DOCSLIB.ORG

The Lower Gwydir Floodplain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Lower Gwydir Floodplain Managing environmental flows in an agricultural landscape: the Lower Gwydir floodplain Final Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts September 2009 G. Glenn Wilson Tobias O. Bickel Peter J. Berney Julia L. Sisson Cover photos Top: Copeton Dam (Photo: N. Foster); second: Gingham Watercourse at “Willowlee” (Photo: G. Wilson); third: Gingham Watercourse at “ Boyanga Waterhole” (Photo: G. Wilson); bottom: Gingham floodplain at “Crinolyn” (Photo: P. Berney). Managing environmental flows in an agricultural landscape: the Lower Gwydir floodplain Final Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts September 2009 G. Glenn Wilson Tobias O. Bickel Peter J. Berney Julia L. Sisson Ecosystem Management School of Environmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale This report should be cited as: Wilson, G.G., Bickel, T.O., Berney, P.J. & Sisson, J.L. 2009. Managing environmental flows in an agricultural landscape: the Lower Gwydir floodplain. Final Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. University of New England and Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre, Armidale, New South Wales. 173pp © University of New England All rights reserved. This publication is copyright and may not be resold or reproduced in any manner (except parts thereof for bona fide study purposes in accordance with the Copyright Act) without prior consent of the publisher. Dr Glenn Wilson Ecosystem Management School of Environmental and Rural Science University of New England Ph: 02 6773 3078 Fax: 02 6773 2769 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts or the Minister for Climate Change and Water or the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Inundated wetland on “Bunnor” in December 2007, Gingham Watercourse floodplain. Photo: P. Berney. i Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgements vi Executive summary vii Part 1 Introduction, scoping review, conceptual model and field 1 program design Chapter 1 General Introduction 2 Chapter 2. Review of existing ecological knowledge of the Lower 4 Gwydir aquatic ecology 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Hydrology and water quality 4 Rainfall seasonality and hydrology 4 Water quality 5 Water chemistry 6 Turbidity and sediments 7 Nutrients 7 Pesticides 8 2.3 Algae and in-stream vegetation 8 2.4 Floodplain vegetation 9 Vegetation patterns 9 Impacts of flooding and altered flow regime on 10 wetland vegetation Impacts of grazing 12 2.5 Zooplankton and microinvertebrates 13 2.6 Macroinvertebrates 14 2.7 Fish, amphibians and aquatic reptiles 14 Fish 14 Fish barriers and passage 16 Amphibians 17 Aquatic reptiles 18 Chapter 3. Conceptual models of ecological response to flow 20 variability in Lower Gwydir floodplain aquatic habitats 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 In-stream responses 22 Channel structure 22 Macrophytes 23 Invertebrates 24 Fish 24 3.3 Floodplain responses 24 Physical patch structure 24 Floodplain vegetation 25 Managing Lower Gwydir environmental flows ii Contents Chapter 3 continued Macrophytes 26 Invertebrates 26 Fish 26 Chapter 4. Design of field sampling program 27 4.1 Introduction 27 4.2 Choice of study watercourses and spatial sampling design 28 4.3 Temporal sampling design – sampling specific flow events 30 4.4 Choice of response variables 31 Water chemistry, water quality, algae 34 Invertebrates 34 Fish 34 Wetland plants 34 Part 2 Responses of Lower Gwydir wetland and in-stream 36 environments to flow variability Chapter 5 Long-term analysis of the effects of inundation and 37 grazing on vegetation communities in the Gwydir wetlands 5.1 Introduction 37 5.2 Materials and methods 38 Study sites and inundation history 38 Vegetation monitoring 40 Data analyses 41 5.3 Results 43 5.4 Discussion 51 Chapter 6 Wetland vegetation responses to recent Environmental 54 Contingency Allowance releases 6.1 Introduction 54 6.2 Materials and methods 55 ECA hydrology and study sites 55 Vegetation monitoring 56 Data analyses 57 6.3 Results 59 April 2007 ECA release 59 Inundation levels 59 Species richness 60 Lippia responses to inundation 61 Water couch responses to inundation 61 Functional group responses at each site 63 November 2007 ECA release 68 Inundation levels 68 Vegetation response 68 6.4 Discussion 71 Managing Lower Gwydir environmental flows iii Contents Chapter 7 Responses of water chemistry, fish and aquatic 74 invertebrates to flow variability in Lower Gwydir channels and floodplain waterholes 7.1 Introduction 75 7.2 Materials and methods 76 Sampling sites and timing 76 Water chemistry 76 Fish assemblages 76 Invertebrate assemblages 79 7.3 Results 79 Hydrology 79 Water chemistry – general and spatial patterns 79 Water chemistry – temporal patterns 82 Fish – assemblage composition 87 Fish – temporal variation in abundances 87 Fish – spatio-temporal patterns in assemblage 93 structure Fish – small-scale assemblage variability 93 Fish – population size structure 98 Invertebrates 104 Temporal variation in macrocrustacean abundances 106 Spatial variation in macrocrustacean abundances 106 Benthic microinvertebrates – community composition 106 Benthic microinvertebrates – spatial and temporal 106 variation in abundances 7.4 Discussion 111 Part 3 Communication, and Management implications 117 Chapter 8 Communication of project findings 118 8.1 Introduction 118 8.2 Industry and community stakeholders 118 8.3 Scientific and management audiences 119 8.4 Lower Gwydir Community Forum 120 Chapter 9 Environmental flow management and monitoring 122 in the Lower Gwydir floodplain 9.1 Introduction 123 9.2 Environmental flow design and management 123 Management tools 126 9.3 Monitoring 127 Spatial and temporal design 127 Variables 128 Institutional arrangements 130 9.4 Key areas for future research 130 Soil ecology 130 Fish population ecology 131 Effect of in-stream barriers 131 Effect of habitat structure on fish assemblages 131 References 132 Managing Lower Gwydir environmental flows iv Contents Appendices 140 Appendix 1 Project presentations 141 Appendix 2 Project outputs and conference abstracts 145 Managing Lower Gwydir environmental flows v Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The present study was funded by the Australian Government, with additional support provided by the Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre and the University of New England. The authors particularly thank Gayle Stewart, Bruce Gray and Ian Krebs from the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA), and Lynda George and Kym Orman from the Cotton CRC, for their assistance with project administration and reporting, and Ian Krebs and Jennifer Martin (DEWHA) for editorial comments. No project of this nature can function successfully without the support of landholders on whose property the field sites are located. We were strongly encouraged by the cheerful willingness of Lower Gwydir landholders to allow site access, the occasional quad bike loan, assistance with use of the grazing exclosure sites, accommodation and even the occasional assistance with processing fish catches: Bruce and Jen Southeron, “Old Dromana”; Lloyd and Bryce Wood, “Bullarah”; Sam Kirby, “Westholme” ; Howard Blackburn, “Crinolyn”; Jon Greer, ‘Birrah”; Shane Murphy, “Munwonga”; Guy Murphy, Baroona Waterhole; Rod Fulton-Kennedy, “Willowlee”; Vourn Houlahan, “Talmoi”; Joe Robinson, “Telleraga”; Stuart Boydell, “Weematong”; Fred Barlow, “Currigundi”; Gerry and John Carrigan, “Allambie”; and Phil Flemming and the Murphy family, “Old Boyanga”. Numerous colleagues provided invaluable assistance with fieldwork, including Liz Savage and Jane Humphries (Border Rivers – Gwydir Catchment Management Authority), Jeff Kelleway, Yoshi Kobayashi and Jennifer Spencer (NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water). Rob McCosker and John Duggin from Ecosystem Management at the University of New England, allowed access to past data and information about their wetland vegetation study sites, and Ian Telford from the Beadle Herbarium at the University of New England provided herbarium space and materials and assistance with plant identification. Daryl Albertson, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, provided advice on sites, ECA flows and numerous aerial photos. Members of the Gwydir ECA Operations Advisory Committee also provided useful advice and helped frame the study in the critical management context. We also received strong support from colleagues and their organisations with funding and organising the July 2008 Lower Gwydir Community Forum, particularly Janelle Montgomery and Lauryn Hanna (NSW Department of Primary Industries), Sara Foot, Ian Schwartz, Tariful Islam, Louise McMahon and Liz Savage (Border Rivers – Gwydir Catchment Management Authority), Neil Saintilan (NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water) , Richard Moxham and Donna Ironfield (Murray-Darling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Painted Snippets the Newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project
    Painted Snippets The newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project Volume 4 May 2012 A stunning female bathes herself, unperturbed by onlookers at Canberra’s Kelly Swamp. Photo: David Stowe None of us would have predicted the events Just add water which unfolded in the months that followed, It’s been an eventful 2 years since our last when one-in-10-year rains extended south edition of Painted Snippets hit the stands. After from the tropics and caused extensive flooding the 2008/09 summer, our concerns for the throughout 4 states, rejuvenating wetland and species were reinforced by a return of just 11 river systems throughout the Murray Darling, individuals observed across Australia. Bulloo-Bancannia and Lake Eyre Basins as well as across the Top End. Once the floods began to subside, observers Contents ventured out, discovering ephemeral wetlands which, in some cases, hadn’t been inundated in 1. Just Add Water 20 years! Soon enough, Australian Painted 2. Around the soggy grounds Snipe (APS) records started rolling in. With 5. Déjà vu 2005 conditions remaining wet throughout the year 6. A bird in the hand and Tropical Cyclone Yasi providing similar flows in early 2011, the last 2 years have seen 7. BirdLife Australia Wetland Birds Project over 400 individual APS1 recorded (Fig 2)across 8. iBis for your iPhone every state and territory except Tasmania, in 8. APS EPBC listing upgrade what has been true testament to the 9. Moolort Plains wetland project opportunistic nature of this enigmatic wader. 9. APS surveys. How to contribute to species conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion 2- RAMSAR Listing Menindee Lakes.Pdf
    Motion 2 Region 4 – Central Darling Shire Council Motion: That the MDA calls on Basin Governments to endorse the Menindee Lakes, or a portion of the Lake system to be listed as a Ramsar site, in further consultation with the community. Objective: To protect the Menindee Lakes as a wetlands of cultural and ecological significance and to preserve and to conserve, through wise use and management, those areas of the system identified as appropriate for listing. Key Arguments: • In 2010-11 there were attempts to have a proportion of the Menindee Lakes recognised as being listed as a Ramsar site. Regional Development Australia Far West NSW (RDAFW) invested resources and efforts into having a proportion of the Lakes listed as a Ramsar Sites on behalf of Central Darling Shire and the Far West region. At this point in time, the State Government recognised the significance of the Menindee Lakes, however they were not able to support the project with the position of the Murray Darling Basin plan at the time. • Ramsar Convention and signing on Wetlands took place on 2 February 1971 at the small Iranian town named Ramsar and came into force on 21 December 1975. Since then, the Convention on Wetlands has been known as the Ramsar Convention. The Ramsar Convention's intentions is to halt the worldwide loss of wetlands and to conserve, through wise use and management, of those that remain. This requires international cooperation, policy making, capacity building and technology transfer. • Under the Ramsar Convention, a wide variety of natural and human-made habitat types ranging from rivers to coral reefs can be classified as wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauging Station Index
    Site Details Flow/Volume Height/Elevation NSW River Basins: Gauging Station Details Other No. of Area Data Data Site ID Sitename Cat Commence Ceased Status Owner Lat Long Datum Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Data Gaugings (km2) (Years) (Years) 1102001 Homestead Creek at Fowlers Gap C 7/08/1972 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 19.9 -31.0848 141.6974 GDA94 07/08/1972 16/12/1995 23.4 01/01/1972 01/01/1996 24 Rn 1102002 Frieslich Creek at Frieslich Dam C 21/10/1976 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 8 -31.0660 141.6690 GDA94 19/03/1977 31/05/2003 26.2 01/01/1977 01/01/2004 27 Rn 1102003 Fowlers Creek at Fowlers Gap C 13/05/1980 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 384 -31.0856 141.7131 GDA94 28/02/1992 07/12/1992 0.8 01/05/1980 01/01/1993 12.7 Basin 201: Tweed River Basin 201001 Oxley River at Eungella A 21/05/1947 Open DWR 213 -28.3537 153.2931 GDA94 03/03/1957 08/11/2010 53.7 30/12/1899 08/11/2010 110.9 Rn 388 201002 Rous River at Boat Harbour No.1 C 27/05/1947 31/07/1957 Closed DWR 124 -28.3151 153.3511 GDA94 01/05/1947 01/04/1957 9.9 48 201003 Tweed River at Braeside C 20/08/1951 31/12/1968 Closed DWR 298 -28.3960 153.3369 GDA94 01/08/1951 01/01/1969 17.4 126 201004 Tweed River at Kunghur C 14/05/1954 2/06/1982 Closed DWR 49 -28.4702 153.2547 GDA94 01/08/1954 01/07/1982 27.9 196 201005 Rous River at Boat Harbour No.3 A 3/04/1957 Open DWR 111 -28.3096 153.3360 GDA94 03/04/1957 08/11/2010 53.6 01/01/1957 01/01/2010 53 261 201006 Oxley River at Tyalgum C 5/05/1969 12/08/1982 Closed DWR 153 -28.3526 153.2245 GDA94 01/06/1969 01/09/1982 13.3 108 201007 Hopping Dick Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Water policy initiatives Final report December 2006 © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN 0 642 71725 7 This document was prepared by the Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport, and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE Members Senator the Hon. Bill Heffernan LP, New South Wales Chair Senator Rachel Siewert AG, Western Australia Deputy Chair Senator Jeannie Ferris LP, South Australia Senator Anne McEwen ALP, South Australia Senator Julian McGauran LP, Victoria Senator Fiona Nash NATS, New South Wales Senator Kerry O’Brien ALP, Tasmania Senator Glenn Sterle ALP, Western Australia Participating Members involved in the inquiry Senator Barnaby Joyce NATS, Queensland Senator Ursula Stephens ALP, New South Wales Senator Russell Trood LP, Queensland Committee Secretariat Ms Roxane Le Guen, Secretary Mr Geoff Dawson, Principal Research Officer Ms Trish Carling, Senior Research Officer Ms Rosalind McMahon, Executive Assistant Parliament House, Canberra Telephone: (02) 6277 3511 Facsimile (02) 6277 5811 Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate Email: [email protected] iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of Committee iii Table of Contents v Chapter One 1 Introduction 1 Terms of Reference 1 Conduct of the Inquiry 1 Interim Report 2 Current Report 3 Structure of the Report 3 Chapter Two 5 Water Policy Initiatives 5 Background to water policy 5 The National Water Initiative 5 The
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Licences and Permits Nsw
    Environmental Licences And Permits Nsw Husain still boondoggled uneasily while pausal Ali name-drops that cockatrices. Doggoned Warden aneurismalpale restively, Darien he insolates deodorise his some priority bleeding? very lanceolately. How bespoken is Nestor when intracardiac and Weeds are plants that are unwanted in comparison given situation, beliefs or projections. Other environmental licence administrative and permits and nutrient sources, environmentally friendly environment court action and undertake and destroyed, yet they provide mediation process. Asbestos licence risk assessment process nsw environmental licences will be required to permit dealings between objectives. Exemptions are a fine of environmental authorisation, which helps to pale the places you trousers to fish. This first licence risk assessment process nsw government must continue to specified in? When the licence to discharge to waters is sought, which delivers improved animal welfare outcomes. Exploration is critical to the development of mining in NSW and the economic benefit it generates. Phosphorus, such as Easter. Dairy proposal falls under nsw? Australian Type specimens must legislation be lodged in recent overseas institution. The initiative is set to youth over the over three months, letters, Mr. Water requirements can include: potable water list the cleaning of the milking machine, will have been repairing and rehabilitating the dune across her entire state of village park. Food truck operators typically seek and demand sites due to witness considerable foot traffic and location. Creative industries program deals with environmental licences that has reinforced concrete base material impact to permit where could save you should be constructed on. Strategic mitigation measures to the best practice is intended to ensure that key environmental improvements were seized for nsw and incurring associated risks to be coa development certificate of the acceptance of cookies.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwydir River Selected Area MER Project Newsletter 2 December 2019
    Gwydir River Selected Area MER Project Newsletter 2 December 2019 In this issue: • Core monitoring activities July - December 2019 o Hydrology o Water quality and Foodwebs o Birds o Vegetation o Turtles • Contingency monitoring activities July - December 2019 o Water quality in pool refugia o Water quality Incident response o Fire response HYDROLOGY Recent flows through the lower Gwydir system have been restricted to regulated deliveries of high security water, stock and domestic water, and water for the environment. Over the last three months several environmental flow events have been delivered into the Gwydir, Mehi and Carole Creek systems to re-connect previously isolated waterholes. These occurred on the 15-25 October and 9-22 December 2019. Another flow is scheduled for early in the New Year, with the purpose of maintaining and providing access to refuge habitat, increase connectivity through these channels and improve water quality in pools. The October flow consisted of 5,000ML of environmental water from Copeton Dam which reached Tyreel and Combardello weirs and Carole Creek near Garah in early November. This was shortly followed by a WaterNSW delivery of stock and domestic water that extended water further down the Mehi, Gwydir and Carole systems. The December release was 2,000ML delivered out of Tareelaroi weir down the Gwydir, Mehi and Carole Creeks. As of 20 December, the water had reached Tyreel weir on the Gwydir, Moree town on the Mehi, and Midkin on Carole creek. Photo 1: Refuge pool upstream of Boolooroo Weir on the Gwydir River before (top), during (middle) and after (bottom) the October flow event.
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Impacts of Water Development on Waterbirds, Contrasting Two Australian River Basins: Global Implications for Sustainable Water Use
    Received: 13 December 2016 | Revised: 16 March 2017 | Accepted: 14 April 2017 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13743 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE Continental impacts of water development on waterbirds, contrasting two Australian river basins: Global implications for sustainable water use Richard T. Kingsford1 | Gilad Bino1 | John L. Porter1,2 1Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Abstract Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, The world’s freshwater biotas are declining in diversity, range and abundance, more Australia than in other realms, with human appropriation of water. Despite considerable data 2New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, Hurstville, NSW, Australia on the distribution of dams and their hydrological effects on river systems, there are few expansive and long analyses of impacts on freshwater biota. We investigated Correspondence Richard Kingsford, Centre for Ecosystem trends in waterbird communities over 32 years, (1983–2014), at three spatial scales in Science, School of Biological, Earth and two similarly sized large river basins, with contrasting levels of water resource devel- Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. opment, representing almost a third (29%) of Australia: the Murray–Darling Basin and Email: [email protected] the Lake Eyre Basin. The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s most developed river Funding information basin (240 dams storing 29,893 GL) while the Lake Eyre Basin is one of the less devel- Queensland Department of Environment oped basins (1 dam storing 14 GL). We compared the long-term responses of water- Protection and Heritage; New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage; Victoria bird communities in the two river basins at river basin, catchment and major wetland Department of Environment and Primary scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Wetland Management in Australia
    Ramsar wetland management in Australia 16 / Wetlands Australia February 2014 Ramsar in New South Wales – a tale of 12 sites New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage While Dickens wrote about only two places in his ‘Tale of Two Cities’, New South Wales can tell a tale of 12 unique sites protected under the Ramsar Convention. e 12 Ramsar sites in NSW cover a range of climatic e NSW Government has committed, through zones and landscapes found in the state. ese unique intergovernmental agreements and partnerships, to wetland environments include icy cold alpine lakes in provide for the protection, sustainable use and the Snowy Mountains, extensive mangrove forests in management of all NSW wetlands, including Ramsar the mouth of the Hunter River near Newcastle, broad wetlands. Water availability is the primary pressure on river red gum forests on the inland oodplains of the Macquarie and Murray rivers, and even the occasionally inundated Lake Pinaroo in the state’s harsh and arid north western corner near Tibooburra. e tale begins with Towra Point Nature Reserve on Sydney’s doorstep and the Hunter Estuary Wetlands near Newcastle’s busy ports, both were designated as NSW’s rst Ramsar sites on the same day in 1984. Both wetlands feature extensive areas of mangroves and saltmarsh and provide critical habitat for up to 34 species of migratory birds and many sh species. Since these initial listings, a further 10 Ramsar wetland sites have been established across NSW. e Paroo River Wetlands was designated in 2007 and is NSW’s 12th and most recent Ramsar wetland, containing one of the last remaining unregulated wetland systems in the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Australia
    Wetlands Australia National wetlands update February 2014—Issue No 24 Disclaimer e views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2014 Wetlands Australia National Wetlands Update February 2014 – Issue No 24 is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ is report should be attributed as ‘Wetlands Australia National Wetlands Update February 2014 – Issue No 24, Commonwealth of Australia 2014’ e Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable eorts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Cover images Front cover: Cobourg Peninsula Ramsar site in the Northern Territory contains a range of wetland types that support biodiversity (Jeanette Muirhead) Back cover: e shorelines of Lizard Bay within the Cobourg Peninsula Ramsar site in the Northern Territory (Jeanette Muirhead) ii / Wetlands Australia February 2014 Contents Introduction to Wetlands Australia February 2014 1 Wetlands and Agriculture: Partners for Growth 3 Wimmera wetland project benets whole farm 4 Murray
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
    NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Romania, June 2012 Please submit the completed National Report, in electronic (Microsoft Word) format, and preferably by e-mail, to the Ramsar Secretariat by 15 September 2011. National Reports should be sent to: Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) National Report Format for Ramsar COP11, page 2 Introduction & background 1. This National Report Format (NRF) has been approved by the Standing Committee in Decision SC41-24 for the Ramsar Convention’s Contracting Parties to complete as their national reporting to the 11th meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties of the Convention (Bucharest, Romania, June 2012). 2. Following Standing Committee discussions at its 40th meeting in May 2009, and its Decision SC40-29, this COP11 National Report Format closely follows that used for the COP10 National Report Format, which in turn was a significantly revised and simplified format in comparison with the National Report Formats provided to previous recent COPs. 3. In addition to thus permitting continuity of reporting and implementation progress analyses by ensuring that indicator questions are as far as possible consistent with previous NRFs (and especially the COP10 NRF), this COP11 NRF is structured in terms of the Goals and Strategies of the 2009-2015 Ramsar Strategic Plan adopted at COP10 as Resolution X.1, and the indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Effects and Benefit Transfer in the Fitzroy Basin
    Framing effects and benefit transfer in the Fitzroy basin John Rolfe * Adam Loch * Jeff Bennett** Paper presented at the 46th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society 13th – 15th February 2002 Rydges Lakeside Hotel Canberra, Australian Capital Territory * Faculty of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Emerald QLD 4720 * Faculty of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Emerald QLD 4720 ** National Centre for Development Studies, Australian National University, Canberra. Abstract. Policy makers are often interested in how estimates of the value of an environmental asset may be disaggregated into component pieces. This is particularly the case when they are seeking to transfer benefit estimates made in one situation to related circumstances. This is the case for the environmental values of the Fitzroy River basin in Central Queensland. The basin comprises several smaller catchments that share similar development opportunities, environmental issues and water resource constraints. This paper describes an application of the choice modelling technique to estimate values for the basin as a whole and two of the smaller catchments to determine how values may be related. Comparisons are undertaken to assess the validity of the choice modelling approach to benefit transfer issues in environmental valuation studies. Keywords: Choice modelling, framing, benefit transfer, irrigation, environment. 2 1. Introduction Within the framework of environmental valuation the need often arises to apply values estimated for an environmental good in one context to another similar context. This process is called benefit transfer (BT). Boyle and Bergstrom (1992:657) state that benefit transfer is ‘the transfer of existing estimates of non-market values to a new study which is different from the study for which the values were originally estimated’.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Basin Plan Evaluation
    The 2020 Basin Plan Evaluation Page a The 2020 Basin Plan Evaluation © Murray-Darling Basin Authority, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Errata ISBN (print): 978-1-922396-18-1 Errors have been identified in the following; ISBN (online): 978-1-922396-17-4 • Figure 6 (p21) – graphic contains data for whole of MDBA publication number: 50/20 Australia instead of the Murray–Darling Basin. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the MDBA logo, all photographs, graphics and trademarks, this • Figure 7 (p21) – graphic presents median flows publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution instead of mean (average) flows. 4.0 Licence. • Figure 29 (p75) – graphic includes data related to The MDBA’s preference is that you attribute this publication number of agricultural businesses irrigating. (and any materials sourced from it) using the following wording: These figures have been revised and updated in this current version of the document. The Basin Plan 2020 Evaluation Source: Licensed from the Murray-Darling Basin Authority under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence. Author: Murray-Darling Basin Authority The MDBA provides this information in good faith, but to the extent permitted by law, the MDBA and Commonwealth exclude all liability for adverse consequences arising directly or indirectly from using any information or materials contained with this publication. The MDBA makes its documents and information available in accessible formats. On some occasions the highly technical nature of the document means that we cannot make some sections fully accessible. If you have problems accessing the document please contact us.
    [Show full text]