DOCSLIB.ORG

Winning at Duplicate Competitive Bidding: Table Judgment Points to Master Choosing Contract: Priorities A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winning at Duplicate Competitive Bidding: Table Judgment Points to Master Choosing Contract: Priorities A Winning at Duplicate Competitive Bidding: Table Judgment Points to Master Choosing Contract: Priorities a. 8+ Major Fit b. NT c. 7 card Major Fit Useful Guidelines a. If 3N is reasonable alternative, bid it. b. Cue bid for NT stoppers. c. 2NT is not a “misfit safe house.” d. Follow the “LAW”; bid to the level of your combined trump. e. A 2/1 overcall shows a good suit, especially if acting at unfavorable vulnerability. f. Open light in 3rd position NV. g. With a void and fit, bid one level higher. h. Any undiscussed bids are a one-round force. Hand Evaluation a. Deduct for duplication of values. b. Downgrade hands with “Quacks”. c. Downgrade with balanced hand patterns, especially 4333. d. Upgrade with Aces, Tens and solid trump suits. e. Positional values count more (or less!). Competing On 20-20 Deals a. Rarely let opponents settle at a supported 2M. Suggested Agreement: “Scrambling 2NT”. b. Don’t give opponents a “free pass” when they compete and it is your hand; X and enjoy more frequent tops. c. If opponents try to force you to the 3-level and you are tempted to bid 2NT, think penalty X instead. d. If playing Negative X, Opener protects Responder with re-opening X, if short in Overcaller’s suit. Communication a. Describe your hand in as few bids as possible b. Don’t hide trump support, but bid out your hand. c. Don’t “correct” a previous bidding error by passing. Winning at Duplicate Competitive Bidding: Table Judgment The “LAW” of Total Tricks (or LoTT) Larry Cohen developed the “Law of Total Tricks” (LoTT or “LAW”) which postulates that when both sides have at least an eight card fit, the total number of tricks available is equal to the sum of the trumps of both pairs. There’s a whole book on the subject which you can read; an approximation, “Simple LAW” is bidding to the level of your side’s trumps. For example, if your partner overcalls and you have three trumps, raise to the 2-level; if you have four trumps, raise to the 3-level and if you have five trumps, raise to the 4-level. The raise to the 3- and 4-levels need to be conditioned on vulnerability and shape. The reasoning and statistics behind the “LAW” is technical, but basically it says that if you respect the total number of trumps, you will have an optimum or “Par” result. This does not mean you’ll make your contract; rather, you will have arrived at your optimum contract, even if the opponents double and you go down. If you break the “LAW” but your opponents don’t double you, you might still get a good result, as they have let you off the hook. Cohen summarizes his theory: i. When the balance of HCP is unfavorable, bidding to the “LAW” level will act as a useful sacrifice. ii. When the balance of HCP is favorable, bidding to the “LAW” level will be an achievable contract. iii. When the HCP are fairly equally split between the two sides, bidding to the “LAW” level avoids the danger of a losing sacrifice. Basic LAW Add the two levels plus 11; bid if there are that many trump.1 Bid 2 over 2 15 Total Trump Bid 3 over 2 16 Total Trump Bid 3 over 3 17 Total Trump Bid 4 over 3 18 Total Trump Bid 4 over 4 19 Total Trump Bid 5 over 4 20 Total Trump 1 Jim Slinger, Competitive Bidding Decisions, “Thinking At Bridge”, 2006 Winning at Duplicate Competitive Bidding: Table Judgment Points to Ponder More Useful Guidelines a. With longer Spades (5+) and another suit, consider showing Spades and making a reopening double to bring other suit into auction. b. If you have pushed Opponents with stronger hands into 4 of a minor, you have achieved your purpose. c. Suggested Agreement: Do not use “Western Cue” to show a partial stopper. If there are two suits in question, bid the one where you have a stopper. If opponents have bid a suit, a cue bid asks for a stopper and implies stopper(s) in other unbid suit(s) Hand Evaluation a. If Partner gives you a LR+ and you have a second five card suit, bid game. b. Do not show a splinter when singleton is an Ace. c. Use Simple Loser Count for suit contracts where a fit is found. Opening hand is 7-loser; LR is 8-loser; a simple raise or 1N response is 9-loser. If your combined loser count is 14, game is likely in a Major; if 13, game is likely in a minor; and, if 12, investigate small slam. Communication a. Don’t rescue partner after her Overcall when you are void or singleton in her suit. b. Show your partner a secondary fit to help her judge whether to bid on or X. Preempts & Sacrifices a. Don’t preempt with 2 Aces. b. If you or your Partner have made opponent’s guess at their contract….Pass. c. Bid as if an Unfavorable “sacrifice” doesn’t exist. d. Resist bidding “5 over 5” except with extreme distribution. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Things You Might Like to Know About Duplicate Bridge
    ♠♥♦♣ THINGS YOU MIGHT LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT DUPLICATE BRIDGE Prepared by MayHem Published by the UNIT 241 Board of Directors ♠♥♦♣ Welcome to Duplicate Bridge and the ACBL This booklet has been designed to serve as a reference tool for miscellaneous information about duplicate bridge and its governing organization, the ACBL. It is intended for the newer or less than seasoned duplicate bridge players. Most of these things that follow, while not perfectly obvious to new players, are old hat to experienced tournaments players. Table of Contents Part 1. Expected In-behavior (or things you need to know).........................3 Part 2. Alerts and Announcements (learn to live with them....we have!)................................................4 Part 3. Types of Regular Events a. Stratified Games (Pairs and Teams)..............................................12 b. IMP Pairs (Pairs)...........................................................................13 c. Bracketed KO’s (Teams)...............................................................15 d. Swiss Teams and BAM Teams (Teams).......................................16 e. Continuous Pairs (Side Games)......................................................17 f. Strategy: IMPs vs Matchpoints......................................................18 Part 4. Special ACBL-Wide Events (they cost more!)................................20 Part 5. Glossary of Terms (from the ACBL website)..................................25 Part 6. FAQ (with answers hopefully).........................................................40 Copyright © 2004 MayHem 2 Part 1. Expected In-Behavior Just as all kinds of competitive-type endeavors have their expected in- behavior, so does duplicate bridge. One important thing to keep in mind is that this is a competitive adventure.....as opposed to the social outing that you may be used to at your rubber bridge games. Now that is not to say that you can=t be sociable at the duplicate table. Of course you can.....and should.....just don=t carry it to extreme by talking during the auction or play.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of Fame Takes Five
    Friday, July 24, 2009 Volume 81, Number 1 Daily Bulletin Washington, DC 81st Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Hall of Fame takes five Hall of Fame inductee Mark Lair, center, with Mike Passell, left, and Eddie Wold. Sportsman of the Year Peter Boyd with longtime (right) Aileen Osofsky and her son, Alan. partner Steve Robinson. If standing ovations could be converted to masterpoints, three of the five inductees at the Defenders out in top GNT flight Bridge Hall of Fame dinner on Thursday evening The District 14 team captained by Bob sixth, Bill Kent, is from Iowa. would be instant contenders for the Barry Crane Top Balderson, holding a 1-IMP lead against the They knocked out the District 9 squad 500. defending champions with 16 deals to play, won captained by Warren Spector (David Berkowitz, Time after time, members of the audience were the fourth quarter 50-9 to advance to the round of Larry Cohen, Mike Becker, Jeff Meckstroth and on their feet, applauding a sterling new class for the eight in the Grand National Teams Championship Eric Rodwell). The team was seeking a third ACBL Hall of Fame. Enjoying the accolades were: Flight. straight win in the event. • Mark Lair, many-time North American champion Five of the six team members are from All four flights of the GNT – including Flights and one of ACBL’s top players. Minnesota – Bob and Cynthia Balderson, Peggy A, B and C – will play the round of eight today. • Aileen Osofsky, ACBL Goodwill chair for nearly Kaplan, Carol Miner and Paul Meerschaert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Deal by Larry Cohen
    BB The Real Deal by Larry Cohen too strong, you don’t make a pre - for fear that we belong in hearts. emptive bid, since partner expects No other ‘side’ issues bother me. I you to be weak when you preempt. don’t mind having an ace or a void Can you hold a side ace for a on the side, or a four-card minor. preempt? Absolutely. As long as the 4) With a six-card suit, I preempt at value of the hand is “less than an the two-level. With a seven-card opening one-bid,” it is in range for a suit, the preempt should be made at preempt. Here are my guidelines for the three-level. With an eight-card preemptive openings or overcalls: suit? You guessed it—the four level. 1) A decent suit of six cards or longer. 5) Different teachers will tell you ‘Decent’ means you have some ‘meat’ different things. If you try to listen Larry Cohen, a many-time National at the top of the suit. I would not to everyone’s rules, you will get champion, recently won the Silodor pre empt with J –8–7–5–4–3. I would confused. I’m quite comfortable and Open Pairs for a third time at the preempt with K –J–10 –8–7–6. I don’t confident about my 1) to 4) above, ACBL Spring North American recommend a strict requirement — but they are not set in stone. You Championships held in Houston. such as ‘2 of the top 3 honors.’ I do won’t get sued or kicked out of ACBL One of Larry’s favorite teaching recommend looking at vulnerability.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVERANCE © Mr Bridge ( 01483 489961
    Number: 212 August 2020 BRIDGEJulian Pottage’s Double Dummy Problem VER ANCE SE ♠ A 8 ♥ K Q 10 ♦ 6 5 4 3 2 ♣ J 10 2 ♠ K 10 7 ♠ J ♥ N ♥ 2 W E J 8 7 6 ♦ 9 8 7 S ♦ A Q J 10 ♣ A Q 9 5 4 3 ♣ K 8 7 6 ♠ Q 9 6 5 4 3 2 ♥ A 9 5 4 3 ♦ K ♣ Void Contract 5♠ by South Lead: ♥2 This Double Dummy problem can also be found on page 5 of this issue. The answer will be published on page 4 next month. of the audiences shown in immediately to keep my Bernard’s DVDs would put account safe. Of course that READERS’ their composition at 70% leads straight away to the female. When Bernard puts question: if I change my another bidding quiz up on Mr Bridge password now, the screen in his YouTube what is to stop whoever session, the storm of answers originally hacked into LETTERS which suddenly hits the chat the website from doing stream comes mostly from so again and stealing DOUBLE DOSE: Part One gives the impression that women. There is nothing my new password? In recent weeks, some fans of subscriptions are expected wrong in having a retinue. More importantly, why Bernard Magee have taken to be as much charitable The number of occasions haven’t users been an enormous leap of faith. as they are commercial. in these sessions when warned of this data They have signed up for a By comparison, Andrew Bernard has resorted to his breach by Mr Bridge? website with very little idea Robson’s website charges expression “Partner, I’m I should add that I have of what it will look like, at £7.99 plus VAT per month — excited” has been thankfully 160 passwords according a ‘founder member’s’ rate that’s £9.59 in total — once small.
    [Show full text]
  • Skill Preferred, but Luck Is More Than Welcome Strul Takes Slim Lead In
    Saturay, December 1, 2007 Volume 80, Number 9 Daily Bulletin 80th Fall North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Skill preferred, but luck Strul takes slim is more than welcome lead in Reisinger Many years ago, Allan Falk was playing in the Vanderbilt The team captained by Aubrey Strul, winners of the Mitchell Board-a-Match Knockout Teams. At one point early in the event, Falk and Teams earlier in the tournament, hold a narrow lead going into today’s semifinal his teammates found themselves pitted against a squad that sessions of the Reisinger Board-a-Match Teams. included some of the continent’s best players. Strul, a Floridian, is playing with Michael Becker, Larry Cohen, David Falk remembers the occasion so well because the Berkowitz, Chip Martel and Lew Stansby. heavily favored team bid five slams that rated to make After two qualifying sessions, they were one board clear of the Russian- better than two-thirds of the time – and each went down on a Polish foursome of Andrew Gromov – Aleksander Dubinin and Cezary Balicki – foul trump split, and each was a loss for the stars. Falk and Adam Zmudzinski. company surprised even themselves by advancing in the The field will be reduced to 14 teams for the two final sessions on Sunday. Vanderbilt. It doesn’t take much analytical skill to conclude that the major factor in the win by Falk’s team was good, old-fashioned luck. They were in the right place at Austrians leading the right time. Falk does note, by the way, that his team was good enough to win two more matches after their big upset.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Daily Bulletin
    Monday, July 21, 2008 Volume 80, Number 4 Daily Bulletin 80th Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Dave Smith Districts 8, 9, 23 and 24 take GNT titles District 9 repeats in GNT Championship Flight The District 9 team captained by Mike Becker led from start to finish in scoring a second straight win in the Grand National Teams, Championship Flight, knocking off Jan Jansma and Ricco Van Preeijen. the District 25 squad led by Frank Merblum 125-74. Dutch duo take LM Pairs Continued on page 5 Two players from the Netherlands who agreed to play five minutes before game time saved their Grand National Teams, Championship Continued on page 21 Flight, winners: front, David Berkowitz, Eric Rodwell, Mike Becker; rear, Larry Cohen, Jeff Meckstroth, Warren Spector. District 24 wins GNT Flight A The District 24 team captained by James Scott surged ahead in the second quarter of their match with a team from Ohio and went on to a 125-74 victory in the Grand National Teams, Flight A. The winners are Scott, Wilton CT; Harry Apfel, John Ramos and Kelley Hwang, New York City; Valentin Carciu, Steve Johnson and Mark Teaford. Continued on page 5 Tops in the Grand National Teams, Southern California pair Flight A: front, Valentin Carciu, John Ramos, James Scott; rear, Sorin claim Bruce LM Pleacoff, Kelley Hwang, Harry Apfel. Steve Johnson and Mark Teaford nearly didn’t make it out of the first day’s qualifying sessions. District 23 wins GNT Continued on page 21 Flight B District 23 won a tight match in the Flight B Grand National Teams.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Bridge Bulletin Index
    2000 Bridge Bulletin Index ACBL BRIDGE HALL OF FAME. George Rosenkranz named Blackwood Award winner, Meyer Schleifer receives the von Zedtwitz Award C February. Hall of Fame inducts Lou Bluhm, Harry Fishbein, Charles Solomon, George Rosenkranz, Sidney Lazard, Meyer Schleifer and Ira Rubin C October. ACBL BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Highlights from the Boston Board meeting --- February. Election notice C March C May . Highlights of Cincinnati Board meeting C May. Highlights from the Anaheim meeting C October. Election results for 2000 Board C November. ACBL CHARITY FOUNDATION. 2000 Charity Committee appointees named --- February. ACBL CHARITY GAME. Winners C August. ACBL GOODWILL COMMITTEE. 2000 Appointees named --- February. ACBL HALL OF FAME. Rosenkranz wins Blackwood award; Meyer Schleifer is von Zedtwitz award winner C February. ACBL HONORARY MEMBER OF THE YEAR. Chip Martel named for 2000 --- February. ACBL INSTANT MATCHPOINT GAME. Promo C August, September. Results C December. ACBL INTERNATIONAL FUND GAME. Winners C July, November. ACBL PATRON MEMBER LIST. December. ACBL SENIOR GAME. Winners C May. ACE OF CLUBS. Winners of the 1999 contest --- April. AMERICAN BRIDGE ASSOCIATION. Schedule of upcoming national events --- monthly. ANAHEIM NABC. Promos C April --- July. Meltzer squad wins Spingold; Wei-Sender team takes Wagar; District 9 repeats win in GNT-A; District 19 wins GNT-B title; District 13 victorious in GNT-C contest; Zia, Rosenberg top LM Pairs field; Ping, Leung win Red Ribbon; Nugit squad wins Senior Swiss teams C October. Willenken, Silverstein win Fast Open Pairs; Bach and Burgess take IMP Pairs title; Mixed B-A-M winners; 199er Pairs winners; Five-way tie fir Fishbein Trophy; other NABC highlights C November.
    [Show full text]
  • Michaels Cuebid Majors and That You Had a Limited Hand (6 to 11 Points) Or a Very Good Hand (16-Plus Points)
    This tells partner you have five spades and a five-card minor. What if partner doesn't have a fit for spades and wants to know what your minor is? He bids 2NT (con- ventional) to say, "Bid your minor." You can then bid 3 + . Important point: Don't tell your story twice Your RHO opens 1+ and you hold .KQ643 .J10764 +A4 ~8. You bid 2+ (Michaels) and LHO passes. Partner bids 2. and RHO bids 3~. What now? When you bid 2. , you told part- ner that your hand was 5-5 in the Michaels Cuebid majors and that you had a limited hand (6 to 11 points) or a very good hand (16-plus points). Since you he Michaels cuebid - brain- RHO You LHO Partner have the weaker range, and partner child of the late Mike Mi- 1+ 2+ has already chosen the suit and level T chaels - allows a player to show a major two-suiter, Put another he prefers, you should pass. Part- describe a two-suited hand in one way, a direct cuebid of an oppo- ner already knows what you have bid in competitive auctions. It is nent's opening bid of one-of-a-minor - don't compete to 3.! Partner typically reserved for hands with a shows the majors, 5-5 or longer. might have been forced to bid 2. 5-5 (or longer) pattern. An important question, however, with a hand such as When a player bids a suit which is how strong a hand does the .107 .86 +Q876 ~KI0932.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule Welcome to the Summer NAOBC
    Wednesday, July 14 Welcome to the Summer NAOBC We are pleased that you have joined us for the ACBL’s fourth North American Online Bridge Championships. These contests have been popular and greatly enjoyed by those who played in them. Like last time, we are offering three flights of both knockout and pair events. We have also expanded to include additional pairs events, also with three flights, lasting two days and three days. We hope that our members will continue to find these tournaments a source of education and fun. Please check out the online Daily Bulletins for updates on the events, tips on how to upload your convention card and use other features of BBO, and guidance from the ACBL National Recorder on rules for ethical play online. We invite you to give us your feedback on your experience so that we can make these events even more successful in the future. Please play nice, play fair and have fun. Joseph Jones Executive Director Schedule Premier KO Two-Day Pairs Grand National Teams See full schedule at acbl.org/naobc. All flights All flights All flights Wednesday, July 14 Swiss qualifying Thursday, July 15 Round of 16 Friday, July 16 Quarterfinals Saturday, July 17 Qualifying sessions Semifinals Sunday, July 18 Final sessions Finals Monday, July 19 Opening Round Tuesday, July 20 Round of 32 IMP Pairs Wednesday, July 21 Round of 16 Qualifying sessions Three-Day Pairs Thursday, July 22 Quarterfinals Final sessions All flights Friday, July 23 Semifinals Two-Day Pairs Qualifying sessions Saturday, July 24 Finals Qualifying sessions Semifinal sessions Sunday, July 25 Final sessions Final sessions About the Grand National Teams, Championship and Flight A The Grand National Teams is a North American Morehead was a member of the National Laws contest with all 25 ACBL districts participating.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaheim Angels?–Not Exactly
    Presents Anaheim Angels?–Not Exactly Appeals at the 2000 Summer NABC Plus cases from the World Teams Olympiad Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ...................................................... iii The Expert Panel.................................................v Cases from Anaheim Tempo (Cases 1-21)...........................................1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 22-26)..........................75 Misinformation (Cases 27-43) ..................................90 Other (Case 44-48)..........................................142 Cases from the 11th World Teams Bridge Olympiad, Maastricht..........158 Tempo (Cases 49-50)........................................159 Misinformation (Cases 51-55) .................................165 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists..........................182 Closing Remarks From the Editor..................................186 The Panel’s Director and Committee Ratings .........................191 NABC Appeals Committee .......................................192 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMW Appeal Without Merit Warning LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goal is to inform, provide constructive criticism, and foster change (hopefully) for the better in a manner that is entertaining, instructive and stimulating. The ACBL
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatic Standard
    PRAGMATIC STANDARD INTRODUCTION The fate of every bridge hand depends upon the respective key role properly played or awfully missed by the players occupying their respective seat. Their role is confined to the four main departments of the game, namely, bidding, declarer’s play, opening lead & defensive play. Out of them bidding is the beginning move of the battle & that’s why said to be twice important over the play of the hand. This book is on bidding & is solely meant for the tournament diehards who are keen to decide their action on every frequently recurring bidding situation. Their success at bridge has no alternative for a sharp memory with a complete systematic preparation but at the table the prime thing is concentration demanding a calm mind for a continuous process of counting. That is why it said that the name of he game is to think. Thinking at the table is nothing but time to enjoy and honor the beauty of the game turning every deal into a fruitful experience. Concentration in bridge starts as you take your assigned seat & pick up your first hand from the correct slot. We conclude a bid based on our judgment, which is nothing but an outcome of overall structure of system, close partnership understanding, accurate hand evaluation, logical deductions and experience. As regards following any specific popular or established bidding system I remember Victor Mollo, one of the great bridge player and writer, who once quoted that “Every bridge player is a system maker” and indeed it is so. Due to the individual experience players like to make a number of changes in a given system.
    [Show full text]