The Pluto Experiment at Doris (Desy) And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pluto Experiment at Doris (Desy) And THE PLUTO EXPERIMENT AT DORIS (DESY) AND THE DISCOVERY OF THE GLUON. (A RECOLLECTION). Bruno R. Stella1 Department of Physics of Roma Tre University and INFN; Rome, Italy Hans-Jürgen Meyer2 formerly at Department of Physics, Siegen University; Siegen, Germany (to be submitted to The European Physical Journal H) Abstract. With the aim of determining the contribution of the PLUTO experiment at the DORIS e+e- storage ring to the discovery of the gluon, as members of this former collaboration we have reconsidered all the scientific material produced by PLUTO in 1978 and the first half of 1979. It is clear that the experiment demonstrated the main decay of the Y(9.46 GeV) resonance to be mediated by 3 gluons, by providing evidence for the agreement of this hypothesis with average values and differential distributions of all possible experimental variables and by excluding all other possible alternative models. Moreover PLUTO measured in June 1979 the matrix element of the 3-gluon decay to be quantitatively as expected by QCD (even after hadronization) and, having checked the possibility to correctly trace the gluons’ directions, demonstrated the spin 1 nature of the gluon by excluding spin 0 and spin ½. The hadronization of the gluon like a quark jet, hypothesized in the 3-gluon jet Monte Carlo simulation, was compatible with the topological data at this energy and was shown to -1 be an approximation at 10% level for the multiplicity (≈<p||> ); the right expected gluon fragmentation was needed for the inclusive distributions; this was the first experimental study of (identified) gluon jets. In the following measurements at the PETRA storage ring, these results were confirmed by PLUTO and by three contemporaneous experiments by evidencing at higher energies the gluon radiation (“bremsstrahlung”), the softer one, by jet broadening, and the hard one, by the emission of (now clearly visible) gluon jets by quarks. The gluon’s spin 1 particle nature was also confirmed. The PLUTO results on Y decays had been confirmed both by contemporaneous experiments at DORIS (partially) and later (also partially) were confirmed by more sophisticated detectors. 1 Introduction Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD, the theory of strong interactions) and the gluon, the messenger of the strong (“color”) force, were proposed (after an early paper by Gell-Mann in 1962 [1]) in the years 1970-1980 [2], in parallel and after the quark parton model was stabilized. A 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] 1 laboratory for studying QCD and gluons was proposed to be the next heavy narrow hadronic resonance [3-6]. In 1977 the Y(9.46 GeV) resonance was discovered at Fermilab [7] and its very narrow width (≈50 keV) was found at DORIS (3-10 GeV e+e- storage ring at DESY) by the experiments PLUTO and DASP2 in May 1978 [8]. The first evidence for the abundant decay of Y into 3 gluons was reported by the PLUTO Collaboration, at Schools and Conferences in Summer 1978 [9-17], as well as in publications [18-20]. Further presentations followed at Winter [21,22] and Spring [23-25] schools and meetings, and the cross sections were given in the thesis [26]. In June 1979 at the Geneva International Conference [27] the evidence for the Y decay into 3 gluons (with the partonic matrix element) was presented by PLUTO [28, mentioned also in 29,30] and the first evidence at PETRA (the new 10-48 GeV e+e- storage ring at DESY) for quark jet broadening by gluon radiation was shown by TASSO [30] and also with more results by PLUTO [31]. At the following Lepton-Photon Symposium at FermiLab [32] PLUTO showed the step due to the production of the new quark b and confirmed the jet broadening [33] and the 3-gluon interpretation of the Y decay [34]. At this conference the evidence for three jet events (interpreted as gluon radiation by a pair) was shown by the TASSO, PLUTO, MARK-J and JADE experiments at PETRA [36-41] again confirming the existence of gluon jets now at a factor three larger energies. As members of the PLUTO Collaboration, after more than thirty years we think it timely and worthwhile to recollect and recall in this article, and for a wider public, what PLUTO did in relation to the gluon discovery in the years 1978 and first half of 1979 and the confirmations obtained both at DORIS and at PETRA. In chapter 2 we briefly summarize the related physics highlights preceeding the PLUTO experiment at DORIS; in chapter 3 we sketch the PLUTO detector and the properties of the DORIS and PETRA storage rings, with a brief history of the machines and the detector; in chapter 4 we sketch the simulations of the physical processes. In the main chapter 5 we recollect the elements for the discovery of the Y→3-gluon decay: the Y resonance; inclusive dynamics; geometry (topology); exclusion of alternative models; exclusive 3-gluon dynamics and gluon hadronization (the first study of gluon jets). All with the aim to single out the sufficient and the necessary conditions to demonstrate the validity of the 3-gluon hypothesis (QCD). In chapter 6 we cover the confirmations found at DORIS, especially by a more sophisticated detector (ARGUS), as well by CLEO at the CESR storage ring, Cornell, USA, the jet broadening found at PETRA and the most important confirmation for the gluon: the discovery of gluon bremsstrahlung. Finally we give a summary and draw the conclusions in chapter 7. 2 Prologue: The related physics in the years 1974-1978 The pointlike fractionally charged constituents of the elementary particles (partons or quarks) were hypothesized and found in the years 1964-1974. The last step, the number of quarks, was + - + - + - demonstrated experimentally by measuring R, the ratio σ(e e hadrons) / σ(e e μ μ ), a measurement of the sum of the square of the quark charges divided by the square of the muon’s charge. A new quantum number (“color”) was needed to justify the high R value measured at e+e- colliders [42]. In 1974 a very narrow resonance was discovered [43], the J/ψ(3.1 GeV), recognised to be the ground state of a new resonance, of the “charm” quark, “charmonium” ( ). In 1975 excited states were found, starting the field of charmonium spectroscopy [44]. Using the measured J/ψ + - + - cross section and the J/ψe e , μ μ branching ratios, in non-relativistic potential models for quark binding, the charm quark was shown to have a charge ⅔ of the proton charge. The presence and 2 charge of the new quark was also seen in e+e- annihilations as a step in R outside the resonance region. In 1975 Appelquist and Politzer [3] proposed (in analogy with the orthopositronium decay into 3 photons calculated with QED by Ore and Powell [45]) that a narrow resonance found in e+e- annihilation (with the quantum numbers of the photon, as orthopositronium decaying into 3 γ’s) should decay into 3 gluons, the supposed exchange particle of the strong interactions (with the same quantum numbers of the photon, plus “color”: QCD is the name of the resulting theory). In the same year at SPEAR [46] at 7.4 Gev the first “jets” of particles were seen in e+e- → annihilations, a mechanism proposed [47-53] for the hadronization of quarks and gluons. (This means that a jet of 3.7 GeV or more is visible sometimes by the naked eye as a separate cluster of particles of limited transverse momentum with respect to its mean longitudinal momentum). A new heavy lepton, the tau (τ), was also found in 1975 *54+ as a third charged lepton (after the electron and the muon). The τ, being heavy enough, can decay also into hadrons. Its existence implied the existence of a new heavy quark doublet (“beauty” and “truth” or “bottom” and “top”) paired with it and the tau neutrino (according to the hypotheses of Glashow, Iliopulos and Maiani and of Kobajashi and Maskawa [55]). The properties of the possible ground state were predicted in detail by Eichten and Gottfried in 1977 [56]. In 1976, Ellis, Gaillard and Ross [50] proposed that high energy quarks should radiate gluons (a 1— neutral massless colored particle) very much as in QED the electrons radiate photons. The pairs produced in e+e- annihilations could radiate gluons (gluon bremsstrahlung) and those gluons could manifest themselves as a cascade of quarks and gluons and finally ordinary hadrons: jets again [50-52]. In 1976 the charmed mesons D and D* were discovered as bound states of a “light (u,d,s)” quark and the new charm quark [44]. In 1977 a Y(9.5 GeV) heavy resonance was discovered in an experiment at Fermilab of a proton beam striking a nuclear target [7], relatively narrow (±200 MeV, compatible with the resolution of the experiment) and seen in the μ+μ- decay. Koller and Walsh [4] and in 1978-79 together with Krasemann, Zerwas and Kramer [6] and Fritzsch and Streng [5] proposed a test of QCD by looking for gluon jets in the decay of a heavy quark-antiquark bound state produced in e+e- annihilations and calculated the gluon or jet (the forward product of its hadronization) angular distributions, estimating also multiplicities and momentum distributions of hadrons in a 3 gluons 3 jets final state. When, at DESY, the Y(9.46) was confirmed by PLUTO to be an extremely narrow state [8,76] but with abundant hadronic decays, it was clear that it was not decaying as a ‘normal’ hadronic resonance: it was a possible candidate for the proposed 3-gluon decay.
Recommended publications
  • From God's Particle to Dark Matter
    SAE./No.65/October 2016 Studies in Applied Economics FROM GOD'S PARTICLE TO DARK MATTER Joachim Mnich Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and Study of Business Enterprise From God’s Particle to Dark Matter Investigating the Universe: Getting the Big Picture by Colliding Small Particles1 by Joachim Mnich Copyright 2016 by the author. About the Series The Studies in Applied Economics series is under the general direction of Prof. Steve H. Hanke, Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise ([email protected]). About the Author Joachim Mnich is the Director for Particle and Astroparticle Physics at the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) and Professor of Physics at the University of Hamburg. He is currently Chair of the International Committee for Future Accelerators (ICFA), a panel working under the auspice of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) to promote international collaboration in all phases of the construction and exploitation of high energy accelerators. He is also a member of numerous national and international strategy and advisory boards. Prof. Joachim Mnich has a graduate degree in electrical engineering and obtained a PhD in particle physics, both from Aachen University. In the past, he has worked on large particle physics experiments at DESY and CERN. His interest is experimental particle physics, particularly precision tests of the electroweak interaction, and the design, development, and construction of modern tracking detectors. Since 2000, he has been a member of the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN and contributed to the construction of the silicon-based central tracking detector as well as to studies to test the Standard Model of particle physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The PLUTO Experiment at DORIS (DESY) and the Discovery of the Gluon (A Recollection]
    (9.46 GeV) and the gluon discovery (a critical recollection of PLUTO results)* Bruno R. Stella1,a and Hans-Jürgen Meyer2,b 1 Department of Physics of Roma Tre University and INFN; Rome, Italy 2 formerly at Department of Physics, Siegen University; Siegen, Germany Abstract. The hadronic decays of (9.46 GeV) were first studied by the PLUTO experiment at the DORIS e+e- storage ring (DESY). With the aim of determining the contribution of PLUTO to the discovery of the gluon, as members of this former collaboration we have reconsidered all the scientific material produced by PLUTO in 1978 and the first half of 1979. It results clearly that the experiment demonstrated the main decay of the (9.46 GeV) resonance to be mediated by 3 gluons, by providing evidence for the agreement of this hypothesis with average values and differential distributions of all possible experimental variables and by excluding all other possible alternative models. Jettiness resulted evident by the average transverse momentum <pT> with respect to the event thrust axis, which was the same as experimentally observed by PLUTO itself at nearby continuum c.m.s. energies for 2-quark jet events. On the contrary, the average sphericity <S> and more topological variables as well as the momentum distribution showed a net difference with the same data comparison, a result compatible with jettiness only in case of more than 2 jets. Flatness as consequence of a 3-body decay (therefore 3 jets) was indicated by the low average momentum out of the event plane <pout>, altogether a result being independent of models.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Changes to the E- / E+ Injector (Linac II) at DESY
    Proceedings of LINAC08, Victoria, BC, Canada TUP008 RECENT CHANGES TO THE e+ /e- INJECTOR (LINAC II) AT DESY M. Hüning#, M. Schmitz, DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract required together with the high revolution frequency of The Linac II at DESY consists of a 6A/150kV DC PIA a reduction of beam pulse duration. electron gun, a 400 MeV primary electron linac, an Today DESY II with its injector Linac II provides 800 MW positron converter, and a 450 MeV secondary electrons and positrons for the synchrotron radiation electron/positron linac. facility DORIS, the synchrotron radiation facility under The Positron Intensity Accumulator (PIA) is also construction PETRA III, and for test beam targets inside considered part of the injector complex accumulating and DESY II. The injection into HERA via PETRA II is shut damping the 50 Hz beam pulses from the linac and off, but there is an option to inject directly into HERA if transferring them with a rate of 6.25 Hz or 3.125 Hz into there is the requirement by future projects. the Synchrotron DESY II. The typical positrons rates are 6⋅1010/s. LINAC OVERVIEW DESY II and Linac II will serve as injectors for the two synchrotron light facilities PETRA III and DORIS. Since Injection System PETRA III will operate in top-up mode, Linac availability The primary electron beam is produced by a 120 kV of 98-99% is required. DORIS requires positrons for pulsed DC diode gun. Beam pulses of up to 6 A and 4 μs operation. Therefore during top-up mode positrons are duration are produced.
    [Show full text]
  • European XFEL Status of Technical Developments Massimo Altarelli
    European XFEL Status of Technical Developments Massimo Altarelli On behalf also of Serguei Molodtsov, Andreas Schwarz, Thomas Tschentscher and Karl Witte European XFEL - Status of Technical Developments The European XFEL – “Start-up” Version 2 Some specifications Photon energy 0.8–12.4 keV beam transport & instruments ~1000 m Pulse duration <100 fs Pulse energy few mJ undulator ~200 m super-conducting accelerator 10 Hz/4.5 MHz (27 000 b/s) accelerator ~1700 m 3 beamlines/6 instruments ¾ extension to TDR version with 5 BLs and 10 instruments possible Various other extensions possible SASE 2 tunable, planar e- ¾ variable polarization ID’s ~0.15 – 0.4 nm ¾ electrons shorter wavelengths 17.5 GeV ¾ possibly CW operation SASE 1 - e planar SASE 3 Experiments First beam 2014 0.1 nm tunable, planar 0.4 – 1.6 nm Start of user operation 2015 1.2 – 4.9 nm (10 GeV) Fourth European XFEL Users' Meeting, Hamburg, 27-29.01.2010 Massimo Altarelli, European XFEL European XFEL - Status of Technical Developments Scientific instruments 3 Ultrafast Coherent Diffraction Imaging of Single Particles, Clusters, and Biomolecules (SPB) Structure determination of single particles: atomic clusters, bio-molecules, virus particles, cells. Materials Imaging & Dynamics (MID) Structure determination of nano- devices and dynamics at the nanoscale. Femtosecond Diffraction Experiments (FDE) Time-resolved investigations of the dynamics of Hard x-rays solids, liquids, gases High Energy Density Matter (HED) Investigation of matter under extreme conditions using hard
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Production and High Pt Phenomena in Photon-Photon Reactions*
    JET PRODUCTION AND HIGH PT PHENOMENA IN PHOTON-PHOTON REACTIONS* NORBERT WERMES ~" Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ABSTRACT The status of experimental investigations of high PT phenomena and jet production in photon- photon collisions is reviewed. Taking the challenging questions on hard scattering processes in ~/ff reactions as a guide, the experimental approach to these questions is summarized. Results from the PETRA experiments CELLO, JADE, PLUTO, and TASSO are presented including preliminary results on the Q2-dependence of jet cross sections. Experimental limitations and background problems are discussed. Zusammenfassung -- Es wird ein Uberblick fiber den Stand experimenteller Untersuchungen yon high-PT Ph~nomenen und der Erzeugung von Jets in Photon-Photon Wechselwirkungen gegeben. Anhand der herausfordernden Fragen beziiglich harter Streuprozesse in ~/ff Reaktionen wird der experimentelle Ansatz zur Beantwortung dieser Fragen zusammengefasst. Ergebnisse der PETRA Experimente CELLO, JADE, PLUTO und TASSO werden presentiert. Vorli~ufige Untersuchungen der Q2-Abh~ngigkeit von Jet-Wirkungsquerschnitten sowie experimentelle Einschr~nkungen und Untergrundprobleme werden diskutiert. * Work supported by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. ? Alexander yon Humboldt Fellow. 120 1. INTRODUCTION This talk reviews experimental results on hard scattering reactions in qff collisions via high PT phenomena. The talk is divided into three parts. First I shall try to list the physics challenges for photon- photon experiments, in the context of hard scattering processes at high PT. In the main part the experimental approach to these challenging questions is discussed. It will be explained why we believe that hard scattering processes do exist. Then the explicit jet-searches performed by the different experiments are reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Collider Physics at HERA
    ANL-HEP-PR-08-23 Collider Physics at HERA M. Klein1, R. Yoshida2 1University of Liverpool, Physics Department, L69 7ZE, Liverpool, United Kingdom 2Argonne National Laboratory, HEP Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois, 60439, USA May 21, 2008 Abstract From 1992 to 2007, HERA, the first electron-proton collider, operated at cms energies of about 320 GeV and allowed the investigation of deep-inelastic and photoproduction processes at the highest energy scales accessed thus far. This review is an introduction to, and a summary of, the main results obtained at HERA during its operation. To be published in Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics arXiv:0805.3334v1 [hep-ex] 21 May 2008 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Accelerator and Detectors 5 2.1 Introduction.................................... ...... 5 2.2 Accelerator ..................................... ..... 6 2.3 Deep Inelastic Scattering Kinematics . ............. 9 2.4 Detectors ....................................... .... 12 3 Proton Structure Functions 15 3.1 Introduction.................................... ...... 15 3.2 Structure Functions and Parton Distributions . ............... 16 3.3 Measurement Techniques . ........ 18 3.4 Low Q2 and x Results .................................... 19 2 3.4.1 The Discovery of the Rise of F2(x, Q )....................... 19 3.4.2 Remarks on Low x Physics.............................. 20 3.4.3 The Longitudinal Structure Function . .......... 22 3.5 High Q2 Results ....................................... 23 4 QCD Fits 25 4.1 Introduction.................................... ...... 25 4.2 Determinations ofParton Distributions . .............. 26 4.2.1 TheZEUSApproach ............................... .. 27 4.2.2 TheH1Approach................................. .. 28 4.3 Measurements of αs inInclusiveDIS ............................ 29 5 Jet Measurements 32 5.1 TheoreticalConsiderations . ........... 32 5.2 Jet Cross-Section Measurements . ........... 34 5.3 Tests of pQCD and Determination of αs .........................
    [Show full text]
  • DESY) DESY Is One of the World's Leading Accelerator Centres and a Member of the Helmholtz Association
    Deutsches Elektronen- Synchrotron Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) DESY is one of the world's leading accelerator centres and a member of the Helmholtz Association. DESY develops, builds and operates large particle accelerators used to investigate the structure of matter. DESY offers a broad research spectrum of international standing focusing on three main areas: accelerator development, construction and operation; photon science; particle and astroparticle physics. Facts and figures Established in Hamburg on 18 December 1959 • Locations: Hamburg and Zeuthen (Brandenburg) • Budget: 192 Mio.€ (Hamburg 173/Zeuthen 19 Mio.€ ) , Financing: 90% on the national level (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research); 10% on the state level (City of Hamburg and Federal State of Brandenburg) • Employees: approx. 2000, including 650 scientists working in the fields of accelerator operation, research and development • Guest scientists: more than 3000 from over 40 countries p.a. • Training: more than 100 young people in commercial and technical vocations • Young scientists: more than 700 diploma students, doctoral candidates and postdocs Year DESY activities 2009 Start with XFEL 2010 Start with PETRA III 2010 „Go“ for CSSB building 2011 Start of FLASH Extension: FLASH II 2012 Completion of CFEL building 2012 DORIS III shutdown 2013 Start of construction PETRA III Ext. North , East International and national cooperations: HSE Organisation CFEL, CSSB, PIER, LHC, Ice Cube, CTA etc. The classical Safety, Fire protection and Environmental Group and Radiation Protection Group are administrative departments. Personnel safety and experimental safety is under the administration of the different work departments. In total there are 12 engineers, 10 technicians and 5 administrative assistants to support DESY employees and guests in safety, health and environmental interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Technical Design Report
    XFEL X-Ray Free-Electron Laser The European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Technical design report Editors: Massimo Altarelli, Reinhard Brinkmann, Majed Chergui, Winfried Decking, Barry Dobson, Stefan Düsterer, Gerhard Grübel, Walter Graeff, Heinz Graafsma, Janos Hajdu, Jonathan Marangos, Joachim Pflüger, Harald Redlin, David Riley, Ian Robinson, Jörg Rossbach, Andreas Schwarz, Kai Tiedtke, Thomas Tschentscher, Ivan Vartaniants, Hubertus Wabnitz, Hans Weise, Riko Wichmann, Karl Witte, Andreas Wolf, Michael Wulff, Mikhail Yurkov DESY 2006-097 July 2007 Publisher: DESY XFEL Project Group European XFEL Project Team Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron Member of the Helmholtz Association Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg Germany http://www.xfel.net E-Mail: [email protected] Reproduction including extracts is permitted subject to crediting the source. ISBN 978-3-935702-17-1 Contents Contents Authors ...................................................................................................................... vii Foreword .................................................................................................................. xiii Executive summary .....................................................................................................1 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................11 1.1 Accelerator-based light sources..................................................................11 1.2 Free-electron lasers ....................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Gluon
    Discovery of the Gluon Physics 290E Seminar, Spring 2020 Outline – Knowledge known at the time – Theory behind the discovery of the gluon – Key predicted interactions – Jet properties – Relevant experiments – Analysis techniques – Experimental results – Current research pertaining to gluons – Conclusion Knowledge known at the time The year is 1978, During this time, particle physics was arguable a mature subject. 5 of the 6 quarks were discovered by this point (the bottom quark being the most recent), and the only gauge boson that was known was the photon. There was also a theory of the strong interaction, quantum chromodynamics, that had been developed up to this point by Yang, Mills, Gell-Mann, Fritzsch, Leutwyler, and others. Trying to understand the structure of hadrons. Gluons can self-interact! Theory behind the discovery Analogous to QED, the strong interaction between quarks and gluons with a gauge group of SU(3) symmetry is known as quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Where the force mediating particle is the gluon. In QCD, we have some quite particular features such as asymptotic freedom and confinement. 4 α Short range:V (r) = − s QCD 3 r 4 α Long range: V (r) = − s + kr QCD 3 r (Between a quark and antiquark) Quantum fluctuations cause the bare color charge to be screened causes coupling strength to vary. Features are important for an understanding of jet formation. Theory behind the discovery John Ellis postulated the search for the gluon through bremsstrahlung radiation in electron- proton annihilation processes in 1976. Such a process will produce jets of hadrons: e−e+ qq¯g Furthermore, Mary Gaillard, Graham Ross, and John Ellis wrote a paper (“Search for Gluons in e+e- Annihilation.”) that described that the PETRA collider at DESY and the PEP collider at SLAC should be able to observe this process.
    [Show full text]
  • DESY Focuses on HERA
    intrepid young physicists from 20 auditorium at the Plaza of America. countries, including The Flying Cir­ This specially-commissioned work cus of Physics' from Copenhagen featured scientifically accurate lyric and Amsterdam, began their dra­ verse by French astrophysicists Jean matic demonstrations of physics prin­ Audouze and Michel Cassé, music ciples. Thousands of visitors partici­ by Graciane Finzi, and a dance alle­ pated in the fun, which showed how gory of the Big Bang and the creation fascinating science can be. Interac­ of the Universe with choreography by tive video stations, with programmes Jean Guizerix, Wilfride Piollet and specially developed at CERN in col­ Jean-Cristophe Paré from the Opéra laboration with Olivetti, helped visi­ de Paris. (The sound track, featuring tors explore science. film star Michel Piccoli, has been re­ The carnival continued with scien­ corded by Radio-France.) For more tists and gymnasts, disguised as par­ mundane tastes, a CERN scientist ticles, printed circuits, atoms and Ein­ Latino funk band jammed on the cen­ stein clones, dancing around a tral Expo 92 stage until late into the particle accelerator float. Throughout night. the day CERN's glamorous 'Les Tired but happy, the scientists pre­ Horribles Cernettes' belted out their pared to return to their laboratories. special brand of 'hardronic' rock with 'Genius, Originality and Participa­ songs about the hassles of science tion the scientists from CERN life and how making it with physicists showed the public that physics can is tough. be really interesting,' applauded the The day finished on a more serene Expo 92 Information Bulletin. Maybe The CERN Day at Seville finished with the note with the première of a 'Universe physics should go to the ball more of­ première of a specially-commissioned of Light' ballet playing to a packed ten.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Review of the Discovery of the Quark and Gluon Jets
    EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) JETS AND QCD: A Historical Review of the Discovery of the Quark and Gluon Jets and its Impact on QCD⋆ A.Ali1 and G.Kramer2 1 DESY, D-22603 Hamburg (Germany) 2 Universit¨at Hamburg, D-22761 Hamburg (Germany) Abstract. The observation of quark and gluon jets has played a crucial role in establishing Quantum Chromodynamics [QCD] as the theory of the strong interactions within the Standard Model of particle physics. The jets, narrowly collimated bundles of hadrons, reflect configurations of quarks and gluons at short distances. Thus, by analysing energy and angular distributions of the jets experimentally, the properties of the basic constituents of matter and the strong forces acting between them can be explored. In this review, which is primarily a description of the discovery of the quark and gluon jets and the impact of their obser- vation on Quantum Chromodynamics, we elaborate, in particular, the role of the gluons as the carriers of the strong force. Focusing on these basic points, jets in e+e− collisions will be in the foreground of the discussion and we will concentrate on the theory that was contempo- rary with the relevant experiments at the electron-positron colliders. In addition we will delineate the role of jets as tools for exploring other particle aspects in ep and pp/pp¯ collisions - quark and gluon densi- ties in protons, measurements of the QCD coupling, fundamental 2-2 quark/gluon scattering processes, but also the impact of jet decays of top quarks, and W ±, Z bosons on the electroweak sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity Physics. D KAONS, Or
    A PERIODICAL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS WINTER 1995 VOL. 25, NUMBER 4 Editors RENE DONALDSON, BILL KIRK Contributing Editor MICHAEL RIORDAN Editorial Advisory Board JAMES BJORKEN, GEORGE BROWN, ROBERT N. CAHN, DAVID HITLIN, JOEL PRIMACK, NATALIE ROE, ROBERT SIEMANN Illustrations page 4 TERRY ANDERSON Distribution CRYSTAL TILGHMAN The Beam Line is published quarterly by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, PO Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309. Telephone: (415) 926-2585 INTERNET: [email protected] FAX: (415) 926-4500 Issues of the Beam Line are accessible electronically on uayc ou the World Wide Web at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/ pubs/beamline/beamline.html SLAC is operated by Stanford University under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the policy of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Cover: Martin Perl (left) and Frederick Reines (center) receive the 1995 Nobel Prize in physics from His Majesty the King of Sweden at the awards ceremony last December. (Photograph courtesy of Joseph Peri) Printed on recycled paper tj) . CONTENTS FEATURES "We conclude that the signature e-/. events cannot be explained either by the production and decay of any presently known particles 4 Discovery of the Tau or as coming from any of the well- THE ROLE OF MOTIVATION & understood interactions which can TECHNOLOGY IN EXPERIMENTAL conventionally lead to an e and a PARTICLE PHYSICS gu in the final state. A possible ex- One of this year's Nobel Prize in physics planation for these events is the recipients describes the discovery production and decay of a pair of of the tau lepton in his 1975 new particles, each having a mass SLAC experiment.
    [Show full text]