Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia Molecular Psychiatry (2015) 20, 555–562 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1359-4184/15 www.nature.com/mp EXPERT REVIEW Evaluating historical candidate genes for schizophrenia MS Farrell1, T Werge2,3,4, P Sklar5,6,7, MJ Owen8,9, RA Ophoff10,11,12,MCO’Donovan8,9, A Corvin13, S Cichon14,15,16 and PF Sullivan1,17,18 Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (for example, COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1 and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes explicitly evaluated common variant hypotheses about schizophrenia. Our evaluation included a meta-analysis of the candidate gene literature, incorporation of the results of the largest genomic study yet published for schizophrenia, ratings from informed researchers who have published on these genes, and ratings from 24 schizophrenia geneticists. On the basis of current empirical evidence and mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene literature did not yield clear insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia. A likely reason why historical candidate gene studies did not achieve their primary aims is inadequate statistical power. However, the considerable efforts embodied in these early studies unquestionably set the stage for current successes in genomic approaches to schizophrenia. Molecular Psychiatry (2015) 20, 555–562; doi:10.1038/mp.2015.16; published online 10 March 2015 INTRODUCTION unreasonable to hope that similar studies might work for In this review, we consider the current status of candidate genes schizophrenia. Realization of this expectation proved difficult. A for schizophrenia that were prominent in the literature before the pattern emerged whereby an initial claim of association for a genome-wide association study (GWAS) era. This review was seemingly plausible, even exciting, candidate gene for schizo- invited by Professor Julio Licinio, the editor of Molecular Psychiatry. phrenia was followed by a mixed pattern of non-replications and 1 replication. Thus, candidate gene association studies for schizo- Owing to the high heritability of schizophrenia, there have 7–10 been many efforts to discover the causative genetic factors, and phrenia became controversial. candidate gene studies have been a major approach. For example, The goal of this review is to evaluate the current status of the SZGene database2 (obtained November 2009) listed 1406 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia. The motivation is candidate gene papers investigating over 700 genes. In these straightforward: there are hundreds of papers on these genes, several of these genes have motivated considerable biological studies, one or more genetic markers in genes hypothesized to be experimentation, and as recent large-scale studies have expanded involved in the etiology of schizophrenia were genotyped in cases our knowledge base, it is reasonable to review this topic. Early with schizophrenia and controls. Prior to the advances brought 3 candidate gene studies evaluated tens of genetic markers in about by the Human Genome Project and the International hundreds of subjects, and more recent studies conducted 4 fi HapMap Project, it was dif cult and expensive to genotype a genome-wide comparisons of millions of genetic markers in tens comprehensive list of genetic variants in a genomic region. of thousands of subjects. The largest published study is of 34 000 Investigators thus tended to genotype a few genetic markers in a cases from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC), which candidate gene selected on the basis of prevailing theories of the identified 108 genome-wide significant loci.11 etiology of schizophrenia (for example, antipsychotic pharmacol- Almost all of these historical candidate gene studies evaluated ogy) or positional candidate genes from linkage or cytogenetic the role of common variation (one part of a spectrum of variants studies. involved in schizophrenia). Our evaluation includes: (a) meta- The candidate gene strategy had a few notable successes in analysis of candidate gene studies, (b) PGC schizophrenia mega- identifying genetic variation for other complex diseases. Influential analysis results,11 (c) expert evaluations from researchers on examples included replicated associations of Alzheimer’s disease specific candidate genes and (d) survey ratings from schizophrenia with common variation in APOE5 and alcohol dependence with genomics investigators. The latter two approaches are not common variants in alcohol metabolic genes.6 It was thus not ‘scientific’ in a strict sense, but rather provide a general guide to 1Center for Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Genetics, Genomic Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 2Institute of Biological Psychiatry, MHC Sct. Hans, Mental Health Services Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Aarhus, Denmark; 4The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH, Aarhus, Denmark; 5Division of Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 6Institute for Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 7Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 8MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; 9National Centre for Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; 10Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 11Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 12Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; 13Neuropsychiatric Genetics Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; 14Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 15Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 16Department of Genomics, Life and Brain Center, Bonn, Germany; 17Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden and 18Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Correspondence: Dr PF Sullivan, Center for Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Genetics, CB#7264, 5097 Genomic Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7264, NC, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Received 6 August 2014; revised 14 November 2014; accepted 5 January 2015; published online 10 March 2015 Historical schizophrenia candidate genes evaluation MS Farrell et al 556 the ‘significance’ and ‘impact’ that the earlier findings currently firmest proponents of a particular candidate gene in schizo- have in the field. phrenia. These individuals were identified using PubMed searches: (gene (all fields) or 'protein name' (all fields)) and ('schizophrenia' (MeSH terms) or 'schizophrenia' (all fields)). Informed investigators MATERIALS AND METHODS were contacted to request their summary judgment of the current We selected 25 genes prominent in the pre-GWAS era. The first status of one particular gene as a genetic risk factor for schizophrenia GWAS appeared in 2007 but, given that many schizophrenia (1 = very unlikely and 5 = very likely). Genetic risk candidate gene association studies were published in 2008, we could refer to common, uncommon, rare, private or de novo evaluated candidate gene studies published in calendar year 2008 genetic variation. A draft of Table 2 was supplied upon request. or earlier. The 25 genes we selected were either featured in Informed investigators were given the opportunity to include text – reviews of the genetics of schizophrenia10,12 14 or were highly in the supplement to explain their rating. studied (⩾20 papers recorded in SZGene). The genes and the Fourth, we obtained perspectives from ‘schizophrenia geneti- rationale for being a candidate gene for schizophrenia are given in cists’. We used principal investigators from the PGC schizophrenia Table 1. We continued several important assumptions made by working group11 as a convenience sample. We obtained responses virtually all candidate gene studies (see limitations). First, these from 24 investigators for summary judgments using the same studies evaluated ‘schizophrenia’ as a dichotomous entity. Second, rating scheme as for the informed investigators. Many of these as with the primary studies, we assumed that genetic variants act investigators study common, uncommon, rare, private or de novo on the gene it was in or near. This assumption is crucial and will be genetic variation. inaccurate for a currently unknown proportion of genetic variants. Third, as discussed below, almost all of these studies evaluated common genetic variation. RESULTS We evaluated these 25 historical candidate genes for schizo- Table 1 summarizes 25 historically important candidate genes for phrenia in four ways. First, we conducted fixed-effects meta- schizophrenia. For 24 of 25 genes, the initial study conducted analyses for all genetic markers in these 25 genes using summary genotyping to evaluate the impact of common genetic variation data on subjects of European
Recommended publications
  • The Prospective Value of Dopamine Receptors on Bio-Behavior of Tumor
    Journal of Cancer 2019, Vol. 10 1622 Ivyspring International Publisher Journal of Cancer 2019; 10(7): 1622-1632. doi: 10.7150/jca.27780 Review The Prospective Value of Dopamine Receptors on Bio-Behavior of Tumor Xu Wang1,2, Zhi-Bin Wang1,2, Chao Luo1,2,4, Xiao-Yuan Mao1,2, Xi Li1,2, Ji-Ye Yin1,2, Wei Zhang1,2,3, Hong-Hao Zhou1,2,3, Zhao-Qian Liu1,2,3 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, P. R. China; 2. Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha 410078, P. R. China; 3. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, P. R. China; 4. School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410078. Corresponding author: Professor Zhao-Qian Liu: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, P. R. China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University; Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha 410078, P. R. China. Tel: +86 731 89753845, Fax: +86 731 82354476, E-mail: [email protected]. © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. Received: 2018.06.10; Accepted: 2019.02.07; Published: 2019.03.03 Abstract Dopamine receptors are belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptor. There are five types of dopamine receptor (DR), including DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DRD4, and DRD5, which are divided into two major groups: the D1-like receptors (DRD1 and DRD5), and the D2-like receptors (DRD2, DRD3, and DRD4).
    [Show full text]
  • 5-HT7 Receptor Neuroprotection Against Excitotoxicity in the Hippocampus,” AFPC, Quebec City, June 2012
    5-HT7 Receptor Neuroprotection against Excitotoxicity in the Hippocampus by Seyedeh Maryam Vasefi A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmacy Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 ©Seyedeh Maryam Vasefi 2014 i AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Introduction and Objectives: The PDGFβ receptor and its ligand, PDGF-BB, are expressed throughout the central nervous system (CNS), including the hippocampas. Several reports confirm that PDGFβ receptors are neuroprotective against N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA)-induced cell death in hippocampal neurons. NMDA receptor dysfunction is important for the expression of many symptoms of mental health disorders such as schizophrenia. The serotonin (5-HT) type 7 receptor was the most recent of the 5-HT receptor family to be identified and cloned. 5-HT receptors interact with several signaling systems in the CNS including receptors activated by the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate such as the NMDA receptor. Although there is extensive interest in targeting the 5-HT7 receptor with novel therapeutic compounds, the function and signaling properties of 5-HT7 receptors in neurons remains poorly characterized. Methods: The SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line, primary hippocampal cultures, and hippocampal slices were treated with 5-HT7 receptor agonists and antagonists. Western blotting was used to measure PDGFß receptor expression and phosphorylation as well as NMDA receptor subunit expression and phosphorylation levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Key Pathways and Genes in Dementia Via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.18.440371; this version posted July 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Identification of Key Pathways and Genes in Dementia via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karnataka, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.18.440371; this version posted July 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract To provide a better understanding of dementia at the molecular level, this study aimed to identify the genes and key pathways associated with dementia by using integrated bioinformatics analysis. Based on the expression profiling by high throughput sequencing dataset GSE153960 derived from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients with dementia and healthy controls were identified. With DEGs, we performed a series of functional enrichment analyses. Then, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, modules, miRNA-hub gene regulatory network and TF-hub gene regulatory network was constructed, analyzed and visualized, with which the hub genes miRNAs and TFs nodes were screened out. Finally, validation of hub genes was performed by using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetics of Bipolar Disorder
    Molecular Psychiatry (2008) 13, 742–771 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/08 $30.00 www.nature.com/mp FEATURE REVIEW The genetics of bipolar disorder: genome ‘hot regions,’ genes, new potential candidates and future directions A Serretti and L Mandelli Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy Bipolar disorder (BP) is a complex disorder caused by a number of liability genes interacting with the environment. In recent years, a large number of linkage and association studies have been conducted producing an extremely large number of findings often not replicated or partially replicated. Further, results from linkage and association studies are not always easily comparable. Unfortunately, at present a comprehensive coverage of available evidence is still lacking. In the present paper, we summarized results obtained from both linkage and association studies in BP. Further, we indicated new potential interesting genes, located in genome ‘hot regions’ for BP and being expressed in the brain. We reviewed published studies on the subject till December 2007. We precisely localized regions where positive linkage has been found, by the NCBI Map viewer (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview/); further, we identified genes located in interesting areas and expressed in the brain, by the Entrez gene, Unigene databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/) and Human Protein Reference Database (http://www.hprd.org); these genes could be of interest in future investigations. The review of association studies gave interesting results, as a number of genes seem to be definitively involved in BP, such as SLC6A4, TPH2, DRD4, SLC6A3, DAOA, DTNBP1, NRG1, DISC1 and BDNF.
    [Show full text]
  • SZDB: a Database for Schizophrenia Genetic Research
    Schizophrenia Bulletin vol. 43 no. 2 pp. 459–471, 2017 doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw102 Advance Access publication July 22, 2016 SZDB: A Database for Schizophrenia Genetic Research Yong Wu1,2, Yong-Gang Yao1–4, and Xiong-Jian Luo*,1,2,4 1Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming, China; 2Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China; 3CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China 4YGY and XJL are co-corresponding authors who jointly directed this work. *To whom correspondence should be addressed; Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China; tel: +86-871-68125413, fax: +86-871-68125413, e-mail: [email protected] Schizophrenia (SZ) is a debilitating brain disorder with a Introduction complex genetic architecture. Genetic studies, especially Schizophrenia (SZ) is a severe mental disorder charac- recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have terized by abnormal perceptions, incoherent or illogi- identified multiple variants (loci) conferring risk to SZ. cal thoughts, and disorganized speech and behavior. It However, how to efficiently extract meaningful biological affects approximately 0.5%–1% of the world populations1 information from bulk genetic findings of SZ remains a and is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide.2–4 major challenge. There is a pressing
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structure of Dopamine Receptor D4 Bound to the Subtype Selective Ligand, L745870 Ye Zhou1,2, Can Cao1, Lingli He1, Xianping Wang1, Xuejun Cai Zhang1,2*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Crystal structure of dopamine receptor D4 bound to the subtype selective ligand, L745870 Ye Zhou1,2, Can Cao1, Lingli He1, Xianping Wang1, Xuejun Cai Zhang1,2* 1National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Abstract Multiple subtypes of dopamine receptors within the GPCR superfamily regulate neurological processes through various downstream signaling pathways. A crucial question about the dopamine receptor family is what structural features determine the subtype-selectivity of potential drugs. Here, we report the 3.5-angstrom crystal structure of mouse dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) complexed with a subtype-selective antagonist, L745870. Our structure reveals a secondary binding pocket extended from the orthosteric ligand-binding pocket to a DRD4-specific crevice located between transmembrane helices 2 and 3. Additional mutagenesis studies suggest that the antagonist L745870 prevents DRD4 activation by blocking the relative movement between transmembrane helices 2 and 3. These results expand our knowledge of the molecular basis for the physiological functions of DRD4 and assist new drug design. Introduction Dopamine and its receptors play fundamental roles in controlling neurological processes including motor control, cognition, learning, and emotions (Beaulieu and Gainetdinov, 2011). Dopaminergic *For correspondence: dysfunction is associated with the
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Dopamine D4 Receptors in Motor Hyperactivity Induced by Neonatal 6-Hydroxydopamine Lesions in Rats Kehong Zhang, M.D., Ph.D., Frank I
    Role of Dopamine D4 Receptors in Motor Hyperactivity Induced by Neonatal 6-Hydroxydopamine Lesions in Rats Kehong Zhang, M.D., Ph.D., Frank I. Tarazi, Ph.D., and Ross J. Baldessarini, M.D. The role of dopamine D4 receptors in behavioral hyperactivity D4-selective antagonist CP-293,019 dose-dependently was investigated by assessing D4 receptor expression in brain reversed lesion-induced hyperactivity, and D4-agonist CP- regions and behavioral effects of D4 receptor-selective ligands 226,269 increased it. These results indicate a physiological in juvenile rats with neonatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesions, a role of dopamine D4 receptors in motor behavior, and may laboratory model for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder suggest much-needed innovative treatments for ADHD. (ADHD). Autoradiographic analysis indicated that motor [Neuropsychopharmacology 25:624–632, 2001] hyperactivity in lesioned rats was closely correlated with © 2001 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. increases in D4 but not D2 receptor levels in caudate-putamen. Published by Elsevier Science Inc. KEY WORDS: Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder; Human D4 receptors occur in multiple forms with 2– Autoradiography; Dopamine; D4; 6-hydroxydopamine; 11 copies of a 16-amino acid (48 base-pair) sequence in Motor activity the putative third intracellular loop of the peptide (Van Dopamine (DA) modulates physiological processes Tol et al. 1992; Lichter et al. 1993; Asghari et al. 1994). through activation of five G-protein coupled receptors Several recent genetic studies indicate that the 7-repeat D4 receptor allele (D4.7), a relatively uncommon variant, of the D1-like (D1 and D5) and D2-like (D2, D3, and D4) re- ceptor families (Neve and Neve 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    University of Tennessee Health Science Center UTHSC Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations (ETD) College of Graduate Health Sciences 12-2013 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations Part of the Medical Cell Biology Commons, and the Medical Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bogard, Amy Sue , "Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells" (2013). Theses and Dissertations (ETD). Paper 330. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Graduate Health Sciences at UTHSC Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (ETD) by an authorized administrator of UTHSC Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Document Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program Biomedical Sciences Track Molecular Therapeutics and Cell Signaling Research Advisor Rennolds Ostrom, Ph.D. Committee Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Ph.D. Edwards Park, Ph.D. Steven Tavalin, Ph.D. Christopher Waters, Ph.D. DOI 10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029 Comments Six month embargo expired June 2014 This dissertation is available at UTHSC Digital Commons: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations/330 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells A Dissertation Presented for The Graduate Studies Council The University of Tennessee Health Science Center In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy From The University of Tennessee By Amy Sue Bogard December 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Amy Sue Bogard.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Reported Sexual Behavioral Interests and Polymorphisms in the Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4) Exon III VNTR in Heterosexual Young Adults
    Arch Sex Behav (2016) 45:2091–2100 DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0646-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Self-Reported Sexual Behavioral Interests and Polymorphisms in the Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4) Exon III VNTR in Heterosexual Young Adults 1 2 3 3 Andrew C. Halley • Melanie Boretsky • David A. Puts • Mark Shriver Received: 22 January 2014 / Revised: 6 October 2015 / Accepted: 10 October 2015 / Published online: 18 November 2015 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 Abstract Polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor Keywords Dopamine Á DRD4 Á Exon III VNTR Á (DRD4) have previously been shown to associate with a variety Neuroscience Á Sexuality of human behavioral phenotypes, including ADHD pathology, alcohol and tobacco craving, financial risk-taking in males, and broader personality traits such as novelty seeking. Recent research has linked the presence of a 7-repeat (7R) allele in a 48- Introduction bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) along exon III of DRD4 to age at first sexual intercourse, sexual desire, arousal and One of many distinguishing behavioral characteristics of our function, and infidelity and promiscuity. We hypothesized that species, human sexuality is evolutionarily novel in a variety of carriers of longer DRD4 alleles may report interest in a wider ways: we exhibit concealed ovulation and menopause, and variety of sexual behaviors and experiences than noncarriers. engage in a wider variety of sexual acts than nonhuman primates Participants completed a 37-item questionnaire measuring sexual (Bancroft, 2009;Dixson,2013), among others. Recent research interests as well as Cloninger’s Temperament and Character has suggested that some variability in human sexuality can be Inventory,andweregenotypedforthe48-bpVNTRonexonIII explained by genetic polymorphisms affecting neuromodula- of DRD4.
    [Show full text]
  • Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene: Novelty Or Nonsense? Andrew D
    Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene: Novelty or Nonsense? Andrew D. Paterson, M.B., Ch.B., Glen A. Sunohara, Ph.D., and James L. Kennedy, M.D. Although the role of genetics in personality has been studied attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Evidence for the extensively at a phenomenological level, only lately has the role of DRD4 in novelty seeking is inconclusive, with a investigation of specific genes been performed. Recent number of methodological concerns. Use of more reports suggest that DNA variants of the dopamine D4 conservative statistical criteria for significance, employing receptor gene (DRD4) are associated with the personality gene haplotypes, as well as linkage disequilibrium studies, trait of novelty seeking; however, others fail to replicate this are recommended. The molecular biology of the D4 gene is finding. Such conflicting results suggest either a weak also reviewed. effect, an association only in certain populations, or a false- [Neuropsychopharmacology 21:3–16, 1999] positive resulting from population stratification. We © 1999 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. provide a critical analysis of genetic studies of DRD4 Published by Elsevier Science Inc. variants with novelty seeking, alcoholism, drug abuse, and KEY WORDS: Dopamine D4 receptor gene; Association; psychosocial view of personality, that divide the traits Novelty seeking; Alcoholism; Drug abuse; ADHD, DRD4; into four temperaments: novelty seeking (NS); harm Review avoidance; reward dependence; and persistence in In 1996, association of particular variants of the dopa- the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ, mine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) with the personality trait Cloninger 1987). This provided a reliable method for of novelty seeking was reported by two groups (Ebstein the study of normal personality, as well as the study of et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Polymorphisms of Dopamine Receptor Genes and Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Relevance and Future Perspectives
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Polymorphisms of Dopamine Receptor Genes and Parkinson’s Disease: Clinical Relevance and Future Perspectives Luca Magistrelli 1,2 , Marco Ferrari 3 , Alessia Furgiuele 1,3 , Anna Vera Milner 2, Elena Contaldi 2,4 , Cristoforo Comi 2,3,* , Marco Cosentino 3,5 and Franca Marino 3,5 1 PhD Program in Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Medical Humanities, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (A.F.) 2 Movement Disorders Centre, Neurology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy; [email protected] (A.V.M.); [email protected] (E.C.) 3 Centre of Research in Medical Pharmacology, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (F.M.) 4 PhD Program in Medical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy 5 Center of Research in Neuroscience, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by loss of dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain. PD is clinically characterized by a variety of motor and nonmotor symptoms, and treatment relies on dopaminergic replacement. Beyond a common pathological hallmark, PD patients may present differences in both clinical progression and response to drug therapy that are partly affected by genetic factors. Despite extensive knowledge on genetic variability of Citation: Magistrelli, L.; Ferrari, M.; dopaminergic receptors (DR), few studies have addressed their relevance as possible influencers of Furgiuele, A.; Milner, A.V.; Contaldi, clinical heterogeneity in PD patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective NMDA Receptor Positive Allosteric Modulator
    MOL #94516 Structural determinants and mechanism of action of a GluN2C- selective NMDA receptor positive allosteric modulator Alpa Khatri, Pieter B. Burger, Sharon A. Swanger, Kasper B. Hansen, Sommer Zimmerman, Erkan Karakas, Dennis C. Liotta, Hiro Furukawa, James. P. Snyder, Stephen F. Traynelis Journal: Molecular Pharmacology Emory University, Pharmacology Department: AK, SAS, SFT Emory University, Chemistry Department: SZ, PB, DCL, JPS University of Montana, Dept of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Center for Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics: KBH Cold Spring Harbor Labs: EK, HF MOL #94516 Supplemental Figure S1. Supplemental Figure S1. Evaluation of the effects of individual GluN1-1b exon-5 mutations on enhancement of the responses of GluN1-1b/GluN2C expressed in Xenopus oocytes to 100 M glutamate and 30 M glycine by 100 M PYD-1. The response shown is the ratio of current obtained in the presence and absence of PYD-1, and is shown as a percent of control recorded in the same oocyte. For all responses, n = 4-18 oocytes. * p < 0.05 paired t-test or ANOVA against control experiments with wild-type receptor. MOL #94516 Supplemental Figure S2. Supplemental Figure S2. (A-C) PYD-106 was co-applied with QNZ-46 (2C/D inhibitor), DQP-1105 (2C/D inhibitor), and CIQ (2C/D positive allosteric modulator) to determine if PYD-106 shares structural determinants of action with these modulators. The effects of co-applying PYD-106 can be calculated assuming its actions are independent of modulation by QNZ-46, DQP-1105, or CIQ (given as the predicted value). The control response in the absence of PYD is shown as a dashed line, and is taken as 100%.
    [Show full text]