A high concentration of chlorophyll-a during the vegetation season of 2015 (0.02 mg/L) was coupled with high water temperature (above 25 ◦C) and low concentrations of biogenic compounds (phosphorus and nitrogen at 0.02 and 0.001 mg/L, respectively). In 2015, NO3-N was the limiting nutrient in the Sulejów Reservoir. Maximum growth of algae was observed in June and July 2015 (0.02 mg/L chla) along the entire length of the reservoir; algae bloom volume reduction was observed Citation: Ziemi´nska-Stolarska,A.; in September (0.004 mg/L chla).
  • Protected Areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship

    Protected Areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship

    Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Vol. 30 No 3(81): 35-46 Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych DOI 10.2478/oszn-2019-0016 Dariusz Wojdan*, Ilona Żeber-Dzikowska*, Barbara Gworek**, Katarzyna Mickiewicz ***, Jarosław Chmielewski**** Protected areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship * Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach, ** Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, *** Instytut Ochrony Środowiska - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Warszawie **** Wyższa Szkoła Rehabilitacji w Warszawie; e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, protection areas, natural objects, conservation Abstract The Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship is one of the smallest provinces in Poland, but it clearly stands out with a very well-preserved natural environment. Because of exceptional features of animate and inanimate nature, large parts of the province are covered by various forms of nature protection. There is 1 national park (NP), 72 nature reserves (NRs), 9 landscape parks, 21 protected landscape areas and 40 Natura 2000 sites within the administrative borders of the province. The most unique natural features are found in the Świętokrzyski National Park (ŚNP), but the largest surface of the province is covered by protected landscape areas. Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship is the first in Poland in terms of the share of protected areas (as much as 65.2%), strongly outdistancing other Voivodeships. Small natural objects are much more numerous than large protected areas. At present, the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship has 705 natural monuments (NMs), 114 ecological sites (ESs), 20 documentation sites (DSs) and 17 nature and landscape complexes (NLCs). Moreover, new protected areas and sites may still be established within its borders. © IOŚ-PIB 1. INTRODUCTION [Polish Journal of Laws 2004, no.
  • They Fought for Independent Poland

    They Fought for Independent Poland

    2019 Special edition PISMO CODZIENNE Independence Day, November 11, 2019 FREE AGAIN! THEY FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDENT POLAND Dear Readers, The day of November 11 – the National Independence Day – is not accidentally associated with the Polish military uni- form, its symbolism and traditions. Polish soldiers on almost all World War I fronts “threw on the pyre their lives’ fate.” When the Polish occupiers were drown- ing in disasters and revolutions, white- and-red flags were fluttering on Polish streets to mark Poland’s independence. The Republic of Poland was back on the map of Europe, although this was only the beginning of the battle for its bor- ders. Józef Piłsudski in his first order to the united Polish Army shared his feeling of joy with his soldiers: “I’m taking com- mand of you, Soldiers, at the time when the heart of every Pole is beating stron- O God! Thou who from on high ger and faster, when the children of our land have seen the sun of freedom in all its Hurls thine arrows at the defenders of the nation, glory.” He never promised them any bat- We beseech Thee, through this heap of bones! tle laurels or well-merited rest, though. On the contrary – he appealed to them Let the sun shine on us, at least in death! for even greater effort in their service May the daylight shine forth from heaven’s bright portals! for Poland. And they never let him down Let us be seen - as we die! when in 1920 Poland had to defend not only its own sovereignty, but also entire Europe against flooding bolshevism.
  • Botanika – Steciana ��, ����, ��-�� ISSN ����-��

    Botanika – Steciana , , - ISSN -

    Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu CCCLXXXIX Botanika – Steciana , , - www.up.poznan.pl/steciana ISSN - MACROPHYTES, CYANOBACTERIA AND ALGAE OF THE “BRODZKIE LAKE” IN THE MAŁOPOLSKA UPLAND SOUTHERN POLAND PRELIMINARY STUDY BOŻENNA MACIEJCZAK, JOANNA CZERWIK-MARCINKOWSKA B. Maciejczak, J. Czerwik-Marcinkowska, Department of Botany, Institute of Biology, The Jan Kochanowski University of Humanities and Sciences, Świętokrzyska , - Kielce, Poland, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] (Received: September , . Accepted: April , ) ABSTRACT. The present paper provides the results of study on the macrophytes, cyanobacteria and algae of the “Brodzkie Lake” in the Małopolska Upland in southern Poland. In total, taxa (including cyano- bacteria, algae – Heterokontophyta, Dinophyta, Euglenophyta, Chlorophyta and vascular plants) have been recorded in the study area. Qualitative samples were collected in a period from March to October . All taxa were briefl y described and some water quality parameters were also analysed. KEY WORDS: lake, cyanobacteria, algae, macrophytes, bioindicators INTRODUCTION whole basin is mostly uplandish) have contributed to establishment of the Kamienna Valley Protected Land- The “Brodzkie Lake” is one of eight reservoirs con- scape Area. The most important ecological function of structed on the Kamienna River and located within this area is the protection of surface and ground wa- borders of the Staropolski Industrial District (Fig. ). ters and restoration and conservation of an ecological The Kamienna River is the second largest river of the corridor function of the Kamienna River Valley. The Świętokrzyskie Province (following the Nida River). It is Staropolski Industrial District (SID), situated in the Vis- . km long and its catchment area is . km. The tula-Pilica-Nida intefl uve, is the oldest Polish historical Kamienna River is a left tributary of the Vistula River region of industrial development with the dominating and fl ows into it on .
  • Reservoir Sedimentation Problems in the Vistula River Basin, Poland

    Reservoir Sedimentation Problems in the Vistula River Basin, Poland

    Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives (Proceedings of the Exeter Symposium July 1996). IAHSPubl.no. 236, 1996. 501 Reservoir sedimentation problems in the Vistula River basin, Poland ADAM LAJCZAK Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz str. 46, 31-512 Cracow, Poland Abstract Existing knowledge of the geometric and hydrological characteristics of existing and planned dam reservoirs in the Vistula River basin, Poland, and of the spatial differentiation of suspended sediment and bed load transport in the area provides a basis for proposing appropriate locations for planned reservoirs in the river basin. If the location and the order of building of the planned dams conform to these proposals, this will result in slow silting of the reservoirs with advantages both for the use of the river as a waterway and for maximizing the useful life of the reservoirs. INTRODUCTION The correct planning of the development multipurpose reservoir systems in large river basins, where the rivers are characterized by different hydrological regimes and different suspended sediment loads and bed load yields, presents an important problem for fluvial sedimentology. Estimation of the useful lifetime of reservoirs of very diffe­ rent initial geometric and hydrological characteristics, when their functions are fulfilled, must be a prelude to the correct location of planned structures. This time period, which has been estimated for every reservoir studied according to the concept proposed, should not be shorter than the amortization time of the reservoir. The above procedure can be undertaken if the following information is available: (a) the average annual suspended sediment load and bed load as measured at successive gauging stations on the river and its tributaries over a suitable period of time; (b) the initial geometric and hydrological characteristics of existing and planned reservoirs; and (c) the initial trap efficiency for the suspended sediment load of every reservoir studied.
  • Ocena Wód Wykorzystywanych Do Zaopatrzenia Ludności W Wodę Przeznaczoną Do Spożycia W Województwie Małopolskim W 2012 Roku

    Ocena Wód Wykorzystywanych Do Zaopatrzenia Ludności W Wodę Przeznaczoną Do Spożycia W Województwie Małopolskim W 2012 Roku

    Tabela 3. Ocena wód wykorzystywanych do zaopatrzenia ludności w wodę przeznaczoną do spożycia w województwie małopolskim w 2012 roku Punkt pomiarowo- Ocena Kategoria wód wg wskaźników kontrolny (p.p.k.) spełnienia Kategoria wymagań Nazwa JCWP Kod JCWP Rzeka jakości dla obszarów Nazwa km wód Fizyko-chemicznych Bakteriologicznych chronionych (do poboru w wodę do spożycia) Dorzecze: Wisła kod: 2000 Zlewnia: Wisła od Przemszy do Dunajca kod: 213 Soła A2 - ogólna liczba bakterii T Soła od zbiornika PLRW2000152132999 Soła Kęty 16,4 A2 A1 coli, liczba bakterii coli Czaniec do ujścia fek., paciorkowce fekalne Skawy i jej dopływy Skawa do A2-azot Kjeldahla, A3 ogólna liczba bakterii T PLRW20002134299 Skawa Jordanów 71,1 A3 Bystrzanki fosforany, amoniak coli Skawa od zapory T Poniżej zb. Świnna A2 - ogólna liczba bakterii zbiornika Poręba do PLRW200014213477 Skawa 26,6 A2 A1 coli, liczba bakterii coli Świnna Kleczanki bez fek., paciorkowce fekalne Poręba Kleczanki Powyżej A3 A3 - ogólna liczba bakterii T Stryszawka PLRW200012213469 Stryszawka 3,5 A1 ujęcia coli A2 A2 - ogólna liczba bakterii T PLRW20001221347329 Paleczka Paleczka Zembrzyce 1,2 A1 coli, liczba bakterii coli 9 fek., paciorkowce fekalne A2 A2 - ogólna liczba bakterii T Wieprzówka do PLRW2000122134849 Wieprzówka Rzyki 22,7 A1 coli, liczba bakterii coli Targaniczanki fek., paciorkowce fekalne Skawinka i jej dopływy Gościbia A2 - ogólna liczba bakterii T Skawinka do PLRW20001221356699 Gościbia powyżej 4,3 A2 A1 coli, liczba bakterii coli Głogoczówki ujęcia fek., paciorkowce fekalne Skawinka od A2-zawiesina, BZT5, T Powyżej A3 - ogólna liczba bakterii Głogoczówki do PLRW2000192135699 Skawinka 9,0 A3 azot Kjeldahla, OWO, Skawiny coli, ujścia amoniak Sanka Powyżej A2-barwa, OWO, azot A3 - ogólna liczba bakterii T Sanka PLRW20007213589 Sanka 2,7 A3 ujęcia Kjeldahla, amoniak coli Rudawa Rudawa od A2-azot Kjeldahla, T A3- ogólna liczba bakterii Racławki do PLRW20009213699 Rudawa Podkamycze 9,3 A3 fosforany, mangan, coli, liczba bakterii coli fek.
  • Traditional Rural Małopolska

    Traditional Rural Małopolska

    Traditional Rural Małopolska Catalogue TRADITIONAL RURAL MAŁOPOLSKA Małopolska is a region with a rich historical and cultural, extraordinary natural and landscape values and traditional hospitality famous well out of Poland. The uniqueness and multiculturalism affirm the exceptional qualities of the region. The still vibrant folk culture is the strongest expression of the diversity of Małopolska, where each part has its own specific costumes, dialect, customs and traditions. The same folk culture also manifests itself in the architecture, rural buildings, interior design, farm equipment and regional dishes and products. The publication ‘Traditional Rural Małopolska’, which includes offers from 13 farms and agritourism facilities, is an invitation to come to the Małopolska countryside and learn about the most beautiful folk traditions and rituals that have been cultivated in Małopolska for centuries. Hosts of the facilities are enthusiastic, exceptional and open-minded people, who know and nurture the history and traditions of their ‘Little Homelands’, willingly spend their time with their guests, showing them local monuments, folklore and customs. We look forward to seeing you! FARMS PARTICIPATING IN THE PROGRAMME “TRADITIONAL RURAL MAŁOPOLSKA” 1 ”PSZCZÓŁKI” – Niezwojowice .................................................................................................................................................... 6-7 2 ”GOŚCINA u BABCI” – Zalipie ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Warsaw in Short

    Warsaw in Short

    WarsaW TourisT informaTion ph. (+48 22) 94 31, 474 11 42 Tourist information offices: Museums royal route 39 Krakowskie PrzedmieÊcie Street Warsaw Central railway station Shops 54 Jerozolimskie Avenue – Main Hall Warsaw frederic Chopin airport Events 1 ˚wirki i Wigury Street – Arrival Hall Terminal 2 old Town market square Hotels 19, 21/21a Old Town Market Square (opening previewed for the second half of 2008) Praga District Restaurants 30 Okrzei Street Warsaw Editor: Tourist Routes Warsaw Tourist Office Translation: English Language Consultancy Zygmunt Nowak-Soliƒski Practical Information Cartographic Design: Tomasz Nowacki, Warsaw Uniwersity Cartographic Cathedral Photos: archives of Warsaw Tourist Office, Promotion Department of the City of Warsaw, Warsaw museums, W. Hansen, W. Kryƒski, A. Ksià˝ek, K. Naperty, W. Panów, Z. Panów, A. Witkowska, A. Czarnecka, P. Czernecki, P. Dudek, E. Gampel, P. Jab∏oƒski, K. Janiak, Warsaw A. Karpowicz, P. Multan, B. Skierkowski, P. Szaniawski Edition XVI, Warszawa, August 2008 Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport Free copy 1. ˚wirki i Wigury St., 00-906 Warszawa Airport Information, ph. (+48 22) 650 42 20 isBn: 83-89403-03-X www.lotnisko-chopina.pl, www.chopin-airport.pl Contents TourisT informaTion 2 PraCTiCal informaTion 4 fall in love wiTh warsaw 18 warsaw’s hisTory 21 rouTe no 1: 24 The Royal Route: Krakowskie PrzedmieÊcie Street – Nowy Âwiat Street – Royal ¸azienki modern warsaw 65 Park-Palace Complex – Wilanów Park-Palace Complex warsaw neighborhood 66 rouTe no 2: 36 CulTural AttraCTions 74 The Old
  • Improved Tools for River Flood Preparedness Under Changing Risk - Poland

    Improved Tools for River Flood Preparedness Under Changing Risk - Poland

    7th Study Conference on BALTEX, Borgholm, Sweden, 10-14 June 2013 Improved tools for river flood preparedness under changing risk - Poland Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz Institute of Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany - Changing flood risk in Poland - Improved tools for river flood preparedness - Changing flood risk in Poland - Improved tools for river flood preparedness River flooding in Poland River flooding is the most destructive natural peril in the Baltic Sea Basin in general and in Poland in particular. Flood risk and preparedness became matters of broad concern, following the dramatic floods in Poland in 1997 and 2010, when dozens of people were killed, national flood losses reached the level of billions of Euros and the topic made it to cover stories. Floods in PL, May-June 2013 IAHS Special Publication 10 (April 2012) ISBN ISBN 978-1- 907161-28-5 (Paperback); 516 + xvi pages 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 Dartmouth Flood Observatory. Source: et al. (2012) Kundzewicz Dartmouth Flood Observatory. Increasing number of large floods, according tothedata in 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 y = 0.3123x + 2.46 y = 0.2608x + 0.33 R R 2 2 = 0.4339 = 0.6012 Magnitude=>5 Severity=>1.5 Trend in number of days with precipitation in excess of 30 mm, and (b) trend in maximum 5-day precipitation, 1971–2002 (after Lorenc & Olecka, 2006). Catastrophic floods of regional extent in Poland: from 1946 to 1970; from 1971 to 1990; from 1991 to 2010; from 1946 to 2010.
  • Contribution to Knowledge of the Mycobiota of Kampinos National Park

    Contribution to Knowledge of the Mycobiota of Kampinos National Park

    Acta Mycologica DOI: 10.5586/am.1116 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2018-09-29 Accepted: 2018-11-04 Contribution to knowledge of the Published: 2019-06-13 mycobiota of Kampinos National Park Handling editor Wojciech Pusz, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, (Poland): part 2 Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland Błażej Gierczyk1*, Andrzej Szczepkowski2, Tomasz Ślusarczyk3, Authors’ contributions Anna Kujawa4 BG: feld research, identifcation 1 Faculty of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 8, of the specimens, writing of 61-614 Poznań, Poland the manuscript, preparation 2 Faculty of Forestry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 of the drawings and maps; Warsaw, Poland AS: coordination of the work, 3 Naturalists’ Club, 1 Maja 22, 66-200 Świebodzin, Poland feld research, identifcation of 4 Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bukowska 19, the specimens, correction of 60-809 Poznań, Poland the manuscript, photographic documentation; AK: feld * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] research, identifcation of the specimens, correction of the manuscript, photographic documentation; TŚ: feld Abstract research, identifcation of the Continuation of the mycological study of the fre-damaged pine forest in Kampinos specimens, correction of the National Park in central Poland in 2017 produced interesting new fndings. Among manuscript the taxa collected, 36 were new to the park, six had not been hitherto reported from Funding Poland (Calycellina araneocincta, Ciliolarina af. laetifca, Clitocybe metachroides, The studies were fnanced by Galerina cerina f. longicystis, Parasola cuniculorum, Pleonectria pinicola), and the The State Forests National Forest previous status of one taxon (Pleonectria cucurbitula) had been uncertain.