Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT 2015 CONTENT CONTENT Foreword ..................................................................... 4 The Year in Review..................................................... 7 The Office ....................................................................................................................................8 The Team ...................................................................................................................................12 Milestones .................................................................................................................................14 1 Key figures for 2015 ................................................................................................................16 Complaint trends ..................................................... 19 Volume of complaints received ............................................................................................20 Nature of complaints received .............................................................................................22 Timeliness of the preliminary review of complaints .......................................................25 Number of investigations conducted and reasons for declining complaints ..........26 2 Timeliness of conducting investigations ............................................................................31 Geographical distribution of complaints received ..........................................................32 Government agencies subject to the most complaints .................................................35 Summary of key matters and results of important investigations .............................43 Feedback from claimants ......................................................................................................75 Systemic issues and recommendations ................ 81 Systemic issues identified in the reporting period .........................................................82 Recommendations made to relevant authorities ............................................................84 Implementation and follow-up of systemic recommendations made 3 to authorities ...........................................................................................................................85 Cooperation with stakeholders ............................. 93 Working visits ............................................................................................................................94 Cooperation with government agencies............................................................................96 4 Public outreach and communication .................................................................................99 Advocating for business with the government 3 FOREWORD OF THE BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN Dear Friends, Colleagues, and Partners, It is my pleasure to present the 2015 annual complaints from Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, report of the Business Ombudsman Council Kyiv, Odesa, and Zaporizhzhya regions. The of Ukraine. Our first year of operations was fewest complaints were lodged in Chernivtsi, truly a challenge, both in terms of encouraging Khmelnytskyi, and Rivne regions. Ukrainian businesses to lodge complaints and Of all complaints lodged in 2015, the tax issues seek our assistance, and in terms of establishing (dilatory VAT refund, inspections by state tax productive cooperation with the government authorities, problems with the electronic VAT institutions against whom the most complaints administration, customs matters) topped the list were lodged. Having said that, I am glad to of problematic areas. The relationships with the report that we began tangibly delivering on the law enforcement agencies were also acute for promise the Council made to the Ukrainian businesses in 2015. businesses at the beginning of operations: to improve the business climate by easing the In addition to specific recommendations the regulatory burden and maintaining ongoing Council issued to the government agencies, dialogue with entrepreneurs and government our team prepared several systemic reports institutions. providing practical recommendations and legislation amendment advice on Ukraine’s In the reporting year, the Council received 585 most pressing problems related to business complaints from businesses all over Ukraine, climate. The reports covered the following almost 60% of which were eligible for our topics: “Getting Access to Electricity”; “Selected investigation. We successfully closed 151 cases – Problems with Business Activity due to the out of the 342 investigations initiated. Following Anti-Terrorist Operation and the Annexation of these investigations, the Council provided 123 Crimea”; “Problems with Administering Business recommendations to the respective government Taxes in Ukraine”; and “Problems with Cross- agencies, over a half of which was implemented Border Trading in Ukraine”. The work on two as of December 31, 2015. The cumulative direct more reports prepared by us in 2015 – on the financial impact of our investigations in the activities of natural monopolies and abuse of reporting year was UAH 2.7 billion. powers by law enforcement agencies – started In 2015, we received complaints from all in early 2016. I am happy to inform you about Ukrainian regions. City of Kyiv remained the substantial progress in all the areas targeted by most active in terms of submitting complaints. our systemic reports. We received a considerable number of 4 www.boi.org.ua To ensure transparency and reciprocity of my visits, several state administration leaders cooperation from the government authorities publicly declared their commitment to fight most frequently involved in our investigations, corruption and to participate in the the Council signed the Memoranda of Council’s work. Partnership and Cooperation with them. The I remember how tremendous the task before Memoranda we signed with the State Regulatory us seemed when the Council opened its Service of Ukraine, the Ministry of Justice of doors last year. I also remember the cautious Ukraine, and the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine optimism I felt and the skepticism the local are aimed at addressing specific complaints businesses shared when we were starting our from businesses, improving the business first investigations. I am looking back twelve climate, preventing corruption, and eliminating months later at how our team has grown, provisions in legislation that restrict business at the businesses we helped protect their activity. lawful interests, at the state authorities who In order to maintain transparency of evaluating became our allies on the journey to improving the Council’s work, we sent feedback Ukraine’s business climate – and I know we questionnaires to Complainants after closing are on the right track. We still have a long road each case. At the end of the reporting period, ahead of us: cases to solve, investigations to 77% of сomplainants were very satisfied, and conduct, legislation to discuss and draft, more 23% said they were satisfied with our work. No government institutions to partner with, more negative feedback has been received so far. businesses to protect. And standing where I am now, I am confident that we, together, can make We have also encouraged mass media to find the big change happen – one small step after out more and spread the word about the another. Council’s operations. Our efforts resulted in more than 3000 media citations, 99% of which were positive and constructive. During 2015, I paid nine working visits: to Chernigiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, Krasnoarmiisk, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa, Rivne, Lutsk, and Sincerely, Cherkasy to meet with the local entrepreneurs Algirdas Šemeta and state administrations leaders. Following Business Ombudsman Advocating for business with the government 5 THE YEAR IN REVIEW 1.1. THE OFFICE THE BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN COUNCIL IS an independent permanent advisory body of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, with a mandate to help establish a transparent business environment and prevent corruption at the central and local government levels, and in state-owned and state- controlled companies within the scope of their administration. The Council is meant to be the initial point of contact for companies seeking redress against unjust treatment. IN ITS ACTIVITY, THE BOC ABIDES BY Constitution Decrees of the Legislative acts of the Verkhovna Resolutions and the laws of President Rada, in line with the Constitution of the Cabinet Ukraine and the laws of Ukraine of Ministers BOC OPERATES IN ACCORDANCE with Cabinet Resolution #691, dated November 26, 2014, and the Memorandum of Understanding with the Ukrainian Anticorruption Initiative, dated May 12, 2014. The BOC and the Council are used interchangeably throughout the text to refer to the Business Ombudsman Council 8 www.boi.org.ua ОГЛЯД РОКУ THE COUNCIL: reviews complaints by businesses conducts investigations; regarding maladministration by liaises with the public state authorities and civil servants and the relevant authorities to as well as state-owned or state- share its findings. controlled companies; THE COUNCIL HAS THREE MAIN OBJECTIVES: facilitate the battle against corruption $ and other business abuse; contribute to greater investment attractiveness in Ukraine; promote a public service culture of fairness, openness and accountability. Advocating for business with the government 9 BOARD THE SUPERVISORY BOARD, INDEPENDENT the Council’s governing body, BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: includes authorized
Recommended publications
  • Mary Butler Deputy Chief, International Unit Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section Department of Justice, the U.S
    Organizers Partners Programmatic Cooperation Framework for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus uniter Mediapartners Preventing.Fighting.Acting. International Anti-Corruption Conference November 16th, 2015 Timing Conference section title 08:00 AM Registration 09:30 AM SESSION I Making Ukraine a Success Story 09:30 AM Place: Olympic Yard 10:30 AM 10:30 AM Coffee break 10:50 AM PARALLEL Corruption prevention Investigation of corruption Return of stolen assets SESSIONS II Place: Hall of Champions cases and sanctions Place: Altius 10:50 AM Place: Olympic Yard 12:50 PM 12:50 PM Lunch break 13:50 PM PARALLEL Zero tolerance to Mainstreaming anti-corruption Corruption and SESSIONS III corruption in sectoral and regional reforms business 13:50 PM Place: Hall of Champions Place: Olympic Yard Place: Altius 15:50 PM 15:50 PM Coffee break 16:15 PM SESSION IV Plenary closing session 16:15 PM Place: Olympic Yard 17:15 PM 17:20 PM Networking dinner 19:00 PM SESSION I Making Ukraine a Success Story 09:30 AM Place: Olympic Yard 10:30 AM Moderator: Mr. Andriy Kulikov Senior media-expert, journalist 1. Mr. Pavlo Petrenko Minister of Justice, Ukraine 2. Mr. Goran Klemenčič Minister of Justice, Slovenia 3. Mr. Paweł Wojtunik Head of the Central Anticorruption Bureau, Poland 4. Mr. Arkan El-Seblani Chief Technical Advisor, Anti-Corruption and Integrity in the Arab States, UNDP 5. Mr. Nicola Bonucci Director for Legal Affairs, OECD 6. Mr. Björn Janson Deputy to the Executive Secretary of GRECO, Council of Europe Andriy Kulikov Senior media-expert, journalist Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ombudsmen As National Institution for Protection of the Right to Education in Ukraine
    SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume I, May 25th-26th, 2018. 394-404 OMBUDSMEN AS NATIONAL INSTITUTION FOR PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN UKRAINE Olga Melnychuk Maksym Melnychuk Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine Abstract. Under the conditions of an armed conflict in Eastern Ukraine the level of ensuring the fundamental human right to education is being reduced. Therefore there is a need to search for additional mechanisms of the protection of the right to education, among which must be singled out such an extra-judicial human rights mobile institution as an ombudsman. All this stipulates the purpose of the article: to find out the role of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights, the Commissioner of Ukraine on the rights of the Child and the Educational Ombudsman to ensure the right to education in Ukraine. During the study, such methods as the analysis of scientific literature, normative legal acts in the field of the right to education and annual reports of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights were used. The research results of the Razumkov Center (Ukraine) regarding the attitude of citizens to the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rightshave been analyzed. As a resultit was discovered that the measures taken by the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights and the Commissioner on the rights of the Child for the right to education are active and effective. In the society the legislative introduction of the post of educational ombudsman as an additional human rights institution in the field of education in Ukraine is positively evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL-JUNE 2015 State Authorities Should Serve Their People Instead of Acting As Their Ruler»
    QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL-JUNE 2015 State authorities should serve their people instead of acting as their ruler» Algirdas Semeta, «Business Ombudsman for Ukraine CONTENT Content 1 Introduction 4 2 Operations overview 6 The Office The Team Key reporting milestones 3 Complaint trends and significant cases 11 Number of complaints received The term of the preliminary review of complaints Number of complaint reviews and grounds for declining complaints The term for complaint review Geographical distribution of complaints received Government agencies subject to the most complaints Significant cases and results 4 Communications and Outreach 18 Website Social networks The media Working visits Cooperation with government agencies 5 Systemic problems 22 6 Reports on systemic problems 23 7 Plans for the next quarter 29 Advocating for business with the government 3 INTRODUCTION Dear Friends, Colleagues and Partners, It is my pleasure to present to you the first public quarterly report of the Business Ombudsman Council of Ukraine. The Council was set up in November 2014, and since the start of our activities on 20 May 2015, we have received more than enough proof that businesses in Ukraine perceive the Council as an effective tool designed to help improve the business climate in Ukraine. During the first week alone, we received 50 complaints from businesses all over the country, and by the end of the reporting quarter this number grew to 172. When I accepted this job, I was convinced I could contribute in a practical way to a transformation that many consider impossible: a sharp enough reduction in Ukraine’s endemic corruption to spur private investment and improve living standards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2007, No.2
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • “2006: THE YEAR IN REVIEW” – pages 5- 41. HE KRAINIAN EEKLY T PublishedU by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profitW association Vol. LXXV No. 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 14, 2007 $1/$2 in Ukraine Party of the Regions national deputy Top issues for Ukraine in 2007: may stay on as rights ombudsman WTO, borders and real estate by Yana Sedova by Zenon Zawada groundless, irrelevant document. Special to The Ukrainian Weekly This year will also determine whether Kyiv Press Bureau KYIV – The Ukrainian government’s a pro-Ukrainian, Western-oriented Mr. leading defender of human rights may KYIV – Joining the World Trade Yushchenko will be able to coexist with a well continue to be Nina Karpachova, a Organization (WTO), demarcating the pro-Russian coalition government, or if national deputy highly active in the Party Russian-Ukrainian border and regulating the Party of the Regions’ aggressive cam- of the Regions, which has a history of the exploding real estate market will be paign of usurping power will lead to an violating the law and human rights. among the top issues in Ukrainian politics attempt at impeaching Mr. Yushchenko. Ms. Karpachova’s candidacy to for 2007. The Communist Party of Ukraine become the Verkhovna Rada ombudsman On January 10, Ukraine’s three most announced on January 10 that it will sub- for human rights has support from the powerful leaders – President Viktor mit for the Verkhovna Rada’s review in coalition government – despite criticism Yushchenko, Prime Minister Viktor February a bill to impeach Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • National Integrity System Assessment
    NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT UKRAINE 2015 Transparency International Ukraine is a national chapter of the global anti-corruption non-governmental network Transparency International, which has over 90 national chapters and works in more than 100 countries around the world. The mission of TI Ukraine is to limit the expansion of the level of corruption in Ukraine by promoting transparency, accountability, and integrity of public authorities and civil society. www.ti-ukraine.org/en ©2015 Transparency International Ukraine. All rights reserved. Author: Transparency International Ukraine © Cover photo: Flickr/centralniak Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of June 2015. Nevertheless, Transparency International Ukraine cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Transparency International Ukraine and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This project is funded by the European Union TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 II. ABOUT THE ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM 9 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1. General overview 11 2. Strongest and the weakest pillars of the NIS 12 3. The reasons for the weakness of NIS pillars 14 IV. COUNTRY PROFILE – THE FOUNDATIONS FOR THE NA- TIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM 23 V. CORRUPTION PROFILE 28 VI. ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES 32 VII. NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM 37 1. Legislature 37 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Practice of Social, Economic And
    THEORY AND PRACTICE OF SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES monograph Nemoros s.r.o. Prague, 2018 Editorial Board: Zeman Z., Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, member of the Academic Council of the Eastern European Center of the Fundamental Researchers, University of St. Istvan, Godollo, Hungary; Ignatieva I., Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, member of the Academic Council of the Eastern European Center of the Fundamental Researchers, National University of «Kyiv-Mohyla Academy»; Kucherenko D., Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, member of the Academic Council of the Eastern European Center of the Fundamental Researchers, Ukrainian State Employment Service Training Institute; Chagrak N., Ph.D. in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, member of the Academic Council of the Eastern European Center of the Fundamental Researchers, Science and Research Institute of Social and Economic Development. Chief Editor: Roman Rossi, Hon. Dr., President of the Eastern European Center of the Fundamental Researchers (EECFR), Prague, Czech Republic; Reviewers: Csaba Lentner, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary; Paul Cherneski, Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Warsaw University of Management, Warsaw, Poland. © Copyright by Eastern European Center of Fundamental Researchers, Nemoros s.r.o., Rubna 716/24 , 110 00, Prague 1 ISBN 978-617-673-747-6 Nemoros s.r.o., Rubna 716/24 , 110 00, Prague 1, Czech Republic, 2018 CONTENTS PREFACE .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 PART 1. METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF RESOURCE-FUNCTIONAL PROCESSES FOR PROVIDING TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES Zeman Z., Gabor Ag, Judit B., Gal Z. The role of controlling in sustainable development and competitiveness ��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 8 Babina O. Methodological foundation of leadership potential assessment in the system of change management at the enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    No 6/2017 __________________________________________ The Scientific Papers of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine The Scientific Papers of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine The Scientific Papers of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine No 6/2017 Registered by Founding institution: the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Certificate of the state registration of the mass Editorial board: media vehicle КВ No. 16712-5284Р of June 9, 2010. Baimuratov M. O., Doctor of Law, Professor; Boguslaw Banaszak, Doctor of Law, Professor, Dr h.c. multi; Frequency: 6 Issue(s) per year Bersheda Ye. R., Doctor of Economics, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Editor-in-chief); Free of charge Bykov O. M., Doctor of Law, Senior Research Associate; Borysenko Z. M., Doctor of Economics, Professor; Buromenskyi M. V., Doctor of Law, Professor, Corresponding Recommended for publishing by Academic Council Member of the National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine; of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Voloshyn Yu. O., Doctor of Law, Professor; Ukraine (Minutes of Meeting No. 13 of December 27, Vorotin V. Ye., Doctor of Public Administration, Professor; 2017) Haman M. V., Doctor of Public Administration, Professor; Grinenko O. O., Doctor of Law, Senior Research Associate; Dmytriiev A. I., Doctor of Law, Professor; Editorial Board: Zhyliaiev I. B., Doctor of Economics, Senior Research Associate; 4, Nestorivskyi provulok, Kyiv, 04053, Ukraine Zhuravskyi V. S., Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of Tel. (+38-044) 235-96-01 the National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine; Fax (+38-044) 235-96-05 Klymenko O.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Issues for Ukraine in 2007: May Stay on As Rights Ombudsman WTO, Borders and Real Estate by Yana Sedova by Zenon Zawada Groundless, Irrelevant Document
    INSIDE: • “2006: THE YEAR IN REVIEW” – pages 5- 41. HE KRAINIAN EEKLY T PublishedU by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profitW association Vol. LXXV No. 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 14, 2007 $1/$2 in Ukraine Party of the Regions national deputy Top issues for Ukraine in 2007: may stay on as rights ombudsman WTO, borders and real estate by Yana Sedova by Zenon Zawada groundless, irrelevant document. Special to The Ukrainian Weekly This year will also determine whether Kyiv Press Bureau KYIV – The Ukrainian government’s a pro-Ukrainian, Western-oriented Mr. leading defender of human rights may KYIV – Joining the World Trade Yushchenko will be able to coexist with a well continue to be Nina Karpachova, a Organization (WTO), demarcating the pro-Russian coalition government, or if national deputy highly active in the Party Russian-Ukrainian border and regulating the Party of the Regions’ aggressive cam- of the Regions, which has a history of the exploding real estate market will be paign of usurping power will lead to an violating the law and human rights. among the top issues in Ukrainian politics attempt at impeaching Mr. Yushchenko. Ms. Karpachova’s candidacy to for 2007. The Communist Party of Ukraine become the Verkhovna Rada ombudsman On January 10, Ukraine’s three most announced on January 10 that it will sub- for human rights has support from the powerful leaders – President Viktor mit for the Verkhovna Rada’s review in coalition government – despite criticism Yushchenko, Prime Minister Viktor February a bill to impeach Mr. from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Yanukovych and Verkhovna Rada Yushchenko.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonusiak Andrzej
    Publisher Foundation Institute for Eastern Studies ul. Solec 85 00-382 Warsaw Tel.: +48 22 583 11 00 Fax: +48 22 583 11 50 e-mail: [email protected] www.economic-forum.pl Layout Foundation Institute for Eastern Studies Print GOLDRUK Warsaw 2020 Table of Contents Programme 7 List of Speakers 83 List of Participants 178 Partners 259 Programme 8 February 04 February 04 European Integration International Politics Investments Innovations - Slovak Forum Economy Society and Reforms and Security and Development Room 12:15-12:30 Coffee Break 12:15-12:30 Coffee Break Thematic Block Thematic Block Thematic Block Thematic Block Development Aid Projects Agriculture – How to Cross-border Cooperation Regional Military International Cultural Innovative Central Europe – as a Tool for Conducting Succesfully Compete with 12:30-13:30 and the Lifting of Barriers Cooperation as a Tool for 12:30-13:30 Cooperation as a Mean of CooperationOpportunities Eastern Partnership Policy at European Counterparts? for Polish-Ukrainian the Strengthening National and Regional Regional Level Polish Success Story Enterprises of National Security Development 13:30-13:40 Coffee Break 13:30-13:40 Coffee Break Investment Thematic Block The Long Shadow of Thematic Block Climate in Ukraine – Disinformation – A Tool of Gas for Europe. Propaganda – Foreigners on our Labour Thematic Block 13:40-14:40 New Opportunities Chaos. How to Identify And The Consequences of Nord 13:40-14:40 Information War with Market as an Economic Education of Tomorrow or Same Old Problems? Fight Fake News Stream 2. What Will the Ukraine and the Development Accelerator LNG Revolution Bring? West 14:40-15:30 LUNCH 14:40-15:30 LUNCH Thematic Block Thematic Block Thematic Block Thematic Block Thematic Block A Chance for the Carpathian Transformation of the The Role of Regions and The Importance of 15:30-16:40 How to Fight Corruption? 15:30-16:40 Chernobyl – Facts and Macroregion: Environment Ukrainian Donbass.
    [Show full text]