DOCSLIB.ORG

A PDF Version of the Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A PDF Version of the Text Ten Years Later On September 11, 2005, the last Israeli soldier ostensibly left the Gaza Strip. Israel’s policy ever since has condemned Gaza’s residents to a life full of uncertainty and peril, devoid of hope. It seems that many in Israel realize the mistakes that have been made. The situation can and must be rectified immediately. In mid-August 2005, Israel began has no obligation to allow travel to and from implementing its plan to disengage from Gaza through the border crossings it Gaza. Within less than a month, on controls, and its policy on movement has September 11, 2005, its last troops exited been based on the premise that travel, when the territory. The rhetoric that ensued was granted, is an exceptional act of charity that 38 years of occupation had come to an guided by narrow criteria. In March 2006, end, but in fact, Israel has maintained Israel stopped allowing laborers from Gaza control over the movement of both people to enter Israel via Erez Crossing. Just before and goods into and out of the Gaza Strip. It the Second Intifada broke out in 2000, more prohibits travel and trade by sea and air, and than 26,000 Palestinian laborers entered prevents passage between the two parts of Israel via Erez Crossing every day. the Palestinian territory. It also controls The blanket ban on travel between Gaza and access to areas of land inside the Strip and Israel has cut off thousands of Gaza fishing access in Gaza’s own territorial residents from their relatives and denied tens waters. In this way and others, Israel of thousands job opportunities and continues to impact almost every aspect of opportunities for personal and professional life of all of Gaza’s 1.8 million residents. development. Denying travel between Gaza On paper, in statements, and in action, Israel and the West Bank is an aspect of Israel’s acknowledges the duty to prevent a “separation policy”, which is designed to humanitarian disaster in Gaza, but it does separate the two parts of the Palestinian not regard itself as committed to doing territory. The result is not just a violation of anything above the minimum required to individual rights, but also an impediment to keep such a disaster at bay. Since Hamas economic, social and cultural development took over internal control in the Gaza Strip in the Palestinian territory as a whole, which in 2007, Israel has enforced a tight closure, are basic conditions for exercising the right including further restricting movement of to self-determination. people and goods. The closure has prevented Because of the severe restrictions imposed development and impacted innocent on travel of people between Gaza and Israel, civilians in Gaza, and beyond that, by travel from Gaza to third countries takes unraveling Gaza’s economy, has stunted place mainly through Rafah Crossing, which growth in the Palestinian territory as a is controlled by Egypt. However, since the whole. regime change in Egypt in 2013, passage Restrictions on movement of people through the crossing is severely restricted and the crossing itself remains mostly Since the implementation of the disengagement plan, Israel contends that it closed, thus further exacerbating Gaza’s abroad, and most of those as part of a isolation from the world. subsidized project rather than reflecting actual economic activity. In November Restrictions on movement of goods 2014, after Operation Protective Edge and Currently, all commercial transit of goods the destruction it left in its wake, Israel takes place via Kerem Shalom Crossing, began allowing certain products from Gaza which is controlled by Israel. Egypt does not to be sold in the West Bank and in March allow cross border commerce via the 2015 began allowing limited sale of Egyptian-controlled Rafah crossing.The tomatoes and eggplants in Israel. The closure of the Sufa and Nahal Oz crossings permission to sell these specific items in (in 2007 and 2010 respectively) and the Israel came as a special measure for closure of Karni (in 2007 and its conveyer “shmita”, a year during which, according to belt in 2011) thus left Kerem Shalom as Jewish custom, farmland cultivated by Gaza’s sole commercial crossing. Jewish farmers is left to lay fallow. Given ongoing restrictions and quotas on exit of Israel’s policy on entrance of goods to Gaza goods, as well as the complex requirements has undergone several changes over the last and thus costs involved in transporting decade. In the years following Hamas’ rise goods, sales remain limited and have to power in Gaza, between 2007-2010, Israel provided only a small measure of financial restricted entrance of goods to Gaza to a list benefit to few people. of several dozen types of items. After the flotilla incident of May 2010 and the public Restrictions on movement within Gaza criticism that followed, the policy changed, and its territorial waters and since July 2010, civilian goods are Israel also restricts freedom of movement permitted to enter Gaza, with the exception within Gaza. Military forces and of items defined as “dual-use”, on the claim installations deployed on the Israeli side of that they can be used for military purposes the border fence make use of live fire, often as well. The list contains patently civilian with deadly results, to enforce a prohibition goods, which are critical for Gaza’s on entry into an area designated by Israel as reconstruction, infrastructure, and industry, a buffer zone. This is a strip of land including basic construction materials stretching 300 meters into Gaza’s territory, (cement, gravel and steel). Recognizing the all along its border with Israel. Farmers are need to repair the massive damage caused ostensibly permitted to work lands up to a during Operation Protective Edge, a distance of 100 meters from the fence, but mechanism was set up to allow controlled it’s unclear how the army determines who is entry of construction materials, however, the and is not a farmer. The fact that the military pace at which construction materials have presumes to distinguish between farmers entered Gaza under this mechanism meets and non-farmers without using any sort of just a fraction of the demand. coordination mechanism puts lives at risk For seven years, Israel imposed a blanket and effectively prevents farming, harming ban on the sale of Gaza-made and -grown landowners’ livelihoods and reducing goods in Israel and the West Bank, which Gaza’s overall agricultural output. were traditionally Gaza’s most important Israel allows fishing in Gaza’s territorial markets. During these years, the volume of waters up to a distance of six nautical miles goods shipped out of Gaza was miniscule, off the coast, and has occasionally restricted with just a few trucks every month going the distance to three nautical miles only. commercial access. As a consequence, Gaza These restrictions are also often enforced developed a dependence on access to with live fire. In addition to putting lives in employment and markets in Israel and a danger, the restrictions have significantly reliance on Israel for maintaining civilian impacted livelihoods and reduced fishing infrastructure, including for its purchase of output in Gaza. fuel, electricity and water. Gaza and the West Bank, which continue to share a single A decade of mistakes economy, a single education system, a single In the decade that has passed since the healthcare system and countless familial, implementation of the disengagement plan, cultural and social ties, are also reliant on violence has spiraled in three major Israel to allow passage between the two escalations. The years of closure have areas. weakened moderates in Gaza and have With the implementation of the clearly not improved the security of Israeli disengagement plan, Israeli authorities residents in surrounding communities. More propagated the position that Gaza is an than 70% of Gaza’s population receives independent entity, separate from both Israel humanitarian aid and about 57% suffer from and the West Bank and that Israel no longer food insecurity. Gaza’s unemployment rate bears any responsibilities toward its is over 40% - and is nearly 60% among residents. This position is categorically young people. Gaza’s economic stagnation false. is such that its current GDP is lower than it was twenty years ago. All this, in addition to Gaza’s dependence on Israel and Israel’s severe shortages in electricity and clean control over Gaza result in a duty on Israel’s drinking water and grave need for improved part to do whatever it can, subject to civilian infrastructure, hundreds of schools legitimate security considerations, to allow and tens of thousands of homes. Gaza’s residents to lead normal lives. A decade after the disengagement, the time has Israel does not bear sole responsibility for come to reverse the tragic mistakes that have this dire situation, but decisions it made in been made, including first and foremost, the years before and after the disengagement ongoing, unacceptable and unnecessary have played a key role in producing and restrictions on movement. Instead, Israel maintaining it. Prior to the disengagement, should adopt a strategy based on generating Israel failed to invest in developing hope for the people of the region – infrastructure in Gaza, destroyed its seaport Palestinians and Israelis alike. and airport, and has prevented independent Gaza Fact Check: 10 myths for 10 years of disengagement Ten years ago, Israel removed its settlements and military installations from inside the Gaza Strip; a move that remains controversial in Israel to this day and continues to shape the lives of millions of people. The “Disengagement Plan”, as it was called, was the most dramatic step in Israel’s policy toward the Gaza Strip in the last few decades, and as such, gave rise to more than a few myths and misconceptions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf | 459.71 Kb
    מרכז המידע הישראלי לזכויות האדם בשטחים (ע.ר.) One Big Prison Freedom of Movement to and from the Gaza Strip on the Eve of the Disengagement Plan March 2005 Researched and written by Yehezkel Lein Data coordination by Najib Abu Rokaya, Ariana Baruch, Rim ‘Odeh, Shlomi Swissa Fieldwork by Musa Abu Hashhash, Iyad Haddad, Zaki Kahil, Karim Jubran, Mazen al-Majdalawi, ‘Abd al-Karim S’adi Assistance on legal issues by Yossi Wolfson Translated by Zvi Shulman, Shaul Vardi Edited by Rachel Greenspahn Introduction “The only thing missing in Gaza is a morning line-up,” said Abu Majid, who spent ten years in Israeli prisons, to Israeli journalist Amira Hass in 1996.1 This sarcastic comment expressed the frustration of Gaza residents that results from Israel’s rigid policy of closure on the Gaza Strip following the signing of the Oslo Agreements. The gap between the metaphor of the Gaza Strip as a prison and the reality in which Gazans live has rapidly shrunk since the outbreak of the intifada in September 2000 and the imposition of even harsher restrictions on movement. The shrinking of this gap is the subject of this report. Israel’s current policy on access into and out of the Gaza Strip developed gradually during the 1990s. The main component is the “general closure” that was imposed in 1993 on the Occupied Territories and has remained in effect ever since. Every Palestinian wanting to enter Israel, including those wanting to travel between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, needs an individual permit. In 1995, about the time of the Israeli military’s redeployment in the Gaza Strip pursuant to the Oslo Agreements, Israel built a perimeter fence, encircling the Gaza Strip and separating it from Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza-Israel: the Legal and the Military View Transcript
    Gaza-Israel: The Legal and the Military View Transcript Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2015 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 07 October 2015 Gaza-Israel: The Legal and Military View Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice QC General Sir Nick Parker For long enough commentators have usually assumed the Israel - Palestine armed conflict might be lawful, even if individual incidents on both sides attracted condemnation. But is that assumption right? May the conflict lack legality altogether, on one side or both? Have there been war crimes committed by both sides as many suggest? The 2014 Israeli – Gaza conflict (that lasted some 52 days and that was called 'Operation Protective Edge' by the Israeli Defence Force) allows a way to explore some of the underlying issues of the overall conflict. General Sir Nick Parker explains how he advised Geoffrey Nice to approach the conflict's legality and reality from a military point of view. Geoffrey Nice explains what conclusions he then reached. Were war crimes committed by either side? Introduction No human is on this earth as a volunteer; we are all created by an act of force, sometimes of violence just as the universe itself arrived by force. We do not leave the world voluntarily but often by the force of disease. As pressed men on earth we operate according to rules of nature – gravity, energy etc. – and the rules we make for ourselves but focus much attention on what to do when our rules are broken, less on how to save ourselves from ever breaking them. That thought certainly will feature in later lectures on prison and sex in this last year of my lectures as Gresham Professor of Law but is also central to this and the next lecture both on Israel and on parts of its continuing conflict with Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Jerusalem – New Military Order Limits West Bank Palestinian Access
    February 2006 Special Focus Humanitarian Reports Humanitarian Assistance in the oPt Humanitarian Events Monitoring Issues Special Focus: Access to Jerusalem – New Military Order Limits West Bank Palestinian Access As the Barrier nears completion around Jerusalem, recent Israeli The eight other crossings are less time-consuming - drivers and their military orders further restrict West Bank Palestinian pedestrian and passengers generally drive through a checkpoint encountering only vehicle access into Jerusalem.1 These orders integrate the Barrier random ID checks. crossing regime into the closure system and limit West Bank Palestinian traffic into Jerusalem to four Barrier crossings (see map Reduced access to religious sites: below): Qalandiya from the north, Gilo from the south2, Shu’fat camp The ability of the Muslim and Christian communities in the West from the east and Ras Abu Sbeitan (Olive) for pedestrian residents Bank to freely access holy sites in Jerusalem is an additional of Abu Dis, and Al ‘Eizariya.3 concern. With these orders, for example, all three major routes between Jerusalem and Bethlehem (Tunnel road, original Road 60 Currently, there are 12 routes and crossings to enter Jerusalem from (Gilo) and Ein Yalow) will be blocked for Palestinian use. the West Bank including the four in the Barrier (see detailed map Christian and Muslim residents of Bethlehem and the surrounding attached). The eight other routes and crossing points into Jerusalem, villages will in the future access Jerusalem through one barrier now closed to West Bank Palestinians, will remain open to residents crossing and only if a permit has been obtained from the Israeli Civil of Israel including those living in settlements, persons of Jewish Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians Weekly Report
    U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Report: T I O 21N MarchS – 27 March 2007 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians Weekly Report 21 March – 27 March 2007 Of note this week Five Palestinians, including three children, were killed and more than 35 injured when sand barriers of a wastewater collection pool collapsed flooding the nearby Bedouin Village and al Nasser area in the northern Gaza Strip with sewage water. Extensive property damage and destruction resulted and a temporary relief camp was sheltering approximately 1,450 people. West Bank: − The PA health sector strike continues for more than one month in the West Bank. Employees of the health sector staged a sit-in in front of Alia Governmental Hospital in Hebron to protest the government’s inability to pay employees’ salaries. In Bethlehem, all municipality workers went on a one-day strike to protest non-payment of their salaries over the past four months. − Clashes at Qalandiya checkpoint (Jerusalem) have occurred on a regular basis on Friday afternoons following the construction work by Israel at the Mughrabi gate in the Old City area. This week, Palestinians threw Molotov cocktails and stones at IDF soldiers who responded with live rounds injuring one Palestinian. Gaza Strip − 18 homemade rockets, three of which detonated in a Palestinian area, and a Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG) were fired at an IDF observation post east of Al Maghazi Camp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humanitarian Monitor CAP Occupied Palestinian Territory Number 3 July 2006
    The Humanitarian Monitor CAP occupied Palestinian territory Number 3 July 2006 The humanitarian situation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip deteriorated rapidly in 2006. This is the result of the fiscal crisis facing the Palestinian Authority (PA) following the election of the Hamas movement in the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) elections and increased Israeli security and access restrictions. The deteriorating situation led UN agencies and NGOs participating in the 2006 emergency Appeal to produce a monthly report to monitor changes according to key humanitarian indicators in the following sectors: health, child protection and psychosocial support, education, food security, agriculture, water and sanitation and job creation and cash assistance. This report uses a combination of measurable humanitarian indicators and verified field observations. These two data collection methods can provide different accounts of the situation. The humanitarian indicators reveal longer-term changes and trends from one month to another. Field observations show early signs of strain that may indicate future changes in the situation more generally. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel as the occupying power bears the responsibility for the welfare of the Palestinian population. In recent years, international donors and the PA have in practical terms taken on this role. The Government of Israel (GoI) is also under an obligation to transfer VAT taxes and customs duties that it collects on behalf of the PA under the Paris Protocol (1994) which amounts to roughly US$60 million per month or roughly 50% of PA revenues. The GoI has withheld these VAT and customs transfers since the PLC elections in January.
    [Show full text]
  • B'tselem and Hamoked Report: One Big Prison
    One Big Prison Freedom of Movement to and from the Gaza Strip on the Eve of the Disengagement Plan March 2005 One Big Prison Freedom of Movement to and from the Gaza Strip on the Eve of the Disengagement Plan March 2005 Researched and written by Yehezkel Lein Data coordination by Najib Abu Rokaya, Ariana Baruch, Reem ‘Odeh, Shlomi Swissa Fieldwork by Musa Abu Hashhash, Iyad Haddad, Zaki Kahil, Karim Jubran, Mazen al-Majdalawi, ‘Abd al-Karim S’adi Assistance on legal issues by Yossi Wolfson Translated by Zvi Shulman, Shaul Vardi Edited by Rachel Greenspahn Cover photo: Palestinians wait for relatives at Rafah Crossing (Muhammad Sallem, Reuters) ISSN 0793-520X B’TSELEM - The Israeli Center for Human Rights HaMoked: Center for the Defence of in the Occupied Territories was founded in 1989 by a the Individual, founded by Dr. Lotte group of lawyers, authors, academics, journalists, and Salzberger is an Israeli human rights Knesset members. B’Tselem documents human rights organization founded in 1988 against the abuses in the Occupied Territories and brings them to backdrop of the first intifada. HaMoked is the attention of policymakers and the general public. Its designed to guard the rights of Palestinians, data are based on independent fieldwork and research, residents of the Occupied Territories, official sources, the media, and data from Palestinian whose liberties are violated as a result of and Israeli human rights organizations. Israel's policies. Introduction “The only thing missing in Gaza is a morning Since the beginning of the occupation, line-up,” said Abu Majid, who spent ten Palestinians traveling from the Gaza Strip to years in Israeli prisons, to Israeli journalist Egypt through the Rafah crossing have needed Amira Hass in 1996.1 This sarcastic comment a permit from Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Return March": Demonstrations of April 27, 2018, and Continuation
    רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ה ש ל מ רמה כ ז מל ( ( ו למ תשר מ" מה ו ד י ע י ן ה ש ל מ ( ( למ מ" ¶ The “Great Return March": Demonstrations of April 27, 2018, and continuation to be expected April 29, 2018 Palestinians cutting the security fence near the Karni crossing (IDF Spokesperson’s Office, April 27, 2018) Incidents on Friday, April 27 Overview On Friday, April 27, 2018, the fifth Friday of the demonstrations of the "Great Return March," riots took place along the Gaza border with Israel. An estimated 10,000 Palestinians participated in the incidents in five focal points. The events of last Friday included many acts of violence, the most serious of which was an attempt to break through the fence and penetrate into Israel in the Karni crossing area. In view of the blatant attempt to violate Israel’s sovereignty, the IDF spokesperson announced a new policy of response, in which every violent activity would be met with violent activity against Hamas. As part of this policy, Israel Air Force aircraft attacked six targets of Hamas’s naval force. The acts of violence on the last Friday came into expression in several ways: throwing stones and rocks; throwing IEDs and hand grenades at IDF soldiers; flying kites over Israeli territory with burning objects attached to them (some of the kites caused fires in Israel and extensive damage); sabotaging the security fence along the border and the barbed wire close to it (including two incidents of setting fire to the fence, pulling the fence and attempts to cut it).
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians Weekly Report
    U N I T E D N A T I O N S N A T I O N S U N I E S OCHA Weekly Report: 4 – 10 July 2007 | 1 OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians Weekly Report 4 – 10 July 2007 Of note this week Gaza Strip: • The IDF killed 11 Palestinians, injured 15, and arrested 70 during its incursion into the area southeast of Al Bureij Camp (Central Gaza). In addition, three Palestinians were injured, including a 15-year-old boy, during IDF military operations southeast of Beit Hanoun. • A total of 23 Qassam rockets and 33 mortar shells were fired from Gaza towards Israel, of which at least four rockets and 29 mortar shells targeted Kerem Shalom crossing. Five rockets landed in the Palestinian area. Hamas and Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility. No injuries were reported. • The Palestinian Ministry of Health confirmed that it has returned at least 25 corpses to Gaza via Kerem Shalom since the closure of Rafah until 5 July. In all cases, the persons had passed away in Egyptian or other overseas hospitals and not at the border. • Senior Palestinian traders were able to cross Erez crossing this week for the first time since 12 June. Humanitarian assistance continues to enter Gaza through Kerem Shalom and Sufa. Critical medical cases with special coordination arrangements exited through Erez. Karni was open on two days for the crossing of wheat and wheat grain.
    [Show full text]
  • Advance Edited Version
    A ADVANCE EDITED Distr. VERSION GENERAL A/HRC/4/17 29 January 2007 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Fourth session Item 2 of the provisional agenda IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 60/251 OF 15 MARCH 2006 ENTITLED “HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL” Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, John Dugard* * The report was submitted after the deadline so as to include the most recent developments. A/HRC/4/17 page 2 Summary Gaza has again been the focus of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). In response to the capture of Corporal Gilad Shalit by Palestinian militants on 25 June 2006, and the continued firing of Qassam rockets into Israel, Israel conducted two major military operations within Gaza - “Operation Summer Rains” and “Operation Autumn Clouds”. In the course of these operations, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) made repeated military incursions into Gaza, accompanied by heavy artillery shelling and air-to-surface missile attacks. Missiles, shells and bulldozers destroyed or damaged homes, schools, hospitals, mosques, public buildings, bridges, water pipelines and electricity networks. Agricultural lands were levelled by bulldozers. Beit Hanoun was the subject of particularly heavy attacks, and on 8 November 19 civilians were killed and 55 wounded in an artillery attack. Economic sanctions have had a major impact on Gaza. About 70 per cent of Gaza’s workforce is out of work or without pay and over 80 per cent of the population live below the official poverty line. The siege of Gaza is a form of collective punishment in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Gaza War Assessment: the New Face of Conflict
    2014 Gaza War Assessment: The New Face of Conflict A report by the JINSA-commissioned Gaza Conflict Task Force March 2015 — Task Force Members, Advisors, and JINSA Staff — Task Force Members* General Charles Wald, USAF (ret.), Task Force Chair Former Deputy Commander of United States European Command Lieutenant General William B. Caldwell IV, USA (ret.) Former Commander, U.S. Army North Lieutenant General Richard Natonski, USMC (ret.) Former Commander of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Command Major General Rick Devereaux, USAF (ret.) Former Director of Operational Planning, Policy, and Strategy - Headquarters Air Force Major General Mike Jones, USA (ret.) Former Chief of Staff, U.S. Central Command * Previous organizational affiliation shown for identification purposes only; no endorsement by the organization implied. Advisors Professor Eliot Cohen Professor of Strategic Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Lieutenant Colonel Geoffrey Corn, USA (ret.) Presidential Research Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law, Houston JINSA Staff Dr. Michael Makovsky Chief Executive Officer Dr. Benjamin Runkle Director of Programs Jonathan Ruhe Associate Director, Gemunder Center for Defense and Strategy Maayan Roitfarb Programs Associate Ashton Kunkle Gemunder Center Research Assistant . — Table of Contents — 2014 GAZA WAR ASSESSMENT: Executive Summary I. Introduction 7 II. Overview of 2014 Gaza War 8 A. Background B. Causes of Conflict C. Strategies and Concepts of Operations D. Summary of Events
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 3 October 2001 English Original: English/French
    United Nations A/56/428 General Assembly Distr.: General 3 October 2001 English Original: English/French Fifty-sixth session Agenda item 88 Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Note by the Secretary-General* The General Assembly, at its fifty-fifth session, adopted resolution 55/130 on the work of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, in which, among other matters, it requested the Special Committee: (a) Pending complete termination of the Israeli occupation, to continue to investigate Israeli policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, especially Israeli lack of compliance with the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, and to consult, as appropriate, with the International Committee of the Red Cross according to its regulations in order to ensure that the welfare and human rights of the peoples of the occupied territories are safeguarded and to report to the Secretary- General as soon as possible and whenever the need arises thereafter; (b) To submit regularly to the Secretary-General periodic reports on the current situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Jerusalem; (c) To continue to investigate the treatment of prisoners in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Monitoring Report to the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee
    Economic Monitoring Report Public Disclosure Authorized to the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee March 19, 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized www.worldbank.org/ps 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter I: Recent Developments .................................................................................................................. 9 A. Economic Growth ................................................................................................................................ 9 B. Public Finance .................................................................................................................................... 11 The PA’s Fiscal Performance in 2017 ................................................................................................ 11 The 2018 Budget ................................................................................................................................. 12 C. Money and Banking ........................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter II: Gaza’s Evolution Over the Last Two Decades ......................................................................... 18 The Gaza Economy: From One Crisis to The Next ................................................................................ 18 The Humanitarian
    [Show full text]