DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard Wilson Ecology 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Peak District (East) Project Appendix 7H Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report October 2018 Rev04 Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Richard Wilson Clare Mcilwraith Clare Mcilwraith Lorraine King Approved Supplier Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist Regional Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by CM JR 1 December 2016 Final Draft RWE Ecology Principal Ecologist Associate 2 January 2017 Updated following CM CM client comments RWE Ecology Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist 3 September 2018 Minor revisions re RWE Ecology CM LK desk study Principal Ecologist Regional Director 4 October 2018 Minor amendments LS LK LK Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name AECOM i Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Prepared for: National Grid Prepared by: AECOM Limited 5th Floor, 2 City Walk Leeds LS11 9AR United Kingdom T: +44 (0)113 391 6800 aecom.com © AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of National Grid (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report take into account information provided by the Client about the Proposed Project and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methods adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken in June-August 2016 and June-August 2018, and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during those periods. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factual and therefore be subject to minor limitations as detailed in Section 1.3, Appendix A. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to the attention of AECOM after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. AECOM specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Where field investigations are carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to meet the stated objectives of the services. The results of any measurements taken may vary spatially or with time and further confirmatory measurements should be made after any significant delay in issuing this Report. AECOM ii Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Glow Worm Survey Update 2 Appendix A: Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report - Prepared by Richard Wilson Ecology 3 AECOM iii Visual Impact Provision (VIP) – Peak District (East) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report 1 Introduction 1.1 The Proposed Project AECOM was instructed by National Grid to conduct a terrestrial invertebrate survey (including a glow-worm survey) at Dunford Bridge, South Yorkshire (centred approximately on Ordnance Survey grid reference 416540 402440). The survey was undertaken as part of the Phase 2 protected species surveys for the Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Project, Peak District (East) Project, (hereafter referred to as the ‘Proposed Project’). The Proposed Project is described in detail in Chapter 2 of the Environmental Assessment Report. The survey focused on land within and immediately adjacent to Wogden Foot Local Wildlife Site (LWS). A dusk glow-worm survey was also undertaken along habitats located along the Trans Pennine Trail between Dunford Bridge car park and Wogden Foot LWS. The survey and subsequent reporting was undertaken by Richard Wilson Ecology, an AECOM approved supplier. The report prepared by Richard Wilson Ecology is provided as Appendix A. The purpose of this report is to provide baseline technical information only. Accordingly, the report outlines the methods and results of the work undertaken, and provides an evaluation of the relevant habitat, species or assemblage as defined by the objectives (Section 1.3). It does not seek to include recommendations, mitigation or impact assessment. These elements will be addressed in Chapter 7 of the Environmental Assessment Report. 1.2 Defining the Study and Survey Areas Within Appendix A the following terminology is used: · Ecological Study Area – the area which was subject to the collection of background information (desk based study) to supplement the findings of the field surveys, comprising the Survey Area plus a 2km radius. · Invertebrate Survey Area – described in Section 1.2 of Appendix A; this is the area which was identified as being of most potential interest to invertebrates during the Preliminary Environmental Appraisal (PEA) and was subject to the detailed terrestrial invertebrate survey (hereafter termed as the ‘Survey Area’). Other areas outside this Survey Area were scoped out from the more detailed terrestrial invertebrate surveys. 1.3 Survey Aim and Objectives The aim and objectives of the survey work and the subsequent report presented herein were to: Aim: · Collect baseline data on the terrestrial invertebrate assemblage located within the Survey Area. These baseline data will be used to determine the value of the Survey Area for terrestrial invertebrates in order to inform the Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) for the Proposed Project. Objectives: · Undertake a desk study exercise to collate relevant information pertaining to the distribution of protected or notable terrestrial invertebrates within the Ecological Study Area; · Conduct surveys to identify the species and assemblages present within Survey Area focusing on the area of most interest; Wogden Foot LWS to determine the value of the habitats for this species group; · Better understand the variation and botanical composition of the grassland communities present and their relative distribution; and · Determine an overall evaluation of the Survey Area for terrestrial invertebrate species and assemblages in order to take into consideration within the Proposed Project design and to take forward for assessment within the EcIA. AECOM 1 Visual Impact Provision (VIP) – Peak District (East) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report 2 Glow Worm Survey Update In addition to the glow-worm survey conducted by Richard Wilson Ecology in 2016 (as detailed in Appendix A), further updated surveys were conducted in 2018 following consultation with ecological stakeholders. The updated survey visits were conducted in June and July 2018 and comprised a walkover visual search following a transect encompassing the grassland and marginal scrub habitats within Wodgen Foot LWS at dusk for a period of approximately 2 hours. Furthermore the Trans Pennine Trail was walked between Wogden Foot LWS and Dunford Bridge and the grassland verges searched for any signs of displaying glow-worm; the glow-worm Survey Area is shown on Figure 7H.1 in Appendix A. No evidence of glow-worm was observed during the 2018 update surveys. Based upon the results of the 2016 and 2018 surveys combined it is concluded that glow-worm are likely to be absent from the area surveyed. As such the terrestrial invertebrate assemblage as detailed in Appendix A will be taken forward to the EcIA but glow- worm specifically can be scoped out from further assessment. AECOM 2 Visual Impact Provision (VIP) – Peak District (East) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Appendix A: Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report - Prepared by Richard Wilson Ecology AECOM 3 Richard Wilson Ecology Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Peak District (East) Project Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey, Wogden Foot Local Wildlife Site, nr. Dunford Bridge, South Yorkshire Richard Wilson Ecology (on behalf of National Grid) August 2018 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for AECOM Ltd’s information and use in relation to the proposed Visual Impact Provision (VIP), Peak District (East) Project. Richard Wilson Ecology assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/ or its contents. Document History JOB NUMBER: RWE00164 DOCUMENT REF: RW-CM-001-RWE0164-INV Amended by Final Version Revision Purpose Description Date Checked by Client Richard Wilson Issued Ecology 0.1 Draft for Client 10 October 2016 CM 1.0 Final Issue 31 October 2016 CM 31 October 2016 2.0 Final Issue 7 December 2016 7 December 2016 3.0 Updated Issue 31 August 2018 CM 31 August 2018 Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey, Wogden Foot LWS, South Yorkshire Table of Contents Chapter pages Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Survey Area 2 1.3 Limitations 3 2. Legislation 4 2.1 Relevant Legislation 4 3. Methodology 5 3.1 Desk Study 5 3.2 Field Survey 5 3.3 Evaluation Methodologies 5 3.4 Personnel 6 4. Results and Interpretation 7 4.1 Desk Study 7 4.2 Field Survey 8 4.3 Invertebrate Assemblage Analysis 9 4.4 Evaluation 10 5. References 12 Tables Table 1: Weather conditions for survey visits.
Recommended publications
  • Kétszárnyúak (Diptera)

    Kétszárnyúak (Diptera)

    Csoport: KÉTSZÁRNYÚAK Biodiverzitás-nap helyszíne, éve: CSERKÚT, 2013 Gyűjtő: TÓTH SÁNDOR, SOLTÉSZ ZOLTÁN, KÁLMÁN ZOLTÁN, SOÓS NÁNDOR, MAUCHART PÉTER Határozó: TÓTH SÁNDOR, SOLTÉSZ ZOLTÁN, MÓRA ARNOLD Család Latin név Magyar név Asilidae Antiphrisson trifarius (Loew, 1849) Asilidae Choerades marginata (Linnaeus, 1758) Asilidae Dioctria rufipes (De Geer, 1776) Bombyliidae Anthrax antrax (Schrank, 1781) fekete gyászlégy Bombyliidae Anthrax varius Fabricius, 1794 Bombyliidae Bombylius ater Scopoli, 1763 ezüstpettyes pöszörlégy Bombyliidae Bombylius cinerascens Mikan, 1796 Bombyliidae Bombylius discolor Mikan, 1790 feketefarú pöszörlégy Bombyliidae Bombylius fulvescens Wiedemann, 1820 Bombyliidae Bombylius major Linnaeus, 1758 szegélyes pöszörlégy Bombyliidae Bombylius medius Linnaeus, 1758 fehérfarú pöszörlégy Bombyliidae Bombylius pictus , Panzer, 1794 pettyesszárnyú pöszörlégy Bombyliidae Bombylius vulpinus Wiedemann, 1820 Bombyliidae Conophorus virescens (Fabricius, 1787) Bombyliidae Exoprosopa jacchus (Fabricius, 1805) tarkaszárnyú gyászlégy Bombyliidae Exyhalanthrax afer (Fabricius, 1794) Bombyliidae Hemipenthes morio (Linnaeus, 1758) közönséges gyászlégy Bombyliidae Hemipenthes velutinus (Meigen, 1820) Bombyliidae Lomatia sabaea (Fabricius, 1781) közönséges ördöglégy Bombyliidae Phthiria pulicaria (Mikan, 1796) Bombyliidae Villa circumdata (Meigen, 1820) Bombyliidae Villa hottentotta (Linnaeus, 1758) sárga borzaslégy Bombyliidae Villa humilis (Ruthe, 1831) Calliphoridae Lucilia caesar (Linnaeus, 1758) fémzöld döglégy Ceratopogonidae
  • Tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKY N I a RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11

    Tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKY N I a RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11

    tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY A JASKY N I A RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11 NATURAE 2007 1 O B S A H V E D E C K É Š T Ú D I E Jozef Šteffek – Patrícia Danková: Ekologické a ekosozologické vyhodnotenia tanatocenóz malakofauny z náplavov tokov Spišskej Magury ..................................................................... 5 Oto Majzlan: Chrobáky (Coleoptera) Šenkvického a Martinského lesa pri Senci .......... 27 Oto Majzlan: Letová aktivita nosáčikov (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) v NPR Bábsky Predseda redakčnej rady: les pri Nitre .................................................................................................................................... 43 doc. RNDr. Dana Šubová, CSc. Vladimír Straka – Oto Majzlan: Dvojkrídlovce (Diptera) troch lokalít v Chránenej krajinnej oblasti Strážovské vrchy .............................................................................................. 47 Michal Wiezik: Mravce (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) horských a vysokohorských biotopov južnej časti Kráľovohoľských Tatier ............................................................................................ 85 Redakčná rada: Jozef Školek: Sutinové spoločenstvá v NPR Mních ................................................................. 91 prof. RNDr. Peter Bitušík, CSc., RNDr. Miroslav Fulín, CSc., RNDr. Ľudovít Gaál, Stanislav Korenko: Pavúky (Arachnida, Araneae) východnej časti Kozích chrbtov .......... 103 prof. RNDr. Oto Majzlan, PhD., doc. RNDr. Ľubomír Panigaj, CSc., RNDr. Jozef Monika Hatinová – Kristina
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names

    Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names

    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
  • Ad Hoc Referees Committee for This Issue Thomas Dirnböck

    Ad Hoc Referees Committee for This Issue Thomas Dirnböck

    COMITATO DI REVISIONE PER QUESTO NUMERO – Ad hoc referees committee for this issue Thomas Dirnböck Umweltbundesamt GmbH Studien & Beratung II, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Wien, Austria Marco Kovac Slovenian Forestry Institute, Vecna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija Susanna Nocentini Università degli Studi di Firenze, DISTAF, Via S. Bonaventura 13, 50145 Firenze Ralf Ohlemueller Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK Sandro Pignatti Orto Botanico di Roma, Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, L.go Cristina di Svezia, 24, 00165 Roma Stergios Pirintsos Department of Biology, University of Crete, P.O.Box 2208, 71409 Heraklion, Greece Matthias Plattner Hintermann & Weber AG, Oeko-Logische Beratung Planung Forschung, Hauptstrasse 52, CH-4153 Reinach Basel Arne Pommerening School of Agricultural & Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, DU/ UK Roberto Scotti Università degli Studi di Sassari, DESA, Nuoro branch, Via C. Colombo 1, 08100 Nuoro Franz Starlinger Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt Wien, A 1131 Vienna, Austria Silvia Stofer Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft – WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland Norman Woodley Systematic Entomology Lab-USDA , c/o Smithsonian Institution NHB-168 , O Box 37012 Washington, DC 20013-7012 CURATORI DI QUESTO NUMERO – Editors Marco Ferretti, Bruno Petriccione, Gianfranco Fabbio, Filippo Bussotti EDITORE – Publisher C.R.A. - Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura Viale Santa Margherita, 80 – 52100 Arezzo Tel.. ++39 0575 353021; Fax. ++39 0575 353490; E-mail:[email protected] Volume 30, Supplemento 2 - 2006 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS C.R.A.A - ISTITUTO N SPERIMENTALE N A PER LA LSELVICOLTURA I (in alphabetic order) Allegrini, M. C.
  • Les Tachinidae De La Manche

    Les Tachinidae De La Manche

    Les Tachinidae de la Manche : début de l’enquête et première liste (Diptera Brachycera) La famille de mouches que nous allons aborder dans cet article offre le paradoxe d’être à la fois l’une des plus riches en espèces et l’une des plus mal connues des entomologistes. Discrètes, souvent de petite taille et peu colorées, elles passent facilement inaperçues. Totalement ignorées du profane, elles n’ont reçu aucun nom vernaculaire et c’est à peine si les guides de vulgarisation représentent quelques espèces, 6 par exemple dans CHINERY (1986) contre 22 syrphes, famille d’ampleur comparable, soit moins de 1% de la faune européenne ! Un guide spécialisé dans les diptères, J. & H. HAUPT (1998), dont l’éditeur suisse annonce sans vergogne en couverture « l’identification des espèces européennes », illustre 13 espèces, soit 1,5% de la faune d’Europe. Il est certain que l’ampleur de la tâche a pu rebuter les diptéristes de notre pays, d’autant plus qu’aujourd’hui encore aucun ouvrage complet de détermination n’est actuellement disponible en langue française. Et pourtant ces mouches ne manquent pas d’attrait ! De nombreuses espèces sont d’une taille respectable, sous la loupe beaucoup même offrent un aspect séduisant par leurs couleurs veloutées, leurs reflets pruineux, leur système organisé de poils et de soies, toutes surtout ont une biologie complexe, captivante et encore mal étudiée. Pour tout dire, cette enquête limitée à la Manche (voir L’Argiope No 67) s’annonce passionnante car la page est totalement vierge et le champ de recherche immense. Bien sûr, les obstacles sont tels que l’inventaire devra être abordé avec prudence.
  • Diptera) of the Czech Republic

    Diptera) of the Czech Republic

    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 March 2009 Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Republic Jaromir Vafihara*, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig, Benno Herting’r, Petr Mfickstein & Veronika Michalkova J P. & V. Vanhara, ., Tschorsnig, H.-P., Herting, B., Miickstein, Michalkova, 2009: Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Re- public. — Entomol. Fennica 20: 22—48. An annotated host catalogue is given for the Tachinidae ofthe Czech Republic. It comprises 149 of476 tachinid species which are currently known from this coun- try (included the two new records cited below). 195 hosts are listed. The first host records ofTachinidae date back to the second halfofthe 19th century. The bibli- ography for the host records consists of 1 16 papers of 55 researchers. Several re- cords of hitherto unpublished material are included. Phryxe setifacies and Anthomyiopsis plagioderae are first records for the Czech Republic. J. Vanhara (*corresponding author), Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] H.—P. Tschorsnig, Staatliches Museumflir Naturkunde, Rosenstein I, D— 70 191 Stuttgart, Germany, tschorsnig.smns@naturkundemuseum—bw.de P. Muckstein Administration of the Protected Landscape Area Zd’drske' vrchy, Brnenska 39, CZ—591 01 Zd’dr nad Sazavou, Czech Republic, muchstein @email.cz V. Michalkova, Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Received 22 August 200 7, accepted 21 January 2008 1. Introduction The tachinid species are listed in their actual valid nomenclature; probable misidentifications Tachinidae are a very large and important dipter- are — if possible — tentatively corrected, but the an family of (mainly) insect parasitoids.
  • Smådjur I Norrländska Nationalparker 7. Flugor I Björnlandet

    Smådjur I Norrländska Nationalparker 7. Flugor I Björnlandet

    Skörvnöpparn, Umeå Årgång 7(2015), häfte 1: 19-36 Smådjur i norrländska nationalparker 7. Flugor i Björnlandet ANDREAS GARPEBRING, SVEN HELLQVIST & NILS ERICSON I samband med en planerad utökning av Chloropidae, Ephydridae, Milichiidae, Björnlandets nationalpark genomfördes Muscidae, Phoridae och Sphaeroceridae. under 2014 en relativt omfattande Även i några andra familjer har vissa inventering av insekter, både i befintlig artgrupper eller individer av det ena könet nationalpark och i den planerade lämnats obestämda. utökningen. Området ligger i det sydöstra hörnet av Lappland, på gränsen mellan Resultat Åsele och Fredrika socknar i Åsele Sammanlagt artbestämdes över 5300 lappmark, bara ett par km norr om gränsen individer av 474 arter fördelade på 53 mot Ångermanland. Garpebring & familjer. Observationerna har rapporterats Hellqvist (2014) redogör för bakgrunden till in till Artportalen. De artrikaste familjerna den aktuella inventeringen och redovisar bland det artbestämda materialet utgjordes fynd av gaddsteklar. Här redovisas fynd av av blomflugor (Syrphidae) med 96 arter, flugor i det insamlade materialet. dansflugor (Empididae) med 40, Inventeringen utfördes huvudsakligen puckeldansflugor (Hybotidae) med 39, med hjälp av 39 olika fällor (färgskålar, kolvflugor (Scathophagidae) med 31 samt trädfönsterfällor och malaisefällor) på 28 styltflugor (Dolichopodidae) med 29 arter. olika platser i området, under perioden 6 Vad gäller de påträffade arternas ekologi är maj till 26 augusti. För närmare uppgifter det svårt att göra någon heltäckande om fällornas placering och miljö- genomgång av artlistan då många av beskrivningar hänvisas till Garpebring & arternas habitat- och födopreferenser är mer Hellqvist (2014). I samband med utsättning eller mindre okända. En snabb översikt och tömning av fällorna slaghåvades efter bland arter med kända levnadsmönster visar flugor, främst i anslutning till fällorna, men dock på en klar övervikt för arter med larver även på andra platser.
  • Cheshire Wildlife Trust

    Cheshire Wildlife Trust

    Cheshire Wildlife Trust Heteroptera and Diptera surveys on the Manchester Mosses with PANTHEON analysis by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] on behalf of Lancashire and Cheshire Wildlife Trusts Version 1.0 September 2018 Lancashire Wildlife Trust Page 1 of 35 Abstract This report describes the results of a series of surveys on the Manchester mosslands covering heteroptera (shield bugs, plant bugs and allies), craneflies, hoverflies, and a number of other fly families. Sites covered are the Holcroft Moss reserve of Cheshire Wildlife Trust and the Astley, Cadishead and Little Woolden Moss reserves of Lancashire Wildlife Trust. A full list is given of the 615 species recorded and their distribution across the four sites. This species list is interpreted in terms of feeding guilds and habitat assemblages using the PANTHEON software developed by Natural England. This shows a strong representation in the sample of species associated with shaded woodland floor and tall sward and scrub. The national assemblage of peatland species is somewhat less well represented, but includes a higher proportion of rare or scarce species. A comparison is also made with PANTHEON results for similar surveys across a similar range of habitats in the Delamere Forest. This suggests that the invertebrate diversity value of the Manchester Mosses is rather less, perhaps as a result of their fragmented geography and proximity to past and present sources of transport and industrial pollution. Introduction The Manchester Mosses comprise several areas of lowland bog or mire embedded in the flat countryside between Warrington and Manchester. They include several areas designated as SSSIs in view of the highly distinctive and nationally important habitat, such as Risley Moss, Holcroft Moss, Bedford Moss, and Astley Moss.
  • Lancs & Ches Muscidae & Fanniidae

    Lancs & Ches Muscidae & Fanniidae

    The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Muscoidea, Part I by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] Version 1.0 21 December 2020 Summary This report provides a new regional checklist for the Diptera families Muscidae and Fannidae. Together with the families Anthomyiidae and Scathophagidae these constitute the superfamily Muscoidea. Overall statistics on recording activity are given by decade and hectad. Checklists are presented for each of the three Watsonian vice-counties 58, 59, and 60 detailing for each species the number of occurrences and the year of earliest and most recent record. A combined checklist showing distribution by the three vice-counties is also included, covering a total of 241 species, amounting to 68% of the current British checklist. Biodiversity metrics have been used to compare the pre-1970 and post-1970 data both in terms of the overall number of species and significant declines or increases in individual species. The Appendix reviews the national and regional conservation status of species is also discussed. Introduction manageable group for this latest regional review. Fonseca (1968) still provides the main This report is the fifth in a series of reviews of the identification resource for the British Fanniidae, diptera records for Lancashire and Cheshire. but for the Muscidae most species are covered by Previous reviews have covered craneflies and the keys and species descriptions in Gregor et al winter gnats (Brighton, 2017a), soldierflies and (2002). There have been many taxonomic changes allies (Brighton, 2017b), the family Sepsidae in the Muscidae which have rendered many of the (Brighton, 2017c) and most recently that part of names used by Fonseca obsolete, and in some the superfamily Empidoidea formerly regarded as cases erroneous.
  • 3.15 Die Raupenfliegen Und Asselfliegen (Diptera

    3.15 Die Raupenfliegen Und Asselfliegen (Diptera

    3.15 Die Raupenfliegen und Asselfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae et Rhinophoridae) des Naturschutzgebietes „Ahrschleife bei Altenahr“ und angrenzender Bereiche (Rheinland-Pfalz) von HANS-PETER TSCHORSNIG Abstract Tachinidae and Rhinophoridae (Diptera, Brachycera) of the nature reserve “Ahrschleife bei Altenahr” and adjacent parts Data are given for 100 species of Tachinidae (1113 specimens) and for 4 species of Rhinophoridae (179 specimens) from the nature reserve “Ahrschleife bei Altenahr” (Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany). The material has been collected using Oliver traps and Malaise traps. Especially worth mentioning are the rare species Prosethilla kramerella, Phebellia pauciseta, Loewia nudigena and Ceromya flaviseta. Catagonia aberrans reaches the northern border of its distribution in Europe. Inhalt 3.15.1 Einleitung 374 3.15.2 Material und Methode 375 3.15.3 Ergebnisse 376 3.15.3.1 Artenliste 376 3.15.3.1.1 Tachinida 376 3.15.3.1.1.1 Subfamilie: Exoristina 376 3.15.3.1.1.2 Subfamilie: Tachininae 381 3.15.3.1.1.3 Subfamilie: Dexiinae 386 3.15.3.1.1.4 Subfamilie: Phasiinae 388 3.15.3.1.2 Rhinophoridae 390 3.15.4 Diskussion 391 3.15.5 Zusammenfassung 392 3.15.6 Literatur 392 Beiträge zur Landespflege Rheinland-Pfalz Landesamt für Umwelt Rheinland-Pfalz 373 3.15 HANS-PETER TSCHORSNIG: Raupenfliegen und Asselfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae et Rhinophoridae) 3.15.1 Einleitung Die Raupenfliegen (Tachinidae) sind die artenreichste Familie der Fliegen (Diptera, Brachycera). Allein in Deutschland sind zur Zeit 509 Arten dieser in ihrer biologischen Entwicklung sehr spezialisierten Vertreter der Fliegen nachgewiesen. Die meisten Tachinidae sind unscheinbar gefärbt und schwer zu bestimmen.
  • Stanković Et Al., 2019, Biologica Nyssana 10(1)

    Stanković Et Al., 2019, Biologica Nyssana 10(1)

    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3464010 10 (1) September 2019: 59-61 Contribution to the knowledge Short Communication of tachinid fauna in Serbia Saša S. Stanković University of Niš, Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia [email protected] (corresponding author) Marijana Ilić Milošević Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia [email protected] Abstract: Vladimir Žikić Tachinid flies were reared from several species of Lepidoptera larvae during Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of the year 2018. Eight species were recorded from two subfamilies, Exoristinae Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, and Tachininae. The species Ceromya bicolor is new for the Serbian fauna. Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia Also, for the same territory, the genus Ceromya is recorded for the first time. [email protected] Key words: Hans-Peter Tschorsnig Tachinidae, Ceromya bicolor, parasitoids, Serbia Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany Apstract: [email protected] Doprinos poznavanju faune muva guseničarki u Srbiji Muve guseničarke su odgajene iz nekoliko vrsta larvi Lepidoptera Received: August 5, 2019 tokom 2018. godine. Registrovano je osam vrsta iz dve podfamilije, Revised: September 7, 2019 Exoristinae i Tachininae. Vrsta Ceromya bicolor je nova za faunu Sr- Accepted: September 9, 2019 bije. Takođe, za istu teritoriju je prvi put registrovan rod Ceromya. Ključne reči: Tachinidae, Ceromya bicolor, parazitoidi, Srbija Tachinid flies are well known parasitoids of other for the territory of Serbia. For example, Hubenov arthropods. They parasitize almost exclusively in- (2008) reported 288 species for the Serbian fauna, sects, especially larval Lepidoptera, but very rarely Stanković et al.
  • Forensically Important Muscidae (Diptera) Associated with Decomposition of Carcasses and Corpses in the Czech Republic

    Forensically Important Muscidae (Diptera) Associated with Decomposition of Carcasses and Corpses in the Czech Republic

    MENDELNET 2016 FORENSICALLY IMPORTANT MUSCIDAE (DIPTERA) ASSOCIATED WITH DECOMPOSITION OF CARCASSES AND CORPSES IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC VANDA KLIMESOVA1, TEREZA OLEKSAKOVA1, MIROSLAV BARTAK1, HANA SULAKOVA2 1Department of Zoology and Fisheries Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS) Kamycka 129, 165 00 Prague 6 – Suchdol 2Institute of Criminalistics Prague (ICP) post. schr. 62/KUP, Strojnicka 27, 170 89 Prague 7 CZECH REPUBLIC [email protected] Abstract: In years 2011 to 2015, three field experiments were performed in the capital city of Prague to study decomposition and insect colonization of large cadavers in conditions of the Central Europe. Experiments in turns followed decomposition in outdoor environments with the beginning in spring, summer and winter. As the test objects a cadaver of domestic pig (Sus scrofa f. domestica Linnaeus, 1758) weighing 50 kg to 65 kg was used for each test. Our paper presents results of family Muscidae, which was collected during all three studies, with focusing on its using in forensic practice. Altogether 29,237 specimens of the muscids were collected, which belonged to 51 species. It was 16.6% (n = 307) of the total number of Muscidae family which are recorded in the Czech Republic. In all experiments the species Hydrotaea ignava (Harris, 1780) was dominant (spring = 75%, summer = 81%, winter = 41%), which is a typical representative of necrophagous fauna on animal cadavers and human corpses in outdoor habitats during second and/or third successional stages (active decay phase) in the Czech Republic. Key Words: Muscidae, Diptera, forensic entomology, pyramidal trap INTRODUCTION Forensic or criminalistic entomology is the science discipline focusing on specific groups of insect for forensic and law investigation needs (Eliášová and Šuláková 2012).