Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

Final Report

March 2014

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) CONFIDENTIAL

MCB ISA A 0 0 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVN L - KHUSHY - Final Report -V3.docx 10 April 2014 Final Report Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report March 2014

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) CONFIDENTIAL

Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan, Race Course, Vadodara 390007

Mott MacDonald, 501 Sakar II, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad 380 006, Gujarat, India

T +91 (0)79 2657 5550 F +91 (0)79 2657 5558 W www.mottmac.com

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Issue and revision record

Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Standard 00 December, 2013 BD, RR PM PS Draft Report

01 March, 2014 RR PM PS Final Report

02 May, 2014 RR PM PS Final Report

This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project document being relied upon by any other party, or being used only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.

This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Contents

Chapter Title Page

Executive Summary i Overall Voltage Level/Quality ______i Line break/Unscheduled Breakdowns ______i Incidence of Hooking ______ii Crop Output & Yield ______ii Transformer Failure ______ii Motor Failure ii Motor Starter Failure ______ii Bore Well iii View on continuation of the scheme ______iii PGVCL iii Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed ______iii Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure ______iii Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2008-09 ______iii Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2009-10 ______iv Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2010-11 ______iv Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2011-12 ______iv Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2012-13 ______iv Pay Back Period: All Dedicated Feeders ______v Pay Back Period: All Scattered Connections ______v Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders) ______v DGVCL v Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed ______v Year Wise % Theoretical Loss ______vi Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure ______vi Pay Back Period: Dedicated Feeders ______vi Pay Back Period: Scattered Feeders ______vi Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders) ______vi UGVCL vii Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed (Dedicated Feeders) ______vii Year Wise % Theoretical Loss ______vii Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure ______vii Pay Back Period: Dedicated Feeders ______vii Pay Back Period: Scattered Feeders ______vii Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders) ______viii MGVCL viii Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed (Dedicated Feeders) ______viii Year Wise % Theoretical Loss ______viii Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure ______viii Pay Back Period: Dedicated Feeders ______viii Pay Back Period: Scattered Feeders ______ix Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders) ______ix

1 Introduction 1

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

1.1 Mott MacDonald Group ______1 1.1.1 What we do ______1 1.1.2 Mott MacDonald India______2 1.2 Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) ______3 1.3 The Project ______4 1.4 Scope of Work ______4

Part A: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited (PGVCL) 6

2 Profile of PGVCL 7 2.1 Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited ______7

3 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – PGVCL 8

4 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – PGVCL 15 4.1 Approach and Methodology ______15 4.1.1 Sample Design ______15 4.1.2 Questionnaire Design ______16 4.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - PGVCL ______17 4.2.1 General Information ______17 4.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects ______20 4.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY ______27 4.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details ______35 4.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme ______36

5 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – PGVCL 37 5.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY ______38 5.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY ______38 5.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (PGVCL) ______38 5.2.2 Transformer Failures (PGVCL) ______40 5.3 Payback Period (PGVCL) ______40 5.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit ______41 5.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization ______41 5.3.3 Cost of Capital ______41 5.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures ______41 5.4 Pay Back Calculations ______42

Part B: Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited (DGVCL) 45

6 Profile of DGVCL 46 6.1 Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited ______46

7 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – DGVCL 47

8 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – DGVCL 49

8.1 Approach and Methodology ______49 8.1.1 Sample Design ______49 8.1.2 Questionnaire Design ______50 8.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - DGVCL ______50 8.2.1 General Information ______50 8.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects ______53 8.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY ______62 8.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details ______69 8.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme ______70

9 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – DGVCL 71 9.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY ______72 9.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY ______72 9.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (DGVCL) ______72 9.2.2 Transformer Failures (DGVCL) ______75 9.3 Payback Period (DGVCL) ______75 9.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit ______76 9.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization ______76 9.3.3 Cost of Capital ______76 9.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures ______76 9.4 Pay Back Calculations ______77

Part C: Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited (UGVCL) 78

10 Profile of UGVCL 79 10.1 Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited ______79

11 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) 80

12 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) 82 12.1 Approach and Methodology ______82 12.1.1 Sample Design ______82 12.1.2 Questionnaire Design ______83 12.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - UGVCL ______83 12.2.1 General Information ______84 12.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects ______87 12.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY ______94 12.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details ______101 12.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme ______101

13 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – UGVCL 103 13.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY ______104 13.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY ______104 13.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (UGVCL) ______104 13.2.2 Transformer Failures (UGVCL) ______107

13.3 Payback Period (UGVCL) ______107 13.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit ______108 13.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization ______108 13.3.3 Cost of Capital ______108 13.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures ______108 13.4 Pay Back Calculations ______109

Part D: Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited (MGVCL) 110

14 Profile of MGVCL 111 14.1 Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited ______111

15 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – MGVCL 112

16 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – MGVCL 114 16.1 Approach and Methodology ______114 16.1.1 Sample Design ______114 16.1.2 Questionnaire Design ______115 16.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - MGVCL ______115 16.2.1 General Information ______115 16.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects ______118 16.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY ______125 16.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details ______133 16.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme ______133

17 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – MGVCL 135 17.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY ______136 17.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY ______136 17.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (MGVCL) ______136 17.2.2 Transformer Failures (MGVCL) ______139 17.3 Payback Period (MGVCL) ______139 17.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit ______140 17.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization ______140 17.3.3 Cost of Capital ______140 17.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures ______140 17.4 Pay Back Calculations ______141

18 Observations & Recommendations 142 18.1 Consumer Perception of KHUSHY ______142 18.1.1 Overall Voltage Level/Quality ______142 18.1.2 Line break/Unscheduled Breakdowns ______142 18.1.3 Incidence of Hooking ______142 18.1.4 Crop Output & Yield ______142 18.1.5 Transformer Failure ______142 18.1.6 Motor Failure ______143 18.1.7 Motor Starter Failure______143

18.1.8 Bore Well ______143 18.1.9 View on continuation of the scheme ______143 18.2 Estimated Monetary Benefit to Customers ______144 18.3 Cost Benefit Analysis for DISCOMs ______144

Appendices 146 Appendix A. List of Feeders Covered Under KHUSHY ______147 Appendix B. Feeder Wise Change in Units Billed ______154 Appendix C. Feeder-Wise Details on Transformer Failure & Customer Complaints ______162 Appendix D. Questionnaire ______169

The Government of Gujarat - through Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) scheme - has been implementing High Voltage Distribution System (HVDS) in place of Low Voltage Distribution System (LVDS) on identified agricultural feeders. Approximately 65,000 No. of Agricultural consumers are expected to accrue benefits under this scheme. In this context, GUVNL had engaged the service of Mott MacDonald Private Limited to conduct a cost benefit analysis (CBA) and agricultural consumer survey to assess tangible and intangible benefits of KHUSHY scheme.

The KHUSHY scheme has been implemented across all Distribution companies viz. PGVCL, DGVCL, MGVCL and UGVCL. In total 174 feeders across all the distribution companies have been converted under this scheme into HVDS. PGVCL and the agricultural consumers have benefitted immensely under this scheme wherein 157 feeders have been converted into HVDS. All agricultural customers under these feeders have been allotted dedicated transformers for their connections.

The consumer perception survey had to be done for a sample size of 5% of the total benefitted consumers which were expected to be around 65000 Nos with an objective to assess the benefits to the consumer because of the implementation of KHUSHY (HVDS) scheme. The survey has been conducted for 3265 HVDS customers. The distribution of the sample among the distribution companies and further at circle and feeder level has been done on the basis of the actual conversion of feeders under KHUSHY (HVDS). The discom wise sample size is as given in the below table

Discom Circle Division Sub-Division No. of Feeders No. of Beneficiaries PGVCL 10 17 24 29 2865 UGVCL 2 4 5 6 151 DGVCL 3 4 4 5 149 MGVCL 1 1 1 2 100 TOTAL 16 26 34 42 3265

The key observations of the customer perception study for PGVCL are as under

Overall Voltage Level/Quality

There has been a major improvement in the voltage level/quality after the implementation of KHUSHY. The continuity of power supply would not be effective in absence of low or constantly fluctuating voltage. The effectiveness of the implementation of the scheme on this parameter is crucial and has led to improve satisfaction levels of the customers.

Line break/Unscheduled Breakdowns

The incidences of line breaks and unscheduled shutdowns have also drastically decreased after implementation of KHUSHY.

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 i P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Incidence of Hooking

Theft and pilferage account for a substantial part of the high transmission and distribution losses. One of the objectives of the scheme was to minimize these losses. The various steps and technical interventions during the scheme have made it cumbersome for the customers indulge in such activities.

Crop Output & Yield

The primary objective of the project was to provide consumers with uninterrupted and quality Power related benefits. The Crop output & yield are directly dependent on the monsoon & weather conditions. The electricity has little impact on the crop yield especially in cases where there is levels of underground water are low.

Transformer Failure

The transformer failures have decreased drastically after the implementation of KHUSHY. Majority of the surveyed customers strongly agree or agree to the statement that the transformer failures have reduced after the implementation of the scheme.

The survey results show that majority of the customers experienced transformer failures around 3-5 times while other few experienced it more than 5 times. After the implementation of KHUSHY all the surveyed customers experienced transformer failure in the bracket of 0-2 times. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in transformer failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in average days loss per transformer failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

Motor Failure

The survey results show that a major portion of the customers experienced motor failures around 3-5 times while other few experienced it more than 5 times. After the implementation of KHUSHY all the surveyed customers experienced motor failures in the bracket of 0-2 times. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in motor failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in average days loss per motor failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor failures after the implementation of KHUSHY.

Motor Starter Failure

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 ii P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

surveyed customers experienced motor starter failure in the bracket of 0-1 times. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in motor starter failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in average days loss per motor starter failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor starter failures after the implementation of KHUSHY.

Bore Well

The operating hours of the bore well basically depends upon three variables including the monsoon, the levels of ground water and availability of electricity. The electricity issue have been solved to a large extent after the implementation of the scheme. The other two variables remaining unpredictable and largely varying from location to location there, no major increase in the operating hours of the bore wells has been observed.

View on continuation of the scheme

Out of the 3865 beneficiaries surveyed, 99% of them are happy & satisfied with the implementation of the KHUSHY Scheme and have expressed their interest and willingness in support and continuation of the scheme in other parts of the state.

PGVCL

Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed

Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUS) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 523.12 216.46 306.66 59% 2007-08 612.54 256.94 355.6 58% 2008-09 663.37 280.44 382.93 58% 2009-10 747.45 316.83 430.62 58% 2010-11 615.68 331.86 283.82 46% 2011-12 672.02 359.97 312.05 46% 2012-13 748.39 426.52 321.87 43%

Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure

DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 PGVCL 67% 59% 45% 29% 13% 9% 5%

Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2008-09

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 8 No. of Transformers 1415

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 iii P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Particulars Details Units Total Expenditure 13.6 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2009-10 Payback Period 2.808 Years Payback Year 2011-12

Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2009-10

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 8 No. of Transformers 1444 Total Expenditure 16.55 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2010-11 Payback Period 2.78 Years Payback Year 2012-13

Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2010-11

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 58 No. of Transformers 11412 Total Expenditure 146.10 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2011-12 Payback Period 6.22 Years Payback Year 2017-18

Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2011-12

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 16 No. of Transformers 2080 Total Expenditure 25.09 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2012-13 Payback Period 5.288 Years Payback Year 2016-17

Pay Back Period: Feeders Completed in 2012-13

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 71 No. of Transformers 9719 Total Expenditure 105.53 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 4.22 Years Payback Year 2015-16

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 iv P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Pay Back Period: All Dedicated Feeders

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 161 No. of Transformers 26070 Total Expenditure 306.88 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 3.46 Years Payback Year 2016-17

Pay Back Period: All Scattered Connections

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 10583 Total Expenditure 149.71 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 8.77 Years Payback Year 2018-19

Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 161+Scattered No. of Transformers 36653 Total Expenditure 456.59 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 5.47 Years Payback Year 2018-19

DGVCL

Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed

Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUS) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 14.23 6.80 7.43 52% 2007-08 5.42 3.58 1.84 34% 2008-09 11.48 6.28 5.20 45% 2009-10 14.33 7.39 6.94 48% 2010-11 19.40 10.81 8.59 44% 2011-12 24.68 15.53 9.15 37% 2012-13 21.54 16.46 5.07 24%

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 v P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Year Wise % Theoretical Loss

Discom 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 DGVCL 14 88 74 70 63 61 61 Theoretical Loss (%)

Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure

DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 DGVCL 39% 12% 31% 20% 20% 17% 6%

Pay Back Period: Dedicated Feeders

Particulars Units No. of Feeders 6 No. of Transformers 283 Total Expenditure 6.22 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 15.48 Years Payback Year 2028-29

Pay Back Period: Scattered Feeders

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 724 Total Expenditure 4.38 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 53.11 Years Payback Year 2065-66

Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 1007 Total Expenditure 10.60 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 22.16 Years Payback Year 2034-35

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 vi P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

UGVCL

Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed (Dedicated Feeders)

Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUS) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 14.32 12.94 1.38 10% 2007-08 17.88 14.2 3.68 21% 2008-09 18.42 16.28 2.14 12% 2009-10 23.51 19.43 4.08 17% 2010-11 20.75 20.05 0.7 3% 2011-12 21.67 19.66 2.01 9% 2012-13 24.98 20.71 4.27 17%

Year Wise % Theoretical Loss

Discom 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 UGVCL 55% 54% 24% 31% 53% 35% 31% Theoretical Loss (%)

Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure

DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 UGVCL 14% 16% 9% 5% 5% 7% 4%

Pay Back Period: Dedicated Feeders

Particulars Units No. of Feeders 7 No. of Transformers 477 Total Expenditure 4.26 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 14.93 Years Payback Year 2027-28

Pay Back Period: Scattered Feeders

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 1977 Total Expenditure 31.52 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 18.76 Years Payback Year 2031-32

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 vii P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 2454 Total Expenditure 35.78 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 18.30 Years Payback Year 2031-32

MGVCL

Year-Wise Sent Out and Units Billed (Dedicated Feeders)

Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUS) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 11.4 9.0 2.4 21% 2007-08 12.9 9.7 3.3 25% 2008-09 13.6 10.8 2.8 21% 2009-10 14.0 11.7 2.3 16% 2010-11 10.9 9.3 1.6 15% 2011-12 13.1 11.4 1.7 13% 2012-13 14.3 11.9 2.3 16%

Year Wise % Theoretical Loss

Discom 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 MGVCL - 84% 41% 55% 79% 69% 66% Theoretical Loss (%)

Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure

DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 MGVCL - 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2%

Pay Back Period: Dedicated Feeders

Particulars Units No. of Feeders 3 No. of Transformers 263 Total Expenditure 1.99 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 3.49 Years Payback Year 2016-17

vii MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 i P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Pay Back Period: Scattered Feeders

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 2516 Total Expenditure 27.24 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 9.50 Years Payback Year 2022-23

Pay Back Period: Overall (All Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 2910 Total Expenditure 29.29 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 8.30 Years Payback Year -

MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 ix P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 1 Introduction

1.1 Mott MacDonald Group

Mott MacDonald is a U.K. based uniquely diverse £1 billion global consultancy, delivering leading-edge solutions for public and private sector clients across 12 core business areas. As one of the world’s largest employee-owned companies with more than 14,000 staff, the company has principal offices in nearly 50 countries and projects in 140.

Our breadth of skills, sectors, services and global reach makes us uniquely placed to bring our customers: ° Holistic, innovative thinking ° Global experience with local insight ° World-expert practitioners ° Multi-sector perspective

1.1.1 What we do

We work with our customers and use our worldwide resources and experience to: ° Plan, design, procure and deliver projects on any scale ° Provide management consultancy built on technical know-how ° Help shape and implement development policies and programmes ° Advance sustainability and promote the wellbeing of the planet

1.1.1.1 Our service to customers

By staying closely attuned to our customers’ needs and aspirations, we seek to keep ahead of the game, proactively identifying new service requirements and gearing up to meet them. We understand what our customer’s need, what’s required to satisfy those needs and we get on with it – adding real value in the process by saving them as much money and time as possible without ever compromising on quality. We take pride in every commission, no matter the size.

1.1.1.2 Sustainable solutions

We are committed to working in partnership with our customers and supply chains to incorporate sustainable solutions into our projects. We are experts in sustainable design, construction and management, seeking to include sustainability as a driver at the most critical conceptual, planning and feasibility stages of all our projects – addressing the whole-life costs and impacts from a truly multidisciplinary viewpoint.

We are also acting to reduce our own impact and have committed to an active programme to make significant year on year reductions in our per capita carbon emissions.

1 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

1.1.1.3 Innovation

We pride ourselves in finding ways to solve existing challenges and tackle new ones. The value of our innovation can be measured by the prestigious awards our people and projects win – over 200 in the last three years.

1.1.1.4 Our people

Our principal differentiator is the quality of our staff. Our success is fuelled by their dedication, enthusiasm and ingenuity. Many of our engineers, environmentalists, planners, economists, cost consultants; project managers, safety experts, IT specialists, educationalists, healthcare advisors and management consultants are recognised as innovators or world authorities in their fields. Understanding that to work with the best we must be the best, we promote professional excellence and knowledge management, which is why continuous learning and skills improvement are ingrained in our company culture.

1.1.1.5 Community spirit

As a multinational company with a global reach, we recognise our obligation to make a positive contribution to communities in which we work. At a corporate level we engage and support local communities sponsoring a number of charity projects each year. We also encourage and support our staffs who invest enormous time and energy in a range of charitable, educational, disaster relief and development work around the world.

1.1.1.6 Global presence

With major offices and centres of excellence across the globe, we bring our skills and resources directly to our customers, wherever they or their projects are based. Each office has in-depth knowledge and understanding of local conditions and practices, backed by our worldwide resources – enabling us to offer services around the clock, around the world.

1.1.2 Mott MacDonald India

Mott MacDonald in India (hereinafter referred to as MM) has over 1600 staff engaged in planning, developing and delivering projects across many sectors – from energy, industry, water and environment to transport, buildings, urban infrastructure and social development. We are making our mark in many areas of business and industry, serving not only the burgeoning domestic demand but also a wider customer base in core markets such as industry, infrastructure and health.

1.1.2.1 Our Sectors

MM activities are focussed primarily on the growing need for physical and social infrastructure and the creation of wealth and employment through manufacturing and the more efficient development of its resources. These are extraordinarily diverse, ranging across:

2 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

° Buildings ° Communications ° Energy ° Industry and industrial development ° Social development including health and education ° Transportation infrastructure ° Urban development ° Water and environment

In all these markets, we address business and developmental issues as well as engineering. We aim to serve the broader needs of our clients to create successful and sustainable projects. We bring to the market an almost unique combination of management and engineering capability, both local and worldwide, delivered in India with the maximum use of Indian and international resources.

Our Indian business has exceptional expertise in the industry sector, especially in chemicals, pharmaceuticals and textiles where we lead the field in business case planning, business conceptualisation, strategy, financial and demand modelling, basic and detailed engineering, project management, procurement and validation services for some of the world’s largest chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

We are also one of the leading transportation and urban infrastructure service providers in India. Our services in metros are well recognised and we are proud to be associated with Delhi Metro. We are providing design work on almost 40% of the transport system all over Delhi including a 22km stretch from the heart of Delhi to the city’s South-east border.

Our Indian experts are also enhancing project delivery for projects globally in key areas such as oil and gas, water, power, pharmaceuticals, roads and highways, airports and buildings, health and education.

1.2 Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL)

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) is engaged in the business of bulk purchase and sale of electricity, Supervision, Co-ordination and facilitation of the activities of its six Subsidiary Companies including ° GSECL - Engaged in the business of Generation of Electricity. ° GETCO - Engaged in the business of Transmission of Electricity. ° UGVCL - Engaged in the business of Distribution of Electricity in the Northern area of Gujarat. ° DGVCL - Engaged in the business of Distribution of Electricity in the Southern area of Gujarat. ° MGVCL - Engaged in the business of Distribution of Electricity in the Central area of Gujarat. ° PGVCL - Engaged in the business of Distribution of Electricity in the Western area of Gujarat.

One of the basic functions of the Company includes Co-ordination of the activities of its subsidiaries, business, works to determine their economic and financial objectives/targets and to review, control, guide

3 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

and direct their performance with a view to secure optimum utilization of all resources placed at their disposal.

1.3 The Project

The Government of Gujarat - through Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) scheme - has been implementing High Voltage Distribution System (HVDS) in place of Low Voltage Distribution System (LVDS) on identified agricultural feeders. In HVDS, the 11 kV lines are extended nearer to the loads as much as possible and small size Distribution transformers (e.g. 10, 16 & 25 kVA) are erected and service connection is released to the consumer through a short LT lines preferably through insulated overhead cables known as Aerial Bunched Cable (ABC)/PVC Cable. HVDS entails benefits both to DISCOM and consumer.

Till date, all four DISCOMs (viz. PGVCL, UGVCL, MGVCL and DGVCL) put together have invested around Rs. 550 Crore under this scheme. The utilities and approximately 65,000 No. of Agricultural consumers are expected to accrue benefits against this capital expenditure. In this context, GUVNL has engaged the service of Mott MacDonald Private Limited to conduct a cost benefit analysis (CBA) and agricultural consumer survey to assess tangible and intangible benefits of KHUSHY scheme.

1.4 Scope of Work

1. Collect circle-wise actual annual costs incurred for conversion of LVDS to HVDS in identified Areas / feeders across all four DISCOMs of Gujarat: a. Aggregate capital expenditure covering new equipment / material (e.g. distribution transformer, conductor, cross arm etc.) and installation & commissioning; b. Repair and maintenance costs for LVDS and HVDS (e.g. repairing of DTR in case of failure); c. Interest costs (including interest during construction) on loans (if any) d. Any other significant costs incurred by utilities which has impact on cost benefit analysis

2. Estimate tangible (quantitative) benefits accrued to DISCOMs due to conversion of LVDS to HVDS. Consultant will estimate following benefits in monetary terms (to the extent possible and taking reasonable assumptions, wherever needed):

a. Reduction in AT&C losses b. Reduction in distribution transformer failure rate c. Comparison of System interruptions d. Comparison of Technical Losses (Theoretical Losses) e. Comparison of per HP sent out units f. Comparison of Average Ampere Loading on feeders g. Reduction in greenhouse gas emission due to reduction in AT&C losses.

4 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

3. Identify and list down intangible (qualitative) benefits to utilities and consumers due to conversion of LVDS to HVDS.

4. Conduct a consumer perception survey of agriculture consumers {for a specific sample size approximately 5% of total benefited consumers (approximately 65,000 No.) to assess the benefits to the consumer due to implementation of KHUSHY (HVDS) scheme.

5. Develop a MS Excel based model for assessing total costs; total benefits and overall cost benefit analysis. (to be submitted to GUVNL with all the calculation formulas)

6. Prepare a report covering cost benefit analysis and outcome of the consumer survey.

7. Verification of data and information provided by GUVNL, DISCOMs and other organization (if any) for ascertaining its correctness and accuracy.

8. Representing GUVNL before the Govt. of Gujarat or its agencies, Gujarat electricity Regulatory Commission, any statutory or regulatory body or any public forum for sharing of the results of this study.

5 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Part A: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited (PGVCL)

6 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 2 Profile of PGVCL

2.1 Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited

PGVCL was incorporated on 15th September, 2003 with certificate of business w.e.f. 15th October, 2003. Commercial operation of company started on 1st April 2005. PGVCL is feeding electricity in 8 districts of Gujarat namely Rajkot, Jamnagar, Junagadh, Porbandar, Bhuj, Bhavnagar, Surendranagar and Amreli covering total 83 Talukas. For better administration and consumers' conveniences, administrative area of company is divided into 11 circles out of which 6 circles are under direct control of Corporate Office, 4 circles are under the control of Bhavnagar Zonal Office and 1 circle under the control of Bhuj Zonal Office. PGVCL caters to almost 48,61,565 customers. The areas covered by UGVCL are as depicted in the figure. The basic details of PGVCL are as illustrated in the table:

Particulars Details Total Area Covered By Company 99,771 Sq. Kms. Districts Covered 8 Talukas Covered 83 Villages Covered 5905 Total Consumers of Company 4861565 (As on 30.06.13) Circles 11 Divisions 44 Sub Divisions 226

Source: PGVCL Website

7 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 3 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – PGVCL

High Voltage Distribution System including KHUSHY (Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana) is a scheme with an objective of eliminating Line losses by installing smaller size of distribution transformers matching with the load demand of individual consumer or very small group of consumers. The scheme has been largely implemented in the Agriculture Sector since its roll out in the year 2008-09. The scheme had been aimed in improving Voltage Profile as well as reduction in Technical loss and associated Commercial Loss. The scheme had been designed to benefit both the agricultural customers as a result of uninterrupted power with consistent voltage as well as the distribution companies in the long rum due to drastic decrease in transmission and distribution losses.

The KHUSHY scheme has been implemented across all Distribution companies viz. PGVCL, DGVCL, MGVCL and UGVCL. In total 174 feeders across all the distribution companies have been converted under this scheme into HVDS. PGVCL has benefitted immensely under this scheme wherein 161 feeders have been converted into HVDS. All agricultural customers under these feeders have been allotted dedicated transformers for their connections.

The details of feeders in PGVCL which have been converted into HVDS and the number of transformers installed are as given in the table:

8 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

9 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja

Table 3.1: PGVCL Feeder Details

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Project Cost Year of Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Amreli Una Una-2 Amodra 212 19 0 0 0 231 220 2012-13

Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Anandpur Amr 331 13 2 0 0 346 335 2012-13 Amreli Una Kodinar-1 Balnath 187 38 9 0 0 234 281 2011-12 Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Batheshvar # 2010-11 Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Bhavani 404 10 0 0 0 414 524 2010-11 Amreli Amreli-2 Vadia Dhundhiya Pipaliya 116 41 21 3 0 181 235 2009-10 Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Fafani 233 5 4 0 0 242 296 2010-11 Amreli SKD Jafrabad Fichadi 340 7 0 0 0 347 250 2012-13 Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Gaytri 244 37 3 0 0 284 415 2010-11 Amreli Una Kodinar Gir Devali 360 16 2 0 0 378 436 2009-10 Amreli Amreli-1 Amreli Rural Giriya 74 21 10 1 0 106 144 2012-13 Amreli SKD Rajula Hindorana 172 4 0 0 0 176 250 2010-11 Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Khodiyar # 2011-12 Amreli Amreli-2 Dhari-2 Marvadi 49 54 13 0 0 116 108 2012-13 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx Amreli Amreli-2 Chalala Morzar 108 21 12 2 0 143 126 2012-13 na(KHUSH Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Pichhava Ag 114 3 0 0 0 117 136 2009-10 Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Satyanarayan # 2010-11 Amreli Amreli-1 Babra Valaradi 107 40 15 0 0 162 175 2012-13

Amreli Amreli-2 Kunkavav Vavdi Road 251 48 21 3 0 323 370 2010-11 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Bcw 121 53 21 0 0 195 240 2012-13 Bhavnagar Mahuva Jesar Bhandariya 112 14 6 0 0 132 113 2010-11 Bhavnagar Palitana Talaja Borda Ag 111 27 3 0 0 141 113 2009-10 Bhavnagar Mahuva Mahuva R-2 Datha 151 6 2 0 0 159 179 2012-13 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar City-2 Ghogha Hathab 174 14 1 0 0 189 150 2012-13 Bhavnagar Mahuva Jesar Hipavadli 34 33 11 0 0 78 81 2012-13 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar City-2 Mamsa Jaspara 279 30 13 0 0 322 348 2010-11 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Khodiyar 4 118 29 2 0 153 164 2008-09 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Khokhara 310 46 11 0 0 367 399 2009-10

10 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Project Cost Year of

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Bhavnagar Mahuva Mahuva R-2 Kotda 116 18 13 0 0 147 154 2010-11 Bhavnagar Palitana Golidhal Navagam 36 3 0 0 0 39 50 2012-13 Bhavnagar Palitana Talaja Padri 196 7 0 0 0 203 150 2012-13

Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Sanosara Pipardi Ag 86 36 20 0 0 142 163 2012-13 Bhavnagar Mahuva Jesar Vadal 76 33 2 0 0 111 161 2011-12 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Sanosara Vavadi 151 34 23 0 0 208 220 2010-11 Bhuj Naliya Kothara Arjanpar Ag 7 11 21 21 0 60 86 2012-13 Bhuj Anjar Anjar Rural-1 Bhalot Ag 27 10 24 0 0 61 74 2011-12 Bhuj Anjar Anjar Rural Bhavanipar 33 20 26 22 2 103 100 2010-11 Bhuj Anjar Anjar T Dabda 0 1 18 22 0 41 67 2012-13 Bhuj Naliya Nakhtrana Devisar 25 45 23 5 0 98 133 2010-11 Bhuj Mandvi Mundra Gelda 0 5 33 41 11 90 82 2011-12 Bhuj Anjar Bhimasar Hamirpar 132 95 23 5 0 255 318 2012-13 Bhuj Anjar Bhachau Kharoi 9 2 10 50 9 80 26 2010-11 Bhuj Bhachau Rapar Khengarpar 30 38 26 3 0 97 124 2012-13 (KHUSH Yojana

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx Bhuj Bhuj Deshalpar Khirsara Ag 1 5 31 7 0 44 56 2012-13 Bhuj Naliya Nakhtrana Mathal Ag 0 0 1 20 0 21 40 2012-13 Bhuj Mandvi Dahisara Meghpar 1 13 47 12 0 73 98 2012-13 Bhuj Mandvi Mundra Navinal 37 16 61 9 0 123 120 2010-11 Bhuj Bhuj Madhapara Vavdi 3 8 3 0 0 14 19 2012-13

Botad Botad Paliyad Babarkot 94 35 20 0 0 149 187 2009-10 Botad Botad Botad (T-2) Dhakaniya 87 23 3 1 0 114 125 2011-12 Botad Botad Barvala Mithapur Ag 13 126 12 0 0 151 149 2008-09 Botad Gadhada Dhasa Patana 17 266 44 8 1 336 545 2008-09 Botad Gadhada Gadhda-R Pipal 95 20 7 0 0 122 126 2012-13 Botad Botad Botad (R) Ratanvav 11 3 7 0 0 21 23 2012-13 Botad Gadhada DHASA Sitapar 67 22 6 0 0 95 88 2012-13 Botad Botad Botad Zamrala Ag 15 10 5 1 0 31 23 2012-13 Jamnagar Jamnagar City-1 Hapa Aliyabada (New) 18 229 18 1 0 266 231 2008-09 Jamnagar Jamnagar Rural Kalavad West Bamangam 237 32 7 0 0 276 289 2010-11

11 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Project Cost Year of

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Jamnagar Jamnagar City-2 Rural Dhandha Ag 174 20 2 0 0 196 237 2012-13 Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Bhanavad Gunda 148 21 1 0 0 170 428 2010-11 Jamnagar Khamabhalia Khamabhalia-R Hapa Lakhasar 101 12 0 8 3 124 298 2010-11

Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Lalpur Haripar 126 15 10 2 0 153 194 2012-13 Jamnagar Khamabhalia Vadatra SD Juvangadh 267 9 0 0 0 276 344 2012-13 Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Jamjhodpur West Mota Vadiya 38 27 12 20 4 101 303 2010-11 Jamnagar Jamnagar City-2 Sikka Padana 150 10 0 0 0 160 186 2012-13 Jamnagar Jamnagar Rural Dhrol SD Rampar 409 24 0 0 0 433 648 2012-13 Jamnagar Jamnagar Rural Kalavad East Sanala 232 48 11 0 0 291 184 2010-11 Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Jamjhodpur East Sidsar 84 78 4 1 16 183 207 2010-11 Jamnagar Jamnagar City-2 Hapa Theba Ag. 158 11 5 0 0 174 203 2012-13 Junagadh Veraval Akolvadi Amblash 92 65 0 0 0 157 513 2010-11 Junagadh Junagadh-2 Vanthali Balot (Naredi) 196 25 2 0 0 223 279 2011-12 Junagadh Veraval Talala Bhalchel 142 2 1 0 0 145 168 2012-13 Junagadh Junagadh-1 Bhesan Bhatgam 136 19 10 0 0 165 147 2012-13

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Dari Navapara 203 51 1 0 0 255 314 2010-11 na(KHUSH Junagadh Veraval Pranchi Gorakhmadhi 215 45 0 0 0 260 426 2010-11 Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Govindpara (Old 83 101 1 0 0 185 280 2010-11 Talala) Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Harnasha 240 26 1 0 0 267 282 2012-13

Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Khodiyar Jnd 81 66 6 0 0 153 186 2010-11 Junagadh Veraval Akolvadi Kodidra 212 11 0 0 0 223 408 2010-11 Junagadh Junagadh-1 VSR-2 Leriya Ag 180 35 3 0 0 218 198 2012-13 Junagadh Veraval Pranchi Moradia 93 134 0 0 0 227 369 2010-11 Junagadh Veraval Talala Pipalava 249 147 5 0 0 401 504 2010-11 Junagadh Veraval Akolvadi Raydi (Rampara) 0 141 0 0 0 141 192 2010-11 Junagadh Junagadh City GIDC Junagadh Sonrakh 10 0 0 1 0 11 11 2012-13 Junagadh Veraval Pranchi Sunderpara 297 3 0 0 0 300 386 2010-11 Junagadh Junagadh-1 Bilkha Swami 234 20 3 0 0 257 265 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Sara Ambardi 2 16 35 7 0 60 81 2012-13

12 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report Benefit AnalysCost Project Cost Year of

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Morbi Morbi Tankara Ambavadi 15 61 34 0 0 110 125 2012-13 Morbi Morbi Morbi Rural Balwam 0 0 29 8 37 74 60 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Charadva Chupani 0 16 66 44 20 146 85 2010-11

Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Dhavana 1 0 11 19 0 31 62 2012-13

Morbi Morbi Tankara Hadmatia Ag 119 44 15 1 0 179 171 2012-13 KisanHitUrja Shakti(KHUSH is of Yojana Morbi Wankaner Wankaner Rural-1 Holmadh 136 14 0 0 0 150 160 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Sara Jay Bhavani 3 6 25 27 5 66 57 2010-11 Morbi Halvad Sara Jay Bhole 28 44 13 1 0 86 77 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Kansari 3 8 16 14 0 41 62 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Merupar 0 2 8 7 0 17 39 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Charadva Om 4 6 21 4 0 35 31 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Sara Pavan 7 15 34 26 8 90 22 2010-11 Morbi Halvad Sara Ranipat 24 18 18 1 0 61 74 2012-13 Morbi Wankaner Wankaner Rural-2 Ratadia 39 8 2 0 0 49 49 2012-13 Morbi Wankaner Wankaner Rural-2 Samtherava 89 45 21 0 0 155 268 2010-11

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Shivlaheri 1 3 28 8 0 40 66 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Sara Sundari 5 47 41 8 0 101 116 2012-13 Morbi Halvad Charadva Sundergadh 7 38 62 19 1 127 129 2010-11 Porbandar Keshod-2 Keshod-O&M-1 Amarnath 137 161 4 0 0 302 353 2010-11 Porbandar Porbandar Rural Ranavav Boradi 162 23 0 0 0 185 140 2012-13

Porbandar Keshod-2 Mangrol(R) Chakivav 275 56 0 0 0 331 390 2010-11 Porbandar Porbandar Rural Bagvadar Chamunda 147 2 0 0 0 149 185 2012-13 Porbandar Keshod-O&M-2 Chorwad Devgam 42 165 0 0 0 207 232 2010-11 Porbandar Mangrol Madhavpur Diwasa 69 4 0 0 0 73 93 2011-12 Porbandar Kutiyana RURAL Khodiyar Pbr 93 45 5 0 0 143 147 2012-13 Porbandar Porbandar Rural Bagvadar Mariya 113 3 0 0 0 116 147 2012-13 Porbandar Keshod-1 Rural-1 Nonjalvav 165 35 5 2 0 207 243 2012-13 Porbandar Keshod-2 Keshod-O&M-1 Nunarda 69 93 0 0 0 162 205 2010-11 Porbandar Keshod-2 Mangrol(R) Satmarg 64 111 0 0 0 175 220 2010-11 Porbandar Keshod-2 Mangrol(R) Shepa 278 175 0 0 0 453 543 2010-11

13 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Project Cost Year of

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Porbandar Keshod-1 Keshod-O&M-1 Shergadh 265 54 3 0 0 322 356 2011-12 Porbandar Keshod-O&M-2 Mangrol(T) Water Works 178 61 1 0 0 240 293 2010-11 Rajkot City Rajkot City-3 Rajkot Rural Sub- Nakarawadi 202 13 3 0 0 218 138 2012-13

Div Rajkot City Rajkot City-3 Madhapar Sub-Div Rangpar 200 19 1 0 0 220 255 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Dhoraji (R) Bateshwar 258 24 5 0 0 287 303 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Gondal Kotda Bhadva 165 28 2 0 0 195 237 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Jetpur (R) Dedarva 85 49 18 2 0 154 166 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Gondal Lodhika Devda 420 6 1 0 0 427 519 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Gondal Vasavad Devgam Rrc 197 14 2 0 0 213 258 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Jasdan Sardhar Gadhka 207 57 0 0 0 264 311 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Jasdan Jasdan Godladhar 121 6 1 0 0 128 124 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Jetpur (R) Haripar Rrc 43 20 0 0 0 63 85 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Jamkandorana Kobeshwar 140 36 5 0 0 181 273 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Jasdan Jasdan Lilapur 124 4 0 0 0 128 153 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Navagadh Lunagara 313 13 2 0 0 328 389 2011-12 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx Rajkot Rural Rajkot Rural Div LODHIKA Makhavad 169 3 0 0 0 172 197 2012-13 na(KHUSH Rajkot Rural Gondal Rural-2 Mevasha 151 16 5 0 0 172 175 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Rajkot Rural Div Paddhari Mota Rampar 268 7 4 0 0 279 327 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Rajkot City-3 Mpsd Rajdan 238 27 7 0 0 272 360 2011-12

Rajkot Rural Rajkot City-3 RSD Ranpur 134 13 4 0 0 151 214 2012-13 Rajkot Rural Jasdan Vinchhiya Sanali 232 19 0 0 1 252 357 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Rajkot City-3 RSD Sanosara 166 2 0 0 0 168 218 2010-11 Rajkot Rural Rajkot Rural Div Paddhari Thoriyali 323 25 0 0 1 349 464 2010-11 Surendranagar Dhangadhra Dhangadhra Rural Akalvad 3 27 15 3 0 48 36 2012-13 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Anandpur 64 89 10 1 0 164 179 2010-11 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Muli Bali 1 17 37 7 0 62 45 2010-11 Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 Chuda Borana 0 200 2 0 0 202 111 2008-09 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Dada # 2011-12 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Devgadh # 2011-12

14 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Project Cost Year of

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Fulgram 0 302 5 0 0 307 160 2008-09 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Gebinath 40 20 4 0 0 64 57 2012-13 Surendranagar Dhangadhra Bavli Jayshakti 17 11 20 5 0 53 68 2009-10

Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 Chuda Keriya 69 2 1 0 0 72 72 2012-13 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Khakharathal 32 64 10 0 0 106 138 2011-12 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Muli Khatdi 41 65 39 10 0 155 114 2010-11 Surendranagar Dhangadhra Rajsitapur Meghdev 0 11 9 5 0 25 33 2011-12 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Nagadka 70 9 2 0 0 81 83 2012-13 Surendranagar Dhangadhra Bavli Narichana 1 23 23 7 0 54 50 2012-13 Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 LSDR Navi Morvad # 2008-09 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Noli 129 61 10 0 2 202 219 2010-11 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 SRSD Pandavra 54 40 15 12 0 121 140 2011-12 Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Muli Ramperda 4 6 20 6 0 36 23 2010-11 Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 LSDR Sardar # 2008-09 Surendranagar Dhangadhra Bavli Siddhanath 4 2 27 24 1 58 81 2009-10 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx

Total 17993 5779 1627 549 122 26070 30687.56 na(KHUSH

# Data Included in Parent Feeder

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 4 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – PGVCL

The primary beneficiaries of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) are the agricultural consumers and the individual distribution companies. While the agricultural consumers were expected to benefit with quality voltage, freedom from frequent interruptions, timely supply or power, reduction of maintenance costs, the distribution companies were expected to benefit from drastically reduced transmission and distribution losses. To understand the actual benefits accrued by the agricultural consumers and in line with the terms of reference a consumer perception study of agricultural consumers was conducted. The approach and methodology adopted for the study is as given below

4.1 Approach and Methodology

The consultants have adopted a scientific methodology for the current study which was finalized in consultation with GUVNL. The basic approach was primarily to design a sample which would represent all the distribution companies adequately and to extract information from the consumers on several parameters which can give a holistic understanding of the impact of the scheme.

4.1.1 Sample Design

As per the terms of reference the consumer perception survey had to be done for a sample size of 5% of the total benefitted consumers which stand at around 65000 Nos. to assess the benefits to the consumer due to implementation of KHUSHY (HVDS) scheme. Hence the sample size for the survey had to be around 3250 Nos. The survey has been conducted for 3265 HVDS customers. The distribution of the sample among the distribution companies and further at circle and feeder level has been done on the basis of the actual conversion of feeders under KHUSHY (HVDS).

The details of sample design for PGVCL is as under

Table 4.1: Details of conversion of feeders under KHUSHY Discom Circle Division Sub-Division No. of Feeders No. of Beneficiaries PGVCL 10 17 24 29 2865

Source: Information submitted by DISCOMs

The sample distribution for the consumer perception study PGVCL is as given in the table below

Table 4.2: Sample Distribution Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Name of Feeder No. of Beneficiaries PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar City – 2 Ghogha Hathab 110 Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Khokhara 173 Vavdi Sanosar 79 Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Bhanvad Gunda 151 Jamjhodpur- Sidsar 95 East

15 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Name of Feeder No. of Beneficiaries Junagadh JND - 1 Bhesan Bhatgam 106 Bilkha Swami 180 Kutch Anjar Anjar - R1 Bhalot 71 Bachau Rapar Khengarpar 78 Bhuj Madhapar Vavdi 33 Morbi Halvad Sara Ambavadi 118 Morbi Tankara Hadmatiya 119 Porbandar Porbandar – R Ranavav Bordi 110 Kutiyana Khodiyar 147 RRC RRD Paddhari Mota Rampar 139 Gondal Lodhika Devda 72 Lodhika Devda/Und 60 Jetpur Dedarava Dedarava 38 Lunagara Kerali 32 Dedarava Rupavati 50 Dedarava Arab Timbdi 55 Kobeshwar AG Dadvi 11 Kobeshwar AG Kanavadala 34 Surendranagar SNR1 Chuda Borana 113 LSDR Navi Morvad 109 Amreli Amreli-2 Kukavav Vavdi Road 189 Talali AG 136 Botad Botad Gadhada-R Pipal 88 Gadhada Dhasa Patana 37 Sitapar 132 Total PGVCL 2865

Source: IMM Field Survey

4.1.2 Questionnaire Design

16 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

° Technical Details including voltage quality, line break or shutdown details, transformer failure, incidence of hooking, crop output and yield, aricultural income etc, power usage details etc. ° Operational Details including average number of days loss per failure, motor maintenance, average expense per failure, operating days of borewell, operating hours of borewell, number of crops cultivated during year, income per acre, primary type of crop etc. ° Socio Economic Details including type of house, house hold assets, farm assets, number of cattle etc. ° Broad view and suggestion on the implementation of KHUSHY

The questionnaire includes 51 broad questions in total. A copy of the questionnaire has been appended with the report.

4.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - PGVCL

The consultants have surveyed a total of 2865 agricultural consumers across PGVCL. The key survey results are as given below

4.2.1 General Information

The General Information including name of beneficiary, address, contact details, number of family members, source of income, land area, cultivation area, ownership of land, year of connection, billing type, contract demand, connected load, transformer rating etc. we gathered during the field survey. The analysis of the same are given in subsequent sections.

4.2.1.1 Source of Income

Economic resources have a significant direct impact on family wellbeing, as family members depend on each other to meet basic needs and attain a certain standard of living. Changes to economic circumstances (such as reduced income or wealth, or increased expenditure needs) may prevent a family from being able afford necessary or desirable items or services. It is coherent that in order to sustain the family wellbeing (dependency of family members on the head of the family), The source of income needs to be upheld.

From the below table 4.4 the relationship between the family wellbeing and the source of income can be depicted. Out of the 2865 beneficiaries surveyed, 100% have their major source of income as Agriculture with 72% of them having 4-7 dependent family members, 11% having 1-4 family members dependent, 13% having 7-10 family members dependent and 4% having >10 family members dependent on the income & earnings of the head of the household.

17 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.1: Number of Family Members Figure 4.2: Source of Income

4% 11% 0% 13% 1-3 4-7 Agriculture 7-10 100% Others 72% >10

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.3: Number of Family Members and Source of Income No of Family Members No of Respondents Primary Source of Income No of Respondents 1-4 300 Agriculture 2865 4-7 2054 7-10 371 >10 122 Total 2865 Total 2865

Source: IMM Analysis

Continuing to achieve the economic prosperity it is equally important to have ownership of the assets & basic amenities (such as land, house, utilities etc.) which are contributing in the family well-fare and at the same time in maintaining the living standards.

Out of 2865 Beneficiaries surveyed, 96 % of them were having land of their own whereas only 6% of the totals were using land on lease for cultivation of crops and carry out their agricultural activities. It was also observed that 62% of them were having Metered connections whereas 38% of them were un-metered connections.

18 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.3: Ownership of Land Figure 4.4: Billing Type

Owned 38%

Leased 62% Metered 96% Un-Metered

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.4: Ownership of Land and Billing Type Ownership of Land Number of Respondents Billing Type Number of Respondents Owned 2753 Metered 1777 Leased 112 Un-Metered 1088 Total 2865 Total 2865

Source: IMM Analysis

To cater the power demand & supply needs of the state under the KHUSHY scheme across DISCOMs, erection of new transformers and HVDS supply lines have taken place to enable the agricultural consumers to receive benefits like assured quality supply of power with the aim to improve reliability.

In view of the same & as an effective outcome, Table 4.6 below , depicts that out of the 2865 beneficiaries surveyed, 51% of were having contractual demand in the range of 1-5 KVA, 31% were having in the range of 5-10 KVA and the remaining 18% were having in the range of > 10 KVA.

It was also found that almost 97% of the total 2865 beneficiaries were having distribution transformers having ratings in the range of 10- 25 KVA, 3% of them were using transformers with ratings in the range of 25 – 65 KVA and only 0.3% were having transformers with ratings in the range of > 65 KVA.

19 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.5: Contract Demand Figure 4.6: Transformer Rating

3% 0.3% 18% 1-5 10 - 25 KVA 51% 5-10 31% 25 - 65 KVA >10 >65 KVA 97.1%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.5: Contract Demand and Transformer Rating Contract Demand Number of Respondents Transformer Rating Number of Respondents 1-5 KVA 1467 10 – 25 KVA 2782 5-10 KVA 898 25 – 65 KVA 74 >10 KVA 500 >65 KVA 9 Total 2865 Total 2865

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects

The surveyed consumers were asked to give their level of agreement on specific statements related to changes in the technical aspects after implementation of KHUSHY. Their levels of agreement on the specific statements are as illustrated below.

4.2.2.1 Voltage Level / Quality and Stability

Complementary to price, quality is an important feature of the electricity service provided to consumers. With Quality comes Stability which together defines the value that customers derive from consuming electricity. To ensure that the Quality & Stability is delivered effectively to the consumers, it is essential to maintain the voltage at different levels.

20 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.7: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability The overall outcome of the survey states that 90% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the overall voltage level/ 8% 1.8% quality and stability has improved after the 0.1% implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

90.1%

Strongly Agree Agree No Change Disagree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.6: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The overall voltage 90% 8% 2% 0% 0% 100% level/quality and stability PGVCL 2582 228 52 3 0 2865 after implementation of KHUSHY has improved.

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2.2 Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown

The overall outcome of the survey states that 53% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the frequent line break or unscheduled shutdowns has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

21 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.8: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown has reduced

39% 7% 1% 0%

53%

Strongly Agree Agree No Change Disagree Strongly Disagree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.7: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM

The frequent line break or unscheduled 53% 39% 7% 1% 0% 100% shutdown after implementation of KHUSHY PGVCL 1509 1129 208 17 2 2865 Scheme has reduced

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2.3 Transformer Failure

There can be various reasons to a transformer failure, some of the reasons why a transformer fails includes design failures, inadequate or defective installation, oil contamination, insulation deterioration, short circuits, line faults, unknown failures, improper maintenance & operation, lightning, moisture, aging etc. The risk of a transformer failure is actually two-dimensional: the frequency of failure, and the severity of failure.

To overcome such issues DISCOMs have provided the consumers with Step-Down Transformers ranging from ratings 10, 16 & 25 KVA with a service connection through short LT lines and insulated cables Ariel bunched cables (ABC/ PVC). In continuation to the same all possible measures are taken care by the respective DISCOMs to carry out its maintenance activities.

22 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The overall outcome of the survey states that nearly 83% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the transformer failure has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Figure 4.9: Transformer Failure has reduced after the implementation of KHUSHY Scheme 3% 0.0% 0%

14% Strongly Agree Agree No Change

83.0% Disagree Strongly Disagree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.8: Transformer Failure NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The transformer failure has 83% 14% 3% 0% 0% 100% reduced after the PGVCL 2376 390 97 2 0 2865 implementation of KHUSHY scheme.

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2.4 Incidence of Hooking

Normally theft and pilferage accounts for a substantial part of the high transmission and distribution losses, which are mainly committed by two categories of consumers i.e. non-consumers and bonafide consumers. Antisocial elements avail unauthorized/unrecorded supply by hooking or tapping the bare conductors of L.T. feeder or tampered service wires. Pilferage is also done wilfully by way of damaging and / or creating disturbances to measuring equipment installed at their premises.

23 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

To stop or minimize such activities Figure 4.10: Incidence of Hooking DISCOMs under the implementation of KHUSHY have provided the consumers 5% 2% Strongly Agree with insulated overhead cables known as Arial Bunched Cables (ABC/PVC) and Agree other devices and equipment’s. Reducing the length of LT lines by No Change relocation and installations of additional distribution transformers. The overall 93% outcome of the survey states that nearly 94% consumers strongly agree that the incidence hooking has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme. Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.9: Incidence of Hooking NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

Incidence of Hooking has 93% 5% 2% 0 0 100% reduced after PGVCL 2670 131 64 0 0 2865 implementation of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2.5 Crop Output & Yield

As the primary objective of the project was to provide consumers with Power distribution related benefits, whereas Crop output & yield are directly dependent on the monsoon & weather conditions for which the electricity has no significant impact. The survey results show that 23% of the customers strongly agree while other 20% agree that the crop output and yield has increased after the implementation of KHUSHY. 57% of the customers are of the opinion that there has been no change in the crop output and yield after the implementation of KHUSHY.

24 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.11: Crop Output & Yield has increased

Source: Insert source text here

Table 4.10: Crop Output & Yield NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The Crop output & yield 22.8% 20% 57% 0.2% 0% 100% has yield has increased PGVCL 673 565 1622 5 0 2865 after implementation of KHUSHY scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2.6 Agricultural Income

The perception regarding Agricultural Figure 4.12: Agricultural Income income can be depicted from the able, 0% however the overall outcome of the 17% survey states that nearly 17% consumers strongly agrees with the 22% statement that the Agricultural income 61% has increased after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme, whereas 61% states that there has been no change in terms of Strongly Agree Agree No Change Disagree their income.

Source: IMM Analysis

25 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 4.11: Agricultural Income NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM Agricultural Income 17% 22% 60.8% 0.2% 0% 100% has increased after 490 636 1733 6 0 2865 the implementation PGVCL of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.2.7 Availability of Free Time

The perception regarding availability of free time, Figure 4.13: Availability of Free Time the overall outcome of the survey states that nearly 70% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the availability of free time after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme. 13% It was found that after the implementation of the 17% KHUSHY scheme, the power supply to the consumers was distributed as per schedule & timings which was an advantage for them. The 70% free time which was after the implementation was available with the consumers are utilized by them for other working & revenue generating activities, also with a possibility to start a small shop/business to increase their sources of Strongly Agree Agree No Change income which will be ultimately helping them & their families to enhance the lifestyle and Source: IMM Analysis standards of living.

Table 4.12: Availability of Free Time NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM You get free time for yourself 70% 17% 13% 0% 0% 100% after implementation of PGVCL 2005 496 363 1 0 2865 KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

26 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

4.2.2.8 Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme

The perception regarding Overall satisfaction Figure 4.14: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme can be depicted from the table, however the overall outcome of the survey states that 3% nearly 89% beneficiaries strongly agrees with 8% the statement that they are overall satisfied after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

89%

Strongly Agree Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.13: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM You are overall satisfied with the PGVCL 89% 8% 3% 0% 0% 100% KHUSHY Scheme 2524 263 77 1 0 2865

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY

The consumers were asked specific questions related to Technical, Operational and Financial aspects to gauge the quantitative difference in tangible benefits before and after the implementation of KHUSHY.

27 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

4.2.3.1 Transformer Failure

The perception regarding Transformer Figure 4.15: Transformer Failure (Times In a Year) Failure & Average no. of days per failure can be depicted from the table. The survey results show that more 100 than 38% of the customers 90 Before After 80 experienced transformer failures 70 around 3-5 times while other few 60 experienced it more than 5 times. 50 After the implementation of KHUSHY 40 30 all the surveyed customers

Response (in %) (in Response 20 experienced transformer failure in the 10 bracket of 0-2 times. The results 0 hence show that there has been a 0-2 3-5 > 5 considerable decrease in transformer Transformer Failure (No. of times) failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.14: Details on Transformer Failure Before and After KHUSHY Total No. of Beneficiaries Parameter DISCOM Surveyed Transformer Failure (No. of times) Before After Transformer failures before and after 0-2 3-5 > 5 0-2 3-5 >5 implementation of PGVCL 2865 60% 38% 2% 100% 0% 0% KHUSHY 1711 1076 78 2865 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

The survey results show that around 27% of the customers experienced 6-10 days loss due to each transformer failure while other 24% experienced 11-15 days loss due to each transformer failure. After the implementation of KHUSHY more than 99% of the surveyed customers experienced 0-5 days loss due to each transformer failure and also the rate of failure has decreased to 0-2 per year.

28 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.16: Average Number of Days Loss Per Failure 100 90 80 70 60 50 Before 40 After

Response (in %) 30 20 10 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20

Average No. of Days Loss per failure Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.15: Details on Average number of Days Loss per Failure Before and After KHUSHY No. of Paramet Beneficiaries er DISCOM Surveyed Average No. of Days Loss per Failure Average BEFORE AFTER No. of Days 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 Loss Per 33% 27% 24% 9% 6% 99.9% 0.1% 0% 0% 0% Failure PGVCL 2865 953 778 691 267 176 2861 4 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

29 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

4.2.3.2 Motor Maintenance / Failure

The perception regarding Motor Maintenance & Average no. of days per Figure 4.17: Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) failure can be depicted from the table 100 The survey results show that more than 90 30% of the customers experienced 80 Before After motor failures of around 3-5 times while 70 other few experienced it more than 5 60 times. After the implementation of 50 KHUSHY more than 99% of the 40 surveyed customers experienced motor failures in the bracket of 0-2 times. The Response (in %) 30 20 results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in motor failure 10 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 0 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8

Motor Maintenance per failure Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.16: Details on Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Motor BEFORE AFTER Maintenance/ 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 Failure PGVCL 2865 68% 30% 1% 0% 99.97% 0.03% 0% 0% 1959 865 28 13 2864 1 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

30 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 33% Figure 4.18: Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure of the customers experienced 6-10 days

loss after each motor failure while other 100 11% experienced more than 10 days loss 90 after each motor failure. After the 80 Before After 70 implementation of KHUSHY more than 99% 60 of the surveyed customers experienced day 50 loss after each motor failure in the bracket 40 of 0-5 times. The results hence show that 30 there has been a considerable decrease in Response (in %) (in Response 20 average day loss per motor failure after the 10 0 implementation of KHUSHY. 0-5 6-10 > 10

Avg. No. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.17: Details on Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average no. BEFORE AFTER of Days Loss 0-5 6-10 > 10 0-5 6-10 > 10 per Maintenance/ PGVCL 2865 56% 33% 11% 99.90% 0.10% 0% Failure 1601 958 306 2862 3 0

Source: IMM Analysis

31 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that more than Figure 4.19: Average Expense per Failure (INR) 48% of the customers had to incur 100 expense in the bracket of INR 2100-4000 90 Before After due to each motor failure while other 20% 80 70 had to incur expense in the bracket of INR 60 4100-6000 due to each motor failure. After 50 40 the implementation of KHUSHY more than 30 99% of the surveyed customers incurred 20 expense in the bracket of INR 2100-4000 Response (in %) 10 0 due to each motor failure. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor failures after the Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance implementation of KHUSHY. Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.18: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Maintenance (INR) No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 per 4000 6000 8000 4000 6000 8000 Failure PGVCL 2865 26% 48% 20% 5% 0% 99.% 0.35% 0.03% 0% 0% due to Maintena 756 1376 586 147 0 2854 10 1 0 0 nce (INR)

Source: IMM Analysis

32 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

4.2.3.3 Motor Starter Failure

100 The perception regarding Motor starter failure & Before After 90 Average no. of days per failure can be depicted 80 from the table The survey results show that before 70 the implementation of KHUSHY, more than 50% of 60 the customers experienced motor starter failures 50 around 2- 3 times/year while other few experienced 40 it more than 3 times. After the implementation of 30 KHUSHY more than 99% of the surveyed Response %) (in 20 customers experienced motor starter failure in the 10 bracket of 0-1 times. The results hence show that 0 there has been a considerable decrease in motor 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 starter failure after the implementation of KHUSHY. Motor Starter Failure (No. of times /year)

Table 4.19: Details on Motor Starter Failure (No/Yr)

No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor starter Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 per Failure PGVCL 2865 45% 50% 4% 1% 99.9% 0.1% 0% 0% 45% 50% due to 1294 1422 117 32 2862 3 0 0 1294 1422 Maintena nce (INR)

Figure 4.20: Average Number of Days Loss Per Failure due to Motor Starter

33 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

100 The survey results show that more than 68% of the 90 customers experienced 2-3 days loss due to each 80 Before After motor starter failure while other few experienced more 70 60 than 3 days loss due to each motor starter failure. After 50 the implementation of KHUSHY more 100% of the 40 surveyed customers experienced 0-1 day loss due to 30 20 each motor starter failure. The results hence show that Response (in %) 10 there has been a considerable decrease in average 0 day loss per motor starter failure after the 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 implementation of KHUSHY. Motor Starter Failure (No. of Days /year) Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.20: Details on Average Number of Days Loss per Failure due to Motor Starter

DISCOM Total No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Number of 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Days Loss Per Failure due to PGVCL 2865 68% 18% 11% 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter 1943 508 324 90 2865 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

34 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 25% Figure 4.21: Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter of the customers had to incur expense in Failure (INR) the bracket of INR 501-1000 due to each motor failure while other 29% had to incur 100 expense in the bracket of INR 1001-1500 90 after each motor failure. After the 80 Before After implementation of KHUSHY, 99.5% of the 70 surveyed customers incurred expense in 60 the bracket of INR 0-500 after each motor 50 failure. The results hence show that there 40 has been a considerable decrease in 30 expense incurred on motor starter failures Response (in %) 20 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 10 0 0-500 501-1000 1001-1500 >1500 Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.21: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter Failure (INR)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed BEFORE AFTER Average 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 Expense per 1000 1500 1000 1500 Failure due to PGVCL 2865 27% 25% 29% 19% 99.55% 0.07% 0.03% 0.35% Motor Starter Failure 778 730 821 536 2852 2 1 10

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details

The figure below depicts that 98% of the total 3265 surveyed beneficiaries do not have additional single phase connection whereas all are having Bore Well facility.

35 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 4.22: Additional Single Phase Connection Figure 4.23: Bore Well Facility

2% - Yes No

98%

100% Yes No

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.22: Additional single phase connection and Bore Well Details Additional Single Phase Connection Bore Well Facility DISCOM Yes No Yes No PGVCL 55 2810 2865 0

Source: IMM Analysis

4.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme

Out of the 2865 beneficiaries Figure 4.24: View on Continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat surveyed, 98% of them were happy & satisfied with the 2% implementation of the KHUSHY Scheme and had expressed their interest and willingness in Yes support and continuation of the No scheme in other parts of the state 98% aggressively.

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 4.23: Views on continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat DISCOM Yes No PGVCL 2820 45

Source: IMM Analysis

36 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 5 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – PGVCL

The implementation of KHUSHY had been carried out across all the electricity distribution companies in Gujarat viz. PGVCL, UGVCL, DGVCL and MGVCL. The implementation of the scheme started in the year 2008-09 and since then numerous feeders have been completely converted into HVDS under the scheme. In other few feeders implementation has been done in certain pockets of the feeders. Under the scheme more than 44286 agricultural consumers have benefitted till date. The DISCOMs in turn have accrued benefits at their level including reduction in Transmission and Distribution (T&D) losses, system interruptions, greenhouse emissions and increase in revenue. While most of the benefits accrued by the DISCOMs are tangible, the benefits accrued by the agricultural consumers are mainly intangible. The consultants had devised a methodology to conduct the cost-benefit analysis which included segregating the various benefits under the tangible and intangible categories and drawing analysis on the information provided by individual distribution companies. The various benefits accrued by the distribution companies and the agricultural consumers are as shown in the figure.

Figure 5.1: Tangible and Intangible Benefits of KHUSHY

Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

Tangible Benefits Intangible Benefits

° Reduction in T&D Losses ° Reduction in O&M Costs ° Reduction in Transformer Failure

Benefits to Agricultural Consumers

° Reduction in Motor Failure ° Increase in availability of free time ° Reduction in Starter Failure ° Increase in household and farm assets ° Reduction in Capacitor Failure

Source: IMM Analysis

37 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

5.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY

The implementation of KHUSHY was done in all distribution companies. The detailed lists of feeders and villages which have benefitted under the scheme and corresponding details have been attached as Appendix A.

Table 5.1: PGVCL - KHUSHY Implementation Details

DISCOM Feeders No. of Customers PGVCL 161 38175

Source: IMM Analysis

5.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY

The distribution companies have accrued varied tangible and intangible benefits under KHUSHY. The assessments of the tangible benefits have been done on the basis of the year on year information provided by the individual DISCOMs. The broad tangible benefits accrued by the distribution companies under the scheme are as under: ° Reduction in Transmission &Distribution (T&D) Losses ° Reduction in transformer failure ° Decrease in O&M Costs

5.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (PGVCL)

Energy losses occur in the process of supplying electricity to consumers due to technical and commercial losses. The technical losses are due to energy dissipated in the conductors and equipment used for transmission, transformation, sub- transmission and distribution of power. The losses can be further sub grouped depending upon the stage of power transformation & transmission system as Transmission Losses (400kV/220kV/132kV/66kV), as Sub transmission losses (33kV /11kV) and Distribution losses (11kV/0.4kv). The commercial losses are caused by pilferage (Hooking), defective meters, and errors in meter reading and in estimating unmetered supply of energy.

Under KHUSHY major investment in infrastructure has been done with the intention to reduce the aforesaid losses. Under the scheme HT lines are stretched to individual farms and dedicated transformers have been installed. This is expected to reduce the incidence of hooking to a large extent.

5.2.1.1 Units Sent Out and Units Billed

The figures on units sent out and units billed are a clear indication on the change in T&D losses. The percentage of units loss was in excess of 59% in the year ending 2006-07 which has dipped to 43% in the year ending 2012-13.

38 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 5.2: PGVCL - Year-Wise % Units Loss Year-Wise % Units Loss

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Year-Wise % Units Loss

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 5.2: Year-Wise Units Sent Out and Units Billed Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUs) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 523.12 216.46 306.66 59% 2007-08 612.54 256.94 355.6 58% 2008-09 663.37 280.44 382.93 58% 2009-10 747.45 316.83 430.62 58% 2010-11 615.68 331.86 283.82 46% 2011-12 672.02 359.97 312.05 46% 2012-13 748.39 426.52 321.87 43%

Source: IMM Analysis

39 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

5.2.2 Transformer Failures (PGVCL)

5.2.2.1 Transformer Failure

Figure 5.3: PGVCL Year-Wise Transformer Failure

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Transformer Failures

Source: IMM Analysis

The percentage of Transformer Failure as around 67 % in the year ending 2006-07 which has dipped to 5 % in the year ending 2012-13

Table 5.3: Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 PGVCL 67% 59% 45% 29% 13% 9% 5%

Source: IMM Analysis

5.3 Payback Period (PGVCL)

The capital for the KHUSHY scheme has been sourced from Encon grant as well as share capital. Further the implementation of the project started from the year 2008-09. The implementation of the scheme has been done in phases spreading from the year 2008 to present year. The capital expenditure hence has been spread over the years. The year-wise transmission and distribution losses vary largely from feeder to feeder which is the basis of deriving the payback periods. The consultant have hence taken various assumptions for the calculation of payback periods which are as under

40 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

5.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit

The Average yearly losses/Sent Units from 2006-07 to the year of conversion into HVDS have been taken as the baseline loss for the calculation of payback period.

5.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization

To calculate the payback period it is necessary to convert the units saved after the implementation of KHUSHY into monetary terms. The consultants have considered various options for the same which are described as under

° To convert the units saved into monetary terms using Average Energy Charge Realization of HT Industry Segment (as per GERC Filing) ° To convert the units saved into monetary terms using Total Average Energy Charge Realization excluding Agriculture (as per GERC Filing) ° To convert the units saved into monetary terms using Average Energy Charge Realization of Agriculture Segment ( as per GERC Filing)

For the current study the consultant are using the second option ie. Average Energy Charge Realization excluding Agriculture (as per GERC Filing)

5.3.3 Cost of Capital

The capital sources for the scheme are the Encon grant and the share capital of individual distribution companies. The assumptions of the cost of capital of different capital sources are as under. The cost of capital of Encon has been taken as 0% as it is a grant.

Capital Source Cost of Capital % Energy Conservation Grant 0% Share Capital 12%

5.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures

The consultants have also taken in to consideration the savings accrued in terms of operational and maintenance costs due to reduction in transformer failures while calculation payback periods. In absence of accurate data related to year-wise costs on maintenance of transformers from the distribution companies, the consultants have taken into consideration estimated costs of repairs and maintenance of a single transformer which have been provided by PGVCL.

41 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The consultants in addition to calculating total payback period for a particular discom, have also calculated the payback period for a bunch of feeders completed during a particular year separately since the inception of the scheme.

5.4 Pay Back Calculations

Table 5.4: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (2008-09)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 8 No. of Transformers 1415 Total Expenditure 13.6 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2009-10 Payback Period 2.808 Years Payback Year 2011-12

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 5.5: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (2009-10)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 8 No. of Transformers 1444 Total Expenditure 16.55 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2010-11 Payback Period 2.78 Years Payback Year 2012-13

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 5.6: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (2010-11)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 58 No. of Transformers 11412 Total Expenditure 146.10 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2011-12 Payback Period 6.22 Years Payback Year 2017-18

Source: IMM Analysis

42 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 5.7: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (2011-12)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 16 No. of Transformers 2080 Total Expenditure 25.09 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2012-13 Payback Period 5.288 Years Payback Year 2016-17

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 5.8: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (2012-13)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 71 No. of Transformers 9719 Total Expenditure 105.53 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 4.22 Years Payback Year 2015-16

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 5.9: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (Dedicated Feeders)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 161 No. of Transformers 26070 Total Expenditure 306.88 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 3.46 Years Payback Year 2016-17

Source: IMM Analysis

43 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 5.10: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (Scattered Feeders)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 10583 Total Expenditure 149.71 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 8.77 Years Payback Year 2018-19

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 5.11: PGVCL – Payback Calculations (Overall)

Particulars Details Units No. of Feeders 161+Scattered No. of Transformers 36653 Total Expenditure 456.59 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 5.47 Years Payback Year 2018-19

Source: IMM Analysis

44 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Part B: Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited (DGVCL)

45 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 6 Profile of DGVCL

6.1 Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited

DGVCL was incorporated as a Public Limited Company on 15th September, 2003, primarily to carry out distribution of electricity to retail and bulk consumers and has become operational effective from 1st April 2005. The Company is engaged in distribution of electricity in 7 districts namely Bharuch, Narmada, Surat (except part of Surat City), Tapi, Dangs, Navsari and Valsad in South Gujarat. There are in total 23, 33,000 customers of DGVCL. The areas covered by DGVCL are as depicted in the figure. The basic details of DGVCL are as illustrated in the table:

Particulars Details Total Area Covered By Company 23, 307 Sq. Kms. Districts Covered 7 Talukas Covered 37 Villages Covered 3, 518 Total Consumers of Company 23, 33,000 Circles 4 Divisions 19 Sub Divisions 112

46 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 7 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – DGVCL

The KHUSHY scheme has been implemented across all Distribution companies viz. PGVCL, DGVCL, MGVCL and UGVCL. In total 174 feeders across all the distribution companies have been converted under this scheme into HVDS. PGVCL has benefitted immensely under this scheme wherein 157 feeders have been converted into HVDS. All agricultural customers under these feeders have been allotted dedicated transformers for their connections.

The details of feeders in DGVCL which have been converted into HVDS and the number of transformers installed are as given in the table:

47 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

48 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja

Table 7.1: DGVCL Feeder Details

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Project Cost Year of Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion Surat Rural Vyara Valod 11Kv Siker Ag 18 234 44 5 0 301 546 Ongoing Circle Dom

Valsad Navsari Amalsad Mendharbhat Ag 18 9 3 4 3 37 28 2009-2010 fdr VALSAD VALSAD RURAL KHRGAM RUMLA 42 54 46 2 0 144 84 2011-2012 VALSAD Vapi Industrial Sarigam Maroli Rural 72 48 8 8 3 139 135 2011-2012 BHARUCH BHARUCH AMOD 11 KV DANDA 28 70 42 6 0 146 211 2013-2014 RURAL AG BHARUCH BHARUCH PALEJ 11 KV KARENA 19 24 42 3 0 88 66 2012-2013 RURAL AG BHARUCH BHARUCH PALEJ 11 KV PARIYEJ 87 36 39 4 0 166 99 2010-2011 RURAL AG Total 284 475 224 32 6 1021 1169

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 8 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – DGVCL

8.1 Approach and Methodology

8.1.1 Sample Design

The details of sample design for DGVCL is as under

Table 8.1: Details of conversion of feeders under KHUSHY Discom Circle Division Sub-Division No. of Feeders No. of Beneficiaries DGVCL 3 4 4 5 149

Source: Information submitted by DISCOMs The sample distribution for the consumer perception study in DGVCL is as given in the table below

Table 8.2: Sample Distribution Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Name of Feeder No. of Beneficiaries Danda 32 Bharuch Bharuch Rural Amod Karena 21 DGVCL Vapi Industrial Sarigam Maroli 15 Valsad Valsad Rural Khergam Rumla 31 Surat Rural Vyara Valod Siker 50 Total DGVCL 149

Source: IMM Field Survey

49 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.1.2 Questionnaire Design

The consultants have used a pre-designed questionnaire as a research tool for the consumer perception study. The approach while designing the questionnaire was to extract information on several parameters as to understand the overall impact on the agricultural consumers. The details which the questionnaire fetched broadly included the following ° Location Details including district, taluka, Discom, circle, division, subdivision and feeder details. ° General Information including name of beneficiary, address, contact details, number of family members, source of income, land area, cultivation area, ownership of land, year of connection, billing type, contract demand, connected load, transformer rating etc. ° Technical Details including voltage quality, line break or shutdown details, transformer failure, incidence of hooking, crop output and yield, aricultural income etc, power usage details etc. ° Operational Details including average number of days loss per failure, motor maintenance, average expense per failure, operating days of borewell, operating hours of borewell, number of crops cultivated during year, income per acre, primary type of crop etc. ° Socio Economic Details including type of house, house hold assets, farm assets, number of cattle etc. ° Broad view and suggestion on the implementation of KHUSHY

The questionnaire includes 51 broad questions in total. A copy of the questionnaire has been appended with the report.

8.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - DGVCL

The consultants have surveyed a total of 149 agricultural consumers across DGVCL. The key survey results are as given below

8.2.1 General Information

8.2.1.1 Source of Income

50 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

From the below table 4.4 the relationship between the family wellbeing and the source of income can be depicted. Out of the 3265 beneficiaries surveyed, 100% have their major source of income as Agriculture with 65% of them having 4-7 dependent family members, 14% having 1-4 family members dependent, 14% having 7-10 family members dependent and 7% having >10 family members dependent on the income & earnings of the head of the household.

Figure 8.1: Number of Family Members Figure 8.2: Source of Income

7% 0% 14% 14% 1-3 4-7 Agriculture 7-10 100% Others 65% >10

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.3: Number of Family Members and Source of Income No of Family Members No of Respondents Primary Source of Income No of Respondents 1-4 21 Agriculture 149 4-7 96 7-10 21 >10 10 Total 149 Total 149

Source: IMM Analysis

Out of 100 Beneficiaries surveyed, 100 % of them were having land of their own for cultivation of crops and carry out their agricultural activities. It was also observed that 62% of them were having Metered connections whereas 38% of them were un-metered connections.

51 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 8.3: Ownership of Land Figure 8.4: Billing Type

0% 38%

Owned Metered Leased Un-Metered 100% 62%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.4: Ownership of Land and Billing Type Ownership of Land Number of Respondents Billing Type Number of Respondents Owned 140 Metered 57 Leased 0 Un-Metered 92 Total 149 Total 149

Source: IMM Analysis

In view of the same & as an effective outcome, Table 4.6 below , depicts that out of the 100 beneficiaries surveyed, 59% of were having contractual demand in the range of 1-5 KVA, 8% were having in the range of 5-10 KVA and the remaining 33% were having in the range of > 10 KVA.

It was also found that almost 95.3% of the total 100 beneficiaries were having distribution transformers having ratings in the range of 10- 25 KVA and 5% of them were using transformers with ratings in the range of 25 – 65 KVA.

52 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 8.5: Contract Demand Figure 8.6: Transformer Rating

5% 0.0%

33% 1-5 10 - 25 KVA

59% 5-10 25 - 65 KVA >10 >65 KVA 8% 95.3%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.5: Contract Demand and Transformer Rating Contract Demand Number of Respondents Transformer Rating Number of Respondents 1-5 KVA 88 10 – 25 KVA 142 5-10 KVA 12 25 – 65 KVA 7 >10 KVA 49 >65 KVA 0 Total 149 Total 149

Source: IMM Analysis

8.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects

8.2.2.1 Voltage Level / Quality and Stability

53 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 8.7: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability The overall outcome of the survey states that 100% of the surveyed consumers strongly agree with the statement that the overall voltage level/ quality and stability has 100.0% improved after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Strongly Agree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table8.6: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The overall voltage 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% level/quality and stability DGVCL 149 0 0 0 0 149 after implementation of KHUSHY has improved.

Source: IMM Analysis

8.2.2.2 Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown

The overall outcome of the survey states that 68% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the frequent line break or unscheduled shutdowns has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

54 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 8.8: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown has reduced

31% 1%

68%

Strongly Agree Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.7: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM

The frequent line break or unscheduled 68% 31% 1% 0% 0% 100% shutdown after implementation of KHUSHY DGVCL 101 46 2 0 0 149 Scheme has reduced

Source: IMM Analysis

8.2.2.3 Transformer Failure

55 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The overall outcome of the survey states that nearly 98% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the transformer failure has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Figure 8.9: Transformer Failure has reduced after the implementation of KHUSHY Scheme 1%1%

Strongly Agree Agree No Change 98.0%

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.8: Transformer Failure NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The transformer failure has 98% 1% 1% 0% 0% 100% reduced after the DGVCL 146 1 2 0 0 149 implementation of KHUSHY scheme.

Source: IMM Analysis

8.2.2.4 Incidence of Hooking

56 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

To stop or minimize such activities Figure 8.10: Incidence of Hooking DISCOMs under the implementation of KHUSHY have provided the consumers 2% with insulated overhead cables known as Strongly Agree Arial Bunched Cables (ABC/PVC) and other devices and equipment’s. Reducing the length of LT lines by No Change relocation and installations of additional distribution transformers. The overall 98% outcome of the survey states that nearly 99% consumers strongly agree that the incidence hooking has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme. Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.9: Incidence of Hooking NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

Incidence of Hooking has 98% 0% 2% 0% 0% 100% reduced after DGVCL 146 0 3 0 0 149 implementation of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

57 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.2.5 Crop Output & Yield

As the primary objective of the project Figure 8.11: Crop Output & Yield has Increased was to provide consumers with Power 1.00% distribution related benefits, whereas Crop output & yield are directly dependent on the monsoon & weather conditions for which the electricity has no significant impact. The survey results show that 1% of the customers agree 99.00% that the crop output and yield has increased after the implementation of KHUSHY. 99% of the customers are of the opinion that there has been no Agree No Change change in the crop output and yield after the implementation of KHUSHY.

Source: IMM Analysis

Table8.10: Crop Output & Yield NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The Crop output & yield 0% 1% 99% 0% 0% 100% has yield has increased DGVCL 0 2 147 0 0 149 after implementation of KHUSHY scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

58 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.2.6 Agricultural Income

The perception regarding Agricultural income can be depicted from the able, Figure 8.12: Agricultural Income however the overall outcome of the 1% survey states that nearly 1% consumers strongly agrees with the statement that the Agricultural income has increased after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme, whereas 99% states that there has been no change in terms of their 99% income.

Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table8.11: Agricultural Income NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM Agricultural Income 0% 1% 99% 0% 0% 100% has increased after 0 2 147 0 0 149 the implementation DGVCL of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

59 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.2.7 Availability of Free Time

The perception regarding availability of free time Figure 8.13: Availability of Free Time (across DISCOMs) , the overall outcome of the survey states that nearly 99% consumers 1% strongly agree with the statement that the availability of free time after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

It was found that after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme, the power supply to the consumers was distributed as per schedule & timings which was an advantage for them. The 99% free time which was after the implementation was available with the consumers are utilized by them for other working & revenue generating activities, also with a possibility to start a small Strongly Agree No Change shop/business to increase their sources of income which will be ultimately helping them & Source: IMM Analysis their families to enhance the lifestyle and standards of living.

Table8.12: Availability of Free Time NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM You get free time for yourself 99% 0% 1% 0% 0% 100% after implementation of DGVCL 147 0 2 0 0 149 KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

60 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.2.8 Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme

The perception regarding Overall satisfaction Figure 8.14: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme (across DISCOMs) can be depicted from the table, however the overall outcome of the 1% survey states that nearly 99% beneficiaries strongly agrees with the statement that they are overall satisfied after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

99%

Strongly Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.13: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM You are overall satisfied with the DGVCL 99% 0 1% 0% 0% 100% KHUSHY Scheme 147 0 2 0 0 149

Source: IMM Analysis

61 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY

8.2.3.1 Transformer Failure

The perception regarding Transformer Figure 8.15: Transformer Failure (Times In a Year) Failure & Average no. of days per failure (across DISCOMs) can be depicted from the table. The survey 100 results show that more than 37% of 90 Before After 80 the customers experienced 70 transformer failures around 3-5 times 60 while other few experienced it more 50 than 5 times. After the implementation 40 30 of KHUSHY all the surveyed

Response (in %) (in Response 20 customers experienced transformer 10 failure in the bracket of 0-2 times. The 0 results hence show that there has 0-2 3-5 > 5 been a considerable decrease in Transformer Failure (No. of times) transformer failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

Source: IMM Analysis

Table8.14: Details on Transformer Failure Before and After KHUSHY Total No. of Beneficiaries Parameter DISCOM Surveyed Transformer Failure (No. of times) Before After Transformer failures before and after 0-2 3-5 > 5 0-2 3-5 >5 implementation of DGVCL 149 63% 37% 0% 100% 0% 0% KHUSHY 94 55 0 149 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

62 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 40% of the customers experienced 6-10 days loss due to each transformer failure while other 3% experienced 11-15 days loss due to each transformer failure. After the implementation of KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers experienced 0-5 days loss due to each transformer failure and also the rate of failure has decreased to 0-2 per year.

Figure 8.16: Average Number of Days Loss Per Failure – Overall (All Discoms) 100 90 80 70 60

50 Before 40 After

Response (in %) 30 20 10 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20

Average No. of Days Loss per failure Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.15: Details on Average number of Days Loss per Failure Before and After KHUSHY No. of Paramet Beneficiaries er DISCOM Surveyed Average No. of Days Loss per Failure Average BEFORE AFTER No. of Days 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 Loss Per 53% 40% 3% 0% 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Failure DGVCL 149 79 60 5 0 5 149 0 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

63 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.3.2 Motor Maintenance / Failure

The perception regarding Motor Maintenance & Average no. of days per Figure 8.17: Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) failure (across DISCOMs) can be 100 depicted from the table The survey 90 results show that more than 48% of the 80 Before After customers experienced motor failures of 70 around 3-5 times while other few 60 experienced it more than 5 times. After 50 the implementation of KHUSHY all of 40 the surveyed customers experienced motor failures in the bracket of 0-2 Response (in %) 30 times. The results hence show that 20 there has been a considerable decrease 10 in motor failure after the implementation 0 of KHUSHY. 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8

Motor Maintenance per failure Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.16: Details on Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Motor BEFORE AFTER Maintenance/ 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 Failure DGVCL 149 52% 48% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 78 71 0 0 149 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

64 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 8.18: Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure The survey results show that around 4% of the customers experienced 6-10 days 100 loss after each motor failure while other 90 10% experienced more than 10 days loss 80 Before After 70 after each motor failure. After the 60 implementation of KHUSHY all of the 50 surveyed customers experienced day 40 loss after each motor failure in the 30 bracket of 0-5 times. The results hence Response (in %) (in Response 20 show that there has been a considerable 10 decrease in average day loss per motor 0 failure after the implementation of 0-5 6-10 > 10 KHUSHY. Avg. No. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.17: Details on Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average no. BEFORE AFTER of Days Loss 0-5 6-10 > 10 0-5 6-10 > 10 per Maintenance/ DGVCL 149 86% 4% 10% 100% 0% 0% Failure 128 6 15 149 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

65 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that more than 6% of the customers had to incur expense Figure 8.19: Average Expense per Failure (INR) in the bracket of INR 2100-4000 due to 100 each motor failure while other 44% had to 90 Before After incur expense in the bracket of INR 4100- 80 70 6000 due to each motor failure. After the 60 implementation of KHUSHY all of the 50 40 surveyed customers incurred expense in 30 the bracket of INR 2100-4000 due to each 20

Response (in %) 10 motor failure. The results hence show that 0 there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor failures after the implementation of KHUSHY. Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.18: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Maintenance (INR)

No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 per 4000 6000 8000 4000 6000 8000 Failure 38% 6% 44% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% due to DGVCL 149 Maintena 56 9 66 18 0 149 0 0 0 0 nce (INR)

Source: IMM Analysis

66 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.3.3 Motor Starter Failure

100 The perception regarding Motor starter failure & Before After 90 Average no. of days per failure (across DISCOMs) 80 can be depicted from the table The survey results 70 show that before the implementation of KHUSHY, 60 more than 85% of the customers experienced motor 50 starter failures around 2- 3 times/year while other 40 few experienced it more than 3 times. After the 30 implementation of KHUSHY all of the surveyed Response %) (in 20 customers experienced motor starter failure in the 10 bracket of 0-1 times. The results hence show that 0 there has been a considerable decrease in motor 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 starter failure after the implementation of KHUSHY. Motor Starter Failure (No. of times /year)

Table 8.19: Details on Motor Starter Failure (No/Yr)

No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor starter Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 per Failure DGVCL 149 13% 85% 2% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% due to 19 127 3 0 149 0 0 0 Maintena nce (INR)

The survey results show that more than 45% of the customers experienced 2-3 days loss due to each Figure 8.20: Average Number of Days Loss Per motor starter failure while other few experienced more Failure due to Motor Starter than 3 days loss due to each motor starter failure. After 100 the implementation of KHUSHY more 100% of the 90 80 Before After surveyed customers experienced 0-1 day loss due to 70 each motor starter failure. The results hence show that 60 there has been a considerable decrease in average 50 day loss per motor starter failure after the 40 30 implementation of KHUSHY. 20 Response (in %) 10 0 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Motor Starter Failure (No. of Days /year)

Source: IMM Analysis

67 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 8.20: Details on Average Number of Days Loss per Failure due to Motor Starter

DISCOM Total No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Number of 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Days Loss Per Failure due to DGVCL 149 42% 45% 3% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter 62 67 20 0 149 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

Figure 8.21: Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter The survey results show that around 9% of Failure (INR) the customers had to incur expense in the 100 bracket of INR 501-1000 due to each motor 90 failure while other 49% had to incur 80 Before After expense in the bracket of INR 1001-1500 70 after each motor failure. After the 60 implementation of KHUSHY all of the 50 surveyed customers incurred expense in 40 the bracket of INR 0-500 after each motor 30 failure. The results hence show that there

Response (in %) has been a considerable decrease in 20 expense incurred on motor starter failures 10 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 0

Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.21: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter Failure (INR)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed BEFORE AFTER Average 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 Expense per 1000 1500 1000 1500 Failure due to DGVCL 149 10% 9% 49% 32% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter Failure 15 14 73 47 149 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

68 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details

The figure below depicts that 74% of the total 151 surveyed beneficiaries do not have additional single phase connection whereas all are having Bore Well facility.

Figure 8.22: Additional Single Phase Connection Figure 8.23: Bore Well Facility

- Yes No Yes No 26%

74% 100%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.22: Additional single phase connection and Bore Well Details Additional Single Phase Connection Bore Well Facility DISCOM Yes No Yes No DGVCL 38 111 149 0

Source: IMM Analysis

69 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

8.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme

All of the 149 beneficiaries Figure 8.24: View on Continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat surveyed were happy & satisfied with the implementation of the KHUSHY Scheme and had expressed their interest and willingness in support and continuation of the scheme in other parts of the state aggressively.

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 8.23: Views on continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat DISCOM Yes No DGVCL 149 0

Source: IMM Analysis

70 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 9 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – DGVCL

Figure 9.1: Tangible and Intangible Benefits of KHUSHY

Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

Tangibe Benefits Intangible Benefits

° Reduction in T&D Losses ° Reduction in Transformer Failure ° Reduction in O&M Costs

Benefits to Agricultural Consumers

° Reduction in Motor Failure ° Increase in availability of free time ° Reduction in Starter Failure ° Increase in household and farm assets ° Reduction in Capacitor Failure

71 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

9.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY

The implementation of KHUSHY was done in all distribution companies. The detailed lists of feeders, villages and which have benefitted under the scheme and corresponding details have been attached as Appendix A.

Table 9.1: KHUSHY Implementation Details

DISCOM Feeders Villages No. of Customers DGVCL 7 50 2406

Source: IMM Analysis

9.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY

The distribution companies have accrued varied tangible and intangible benefits under KHUSHY. The assessments of the tangible benefits have been done on the basis of the year on year information provided by the individual DISCOMs. The broad tangible benefits accrued by the distribution companies under the scheme are as under ° Reduction in Transmission &Distribution (T&D) Losses ° Reduction in System Interruptions ° Decrease in O&M Costs

9.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (DGVCL)

72 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

9.2.1.1 Units Sent Out and Units Billed

The figures on units sent out and units billed are a clear indication on the change in T&D losses. The percentage of unit loss was in excess of 50% in the year ending 2006-07 which has dipped to 24% in the year ending 2012-13.

Figure 9.2: DGVCL - Year-Wise % Units Loss Year-Wise % Units Loss

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Year-Wise % Units Loss

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 9.2: Discom-Wise and Year-Wise Units Sent Out and Units Billed Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUs) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 14.23 6.8 7.43 52% 2007-08 5.42 3.58 1.84 34% 2008-09 11.48 6.28 5.2 45% 2009-10 14.33 7.39 6.94 48% 2010-11 19.4 10.81 8.59 44% 2011-12 24.68 15.53 9.15 37% 2012-13 21.54 16.46 5.07 24%

Source: IMM Analysis

73 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

9.2.1.2 Theoretical Loss

The percentage of Theoretical Loss was around 88% in the year ending 2007-08 which has dipped to 61% in the year ending 2012-13.

Figure 9.3: Year-Wise Theoretical Loss

100 % Theoretical Loss 90

0 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

The details of the % theoretical losses are as given in the below table. It can be seen that there has been a steady decline in the theoretical losses since the inception of the scheme in the year 2008-09.

Table 9.3: Year Wise % Theoretical Loss

Discom 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 DGVCL 14 88 74 70 63 61 61 Theoretical Loss (%) Theoretical 5.53 16.14 11.41 11.67 12.11 12.49 16.50 Loss (MUs)

74 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

9.2.2 Transformer Failures (DGVCL)

9.2.2.1 Transformer Failure

Figure 9.4: DGVCL Year-Wise Transformer Failure

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Transformer Failures

Source: IMM Analysis

The percentage of Transformer Failure as around 39 % in the year ending 2006-07 which has dipped to 6 % in the year ending 2012-13

Table 9.4: Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 DGVCL 39% 12% 31% 20% 20% 17% 6%

Source: IMM Analysis

9.3 Payback Period (DGVCL)

75 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

9.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit

The Average yearly losses/Sent Units from 2006-07 to the year of conversion into HVDS have been taken as the baseline loss for the calculation of payback period.

9.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization

For the current study the consultant are using the second option ie. Average Energy Charge Realization excluding Agriculture (as per GERC Filing)

9.3.3 Cost of Capital

Capital Source Cost of Capital % Energy Conservation Grant 0% Share Capital 12%

9.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures

76 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

9.4 Pay Back Calculations

Table 9.5: DGVCL – Payback Calculations (Dedicated Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders 6 No. of Transformers 283 Total Expenditure 6.22 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 15.48 Years Payback Year 2028-29

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 9.6: DGVCL – Payback Calculations (Scattered Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 724 Total Expenditure 4.38 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 53.11 Years Payback Year 2065-66

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 9.7: DGVCL – Payback Calculations (Overall)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 1007 Total Expenditure 10.6 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 22.16 Years Payback Year 2034-35

Source: IMM Analysis

77 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Part C: Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited (UGVCL)

78 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 10 Profile of UGVCL

10.1 Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited

UGVCL was incorporated on September, 2003 and the commercial operation of company started in April 2005. UGVCL is feeding electricity in 6 districts namely Banaskantha, Patan, Mehsana, Sabarkantha, Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar and partly in other 3 districts including Kheda, Surendranagar and Bhavnagar of Gujarat covering total 65 Talukas. UGVCL caters to almost 30,52,773 customers across all its circles out of which nearly 2,46,389 are agricultural customers. The areas covered by UGVCL are as depicted in the figure. The basic details of PGVCL are as illustrated in the table below

Particulars Details Total Area Covered By Company 49,950 Sq. Kms. Districts Covered 6+3 (Partly) Talukas Covered 56+9 (Partly) Villages Covered 4628 Total Consumers of Company 30,52,773 Circles 4 Divisions 21

79 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 11 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

The KHUSHY scheme has been implemented across all Distribution companies viz. PGVCL, DGVCL, MGVCL and UGVCL. In total 174 feeders across all the distribution companies have been converted under this scheme into HVDS. PGVCL has benefitted immensely under this scheme wherein 157 feeders have been converted into HVDS. All agricultural customers under these feeders have been allotted dedicated transformers for their connections.

The details of feeders in UGVCL which have been converted into HVDS and the number of transformers installed are as given in the table:

80 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

81 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja

Table 11.1: UGVCL Feeder Details

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Project Cost Year of Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (lakhs) Completion HIMATNAGAR HIMATNAGAR PRANTIJ KATPUR 39 44 47 19 0 149 105 2011-2012 HIMATNAGAR HIMATNAGAR SALAL ARSODA 61 19 14 4 0 98 66 2012-2013

MEHSANA PATAN JANGRAL KOITA AG 0 1 47 24 1 73 41 2009-2010 S/DN FEEDER Mehsana Visnagar Kheralu Mahiyal 37 24 2 1 0 64 88 2008-2009 PALANPUR PALANPUR-II VADGAM 11 KV RAMPURA 12 17 11 0 0 40 33 2010-2011 AG PALANPUR PALANPUR-II VADGAM 11 KV 2 38 8 0 3 51 35 2010-2011 SEJALPURA AG Mehsana Patan Jangral Delvada 0 30 42 38 6 116 57 2009-2010 Total 151 173 171 86 10 591 425

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 12 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

12.1 Approach and Methodology

12.1.1 Sample Design

The details of sample design for UGVCL is as under

Table 12.1: Details of conversion of feeders under KHUSHY Discom Circle Division Sub-Division No. of Feeders No. of Beneficiaries UGVCL 2 4 5 6 151

Source: Information submitted by DISCOMs

82 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The sample distribution for the consumer perception study in UGVCL is as given in the table below

Table 12.2: Sample Distribution Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Name of Feeder No. of Beneficiaries Salal Arsoda 36 Himmatnagar Himmatnagar Prantij Katpur 15 Jangral Delvada 28 UGVCL Mehsana Patan Jangral Koita 22 Palanpur-2 Vadgam KV Rampura 13 Palanpur Palanpur Vagada KV Sejalpura 37 Total UGVCL 151

Source: IMM Field Survey

12.1.2 Questionnaire Design

° Location Details including district, taluka, Discom, circle, division, subdivision and feeder details. ° General Information including name of beneficiary, address, contact details, number of family members, source of income, land area, cultivation area, ownership of land, year of connection, billing type, contract demand, connected load, transformer rating etc. ° Technical Details including voltage quality, line break or shutdown details, transformer failure, incidence of hooking, crop output and yield, aricultural income etc, power usage details etc. ° Operational Details including average number of days loss per failure, motor maintenance, average expense per failure, operating days of borewell, operating hours of borewell, number of crops cultivated during year, income per acre, primary type of crop etc. ° Socio Economic Details including type of house, house hold assets, farm assets, number of cattle etc. ° Broad view and suggestion on the implementation of KHUSHY

The questionnaire includes 51 broad questions in total. A copy of the questionnaire has been appended with the report.

12.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - UGVCL

The consultants have surveyed a total of 151 agricultural consumers across UGVCL. The key survey results are as given below

83 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.1 General Information

12.2.1.1 Source of Income

From the below table 4.4 the relationship between the family wellbeing and the source of income can be depicted. Out of the 151 beneficiaries surveyed, 100% have their major source of income as Agriculture with 53% of them having 4-7 dependent family members, 8% having 1-4 family members dependent, 17% having 7-10 family members dependent and 22% having >10 family members dependent on the income & earnings of the head of the household.

Figure 12.1: Number of Family Members Figure 12.2: Source of Income

8% 0% 22% 1-3 4-7 Agriculture 17% 53% 7-10 100% Others >10

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

84 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 12.3: Number of Family Members and Source of Income No of Family Members No of Respondents Primary Source of Income No of Respondents 1-4 12 Agriculture 151 4-7 80 7-10 25 >10 34 Total 151 Total 151

Source: IMM Analysis

Out of 100 Beneficiaries surveyed, 100 % of them were having land of their own for cultivation of crops and carry out their agricultural activities. It was also observed that 19% of them were having Metered connections whereas 81% of them were un-metered connections.

Figure 12.3: Ownership of Land Figure 12.4: Billing Type

0% 19%

Owned Metered Leased Un-Metered 100%

81%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.4: Ownership of Land and Billing Type Ownership of Land Number of Respondents Billing Type Number of Respondents Owned 151 Metered 29 Leased 0 Un-Metered 122 Total 151 Total 151

Source: IMM Analysis

85 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

In view of the same & as an effective outcome, Table 4.6 below , depicts that out of the 151 beneficiaries surveyed, 3% of were having contractual demand in the range of 1-5 KVA, 33% were having in the range of 5-10 KVA and the remaining 64% were having in the range of > 10 KVA.

It was also found that almost 72% of the total 151 beneficiaries were having distribution transformers having ratings in the range of 10- 25 KVA, 27% of them were using transformers with ratings in the range of 25 – 65 KVA and only 0.7% were having transformers with ratings in the range of > 65 KVA.

Figure 12.5: Contract Demand Figure 12.6: Transformer Rating

3% 0.7% 27% 33% 1-5 10 - 25 KVA 5-10 25 - 65 KVA 64% >10 72.2% >65 KVA

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.5: Contract Demand and Transformer Rating Contract Demand Number of Respondents Transformer Rating Number of Respondents 1-5 KVA 4 10 – 25 KVA 109 5-10 KVA 50 25 – 65 KVA 41 >10 KVA 97 >65 KVA 1 Total 151 Total 151

Source: IMM Analysis

86 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects

12.2.2.1 Voltage Level / Quality and Stability

Figure 12.7: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability The overall outcome of the survey states that 100% of the surveyed consumers strongly agree with the statement that the overall voltage level/ quality and stability has 100.0% improved after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Strongly Agree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.6: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The overall voltage 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% level/quality and stability UGVCL 151 0 0 0 0 151 after implementation of KHUSHY has improved.

Source: IMM Analysis

87 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.2.2 Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown

The overall outcome of the survey states that 99% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the frequent line break or unscheduled shutdowns has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Figure 12.8: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown has reduced

99% 1%

Strongly Agree Agree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.7: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM

The frequent line break or unscheduled 99% 1% 0% 0% 0% 100% shutdown after implementation of KHUSHY UGVCL 149 2 0 0 0 151 Scheme has reduced

Source: IMM Analysis

12.2.2.3 Transformer Failure

88 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The overall outcome of the survey states that nearly 99% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the transformer failure has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Figure 12.9: Transformer Failure has reduced after the implementation of KHUSHY Scheme 1%

Strongly Agree Agree

99.0%

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.8: Transformer Failure NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The transformer failure has 99% 1% 0% 0% 0% 100% reduced after the UGVCL 150 1 0 0 0 151 implementation of KHUSHY scheme.

Source: IMM Analysis

12.2.2.4 Incidence of Hooking

89 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

To stop or minimize such activities Figure 12.10: Incidence of Hooking DISCOMs under the implementation of KHUSHY have provided the consumers 0% with insulated overhead cables known as Strongly Agree Arial Bunched Cables (ABC/PVC) and other devices and equipment’s. Reducing the length of LT lines by No Change relocation and installations of additional distribution transformers. The overall 100% outcome of the survey states that nearly 99% consumers strongly agree that the incidence hooking has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme. Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.9: Incidence of Hooking NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

Incidence of Hooking has 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% reduced after UGVCL 151 0 0 0 0 151 implementation of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

12.2.2.5 Crop Output & Yield

Figure 12.11: Crop Output & Yield has Increased As the primary objective of the project was to provide consumers with Power 1.00% distribution related benefits, whereas Crop output & yield are directly dependent on the monsoon & weather conditions for which the electricity has no 99.00% significant impact. The survey results show that 1% of the customers strongly agree that the crop output and yield has Agree Strongly Agree increased after the implementation of

KHUSHY. 99% of the customers agree that the crop output and yield has Source: IMM Analysis increased after the implementation of KHUSHY.

90 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 12.10: Crop Output & Yield NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The Crop output & yield 1% 99% 0% 0% 0% 100% has yield has increased UGVCL 1 150 0 0 0 151 after implementation of KHUSHY scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

12.2.2.6 Agricultural Income

The perception regarding Agricultural Figure 12.12: Agricultural Income income can be depicted from the able, 0% however the overall outcome of the survey states that nearly none of the consumers surveyed agree with the statement that the Agricultural income has increased after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme 100%

Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.11: Agricultural Income NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM Agricultural Income 0 0 100% 0% 0% 100% has increased after 0 0 151 0 0 151 the implementation UGVCL of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

91 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.2.7 Availability of Free Time

The perception regarding availability of free time, Figure 12.13: Availability of Free Time the overall outcome of the survey states that 100% of the surveyed consumers strongly agree 0% with the statement that the availability of free time after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

It was found that after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme, the power supply to the consumers was distributed as per schedule & timings which was an advantage for them. The 100% free time which was after the implementation was available with the consumers are utilized by them for other working & revenue generating activities, also with a possibility to start a small Strongly Agree No Change shop/business to increase their sources of income which will be ultimately helping them & Source: IMM Analysis their families to enhance the lifestyle and standards of living.

Table 12.12: Availability of Free Time NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM You get free time for yourself 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% after implementation of UGVCL 151 0 0 0 0 151 KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

92 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.2.8 Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme

The perception regarding Overall satisfaction Figure 12.14: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme (across DISCOMs) can be depicted from the table, however the overall outcome of the 0% survey states that nearly 99% beneficiaries strongly agrees with the statement that they are overall satisfied after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

100%

Strongly Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.13: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme

Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM You are overall satisfied with the UGVCL 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% KHUSHY Scheme 151 0 0 0 0 151

Source: IMM Analysis

93 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY

12.2.3.1 Transformer Failure

The perception regarding Transformer Figure 12.15: Transformer Failure (Times In a Year) Failure & Average no. of days per failure (across DISCOMs) can be depicted from the table. The survey 100 results show that more than 24% of 90 Before After 80 the customers experienced 70 transformer failures around 3-5 times 60 while other few experienced it more 50 than 5 times. After the implementation 40 30 of KHUSHY all the surveyed

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.14: Details on Transformer Failure Before and After KHUSHY Total No. of Beneficiaries Parameter DISCOM Surveyed Transformer Failure (No. of times) Before After Transformer failures before and after 0-2 3-5 > 5 0-2 3-5 >5 implementation of UGVCL 151 60% 24% 17% 100% 0% 0% KHUSHY 90 36 25 151 0 .0

Source: IMM Analysis

The survey results show that around 29% of the customers experienced 6-10 days loss due to each transformer failure while other 1% experienced 11-15 days loss due to each transformer failure. After the implementation of KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers experienced 0-5 days loss due to each transformer failure and also the rate of failure has decreased to 0-2 per year.

94 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 12.16: Average Number of Days Loss Per Failure 100 90 80 70 60

50 Before 40 After

Response (in %) 30 20 10 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20

Average No. of Days Loss per failure Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.15: Details on Average number of Days Loss per Failure Before and After KHUSHY No. of Paramet Beneficiaries er DISCOM Surveyed Average No. of Days Loss per Failure Average BEFORE AFTER No. of Days 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 Loss Per 69% 29% 1% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Failure UGVCL 151 104 44 1 2 0 151 0 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

95 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.3.2 Motor Maintenance / Failure

The perception regarding Motor Maintenance & Average no. of days per Figure 12.17: Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) failure can be depicted from the table 100 The survey results show that more than 90 60% of the customers experienced 80 Before After motor failures of around 3-5 times while 70 other few experienced it more than 5 60 times. After the implementation of 50 KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers 40 experienced motor failures in the bracket of 0-2 times. The results hence Response (in %) 30 show that there has been a 20 considerable decrease in motor failure 10 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 0 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 Motor Maintenance per failure

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.16: Details on Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Motor BEFORE AFTER Maintenance/ 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 Failure UGVCL 151 32% 60% 5% 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% 48 91 8 4 151 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

96 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 98% Figure 12.18: Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure of the customers experienced 0-5 days loss after each motor failure while other 100 2% experienced 6-10 days loss after 90 each motor failure. After the 80 Before After 70 implementation of KHUSHY all of the 60 surveyed customers experienced day 50 loss after each motor failure in the 40 bracket of 0-5 times. The results hence 30 show that there has been a considerable Response (in %) (in Response 20 decrease in average day loss per motor 10 failure after the implementation of 0 KHUSHY. 0-5 6-10 > 10 Avg. No. of Days Loss per Maintenance/

Failure

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.17: Details on Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average no. BEFORE AFTER of Days Loss 0-5 6-10 > 10 0-5 6-10 > 10 per Maintenance/ UGVCL 151 98% 2% 0% 100% 0% 0% Failure 148 3 0 151 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

97 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that more than 45% of the customers had to incur Figure 12.19: Average Expense per Failure (INR) expense in the bracket of INR 0-2000 due 100 to each motor failure while other 41% had 90 Before After to incur expense in the bracket of INR 80 70 6100-8000 due to each motor failure. After 60 50 the implementation of KHUSHY all of the 40 surveyed customers incurred expense in 30 20 the bracket of INR 0-2000 due to each 10 Response (in %) 0 motor failure. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor failures after the implementation of KHUSHY. Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.18: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Maintenance (INR)

No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 per 4000 6000 8000 4000 6000 8000 Failure 45% 2% 12% 41% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% due to UGVCL 151 Maintena 68 3 18 62 0 151 0 0 0 0 nce (INR)

Source: IMM Analysis

12.2.3.3 Motor Starter Failure

100 The perception regarding Motor starter failure & Before After 90 Average no. of days per failure can be depicted 80 from the table The survey results show that before 70 the implementation of KHUSHY, more than 69% of 60 the customers experienced motor starter failures 50 around 2- 3 times/year while other few experienced 40 it more than 3 times. After the implementation of 30 KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers Response %) (in 20 experienced motor starter failure in the bracket of 0- 10 1 times. The results hence show that there has 0 been a considerable decrease in motor starter 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 failure after the implementation of KHUSHY. Motor Starter Failure (No. of times /year)

98 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 12.19: Details on Motor Starter Failure (No/Year)

No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor starter Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 per Failure UGVCL 151 21% 69% 9% 1% 100% 0% 0% 0% due to 31 104 14 2 151 0 0 0 Maintena nce (INR)

The survey results show that more than 28% of the Figure 12.20: Average Number of Days Loss Per customers experienced 2-3 days loss due to each Failure due to Motor Starter motor starter failure while other few experienced more 100 than 3 days loss due to each motor starter failure. After 90 the implementation of KHUSHY more 100% of the Before After 80 surveyed customers experienced 0-1 day loss due to 70 60 each motor starter failure. The results hence show that 50 there has been a considerable decrease in average 40 day loss per motor starter failure after the 30 20 implementation of KHUSHY. Response (in %) 10 0 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Motor Starter Failure (No. of Days /year)

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.20: Details on Average Number of Days Loss per Failure due to Motor Starter

DISCOM Total No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Number of 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Days Loss Per Failure due to UGVCL 151 69% 28% 3% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter 104 42 5 0 151 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

99 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 9% of Figure 12.21: Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter the customers had to incur expense in the Failure (INR) bracket of INR 501-1000 due to each motor 100 failure while other 64% had to incur 90 expense in the bracket of INR >500 after 80 Before After each motor failure. After the 70 implementation of KHUSHY all of the 60 surveyed customers incurred expense in 50 the bracket of INR 0-500 after each motor 40 failure. The results hence show that there 30 has been a considerable decrease in Response (in %) 20 expense incurred on motor starter failures 10 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 0

Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.21: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter Failure (INR)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed BEFORE AFTER Average 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 Expense per 1000 1500 1000 1500 Failure due to UGVCL 151 9% 1% 26% 64% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter Failure 13 2 40 96 151 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

100 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

12.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details

The figure below depicts that 62% of the total 151 surveyed beneficiaries do not have additional single phase connection whereas all are having Bore Well facility.

Figure 12.22: Additional Single Phase Connection Figure 12.23: Bore Well Facility - Yes No Yes No 38%

62%

100%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 12.22: Additional single phase connection and Bore Well Details Additional Single Phase Connection Bore Well Facility DISCOM Yes No Yes No UGVCL 57 94 151 0

Source: IMM Analysis

12.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme

Figure 12.24: View on Continuation of the Scheme in other areas of All of the 151 beneficiaries surveyed Gujarat were happy & satisfied with the implementation of the KHUSHY Scheme and had expressed their interest and willingness in support and continuation of the scheme in other parts of the state aggressively.

Source: IMM Analysis

101 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 12.23: Views on continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat DISCOM Yes No UGVCL 151 0

Source: IMM Analysis

102 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 13 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – UGVCL

Figure 13.1: Tangible and Intangible Benefits of KHUSHY

Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

Tangibe Benefits Intangible Benefits

° Reduction in T&D Losses ° Reduction in Transformer Failure ° Reduction in O&M Costs

Benefits to Agricultural Consumers

° Reduction in Motor Failure ° Increase in availability of free time ° Reduction in Starter Failure ° Increase in household and farm assets ° Reduction in Capacitor Failure

103 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

13.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY

Table 13.1: KHUSHY Implementation Details

DISCOM Feeders Villages No. of Customers UGVCL 6 26 780

Source: IMM Analysis

13.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY

13.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (UGVCL)

13.2.1.1 Units Sent Out and Units Billed

The figures on units sent out and units billed are a clear indication on the change in T&D losses. The percentage of units loss was in excess of 21% in the year ending 2007-08 which has decreased to 17% in the year ending 2012-13.

104 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 13.2: UGVCL - Year-Wise % Units Loss Year-Wise % Units Loss

95 85 75 65 55 45 35 25 15 5

-5 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Year-Wise % Units Loss

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 13.2: Discom-Wise and Year-Wise Units Sent Out and Units Billed

Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUs) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 14.32 12.94 1.38 10% 2007-08 17.88 14.20 3.68 21% 2008-09 18.42 16.28 2.14 12% 2009-10 23.51 19.43 4.08 17% 2010-11 20.75 20.05 0.70 3% 2011-12 21.67 19.66 2.01 9% 2012-13 24.98 20.71 4.27 17%

Source: IMM Analysis

105 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

13.2.1.2 Theoretical Loss

The percentage of Theoretical Loss was around 53% in the year ending 2006-07 which has dipped to 31% in the year ending 2012-13.

Figure 13.3: Year-Wise Theoretical Loss (%)

100

0 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

The details of the % theoretical losses are as given in the below table.

Table 13.3: Year Wise % Theoretical Loss

Discom 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 UGVCL 55% 54% 24% 31% 53% 35% 31% Theoretical Loss (%) Theoretical 20.08 18.96 8.44 12.13 17.82 12.81 12.73 Loss (MUs)

106 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

13.2.2 Transformer Failures (UGVCL)

13.2.2.1 Transformer Failure

Figure 13.4: UGVCL Year-Wise Transformer Failure

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Transformer Failures

Source: IMM Analysis

The percentage of Transformer Failure as around 8 % in the year ending 2006-07 which dipped to 5 % in the year ending 2011-12 and subsequently increased back to 8 % in 2012-13.

Table 13.4: Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 UGVCL 14% 16% 9% 5% 5% 7% 4%

Source: IMM Analysis

13.3 Payback Period (UGVCL)

107 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

13.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit

The Average yearly losses/Sent Units from 2006-07 to the year of conversion into HVDS have been taken as the baseline loss for the calculation of payback period.

13.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization

For the current study the consultant are using the second option ie. Average Energy Charge Realization excluding Agriculture (as per GERC Filing)

13.3.3 Cost of Capital

Capital Source Cost of Capital % Energy Conservation Grant 0% Share Capital 12%

13.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures

108 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

13.4 Pay Back Calculations

Table 13.5: UGVCL – Payback Calculations (Dedicated Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders 7 No. of Transformers 477 Total Expenditure 4.26 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 14.93 Years Payback Year 2027-28

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 13.6: UGVCL – Payback Calculations (Scattered Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 1977 Total Expenditure 31.52 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 18.76 Years Payback Year 2031-32

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 13.7: UGVCL – Payback Calculations (Overall)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 2454 Total Expenditure 35.77 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 18.30 Years Payback Year 2031-32

Source: IMM Analysis

109 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Part D: Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited (MGVCL)

110 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 14 Profile of MGVCL

14.1 Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited

MGVCL was incorporated in September, 2003, primarily to carry out distribution of electricity to retail and bulk consumers and has become operational effective from 1 st April 2005. The Company is engaged in distribution of electricity in 5 districts namely Panchmahal, Kheda, Dahod, Anand and Vadodara. There are in total 27, 06,903 customers of MGVCL out of which around 82,289 are agricultural customers. The areas covered by MGVCL are as depicted in the below figure. The basic details of DGVCL are as illustrated in the table below

Particulars Details Total Area Covered By Company 23,854 Sq. Kms. Districts Covered 5 Talukas Covered 48 Villages Covered 4,404 Total Consumers of Company 27,06,903 Circles 4 Divisions 21

111 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 15 Implementation of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – MGVCL

The KHUSHY scheme has been implemented across all Distribution companies viz. PGVCL, DGVCL, MGVCL and UGVCL. In total 174 feeders across all the distribution companies have been converted under this scheme into HVDS. PGVCL has benefitted immensely under this scheme wherein 157 feeders have been converted into HVDS. All agricultural customers under these feeders have been allotted dedicated transformers for their connections.

The details of feeders in MGVCL which have been fully converted into HVDS and the number of transformers installed are as given in the table:

112 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

113 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Ur AnalysisCost of

Table 15.1: MGVCL Feeder Details

P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Project Cost Year of Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder 10 KVA 16 KVA 25 KVA 63 KVA 100 KVA Total (Lakhs) Completion NADIAD MAHEMDAVAD KATHLAL GANGA DAS NA 0 0 27 99 105 231 25 Ongoing MUVADA

Anand Anand Umreth Pansora 29 30 54 3 0 116 35.28 2011-2012 Anand Anand Umreth Dagjipura 18 68 56 6 0 148 57.95 2011-2012 Anand Anand Umreth Kasor 50 56 31 4 0 141 105.82 2012-2013 Nadiad Nadiad Rural Mahudha Kaprupur ------2011-2012 Total 97 154 168 112 105 636 224

ja Shakti(KHUSH ja Yojana

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 16 Consumer Perception of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – MGVCL

16.1 Approach and Methodology

16.1.1 Sample Design

The details of sample design for MGVCL is are as under

Table 16.1: Details of conversion of feeders under KHUSHY Discom Circle Division Sub-Division No. of Feeders No. of Beneficiaries MGVCL 1 1 1 2 100

Source: Information submitted by DISCOMs

The sample distribution for the consumer perception study in MGVCL is as given in the table below

Table 16.2: Sample Distribution Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Name of Feeder No. of Beneficiaries Dagjipura 74 MGVCL Anand Anand Bhalej Kasor 26 Total MGVCL 100 TOTAL 3265

114 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

16.1.2 Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire includes 51 broad questions in total. A copy of the questionnaire has been appended with the report.

16.2 Key Results of Consumer Perception Study - MGVCL

The consultants have surveyed a total of 100 agricultural consumers across MGVCL. The key survey results are as given below

16.2.1 General Information

16.2.1.1 Source of Income

115 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

family wellbeing (dependency of family members on the head of the family), The source of income needs to be upheld.

From the below table 4.4 the relationship between the family wellbeing and the source of income can be depicted. Out of the 100 beneficiaries surveyed, 100% have their major source of income as Agriculture with 55% of them having 4-7 dependent family members, 6% having 1-4 family members dependent, 25% having 7-10 family members dependent and 14% having >10 family members dependent on the income & earnings of the head of the household.

Figure 16.1: Number of Family Members Figure 16.2: Source of Income

6% 0% 14% 1-3 25% 4-7 Agriculture 55% 7-10 100% Others >10

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.3: Number of Family Members and Source of Income No of Family Members No of Respondents Primary Source of Income No of Respondents 1-4 6 Agriculture 100 4-7 51 7-10 23 >10 13 Total 100 Total 100

Source: IMM Analysis

116 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Out of 100 Beneficiaries surveyed, 100 % of them were having land of their own for cultivation of crops and carry out their agricultural activities. It was also observed that 95% of them were having Metered connections whereas 5% of them were un-metered connections.

Figure 16.3: Ownership of Land Figure 16.4: Billing Type

Owned Leased 100%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.4: Ownership of Land and Billing Type Ownership of Land Number of Respondents Billing Type Number of Respondents Owned 100 Metere d 95 Leased 0 Un-Metered 5 Total 100 Total 100

Source: IMM Analysis

In view of the same & as an effective outcome, Table 4.6 below , depicts that out of the 100 beneficiaries surveyed, 0% of were having contractual demand in the range of 1-5 KVA, 51% were having in the range of 5-10 KVA and the remaining 49% were having in the range of > 10 KVA.

It was also found that almost 91% of the total 100 beneficiaries were having distribution transformers having ratings in the range of 10- 25 KVA, 8% of them were using transformers with ratings in the range of 25 – 65 KVA and only 1% were having transformers with ratings in the range of > 65 KVA.

117 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 16.5: Contract Demand Figure 16.6: Transformer Rating

0% 8% 1.0%

49% 1-5 10 - 25 KVA 51% 5-10 25 - 65 KVA >10 >65 KVA 91.0%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.5: Contract Demand and Transformer Rating Contract Demand Number of Respondents Transformer Rating Number of Respondents 1-5 KVA 0 10 – 25 KVA 91 5-10 KVA 51 25 – 65 KVA 8 >10 KVA 49 >65 KVA 1 Total 100 Total 100

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.2 Level of Agreement on Technical and Financial Aspects

16.2.2.1 Voltage Level / Quality and Stability

118 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 16.7: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability The overall outcome of the survey states that 100% of the surveyed consumers strongly agree with the statement that the overall voltage level/ quality and stability has 100.0% improved after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Strongly Agree

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.6: Voltage Level/Quality and Stability NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The overall voltage 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% level/quality and stability MGVCL 100 0 0 0 0 100 after implementation of KHUSHY has improved.

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.2.2 Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown

The overall outcome of the survey states that 74% consumers strongly agree with the statement that the frequent line break or unscheduled shutdowns has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

119 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 16.8: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown has reduced

26%

Strongly Agree Agree 74.0%

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.7: Frequent Line break or Unscheduled Shutdown Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM

The frequent line break or unscheduled 74% 26% 0% 0% 0% 100% shutdown after implementation of KHUSHY MGVCL 74 26 0 .0 0 100 Scheme has reduced

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.2.3 Transformer Failure

120 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 16.9: Transformer Failure has reduced after the implementation of KHUSHY Scheme 0%

Strongly Agree Agree

100.0%

Source: IMM Analysis

The overall outcome of the survey states that nearly 100% of the surveyed consumers strongly agree with the statement that the transformer failure has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Table 16.8: Transformer Failure NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The transformer failure 100% 0 0 0 0 100% has reduced after the MGVCL 100 0 0 0 0 100 implementation of KHUSHY scheme.

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.2.4 Incidence of Hooking

121 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

To stop or minimize such activities Figure 16.10: Incidence of Hooking DISCOMs under the implementation of KHUSHY have provided the consumers 0% with insulated overhead cables known as Strongly Agree Arial Bunched Cables (ABC/PVC) and other devices and equipment’s. Reducing the length of LT lines by No Change relocation and installations of additional distribution transformers. The overall 100% outcome of the survey states that nearly 99% consumers strongly agree that the incidence hooking has reduced after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme. Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.9: Incidence of Hooking NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

Incidence of Hooking 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% has reduced after MGVCL 100 0 0 0 0 100 implementation of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.2.5 Crop Output & Yield

Figure 16.11: Crop Output & Yield has Increased As the primary objective of the project was to provide consumers with Power 0.00% distribution related benefits, whereas Crop output & yield are directly dependent on the monsoon & weather conditions for which the electricity has no significant impact. The survey results 100.00% show that all the surveyed consumers believe that there has been no change in crop output and yield after the No Change Agree implementation of KHUSHY.

Source: IMM Analysis

122 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 16.10: Crop Output & Yield NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total Statement DISCOM

The Crop output & yield 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% has yield has increased MGVCL 0 0 100 0 0 100 after implementation of KHUSHY scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.2.6 Agricultural Income

The perception regarding Agricultural Figure 16.12: Agricultural Income income can be depicted from the able, 0% however the overall outcome of the survey states that none of the consumers surveyed agree with the statement that the Agricultural income has increased after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme 100%

Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.11: Agricultural Income NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM Agricultural Income 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% has increased after 0 0 100 0 0 100 the implementation MGVCL of KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

123 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

16.2.2.7 Availability of Free Time

The perception regarding availability of free time, Figure 16.13: Availability of Free Time the overall outcome of the survey states that 100% of the surveyed consumers strongly agree 0% with the statement that the availability of free time after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

Table 16.12: Availability of Free Time NoChange Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Total

Statement DISCOM You get free time for yourself 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% after implementation of MGVCL 100 0 0 0 0 100 KHUSHY Scheme

Source: IMM Analysis

124 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

16.2.2.8 Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme

The perception regarding Overall satisfaction Figure 16.14: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme can be depicted from the table, however the overall outcome of the survey states that 0% 100% of the surveyed beneficiaries strongly agree with the statement that they are overall satisfied after the implementation of the KHUSHY scheme.

100%

Strongly Agree No Change

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.13: Overall Satisfaction with the KHUSHY Scheme

Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Change Agree Agree Total No

Statement DISCOM You are overall satisfied with the MGVCL 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% KHUSHY Scheme 100 0 0 0 0 100

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.3 Assessment of Tangible Benefits Accrued after implementation of KHUSHY

125 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

16.2.3.1 Transformer Failure

The perception regarding Transformer Figure 16.15: Transformer Failure (Times In a Year) Failure & Average no. of days per failure (across DISCOMs) can be depicted from the table. The survey 100 results show that more than 35% of 90 Before After 80 the customers experienced 70 transformer failures around 3-5 times 60 while other few experienced it more 50 than 5 times. After the implementation 40 30 of KHUSHY all the surveyed

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.14: Details on Transformer Failure Before and After KHUSHY Total No. of Beneficiaries Parameter DISCOM Surveyed Transformer Failure (No. of times) Before After Transformer failures before and after 0-2 3-5 > 5 0-2 3-5 >5 implementation of MGVCL 100 63% 35% 2% 100% 0% 0% KHUSHY 63 35 2 100 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

126 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 99% of the customers experienced 0-5 days loss due to each transformer failure. After the implementation of KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers experienced 0-5 days loss due to each transformer failure and also the rate of failure has decreased to 0-2 per year.

Figure 16.16: Average Number of Days Loss Per Failure 100 90 80 70 60

50 Before 40 After

Response (in %) 30 20 10 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20

Average No. of Days Loss per failure Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.15: Details on Average number of Days Loss per Failure Before and After KHUSHY No. of Paramet Beneficiaries er DISCOM Surveyed Average No. of Days Loss per Failure Average BEFORE AFTER No. of Days 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 > 20 Loss Per 99% 1% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Failure MGVCL 100 99 1 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

127 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

16.2.3.2 Motor Maintenance / Failure

The perception regarding Motor Maintenance & Average no. of days per Figure 16.17: Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) failure can be depicted from the table 100 The survey results show that more than 90 24% of the customers experienced 80 Before After motor failures of around 3-5 times while 70 other few experienced it more than 5 60 times. After the implementation of 50 KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers 40 experienced motor failures in the bracket of 0-2 times. The results hence Response (in %) 30 show that there has been a 20 considerable decrease in motor failure 10 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 0 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 Motor Maintenance per failure

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.16: Details on Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Motor BEFORE AFTER Maintenance/ 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 0-2 3-5 6-8 >8 Failure MGVCL 100 76% 24% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 76 24 0 0 100 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

128 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 16.18: Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

100 The survey results show that 100% of the 90 surveyed customers experienced 0-5 80 Before After days loss after each motor failure. After 70 the implementation of KHUSHY all of the 60 surveyed customers experienced day loss 50 after each motor failure in the bracket of 40 0-5 times. The results hence show that 30 Response (in %) (in Response 20 there has been a considerable decrease 10 in average day loss per motor failure after 0 the implementation of KHUSHY. 0-5 6-10 > 10 Avg. No. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.17: Details on Average no. of Days Loss per Maintenance/ Failure

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average no. BEFORE AFTER of Days Loss 0-5 6-10 > 10 0-5 6-10 > 10 per Maintenance/ MGVCL 100 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% Failure 100 0 0 100 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

129 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that more than 28% of the customers had to incur Figure 16.19: Average Expense per Failure (INR) expense in the bracket of INR 0-2000 due 100 to each motor failure while other 30% had 90 80 Before After to incur expense in the bracket of INR 70 6100-8000 due to each motor failure. After 60 50 the implementation of KHUSHY all of the 40 30 surveyed customers incurred expense in 20 10 the bracket of INR 0-2000 due to each Response (in %) 0 motor failure. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor failures after Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance the implementation of KHUSHY. Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.18: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Maintenance (INR)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Motor Maintenance / Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0- 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 0-2000 2100- 4100- 6100- > 8000 per 2000 4000 6000 8000 4000 6000 8000 Failure 28% 1% 0% 30% 41% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% due to MGVCL 100 Maintena 28 1 0 30 41 100 0 0 0 0 nce (INR)

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.3.3 Motor Starter Failure 100 Before After The perception regarding Motor starter failure & 90 Average no. of days per failure can be depicted 80 from the table The survey results show that before 70 the implementation of KHUSHY, more than 49% of 60 the customers experienced motor starter failures 50 around 2- 3 times/year. After the implementation of 40 KHUSHY all of the surveyed customers 30

Response %) (in experienced motor starter failure in the bracket of 20 0-1 times. The results hence show that there has 10 been a considerable decrease in motor starter 0 failure after the implementation of KHUSHY. 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Motor Starter Failure (No. of times /year)

130 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 16.19: Details on Motor Starter Failure (No/Year)

No. of DISCOM Beneficiari Parameter Motor starter Failure (Times In a Year) es Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Expense 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 per Failure MGVCL 100 51% 49% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% due to 51 49 0 0 100 0 0 0 Maintena nce (INR)

Figure 16.20: Average Number of Days Loss Per The survey results show that more than 49% of the Failure due to Motor Starter customers experienced 2-3 days loss due to each 100 motor starter failure while other few experienced more 90 than 3 days loss due to each motor starter failure. After 80 Before After the implementation of KHUSHY more 100% of the 70 60 surveyed customers experienced 0-1 day loss due to 50 each motor starter failure. The results hence show that 40 there has been a considerable decrease in average 30 20 day loss per motor starter failure after the Response (in %) 10 implementation of KHUSHY. 0 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Motor Starter Failure (No. of Days /year) Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.20: Details on Average Number of Days Loss per Failure due to Motor Starter

DISCOM Total No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed Average BEFORE AFTER Number of 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 0-1 2-3 4-5 >5 Days Loss Per Failure due to MGVCL 100 51% 49% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter 51 49 0 0 100 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

131 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

The survey results show that around 31% Figure 16.21: Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter of the customers had to incur expense in Failure (INR) the bracket of INR 0-500 due to each motor 100 failure while other 69% had to incur 90 expense in the bracket of INR >1500 after 80 Before After each motor failure. After the 70 implementation of KHUSHY all of the 60 surveyed customers incurred expense in 50 the bracket of INR 0-500 after each motor failure. The results hence show that there 40 has been a considerable decrease in 30

Response (in %) expense incurred on motor starter failures 20 after the implementation of KHUSHY. 10 0

Avg. Expense / Failure due to Maintenance

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.21: Details on Average Expense per Failure due to Motor Starter Failure (INR)

DISCOM No. of Parameter Beneficiaries Days Loss Per Failure (Times In a Year) Surveyed BEFORE AFTER Average 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 0-500 501- 1001- >1500 Expense per 1000 1500 1000 1500 Failure due to MGVCL 100 31% 0% 0% 69% 100% 0% 0% 0% Motor Starter Failure 31 0 0 69 100 0 0 0

Source: IMM Analysis

132 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

16.2.4 Single Phase Connection and Bore well Details

The figure below depicts that 62% of the total 100 surveyed beneficiaries do not have additional single phase connection whereas all are having Bore Well facility.

Figure 16.22: Additional Single Phase Connection Figure 16.23: Bore Well Facility - Yes No Yes No 38%

62%

100%

Source: IMM Analysis Source: IMM Analysis

Table 16.22: Additional single phase connection and Bore Well Details Additional Single Phase Connection Bore Well Facility DISCOM Yes No Yes No MGVCL 38 62 100 0

Source: IMM Analysis

16.2.5 View on continuation of the scheme

All of the 100 beneficiaries Figure 16.24: View on Continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat surveyed were happy & satisfied with the implementation of the KHUSHY Scheme and had expressed their interest and willingness in support and continuation of the scheme in other parts of the state aggressively.

Source: IMM Analysis

133 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Table 16.23: Views on continuation of the Scheme in other areas of Gujarat DISCOM Yes No MGVCL 100 0

Source: IMM Analysis

134 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 17 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY) – MGVCL

The consultants had devised a methodology to conduct the cost-benefit analysis which included segregating the various benefits under the tangible and intangible categories and drawing analysis on the information provided by individual distribution companies. The various benefits accrued by the distribution companies and the agricultural consumers are as shown in the figure.

Figure 17.1: Tangible and Intangible Benefits of KHUSHY

Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSHY)

Tangibe Benefits Intangible Benefits

° Reduction in T&D Losses ° Reduction in Transformer Failure ° Reduction in O&M Costs

Benefits to Agricultural Consumers

° Reduction in Motor Failure ° Increase in availability of free time ° Reduction in Starter Failure ° Increase in household and farm assets ° Reduction in Capacitor Failure

135 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

17.1 Implementation Details of KHUSHY

Table 17.1: KHUSHY Implementation Details

DISCOM Feeders Villages No. of Customers MGVCL 3 25 400

Source: IMM Analysis

17.2 Benefits Accrued Under KHUSHY

The distribution companies have accrued varied tangible and intangible benefits under KHUSHY. The assessments of the tangible benefits have been done on the basis of the year on year information provided by the individual DISCOMs. The broad tangible benefits accrued by the distribution companies under the scheme are as under ° Reduction in Transmission &Distribution (T&D) Losses ° Reduction in System Interruptions ° Decrease in O&M Costs

17.2.1 Transmission and Distribution Losses (MGVCL)

17.2.1.1 Units Sent Out and Units Billed

The figures on units sent out and units billed are a clear indication on the change in T&D losses. The percentage of units loss was in excess of 21% in the year ending 2006-07 which has dipped to 16% in the year ending 2012-13.

136 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Figure 17.2: MGVCL - Year-Wise % Units Loss Year-Wise % Units Loss

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

0% 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Year-Wise % Units Loss

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 17.2: Discom-Wise and Year-Wise Units Sent Out and Units Billed

Year Units Sent Out (MUs) Units Billed (MUs) Loss (MUs) % Dist. Loss 2006-07 11.4 9.0 2.4 21% 2007-08 12.9 9.7 3.3 25% 2008-09 13.6 10.8 2.8 21% 2009-10 14.0 11.7 2.3 16% 2010-11 10.9 9.3 1.6 15% 2011-12 13.1 11.4 1.7 13% 2012-13 14.3 11.9 2.3 16%

Source: IMM Analysis

137 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

17.2.1.2 Theoretical Loss

The percentage of Theoretical Loss was around 84% in the year ending 2007-08 which has dipped to 66% in the year ending 2012-13.

Figure 17.3: Year-Wise Theoretical Loss

100

90 % Theoretical Loss 80

0 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

The details of the % theoretical losses are as given in the below table

Table 17.3: Year Wise % Theoretical Loss

Discom 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 MGVCL - 84% 41% 55% 79% 69% 66% Theoretical Loss (%)

138 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

17.2.2 Transformer Failures (MGVCL)

17.2.2.1 Transformer Failure

Figure 17.4: PGVCL Year-Wise Transformer Failure

5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Transformer Failures

Source: IMM Analysis

The percentage of Transformer Failure as around 4% in the year ending 2007-08 which has dipped to 2 % in the year ending 2012-13.

Table 17.4: Year-Wise Details on % Transformer Failure

DISCOM 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 MGVCL - 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2%

17.3 Payback Period (MGVCL)

139 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

17.3.1 Selection of Baseline Loss/Sent Unit

The Average yearly losses/Sent Units from 2006-07 to the year of conversion into HVDS have been taken as the baseline loss for the calculation of payback period.

17.3.2 Selection of Cost Realization

For the current study the consultant are using the second option ie. Average Energy Charge Realization excluding Agriculture (as per GERC Filing)

17.3.3 Cost of Capital

Capital Source Cost of Capital % Energy Conservation Grant 0% Share Capital 12%

17.3.4 Savings due to reduction in Transformer Failures

140 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

17.4 Pay Back Calculations

Table 17.5: MGVCL – Payback Calculations (Dedicated Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders 3 No. of Transformers 263 Total Expenditure 1.99 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 3.49 Years Payback Year 2016-17

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 17.6: MGVCL – Payback Calculations (Scattered Feeders)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 2384 Total Expenditure 27.30 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 9.50 Years Payback Year 2022-23

Source: IMM Analysis

Table 17.7: MGVCL – Payback Calculations (Overall)

Particulars Units No. of Feeders - No. of Transformers 2910 Total Expenditure 29.29 INR Crores Base Year (1st Year) 2013-14 Payback Period 8.83 Years Payback Year 2021-22

Source: IMM Analysis

141 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL 18 Observations & Recommendations

18.1 Consumer Perception of KHUSHY

18.1.1 Overall Voltage Level/Quality

18.1.2 Line break/Unscheduled Breakdowns

The incidences of line breaks and unscheduled shutdowns have also drastically decreased after implementation of KHUSHY.

18.1.3 Incidence of Hooking

18.1.4 Crop Output & Yield

18.1.5 Transformer Failure

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in average days loss per transformer failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

142 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

18.1.6 Motor Failure

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in average days loss per motor failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor failures after the implementation of KHUSHY.

18.1.7 Motor Starter Failure

The survey results show that a major portion of the customers experienced motor starter failures around 2- 3 times/year while other few experienced it more than 3 times. After the implementation of KHUSHY all the surveyed customers experienced motor starter failure in the bracket of 0-1 times. The results hence show that there has been a considerable decrease in motor starter failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in average days loss per motor starter failure after the implementation of KHUSHY.

The results also show that there has been a considerable decrease in expense incurred on motor starter failures after the implementation of KHUSHY.

18.1.8 Bore Well

18.1.9 View on continuation of the scheme

Out of the 2865 beneficiaries surveyed, 99% of them are happy & satisfied with the implementation of the KHUSHY Scheme and have expressed their interest and willingness in support and continuation of the scheme in other parts of the state.

143 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

18.2 Estimated Monetary Benefit to Customers

The estimated yearly savings by the customers (across all discoms) on the cost incurred on motor failures and motor starter failures are as under

Table 18.1: Monetary Benefits Average no. of Average expense Number of Total Estimated Particulars INR Failures/Year incurred/customer/year Customers Savings/Year Average Savings in Motor 3233 2 6466 44286 28,63,53276 Failure Expenses after KHUSHY Average Savings in Motor 1126 1.6 1801 44286 7,97,85657 Starter Failure Expenses after KHUSHY Total INR 36,61,38934

It can be seen from the above table that there is a saving in excess of INR 360 Million to farmers only by way of reduction in motor and motor starter failure expenses. In addition to this there is man days savings which now is used by farmers in other productive work like different livelihood and more time spend with their family.

18.3 Cost Benefit Analysis for DISCOMs

The implementation of the scheme had resulted into significant benefit for two discoms (UGVCL & PGVCL). The payback of investment after considering the cost of capital associated with share capital is reasonable as per industry standards and practise for schemes which have far reaching social significance. The details of discom-wise investment, savings (MUs), estimated payback period is provided in the table below:

Table 18.2: Summary of Analysis Total Expenditure as on 31st March 2012- Payback Period Estimated 13 Base Year (1st from Base Year Paybac Savings ( in DISCOM (INR Crore) Year) ( IN YEARS) k Year MUS) DGVCL (Dedicated) 6.22 2013-14 15.48 2028-29 0.84 DGVCL (Scattered) 4.38 2013-14 53.11 2065-66 0.19 DGVCL (TOTAL) 10.59 2013-14 22.16 2034-35 1.03 MGVCL (Dedicated) 1.99 2013-14 3.49 2016-17 0.73 MGVCL (Scattered) 27.24 2013-14 9.50 2022-23 5.81 MGVCL (TOTAL) 29.23 2013-14 8.83 2021-22 6.54 PGVCL (Dedicated) 308.24 2013-14 3.20 2016-17 174.94 PGVCL(Scattered) 160.27 2013-14 12.91 2024-25 49.11 PGVCL (TOTAL) 468.51 2013-14 5.04 2018-19 224.05

144 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

Total Expenditure as on 31st March 2012- Payback Period Estimated 13 Base Year (1st from Base Year Paybac Savings ( in DISCOM (INR Crore) Year) ( IN YEARS) k Year MUS) UGVCL (Dedicated) 4.26 2013-14 14.93 2027-28 0.67 UGVCL (Scattered) 31.52 2013-14 18.76 2031-32 3.80 UGVCL (TOTAL) 35.78 2013-14 18.30 2031-32 4.47 TOTAL 544.11 - - - 236.09

Since the implementation of scheme has accrued monetary benefits for some of the discoms, the scheme should be implemented in line with rationale of converting high-loss Ag LVDS feeders into HVDS feeders. The focus and priority should be given to conversion of dedicated feeders over scattered pockets.

145 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Appendices

Appendix A. List of Feeders Covered Under KHUSHY ______147 Appendix B. Feeder Wise Change in Units Billed ______154 Appendix C. Feeder-Wise Details on Transformer Failure & Customer Complaints ______162 Appendix D. Questionnaire ______169

146 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Appendix A. List of Feeders Covered Under KHUSHY

The list of feeders covered under KHUSY and the corresponding details including Discom details, Circle, Division, Sub-Division, villages covered, number of consumers benefitted, number of transformers installed etc. are as given in the table:

147 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

148 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder Year of Completion No. of Installed Transformers PGVCL Amreli Una Una-2 Amodra 231 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Anandpur Amr 346 2012-13 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-1 Balnath 234 2011-12 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Batheshvar # 2010-11 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Bhavani 414 2010-11

PGVCL Amreli Amreli-2 Vadia Dhundhiya Pipaliya 181 2009-10 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Fafani 242 2010-11 PGVCL Amreli SKD Jafrabad Fichadi 347 2012-13 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Gaytri 284 2010-11 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar Gir Devali 378 2009-10 PGVCL Amreli Amreli-1 Amreli Rural Giriya 106 2012-13 PGVCL Amreli SKD Rajula Hindorana 176 2010-11 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Khodiyar # 2011-12 PGVCL Amreli Amreli-2 Dhari-2 Marvadi 116 2012-13 PGVCL Amreli Amreli-2 Chalala Morzar 143 2012-13 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Pichhava Ag 117 2009-10 PGVCL Amreli Una Kodinar-2 Satyanarayan # 2010-11 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Amreli Amreli-1 Babra Valaradi 162 2012-13 PGVCL Amreli Amreli-2 Kunkavav Vavdi Road 323 2010-11 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Bcw 195 2012-13 PGVCL Bhavnagar Mahuva Jesar Bhandariya 132 2010-11

PGVCL Bhavnagar Palitana Talaja Borda Ag 141 2009-10 PGVCL Bhavnagar Mahuva Mahuva R-2 Datha 159 2012-13 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar City-2 Ghogha Hathab 189 2012-13 PGVCL Bhavnagar Mahuva Jesar Hipavadli 78 2012-13 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar City-2 Mamsa Jaspara 322 2010-11 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Khodiyar 153 2008-09 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Vartej Khokhara 367 2009-10 PGVCL Bhavnagar Mahuva Mahuva R-2 Kotda 147 2010-11 PGVCL Bhavnagar Palitana Golidhal Navagam 39 2012-13 PGVCL Bhavnagar Palitana Talaja Padri 203 2012-13

149 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder Year of Completion No. of Installed Transformers PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Sanosara Pipardi Ag 142 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Bhavnagar Mahuva Jesar Vadal 111 2011-12 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhavnagar Rural Sanosara Vavadi 208 2010-11 PGVCL Bhuj Naliya Kothara Arjanpar Ag 60 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Anjar Anjar Rural-1 Bhalot Ag 61 2011-12

PGVCL Bhuj Anjar Anjar Rural Bhavanipar 103 2010-11 PGVCL Bhuj Anjar Anjar T Dabda 41 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Naliya Nakhtrana Devisar 98 2010-11 PGVCL Bhuj Mandvi Mundra Gelda 90 2011-12 PGVCL Bhuj Anjar Bhimasar Hamirpar 255 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Anjar Bhachau Kharoi 80 2010-11 PGVCL Bhuj Bhachau Rapar Khengarpar 97 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Bhuj Deshalpar Khirsara Ag 44 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Naliya Nakhtrana Mathal Ag 21 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Mandvi Dahisara Meghpar 73 2012-13 PGVCL Bhuj Mandvi Mundra Navinal 123 2010-11 PGVCL Bhuj Bhuj Madhapara Vavdi 14 2012-13 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Botad Botad Paliyad Babarkot 149 2009-10 PGVCL Botad Botad Botad (T-2) Dhakaniya 114 2011-12 PGVCL Botad Botad Barvala Mithapur Ag 151 2008-09 PGVCL Botad Gadhada Dhasa Patana 336 2008-09

PGVCL Botad Gadhada Gadhda-R Pipal 122 2012-13 PGVCL Botad Botad Botad (R) Ratanvav 21 2012-13 PGVCL Botad Gadhada DHASA Sitapar 95 2012-13 PGVCL Botad Botad Botad Zamrala Ag 31 2012-13 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar City-1 Hapa Aliyabada (New) 266 2008-09 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar Rural Kalavad West Bamangam 276 2010-11 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar City-2 Rural Dhandha Ag 196 2012-13 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Bhanavad Gunda 170 2010-11 PGVCL Jamnagar Khamabhalia Khamabhalia-R Hapa Lakhasar 124 2010-11 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Lalpur Haripar 153 2012-13

150 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder Year of Completion No. of Installed Transformers PGVCL Jamnagar Khamabhalia Vadatra SD Juvangadh 276 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Jamjhodpur West Mota Vadiya 101 2010-11 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar City-2 Sikka Padana 160 2012-13 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar Rural Dhrol SD Rampar 433 2012-13 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar Rural Kalavad East Sanala 291 2010-11

PGVCL Jamnagar Jamjhodpur Jamjhodpur East Sidsar 183 2010-11 PGVCL Jamnagar Jamnagar City-2 Hapa Theba Ag. 174 2012-13 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Akolvadi Amblash 157 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Junagadh-2 Vanthali Balot (Naredi) 223 2011-12 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Talala Bhalchel 145 2012-13 PGVCL Junagadh Junagadh-1 Bhesan Bhatgam 165 2012-13 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Dari Navapara 255 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Pranchi Gorakhmadhi 260 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Govindpara (Old Talala) 185 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Harnasha 267 2012-13 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval P. Patan Khodiyar Jnd 153 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Akolvadi Kodidra 223 2010-11 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Junagadh Junagadh-1 VSR-2 Leriya Ag 218 2012-13 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Pranchi Moradia 227 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Talala Pipalava 401 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Akolvadi Raydi (Rampara) 141 2010-11

PGVCL Junagadh Junagadh City GIDC Junagadh Sonrakh 11 2012-13 PGVCL Junagadh Veraval Pranchi Sunderpara 300 2010-11 PGVCL Junagadh Junagadh-1 Bilkha Swami 257 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Sara Ambardi 60 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Morbi Tankara Ambavadi 110 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Morbi Morbi Rural Balwam 74 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Charadva Chupani 146 2010-11 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Dhavana 31 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Morbi Tankara Hadmatia Ag 179 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Wankaner Wankaner Rural-1 Holmadh 150 2012-13

151 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder Year of Completion No. of Installed Transformers PGVCL Morbi Halvad Sara Jay Bhavani 66 2010-11 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Sara Jay Bhole 86 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Kansari 41 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Merupar 17 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Charadva Om 35 2012-13

PGVCL Morbi Halvad Sara Pavan 90 2010-11 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Sara Ranipat 61 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Wankaner Wankaner Rural-2 Ratadia 49 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Wankaner Wankaner Rural-2 Samtherava 155 2010-11 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Halvad Town Shivlaheri 40 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Sara Sundari 101 2012-13 PGVCL Morbi Halvad Charadva Sundergadh 127 2010-11 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-2 Keshod-O&M-1 Amarnath 302 2010-11 PGVCL Porbandar Porbandar Rural Ranavav Boradi 185 2012-13 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-2 Mangrol(R) Chakivav 331 2010-11

PGVCL Porbandar Porbandar Rural Bagvadar Chamunda 149 2012-13 (KHUSH Yojana PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-O&M-2 Chorwad Devgam 207 2010-11 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Porbandar Mangrol Madhavpur Diwasa 73 2011-12 PGVCL Porbandar Kutiyana RURAL Khodiyar Pbr 143 2012-13 PGVCL Porbandar Porbandar Rural Bagvadar Mariya 116 2012-13 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-1 Rural-1 Nonjalvav 207 2012-13

PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-2 Keshod-O&M-1 Nunarda 162 2010-11 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-2 Mangrol(R) Satmarg 175 2010-11 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-2 Mangrol(R) Shepa 453 2010-11 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-1 Keshod-O&M-1 Shergadh 322 2011-12 PGVCL Porbandar Keshod-O&M-2 Mangrol(T) Water Works 240 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot City Rajkot City-3 Rajkot Rural Sub-Div Nakarawadi 218 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot City Rajkot City-3 Madhapar Sub-Div Rangpar 220 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Dhoraji (R) Bateshwar 287 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Gondal Kotda Bhadva 195 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Jetpur (R) Dedarva 154 2012-13

152 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder Year of Completion No. of Installed Transformers PGVCL Rajkot Rural Gondal Lodhika Devda 427 2010-11 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Gondal Vasavad Devgam Rrc 213 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Jasdan Sardhar Gadhka 264 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Jasdan Jasdan Godladhar 128 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Jetpur (R) Haripar Rrc 63 2010-11

PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Jamkandorana Kobeshwar 181 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Jasdan Jasdan Lilapur 128 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dhoraji Navagadh Lunagara 328 2011-12 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajkot Rural Div LODHIKA Makhavad 172 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Gondal Rural-2 Mevasha 172 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajkot Rural Div Paddhari Mota Rampar 279 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajkot City-3 Mpsd Rajdan 272 2011-12 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajkot City-3 RSD Ranpur 151 2012-13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Jasdan Vinchhiya Sanali 252 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajkot City-3 RSD Sanosara 168 2010-11 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajkot Rural Div Paddhari Thoriyali 349 2010-11 PGVCL Surendranagar Dhangadhra Dhangadhra Rural Akalvad 48 2012-13 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Anandpur 164 2010-11 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Muli Bali 62 2010-11 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 Chuda Borana 202 2008-09 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Dada # 2011-12

PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Devgadh # 2011-12 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Fulgram 307 2008-09 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Gebinath 64 2012-13 PGVCL Surendranagar Dhangadhra Bavli Jayshakti 53 2009-10 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 Chuda Keriya 72 2012-13 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Than Khakharathal 106 2011-12 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Muli Khatdi 155 2010-11 PGVCL Surendranagar Dhangadhra Rajsitapur Meghdev 25 2011-12 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Nagadka 81 2012-13 PGVCL Surendranagar Dhangadhra Bavli Narichana 54 2012-13

153 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report Benefit AnCost Discom Circle Division Sub-Division Feeder Year of Completion No. of Installed Transformers PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 LSDR Navi Morvad # 2008-09 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Sayla Noli 202 2010-11 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 SRSD Pandavra 121 2011-12 PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-2 Muli Ramperda 36 2010-11

PGVCL Surendranagar Surendranagar-1 LSDR Sardar # 2008-09 KisanHitUrja Shakti(KHUSH of alysis Yojana

PGVCL Surendranagar Dhangadhra Bavli Siddhanath 58 2009-10

rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Appendix B. Feeder Wise Change in Units Billed

The Feeder-wise change in units billed after implementation of KHUSHY is as given in the table:

154 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

155 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS) 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Amreli Amodra 2.82 3.57 4.67 5.23 4.53 5.87 5.79 2.15 2.89 2.91 2.92 2.98 3.27 4.35 PGVCL Amreli Anandpur Amr 6.59 7.05 8.36 6.07 6.07 7.60 11.06 3.59 3.45 3.55 3.55 4.35 4.35 5.44 PGVCL Amreli Balnath 5.52 7.23 7.56 8.52 8.77 8.83 9.10 1.83 3.28 3.39 3.75 4.40 4.77 5.76

PGVCL Amreli Batheshvar # PGVCL Amreli Bhavani 5.59 6.49 7.01 8.51 5.58 3.43 4.11 1.23 2.36 2.54 2.59 3.03 1.21 1.45 Dhundhiya PGVCL Amreli 4.20 5.72 5.87 6.80 4.45 5.52 6.38 2.07 2.89 3.22 3.29 4.16 4.66 4.91 Pipaliya PGVCL Amreli Fafani 3.24 3.88 4.09 4.66 3.39 3.15 3.34 0.51 1.02 1.22 1.31 2.11 2.35 2.58 PGVCL Amreli Fichadi 1.65 2.15 1.80 2.06 1.82 4.01 2.42 1.50 1.83 2.00 2.24 1.87 2.28 2.42 PGVCL Amreli Gaytri 5.07 5.26 5.39 6.71 5.55 6.04 4.55 0.87 1.71 1.80 1.84 1.96 3.38 2.56 PGVCL Amreli Gir Devali 5.46 6.22 6.60 8.38 5.18 4.53 4.51 1.40 2.35 2.61 2.68 3.86 2.58 2.69 PGVCL Amreli Giriya 0.00 0.00 4.03 5.98 4.35 3.72 4.13 0.00 0.00 1.43 2.03 1.81 1.97 2.87 PGVCL Amreli Hindorana 1.42 2.42 2.33 1.77 1.50 1.76 2.43 0.81 1.10 1.16 1.52 1.63 1.91 2.28 PGVCL Amreli Khodiyar # rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx

PGVCL Amreli Marvadi 4.06 5.26 5.48 7.70 3.58 5.05 6.02 1.55 3.17 2.98 3.08 1.59 1.73 2.59 na(KHUSH PGVCL Amreli Morzar 4.85 5.85 6.61 7.04 4.86 5.96 8.06 1.92 2.86 3.10 2.59 2.01 2.16 3.78 PGVCL Amreli Pichhava Ag 1.06 3.09 2.53 2.75 1.86 2.13 2.29 2.47 2.47 0.58 1.07 1.08 1.12 1.23 PGVCL Amreli Satyanarayan #

PGVCL Amreli Valaradi 1.42 2.92 3.14 4.04 4.34 4.48 3.59 1.36 1.66 1.89 1.82 2.18 2.37 2.67 PGVCL Amreli Vavdi Road 2.32 5.80 3.31 5.85 5.19 6.38 3.77 1.79 2.48 1.81 2.81 3.33 4.68 3.78 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bcw 2.38 3.01 3.54 6.36 5.45 5.55 7.43 1.40 3.10 3.21 3.40 3.59 3.71 4.06 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhandariya 0.00 0.00 2.58 2.64 1.63 2.28 3.39 0.00 0.00 0.80 1.29 1.36 1.47 2.02 PGVCL Bhavnagar Borda Ag 2.72 2.70 2.45 1.35 1.47 1.84 1.23 1.17 1.09 1.10 0.63 1.01 1.11 1.06 PGVCL Bhavnagar Datha 3.98 4.14 3.93 2.64 2.23 2.86 3.80 1.74 1.26 1.31 0.25 0.54 0.56 1.58 PGVCL Bhavnagar Hathab 2.48 3.02 3.68 4.47 3.81 4.03 4.79 0.29 0.18 0.91 1.27 1.50 1.88 2.43 PGVCL Bhavnagar Hipavadli 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.10 2.71 4.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.62 1.04 PGVCL Bhavnagar Jaspara 3.54 3.62 3.69 4.00 3.15 2.64 2.55 0.52 0.58 0.81 2.13 2.50 2.59 2.65

156 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS) 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Bhavnagar Khodiyar 5.54 5.11 3.73 5.04 4.29 4.83 6.06 3.09 3.47 4.70 4.72 3.68 3.72 4.02 PGVCL Bhavnagar Khokhara 4.40 4.20 4.50 4.09 3.84 4.92 5.43 1.41 2.24 2.66 3.38 4.01 4.53 4.44 PGVCL Bhavnagar Kotda 4.97 4.54 4.21 2.66 2.06 2.85 3.66 2.46 2.11 2.01 1.53 1.89 1.99 2.25

PGVCL Bhavnagar Navagam 3.36 3.90 4.93 2.68 0.81 0.92 1.11 2.72 2.96 2.96 2.07 0.32 0.34 0.46 PGVCL Bhavnagar Padri 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.11 2.61 3.38 2.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 1.17 1.05 1.20 PGVCL Bhavnagar Pipardi Ag 2.46 2.58 2.57 3.65 3.63 4.49 1.41 0.93 0.88 0.83 0.43 0.43 1.24 0.64 PGVCL Bhavnagar Vadal 6.25 5.78 6.45 6.59 4.43 5.28 6.48 1.07 0.82 0.95 0.83 0.64 1.44 3.15 PGVCL Bhavnagar Vavadi 2.63 2.90 3.37 5.12 3.94 4.49 4.77 0.81 0.79 0.82 2.66 2.98 3.32 3.29 PGVCL Bhuj Arjanpar Ag 6.06 7.13 8.43 9.09 8.78 9.66 9.62 0.00 0.28 2.72 3.60 3.86 4.57 6.27 PGVCL Bhuj Bhalot Ag 6.08 5.87 3.87 4.14 3.74 4.21 4.61 1.30 2.04 1.40 1.37 1.28 1.51 2.46 PGVCL Bhuj Bhavanipar 0.00 1.34 6.91 7.99 6.31 5.30 6.86 0.00 0.28 1.71 1.81 2.38 1.98 3.48 PGVCL Bhuj Dabda 4.24 4.42 4.72 5.45 4.86 5.42 5.96 3.21 3.72 3.95 4.54 4.29 3.79 3.91 PGVCL Bhuj Devisar 4.32 5.44 6.18 6.79 5.49 6.04 8.91 1.54 1.70 2.24 2.62 3.12 3.31 5.47 PGVCL Bhuj Gelda 7.31 7.76 7.74 8.71 7.57 8.15 9.96 3.80 3.68 3.65 3.80 4.01 4.33 6.95 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Bhuj Hamirpar 5.74 7.99 7.50 7.59 6.09 6.53 8.05 3.06 2.82 2.53 2.62 2.50 2.56 3.27 na(KHUSH PGVCL Bhuj Kharoi 6.75 7.81 7.98 9.82 4.63 3.80 5.12 2.21 2.67 3.38 4.22 4.61 4.50 2.24 PGVCL Bhuj Khengarpar 5.26 5.87 4.75 5.29 6.04 7.09 9.08 0.75 0.72 0.76 0.73 0.38 0.53 0.78 PGVCL Bhuj Khirsara Ag 3.31 4.93 5.18 5.56 4.67 5.29 5.76 1.28 1.28 1.62 1.66 1.68 1.79 2.77

PGVCL Bhuj Mathal Ag 5.79 0.00 6.02 5.64 5.02 4.84 6.76 5.73 4.99 2.17 2.24 2.27 3.36 5.70 PGVCL Bhuj Meghpar 5.89 6.21 6.52 6.93 6.17 6.43 7.69 3.41 3.46 3.54 3.71 3.97 4.30 4.82 PGVCL Bhuj Navinal 8.95 9.70 10.04 10.48 9.44 5.07 6.84 4.19 4.31 4.36 4.76 5.05 3.66 4.21 PGVCL Bhuj Vavdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.78 4.48 6.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 2.12 2.31 PGVCL Botad Babarkot 0.00 2.05 2.70 3.03 1.95 2.32 1.77 0.00 0.29 0.87 1.92 1.88 1.94 1.90 PGVCL Botad Dhakaniya 0.00 1.35 1.79 2.79 2.76 3.04 2.58 0.00 5.09 3.35 2.00 2.32 2.56 2.85 PGVCL Botad Mithapur Ag 2.38 3.09 2.71 4.00 2.39 2.27 2.41 0.91 1.20 1.40 2.07 1.97 1.86 1.96 PGVCL Botad Patana 4.70 4.57 4.67 2.03 0.69 0.85 1.19 2.86 3.03 2.81 2.72 0.93 1.09 1.19 PGVCL Botad Pipal 0.00 2.27 1.99 2.85 1.99 2.20 2.74 0.00 1.89 1.59 1.54 1.60 0.97 3.22

157 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS) 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Botad Ratanvav 2.08 1.84 1.72 2.87 1.58 1.48 1.18 1.08 1.24 1.38 1.67 1.12 1.12 1.28 PGVCL Botad Sitapar 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.04 2.39 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.92 1.20 1.69 PGVCL Botad Zamrala Ag 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.37 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.92 1.43

PGVCL Jamnagar Aliyabada (New) 3.26 3.10 4.13 5.14 4.30 4.68 1.16 2.28 3.13 3.20 3.90 4.02 4.90 2.29 PGVCL Jamnagar Bamangam 4.53 4.41 5.18 6.10 4.50 5.19 4.89 0.70 0.76 1.91 2.67 3.71 4.17 4.29 PGVCL Jamnagar Dhandha Ag 0.00 1.08 3.38 4.79 3.92 4.86 5.38 0.00 0.42 0.90 0.95 0.99 1.19 1.19 PGVCL Jamnagar Gunda 3.53 3.51 4.66 4.08 2.72 4.36 2.73 0.42 1.32 1.44 3.34 3.34 3.83 2.71 PGVCL Jamnagar Hapa Lakhasar 4.11 7.64 8.15 6.37 4.30 4.73 5.48 0.32 0.69 1.08 1.93 1.88 2.18 2.25 PGVCL Jamnagar Haripar 0.68 0.68 2.00 2.33 1.18 1.61 2.03 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.96 0.96 1.19 1.21 PGVCL Jamnagar Juvangadh 4.79 3.03 3.43 3.97 2.79 4.34 5.87 1.70 1.21 1.59 1.07 0.29 0.42 0.31 PGVCL Jamnagar Mota Vadiya 1.17 2.03 2.23 2.58 2.44 2.54 2.93 0.63 0.65 0.73 0.82 0.71 0.91 1.18 PGVCL Jamnagar Padana 2.03 1.92 2.50 2.88 2.57 3.19 3.42 1.66 0.98 0.89 0.84 0.79 0.92 1.04 PGVCL Jamnagar Rampar 0.85 4.86 4.70 5.54 4.54 5.07 5.24 0.15 1.29 1.69 1.70 1.82 2.03 2.18 PGVCL Jamnagar Sanala 4.15 4.45 6.06 4.21 1.15 1.44 3.21 0.76 1.01 2.98 2.75 2.08 2.11 2.03 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Jamnagar Sidsar 3.68 3.79 4.62 5.69 4.15 2.79 2.72 1.78 1.88 2.07 2.32 2.25 2.66 3.30 na(KHUSH PGVCL Jamnagar Theba Ag. 0.00 0.00 0.99 2.92 2.52 2.93 3.29 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.33 0.18 0.21 1.62 PGVCL Junagadh Amblash 4.64 5.28 4.81 5.90 4.22 4.49 4.43 3.45 2.58 2.56 2.88 2.93 3.13 3.90 PGVCL Junagadh Balot (Naredi) 3.96 2.68 3.00 3.93 2.38 3.18 3.68 1.91 0.52 0.53 1.85 1.50 1.71 2.16

PGVCL Junagadh Bhalchel 1.83 1.85 1.99 2.90 2.17 1.94 2.28 0.82 0.75 0.78 0.79 0.83 0.94 1.17 PGVCL Junagadh Bhatgam 4.14 4.16 4.40 7.08 3.10 3.53 4.15 1.87 2.36 2.80 3.36 1.65 1.28 1.48 PGVCL Junagadh Dari Navapara 5.93 6.95 8.51 4.02 5.67 6.14 7.05 3.88 3.35 3.35 1.94 2.92 2.94 3.49 PGVCL Junagadh Gorakhmadhi 6.06 7.21 7.58 8.93 7.16 8.63 8.30 2.57 2.57 2.75 3.53 3.76 4.19 4.92 Govindpara (Old PGVCL Junagadh 4.36 6.35 7.68 7.70 6.42 4.00 3.81 2.10 2.94 2.99 3.11 3.20 2.62 2.66 Talala) PGVCL Junagadh Harnasha 4.03 3.13 4.00 6.04 5.32 5.89 8.40 2.20 1.77 1.79 1.83 1.96 1.92 2.36 PGVCL Junagadh Khodiyar Jnd 6.11 6.72 6.46 7.73 6.72 7.71 7.68 2.01 2.76 2.68 2.75 2.73 3.07 3.64 PGVCL Junagadh Kodidra 4.01 5.10 5.82 5.23 4.51 3.10 3.33 2.90 3.03 3.02 3.22 3.30 2.00 2.42

158 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit U AnalysisCost of Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS) 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Junagadh Leriya Ag 5.33 5.05 4.80 5.77 3.30 5.18 5.31 2.43 2.25 2.08 2.21 2.09 2.55 2.55 PGVCL Junagadh Moradia 6.87 6.45 6.89 8.02 6.06 6.42 4.65 1.85 1.93 1.98 2.39 2.44 2.83 3.13 PGVCL Junagadh Pipalava 9.77 8.72 7.04 8.34 6.23 7.23 7.57 3.07 3.56 3.72 3.40 3.72 3.93 4.60

PGVCL Junagadh Raydi (Rampara) 8.33 9.08 8.53 8.47 6.63 6.56 5.25 3.33 2.97 3.20 3.23 3.12 3.56 3.86 PGVCL Junagadh Sonrakh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.16 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.12 PGVCL Junagadh Sunderpara 4.96 6.96 6.25 7.18 5.93 8.17 7.81 1.93 1.38 1.44 1.77 1.85 2.09 2.72 PGVCL Junagadh Swami 0.00 0.00 1.80 4.04 2.63 3.32 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.97 1.56 1.34 1.29 1.81 PGVCL Morbi Ambardi 7.01 5.45 4.55 10.39 9.01 9.30 10.85 2.82 2.89 3.07 3.36 3.56 3.90 5.03 PGVCL Morbi Ambavadi 0.06 2.32 3.16 3.99 3.59 3.94 5.80 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.16 1.94 4.05

PGVCL Morbi Balwam 1.71 4.37 4.35 5.32 4.03 4.28 6.87 1.02 1.30 1.31 1.30 2.34 3.05 4.11 Shaktirja(KHUSH Yojana PGVCL Morbi Chupani 12.82 13.29 12.89 14.45 13.78 17.36 21.81 6.18 6.15 6.67 6.93 7.93 9.09 12.22 PGVCL Morbi Dhavana 0.00 7.94 7.90 9.23 10.36 5.06 6.83 0.00 3.61 4.00 3.95 4.30 4.60 2.46 PGVCL Morbi Hadmatia Ag 2.78 3.28 3.68 3.19 2.31 2.38 3.43 0.72 0.74 0.70 0.76 0.69 0.76 1.77 PGVCL Morbi Holmadh 3.00 2.98 3.35 2.94 1.84 2.14 3.14 0.14 0.13 3.16 2.95 1.06 1.10 2.90 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Morbi Jay Bhavani 8.19 8.03 7.20 5.34 4.85 4.46 5.64 2.88 2.94 3.05 3.29 2.48 2.12 3.01 PGVCL Morbi Jay Bhole 0.00 0.20 2.84 6.68 5.58 7.38 10.79 0.00 0.08 0.50 0.46 2.02 3.22 4.08 PGVCL Morbi Kansari 5.41 5.39 5.12 6.61 4.62 4.56 6.20 1.00 1.53 1.60 1.69 1.87 1.90 3.47 PGVCL Morbi Merupar 0.00 7.16 7.17 8.69 8.15 8.19 9.89 0.00 2.91 2.97 3.09 3.25 4.01 5.57

PGVCL Morbi Om 3.13 2.98 2.64 3.17 2.89 4.77 5.87 0.43 0.50 0.85 1.38 1.50 1.60 2.34 PGVCL Morbi Pavan 7.38 8.37 9.29 10.05 8.65 5.45 4.68 3.17 3.23 3.62 3.76 4.06 4.28 3.34 PGVCL Morbi Ranipat 0.00 5.48 6.00 7.43 6.67 5.95 6.20 0.00 1.18 1.33 1.53 1.84 2.07 1.67 PGVCL Morbi Ratadia 5.46 5.63 5.55 7.33 2.32 2.92 3.89 0.26 0.37 0.88 1.70 0.67 0.84 2.43 PGVCL Morbi Samtherava 3.69 6.36 6.66 7.72 6.20 7.55 8.93 1.98 2.24 2.30 2.84 2.76 3.32 5.36 PGVCL Morbi Shivlaheri 5.88 8.16 8.65 10.89 8.32 6.46 7.33 2.16 2.23 2.43 2.57 2.97 2.97 4.42 PGVCL Morbi Sundari 6.77 8.11 7.94 9.46 8.05 8.53 7.37 1.45 1.59 1.72 1.95 2.14 2.27 2.42 PGVCL Morbi Sundergadh 7.74 8.13 7.34 6.51 6.41 6.99 9.07 4.58 4.40 4.59 3.23 4.94 5.11 6.03 PGVCL Porbandar Amarnath 0.00 2.56 2.88 3.29 2.62 1.98 2.32 0.00 0.82 0.71 2.18 2.17 1.86 1.92

159 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS) 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Porbandar Boradi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 2.62 6.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.79 2.65 PGVCL Porbandar Chakivav 2.35 3.49 3.94 4.73 3.77 4.39 4.40 0.82 1.60 1.68 2.35 2.38 2.46 2.53 PGVCL Porbandar Chamunda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 1.52 2.14 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 1.09 1.12 1.10

PGVCL Porbandar Devgam 3.42 4.02 3.60 4.28 3.78 3.73 3.01 2.61 1.90 2.00 1.91 1.88 2.24 2.33 PGVCL Porbandar Diwasa 1.28 1.00 1.22 1.38 1.30 1.49 1.48 0.55 0.62 0.65 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.70 PGVCL Porbandar Khodiyar Pbr 0.00 1.35 2.76 3.11 2.64 2.92 3.52 0.00 0.07 0.87 0.95 0.91 1.29 2.09 PGVCL Porbandar Mariya 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.96 1.10 1.99 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.57 1.06 1.14 1.14 PGVCL Porbandar Nonjalvav 4.86 3.22 3.48 4.80 2.95 4.18 6.24 1.98 1.90 2.04 2.47 2.37 2.80 2.94 PGVCL Porbandar Nunarda 0.00 1.25 0.75 1.66 1.35 1.61 1.64 0.00 0.97 0.18 0.55 0.53 0.46 1.12 PGVCL Porbandar Satmarg 2.11 2.67 2.93 3.33 2.23 2.46 2.68 0.88 1.61 1.31 1.06 1.03 1.12 1.15 PGVCL Porbandar Shepa 3.42 3.93 5.94 6.62 5.12 5.24 5.13 2.75 3.39 3.85 4.36 4.23 3.95 4.05 PGVCL Porbandar Shergadh 1.87 2.90 3.10 3.72 2.83 2.97 3.05 1.29 1.67 1.72 2.03 2.56 3.08 3.66 PGVCL Porbandar Water Works 2.91 3.69 3.76 4.01 3.40 3.86 4.01 2.08 2.23 2.25 2.34 2.29 2.46 2.39 PGVCL Rajkot City Nakarawadi 2.90 4.32 4.56 4.33 2.71 3.47 0.00 0.00 1.49 2.67 2.32 2.04 2.60 0.00 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Rajkot City Rangpar 3.59 3.05 3.24 4.39 2.77 3.48 0.00 0.72 1.72 1.82 2.24 2.07 1.99 0.00 na(KHUSH PGVCL Rajkot Rural Bateshwar 0.00 1.10 2.80 5.12 2.08 1.97 2.35 0.00 1.15 1.49 1.58 1.55 1.73 1.97 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Bhadva 4.51 4.44 3.78 3.48 2.57 3.16 3.25 2.72 2.34 2.51 2.17 2.17 2.48 2.74 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dedarva 2.02 3.32 3.40 5.22 3.95 5.67 5.94 1.19 1.79 1.97 2.37 2.39 3.06 2.92

PGVCL Rajkot Rural Devda 5.84 2.46 5.14 4.02 2.93 1.49 1.25 0.01 0.24 0.50 1.50 1.93 1.16 1.06 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Devgam Rrc 4.67 5.52 6.28 6.01 3.58 3.75 4.39 0.98 1.11 0.95 1.07 1.21 1.66 2.15 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Gadhka 0.60 2.85 3.42 3.71 2.43 2.67 2.51 0.17 1.27 1.30 2.24 2.11 2.25 2.74 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Godladhar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 1.64 1.82 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.89 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Haripar Rrc 0.00 0.68 2.00 2.33 1.18 1.61 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.95 0.96 1.19 1.21 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Kobeshwar 0.00 0.00 1.75 3.10 2.20 3.22 2.96 0.00 0.00 0.61 2.47 2.33 2.32 2.93 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Lilapur 5.85 5.93 5.82 2.68 2.10 2.54 2.88 2.39 2.09 2.36 1.01 1.13 1.17 1.51 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Lunagara 0.00 0.00 1.61 2.12 2.16 3.03 2.02 0.00 0.00 1.26 2.26 2.30 2.72 2.38 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Makhavad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 1.59 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.11 1.14

160 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report Cost Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS)

2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis(K of Yojana P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Mevasha 2.70 4.20 1.23 2.44 3.62 4.16 3.72 3.66 3.07 0.47 0.06 0.65 1.11 1.02 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Mota Rampar 2.27 3.12 3.34 3.24 3.42 3.86 4.09 2.14 2.13 2.38 2.60 2.39 2.59 3.09 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajdan 8.00 4.62 4.63 5.26 3.49 4.69 3.60 1.17 1.70 1.91 2.63 2.43 2.70 2.42

PGVCL Rajkot Rural Ranpur 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 3.25 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.29 1.42 0.00 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Sanali 3.01 3.24 3.70 3.56 3.28 1.67 0.93 0.30 0.26 0.81 1.72 1.81 2.07 0.98 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Sanosara 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 1.95 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.83 1.82 2.15 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Thoriyali 3.97 4.21 4.43 5.07 4.08 4.58 6.04 1.56 1.68 1.93 2.22 2.73 3.43 5.03 PGVCL Surendranagar Akalvad 0.00 0.38 4.21 4.91 4.11 5.16 6.92 0.00 0.11 1.28 1.78 2.02 2.34 3.11 PGVCL Surendranagar Anandpur 6.59 7.05 8.36 6.07 6.07 7.60 11.06 3.59 3.45 3.55 4.35 4.35 4.35 5.44 PGVCL Surendranagar Bali 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.27 5.31 7.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 1.37 1.69 PGVCL Surendranagar Borana 4.28 2.75 1.68 1.39 2.09 2.22 2.16 1.17 1.04 1.15 1.72 2.09 2.28 2.46 PGVCL Surendranagar Dada # PGVCL Surendranagar Devgadh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 PGVCL Surendranagar Fulgram 4.31 4.78 4.06 3.52 2.96 1.12 0.80 2.98 2.87 3.04 3.44 3.66 2.02 1.49 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Surendranagar Gebinath 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 3.07 3.64 5.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.05 1.31 2.41 PGVCL Surendranagar Jayshakti 7.32 7.75 6.73 4.78 4.63 4.89 6.56 2.35 2.27 1.67 1.87 2.69 3.11 3.70 HUSH PGVCL Surendranagar Keriya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.90 0.91 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.44 0.47 0.71 PGVCL Surendranagar Khakharathal 8.93 9.65 10.80 10.84 7.47 5.89 8.41 3.87 4.00 4.07 4.35 4.61 4.20 4.20

PGVCL Surendranagar Khatdi 6.52 7.69 7.80 8.13 6.34 7.16 10.93 3.43 3.20 3.20 3.60 3.10 3.38 3.92 PGVCL Surendranagar Meghdev 0.00 3.28 3.68 4.12 3.75 4.34 5.85 0.00 0.62 1.21 1.40 1.60 1.90 2.89 PGVCL Surendranagar Nagadka 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.41 3.66 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 1.23 1.73 PGVCL Surendranagar Narichana 8.64 7.95 8.30 9.52 9.23 11.65 10.58 4.19 3.76 4.16 4.66 3.85 3.42 4.49 PGVCL Surendranagar Navi Morvad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.52 PGVCL Surendranagar Noli 6.58 5.76 4.39 3.82 3.85 4.39 3.85 2.04 1.92 1.80 1.77 1.19 1.46 1.96 PGVCL Surendranagar Pandavra 5.52 5.52 6.18 7.15 5.80 6.50 7.85 2.57 2.55 2.61 2.75 2.76 3.03 3.82 PGVCL Surendranagar Ramperda 9.26 8.73 6.94 8.07 1.69 3.95 6.40 3.03 2.89 1.91 2.26 1.33 1.62 2.05 PGVCL Surendranagar Sardar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 1.80

161 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Units Send (MuS) Units Billed (MuS) 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 Discom Circle Feeder 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 PGVCL Surendranagar Siddhanath 10.03 10.25 7.03 6.02 5.23 5.48 7.39 3.14 3.02 2.70 1.93 2.83 3.09 3.40

DGVCL Valsad Mendharbhat 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.18 1.97 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.44 0.45 0.48

DGVCL Bharuch Pariyej - - 3.64 5.04 4.60 5.05 4.23 - - 3.10 3.58 3.73 3.83 3.89

DGVCL Valsad Rumla 8.09 2.57 1.92 2.18 2.78 2.91 2.63 3.54 2.40 1.57 1.73 1.58 1.67 1.69

DGVCL Bharuch Karena - - - - 5.26 5.15 5.20 - - - - 3.80 4.10 3.91 DGVCL Bharuch Danda - - - - - 4.71 4.94 - - - - - 4.22 4.30 DGVCL Surat Rural Siker Ag Dom - - 3.17 4.31 3.90 3.78 2.62 - - 0.52 1.03 0.72 0.76 1.90 DGVCL Valsad Maroli Rural 6.01 2.71 2.61 2.65 2.73 2.93 1.72 1.30 0.74 0.65 0.58 0.54 0.50 0.29 MGVCL Anand Pansora 3.59 3.51 4.29 4.07 2.37 2.69 3.10 2.55 2.26 2.93 3.24 2.05 2.28 2.53 MGVCL Anand Dagjipura 2.27 3.22 3.29 3.76 3.43 4.01 4.70 1.01 1.92 2.51 3.00 2.84 3.44 3.57 MGVCL Anand Kasor 3.10 2.95 3.24 3.84 3.47 4.66 4.13 2.95 2.24 2.55 3.17 2.74 3.92 3.51 Gangadas nu rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx

MGVCL Nadiad na(KHUSH Muvado - 3.66 3.85 5.60 4.75 4.85 4.87 - 2.52 2.68 2.71 2.79 3.11 2.77 UGCVL Mehsana Mahiyal 2.09 2.15 2.22 2.56 2.19 2.44 2.67 2.03 2.10 2.15 2.37 2.49 2.25 2.58 UGCVL Mehsana Koita 6.81 5.08 4.07 4.96 4.38 4.36 5.40 5.81 3.88 3.88 4.15 4.10 4.10 4.30 UGCVL Mehsana Delvada 0.78 3.37 4.78 5.97 5.29 5.99 7.31 0.70 2.48 3.94 4.74 5.12 5.35 5.60

UGCVL Palanpur Rampura - 1.22 1.05 1.23 1.05 1.15 1.39 - 1.14 1.23 1.06 1.09 1.14 1.19 UGCVL Palanpur Sejalpura - 1.15 1.05 1.17 0.98 1.12 1.25 - 1.18 1.18 1.11 1.13 1.19 1.20 UGCVL Hinatnagar Arsoda 2.58 2.53 1.99 2.12 1.90 2.12 2.19 2.43 1.50 1.57 1.76 1.77 1.83 1.97 UGCVL Hinatnagar Katpur 2.06 2.38 3.25 5.50 4.96 4.49 4.77 1.97 1.92 2.33 4.24 4.35 3.81 3.86

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Appendix C. Feeder-Wise Details on Transformer Failure & Customer Complaints

The Feeder-wise details on transformer failure and customer interruptions are as given in the table:

162 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

163 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Year-Wise Transformer Failures

Discom Circle Feeder 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Amreli Amodra 38 43 35 47 47 47 13 PGVCL Amreli Anandpur Amr 15 18 23 18 18 17 12 PGVCL Amreli Balnath 37 46 34 45 43 6 6

PGVCL Amreli Batheshvar # PGVCL Amreli Bhavani 17 15 27 20 14 12 9 PGVCL Amreli Dhundhiya Pipaliya 25 28 27 8 7 15 15 PGVCL Amreli Fafani 21 23 38 21 13 11 11 PGVCL Amreli Fichadi 28 24 17 15 10 11 2 PGVCL Amreli Gaytri 19 21 33 25 13 16 22 PGVCL Amreli Gir Devali 17 18 19 12 13 13 9 PGVCL Amreli Giriya 0 0 49 45 57 34 7 PGVCL Amreli Hindorana 56 59 58 14 8 8 14 PGVCL Amreli Khodiyar # PGVCL Amreli Marvadi 0 0 47 52 43 40 37 PGVCL Amreli Morzar 72 56 60 45 40 38 38 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KH PGVCL Amreli Pichhava Ag 32 36 27 24 16 18 17 PGVCL Amreli Satyanarayan #

PGVCL Amreli Valaradi 0 0 26 24 26 23 7 USH PGVCL Amreli Vavdi Road 0 0 21 11 0 11 11

PGVCL Bhavnagar Bcw 0 0 0 0 8 5 2 PGVCL Bhavnagar Bhandariya 60 60 17 10 10 PGVCL Bhavnagar Borda Ag 0 42 126 21 7 6 9 PGVCL Bhavnagar Datha 0 0 0 0 24 9 1 PGVCL Bhavnagar Hathab 0 0 0 0 20 18 15 PGVCL Bhavnagar Hipavadli 2 2 2 PGVCL Bhavnagar Jaspara 0 58 81 67 10 4 4 PGVCL Bhavnagar Khodiyar 0 12 7 6 11 7 1 PGVCL Bhavnagar Khokhara 0 15 8 6 4 2 2

164 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Year-Wise Transformer Failures

Discom Circle Feeder 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Bhavnagar Kotda 0 22 64 14 1 4 3 PGVCL Bhavnagar Navagam 0 0 0 0 15 9 9 PGVCL Bhavnagar Padri 22 18 18

PGVCL Bhavnagar Pipardi Ag 0 0 0 0 12 8 8 PGVCL Bhavnagar Vadal 0 0 0 0 18 3 1 PGVCL Bhavnagar Vavadi 0 18 29 20 5 7 7 PGVCL Bhuj Arjanpar Ag 28 25 23 15 21 21 19 PGVCL Bhuj Bhalot Ag 0 0 3 3 15 10 11 PGVCL Bhuj Bhavanipar 0 0 2 8 21 21 3 PGVCL Bhuj Dabda 0 0 0 3 9 9 12 PGVCL Bhuj Devisar 24 16 20 14 14 10 10 PGVCL Bhuj Gelda 29 28 21 19 18 25 10 PGVCL Bhuj Hamirpar 14 13 14 12 12 13 11 PGVCL Bhuj Kharoi 13 12 10 9 11 8 8 PGVCL Bhuj Khengarpar 15 13 13 15 10 12 9 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Bhuj Khirsara Ag 13 13 12 13 16 11 8 PGVCL Bhuj Mathal Ag 20 16 16 15 11 7 12 PGVCL Bhuj Meghpar 30 21 28 35 27 27 30 PGVCL Bhuj Navinal 23 22 21 19 13 10 13

PGVCL Bhuj Vavdi 17 15 11 PGVCL Botad Babarkot 33 11 3 2 2 PGVCL Botad Dhakaniya 12 3 2 PGVCL Botad Mithapur Ag 38 20 3 5 9 3 PGVCL Botad Patana 12 4 5 16 13 6 PGVCL Botad Pipal 10 9 4 PGVCL Botad Ratanvav 17 5 11 PGVCL Botad Sitapar 6 7 7 PGVCL Botad Zamrala Ag 3 7

165 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report Benefit AnalysisCost of Year-Wise Transformer Failures

Discom Circle Feeder 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Jamnagar Aliyabada (New) 39 59 4 12 5 5 8 PGVCL Jamnagar Bamangam 61 26 24 8 7 6 6 PGVCL Jamnagar Dhandha Ag 74 74 42 39 52 32 9

PGVCL Jamnagar Gunda 38 34 30 26 42 28 20 PGVCL Jamnagar Hapa Lakhasar 49 51 48 43 10 12 5 PGVCL Jamnagar Haripar 34 81 67 64 45 39 24

PGVCL Jamnagar Juvangadh 60 51 53 69 65 59 34 KisanHitUrja Shakti(KHUSH Yojana PGVCL Jamnagar Mota Vadiya 76 72 61 56 15 8 8 PGVCL Jamnagar Padana 90 62 41 27 32 37 9 PGVCL Jamnagar Rampar 35 38 26 39 37 11 2 PGVCL Jamnagar Sanala 57 51 24 27 34 25 10 PGVCL Jamnagar Sidsar 84 64 76 65 64 61 17 PGVCL Jamnagar Theba Ag. 23 23 23 33 17 17 6 PGVCL Junagadh Amblash 11 10 9 11 17 15 16 PGVCL Junagadh Balot (Naredi) 10 8 10 12 10 9 8 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx PGVCL Junagadh Bhalchel 6 3 2 2 3 3 5 PGVCL Junagadh Bhatgam 5 9 16 14 13 17 12 PGVCL Junagadh Dari Navapara 12 11 11 11 11 10 10 PGVCL Junagadh Gorakhmadhi 14 14 14 14 16 15 18

PGVCL Junagadh Govindpara (Old Talala) 10 9 10 9 9 8 12 PGVCL Junagadh Harnasha 10 8 8 7 9 8 9 PGVCL Junagadh Khodiyar Jnd 10 9 10 9 10 10 12 PGVCL Junagadh Kodidra 8 7 6 9 15 14 14 PGVCL Junagadh Leriya Ag 12 13 13 17 15 16 9 PGVCL Junagadh Moradia 12 10 9 13 18 16 15 PGVCL Junagadh Pipalava 12 13 12 14 23 21 22 PGVCL Junagadh Raydi (Rampara) 10 11 11 12 13 12 14 PGVCL Junagadh Sonrakh 0 0 0 0 0 2 1

166 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Year-Wise Transformer Failures

Discom Circle Feeder 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Junagadh Sunderpara 12 11 10 12 17 15 14 PGVCL Junagadh Swami 0 0 0 5 9 9 4 PGVCL Morbi Ambardi 10 10 9 9 9 7 3

PGVCL Morbi Ambavadi 9 9 8 7 6 5 2 PGVCL Morbi Balwam 13 13 10 10 6 4 2 PGVCL Morbi Chupani 21 21 19 21 4 7 3 PGVCL Morbi Dhavana 8 7 7 6 4 2 2 PGVCL Morbi Hadmatia Ag 6 6 6 5 4 6 5 PGVCL Morbi Holmadh 9 8 8 7 7 7 3 PGVCL Morbi Jay Bhavani 32 18 31 33 9 10 6 PGVCL Morbi Jay Bhole 11 12 11 10 10 3 3 PGVCL Morbi Kansari 10 10 8 8 8 9 6 PGVCL Morbi Merupar 11 10 10 8 7 3 7 PGVCL Morbi Om 11 8 7 7 6 7 4 PGVCL Morbi Pavan 44 29 40 38 6 4 8 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Morbi Ranipat 7 8 6 6 6 6 2 PGVCL Morbi Ratadia 10 9 9 9 9 4 4 PGVCL Morbi Samtherava 39 18 30 44 7 6 8 PGVCL Morbi Shivlaheri 8 8 8 7 7 5 5

PGVCL Morbi Sundari 9 9 9 8 8 6 1 PGVCL Morbi Sundergadh 17 11 17 16 9 10 6 PGVCL Porbandar Amarnath 55 47 37 16 18 10 PGVCL Porbandar Boradi 27 22 7 PGVCL Porbandar Chakivav 25 24 45 53 3 11 14 PGVCL Porbandar Chamunda 41 41 86 7 PGVCL Porbandar Devgam 27 23 52 31 11 18 10 PGVCL Porbandar Diwasa 50 33 40 27 36 4 38 PGVCL Porbandar Khodiyar Pbr 68 72 94 6

167 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Year-Wise Transformer Failures

Discom Circle Feeder 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Porbandar Mariya 17 27 36 36 22 24 9 PGVCL Porbandar Nonjalvav 29 29 30 11 12 10 14 PGVCL Porbandar Nunarda 10 12 19 11 6 9 1

PGVCL Porbandar Satmarg 21 19 20 8 3 3 7 PGVCL Porbandar Shepa 15 22 25 24 49 11 6 PGVCL Porbandar Shergadh 38 40 35 43 4 7 11 PGVCL Porbandar Water Works 27 23 52 31 11 18 10 PGVCL Rajkot City Nakarawadi 12 10 11 14 13 17 PGVCL Rajkot City Rangpar 14 16 10 8 9 13 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Bateshwar 9 9 9 12 9 16 7 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Bhadva 40 34 16 9 23 12 10 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Dedarva 14 13 11 10 10 10 5 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Devda 20 20 16 7 3 3 2 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Devgam Rrc 27 23 52 31 11 18 10 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Gadhka 52 33 38 33 9 2 2 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Rajkot Rural Godladhar 13 13 13 8 21 8 3 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Haripar Rrc 134 81 67 64 45 39 24 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Kobeshwar 79 79 79 90 22 13 10 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Lilapur 63 59 23 9 10 3 2

PGVCL Rajkot Rural Lunagara 9 9 9 9 12 9 8 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Makhavad 22 22 22 22 22 6 3 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Mevasha 38 30 33 40 16 30 8 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Mota Rampar 32 31 44 29 33 19 10 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Rajdan 46 35 35 30 3 5 10 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Ranpur 22 14 13 2 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Sanali 14 9 4 3 17 3 3 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Sanosara 14 9 4 3 17 3 3 PGVCL Rajkot Rural Thoriyali 20 35 34 15 6 7 15

168 CONFIDENTIAL Final Report KisanHitBenefit Urja ShaktiAnalysis Cost of Yoja Year-Wise Transformer Failures

Discom Circle Feeder 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Repo MCB/ISA/A/0/010 April2014 PGVCL Surendranagar Akalvad 0 34 34 21 15 9 7 PGVCL Surendranagar Anandpur 15 0 23 18 18 17 12 PGVCL Surendranagar Bali 0 0 0 2 19 27 34

PGVCL Surendranagar Borana 38 55 4 2 5 1 2 PGVCL Surendranagar Dada # PGVCL Surendranagar Devgadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 PGVCL Surendranagar Fulgram 37 40 3 4 3 27 11 PGVCL Surendranagar Gebinath 0 0 0 13 21 20 11 PGVCL Surendranagar Jayshakti 52 52 44 30 20 14 15 PGVCL Surendranagar Keriya 0 0 0 14 9 8 3 PGVCL Surendranagar Khakharathal 22 21 27 20 23 29 11 PGVCL Surendranagar Khatdi 34 16 10 45 20 47 34 PGVCL Surendranagar Meghdev 0 59 59 31 19 9 8 PGVCL Surendranagar Nagadka 0 0 0 0 10 8 5 PGVCL Surendranagar Narichana 38 38 17 24 19 15 16 rt\GUVNL- KHUSHYFinal- Report-V3.docx na(KHUSH PGVCL Surendranagar Navi Morvad 0 0 0 0 12 14 10 PGVCL Surendranagar Noli 15 10 18 23 13 12 10 PGVCL Surendranagar Pandavra 20 19 13 28 22 19 22 PGVCL Surendranagar Ramperda 40 25 17 38 43 31 31

PGVCL Surendranagar Sardar 0 0 0 0 15 13 9 PGVCL Surendranagar Siddhanath 47 47 54 40 15 10 14

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL Appendix D. Questionnaire

169 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx

Cost Benefit Analysis of Kisan Hit Urja Shakti Yojana (KHUSH Final Report CONFIDENTIAL

170 MCB/ISA/A/0/0 10 April 2014 P:\Ahmedabad\AMC\PROJECTS\326672AA01\Documents\Report\GUVNL - KHUSHY - Final Report-V3.docx