Natura 2000 and Forests 2000 Natura
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nature-Scorecard-Netherlands.Pdf
NATURE SCORE CARD The Netherlands Netherlands has been a member of the European Union since its founding. Its Natura 2000 network consists of 195 sites, covering 20603km2, all of which are terrestrial (13.29% of the land area) while marine NATURA 2000 sites are covering 15083km2. The below analysis and recommendations suggest that national authorities still need to make further efforts in order to fully implement the Birds and Habitats Directives and effective conservation of threatened species and habitats to be achieved on the ground. Transposition Site designation Management of sites (terrestrial) Avoid deterioration of sites, disturbance of species and implementation of appropriate assessments (terrestrial) Landscape connectivity Funding and resources Habitats and species monitoring Promotion of research Non-native species Stakeholder engagement, public participation and communication Species protection Management of sites (marine) Avoid deterioration of sites, disturbance of species and implementation of appropriate assessments (marine) ACTION PLAN FOR NATURE IN THE NETHERLANDS Transposition and designation Prevention of negative impacts Complete the process of the designation of Natura 2000 Determine and execute management plans for all sites sites, including the identification and designation of As soon as possible. marine SPAs (Brown Bank and other qualifying sites). Take action on species protection Climate change adaptation and nature have a natural synergy. Evaluate the nitrogen and nitrates policy on the Natura2000 targets taking into account the accumulating long term effects in the soil. Active management to achieve favourable conservation Funding status Finance true management costs Put results in management plans with automatic back- up actions Monitoring and research Stakeholder engagement Take action on surveillance, control and enforcement. -
Ecological Economics and Sustainable Forest Management: Developing a Transdisciplinary Approach for the Carpathian Mountains
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS AND SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT: DEVELOPING A TRANSDISCIPLINARY APPROACH FOR THE CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS Edited by I.P. Soloviy and W.S. Keeton Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Lviv © Ihor P. Soloviy and William S. Keeton © Ukrainian National Forestry University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Ukrainian National Forestry University Press Gen. Chuprynky 103 Lviv 79057 Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: developing a transdisciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains. Edited by I.P. Soloviy, W.S. Keeton. – Lviv : Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Liga-Pres, 2009. − 432 p. – Statistics: fig. 28, tables 67 , bibliography 686 . The modern scientific conceptions and approaches of ecological economics and sustainable forestry are presented in the book. The attention is given especially to the possibility of the integration of these concepts towards solving the real ecological and economic problems of mountain territories and its sustainable development. The ways of sustainability of forest sector approaching have been proposed using the Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains as a case study. The book will be a useful source for scientists and experts in the field of forest and environmental policies, forest economics and management, as well as for the broad nature conservation publicity. Printed and bound in Ukraine by Omelchenko V. G. LTD Kozelnytska 4, Lviv, Ukraine, phone + 38 0322 98 0380 ISBN 978-966-397-109-0 ЕКОЛОГІЧНА ЕКОНОМІКА ТА МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ СТАЛОГО ЛІСОВОГО ГОСПОДАРСТВА: РОЗВИТОК ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛІНАРНОГО ПІДХОДУ ДО КАРПАТСЬКИХ ГІР За науковою редакцією І. -
How Community Restoration and Management of Forests Can Help Meet Climate Goals EU Forests of Hope
1 How community restoration and management of forests can help meet climate goals EU Forests of Hope March 2020 2 Contents From ‘Forests in danger’ to ‘Forests of hope’! 3 Estonia 5 Vormsi church forest: a century ago and today France 8 A fair trade from the tree to the beam Latvia 10 Family run forestry shows a diverse range of benefits in Latvia Portugal 12 From forest to desert and back again! Galicia, Spain 14 Still working toward our Atlantic forest dream Sweden 18 Taking forestry back to the future Ireland 21 Monoculture Sitka spruce plantations dominate Ireland’s forest landscapes. But a movement to transform them is growing Acknowledgments This publication was written by members of civil society, NGOs and researchers from EU MemberStates, and compiled and edited by Fern. Thank you to Martin Luiga and Estonian Forest Aid; Algor Streng; Reseau Alternatives Forestieres’ Anne Berthet and Collectif Bois 07; Janis Rozitis and Pasaules Dabas Fonds; João Paulo Fidalgo Carvalho, Pedro Januário, Maria Lino and members of Luzlinar; Manuel López Rodriguez and the Teis Community; Priya Devasirvatham, Sven Kallen, Rodger Abey Parris, Joachim Englert and members of LIFE MycoRestore; Eva-Lotta Hultén and Plockhugget; and Seán Ó Conláin. Cover photo by Projecto Bosques, Luzlinar organisation This report was originally released in June 2019, and republished in Marsh 2020 with additional examples of close-to-nature forestry projects from Ireland and Sweden. Fern office UK, 1C Fosseway Business Centre, Stratford Road, Moreton in Marsh, GL56 9NQ, UK Fern office Brussels, Rue d’Edimbourg, 26, 1050 Brussels, Belgium www.fern.org This briefing has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Climate Foundation, the David & Lucille Packard Foundation and the European Commission. -
Natura 2000 & Tourism
Natura 2000 & tourism Partnerships for Biodiversity European policies and the role of protected areas 2019 Seminar-dialogue 29 October 2019 Presentation by Sofia Pachini, unit ENV.D3 [email protected] • Latest report on natural & cultural heritage in Natura 2000 • Scoping study on tourism and recreational activities in Natura 2000 • Next steps Natural and Cultural Heritage in Europe: Working together within Natura 2000 Photo Naturepl.com https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/manage ment/pdf/Natural_and_Cultural_Heritage_report_2019_WEB.pdf 1.2 Linking natural and cultural heritage The term ‘heritage’ tends to evoke first and foremost the traditional concept of built cultural heritage: impressive monuments and stunning works of art (paintings, literature, music etc..) or archaeological sites, museums, forts and palaces, even modern industrial sites. But this is, in fact, just the tip of the iceberg. Europe is also endowed with a myriad other less tangible forms of cultural heritage, such as local arts and crafts, products (cheese, sausages and other local produce), knowledge, skills, spiritual beliefs and folklore that are deeply rooted in our sense of identity and that have been passed down for generations. This immensely diverse cultural heritage is interwoven with our rich and equally diverse natural heritage. Traditionally, natural and cultural heritage have been seen as completely distinct from one another, and sometimes even as antagonists. Some have expressed the view that ‘Nature ends where culture begins’. Indeed, the transition from nature to culture is not always easy to define: nature could mean all that exists naturally whereas culture only includes items that have been created by man. -
Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Production, Land Expectation Value
Project no. 518128 EFORWOOD Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment Instrument: IP Thematic Priority: 6.3 Global Change and Ecosystems Deliverable PD2.2.5 Report on time and scale integration of environmental impacts of forest management alternatives by use of generic modelling approach Due date of deliverable: Month 44 Actual submission date: Month 55 Start date of project: 011105 Duration: 4 years Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: University of Copenhagen (KU), Denmark Final version Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission CO Services) 1 Deliverable PD 2.2.5 - Report on time and scale integration of environmental impacts of forest management alternatives by use of generic modelling approaches: a case study of synergies and trade-offs between production and ecological services. Philipp Duncker1, Karsten Raulund-Rasmussen2, Per Gundersen2, Johnny de Jong3 Klaus Katzensteiner4, Hans Peter Ravn2, Mike Smith5, Otto Eckmüllner4 1 Institute for Forest Growth, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany 2 Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden 4 Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU) Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT Forests provide multiple functions and services among which society traditionally tends to have a high interest in wood production. In consequence, forest management aims at increasing the timber volume produced and the economic return through intervening with natural processes. -
Performing Failure in Conservation Policy. the Implementation of European Union Directives in the Netherlands
Performing failure in conservation policy. The implementation of European Union directives in the Netherlands. Raoul Beunen1, Kristof Van Assche and Martijn Duineveld This is a revised personal version of the article published in Land Use Policy: Beunen, R., K. Van Assche, M. Duineveld, 2013. Performing failure in conservation policy. The implementation of European Union directives in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 31 (1): 280-288: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.009 1Corresponding author. Dr. ir. Raoul Beunen is Assistant Professor at the Land Use Planning Group at Wageningen University. P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands, tel. +31 317 482 697 [email protected] Dr. ir. Kristof Van Assche, is Associate Professor at the Community Studies Department at Minnesota State Universities. Stewart Hall 337, 720 4th Avenue South, St. Cloud, MN 56301-4498, [email protected] Dr. ir. Martijn Duineveld is Assistant Professor at the Cultural Geography Group at Wageningen University. P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract. In this article we present the results of a study towards the reality effects of discourses affecting the implementation of Natura 2000 in the Netherlands. The Dutch case shows how fast deinstitutionalization of conservation policies can take place. Traditions of conservation are disrupted as an unintended consequence of international policy. This study shows that conservationists and others involved in nature conservation should pay more attention to the ways in which conservation needs and practices are represented and institutionalized, how these representations become embedded in more general narratives and how the new institutions are bound to be gamed and re-narrated themselves. -
Natura 2000: European Wildlife Sites
Natura 2000: European wildlife sites This leaflet provides information on the law relating to European Union designations to protect wildlife and habitats in England, called Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation. It is for general guidance only. What are Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)? SPAs and SACs are designated under European laws to protect Europe's rich variety of wildlife and habitats. All European Union member states are required to designate SPAs and SACs and ensure they are properly looked after to protect their biodiversity. Together, SPAs and SACs make up a series of sites across Europe, referred to collectively as Natura 2000 sites. In the UK they are also known as European sites. SPAs are designated under the European Commission's 'Birds Directive' to protect wild birds and their habitats. SACs are designated under the 'Habitats Directive' to conserve habitats and species other than birds that are important in their own right. There are more than 320 Natura 2000 sites in England, nearly 900 in the UK and more than 25,000 throughout Europe. These sites vary in size from a few hectares to hundreds of square kilometres, and protect a huge range of species and habitats, covering moorlands, forests, grasslands, rivers and lakes, bogs, estuaries and other wetlands, and many coastal and marine habitats. Some sites include habitats such as disused quarries, canals and buildings which sustain important wildlife populations. How are SPAs and SACs identified? SPAs and SACs are selected using scientific information about the species and habitats that occur in England and their importance to European biodiversity conservation. -
The European Natura 2000 Protected Area Approach: a Practitioner’S Perspective
www.iucn.org/parks 79 THE EUROPEAN NATURA 2000 PROTECTED AREA APPROACH: A PRACTITIONER’S PERSPECTIVE Roger Crofts 1* * [email protected], www.rogercrofts.net 1 WCPA Emeritus, Edinburgh, Scotland ABSTRACT Natura 2000 is the first and only regional biodiversity protected area approach in the world. Over its 20 years of existence it has been a positive force for conservation, but it has certain limitations. This paper assesses some of its strengths and weaknesses from a practitioner’s perspective. Overall, the assessment is positive as without it biodiversity loss would probably have been greater, and with it there is a unique transnational approach. The positive aspects identified are the biogeographical framework, pan-European classification of species and habitats, and the political will to implement it. The negative aspects are that it is a static approach to species and habitat conservation, the Natura approach to biodiversity conservation is being undermined by perverse subsidies from other EU funding mechanisms, especially the Common Agricultural Policy, and the effects of development on the fragmentation of habitats are dominant. Also, in practice, there has been a failure to implement wider countryside and connectivity measures. Lessons relevant to other parts of the world are discussed. KEYWORDS: Natura 2000, practitioner’s perspective, perverse subsidies, connectivity, lessons learned INTRODUCTION 1979); it is now known in its amended form as Directive The European Union (EU) programme for the protection 2009/147/EEC. The Directive provides for the of birds, and of species and habitats has been protection, management and control of all species of implemented primarily through Natura 2000. -
Natura 2000Isstillunderdevelopment, Covering Anever Richerrange of 1979 Birds Directive Andthe 1992Habitats Directive
June 2009 Natura 2000 EN NATURE Natura 2000 is the EU-wide network of nature conservation areas set up to ensure the survival of Europe’s most valuable species and habitats. It is not restricted to nature reserves, but based on a much broader principle of conservation and sustainable use, where people and wildlife can live together in harmony. By the end of 2008, the network will comprise more than 25 000 sites, covering around 20 % of the total land area of the EU — around 800 000 km2 — plus 100 000 km2 of marine environment. Natura 2000 is at the heart of EU nature policy and is a remarkable demonstration of Europe’s commitment to act to preserve its rich native biodiversity for future generations. Europe’s wildlife and ecosystems are under threat. The EU has pledged to halt the decline in biodiversity by 2010, and is part of a global agreement to signifi cantly reduce biodiversity loss by that date. Natura 2000 is key to achieving this goal. The network is founded on two pioneering pieces of EU legislation: the 1979 Birds Directive and the 1992 Habitats Directive. Natura 2000 is still under development, covering an ever richer range of European fl ora and fauna. It already off ers protection to over 1 000 rare and threatened animal and plant species and 200 habitat types across the 27 Member States. © Frank Vassen © Frank Fact 1: It is in our interests to save Fact 2: Natura 2000 is a partnership biodiversity between people and wildlife Biodiversity in Europe is under threat: many of Europe’s indigenous Natura 2000 is at the core of EU biodiversity policy: a unique animal species are threatened. -
(PAF) for NATURA 2000 in SLOVENIA
PRIORITISED ACTION FRAMEWORK (PAF) FOR NATURA 2000 in SLOVENIA pursuant to Article 8 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitats Directive) for the Multiannual Financial Framework period 2021 – 2027 Contact address: Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning Dunajska 48 SI- 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia [email protected] PAF SI 2019 A. Introduction A.1 General introduction Prioritised action frameworks (PAFs) are strategic multiannual planning tools, aimed at providing a comprehensive overview of the measures that are needed to implement the EU-wide Natura 2000 network and its associated green infrastructure, specifying the financing needs for these measures and linking them to the corresponding EU funding programmes. In line with the objectives of the EU Habitats Directive1 on which the Natura 2000 network is based, the measures to be identified in the PAFs shall mainly be designed "to maintain and restore, at a favourable conservation status, natural habitats and species of EU importance, whilst taking account of economic, social and cultural requirements and regional and local characteristics". The legal basis for the PAF is Article 8 (1) of the Habitats Directive2, which requires Member States to send, as appropriate, to the Commission their estimates relating to the European Union co-financing which they consider necessary to meet their following obligations in relation to Natura 2000: to establish the necessary conservation measures involving, if need be, appropriate management plans specifically designed for the sites or integrated into other development plans, to establish appropriate statutory, administrative or contractual measures which correspond to the ecological requirements of the natural habitat types in Annex I and the species in Annex II present on the sites. -
Integration of Natura 2000 and Biodiversity Into Eu Funding (Eafrd, Erdf, Cf, Emff, Esf)
INTEGRATION OF NATURA 2000 AND BIODIVERSITY INTO EU FUNDING (EAFRD, ERDF, CF, EMFF, ESF) ANALYSIS OF A SELECTION OF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES APPROVED FOR 2014-2020 The N2K Group E Integration of Natura 2000 and biodiversity into EU funding (EAFRD, ERDF, CF, EMFF, ESF). Analysis of a selection of operational programmes approved for 2014-2020 European Commission, 2016 Reproduction authorised provided the source is acknowledged. All photos are under copyright. This document has been prepared for the European Commission by the N2K GROUP under contract N° 070202/2014/692494/SER/B3 ‘Technical and scientific support in re- lation to the Habitats and Birds Directives’. Acknowledgements: The analysis of the Operational Programmes has been coordinated by Concha Olmeda, with the contribution of the following experts: Ernesto Ruiz, David García Calvo, Mariella Fourli, Nelly Papazova, Milan Janak, Dobromil Galvanek, Anja Finje, Seppo Vuolanto, Pawel Pawlaczyk, Nathaniel Page, Razvan Popa (N2K Group). Marianne Kettunen and Evelyn Underwood (IEEP). Front cover photo: Sierra Morena, Spain. Aixa Sopeña. All photos in the document: Atecma photo archive Layout: Diego Ruiz TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i-vi 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. EU FUNDING FOR NATURA 2000 AND BIODIVERSITY 2 2.1 Strengthening the integration approach 2 2.2 Results and lessons learnt from the previous financial period 3 3. INTEGRATION OF RELEVANT OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES INTO THE EU FUNDING PROGRAMMES 5 3.1 Investment priorities in the current financial framework (2014-2020) 5 3.2 RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (EAFRD) 7 3.2.1 Priorities and measures targeted at Natura 2000 and protected habitats and species 7 3.2.2 Allocation of resources to Natura 2000/biodiversity in the RDPs analysed 20 3.2.3 Expected results/outcomes. -
The Value of Natura 2000
Science for Environment Policy FUTURE BRIEF: The Value of Natura 2000 May 2015 Issue 12 Environment Science for Environment Policy This Future Brief is written and edited by the Science The Value of Natura 2000 Communication Unit, University of the West of England (UWE), Bristol Email: [email protected] Contents To cite this publication: Science for Environment Policy (2015) The Value of Natura 2000 Future Brief 12. Brief produced for the European Commission Introduction 3 DG Environment. Bristol: Science Communication Unit, 1. What is the value of Natura 2000 for UWE. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy biodiversity protection? 4 2. What is the value of Natura 2000 in terms of benefits to people? 7 Acknowledgements We wish to thank the scientific advisor, Olaf Bastian (Nature 3. What is the economic value of Natura 2000? 8 conservation authority, Dresden) for his input to this report. Conclusions 10 Final responsibility for the content and accuracy of the report, however, lies solely with the author. References 11 Images Page 3: The critically endangered Iberian Lynx (Lynx pardinus). Reproduced with permission from Programa de conservacion ex-situ del lince Iberico. http://www.lynxexsitu.es/ Page 5: Golden Eagle ©istockphoto.com/Neil_Burton. Page 6: Landmannalaugar, Fjallabak Nature Reserve ©istockphoto.com/Fyletto Page 7: Common European adder. CC BY 3.0 Benny Trapp, Wikimedia Commons, 2009. http://commons.wikimedia.org/ About Science for Environment Policy wiki/File:Benny_Trapp_Vipera_berus.jpg Science for Environment Policy is a free news Page 9 : Azores bullfinch Pyrrhula murina Pico da Vara Sao and information service published by the European Miguel.