DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Technology Mission Directorate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Technology Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Presented by: Dr. Michael Gazarik Associate Administrator, STMD April 2014 www.nasa.gov/spacetech Space Technology… …. an Investment for the Future • Enables a new class of NASA missions Addresses National Needs beyond low Earth Orbit. A generation of studies and reports (40+ since 1980) document the need for • Delivers innovative solutions that regular investment in new, dramatically improve technological transformative space technologies. capabilities for NASA and the Nation. • Develops technologies and capabilities that make NASA’s missions more affordable and more reliable. • Invests in the economy by creating markets and spurring innovation for traditional and emerging aerospace business. • Engages the brightest minds from academia in solving NASA’s tough technological challenges. Value to NASA Value to the Nation Who: The NASA Workforce Academia Small Businesses The Broader Aerospace Enterprise 2 Major Highlights The PhoneSat 2.5 mission will be launched as a rideshare on SpaceX vehicle, to demonstrate command and control capability of operational satellites. NASA engineers successfully hot-fire Successfully fabricated a 5.5- tested a 3-D printed rocket engine meter composite cryogenic injector at NASA GRC, marking one of propellant tank and testing at the first steps in using additive Boeing’s facility in Washington manufacturing for space travel. and will continue testing at NASA MSFC this year. At NASA MSFC, the largest 3-D printed rocket engine ISS Fluid SLOSH experiment launched on injector NASA has ever Antares /Orb-1 on Dec. 18, 2014 and now The Flight Opportunities program tested blazed to life at an aboard ISS for testing that will be used to enabled flight validation of 35 engine firing that generated a improve our understanding of how liquids technologies that were tested in record 20,000 pounds of behave in microgravity space-like environments on four thrust. different flight platforms . 3 Major Highlights Green Propellant Infusion Mission took another step closer to infusion by proving capabilities for continuous thrust during testing and is preparing for flight test in 2015. NASA's built and is sending a set ATK's “MegaFlex” (left) and DSS of high-tech legs up to the ISS for “ROSA” (right) solar array are Robonaut 2 (R2) that will provide two concepts NASA is maturing R2 the mobility it needs to help with to support the development of regular and repetitive tasks inside next generation solar arrays in and outside the space station advancing Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Assembly California Institute of Technology Low density supersonic decelerator parachute testing at Surface Telerobotics- China Lake, CA. Successfully LDSDPDVTRR The technical data in this document is controlled under the U.S. Export Regulations; release to foreign persons may require an export authorization. 42 First real-time remote demonstrated ability to deploy and operations of a robotic pull a large parachute with 90,000 rover from space and pounds of force taking the next first simulation of steps to landing on Mars. human-robot waypoint 4 mission Space Technology Portfolio Transformative & Crosscutting Pioneering Concepts/Developing Creating Markets & Growing Technology Breakthroughs InnovationOffice of Community the Innovation Economy Associate Administrator Technology NASA Innovative Advanced Centennial Challenges Demonstration directly engages nontraditional Concepts (NIAC) nurtures Missions sources advancing technologies of bridges the gap visionary ideas that could transform value to NASA’s missions and to between early proof-of-concept tests future NASA missions with the the aerospace community. The and the final infusion of cost- creation of breakthroughs—radically program offers challenges set up effective, revolutionary technologies better or entirely new aerospace as competitions that award prize into successful NASA, government concepts–while engaging America’s money to the individuals or teams and commercial space missions. innovators and entrepreneurs as that achieve a specified partners in the journey. technology challenge. Space Technology Small Spacecraft Flight Opportunities Research Grants Technology Program seek to facilitates the progress of space accelerate the development of technologies toward flight develops and demonstrates “push” technologies to support readiness status through testing new capabilities employing the future space science and exploration in space-relevant environments. unique features of small needs through innovative efforts with The program fosters spacecraft for science, high risk/high payoff while development of the commercial exploration and space developing the next generation of reusable suborbital operations. innovators through grants and transportation industry. fellowships. Game Changing Center Innovation Fund Small Business Development seeks to stimulates and encourages Innovation Research creativity and innovation within identify and rapidly mature (SBIR) and Small innovative/high impact capabilities the NASA Centers by addressing and technologies that may lead to the technology needs of the Business Technology entirely new approaches for the Agency and the Nation. Funds are Transfer (STTR) Programs Agency’s broad array of future space invested to each NASA Center to support emerging technologies provide an opportunity for small, missions. high technology companies and and creative initiatives that research institutions to develop leverage Center talent and key technologies addressing the capabilities. Agency’s needs and developing Space Technology 5 the Nation’s innovation economy. Research Grants 5 FY2014 Big Nine 6 Deep Space Exploration is Near Space Technology will focus investments in 8 key thrust areas that will enable or substantially enhance future NASA mission capabilities. High Power Space Optical Advanced Mars Entry Space Lightweight Deep Space Space Solar Electric Comm. Life Support Descent and Robotic Space Navigation Observatory Propulsion & Resource Landing Systems Structures Systems Utilization Systems Deep space Substantially Technologies for Permits more Creates future Targets Allows for more Allows for human increase the human capable science humanoid substantial capable science significant exploration, available exploration missions, eventual robotics, increases in and human increases in science missions bandwidth for mission including human missions to autonomy and launch mass, and exploration future science and commercial near Earth space Mars mars including, remote allow for large missions using capabilities applications with communications atmospheric hypersonic and operations decreases in advanced atomic including, investments in currently limited In-situ resource supersonic technologies to needed clocks, x-ray AFTA/WFIRST advanced solar by power and utilization, near aerodynamic substantially structural mass detectors and coronagraph arrays and frequency closed loop air decelerators, a augments the for spacecraft fast light optical technology to advanced electric allocation revitalization and new generation of capability of and in-space gyroscopes. characterize exo- propulsion restrictions, and water recovery, compliant TPS future human structures. planets by direct systems, high- increase the EVA gloves and materials, retro- space flight observation and power Hall communications radiation propulsion missions. advances in the thrusters and throughput for a protection. technologies, surface materials power deep space instrumentation as well as control processing units. mission. and modeling systems for large capabilities. space optics. 7 STMD FY2015 President’s Budget 800 600 13 14 15 16 Total 699 699 699 699 400 PICS 29.5 29.5 29.5 29.5 200 SBIR 173.7 181.9 187.2 195.3 - CSTD 293.8 272.1 266.6 259.7 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 ETD FY 2016 202FY 2017 215.5 FY 2018 215.7 FY 2019214.5 Budget Authority ($M) Notional FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2015 President's Budget Request 706 713 720 727 734 Partnership Developments and Strategic Integration 34 34 34 34 34 OCT SBIR and STTR 191 201 212 212 212 Crosscutting Space Tech Development 257 190 186 199 204 Early Stage Innovation 67 67 68 69 69 Flight Opportunities 15 15 15 15 15 Small Spacecraft 17 17 17 17 17 Game Changing Development 50 45 49 36 39 Technology Demonstration Missions 106 46 36 61 63 Exploration Technology Development 224 288 288 282 285 Space TechMissionSpace Directorate Game Changing Development 103 129 126 132 129 Technology Demonstration Missions 121 159 162 150 156 8 *Numbers do not total due to rounding CY Major Events & Milestones 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Optical Comm & Sensor Demo Sunjammer EDSN Cryogenic Solar Sail HIAD SmallSat Propellant IRVE 3 Demo Storage & Human Robotic Transfer Systems & Telerobotics Integrated Solar Array Laser Human Robotic Human Robotic Cubesat Communications Systems & Systems & Proximity Relay Telerobotics PhoneSat Telerobotics Ops Demo 1 & 2.0 Demonstration Deep Space Future Planning Atomic Clock PhoneSat 5.5m 2.4 & 2.5 Composite MEDLI Cryotank SEP Demo Green Mission Propellant LDSD: Supersonic Inflatable LDSD Supersonic 2.4m Aerodynamic Decelerator Inflatable Aerodynamic Composite Decelerator Cryotank 9 Technology Demonstration Missions Highlights: Goal: • Selection of two deployable solar array designs to be developed for the Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bolden Testimony
    HOLD FOR RELEASE UNTIL PRESENTED BY WITNESS November 17, 2011 Statement of The Honorable Charles F. Bolden, Jr. Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration before the Subcommittee on Science and Space Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation U. S. Senate Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the outlook for NASA’s human space flight program. This has been a remarkable year, as we have completed assembling and outfitting of the U.S. On-orbit Segment (USOS) of the International Space Station (ISS), allowing us to focus on full utilization of the Station’s research capabilities; taken key steps in moving forward into the future of exploration beyond Low-Earth Orbit (LEO); celebrated the 50 th anniversary of human spaceflight; and witnessed the successful conclusion of the historic Space Shuttle Program. We are also pleased with the progress our industry partners have made in developing an American capability to transport cargo and eventually astronauts to the ISS, and end the outsourcing of this work to foreign governments. More importantly, this will add a critical level of redundancy for transporting cargo and crew to the ISS. A robust transportation architecture is important to ensuring full utilization of this amazing research facility. Enabling commercial crew and cargo transportation systems in LEO allows NASA to focus on developing its own systems for sending astronauts on missions of exploration beyond LEO. This split between commercial and Government systems allows for a cost effective approach to promote a broad base for human exploration by the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020
    Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020 Christopher Baker NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Executive National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 CHANGING THE PACE OF SPACE Through Small Spacecraft Technology and Flight Opportunities, Space Tech is pursuing the rapid identification, development, and testing of capabilities that exploit agile spacecraft platforms and responsive launch capabilities to increase the pace of space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 THROUGH SUBORBITAL FLIGHT The Flight Opportunities program facilitates rapid demonstration of promising technologies for space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce through suborbital testing with industry flight providers LEARN MORE: WWW.NASA.GOV/TECHNOLOGY Photo Credit: Blue Origin National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 FLIGHT OPPORTUNITIES BY THE NUMBERS Between 2011 and today… In 2019 alone… Supported 195 successful fights Supported 15 successful fights Enabled 676 tests of payloads Enabled 47 tests of payloads 254 technologies in the portfolio 86 technologies in the portfolio 13 active commercial providers 9 active commercial providers National Aeronautics and Space Administration Numbers current as of March 1, 2020 4 TECHNOLOGY TESTED IN SUBORBITAL Lunar Payloads ISS SPACE IS GOING TO EARTH ORBIT, THE MOON, MARS, AND BEYOND Mars 2020 Commercial Critical Space Lunar Payload Exploration Services Solutions National Aeronautics and Space Administration 5 SUBORBITAL INFUSION HIGHLIGHT Commercial Lunar Payload Services Four companies selected as Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CPLS) providers leveraged Flight Opportunities-supported suborbital flights to test technologies that are incorporated into their landers and/or are testing lunar landing technologies under Flight Opportunities for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Atmosphere-Breathing Electric Propulsion
    Analysis of Atmosphere-Breathing Electric Propulsion IEPC-2013-421 Presented at the 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA October 6{10, 2013 Tony Sch¨onherr,∗ and Kimiya Komurasakiy The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan and Georg Herdrichz University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Baden-W¨urttemberg, 70569, Germany To extend lifetime of commercial and scientific satellites in LEO and below (100-250 km of altitude) the recent years showed an increased activity in the field of air-breathing electric propulsion as well as beamed-energy propulsion systems. However, preliminary studies showed that the propellant flow necessary for electrostatic propulsion exceeds the mass intake possible within reasonable limits, and that electrode erosion due to oxygen flow might limit the lifetime of eventual thruster systems. Pulsed plasma thruster can be successfully operated with smaller mass intake, and operate at relatively small power demands which makes them an interesting candidate for air-breathing application in LEO, and their feasibility is investigated within this study. Further, to avoid electrode erosion, inductive plasma generator technology is discussed to derive a possible propulsion system that can handle gaseous propellant with no harmful effects. Nomenclature E = discharge energy per pulse FD = drag force imposed on satellite f = discharge frequency h = orbital altitude mbit = mass shot per pulse n = number density t = orbital lifetime I. Introduction Carrying propellant for attitude and orbit control on satellites in an Earth orbit results in an increased satellite mass, and, therefore, yields higher costs for manufacturing and launch of the spacecraft. Electric space propulsion helped in the past to reduce the mass requirements compared to standard chemical propul- sion as a result of the superior specific impulse, but limitations remain with regards to lifetime and lower ∗Assistant Professor, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • (SAM) Alloy Parts Using X-Ray CT
    Research Article ISSN 2639-9466 Nanotechnology & Applications Porosity Determination and Characterization of Binder Jet Printed Structural Amorphous Metal (SAM) Alloy Parts Using X-Ray CT Amamchukwu B. Ilogebe1*, Benedict Uzochukwu2, and Amy M. Elliot3 1North Carolina A&T State University, US. *Correspondence: Amamchukwu B. Ilogebe, North Carolina A&T State University, 2Virginia State University, US. US. 3Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US. Received: 04 November 2019; Accepted: 29 November 2019 Citation: Amamchukwu B. Ilogebe, Benedict Uzochukwu, Amy M. Elliot. Porosity Determination and Characterization of Binder Jet Printed Structural Amorphous Metal (SAM) Alloy Parts Using X-Ray CT. Nano Tech Appl. 2019; 2(1): 1-6. ABSTRACT The advent of Binder jet additive manufacturing continued to a revelation in the manufacture of intricate metal parts. This technology has been utilized in medical, aerospace and automotive industries, not much has been reported in the printing of parts from amorphous metal powders, which have found numerous applications in engineering because of their special properties. In this research, special emphasis was placed on two different manufacturing methods for structural amorphous metal alloy (SAM alloy); Die compaction and Binder jet printing. Samples of SAM alloy was created from these two-manufacturing methods and were subsequently, sintered, analyzed and compared. Previous studies show that as much as up to 50% porosity could be recorded in binder jet printing [1,2]. In this regard, different techniques were used to determine the percentage porosity from both manufacturing methods. The Archimedes method was used to determine the density and percentage porosity of the parts from the two methods. Similarly, percentage porosity was also determined using different tools in computed tomography (CT) analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Download
    NASA Technical Memorandum 106110 Comparisons of Selected Laser Beam Power Missions to Conventionally Powered Missions John M. Bozek National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and Steven R. Oleson, Geoffrey A. Landis, and Mark W. Stavnes Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Lewis Research Center Group Brook Park, Ohio Prepared for the First Annual Wireless Power Transmission Conference sponsored by the Center for Space Power, Texas A&M University San Antonio, Texas, February 23-25, 1993 NASA COMPARISONS OF SELECTED LASER BEAM POWER MISSIONS TO CONVENTIONALLY POWERED MISSIONS John M. Bozek National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 and Steven R. Oleson, Geoffrey A. Landis, and Mark W. Stavnes Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Lewis Research Center Group Brook Park, Ohio 44142 SUMMARY Earth-based laser sites beaming laser power to space assets have shown benefits over competing power system concepts for specific missions. Missions analyzed in this report that show benefits of laser beam power are low-Earth-orbit (LEO) to geosynchronous-Earth-orbit (GEO) transfer, LEO to low-lunar-orbit (LLO) cargo missions, and lunar-base power. Both laser- and solar-powered orbit transfer vehicles (OTV's) make a "tug" concept viable, which substantially reduces cumulative initial mass to LEO in comparison to chemical propulsion concepts. In addition, electric propulsion OTV's powered by a laser beam have shorter trip times to and from GEO than do competing OTV's powered solely by the Sun. A round-trip savings of 3 months was calculated for the use of a laser OTV tug instead of a solar OTV tug.
    [Show full text]
  • Herman IEPC-2019-651 PPE IPS Final
    The Application of Advanced Electric Propulsion on the NASA Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) IEPC-2019-651 Presented at the 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference University of Vienna • Vienna • Austria September 15 – 20, 2019 Daniel A. Herman,1 Timothy Gray,2 NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135, United States and Ian Johnson,3 Taylor Kerl,4 Ty Lee,5 and Tina Silva6 Maxar, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, United States Abstract: NASA is charGed with landinG the first American woman and next American man on the South Pole of the Moon by 2024. To meet this challenGe, NASA’s Gateway will develop and deploy critical infrastructure required for operations on the lunar surface and that enables a sustained presence on and around the moon. NASA’s Power and Propulsion Element (PPE), the first planned element of NASA’s cis-lunar Gateway, leveraGes prior and ongoing NASA and U.S. industry investments in high-power, long-life solar electric propulsion technoloGy investments. NASA awarded a PPE contract to Maxar TechnoloGies to demonstrate a 2,500 kg xenon capacity, 50 kW-class SEP spacecraft that meets Gateway’s needs, aligns with industry’s heritage spacecraft buses, and allows extensibility for NASA’s Mars exploration Goals. Maxar’s PPE concept desiGn, is based on their hiGh heritaGe, modular, and highly reliable 1300-series bus architecture. The electric propulsion system features two 13 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion (AEPS) strings from Aerojet Rocketdyne and a Maxar- developed system comprised of four Busek 6 kW Hall-effect thrusters mounted in pairs on larGe ranGe of motion mechanisms pointing arms with four 6 kW-class, Maxar-built PPUs derived from Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sample AMS Latex File
    Riot, V. J. et al. (2021): JoSS, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 995–1006 (Peer-reviewed article available at www.jossonline.com) www.adeepakpublishing.com www. JoSSonline.com Lessons Learned Using Iridium to Com- municate with a CubeSat in Low Earth Orbit Vincent J. Riot, Lance M. Simms, and Darrell Carter Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA, USA Abstract This paper presents the design and approval process for operating an Iridium transceiver on orbit and provide on-orbit performance data obtained from a CubeSat platform in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) (500 km orbit). On-orbit data demonstrates that use of a commercial, low-cost Iridium transceiver can serve as a valuable communication approach for low volume telemetry with less than a 30-minute lag for approximately 90% of the time. We also demonstrate that a radial differential velocity of 7 km/sec corresponding to about a 37.5kHz doppler shift and a distance of less than 2,000 km can be used for mission planning. Introduction Setting up a dedicated radio communication link tion is about 5-15 minutes per day per ground station, with a CubeSat in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) presents depending on the altitude and inclination of the satel- several challenges, especially for institutions with lim- lite, as well as the latitude of the ground station. This ited funding or resources. The traditional approach of means the operator is oblivious to the current state of using one or more dedicated radio ground stations to the satellite most of the time, even if multiple ground communicate directly with the satellite is often prohib- stations distributed across the Earth are used.
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Rocket Upper Stage Development of a Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation Tool to Determine the Feasibility of Upper Stage Reusability L
    Reusable Rocket Upper Stage Development of a Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation Tool to Determine the Feasibility of Upper Stage Reusability L. Pepermans Technische Universiteit Delft Reusable Rocket Upper Stage Development of a Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation Tool to Determine the Feasibility of Upper Stage Reusability by L. Pepermans to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Wednesday October 30, 2019 at 14:30 AM. Student number: 4144538 Project duration: September 1, 2018 – October 30, 2019 Thesis committee: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen , TU Delft, supervisor Prof. E.K.A Gill, TU Delft Dr.ir. D. Dirkx, TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until October 30, 2019. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover image: S-IVB upper stage of Skylab 3 mission in orbit [23] Preface Before you lies my thesis to graduate from Delft University of Technology on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of reusable upper stages. During the accompanying literature study, it was determined that the technology readiness level is sufficiently high for upper stage reusability. However, it was unsure whether a cost-effective system could be build. I have been interested in the field of Entry, Descent, and Landing ever since I joined the Capsule Team of Delft Aerospace Rocket Engineering (DARE). During my time within the team, it split up in the Structures Team and Recovery Team. In September 2016, I became Chief Recovery for the Stratos III student-built sounding rocket. During this time, I realised that there was a lack of fundamental knowledge in aerodynamic decelerators within DARE.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonesat: Modeling a Spacecraft for Remote Imaging
    MIT Space Exploration Initiative Outreach PhoneSat: Modeling a spacecraft for remote imaging Avery Normandin Published on: Apr 02, 2020 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) MIT Space Exploration Initiative Outreach PhoneSat: Modeling a spacecraft for remote imaging Activity: creating a small satellite to protect your cell phone in outer-space environments! Background: Small satellites are constantly orbiting Earth, providing useful data about the planet over time. These satellites are designed and built by engineers to withstand the harsh space environment. A “cubesat” is a specific type of small satellite that has very particular specifications, making it easier for people around the world to design and launch. Today, you’ll be turning your phone into a mock-satellite! Mission: It’s your first visit to space as NASA’s newest astronaut - congratulations! Your first mission is to deploy a 1U (10 x 10 x 10 cm) small satellite that takes pictures of the plants and trees in your neighborhood. Your plan is to thrust the satellite into orbit by throwing it outside the International Space Station (ISS). However, during launch, you hear a loud crash - the satellite you have spent the last year designing and building has fallen and broken! Mission control informs you that you are still responsible for getting a satellite into orbit upon your arrival to the ISS. Your new mission is to rebuild the satellite and test a prototype first at home -- one that takes. The only ‘computer’ available to run your satellite? Your smartphone! Using the constraints defined by a cubesat, you will be creating a prototype structure that nests your phone as a “satellite payload”.
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Stage Concepts Design Tool
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-421 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) DOI: ADD DOINUMBER HERE Reusable stage concepts design tool Lars Pepermans?, Barry Zandbergeny ?Delft University of Technology Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft [email protected] yDelft University of Technology Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft Abstract Reusable launch vehicles hold the promise of substantially reducing the cost of access to space. Many different approaches towards realising a reusable rocket exist or are being proposed. This work focuses on the use of an optimisation method for conceptual design of non-winged reusable upper stages, thereby allowing it to take into account landing on land, sea or mid-air retrieval as well as landing the full stage or the engine only. As the optimisation criterion, the ratio of the specific launch cost of the reusable to the expendable version is used. The tool also provides for a Monte Carlo analysis, which allows for investigating the ruggedness of the design solution(s) found. The article will describe the methods implemented in the Conceptual Reusability Design Tool (CRDT) together with the modifications made to ParSim v3, a simulation tool by Delft Aerospace Rocket Engi- neering. Furthermore, it will present the steps taken to verify and validate CRDT. Finally, several example cases are presented based on the Atlas V-Centaur launch vehicle. The cases demonstrate the tools capa- bility of finding optimum and the sensitivity of the found optimum. However, it also shows the optimum when the user disables some Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) options. 1. Introduction To make space more accessible, one can reduce the cost of an orbital launch.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications for the Techedsat/Phonesat Missions NASA Ames Research Center
    Communications for the TechEdSat/PhoneSat Missions NASA Ames Research Center Presentation to Small Satellite Pre-Conference Workshop August 5, 2017 Marcus Murbach, PI Rick Alena, Co-I Ali Guarneros-Luna, Co-I Jon Wheless, Engineer SOAREX/TechEdSat/PhoneSat Teams Flight Experiments of Recent Years (2008-2017): 9 Flights SOAREX-6 (2008) SOAREX-7 TES-1 TES-2 (2009) Oct 4, 2012 TES-3 PhoneSat Aug 3, 2013 Iridium-test (6 wk de- Aug 21, 2013 TES-4 orbit) Mar 3, 2015 TES-5 (4 wk de-orbit) Mar 6, 2017 (deorbited Jul 29) TES/PS Team, 2014 SOAREX-8 (2015) SOAREX-9 (2016) TES/PS Team, Summer 2017 What is an Exo-Brake…? Simple, drag-modulated de-orbit system based on tension elements TechEdSat5 was deployed from ISS on March 6, 2017 by NanoRacks The TechEdSat 5 Exo-Brake Experiment • The Exo-Brake is an exo-atmospheric braking and de-orbit device which has successfully flown twice before in a fixed configuration on TechEdSat-3 and 4 • The TechEdSat rapid prototype flight series is conducted as a hands-on training environment for young professionals and university partners • The project helps verify Entry Systems Modeling by gathering real-world data aboard sounding rockets and CubeSats • In the future, passive Exo-Brake systems may be used for small-sat disposal and the development of technologies to permit on-demand sample return from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) scientific/manufacturing platforms TechEdSat 5 (TES5) Avionics, Software and Communications • The 3.5 U CubeSat contains a low-level AVR microprocessor for power control and a high-level Atom processor for fast data processing • The primary Command and Telemetry (C&T) link is provided by the Iridium constellation through on-board Short Burst Data (SBD) modems.
    [Show full text]