DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyrighted Material

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyrighted Material 1 1 Ground Squirrels Marie Kubiak 1.1 ­Introduction are inquisitive and highly active so enclosures should be secure – such as large aviaries with narrow spaced mesh. Nest Ground squirrels make up the subfamily of Xerinae, within boxes should be provided (at least one per animal) with hay the Sciuridae (squirrel) family and include a variety of substrate and branches, tunnels, hides and wheels ­provided well-known species such as the groundhog and marmot. for enrichment and to encourage activity. Chipmunks will The species within this subfamily that are more commonly chew plastics, wood, wires and other ­materials and this should kept as pets, and are covered in this chapter, are prairie be taken into account when planning enclosure construction, dogs, Richardson’s ground squirrels and Siberian chip- and when toys or décor are added. They are omnivores and munks. Biological parameters for these species are included can be fed a rodent pellet diet but this should be supplemented in Table 1.1. with seeds, vegetables, insects, and hay. Food may be stored in substrate or nest boxes so it is important to check and clean enclosures thoroughly on at least a weekly basis to prevent 1.2 ­Husbandry spoilage. Fresh water should always be available and water bottles are generally accepted well. Free range access within a 1.2.1 Siberian Chipmunks house is not advisable due to potential for escape, injury, or damage inflicted to household possessions. In winter wild Siberian chipmunks (Tamias sibiricus) are squirrel-like chipmunks do not exhibit true hibernation but have fluctuat- rodents originating primarily from Northern Asia. Although ing torpor, with several days of dormancy followed by a period common in the pet trade in Europe in the late twentieth and of normothermia, activity, and feeding. In torpor their body early twenty-first century, in 2015 this species was added to temperature drops to around 5 °C and heart rate slows to EU Invasive Alien Species (IAS) Regulation (1143/2014), 4 beats/min. In captivity there is no drive for torpor as tem- resulting in a ban within the European Union on importation, peratures tend to remain stable through seasons and food is keeping, breeding, transport, trade, and accidental or inten- abundant. There is no evidence that absence of torpor has any tional release of this species, though an exemption is made for negative impact. animals to be transported for veterinary care. As such this ­species can only be kept by existingCOPYRIGHTED owners for their natural MATERIAL 1.2.2 Prairie Dogs lifespan, or under licence for medical, research, or­conservation purposes. At present these restrictions remain in place for the Prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) are large, North American United Kingdom. Pet Siberian chipmunk numbers are declin- members of the squirrel family and have five recognised ing as animals reach the end of their life and no new animals species. Of these only the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys are able to be acquired or bred. Other species of chipmunks ludovicianus) is encountered with any frequency as a pet in may be legally kept but are extremely rare as pets. The Pallas the UK. Well-socialised individuals can make good pets but squirrel (Callosciurus erythraeus) and Fox squirrel (Sciurus even the tamest prairie dog can become aggressive during niger), both rarely kept as pets, have also been listed as­invasive their breeding season. species and are subject to the same restrictions. Captive animals require deep substrate to form their Chipmunks are terrestrial though have good climbing ­burrows as well as a large overground area for activity, ­capabilities and will use the full height of enclosures. They ­sufficient to enable a group of animals to be kept together. Handbook of Exotic Pet Medicine, First Edition. Edited by Marie Kubiak. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2021 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Companion website: www.wiley.com/go/kubiak/exotic_pet_medicine 0004775566.INDD 1 8/6/2020 3:27:02 PM 2 1 Ground Squirrels Table 1.1 Biological parameters (for animals not undergoing torpor). Body Respiratory rate Heart rate Sexual Body weight Lifespan temperature (°C) (/min) (/min) maturity Gestation Siberian Chipmunk 50–150 g 5–10 years 37–38 70–80 250–350 8–14 months 30–31 days (Tamias sibiricus) Black tailed-prairie dog 0.7–2 kg 7–10 years 35.3–39 40–60 200–318 2 yrs 30–35 days (Cynomys ludovicianus) Richardson’s Ground 0.4–0.6 kg 4 years 37.5–39.5 40–100 245–275 11 months 23 days Squirrel (Urocitellus richardsonii) Enclosure size requirements have been detailed as increase body condition but can lead to obesity or disruption 2 × 2 × 2.5 ft (L × W × H) per animal (Pilny and Hess 2004) to normal intestinal function if fed in excess. but this should be regarded as an absolute minimum and 4 × 4× 2.5 ft would be considered more suitable as a mini- 1.2.3 Ground Squirrels mum to allow animals to display normal behaviour. An area of deep substrate should be provided to allow creation Ground squirrel species are uncommon as companion ani- of burrows and can be hay, shredded paper, or soil. Artificial mals though Richardson’s Ground squirrels (Urocitellus rich- burrows and shelters such as drain pipes or wooden boxes ardsonii) (RGS) are occasionally kept. This species is native can be provided for hide and sleeping areas. Cage bars to the grasslands of the Northern United States of America should be no further than 1 inch apart to prevent escape. and Southern Canada and do cross over territory with prairie An elevated observation shelf should be provided as prairie dogs. In the wild, female familial groups exist with solitary dogs are inquisitive and will often climb to investigate males only being tolerated during breeding. In captivity they activity in the surrounding area (Pilny and Hess 2004). can be maintained in social single-sex colonies or mixed sex Plastic should be avoided as it is likely to be chewed. colonies with males being neutered. Though destructive and Chosen toilet areas will be well defined allowing easy daily with a tendency to bite defensively, RGS tend to make good cleaning of urine and faeces and a litter tray can be placed companion animals with regular handling and interaction. in the chosen site. A warm room or supplemental heating Captive animals have similar requirements to prairie is necessary to provide temperatures of 20–22 °C as prairie dogs, though as a smaller species enclosures can be less dogs may enter torpor at cooler temperatures (Johnson- extensive, with 3 × 2 × 1.5 ft advised per animal. Cage bars Delaney 2006). Torpor is not obligatory in prairie dogs but should be no more than 0.75 inch apart. The observation is a facultative response to temperature drop and lack of shelf should not be placed more than 18 inches above the available food and water. Although body temperatures ground as RGS are not good climbers. Ambient tempera- reduce, they remain significantly higher than ambient tures of 18–25 °C are advisable but they are adapted to cooler environmental temperature at approximately 19 °C even in temperatures and will not enter torpor unless temperatures deep torpor bouts. These deep torpor bouts are interspersed drop to below 7 °C (Michener 1983). In the wild RGS are with periods of activity and normothermia when environ- obligate hibernators and will spend up to nine months of mental conditions improve (Lehmer et al. 2001). As torpor the year in true torpor, with body temperature dropping to is facultative there is no need to replicate the conditions in close to environmental temperature as heart and respiratory captivity and to date no adverse effects have been reported rates slow dramatically (Michener and Koeppl 1985). Brief with absence of torpor in prairie dogs. periods of around 12 hours of warming to normal body tem- Prairie dogs are hindgut fermenters and require a high perature occur during this torpor (Michener and Koeppl fibre intake to maintain intestinal health. Where a normal 1985). In captivity temperatures are stable and food is read- appetite is present, provision of a variety of grasses, hay, flow- ily available and torpor rarely occurs. These less harsh con- ers, herbs, fresh vegetables and leaves and occasional inverte- ditions aid overall longevity but the lack of torpor and high brates is appropriate (Orcutt 2005). Pelleted diets designed for metabolic rate all year round may be associated with higher rabbits or rodents can be convenient food source for owners rates of neoplasia seen in RGS in captivity. but should make up no more than 10% of the diet, with high RGS are omnivorous with their dietary requirements fibre material making up the majority of food provided. Seeds intermediate between prairie dogs and chipmunks. Seeds and grains can be offered in small quantities as treats or to should be limited to occasional treats to avoid obesity. 0004775566.INDD 2 8/6/2020 3:27:02 PM 1.3 ­Clinica Evaluatio 3 1.3 ­Clinical Evaluation 1.3.1 History-Taking A full review of husbandry is essential as inappropriate conditions are common causes of health concerns. Contact with other animals, diet, previous medical history, enclo- sure size and set-up, and reproductive status are all key information. It is prudent to ascertain familiarity of indi- vidual animals with handling before attempting restraint. For individual health complaints, the duration of symp- toms, number of animals affected, and any changes made to environment in the period preceding clinical disease should be ascertained. 1.3.2 Handling Chipmunks are fast moving, adept at climbing and jump- ing, and rarely habituated to handling.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs
    Black-tailed Prairie Dogs Land Stewardship Information Series Prairie Dogs in Jeffco Identification Black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) are medium-sized burrowing rodents with tan fur and whitish bellies. They are about 12-15 inches long and weigh between 2-4 pounds. The tips of their short tails have black markings. Ecosystem Black-tailed prairie dogs are found at elevations below 6000 feet, east of the foothills. They feed mainly on grasses and forbs but will occasionally feed on insects. They clip taller plants close to the ground to provide a clear view of their surroundings. The clipped grass is left on the ground or may be used to line underground chambers. Prairie dogs dig tunnels below the soil surface. The tunnels are about 6 feet underground and can be about 15 yards long with two or more entrances. The system provides shelter, protection from predators, and nesting sites. The tunnel entrances are mound-shaped which prevents water from draining in and provides an elevated perch to watch their surroundings. Prairie dogs are active during the day. They do not hibernate but will stay in their burrows during extremely cold or hot days. A healthy prairie dog town will have diverse and balanced native vegetation. In urban areas, many prairie dog towns are fragmented and confined by human development.As a result of this confinement, vegetation can become denuded and the resulting disturbance allows invasive and noxious weeds to predominate. These changes affect how the prairie Quick Facts ecosystem functions and can fundamentally change the plants and animals that live there.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Mammals of Beijing Feb 2018
    A Guide to the Mammals of Beijing Last update 8 March 2018 Terry Townshend A GUIDE TO THE MAMMALS OF BEIJING "1 Introduction This guide has been collated to help residents and visitors to Beijing interested in specifically looking for mammals and/or identifying any species they record through casual observations. Given the lack of english-language resources and data this guide is certainly not comprehensive and reflects only a partial summary of the mammals in the capital. At the moment it includes information about only some of the orders and families. For example, mice, rats, voles, shrews, moles and bats are not included; as information is discovered or made available, the guide will be updated to rectify as many of these omissions as possible. Please contact Birding Beijing if you can help improve the information contained in this guide in any way. Individual sightings of any mammal in Beijing are also of interest. Please send any details, including species, location, date and time via email to [email protected]. Thank you. Format The list of mammals follows the order of “A Guide to the Mammals of China” by Andrew T Smith and Yan Xie1, the best reference guide to mammals in China. The format includes English name, scientific name, Chinese name and ‘pinyin’ (the Romanisation of Chinese characters based on their pronunciation). Photos are included where available together with a short paragraph about the status in Beijing. 1 Smith, Andrew T and Xie, Yan, “A Guide to the Mammals of China”, Princeton University Press, 2008 A GUIDE TO THE MAMMALS OF BEIJING "2 The Mammals Rhesus Macaque – Macaca mulatta – 猕猴 – Mi Hou Historically thought to have occurred in Beijing and today occasionally seen in Fangshan District, although sightings are thought to involve animals introduced for tourism purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepotism in Prairie Dogs (Cynomys Ludovicianus) Varies with Competition but Not with Kinship
    Anim . Behar ., 1986, 34, 263-270 Nepotism in prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) varies with competition but not with kinship JOHN L . HOOGLAND* Department of Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, U .S .A . Abstract. Behavioural interactions among black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) of the same sex clearly show nepotism (the favouring of kin) . Males and females consistently interact more amicably with kin than with non-kin . Nepotism in this context is striking for two reasons . First, individuals do not interact more amicably with close kin such as offspring and full-siblings than with more distant kin such as half-siblings, full-nieces, half-nieces, and half-nephews . Second, nepotism varies inversely and dramati- cally with changes in competition for either oestrous females (among males) or nesting burrows and breeding rights (among females) . Nepotism is the preferential treatment of genetic document, has been reported for only a few species relatives (Alexander 1974; Sherman 1980a), and including sweat bees (Lasioglossum °ephyrum : parental care is one obvious expression of nepo- Greenberg 1979 ; Buckle & Greenberg 1981), Beld- tism . Hamilton (1964) predicted that nepotism ing's ground squirrels (Spermophilus beldingi : Sher- beyond parental care should vary directly with the man 1980b), two species of primates (Clutton- coefficient of genetic relatedness (r) under the Brock & Harvey 1976 ; Kurland 1977; Massey appropriate conditions ; that is, individuals should 1977). and humans (Wilson 1978 ; Alaxander 1979; cooperate with close genetic relatives more than Chagnon 1979) . Nepotism evidently does not cor- with distant relatives . Altmann (1979) later pointed relate with r in carpenter ants (Camponotus spp .) or out that if the recipient's benefit varies directly with perhaps in other insect species in which individuals the donor's investment, then individuals should live in huge colonies (Wilson 1971 : Carlin & channel all assistance to closest kin only .
    [Show full text]
  • Helminth Fauna of the Siberian Chipmunk, Tamias Sibiricus Laxmann (Rodentia, Sciuridae) Introduced in Suburban French Forests
    Parasitol Res (2007) 100:1375–1379 DOI 10.1007/s00436-006-0389-3 SHORT COMMUNICATION Helminth fauna of the Siberian chipmunk, Tamias sibiricus Laxmann (Rodentia, Sciuridae) introduced in suburban French forests Benoît Pisanu & Christelle Jerusalem & Cindy Huchery & Julie Marmet & Jean-Louis Chapuis Received: 12 October 2006 /Accepted: 7 November 2006 / Published online: 6 December 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract The spread of an immigrant host species can be Introduction influenced both by its specific helminth parasites that come along with it and by newly acquired infections from native Parasitism can impede or favor the spread of an immigrant fauna. The Siberian chipmunk, Tamias sibiricus Laxmann host species into a novel environment (Drake 2003). This (Rodentia, Sciuridae), a northeastern Eurasiatic ground effect depend on whether the host is infected by parasites nesting Sciurid, has been introduced in France for less than acquired from native fauna (Höfle et al. 2004)orby three decades. Thirty individuals were collected from three parasites restricted to the host (Thomas et al. 1997). When suburban forests in the Ile-de-France Region between 2002 abruptly introduced, small rodents can bring along with and 2006. Two intestinal nematode species dominated the them a subset of their monoxenous and stenoxenous helminth fauna: Brevistriata skrjabini [Prevalence, P, 99% helminth species (i.e., direct life cycle species and with a C.I., 87% (64–97%); mean intensity, M.I., 99% C.I., 43 restricted range of phylogenetically related suitable host), (28–78)] and Aonchotheca annulosa [P, 47% (25–69%); and generally, loose the more generalist species (Pisanu et M.I., 35 (3–157)].
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Plague in Gunnison's Prairie Dogs
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Plague in Gunnison’s Prairie Dogs MAY 2014 Controlling Plague in Gunnison’s Prairie Dogs Plague, caused by a non-native bacteria and carried by fleas can kill all prairie dogs in a colony, leading to local extinctions that threaten the overall survival of the Gunnison’s prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) in Colorado. Unmanaged plague has the potential to reduce populations of the Gunnison’s prairie dog to the point that a listing as federally endangered or threatened becomes more likely. Such a listing would not only underscore the need for additional conservation, it could also limit land uses for agriculture and recreation. The Gunnison’s prairie dog serves key roles in southwest Colorado’s biological landscapes: • A food source for many wildlife species including raptors and mammalian carnivores. • Prairie dog colonies serve as habitat for mountain plover, burrowing owl, badger, weasel, snakes and other wildlife species. Research Objectives Since the Gunnison’s prairie dog is an important species in the state’s ecosystem, Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has determined that controlling plague in this species is a priority conservation action. The CPW goal is to develop plague management tools to help manage and stabilize Gunnison’s prairie dog populations on public lands and in cooperation with willing landowners. CPW Plague Control Research Success The U.S. Geological Survey’s National Wildlife Health Center developed a sylvatic plague vaccine (SPV) and tested the vaccine in the lab in 2010. That laboratory research demonstrated that the vaccine is safe and protects prairie dogs from plague. Field trials are necessary to confirm these findings in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern
    Identification guide of Invasive Alien Species of Union concern Support for customs on the identification of IAS of Union concern Project task ENV.D.2/SER/2016/0011 (v1.1) Text: Riccardo Scalera, Johan van Valkenburg, Sandro Bertolino, Elena Tricarico, Katharina Lapin Illustrations: Massimiliano Lipperi, Studio Wildart Date of completion: 6/11/2017 Comments which could support improvement of this document are welcome. Please send your comments by e-mail to [email protected] This technical note has been drafted by a team of experts under the supervision of IUCN within the framework of the contract No 07.0202/2016/739524/SER/ENV.D.2 “Technical and Scientific support in relation to the Implementation of Regulation 1143/2014 on Invasive Alien Species”. The information and views set out in this note do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this note. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents Gunnera tinctoria 2 Alternanthera philoxeroides 8 Procambarus fallax f. virginalis 13 Tamias sibiricus 18 Callosciurus erythraeus 23 Gunnera tinctoria Giant rhubarb, Chilean rhubarb, Chilean gunnera, Nalca, Panque General description: Synonyms Gunnera chilensis Lam., Gunnera scabra Ruiz. & Deep-green herbaceous, deciduous, Pav., Panke tinctoria Molina. clump-forming, perennial plant with thick, wholly rhizomatous stems Species ID producing umbrella-sized, orbicular or Kingdom: Plantae ovate leaves on stout petioles.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Dog (Cynomys Ludovicianus) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) in Canada Black-tailed Prairie Dog June 2009 About the Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003, and one of its purposes is “to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened.” What is a species of special concern? Under SARA, a species of special concern is a wildlife species that could become threatened or endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. Species of special concern are included in the SARA List of Wildlife Species at Risk. What is a management plan? Under SARA, a management plan is an action-oriented planning document that identifies the conservation activities and land use measures needed to ensure, at a minimum, that a species of special concern does not become threatened or endangered. For many species, the ultimate aim of the management plan will be to alleviate human threats and remove the species from the List of Wildlife Species at Risk. The plan sets goals and objectives, identifies threats, and indicates the main areas of activities to be undertaken to address those threats. Management plan development is mandated under Sections 65–72 of SARA (http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/approach/act/default_e.cfm). A management plan has to be developed within three years after the species is added to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. Species: Gunnison's Prairie
    1. Species: Gunnison’s Prairie Dog (Cynomys gunnisoni (gunnisoni = pop. 1)) 2. Status: Table 1 summarizes the current status of this species or subspecies by various ranking entity and defines the meaning of the status. Table 1. Current status of Cynomys gunnisoni Entity Status Status Definition NatureServe G5T2 Species is Imperiled At high risk of extinction or elimination due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. CNHP S2 Species is Imperiled At high risk of extinction or elimination due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. Colorado SGCN, Tier 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need State List Status USDA Forest R2 Sensitive Region 2 Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species Service USDI FWSb N/A N/A a Colorado Natural Heritage Program. b US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. The 2012 U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule defines Species of Conservation Concern (SCC) as “a species, other than federally recognized threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate species, that is known to occur in the plan area and for which the regional forester has determined that the best available scientific information indicates substantial concern about the species' capability to persist over the long-term in the plan area” (36 CFR 219.9). This overview was developed to summarize information relating to this species’ consideration to be listed as a SCC on the Rio Grande National Forest, and to aid in the development of plan components and monitoring objectives. 3. Taxonomy Genus/species Cynomys gunnisoni is accepted as valid (ITIS 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • A Prairie Dog for Mr. Jefferson
    A Prairie Dog For Mr. Jefferson In late 1803, after the completion of the Louisiana Purchase transfer ceremonies at the Cabildo in New Orleans, President Thomas Jefferson wasted no time in tasking Meriwether Lewis with putting together an expedition to map and explore the United States’ newly acquired lands west of the Mississippi River. Lewis chose William Clark as his co-leader for the mission, and the Lewis and Clark Expedition was underway. The two captains of this historic excursion, which lasted over two years (May 1804 to September 1806), were also charged with finding a practical route across the western half of the continent and to take steps to establish an American presence and sovereignty in the new territory before Britain or other European powers could, in any way, lay claim to it. In the course of their quest, these two undaunted explorers experienced unforgiving terrain and weather, treacherous streams, starvation, extreme physical peril, disease and both hostile and friendly Native Americans. Still, the approximately 8,000-mile journey was considered a great success and provided new geographic, ecological, social, botanical and zoological information about previously uncharted regions of North America. Left to right: Meriwether Lewis, prairie dog and William Clark By early 1805, the expedition team had built an encampment on the Missouri River in present-day North Dakota known as Fort Mandan, and they had already prepared a shipment of zoological specimens. According to Paul Russell Cutright in his book, Lewis & Clark, Pioneering Naturalists (1969), this shipment included: “1 tin box containing insects, mice &c and a unique collection of skins, horns, and bones of such animals as pronghorn, mule deer, prairie dog, white- tailed jack rabbit, coyote, long-tailed weasel, badger, elk, and bighorn sheep” There is nothing unusual in this except for the fact that the captains made the decision to consign to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the Burrow Forecast of the Prairie Dog
    Report from the Burrow Forecast of the Prairie Dog A Report from WildEarth Guardians By Dr. Lauren McCain February 2, 2009 MISSION STATEMENT WILDEARTH GUARDIANS protects and restores the wildlife, wild places and wild rivers of the American West. Inquiries about this report and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS’ work can be made directly to: Lauren McCain WILDEARTH GUARDIANS 1536 Wynkoop St., Suite 301 Denver, CO 80202 303-573-4898 ext. 528 [email protected]. Cartography: Kurt Menke, Bird’s Eye View GIS GIS Data: Travis Livieri, Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service Front cover photo: © Rich Reading Back cover photo: © Russell Graves Outside Reviewers: Lindsey Sterling Krank, Jonathan Proctor, Richard Reading, Erin Robertson (Review does not constitute an endorsement of the 2009 Report from the Burrow.) © WILDEARTH GUARDIANS All rights reserved. No part of this report may be used in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, except in the case of brief quotations. REPORT FROM THE BURROW 2009: FORECAST OF THE PRAIRIE DOG This year, on Inauguration Day, we begin a new era that more broadly defines who can achieve the American dream. Two weeks later, a nation of prairie dogs hopes for a small piece of that dream by sharing Groundhog Day with their famous cousins—by celebrating Prairie Dog Day. On February 2nd, WildEarth Guardians and other friends of prairie dogs continue creating a new era of renewal and safety for prairie dog colonies. The Black-tailed prairie dog. © R. Reading animals have suffered greatly during previous administrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Prairie
    RAC AGENDA – March 2015 Revised February 17, 2015 1. Welcome, RAC Introductions and RAC Procedure - RAC Chair 2. Approval of Agenda and Minutes ACTION - RAC Chair 3. Wildlife Board Meeting Update INFORMATIONAL - RAC Chair 4. Regional Update INFORMATIONAL - DWR Regional Supervisor 5. Utah Prairie Dog Management Plan ACTION - NRO – Martin Bushman – Assistant Attorney General - CRO – Chris Keleher – Deputy Director, Species Recovery Program - NERO – Adam Kavalunas – Utah Prairie Dog Biologist - SERO – Jessica Van Woeart – Sensitive Species Biologist - SRO – Kevin Bunnell – Southern Region Supervisor 6. R657-70 Taking Utah Prairie Dog – New Rule ACTION R657-19 Taking Nongame Mammals – Amendments R657-3 Collection, Importation, Transportation and Possession of Animals - Amendments - NRO – Martin Bushman – Assistant Attorney General - CRO – Chris Keleher – Deputy Director, Species Recovery Program - NERO – Adam Kavalunas – Utah Prairie Dog Biologist - SERO – Jessica Van Woeart – Sensitive Species Biologist - SRO – Kevin Bunnell – Southern Region Supervisor Region Specific Items – to be presented in the specified region only. CRO Central Region Managers – Question and Answer Session INFORMATION John Fairchild, Central Region Supervisor Meeting Locations SR RAC – March 3rd, 6:30 PM CR RAC – March 3rd, 6:30 PM Cedar City Middle School CR Conference Center 2215 W. Royal Hunte Dr., Cedar 1115 N. Main Street, Springville SER RAC – March 3rd, 6:30 PM NR RAC – March 3rd, 6:30 PM John Wesley Powell Museum Brigham City Community Center 1765 E. Main St., Green River 24 N. 300 W., Brigham City NER RAC – March 3rd, 6:30 PM Board Meeting – March 5th, 9:00 AM Wildlife Resources NER Office DNR, Boardroom 318 N. Vernal Ave, Vernal 1594 W.
    [Show full text]