DOCSLIB.ORG

Mark 202 1 Edition Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mark 202 1 Edition Dr Notes on Mark 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable WRITER The writer did not identify himself by name anywhere in this Gospel. This is true of all four Gospels. "The title, 'According to Mark' (… [kata Markon]), was probably added when the canonical gospels were collected and there was need to distinguish Mark's version of the gospel from the others. The gospel titles are generally thought to have been added in the second century but may have been added much earlier. Certainly we may say that the title indicates that by A.D. 125 or so an important segment of the early church thought that a person named Mark wrote the second gospel."1 There are many statements of the early church fathers that identify the "John Mark" who is frequently mentioned in the New Testament as the writer. The earliest reference of this type is in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History (ca. A.D. 326).2 Eusebius quoted Papius' Exegesis of the Lord's Oracles (ca. A.D. 140), a work now lost. Papius quoted "the Elder," probably the Apostle John, who said the following things about this Gospel: Mark wrote it, though he was not a disciple of Jesus during Jesus' ministry or an eyewitness of Jesus' ministry. He accompanied the Apostle Peter and listened to his preaching. He based his Gospel on the eyewitness account and spoken ministry of Peter. 1Donald A. Carson and Douglas J. Moo, An Introduction to the New Testament, p. 172. See ibid, pp. 726-43 for a brief discussion of the formation of the New Testament canon. 2The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus, 3:39:15. Copyright Ó 2021 by Thomas L. Constable www.soniclight.com 2 Dr. Constable's Notes on Mark 2021 Edition Mark did not write his Gospel in strict orderly sequence, meaning either chronological order1 or rhetorical and artistic order2, but he recorded accurately what Peter remembered of Jesus' words and deeds. He considered himself an interpreter of Peter's content. By this, "the Elder" probably meant that Mark recorded the teaching of Peter for the church, though not necessarily verbatim, as Peter expressed himself.3 Finally, "the Elder" said that Mark's account is wholly reliable. Another important source of the tradition that Mark wrote this Gospel is the Anti-Marcionite Prologue to Mark (A.D. 160-180). It also stated that Mark received his information from Peter. Moreover, it recorded that Mark wrote after Peter died, and that he wrote this Gospel in Italy.4 Irenaeus (ca. A.D. 180-185), another early church father, noted that Mark wrote after Peter and Paul had died.5 Other early tradition documenting these facts comes from Justin Martyr (ca. A.D. 150-160), Clement of Alexandria (ca. A.D. 195), Tertullian (ca. A.D. 200), the Muratorian Canon (ca. A.D. 200), and Origen (ca. A.D. 230). This testimony dates from the end of the second century. Furthermore it comes from three different centers of early Christianity: Asia Minor (modern Turkey), Rome (in Italy), and Alexandria (in Egypt). Thus there is strong external evidence that Mark wrote this Gospel. The Mark in view is the "John Mark" mentioned frequently in the New Testament (Acts 12:12, 25; 13:5, 13; 15:36-39; Col. 4:10; Phile. 24; 2 Tim. 4:11; 1 Pet. 5:13; et al.). He was evidently a relative of Barnabas, and he accompanied Barnabas and Paul on their first missionary journey, but left these apostles when they reached Perga. Mark became useful to Paul during Paul's second Roman imprisonment, and was also with Peter when Peter was in Rome. Peter described him as his "son," probably his protégé.6 It seems unlikely that the early church would have accepted this Gospel as authoritative, since its writer was a secondary figure, without having convincing proof that Mark wrote it. Perhaps Luke showed special interest 1Martin Hengel, "Literary, Theological, and Historical Problems in the Gospel of Mark," in Studies in the Gospel of Mark, p. 48. 2Robert A. Guelich, Mark 1—8:26, p. xxvii. 3Richard C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of St. Mark's Gospel, p. 12. 4The Anti-Marcionite Prologue. 5Against Heresies, 3:1:2. 6For a table comparing Peter's address in Acts 10:36-40 and the structure of Mark's Gospel, see Carson and Moo, p. 193. 2021 Edition Dr. Constable's Notes on Mark 3 in John Mark, in Acts, because he was the writer of this Gospel, more than because he caused a breach between Paul and Barnabas.1 "It is evident that he [Mark] was a charismatically endowed teacher and evangelist… A careful reading of the Gospel will serve to introduce the author as a theologian of the first rank who never forgot that his primary intention was the strengthening of the people of God in a time of fiery ordeal."2 DATE The earliest Mark could have written, if the testimonies of the Anti- Marcionite Prologue and Irenaeus are correct, was after the death of Peter and Paul. The most probable dates of Peter's martyrdom in Rome are A.D. 64-67. Paul probably died as a martyr there in A.D. 67-68. However, Clement of Alexandria and Origen both placed the composition of this Gospel during Peter's lifetime. This may mean that Mark wrote shortly before Peter died. Perhaps Mark began his Gospel during Peter's last years in Rome and completed it after Peter's death. The latest that Mark could have written his Gospel was probably A.D. 70, when Titus destroyed Jerusalem. Many scholars believe that since no Gospel writer referred to that event, which fulfilled prophecy, they all must have written before it. To summarize, Mark probably wrote this Gospel sometime between A.D. 63 and 70. ORIGIN AND DESTINATION Most of the early Christian tradition says Mark wrote in Italy, and specifically in Rome.3 This external testimony finds support in the internal evidence of the Gospel itself. Many indications in the text point to Mark's having written for Gentile readers originally, particularly Romans. He explained Jewish customs that would have been strange to Gentile readers (e.g., 7:2-4; 15:42). He translated Aramaic words that would have been unfamiliar to Gentiles (3:17; 5:41; 7:11, 34; 15:22). Compared to Matthew and Luke he 1A. E. J. Rawlinson, The Gospel According to St. Mark, p. xxxi. 2William L. Lane, The Gospel according to Mark, p. 23. 3Irenaeus, and Clement of Alexandria. 4 Dr. Constable's Notes on Mark 2021 Edition used many Latinisms and Latin loan words, indicating Roman influence. However, some students of the book believe that Mark wrote from Palestine.1 Mark showed special interest in persecution and martyrdom, which would have been of special interest to Roman readers when he wrote (e.g., 8:34- 38; 13:9-13). Christians were then suffering persecution in Rome, and in various other places throughout the empire, especially after Nero began to persecute Christians in A.D. 65. For Romans, death by crucifixion was enough to disqualify Jesus as the Savior, and much of what Mark emphasized showed that He did not deserve crucifixion.2 Finally, the early circulation and widespread acceptance of this Gospel among Christians suggest that it originated from, and went to, a powerful and influential church.3 "Matthew is directed to the religious man. Mark was written to the strong man. Luke is addressed to the thinking man. The Gospel of John is directed to the wretched man, the man who needs salvation."4 CHARACTERISTICS Linguistically, Mark used a relatively limited vocabulary when he wrote this Gospel. For example, he used only about 80 words that occur nowhere else in the Greek New Testament, compared with Luke's Gospel that contains about 250 such words. Another unique feature is that Mark also liked to transliterate Latin idioms and phrases into Greek (e.g., centurio [15:39], quadrans [12:42], flagellare [15:15], speculator [6:27], census [12:42], sextarius [7:4], and praetorium [15:6]).5 However, the Aramaic language also influenced Mark's Greek, possibly because Peter spoke Aramaic. Mark included more Aramaic phrases than any of the other Gospel writers (e.g., boanerges [3:17], talitha cumi [5:41], korban [7:11], ephphatha [7:34], 1E.g., J. Sidlow Baxter, Explore the Book, 5:221. 2Robert H. Gundry, Mark, p. 1045. 3Walter W. Wessel, "Mark," in Matthew-Luke, vol. 8 of The Expositor's Bible Commentary, p. 609. 4J. Vernon McGee, Thru the Bible with J. Vernon McGee, 4:163. 5A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, 1:250. 2021 Edition Dr. Constable's Notes on Mark 5 and abba [14:36]).1 Mark evidently translated into Greek many of Peter's stories that Peter had recounted in Aramaic.2 The result was at times a rather rough and ungrammatical Greek wording, compared with Luke, who had a much more polished style of writing. However, Mark used a forceful, fresh, and vigorous style of writing. This comes through in his frequent use of the historical present tense that expresses action as happening at once.3 It is also obvious in his frequent use (41 times) of the Greek adverb euthys translated "immediately."4 The resulting effect is that as one reads Mark's Gospel, one feels that he or she is reading a reporter's eyewitness account of the events.5 "Though primarily engaged in an oral rather than a written ministry, D. L. Moody was in certain respects a modern equivalent to Mark as a communicator of the gospel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Naked Runaway and the Enrobed Reporter of Mark 14 and 16: What Is the Author Doing with What He Is Saying?
    JETS 54.3 (September 2011) 527–45 THE NAKED RUNAWAY AND THE ENROBED REPORTER OF MARK 14 AND 16: WHAT IS THE AUTHOR DOING WITH WHAT HE IS SAYING? !"#!$!% &'#'()**!* There is no question that Mark 14:51–52 is a major crux of Mark’s Gos- pel—the account of a “young man” +eeing naked from the scene as Jesus was arrested. 1 These verses are “a total enigma,” concluded Morna Hooker. A “bizarre episode,” said Eugene Boring. Francis Moloney called it a “strange passage.” “Confusing” and “unclear,” labeled Robert Stein. “[M]akes no sense as an actual incident,” claimed Robin Scroggs and Kent Gro,. “Whimsical,” declared John Knox. 2 This degree of interpretive chaos has resulted in an inordinate amount of speculation, inversely proportional to the evangelist’s reticence, as many a scholar and preacher has exercised upon this crux his or her own expository creativity. The reason for these hermeneutical acrobat- ics is obvious: if 14:51–52 is erased from the account—which apparently is what Matthew and Luke did in their respective Gospels (Matt 26:56–57; Luke 22:54)—what is left actually makes for a seamless reading of a coherent story. 3 But, as far as scholarship can tell us, those two verses remain in the canonical version and -nal form of the Gospel of Mark; and so, preachers have to make some sense of this perplexing text situated in this locus in Mark’s passion. Hence, the proliferation of explanations, particularly dealing with the identity of the “young man” (νεανίσκος) in 14:51–52, who “appears out of nowhere at the wrong place in the story, at the wrong place in the text, like a clown at a funeral, this τις [a certain] young man, this unnamed literary follower following the departure of all followers.” 4 Howard Jackson concludes that, “freed of the shackles of narrative coherence and contextual integrity, many * Abraham Kuruvilla is associate professor of pastoral ministries at Dallas Theological Seminary, 3909 Swiss Ave., Dallas, TX 75204.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gospel of Mark
    The Gospel of Mark A Living Word Independent Bible Study The Gospel of Mark Part 7 Mar k 3:7-19 A Living Word Independent Bible Study Mark 2:1 through 3:6 forms a very clear “subsection” of Mark’s Gospel. REVIEW We’ve now seen Jesus healing, exorcising demons, even forgiving of sins. Mar k 1:1-3:6 We have also seen escalating conflict over forgiving sins, associating with the wrong people, not fasting, and being perceived as disrespectful of the Sabbath. All of this has resulted in Jesus’ opponents beginning to plot to kill him. Beginning in 3:7, there is a clear shift in tone from the controversy narratives that precede it. The section from 3:7 through 3:12, while advancing the story, also summarizes what Jesus has been doing up to now. There are no specific stories in this section, only generalities. “his disciples” This includes ALL followers of Jesus – soon, we will see Mark 3:7 ( NIV) some of these followers designated “apostles”, from among the MANY “disciples”. Jesus withdrew with his disciples to the lake, “to the lake” and a large crowd from We are starting to see that this is a very frequent place for Galilee followed. Jesus to visit! He went there in 1:16 and 2:13 previously. “large crowd from Galilee followed” Just as in 1:37; 1:45; and 2:13! This will continue to be the case going forward! “When they heard” News is spreading even more widely, by word of mouth. Mark 3:8 ( NIV) “from Judea, …” When they heard all he Six areas are listed where people came from to see Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark 5:1-43) O Read out Loud As a Group, 5 Verses Per Person
    RCC LIFE GROUP DISCUSSION (STUDENT) MARK CHAPTER 5 Discussion Starter o “It is true that God may have called you to be exactly where you are. But, it is absolutely vital to grasp that he didn’t call you there so you could settle in and live your life in comfort and superficial peace.” From Francis Chan’s book “Forgotten God” ▪ What do you think this quote means in your own words? ▪ Do you agree or disagree with this quote? Why? Opening Prayer o Ask if someone wants to volunteer before leading the prayer Tell the Story Read the Story (Mark 5:1-43) o Read out loud as a group, 5 verses per person. Let everyone know they can opt out if they would like. Breaking it Down o All questions should be utilized as appropriate based upon group dynamics to facilitate both understanding and discussion. Don’t feel tied to the questions and don’t feel like you have to get through every question. Follow the Spirit’s lead! All questions are a matter of perspective in some way BUT there are specific questions that this is truer of and these questions have been indicated to be perspective/opinion questions. Mark 5:1-8 o What is the recorded timing of Jesus’ encountering the man with the unclean spirit and why is this significant? 1 o How would you characterize Jesus’ interaction with this man with unclean spirit? Would have anything about this scene made you afraid, uncomfortable, or unsafe? o How powerful was this unclean spirit and how do you know? Mark 5:9-15 o Of all the questions that Jesus could have asked this unclean Spirit, why do you think
    [Show full text]
  • What Did Jesus Say About the End Times: Part 1
    1 What Did Jesus Say About The End Times: Part 1 Mark 13:1-23 Introduction: 1) Few subjects spark greater interest than the study of eschatology or the “end times.” Christians and non-Christians alike are fascinated by the issue, even if they are skeptical about much of what they hear and read. Unfortunately much of this skepticism is warranted when you consider the spectacularly erroneous predictions of so many pseudo-prophets and prognosticators. 2) No one has swung and missed on the coming of the end more than the Jehovah’s Witnesses whose false predictions currently stands at 9 (1874, 1878, 1881, 1910, 1914, 1918, 1925, 1975, and 1984). In 1988 many evangelical Christians looked rather foolish when they were seduced by Edgar Whisenant’s 88 Reasons Why the Rapture is in 1988. Not to be out done, New Age advocates cite Mayan & Aztec calendars and predict the end will come on December 21, 2012. And, I could continue down this tragic trail for quite some time. 3) Jesus addressed issues related to the end times in what is often called “the Olivet Discourse” since it was delivered on the Mount of Olives overlooking Jerusalem. So important was this teaching that we find it recorded in all 3 synoptic gospels (Matt 24:1-25: 46; Mark 13:1-37; Luke 21:5-36). As we examine these verses we do not find Jesus encouraging us to set dates or identify the Antichrist, False Prophet or the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Rather, He admonishes us be on guard (v.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruciformed ! Mark's Story of Jesus and His Disciples
    CRUCIFORMED ! MARK’S STORY OF JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES A literary study of the narrative of Mark’s Gospel with insights and conversation starters in twenty sessions A resource for the Book of Faith initiative within the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America THE REV. DR. MARK I. WEGENER RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA [email protected] Copyright © 2015 This page is intentionally left blank so you can photocopy the pages back-to- back without losing the sequence. CRUCIFORMED ! MARK’S STORY OF JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES From all inductions, the gospel according to Mark is the first to call the story of Jesus a St. Mark is the earliest of the four gospels in “gospel.” At that time “gospel” or “evangel” the New Testament. Most likely it was written was almost a technical term for an official around 70 CE, shortly before or after the announcement that a new emperor was arriv- Roman armies captured Jerusalem and de- ing, or that a city or territory was to receive stroyed the temple. special treatment, such as a reduction in taxes. Of course, no one knows exactly who wrote Perhaps the political connotation of “gospel” this document. Traditionally the name of is why the accounts of Matthew, Luke and John Mark, a companion of both the apostles John do not explicitly refer to themselves as Paul and Peter, has been associated with it. “gospels.” But the evidence that this person is the actual author is slim at a best. Third, Mark provided the pattern which was later used by the authors of Matthew and And exactly where it was written and for Luke.
    [Show full text]
  • End Time Chronology from Jesus in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21) Shawn Nelson
    November 5, 2017 End Time Chronology from Jesus in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21) Shawn Nelson (1) How does Matthew 24 fit into our on-going study? The view we’ve been teaching (Premillennialism) says there will be a literal world leader (antichrist) who is able to establish peace treaty in the Middle East between Israel and her neighbors for 7 years (Dan. 9:24-27). In the middle of the 7 years he walks into the temple in Jerusalem, takes away the sacrifices (Dan. 12:11), and declares himself to be God (Dan. 9:27; 11:31; Matt. 24:15; Mark 13:14; 2 Thess. 2:3-4). He forces everybody to worship him (2 Thess. 2:4; Rev. 13:15) and requires them to have a mark in order to buy or sell anything anywhere in the world (Rev. 13:16). Matthew 24 helps us see that Jesus’ taught the above scenario too. Jesus mentions all of the following: the existence of the nation of Israel, the temple in Jerusalem, the antichrist, tribulation, the second coming (and possibly rapture). The Temple to Be Destroyed 24 Then Jesus went out and departed from the temple, and His disciples came up to show Him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said to them, “Do you not see all these things? [the Jerusalem temple] Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” The Disciples’ Two Questions 3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? [temple being destroyed] And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” The Tribulation 4 And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you.
    [Show full text]
  • Author of the Gospel of John with Jesus' Mother
    JOHN MARK, AUTHOR OF THE GOSPEL OF JOHN WITH JESUS’ MOTHER © A.A.M. van der Hoeven, The Netherlands, updated June 6, 2013, www.JesusKing.info 1. Introduction – the beloved disciple and evangelist, a priest called John ............................................................ 4 2. The Cenacle – in house of Mark ánd John ......................................................................................................... 5 3. The rich young ruler and the fleeing young man ............................................................................................... 8 3.1. Ruler (‘archōn’) ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Cenacle in the house of Nicodemus and John Mark .................................................................................... 10 Secret disciples ............................................................................................................................................ 12 3.2. Young man (‘neaniskos’) ......................................................................................................................... 13 Caught in fear .............................................................................................................................................. 17 4. John Mark an attendant (‘hypēretēs’) ............................................................................................................... 18 4.1. Lower officer of the temple prison ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congrats, Loser —Riddles from Q, Week 6— Matthew 5:1-12//Luke 6:17-26 (NIV)
    Grace Bible Chapel, July 18, 2021 Greg Rhodea, PhD Congrats, Loser —Riddles from Q, Week 6— Matthew 5:1-12//Luke 6:17-26 (NIV) 1 Now when Jesus saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His 17 He went down with them and stood on a level place. A large crowd of his disciples came to him, 2 and he began to teach them. disciples was there and a great number of people from all over Judea, from Jerusalem, and from the coastal region around Tyre and Sidon, 18 who had come to hear him and to be healed of their diseases. Those troubled by impure spirits were cured, 19 and the people all tried to touch him, because power was coming from him and healing them all. 20 Looking at his disciples, he said: 3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit, “Blessed are you who are poor, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. for yours is the kingdom of God. 4 Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted. 5 Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth. 6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, 21 Blessed are you who hunger now, for they will be filled. for you will be satisfied. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. 7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God. 9 Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theological Significance of the Isaiah Citation in Mark 4:12
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 7 Original Research The theological significance of the Isaiah citation in Mark 4:12 Author: The well-known passage Mark 4:1–34 is no stranger to New Testament scientific scrutiny, not 1 Peter Nagel to even mention the hotly debated phrases in Mark 4:10–12. To avoid repetition, the aim with Affiliation: this article is to determine the extent of the impact the Isaiah 6:9–10 citation in Mark 4:12 might 1Department of New have had on the interpretation and understanding of Mark 4:1–34 and the Gospel as a whole. Testament Studies, The theory is that the citation in Mark 4:12, especially within Mark 4:1–34, is foundational for University of the Free State, understanding the Markan gospel as a ‘parable’. Moreover, the redactional inclusion of the South Africa concept of ‘the Twelve’ will prove to be a vital contribution in understanding the Markan Corresponding author: gospel as a ‘parable’. Arguing this theory will include evaluating the parable theory in Mark Peter Nagel, 4:10–12, followed by determining the interpretative effect the explicit citation in Mark 4:12 had [email protected] on Mark 4:10–12 and its larger literary context (Mk. 4:1–34). This will be followed by concluding Dates: remarks and suggestions. Received: 09 Nov. 2015 Accepted: 26 Jan. 2016 Published: 30 June 2016 Introduction How to cite this article: Much has been written about the parables, especially those attested in Mark 4:1–34.1 These include Nagel P., 2016, ‘The investigations into the so-called ‘parable theory’ (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Gospels for Lent
    Reading the Gospels for Lent 2/26 John 1:1-14; Luke 1 Birth of John the Baptist 2/27 Matthew 1; Luke 2:1-38 Jesus’ birth 2/28 Matthew 2; Luke 2:39-52 Epiphany 2/29 Matthew 3:1-12; Mark 1:1-12; Luke 3:1-20; John 1:15-28 John the Baptist 3/2 Matthew 3:13-4:11; Mark 1:9-13; Luke 3:20-4:13; John 1:29-34 Baptism & Temptation 3/3 Matthew 4:12-25; Mark 1:14-45; Luke 4:14-5:16; John 1:35-51 Calling Disciples 3/4 John chapters 2-4 First miracles 3/5 Matthew 9:1-17; Mark 2:1-22; Luke 5:17-39; John 5 Dining with tax collectors 3/6 Matthew 12:1-21; Mark 2:23-3:19; Luke 6:1-19 Healing on the Sabbath 3/7 Matthew chapters 5-7; Luke 6:20-49 7 11:1-13 Sermon on the Mount 3/9 Matthew 8:1-13; & chapter 11; Luke chapter 7 Healing centurion’s servant 3/10 Matthew 13; Luke 8:1-12; Mark 4:1-34 Kingdom parables 3/11 Matthew 8:15-34 & 9:18-26; Mark 4:35-5:43; Luke 8:22-56 Calming sea; Legion; Jairus 3/12 Matthew 9:27-10:42; Mark 6:1-13; Luke 9:1-6 Sending out the Twelve 3/13 Matthew 14; Mark 6:14-56; Luke 9:7-17; John 6:1-24 Feeding 5000 3/14 John 6:25-71 3/16 Matthew 15 & Mark 7 Canaanite woman 3/17 Matthew 16; Mark 8; Luke 9:18-27 “Who do people say I am?” 3/18 Matthew 17; Mark 9:1-23; Luke 9:28-45 Transfiguration 3/19 Matthew 18; Mark 9:33-50 Luke 9:46-10:54 Who is the greatest? 3/20 John chapters 7 & 8 Jesus teaches in Jerusalem 3/21 John chapters 9 & 10 Good Shepherd 3/23 Luke chapters 12 & 13 3/24 Luke chapters 14 & 15 3/25 Luke 16:1-17:10 3/26 John 11 & Luke 17:11-18:14 3/27 Matthew 19:1-20:16; Mark 10:1-31; Luke 18:15-30 Divorce & other teachings 3/28
    [Show full text]
  • “The Narrow Door” Luke 13:22-30 by David A. Ritchie Sunday, March 17
    LUKE Part 55: “The Narrow Door” Luke 13:22-30 By David A. Ritchie Sunday, March 17, 2019 (The Second Sunday of Lent) Scripture Reading 22 He went on his way through towns and villages, teaching and journeying toward Jerusalem. 23 And someone said to him, “Lord, will those who are saved be few?” And he said to them, 24 “Strive to enter through the narrow door. For many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able. 25 When once the master of the house has risen and shut the door, and you begin to stand outside and to knock at the door, saying, ‘Lord, open to us,’ then he will answer you, ‘I do not know where you come from.’ 26 Then you will begin to say, ‘We ate and drank in your presence, and you taught in our streets.’ 27 But he will say, ‘I tell you, I do not know where you come from. Depart from me, all you workers of evil!’ 28 In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, but you yourselves cast out. 29 And people will come from east and west, and from north and south, and recline at table in the kingdom of God. 30 And behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last.” 1 Almighty and Everlasting God, as we open your Holy Word today, may your Spirit give us eyes to see your kingdom anew.
    [Show full text]
  • Sermon Notes a Different Kind of Religion
    Bringing it Home A Different Kind of Religion 1. Pastor Jeremiah said, “The legalists of [our day] have determined that being a October 14, 2012 Dr. David Jeremiah Christian is like going to a funeral.” How might your life feel this way? What Mark 2:13-22 might be keeping you from the joy of Jesus? What new tradition, or practice, could help you reconnect with Jesus in a fresh, new way? Sermon Notes I. Jesus did not come for saints, but for sinners. - Mark 2:13-17 A. The calling of Levi - Mark 2:14 B. The celebration in Levi’s home - Mark 2:15 2. Look back at question #5. You might be one of the three kinds of people C. The criticism by the Scribes and Pharisees - Mark 2:16 listed, right now. Which kind are you and what is keeping you from coming to Jesus to experience the joy that He promises? D. The conclusion of Jesus - Mark 2:17 II. Jesus did not come for sadness, but for gladness. - Mark 2:18-20; John 15:11 III. Jesus did not come for reformation, but for regeneration. - Matthew 2:21-22 A. Christianity is not something new added to something old. - Mark 2:21 B. Christianity is something new replacing something old. - Mark 2:22; Acts 4:12 www.shadowmountain.org/smallgroups 2100 Greenfield Drive, El Cajon, CA 92019, 619.440.1802 © Copyright 2012 by Shadow Mountain Ministries Small Group Questions 3. And yet, “… joyful celebration should be the normal experience of those who Getting Started follow Christ.” Read the following scriptures and discuss the truth of God’s 1.
    [Show full text]