Early Danish Grb Experiments – and Some for the Future?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Danish Grb Experiments – and Some for the Future? Gamma-ray Bursts: 15 Years of GRB Afterglows A.J. Castro-Tirado, J. Gorosabel and I.H. Park (eds) EAS Publications Series, 61 (2013) 15–25 EARLY DANISH GRB EXPERIMENTS – AND SOME FOR THE FUTURE? N. Lund1 Abstract. By 1975 the hunt for GRB counterparts had been on for almost ten years without success. Gamma burst instruments of that day provided little or no directional data in themselves. Positions could be extracted only using the time delay technique – potentially accurate but very slow. Triggered by a japanese report of a balloon instrument for GRB studies based on a Rotation Modulation Collimator we at the Danish Space Research Institute started the development of an RMC detector for GRBs, the WATCH wide field monitor. Four WATCH units were flown on the Soviet Granat satellites, and one on ESA’s EURECA satellite. The design and results will be summarized. Now, 35 years later, recent detector developments may allow the construction of WATCH-type instruments able to fit weight, power and data-wise into 1 kg cubesats. This could provide the basis for a true all-sky monitor with 100 percent duty cycle for rare, bright events. 1 Introduction The Danish Space Research Institute (DSRI) was set up in 1968 to provide a national focal point for a national participation in the European Space Research Organisation, ESRO. Prior to the formation of DSRI the national efforts in space had been directed towards the ionosphere because of the importance of this at- mospheric region for radio communications with Greenland. The first director of DSRI was Bernard Peters, a well known figure in the post war cosmic ray re- search. Not surprisingly, the first astrophysics project was a cosmic ray isotope experiment, constructed in collaboration with Centre d’Etudes Nucleaire, Saclay in France. This experiment was launched in 1979 on the NASA satellite HEAO-3. With a weight of 350 kg the HEAO-3 experiment was very large for its time, and even before the launch it was clear that DSRI had to find a new future research 1 DTU Space, Elektrovej Building 327, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark c EAS, EDP Sciences 2013 DOI: 10.1051/eas/1361002 16 Gamma-ray Bursts: 15 Years of GRB Afterglows theme for its astrophysics group, we could not dream of building anything larger or more complex to improve on the HEAO-3 results. At that time the Cosmic Gamma-Ray Bursts were the big mystery which in- trigued astrophysi-cists all over the world. Why had nobody succeeded in finding any counterparts? How could these events be so luminous in X- and gamma-rays, yet so completely absent at other wave-lengths? The distribution across the sky was peculiar to say the least – no hint of an origin within our Galaxy, yet it seemed obvious that such extraordinary flashes had to have a relatively local origin? A few good positions had been obtained from the early InterPlanetary Network (IPN), but nothing conspicuous was visible within the small IPN error boxes. Figure 1. In the early days it took quite a while to finalize the IPN positions – clock syn- chronization is not trivial! Therefore it was obvious that what was needed was an instrument which by itself could determine the burst position in near real time so ground based follow-up could start within hours or days rather than months. For the follow-up we planned to use classical astronomical search procedures – blink- ing Schmidt-plates, so we expected that a position accuracy better than 1 degree would be adequate – at least it would be far better than anything done in near real time on GRB’s up to that point. Fig. 1. Error box for GRB 790406 derived by the Interplanetary Network (Evans et al. 1980). 2 Instrument design For our instrument design we were inspired by a Japanese balloon experiment employing Rotation Modulation Collimators (RMC’s), Nishimura et al. (1976). RMC’s were originally developed by Mertz (1968), actually to be used for electronic read-out of optical Schmidt telescopes. However, it was in X-ray astronomy that the RMC technique really made its mark, with experiments on the British ARIEL V and the US SAS-3 satellites. N. Lund: Early Danish GRB Experiments 17 Nishimuras balloon experiment, specifically designed for GRB studies, em- ployed 3 detectors, two RMC detectors with orthogonal grid orientations and one “monitor counter” to provide an unmodulated time history of the burst. Figure 2. In the RMC technique the source positions are derived by an analysis of the “modulation pattern” arising through the rotation of the double grid structure. Figure 3. Fig. 2. Detector configuration of Fig. 3. Modulation patterns cor- Nishimuras balloon payload. Two or- responding to different off-axis and thogonal RMC detectors and one mon- phase angles. Off-axis: 10◦,20◦,30◦, itor counter. 40◦ and 50◦. The japanese design with the monitor counter took into account that GRB’s were known to have unpredictable time structures, and the derivation of the in- strument modulation would be uncertain without an independent measurement of the true light curve. Two orthogonal RMC-units were used because the balloon payload rotated relatively slowly (two revolutions per minute) and many GRB’s would only last for a small fraction of a revolution. We realized that by suitable modifications of the RMC detector we could dis- pense with the monitor counter and achieve with one detector what was done with three in the balloon. The design of our WATCH (Wide Angle Telescope for Cosmic Hard X-rays) detector is shown together with the classical RMC in Figure 4. We eliminated the lower shadow grid and replaced it by two interleaved grid detectors with the same pitch as the top shadow grid. Now we can derive the un-modulated time history of a burst by adding the signals from the two detectors, and we can derive the instrument modulation of the signal independent of the signal amplitude from the ratio of the time history from one of the detectors to the un-modulated time history. 18 Gamma-ray Bursts: 15 Years of GRB Afterglows Fig. 4. Comparison of classical RMC (left) and WATCH design (right). The classical RMC uses two 50% open grids rotating synchronously and a single, large area detec- tor which observes the time pattern of light and shadow as the grids rotate. WATCH uses only one shadow grid, but the co-rotating detector is now more complex with two interleaved grid-detectors. We also opted for a high spin rate of our detector: 60 revolutions per minute. More details on the design of the original WATCH instruments can be found in (Lund 1981 & Brandt et al. 1990). It should be noted that unlike most other GRB-instruments WATCH did not rely on the “burst”-nature of the GRBs to observe and localize them. WATCH performs equally well on persistent X-ray sources, it is a true wide field monitor. We build prototypes of the instrument and flew them in balloons from Spitzbergen in 1979 and 1980. Figure 5. No gamma bursts were observed during these flights but the design was proven and on this basis we got the instrument accepted for flight on ESA’s EURECA (EUropean REtrievable CArrier), a micro- gravity satellite with a planned launch in 1988. The main characteristics of the original WATCH instrument (Fig. 7) and the expected characteristics of a modern version of the instrument can be found in Table 1 of Section 5. 3 The challenger disaster and a new opportunity The construction of the WATCH flight model was well underway when in January 1986 the Challenger accident put a halt to the US shuttle program. For more than a year it was undecided whether EURECA would ever fly – in the aftermath of the disaster NASA had decided to transfer all future satellite launches back to expendable launchers, the Shuttle would only be used for manned flights – with a few exceptions. N. Lund: Early Danish GRB Experiments 19 In the summer of 1986, in the middle of this limbo I was fortunate to meet Rashid Sunyaev from the Moscow at a COSPAR meeting in Toulouse. We both made a presentation in a session devoted to future X-ray satellite missions. Rashid presented “Granat”, a Russian-French mission with a large French gamma-ray instrument, Sigma, and a cluster of Russian X-ray telescopes, ART-P and ART-S. In addition Granat carried two gamma-burst instruments, the French Phebus and the Russian Konus with an associated rapid moving platform, “Tournesol” with X-ray and optical cameras. (Unfortunately the downlink data connection to the entire Russian GRB instrument complex was lost soon after launch – otherwise the GRB afterglows may have been discovered with Granat in 1990 rather than with SAX in 1997.) In his presentation Rashid expressed regret that Granat did not carry an all-sky monitor. Such an instrument had been fore- seen, there was room for it as well as excess payload mass, but the instrument development had been delayed. Immediately after this I presented WATCH – an all-sky monitor which now appeared to be homeless! This was too much of a coincidence to be neglected. After the session Rashid and I met and after a good bottle of French red wine I could go back to Copenhagen with an offer from Rashid to fly four WATCH units on Granat – delivery of the flight units to be executed within a year! Of course we did not succeed to build four flight units adapted for Granat within a year, but the delivery of the flight units began in 1988.
Recommended publications
  • AAS Worldwide Telescope: Seamless, Cross-Platform Data Visualization Engine for Astronomy Research, Education, and Democratizing Data
    AAS WorldWide Telescope: Seamless, Cross-Platform Data Visualization Engine for Astronomy Research, Education, and Democratizing Data The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Rosenfield, Philip, Jonathan Fay, Ronald K Gilchrist, Chenzhou Cui, A. David Weigel, Thomas Robitaille, Oderah Justin Otor, and Alyssa Goodman. 2018. AAS WorldWide Telescope: Seamless, Cross-Platform Data Visualization Engine for Astronomy Research, Education, and Democratizing Data. The Astrophysical Journal: Supplement Series 236, no. 1. Published Version https://iopscience-iop-org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/ article/10.3847/1538-4365/aab776 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41504669 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Draft version January 30, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 AAS WorldWide Telescope: Seamless, Cross-Platform Data Visualization Engine for Astronomy Research, Education, and Democratizing Data Philip Rosenfield,1 Jonathan Fay,1 Ronald K Gilchrist,1 Chenzhou Cui,2 A. David Weigel,3 Thomas Robitaille,4 Oderah Justin Otor,1 and Alyssa Goodman5 1American Astronomical Society 1667 K St NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006, USA 2National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District Beijing, 100012, China 3Christenberry Planetarium, Samford University 800 Lakeshore Drive Birmingham, AL 35229, USA 4Aperio Software Ltd. Headingley Enterprise and Arts Centre, Bennett Road Leeds, LS6 3HN, United Kingdom 5Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 60 Garden St.
    [Show full text]
  • Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (Stray-Light Baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017
    Mindrum.com Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (stray-light baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017 1 Overview Mindrum.com Precollimator •Past •Present •Future 2 Past Mindrum.com • Space X-Ray Telescopes (XRT) • Basic Structure • Effectiveness • Past Construction 3 Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton 1999 • Chandra 1999 • HETE-2 2000-07 • INTEGRAL 2002 4 ESA/NASA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Swift 2004 • Suzaku 2005-2015 • AGILE 2007 • NuSTAR 2012 5 NASA/JPL/ASI/JAXA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Astrosat 2015 • Hitomi (ASTRO-H) 2016-2016 • NICER (ISS) 2017 • HXMT/Insight 慧眼 2017 6 NASA/JPL/CNSA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com NASA/JPL-Caltech Harrison, F.A. et al. (2013; ApJ, 770, 103) 7 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com Grazing Incidence 8 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: NuSTAR Mirrors Mindrum.com 9 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM Newton XRT 10 ESA Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton mirrors D. de Chambure, XMM Project (ESTEC)/ESA 11 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • Thermal Precollimator on ROSAT 12 http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/ Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • AGILE Precollimator 13 http://agile.asdc.asi.it Basic Structure Mindrum.com • Spektr-RG 2018 14 MPE Basic Structure: Stray X-Rays Mindrum.com 15 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: Grazing Mindrum.com 16 NASA X-Ray Effectiveness: Straylight Mindrum.com • Correct Reflection • Secondary Only • Backside Reflection • Primary Only 17 X-Ray Effectiveness Mindrum.com • The Crab Nebula by: ROSAT (1990) Chandra 18 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Astronomy in the 90S
    Space Astronomy in the 90s Jonathan McDowell April 26, 1995 1 Why Space Astronomy? • SHARPER PICTURES (Spatial Resolution) The Earth’s atmosphere messes up the light coming in (stars twinkle, etc). • TECHNICOLOR (X-ray, infrared, etc) The atmosphere also absorbs light of different wavelengths (col- ors) outside the visible range. X-ray astronomy is impossible from the Earth’s surface. 2 What are the differences between satellite instruments? • Focussing optics or bare detectors • Wavelength or energy range - IR, UV, etc. Different technology used for different wavebands. • Spatial Resolution (how sharp a picture?) • Spatial Field of View (how large a piece of sky?) • Spectral Resolution (can it tell photons of different energies apart?) • Spectral Field of View (bandwidth) • Sensitivity • Pointing Accuracy • Lifetime • Orbit (hence operating efficiency, background, etc.) • Scan or Point What are the differences between satellites? • Spinning or 3-axis pointing (older satellites spun around a fixed axis, precession let them eventually see different parts of the sky) • Fixed or movable solar arrays (fixed arrays mean the spacecraft has to point near the plane perpendicular to the solar-satellite vector) 3 • Low or high orbit (low orbit has higher radiation, atmospheric drag, and more Earth occultation; high orbit has slower preces- sion and no refurbishment opportunity) • Propulsion to raise orbit? • Other consumables (proportional counter gas, attitude control gas, liquid helium coolant) 4 What are the differences in operation? • PI mission vs. GO mission PI = Principal Investigator. One of the people responsible for building the satellite. Nowadays often referred to as IPIs (In- strument PIs). GO = Guest Observer. Someone who just want to use the satel- lite.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Acceleration in Solar Flares What Is the Link Between Heating and Particle Acceleration?
    Energetic Particles in the Solar Atmosphere (X- ray diagnostics) Nicole Vilmer LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UPMC, Université Paris-Diderot The Sun as a Particle Accelerator: First detection of energetic protons from the Sun(1942) (related to a solar flare) First X-ray observations of solar flares (1970) Chupp et al., 1974 First observations of -ray lines from solar flares (OSO7/Prognoz 1972) Since then many more observations With e.g. RHESSI (2002-2018) And also INTEGRAL, FERMI >120000 X-ray flares observed by RHESSI (NASA/SMEX; 2002-2018) But still a limited number of gamma- ray line flares ~30 Solar flare: Sudden release of magnetic energy Heating Particle acceleration X-rays 6-8 keV 25-80 keV 195 Å 304 Å 21 aug 2002 (extreme ultraviolet) 335 Å 15 fev 2011 HXR/GR diagnostics of energetic electrons and ions SXR emission Hot Plasma (7to 8 MK ) HXR emission Bremsstrahlung from non-thermal electrons Prompt -ray lines : Deexcitation lines(C and 0) (60%) Signature of energetic ions (>2 MeV/nuc) Neutron capture line: p –p ; p-α and p-ions interactions Production of neutrons Collisional slowing down of neutrons Radiative capture on ambient H deuterium + 2.2 MeV. line RHESSI Observations X/ spectrum Thermal components T= 2 10 7 K T= 4 10 7 K Electron bremsstrahlung Ultrarelativistic -ray lines Electron (ions > 3 MeV/nuc) Bremsstrahlung (INTEGRAL) SMM/GRS PHEBUS/GRANAT FERMI/LAT observations RHESSI Pion decay radiation(ions > ~300MeV/nuc) Particle acceleration in solar flares What is the link between heating and particle acceleration? Where are the acceleration sites? What is the transport of particles from acceleration sites to X/ γ ray emission sites? What are the characteristic acceleration times? RHESSI How many energetic particles? Energy spectra? Relative abundances of energetic ions? RHESSI Which acceleration mechanisms in solar flares? Shock acceleration? Stochastic acceleration? (wave-particle interaction) Direct Electric field acceleration.
    [Show full text]
  • Centaurus a at Hard X-Rays and Gamma Rays
    Centaurus A at Hard X-Rays and Soft Gamma-Rays Chandra 1-10 keV CGRO-COMPTEL 1 ± 30 MeV Fermi 100 MeV ± 100 GeV Helmut Steinle Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Many Faces of Centaurus A ± Sydney, 28 June ± 3 July 2009; H. Steinle, MPE 1 / 35 Centaurus A at Hard X-Rays and Soft Gamma-Rays Contents · Introduction · The Spectral Energy Distribution · Properties of the existing measurements in the hard X-ray / soft Gamma-ray regime · Important satellites for this energy / frequency range · Variability of the X-ray / Gamma-ray emission · Two examples of models for the Cen A Spectral Energy Distribution · Problems (features) to be considered when using the hard X-ray / soft Gamma-ray data ± the ªsoft X-ray transient problemº ± the ªSED problemº · Outlook ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Many Faces of Centaurus A ± Sydney, 28 June ± 3 July 2009; H. Steinle, MPE 2 / 35 Centaurus A at Hard X-Rays and Soft Gamma-Rays ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduction In the introductory (ªsetting the stageº) section of the
    [Show full text]
  • THE GAMMA RAY EXPERIMENT for the SMALL ASTRONOMY SATELLITE B (SAS-B) C. E. Fichtel, C. H..~Hrmann, R. C. Hartman, D. A. Kniffen
    THE GAMMA RAY EXPERIMENT FOR THE SMALL ASTRONOMY SATELLITE B (SAS-B) C. E. Fichtel, C. H.. ~hrmann, R. C. Hartman, D. A. Kniffen, H. B. Ogelman*, and R. W. Ross Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. 20771 Abstract A magnetic core digitized spark chamber gamma ray telescope has been developed for satellite use and will be flown on SAS-B in less than one year. The SAS-B detector will have the following characteristics: Effective area ~ 500 cm2 , solid angle = ~ SR; Efficiency (high energy) ~ 0.29; and time resolution of better than two milliseconds. A detailed picture of the galactic plane in gamma rays should be obtained with this experiment, and a study of point sources, including short bursts of gamma rays from supernovae explosions, will also be possible. 1. Introduction The SAS-B gamma ray telescope represents the first satellite version of a planned evolution of a gamma ray digitized spark chamber telescope which began with the development of a balloon borne instrument. The telescope is aimed at the study of gamma rays whose energy exceeds about 20 MeV. In the early 1960's, it was realized that the celestial gamma ray intensity was very low compared to the high background of cosmic ray particles and earth albedo. For this reason, a picture type detector seemed to be needed to identify unambiguously the electron pair produced by the gamma ray and to study its properties - particularly to obtain a measure of the energy and arrival direction of the gamma ray. In addition, the secondary gamma ray flux produced by cosmic rays in the atmosphere, even at the altitudes of the present large balloons, severely limits the gamma ray astronomy which can be accomplished with balloons and dictates that gamma ray ~stronomy must ultimately be accomplished with detector systems on satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments on the Differential Vlbi Measurements with the Former Russian Deep Space Network
    EXPERIMENTS ON THE DIFFERENTIAL VLBI MEASUREMENTS WITH THE FORMER RUSSIAN DEEP SPACE NETWORK Igor E. Molotov(1,2,3) (1)Bear Lakes Radio Astronomy Station of Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory, Pulkovskoye chosse 65/1, Saint-Petersburg, 196140, Russia , E-mail: [email protected] (2)Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Miusskaja sq. 4, 125047 Moscow, Russia (3)Central Research Institute for Machine Building, 4 Pionerskaya Street, Korolev, 141070, Russia ABSTRACT The differential VLBI technique (delta-VLBI) is applied transforms the signals into video frequencies, which for measuring spacecraft position with accuracy up to 1 then are sampled with 1- or 2-bit quantization, formatted in any standard VLBI format (Mk-4, S2, K-4, mas. This procedure allows to link the sky position of object with the position of close ICRF quasar on the Mk-2) and recorded on magnetic tapes or PC-disks celestial sphere. Few delta-VLBI measurements can together with precise clock using VLBI terminal. All frequency transformations are connected with atomic urgently improve the knowledge of object trajectory in the times of critical maneuvers. frequency standard. The tapes/disks from all radio telescopes of VLBI array are collected at data The Russian Deep Space Network that was based on processing center, where the data are cross-correlated. three large antennas: 70 m in Evpatoria (Ukraine) and The processing is aimed to measure the time delay of Ussuriysk (Far East), and 64 m in Bear Lakes (near emitted wavefront arrival to receiving antennas, and Moscow) arranged the trial delta-VLBI experiments frequency of interference (fringe rate), that contain the with help of four scientific institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • GRANAT/WATCH Catalogue of Cosmic Gamma-Ray Bursts: December 1989 to September 1994? S.Y
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS APRIL I 1998,PAGE1 SUPPLEMENT SERIES Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 129, 1-8 (1998) GRANAT/WATCH catalogue of cosmic gamma-ray bursts: December 1989 to September 1994? S.Y. Sazonov1,2, R.A. Sunyaev1,2, O.V. Terekhov1,N.Lund3, S. Brandt4, and A.J. Castro-Tirado5 1 Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 84/32, 117810 Moscow, Russia 2 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschildstr 1, 85740 Garching, Germany 3 Danish Space Research Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 4 Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D436, Los Alamos, NM 87545, U.S.A. 5 Laboratorio de astrof´ısica Espacial y F´ısica Fundamental (LAEFF), INTA, P.O. Box 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain Received May 23; accepted August 8, 1997 Abstract. We present the catalogue of gamma-ray bursts celestial positions (the radius of the localization region is (GRB) observed with the WATCH all-sky monitor on generally smaller than 1 deg at the 3σ confidence level) board the GRANAT satellite during the period December of short-lived hard X-ray sources, which include GRBs. 1989 to September 1994. The cosmic origin of 95 bursts Another feature of the instrument relevant to observa- comprising the catalogue is confirmed either by their lo- tions of GRBs is that its detectors are sensitive over an calization with WATCH or by their detection with other X-ray energy range that reaches down to ∼ 8 keV, the do- GRB experiments. For each burst its time history and main where the properties of GRBs are known less than information on its intensity in the two energy ranges at higher energies.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.07969V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 22 Mar 2021
    INR-TH-2020-032 Towards Testing Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma Mission V. V. Barinov,1, 2, ∗ R. A. Burenin,3, 4, y D. S. Gorbunov,2, 5, z and R. A. Krivonos3, x 1Physics Department, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia 2Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117312, Russia 3Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117997, Russia 4National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 101000, Russia 5Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia We investigate the prospects of the SRG mission in searches for the keV-scale mass sterile neutrino dark matter radiatively decaying into active neutrino and photon. The ongoing all-sky X-ray survey of the SRG space observatory with data acquired by the ART-XC and eROSITA telescopes can provide a possibility to fully explore the resonant production mechanism of the dark matter sterile neutrino, which exploits the lepton asymmetry in the primordial plasma consistent with cosmological limits from the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. In particular, it is shown that at the end of the four year all-sky survey, the sensitivity of the eROSITA telescope near the 3.5 keV line signal reported earlier can be comparable to that of the XMM -Newton with all collected data, which will allow one to carry out another independent study of the possible sterile neutrino decay signal in this area. In the energy range below ≈ 2:4 keV, the expected constraints on the model parameters can be significantly stronger than those obtained with XMM -Newton.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Problems Addressed by the Spektr-UV Space Project (World Space Observatory—Ultraviolet)
    ISSN 1063-7729, Astronomy Reports, 2016, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1–42. c Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2016. Original Russian Text c A.A. Boyarchuk, B.M. Shustov, I.S. Savanov, M.E. Sachkov, D.V. Bisikalo, L.I. Mashonkina, D.Z. Wiebe, V.I. Shematovich, Yu.A. Shchekinov, T.A. Ryabchikova, N.N. Chugai, P.B. Ivanov, N.V. Voshchinnikov, A.I. Gomez de Castro, S.A. Lamzin, N. Piskunov, T. Ayres, K.G. Strassmeier, S. Jeffrey, S.K. Zwintz, D. Shulyak, J.-C. G´erard, B. Hubert, L. Fossati, H. Lammer, K. Werner, A.G. Zhilkin, P.V. Kaigorodov, S.G. Sichevskii, S. Ustamuich, E.N. Kanev, E.Yu. Kil’pio, 2016, published in Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, 2016, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 3–48. Scientific Problems Addressed by the Spektr-UV Space Project (World Space Observatory—Ultraviolet) A. A. Boyarchuk1, B.M.Shustov1*, I. S. Savanov1, M.E.Sachkov1, D. V. Bisikalo1, L. I. Mashonkina1, D.Z.Wiebe1,V.I.Shematovich1,Yu.A.Shchekinov2, T. A. Ryabchikova1, N.N.Chugai1, P.B.Ivanov3, N.V.Voshchinnikov4, A. I. Gomez de Castro5,S.A.Lamzin6,N.Piskunov7,T.Ayres8, K. G. Strassmeier9, S. Jeffrey10,S.K.Zwintz11, D. Shulyak12,J.-C.Gerard´ 13,B.Hubert13, L. Fossati14, H. Lammer14,K.Werner15,A.G.Zhilkin1,P.V.Kaigorodov1, S. G. Sichevskii1,S.Ustamuich5,E.N.Kanev1, and E. Yu. Kil’pio1 1Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Pyatnitskaya 48, Moscow, 119017 Russia 2Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, 344006 Russia 3Astro Space Center, Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 4St.
    [Show full text]
  • Spektr-RG All-Sky Survey Will Be a Major Step Forward for X-Ray Astronomy, Which Celebrated Its 50Th Anniversary a Few Years Ago
    CONTEXT The Spektr-RG all-sky survey will be a major step forward for X-ray astronomy, which celebrated its 50th anniversary a few years ago. 1962. Professor Riccardo Giacconi and his team are the first to identify X-ray emission originating from outside the Solar system (a neutron star dubbed Sco X-1). In 2002, he is awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for this feat and the following discoveries of distant X-ray sources. 1970–1973. The first X-ray all-sky survey in the 2–20 keV energy band is carried out by the Uhuru space observatory (NASA). It discovers more than 300 X-ray sources in our Milky Way and beyond. 1977–1979. An even more sensitive survey is carried out by the HEAO-1 (NASA) space observatory at energies from 0.25 to 180 keV. 1989-1998. Over the initial four years of directed observations, the Granat astrophysical observatory (USSR) observes many galactic and extra-galactic X-ray sources with emphasis on the deep imaging of the Center of our Galaxy in the hard (40-150 keV) and soft (4-20 keV) X-ray ranges. Unique maps of the Galactic Center in X- and gamma- rays are created; black holes, neutron stars and the first microquasar are discovered. Then Granat carries out a sensitive all-sky survey in the 40 to 200 keV energy band. 1990–1999. In its first six months of operation the ROSAT space observatory (DLR, NASA) performs a deep all-sky survey in the soft X-ray band (0.1–2.4 keV).
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Great Observatories
    NASA’s Great Observatories To grasp the wonders of the cosmos, and understand its infinite variety and splendor, we must collect and analyze radiation emitted by phenomena throughout the entire electromagnetic (EM) spectrum. Towards that end, NASA proposed the concept of Great Observatories, a series of four space-borne observatories designed to conduct astronomical studies over many different wavelengths (visible, gamma rays, X-rays, and infrared). An important aspect of the Great Observatory program was to overlap the operations phases of the missions to enable astronomers to make contemporaneous observations of an object at different spectral wavelengths. The first element of the program -- and arguably the best known -- is the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The Hubble telescope was deployed by a NASA Space Shuttle in 1990. A subsequent Shuttle mission in 1993 serviced HST and recovered its full capability. A second successful servicing mission took place in 1997. Subsequent servicing missions have added additional capabilities to HST, which observes the Universe at ultraviolet, visual, and near-infrared wavelengths. Diagram of the Space Telescope, 1981 Since its preliminary inception, HST was designed to be a different type of mission for NASA -- a long term space- based observatory. From its position 380 miles above Earth's surface, the Hubble Space Telescope has contributed enormously to astronomy. It has expanded our understanding of star birth, star death, and galaxy evolution, and has helped move black holes from scientific theory to fact. Credited with thousands of images and the subject of thousands of research papers, the space telescope is helping astronomers answer a wide range of intriguing questions about the origin and evolution of the universe.
    [Show full text]