DOCSLIB.ORG

Homicide: Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RepoRt HOMICIDE: muRdeR and involuntaRy manslaughteR (lRc 87 – 2008) report HOMICIDE: murder aNd iNvoluNtary maNslaughter (lrc 87 – 2008) © copyright law reform commission 2008 First published January 2008 ISSN 1393-3132 i law reForm commissioN THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION’S ROLE the law reform commission is an independent statutory body established by the Law Reform Commission Act 1975. the commission’s principal role is to keep the law under review and to make proposals for reform, in particular by recommending the enactment of legislation to clarify and modernise the law. since it was established, the commission has published over 130 documents containing proposals for law reform and these are all available at www.lawreform.ie. most of these proposals have led to reforming legislation. the commission’s role is carried out primarily under a programme of law reform. its Third Programme of Law Reform 2008-2014 was prepared by the commission following broad consultation and discussion. in accordance with the 1975 act, it was approved by the government in december 2007 and placed before both houses of the oireachtas. the commission also works on specific matters referred to it by the attorney general under the 1975 act. since 2006, the commission’s role includes two other areas of activity, statute law restatement and the legislation directory. statute law restatement involves the administrative consolidation of all amendments to an act into a single text, making legislation more accessible. under the Statute Law (Restatement) Act 2002, where this text is certified by the attorney general it can be relied on as evidence of the law in question. the legislation directory - previously called the chronological tables of the statutes - is a searchable annotated guide to all legislative changes. after the commission took over responsibility for this important resource, it decided to change the name to legislation directory to indicate its function more clearly. ii HOMICIDE: murder aNd iNvoluNtary maNslaughter MEMBERSHIP the law reform commission consists of a president, one full-time commissioner and three part-time commissioners. The commissioners at present are: President: The hon mrs Justice catherine mcguinness, former judge of the supreme court Full-time Commissioner: Patricia t. rickard-clarke, solicitor Part-time Commissioner: Professor Finbarr mcauley Part-time Commissioner: Marian shanley, solicitor Part-time Commissioner: Donal o’donnell, senior counsel iii law reForm commissioN Law REFORM RESEARCH Staff Director of Research: Raymond byrne bcl, llm (Nui), Barrister-at-law Legal Researchers: Áine clancy bcl, llm (Nui) Kate dineen llb, llm (cantab) Philip Flaherty bcl, llm (Nui), diop sa gh (Nui) Eleanor leane llb, llm (Nui) Margaret maguire llb, llm (Nui) Richard mcNamara bcl, llm (Nui) Jane mulcahy bcl (law and german), llm (Nui) Gemma Ní chaoimh bcl, llm (Nui) Verona Ní dhrisceoil bcl (dlí agus gaeilge), llm (Nui) Jane o’grady bcl, llb (Nui), lpc (college of law) Charles o’ mahony ba, llb (Nui), llm (lond), llm (Nui) Nicola white llb, llm (dub) attorney-at-law (Ny) Joanne williams llb, llm (Nui), barrister-at-law StatUTE Law REstatEMENT Project Manager for Restatement: Alma clissmann, ba (mod), llb, dip eur law (bruges), solicitor Legal Researchers: John p. byrne bcl, llm (Nui), barrister-at-law John Kenny llb, llm (cape town), barrister-at-law Eimear long llb, barrister-at-law LEGIslatION DIRECTORY Project Manager for Legislation Directory: Deirdre ahern llb, llm (cantab), dip e-commerce (law society), solicitor Legal Researchers: Eóin mcmanus ba, llb (Nui), llm (lond) Tina o’ reilly bcl (law and german), llm (Nui) iv HOMICIDE: murder aNd iNvoluNtary maNslaughter ADMINIstratION Staff Secretary/Head of Administration: John Quirke Higher Executive Officer: Alan heade Executive Officers: Emma Kenny Darina moran Peter trainor Legal Information Manager: Conor Kennedy ba, h dip lis Cataloguer: Eithne boland ba (hons), hdip ed, hdip lis Clerical Officers: Ann browne Ann byrne Liam dargan Sabrina Kelly PRINCIPAL LEGAL RESEARCHER FOR THIS REPORT Jane mulcahy bcl (law and german), llm (Nui) v law reForm commissioN COntaCT DEtaILS Further information can be obtained from: Secretary/head of administration Law reform commission 35-39 shelbourne road Ballsbridge Dublin 4 TELEPHONE: +353 1 637 7600 FAX: +353 1 637 7601 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.lawreform.ie vi HOMICIDE: murder aNd iNvoluNtary maNslaughter ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS the commission would like to thank the following people who provided valuable assistance: Senator Ivana Bacik, reid professor TCD The Hon Mr Justice Robert Barr, Former Judge of the high court The Hon Mr Justice Declan Budd, Judge of the high court Mr Conal Boyce, solicitor, boyce, burns & co Mr Noel Brett, ceo road safety authority Mr Tom Cahill, bar council, barrister-at-law Ms Collette Carey, criminal law committee, law society of ireland The Hon Mr Justice Paul Carney, Judge of the high court The Hon Mr Justice Peter Charleton, Judge of the high court Ms Siobhán Dunne, Mr Peter W Ferguson, advocate, scotland Mr Maurice Gaffney sc The Hon Mr Justice Hugh Geoghegan, Judge of the supreme court The late Mr Brendan Grogan sc Mr James Hamilton, director of public prosecutions Dr John Harbison, former state pathologist The Hon Mr Justice John Hedigan, Judge of the high court Mr Brendan McArdle, formerly detective sergeant of an garda síochána His Honour Judge Pat McCartan, Judge of the circuit court Professor Paul McCutcheon, head of school of law ul Mr Paul Anthony McDermott, barrister-at-law Mr Patrick McEntee sc The Hon Mr Justice Aindreas Ó Caoimh, court of Justice of the european communities The Hon Mr Justice Kevin O’Higgins, Judge of the high court Mr Caoimhín O’hUiginn, formerly assistant secretary at the department of Justice, equality and law reform Mr Simon P O’Leary, Former law reform commissioner Mr Paul O’Connor, school of law ucd Mr Stephen Pye, office of parliamentary counsel Mr Dara Robinson, criminal law committee chairman, law society of ireland Dr John Stannard, senior lecturer in law, Queen’s university belfast Mr Kieron Wood, barrister-at-law Professor Stanley Yeo, National university of singapore however, full responsibility for this publication lies with the commission. vii viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Legislation xi Table of Cases xiii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 THE MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER DISTINCTION AND THE LABELLING OF CRIMINAL OFFENCES 5 A Labelling and moral culpability 5 B Maintaining the murder/manslaughter distinction 6 C The mandatory life sentence for murder 12 CHAPTER 2 MURDER: THE CURRENT LAW AND ISSUES 25 A Introduction 25 B Murder in Ireland 25 C Murder in England and Wales 35 D Issues relating to murder 41 (1) Are there morally culpable killings currently outside the definition of murder, which ought to be punished as murder? 41 (2) Should intention to cause serious injury continue to form the mens rea for murder? 43 (3) Should “serious injury” be defined? 47 CHAPTER 3 MURDER: PROPOSALS FOR REFORM 51 A Introduction 51 B Incorporating recklessness into the mental element in murder 51 C Retaining implied malice murder 62 D Implied malice: recklessness as to serious injury? 64 E Defining “serious injury” 65 F The Commission’s recommended definition of murder 68 CHAPTER 4 INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER: THE CURRENT LAW AND ISSUES 75 A Introduction 75 B Manslaughter in Ireland 75 C Unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter: the present law 79 D Issues relating to unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter 80 (1) Should low levels of violence, which unforeseeably result in death be treated as unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter or as assault? 80 E Gross negligence manslaughter: the present law 84 ix F Issues relating to gross negligence manslaughter 88 (1) Should the capacity of the accused to advert to the risk or meet the expected standard be a relevant consideration in gross negligence manslaughter cases? 88 (2) Should the risk be raised to one of “death” or “death or serious injury” in the gross negligence manslaughter test? 89 (3) Should gross negligence manslaughter be abolished and replaced by a lesser homicide category such as negligent homicide? 92 G Motor manslaughter and the related driving offences: the current law 93 CHAPTER 5 INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER: OPTIONS FOR REFORM 95 A Introduction 95 B Unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter 95 (1) Low levels of deliberate violence which unforeseeably cause death 96 (2) Manslaughter by drug injection 106 C Gross Negligence Manslaughter 108 D Motor manslaughter and the related driving offences 112 CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 117 APPENDIX DRAFT HOMICIDE BILL 2008 121 x TABLE OF LEGISLATION Canadian Criminal Code 1985 1985, c. C-46 Can Children Act 2001 2001, No. 24 Irl Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 2007, c. 19 Eng Criminal Justice (Temporary Release of Prisoners) Act 2003 2003, No. 34 Irl Criminal Justice Act 1951 1951, No. 2 Irl Criminal Justice Act 1964 1964, No. 5 Irl Criminal Justice Act 1990 1990, No. 16 Irl Criminal Justice Act 2003 2003, c. 44 Eng Criminal Justice Act 2006 2006, No. 26 Irl Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006 2006, No. 11 Irl European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 2003, No. 20 Irl Homicide Act 1957 1957, 5 & 6 Eliz. Eng II c. 11 Indian Penal Code Act 1860 1860, No. 45 India Maritime Safety Act 2005 2005, No. 11 Irl Merchant Shipping Act 1981 1981, No. 33 Irl Model Penal Code 1985 USA Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 1997, No. 26 Irl Offences Against the Person Act 1861 1861, 24 & 25 Eng Vict. c. 100 Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 1989 1989, No. 7 Irl The Criminal Code Act 1902 (WA) 1902, 1 and 2 Aus Edw. VII No. 14 xi TABLE OF CASES Andrews v DPP [1937] AC 576 Eng Boughey v The Queen [1986] 161 CLR 10 Aus Cawthorne v H.M.
Recommended publications
  • Drugs: the Judicial Response

    Drugs: the Judicial Response

    Drugs: The Judicial Response PETER CHARLETON, SC and PAUL ANTHONY MCDERMOTT, Barrister Introduction1 Criminal Appeal accepted the fact that drop in Ireland would be the subject of the defendant: much speculation but as little informed he tension in relation to a judicial debate as possible. A huge rise in Was a person who, while he traded economic prosperity leading to general response to crimes committed by in misery, was a victim of the drug addicts is increasingly that building works which spread that T system himself in that he was a prosperity into deprived areas may be between moving towards treatment heroin addict and that his activities options or towards an even more one factor. Another factor may be were at least in part directed towards Ireland’s unique laws on the seizure of rigorous imposition of penalties. Public feeding his habit. opinion in Ireland about the evils of criminal assets. Another possible factor drug misuse has probably never been as Irish courts have struggled, as have is the break-up of the gang which made strong as it is at the present time.2 courts everywhere in the western world, the passage of this law easier. More on with the concept of drug addiction as this later. Coupled with strident political calls mitigation. Differences have been drawn The purpose of this article is to incarcerate drug traffickers are pleas between the cold blooded non-user of for more resources to allow dependants therefore to examine the opposing trends drugs and those who commit various of the courts being used as deterrent to leave their habits behind them.
  • Download Bar Review Volume 22

    Download Bar Review Volume 22

    THE BAR Volume 22 Number 5 RJournal of TEhe Bar of IVreland IEW November 2017 Implementing the Victims' Directive: a prosecutor's perspective CONTENTS The Bar Review The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5166 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie EDITORIAL BOARD 133 Editor Eilis Brennan BL Gerry Durcan SC Brian Kennedy SC Patrick Leonard SC Paul Anthony McDermott SC Sara Moorhead SC Brian Murray SC James O'Reilly SC Mary O'Toole, SC 124 Mark Sanfey SC Claire Bruton BL Claire Hogan BL Mark O'Connell BL Ciara Murphy, Director Shirley Coulter, Director, Comms and Policy Vanessa Curley, Law Library Deirdre Lambe, Law Library Rose Fisher, Events and Administration Manager Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher PUBLISHERS 143 Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland by Think Media Ltd Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman Paul O’Grady 127 Colm Quinn Design: Tony Byrne Tom Cullen Eimear Moroney Advertising: Paul O’Grady Message from the Chairman 120 LEGAL UPDATE XXIX Commercial matters and news items relating Editor's note 121 Feature 127 to The Bar Review should be addressed to: Protecting children's rights Paul O’Grady The Bar Review News 121 Think Media Ltd The Denham Fellowship Law in practice The Malthouse, Visit from Texan delegation A benchmark for bullying claims 129 537 NCR, Dublin DO1 R5X8 Tel: +353 (0)1 856 1166 John Philpot Curran commemoration The hidden persuaders and the inner 133 Fax: +353 (0)1 856 1169 nature of tort action Email: [email protected] Web: www.thinkmedia.ie Business news 123 Implementing the Victims' 138 Professional pension advice Directive: a prosecutor's perspective www.lawlibrary.ie Interview 124 Closing argument 143 Views expressed by contributors or The lawyer at the centre From wellness to resilience correspondents are not necessarily those of The Bar of Ireland or the publisher and neither The Bar of Ireland nor the publisher accept any Papers and editorial items should be addressed to: responsibility for them.
  • Download Bar Review Volume 21

    Download Bar Review Volume 21

    THE BAR Volume 21 Number 2 REVIEWJournal of The Bar of Ireland April 2016 Unlawful detention CONTENTS The Bar Review The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5166 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie EDITORIAL BOARD 45 Editor Eilis Brennan BL Eileen Barrington SC 66 Gerard Durcan SC Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Niamh Hyland SC Brian Kennedy SC Patrick Leonard SC Paul Anthony McDermott SC Sara Moorhead SC Brian R Murray SC James O'Reilly SC Mary O'Toole SC Mark Sanfey SC 56 Claire Bruton BL Diane Duggan BL Claire Hogan BL Grainne Larkin BL Mark O'Connell BL Thomas O'Malley BL Ciara Murphy, Director Shirley Coulter, Director, Comms and Policy Vanessa Curley, Law Library Deirdre Lambe, Law Library Rose Fisher, PA to the Director Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher PUBLISHERS Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland 54 59 48 by Think Media Ltd Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman Paul O’Grady Colm Quinn Message from the Chairman 44 Interview 56 Design: Tony Byrne Tom Cullen Moving on Ruth O’Sullivan Editor's note 45 Niamh Short Advertising: Paul O’Grady Law in practice 59 News 45 Commercial matters and news items relating Damages for unlawful judicial jailing 59 to The Bar Review should be addressed to: Launch of Bar of Ireland 1916 exhibition Controlling the market 62 Paul O’Grady Bar of Ireland Transition Year Programme The Bar Review Report from The Bar of Ireland Annual Conference 2016 The Battle of the Four Courts, 1916 66 Think Media Ltd The
  • A Legal Response to Colin Holmes

    A Legal Response to Colin Holmes

    J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.17.2.86 on 1 June 1991. Downloaded from Journal ofmedical ethics, 1991, 17, 86-88 Psychopathic disorder: a category mistake? A legal response to Colin Holmes Irene Mackay University ofManchester Author's abstract diminished responsibility upon which I propose to comment. Holmes is concerned with a conflict between law and The absence of any established medical or medicine about the problem ofpsychopathy, in particular psychiatric definition of 'moral insanity' or as it relates to homicide. 'psychopathy' is noteworthy in this article by Colin He looksfor a consistent set oflegal principles based on Holmes. It is not clear whether either can be referred to a variety ofmedical concepts and in doing so criticises the correctly as an illness or whether the two could be courtfor its commonsense approach, its disregardfor synonymous. Moral insanity is referred to as 'absence medical evidence andfor employing lay notions of of conscience', 'no capacity for true moral feelings', responsibility and illness. 'depravity', and 'absence of moral scruple'. This commentary explores how Holmes's notionsfit into Psychopathy appears to mean 'total lack ofcopyright. existing legal rules and explains how the court seeks the compunction or consequent moral emotion', 'absence assistance ofmedical evidence when looking at the evidence of conscience', 'inability to experience guilt' and 'lack as a whole to enable it to decide upon issues ofdefence, of respect for the moral claims of others'. which involve legal and not medical concepts. Holmes is concerned with the conflict between law There is a difficulty inherent in this paper, as it seeks to and medicine about what he refers to as the problem of psychopathy.
  • The Origins of the Homicide Act 1957

    The Origins of the Homicide Act 1957

    Journal ofmedical ethics, 1986, 12, 8-12 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.12.1.8 on 1 March 1986. Downloaded from Forensic psychiatry symposium The origins of the Homicide Act 1957 J Higgins Regional Forensic Psychiatry Service, Liverpool Editor's note were certain serious wrongs, amongst them murder, which were 'botless', that is they could not be expiated Thispaper traces the history ofthe concepts ofinsanity and by compensation but had to be punished by death and diminished responsibility in English law. Insanity as a forfeiture ofproperty. Nevertheless for both groups of defence in Law has two components, and these two offences, botless and non-botless, there was no components developed quite separately. The idea that an assessment of culpability or responsibility - a sort of insane person may not know what he or she is doing when strict liability operated. It appears that the mentally he or she commits an offence, and isfor this reason not abnormal offender's family would have to pay guilty, goes back to the thirteenth century. The other compensation for any act done by him, including component, which developed in the seventeenth century, homicide, and thereafter take care of him - 'an insane was known as the 'right-wrong test'. According to this a person should be guarded and treated leniently by his person who commits an offence may be not guilty on the parents'. copyright. grounds that he does not know that what he is doing is wrong. The conceptofdiminished responsibility originated in the middle ofthe nineteenth century and was developed The twelfth to the eighteenth centuries in Scottish law.
  • DAY 08 071317 DISCLOSURES.Sgngl

    DAY 08 071317 DISCLOSURES.Sgngl

    TRIBUNAL OF INQUIRY INTO PROTECTED DISCLOSURES MADE UNDER THE PROTECTED DISCLOSURES ACT 2014 AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS PASSED BY DÁIL ÉIREANN AND SEANAD ÉIREANN ON 16 FEBRUARY 2017 ESTABLISHED BY INSTRUMENT MADE BY THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY UNDER THE TRIBUNALS OF INQUIRY (EVIDENCE) ACT 1921, ON 17 FEBRUARY 2017 SOLE MEMBER: MR. JUSTICE PETER CHARLETON, JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT HELD IN DUBLIN CASTLE ON THURSDAY, 13TH JULY 2017 - DAY 8 Gwen Malone Stenography Services certify the following to be a verbatim transcript of their stenographic notes in the above-named 8 action. ______________________ GWEN MALONE STENOGRAPHY SERVICES APPEARANCES SOLE MEMBER: MR. JUSTICE PETER CHARLETON, JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT REGISTRAR: MR. PETER KAVANAGH FOR THE TRIBUNAL: MR. DIARMUID MCGUINNESS SC MR. PATRICK MARRINAN SC MS. KATHLEEN LEADER BL MS. ELIZABETH MULLAN, SOLICITOR FOR MS. D: MR. NIALL BUCKLEY BL INSTRUCTED BY: MR. KIERAN KELLY FANNING & KELLY SOLICITORS HATCH HALL HATCH STREET LOWER SAINT KEVIN'S DUBLIN FOR SGT. McCABE: MR. MICHAEL McDOWELL SC MR. PAUL McGARRY SC MR. BREFFNI GORDON BL INSTRUCTED BY: SEAN COSTELLO & COMPANY HALIDAY HOUSE 32 ARRAN QUAY DUBLIN 7 FOR THE COMMISSIONER: MR. MÍCHEÁL P. O'HIGGINS SC MR. CONOR DIGNAM SC MR. DONAL McGUINNESS BL INSTRUCTED BY: MS. KATHY DONALD CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE OSMOND HOUSE LITTLE SHIP STREET DUBLIN 8 FOR THE HSE: MR. MICHAEL CUSH SC INSTRUCTED BY: MR. JON LEGORBURU MR. SEAN O'DONNELL MR. REDMOND SCANLON BYRNE WALLACE 88 HARCOURT STREET DUBLIN 2 FOR TUSLA: MR. PAUL ANTHONY McDERMOTT SC INSTRUCTED BY: ARTHUR COX TEN EARLSFORT TERRACE DUBLIN 2 FOR ALAN SHATTER: MR.
  • A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?

    A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?

    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 177 (Overview) A NEW HOMICIDE ACT FOR ENGLAND AND WALES? An Overview The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale QC, FBA Mr Stuart Bridge Dr Jeremy Horder Professor Martin Partington CBE The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Steve Humphreys and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. This overview, completed on 28 November 2005, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. For those who are interested in a fuller discussion of the law and the Law Commission's proposals, our formal consultation paper is accessible from http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/murder.htm, or you can order a hard copy from TSO (www.tso.co.uk). The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on its proposals before 13 April 2006. Comments may be sent either – By post to: David Hughes Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1N 2BQ Tel: 020-7453-1212 Fax: 020-7453-1297 By email to: [email protected] It would be helpful if, where possible, comments sent by post could also be sent on disk, or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. All responses will be treated as public documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, and may be made available to third parties.
  • Dáil Éireann

    Dáil Éireann

    Vol. 938 Wednesday, No. 1 8 February 2017 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 08/02/2017A00100Leaders’ Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 408 08/02/2017J00300Business of Dáil � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 417 08/02/2017L02800Questions on Promised Legislation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 422 08/02/2017Q01550Topical Issue Matters � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 433 08/02/2017Q01700Ceisteanna - Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 434 08/02/2017Q01800Brexit Issues � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 434 08/02/2017S00750Cabinet Committee Meetings � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 439 08/02/2017T04300Departmental Records � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 445 08/02/2017U01200Priority Questions� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
  • Violence Against the Person

    Violence Against the Person

    Home Office Counting Rules for Recorded Crime With effect from April 2021 Violence against the Person Homicide Death or Serious Injury – Unlawful Driving Violence with injury Violence without injury Stalking and Harassment All Counting Rules enquiries should be directed to the Force Crime Registrar Home Office Counting Rules for Recorded Crime With effect from April 2021 Homicide Classification Rules and Guidance 1 Murder 4/1 Manslaughter 4/10 Corporate Manslaughter 4/2 Infanticide All Counting Rules enquiries should be directed to the Force Crime Registrar Home Office Counting Rules for Recorded Crime With effect from April 2021 Homicide – Classification Rules and Guidance (1 of 1) Classification: Diminished Responsibility Manslaughter Homicide Act 1957 Sec 2 These crimes should not be counted separately as they will already have been counted as murder (class 1). Coverage Murder Only the Common Law definition applies to recorded crime. Sections 9 and 10 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 give English courts jurisdiction where murders are committed abroad, but these crimes should not be included in recorded crime. Manslaughter Only the Common Law and Offences against the Person Act 1861 definitions apply to recorded crime. Sections 9 and 10 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 gives courts jurisdiction where manslaughters are committed abroad, but these crimes should not be included in recorded crime. Legal Definitions Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 Sec 1(1) “1 The offence (1) An organisation to which this section applies is guilty of an offence if the way in which its activities are managed or organised - (a) causes a person’s death, and (b) amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased.” Capable of Being Born Alive - Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 Capable of being born alive means capable of being born alive at the time the act was done.
  • Developments in the English Law of Homicide

    Developments in the English Law of Homicide

    University of Miami Law Review Volume 14 Number 3 Article 3 5-1-1960 Developments in the English Law of Homicide Ronald H. Maudsley Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Ronald H. Maudsley, Developments in the English Law of Homicide, 14 U. Miami L. Rev. 355 (1960) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol14/iss3/3 This Leading Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ENGLISH LAW OF HOMICIDE RONALD H. MAUDSLEY* Although the several states of the United States have made many statutory changes in the common law rules concerning crimes, the common law still remains the basis of the criminal law of nearly all American jurisdictions.1 Even the federal courts, which rely entirely upon statutory enactments for their criminal law, take note also of common law doctrines.2 It is not surprising that many of the problems which face the states in the criminal law field are similar to those which challenge the initiative of judges and legislators in England at the present time. Legislation intended to meet some of these problems was passed in England in 1957; and it may be of interest to consider the provisions of the Homicide Act of that year as an attempt to deal with such problems.
  • Download Bar Review Volume 23

    Download Bar Review Volume 23

    THE BAR Volume 23 Number 6 RJournal of TEhe Bar of IVreland IEW December 2018 Examining the rule in Browne v Dunn CONTENTS The Bar Review The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5166 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie EDITORIAL BOARD Editor Eilis Brennan SC Gerry Durcan SC Brian Kennedy SC Patrick Leonard SC Paul Anthony McDermott SC Sara Moorhead SC Brian Murray SC James O'Reilly SC Mary O'Toole, SC Mark Sanfey SC 156 169 Claire Bruton BL Claire Hogan BL Mark O'Connell BL Sonja O’Connor BL 161 165 Ciara Murphy, CEO Shirley Coulter, Director, Comms and Policy Vanessa Curley, Law Library Aedamair Gallagher, Senior Research and Policy Executive Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher Ann-Marie Hardiman, Think Media PUBLISHERS Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland by Think Media Ltd Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman Paul O’Grady Colm Quinn Design: Tony Byrne Tom Cullen Niamh Short Message from the Chairman 150 Law in practice 160 Advertising: Paul O’Grady Prompt notification of personal injury claims Editor's note 151 Commercial matters and news items relating to The Bar Review should be addressed to: LEGAL UPDATE xliii Paul O’Grady News 151 The Bar Review Think Media Ltd WWI commemoration Law in practice The Malthouse, New Bar Equality and Diversity Committee The rule in Browne v Dunn: here to stay 161 537 NCR, Dublin DO1 R5X8 Tel: +353 (0)1 856 1166 EBA Annual Employment Law Conference Doctors differ… 165 Fax: +353 (0)1 856 1169 Bailey revisited: when will a court 169 Email: [email protected] Web: www.thinkmedia.ie Obituary 154 re-examine its own judgment? Marie Torrens www.lawlibrary.ie Closing argument 173 Interview 156 Tweet nothings Views expressed by contributors or Protecting our privacy correspondents are not necessarily those of The Bar of Ireland or the publisher and neither The Bar of Ireland nor the publisher accept any Papers and editorial items should be addressed to: responsibility for them.
  • Criminal Law Suggested Answers – January 2012

    Criminal Law Suggested Answers – January 2012

    LEVEL 3 – UNIT 3 – CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS – JANUARY 2012 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should have included in their answers to the January 2012 examinations. The suggested answers do not for all questions set out all the points which students may have included in their responses to the questions. Students will have received credit, where applicable, for other points not addressed by the suggested answers. Students and tutors should review the suggested answers in conjunction with the question papers and the Chief Examiners’ reports which provide feedback on student performance in the examination. SECTION A 1. Malice aforethought is the intention to kill or the intention to cause GBH. 2. The actus reus will be the continuing act throughout the duration of the crime. It is necessary for the mens rea to be formed at some time during the actus reus. It can be at the beginning Thabo Meli 1954 or at the end Fagan v MPC 1969 or at some other stage; it can be present throughout as well. 3. The actus reus for basic criminal damage is set out in section 1(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 and requires that property belonging to another must be destroyed or damaged. Damage includes non-permanent damage and whether there has been damage is assessed by the time and cost of rectifying the damage Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary (1986); A v R (1978).