Overcrowding of Prisons. an Australian Perspective by Luke
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
115TH VISITING INTERNATIONAL EXPERTS’ TRAINING PAPERS COURSE VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS CURRENT ISSUES IN CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT AND EFFECTIVE COUNTERMEASURES: OVERCROWDING OF PRISONS, THE MANAGEMENT OF WOMEN, FOREIGN PRISONERS AND THOSE CONVICTED OF DRUG RELATED OFFENCES. AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE Luke Grant* LECTURE 1. OVERCROWDING to the realisation of many of the objectives of a modem correctional system. I. INTRODUCTION The rising number of people in prison The dilemma of prison overcrowding around the world has been the subject of encourages a number of logical solutions. international interest particularly over the The approach that is taken in each country past two decades. will be the outcome of a number of factors including the philosophy of punishment, The number of people in custody per the viability of alternatives to capita varies enormously over time and imprisonment, economics, political and between jurisdictions and interpretation of populist ideology and the flexibility of the these differences particularly between legislative framework. There are countries is difficult. What is clear essentially three ways to solve the problem: however, is that the use of imprisonment as a form of punishment and incapacitation 1. Reduce the number of prisoners is increasing in most countries and that 2. Increase the scale of available facilities overcrowding (which I would define as a and resources (build more gaols) shortage of space and resources relative to 3. Rationalise the available resources and the size of the population) in many places facilities e.g. to double up in is becoming a significant problem. accommodation areas and to reallocates funds for rehabilitation It is also apparent that there is no one programms to meet more basic needs single factor that can be identified as being like food and clothing. primarily responsible. There has been a lot of conjecture about the impact of the Unfortunately for prison administrators international drug problem and about it is usually only the third of these options rising crime rates, but researchers have over which they have any direct influence. consistently failed to show that this is the root cause. In some countries the option of reducing prisoner numbers will not be considered Overcrowding itself is more than just a because the number of people in custody shortage of bed space, it has implications may be regarded as a positive outcome of for the levels of programmes activity, good law and order policies. In other hygiene, violence etc. It can be an obstacle countries the option of building more gaols may not be possible because of economic * New South Wales, Department of Corrective constraints. In many jurisdictions a Services, Australia combination of each of these approaches 207 RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 57 will prevail. This is certainly the case in and unsentenced components of the Australia. population or are only able to account for numbers imprisoned in federal or state Whatever the approach, rigorous facilities and not on local lock-ups. research is required to understand the Forensic patients in secure psychiatric causes of overcrowding and to ensure that facilities may not always be included. Some whatever strategies are adopted do produce countries include people detained for the desired outcome. A solid research base immigration violations who are awaiting is also required to make accurate deportation, others don’t. The problem predictions about the prison population then with making comparisons is that which can then be used to inform the differences in rate may simply be planning process and decisions about the attributable to differences in the Counting impact of new policies and legislation. In method. most jurisdictions including Australia, there are large gaps between theory, A second problem is that the number of empirical research and practice. prisoners per 100,000 population is static and obscures the relative impacts of the In this paper I will explore some of the following dynamic determinants: theories about prison population growth. I will then use the situation in New South • The relative number of inmates on Wales as a case study to identify factors remand, the rate of admissions and the contributing to the recent inmate numbers bailed, the length of stay pre- population increase. I will then outline trial some of the strategies we have used and • the relative number of sentenced provide an overview of why these may not prisoners, the rate of sentenced have been as effective as hoped. I am not admissions, the average length of proposing that the NSW experience is detention representative, but that the approach to • the effect of parole and/or remissions analysing the problem has broad applicability in all jurisdictions. Some theories on the rate of imprisonment A note about comparing rates of It is useful to examine some of the imprisonment between countries theories put forward in the international The main indicator used for measuring literature to account for the recent increase the use of imprisonment is the number of in numbers in prisoners. My own persons in custody per 100,000 total experience indicates that those in population. The number of people government who make decisions about imprisoned is either taken on a particular strategies for managing overcrowding date (usually 30 June) or from the average seldom have a good understanding of this daily population over a given year. While body of work and this had led to ill this definition may be standardised, the conceived policies. first problem that comes when making comparisons between countries is exactly Most of the international literature on who is included in the total population. prison numbers has come from the United Some countries for example Australia and States and United Kingdom that have both Canada do not include offenders under the experienced unprecedented increases in age of 18 in their counts. Other countries the numbers of people in custody. In maintain separate statistics for sentenced particular I would recommend as a classic 208 115TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS text on the subject a book called The Scale The rate of crime and the rate of of Imprisonment by Franklin E Zimring imprisonment and Gordon Hawkins which although There is a body of contradictory and published in 1991 is still provides a most confusing evidence that attempts to compelling analysis of the American establish a causal relationship between the situation. For an international comparison rate of crime and the rate of imprisonment. of imprisonment rates read Young and Contrary to popular and political opinion Brown’s Cross-national Comparisons of there is no clear relationship between the Imprisonment1 I would also recommend a imprisonment rate and the crime rate, paper by Caplow and Simon published in though it has been argued that such a 1999 and entitled “Understanding Prison relationship does exist for specific Policy and Population Trends”. categories of crime e.g. serious violent crime and this category of offender. Theories about the determinants of the Zimring and Hawkins compared prison population have historically failed imprisonment rates in the USA with to give planners the capacity to accurately reported crime rates including the FBI predict changes to the population. This index crime rates. They found: may be because they have tended towards over-simplification. A well known flawed the lack of a direct and simple theory was put forward by Blumstein and relationship that would enable us to Cohen in 1973 who after analysing the successfully explain most fluctuations relatively stable American prison in the rate of imprisonment by population prior to 1973 proposed that reference to changes in crime rates. punishment was a self regulating system. They argued that: Young and Brown (1993) carried out a comprehensive cross national comparison if prison populations get too large. of imprisonment and concluded similarly Police can choose not to arrest, that: prosecutors can choose not to press charges, judges can choose not to our conclusion would be that only a imprison... Similarly if the populations small measure of the differences in drop too far below the stable rate then prison populations between one pressure would develop to sanction jurisdiction and another or the certain kinds of behaviour that had changes in prison populations within previously been tolerated. particular jurisdictions seem to be related to crime rates. Moreover to Unfortunately for Blumstein and Cohen the extent that there is a relationship, the population of prisoners started to climb we can not be certain that it is a causal exponentially the following year and this one. increase has not abated. If the rate of incarceration is not directly related to the rate of crime then what explains it? 1 Young, Warren and Mark Brown. 1993. Cross The literature can be conveniently National Comparisons of lmprisonment. In Crime divided into two approaches. The first of and Justice: A review of Research, Vol 17. these has been called ‘the deterministic University of Chicago Press approach’ which points to the importance 209 RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 57 of factors outside the criminal justice American National Institute of Justice system. The second approach emphasises study in 1980 claimed to show this and has the impact of policy choices and attitudes been much cited in literature as evidence within the criminal justice system. of such an effect. However in 1982 the data was re-analysed