Drug Development for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Guidance for Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drug Development for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Guidance for Industry Drug Development for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Guidance for Industry August 2017 Contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 2 III. BENEFIT RISK...................................................................................................................... 5 A. General comments .................................................................................................................. 5 B. Evidence of patient and caregiver preferences ....................................................................... 5 C. Implications of patient risk/benefit preferences in ALS ......................................................... 7 1. Alternative endpoints........................................................................................................... 7 2. Placebo control arm ............................................................................................................. 8 3. Threshold for statistical significance ................................................................................... 9 4. Method of delivery ............................................................................................................ 10 5. Role of expanded access and accelerated approval ........................................................... 11 6. Patient protection and need for informed decisions in consultation with physician ......... 11 IV. THE CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ALS ....... 13 A. General comments ................................................................................................................ 13 B. Testing and evaluation across the course of the disease ....................................................... 14 1. ALS functional rating scales ............................................................................................. 14 2. Upper motor neuron involvement ..................................................................................... 15 3. Cognitive dysfunction ....................................................................................................... 16 4. Muscle strength ................................................................................................................. 17 5. Respiratory assessment ...................................................................................................... 18 6. Bulbar function tests .......................................................................................................... 19 7. Following nutritional status ............................................................................................... 19 8. Quality of life and survival measures ................................................................................ 20 9. Electrophysiological measures .......................................................................................... 20 10. Laboratory measures ....................................................................................................... 21 11. Biomarkers ...................................................................................................................... 21 C. Phenotypes, phenotype heterogeneity, and disease progression .......................................... 21 1. Clinical phenotypes ........................................................................................................... 21 2. Staging ............................................................................................................................... 25 D. Genetic predictors of disease ................................................................................................ 26 i E. Effect of standard interventions on the natural history of ALS ............................................ 27 1. Nutrition management ....................................................................................................... 27 2. Physical and occupational therapy ................................................................................... 29 3. Respiratory management ................................................................................................... 30 4. Psychological support and end-of-life care ....................................................................... 32 V. DIAGNOSIS ........................................................................................................................... 34 A. General comments ................................................................................................................ 34 1. Who makes a diagnosis of ALS?....................................................................................... 34 2. Neurological history and examination ............................................................................... 34 B. Barriers to early diagnosis .................................................................................................... 34 1. Impact of diagnostic milestones on delayed diagnosis...................................................... 35 2. Financial barriers to diagnosis ........................................................................................... 35 3. Heterogeneity of ALS disease presentation and progression ............................................ 36 4. Frontotemporal dementia in ALS ..................................................................................... 36 C. Diagnostic criteria ................................................................................................................. 38 1. The El Escorial criteria-revised ......................................................................................... 38 2. Awaji diagnostic algorithm ............................................................................................... 39 D. Diagnostic laboratory investigations/Methods for confirming diagnosis ............................ 39 1. Blood and urine tests ......................................................................................................... 39 2. CSF studies ........................................................................................................................ 40 3. Electrophysiological studies .............................................................................................. 41 4. Imaging studies .................................................................................................................. 41 5. Nerve/muscle biopsy ......................................................................................................... 42 6. Genetic analyses ................................................................................................................ 42 VI. BIOMARKERS .................................................................................................................... 44 A. General comments ................................................................................................................ 44 B. Current state of biomarkers in ALS (369) ............................................................................ 46 1. Identifying and using biomarkers ...................................................................................... 46 2. Current promising biomarkers (limitations/strategic) ....................................................... 47 C. Use of Biomarkers in Trials ................................................................................................. 49 1. Context and illustrations of biomarker incorporation in ALS trials .................................. 49 ii 2. Defining biomarker utility for a trial; Context of use as a framework for maximizing biomarker benefit in ALS trials .................................................................... 49 D. Summary and Proposed Guidances ...................................................................................... 52 VII. CLINICAL TRIALS AND OUTCOME MEASURES .................................................... 54 A. General comments ................................................................................................................ 54 B. Clinical Trials ....................................................................................................................... 54 1. Inclusion/exclusion criteria ............................................................................................... 54 2. Feasibility issues ................................................................................................................ 58 3. Trial design ........................................................................................................................ 59 C. Outcome measures and endpoints ........................................................................................ 67 1. Outcomes sufficient to support approval ........................................................................... 67 2. Outcomes that would support approval secondarily ......................................................... 74 3. Outcomes that assay potential disease pathways ............................................................... 79 4. Time-to-failure endpoints .................................................................................................. 80 5. Safety outcomes................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • New Hypothesis and Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: a Holistic Point of View of the Key Evidence
    Final degree project New hypothesis and treatment of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a holistic point of view of the key evidence Main subject: Pharmacology Secondary subjects: Physiopathology and Biochemistry David Rubert Sánchez June 2018 A l’équipe de Neurodialitics, spécialement à Bernard Renaud This work is licenced under a Creative Commons license. 2 Table of contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Resum ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Natural history .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Epidemiology ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Primary cause and primary mechanism.............................................................................. 8 2.3.1 Genetic basis ................................................................................................................ 8 2.3.2 Epigenetic involvement .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Protective Effect of Edaravone on Memory Impairment Induced By
    Psychiatry Research 281 (2019) 112577 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Psychiatry Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres The protective effect of edaravone on memory impairment induced by chronic sleep deprivation T ⁎ Karem H. Alzoubia, , Heba S. Al Mosabihb, Amjad F. Mahasnehb a Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan b Department of Applied Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Sleep plays a critical role in body health maintenance, whereas sleep deprivation (SD) negatively affects cog- Edaravone nitive function. Cognitive defects mainly memory impairment resulting from sleep deprivation were related to Sleep deprivation an increase in the level of oxidative stress in the body, including the brain hippocampus region. Edaravone is a Memory potent free radical scavenger having antioxidant effect. In the current study, edaravone's ability to prevent SD Maze induced cognitive impairment was tested in rats. Animals were sleep deprived 8 h/day for 4 weeks. Oxidative stress Concurrently, edaravone was administrated intraperitoneally for four weeks. Animals performance during cognitive testing was evaluated to display if edaravone has a role in the prevention of sleep deprivation induced memory impairment. Additionally, the role of antioxidant biomarkers glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase, glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), GSH/GSSG in this effect was investigated. The results showed that SD impaired both short- and long- term memories, and chronic edaravone administration prevented such effect. Additionally, edaravone prevented decreases in hippocampal GPx, catalase, GSH/GSSG ratio and nor- malized increases in GSSG levels, which were impaired by SD model. In conclusion, current result showed a protective effect of edaravone administration against SD induction that could be related to edaravone's ability to normalizing mechanisms related to oxidative balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Dioxin-Induced Damage to Fetal Steroidogenesis and Gonadotropin Formation by Maternal Co-Treatment with A-Lipoic Acid
    Restoration of Dioxin-Induced Damage to Fetal Steroidogenesis and Gonadotropin Formation by Maternal Co-Treatment with a-Lipoic Acid Takayuki Koga1, Takumi Ishida1,2, Tomoki Takeda1, Yuji Ishii1, Hiroshi Uchi3, Kiyomi Tsukimori4, Midori Yamamoto5, Masaru Himeno5, Masutaka Furue3,6, Hideyuki Yamada1* 1 Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 2 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan, 3 Research and Clinical Center for Yusho and Dioxin, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, 4 Department of Obstetrics, Fukuoka Children’s Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, 5 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagasaki International University, Sasebo, Japan, 6 Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Abstract 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), an endocrine disruptor, causes reproductive and developmental toxic effects in pups following maternal exposure in a number of animal models. Our previous studies have demonstrated that TCDD imprints sexual immaturity by suppressing the expression of fetal pituitary gonadotropins, the regulators of gonadal steroidogenesis. In the present study, we discovered that all TCDD-produced damage to fetal production of pituitary gonadotropins as well as testicular steroidogenesis can be repaired by co-treating pregnant rats with a-lipoic acid (LA), an obligate co-factor for intermediary metabolism including energy production. While LA also acts as an anti-oxidant, other anti-oxidants; i.e., ascorbic acid, butylated hydroxyanisole and edaravone, failed to exhibit any beneficial effects. Neither wasting syndrome nor CYP1A1 induction in the fetal brain caused through the activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) could be attenuated by LA. These lines of evidence suggest that oxidative stress makes only a minor contribution to the TCDD-induced disorder of fetal steroidogenesis, and LA has a restorative effect by targeting on mechanism(s) other than AhR activation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Is Edaravone Effective Against Acute Ischemic Stroke And
    Review HowJCBNJournal0912-00091880-5086theKyoto,jcbn17-6210.3164/jcbn.17-62Review Society Japanof Clinical isfor Free edaravone Biochemistry Radical Research and Nutrition Japan effective against acute ischemic stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Kazutoshi Watanabe,1 Masahiko Tanaka,2 Satoshi Yuki,3 Manabu Hirai4 and Yorihiro Yamamoto2,* 1Sohyaku. Innovative Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 1000 Kamoshidacho, Aobaku, Yokohama 2270033, Japan 2School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo University of Technology, 14041 Katakuracho, Hachioji 1920982, Japan 3Ikuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 1710 NihonbashiKoamicho, Chuoku, Tokyo 1038405, Japan 4Ikuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 3210 Doshomachi, Chuoku, Osaka 5418505, Japan (Received?? 30 June, 2017; Accepted 11 July, 2017; Published online 11 November, 2017) CreativestrictedvidedEdaravoneCopyright2018This the isuse, originalanCommons is opendistribution,©a 2018lowmolecularweight workaccess JCBNAttribution is article andproperly reproduction distributed License, cited. antioxidant underwhichin any the drugpermitsmedium, terms targeting ofunre- pro- the suppress such oxidation. Since lipid peroxyl radicals play the main peroxyl radicals among many types of reactive oxygen species. role in the chain reaction, development of drugs to scavenge lipid Because of its amphiphilicity, it scavenges both lipid and water peroxyl radicals is considered a priority. soluble
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Clinical Trial Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
    REVIEWS Improving clinical trial outcomes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Matthew C. Kiernan 1,2 ✉ , Steve Vucic3, Kevin Talbot 4, Christopher J. McDermott 5,6, Orla Hardiman7,8, Jeremy M. Shefner 9, Ammar Al-Chalabi 10, William Huynh 1,2, Merit Cudkowicz11,12, Paul Talman 13, Leonard H. Van den Berg14, Thanuja Dharmadasa 4, Paul Wicks 15, Claire Reilly 16 and Martin R. Turner 4 Abstract | Individuals who are diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) today face the same historically intransigent problem that has existed since the initial description of the disease in the 1860s — a lack of effective therapies. In part, the development of new treatments has been hampered by an imperfect understanding of the biological processes that trigger ALS and promote disease progression. Advances in our understanding of these biological processes, including the causative genetic mutations, and of the influence of environmental factors have deepened our appreciation of disease pathophysiology. The consequent identification of pathogenic targets means that the introduction of effective therapies is becoming a realistic prospect. Progress in precision medicine, including genetically targeted therapies, will undoubtedly change the natural history of ALS. The evolution of clinical trial designs combined with improved methods for patient stratification will facilitate the translation of novel therapies into the clinic. In addition, the refinement of emerging biomarkers of therapeutic benefits is critical to the streamlining of care for individuals. In this Review, we synthesize these developments in ALS and discuss the further developments and refinements needed to accelerate the introduction of effective therapeutic approaches. Neurodegeneration and dementia pose a major public owing to a lack of proven biomarkers and clinical trial health challenge worldwide owing to their devastating outcome measures10.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
    antioxidants Review Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia Valentina Novak 1, Boris Rogelj 1,2 and Vera Župunski 1,* 1 Chair of Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (V.N.); [email protected] (B.R.) 2 Department of Biotechnology, Jozef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are severe neu- rodegenerative disorders that belong to a common disease spectrum. The molecular and cellular aetiology of the spectrum is a highly complex encompassing dysfunction in many processes, includ- ing mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. There is a paucity of treatment options aside from therapies with subtle effects on the post diagnostic lifespan and symptom management. This presents great interest and necessity for the discovery and development of new compounds and therapies with beneficial effects on the disease. Polyphenols are secondary metabolites found in plant-based foods and are well known for their antioxidant activity. Recent research suggests that they also have a diverse array of neuroprotective functions that could lead to better treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. We present an overview of the effects of various polyphenols in cell line and animal models of ALS/FTD. Furthermore, possible mechanisms behind actions of the most researched compounds (resveratrol, curcumin and green tea catechins) are discussed. Citation: Novak, V.; Rogelj, B.; Keywords: ALS; FTD; polyphenols; neurodegeneration; resveratrol; curcumin; catechin; EGCG Župunski, V. Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia.
    [Show full text]
  • 46 L Nursing2015 L Volume 45, Number 10 46 L
    46 l Nursing2015 l Volume 45, Number 10 www.Nursing2015.com Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2.0 ANCC ALCONTACT HOURSS Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: What nurses need to know By Tamara L. Bellomo, MSN, RN-BC, and Lucille Cichminski, MSN, RN A MOTHER OF THREE teenage children, Mrs. is one of the most common neuromuscular dis- S, 49, presented to her healthcare provider eases in the world. This rapidly progressive, fatal with bilateral leg twitching and weakness, dif- neuromuscular disease involves the degeneration ficulty swallowing, and fatigue that’s worsened and death of the upper and lower motor neu- over the past few weeks. While she was on her rons.1 This article discusses the diagnosis and daily morning walk, she tripped and fell. She treatment of ALS and how nurses can help their experienced a small laceration to her leg, patients deal with the difficult diagnosis and find prompting her visit to the healthcare facility. the resources they and their families need. Her husband said that she’d had periods of slurred speech over the past few months as Who’s affected? well. She was alert and oriented, and her vital An estimated 20,000 to 30,000 Americans are signs were all within normal limits. living with ALS, and about 5,000 new cases After an exam, her healthcare provider are diagnosed each year in the United States.2 referred her to a neurologist who ordered This disease affects people of all ethnic, socio- magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an electro- economic, and racial backgrounds.2,3 ALS most HOTOTAKE / P myogram, and a full bloodwork panel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Trial Landscape in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis—Past, Present, and Future
    Received: 16 September 2019 | Revised: 8 December 2019 | Accepted: 27 January 2020 DOI: 10.1002/med.21661 REVIEW ARTICLE The clinical trial landscape in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—Past, present, and future Heike J. Wobst1 | Korrie L. Mack2,3 | Dean G. Brown4 | Nicholas J. Brandon1 | James Shorter2 1Neuroscience, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts Abstract 2 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegen- Perelman School of Medicine, University of erative disease marked by progressive loss of muscle func- Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ‐ 3Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey tion. It is the most common adult onset form of motor 4Hit Discovery, Discovery Sciences, neuron disease, affecting about 16 000 people in the United BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, States alone. The average survival is about 3 years. Only two Massachusetts interventional drugs, the antiglutamatergic small‐molecule Correspondence riluzole and the more recent antioxidant edaravone, have Heike J. Wobst, Jnana Therapeutics, Northern been approved for the treatment of ALS to date. Therapeutic Avenue, Boston, MA 02210. Email: [email protected] strategies under investigation in clinical trials cover a range of different modalities and targets, and more than 70 dif- James Shorter, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, ferent drugs have been tested in the clinic to date. Here, we University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA summarize and classify interventional therapeutic strategies 19104. Email: [email protected] based on their molecular targets and phenotypic effects. We also discuss possible reasons for the failure of clinical trials in Present address Heike J. Wobst, Dean G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Edaravone on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
    Review J Neurol Res. 2020;10(5):150-159 The Effect of Edaravone on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Brandon Nightingale Abstract disorder can be caused by myriad gene mutations [2]. ALS is associated with ≥ 30 gene mutations, with evidence of oligo- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a neurodegenerative disease, is genic inheritance and genetic pleiotropy [3]. This is different fatal within 3 years of symptom onset. Both upper motor neurons and from a homogeneous disorder in which the catalytic event for lower motor neurons are targeted. It is hypothesized that: edaravone is the disorder is the same for all patients. ALS is considered ei- effective at managing ALS. This review article used a combination of ther sporadic (SALS) or familial (FALS), in which 10% of the secondary and primary research articles to gain a plethora of informa- cases are inherited in a familial pattern [4]. tion to help test this hypothesis. Using PubMed, research articles were The characteristic feature for ALS is the involvement of studied to identify important information. For the Introduction, both both upper motor neurons (UMNs) and lower motor neurons secondary and primary articles were used without a limitation on pub- (LMNs), which present with defining features when a lesion lication date. For the Results section, only primary articles were used occurs in the respective neuron. When a lesion takes place in an which had to have been published no earlier than 2006. The Results LMN, the characteristic findings will be weakness, muscle at- section of this review helped to support the hypothesis that edaravone rophy and fasciculations. In contrast, when a lesion takes place is effective at managing ALS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 National ALS Registry Annual Meeting Executive Summary
    ATSDR’s Annual ALS Surveillance Meeting Summary Report August 1-2, 2017 2018 National ALS Registry Annual Meeting Executive Summary The cause(s) of ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) remain unknown for 90-95 percent of those diagnosed with the disease and there is still no cure. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) established the National ALS Registry to determine how many people in the US are living with ALS, to describe the demographics of ALS patients, and most importantly to examine the risk factors for ALS. Although the Registry’s primary purpose is to capture cases of ALS, the Registry does a lot more than just count cases. The Registry is also: Funding ALS research, Collecting specimens from Registry enrollees through the National ALS Biorepository, Connecting patients with researchers recruiting for ALS clinical trials or epidemiological studies, Obtaining etiologic data from Registry enrollees through 17 different online risk factor modules such as occupational history, military history, residential history, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), Providing data and biospecimens to scientists to further ALS research. The National ALS Registry Annual Meeting was held in Atlanta on August 7-8, 2018. There were 51 attendees, including persons living with ALS, neurologists, researchers, representatives of national ALS organizations, representatives of pharmaceutical companies, Registry staff, and other ALS experts. Background, Methodology, and State of the Registry Because ALS is a non-notifiable condition, CDC does not receive reports from states of the occurrence of ALS, as it does for most communicable diseases. The novel methodology developed by ATSDR for identifying newly diagnosed ALS cases uses data from national administrative databases (i.e., Medicare and the Veterans Administration) in addition to the information entered into the online Registry web portal by persons living with ALS.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Statement
    May 25, 2021 ALS Organizations Double Down on Their Support for Reintroduced Legislation That Will Accelerate Research and Encourage Access to Critical Investigational Therapies for Those Living with ALS. Today, leaders in the House of Representatives and Senate reintroduced the Accelerating Access to Critical Therapies for ALS Act. The ALS Association, I AM ALS, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) endorse the revised legislation with this statement: “The Accelerating Access to Critical Therapies (ACT) for ALS Act builds new pathways to fund early access to ALS investigational therapies, accelerates ALS and rare neurodegenerative disease therapeutic development through a public-private partnership, and increases research on, and development of, interventions for rare neurodegenerative diseases through a new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) research grants program. The ALS Association, I AM ALS, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association endorse this legislation that is a paradigm shift in how therapeutic development, access to treatments, and research has been approached in a fatal, fast- progressing disease like ALS. The ACT for ALS will authorize $100 million a year over a five-year period to: (1) create a new grant program that funds access to investigational ALS treatments currently in development from small biotechnology companies for those patients who cannot participate in clinical trials, while concurrently supporting a research objective on how these investigational treatments impact the disease; (2) establish a Health
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-ALS-Mission-Toolkit Web.Pdf
    OUR MISSION OUR MISSION TABLE OF CONTENTS OUR MISSION Our Case for Support . iv Annual Impact . v Our Vision and Mission . vi CHAPTER 1: RESEARCH The ALS Association Research Program The ALS Association Research Program . 1–1 Research . 1–5 Our Strategic Initiatives . 1–5 Infographics Current Projects . 1–13 Accelerating the Search for a Cure . 1–14 Research By the Numbers . 1–15 Research Strategy . 1–16 Funded Research . 1–17 Scientific Focus Areas . 1–18 Advances in ALS Research . 1–20 Research Initiatives The ALS Association’s ALS Roundtable Program . 1–22 ALS Voice of The Patient Report . 1–24 ALS Focus Survey Program . 1–26 Research Staff . 1–28 CHAPTER 2: CARE SERVICES How We Work Summary . 2–1 How We Work . 2–2 Chapter Membership . 2–4 ii How We Support Clinical Care Supporting Clinical Care . 2–11 Certified Centers . 2–14 Where We Support Care . 2–15 Impact & Resources Care Services Impact . 2–20 Filling the Gap . 2–21 Education — Living with ALS: General Scope . 2–22 Education — Living with ALS: Medical Resources . 2–24 Assistive Technology — Assistive Technology in the ALS Space . 2–26 Children’s Programs and Resources . 2–28 The Jane Calmes ALS Scholarship Fund . 2–32 ALS Association Care Connection . 2–33 Care Services Staff . 2–34 CHAPTER 3: ADVOCACY Introduction To ALS Advocacy Introduction . 3–1 History of ALS Advocacy . 3–2 History of ALS Advocacy: Timeline . 3–3 Advocacy Action Advocacy Guiding Principles . 3–5 How We Advocate . 3–6 Priorities, Impact, and Coalitions ALS Guidance . 3–10 Advocacy Impact .
    [Show full text]