DOCSLIB.ORG

South UGB Bridge Public Comments Received Via Questionnaire, Open House and Email

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South UGB Bridge Public Comments Received Via Questionnaire, Open House and Email South UGB Bridge Public Comments Received via Questionnaire, Open House and Email. As of 4-23-14 General Project Comments • Bad idea • The bridge is a fantastic project. • It's imperative that any new bridge be open to bikes • Please build the bridge so I can stop driving to get to the mountain bike trails. Please. Long overdue. • Thank you!!! • Let's get this done soon • Please make it happen. Being able to ride or hike the trail through, would be a fantastic community asset • This would be so nice for South East side residents to use current west side trail systems!!!! • Just make it happen, it is LONG overdue!!!! • This project is Paramount to SW Bend residents and our quality of life. Please do all that is possible to get this through!!!! Thank You! • This is a great plan as trail users in SW Bend on the East side of the river won't have to commute (drive) to Farewell Bend Park or the other Parks near the Old Mill to use the river trail actively. • Do NOT do it. Unnecessary waste of taxpayer dollars. • The map does not contain a specific proposed trail route near River Rim and therefore this process is significantly flawed and will likely be challenged. • Can't wait to have more access! Thank you • Area is too important for wildlife to increase traffic • I like the idea of having a continuous bike trail along the river. There are sections that are off limits or don't have a trail, and that needs to be addressed so that anyone can commute or recreate on a bike along the river on either or both sides. • I would like to have access to the river and trail in multiple ways which the new bridge and parking lot will allow. • Build! • Based on the Elk Meadow, when there are a lot of dogs, there is less wildlife. I'm assuming this trail will not go through a protected area that might disrupt habitats. • Just build it. • It’s a great project for generations to enjoy! • This is a great project and the idea of extending the River Trail and a bridge are both very favorable. • The proposed trailhead and trail areas are heavily forested and present a real fire danger. Those who live in the area fear more fires since the 1990 Awbrey Hall fire decimated the area. Additionally, a fire started by humans in 2010 threatened some of the same homes. Trespassing on private land is also a concern and infringement on the river easement along River Bend Drive. This easement is for fishing foot traffic only. • Working toward an interest in a safe bike way from DRW to town. It’s very disappointing that individuals have been allowed to rob the public of a river level route. I’m in favor of a Tumalo to Sunriver route. I assume west side has USFS route possibilities. I think a crossing from the south end of eastside housing (DRW) to connect to (assumed) west side routes would be good. I’m unaware of any established bike lanes in DRW and I do not know if you have any biking population in DRW to justify such a consideration. • “walking bridge” – good plan (South UGB Bridge) (easy access from River Bend Drive) Add a second walking bridge to create a trail loop. • I think it is a great idea and much needed access to the west side of the river. • Will there be parking on the west side? Who owns land between Cinder Cone and River? We would access the west side more often if there was a bridge. We drive now since a long north till a bridge crosses the river for bike usage. Will there be any off-trail areas to ride mtn bikes? How will it connect to Sunriver (e.g., Dillon, Benham, Rd 41, etc.) Horses? They are on other areas of this trail connection. Any user fees? (e.g., NW Forest Pass) • Great idea, I love the idea of having better access to the river trails west side from River Rim. • Tie in Buck Canyon/Cinder Cone Trail to Elk Meadow and existing park on east side of Cinder Cone. • Looking forward to residents or DRW finally having legal/public access to the Deschutes River! • It would be wonderful to have a fenced dog run park, but that might not be feasible. • This is important elk winter range habitat and there has been cumulative reduction of area and human incursion in this area – this is an area where the elk cross the river, please leave the elk alone. Also in the River Survey some years ago the consensus for the southern reach was to leave it wild and untouched. There is also a Blue Heron rookery in this area – why must humans go everywhere? Have access to everything – give the critters a break. The existing river trail on the east side (COID) is hammered – don’t want to see that happen to the south. There has not been adequate signage of the river trail north of River Rim Park so people get lost. This is wild and scenic part of the river – no bridges! • Do we need parking?? • We just moved to Bend in Sept. 2013 so have not become familiar with the trail much yet we live in DRW where there is no public access to the river and would love access. • The map is not specific enough. There should be a trail from or through the River Bend Estates along the river through the sanctuary to access South Bend as long as it does not infringe on personal property. • Great plan! • Love the idea of riding a bike to Sunriver on a bike path! • I am concerned about increased traffic on the cinder cone as my lot backs up to it. Often, people on the trail create their own paths so that they can get a look at our backyards. OK for neighbors, but not the entire county or much less visitors. • Make it so. • I am unclear as to how to access the bridge from the Buck Canyon parking lot. It happens that somehow one would have to cross an area that is privately owned (Thompson). I am very concerned about trail users parking on River Rim’s narrow streets with parking allowed only on one side of the street. How will that be managed? In addition, if the northern parking area is chosen, the people in the homes on Charleston in river Rim will back up to a parking lot, public bathroom, etc. I am sure that is not something they anticipated or would welcome. • As the Bend area grows in a southwesterly direction, access to outdoor areas becomes important to the population. Convenient points of access encourage outdoor play, recreation and exercise for all generations adding to a healthy lifestyle. Thank-you (BPRD) for your vision in this area. • Since we live in River Rim we would access the proposed trails and bridge by foot or bikes. • Thank you for opening the planning process for this project to the community. Public river access is greatly needed in this southwest region and a bridge will greatly improve access to west side trails. • Impact on residential traffic where there is already a problem in river Rim with speeding and traffic. Proximity to the “wildlife area” – we’ve already lost the elk migration corridor in this area, now let’s get rid of the remaining wildlife? They like parking lots!! Trash impact- bottles, cans, plastic “full” dog poo bags, cigarette butts now to be found in this area of the river? The city can’t maintain the existing trail! “a bridge to where”? I’m sure this would be beneficial to the developer and landowner as a “project amenity”. There are thousands of acres of recreational sites near Bend and the Deschutes River that are accessible. Keep it out of River Rim! Too bad our city forefathers did not designate this area as a Wild and Scenic river before the masses arrived to spoil what little remaining wilderness we have. I was appalled at the future plans for connecting Bend with Sunriver, via the Deschutes River Trail Project. Here are a few of my MANY concerns: 1) Are residents on the WEST side exempt from such impacts on their property or is it easier to place the parking lot, access, and destruction of the environment on the EAST side where there is more likely to be a favorable response by the masses? 2) Impact on river Rim Traffic – there is a significant traffic and safety issue already existing within this neighborhood. With only two access roads (that cut through 19mph private streets), how can the increased flow of visitors that will be using the parking lot, trail and bridge be regulated for safety and quiet domain? 3) Trash impact—I have walked the existing trail, and with great disappointment and disgust I find beer cans, soda cans, plastic water bottles, full dog poop bags, cigarette butts, and Styrofoam cups. Inevitably these pollutants wash into the river. There are not enough serviceable trash containers that are regularly maintained by the city. River pollution impact has not been addressed or mentioned in your public proposals. 4) After years of economic downturn for builders and developers, I’m sure this “recreational amenity” would benefit those who wish to go forward with property development. 5) Significant impact on one of the last remaining wildlife corridors in the area – the River Rim development admit tingly destroyed a wildlife wintering grounds for elk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Bend Community Wildfire Protection Plan
    Greater Bend Community Wildfire Protection Plan Two Bulls Fire, June 2014 February 2016 Prepared by Project Wildfire 541-322-7129 www.projectwildfire.org [email protected] ª Executive Summary Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPs) are documents that are designed by a local group of stakeholders who are invested in the wildland fire threat to their area. The group of stakeholders typically consists of a representative from the fire department(s), the state, any governing bodies and especially property owners. Each of these representatives should bring their concerns regarding wildland fire to the discussion and propose solutions to their concerns. Although reducing the risk of high intensity wildland fire is the primary motivation behind this plan, managing the larger landscape to restore forest health and more resilient conditions and improving fire response by all fire agencies are also discussed and addressed in the action plan. Continued efforts have been made by county, state and federal land management agencies to reduce the threat of high intensity wildland fires through education and fuels reduction activities on public lands. In addition, private property owners have responded enthusiastically to the defensible space and preparation guidelines and recommendations to reduce hazardous fuels on their own properties by participating in programs such as Firewise and FireFree. All of these activities allow the Greater Bend Area to become a more Fire Adapted Community. Wildland fire is a natural and necessary component of ecosystems across the country. Central Oregon is no exception. Historically, wildland fires have shaped the forests and wildlands valued by residents and visitors. These landscapes however, are now significantly altered due to fire prevention efforts, modern suppression activities and a general lack of large scale fires, resulting in overgrown forests with dense fuels that burn more intensely than in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Jlil~~2T~ 2 DEATH/LELA Tl'bl1cn, BEND O:5LIZL2Z O~/1"/27 Lcel'~TRAL OREGON QAME WARDEN
    - - . ...... .. ,. .., ,. '" , BEFORe: 1970 .:JlIl~~2t~ 2 DEATH/LELA tl'Bl1Cn, BEND O:5LIZL2Z _ O~/1"/27 LCEl'~TRAL OREGON QAME WARDEN. CLARENCE ADAMS. V,ILL ABBOTT', RUFUS tl'. 1 AUTO ACCIDENT IN BEND KILL!! HOWARD NOONCHEBTEN I O~/20/;Z7 1 AUTO ACCIDENT INGUEBT ON NCONCHf:STER 06L2l!U:l7 ;Z DEATH/RUFUS A. ABBOTT. REDMOND O~/2~/;Z7 08/11/27 1 REDMOND BOY • .JIM TONEY, KILLED BY F"""l'l-£RS PISTOL ABEL, ANO C. 08/30/27 1 ~ ACCIONET KIL.U!lMRS. W. A. SHELBY. BEND 11/27/~1 ~ DEATHIANO C. ABEl., CROOK COVNTY 09102/27 l'FLOATING ~CDY/MA~ FOUND IN DESCHUTES 09i0"3/27 1 LOGGER. SARAFTNA CAVALON. DIES IN C~MP ACCIDENT ABEL, ESTHER 09/07/27 1 INGUEST ON CAUALON. LOGgE~ ~ILLED !N 4CC!CE~T 12/26/~1 ~ OEATH/MR5. ESTHER ABEL. PRINEVILLE 09/0fl/27 1 TWO BOYS ,~E:PORTf:DLOST IN CASCADES l'</EM fiEr'D 09/0"10?7 1 5EARC~ ~OR LOST BOYS. GUY FERRYfHENRY CRAMER. IN ABREGO, .G:ERALD 5. 09/101'27 1 HOP~ DWINDLES FOR FINDING ~RRY/CRAMER , 1 ~~ STORM ADOS 0 PERILS/BOrS LOST IN C~ecADE~ :O/11/4~ ~ ?FC. ~ERALD 3. ABREGO POSTHUMOVSLY AWARDED B~ONZ 09/12/27 09/12/"27 1 SEARCH ~OR CRAMERIFeR~Y CONTINUES ABRUZZO, FRANK H. 09/13/27 4 ED - MOUNTA!N SEARCH VN~U5T CRITICISM 02/17/69 ;2 DEATH/FRANK ~ ABRUZZO O'U17/27 1 STORMS BLOCK SEARCH FOR FERRY/CRAMER 09/20/27 1 SEARCH FOR LOST YOUTHS RESUMES ACCIDENTS 09/23,27 1 NO TRACe:/L05T CLIMBERS REPORTED ALSO SPECIFIC TYf>ES/ACCIDENTS 09/28/27 1 TRAGIC MISTAKE HELD KEY TO FERRY/CRAMERS DEATH 10/19(06 1 1 BEND FREIGHTER CRUSHED TO DEATH 11/12/27 VETERAN LOGGER.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Butte Cinder Pit Expansion Project Environmental Assessment
    Red Butte Cinder Pit Expansion Project United States Environmental Assessment Bend-Fort Rock Ranger District Department of Agriculture Deschutes National Forest Deschutes County, Oregon Forest Service February 2015 Township 18 South, Range 11 East, Section 28 Willamette Meridian For More Information Contact: Beth Peer, Environmental Coordinator 63095 Deschutes Market Road Bend, OR 97701 Phone: 541-383-4769 [email protected] Red Butte Pit Expansion EA The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Red Butte Pit Expansion EA TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... 1 List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LA PINE the Newberry National Monument Is Located in the Town Of
    LA PINE The Newberry National Monument is located in the town of La Pine. It is just 5 miles north of the Chamber office on Hwy 97. Turn Left (east) and travel up into the crater to enjoy the world’s largest obsidian flow, Paulina Lake and resort and the wonderful little East Lake resort. Both Lakes feature camping, a store, restaurant, boats, fishing, and camping or cab- ins to rent. Paulina is open for the winter, too and you can go into the resort to stay on a snowmobile! This is the one thing in La Pine you do not want to miss! For information about any of the Lava Lands destinations call the Newberry National Monument Hotline number at 541-383-5700. Inside the Caldera: Paulina Creek Water slides. Go on Paulina Lake road to McKay Campground (McKay Crossing Campground) then take the 1-1/2 mile trail to the waterslides. To get to the Hot Springs go to the far end of Little Crater Campground on Paulina Lake and hike on the lakeshore trail approximately 1 mile. You will see the little hot spring pools that people have made through the years. Rosland Campground is located ¼ mile past the Little Deschutes River on Burgess Road (Wickiup turn off from Hwy 97) The little park is a Park District owned park that features a day use area with access to the river, camping and they are remodeling the park to include a new pavilion that is a covered area for your picnics, gatherings and meetings. WEST Places to go within 45 minutes of the Chamber of Commerce in La Pine: 541-536-9771 South Twin Lake/North Twin Lake- Take Huntington Road through town, north to Burgess.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan
    Upper Deschutes River Fish ManagementPlan Draft May22, 1996 Oregon Department of Fish and Wtldlife Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Page 1 of 431 Upper Deschutes River Basin Fish Management Plan 1996 COMPLETED DISTRICT DRAFT 04/11/96 6:12:58 PM DESCHUTES RIVER from Wickiup Dam to Bend (North Canal Dam) including the tributaries Fall River and Spring River Overview This portion of the basin plan includes the Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam (RM 227) downstream to Bend (North Canal Dam, RM 164.8), Fall River, and Spring River. The Little Deschutes River, a major tributary which enters at RM 193, is not included because of its' length and connection with other waters in the basin. The Little Deschutes River will be presented in a separate section of the basin plan. In the Habitat and Fish Management sections of the following discussion, the Deschutes River will be divided into two sections; Wickiup Dam to Benham Falls (RM 181), and Benham Falls to Bend (North Canal Dam). The reason for this is based on stream morphology and changes in fish populations. Benham Falls is a high gradient natural cascade which separates the Deschutes River into two logical sections with low gradient above the falls and high gradient below. Similarly, fish population composition changes at Benham Falls with brown trout dominant above and rainbow trout dominant below. The remaining sections; location and ownership, fish stocking history, angling regulations, management issues, summary of alternatives and alternatives will be presented as (1) Deschutes River, and (2) Tributaries. In 1987, the Oregon legislature designated the section of Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam to General Patch Bridge, and from Harper Bridge to the north boundary of the Deschutes National Forest as a State Scenic Waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonanza Wishram Emerson Locust Grove Dufur East Summit Ridge
    Bonanza Wishram Emerson Locust Grove Dufur East Erskine Summit Ridge Friend Badger Lake Flag Point Mount Hood South Sinamox Rosebush Postage Stamp Butte Sherars Bridge Grass Valley Wamic Kent Maupin Wapinitia Pass Post Point Rock Creek Reservoir Tygh Valley Dead Dog Canyon Bronx Canyon Dant Timothy Lake Mount Wilson Beaver Butte Foreman Point Wapinitia Maupin SW Shaniko Criterion Macken Canyon Pinhead Buttes Fort Butte Hehe Butte Simnasho Kaskela Sidwalter Buttes Mutton Mountain Antelope Shaniko Junction Shaniko Summit Hastings Peak Olallie Butte Boulder Lake Sawmill Butte Gateway Potters Ponds Warm Springs Eagle Butte Willowdale Degner Canyon Donnybrook Arrastra Butte Lionshead Mount Jefferson Shitike Butte Metolius Bench Madras West Madras East Ashwood Seekseequa Junction Teller Butte Axehandle Butte Horse Heaven Creek Marion Lake Candle Creek Fly Creek Culver Prairie Farm Spring Round Butte Dam Buck Butte Foley Butte Opal Mountain Brewer Reservoir Dutchman Creek Stephenson Mountain Lawson Mountain Black Butte Antone Three Fingered Jack Opal City Little Squaw Back Squaw Back Ridge Steelhead Falls Gray Butte Hensley Butte Salt Butte Derr Meadows Grizzly Mountain Steins Pillar Whistler Point Ochoco Butte Mount Pisgah Peterson Point Sisters Mount Washington Black Crater Redmond O’Neil Henkle Butte Cline Falls Prineville Keys Creek Six Corners Wolf Mountain Houston Lake Cadle Butte Gerow Butte Ochoco Reservoir Lookout Mountain Williams Prairie Little Summit Prairie Post North Sister Tumalo Tumalo Dam Paulina Trout Creek Butte Three Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Benham Falls, OR
    Benham Falls, OR Vicinity Location: The trailhead is about 125 miles southeast of Portland, Oregon in the Deschutes National Forest. Directions: From Portland, drive to Bend, about 175 miles. From Bend, drive south onto Cascade Lakes National Scenic Byway passing through several traffic circles. After the last traffic circle, continue on Cascade Lakes Highway / SW Century Dr for about 5 miles. Turn left onto Dillon Falls Rd / NF-41 and continue for 4 miles. After 4 miles, turn left onto a gravel road following signs for Benham Falls. Drive for 2.2 miles on FR 400 and park at the end of the road. There is a restroom at the trailhead. From May 1 through September 30 $5 daily permit or a Northwest Forest pass is required. No on- site purchase for permits. No permits are needed to park between October 1st and June 30. Dogs are allowed and have to be on-leash from May 15th to September 15th. Trail: Deschutes River Trail. There is no geocache on this trail, but there is farther up the Deschutes River Trail. Trail Maps: Topo Map, Download Garmin .gpx file Length and Elevation: 0.4 miles roundtrip. Elevation at the trailhead is 4,150 feet. Elevation gain totals 100 feet. Total gain and loss is 200 feet. Highest elevation is 4,150 feet. Review: April 17, 2014. The short trail goes down several gentle switchbacks through the pine-scented forest with the ever- present roar of the waterfall. The trail is enclosed by a split-rail fence to keep people from trampling the area around the overlook.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2006
    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2006 WWWelcome to Central Oregon! This year’s Volcanic Vistas celebrates Scenic Byways and Community Connections. Scenic Byways provide connections between natural resources, communities, people and places. Scenic Byways create a bridge to the natural environment for recreational oppor- tunities and provide interpretation of the geological and historical events that have drawn people to central Oregon for years. Central Oregon and the Forest Service have a great deal of pride in the Scenic Byways found here. Journeys on the Cascade Lakes, Outback, and McKenzie-Santiam National Scenic Byways all begin on the Deschutes National Forest. Central Oregon communities benefit from the tourism and recreation opportuni- ties promoted by the National Scenic Byways Program. Other less traveled tour routes are to be found on BLM’s Back Country Byways. These are hidden gems full of surprises as well. We hope your discoveries and adventures this summer will be filled with beautiful scenery and fun activities. We also hope you will enjoy these Volcanic Vistas stories about community connections and partnerships that work together to protect valuable resources and to provide both visitors and residents with the unique recreational experiences that are a vital part of all central Oregon communities. Be sure to have fun and be safe! Leslie Weldon Jeff Walter Forest Supervisor Forest Supervisor Deschutes National Forest Ochoco National Forest & Crooked River National Grassland What's Your Interest? Inside.... The Deschutes and Ochoco National Be Safe! 2 Forests are a recreation haven. There are Go To Special Places 3 2.5 million acres of forest including seven Connect with the Forest 4 wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, Connect with Forest History 5 six rivers, 157 lakes and reservoirs, approxi- Experience Today 6-7 mately 1,600 miles of trails, Lava Lands Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Discover the Natural World Newberry National Volcanic Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2015 to 09/30/2015 Deschutes National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2015 to 09/30/2015 Deschutes National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Aquatic Invasive Species order - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Completed Actual: 03/03/2015 07/2015 James Capurso to prevent the spread or 208-557-5780 introduction of aquatic invasive [email protected] species Description: The purpose of this order is to prevent the spread or introduction of aquatic invasive plant or animal species. CE Public involvement is targeted for the Umatilla, Willamette, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie, Gifford Pinchot, and Colville NFs. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=44360 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Asotin, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Ferry, Garfield, King, Klickitat, Lewis, Pend Oreille, Pierce, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Stevens, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Baker, Clackamas, Douglas, Grant, Jefferson, Lane, Linn, Marion, Morrow, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wheeler. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Order will apply to all Forests in Region 6, however targeted scoping is with the Umatilla, Gifford Pinchot, Mt. Baker/Snoqualmie, Willamette and Colville NFs tribal and public scoping lists. Deschutes National Forest Bend/Fort Rock Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region Brown's Cr. and Arnold Ice - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 04/01/2015 07/2015 Beth Peer Cave Post Fire Restoration (other than forest products) 541-383-4769 CE - Fuels management [email protected] Description: Two wildfire areas are proposed for restoration: Arnold Ice Cave, 120 ac.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Railroads – Sl
    1 OREGON RAILROADS – SL 179 07.10.20 page 1 of 16 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Union Pacific (1-13), Central RR of Oregon (15-17), Oregon Trunk (19), Spokane Seattle & Portland (23-24), Southern Pacific RR (30-51), Great Northern Rly (Bend-Bieber)(52) and Short Lines (53-72). Northern Pacific, see SPS, 23, & WA 8 & 9. Based on 1858 Dinsmore Guide (x), Official Guide (G)1875 (y), 1893G (z), Company Public (t), Working (w) TTs & Tariffs ($) as noted, 1976G (e) and current Amtrak TTs (f). q: 1884G; AG/LG/MG/PSG; Appletons/ Lewis & Drydens/Rand McNally/Puget Sound Guides; TD: Travelers Directory Former names: [ ] Distances in miles Gauge 4’ 8½” unless noted (date)>(date) start/end of passenger service op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass?: passenger service? Certain non-passenger locations shown in italics thus: (name) # Histories, incdg “Stations West”, by Culp Reference letters in brackets: (a), location shown in public timetable, but no trains stop. x-f = xyzabcdef etc. w+ Working TT implies trains will make conditional stops but no s or f symbol shown. UNION PACIFIC RLY (UP) 115.6 Bodie w* [Casey pass? ] z: 1890G; a: 1911(OWRN)t; b: 1929t/1926G ; c: 1939t; 117.4 Nordeen d pass? d:1948w/1951t; w: 1928w; w2: 1916w; p: 1914G; r:1923G 118.4 Kamela z-d w*: 1928w, no f/s symbol, “stop at any station”? 121.2 Ross d pass? unlocated (OWRN, 1904Glist, pass?): 124.5 Meacham z-d Menominee [Nicolai ] 128.8 Porter 1916G ]Porters ] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path Project Environmental Assessment
    Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path Project Environmental Assessment United States Bend-Fort Rock Ranger District Department of Deschutes National Forest Agriculture Deschutes County, Oregon Forest Service March 2013 Township 19 South, Range 11 East, Sections 16, 17, 20-26 Willamette Meridian For More Information Contact: Scott McBride 63095 Deschutes Market Road Bend, OR 97701 Phone: 541-383-4712 Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path EA The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path EA COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS ABA Architectural Barriers Act AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials BA Biological Assessment BBC Birds of Conservation Concern BE Biological Evaluation BMP Best Management Practices BO Biological Opinion CEQ Council of Environmental Quality CFR Code
    [Show full text]