Modeling of Subduction Components in the Genesis of the Meso-Cenozoic Igneous Rocks from the South Shetland Arc, Antarctica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modeling of Subduction Components in the Genesis of the Meso-Cenozoic Igneous Rocks from the South Shetland Arc, Antarctica Modeling of subduction components in the Genesis of the Meso-Cenozoic igneous rocks from the South Shetland Arc, Antarctica Adriane Machadoa,T, Farid Chemale Jr.a, Rommulo V. Conceic¸a˜oa, Koji Kawaskitaa, Diego Moratab, Orlando Oteı´zab, William R. Van Schmusc aFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Institute of Geosciences, Isotope Geology Laboratory, Av. Bento Gonc¸alves, 9500, Campus do Vale, Agronomia, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil bDepartment of Geology, University of Chile, Casilla 13518, Correo 21, Santiago, Chile cDepartment of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA Abstract Isotope data and trace elements concentrations are presented for volcanic and plutonic rocks from the Livingston, Greenwich, Robert, King George and Ardley islands (South Shetland arc, Antarctica). These islands were formed during 87 86 subduction of the Phoenix Plate under the Antarctica Plate from Cretaceous to Tertiary. Isotopically ( Sr/ Sr)o ratios vary from 143 144 0.7033 to 0.7046 and ( Nd/ Nd)o ratios from 0.5127 to 0.5129. qNd values vary from +2.71 to +7.30 that indicate asthenospheric mantle source for the analysed samples. 208Pb/204Pb ratios vary from 38.12 to 38.70, 207Pb/204Pb ratios are between 15.49 and 15.68, and 206Pb/204Pb from 18.28 to 18.81. The South Shetland rocks are thought to be derived from a depleted MORB mantle source (DMM) modified by mixtures of two enriched mantle components such as slab-derived melts and/or fluids and small fractions of oceanic sediment (EM I and EM II). The isotopic compositions of the subduction component can be explained by mixing between at least 4 wt.% of sediment and 96 wt.% of melts and/or fluids derived from altered MORB. Keywords: Subduction; Fluids; Island arc magmas; Pb isotopes; Nd isotopes; Sr isotopes 1. Introduction T Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 51 33166398; fax: +55 51 Island arcs are central to the understanding of 33166340. mantle evolution because they represent the site where E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Machado). crustal material of various types may be returned to 436 A. Machado et al. / Lithos 82 (2005) 435–453 the deep mantle. Island-arc magmatism may allow us typical island arc rocks, which constitute the bulk to sample this material that is in the process of being of the worldwide database for subduction-related recycled. compositions. White and Dupre (1986) and Ellam and Hawkes- In this paper, Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic ratios, worth (1988) proposed three component-mixing together with trace element compositions are pre- models for the island arcs mantle evolution. These sented from samples of the South Shetland Islands. involve contamination of the depleted-mantle source We use these data to discuss the South Shetland Arc of IAB with partial melts of subducted sediment and mantle source and processes of magma genesis. The large-ion lithophile element-enriched slab-derived studied samples were collected at western Livingston fluids. Evidence for such a process is seen when Island (Byers Peninsula, Fig. 2), southeastern Green- abundances of low-field-strength large-ion lithophile wich Island (Fort Point, Fig. 3), western Robert elements (LILE), such as Cs, Rb, Ba, Sr, are Island (Coppermine Peninsula, Fig. 4), southwestern normalized against high-field-strength elements King George Island (Fildes Peninsula, Fig. 5) and (HFSE), such as Nb, Zr, Hf, Y. This argument is northeastern Ardley Island (Fig. 5). The ages from based on the ratios of mobile and immobile the South Shetland samples vary from 143 Ma to 44 elements in aqueous fluids, ratios of LILE, HFSE Ma. (Grikurov et al., 1970; Gracanin, 1983; Smellie and light rare earth elements (Ishikawa and Naka- et al., 1984; Hathway, 1997; Oteiza, 1999; Pankhurst mura, 1994; Ryan et al., 1995; Scambelluri and et al., 2000). Philippot, 2001). The South Shetland Islands arc (Fig. 1) provides an opportunity to compare and contrast 2. Geological setting the effects of fluids and sediment involvement in a subduction zone. The rocks from the South Shet- The continent of Antarctica is divided into two land Islands are apparently uncontaminated by large geologic areas: East and West Antarctica. East intra-crustal components and they should have Antarctica is the large bean-shaped land mass centered largely evolved through simple fractional crystal- on 908 east longitude. West Antarctica is the area lization from a primitive island arc basalt precur- centered on 908 west longitude and includes the sor. These samples are similar in most aspects to Antarctica Peninsula. ° ° 62 W 58°W Elephant 54 W ° South 61 S Am. South N Shetland Islands Clarence Gibbs 90° Antarctica Drake Sea King George 0 2400 km 180° Nelson Robert Greenwich Snow Livingston rait Deception St Smith ld D'Urville fie ns Antarctica ra 64°S Low B Peninsula Joinville 0 100 km Dundee Fig. 1. Location map of the South Shetland Islands (modified from Machado, 1997). A. Machado et al. / Lithos 82 (2005) 435–453 437 61°S 60°W N N Drake Sea Greenwich Snow Livingston Smith Deception Low 64° W 0 10 km Start Point Byers Peninsula 128 ± 3 Ma (K-Ar - Pankhurst et al., 1979) ± 123 4 Ma Villard Point 109 ± 4 Ma (K-Ar - Pankhurst et al., 1979) (K-Ar - Pankhurst et al., 1979) 143 ± 5 Ma (Ar-Ar - Gracanin, 1983) 98012301 98012202 Chester Cone Negro Hill 98012002 President Beaches 98012501 78 ± 5 Ma (K-Ar - Oteíza, 1999) 98011501 Devils 111 ± 4 Ma Point (Rb-Sr - Smellie, 1984) 120.3 ± 2.2 Ma 119.4 ± 0.6 Ma 119.1 ± 0.8 Ma Legend (Ar-Ar - Hathway, 1987) Byers Formation Hypabyssal intrusions Agglomerates Agglomerate Member Clastic rocks Agglomerates Volcanic Member Lavas Clastic rocks Mixed marine Agglomerates Member Lavas Mainly mudstones and siltstones Mudstones Member 0 2 km Fault Sample Fig. 2. Sketch of the geological map of Byers Peninsula (Livingston Island) showing sample locations and age of the studied rocks (modified from Smellie et al., 1984). 438 A. Machado et al. / Lithos 82 (2005) 435–453 N Fort Point HA-19.1 N HA-20 Robert Drake Sea English Strait Duff Point Discovery Bay PA-8.1A Greenwi 62°30'S ch HY-4 Yankee HA-8.2A HA-1.1 Mc. FarlaneBay Strait 0 3km ° Livingston 59 45' W Outcrops Samples 0 500m Fig. 3. Sketch of the geological map of Fort Point (Greenwich Island) showing sample locations of the rocks (modified from Azevedo, 1992). East Antarctica is a large Precambrian shield; a likewise these mountains, is made of igneous stable portion of a continent composed of old rocks intrusive and volcanic as well as metamorphosed that have changed very little over a long time. The sedimentary rocks. oldest rocks found in this area are over 3 billion years The Antarctica Peninsula is bordered by a complex old. These are metamorphic rocks overlaid by system of tectonic plates, including the South Amer- younger, flat-lying ocean-deposited sediment. The ica, Scotia, Drake/Phoenix, South Orkney and Sand- rocks were recrystallized during a mountain building wich plates, which are dominated by extensional and episode caused by plate collision, in the early strike-slip tectonic limits (Fig. 6). This configuration Paleozoic Era (about 500 Ma). was formed only in the last 38 Ma with the opening of West Antarctica was built up over the last 500 Drake Passage and Scotia Sea (Barker and Burrell, million years by the addition of small continental 1977; Barker et al., 1991). Before 38 Ma the fragments (microplates) that have built up the relationships between the major plates were marked mountains of West Antarctica. Unlike East Antarctica, by destructive plate interaction generating Mesozoic– if the ice were removed in the west, the land would Cenozoic accretionary wedges, island arcs and back- have considerable relief. The area would probably arc basins recorded at the South Shetland Islands, appear as a series of island chains and mountain Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia (Dalziel, 1984; ranges. Lawver et al., 1996). The Antarctica Peninsula and the rest of West The tectonic context of the South America-Scotia- Antarctica were the most recent additions. The Antarctic plate junction has been related to a complex Andean Orogeny of late Mesozoic and early evolution from Paleozoic–Mesozoic to the present. Cenozoic (about 60–80 million years ago) formed This evolution is marked by several tectonic episodes the peninsula. This activity coincided with the final from 250 Ma to 20 Ma, such as the Paleozoic– breakup of Gondwana as South America, Australia, Mesozoic Samfrau Orogeny, early processes of and Antarctica split apart. The peninsula is an Gondwana fragmentation, Gondwana break-up, Phoe- extension of the Andes of South America, and nix plate subduction, arc volcanism in the South A. Machado et al. / Lithos 82 (2005) 435–453 439 N Robert Drake Sea English Strait N Greenwich 62°30' S M c. Farlane Strait 0 3km 59°45' W Livingston 60 ± 1 Ma (K-Ar Smellie et al., 1984) Fort Willian 96020701 Coppermine Peninsula 42°22' S English Strait 96022302 83 ± 2 Ma 78 ± 2 Ma (K-Ar Smellie et al., 1984) Coppermine Cove Legend Coppermine Formation Tuffs, volcanic brecchas and agglomerates Olivine-basalt lavas Basaltic intrusions Ice and Snow 96022001 Samples Fault Triplet 96022005 59°44' W 0 1km Fig. 4. Sketch of the geological map of Coppermine Peninsula (Robert Island) showing sample locations and age of rocks (modified from Smellie et al., 1984). Shetland Islands, and extensional tectonism in the lands to South Sandwich Arc where four phases of Antarctica Peninsula. island arc volcanism have been identified: 130–110 The collision of a spreading centre at the Antarctica Ma; 90–70 Ma; 60–40 Ma; 30–20 Ma (Birkenmajer et Peninsula trench caused the migration of magmatism al., 1986).
Recommended publications
  • Crossing the Circle
    ANTARCTIC 2021.22 CROSSING THE CIRCLE Southern Expedition Contents 1 Overview 2 Itinerary 5 Arrival and Departure Details 7 Your Ship Options 10 Included Activities 11 Adventure Options 12 Dates and Rates 13 Inclusions and Exclusions 14 Your Expedition Team 15 Extend Your Trip 16 Meals on Board 17 Possible Excursions 21 Packing Checklist Overview Crossing the Circle: Southern Expedition Antarctica offers so many extraordinary things to see and do, and traveling with Quark Expeditions® offers multiple options to personalize your experience. We’ve designed this guide to help you identify what interests you most, so that you can start planning your version of the perfect expedition to the 7th Continent. With a more in-depth exploration of the Antarctic Peninsula, our Crossing the Circle: Southern Expedition voyage gives you the chance to venture beyond the EXPEDITION IN BRIEF Antarctic Circle, a milestone few have reached. Including an in-depth exploration of Be one of the few travelers the penguin colonies, glaciers, bays and historical sites of the Peninsula, you’ll also to venture to 66°33'S navigate beyond 66⁰33´ South. Encounter even more wildlife and experience the Visit Antarctic research awe of splendid isolation. You can personalize your adventure with options that suit stations your interests, and cross the 7th Continent off your list—your way. Witness abundant Antarctic wildlife, including penguins, Antarctica has been inspiring explorers for centuries and our expeditions offer the seals and whales chance for you to discover why. We’re excited to host you on your unforgettable Experience western Antarctic Peninsula highlights and visit adventure! Feel free to reach out to our team of Polar Travel Advisers who can iconic landing sites answer your questions and provide assistance at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrientos Island (Aitcho Islands) ANTARCTIC TREATY King George Is
    Barrientos Island (Aitcho Islands) ANTARCTIC TREATY King George Is. Barrientos Island visitor site guide Ferraz Station Turret Point (Aitcho Islands) Admiralty Bay Elephant Is. Maxwell Bay Penguin Island 62˚24’S, 59˚47’W - North entrance to English Strait Marsh/frei Stations Great Wall Station between Robert and Greenwich Islands. Bellingshausen Station Arctowski Station Artigas Station Jubany Station King Sejong Station Potter Cove Key features AITCHO Nelson Is. ISLANDRobert Is. - Gentoo and Chinstrap Penguins S Mitchell Cove - Southern Elephant Seals Greenwich Is. Robert Point - Geological features Fort Point Half Moon Is. Yankee Harbour - Southern Giant Petrels Livingston Is. - Vegetation Hannah Point Bransfield Strait Snow Is. Telefon Bay Pendulum Cove Gourdin Is. Deception Is. Baily Head Description Vapour Col Cape Whaler's Bay Dubouzet B. O'higgins Station TOPOGRAPHY This 1.5km island’s north coast is dominated by steep cliffs, reaching a height of approximatelyAstr 70olabe Cape Hope metres, with a gentle slope down to the south coast. The eastern and western ends of the island Island are Legoupil Bay black sand and cobbled beaches. Columnar basalt outcrops are a notable feature of the western end. a insul FAUNA Confirmed breeders: Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua), chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica), Pen inity southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus), kelp gull (LarusNorthwest dominicanus (Nw)), and skuas (Catharacta spp.). Tr Suspected breeders: Blue-eyed shag (Phalacrocorax atricepsSubar) andea Wilson’s storm-petrel (OceanitesBone Bay Tower Is. oceanicus). Regularly haul out: Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii), southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina), and from late December, Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus Trgazellainity Is. ). Charcot Bay FLORA The entire centre of the island is covered by a very extensive moss carpet.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Treaty Handbook
    Annex Proposed Renumbering of Antarctic Protected Areas Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted ‘Taylor Rookery 1 101 1992 Rookery Islands 2 102 1992 Ardery Island and Odbert Island 3 103 1992 Sabrina Island 4 104 Beaufort Island 5 105 Cape Crozier [redesignated as SSSI no.4] - - Cape Hallet 7 106 Dion Islands 8 107 Green Island 9 108 Byers Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no. 6] - - Cape Shireff [redesignated as SSSI no. 32] - - Fildes Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no.5] - - Moe Island 13 109 1995 Lynch Island 14 110 Southern Powell Island 15 111 1995 Coppermine Peninsula 16 112 Litchfield Island 17 113 North Coronation Island 18 114 Lagotellerie Island 19 115 New College Valley 20 116 1992 Avian Island (was SSSI no. 30) 21 117 ‘Cryptogram Ridge’ 22 118 Forlidas and Davis Valley Ponds 23 119 Pointe-Geologic Archipelago 24 120 1995 Cape Royds 1 121 Arrival Heights 2 122 Barwick Valley 3 123 Cape Crozier (was SPA no. 6) 4 124 Fildes Peninsula (was SPA no. 12) 5 125 Byers Peninsula (was SPA no. 10) 6 126 Haswell Island 7 127 Western Shore of Admiralty Bay 8 128 Rothera Point 9 129 Caughley Beach 10 116 1995 ‘Tramway Ridge’ 11 130 Canada Glacier 12 131 Potter Peninsula 13 132 Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted Harmony Point 14 133 Cierva Point 15 134 North-east Bailey Peninsula 16 135 Clark Peninsula 17 136 North-west White Island 18 137 Linnaeus Terrace 19 138 Biscoe Point 20 139 Parts of Deception Island 21 140 ‘Yukidori Valley’ 22 141 Svarthmaren 23 142 Summit of Mount Melbourne 24 118 ‘Marine Plain’ 25 143 Chile Bay 26 144 Port Foster 27 145 South Bay 28 146 Ablation Point 29 147 Avian Island [redesignated as SPA no.
    [Show full text]
  • Amlr Antarctic Marine
    6. Pinniped research at Cape Shirreff, Livingston Island, Antarctica, 2007/08; submitted by Michael E. Goebel, Birgitte I. McDonald, Scott Freeman, Russell G. Haner, Natalie B. Spear, and Stephanie N. Sexton. 6.1 Objectives: As upper trophic level predators, pinnipeds are a conspicuous component of the marine ecosystem around the South Shetland Islands. They respond to spatio-temporal changes in physical and biological oceanography and are directly dependent upon availability of krill (Euphausia superba) for maintenance, growth, and reproduction during the austral summer. Because of their current numbers and their pre-exploitation biomass in the Antarctic Peninsula region and Scotia Sea, Antarctic fur seals are recognized to be an important “krill-dependent” upper trophic level predator. The general objectives for U.S. AMLR pinniped research at Cape Shirreff (62o28'S, 60o46'W) are to monitor population demography and trends, reproductive success, and foraging ecology of pinnipeds throughout the summer months. The Antarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus gazella, is the most abundant pinniped at Cape Shirreff; our studies are focused to a large degree on the foraging ecology, diving behavior, foraging range, energetics, diet, and reproductive success of this species. The 2007/08 field season began with the arrival at Cape Shirreff of a five person field team via the R/V Laurence M. Gould on 7 November 2007. Research activities were initiated soon after and continued until closure of the camp on 8 March 2008. Our specific research objectives for the 2007/08 field season were to: A. Monitor Antarctic fur seal female attendance behavior (time at sea foraging and time ashore attending a pup); B.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Environmental Conditions of Antarctic Footpaths to Support Management Decisions
    Journal of Environmental Management 177 (2016) 320e330 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman Research article Assessing environmental conditions of Antarctic footpaths to support management decisions * Pablo Tejedo a, , Javier Benayas a, Daniela Cajiao b, Belen Albertos c, Francisco Lara d, Luis R. Pertierra a, Manuela Andres-Abell an e, Consuelo Wic e, Maria Jose Lucianez~ d, Natalia Enríquez d, Ana Justel f, Günther K. Reck b a Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES-28049 Madrid, Spain b Instituto de Ecología Aplicada ECOLAP-USFQ, Universidad de San Francisco de Quito, P.O. Box 1712841, Quito, Ecuador c Departamento de Botanica, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Vicente Andres Estelles s/n, ES-46100 Burjassot, Spain d Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES-28049 Madrid, Spain e Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología Agroforestal y Genetica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Espana~ s/n, ES-02071 Albacete, Spain f Departamento de Matematicas, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, C/ Francisco Tomas y Valiente 5, ES-28049 Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: Thousands of tourists visit certain Antarctic sites each year, generating a wide variety of environmental Received 18 September 2015 impacts. Scientific knowledge of human activities and their impacts can help in the effective design of Received in revised form management measures and impact mitigation. We present a case study from Barrientos Island in which a 6 April 2016 management measure was originally put in place with the goal of minimizing environmental impacts but Accepted 10 April 2016 resulted in new undesired impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • ANT 2014-2015 DBD with Maps 03-07-2013
    Day by Day Itinerary INTRODUCTION Antarctica Expedition Cruises 2014 / 2015 Antarctic Peninsula ‐ Falkland Islands ‐ South Georgia Atlantic Odyssey Itinerary All promoted itineraries are for general guidance only. Programs may vary depending on local ice and weather conditions and ad hoc decisions by the Expedition Leader to take advantage of opportunities to see wildlife. Flexibility is paramount for expedition cruises. Landings are always subJect to weather, local site availabilities and environmental regulations (IAATO). Official sailing plans and landing slots will be scheduled with IAATO approximately 5 months prior to the start of the season. The final sailing plan will be determined by the Expedition Leader on board. The implementation of the sailing plan is subject to the capability of the vessel and the discretion of the Master. Taking the exorbitant high fuel prices into account, it is agreed that Oceanwide Expeditions has the right to reduce the speed of the engines (including sailing on one engine) wherever possible, unless this affects the character of the intended voyage substantially and Jeopardizes the safety of the vessel, its crew, staff and passengers. Rubber Boots and Expedition Jackets Onboard Plancius & Ortelius all passengers are entitled to use a pair of sturdy rubber boots for free. Sizes need to be pre‐ ordered with our reservation departments at least 8 weeks prior to departure. A voucher will be sent with final travel documents approximately 4 weeks prior to departure. Laying claims on equipment items without pre‐order and voucher can not be accepted when boarding the vessel. Boots will need to be returned to the expedition team at the end of the voyage.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Research and Innovation in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.074849; this version posted May 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Biodiversity Research and Innovation in Antarctica and the 2 Southern Ocean 3 2020 4 Paul Oldham and Jasmine Kindness1 5 Abstract 6 This article examines biodiversity research and innovation in Antarctica and the Southern 7 Ocean based on a review of 150,401 scientific articles and 29,690 patent families for 8 Antarctic species. The paper exploits the growing availability of open access databases, 9 such as the Lens and Microsoft Academic Graph, along with taxonomic data from the Global 10 Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) to explore the scientific and patent literature for 11 the Antarctic at scale. The paper identifies the main contours of scientific research in 12 Antarctica before exploring commercially oriented biodiversity research and development 13 in the scientific literature and patent publications. The paper argues that biodiversity is not 14 a free good and must be paid for. Ways forward in debates on commercial research and 15 development in Antarctica can be found through increasing attention to the valuation of 16 ecosystem services, new approaches to natural capital accounting and payment for 17 ecosystem services that would bring the Antarctic, and the Antarctic Treaty System, into 18 the wider fold of work on the economics of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Trampling on Maritime Antarctica: Can Soil Ecosystems Be Effectively Protected Through Existing Codes of Conduct? Pablo Tejedo,1 Luis R
    RESEARCH/REVIEW ARTICLE Trampling on maritime Antarctica: can soil ecosystems be effectively protected through existing codes of conduct? Pablo Tejedo,1 Luis R. Pertierra,1 Javier Benayas,1 Peter Convey,2 Ana Justel3 & Antonio Quesada4 1 Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Auto´ noma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, Madrid, ES-28049, Spain 2 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK 3 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Auto´ noma de Madrid, C/ Francisco Toma´ s y Valiente 7, Madrid, ES-28049, Spain 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Auto´ noma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, Madrid, ES-28049, Spain Keywords Abstract Trampling impacts; environmental monitoring; low impact practices; soil Soil trampling is one of the most obvious direct negative human impacts resilience; soil penetration resistance; in Antarctica. Through a range of experiments and field studies based on collembolan abundance. quantitative physical (soil penetration resistance) and biological (collembolan abundance) indicators, we evaluate the current codes of conduct relating to Correspondence the protection of Antarctic soils from the consequences of pedestrian impacts. Pablo Tejedo, Department of Ecology, These guidelines include using, where available, established paths that cross Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Auto´ noma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, Madrid, ES-28049, vegetation-free soils. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is highly Spain. dependent on context. Limited intensity use*below 100 foot passes per year* E-mail: [email protected] produces small changes at the soil surface that can recover relatively rapidly, suggesting that the dispersal of activity across wider corridors may be the most appropriate option.
    [Show full text]
  • South Shetland Islands and the Antarctic Peninsula
    RCC PILOTAGE FOUNDATION www.rccpf.org.uk SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS PETE HILL ©RCC Pilotage Foundation 2004 AND THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA NOËL MARSHALL ©RCC Pilotage Foundation 2007 The RCC Pilotage Foundation is grateful to Pete Hill and Noël Marshall for describing their experiences during cruises to these waters. These separate accounts overlap in the Shetland Islands. This can best be seen in the Contents page of this interactive publication. Caution These notes have been prepared by the authors on the basis of the information they were able to obtain in the course of their indidual visits to the areas described. In particular, soundings shown reflect the route taken by the author and the absence of soundings does not indicate that depths are necessarily safe. The notes are in no way comprehensive and refer only to the conditions encountered at the time of the visits. Any plans are simply sketches and do not represent the results of a survey of the places referred to. They should be used with extreme caution. The RCC Pilotage Foundation and the authors have published these notes in the hope that they may be of some help to mariners but the safety of a vessel depends ultimately on the judgment of the skipper who should assess all information, published or unpublished. To the extent permitted by law, the RCC Pilotage Foundation and the authors do not accept liability for any loss and/or damage howsoever caused that may arise from reliance on information contained in these pages. CONTENTS To view the area in Google Maps, click pin PETE HILL
    [Show full text]
  • Leucistic Antarctic Fur Seal (Arctocephalus Gazella) at Robert Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica, with a Note on Colour Morph Nomenclature
    Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-016-2069-9 SHORT NOTE Leucistic Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) at Robert Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica, with a note on colour morph nomenclature Víctor Romero1 · Diego G. Tirira2,3 Received: 13 July 2016 / Revised: 11 December 2016 / Accepted: 19 December 2016 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Abstract Fur chromatic disorders, which include albi- Introduction nism, leucism and melanism, are rare in mammals. World- wide these atypical cases are naturally infrequent and Pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, and walruses) have relatively poorly reported in the literature, particularly in pinnipeds. conservative and uniform colour patterns compared to The knowledge available about colouration in mammals other groups of vertebrates and even other mammals. How- comes from studies in mice and other domestic mammals. ever, substantial intra- and interspecific variation in coat Generally this information is homologous to most mam- colour has been reported in this group (Perrin 2009). Coat mals. However, adaptive interpretation of atypical col- colour patterns in pinnipeds are generally understood as an ouration patterns in pinnipeds and its biological relevance adaptive expression related to evasion of predators, feeding, are uncertain. Hence, this report is indirect evidence of a sexual selection and thermoregulation (Caro et al. 2012). source of misunderstood genetic variability for this group Added to the range of natural colour variations are occur- of carnivores. Here, we present an opportunistic observa- rences of albinism, leucism or melanism (Acevedo et al. tion of leucism in an Antarctic Fur Seal, Arctocephalus 2009). These atypical conditions have a congenital origin gazella, from Peninsula Coppermine, in Robert Island, as a consequence of mutations affecting the generation, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 175/Friday, September 9, 2016
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2016 / Notices 62543 banding. The principal avian predators ASPA 132, Potter Peninsula, King Division of Polar Programs, National of the penguins (skuas, gulls, giant George Island, South Shetland Islands Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson petrels and sheathbills) are also ASPA 133, Harmony Point, Nelson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. monitored and, when possible, adults Island, South Shetland Island FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and chicks will be banded, weighed and ASPA 134, Cierva Point Offshore Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer, at measured for behavioral and Islands, Danco Coast, Antarctic the above address or ACApermits@ demographic studies. In addition, the Peninsula nsf.gov or (703) 292–7149. applicant may census, band and ASPA 139, Biscoe Point, Anvers Island SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The measure cape petrels and blue-eyed ASPA 140, Shores of Port Foster, National Science Foundation, as shags. The applicant may collect Deception Island, South Shetland directed by the Antarctic Conservation samples of penguin and skua blood from Islands Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541), as adults of each species. The number of ASPA 144, Chile Bay amended by the Antarctic Science, takes per annum of each avian species ASPA 145, Port Foster, Deception Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, will be as follows: chinstrap penguin, Island, South Shetland Islands ASPA 146, South Bay, Doumer Island, has developed regulations for the 3320; Adelie penguin, 2880; Gentoo Palmer Archipelago establishment of a permit system for penguin, 3020; brown skua, 600; south ASPA 148, Mount Flora, Hope Bay, various activities in Antarctica and polar skua, 600; giant petrel, 600; kelp Antarctic Peninsula designation of certain animals and gull, 100; blue-eyed shag, 150; snowy ASPA 149, Cape Shirreff, Livingston certain geographic areas a requiring sheathbill, 45; cape petrel, 200.
    [Show full text]