Society for Industrial Archeology · New England Chapters
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field. -
East Coast.Xlsx
Bagster® collection service is available in the following areas. This list is alphabetical by state and then by city name. Please note that some zip codes within a city may not be serviced due to local franchise restrictions. Bagster collection service area subject to change at any time. If your area is not listed or you have questions visit www.thebagster.com or call 1-877-789-BAGS (2247). State City Zip CT A A R P Pharmacy 06167 CT Abington 06230 CT Accr A Data 06087 CT Advertising Distr Co 06537 CT Advertising Distr Co 06538 CT Aetna Insurance 06160 CT Aetna Life 06156 CT Allingtown 06516 CT Allstate 06153 CT Amston 06231 CT Andover 06232 CT Ansonia 06401 CT Ansonia 06418 CT Ashford 06250 CT Ashford 06278 CT Avon 06001 CT Bakersville 06057 CT Ballouville 06233 CT Baltic 06330 CT Baltic 06351 CT Bank Of America 06150 CT Bank Of America 06151 CT Bank Of America 06180 CT Bantam 06750 CT Bantam 06759 CT Barkhamsted 06063 CT Barry Square 06114 CT Beacon Falls 06403 CT Belle Haven 06830 CT Berlin 06037 CT Bethany 06524 CT Bethel 06801 CT Bethlehem Village 06751 CT Bishop's Corner 06117 CT Bishop's Corner 06137 CT Bissell 06074 CT Bloomfield 06002 CT Bloomingdales By Mail Ltd 06411 CT Blue Hills 06002 CT Blue Hills 06112 CT Bolton 06043 CT Borough 06340 CT Botsford 06404 CT Bozrah 06334 CT Bradley International Airpor 06096 CT Branford 06405 CT Bridgeport 06601 CT Bridgeport 06602 CT Bridgeport 06604 CT Bridgeport 06605 CT Bridgeport 06606 CT Bridgeport 06607 CT Bridgeport 06608 CT Bridgeport 06610 CT Bridgeport 06611 CT Bridgeport 06612 -
SUMMER 1993 PAGE THREE in 1926, Powers a Saw Mill, a Woodworking Shop, and a Feed E.A.I.A
THE MILL Sawyers and Millwrights AT LEDYARD, of Saugerties, New York CONNECTICUT I n response to my request for information on up-and.-down sawmills, a friend in Albany county, New York, sent a draw ing of a blade he had document ed on a mill at Kent, Connecti cut, and a letter telling of anot-her vertical mill he had discovered in Ledyard, Connect icut. He had visited the Led yard site in July but it was not in operation because the water in the millpond was low. He planned to go back in April or May of this year when the mill would De working and open to the public. In early May I called the number he had given me and was told b,y Ruth Dyer, one of the volunteers at the site, that the mill had just suffered a major breakdown. The men who O1arlie i:nd Michael Rothe TrainiQ9 Their Tean, Michael operate and maintain it were keeps six Belgian hOrses for logglng. They are ideal for working on the problem but were selective harvesting and do less dcmage to the forest than not sure when it would be oper modern diesel equipment, (Photo by P.Sinclair) ational. I told her I would come anyway. Afterall, mainte nance and repair are important aspects of a water mill. Ithough little remains in the vritten record, some Ledyard, Connecticut, is A a hilly township a few miles believed there was a sawmill in the mid-Hudson Valley at from the states southern coast the present town of Saugerties, New York, before the area It lies in the watershed of the was formally settled in the 168Os. -
Tree Trimming Plan
Wagner Wildlife Sanctuary EAST LYME Eightmile River Wildlife Area 11Y1 Oxoboxo River Water Access 68 5L OH Primary 2019 Trimming 1 Eightmile River Wildlife Area 1 Enhanced Tree Trimming 11Y 1 Backbone Maintenance Trimming Y 1 1 Scheduled Maintenance Trimming Nehantic State Forest 1 1 Y Substations 1 Town Boundary State Forest 1 5 L State Park or Preserve 1 9 6 L 8 Y 0 Nehantic State Forest 1 Wildlife Area or Sanctuary 4 Powers Lake 1 1 9 5 L Other DEP Property L Norwich Pond 0 6 4 8 9 L 9L04 0 Beckett Hill State Park Scenic Reserve 8 Bayonet Street Uncas Pond Pattagansett Lake Town Mileage Summary 9 L Pattagansett Lake Water Access 0 4 ETT: 1.56 FLANDERS BB METT: 9.25 Nehantic State Forest SMT: 22.39 Lords Cove Wildlife Area 7 Total: 33.19 L0 Lords Cove Wildlife Area 9 9 L Lords Cove Wildlife1 Area Gorton Pond 5 0 7 L 15L68 Jordan Cove Water Access 6 Gorton Pond Water Access 8 Ferry Point Marsh Wildlife Area Dodge Pond Niantic River Water Access Dodge Pond Lieutenant River Water Access Rocky Neck State Park Connecticut River Water Access (Old Saybrook) Bride Brook Wildlife Sanctuary Lieutenant River Water Access Jordan Cove Water Access 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Rocky Neck State Park Harkness Memorial State Park Miles Great Island Wildlife Area Rocky Neck State Park 2 1 Dock Road Water Access Ragged Rock Creek Marsh Wildlife Area Y 2 Harkness Memorial State Park Great Island Wildlife Area Fourmile River Water Access 2 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION: The material contained on the 1 Seaside State Park Y Overhead Distribution Circuit Map shall be considered proprietary to Eversource (ES), and Users (which shall be defined as any person Great Island Wildlife Area Rocky Neck State Park 2 or entity who has received the Map through sale, purchase, exchange gift, or otherwise) shall keep it in confidence and shall not furnish or Great Island Wildlife Area disclose it to any third party without the prior written permission of Eversource. -
NORWICH the 1\.Ose of New England
~1r~11"11: }llL®~ffil~ = (g)~~"lf'(?@ 00@) t;;;l Q..Ass. poo~. ':)'J4CoU Ea.'l fJ? ACGf.SS~ON ~0 2.0toT]O I . OU~C!: . '' ''3' '' ''''' 0231'' '' ' '~~~[l~ li ll00080i~ l' '~i'i~i' '' ~'n~' 4679''''' '' ' ' ' ' ''' '' ' PICTURESQUE AND INDUSTRIAL . EASTERN CONNECTICUT JUL 25 1918 Picturesque eEl. Industrial Eastern Connecticut ITS DESIRABILITY A Place for Industries A Place for Agriculture A Place for Homes A Place for Vacations PUBLISHED BY THE EASTERN CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE \ . '':... t BrooklynO Colchester 0 ~• ch auy ~Pond N 1 Prefatory Note HE reason of this work is the desire of the five Business Men's Asso ciations in this part of the State, through their special Eastern Connecticut Development Committee, to join forces to secure and D make promptly available for inquiries compact information regarding industrial and residential opportunities in Eastern Connecticut. We expect that this information and publication will make our own business men better acquainted with each other, and with local resources, and hence will stimulate the development of local enterprises by local men as well as by men and by capital from outside the territory. The text is furnished by a considerable number of contributors, so that varied points of view are presented together with the bare statement of facts. The plan of this first edition limits the extent of its advertising pages, but as information accumulates and knowledge of the project extends, later editions may include many concrete propositions for development and the offering of farms and other properties for sale and for exchange. The "Good Roads" movement is reflected here. -
A Bibliography of Publications Relating to Water Resources in Connecticut, 1900-1970 William C
University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Special Reports Connecticut Institute of Water Resources June 1970 A Bibliography of Publications Relating to Water Resources in Connecticut, 1900-1970 William C. Kennard Institute of Water Resources Jane S. Fisher Institute of Water Resources Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/ctiwr_specreports Recommended Citation Kennard, William C. and Fisher, Jane S., "A Bibliography of Publications Relating to Water Resources in Connecticut, 1900-1970" (1970). Special Reports. 8. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/ctiwr_specreports/8 I~:-,:: ,i~i ~a~f~xi-~:- - -~~;, - ., ,ifP~t- ,ii~ -Zi ·#- r. -, ,;i;_ n_ - ,1: ri_ ~ .- ~ - _i~,` I . - -I-: 4t-j . -~~~~ ,-. ;~~~~~~t-,I I I~~~~~~_: . -Y -5-- ,-, -3 t - - ~~~~~~-~~~.-,I.W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `_ ~ ~ ~~~~~ i-2.,, _~- -, -~- w ", --- ,'~,,~~--I ~l. ::, 'I ~ l--i-- iii- _'~._~~,__. ._, ~ ~ ~ - A-, !~._, ,--i-izs-- `11~ c. ?.-,; i,!·- -?-~' -7 ~ ~ '4 ,fc·v~~, _1, ~- - ,~, l ~-%~~~~ -- s:_ , _-11-~Iv ~ ---" ~ ~, ~ ~ .k~~~ -"- , --- -,- ", _n, -, _~~~~~~__l1-.7-I- j-_ t,- _~~~~~~2~~--_,~~~~. -",7 -~ i --,.~~~~t: !~,~ -. - .~- lkz~,~ ,_~,, __.. ~~I --,I ~,!:f~c-, ~~~~~~~,~ ~~~~~~~~,~~~-_'-_- ~~ -, - ' ·-I-b _-! - wv;-n7:.,.,- , ''..; :~·- :~~~~~~~~~~~~~i-- ill~,-:: ~- 4ut -- ~ ,, ~ ~ ---.:--'4~~.AC-W `: ~ ~ ~ ~ ,V~~~i.-- -~~~~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-- ~~~Z-~;W'i- , . ~ - ~ !"''~~-~~-,~~r,--,i:1,3~~,fpf',~,':.--,~,,-,,-,"'-'v~_ 7,-, ,.,- "T - , ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-. t y~_`_1,1 , . -11~.~;,, I-.___;!i i 'I,.,: , P~'., ,~: ,''.-.~~:: --7 _ -.i, ; a , . -~- ~ - ` ~:- I ; - iIas,.,.f_.~_ ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ,- , t-,i---!r,~ !4 , - _ -. _ i..n~ , ,, ~ ~ ~:-t~~,~-,_-- ~ , - ~ -,~~,_-- , * ,- Z- ,--- ~ _,-~ ~ _-- ,~",i-,d.,- ,,- . ,, .:,, , I_,-f7 , __" ~ ~~~ , - :, -i~:7%..~ -, -- ~ i W, s-,i,":, -I .-- ,-. I, ,"I- , - "__.1 _ _- -~-~ -t~ ,-.'.'~-~ -~ ,,~i- ~,~: --, ~ ~ -, -_- ;-,- ;~,11~l!~_!D__ __6, -, I , -- I- ',1-1 I. -
Public Water Supply Management Area
COORDINATED PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM PLAN a PART III: FINAL INTEGRATED REPORT Southeast Connecticut Public Water Supply Management Area March 2001 Preparedfor: Department of Public Health Hartford, Connecticut and the Southeast Connecticut Water Utility Coordinating Committee Prepared by: Milone & MacBroom, Inc. 716 South Main Street Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 203) 271- 1773 With assistancefrom Planners Collaborative, Inc. on Water Conservation and Land Use Planning cW MILONE& MACBROOM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. 0 INTRODUCTION a 2. 0 POPULATION, CONSUMPTION, AND SAFE YIELD PROJECTIONS 2. 1 Introduction 2- 1 2. 2 Municipal Population and Demand Projections 2- 3 2. 3 Exclusive Service Area Population and Demand Projections 2- 4 2. 4 Existing and Future Safe Yields 2- 16 3. 0 INTERCONNECTIONS, JOINT USE FACILITIES, AND SATELLITE MANAGEMENT 3. 1 Interconnections 3- 1 3. 2 Joint Use or Ownership of Facilities 3- 8 3. 3 Satellite Management 3- 10 4. 0 RECOMMENDED MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS 4. 1 Overview 4- 1 4. 2 Definition of Terms 4- 2 4. 3 Facility Location 4- 2 4.4 Water Supply Requirements 4- 3 4. 5 Source Protection 4-4 4. 6 Well Construction and Water Quality 4-4 4. 7 Atmospheric Storage Tanks 4- 5 4. 8 On- Site Standby Power 4- 5 4.9 Transmission and Distribution System 4- 6 4. 10 Materials 4- 8 4. 11 Fire Protection 4- 8 4. 12 Service Pipes 4- 10 4. 13 Pumphouse Requirements 4- 10 4. 14 Individual Utility Standards 4- 11 4. 15 Impact on Existing Systems 4- 11 4. 16 Conclusions and Recommendations 4- 12 5. 0 WATER CONSERVATION 5. -
Pot Hunting, Looting, and the Indian Ledge Site
BULLETIN OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CONNECTICUT NUMBER 55 1992 Edited by LUCIANNE LAVIN CONTENTS Editor's Corner •••••••••••••.••••••••••••••.•..••••••••••••••••••••••••• '.••.•••••••iii The Cyrus Sherwood Bradley Collection: A Preliminary Study of the Prehistoric Native American Presence in Fairfield, Connecticut SALLY STRAZDINS •••••••••...•••••••••••.••••••••••••.••••••••••••.••••••••••••..•••••• 1 Southington Rock Shelters FRED W. GUDRIAN •••••••.•..••••••••.•..•••••••.••.••..••••••••••••..••••••••••...•••• 21 Unidentified Artifact from the Salmon River in Eastern Connecticut JOSEPH PARKOS ••.......••••.•........•.•••••..••.•.••••••••••.......•••••••••....•.•• 38 Aboriginal Pottery from the Indian Ridge Site, New Milford, Connecticut LUCIANNE LAVIN and LAURIE MIROFF •••....•.••••.•••.....•.•••••••••.•....••••••••••••• 39 Heating Duration and Thermally Altered Stone PETER PAGOULATOS ..•.••.••••.•....••••••••••.....•••••••.•..•.•.•...•••••.•••.....•.• 63 The Maintenance of Eastern Connecticut Quartzite Tools: An Experimental Study PETER PAGOULATOS .•.•••.••••.•.....•••••••.•.•.•••.••.••••.....•..•.•••••••••••.....• 71 Connecticut Historical and Industrial Archaeology Bibliography ROBERT R. GRAD IE, III, and DAVID A. POIRIER ••••......••••.•••••••.•...•...••••.••••• 77 Pot Hunting, Looting, and the Indian Ledge Site DANIEL CRUSON and ELIZABETH HOAG .••••..•....•.••••••••...••.•••.••••.....•.•..•••••• 87 The Contributors .•.•...••.•.•.•...•.•••••...•.•••••••••.•..•••.•••••••..•••.....•.•• 91 Cover Illustration: Approximate boundaries -
2010 Plan of Conservation and Development
MONTVILLE Plan of Conservation and Development 2010 Prepared by: The Montville Planning and Zoning Commission Marcia A. Vlaun, AICP Colleen Bezanson, GIS Specialist Effective Date 1 May 15, 2010 "If you don’t know where you’re going, you might not get there" Yogi Berra PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2010 Table of Contents List of Figures ………………………………………………………………….... i. List of Tables …………………………………………………………………….. iv. Reference List ………………………………………………………………….... v. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………... 1 Community Profile History ………………………………………………………………. 3 Population ………………………………………………………….... 9 Housing …………………………………………………………….... 13 Natural Resources ………………………………………………….... 25 Open Space and Cultural Resources ………………………………... 43 Community Facilities & Infrastructure ……………………………... 53 Stormwater …………………………………………………………. 63 Transportation ……………………………………………………….. 67 Economy …………………………………………………………….. 89 Future Land Use ………………………………………………………………... 111 Plan Implementation…………………………………………………………… 113 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………….. 118 PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2010 List of Figures Figure 1. Housing Units (1980-2000) ………………………………………………………... 9 Figure 2. Persons/ Housing Unit ( 1980-2000) ………………………………………………. 9 Figure 3. Population and Households (1960-2007) …………………………………………... 9 Figure 4. Population Projects (2000-2025) …………………………………………………... 10 Figure 5. Population Density by Census Block Group Map …………………………………. 10 Figure 6. Town of Montville Dependency Ratios ……………………………………………. 11 Figure 7. Montville, Ct. Single -
Connecticut Water Quality Standards
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS WATER RESOURCES CO/Vg~ISSION STATE OFFICE BUILDING HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 1970 STATE OF CONNECTICUT WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION STATE OFFICE BUILDING ~ HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06115 WATER qUALITY STANDARDS Pur~ ~uant to the provisions of Section the 1967 S~pplement t6 the General Statutes of Connec notice was published in the Connecticut Law Journal 26, 1970 that the W.ater Resourc~s~ Commission ado on November 17, 1969 Water Quality Standa~d~s for all and intrastate waters in the State of Connecl that, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of Interior approved said standards in th~ir’~antirety on Apri~l 21, 1970 insofar as the said standards apply to interstate wa~er9. --I -- STATE OF CONNECTICUT WA TER RESOURCES COMMISSION STATE OFFICE BUILDING ¯ HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06115 WATER %UALITY CRITERIA GENERAL POLICY i. Water quality standards adopted on the basle of thee ofe criteriath~ ere in accord with all the requirements of Section 25-5~e Suppiemen-t~o=the~General Statutes. to t~h~e receiving w~t_ers, cognizance ~h~l be given both r~time ad~pted~b~t shall be defi~e~ and controlled by the uommlsslon.~J other waste iarsmeters wikl,eonstitute a portion 3. Recommendations on -~ ~-~=" ’<’~==~" ~" in of the continuing effort of the~ommission~fU~e~ oexln g ~iD~e~s~ate and intrastate~water~qualitY standards. The Commission~ reserves the right to amend or extend the followin~ criteria as improved standard methods are developed or revisions consistent with the enhancement of water quality are justified. Coastal and marine waters are those generally subject to the rise and fall of the tide. -
Table 2. Employment Status of the Population 16 Years Old and Over in Households for the United States, States, Places, and for Puerto Rico: 2000
g PHC-T-28. Employment Status of the Population in Households for the United States, States, Counties, Places, and for Puerto Rico: 2000 Table 2. Employment Status of the Population 16 Years Old and Over in Households for the United States, States, Places, and for Puerto Rico: 2000 Note: Numbers rounded to 10's. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, special tabulation. Internet release date: October 6, 2003 [Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see, http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/doc/sf3.pdf] United States Total household Civilian labor force State population 16 Percent Armed Not in labor Place and over Total Employed Unemployed unemployed Forces force United States 209,554,830 135,780,340 128,662,600 7,117,740 5.2 800,110 72,974,380 Alabama 3,338,060 2,024,170 1,908,440 115,730 5.7 12,120 1,301,760 Abbeville city 2,320 1,270 1,190 80 6.3 0 1,050 Adamsville city 3,840 2,410 2,350 60 2.5 10 1,430 Addison town 570 330 330 10 3.0 0 240 Akron town 380 180 170 10 5.6 0 210 Alabaster city 16,690 12,530 12,220 310 2.5 80 4,080 Albertville city 13,180 8,170 7,690 490 6.0 0 5,010 Alexander City city 11,240 6,390 6,000 380 5.9 10 4,840 Alexandria CDP 2,820 1,840 1,810 40 2.2 10 970 Aliceville city 1,710 810 680 130 16.0 0 900 Allgood town 420 260 250 10 3.8 0 160 Altoona town 740 350 330 20 5.7 0 390 Andalusia city 6,570 3,650 3,330 330 9.0 10 2,910 Anderson town 270 130 110 10 7.7 0 140 Anniston city 18,510 9,900 9,080 820 8.3 30 8,570 Arab city 5,660 -
USGS OGW, BG: Combined Use of Borehole Geophysics and Packers
Combined Use of Borehole Geophysics and Packers to Site Potable Wells in a Contaminated Area in Montville, Connecticut Aaron Green, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection; and John W. Lane, Jr., Carole D. Johnson, John H. Williams, Remo A. Mondazzi, and Peter K. Joesten, U.S. Geological Survey Abstract A leaking underground gasoline tank contaminated a crystalline bedrock aquifer in Montville, Connecticut, USA with MTBE and benzene. At the original residential bedrock supply wells, the median MTBE concentration was 165 micrograms per liter (µg/L), and the median benzene concentration was 320 µg/L. The maximum concentrations of MTBE and benzene were 4,300 µg/l and 1,700 µg/L, respectively. Because of the unavailability of a public water supply and the long-term expense of point-of-use (on-site) treatment systems, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program considered drilling replacement wells for water supply, if suitable drill sites could be located. Borehole geophysical methods were used as part of the investigation to find suitable drill sites. The U.S. Geological Survey performed borehole radar logging in three of the most contaminated wells. Other geophysical logs were run in two of the wells to enhance the hydrogeological characterizations. These data, combined with straddle- packer testing provided by a drilling contractor, formed the basis of a conceptual model used in the search for discrete fractures with better water quality than provided by an open-hole sample. At Property A, a single transmissive fracture was identified at the bottom of the well. This well, although having historically lower gasoline concentrations than the other two wells, had persistent high iron bacteria fouling of the filtration system.