DOCSLIB.ORG

Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Grant Three Rural Definitions Lewis Wahkiakum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Grant Three Rural Definitions Lewis Wahkiakum Kitsap Okanogan Okanogan Mason Ferry Pend Oreille King Chelan Stevens Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Grant Three rural definitions Lewis Wahkiakum based on Census Clatsop Adams Cowlitz Benewah Yakima Columbia Places Whitman Skamania Franklin Clark Latah Tillamook Washington Benton Multnomah Klickitat Garfield Walla Walla Columbia Yamhill Hood River Nez Perce Asotin Clackamas Lewis Polk Rural locations are those outside Sherman Lincoln Marion Gilliam Census Places with a population... Wasco Morrow Umatilla Benton Wallowa Linn ...greater than or equal to 2,500 Union Idaho Jefferson Wheeler Outside Census Places >= 2,500 people Lane Grant Baker Adams ...greater than or equal to 10,000 Crook Deschutes Coos Douglas Outside Census Places >= 2,500 people Washington Valley Census Places: 2,500 - 9,999 Payette Gem Curry ...greater than or equal to 50,000 Boise Josephine Canyon Klamath Outside Census Places >= 2,500 people Jackson Lake Harney Ada Malheur Census Places: 2,500 - 9,999 Del Norte Elmore Census Places: 10,000 - 49,999 Siskiyou Owyhee Urban locations under all Modoc Humboldt three defintions: Trinity Washoe Census Places: >= 50,000 people Shasta Humboldt Lassen Elko Tehama Pershing For more information on definitions, Mendocino Plumas see documentation Kitsap Okanogan Okanogan Mason Ferry Pend Oreille King Chelan Stevens Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Grant Three rural definitions Lewis Wahkiakum based on Census Clatsop Adams Cowlitz Benewah Yakima Columbia Urban Areas Whitman Skamania Franklin Clark Latah Tillamook Washington Benton Multnomah Klickitat Garfield Walla Walla Columbia Yamhill Hood River Nez Perce Asotin Clackamas Lewis Polk Rural locations are those Sherman Lincoln Marion Gilliam outside Census Urban Areas Wasco Morrow Umatilla Benton with a population... Wallowa Linn Union Idaho Jefferson ...greater than or equal to 2,500 Wheeler Lane Outside Census Urban Areas >= 2,500 Grant Baker Adams Crook Deschutes ...greater than or equal to 10,000 Coos Douglas Washington Valley Outside Census Urban Areas >= 2,500 Census Urban Areas: 2,500 - 9,999 Payette Gem Curry Boise ...greater than or equal to 50,000 Josephine Canyon Jackson Klamath Lake Harney Ada Outside Census Urban Areas >= 2,500 Malheur Census Urban Areas: 2,500 - 9,999 Del Norte Elmore Census Urban Areas: 10,000 - 49,999 Siskiyou Owyhee Modoc Urban locations under all Humboldt three definitions: Trinity Washoe Census Urban Areas: >= 50,000 Shasta Humboldt Lassen Elko Tehama Pershing For more information on definitions, Mendocino Plumas see documentation Kitsap Okanogan Okanogan Mason Ferry Pend Oreille King Chelan Stevens Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Grant Rural definition based Lewis Wahkiakum Clatsop Adams on Office of Management Cowlitz Benewah Yakima Columbia Whitman and Budget (OMB) Skamania Franklin Clark Latah Tillamook metro counties Washington Benton Multnomah Klickitat Garfield Walla Walla Columbia Yamhill Hood River Nez Perce Asotin Clackamas Lewis Polk Sherman Lincoln Gilliam Marion Wasco Umatilla Rural: Nonmetro county Morrow Benton Urban: OMB metro county Wallowa Linn Union Idaho Jefferson Wheeler Lane Grant Baker Adams Crook Deschutes Coos Douglas Washington Valley Payette Gem Curry Boise Josephine Canyon Jackson Klamath Lake Harney Ada Malheur Del Norte Elmore Siskiyou Owyhee Modoc Humboldt Trinity Washoe Shasta Humboldt Lassen Elko Tehama Pershing For more information on definitions, Mendocino Plumas see documentation Kitsap Okanogan Okanogan Mason Ferry Pend Oreille King Chelan Stevens Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Rural definition based Grant Lewis Wahkiakum on Economic Adams Clatsop Cowlitz Benewah Yakima Columbia Research Service Whitman Skamania Franklin Clark Latah Tillamook Rural-Urban Washington Benton Multnomah Klickitat Garfield Walla Walla Columbia Commuting Yamhill Hood River Nez Perce Asotin Clackamas Lewis Areas (RUCA) Polk Sherman Lincoln Marion Gilliam Wasco Morrow Umatilla Benton Rural: RUCA tracts with codes 4-10 Wallowa Linn Union Idaho Urban: RUCA tracts with codes 1-3 Jefferson Wheeler Lane Grant Baker Adams Crook Deschutes Coos Douglas Washington Valley Payette Gem Curry Boise Josephine Canyon Jackson Klamath Lake Harney Ada Malheur Del Norte Elmore Siskiyou Owyhee Modoc Humboldt Trinity Washoe Shasta Humboldt Lassen Elko Tehama Pershing For more information on definitions, Mendocino Plumas see documentation Kitsap Okanogan Okanogan Mason Ferry Pend Oreille King Chelan Stevens Oregon Grays Harbor Douglas Bonner Thurston Pierce Lincoln Pacific Kittitas Spokane Grant Lewis The USDA Business and Wahkiakum Clatsop Adams Cowlitz Benewah Yakima Industry ineligible Columbia Whitman Skamania Franklin locations are Census Clark Latah Tillamook Washington Benton Multnomah Klickitat Garfield Places greater than Walla Walla Columbia Yamhill Hood River Nez Perce Asotin 50,000 people and their Lewis Clackamas Polk Sherman Lincoln Marion Gilliam adjacent and contiguous Wasco Morrow Umatilla Benton Urbanized Areas Wallowa Linn Union Idaho Jefferson Wheeler Rural Lane Grant Baker Adams Urban: USDA B&I ineligible locations Crook Deschutes Coos Douglas Washington Valley Payette Gem Curry Boise Josephine Canyon Jackson Klamath Lake Harney Ada Malheur Del Norte Elmore Siskiyou Owyhee Modoc Humboldt Trinity Washoe Shasta Humboldt Lassen Elko Tehama Pershing For more information on definitions, Mendocino Plumas see documentation Rural Population Indicators for United States, 2000 Rural definition (see details in data appendix) ERS RUCA USDA B&I Rural is defined as areas Census Places with a Census Urban Areas with OMB metro tract codes ineligible outside… population ≥ a population ≥ counties 1-3 locations U.S. total 2,500 10,000 50,000 2,500 10,000 50,000 Population Total population considered rural (million) 87.7 115.8 177 59.1 70.6 89.5 48.8 57.6 101.9 281.4 Percent of population considered rural 31.1 41.1 62.9 21 25.1 31.8 17.4 20.5 36.2 N/A Percent of land area considered rural 97 97.9 99 97.4 97.6 98 74.6 81.2 97.9 N/A Population density (people/sq mile) 25.6 33.4 50.5 17.1 20.4 25.8 18.5 20 29.4 79.6 Age Percent younger than 18 26 25.9 25.7 26.1 26 25.7 25.2 25.3 25.6 25.6 Percent 19 to 64 61.5 61 61.1 61.1 60.8 60.7 59.9 59.9 60.7 61.9 Percent 65 or older 12.5 13.1 13.1 12.8 13.2 13.6 15 14.8 13.7 12.4 Ethnicity Percent non-Hispanic Black 6.9 7.2 8.3 5.9 6.6 7.2 8.4 8.4 7.5 12 Percent American Indian 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.8 1.8 1.3 0.7 Percent Hispanic 5 5.8 7.8 4 4.8 6.1 5.3 6.6 6.4 12.5 Education Percent not completing high school 19.2 19.1 18.4 21.2 21.6 21.8 23.5 23.7 21.4 19.6 Percent completing high school only 33.7 33.1 31.2 36.2 35.8 35 35.9 35.5 34.5 28.6 Percent with only some college 20.4 20.5 21 20.1 20.1 20.3 19.7 19.8 20.5 21 Percent with a college degree or higher 26.8 27.3 29.4 22.5 22.4 22.9 20.8 21 23.6 30.7 Rural Population Indicators for United States, 2000 Rural definition (see details in data appendix) ERS RUCA USDA B&I Rural is defined as areas Census Places with a Census Urban Areas with OMB metro tract codes ineligible outside… population ≥ a population ≥ counties 1-3 locations U.S. total 2,500 10,000 50,000 2,500 10,000 50,000 Income Average household income ($1,000) 56 56 57 51 50 49 43 43 49 57 Percent in near-poverty households 8 8.2 8 9 9.3 9.6 10.9 10.9 9.5 8.6 Percent in below-poverty households 9.9 10.3 10.5 11 11.7 12.5 14.8 14.8 12.5 12.4 Percent in deep-poverty households 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.1 5.2 5.6 Employment Percent in agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, mining industries 4 3.5 2.6 5.6 5.2 4.7 5.7 5.6 4.3 1.9 Percent traveling > 1/2 hour to work 10.3 9.9 9.8 10.3 9.8 8.9 6.6 6.6 8.5 10.4 Housing Percent seasonal housing 7 6.2 4.7 8.9 8.1 7 8.5 8.2 6.8 3.3 Percent without complete plumbing 2 1.7 1.3 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.5 2.4 1.9 1.2 Houshold composition Percent 65 and older and living alone 25 26.4 27.2 25.2 26.5 27.6 29.3 29.3 27.8 28.2 Percent own children under 18 in female-headed houshold 13.5 14.9 16.5 12.8 14.4 16.2 18.6 18.8 16.9 20 Rural Population Indicators for Oregon, 2000 Rural definition (see details in data appendix) ERS RUCA USDA B&I Rural is defined as areas Census Places with a Census Urban Areas with OMB metro tract codes ineligible outside… population ≥ a population ≥ counties 1-3 locations State total 2,500 10,000 50,000 2,500 10,000 50,000 Population Total population considered rural (million) 1.0 1.4 2.2 0.7 0.9 1.4 0.8 1.0 1.5 3.4 Percent of population considered rural 29.7 41.4 64.7 21.3 27.5 42.2 23.5 29.1 43.9 N/A Percent of land area considered rural 99.1 99.3 99.6 98.9 99.1 99.3 81.9 86.3 99.3 N/A Population density (people/sq mile) 10.7 14.9 23.1 7.7 9.9 15.2 10.2 12.0 15.7 35.6 Age Percent younger than 18 24.6 25.1 25.5 24.4 24.8 25.3 24.7 24.9 25.1 24.7 Percent 19 to 64 61.1 60.6 61.0 61.1 60.4 59.7 58.7 58.9 60.1 62.5 Percent 65 or older 14.3 14.3 13.6 14.5 14.8 15.0 16.5 16.2 14.8 12.8 Ethnicity Percent non-Hispanic Black 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.5 Percent American Indian 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.1 Percent Hispanic 5.2 6.5 7.5 4.3 5.6 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.4 8.0 Education Percent not completing high school 15.1 15.8 15.2 15.0 16.4 17.4 18.8 18.3 17.1 14.9 Percent completing high school only 29.7 29.4 28.0 30.5 30.9 30.9 32.3 32.1 30.4 26.3 Percent with only some college 27.8 27.7 27.6 28.0 27.8 27.5 27.0 27.1 27.3 27.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overview Lane County, Oregon
    Overview Lane County, Oregon Historical and Geographic Information Lane County was established in 1851 and is geographically situated on the west side of Oregon, about midway down the state’s coastline. It was named for Gen. Joseph Lane, a rugged frontier hero who was Oregon's first territorial governor. Pioneers traveling the Oregon Trail in the late 1840’s came to Lane County mainly to farm. The county's first district court met under a large oak tree until a clerk's office could be built in 1852. A few years later, the first courthouse opened in what is now downtown Eugene. With the building of the railroads, the market for timber opened in the 1880’s. The county encompasses 4,722 square miles and, in many ways, typifies Oregon. The county’s lands are geographically a microcosm of the state – ranging from rugged glaciated mountains in the east, through a broad valley spreading across the Willamette River mid- county, to a beautiful and rugged coastline along the western edge. It is one of two Oregon counties that extend from the Pacific Ocean to the Cascades. Special points of interest include twenty historic covered bridges, Bohemia Mines, coastal sand dunes, Darlingtonia Botanical Wayside, numerous reservoirs, Heceta Head Lighthouse, Hendricks Park Rhododendron Garden, hot springs, Hult Center for the Performing Arts, Lane ESD Planetarium, McKenzie River, McKenzie Pass, Mt. Pisgah Arboretum, Old Town Florence, Pac-12 sports events, Proxy Falls, sea lion caves, vineyards and wineries, Waldo Lake, Washburne State Park tide pools, and Willamette Pass ski area. Lane County has 12 incorporated cities which include Coburg, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Dunes City, Eugene, Florence, Junction City, Lowell, Oakridge, Springfield, Veneta, and Westfir.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Lane County, Oregon
    Overview Lane County, Oregon Historical and Geographic Information Lane County was established in 1851 and is geographically situated on the west side of Oregon, about midway down the state’s coastline. It was named for Gen. Joseph Lane, a rugged frontier hero who was Oregon's first territorial governor. Pioneers traveling the Oregon Trail in the late 1840’s came to Lane County mainly to farm. The county's first district court met under a large oak tree until a clerk's office could be built in 1852. A few years later, the first courthouse opened in what is now downtown Eugene. With the building of the railroads, the market for timber opened in the 1880’s. The county encompasses 4,722 square miles and, in many ways, typifies Oregon. The county’s lands are geographically a microcosm of the state – ranging from rugged glaciated mountains in the east, through a broad valley spreading across the Willamette River mid- county, to a beautiful and rugged coastline along the western edge. It is one of two Oregon counties that extend from the Pacific Ocean to the Cascades. Special points of interest include twenty historic covered bridges, Bohemia Mines, coastal sand dunes, Darlingtonia Botanical Wayside, numerous reservoirs, Heceta Head Lighthouse, Hendricks Park Rhododendron Garden, hot springs, Hult Center for the Performing Arts, Lane ESD Planetarium, McKenzie River, McKenzie Pass, Mt. Pisgah Arboretum, Old Town Florence, Pac-12 sports events, Proxy Falls, sea lion caves, vineyards and wineries, Waldo Lake, Washburne State Park tide pools, and Willamette Pass ski area. Lane County has 12 incorporated cities which include Coburg, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Dunes City, Eugene, Florence, Junction City, Lowell, Oakridge, Springfield, Veneta, and Westfir.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: Putting Back the Missing Pieces
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 01-15 IDAHO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AUGUST 2001 RESTORING PALOUSE AND CANYON GRASSLANDS: PUTTING BACK THE MISSING PIECES Compiled and Edited by Bertie J. Weddell Restoring Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: Putting Back the Missing Pieces A. Restoration of Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: A Review. B.J. Weddell and J. Lichthardt B. Soil Biological fingerprints from Meadow Steppe and Steppe Communities with Native and Non-native Vegetation. B.J. Weddell, P. Frohne, and A.C. Kennedy C. Experimental Test of Microbial Biocontrol of Cheatgrass. B.J. Weddell, A. Kennedy, P. Frohne, and S. Higgins D. Experimental Test of the Effects of Erosion Control Blankets on the Survival of Bluebunch Wheatgrass Plugs. B.J. Weddell Complied and edited by Bertie J. Weddell dRaba Consulting 1415 NW State Street Pullman, WA 99163 March 2000 for the Bureau of Land Management Cottonwood Field Office Route 3, Box 181 Cottonwood, ID 83522 Table of Contents Contributors ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii Acknowledgments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iv Overview --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v 1. Restoration of Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: A Review, B.J. Weddell and J. Lichthardt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • OMB Bulletin No. 20-01 Appendix
    EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 March 6, 2020 0MB BULLETIN NO. 20-01 TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas 1. Purpose: This Bulletin and its Appendix ("the Bulletin") establish revised delineations for the Nation's Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas. The Bulletin also provides delineations of Metropolitan Divisions as well as delineations of New England City and Town Areas. This Bulletin and updates and supersedes 0MB Bulletin No. 18-04, issued on September 14, 2018. The Attachment to the Bulletin, "Updates to Statistical Areas," provides detailed information on the update of statistical areas since that time. The delineations of the statistical areas shown in the Appendix's nine lists take effect immediately. These delineations reflect the Standards for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas that the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) published on June 28, 2010, (75 FR 37246) and the application of those standards to Census Bureau population and journey-to-work data. The Bulletin also provides guidance on the use of the delineations of these statistical areas. 2. Background: Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. § 3504(e)(3), 31 U.S.C. § 1104(d), and Executive Order No. 10,253 (June 11, 1951), 0MB delineates Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Metropolitan Divisions, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, Combined Statistical Areas, and New England City and Town Areas for use in Federal statistical activities.
    [Show full text]
  • County Natural Resources Policy
    Crook County Oregon Natural Resources Policy Crook County Board of County Commissioners CROOK COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN REVISION 013 1 | Page Table of Contents Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Revision .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Severability ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Crook County Overview ............................................................................................................................... 6 Land Use & Management ......................................................................................................................... 8 Agriculture & Timber ............................................................................................................................... 9 Recreation & Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 10 Wilderness and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................................................................... 10 Principles for Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Central Oregon Economic Profile
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR CENTRAL OREGON 2019 CENTRAL OREGON ECONOMIC PROFILE 705 SW BONNETT WAY EDCOINFO.COM SUITE 1000 #EDCOINFO BEND, OR 97702 @EDCOINFO 541.388.3236 Table of Contents Welcome........................................................................................................ 2 Central Oregon Overview................................................................................ 3 Population..................................................................................................... 4 Move.............................................................................................................. 6 Relocate / Expand.......................................................................................... 7 Start................................................................................................................ 8 Entrepreneurial Support................................................................................. 9 Grow............................................................................................................... 10 Workforce...................................................................................................... 11 Delivering What Is Expected......................................................................... 12 Transportation............................................................................................... 13 Services / Infrastructure................................................................................ 14 Top Employers..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pandalus Jordani ) Recruitment from Environmental Models Robert W
    HANNAH: INDex TO ImpROve fOReCASTS Of OCeAN SHRImp CalCOfI Rep., vol. 51, 2010 Use of a pre-recrUit abUndance index to improve forecasts of ocean shrimp (Pandalus jordani ) recrUitment from environmental models ROBert W. HANNAH Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Hatfield Marine Science Center 2040 Se Marine Science Drive Newport, Oregon 97365, U.S.A. Tel.: +1 541 867 0300 ext. 231; Fax: +1 541 867 0311 email: [email protected] ABSTRACT northward to southward surface currents is forced by a I investigated the potential to improve forecasts of similar shift in the predominant coastal winds in early annual loge recruitment to the ocean shrimp (Pandalus spring, and is reflected in a sharp drop in coastal sea level jordani) fishery using a pre-recruit index based on the height (Huyer et al. 1979). An early transition (gener- percentage of age-zero shrimp from fishery samples in ally in March or early April), results in a lower mean the year prior to recruitment. The index was incorpo- April sea level height (fig. 1, Crescent City, California, rated into existing models in which loge age-1 recruit- ASLHt-1), which has been associated with strong age-1 ment is forced by environmental variables related to the recruitment of ocean shrimp in Oregon waters the spring transition in coastal currents (negative correlation following year (Hannah 1993). The mechanisms under- with April sea level height at Crescent City, Califor- lying this association are not well understood. How- nia, ASLHt-1) and the strength of April–July upwelling ever, an early spring transition, with associated coastal winds at 42˚N.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUR PRECIPITATION for OREGON Final Report
    REGIONAL PRECIPITATION-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL MAPPING OF 24- HOUR PRECIPITATION FOR OREGON Final Report SPR 656 REGIONAL PRECIPITATION-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL MAPPING OF 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION FOR OREGON Final Report SPR 656 by Melvin G. Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. and Bruce L. Barker P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants 7326 Boston Harbor Road NE Olympia, WA 98506 George H. Taylor CCM Oregon Climate Service, Oregon State University Strand Agriculture Hall 326 Corvallis, OR 97331 James R. Wallis Ph.D. Yale University 9 Hillhouse Avenue, ML8 New Haven, CT 06511 for Oregon Department of Transportation Research Unit 200 Hawthorne Ave. SE, Suite B-240 Salem OR 97301-5192 and Federal Highway Administration 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0003 January 2008 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. OR-RD-FHWA-08-05 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Regional Precipitation-Frequency Analysis and Spatial Mapping of 24-Hour January 2008 Precipitation for Oregon 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. MG Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. (MGS Engineering Consultants) BL Barker P.E. (MGS Engineering Consultants) GH Taylor CCM (Oregon Climate Service) JR Wallis Ph.D. (Yale University) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Oregon Department of Transportation Research Unit 11. Contract or Grant No. 200 Hawthorne Ave. SE, Suite B-240 Salem, OR 97301-5192 SPR 656 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Oregon Department of Transportation Final Report Research Unit and Federal Highway Administration 200 Hawthorne Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • How Economically Interdependent Is the Portland Metro Core with Its Rural Periphery? a Comparison Across Two Decades
    HOW ECONOMICALLY INTERDEPENDENT IS THE PORTLAND METRO CORE WITH ITS RURAL PERIPHERY? A COMPARISON ACROSS TWO DECADES. by David Holland, Paul Lewin, Bruce Sorte and Bruce Weber February 2009 Working Paper Number RSP 0901 Rural Studies Program Oregon State University 213 Ballard Extension Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 (541) 737-1442 [email protected] This paper is a revision of a paper prepared for the Toward One Oregon: Rural-Urban Interdependence Conference, November 14, 2008, Salem, Oregon David Holland is professor emeritus at the School of Economic Sciences at Washington State University, Pullman, Washington; Paul Lewin is a graduate student at the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Bruce Sorte is Community Economist in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Bruce Weber is Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University, Corvallis and Director of the Rural Studies Program 2 Introduction Rural areas in many parts of this country have lagged economically relative to urban centers for many decades. This has been true particularly in the Pacific Northwest. The relative vitality of urban centers has led some to suggest that rural areas and rural policy ought to pursue a strategy of strengthening rural-urban economic linkages (Porter, 2004, Dabson, 2007). Not very much is known, however, about the economic relationship between urban centers and their rural hinterlands. Better understanding of the linkages between rural and urban economies would aid policymakers in addressing interrelated problems such as declining economic opportunity in rural regions that is often combined with losses in quality of life in urban areas experiencing high rates of population growth (Harrison and Sieb, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics of the Portland-Vancouver MSA
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies 5-2010 Population Dynamics of the Portland-Vancouver MSA Webb Sprague Portland State University Emily Picha Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metropolitianstudies Part of the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Sprague, Webb and Picha, Emily, "Population Dynamics of the Portland-Vancouver MSA" (2010). Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications. 132. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metropolitianstudies/132 This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Population Dynamics of the Portland­Vancouver MSA Webb Sprague, Emily Picha May 2010 This article offers a descriptive overview of population dynamics in the Portland-Vancouver Article Outline Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The MSA includes five of Oregon’s 36 counties– 1. Population Growth over Time Clackamas, Columbia, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill, as well as Clark and Skamania 2. Components of Population Growth counties in the state of Washington (see Figure 1). (In 2007, the Portland-Vancouver- 3. Influence of International and Domestic Beaverton MSA was redefined to include Skamania County in Washington. For the sake of Immigration 4. Effect of Employment on Population comparability, we have therefore derived all historical data as if this definition has always Growth applied. Because of this change, many of our historical numbers may have shifted since the last 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Prineville & Crook County Profile
    Quick Reference 1 Top Employers & Industries 11 Telecommunication 22001177 2 Wage Information 11 Health & Emergency Services 3 Industry Mix 12 Travel Distance & Times PRINEVILLE & CROOK 4 Business Costs 12 Transportation COUNTY PROFILE 5 Employment Trends 14 Topography & Climate 5 Housing & Real Estate 15 Parks & Recreation 8 Valuations 14 Business Resources Prineville/Crook County Economic 8 Education 15 Entrepreneurial Landscape Development 10 Utilities 510 SE Lynn Blvd. Prineville, OR 97754 www.edcoinfo.com 541.233.2015 WELCOME TO PRINEVILLE! Established in 1868, Prineville is the oldest community in Central Oregon and one of the State’s first incorporated cities. Prineville’s economic origins are tied to the land in agriculture, forest products, the railroad, and manufacturing. Visit Prineville and surrounding areas in Crook County and you'll discover the heritage of a frontier town, the ideals of the area's family focus, and the pride of a community dedicated to progress. Community leaders are united in their efforts to grow and diversify Crook County’s economic base, assuring long-term economic vitality and providing residents with family-wage jobs. Both Apple and Facebook have data centers located in Crook County and have helped to reshape the business climate by adding a major high tech presence. Facebook has built one of the most energy-efficient data centers of its kind in the world. In terms of future growth, Prineville is well prepared with infrastructure in place for water and wastewater to support growth and development for decades to come. Prineville also offers inexpensive industrial land, some of the lowest-priced in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • US Census Data
    Latino Population Statistics: Central Oregon Compiled by the Latino Community Association (LCA) – Bend, Oregon *updated June 2016 Oregon State and Central Oregon 1990 Census - Latino Population Oregon State 112,707 (4% of total) Deschutes County, Oregon 1,526 (2% of total) Bend, Oregon 485/867 (2% of total) City/Division Redmond, Oregon 197/360 (2.4% of total) City/Division Jefferson County, Oregon 1,448 (10.5% of total) Madras, Oregon 739/1,038 (21.5% of total) City/Division Crook County 388 (2.7% of total) Prineville 138 (2.5% of total) 2000 Census - Latino Population Oregon State 275,314 (8% of total) (43.5% foreign born) Deschutes County, Oregon 4,304 (4.7% of total) (27.5% foreign born) Bend, Oregon 2,396 (4.6% of total) (35% foreign born) Redmond, Oregon 739 (5.5% of total) (24% foreign born) Jefferson County, Oregon 3,372 (17.7% of total) (56% foreign born) Madras, Oregon 1,815 (35% of total) (57% foreign born) Crook County 1,082 (5.6% of total) Prineville ------- 2010 Census - Latino Population Oregon State 450,062 (12% of total) Deschutes County, Oregon 11,718 (7.4% of total) Bend, Oregon 6,256 (8.2% of total) Redmond, Oregon 3,275 (12.5% of total) Jefferson County, Oregon 4,195 (19.3% of total) Madras, Oregon 2,330 (38.5% of total) Crook County 1,463 (7% of total) Prineville 1,258 (8.4% of total) 2015 American Community Survey - Latino Population Oregon State 511,680 (12.7% of total) Deschutes County, Oregon 13,846 (7.9% of total) Bend, Oregon 7,135 (8.2% of total) based on 2014 % of 2015 total Redmond, Oregon 3,754 (13.1% of
    [Show full text]