DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Bosnia), 15 May 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Bosnia), 15 May 2014 Photo 1. Landslide in the village of Topcic Polje, near Zenica (central Bosnia), 15 May 2014 Source: huffingtonpost.com SEM 2015 186 ELISE HAUMONT The May 2014 Floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina ay 2014 will probably be remembered for decades in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Never in living memory had the country been struck by such a large and destructive natural disaster, as record-breaking levels of rainfall led to gigantic floods, and numerous landslides. Tens of thousands of people had to urgently flee the rising water levels, while others had to leave their homes for good as they were destroyed or buried. As is often the case when such a disaster occurs, some popu- lations proved more vulnerable than others; in this particular case, the Roma minori- Mties and the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) from the Balkan war were worse affected. The evacuation of flooded areas was not planned beforehand and proved extremely chaotic. Temporary accommodation facilities were created ad hoc in buildings that were not designed to house people. The vast majority of those evacu- ated and displaced sought shelter with relatives, yet there is very little information about them. International aid proved crucial in reconstruction efforts, especially for rebuilding houses and recovering livelihoods, while the Bosnian public authori- ties, divided among numerous administrative levels demonstrated a weak response capability. 1. AN UNPRECEDENTED NATURAL DISASTER WITH ENORMOUS DAMAGE 1.1. Extraordinary levels of rainfall lead to mass flooding and landslides Bosnia and Herzegovina is largely a mountainous country, except for its northern part which reaches into the Pannonian basin. The Sava River, the largest in the country, forms a natural border with Croatia to the north. To the east, the Drina River follows the border with Serbia. A low-pressure area designated “Yvette” or “Tamara” affected a large area of south-eastern and central Europe. Continuous, heavy rainfall, commencing on 13 May, resulted in extensive flooding in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), and Croatia. Three months’ worth of rain fell in the space of only three days; the heav- iest rainfall in BiH since records began in 1894 (ACAPS, 2014). “Given the country’s topography, a vast number of rivers descend from higher elevations and feed into the Sava downstream. This caused sudden flash floods and extended inundations in the vast lower plains, where much of the country’s food and agricultural production is concentrated. Water moved downstream and upon reaching the River Sana, which also received flows from its tributaries to the east, remained above normal levels for many weeks; this impeded the normal discharge and recession in the flooded areas” (BiH Floods – Recovery Needs Assessment, 2014). In some places, the water reached the second floor of houses. SEM 2015 187 ELISE HAUMONT THE MAY 2014 FLOODS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: EUROPE EVACUATION AND DISPLACEMENT Figure 1. Deadly flood across souhest Europe Source: IOM, June 2014, Overview on IOM activities, Humanitarian Situation Report Rapid field assessment carried out on 3-4 June 2014 In BiH, between 1 and 1.5 million people are estimated to have been affected (out of a total population of 3.8 million). Affected areas cover approximately one-third of the country: Tuzla canton, Sarajevo canton, Zenica-Doboj canton, Bosnia-Podrinje canton, Una-Sana canton, Brčko district, and the regions of Banja Luka, Doboj, Bijeljina, Odžak, Bosanski Šamac and Srebrenica. The most affected were Bosanski Šamac, Odžak, Orašje, Doboj, Bijeljina, Brčko, and Maglaj. Floodwaters persisted for a number of weeks across a large portion of the affected area, restricting aid access, and impeding the return of the population and the resumption of agricultural and economic activity. As such, a full inspection that would have enabled a prompt estimation of the damage, effects and needs was further complicated and delayed. 1.2. Damage, casualties and immediate threats These floods are considered to be the most serious natural disaster in the country in the past 120 years. Houses endured various forms of damage, depending on the level that waters reached and on the solidity of the construction. Moreover, heavy rains caused over 3,000 landslides which in some areas completely covered dwellings. Data provided by the Government of BiH on 28 May 2014, account for 852 completely destroyed houses, 47,745 damaged, and 6,109 at risk of being affected by landslides (IOM, June 2014). At the UN Head of Missions meeting in September, the number of damaged housing units was estimated to be 38,000, while Reliefweb, on its page on the Balkan floods, Overview, cites 75,000 damaged houses, of which 25,000 were SEM 2015 188 severely damaged. Naturally, electricity and communications were cut off, many roads, bridges and transport facilities rendered unusable, sanitation facilities were damaged and the water supply polluted. Livestock were severely affected as well as crops and yields. The total economic impact of the disaster is estimated to have reached 2.04 billion EUR or 15% of BiH’s GDP in 2014 (Delegation of the EU to Bosnia and Herzegovina). According to official statistics, 25 people died as a result of the disaster11. As of 19 May, it is estimated that more than one million people did not have access to drink- able water or other basic needs including food, especially for babies, clothes, medi- cines, and construction materials. The temperature rose to 30 degrees Celsius in the days following the disaster, and the risk of outbreaks of disease was high due to the large number of rotting animal carcasses. As this paper will explore, the extent of the damage caused by the May 2014 floods was aggravated by BiH’s civil war heritage. This 3 and a half-year conflict that ended less than 20 years ago caused around 100,000 casualties in total, and displaced over 2,2 million people. Another consequence of the civil war, constituting an additional security threat, is the fact that 70% of the flood-affected zone is landmines-contam- inated (BiH Floods – Recovery Needs Assessment, 2014). Landslides and flooding caused some landmines and unexploded ordnances to move. Mine warning signs were also washed away or displaced. A mine exploded in Brčko district but nobody was injured. The issue of shifting minefields also affected the provision of assis- tance, since the government warned against the use of roads without prior clearance (ACAPS, 2014). Securing these affected areas will take years. Bosnian foreign minister Zlatko Lagumdzija did not hesitate to compare the damages caused by the floods to those caused by the 1992-1995 war: “The physical destruction is not less than the destruction caused by the war. […] During the war, many people lost everything. Today, again they have nothing.” A large number of Bosnians also made the comparison, as their distress revived traumatic memories from the civil war (characterised by mass bombings of towns, ethnic cleansing and mass rape), which explain why psychological support was such a priority in relief and recovery assistance programmes. 1.3. New floods in August and September hit already weakened areas This paper will focus on the May 2014 floods and their consequences in terms of displacement because they were exceptionally huge in size. However, it is worth noting that two other episodes of heavy rainfall led to floods and landslides in the following months. In affected regions, they considerably slowed the recovery efforts and caused further damage to already weakened areas. From 5 to 8 August, heavy rainfall caused flooding and landslides in Croatia, Serbia and central and northern Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Government of the Federa- tion of BiH, Brcko District, Banja Luka, Celinac, Kozarska Dubica, Petrovo, and Kosta- jnica declared a state of natural and other disasters. Some areas that were hit by the May floods were flooded again (i.e. Zenica, Topcic Polje, Zepce, Zeljezno Polje, Banja Luka, Srebrenik, Tuzla, Celic, Lukavac, Gračanica, Doboj Istok, Celinac, Bijeljina, and Brcko District). As in May, houses were submerged or buried, bridges destroyed, roads blocked and communications cut off. The worst reported situation was in the Lukavac and Gračanica regions. In the latter, several hundred people were evacu- ated from their homes (UN, August 2014; JUKIC, August 2014). The September rains affected neighbouring countries more than Bosnia itself. Only in Bosanske Gradiške, in the north, were houses flooded (EUROPEAN COMMISSION, September 2014). 1. Number found in main sources, but an undated IOM report cites 32 casualties... SEM 2015 189 ELISE HAUMONT THE MAY 2014 FLOODS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: EUROPE EVACUATION AND DISPLACEMENT 2. MASSIVE DISPLACEMENT FOLLOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC PATTERNS 2.1. Unreliable data Several sources evoke “a local media, quoting government sources”2 to advance a total of 950,000 people who had to evacuate their homes at some point following the beginning of the floods (articles and reports written around 20-25 May). On 20 May, CNN cited “Bosnian officials” to give the figure of 30,000 people displaced. On the same date, abc.net cited Assistant Security Minister Samir Agic to posit 500,000 people having left their homes (GEARIN, May 2014). The needs assessment endorsed by the UN, the European Union and the World Bank cites a total of 89,981 people displaced, with 49 822 people taking refuge in either official or alternative private accommoda- tion at the peak level of displacement. In June, IOM cautiously evoked “tens of thou- sands” of displaced people, among which 90% found themselves in temporary living arrangements with relatives. In an article written in September 2014, IDMC stated that “the exact number of those displaced by the floods is unknown. Those who seek shelter with families and friends have not been included in displacement estimates and the figures for those living in the temporary accommodation facilities fluctuate as family members return home.” 2.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prof. Dr. Izet Masic Izet Masic Was Born on 1952 in Gracanica, Bosnia
    Prof. Dr. Izet Masic Izet Masic was born on 1952 in Gracanica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He graduated from Primary school in Gracanica in 1967, Grammar school (Gymnasium) in Gracanica in 1971 and Medical faculty in Sarajevo in 1976. He notified his medical diploma at Medical faculty in Innsbruck (Austria) in 1996. Postgraduate study of Social Medicine and organization of health care system finished at Medical Faculty University of Sarajevo in 1978. He pasted specialist’s exam from the same area in 1982. His master thesis was “Evaluation of information system of family health” and PhD thesis “Evaluation of computerized information system in primary health care”, both earned from Medical Faculty University of Sarajevo in 1985 and 1990. After the studies he worked at Institute for Social medicine and organization of heath care system at Medical Faculty University of Sarajevo as general practitioner and research fallow on the project “Content of physician work in family and municipality” and after the specialist’s exam in 1982 as assistant researcher and since 1988 as assistant. Masic become assistant professor for Social medicine in 1991. He became teacher at Nursing College in 1986 and since 1989 he was developed into professor on the same institution. In 1992 Izet Masic established Cathedra for Medical Informatics at Medical Faculty of University of Sarajevo and past through all phases from assistant professor in 1992 to full professor in 1998. In 2002 he became full professor for Family medicine at Medical Faculty University of Sarajevo and in 2005 he become full professor for Family medicine and at Faculty for Health Sciences University of Zenica.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Speleology 37 (1) 11-26 Bologna (Italy) January 2008
    International Journal of Speleology 37 (1) 11-26 Bologna (Italy) January 2008 Available online at www.ijs.speleo.it International Journal of Speleology Official Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Hydrodynamic aspect of caves Mitja Prelovšek1, Janez Turk2, Franci Gabrovšek3 Abstract: Prelovšek M., Turk J. and Gabrovšek F. 2008. Hydrodynamic aspect of caves. International Journal of Speleology, 37 (1), 11-26. Bologna (Italy). ISSN 0392-6672. From a hydrological point of view, active caves are a series of connected conduits which drain water through an aquifer. Water tends to choose the easiest way through the system but different geological and morphological barriers act as flow restrictions. The number and characteristics of restrictions depends on the particular speleogenetic environment, which is a function of geological, geomorphological, climatological and hydrological settings. Such a variety and heterogeneity of underground systems has presented a challenge for human understanding for many centuries. Access to many underground passages, theoretical knowledge and recent methods (modeling, water pressure-resistant dataloggers, precise sensors etc.) give us the opportunity to get better insight into the hydrodynamic aspect of caves. In our work we tried to approach underground hydrodynamics from both theoretical and practical points of view. We present some theoretical background of open surface and pressurized flow in underground rivers and present results of some possible scenarios. Moreover, two case studies from the Ljubljanica river basin are presented in more detail: the cave system between Planinsko polje and Ljubljansko barje, and the cave system between Bloško polje and Cerkniško polje. The approach and methodology in each case is somewhat different, as the aims were different at the beginning of exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming
    Copyright © 2012 by Robert D. Kaplan Maps copyright © 2012 by David Lindroth, Inc. All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Random House, an imprint of The Random House Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York. RANDOM HOUSE and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. The preface contains material from four earlier titles by Robert D. Kaplan: Soldiers of God (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 1990), An Empire Wilderness (New York: Random House, Inc., 1998), Eastward to Tartary (New York: Random House, Inc., 2000), and Hog Pilots, Blue Water Grunts (New York: Random House, Inc., 2007). LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Kaplan, Robert D. The revenge of geography : what the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate / by Robert D. Kaplan. p. cm. eISBN: 978-0-679-60483-9 1. Political geography. I. Title. JC319.K335 2012 320.1′2—dc23 2012000655 www.atrandom.com Title-spread image: © iStockphoto Jacket design: Greg Mollica Front-jacket illustrations (top to bottom): Gerardus Mercator, double hemisphere world map, 1587 (Bridgeman Art Library); Joan Blaeu, view of antique Thessaly, from the Atlas Maior, 1662 (Bridgeman Art Library); Robert Wilkinson, “A New and Correct Map v3.1_r1 But precisely because I expect little of the human condition, man’s periods of felicity, his partial progress, his efforts to begin over again and to continue, all seem to me like so many prodigies which nearly compensate for the monstrous mass of ills and defeats, of indifference and error. Catastrophe and ruin will come; disorder will triumph, but order will too, from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhine: Germany's River, Not Germany's Boundary
    Source: E.M. Arndt, Deutschlands Fluss, aber nicht Deutschlands Gränze, English trl. UvA Talen / SPIN. the French was as bad as it was foolish. One would have The Rhine: Germany’s river, not Germany’s thought that ten years, indeed twenty years, of blindness and misfortune might have sent a little light into their dark minds boundary and brought the errants back into line, especially since the French had long ago overturned their own proof, but far from it. There are still many who behave, indeed who exhaust Ernst Moritz Arndt themselves in deductions and proofs, as if the Rhine as the border between France and Germany is something indispu- table and settled. So effective is constant repetition, and so little are most Germans – who pride themselves on their ‘The Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ is what Sully proved profundity in thought and speech – accustomed to thinking. 1600 and 1610; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ The empty echoing of foreign opinions, especially the proclaimed Richelieu in 1625 and 1635; ‘the Rhine is France’s echoing of French hocus-pocus and sophistries, has sadly natural boundary,’ declared Count d’Avaux in the 1640s at become too much of a fashion on this side of the Rhine, in Münster, in the holy places where Hermann the Cheruscan had the country where thoroughness and depth of thought is once made a dufferent typeof declaration to the Romans; ‘the supposed to reside. Given this state of affairs, especially this Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ resounded from 1670 to sad state of German minds and hearts, I consider it not super- 1700 in Louvois’ and Colbert’s speeches in Louis XIV’s council fluous to present our ancient, magnificent and holy River of state, and the court poets Boileau and Racine sang it in the Rhine, what it was, is and will be, to the good German antechamber; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ cried the people, who are confused by too many political prattlers and monsters on the Seine from 1790 to 1800.
    [Show full text]
  • Amel Alić, Phd, Haris Cerić, Phd, Sedin Habibović
    Amel Alić, PhD, University of Zenica Haris Cerić, PhD, University of Sarajevo Sedin Habibović, MA, Public Health Institution Addiction Treatment Centre of Zenica-Doboj Canton Authors Amel Alić, PhD, University of Zenica Haris Cerić, PhD, University of Sarajevo Sedin Habibović, MA, Public Health Institution Addiction Treatment Centre of Zenica-Doboj Canton Editor Elma Mahmutović, United World College in Mostar Critics: Academic Adila Pašalić-Kreso and Academic Ivo Cvitković Translator: Libar translation bureau Mostar Illustrator: Shift Brand Design Number of editions: 1 Name and seat of the publisher: IC Štamparija d.o.o., Titova 96, Mostar Year of publication and year of printing: 2017 Name and seat of printer: IC Štamparija d.o.o., Titova 96, Mostar Number of copies: 300 Authors Amel Alić, PhD, University of Zenica Haris Cerić, PhD, University of Sarajevo Sedin Habibović, MA, Public Health Institution Addiction Treatment Centre of Zenica-Doboj Canton Mostar, 2017 ABOUT THE AUTHORS AMEL ALIĆ, PhD (1971), Associate Professor for pedagogic/ed- ucation courses at the Faculty of Philosophy in Zenica. Amel earned his BA degree at the Faculty of philosophy (University of Sarajevo), MA degree in special education at University of Sa- rajevo and University of Joensuu and his (Ph. D) at University of Sarajevo. He is author of the book entitled Structure and Dynam- ics of Family Culture (2012, Sarajevo, Dobra knjiga and CNS), and co-author of the books The Basics of Inclusive Education (2005, Zenica, Hijatus) and Creative Actions in Literature Classes (2012, Zenica, City Library). HARIS CERIĆ, Ph.D., (1974), Associate Professor for the peda- gogic/education courses at the Faculty of Political Sciences in Sa- rajevo.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do You Oppose Bih's Accession?
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Public Opinion on Foreign Influence and Violent Extremism March 7, 2019 – March 26, 2019 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in Survey Research by Ipsos Bosnia and Herzegovina. • Data was collected between March 7 and 26, 2019, through in-home, in-person interviews using the CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing) method. • A total of 2,190 interviews were completed with an overall margin of error of +/- 2.1% at the midrange of the 95-percent confidence level for the full sample. • A nationally representative sample was based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, with a random selection of households and respondents within each Primary Sampling Unit (PSU). The first level was the region and the second level was urbanity. • Using data from the 2013 census as statistical reference for sample design, the sample is made up of citizens of BiH, aged 18+. • Sampling frame: address registry within strata defined by region and type of settlements (urban and rural). • Targeted oversampling was conducted in four areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina that have been identified as susceptible to radical tendencies: Zenica-Doboj Canton (n=148), Una-Sana Canton (n=188), Herzegovina-Neretva Canton (n=206) and Republika Srpska East (n=102). Oversampling in these areas sought to yield more specific insights into the public’s perception of the role of religion in society, the presence of extremism, and interethnic tension, among others. • Households were selected by a random route technique. • Respondent selection was made using random selection, any member of a household with the same probability (SRSWoR).
    [Show full text]
  • Popovo Polje Inventarization the System
    borut juvanec ljubljana university, faculty of architecture, slovenia institute of vernacular architecture, ljubljana architecture of water bosna i hercegovina popovo polje inventarization the system ICOMOS Bosnia and Herzegovina ljubljana 2o15 prof dr borut juvanec, ljubljana university, faculty of architecture zoisova 12, 1 LJUBLJANA insitute of vernacular architecture, Prijateljeva 11, 1 LJUBLJANA Slovenia [email protected] ljubljana 2o15 borut juvanec, ljubljana university SLOVENIA inventarization ICOMOS Bosnia and Herzegovina inventarization < Donje Hrasno Hutovo salaš, corn drying shed ponor mlinica, documented < Neum ponor mlinica, photographed irrigation system, wheels serial mlinica, stream < Trebišnjica classical watermill Melja Međa Ravno Stolac Mostar > Bosna i Hercegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina Hercegovina Mrkonjići POPOVOSedlari POLJE Žakovo Poljice Dobromani Popovo Crna Gora > Montenegro Hrvatska Staro Slano Croatia Hum TREBINJE Bileća > Nikšić MNE > Pridvorci Herceg rebišnjica Novi MNE > < T o 18 E < Dubrovnik HR Bosna i Hercegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina salaš / corn drying shed Salaš or corn drying shed is an object for drying and storing the corn. It has the stony basement (sometimes used as the cellar) and the gables in stone. Inbetween can be found the wooden construction of the roof, now covered by the clay tiles. Originally covering of the roof was thatched by the straw or reed - the ‚guvno’ or treshing floor behind the object in Ravno speaks about cereals, not in use today. The side walls are realized in wattle, which stop entrance to the rodents, but it is open to the wind, needed for drying the corn. ponor mlinica Ponor mlinica (mlin) or ponor waterwell, shaft waterwell is an unique system of use the flooding water of the Trebišnjica river.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding Analysis of Karst Poljes in Bosnia & Herzegovina
    Flooding analysis of Karst Poljes in Bosnia & Herzegovina Ulrich Schwarz FLUVIUS, Vienna 31.05.2013 Flooding analysis of Karst Poljes in Bosnia & Herzegovina For further information please contact: Romy Durst Euronatur Konstanzerstrasse 22 D-78315 Radolfzell [email protected] Dr. Ulrich Schwarz FLUVIUS Hetzgasse 22/7 A-1030 Vienna Email: [email protected] This document has been produced by: Ulrich Schwarz, FLUVIUS, Vienna Acknowledgements: Borut Stumberger Cover photo: Livanjsko Polje, Ulrich Schwarz 1 Flooding analysis of Karst Poljes in Bosnia & Herzegovina Table of Contents 1. Introduction and aim of the study .............................................................................................................. 4 2. Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Geomorphological definition .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Hydrology ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Analysis of DEM .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Analysis of maps...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title: Support to Local and Regional Development In
    1 TITLE: SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Abstract: the abstract for paper no. 57 NAME: JASMINA OSMANAGIĆ, PHD Faculty of Economics, Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Phone: +387 33 27 59 19 E-mail: [email protected] Mirko Pejanović, PhD FPN University of Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 29 58 59 Klelija Balta UNDP 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 10 42 20 2 SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND ABSTRACT The paper is a review European Commission support for local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1999 to 2006. In focus are The Quick Impact Facility Project Phase I (QIF 1) 1999-2002, European Union- Quick Impact Facility Project Phase II (EUQIF II) 2002-2004, European Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase I (EU RED I) 2004-2005 and Europe Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase II (EU RED II) 2005-2007). The paper contents background information, previous assistance, other related programmes, European Commission funded projects, non European Commission funded projects, definition on participants, target groups or beneficiaries, employed domicile populations, start situation, objectives, scope of work, methodology and approach, transparency, visibility, expected outputs and indicators, funds or budget, reporting, monitoring and evaluation. The paper presents knowledge transfer about local and regional theories and policies from experts European Commission to local experts. The paper shows funds. (Regional Development in Tuzla 1.2 Million Euro, Regional Development in Brcko 1.0 Million Euro, Mostar Economic Development 500.000 Euro, Sarajevo Economic Region 200.000 Euro, Quick Impact Facility 5.5 Million Euro, Foreign 3 Investment Promotion 1.0 Million Euro, European Fund 55 Million Euro, specific activities 3,200.000 Euro and Project Fund 3,800.000 Euro, EUQIF II about 3 Million Euro, etc) and benefits for EU and B&H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inscription of Cohors Iii Alpinorum from Cecela Near Drniš (Dalmatia) and the Question of the Roman Military Presence in Petrovo Polje During the Principate
    THE INSCRIPTION OF COHORS III ALPINORUM FROM CECELA NEAR DRNIŠ (DALMATIA) AND THE QUESTION OF THE ROMAN MILITARY PRESENCE IN PETROVO POLJE DURING THE PRINCIPATE Nikola CESARIK Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts Institute for Historical and Social Sciences in Rijeka Abstract: New insights about the previously unpublished inscription of [email protected] cohors III Alpinorum, located in the Archaeological Museum in Zadar, are brought to light. Previously documented as an inscription from an unknown Luka DRAHOTUSKY-BRUKETA site, calling upon the diaries of a Friar Lujo Marun, it is now identified as Ruđera Boškovića 22, 34000 Požega, Croatia an inscription from Petrovo polje; more precisely from the Cecela hilltop in [email protected] the village of Siverić near the city of Drniš. So far, eight inscriptions with the record of Roman auxiliary units were found in the area of Petrovo polje, thus the inscription from Cecela should not be considered as an isolated DOI: 10.14795/j.v7i2.533 case, but rather as a part of a relatively larger group of epigraphic records ISSN 2360 – 266X of Roman auxiliary units. The inscriptions were found in several locations (Tepljuh, Otavice, Kadina Glavica, Umljanovići) and as such, they represent ISSN–L 2360 – 266X the foundation of a hypothesis for the existence of several Roman auxiliary forts in Petrovo polje. On the other hand, it has recently been suggested that only one fort should be located in Petrovo polje, i.e. in the wider area of Kadina Glavica. The proposed location for the auxiliary fort is found at the slope below the place name “Glavičina” in the area of the village of Parčić near Kadina Glavica.
    [Show full text]
  • Kako Doći Do Banja Luke?
    Kako doći do Banja Luke? Automobilom - iz smjera Beograd: Beograd je od Banjaluke udaljen 350 km. Ukoliko, u Banjaluku, dolazite iz Beograda uključujete na auto put E70 prema zapadu i Zagrebu. Na 300-tom kilometru u mjestu Okučani izađite sa auto-puta i skrenite desno na putni pravac E661 i vozite južno prema graničnom prelazu Bosne i Hercegovine u Gradišci (11km). Od Gradiške nastavljate istim putnim pravcem E661 prema jugu do Banjaluke (50km). - - iz smjera Zagreb: Zagreb je od Banjaluke udaljen oko 180 km. Ukoliko u Banjaluku dolazite iz Zagreba, uključite se na auto-put E70 prema istoku i Beogradu. Na 106-tom kilometru od Zagreba, u mjestu Okučani, izađite sa auto-puta, te nakon naplatnih kućica skrenite na lijevo, na putni pravac E661 i vozite južno prema graničnom prelazu Bosne i Hercegovine u Gradišci (11km). Od Gradiške nastavljate istim putnim pravcem (E661) prema jugu do Banjaluke (50km). - - .iz smjera Sarajevo: Sarajevo je od Banjaluke udaljeno oko 250 km. Ukoliko, u Banjaluku, dolazite iz Sarajeva idite na sjeverozapad prema mjestu Kakanj i magistralnom putu E-73 te se na 60-tom kilometru odlučite između dva različita putna pravca koja vode do Banjaluke. Prvi (bolji i duži) put nastavlja putnim pravcem E73 prema sjeveru i mjestima Zenica i Maglaj a na 17-om kilometru nakon Doboja, skrećete lijevo i nastavljate put prema Derventi, Prnjavoru i Klašnicama. U Klašnicama (nakon mosta) skrećete lijevo i uključujete se na magistralni put M16 (E661) i nastavljate voziti 16 km južno za Banjaluku. Drugim, kraćim i mnogo interesantnijim putem, ćete stići ako idući iz Sarajeva skrenete desno u mjestu Lašva i uključite se na magistralni putni pravac E661 prema Vitezu, Travniku, Jajcu i dalje prema Banjaluci.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodrow Wilson Boundary Between Turkey and Armenia
    WOODROW WILSON BOUNDARY BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA The publication of this book is sponsored by HYKSOS Foundation for the memory of General ANDRANIK – hero of the ARMENIAN NATION. Arbitral Award of the President of the United States of America Woodrow Wilson Full Report of the Committee upon the Arbitration of the Boundary between Turkey and Armenia. Washington, November 22nd, 1920. Prepared with an introduction by Ara Papian. Includes indices. Technical editor: Davit O. Abrahamyan ISBN 978-9939-50-160-4 Printed by “Asoghik” Publishing House Published in Armenia www.wilsonforarmenia.org © Ara Papian, 2011. All rights reserved. This book is dedicated to all who support Armenia in their daily lives, wherever they may live, with the hope that the information contained in this book will be of great use and value in advocating Armenia’s cause. Woodrow Wilson (December 28, 1856 – February 3, 1924) 28th President of the United States of America (March 4, 1913 – March 4, 1921) ARBITRAL AWARD OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WOODROW WILSON FULL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE UPON THE ARBITRATION OF THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA WASHINGTON, NOVEMBER 22ND, 1920 PREPARED with an introduction by ARA PAPIAN Yerevan – 2011 Y Z There was a time when every American schoolboy knew of Armenia, the entire proceeds of the Yale-Harvard Game (1916) were donated to the relief of “the starving Armenians,” and President Woodrow Wilson’s arbitration to determine the border between Armenia and Ottoman Turkey was seen as natural, given the high standing the 28th President enjoyed in the Old World.
    [Show full text]