The Evolutionary and Phylogeographic History of Woolly Mammoths: a Comprehensive Mitogenomic Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Evolutionary and Phylogeographic History of Woolly Mammoths: a Comprehensive Mitogenomic Analysis www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The evolutionary and phylogeographic history of woolly mammoths: a comprehensive Received: 21 September 2016 Accepted: 10 February 2017 mitogenomic analysis Published: 22 March 2017 Dan Chang1,*, Michael Knapp2,*, Jacob Enk3,*, Sebastian Lippold4, Martin Kircher5, Adrian Lister6, Ross D. E. MacPhee7, Christopher Widga8, Paul Czechowski9, Robert Sommer10, Emily Hodges11, Nikolaus Stümpel12, Ian Barnes6, Love Dalén13, Anatoly Derevianko14, Mietje Germonpré15, Alexandra Hillebrand-Voiculescu16, Silviu Constantin16, Tatyana Kuznetsova17, Dick Mol18, Thomas Rathgeber19, Wilfried Rosendahl20, Alexey N. Tikhonov21,22, Eske Willerslev23,24,25, Greg Hannon26, Carles Lalueza-Fox27, Ulrich Joger12, Hendrik Poinar3, Michael Hofreiter28 & Beth Shapiro1 Near the end of the Pleistocene epoch, populations of the woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) were distributed across parts of three continents, from western Europe and northern Asia through Beringia to the Atlantic seaboard of North America. Nonetheless, questions about the connectivity and temporal continuity of mammoth populations and species remain unanswered. We use a combination of targeted enrichment and high-throughput sequencing to assemble and interpret a data set of 143 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 2Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, 270 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. 3McMaster Ancient DNA Centre, Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L9, Canada. 4Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig D04103, Germany. 5Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195-5065, USA. 6Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 7Department of Mammalogy, American Museum of Natural History, 200 Central Park West, New York NY, 10024, USA. 8Center of Excellence in Paleontology, East Tennessee State University, 1212 Sunset Dr., Gray, TN 37615, USA. 9Antarctic Biological Research Initiative, 31 Jobson Road, SA 5110, Australia. 10Department of Zoology, Institute of Biosciences, University of Rostock, Universitätsplatz 2, Rostock D-18055, Germany. 11Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2215 Garland Ave, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. 12Staatliches Naturhistorisches Museum Braunschweig, Pockelstrasse 10, Braunschweig 38106, Germany. 13Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, S-104 05 Stockholm, P.O. Box 50007, Sweden. 14Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 17, Novosibirsk, Akademia Lavrentieva, 630090, Russia. 15Operational Directorate “Earth and History of Life”, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, Brussels 1000, Belgium. 16“Emil Racoviţă” Institute of Speleology, Frumoasă 31, Bucharest, 01906, Romania. 17Department of Palaeontology, Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, ul. Leninskiye Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia. 18Mammuthus Club International, Gudumholm 41, Hoofddorp, HG 2133, Netherlands. 19Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart Rosenstein, Gewann 1, Stuttgart 70191, Germany. 20Department “World Cultures and Environment”, Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen, C 5, Zeughaus, Mannheim, 68159, Germany. 21Zoological Institute Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab., 1 Saint- Petersburg 199034, Russia. 22Institute of Applied Ecology of the North, North-Eastern Federal University, Lenina 1, Yakutsk, Russia. 23Centre for GeoGenetics, Copenhagen University, Nørregade ‘10, Copenhagen, 1165, Denmark. 24Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St. Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK. 25Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK. 26CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK. 27Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Doctor Aiguader, 88, Barcelona, 08003, Spain. 28Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Evolutionary Adaptive Genomics, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Potsdam, 14476, Germany. *These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to B.S. (email: [email protected]) SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 7:44585 | DOI: 10.1038/srep44585 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ mammoth mitochondrial genomes, sampled from fossils recovered from across their Holarctic range. Our dataset includes 54 previously unpublished mitochondrial genomes and significantly increases the coverage of the Eurasian range of the species. The resulting global phylogeny confirms that the Late Pleistocene mammoth population comprised three distinct mitochondrial lineages that began to diverge ~1.0–2.0 million years ago (Ma). We also find that mammoth mitochondrial lineages were strongly geographically partitioned throughout the Pleistocene. In combination, our genetic results and the pattern of morphological variation in time and space suggest that male-mediated gene flow, rather than large-scale dispersals, was important in the Pleistocene evolutionary history of mammoths. Late Pleistocene mammoth remains are common across Eurasia and North America in temperate as well as high latitude areas1,2. However, until recently, little effort was applied to the recovery of ancient DNA (aDNA) from fossils collected in mid-continental areas, as preservation of genetic material in these regions is generally much poorer than in high-latitudes. Gradual improvements in methodology and instrumentation have enabled recov- ery of aDNA from more challenging remains, such as from mammoth bones preserved in temperate regions of Eurasia3–5 and, more recently, North America6. These data can be used to resolve persisting questions regarding mammoth diversity and population structure. Our understanding of the evolutionary history of Mammuthus has been developed largely from mor- phological study of their fossils, especially the most resilient and therefore most abundant elements: molar teeth1,7–10. According to the fossil evidence, mammoths evolved in Africa during the late Miocene and later dis- persed into Asia and Europe, and eventually North America via Beringia, during the Middle Pliocene to Early Pleistocene1,10,11. The evolution of Mammuthus during the Pleistocene is usually presented as a succession of chronologically overlapping species, including (from earliest to latest) M. meridionalis (southern mammoths), M. trogontherii (steppe mammoths), and M. columbi (Columbian mammoths) and M. primigenius (woolly mammoths)1,7,8,10. According to the current model based on morphology, a population of southern mammoths gave rise to the steppe mammoth around ~1.7 million years ago (Ma) in Asia. Later, perhaps as early as 0.7 Ma, a second tran- sition occurred in Asia as a steppe mammoth population gave rise to the woolly mammoth1,12. Subsequently, these species dispersed out of Asia into Europe and North America. The European fossil record suggests sev- eral distinct waves of dispersal into Europe, after which the migrants may have coexisted and even hybridized with endemic European mammoth populations2,8. Until recently, it was generally held that southern mammoths dispersed into North America around 1.5 Ma13, where they evolved into Columbian mammoths (M. columbi), Jefferson’s mammoth (M. jeffersonii) and the Channel Islands pygmy mammoth (M. exilis)6,7. However, Lister and Sher2 recently suggested that southern mammoths never migrated to North America, and that all early North American mammoth fossils (1.5–1.3 Ma) that are classifiable based on morphology descend from dispersal(s) of steppe mammoths. A key implication of this interpretation is that the steppe mammoth population in northeast- ern Siberia was ancestral to both Columbian and woolly mammoths although at different points in time. Results of a recent study6 analysing complete mitogenomes from North American mammoth populations were consist- ent with this hypothesis. Furthermore, this study found evidence of hybridisation and potential male mediated gene flow between North American woolly mammoths, Columbian mammoths, Jefferson’s mammoth and pygmy mammoth6. Eurasian mammoths have received far less attention thus far. Previous population-level genetic analyses beyond the permafrost regions of Western Beringia were restricted to a small fragment of the mitochondrial genome. These studies partitioned woolly mammoth mitochondrial diversity into either three major clades3,5 or five haplogroups4 but were unable to resolve either the order in which these clades emerged or the timing of their origin. As a result the evolution of mammoths across their vast Eurasian range remains unclear. Here, we combine hybridization-based targeted capture14–16, multiplex PCR17,18 and high-throughput sequencing to generate 54 complete mammoth mitochondrial genomes, including 22 from temperate localities across Eurasia. We incorporate these into a globally extensive data set totalling 143 mammoth mitochondrial genomes sampled from across the northern hemisphere. We use a combined approach that incorporates both the deep paleontological record and more recent radiocarbon dates to calibrate the evolutionary rate, and infer the most comprehensive mammoth mitochondrial phylogeny to date. Results Using hybridization
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Note on a Bavelian Fauna from the North Sea with Possibly Two Mammoth Species
    Dick Mol 1,2, Klaas Post 1,Jelle W.F.Reumer 1,John de Vos 3 & Cees Laban 4 1 Natuurmuseum Rotterdam 2 Cerpolex, Paris 3 Naturalis, Leiden 4 NITG, Utrecht Het Gat: preliminary note on a Bavelian fauna from the North Sea with possibly two mammoth species Mol, D., Post, K., Reumer, J.W.F., De Vos, J. & Laban, C., 2003 - Het Gat: preliminary note on a Bavelian fauna from the North Sea with possibly two mammoth species - in: Reumer, J.W.F., De Vos, J. & Mol, D. (eds.) - ADVANCES IN MAMMOTH RESEARCH (Proceedings of the Second International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, May 16-20 1999) DEINSEA 9: 253 - 266 [ISSN 0923-9308] Published 24 May 2003 We describe the fossil vertebrate remains from a site (‘Het Gat’) on the bottom of the North Sea, between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The site is a maximally c. 46 m deep gully that cuts through layers of Holocene and Eemian sediments and reaches into the Yarmouth Roads Formation. This part of the Yarmouth Roads Formation is a complex of fluvial sediments of late Early-Pleistocene, most probably Bavelian, age. The age of the Bavelian is considered to be some 1.000.000 - 750.000 years (1 - 0.75 Ma). As the fossils originate from the Yarmouth Roads Formation, the fauna is thus attributed a late Early Pleistocene age; we correlate it to localities such as Untermassfeld (Germany) and Saint-Prest (France), which both have an estimated age of c. 1 Ma. The faunal content of the site ‘Het Gat’ is provisionally as follows: (Proboscidea) Mammuthus meridionalis and/or Mammuthus trogontherii; (Artiodactyla) Hippopotamus antiquus, Alces lati- frons, Megaloceros dawkinsi, Megaloceros savini, Eucladoceros ctenoides, Bison menneri; (Perissodactyla) Equus major, Stephanorhinus etruscus; (Carnivora) Homotherium cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Elephas Antiquus in Greece: New finds and a Reappraisal of Older Material (Mammalia, Proboscidea, Elephantidae)
    Quaternary International xxx (2010) 1e11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Elephas antiquus in Greece: New finds and a reappraisal of older material (Mammalia, Proboscidea, Elephantidae) Evangelia Tsoukala a,*, Dick Mol b, Spyridoula Pappa a, Evangelos Vlachos a, Wilrie van Logchem c, Markos Vaxevanopoulos d, Jelle Reumer e a Aristotle University, School of Geology, University campus, 54 124 Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece b Natural History Museum Rotterdam and Mammuthus Club International, Gudumholm 41, 2133 HG Hoofddorp, The Netherlands c Mammuthus Club International, Bosuilstraat 12, 4105 WE Culemborg, The Netherlands d Ministry of Culture, Ephorate of Palaeoanthropology-Speleology of Northern Greece, Navarinou 28, 55131, Thessaloniki, Greece e Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University and Natural History Museum Rotterdam, PO Box 23452, 3001 KL Rotterdam, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: This paper briefly describes some recently discovered remains of the straight-tusked elephant, Elephas Available online xxx antiquus, from Greece. Material of this extinct proboscidean was found in four localities in Northern Greece: Kaloneri and Sotiras in Western Macedonia, Xerias in Eastern Macedonia, and Larissa in Thessaly. In addition, published elephant remains from Ambelia, Petres and Perdikas, also from Northern Greece, are reinterpreted and also attributed to E. antiquus. Of all these, the Kaloneri elephant shows an inter- esting paleopathology: it was disabled by a broken right tusk. Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction of E. namadicus comes from India. Maglio (1973) considered the Asiatic form E. namadicus to be a senior synonym of the European Fossil Proboscidea are known from Neogene and Quaternary form E.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Extinctions on California's
    Flightless ducks, giant mice and pygmy mammoths: Late Quaternary extinctions on California’s Channel Islands Torben C. Rick, Courtney A. Hofman, Todd J. Braje, Jesu´ s E. Maldonado, T. Scott Sillett, Kevin Danchisko and Jon M. Erlandson Abstract Explanations for the extinction of Late Quaternary megafauna are heavily debated, ranging from human overkill to climate change, disease and extraterrestrial impacts. Synthesis and analysis of Late Quaternary animal extinctions on California’s Channel Islands suggest that, despite supporting Native American populations for some 13,000 years, few mammal, bird or other species are known to have gone extinct during the prehistoric human era, and most of these coexisted with humans for several millennia. Our analysis provides insight into the nature and variability of Quaternary extinctions on islands and a broader context for understanding ancient extinctions in North America. Keywords Megafauna; island ecology; human-environmental interactions; overkill; climate change. Downloaded by [Torben C. Rick] at 03:56 22 February 2012 Introduction In earth’s history there have been five mass extinctions – the Ordovician, Devonian, Permian, Triassic and Cretaceous events – characterized by a loss of over 75 per cent of species in a short geological time period (e.g. 2 million years or less: Barnosky et al. 2011). Although not a mass extinction, one of the most heavily debated extinction events is the Late Quaternary extinction of megafauna, when some two-thirds of large terrestrial mammalian genera (444kg) worldwide went extinct (Barnosky et al. 2004). Explanations for this event include climate change, as the planet went from a glacial to interglacial World Archaeology Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Guide Presented by the Field Museum
    at the San Diego Natural History Museum July 4-November 11, 2013 Educator Guide Presented by The Field Museum INSIDE: Exhibition Introduction • Planning Your Visit Gallery Overviews and Guiding Questions • Focused Field Trip Activities Correlations to California State Content Standards • Additional Resources Mammoths and Mastodons: Titans of the Ice Age at the San Diego Natural History Museum is supported by: City of San Diego Commission for Arts and Culture County of San Diego Board of Supervisors, Community Enhancement Program Walter J. and Betty C. Zable Foundation Qualcomm Foundation The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation VWR Charitable Foundation Education Sponsor: The Field Museum gratefully acknowledges the collaboration and assistance of the Shemanovskii Regional Museum and Exhibition Complex and the International Mammoth Committee. Walking Map The Field Museum • Mammoths and Mastodons Educator Guide • fieldmuseum.org/mammoths Page 2 www.sdnhm.org/mammoths-mastodons Exhibition Introduction Mammoths and Mastodons: Titans of the Ice Age July 4–November 11, 2013 Millions of years ago, colossal mammals roamed Europe, Asia, and North America. From the gigantic mammoth to the massive mastodon, these creatures have captured the world’s fascination. Meet “Lyuba,” the best-preserved baby mammoth in the world, and discover all that we’ve learned from her. Journey back to the Ice Age through monumental video installations, roam among saber-toothed cats and giant bears, and wonder over some of the oldest human artifacts in existence. Hands-on exciting interactive displays reveal the difference between a mammoth and a mastodon, This sketch shows a Columbian mammoth, an offer what may have caused their extinction, and show African elephant, and an American mastodon how today’s scientists excavate, analyze, and learn more (from back to front).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoths and Mastodons Teachable Moments
    Teachable Moments Guide: Mammoths & Mastodons Grades K - 12 Section 1 | Stomping Grounds: Mammoths and Mastodons Duration Highlight Pieces: American Mastodon & Columbian Mammoth Articulated Skeletons 30-45 minutes Field Journal Activity: Next to the life-sized model of the Columbian Mammoth is a mural depicting life in North America during the last Ice Age. Allow students time to observe the mural and then NGSS Alignment guide your students’ observations with the following questions: What do you see in this DCIs environment? What is happening in this mural? Is there anything here that surprises you? Do you think anything is missing from this image? 3-LS4-1, 3, 4 MS/HS Extension: How does this mural demonstrate the biodiversity of Ice Age Los Angeles? Ask MS-LS4-1,2 your students to look for other murals in the museum that also depict Ice Age biodiversity and have HS-LS4-1 them compare these images. S+E Practices Section 2 | Pushed to Their Limits: Mammoths in Miniature 1,3, 4 Highlight Pieces: Pygmy Mammoth Model & Lower Jaw How were pygmy mammoths better adapted to changing climate than larger mammoth species? Crosscutting Concepts Field Journal Activity: Invite your students to examine the lower jaws of the Columbian mammoth and the 1, 2, 7 pygmy mammoth on display. Using their Paleontology Field Journals, have students compare the similarities CA EP&Cs and differences or draw some of their reflections. III.a MS/HS Extension: Are there other examples of animals adapting to their environment by adapting their size? How would this help
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Information About the Museum of Prehistoric Man Steinheim an Der Murr
    Brief information about the Museum of Prehistoric Man Steinheim an der Murr The museum The Museum of Prehistoric Man is an institution of the town Steinheim an der Murr and a branch of the State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart. It is located in the Hans-Trautwein-Haus. The name honours Hans Trautwein, the mayor of Steinheim from 1600-1614 and 1626-1634. The building was used as a school from 1881 until 1963 and served as a library since 1965. Three years later, the Museum of Prehistoric Man was established. The museum was expanded in 1974, and again enlarged and completely redesigned in 1983. Prof. Dr. Karl Dietrich Adam and Dr. Gert Bloos from the Natural History Museum in Stuttgart designed the concept, and the Atelier for Communication Design Walter Guttenberger from Kernen im Remstal implemented it. The exhibition area is 340 square meters. It is divided over two floors. The tour through the museum begins with an introduction to the prehistory of mankind. The main part of the exhibition concerns the fossil man of Steinheim, the geology of the area, and the wildlife of Steinheim during the ice age. Exhibition area “Ice Age Animals” The Steinheim area of fossil discoveries From the end of the 19th century to around the year 1965, the sand- and gravel quarries between Steinheim and Murr yielded many mammalian fossils, for example 96 bison, 45 mammoth, 45 giant deer, 25 straight-tusked elephants, 9 bears, 8 aurochs, 2 lions and 1 saber-tooth cat. Steinheim gained international attention after the discovery of the skeletons of the Steinheim steppe mammoth and the aurochs in 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mammoths on Their Biome: Clash of Two Paradigms
    P. V. Putshkov Institute of Zoology,Academia of Sciences, Kiev The impact of mammoths on their biome: clash of two paradigms Putshkov, P.V., 2003 - The impact of mammoths on their biome: clash of two paradigms - in: Reumer, J.W.F., de Vos, J. & Mol, D. (eds.) - ADVANCES IN MAMMOTH RESEARCH (Proceedings of the Second International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, May 16-20 1999) - DEINSEA 9: 365- 379 [ISSN 0923-9308] Published 24 May 2003 Mammoths, woolly rhinoceroses, musk oxen, primitive bisons, and horses of northern races were stenobiotic cryoxerophiles living only under extreme cryoarid conditions according to the ‘steppe- tundra crash paradigm’. These animals are considered to be strict grazers on arid steppe-tundra gras- ses; hence, the possibility that mammoths maintain their pastures the way modern elephants do is rejected. Climatists claim that mammoths and their faunal satellites were killed by the Holocene warming a result of their inability to feed themselves in any of modern landscapes and to withstand the weather-caused losses. Their survival throughout interglacials is considered as resulting from climatic instability: short warm episodes are said to have alternated with very cold ones. It is belie- ved that a permanent Arctic Ocean ice-shield persisted along the Siberian coast even in summer; its cooling and aridifying influence maintained steppe-tundras and similar ecosystems throughout Northern Eurasia. On the contrary, the stable Holocene warming resulted in the disappearance of this ice-shield, in the destruction of the ecosystem of the mammoths, and in megafaunal extinctions. This conception is based mainly on the properties of Eemian Greenland ice layers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pattern and Process of Mammoth Evolution in Eurasia Adrian M
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary International 126–128 (2005) 49–64 The pattern and process of mammoth evolution in Eurasia Adrian M. Listera,*, Andrei V. Sherb, Hans van Essenc, Guangbiao Weid a Department of Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK b Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia c Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9515, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands d Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 643, Beijing 100044, China Available online 17 July 2004 Abstract Mammoth evolution in Eurasia represents one of the best-studied examples of evolutionary pattern and process in the terrestrial fossil record. A pervasive belief in the gradual transformation of chronospecies in Europe is giving way to a more complex model incorporating geographical variation across the whole of northern Eurasia. This in turn casts doubt on biostratigraphic deductions which assume gradual transformation of molar morphology, simultaneous across the species’ range. The earliest European elephantids, Mammuthus rumanus, occur in the interval 3.5–2.5 Ma, and are distinctly more primitive than the better-known M. meridionalis. The species ‘M. gromovi’, identified in the interval c. 2.6–2.2 Ma, appears to be a junior synonym of M. meridionalis. M. meridionalis dispersed widely and, in the interval 2.0–1.5 Ma, gave rise to M. trogontherii in eastern Asia, probably in China, spreading to NE Siberia by 1.2 Ma. Between that date and c. 600 ka, flow of genes and/or individuals westwards produced an interaction with European M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoths Fact Sheet
    Geology fact sheet: MAMMOTHS The three species of elephant alive today (the African Bush, African Forest and the Asian elephant) are all that remain of a very diverse group of ‘elephantids’. Elephantids evolved and diversified during the last five million years. The earliest species lived in the tropical woodlands of Africa, but later species migrated into Europe, Asia and even North America. The mammoths were a group of elephantids which specialised in eating grasses and shrubs of the cooler areas of northern Europe. When the Ice Age brought freezing temperatures to most of Europe, mammoths were well adapted to survive. Norfolk is one of the best places in the world to find mammoth fossils because much of the county has sediments of the right age (from the last 3 million years). A diverse group of animals – just a few extinct and extant proboscidean (including the elephantids). Mammuthus meridionalis, the ‘Southern Mammoth’, is the ancestor of the two later species found in Norfolk. It lived between about 3 million and 750,000 years ago in Europe. It lived on a varied diet of grasses, shrubs and trees. A Southern Mammoth, with an average-height human silhouette for scale Mammuthus trogontherii, the ‘Steppe Mammoth’, replaced its ancestor species Mammuthus meridionalis about 750,000 years ago. These large mammoths ate grasses, but also trees and shrubs. It was probably the largest species of elephantid ever to have lived. It weighed at least ten tonnes and stood four metres high at the shoulder. The famous West Runton Mammoth skeleton is from this species. The largest living elephants today weigh only about five tonnes and are three to three and a half metres high.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammuthus Meridionalis (Proboscidea: Elephantidae) From
    George E. McDaniel, Jr. & George T. Jefferson California Department of Parks and Recreation, Borrego Springs Mammuthus meridionalis (Proboscidea: Elephantidae) from the Borrego Badlands of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park®, California: phylogenetic and biochronologic implications McDaniel, G.E., Jr. & Jefferson, G.T., 2003 - Mammuthus meridionalis (Proboscidea: Elephantidae) from the Borrego Badlands of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park®, California: phylo- genetic and biochronologic implications - in: Reumer, J.W.F., De Vos, J. & Mol, D. (eds.) - ADVANCES IN MAMMOTH RESEARCH (Proceedings of the Second International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, May 16-20 1999) - DEINSEA 9: 239-252 [ISSN 0923-9308] Published 24 May 2003 A nearly complete skeleton of a mature female southern mammoth was recovered from the Borrego Badlands in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park®, California, USA. The remains represent a late evolutionary stage of the Mammuthus meridionalis (NESTI, 1825) chronocline, and constitute the most complete skeleton of this taxon in North America. Magnetostratigraphy and tephrochro- nology date the specimen at approximately 1.1 Ma BP. The osteology and osteometrics are pre- sented herein. This late stage of Mammuthus meridionalis co-existed with an early evolutionary stage of M. columbi (= M. imperator of some authors). Significant morphological differences between the two taxa from the Borrego Badlands suggest that M. armeniacus rather than M. meri- dionalis was immediately ancestral to M.columbi. A dispersal of M. armeniacus to North America approximately 1.2 Ma BP is implied. At least two mammoth lineages (excluding Mammuthus pri- migenius) are seen in North America. An early M. meridionalis lineage and a later M. armeniacus - M. columbi lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Practicum Students Unearth a Mammoth Ancestor 24 July 2018, by Elena Fritz
    Practicum students unearth a mammoth ancestor 24 July 2018, by Elena Fritz trogontherium elephant (steppe mammoth). It is the ancestor of woolly mammoths, which lived in large numbers in modern Siberia several tens of thousands of years ago. According to available data, the trogontherium elephant was one of the largest examples of a proboscis. It could reach 4.2 meters at the shoulders and it weighed up to 10 tons. "It is also possible that the teeth found belong to the Khazar elephant, which is an intermediate evolutionary link between the trogontherium elephant and the woolly mammoth. This animal Students of the Biological Institute. Credit: Tomsk State lived in the Middle Pleistocene (400-100 thousand University years ago)," says Andrey Shpansky. The Khazar elephant also inhabited open spaces but was smaller in size. To determine more accurately what the remnants are, scientists need to study them While studying ancient soils in the Bograd region, and make measurements. students of the Biological Institute performing a practicum in the Republic of Khakassia discovered large bone remnants that supposedly belong to the ancestor of woolly mammoths—the trogontherium elephant. These mammals lived in the early Pleistocene—from 800 to 400 thousand years ago. Such findings are much less common than bones of woolly mammoths, and are of great interest to scientists. "The finds were made while working on the shore of the Krasnoyarsk Reservoir," says Oleg Merzlyakov, the practicum leader. "The students have studied fossil soils in the section where the Yenisei River washed up on the shore and found Large bone remnants that supposedly belonged to the large bone remains there.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Elephants of Deep Time
    Video Transcript - Forgotten Elephants of Deep Time Maggy Benson: Welcome to Q?rius, the Coralyn W. Whitney Science Education Center, which is right in the heart of the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, right in [00:00:30] Washington D.C. Emmanuel Kyei-Baffour: Yes. Right here, you get to interact with over 6,000 real museum objects and you get to be the scientist or even meet a real scientist like today. Maggy Benson: Yeah, totally. So today, we're going to be exploring the real science of fossil elephants. Here on Smithsonian Science How, we're connecting you to the science and the scientists of the Smithsonian. I'm Maggy Benson. Emmanuel Kyei-Baffour: I'm Emmanuel Kyei-Baffour and [00:01:00] I'm so excited to talk about elephants, and I didn't know we could learn so much about elephants from just looking at their teeth. Maggy Benson: Yeah, fossil teeth. Students, did you know that you can learn a lot about an animal just from its fossils? Today, you're going to be paleontologists and we're going to help you learn some of the tools to be able to learn about body size, diet, and even where an elephant is from and who else it's related to just by looking at its fossils, Emmanuel Kyei-Baffour: [00:01:30] Just like our expert. And students, if you like to find patterns, make observations, or ask questions, you're already thinking like a paleontologist. Maggy Benson: Totally. Emmanuel Kyei-Baffour: Mm-hmm! I'm so excited, and speaking of polls, we actually have a poll to kick off our broadcast.
    [Show full text]