C Co Ha M Pl Row Oun Aza Itig Lan W W Nty Ard Gatio Wing on G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

C Co Ha M Pl Row Oun Aza Itig Lan W W Nty Ard Gatio Wing on G Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan Crow Wing County June 28 Hazard Mitigation 2011 Plan The Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation plan is intended to reduce the threat of natural, human induced and technological hazards through the assessment of these hazards and through the development of an action plan specifying goals, objective, and strategies. Through this advanced planning, Crow Wing County will continue to be a leader in ensuring the safeety and public protection of the entire countywide community. 09/01/2010 Page 1 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgments Board of Commissioners Philip J. Trusty, Chair Paul M. Thiede, Vice Chair Rachel Reabe Nystrom Rosemary Franzen Doug Houge Emergency Management Director John Bowen Citizen Planning Team Members Sue Lenzen Clarice Kemper Marty Peisch Brian Blom Kent A. Rees John Bowen Patsy Olson Amy Fischer Lindy Johnson Scott Bowers Mary Gottsch Kari Christiansen Technical Advisory Team Members Joyce Mueller/Gwen Anderson Lyndon Robjent/Tim Bray Pat Gaertner Amy Fischer John Bowen Chris Etzler Facilitation Chris Etzler, Project lead Tad Erickson, Community & Economic Development Planner Special Acknowledgements Marc Williams, Crow Wing County GIS, Mapping Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents 09/01/2010 Page 2 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1 Purpose, Introduction & Planning Process………..7 1.1 Purpose……………………………………………………….7 1.2 Background…………………………………………………..7 1.3 Introduction………….……………………………………….7 1.4 The Planning Process…………..………………………….8 1.41 Data Collection…………………………………………8 1.4.2 Public & Local Government Participation Component……………………………..9 1.4.3 Development of Goals, Objectives and Strategies/Meeting Dates………………………………….15 1.4.4 Drafting & Development…………..………………...16 1.4.5 Public Review, County Adoption, State & FEMA Review & Adoption………………………………….…......16 Section 2 Community Profile…………………………………………17 2.1 General Overview……………………………………………17 2.2 Local Community Overview……………………………….18 2.2.1 Baxter.…………………………………………….…..19 2.2.2 Brainerd………………………………………….……19 2.2.3 Breezy Point………………………………………….20 2.2.4 Crosby……………………………………………...…20 2.2.5 Crosslake……………………………………………..21 2.2.6 Cuyuna……………………………………………..…22 2.2.7 Deerwood…………………………………………….22 2.2.8 Emily………………………………………………….23 2.2.9 Fifty Lakes……………………………………………24 2.2.10 Fort Ripley………………………………………….24 2.2.11 Garrison…………………………………………….25 2.2.12 Ironton……………………………………………….26 2.2.13 Jenkins………………………………………………26 2.2.14 Manhattan Beach…………………………………..26 2.2.15 Nisswa………………………………………………27 2.2.16 Pequot Lakes………………….……………………27 2.2.17 Riverton……………………………………………..28 2.2.18 Trommald……………………………………………28 2.3 General County History………………………………………..….29 2.4 Physical Characteristics………………………………………….30 2.4.1 Climate & Precipitation……………………………………..30 2.4.2 Bedrock Geology & History………………………………..33 09/01/2010 Page 3 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2.4.3 General Soils………………………………………………..35 2.4.4 Erosion Prone Soils………………………………………...36 2.4.5 Hydrology……………………………………………………36 2.4.5a Aquifer Systems…………………………………………...38 2.4.5bWatersheds…………………………………………………39 2.4.5c Protected Waters, Ditches & Control Structures….. …44 2.4.6 Land Cover……….…………………………………………44 2.4.7 Topography………………………………………………….47 3.0 Risk Assessment……………………………..……………………48 3.1 Hazard Overview……………………………………………..48 3.2 Profiling Natural Hazards…………………..…………………...50 3.2.1 Severe Summer Storms…………………………….50 3.2.2 Tornado…………………………………………...….58 3.2.3 Flooding………………………………………………62 3.2.4 Winter Storms & Events…………………………….65 3.2.5 Extreme Temperatures……………………………...69 3.2.6 Wind Storm (Sustained)…………………………….72 3.2.7 Infectious Disease………………………………….72 3.2.8 Wild Fire………………………………………………76 3.2.9 Drought……………………………………………….77 3.2.10 Insect Infestation, Invasive Species, & Excessive Wildlife Population………………………………………….79 3.2.11 Earthquake……………………………………….81 3.2.12 Dust Storms………………………………………82 3.2.13 Human Caused Fire………………………………84 3.3 Vulnerability Summary……………………………………………85 3.3.1 Methodology………………………………………85 3.4 Assessing Vulnerability………………………………………..…86 3.4.1 Addressing repetitive loss properties………….86 3.5 Assessing Vulnerability……………………..…………………....86 3.5.1 Identifying structures, infrastructure, and critical facilities………………………………….………………………………...86 Infrastructure……………………………………………………..…88 Pipelines……………………………………………………..88 Solid Waste……………………………………………….…88 Landfills…………………….………………………………89 Open Landfills……………………………………………..89 Closed Landfills……………………………………………89 Sanitation Providers………………………………………..90 09/01/2010 Page 4 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan Transportation………………………………………………91 Airports………………………………………………….….91 Railroads……………………………………………..…….91 Roads……………………………………………………….91 Transit………………………………………………………93 Utilities……………………………………………………….95 Drinking Water…………………………………………….97 Storm & Waste Water ……………………………………97 Wells……………………………………………………….98 Population & Housing Characteristics………………………98 3.6 Assessing Vulnerability…………………………………………102 3.6.1 Estimating potential losses………………………………...102 3.6.2 Using Township Market Values to Estimate Financial Lossses..........102 3.7 Assessing Vulnerability…………………………………………104 3.7.1 Analyzing development trends……………………….104 3.8 Multi Jurisdictional Mitigation Assessment…………………105 4.0 Mitigation Strategy (Action Plan[Goals, Objectives, Strategies, & Funding)……………………………………….………109 4.1a National Flood Insurance Plan (NFIP) Compliance………112 4.1 Natural Hazard Goals, Objectives & Strategies………115 4.1.1 Severe Summer Storms…………………………...115 4.1.2 Tornado……………………………………………..117 4.1.3 Flooding & Flash Flooding………………………...118 4.1.4 Winter Storms………………………………………121 4.1.5 Extreme Temperatures………………………….…123 4.1.6 Wind Storm (Sustained)…………………………..125 4.1.7 Infectious Disease………………………………….126 4.1.8 Wildfire………………………………………………127 4.1.9 Drought,……………………………………………..128 4.1.10Insect Infestation, Invasive Species, & Excessive Wildlife Population......………………………………………………….129 4.1.11 Earthquake……..……..…………………………..131 4.1.12 Dust Storm………………….…………………..…132 4.2Human Caused/Technological Hazard Goals, Objectives &Strategies…………………………………………………………..…132 4.2.1 Fire……………………………………………………….…133 4.2.2 Dam Failure…………………………………………133 09/01/2010 Page 5 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan 4.2.3 Hazardous Material (Transport & Train)…………134 4.2.4 Hazardous Material (Fixed Facilities)……………135 4.2.5 Water Pollution………………………………136 4.2.6 Power Failure………………………………..137 4.2.7 Terrorism…………………………………......139 4.2.8 Communication Breakdown……………......139 4.3 Plan Maintenance Process…………………………….…140 4.3.1Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan....140 4.3.2Incorporation into Existing Planning mechanism..141 4.3.3Continued public involvement……………………..141 4.4 Potential Funding Sources ………………….…………..143 4.5 City Participation In Mitigation Strategies…….………143 4.6 Ongoing Benchmark table……………………...………..152 Appendices Appendix A Community Buildings By City Appendix B Township Demographic Information Appendix C City Demographic Information Appendix D List of Invitees Appendix E Recommended Revisions for Plan Update Appendix F Hazard Mitigation Worksheets Appendix G Local Unit of Government Resolutions Appendix H Summary of Potential Funding Sources Appendix I Chronology of Meetings & Attendee lists Appendix J City Participation Questionnaires 09/01/2010 Page 6 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.0 Purpose, IIntroduction, and Planning Process 1.1 Purpose This plan is intended to reduce the threat of natural, human induced and technological hazards through the assessment of these hazards and through the development of an action plan specifying goals, objectives, and strategies. Through this advanced planning, Crow Wing County will continue to be a leader in ensuring the safety and public protection of the entire countywide community. The purpose for the creation of this plan is to: 1. Foster communication between cities, townships, busiinesses, community organizations, public and private facilities, organizations, and similar entities throughout the county 2. Promote sound public policy designed to protect life and property from natural, human caused and technological hazards 3. Develop and implement educational programs to increase public awareness of the risks associated with all hazards 4. Provide for a safer and more enjoyable countywide community 1.2 Backkground The Crow Wing County All Hazard Mitigation Plan was funded through the Pre- Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program established by the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and through county in-kind contributions. Intended to break the cycle of disaster and rebuild. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) program offers financial assistance to local governments to prepare and implement their local all hazard mitigation plans. More information on the PDM program can be found through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Minnesota Homeland Security and Emergency Management, or the Minnesota Loocal Planning Assistance Center. 1.3 Introduction Definition of Mitigation: Hazard Mitigation is defined as any action taken to eliminate or lessen the risk of natural and human caused or technological hazards to life and property. Mitigation measures might include public education, development of regulations or public policy, structural hazard control or 09/01/2010 Page 7 Crow Wing County Hazard Mitigation Plan protection projects, altering or retro fitting facilities, acquisition or relocation of structures, or the development of improved or increased warning systems. 1.4 The Planning Process To assist in
Recommended publications
  • The Campground Host Volunteer Program
    CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM THE CAMPGROUND HOST VOLUNTEER PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. Addresses are listed at the back of this brochure. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Recreation 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 651-259-5607 [email protected] Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs. Volunteers will set an example by being model campers, practicing good housekeeping at all times in and around the host site, and by observing all rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainerd Area
    R34W R33W R32W R31W R30W R0W R29W R0W R28W R27W R26W R25W R25W R27W R26W R25W R24W 95°0'0"W 94°55'0"W 94°50'0"W 94°45'0"W 94°40'0"W 94°35'0"W 94°30'0"W 94°25'0"W 94°20'0"W 94°15'0"W 94°10'0"W 94°5'0"W 94°0'0"W 93°55'0"W 93°50'0"W 93°45'0"W 93°40'0"W 93°35'0"W 93°30'0"W 93°25'0"W 93°20'0"W Steamboat River Blandin Dam Trout 1 6 1 6 1 6 6 Sugar Point Bog 1 6 1 6 Poole Bay 47°13'55"N Little Bear Creek 1 6 La Prairie Laporte Bear River 1 159 Buffalo Creek Garfield Swamp Goose Vermillion River Meyers Bay 146 501 Rice 190 Lake George 320 Battleground State Forest Leighton Brook Prairie RiverGunn 47°11'55"N MN12 304 326 Rice 170 George 219 36 31 Sugar Bay GPZ T55N 36 31 36 31 36 Elevenmile Corner 119 Steamboat Bay 47°11'55"N Bemidji Area Kabekona RiverGulch Creek Salter Bay 129 Skunk Brook Sugar Brook King Bay 412 Boy Bay Boy River 1 6 100 T143N 1 6 1 6 1 Dan Dick Creek Pokegama Blackberry 47°9'55"N 220 212 ¤£2 36 31 Y49 Boy River Kabekona Benedict 36 36 31 Welshes Bay 36 31 Sucker Branch 36 31 36 31 Sherry Arm Bay 47°9'55"N 36 31 Philbin 1 36 31 Sugar 6 Kabekona River 6 36 Siseebakwet 1 6 1 6 1 Traders Bay Leech EWM 1 6 Wendigo Arm Bay 47°7'55"N 1 6 1 6 9995 Kabekona Bay 1 Remer State Forest 370 T54N Baker 295 Deer River Area 47°7'55"N Big Thunder Peak Agency Bay Smith Creek B1 B2 Onigum Headquarters Bay Tobique 36 31 36 31 47°5'55"N Walker Walker Bay 36 31 36 T142N Boy Golden Anniversary State Forest 416 412 Loon Lake Dam 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 47°5'55"N 155 North Fork Willow River Kaylor Fishpond Dam Brevik Swift River 259 36 31 261 Uram Bay Emmaville
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future Connecting People to Minnesota’S Great Outdoors
    Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future Connecting People to Minnesota’s Great Outdoors Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails June 9, 2011 i Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future This plan was prepared in accordance with Laws of Minnesota for 2009, chapter 172, article 3, section 2(e). This planning effort was funded in part by the Parks and Trails Fund of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment. Copyright 2011 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources This information is available in an alternative format upon request. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future Table of Contents Letter from the Division Director ii Acknowledgments iv Executive Summary 1 DNR Mission Statement and Division Vision Statement 5 Introduction 6 Minnesota State Parks and Trails – Division Responsibilities 11 Trends that Impact the Department and the Division 28 Desired Outcomes, Goals, and Strategies 35 Strategic Directions 54 Funding the Strategic Directions 59 Implementation 64 Appendices A. Figures – Major Facilities, Staffed Locations & Admin. Boundaries, District Maps A-1 B. Division of Parks and Trails Budget Analysis – Addendum B-1 C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Minnesota Statutes 2013 89.021 89.021 State Forests
    1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 89.021 89.021 STATE FORESTS. Subdivision 1. Established. There are hereby established and reestablished as state forests, in accordance with the forest resource management policy and plan, all lands and waters now owned by the state or hereafter acquired by the state, excepting lands acquired for other specific purposes or tax-forfeited lands held in trust for the taxing districts unless incorporated therein as otherwise provided by law. History: 1943 c 171 s 1; 1963 c 332 s 1; 1982 c 511 s 9; 1990 c 473 s 3,6 Subd. 1a. Boundaries designated. The commissioner of natural resources may acquire by gift or purchase land or interests in land adjacent to a state forest. The commissioner shall propose legislation to change the boundaries of established state forests for the acquisition of land adjacent to the state forests, provided that the lands meet the definition of forest land as defined in section 89.001, subdivision 4. History: 2011 c 3 s 3 Subd. 2. Badoura State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1; 1967 c 514 s 1; 1980 c 424 Subd. 3. Battleground State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 4. Bear Island State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 5. Beltrami Island State Forest. History: 1943 c 171 s 1; 1963 c 332 s 1; 2000 c 485 s 20 subd 1; 2004 c 262 art 2 s 14 Subd. 6. Big Fork State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 7. Birch Lakes State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1; 2008 c 368 art 1 s 23 Subd.
    [Show full text]
  • 1~11~~~~11Im~11M1~Mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069
    LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY ~ SD428.A2 M6 1986 -1~11~~~~11im~11m1~mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069 0 428 , A. M6 1 9 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) State Forest Recreation Areas Minnesota's 56 state forests contain over 3.2 million acres of state owned lands which are administered by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. State forest lands are managed to produce timber and other forest crops, provide outdoor recreation, protect watershed, and perpetuate rare and distinctive species of flora and fauna. State forests are multiple use areas that are managed to provide a sustained yield of renewable resources, while maintaining or improving the quality of the forest. Minnesota's state forests provide unlimited opportunities for outdoor recreationists to pursue a variety of outdoor activities. Berry picking, mushroom hunting, wildflower identification, nature photography and hunting are just a few of the unstructured outdoor activities which can be accommodated in state forests. For people who prefer a more structured form of recreation, Minnesota's state forests contain over 50 campgrounds, most located on lakes or canoe routes. State forest campgrounds are of the primitive type designed to furnish only the basic needs of individuals who camp for the enjoyment of the outdoors. Each campsite consists of a cleared area, fireplace and table. In addition, pit toilets, garbage cans and drinking water may be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Nov 16 2016 Legal Action Re
    Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council Laws of Minnesota 2012 Accomplishment Plan Date: July 31, 2014 P ro gram o r P ro ject T itle: Mississippi Northwoods Habitat Complex Protection Fund s Reco mmend ed : $ 11,040,000 Manager's Name: Kirk Titus O rganizatio n: Crow Wing County Land Supervisor Ad d ress: 322 Laurel St. Suite 12 C ity: Brainerd, 56401 O ffice Numb er: 218-824-1138 Email: [email protected] Legislative C itatio n: ML 2012, C h. 264, Art. 1, Sec. 2, Sub d . 3(b ) Ap p ro p riatio n Language: $11,040,000 in the second year is to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with Crow Wing County to acquire land in fee along the Mississippi River in Crow Wing County to be added to the county forest system. The purchase price must not exceed the appraised fair market value of the property as reviewed and approved under established procedures in compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Department of Natural Resources Supplemental Appraisal and Appraisal Review Guidelines (effective July 15, 2009). A land description must be provided as part of the required accomplishment plan. Development of a paved trail on land acquired under this paragraph constitutes an alteration of the intended use of the interest in real property and must be handled according to Minnesota Statutes, section 97A.056, subdivision 15. Any plan, including trail alignment, for the development of a paved trail must be submitted to the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council for approval.
    [Show full text]
  • L-SOHC Request for Funding Form 1 Request for Funding Form Lessard
    Request for Funding Form Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council Fiscal Year 2011 Program or Project Title: #30 Accelerated Forest Wildlife Habitat Program Date: November 2, 2009 Manager’s Name: Cynthia Osmundson Title: Forest Wildlife Program Consultant Division of Fish and Wildlife, DNR Mailing Address: 500 Lafayette Rd, St. Paul, MN. 55155 Telephone: (651) 259-5190 Fax: (651) 297-4961 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: .dnr.state.mn. Council Out-Year Projections of Needs Funding Request Funds Requested ($000s) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Forest Habitat Enhancement and 7,180 Restoration Div. of Forestry Lands 4,161 Wildlife Management Areas 1,719 (WMAs) Scientific and Natural Areas 1,300 (SNAs Forest Habitat Acquisition 10,343 4,960 8,000 8,000 Outdoor Heritage Fund Totals 17,523 A. Summary Our program will increase populations of a variety of game and non-game wildlife species by protecting, restoring, and enhancing forest vegetation (habitats) on which wildlife depends. This program of on-the-ground forest conservation projects will amplify the wildlife value of forest communities on Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administered forestlands. Our forest restoration and enhancement management will treat 27,060 ac during this funding cycle. These activities are not conducted as part of the DNR’s commercial timber operations. Additionally, our program will acquire 2,219 ac of forestland that contributes to habitat complexes and other high priorities. Acquisitions focus on forestland for public hunting, and compatible outdoor uses consistent with the Outdoor L-SOHC Request for Funding Form 1 Recreation Act (M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Forest Recreation Guide
    Activities abound Camping in State www.mndnr.gov/state_forests in a state forest. Forests... Choose your fun: Your Way Minnesota There are four different ways of • Hiking camping in a state forest. State • Mountain biking 1. Individual Campsites- campsites designated for individuals or single Forest • Horseback riding families. The sites are designed to furnish • Geocaching only the basic needs of the camper. Most consist of a cleared area, fire ring, table, • Canoeing vault toilets, garbage cans, and drinking Recreation water. Campsites are all on a first-come, • Snowmobiling first-served basis. Fees are collected at the sites. Guide • Cross-County Skiing 2. Group Campsites- campsites designated • Biking for larger groups.The sites are designed to furnish only the basic needs of the • OHV riding camper. Most consist of a cleared area, • Camping fire ring, table, vault toilets, garbage cans, and drinking water. Group sites are all on • Fishing a first-come, first-served basis. Fees are collected at the sites. • Hunting 3. Horse Campsites- campsites where • Berry picking horses are allowed. The sites are designed to furnish only the basic needs of the • Birding camper. Most consist of a cleared area, fire ring, table, vault toilets, garbage cans, • Wildlife viewing and drinking water. In addition, these • Wildflower viewing campsites also may have picket lines and compost bins for manure disposal. The State Forest Recreation Guide is published by the Minnesota Department of Campsites are all on a first-come, first- Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, 500 Lafaytte Road, St.Paul, Mn 55155- 4039. Phone 651-259-5600. Written by Kim Lanahan-Lahti; Graphic Design by served basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Office of The
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp October 2, 2018 Senator Carrie Ruud Chair, Senate Environment and Natural Resources Policy and Legacy Finance Committee 3233 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Senator Bill Ingebritsen Chair, Senate Environment and Natural Resources Finance Committee 3207 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Representative Dan Fabian Chair, House Environment and Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee 365 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Representative Jim Knoblach Chair, House Ways and Means Committee 453 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: Report on the Land Acquisition Account – FY 2018 Dear Committee Chairs: As required by Minn.Stat. §94.165, enclosed please find the annual report of DNR’s use of funds from the Land Acquisition Account for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. The Land Acquisition Account provides a source of funding for land acquisitions for the outdoor recreation system. The account also pays expenses incurred by DNR in offering property for sale or exchange. This report summarizes the revenue received to the account and expenditures made during FY18. It also provides examples of acquisition, sale and exchange work made possible with funds from the Account. If you need additional information about the information in this report, please contact Jess Richards, Director of the Division of Lands and Minerals,
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Update 2015
    PAUL BUNYAN SCENIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2015 Prepared By: THE REGION FIVE DEVELOPMEN COMMISSION In light funding changed through MAP 21 the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) requested that the Regional Development Commissions (RDC) partner with Scenic Byways throughout the state to update each Byways’ Corridor Management Plans with the intent to better align them with current funding opportunities. The 2015 Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Update is the first update to the original Corridor Management Plan. Therefore, this document is a continuation of the Paul Bunyan Scenic Byways’ ongoing planning and maintenance process. This plan formally replaces the past Corridor Management plan from 2001. The Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway Association has used this planning update process as an opportunity to re-evaluate several elements of importance including management, marketing, monitoring as well as future funding. In addition the Byway Association has used this planning update process to reinforce the existing policies and practices pertaining to management, marketing, monitoring and future funding in order to both update as needed and reinforce past decisions that are still valid. A major premise of this Corridor Management Plan update therefore, is to utilize portions of the previous corridor management plan and other local planning mechanism whenever applicable. 1 Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Update 2015 Published by the Region Five Development Commission For the Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway 2015 2 What is Corridor Management Planning? A Corridor Management Plan (CMP) is a written plan developed by the communities along a scenic byway that outlines how to protect and enhance the byway’s intrinsic qualities and character that define their byway corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) Minnesota's .56 state forests contain over 3.2 mill ion needs of individuals who canp for the enjo.J1Tl€11t of the acres of state o.vned lands which are adninisterecr by the outdoors. Each canp:;ite consists of a cleared area, Departrrent of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. fireplace and table. In addition, pit toilets, garbage State forest 1ands are rranaged to produce timber and cans and drinking water are provided at canp:Jmunds that other forest crops, provide outdoor recreation, protect charge a fee. Sane campgrounds have hiking trails, watershed, and perpetuate rare and distinctive species water access sites and swimning beaches. of flora and fauna. State forests are multiple use areas that are rranagecl to provide a sustained yield of In addition to canpgrounds, over 20 day use areas have renew:i.ble resrurces, while maintaining or irrproving the been developed adjacent to canp:Jmunds or at other quality of the forest. scenic locations within state forests. Day use areas are c011T0nly equipped with picnic tables, fire rings, Minnesota's state forests provide unlimited drinking water, toilets and garbage cans. Many have opportunities for outdoor recreationists to pursue a boat accesses and swimning beaches. variety of outdoor activities. Berry picking, mushroan hunting, wildflov.er identification, nature photography To accarrnodate hikers and skiers, there are more than and hunting are just a fe>J of the unstructured outdoor 150 miles of trails spread throughout the forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwoods Initiative
    Northwoods Initiative © Jim Brandenburg Minnesota Protecting the Iconic Places of Northern Superior and Chippewa Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan National Forests Forest Legacy The Northwoods of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan serve as a refuge for people living throughout the Midwest and beyond. Encompassing the Upper Great Lakes, the North Shore Northwoods are filled with countless freshwater lakes, winding streams and rivers, and an Healthy Waters infinite wealth of stories. It is from this landscape that great conservationists — Aldo Leopold, Sigurd Olson and John Muir — have drawn their inspiration. And it is to this vast landscape, spanning more than 88,000 square miles, that millions of Americans venture each Wisconsin year for recreation, revitalization, and a chance to reconnect to the natural world. Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest The Trust for Public Land established the Northwoods Initiative to protect the iconic Forest Legacy landscapes of northern Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan and preserve a heritage that is at risk of disappearing. Through the Northwoods Initiative, The Trust for Public Land Healthy Waters partners with communities, landowners, and public agencies to achieve the following goals: Tribal Lands • Protect the water quality and recreational value of lakes, rivers, and streams; Great Lakes Shoreline • Prevent forest fragmentation and plan for sustainable resource management to and Headwaters maintain the local economies and ways of life; • Negotiate win-win outcomes for landowners, public agencies,
    [Show full text]