DOCSLIB.ORG

Competitive Interactions Between the Herring Gull L. A. Cachinnans and the Great Black-Headed Gull L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Competitive Interactions Between the Herring Gull L. A. Cachinnans and the Great Black-Headed Gull L ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Seevögel - Zeitschrift des Vereins Jordsand zum Schutz der Seevögel und der Natur e.V. Jahr/Year: 1991 Band/Volume: 12_2_1991 Autor(en)/Author(s): Mierauskas Pranas, Buzun Valerie Artikel/Article: Competitive Interactions between the Herring Gull L. a. cachinnans and the Great Black-Headed Gull L. ichthyaetus at Sivash Lake (South Ukraine) 34- 35 34 Competitive Interactions between Herring Gull and Great Black-Headed Gull Competitive Interactions between the Herring GullL. a. cachinnans and the Great Black-Headed Gull L. ichthyaetus at Sivash Lake (South Ukraine) From Pranas Mierauskas and Valerie Buzun Introduction peak in the first half of April. L. ichthyaetus ready settled. However, this was the sole means for L. ichthyaetus to deter aggres­ At Lake Sivash, as in many European laid eggs from mid-March to the end of the countries and North America, the Herring month, the egg-laying of the whole colony sive attacks of L. a. cachinnans and to oc­ Gull Larus a. cachinnans constantly in­ was over in the period of 10 to 12 days cupy the territory. Colonies ofL. ichthy­ (Kostin 1983, Siochin et al. 1988). Chicks were dense, pairs of this species creases in number, expands its breeding aetus usually nested in 17,5 ±2,5 cm intervals territory and occupies new habitats (Sio- of L. ichthyaetus hatched in mid-April in the interval of 7 to 10 days. After hatching, from each other in the centre and in 1 m in­ chin et al. 1988). In the Great Black-head­ ed Gull Larus ichthyaetus, these proces­ when chicks were already able to walk, tervals at the periphery (Siochin et al. they used to form a kind of flocks which 1988). ses occur less intensively. These two spe­ cies form mixed colonies, their feeding ra­ were gradually joined by all the young. In the period of egg-laying and hatching tions are similar, but they differ in percen­ Thus all birds of the species laid eggs or Herring Gulls often attacked the nests of tage composition of feeding objects (Sio- hatched in a strictly determined period of Great Black-headed Gulls, especially, time. Egg-laying and hatching were timed chin et al. 1988). Competition for feeding those at the periphery of the colony and sites in the colony, for feeding objects, as so that these processes never overlaid, those left by their owners. Neighbours of well as strong inclination for predation in i. e. hatching started only when egg-laying the attacked nest did not chase away the L.a. cachinnans determine agressive re­ process in the colony was over. Such tim­ intruder trying only to frighten it by jabbing ing is also characteristic of lationships between the species in the co­ Larus melano- posture. Nimbleness of L.a. cachinnans lony. cephalus and Larus atricilla in North Ame­ allowed them to avoid the jab. L. ichthy­ rica (B urger 1979; B uzun & M ierauskas aetus left the nest only then the distance Study area and methods 1987). between the approaching man and the The processes of egg-laying and hatching nest was 4-5 m. The moment L. ichthy­ Investigations were carried out in Central in the Herring Gull were not strictly limited aetus left the nest,L. a. cachinnans start­ Sivash (the island of Kitai) in April of 1984 in time, i.e. when some birds were begin­ ed eating eggs even in the presence of the and 1985, also in Eastern Sivash (near the ning to lay eggs, other clutches were al­ man. When L.a. cachinnans were ap­ island of Kujanly) in the first part of May in ready hatching. Thus the physiological proaching of flying above L. ichthyaetus, 1986. The Kitai is an island of solid ground state of Herring Gulls is more diverse than the latter used to turn their heads towards (mainly clay) covered by dense grass ve­ that of Great Black-headed Gulls, what, the predators with their bills open. To de­ getation reaching above 50 cm height, the most probably, determines the aggressive fend from the intruder L. ichthyaetus jab­ area of the island being 3 ha and the behaviour of Herring Gulls. bed it with the bill or, if the predator seem­ height of banks 6m. In Eastern Sivash L.a. cachinnans arrived at the breeding ed persistant, left the nest and chased the near the Kujanly there are some small al­ intruder away beeting it with wings or luvial sandy islands with the admixture of territory and began making nests earlier shells. L. ichthyaetus bred in one about than L. ichthyaetus but these were only 150 m length and to 20 m width. There solitary individuals (Kostin 1983; Siochin were 4 microcolonies there (with 40-60et al. 1988). L. ichthyaetus began making nests each) of 5 to 8 m apart. In total, 200 their nests after the territory had already pairs bred in the island. been occupied by solitary L.a. cachin­ nans. L. ichthyaetus were characterized In the space between the colonies of by mass colonization of the territory; it also L. ichthyaetus, L. a. cachinnans and applies to L. melanocephalus (B uzun & Phalacrocorax carbo bred. The island of Mierauskas 1987). Such an entire occu­ Kitai concentrated 2 microcolonies, locat­ pation of the territory evoked aggressive ed in a distance of 3-4 m each from reaction of L. a. cachinnans that had al­ another. Observations were completed using a small tent located not far from the colo­ nies. Behaviour of both species have been observed visually, filmed and photo­ graphed. Vocalizations were taped on a Sony TC-800B tape recorder. Some birds were marked by picric acid without catch­ ing them (e. g. dyeing the walls of the nest, etc.). Results Fig. 1: The Great Black-headed Gull sitting in its nest is often attacked by groups of the Occupation of breeding areas occurred Herring Gulls which increase their success in oophagia while cooperating among from mid-February to early March (Kostin 1983). L. ichthyaetus began making their themselves. nests in places without or with thin grass Abb. 1: Eine auf ihrem Nest sitzende Fischmöwe(L. ichthyaetus) wird häufig von mehre­ vegetation. Egg-laying of L.a. cachinnans ren Silbermöwen(L.a. cachinnans) attackiert. Durch Kooperation mehrerer started on March 5-18 and reached the dieser Möwen erhöhen sie ihren Erfolg beim Eierraub. SEEVÖGEL, Zeitschrift Verein Jordsand, Hamburg 1991 / Band 12, Heft 2 35 creases considerably, thus a newly form­ ed group colonizes a new area. Solitary new-comers would undoubtedly be pushed out by L. a. cachinnans. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr. Prüter for encourage­ ment to publish this article in »Seevögel«. We thank Mr. E.G reimas , Mr. G.V aitkus and Mr. M. Zurba for assistance with the field work, Mrs. V.Z aliene helped with translations. Zusammenfassung Konkurrenzbeziehungen zwischen der Silbermöwe (La. cachinnans) und der Fischmöwe (L. ichthyaetus) am Sivash Fig.2: The Great Black-headed Gull’s clipping is less efficient than violent cut of the See (südliche Ukraine) Herring Gull. Im April 1984 und 1985 sowie im Mai 1986 Abb. 2: Das »clipping« (Zerschneiden) der Fischmöwe ist weniger effektiv als der starke führten die Autoren verhaltensbiologische Hieb der Silbermöwe. Studien an der Fischmöwe und der Silber­ möwe durch, die am Sivash See (südliche pushing with the breast. The greater body has a primitive vocal repertoir, producing Ukraine) Mischkolonien bilden. mass of Great Black-headed Gull gave it only eight different types of calls. Like Es wird die Besetzung des Brutplatzes, an advantage over the Herring Gull. La. L. melanocephalus, L. relictus and L ge­ der Nestbau, die Eiablage und das Brut­ cachinnans were more successful in ne/, L. ichthyaetus has no special vocal­ geschäft bei beiden Arten beschrieben oophagia, when 2 or 3 individuals cooper­ izations expressing warning, anxiety, und die gegenseitige Beeinflussung auf ated (Fig. 1). In this case, one bird at­ alarm or aggressiveness. This acoustic den zeitlichen Ablauf der einzelnen Pha­ tacked a victim and enticed it from the evidence supports the theory thatL. ich­ sen dargestellt und diskutiert. Auch wird nest; meanwhile the predator behind thyaetus is closely related to »primitive« das zwischenartliche Predationsverhal- snatched an egg (or a chick) from the nest, gulls or to species that have formed even ten (Eier- und Jungenraub) beschrieben. pecked it through and ate.The owner of earlier (B uzun & M ierauskas 1987; Mie­ the nest didn’t persuit the robber eating rauskas 1987; Mierauskas & B uzun References it’s egg but returned to the nest. We 1988). haven’t observed a case when a predator, Burger, J. (1979): Competition and predation: From the viewpoint of defence behaviour, Herring Gulls versus Laughing Gulls. - eating the stolen egg, would attack the L. ichthyaetus has a low defence capacity. nest again. Condor 81: 269-277. It usually defends only the nest, but not the Buzun, V. & P. Mierauskas (1987): Behaviour of L. a. cachinnans often attacked nests of colony, beating the intruder with wings, by the Mediterranean Gull (Larus their conspecifics. Usually La. cachin­ jabbing posture or passively sitting in melanocephalus) during colony formation nans that had lost their nests became pre­ dense colonies(Z ubakin 1976). Contrary and the early breading stages. - Bull. Mos- dators. In the colony there were always a to L. ichthyaetus, the Herring and Com­ kowskovo Obscestva Ispytatelei Prirody - group of birds constantly engaged in pre­ mon Gulls as well as other »progressive« ser. Biologia 92,3: 27-36. (Russian). Buzun, V. & P. Mierauskas (1988): Develop­ dation. Others did that rather seldom.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Herring Gull Complex (Larus Argentatus - Fuscus - Cachinnans) As a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations
    The Herring Gull Complex (Larus argentatus - fuscus - cachinnans) as a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations Dorit Liebers-Helbig, Viviane Sternkopf, Andreas J. Helbig{, and Peter de Knijff Abstract Under what circumstances speciation in sexually reproducing animals can occur without geographical disjunction is still controversial. According to the ring species model, a reproductive barrier may arise through “isolation-by-distance” when peripheral populations of a species meet after expanding around some uninhabitable barrier. The classical example for this kind of speciation is the herring gull (Larus argentatus) complex with a circumpolar distribution in the northern hemisphere. An analysis of mitochondrial DNA variation among 21 gull taxa indicated that members of this complex differentiated largely in allopatry following multiple vicariance and long-distance colonization events, not primarily through “isolation-by-distance”. In a recent approach, we applied nuclear intron sequences and AFLP markers to be compared with the mitochondrial phylogeography. These markers served to reconstruct the overall phylogeny of the genus Larus and to test for the apparent biphyletic origin of two species (argentatus, hyperboreus) as well as the unex- pected position of L. marinus within this complex. All three taxa are members of the herring gull radiation but experienced, to a different degree, extensive mitochon- drial introgression through hybridization. The discrepancies between the mitochon- drial gene tree and the taxon phylogeny based on nuclear markers are illustrated. 1 Introduction Ernst Mayr (1942), based on earlier ideas of Stegmann (1934) and Geyr (1938), proposed that reproductive isolation may evolve in a single species through D. Liebers-Helbig (*) and V. Sternkopf Deutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany e-mail: [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • Laughing Gulls Breed Primarily Along the Pacific Coast of Mexico and the Atlantic and Caribbean Coasts from S
    LAUGHING GULL Leucophaeus atricilla non-breeding visitor, regular winterer L.a. megalopterus Laughing Gulls breed primarily along the Pacific coast of Mexico and the Atlantic and Caribbean coasts from s. Canada to Venezuela, and they winter S to Peru and the Amazon delta (AOU 1998, Howell and Dunn 2007). It and Franklin's Gull were placed along with other gulls in the genus Larus until split by the AOU (2008). Vagrant Laughing Gulls have been reported in Europe (Cramp and Simmons 1983) and widely in the Pacific, from Clipperton I to Wake Atoll (Rauzon et al. 2008), Johnston Atoll (records of at least 14 individuals, 1964-2003), Palmyra, Baker, Kiribati, Pheonix, Marshall, Pitcairn, Gambier, and Samoan Is, as well as Australia/New Zealand (King 1967; Clapp and Sibley 1967; Sibley and McFarlane 1968; Pratt et al. 1987, 2010; Garrett 1987; Wragg 1994; Higgins and Davies 1996; Vanderwerf et al. 2004; Hayes et al. 2015; E 50:13 [identified as Franklin's Gull], 58:50). Another interesting record is of one photographed attending an observer rowing solo between San Francisco and Australia at 6.5° N, 155° W, about 1400 km S of Hawai'i I, 1-2 Nov 2007. They have been recorded almost annually as winter visitors to the Hawaiian Islands since the mid-1970s, numbers increasing from the NW to the SE, as would be expected of this N American species. The great majority of records involve first-year birds, and, despite the many records in the S Pacific, there is no evidence for a transient population through the Hawaiian Islands, or of individuals returning for consecutive winters after departing in spring.
    [Show full text]
  • First Confirmed Record of Belcher's Gull Larus Belcheri for Colombia with Notes on the Status of Other Gull Species
    First confirmed record of Belcher's Gull Larus belcheri for Colombia with notes on the status of other gull species Primer registro confirmado de la Gaviota Peruana Larus belcheri para Colombia con notas sobre el estado de otras especies de gaviotas Trevor Ellery1 & José Ferney Salgado2 1 Independent. Email: [email protected] 2 Corporación para el Fomento del Aviturismo en Colombia. Abstract We present photographic records of a Belcher's Gull Larus belcheri from the Colombian Caribbean region. These are the first confirmed records of this species in the country. Keywords: new record, range extension, gull, identification. Resumen Presentamos registros fotograficos de un individuo de la Gaviota Peruana Larus belcheri en la region del Caribe de Colombia. Estos son los primeros registros confirmados para el país. Palabras clave: Nuevo registro, extensión de distribución, gaviota, identificación. Introduction the Pacific Ocean coasts of southern South America, and Belcher's Gull or Band-tailed Gull Larus belcheri has long Olrog's Gull L. atlanticus of southern Brazil, Uruguay and been considered a possible or probable species for Argentina (Howell & Dunn 2007, Remsen et al. 2018). Colombia, with observations nearby from Panama (Hilty & Brown 1986). It was first listed for Colombia by Salaman A good rule of thumb for gulls in Colombia is that if it's not et al. (2001) without any justification or notes, perhaps on a Laughing Gull Leucophaeus atricilla, then it's interesting. the presumption that the species could never logically have A second good rule of thumb for Colombian gulls is that if reached the Panamanian observation locality from its it's not a Laughing Gull, you are probably watching it at Los southern breeding grounds without passing through the Camarones or Santuario de Fauna y Flora Los Flamencos, country.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Headed Gull Chroicocephalus Ridibundus
    Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus Folk Name: Common Black-headed Gull Status: Migrant Abundance: Accidental Habitat: Open water of lakes and rivers The Black-headed Gull is a Eurasian gull that occasionally shows up in the Carolinas between early August and the end of April. It was first confirmed in North Carolina at Fort Macon on August 10, 1967, and was first confirmed in South Carolina at Huntington Beach State Park on October 29, 1970. It used to be called the “Common Black-headed Gull.” It is almost always seen with Ring- billed Gulls, although one Carolina ornithologist noted “that association may relate more to the abundance of Ring-billed Gulls in winter than any biological affinity it was relocated, several groups of excited observers were between the two.” The Black-headed Gull is a rare but allowed access into the wastewater treatment plant to see regular visitor along the coast of the Carolinas. There this special bird. are only four records of this gull inland in the Carolina Remarkably, a second Black-headed Gull, an adult Piedmont. The first two records were of birds found at bird, was sighted in Mecklenburg County on Mountain Jordan Lake on January 16, 2005, and at Falls Lake on Island Lake on December 16, 2012. Dennis Kent, John December 9, 2010. The latest records are of two sightings Scavetto, and Bill Rowse were scouring the lake during here in the Central Carolinas. the Southern Lake Norman Christmas Bird Count when At times, the discovery of a rare bird is often an they found this bird.
    [Show full text]
  • International Black-Legged Kittiwake Conservation Strategy and Action Plan Acknowledgements Table of Contents
    ARCTIC COUNCIL Circumpolar Seabird Expert Group July 2020 International Black-legged Kittiwake Conservation Strategy and Action Plan Acknowledgements Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................4 CAFF Designated Agencies: Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................................................5 • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway Chapter 2: Ecology of the kittiwake ....................................................................................................................6 • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada Species information ...............................................................................................................................................................................................6 • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) Habitat requirements ............................................................................................................................................................................................6 • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland Life cycle and reproduction ................................................................................................................................................................................7 • Icelandic Institute of Natural
    [Show full text]
  • Bonaparte's Gull Larus Philadelphia the Only Small Gull Regular in San
    Gulls and Terns — Family Laridae 235 Bonaparte’s Gull Larus philadelphia The only small gull regular in San Diego County, Bonaparte’s Gull is most abundant on the ocean, where, in winter, it can often be seen in flocks of hundreds a short distance offshore. Along the coast, it is much less numerous, though still often com- mon in San Diego Bay or the north county lagoons. Inland, Bonaparte’s Gull is quite irregular, both from lake to lake and from year to year. Even along the coast Bonaparte’s Gull appears to be becoming patchier in its distribution, perhaps as a symptom of the faltering productivity of the ocean off southern California. Winter: Offshore, the flocks of Bonaparte’s Gulls undoubt- edly shift widely with the shifting of fish and plankton. Photo by Anthony Mercieca Onshore, however, the species has a few favored con- centration points, especially the sewage ponds near the 100 on 14 December 1997, B. Schram). At other lakes our Santa Margarita River along Stuart Mesa Road (G5; up counts were of 15 or fewer. Inland, however, the species’ to 70 on 6 December 1998, R. E. Fischer), Buena Vista occurrence is quite irregular, as exemplified by the his- Lagoon (H5; 150 on 7 February 1999, J. Determan), Los tory of Lake Henshaw Christmas bird counts: Bonaparte’s Peñasquitos Lagoon (N7; 100 on 3 January 1999, D. K. Gull has been recorded on 17 of 22 counts 1981–2002, Adams), and the San Diego River mouth (R7; 200 on 22 with a median of 25, a mean of 59, and a maximum of 418 February 2000, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Second-Winter Thayer's Gull
    The in-between age of the in-between Gull: Identification of second-winter Thayer’s Gull Chris Gibbins and Martin Garner Abstract One of the early detailed articles on the identification of Thayer’s Gull was titled ‘The in- between Gull’ (Garner and Mactavish, 2001). This and subsequent articles, however, dealt only with the identification of first-winter1 and adult Thayer’s; little has been published on the other, in-between, age groups. While photographs and published descriptions allow birders to gain a general sense of what Thayer’s Gulls look like in second-winter plumage, to our knowledge no specific criteria that help separate Thayer’s from similar taxa at this age have been proposed. This photo-essay focuses on the identification of second-winter birds and sets out a number of specific features that, subject to testing and refinement, may help form criteria for the identification of out-of-range Thayer’s Gulls. The absence of a mirror in the outer primary, the number of primaries with a venetian blind pattern and the balance of dark and pale in the outer primaries help separate second-winter Thayer’s from darker Kumlien’s Gulls. The exact tone and pattern of fringing on the primaries and the tone of brown in the tertials, tail and secondaries are also important for separating these taxa at this age. Some hybrid gulls (involving various combinations of Herring, American Herring, Glaucous and Glaucous-winged) can resemble Thayer’s, but structure, along with these plumage features, should help rule out most hybrids. While typical second-winter Thayer’s Gulls are eminently identifiable, the frequency of hybrids and birds with characteristics intermediate between Kumlien’s and Thayer’s help stress the need for caution.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife
    Natural Heritage Great Black-backed Gull & Endangered Species Larus marinus Program State Status: None www.mass.gov/nhesp Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife SPECIES DESCRIPTION: The Great Black-backed Herring Gull. They use open areas as roosting sites, Gull is the largest and heaviest gull in North America including parking lots, fields, helipads, and airport and one of the largest in the world. The adult is mostly runways. white with a black back and wings and has a yellowish bill with a red spot near the tip. Overall, this gull appears heavy and robust with a heavy bill. In adults, there is no significant seasonal or sexual difference in plumage. The Great Black-backed Gull’s reputation is built on its apparent bullying of smaller gulls and terns, as well as its voracious appetite for the eggs and young of other birds. Formerly unheard of as a breeding species in the Commonwealth, the Great Black-backed Gull is now relatively common along coastal Massachusetts. DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE: In North America, the breeding range includes coastal areas (particularly on offshore islands) extending from Labrador to North Carolina and along large inland waterbodies (e.g., Great Lakes, Lake Champlain). THREATS: Pesticides, pollutants, storms, habitat Historically, Great Black-backed Gulls did not nest in degradation, and decline in food resources could affect Massachusetts and were first documented as a breeding local populations. bird in the state in 1931. Since that time their populations have dramatically increased, thought to be a result of increased food resources associated with a REFERENCES: human dominated landscape (e.g., landfills).
    [Show full text]
  • Manual for Gull Control at Massachusetts Landfills
    MANUAL FOR GULL CONTROL AT MASSACHUSETTS LANDFILLS JOINTLY DEVELOPED BY: Metropolitan District Commission, Division of Watershed Management Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Prevention Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife USDA APHIS Wildlife Services May 1998 MANUAL FOR GULL CONTROL AT MASSACHUSETTS LANDFILLS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................2 A. GULL SPECIES OF CONCERN ...................................................................................................2 B. GULLS AND WATER SUPPLIES .................................................................................................2 C. GULLS AND LANDFILLS ..........................................................................................................3 III. OVERVIEW OF GULL CONTROL METHODS ...........................................................4 IV. GULL CONTROL PROGRAM FOR LANDFILLS........................................................5 A. GENERAL...............................................................................................................................5 B. PROGRAM COMPONENTS ........................................................................................................5 1. Habitat Alteration................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Laughing Gull Leucophaeus Atricilla
    Laughing Gull Leucophaeus atricilla Folk Name: Blackhead, Fool Gull Status: Migrant, Winter Visitor Abundance: Rare to Uncommon Habitat: Open water of lakes and rivers The Laughing Gull is a common, well-known bird of the Carolina coast. Every tourist visiting the beach is familiar with these black-hooded birds, their noisy laughs, and their ocean-side antics while they search for food. This bird is such an iconic bird of the beach that many Carolina cottages, restaurants, taverns, and other businesses are named after them. At 16 ½ inches, the Laughing Gull is just an inch smaller than the also common Ring- billed Gull. The Laughing Gull, Herring Gull, and Great Black-backed Gull are the only gulls that breed in North Carolina, and the Laughing Gull is the only gull that bred here prior to the 1960s. Around the turn of the twentieth century, back-to- April,” presumably this influx was storm related as well. back catastrophes wreaked havoc on North Carolina’s David Wright found a flock of seven at the Charlotte Laughing Gulls. First, market hunters targeted this bird Water Reservoir on 28 April, Kevin Hennings reported a along much of the East Coast, shooting scores each year Laughing Gull on 29 April on Lake Wylie in York County, and selling their valuable feathers for use in the millinery and Heathy Walker reported one in Charlotte on 10 May. trade. Fortunately, the state’s “Audubon Law,” passed Other records from the end of the twentieth century in 1903, provided some relief from this indiscriminate include: one in Mecklenburg County on November hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Breeding and Distribution of Lava Gull Leucophaeus Fuliginosus K
    Cotinga 37 Observations on the breeding and distribution of Lava Gull Leucophaeus fuliginosus K. Thalia Grant, Olivia H. Estes and Gregory B. Estes Received 7 January 2014; final revision accepted 3 December 2014 Cotinga 37 (2015): OL 22–37 published online 10 March 2015 La Gaviota de Lava Leucophaeus fuliginosus, endémica del archipiélago de Galápagos, es la gaviota más rara del mundo, cuyos hábitos de reproducción son poco conocidos. En los años 2011 y 2012 se observó anidación en la isla Genovesa en densidades mayores a las reportadas previamente en Galápagos. Las parejas reproductoras fueron muy territoriales, defendiendo áreas de hasta 70 m de diámetro contra coespecíficos. Las hembras fueron más agresivas que los machos frente a los intrusos de otras especias percibidos como una amenaza. La nidada de 1–2 huevos fue incubada por ambos miembros de la pareja en turnos de dos horas. Los polluelos salieron del nido 4–5 días después de la eclosión, seleccionando lugares en el territorio más protegidos a los cuales retornaron regularmente para descansar. Los adultos reproductores fueron depredadores oportunistas, alimentando a sus crías principalmente con huevos y polluelos de aves marinas y peces robados de las mismas aves. Reconocemos una relación parasítica entre la cleptoparásita Fragata Real Fregata magnificens y la Gaviota de Lava, y sospechamos que este es el medio principal por el cual en esta isla las gaviotas adquieren los peces que comen. Presentamos datos sobre las comunicaciones entre los padres y la cría, proporcionamos la primera serie de fotografías del desarrollo del polluelo de Gaviota de Lava y describimos una característica en el plumaje de los adultos que no ha sido descrita previamente.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification of West Palearctic Gulls P
    British Birds VOLUME 71 NUMBER 4 APRIL 1978 Field identification of west Palearctic gulls P. J. Grant The west Palearctic list includes 23 species of gulls: more than half the world total. Field guides—because of their concise format—provide inad­ equate coverage of identification and ageing, which has probably fostered the indifference felt by many bird­ watchers towards gulls. This five- part series aims to change that attitude nterest in identifying gulls is growing, as part of the recent general I improvement in identification standards, but doubtless also stimulated by the addition to the British and Irish list of no less than three Nearctic species in little over a decade (Laughing Gull Larus atricilla in 1966, Franklin's Gull L. pipixcan in 1970 and Ring-billed Gull L. delaivarensis in 1973). The realisation is slowly dawning that regular checking through flocks of gulls can be worthwhile. Just as important as identification is the ability to recognise the age of individual immatures. This is obviously necessary in studies of popula­ tion, distribution and migration, but is also a challenge in its own right to the serious bird-identifier. Indeed, identification and ageing go hand- in-hand, for it is only by practising his recognition skills on the common species—of all ages—that an observer will acquire the degree of familiarity necessary for the confident identification of the occasional rarity. The enormous debt owed to D.J. Dwight's The Gulls of the World (1925) is readily acknowledged. That work, however, has long been out of print and its format was designed for the museum and taxonomic worker; the present series of papers will provide a reference more suited to field observers.
    [Show full text]