War Against U.S. Navy Veterans

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

War Against U.S. Navy Veterans WAR AGAINST U.S. NAVY VETERANS BY BOB FORD The USS Ronald Reagan and her gallant crew of men and women recently performed a heroic service for thousands after the devastating earthquake and tsunami on the east coast of northern Japan. They just don’t know it yet. The Reagan, and her carrier strike group, USS Chancellorsville and USS Preble, were nearly 100 miles offshore when they were engulfed by what the Navy described as: “A month’s radiation in just one hour.” The 7th Fleet command quickly repositioned these ships after contamination was detected aboard. If anyone in Washington has common sense, the incident should bring an end to the long and contentious war by the Department of Veterans Affairs against sailors of the Vietnam War who were exposed to Agent Orange. But because Washington, D.C., is the last place anyone would expect to find common sense, and because this story involves the worst in bureaucratic confusion and ineptitude as well as a callous disregard for the plight of men who once sailed in harm’s way in our nation’s defense, this story is being written from a small town in Pennsylvania. It’s a disgraceful nightmare not only to these veterans, but in many cases their families with only the widows left to fend for themselves as their husbands have paid the ultimate price for serving their country. The Navy veterans who are still alive are all over 50. They manned the decks of the greatest navy in the world, on ships large and small, determined mostly by the luck of the draw. And it was this luck of the draw that has now left the majority of them without benefits for their service. Senior bureaucrats in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs seem relentlessly determined to prevent Navy veterans of the Vietnam War from receiving benefits that are automatically granted to all other Vietnam veterans.Veterans Affairs officials made a decision to cut off previously granted benefits by reinterpreting their own regulations, and as a result, have left thousands of Navy veterans to suffer and die without disability and health benefits from the government that sent them to that distant war. It was a war that I firmly believe caused their illnesses. Agent Orange is the term used to describe the dioxin-laced herbicides that were repeatedly sprayed over Vietnam to defoliate the jungles. The goal was to eliminate hiding places for enemy soldiers. The term originated from the orange stripe around the barrels of chemicals. Most of this deadly stuff was flown out of the large base at Da Nang, Vietnam, under the mission term Operation Ranch Hand. Literally, tons of it were dumped by multiengine aircraft, often three and four abreast. On the one hand, it did its job. Untold acres of Vietnam’s jungles were turned into a deadly wasteland. But it also exposed American servicemen and women to a chemical that now has them dying on average 13 years earlier than their counterparts who did not serve in Vietnam. This despite the manufacturers, Dow Chemical and Monsanto, assuring the government, that all was safe. After years of denial in a prolonged battle by Vietnam veterans, the government finally acknowledged the disabilities likely caused by Agent Orange, and a system was established to process claims for those who now have one or more of the diseases recognized by the VA as likely linked to exposure to these chemicals. The National Academy of Sciences was charged with determining which diseases were connected to Agent Orange. The list includes many cancers, multiple myeloma, type 2 diabetes and Parkinson’s disease, among others. Published in The Patriot-News on Dec. 11, 2011 1 The Agent Orange Act of 1991 provided for benefits to all who had earned the Vietnam Service Medal during the 10-year war. The legislation was clear: Anyone who served, whether on land or sea, was presumed to have been exposed to Agent Orange. For many, it was too late, including Lt. Elmo R. Zumwalt III, the son of then Vice Adm. Elmo R. Zumwalt Jr, commander of Naval Forces, Vietnam.The younger Zumwalt was a swift boat skipper who died of cancer in 1988 at age 42. It also was too late for my friend, Marine Capt. Robert B. Scholl, whom I had talked into joining up with me in 1958. Bob flew 324 combat missions out of Da Nang during two tours, one in F4 Phantoms, the second as a helicopter gunship pilot. He died of cancer at 52.His younger brother, Jim, would follow him into the Marines, to Da Nang, and into the grave from cancer. Several other personal friends of mine have gone the same way, from the same cause. After 1991, veterans were able to apply for disability benefits when they were stricken with deadly cancers. Besides their diagnosis, all they needed to submit was proof of Vietnam service on their Department of Defense Form 214. To this day, for veterans of the Army, Air Force and Marine Corps, the process remains clear and fast. You were there, you have it, you are eligible. But shamefully, that is not the way it works for Navy veterans. As far as the VA is concerned, most Navy Vietnam veterans were never there and are not entitled to Agent Orange benefits, even though the government of Australia has shown that its Vietnam naval veterans are dying at a higher rate than counterparts who served on the ground. VA bureaucrats did not seem to warm to the idea of Agent Orange benefits in the first place. This was something that had been imposed upon them by Congress. Implementing this new disability benefit was going to be cumbersome, costly and impose upon their authority to determine which veterans would get what. Nevertheless, in 1990, VA regulations defined service in Vietnam to include “service in the waters offshore or service in other locations if the service involved visitation in Vietnam.” Thus, when the Agent Orange Act was passed by Congress, the simple way to determine eligibility for any veteran who was diagnosed with one of the related disabilities was proof of service in Vietnam. Initially, eligible veterans, including Navy veterans, applied for and received the disability benefits to which they were entitled. But in 2001, George W. Bush and his administrative team, many of whom avoided service in Vietnam, were calling the shots. Within a year, Blue Water Navy veterans would be stripped of their eligibility for Agent Orange benefits.The Bush administration bureaucrats said that sailors who served aboard ships offshore could not have been exposed to Agent Orange. Only those who could prove they had left the ship and set foot in Vietnam would be eligible for benefits. Many Navy veterans already receiving benefits had their disability revoked and payments stopped. New claims were denied, and it was left to each individual to prove on appeal that he was exposed under the new rules. Suddenly, two new terms entered the Vietnam history books: Brown Water Navy and Blue Water Navy. Brown Water Navy veterans are eligible for Agent Orange benefits; Blue Water Navy veterans are not. The Brown Water Navy referred to boats and ships that operated on inland waterways such as swift boats skippered by Zumwalt and by Lt. John Kerry, the former presidential candidate. It also included a few landing ship tanks and other amphibious naval ships and landing craft. The Blue Water Navy was composed of larger ships that operated mainly on the open seas, particularly at Yankee Station in the Tonkin Gulf, anywhere from several miles to 50 or more miles offshore. These were the capital ships of the Navy and their escort and supply vessels. Under the modified VA rules, sailors serving aboard a Blue Water ship had to document proof that they had gone ashore in Vietnam. Few sailors could make this claim, and even for those who could found securing actual proof next to impossible in many cases. Published in The Patriot-News on Dec. 11, 2011 2 Ironically, there is much scientific evidence to prove that Blue Water sailors were not only exposed to Agent Orange, but probably to a greater degree than troops on the ground. Because of that evidence, sailors from Australia are granted disability benefits for Agent Orange just as U.S. sailors were until 2002. Australia conducted extensive medical and scientific research from many sources, and the government concluded that its sailors and ships were exposed to Agent Orange while sailing off the coast of Vietnam and that the water distillation process then in use by Australians, as well as the U.S. Navy, likely made the contamination worse. The most important evidence is that Australia’s sailors, most of whom stayed offshore, are contracting Agent Orange cancers at a higher rate than Australian veterans who served on the ground in Vietnam. The Australians did not reach their conclusions lightly. Their scientific studies were thorough and exhausting. All the evidence was there, and the government of Australia acted accordingly, in 2006 granting Agent Orange benefits to the very sailors whose ships sailed alongside ours. In the United States, VA bureaucrats also responded quickly. They began to nitpick potential flaws in the Australian scientific studies. To do otherwise would endanger their own positions. But Blue Water sailors were not going quietly. Former Navy Cmdr. Jonathon L. Haas, who had served in Vietnam aboard the ammunition tender USS Mount Katmai, appealed his 2004 denial of benefits to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.As part of his claim, Haas testified that clouds of Agent Orange propelled by offshore prevailing winds covered his ship, much like what occurred in March 2011 to the USS Reagan battle group off Japan.
Recommended publications
  • The Alliance of Military Reunions
    The Alliance of Military Reunions Louis "Skip" Sander, Executive Director [email protected] – www.amr1.org – (412) 367-1376 153 Mayer Drive, Pittsburgh PA 15237 Directory of Military Reunions How to Use This List... Members are listed alphabetically within their service branch. To jump to a service branch, just click its name below. To visit a group's web site, just click its name. Groups with names in gray do not currently have a public web site. If you want to contact one of the latter, just send us an email. To learn more about a member's ship or unit, click the • to the left of its name. Air Force Army Coast Guard Marine Corps Navy Other AIR FORCE, including WWII USAAF ● 1st Computation Tech Squadron ● 3rd Air Rescue Squadron, Det. 1, Korea 1951-52 ● 6th Weather Squadron (Mobile) ● 7th Fighter Command Association WWII ● 8th Air Force Historical Society ● 9th Physiological Support Squadron ● 10th Security Police Association ● 11th Bombardment Group Association (H) ● 11th & 12th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadrons Joint Reunion ● 13 Jungle Air Force Veterans Association ● 15th Radio Squadron Mobile (RSM) USAFSS ● 20th Fighter Wing Association ● 34th Bomb Squadron ● 34th Tactical Fighter Squadron, Korat Thailand ● 39th Fighter Squadron Association ● 47th Bomb Wing Association ● 48th Communications Squadron Association ● 51st Munitions Maintenance Squadron Association ● 55th & 58th Weather Reconnaissance Squadrons ● 57th TCS/MAS/AS/WPS (Troop Carrier Squadron, Military Airlift Squadron, Airlift Squadron, Weapons Squadron) Military
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Penny
    T H E BRIGHT PENNY May 2003 A NEWSLETTER FOR MEMBERS OF THE USS BERKELEY (DDG -15) ASSOCIATION 2004 Reunion in Branson, MO. It’s a great time to be an American. My son served in the first Persian MASTER CHIEF IN THE SPOTLIGHT Gulf War and I am sure there are USS Berkeley crew Master Chief George (Sid) Watson was born in 1945 in Rockford, Illinois me mbers who have and raised in Troy, New York where he sons or daughters attended St. Au gustine’s elementary that have served in school and LaSalle Institute high school. He enlisted in the Navy on September Iraqi Freedom. My 30, 1963, attending boot c amp at RTC gratitude and Great Lakes, IL. Following recruit appreciation goes training he was assigned to FT”A” School at Bainbridge, MD, and then to out to all of them. FT”C” Sch ool at Damneck, VA. His first Thanks to their shipboard assignment was aboard the Ray Bartlett patriotism and USS Conyngham (DDG —17) in Norfolk, courage, the world VA. In May 1966 he was ordered to the USS Berkeley (DDG -15) in Long will be a better place for yours and Beach, CA., attending FT ”B” School at my grand children. NTC Great Lakes, IL. while enroute. The voting for the loca tion of the During hi s Berkeley tour from December 1966 to January 1972 he 2004 reunion is now complete and served as Missile Computer Work Branson is the winner. The reunion Center Supervisor. From Berkeley he will be September 30th through was t ransferred to the USS Somers FCCM George Watson (DDG -34) in Long Beach, CA, where he October 3rd 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • By Samuel J. Cox RADM, USN (Retired) Director of Naval History Curator for the Navy Director, Naval History and Heritage Command
    Tribute to the Life of Rear Admiral William Albert “Bill” Walsh, USN(Ret) By Samuel J. Cox RADM, USN (retired) Director of Naval History Curator for the Navy Director, Naval History and Heritage Command It is with deep regret I inform you of the passing of Rear Admiral William Albert “Bill” Walsh, U.S. Navy (Retired) on 14 April 2020 at age 86. Bill entered the Naval Reserve Officer Training program at the University of Notre Dame in September 1952 and served as a Surface Line Officer until his retirement in late 1985 as the Director of the Surface Warfare Division (OP-32) on the OPNAV Staff. His tours included multiple amphibious ship assignments, three Vietnam deployments (on USS REEVES (DLG-24,) as Executive Officer of USS COCHRANE (DDG-21) and Commanding Officer of USS TOWERS (DDG-9) during which he earned a Bronze Star,) as well as command of USS JUNEAU (LPD-10,) Amphibious Squadron THREE, and Amphibious Group Eastern Pacific. While attending the University of Notre Dame, Bill received a draft notice from the U.S. Army during the Korean War. Displaying sound judgment, he promptly applied and was accepted in the Naval Reserve Officer Training Program on 18 September 1952. Midshipman Walsh graduated from Notre Dame in June 1955 with a Bachelor of Science in Commerce/Accounting and was commissioned an ensign in the U.S. Naval Reserve. Following a couple months at Naval Amphibious Training Unit, Little Creek, VA, in July 1955 he reported to his first ship, the Underwater Demolition Team (UDT) flagship-configured fast transport HOLLIS (APD-86,) which conducted local operations and a Midshipman Cruise before being decommissioned in October 1956.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
    Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays.
    [Show full text]
  • USS O'callahan (DE/FF-1051) Chronology/Timeline
    USS O'CALLAHAN (DE/FF-1051) Chronology/Timeline The chronology was started, and the major effort accomplished by GMG1 Bill Scroggins. Other former crewmembers that provided input include TM3 Ron Kobeluch, FTG2 Mike Poncsak, and RM2 Richard Settle. The O’Callahan’s first Captain, Cmdr. Bob Brown, saved almost all of the Plans of the Day and Plans of the Week from his time in command. Items from these documents are marked (POD) or (POW). The POW dates may not be as accurate as the POD dates. The chronology was compiled from numerous sources, but thanks are due to O’CALLAHAN’s former crewmembers who contributed much of the information and all of the recollections here. Dates in RED are confirmed dates. Dates in BLACK are approximate dates. Dates or Events in BLUE are unconfirmed dates or events and may not be correct. Notes, sources and comments are in GREEN and quotes are in PINK. 1964 19 February 1964 Wednesday. O’CALLAHAN’s keel is laid down by the Defoe Shipbuilding Co. in Bay City, Michigan. The building of O’CALLAHAN is Defoe Shipbuilding Company Job Number 439. This date and info are from the website, “Destroyers Online” and the Defoe Shipbuilding Company website. 1965 20 October 1965 Wednesday. O’CALLAHAN is launched at the Defoe Shipyard in Bay City, Michigan. She is christened by Chaplain O'Callahan's sister, Sister Rose Marie O'Callahan, a catholic nun of the Mary Knoll Order. This date and info are from the website, “Destroyers Online.” 1968 Jan/Feb? 1968 Cadre crew reports to the USS O’CALLAHAN (DE-1051) at Bay City, Michigan Commander Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Supply Corps
    SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2017 SUPPOs Supplying the Fight A Message from the Chief of Supply Corps Recognizing the central importance of supply to establishing the Navy, President George Washington laid the foundation for the U.S. Navy Supply Corps in 1775 with the appointment of Tench Francis, a Philadelphia businessman, as the country’s first Purveyor of Public Supplies. Francis provided vital support to the first Navy ships, and started our tradition of selfless service. The Navy’s trusted providers of supplies, our supply officers (SUPPOs) keep operations running smoothly to support the mission. But they can’t do it alone. Working as a team with their skilled and experienced enlisted members, our SUPPOs are experts in our field who know inventory and financial management, food, retail, postal operations, and disbursing management. They are leaders and problem solvers who tackle complex challenges to implement effective and efficient management solutions, ensuring our customers’ needs are met. To be “Ready for Sea,” we must be professionally ready with the skills to operate in all our lines of operation. We also need character readiness, demonstrated by our integrity, accountabili- ty, initiative, and toughness. Lastly, we need to be individually ready; to be fit, healthy, and ready to meet the demands of the fight. This issue provides insights from our SUPPOs’ important work as they meet the unique needs of their various commands. Like the pursuers and paymasters who have gone before, SUPPOs uphold our rich heritage, and embrace their responsibilities to support the warfighter with a servant’s heart. Our SUPPO’s success depends on their character and competence, knowledge of the shore infrastructure, relationships with our professional civilian workforce, and on the enlisted members they lead and serve with.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Quarter 2013
    “Rest well, yet sleep lightly and hear the call, if again sounded, to provide Firepower for Freedom…” 3rd Quarter 2013 The Jerseyman Number 79 Update on the Battleship New Jersey Memorial Kiosk Rich Thrash, Battleship Brass Team Volunteer It’s been a very busy spring on the battleship, lots of special events going on and overall attendance seems to be up a little over recent years. I don’t have any hard numbers to support that observation, but I do know I’m seeing more people passing by us as we work along the tour routes. The Turret II Experience is popular too; in fact additional slots are now available to schedule that tour on Saturdays. In addition to spending every Saturday I can on the ship working and polishing brass, I’ve also been busy over the last few months adding more crewmember names to the Memorial Kiosk. I’d like to take this opportunity to thank Tom Kowszun for his help with the programming aspects of making the kiosk more user-friendly and interactive. I’ve also had a lot of help from Margaret and Dave Burgess who, through the use of www.ancestry.com, have tracked down the names of all plank owners who were onboard on commissioning day, May 23, 1943. Ancestry.com has been a great resource for this initial effort because it contains Muster Logs for the ships entire 1940’s period of active service. Memorial Kiosk, now on the main deck in the Sailors’ Life Gallery, a With Tom’s help we’ve taken the kiosk from something visitors could just much better location for it read names on, to a place where they can leave Deck Log entries about their visit and request information on how to add names to the kiosk.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • The Ironman—A Double Ender's Newsletter
    U S S R E E V E S (DLG-24/CG-24) A SSOCIATION Spring 2013 Volume 6, Issue 1 The Ironman—A Double Ender’s Newsletter Membership Scorebox Reeves 19661966----19681968 Cruise With DESRON 9 Current 34 USS REEVES (DLG-24) departed supply management. Past Due 126 Long Beach, California, on 26 May On 1 July 1968, REEVES departed Snail Mail Ad- 248 1966, for a two year tour with the U.S. Yokosuka, Japan, for her new dresses Only Seventh Fleet. The ship, a unit of De- homeport of Long Beach, California. Email Address 473 stroyer Squadron Nine, was homeport- Leaving Japan was a sad occasion for ed in Yokosuka, Japan, and operated Total Shipmates 2,968 many, but there was a happiness in the in the Gulf of Tonkin as an anti-air thought of “going home.” warfare Dues Notice! The trip picket and Please be sure to check your home was search and mailing label or email nota- eventful tion. rescue and enjoya- If it doesn’t say Current unit, with ble for the above your name at the top three pa- of the label, you should re- entire crew. trols as an new your annual dues. To REEVES reach the greatest number of escort to crossed the shipmates, we will publish Aircraft the complete Association Equator, Carriers. newsletter to any valid email where King or snail mail address. Your REEVES Neptune dues payments make this spent 720 USS REEVES (DLG-24) in the Hawaiian Op Area, enroute to Long Beach on 6 August 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Commanding Officer, USS STERETT (CG 31) To: Director of Naval History (OP-098H)
    II/ 5750 Ser 00/ From: Commanding Officer, USS STERETT (CG 31) To: Director of Naval History (OP-098H) SUbj: ANNUAL COMMAND HISTORY Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 5750.12E Encl: (1) Command Composition and Organization (2) 1991 Chronology (3) 1991 Command History (4) Commanding Officer's Biography (5) Commanding Officer's Photograph (6) Welcome Aboard Pamphlet (7) Farewell Ceremony Pamphlet 1. In accordance with reference (a), the command history for 1991 is submitted. T. E. BLOUNT JR. USS STERETT (CG 31) COMMAND COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION 1. Mission. USS STERETT (CG 31) is a Josephus Daniels class guided Missile Cruiser whose primary missions are anti-aircraft, anti-submarine, and anti-surface warfare. 2. organization. During the first half of the year, STERETT was assigned to Commander Naval Surface Group Western Pacific. The Commanding Officer is captain T. E. Blount Jr. On 04 June 1992 STERETT changed homeports from Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines to San Diego, California and she subsequently was assigned to Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group FIVE. I I I I i 1 I ~ 1991 CHRONOLOGY USB STERETT (CG 31) 01 JAN - 03 JAN INPORT SUBIC BAY, RP 03 JAN - 07 JAN UNDERWAY ENROUTE SINGAPORE WITH BATTLEGROUP E 07 JAN - 10 JAN INPORT SINGAPORE 10 JAN - 14 JAN UNDERWAY ENROUTE PATTAYA BEACH, THAILAND 11 JAN CROSSED THE EQUATOR 14 JAN - 18 JAN INPORT PATTAYA BEACH, THAILAND 18 JAN - 22 JAN UNDERWAY ENROUTE SUBIC BAY, RP 22 JAN - 25 JAN INPORT SUBIC BAY, RP 25 JAN UNDERWAY MISSILE EXERCISE 91-2 26 JAN - 27 JAN UNDERWAY ENROUTE BUCKNER BAY, OKINAWA 27
    [Show full text]
  • 2 3 Apr 1993 1..1
    I ( '#.' ...--.. ,Y , 1~ v'I i ( "LJ ; cj II0II') DEPARTMENT OFTHE NA _ -,...J USS STERETT (CG-31) FPO AP 96678·1154 5750 Ser 00/ 1 0 o .2 3 APR 1993 1..1 From: Commanding Officer, USS STERETT (CG 31) To: Director of Naval History (OP-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374-0571 Subj: ANNUAL COMMAND HISTORY Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 5750.12E Encl: (1) Command Composition and Organization (2 ) 1992 Chronology (3) 1992 Command History (4) Captain T.E. Blount Jr. Biography (5) Captain T.E. Blount Jr. Photograph (6) Commander G.O. Dorsey Biography (7) Commander G.O. Dorsey Photograph (8) Welcome Aboard Pamphlet (9) 1990-1992 Cruisebook (10) Overhaul SITREP file 1. In accordance with reference (a), enclosures (1) through (10) are submitted as the command history for 1992. USS STERETT (CG 31) COMMAHD COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION IJ Co.-and Co.position and Organization. USS STERETT (CG 31) is a Josephus Daniels class guided Missile Cruiser whose primary missions are anti-aircraft, anti-submarine, and anti-surface warfare. STERETT was assigned to Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group FIVE until 01 May 1993 when she was re-assigned to Commander, Carrier-Group THREE. Captain T. E. Blount Jr. was the commanding officer until he was relieved on 16 December 1992 by Commander G.O. Dorsey. After the change of command, STERETT was assigned to commander, Destroyer­ Squadron THIRTEEN on 16 December. STERETT was homeported at San Diego, California. Ie Enclosure (1) 2. 1992 CHRONOLOGY 01 JAN - 04 JAN DRYDOCK, SOUTHWEST MARINE SHIPYARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Penny
    T H E BRIGHT PENNY December 1998 A NEWSLETTER FOR MEMBERS OF THE USS BERKELEY (DDG-15) ASSOCIATION A new mission for the former USS HOEL (DDG-13) Today the ex-USS HOEL is providing 50 megawatts of electrical power to the city of SKIPPER IN THE SPOTLIGHT Manaus, Brazil, located about 1,000 miles up the Amazon River. The ship was Captain Dickman is a native of Dunsmuir, California and now resides delivered to it’s new home in the Fall of with his wife in Virginia Beach, Virginia. 1997. Ex-HOEL is the first of several Following graduation from the U.S. stricken Adams Class DDG’s purchased at Naval Academy in 1953 he served tours a cost of $46,000 by the Florida Crushed of duty on the USS WEDDERBURN (DD- Stone Company in Leesburg, Florida to be 684), USS JEFFERSON COUNTY (LST- converted into floating electrical platforms. 845) and the staff of Amphibious Operational Training Unit, Pacific. He The actual conversion took place in next attended the U.S. Naval Charleston, South Carolina where the Postgraduate School at Monterey, CA. weapons systems, topside superstructure He then reported to the Pre-Com Detail and propellers were removed. The two and as engineering officer of the USS stacks are new construction. And, the final JOHN KING (DDG-3). Subsequent tours displacement was reduced from 4,500 to included instructor duty at the Naval Destroyer School, Newport, RI, 3,370 tons. Executive Officer of USS ROBISON In the engineering plant the dual 35,000 (DDG-12), Engineering Officer of USS hp propulsion systems drive two electrical INTREPID (CV-11), staff assignments at generators providing a net available output OPNAV and NAVESEASYSCOM.
    [Show full text]